Next Article in Journal
Assessing Barriers in Adaptation of Water Management Innovations under Rotational Canal Water Distribution System
Previous Article in Journal
Mixed Modeling in Genetic Divergence Study of Elite Popcorn Hybrids (Zea mays var. everta)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Combination of Plant Extracts and Probiotics Improved Jejunal Barrier and Absorption Capacity of Weaned Piglets

1
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Animal Sciences and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, No. 61 Daizong Street, Tai’an 271018, China
2
Dongying Science and Technology Innovation Service Center, No. 359 Nanyi Road, Dongying District, Dongying 257091, China
3
Guelph Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), 93 Stone Road West, Guelph, ON N1G 5C9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2022, 12(7), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070912
Submission received: 25 April 2022 / Revised: 22 June 2022 / Accepted: 22 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Farm Animal Production)

Abstract

:
Plant extracts and probiotics play a vital role in maintaining animal intestinal health. However, their joint compatibility program still needs to be further explored. In our study, thirty two piglets (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire) were selected to divided into four treatments, which included basal diet, basal diet + 1000 mg/kg probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO), basal diet + 500 mg/kg Illicium verum extracts (IVE), and basal diet + 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO. All the piglets were housed individually for the 42-d trial period after 7-d adaptation. Results showed that dietary supplementation of PGO and IVE increased the digestibility of ether extract (EE), crude protein (CP), and lysine (p < 0.05). Likewise, the net protein utilization (NPU) was also improved (p < 0.05). What is more, adding PGO and IVE reduced crypt depth, increased villus length, and chrionic gland ratio of piglets (p < 0.05). Additionally, IVE or PGO that was applied alone can increase the expression of Occludin, Zona occludens 1 (ZO-1), and Sodium-dependent glucose transporters 1 (SGLT1) in jejunum (p < 0.05). Our results strongly suggest that the combination of IVE and PGO can improve the nutrient digestibility of weaned piglets by increasing the expression of nutrient transport vectors (SGLT1 and CAT1) and tight junction proteins (Occludin and ZO-1) in the jejunum. In conclusion, the combination of plant extracts and probiotics is a vital strategy to improve animal health before the advent of antibiotic substitutes with absolute advantages.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the functions of probiotics and plant extracts, such as antibacterial, antioxidant, and maintaining intestinal health, have been gradually recognized by the public [1,2]. Probiotics are defined as living microorganisms that have beneficial effects on host health when ingested in sufficient quantities [3]. Studies have shown that different probiotics can play a positive role in the healthy development of animals [4,5,6], plants [7,8], and humans [9,10]. The first-generation probiotics are mainly used in the food industry, focusing on the health function of the body. The second-generation probiotics refer to the specific strains with sufficient dose that can help the body recover the healthy phenotype or can use the existing strains as the carrier of health promoting molecules, so they are also called live biotherapeutics [11]. At present, the probiotic market is mainly occupied by the first-generation probiotics. Before the advent of second-generation probiotics, the rational use and benefit maximization of existing probiotics has become an important issue for current researchers. The ways of probiotics regulating animal intestinal health mainly come from two aspects. Dominant flora theory: first, probiotics adhere to intestinal mucosal epithelial cells by competing for nutrients and parasitic sites and inhibit the attachment and growth of harmful bacteria. Biological oxygen capture theory: secondly, when the spores of probiotics enter the intestinal tract, they accelerate the consumption of oxygen in the environment, ensure the anaerobic environment and the growth of dominant bacteria, and ultimately improve the production performance of the host [12,13,14]. Illicium verum extracts (IVE) is a volatile oil with a unique aromatic smell extracted from the fruits or leaves of Illicium verum, whose main components are trans anisole, anisaldehyde, and estragol [15,16]. The main functions of IVE are anti-bacterial, enhancing the body’s antioxidant and immune functions [17,18]. Studies have shown that IVE can exert its antibacterial function by inhibiting the formation of biofilm and reducing bacterial adhesion [19]. In recent years, the studies on plant extracts and enzyme-added composite microecological preparations have mainly aimed at a single object [20,21], but there are few reports on the interaction between the two in different animals [22,23]. Therefore, we have reason to propose that on the premise that plant extracts play a bactericidal role, using microecological agents to reshape healthy intestinal flora and build a synergistic system will become an important problem to be solved by researchers. In our study, IVE and probiotics with added glucose oxidase were used as the subjects to analyze nutrient utilization, intestinal histomorphology, and expression of developing-related factors of weaned piglets to investigate the mechanism of their combined use in improving the body development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. IVE and Probiotics Supplemented Diet

IVE (trans-anethole ≥ 93.16% and estragole ≥ 1.16%) was obtained by steam distillation in the Chinese Herb Medicine Laboratory of Shandong Agricultural University (Tai’an, China). Probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) containing Bacillus subtilis (1.9 × 1010 cfu/g), Bacillus licheniformis PWD-1 (2.0 × 1010 cfu/g), Lactobacillus (5.0 × 1010 cfu/g), and glucose oxidase (3000 U/g) were provided by Beijing CRVAB Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).
The basal diet was formulated according to the minimum nutrient requirements of piglets by the National Research Council (Table 1) [24]. Next, IVE and PGO were added proportionally to the basal diet for the preparation of experimental diets.

