Quantitative Carbon Changes of Selected Organic Fractions during the Aerobic Biological Recycling of Biodegradable Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) as a Potential Soil Environment Improving Amendment—A Case Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Design of the Working Experiment
2.2. Basic Chemical Analyses
2.3. Detailed Chemical Analyses
- Carbon of hydrophobic substances (HSCs): extracted by means of an ethanol and benzene mixture (1:2 v/v) using the Soxhlet extractor (extraction time: 4 h). Following the extraction, the samples were dried in a controlled condition at 40 °C temperature for 24 h to evaporate the extractant. The HSC was calculated as the difference in the organic carbon before and after the extraction [22];
- Water-extractable organic carbon (WEOC): determined in a centrifuged aqueous solution 5 g ÷ 50 mL (1 ÷ 10 m ÷ v) after the dynamic [33] extraction (three repetitions, intensity: 40 rpm, extraction time: 4 h per repetition, centrifugation: 4000 rpm 10 min−1);
- Carbon extracted with 5% H2SO4 (CAC): determined in a centrifuged acid solution 5 g ÷ 50 mL (1 ÷ 10 m ÷ v) after the dynamic extraction (three repetitions, intensity: 40 rpm, extraction time: 4 h per repetition, centrifugation: 4000 rpm 10 min−1);
- Cellulose carbon extracted with 72% H2SO4 (CCEL): two-stage extraction: the acid stage 5 g ÷ 50 mL (1 ÷ 10 m ÷ v)—three repetitions in acid, intensity: 40 rpm, extraction time: 4 h per repetition, centrifugation: 4000 rpm 10 min−1 and the neutralisation stage with water 5 g ÷ 50 mL (1 ÷ 10 m ÷ v)—three repetitions, intensity: 40 rpm, extraction time: 1 h per repetition, centrifugation: 4000 rpm 10 min−1. CCEL content determined the summed solutions of both stages.
- Carbon of the ligno-humic complex extracted with 0,1 M NaoH dm−3 (CALK): determined in centrifuged alkaline solution 5 g ÷ 50 mL (1 ÷ 10 m ÷ v) after the dynamic extraction (three repetitions, intensity: 40 rpm, extraction time: 4 h per repetition, centrifugation: 4000 rpm 10 min−1);
- Residual carbon (CR): non-hydrolysing organic carbon and humin fractions [34] remaining in the sample, calculated according to the formula: CR = TOC − (HSC + WEOC + CAC + CCEL + CALK).
2.4. Statistical Analyses
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Changes in the Temperature and Humidity of the Composted Waste
3.2. Changes in TOC, TN and the TOC/TN Ratio during the Composting of MSW
3.3. Changes in the HSC, WEOC, CAC, CCEL, CALK and CR Contents of the Composted Waste
3.4. Changes in the Share of the Organic Carbon of the Extracted Fractions in Relation to TOC
4. Summary and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fiorucci, P.F.; Minciardi, R.M.; Robba, M.; Sacile, R. Solid waste management in urban areas development and application of a decision support system. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2003, 4, 301–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamer, G. Solid waste treatment and disposal: Effects on public health and environmental safety. Biotechnol. Adv. 2003, 22, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ciavatta, C.; Centemero, M.; Toselli, M.; Zaccone, C.; Senesi, N. Compost production, analysis and applications in agriculture. In Multi-Scale Biogeochemical Processes in Soil Ecosystems; Yang, Y., Keiluweit, M., Senesi, N., Xing, B., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghisellini, P.; Cialani, C.; Ulgiati, S. A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 114, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakai, S.; Sawell, S.E.; Chandler, A.J.; Eighmy, T.T.; Kosson, D.S.; Vehlow, J.; van der Sloot, H.A.; Hartlén, J.; Hjelmar, O. World trends in municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag. 1996, 16, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrero, L.A.; Ger Maas, W.H. Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Manag. 2013, 33, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marshall, R.E.; Farahbakhsh, K. Systems approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries. Waste Manag. 2013, 33, 998–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miikki, V.; Senesi, N.; Hanninen, K. Characterization of humic material formed by composting of domestic and industrial biowastes: Part 2 spectroscopic evaluation of humic acid structures. Chemosphere 1997, 34, 1639–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castaldi, P.; Guido, A.; Roberto, M.; Pietro, M. Study of the organic matter evolution during municipal solid waste composting aimed at identifying suitable parameters for the evaluation of compost maturity. Waste Manag. 