Aquaponics in Saudi Arabia: Initial Steps towards Addressing Food Security in the Arid Region
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- extreme weather conditions demanding costly water temperature and climate control technology,
- choice of suitable fish species and crops depending on their profitability, weather conditions, farmer and consumer preference, system capacity, and type and quality of water [17],
- materials available locally, which directly influences the investment and running costs,
- suitability of local market dynamics and lifestyle because the product can be certified as organic, and
- limited capability and experience of technical people [6].
2. Background
2.1. Climate
2.2. Water Scarcity
2.3. Food Imports
2.4. Initiatives and Actions by Saudi Arabia
3. Aquaponics in Saudi Arabia
3.1. SWOT Analysis
3.1.1. Strengths
- Produce: Superior quality, fresh, consistent yield, uniform growth, high nutritional value, longer shelf-life.
- Revenue sources: Retail, food & beverage (restaurants) and B2C sector, training and workshops, agri-tourism, supplies, and services.
- Competencies: Low water usage, the possibility of decentralized and urban agriculture (can be done at roof-tops and backyard) [14], protected cropping, 100% organic and chemical-free, very low probability of disease compared with hydroponics and aquaculture, proximity to market implying lesser food miles and packaging costs, soil-less.
- Overall advantages: Compliant with environmental safety standards and regulations, lack of market competition, resource-efficient, solar power, and geothermal integration is possible.
3.1.2. Weaknesses
- Environment: Dealing with high temperature and humidity cost-effectively, availability of acceptable water quality.
- Sources of revenue loss: Extreme temperatures, sand storms, higher energy costs due to climate control, pests.
- High capital costs for farm construction.
- Needs specialized knowledge, which is still lacking in terms of expertise and skill set.
3.1.3. Opportunities
- Availability of technology: Superior transport infrastructure, well-connected road network throughout Saudi Arabia and the Middle East, greenhouse climate control technologies are available, possible to procure state-of-the-art technology due to the existing mature oil and gas sector.
- Government policies: Vision 2030 and MEWA water strategy envision water and food-secure country.
- Customer: Shift towards an organic and healthy diet, awareness about health-conscious lifestyle, environmentally responsible farming.
- Market voids: Absence of economical organic options for the consumer, fresh local produce is highly seasonal and mostly inorganic, poor shelf life of imports.
- Favorable trends: Preference for local produce with environmental benefits and superior freshness.
3.1.4. Threats
- Obstacles: Volatile markets, cheaper alternatives become favorable as FPI rises, imported alternatives constantly penetrating the marketplace, getting organic and chemical-free certification from Saudi food and drug authority (FDA) for Aquaponics, spreading awareness among the locals.
- Economic factors: Trade and purchasing patterns are highly dependent on econo-political conditions, and high labor and import costs in the country.
- Vulnerabilities: Balancing between customer demands and weather conditions, weather-suitable crops limit the crop variety, and penetration in the market might require low initial prices.
3.2. Building a New System
3.2.1. Site Survey and Preparation
3.2.2. Sourcing
3.2.3. Grow Beds
3.2.4. Greenhouse
3.2.5. Fish Rearing Section
3.2.6. Air Supply
3.2.7. Instrumentation
3.2.8. Supplementation and pH Management
3.2.9. Backup System
4. Results and Discussion
- The availability of state-of-the-art climate control technology can solve the problem of protected cropping.
- Increasing awareness among the masses about Aquaponics with a well-designed marketing strategy, which will assist in getting the necessary certifications and clarify any doubts regarding food safety.