2.2. Preparation and Determination of IVE

Steam distillation method is adopted. Each batch uses 2 kg of Illicium verum. During the extraction process, the bottom temperature is (96 ± 3) °C, the steam flow is (700 ± 50) mL/h, and the steam pressure is (0.025 ± 0.01) MPa. After obtaining low concentration oil–water mixture, IVE was obtained by concentration and separation through liquid separation funnel.
Determination of trans-anethole by gas chromatography. The chromatographic column was polyethylene glycol 20,000 (PEG-20M) at 70 °C for 1 min. Then, it was linearly heated to 220 °C at a rate of 2 °C/min. Finally, the temperature was kept at 220 °C for 20 min. The inlet and detector temperature were 250 °C, the carrier gas flow rate was 1 mL/min, and the split ratio was 100:1. Estragole was determined by gas chromatography. The chromatographic column is methyl polysiloxane capillary column. The temperature of chromatographic furnace is 200 °C constant temperature. The temperature of injection port and detector is 250 °C. The flow rate of carrier gas is 30 mL/min and the split ratio is 1:75.

2.3. Animals, Experimental Design, and Management

Management and design of the experiment followed animal care rules approved by the Animal Nutrition Research Institute of Shandong Agricultural University and the Ministry of Agriculture of China for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (SDAUA-2020-0710). Thirty-two piglets (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire) at the age of 38 d with an average body weight of 14.96 ± 0.36 kg (mean ± SD) were selected and randomly divided into four treatments. Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+), respectively.
All piglets were kept in individual stainless-steel cages (0.48 m2) at a piggery of Shandong Agricultural University during the entire experiment period. The piglets had free access to food and water during the entire experiment period. The experiment was conducted for 42 d following a 7-d adaptation.

2.4. Sample Collections for Analysis of Nutrient Availability

We collected and recorded the amount of feces and urine excreted by each pig every day. After mixing, the representative samples were stored at −20 °C. The samples of feed and feces were dried at 65 °C to constant weight, and the indexes were determined after 72 h of moisture regain. The analysis of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), ethyl ether extract (EE), and CP was according to AOAC [25]. The content of amino acids was determined by Shandong Hua’an Detection Technology Co., Ltd. with Hitachi 835 high-speed automatic amino acid analyzer (Tokyo, Japan).

2.5. Sampling for Determination of Jejunal Barrier and Absorption Capacity

Piglets were euthanized (slaughtered after being fainted by electric shock at the neck) after fasting for 12 h and the jejunum was immediately removed under sterile conditions on the last day of the experiment. One sample was then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for the subsequent analysis of genes expression of Occludin, Zona occludens 1 (ZO-1), Sodium-dependent glucose transporters 1 (SGLT1), and Cationic amino acid transporter 1 (CAT1). Another sample was promptly fixed in Bouin’s solution for 24 to 48 h for hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical analysis.

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for cDNA templates was carried out using ABI 7500 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Total RNA was extracted preserved at −80 °C with Trizol kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The quality of the total RNA samples was tested by spectrophotometry. The purity and concentration of RNA were determined using UV spectrophotometer (DS-11 Spectrophotometer, DeNovix, Wilmington, DE, USA) at an absorbance ratio of 260/280 nm (values in the range 1.8 to 2.0 indicate a pure RNA sample). Specific primers targeting Occludin, ZO-1, SGLT1, CAT1, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) genes were designed based on pig gene sequences reported on GenBank using Primer 6.0 and synthesized by Shanghai bioengineering LTD (Table 2). Total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using the Prime Script@ RT Master Mix Perfect Real Time Kit (DDR036A, TaKaRa, Dalian, China). A total volume of 20 µL of the PCR mixture and reagents were added in accordance with the fluorescent quantitative PCR kit instructions. The optimized qRT-PCR protocol included an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 34 s, 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 60 s, and a detection of fluorescence signals at 60 °C. The amount of relative gene expression was expressed and calculated as being equal to 2−ΔΔCT [26].

2.7. Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis

After dewaxing and hydration, the tissue sections were decolorized with xylene and alcohol, then stained with hematoxylin for 1 min, and then washed with water until the solution was colorless. They were then stained with eosin and observed under a microscope (Nikon ELIPSE 80i, Tokyo, Japan). At least 6 staining sections of 3 piglets were examined in each group.
As described by Yang et al. [26], sections were preincubated with microwave in sodium citrate buffer (0.01 mol/L, pH 6.0) for 20 min and then incubated in 10% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 1.5 h to block endogenous peroxidase activity. To prevent nonspecific binding, sections were cultured in 10% normal goat serum for 1 h (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China). Then, the sections were incubated overnight with polyclonal rabbit antibodies SGLT1 (1:250, AB14685, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and polyclonal rabbit antibodies ZO-1 (1:150, AB96587, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 4 °C. Then, the sections were immersed in diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (DAB kit, Tiangen PA110, Beijing, China) to detect immunostaining. Images were analyzed using Image Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Control Netics, Silver Spring, MD, USA) for integrated optical density (IOD).

2.8. Western Blotting

The total protein was isolated from jejunum and determined (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), and the protein content of each sample was adjusted to 60 µg. Samples were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred to a fixed object-p transfer membrane (Solarbio, Beijing, China). After 2 h of incubation with 10% skim milk powder, they were washed three times with Tris (TBST, pH 7.6). All primary antibodies were incubated overnight. After washing with TBST, membranes were diluted with goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000, ab6721, Cambridge, UK) (1:5000, UK), then washed 5 times, soaked in high sensitivity luminescence reagent (Beijing, Shanghai, China) using fusion captain Advanced FX7 (Beijing Oriental Technology Development Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and analyzed using IPP6.0.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and double factor variance analysis using the SAS program (version 9.2, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Significant differences among treatment means were separated by Duncan’s multiple range tests. The data were initially analyzed using a completely randomized design. All statements of significance were based on the probability of p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Nutrients Digestibility