2005, 25, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chefetz, B.; Hatcher, P.G.; Hadar, Y.; Chen, Y. Chemical and Biological Characterization of Organic Matter during Composting of Municipal Solid Waste. J. Environ. Qual. 1996, 25, 776–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, J.I.; Tsaji, J.J.; Wu, K.H. Thermophilic composting of food waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albersheim, P. The walls of growing plants. Sci. Am. 1975, 232, 80–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tiquia, S.M. Evolution of extracellular enzyme activities during manure composting. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 92, 764–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Komilis, D.; Ham, R.K. The effect of lignin and sugars to the aerobic decomposition of solid waste. Waste Manag. 2003, 23, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ryckeboer, J.; Mergaert, J.; Coosemans, J.; Deprins, K.; Swings, J. Microbiological aspects of biowaste during composting in a monitored compost bin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 94, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Waksman, S.A. Humus. Origin, Chemical Composition and Importance in Nature; Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1936; Available online: https://soilcarboncoalition.org/files/Waksman-Humus.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2022).
- Stevenson, F.J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Sanchez–Monedero, M.A.; Roig, A.; Cegarra, J.; Bernal, M.P. Relationships between water–soluble carbohydrate and phenol fractions and the humification indices of different organic wastes during composting. Bioresour. Technol. 1999, 70, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schnitzer, M.; Monreal, C.M. Chapter Three—Quo Vadis Soil Organic Matter Research? A Biological Link to the Chemistry of Humification. Adv. Agron. 2011, 113, 143–217. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.M.; Liu, R.; Hao, J.K.; Li, D.; Wei, Z.M.; Teng, R.N.; Sun, B.L. Protein and carbohydrate drive microbial responses in diverse ways during different animal manures composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 271, 482–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodziewicz, A.; Sobolczyk, J.; Łaba, W.; Choińska, A.; Bubel, F.; Bekier, J. Wykorzystanie szczepionki drobnoustrojów do kompostowania odpadów keratynowych w bioreaktorze statycznym. Inż. Ap. Chem. 2009, 48, 98–100. [Google Scholar]
- Bekier, J.J.; Drozd, J.; Jamroz, E.; Jarosz, B.; Kocowicz, A.; Walenczak, K.; Weber, J. Changes in selected hydrophobic components during composting of municipal solid wastes. J. Soils Sediments 2014, 14, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maliki, A.D.; Lai, K.-M. Design and application of a pre-composting test step to determine the effect of high fat food wastes on an industrial scale in-vessel composting system. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2011, 65, 906–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hachicha, R.; Hachicha, S.; Trabelsi, I.; Woodward, S.; Mechichi, T. Evolution of the fatty fraction during co-composting of olive oil industry wastes with animal manure: Maturity assessment of the end product. Chemosphere 2009, 75, 1382–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- International Humic Substances Society. Available online: http://humic-substances.org (accessed on 30 June 2022).
- Chelinho, S.; Pereira, C.; Breitenbach, P.; Baretta, D.; Sousa, J.P. Quality standards for urban waste composts: The need for biological effect data. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 694, 133602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vaverková, M.D. Landfill Impacts on the Environment—Review. Geosciences 2019, 9, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hughes, R. The EU Circular Economy Package—Life Cycle Thinking to Life Cycle Law? Procedia Cirp 2017, 61, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elemental Microanalysis Limited. Certificate of Analysis No 314878. Available online: https://www.elementalmicroanalysis.com/Downloads/B2044-2046-2049-314878.pdf (accessed on 20 October 2022).