- Higher startup costs can be reduced with the introduction of cheaper alternatives, such as recyclable items, and also by introducing small-scale farming instead of large-scale commercial setups, which will support the concept of decentralized agriculture to reduce food miles,
- Avoiding the use of imported components and material as much as possible,
- Training programs at a national level can cover the lack of experienced manpower [30], and universities can play an important role in this area,
- Target staple products (such as tomatoes) besides the exotic varieties, which are usually required by high-end customers, and
- To have additional revenue streams by offering Aquaponics courses, workshops, agri-tourism, and supplies and services.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
SWOT | Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats |
FPI | Food Price Index |
MENA | Middle East and North Africa |
NFT | Nutrient Film Technique |
DWC | Deep Water Culture |
UVI | University of Virgin Islands |
MEWA | Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture, Saudi Arabia |
FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization |
B2C | Business-to-Consumer |
FDA | Food and Drug Authority |
SS | Stainless Steel |
IBC | Intermediate Bulk Container |
DO | Dissolved Oxygen |
TSS | Total Suspended Solids |
TDS | Total Dissolved Solids |
References
- FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2022. Available online: https://www.fao.org/food-agriculture-statistics/en/ (accessed on 16 May 2022).
- Yep, B.; Zheng, Y. Aquaponic trends and challenges—A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 1586–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinho, S.M.; David, L.H.; Garcia, F.; Keesman, K.J.; Portella, M.C.; Goddek, S. South American fish species suitable for aquaponics: A review. Aquac. Int. 2021, 29, 1427–1449. [Google Scholar]
- COST. FA1205—Assessing and Improving the Quality of Aquatic Animal Gametes to Enhance Aquatic Resources—The Need to Harmonize and Standardize Evolving Methodologies, and Improve Transfer from Academia to Industry. 2022. Available online: https://www.cost.eu/actions/FA1205/ (accessed on 16 May 2022).
- Palm, H.W.; Knaus, U.; Appelbaum, S.; Goddek, S.; Strauch, S.M.; Vermeulen, T.; Haïssam Jijakli, M.; Kotzen, B. Towards commercial aquaponics: A review of systems, designs, scales and nomenclature. Aquac. Int. 2018, 26, 813–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obirikorang, K.A.; Sekey, W.; Gyampoh, B.A.; Ashiagbor, G.; Asante, W. Aquaponics for Improved Food Security in Africa: A Review. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 705549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Körner, O.; Bisbis, M.B.; Baganz, G.F.; Baganz, D.; Staaks, G.B.; Monsees, H.; Goddek, S.; Keesman, K.J. Environmental impact assessment of local decoupled multi-loop aquaponics in an urban context. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 313, 127735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarigan, N.B.; Goddek, S.; Keesman, K.J. Explorative study of aquaponics systems in Indonesia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Hafedh, Y.S.; Alam, A.; Beltagi, M.S. Food production and water conservation in a recirculating aquaponic system in Saudi Arabia at different ratios of fish feed to plants. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2008, 39, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalsgaard, J.; Lund, I.; Thorarinsdottir, R.; Drengstig, A.; Arvonen, K.; Pedersen, P.B. Farming different species in RAS in Nordic countries: Current status and future perspectives. Aquac. Eng. 2013, 53, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mok, W.K.; Tan, Y.X.; Chen, W.N. Technology innovations for food security in Singapore: A case study of future food systems for an increasingly natural resource-scarce world. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 102, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armanda, D.T.; Guinée, J.B.; Tukker, A. The second green revolution: Innovative urban agriculture’s contribution to food security and sustainability–A review. Glob. Food Secur. 2019, 22, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Y.; Ding, K.; Xu, Y.; Tang, Y.; Liu, D.; Li, G. States, trends, and future of aquaponics research. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.M.; Akram, M.T.; Janke, R.; Qadri, R.W.K.; Al-Sadi, A.M.; Farooque, A.A. Urban horticulture for food secure cities through and beyond COVID-19. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wirza, R.; Nazir, S. Urban aquaponics farming and cities-a systematic literature review. Rev. Environ. Health 2021, 36, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, F.; Ghamkhar, R.; Ashton, W.; Hicks, A.L. Sustainable seafood and vegetable production: Aquaponics as a potential opportunity in urban areas. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2019, 15, 832–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mupambwa, H.A.; Hausiku, M.K.; Nciizah, A.D.; Dube, E. The unique Namib desert-coastal region and its opportunities for climate smart agriculture: A review. Cogent Food Agric. 2019, 5, 1645258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abusin, S.A.; Mandikiana, B.W. Towards sustainable food production systems in Qatar: Assessment of the viability of aquaponics. Glob. Food Secur. 2020, 25, 100349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wongkiew, S.; Hu, Z.; Lee, J.W.; Chandran, K.; Nhan, H.T.; Marcelino, K.R.; Khanal, S.K. Nitrogen recovery via aquaponics–bioponics: Engineering considerations and perspectives. ACS ES&T Eng. 2021, 1, 326–339. [Google Scholar]
- Botha, I. Aquaponics as a Productive Rehabilitation Alternative in Mpumalanga Highveld Coalfields. Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Masser, M.P.; Rakocy, J.; Losordo, T.M. Recirculating aquaculture tank production systems. Manag. Recirc. Syst. 1999, 452, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Goddek, S.; Delaide, B.; Mankasingh, U.; Ragnarsdottir, K.V.; Jijakli, H.; Thorarinsdottir, R. Challenges of sustainable and commercial aquaponics. Sustainability 2015, 7, 4199–4224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tyson, R.; Simonne, E.; Treadwell, D.; Davis, M.; White, J. Effect of water pH on yield and nutritional status of greenhouse cucumber grown in recirculating hydroponics. J. Plant Nutr. 2008, 31, 2018–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- König, B.; Janker, J.; Reinhardt, T.; Villarroel, M.; Junge, R. Analysis of aquaponics as an emerging technological innovation system. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 180, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Greenfeld, A.; Becker, N.; McIlwain, J.; Fotedar, R.; Bornman, J.F. Economically viable aquaponics? Identifying the gap between potential and current uncertainties. Rev. Aquac. 2019, 11, 848–862. [Google Scholar]
- Abdelrahman, A.A.M. Effect of Feeding Frequency and Stocking Density on Tilapia Oreochromis Niloticus and Lettuce Lactuca Sativa Production in Aquaponics System under the UAE Condition and Business Enterprise Analysis. Master’s Thesis, Department of Biology, College of Science, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Baganz, G.F.; Junge, R.; Portella, M.C.; Goddek, S.; Keesman, K.J.; Baganz, D.; Staaks, G.; Shaw, C.; Lohrberg, F.; Kloas, W. The aquaponic principle—It is all about coupling. Rev. Aquac. 2022, 14, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colt, J.; Schuur, A.M.; Weaver, D.; Semmens, K. Engineering design of aquaponics systems. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2022, 30, 33–80. [Google Scholar]
- Engle, C.R. Economics of Aquaponics; Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service: Oklahoma City, OK, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, A.Q.; Aldosari, F.; Hussain, S.M. Fish consumption behavior and fish farming attitude in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2018, 17, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peel, M.C.; Finlayson, B.L.; McMahon, T.A. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 11, 1633–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al-Ahmadi, K.; Al-Ahmadi, S. Spatiotemporal variations in rainfall–topographic relationships in southwestern Saudi Arabia. Arab. J. Geosci. 2014, 7, 3309–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zittis, G. Observed rainfall trends and precipitation uncertainty in the vicinity of the Mediterranean, Middle East and North Africa. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2018, 134, 1207–1230. [Google Scholar]
- Amin, M.T.; Kissock, J.K. Dynamic modeling and verification of an energy-efficient greenhouse with aquaponics. In Proceedings of the Energy Sustainability. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Charlotte, NC, USA, 26–30 June 2016; Volume 50220, p. V001T11A005. [Google Scholar]
- World Bank Data Catalog. World Development Indicators. 2022. Available online: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0037712 (accessed on 6 May 2022).
- Bank, W. Beyond Scarcity: Water Security in the Middle East and North Africa; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Green Policy Platform. Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas. 2021. Available online: https://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/tools-and-platforms/aqueduct-water-risk-atlas (accessed on 7 June 2022).
- Saudi Government Open Data Portal. Saudi Government Open Data Portal: Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture. 2022. Available online: https://data.gov.sa/Data/en/organization/ministry_of_environment-_water_and_agriculture (accessed on 17 May 2022).