Dietary supplementation of PGO and IVE increased the digestibility of EE and CP (p < 0.05, Table 3). Compared with the control group, the net protein utilization (NPU) of weaned piglets was increased by adding of PGO and IVE (p < 0.05). Pooled data showed that both IVE and PGO also improved the EE and CP digestibility of piglets (p < 0.05). Likewise, adding PGO and IVE also improved the NPU of piglets (p < 0.05). Significant interaction was observed between IVE and PGO in the digestibility of lysine (p < 0.05), but there is no interaction on digestibility of methionine, arginine, histidine, leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, threonine, valine, and total essential amino acids (p > 0.05, Table 4). Compared with control group, the lysine digestibility decreased in the order of (IVE + PGO+) > (IVE + PGO−) > (IVE-PGO+), and the tryptophan digestibility decreased in the order of (IVE-PGO+) > (IVE + PGO+) > (IVE + PGO−). Pooled data showed that adding PGO and IVE increased the digestibility of lysine (p < 0.05), while adding PGO increased the digestibility of tryptophan (p < 0.05).
No ocular pathological changes were found in jejunum tissue sections of all treatments (Figure 1). The villus length in addition of PGO group was higher than that of control group (p < 0.05, Table 5), and the chrionic gland ratio in addition of PGO and IVE group was higher than that of control group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the crypt depth in the group supplemented with IVE was lower than that of other groups (p < 0.05). Significant interaction was observed between IVE and PGO in the chrionic gland ratio (p < 0.05). Pooled data showed that adding PGO and IVE reduced crypt depth and increased the villus length and chrionic gland ratio of piglets (p < 0.05).

3.2. Localization of SGLT1 and ZO-1

The immunopositive distribution of SGLT1 and ZO-1 in jejunum indicated that the expression of SGLT1 in IVE-PGO+, IVE + PGO−, and IVE + PGO+ groups was mainly distributed in the middle of jejunum villi, and gradually increased from the top to the middle (Figure 2 and Figure 3). In addition, there were positive reactions in the villous chylous ducts. In the IVE-PGO− group, the positive reaction was strongest at the base of villi, but weaker at the upper and middle villi. The expression sites of ZO-1 are mainly distributed in the microvilli of jejunum and the wall of chylous villi, and the positive spots on the wall of chylous villi are mostly beaded.

3.3. The Expression of mRNA and Protein

The mRNA expression of ZO-1 and SGLT1 in jejunum of weaned piglets increased by adding IVE and PGO alone (Table 6, p < 0.05). In addition, PGO can also increase the mRNA expression of occludin and CAT1 (p < 0.05). The combination of IVE and PGO had significant interaction on increasing the mRNA expression of ZO-1 and SGLT1 in the jejunum (p < 0.05) and also showed a trend of promoting the mRNA expression of CAT1 (p < 0.10).
The results of western-blot showed that dietary supplemented with IVE or PGO alone can increase the protein expression of jejunal Occludin, ZO-1, and SGLT1 in weaned piglets (Figure 4, p < 0.05). In addition, IVE can also increase the protein expression of CAT1 (p < 0.05). PGO and IVE showed significant interaction on the protein expression of Occludin, ZO-1, SGLT1, and CAT1 in jejunum of weaned piglets (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

4.1. Nutrients Digestibility

In our study, strains which can coexist with IVE were selected, and they established a synergistic system after compatibility. What is more, it was combined with IVE in the diet of weaned piglets. Although there was no statistical difference in growth performance, it played a positive role in improving nutrients digestibility. Studies have shown that the addition of compound probiotics composed of Lactobacillus, Bacillus subtilis, Yeast, and Bifidobacteria in the diet can improve the apparent digestibility of CP, EE, crude fiber (CF), and calcium (Ca) of weaned piglets [27,28]. This may be because the secondary metabolites of microorganisms contain some substances that can promote intestinal development. However, the study of IVE in weaned piglets is rare. Chen et al., (2017) showed that the addition of IVE did not affect the apparent digestibility of DM, OM, and CP in weaned piglets [29]. In our study, the supplementation of IVE and probiotics with added glucose oxidase can promote the digestibility of EE and CP, however, they only interact with the digestibility of CP. In our strategy, IVE reduces the abundance of harmful bacteria by inhibiting the formation of bacterial biofilm. In addition, when IVE is used in combination with probiotics, probiotics and harmful bacteria competitively adhere to intestinal mucosal epithelial cells and compete with pathogenic microorganisms for nutrients and ecological sites, therefore enhancing the biological barrier function of animal intestines and helping the host establish a healthy intestinal flora. This also improves the digestibility and growth performance of nutrients. In addition, we found that both IVE and probiotics with added glucose oxidase could improve the digestibility of amino acid, especially lysine, but no synergistic effect was observed. Similar conclusions have been confirmed in broiler chickens [30] and laying hens [31].

4.2. Jejunum Histomorphology

The integrity of intestinal villi and intestinal wall in jejunum is one of the important factors affecting the digestion also absorption of small intestine, and the ratio of villus length and crypt depth can reflect the basic relationship between intestinal villus and crypt [6,32]. Studies showed that plant extracts such as sugarcane [33] and red pepper [34] could improve the villus morphology and villus length/crypt depth. In recent years, the positive effect of probiotics on intestinal morphology has been recognized by researchers. Another study showed that when Bacteriophage, Lactobacillus Acidophilus, Bacillus Subtilis, and Saccharomyces Cerevisiae were combined to form a composite microecological agent, this improved the ratio of villus length and crypt depth [35]. In addition, in the study of Mishra et al., (2016), Saccharomyces Cerevisiae NCDC-49 and Lactobacillus Acidophilus-15 were combined to feed weaned piglets, which also improved the ratio of villus length and crypt depth [36]. What is more, we also observed the positive effect of the combination of PGO and IVE preparation on the ratio of villus length and crypt depth. Similarly, conclusions were also confirmed by Dowarah et al., (2017) [37]. By observing and comparing the jejunal sections of the four treatment groups, we found that the jejunal villi of piglets supplemented with PGO showed better morphology. It is worth noting that the combination of PGO and IVE has no superposition effect on the improvement of jejunal villus morphology. Although the villus morphology was also appropriately improved in the IVE + PGO + group, the ratio of villus length and crypt depth did not change significantly. Therefore, we believe that PGO and IVE play their prebiotic role by acting on different targets.