- Cesaro, A.; Belgiorno, V.; Guida, M. Compost from organic solid waste: Quality assessment and European regulations for its sustainable use. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 94, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adani, F.; Ricca, G.; Tambone, F.; Genevini, P. Isolation of the stable fraction (the core) of the humic acid. Chemosphere 2006, 65, 1300–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adani, F.; Genevini, P.L.; Tambone, F. A new index of organic matter stability. Compost Sci. Util. 1995, 3, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamroz, E.; Bekier, J.; Medynska-Juraszek, A.; Kaluza-Haladyn, A.; Cwielag-Piasecka, I.; Bednik, M. The contribution of water extractable forms of plant nutrients to evaluate MSW compost maturity: A case study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber, J.; Jamroz, E.; Kocowicz, A.; Debicka, M.; Bekier, J.; Ćwieląg-Piasecka, I.; Ukalska-Jaruga, A.; Mielnik, L.; Bejger, R.; Jerzykiewicz, M. Optimized isolation method of humin fraction from mineral soil material. Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 44, 1289–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Inbar, Y. 1993. Chemical and spectroscopical analyses of OM transformations during composting in relation to compost maturity. In Science and Engineering of Composting; Hoitink, H.A.J., Keener, H.M., Eds.; Renaissance Publications: Worthington, OH, USA, 1993; pp. 551–600. [Google Scholar]
- Licznar, M.; Drozd, J.; Licznar, S.E.; Weber, J.; Bekier, J.; Walenczak, K. Effect of municipal waste moisture level on transformations of nitrogen forms in the course of composting. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 2010, 17, 787–797. [Google Scholar]
- Iglesias-Jimenez, E.; Garcia, V.P. Determination of maturity indexes for city refuse composts. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1992, 38, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekier, J.; Drozd, J.; Licznar, M. Nitrogen transformations in composts produced from municipal solid waste. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 2011, 18, 497–506. [Google Scholar]
- Chanyasak, V.; Kubota, H. Carbon/organic nitrogen ratio in water extrect as measure of composting degredation. J. Ferment Technol. 1981, 50, 215–219. [Google Scholar]
- Bernat, K.; Kulikowska, D.; Wojnowska-Baryła, I.; Kamińska, A. Can the biological stage of a mechanical–biological treatment plant that is designed for mixed municipal solid waste be successfully utilized for effective composting of selectively collected biowaste? Waste Manag. 2022, 149, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gariglio, N.F.; Buyatti, M.A.; Pilatti, R.A.; Rossia, D.E.G.; Acosta, M.R. Use of a germination bioassay to test compost maturity of willow (Salix sp.) sawdust. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2002, 30, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eggen, T.; Vethe, O. Stability indices for different composts. Compost Sci. Util. 2001, 9, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pare, T.; Dinel, H.; Schnitzer, M.; Dumontet, S. Transformations of carbon and nitrogen during composting of animal manure and shredded paper. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1998, 26, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amir, S.; Merlina, G.; Pinelli, E.; Winterton, P.; Revel, C.; Hafidi, M. Microbial community dynamics during composting of sewage sludge and straw studied through phospholipid and neutral lipid analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 159, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kałuża-Haładyn, A.; Jamroz, E.; Bekier, J. The dynamics of some physical and physico-chemical properties during composting of municipal solid wastes and biomass of energetic plants. Soil Sci. Ann. 2018, 69, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kałuża-Haładyn, A.; Jamroz, E.; Bekier, J. Humic substances of differently matured composts produced from municipal solid wastes and biomass of energetic plants. Soil Sci. Ann. 2019, 70, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kononova, M.M. Soil Organic Matter: Its Nature, Its Role in Soil Formation and in Soil Fertility, 2nd ed.; Pergamon Press Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 1966; Available online: https://books.google.pl/books?id=ExjLBAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=pl&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed on 20 October 2022).