- Baig, M.B.; Alotibi, Y.; Straquadine, G.S.; Alataway, A. Water resources in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Challenges and strategies for improvement. In Water Policies in MENA Countries; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 135–160. [Google Scholar]
- Food and Agriculture Organization, UN. AQUASTAT. 2022. Available online: https://www.fao.org/aquastat/statistics/query/index.html;jsessionid=A3209D26DDAED85223C2E7DC4069BC8B (accessed on 19 January 2022).
- Chowdhury, S.; Al-Zahrani, M. Characterizing water resources and trends of sector wise water consumptions in Saudi Arabia. J. King Saud Univ.-Eng. Sci. 2015, 27, 68–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fiaz, S.; Noor, M.A.; Aldosri, F.O. Achieving food security in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia through innovation: Potential role of agricultural extension. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2018, 17, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- TrendEconomy. Annual International Trade Statistics by Country (HS02)—Saudi Arabia. 2021. Available online: https://trendeconomy.com/data/h2/SaudiArabia/0301 (accessed on 18 May 2022).
- World Bank. World Integrated Trade Solution. 2022. Available online: https://wits.worldbank.org/ (accessed on 25 February 2022).
- USDA. USDA Scheduled Reports—2016. 2016. Available online: https://www.fas.usda.gov/data-analysis/scheduled-reports-2016 (accessed on 18 May 2022).
- Kappler, G.; Dias, J.B.; Haeberle, F.; Wander, P.R.; Moraes, C.A.M.; Modolo, R.C.E. Study of an earth-to-water heat exchange system which relies on underground water tanks. Renew. Energy 2019, 133, 1236–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharqawy, M.H.; Said, S.; Mokheimer, E.; Habib, M.; Badr, H.; Al-Shayea, N. First in situ determination of the ground thermal conductivity for boreholeheat exchanger applications in Saudi Arabia. Renew. Energy 2009, 34, 2218–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasozi, N.; Tandlich, R.; Fick, M.; Kaiser, H.; Wilhelmi, B. Iron supplementation and management in aquaponic systems: A review. Aquac. Rep. 2019, 15, 100221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Country | Annual Imports per Capita [US$] | Major Import Countries |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 237 | India, USA, Argentina, Indonesia, Egypt |
UAE | 705 | India, USA, Canada, Iraq, Spain |
Bahrain | 346 | India, Australia, Saudi Arabia, UAE, USA |
Qatar | 406 | India, Iran, Russia, Pakistan, USA |
China | 52 | Brazil, USA, Thailand, Indonesia, Canada |
USA | 175 | Mexico, Canada, Colombia, Chile, Peru |
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
26 C | |
24.5 C | |
0.566 m/day [47] | |
12 days |
Month | Max/Min Temperature [C] | Max/Min Relative Humidity [%] |
---|---|---|
January | 27/6 | 94/6 |
February | 36/6 | 94/8 |
March | 41/12 | 100/6 |
April | 40/18 | 88/6 |
May | 45/22 | 69/6 |
June | 49/27 | 70/6 |
July | 48/28 | 89/6 |
August | 47/26 | 79/6 |
September | 47/23 | 89/5 |
October | 43/16 | 83/8 |
November | 33/14 | 88/24 |
December | 29/11 | 94/26 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Memon, A.M.; AlHems, L.M.; Yamaç, S.S.; Barry, M.S.; Alam, A.; AlMuhanna, A. Aquaponics in Saudi Arabia: Initial Steps towards Addressing Food Security in the Arid Region. Agriculture 2022, 12, 2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122094
Memon AM, AlHems LM, Yamaç SS, Barry MS, Alam A, AlMuhanna A. Aquaponics in Saudi Arabia: Initial Steps towards Addressing Food Security in the Arid Region. Agriculture. 2022; 12(12):2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122094
Chicago/Turabian StyleMemon, Azhar M., Luai M. AlHems, Sevim Seda Yamaç, Muhammad S. Barry, Aftab Alam, and Ahmed AlMuhanna. 2022. "Aquaponics in Saudi Arabia: Initial Steps towards Addressing Food Security in the Arid Region" Agriculture 12, no. 12: 2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122094