4.3. Localization and Expression

SGLT1, as a membrane transport vector, is mainly expressed on the surface of villi. In our study, the positive reaction of SGLT1 increased gradually from the top to the middle of villi. Additionally, some positive reaction points in the chylous duct of villi were detected, which were scattered. Similar conclusions have been reached in the study of Yoshida et al., (1995) and Moran et al., (2010) [38,39]. In addition, zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) is one of the components of tight junction, which is mainly distributed in cell space and chyle tube wall. SGLT1 is a membrane transporter for glucose transport on the surface of small intestinal villi and plays a vital role in glucose uptake [39]. In our study, IVE and PGO were found to promote the expression of SGLT1 in small intestinal villi of weaned piglets. Similar conclusions were confirmed in the study of Silveira et al., (2018) [40]. The difference of strain composition is an important reason for the inconsistent expression of SGLT1. Another result showed that the expression of ZO-1 was significantly increased by feeding probiotics, consisting of 8 strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, and Lactobacillus casei [41]. However, the opposite conclusion was also observed [42]. The expression of ZO-1 is closely related to intestinal permeability. Inoue et al., (2006) found that the increase of the expression of tight junction proteins such as ZO-1 and occludin is synchronized with the recovery of intestinal barrier function [43]. Plant extracts such as Quercetin [44], Pseudomonas [45], and probiotics such as Lactobacillus plantarum [41], Lactobacillus suis [46], Lactobacillus rhamnosus [47], and Bacillus [48] can upregulate the expression levels of ZO-1 and occludin. In this study, trans anethole, anisaldehyde, estragole, and other plant active components in IVE may promote the expression of tight junction protein. It is suggested that PGO and IVE can improve the expression of tight junction protein in jejunal epithelial cells of piglets, improve jejunal permeability, and enhance its barrier function.
As a basic amino acid transporter, CAT1 plays a vital role in the absorption of lysine, arginine, and histidine [49]. At present, the research on CAT1 mainly focuses on lysine. Studies showed that there is a positive correlation between CAT1 and lysine in porcine small intestinal epithelial cells [50]. Another study showed that apple polyphenols could increase the expression of CAT1 in the muscle tissue of finishing pigs [51]. In our study, we found that IVE upregulated the expression of CAT1, but the effect of PGO on CAT1 was not observed. Therefore, we speculate that IVE can further improve lysine digestibility of piglets by increasing CAT1 expression. In addition, although PGO improved the digestibility of lysine, the expression of CAT1 did not change, suggesting that PGO may improve the absorption of lysine by regulating it in other ways, and relevant studies need to be further confirmed.
It must be mentioned that the difficult colonization of probiotics in the host intestine is a huge obstacle to the promotion and application of the first-generation probiotics. Studies shows that in the use of most probiotics, they only act as a passing bacterium [52]. However, studies have also shown that probiotics do not necessarily play a role only when they are alive [53,54]. Extracellular enzymes and ester peptides produced by probiotics when they are alive also play an important role in improving host health [55,56]. However, we did perform 16S rRNA sequencing analysis on animal feces in the early stages of the experiment and found that the abundance of some beneficial bacteria such as Christensen increased, but we did not find that the abundance of the genus of probiotics we invested in increased. Therefore, we speculate that the probiotics used under the test conditions may play a role through its secondary metabolites.

5. Conclusions

Our results strongly suggest that the combination of IVE and PGO can improve the nutrient digestibility of weaned piglets by increasing the expression of nutrient transport vectors (SGLT1 and CAT1) and tight junction proteins (occludin and ZO-1) in the jejunum. Under the global trend of limiting the use of antibiotics, our research provides a new idea for the selection of antibiotic substitutes. At present, among the most alternative antibiotics, the first-generation probiotics are widely used, but the effect is not ideal when used alone. It is suggested that the combination of plant extracts and probiotics is a vital strategy to improve animal health before the advent of antibiotic substitutes with absolute advantages.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Y. and X.M.; methodology, C.Y.; software, S.J. (Shan Jiang); validation, L.Y. and S.J. (Shan Jiang); formal analysis, X.M. and S.J. (Shan Jiang); investigation, S.J. (Shan Jiang); resources, W.Y.; data curation, S.J. (Shan Jiang); writing—original draft preparation, L.Y.; writing—review and editing, W.Y. and S.J. (Shuzhen Jiang); visualization, C.Y.; supervision, X.M.; project administration, S.J. (Shuzhen Jiang) and W.Y.; funding acquisition, S.J. (Shuzhen Jiang). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Shandong Province Pig Industry Technology System, grant number SDAIT-08-05, and Major Innovative Projects of Shandong Province, grant number 2019JZZY020609.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Animal Nutrition Research Institute of Shandong Agricultural University and the Ministry of Agriculture of China for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (SDAUA-2020-0710).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