- Chen, Y.; Chefetz, B.; Adani, F.; Genevini, P.; Hadar, Y. Organic matter transformation during composting of Municipal Solid Waste. In The Role of Humic Substances in Ecosystems and in Environmental Protection; Drozd, J., Gonet, S., Senesi, N., Weber, J., Eds.; PTSH: Wroclaw, Poland, 1997; pp. 795–804. [Google Scholar]
- Koivula, N.; Hänninien, K. Concentrations of monosaccharides in humic substances in the early stages of humification. Chemosphere 2001, 44, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Senesi, N.; Miano, T.; Provenzano, M.R.; Brunetti, G. Characterization, differentiation, and classification of humic substances by fluorescence spectroscopy. Soil Sci. 1991, 152, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jerzykiewicz, M. The effect of Hg(II) ions on the free radicals of humic substances and their model compounds. Chemosphere 2013, 92, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kulikowska, D.; Sindrewicz, S. Effect of barley straw and coniferous bark on humification process during sewage sludge composting. Waste Manag. 2018, 79, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayes, M.H.B.; Swift, R.S. Vindication of humic substances as a key component of organic matter in soil and water. Adv. Agron. 2020, 163, 1–37. [Google Scholar]
- Sowiński, J.; Jama-Rodzeńska, A.; Perera, P.C.D.; Jamroz, E.; Bekier, J. The changes of willow biomass characteristics during the composting process and their phytotoxicity effect on Sinapis alba L. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0275268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamczewska-Sowińska, K.; Sowiński, J.; Jamroz, E.; Bekier, J. Compost from willow biomass (Salix viminalis L.) as a horticultural substrate alternative to peat in the production of vegetable transplants. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 17617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekier, J.; Jamroz, E.; Sowiński, J.; Adamczewska-Sowińska, K.; Kałuża-Haładyn, A. Effect of Differently Matured Composts from Willow on Growth and Development of Lettuce. Agronomy 2022, 12, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamczewska-Sowińska, K.; Sowiński, J.; Jamroz, E.; Bekier, J. Combining Willow Compost and Peat as Media for Juvenile Tomato Transplant Production. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hay, J.C.; Kuchenrither, R. Fundamentals and application of windrow composting. J. Environ. Eng. 1990, 116, 746–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondini, C.; Sequi, P. Implication of soil C sequestration on sustainable agriculture and environment. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 678–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cataldo, E.; Fucile, M.; Mattii, G.B. Composting from municipal solid waste: A sustainable tool for the environment and to improve grape quality. J. Agric. Sci. 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwiatkowska-Malina, J. Qualitative and quantitative soil organic matter estimation for sustainable soil management. J. Soils Sediments 2018, 18, 2801–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dębska, B.; Długosz, J.; Piotrowska-Długosz, A.; Banach-Szott, M. The impact of a bio-fertilizer on the soil organic matter status and carbon sequestration—Results from a field-scale study. J. Soils Sediments 2016, 16, 2335–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameter | Time | Temperature | Moisture | TOC | TN | HSC | WEOC | CAC | CCEL | CALK | CR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time | - | ns | −0.587 | −0.974 | 0.915 | −0.861 | −0.930 | −0.927 | −0.980 | 0.895 | −0.951 |
Temperature | ns | - | 0.593 | −0.575 | 0.519 | −0.583 | −0.494 | −0.682 | ns | ns | ns |