References

  1. Zhang, Z.; Zhou, H.; Guan, M.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, L. Lactobacillus casei YRL577 combined with plant extracts reduce markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. Br. J. Nutr. 2020, 125, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xu, B.C.; Fu, J.; Zhu, L.Y.; Li, Z.; Jin, M.L.; Wang, Y.Z. Overall assessment of antibiotic substitutes for pigs: A set of meta-analyses. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 12, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Chen, P.L. Effect of probiotics on intestinal flora and its application in livestock and poultry production. Hunan Feed. 2019, 1, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liao, S.F.; Nyachoti, M. Using probiotics to improve swine gut health and nutrient utilization. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 3, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, W.; Chang, J.; Wang, P.; Liu, C.Q.; Yin, Q.Q.; Song, A.D.; Gao, T.Z.; Dang, X.W.; Lu, F.S. Effect of Compound Probiotics and Mycotoxin Degradation Enzymes on Alleviating Cytotoxicity of Swine Jejunal Epithelial Cells Induced by Aflatoxin B1 and Zearalenone. Toxins 2019, 11, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Berlec, A. Novel techniques and findings in the study of plant microbiota: Search for plant probiotics. Plant Sci. Int. J. Exp. Plant Biol. 2012, 193, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Belorkar, S.A. Biostimulants: Promising Probiotics for Plant Health; Woodhead Publishing: Shaston, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. Waters, J.L.; Ley, R.E. The human gut bacteria Christensenellaceae are widespread, heritable, and associated with health. BMC Biol. 2019, 17, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lata, P. Probiotics for Human Health; Springer: Singapore, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  11. O’Toole, P.W.; Marchesi, J.R.; Hill, C. Next-generation probiotics: The spectrum from probiotics to live biotherapeutics. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sánchez, B.; Delgado, S.; Blanco-míguez, A.; Lourenço, A.; Gueimonde, M.; Margolles, A. Probiotics, gut microbiota, and their influence on host health and disease. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2016, 61, 1600240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Dai, C.; Zhao, D.H.; Jiang, M. probiotics regulate the intestinal epithelial barrier in vivo and in vitro via the p38 and ERK signaling pathways. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2012, 29, 202. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, S.; Yang, F.; Thacker, P.A.; Zhang, G.; Qiao, S.; Ma, X. Oral administration of Lactobacillus fermentum I5007 favors intestinal development and alters the intestinal microbiota in formula-fed piglets. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, J.F.; Yang, C.H.; Chang, H.W. Chemical composition and antibacterial activities of Illicium verum against antibiotic-resistant pathogens. J. Med. Food 2010, 13, 1254–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, G.W.; Hu, W.T.; Huang, B.K.; Qin, L.P. Illicium verum: A review on its botany, traditional use, chemistry and pharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 136, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ding, X.; Yang, C.; Yang, Z.; Ren, X.J.; Wang, P. Effects of star anise (Illicium verum Hook.f) oil on the nuclear factor E2–related factor 2 signaling pathway of chickens during subclinical Escherichia coli challenge. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 3092–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shi, Y.; Chen, G.; Chen, K.; Chen, X.; Kan, J. Assessment of fresh star anise (Illicium verum Hook.f.) drying methods for influencing drying characteristics, color, flavor, volatile oil and shikimic acid. Food Chem. 2020, 342, 128359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luís, Â.; Sousa, S.; Wackerlig, J.; Dobusch, D.; Duarte, A.P.; Pereira, L.; Domingues, F. Star anise (Illicium verum Hook. f.) essential oil: Antioxidant properties and antibacterial activity against Acinetobacter baumannii. Flavour Fragr. J. 2019, 34, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wei, H.K.; Wang, J.; Cheng, C.S.; Jin, L.Z.; Peng, J. Application of plant essential oils in pig diets. Feed Addit. 2020, 13, 227–237. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yi, Y.; You, X.; Long, Y.; Huang, Y. Efficacy of different plant extracts in the prevention of radiation dermatitis in radiotherapy patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A protocol for a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Medicine 2020, 99, 23523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.J.; Yang, Z.B.; Yang, W.R.; Huang, L.B.; Xu, C.; Liu, M.; Ge, J.S.; Wang, Y.X.; Jiang, S.Z. Illicium verum extracts and probiotics with added glucose oxidase promote antioxidant capacity through upregulating hepatic and jejunal Nrf2/Keap1 of weaned piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Holkem, A.T.; Silva, M.P.; Favaro-Trindade, C.S. Probiotics and plant extracts: A promising synergy and delivery systems. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 4, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 10th ed.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, 8th ed.; AOAC: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang, L.J.; Min, Z.; Libo, H.; Weiren, Y.; Zaibin, Y.; Shuzhen, J.; Jinshan, G. Zearalenone promotes follicle growth through modulation of Wnt-1/β-catenin signaling pathway and expression of estrogen receptor genes in ovaries of post-weaning piglets. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 7899–7906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, Y.; Huang, K.X.; Liang, P.X.; Yang, K.Z.; Zou, L.J.; Yang, Y.F. Effects of compound probiotics on growth performance and apparent nutrient digestibility of piglets. China Feed. 2019, 21, 57–59. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhou, S.; Huang, H.S.; Yang, W.R. Effects of enzyme and probiotics on nutrient utilization and growth performance of Weaned Piglets. Feed. Ind. 2011, 32, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen, P. Study on the Effect of Illicium Verum and Eucommia Leaf Extract on the Antioxidant Abilities and Immunity in Weaned Piglets; Shandong Agricultural University: Tai’an, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ding, X.; Ren, X.J.; Yang, Z.B.; Li, G.; Zhang, X.Q. Effects of star anise, essential oil and residues on amino acid utilization in Broilers. Feed. Ind. 2018, 39, 48–51. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yu, C.Y. Study on the Effects of Star Anise oil (Illicium verum) on the Laying Performance, Nutrient Utilization and Antioxidant Status in Laying Hens; Shandong Agricultural University: Tai’an, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  32. Curry, S.M.; Schwartz, K.J.; Yoon, K.J.; Gabler, K.J.; Burrough, E.R. Effects of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection on nursery pig intestinal function and barrier integrity. Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 211, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shen, X.X. Effects of Sugar Cane Extract on Intestinal Histological Moprhology of Growing Pigs and Heat Stressed Rats; Nanjing Agricultural University: Tai’an, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cairo, P.L.G.; Gois, F.D.; Sbardella, M.; Silveira, H.; Oliveira, R.M.; Allaman, I.B.; Cantarelli, V.S.; Costa, L.B. Effects of dietary supplementation of red pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi) essential oil on performance, small intestinal morphology and microbial counts of weanling pigs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, J.S.; Hosseindoust, A.; Lee, S.H.; Choi, Y.H.; Chae, B.J. Bacteriophage cocktail and multi-strain probiotics in the feed for weanling pigs: Effects on intestine morphology and targeted intestinal coliforms and Clostridium. Animal 2017, 1, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Mishra, D.K.; Verma, A.K.; Agarwal, N.; Singh, P. Effect of Probiotics on Blood Biochemical Profile, Immunity and Small Intestine Morphology in Growing Finishing Pigs. Agric. Res. 2016, 5, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dowarah, R.; Verma, A.K.; Agarwal, N.; Patel, B.H.M.; Singh, P. Effect of swine based probiotic on performance, diarrhoea scores, intestinal microbiota and gut health of grower-finisher crossbred pigs. Livest. Sci. 2017, 195, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yoshida, A.; Takata, K.; Kasahara, T.; Aoyagi, T.; Saito, S.; Hirano, H. Immunohistochemical localization of Na(+)-dependent glucose transporter in the rat digestive tract. Histochem. J. 1995, 27, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Moran, A.W.; Al-Rammahi, M.A.; Arora, D.K.; Batchelor, D.J.; Coulter, E.A.; Ionescu, C.; Bravo, D.; Shirazi-Beechey, S.P. Expression of Na+/glucose co-transporter 1 (SGLT1) is enhanced by supplementation of the diet of weaning piglets with artificial sweeteners. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 104, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Silveira, H.; Melo, A.D.B.; Bortoluzzi, C.; Costa, L.B.; Rostagno, M.H.; Schinckel, A.P.; Garbossa, C.A.P.; Cantarelli, V.D.S. Feed additives can differentially modulate NF-κB (Rel A/p65), IGF-1, GLUT2, and SGLT1 gene expression in porcine jejunal explants. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2018, 47, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wang, J.; Ji, H.; Wang, S.; Liu, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Y. Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum promotes intestinal barrier function by strengthening the epithelium and modulating gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Jahromi, M.F.; Altaher, Y.W.; Shokryazdan, P.; Ebrahimi, R.; Ebrahimi, M.; Idrus, Z.; Tufarelli, V.; Liang, J.B. Dietary supplementation of a mixture of Lactobacillusstrains enhances performance of broiler chickens raised under heat stress conditions. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2016, 60, 1099–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Inoue, K.; Oyamada, M.; Mitsufuji, S.; Okanoue, T.; Takamatsu, T. Different changes in the expression of multiple kinds of tight-junction proteins during ischemia-reperfusion injury of the rat ileum. Acta Histochem. Cytochem. 2006, 39, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Zou, Y.; Wei, H.K.; Xiang, Q.H.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y.F.; Peng, J. Protective effect of quercetin on pig intestinal integrity after transport stress is associated with regulation oxidative status and inflammation. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2016, 78, 1487–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, D.F.; Zhou, L.L.; Hu, H.C.; Zhou, H.L. Effects of extract of Pseudostellaria on histological morphology and permeability of ileal mucosa in Weaned Piglets. Chin. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 54, 110–114. [Google Scholar]
  46. Roselli, M.; Finamore, A.; Britti, M.S.; Konstantinov, S.R.; Smidt, H.; de Vos, W.M.; Mengheri, E. The novel porcine Lactobacillus sobrius strain protects intestinal cells from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 infection and prevents membrane barrier damage. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 2709–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Bhat, M.I.; Sowmya, K.; Kapila, S.; Kapila, R. Potential Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus (MTCC-5897) Inhibits Escherichia coli Impaired Intestinal Barrier Function by modulating the Host Tight Junction Gene Response. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2019, 12, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Du, W.; Xu, H.; Mei, X.; Cao, X.; Gong, L.; Wu, Y.; Li, Y.; Yu, D.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; et al. Probiotic Bacillus enhance the intestinal epithelial cell barrier and immune function of piglets. Benef. Microbes 2018, 9, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, B.L.; Wang, S.; Hao, Z.M.; Wei, Z.Y. Research progress of basic amino acid transporters in animal cells. Feed. Ind. 2010, 31, 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhi, A.M.; Zuo, J.J.; Zhou, X.Y.; Zou, S.K.; Huang, Z.Y.; Wang, X.L.; Ye, H.; Dai, F.W.; Feng, D.Y. The Influence of Different Lysine Concentration on the Cationic Amino Acid Transporter mRNA Expression of Porcine IEC. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2010, 26, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu, X.; Chen, X.; Chen, D.; Yu, B.; Yin, J.; Huang, Z. Effects of dietary apple polyphenol supplementation on carcass traits, meat quality, muscle amino acid and fatty acid composition in finishing pigs. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 7426–7434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, L.X.; Hu, T.; Xu, X. Effects of probiotics on the intestinal flora of piglets. China Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2013, 40, 172–174. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang, S.; Ahmadi, S.; Nagpal, R.; Jian, S.; Mishra, S.P.; Kavanagh, K.; Zhu, X.W.; Wang, Z.; Mcclain, D.; Kritchevsky, S.B.; et al. Lipoteichoic acid from the cell wall of a heat killed Lactobacillus paracasei D3-5 ameliorates aging-related leaky gut, inflammation and improves physical and cognitive functions: From C. elegans to mice. Geroscience 2020, 42, 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wegh, C.A.M.; Geerlings, S.Y.; Knol, J.; Roeselers, G.; Belzer, C. Postbiotics and their potential applications in early life nutrition and beyond. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Klemashevich, C.; Wu, C.; Howsmon, D.; Alaniz, R.C.; Lee, K.; Jayaraman, A. Rational identification of diet-derived postbiotics for improving intestinal microbiota function. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 26, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wilkins, T.; Sequoia, J. Probiotics for gastrointestinal conditions: A summary of the evidence. Am. Fam. Physician 2017, 96, 170–178. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on the jejunal histomorphology of weaned piglets. Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−, (A1,A2)), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+, (B1,B2)), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−, (C1,C2)), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+, (D1,D2)), respectively.
Figure 1. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on the jejunal histomorphology of weaned piglets. Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−, (A1,A2)), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+, (B1,B2)), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−, (C1,C2)), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+, (D1,D2)), respectively.
Agriculture 12 00912 g001
Figure 2. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on the immune positive distribution of Sodium/Glucose Cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) in jejunum of weaned piglets. Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−, (A1A4)), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+, (B1B4)), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−, (C1C4)), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+, (D1D4)), respectively.
Figure 2. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on the immune positive distribution of Sodium/Glucose Cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) in jejunum of weaned piglets. Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−, (A1A4)), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+, (B1B4)), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−, (C1C4)), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+, (D1D4)), respectively.
Agriculture 12 00912 g002
Figure 3. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on the immune positive distribution of Zona Occludens 1 (ZO-1) in jejunum of weaned piglets. Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−, (A1A4)), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+, (B1B4)), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−, (C1C4)), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+, (D1D4)), respectively.
Figure 3. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on the immune positive distribution of Zona Occludens 1 (ZO-1) in jejunum of weaned piglets. Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−, (A1A4)), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+, (B1B4)), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−, (C1C4)), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+, (D1D4)), respectively.
Agriculture 12 00912 g003
Figure 4. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on western blot of Zona Occludens 1 (ZO-1), Sodium/Glucose Cotransporter 1 (SGLT1), Cationic Amino Acid Transporter 1 (CAT1), and Occludin in jejunum of weaned piglets. Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+), respectively. (AD) represents the expression on western blot of ZO-1, SGLT1, CAT1, and Occludin in jejunum. ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on western blot of Zona Occludens 1 (ZO-1), Sodium/Glucose Cotransporter 1 (SGLT1), Cationic Amino Acid Transporter 1 (CAT1), and Occludin in jejunum of weaned piglets. Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+), respectively. (AD) represents the expression on western blot of ZO-1, SGLT1, CAT1, and Occludin in jejunum. ** p < 0.01.
Agriculture 12 00912 g004
Table 1. Ingredients and nutrient levels of basal diet (air dry basis)%.
Table 1. Ingredients and nutrient levels of basal diet (air dry basis)%.
IngredientsContent (%)Nutrients 2
Corn64.50Digestible Energy, MJ/kg13.81
Whey powder5.00Crude Protein (%)19.82
Soybean meal23.00Calcium (%)0.70
Fish meal5.00Total Phosphorus (%)0.64
L-Lysine HCl0.20Lysine (%)1.22
CaHPO40.70Sulfur Amino Acid (%)0.65
Pulverized Limestone0.30Threonine (%)0.75
NaCl0.30Tryptophan (%)0.22
Premix 11.00
Total100.0