Moisture | −0.587 | 0.593 | - | 0.496 | 0.487 | ns | ns | 0.510 | 0.529 | 0.603 | 0.517 |
TOC | −0.974 | −0.575 | 0.496 | - | −0.932 | 0.897 | 0.949 | 0.930 | 0.960 | −0.934 | 0.992 |
TN | 0.915 | 0.519 | 0.487 | −0.932 | - | −0.884 | −0.950 | −0.929 | −0.866 | 0.924 | −0.914 |
HSC | −0.861 | −0.583 | ns | 0.897 | −0.884 | - | 0.956 | 0.829 | 0.879 | −0.924 | 0.853 |
WEOC | −0.930 | −0.494 | ns | 0.949 | −0.950 | 0.956 | - | 0.936 | 0.914 | −0.979 | 0.915 |
CAC | −0.927 | −0.682 | 0.510 | 0.930 | −0.929 | 0.829 | 0.936 | - | 0.881 | −0.912 | 0.906 |
CCEL | −0.980 | ns | 0.529 | 0.960 | −0.866 | 0.879 | 0.914 | 0.881 | - | −0.880 | 0.928 |
CALK | 0.895 | 0.512 | 0.603 | −0.934 | 0.924 | −0.924 | −0.979 | −0.912 | −0.880 | - | −0.915 |
CR | −0.951 | −0.542 | 0.517 | 0.992 | −0.914 | 0.853 | 0.915 | 0.906 | 0.928 | −0.915 | - |
Composting Time | Parameter | TOC | TN | HSC | WEOC | CAC | CCEL | CALK | CR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[Days] | [g kg−1] | ||||||||
1 | Mean | 352.66 | 10.95 | 19.41 | 29.85 | 18.73 | 85.43 | 28.02 | 171.22 |
St. dev | 12.70 | 0.41 | 0.71 | 0.54 | 0.34 | 1.55 | 0.51 | 11.81 | |
14 | Mean | 316.93 | 11.55 | 11.41 | 23.37 | 18.26 | 77.49 | 30.44 | 155.96 |
St. dev | 1.46 | 0.54 | 0.66 | 0.49 | 0.38 | 2.08 | 0.64 | 2.43 | |
28 | Mean | 292.08 | 11.66 | 9.99 | 19.14 | 19.31 | 71.89 | 35.50 | 136.25 |
St. dev | 2.77 | 0.49 | 0.07 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 3.02 | 1.05 | 2.91 | |
45 | Mean | 263.31 | 13.26 | 6.26 | 7.53 | 12.08 | 69.59 | 41.76 | 126.10 |
St. dev | 2.49 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 1.22 | 1.30 | 2.53 | |
56 | Mean | 232.85 | 13.50 | 5.70 | 7.01 | 10.46 | 65.82 | 44.84 | 99.02 |
St. dev | 1.45 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 1.80 | 0.38 | 2.18 | |
70 | Mean | 185.68 | 13.77 | 5.13 | 5.22 | 8.92 | 61.73 | 45.38 | 59.30 |
St. dev | 1.65 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.62 | 1.57 | 0.67 | 0.10 | |
90 | Mean | 175.70 | 14.33 | 4.46 | 2.81 | 9.39 | 54.84 | 45.92 | 58.27 |
St. dev | 0.72 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.52 | 1.06 | 0.59 | 0.80 | |
107 | Mean | 168.73 | 14.23 | 4.05 | 2.13 | 6.55 | 49.55 | 45.05 | 61.39 |
St. dev | 1.14 | 0.25 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.57 | 0.76 | 0.48 | 0.35 | |
LSD | 16.62 | 1.21 | 1.31 | 1.34 | 1.59 | 4.76 | 2.64 | 15.77 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bekier, J.; Jamroz, E.; Dębicka, M.; Ćwieląg-Piasecka, I.; Kocowicz, A. Quantitative Carbon Changes of Selected Organic Fractions during the Aerobic Biological Recycling of Biodegradable Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) as a Potential Soil Environment Improving Amendment—A Case Study. Agriculture 2022, 12, 2058. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122058
Bekier J, Jamroz E, Dębicka M, Ćwieląg-Piasecka I, Kocowicz A. Quantitative Carbon Changes of Selected Organic Fractions during the Aerobic Biological Recycling of Biodegradable Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) as a Potential Soil Environment Improving Amendment—A Case Study. Agriculture. 2022; 12(12):2058. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122058
Chicago/Turabian StyleBekier, Jakub, Elżbieta Jamroz, Magdalena Dębicka, Irmina Ćwieląg-Piasecka, and Andrzej Kocowicz. 2022. "Quantitative Carbon Changes of Selected Organic Fractions during the Aerobic Biological Recycling of Biodegradable Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) as a Potential Soil Environment Improving Amendment—A Case Study" Agriculture 12, no. 12: 2058. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122058