1 Supplied per kg of diet: VA 3300 IU, VD3 330 IU, VE 24 IU, VK3 0.75 mg, VB1 1.50 mg, VB2 5.25 mg, VB12 0.026 mg, pantothenic acid 15.00 mg, niacin 22.50 mg, biotin 0.075 mg, folic acid 0.45 mg, Mn (as MnSO4·H2O) 6.00 mg, Fe (as FeSO4·H2O) 150 mg, Zn (as ZnSO4·H2O) 150 mg, Cu (as CuSO4·5H2O) 9.00 mg, I (as KIO3) 0.21 mg, Se (as Na2SeO3) 0.45 mg. 2 Digestible energy was the calculated value, and the other nutrient levels were analyzed value.
Table 2. Primers sequences of PCR.
Table 2. Primers sequences of PCR.
GenesAccession No.Primer Sequence (5′ to 3′)Product Size bp
GADPHNM_001206359.1F: ATGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTGAA154
R: CGTGGGTGGAATCATACTGG
SGLT1M34044F: ATGTACCTGTCTGTCCTGTCG381
R: GTGTTGGAGATGGTCTTGGAG
CAT1NM_001012613F: CATCAAAAACTGGCAGCTCA185
R: TGGTAGCGATGCAGTCAAAG
OccludinU79554F:
TATGAGACAGACTACACAACTGGCGGCGAGTCC
363
R:
ATCATAGTCTCCAACCATCTTCTTGATGTG
ZO-1MX003353439.2F: CAGCCCGAGGCGTGTTTA150
R: AAGGTGGGAGGATGCTGTTG
Table 3. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on the nutrient digestibility of weaned piglets 1, %.
Table 3. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on the nutrient digestibility of weaned piglets 1, %.
ItemsApparent DigestibilityBVNPU
DMOMEECP
IVE−PGO−80.4683.7587.97 c76.30 c88.0267.16 b
PGO+80.8084.3188.90 b77.92 a88.3968.87 a
IVE+PGO−80.5583.8489.22 ab77.49 b88.8768.87 a
PGO+80.8784.3389.69 a77.48 b89.0068.96 a
SEM 0.2010.3090.1800.3970.5270.546
PooledIVE−80.6384.0388.44 b77.1188.2168.02 b
IVE+80.7184.0889.45 a77.4988.9468.91 a
PGO−80.5183.7988.59 b76.90 b88.4568.01 b
PGO+80.8384.3289.30 a77.70 a88.7068.92 a
p-ValueIVE+0.9490.9010.0020.1270.6430.048
PGO+0.5190.2270.0440.0430.3270.026
PGO × IVE0.8760.9290.4520.0460.3160.141
1 Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+), respectively. In the same column, values with different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.05). DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; EE, ether extract; CP, crud protein; BV, biological value; NPU, net protein utilization.
Table 4. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on EAA digestibility of weaned piglets 1, %.
Table 4. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on EAA digestibility of weaned piglets 1, %.
ItemsLysineMethionineTryptophanArginineHistidineLeucineIsoleucinePhenylalanineThreonineValineTEAA
IVE−PGO−83.94 c84.7878.41 c88.2486.5379.5577.3478.5278.2577.9781.65
PGO+85.15 b83.8481.95 a88.4586.1579.8475.9278.4877.5276.5581.21
IVE+PGO−85.21 b84.2480.92 b88.3186.1179.4577.7579.1577.4376.5881.63
PGO+85.96 a85.7281.07 b88.7886.2681.2178.0178.7778.7476.9381.99
SEM0.230.410.360.250.330.460.470.400.430.440.24
PooledIVE−84.55 b84.3180.1888.3586.3479.7076.6378.5077.8977.2681.43
IVE+85.59 a84.9881.0088.5586.1980.3377.8878.9678.0976.7681.81
PGO−84.58 b84.5179.67 b88.2886.3279.5077.5578.8477.8477.2881.64
PGO+85.56 a84.7881.51 a88.6286.2180.5376.9778.6378.1376.7481.60
p-ValueIVE+0.0130.4100.1910.6600.8140.4880.0790.5330.8080.6000.523
PGO+0.0170.8290.0090.6140.8660.2690.4180.7560.6810.5940.942
PGO × IVE0.0460.1110.0210.8570.6930.4250.2560.8320.2600.3190.549
1 Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+), respectively. EAA: Essential amino acid; TEAA: Total essential amino acid. In the same column, values with different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on the jejunal villi and crypt depth of weaned piglets 1.
Table 5. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on the jejunal villi and crypt depth of weaned piglets 1.
ItemsVillus Length, μmCrypt Depth, μmVillus Length/Crypt Depth
IVE−PGO−461.46 b390.17 a1.18 b
PGO+596.56 a333.80 a1.78 a
IVE+PGO−552.86 ab300.32 b1.84 a
PGO+551.61 ab324.91 a1.69 ab
SEM 14.46112.3120.093
PooledIVE−529.02361.991.48
IVE+552.24312.621.77
PGO−507.17345.251.51
PGO+574.09329.361.74
p-ValueIVE+0.3600.0180.049
PGO+0.0340.8960.033
PGO × IVE0.6630.0580.010
1 Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+), respectively. In the same column, values with different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 6. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on the relative mRNA expression of jejunum in weaned piglets 1.
Table 6. Effect of probiotics with added glucose oxidase (PGO) and Illicium verum extracts (IVE) on the relative mRNA expression of jejunum in weaned piglets 1.
ItemsOccludinZO-1SGLT1CAT1
IVE−PGO−1.00 b1.00 c1.00 b1.00 b
PGO+1.48 a2.30 a1.36 a1.83 a
IVE+PGO−1.28 ab1.57 b1.41 a1.24 ab
PGO+1.48 a1.92 a1.35 a1.63 ab
SEM 0.2010.2880.1770.314
PooledIVE−1.241.651.181.42
IVE+1.281.751.381.44
PGO−1.041.291.211.12
PGO+1.482.111.361.73
p-valueIVE+0.7040.0710.0320.165
PGO+0.010<0.0010.002<0.001
PGO × IVE0.2660.040.0130.093
1 Treatment 1 was fed with basal diet (IVE-PGO−), and treatments 2, 3, and 4 were fed the basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE-PGO+), 500 mg/kg IVE (IVE + PGO−), and 500 mg/kg IVE + 1000 mg/kg PGO (IVE + PGO+), respectively. ZO-1, Tight junction protein 1 (Zona occludens 1); SGLT1, Sodium-dependent glucose transporters 1; CAT1, Recombinant Cationic Amino Acid Transporter 1. SEM: standard error of the means; Values with a column with the different letters mean significantly different (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, L.; Ma, X.; Yang, C.; Jiang, S.; Yang, W.; Jiang, S. The Combination of Plant Extracts and Probiotics Improved Jejunal Barrier and Absorption Capacity of Weaned Piglets. Agriculture 2022, 12, 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070912

AMA Style

Yang L, Ma X, Yang C, Jiang S, Yang W, Jiang S. The Combination of Plant Extracts and Probiotics Improved Jejunal Barrier and Absorption Capacity of Weaned Piglets. Agriculture. 2022; 12(7):912. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070912

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Lijie, Xiangming Ma, Chongwu Yang, Shan Jiang, Weiren Yang, and Shuzhen Jiang. 2022. "The Combination of Plant Extracts and Probiotics Improved Jejunal Barrier and Absorption Capacity of Weaned Piglets" Agriculture 12, no. 7: 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070912

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop