Urgent Pericardiocentesis Is More Frequently Needed After Left Circumflex Coronary Artery Perforation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Protocol
2.2. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Comparison with Previous Studies
4.1.1. Incidence of Cardiac Tamponade after Coronary Perforation
4.1.2. Incidence of Iatrogenic Cardiac Tamponade According to the Vessel Involved
4.1.3. Coronary Artery Spatial Distribution of Coronary Perforations
4.2. Mechanistic Considerations – Clinical Implications of LCx Involvement as a Culprit Vessel in Acute Coronary Syndromes
4.3. Study Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ellis, S.G.; Ajluni, S.; Arnold, A.Z.; Popma, J.J.; Bittl, J.A.; Eigler, N.L.; Cowley, M.J.; Raymond, R.E.; Safian, R.D.; Whitlow, P.L. Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome. Circulation 1994, 90, 2725–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fasseas, P.; Orford, J.L.; Panetta, C.J.; Bell, M.R.; Denktas, A.E.; Lennon, R.J.; Holmes, D.R.; Berger, P.B. Incidence, correlates, management, and clinical outcome of coronary perforation: Analysis of 16,298 procedures. Am. Heart J. 2004, 147, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javaid, A.; Buch, A.N.; Satler, L.F.; Kent, K.M.; Suddath, W.O.; Lindsay, J.; Pichard, A.D.; Waksman, R. Management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am. J. Cardiol. 2006, 98, 911–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shimony, A.; Zahger, D.; Van Straten, M.; Shalev, A.; Gilutz, H.; Ilia, R.; Cafri, C. Incidence, risk factors, management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am. J. Cardiol. 2009, 104, 1674–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimony, A.; Joseph, L.; Mottillo, S.; Eisenberg, M.J. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Can. J. Cardiol. 2011, 27, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemmert, M.E.; van Bommel, R.J.; Diletti, R.; Wilschut, J.M.; de Jaegere, P.P.; Zijlstra, F.; Daemen, J.; Van Mieghem, N.M. Clinical characteristics and management of coronary artery perforations: A single-center 11-year experience and practical overview. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e007049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stankovic, G.; Orlic, D.; Corvaja, N.; Airoldi, F.; Chieffo, A.; Spanos, V.; Montorfano, M.; Carlino, M.; Finci, L.; Sangiorgi, G.; et al. Incidence, predictors, in-hospital, and late outcomes of coronary artery perforations. Am. J. Cardiol. 2004, 93, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doll, J.A.; Nikolsky, E.; Stone, G.W.; Mehran, R.; Lincoff, A.M.; Caixeta, A.; McLaurin, B.; Cristea, E.; Fahy, M.; Kesanakurthy, V.; et al. Outcomes of patients with coronary artery perforation complicating percutaneous coronary intervention and correlations with the type of adjunctive antithrombotic therapy: Pooled analysis from REPLACE-2, ACUITY, and HORIZONS-AMI trials. J. Interv. Cardiol. 2009, 22, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinnaird, T.; Kwok, C.S.; Kontopantelis, E.; Ossei-Gerning, N.; Ludman, P.; deBelder, M.; Anderson, R.; Mamas, M.A. Incidence, determinants, and outcomes of coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2013: An analysis of 527 121 cases from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2016, 9, e003449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guttmann, O.P.; Jones, D.A.; Gulati, A.; Kotecha, T.; Fayed, H.; Patel, D.; Crake, T.; Ozkor, M.; Wragg, A.; Smith, E.J.; et al. Prevalence and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention 2017, 13, e595–e601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakowski, T.; Węgiel, M.; Siudak, Z.; Plens, K.; Dziewierz, A.; Birkemeyer, R.; Kleczyński, P.; Tokarek, T.; Rzeszutko, Ł.; Dudek, D. Prevalence and predictors of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary interventions (from the ORPKI National Registry in Poland). Am. J. Cardiol. 2019, 124, 1186–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Von Sohsten, R.; Kopistansky, C.; Cohen, M.; Kussmaul, W.G., 3rd. Cardiac tamponade in the “new device” era: Evaluation of 6999 consecutive percutaneous coronary interventions. Am. Heart J. 2000, 140, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fejka, M.; Dixon, S.R.; Safian, R.D.; O’Neill, W.W.; Grines, C.L.; Finta, B.; Marcovitz, P.A.; Kahn, J.K. Diagnosis, management, and clinical outcome of cardiac tamponade complicating percutaneous coronary intervention. Am. J. Cardiol. 2002, 90, 1183–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stathopoulos, I.; Kossidas, K.; Panagopoulos, G.; Garratt, K. Cardiac tamponade complicating coronary perforation during angioplasty: Short-term outcomes and long-term survival. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2013, 25, 486–491. [Google Scholar]
- Austen, W.G.; Edwards, J.E.; Frye, R.L.; Gensini, G.G.; Gott, V.L.; Griffith, L.S.; McGoon, D.C.; Murphy, M.L.; Roe, B.B. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975, 51 (Suppl. 4), 5–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al-Lamee, R.; Ielasi, A.; Latib, A.; Godino, C.; Ferraro, M.; Mussardo, M.; Arioli, F.; Carlino, M.; Montorfano, M.; Chieffo, A.; et al. Incidence, predictors, management, immediate and long-term outcomes following grade III coronary perforation. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2011, 4, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kiernan, T.J.; Yan, B.P.; Ruggiero, N.; Eisenberg, J.D.; Bernal, J.; Cubeddu, R.J.; Witzke, C.; Don, C.; Cruz-Gonzalez, I.; Rosenfield, K.; et al. Coronary artery perforations in the contemporary interventional era. J. Interv. Cardiol. 2009, 22, 350–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harnek, J.; James, S.; Lagerqvist, B. Coronary artery perforation and tamponade—Incidence, risk factors, predictors and outcomes from 12 years’ data of the SCAAR Registry. Circ. J. 2019, 84, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- From, A.M.; Best, P.J.; Lennon, R.J.; Rihal, C.S.; Prasad, A. Acute myocardial infarction due to left circumflex artery occlusion and significance of ST-segment elevation. Am. J. Cardiol. 2010, 106, 1081–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmitt, C.; Lehmann, G.; Schmieder, S.; Karch, M.; Neumann, F.J.; Schömig, A. Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in angiographically documented occluded infarct vessel: Limitations of ST-segment elevation in standard and extended ECG leads. Chest 2001, 120, 1540–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, J.C.; Normand, S.L.; Mauri, L.; Kuntz, R.E. Coronary artery spatial distribution of acute myocardial infarction occlusions. Circulation 2004, 110, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Antoni, M.L.; Yiu, K.H.; Atary, J.Z.; Delgado, V.; Holman, E.R.; van der Wall, E.E.; Schuijf, J.D.; Bax, J.J.; Schalij, M.J. Distribution of culprit lesions in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Coron. Artery Dis. 2011, 22, 533–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghanim, D.; Kusniec, F.; Kinany, W.; Qarawani, D.; Meerkin, D.; Taha, K.; Amir, O.; Carasso, S. Left circumflex coronary artery as the culprit vessel in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Tex. Heart Inst. J. 2017, 44, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Characteristic | Acute Tamponade n = 21 | No Tamponade n = 60 | p-Value a |
---|---|---|---|
Baseline clinical characteristics | |||
Age (years) | 70 ± 9 | 70 ± 10 | 0.98 |
Men/Women (%) | 38/62 | 62/38 | 0.08 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 25.8 ± 4.3 | 27.3 ± 4.6 | 0.22 |
Acute coronary syndrome/stable angina (%) | 81/19 | 78/22 | 1 |
Hypertension (%) | 81 | 73 | 0.57 |
Diabetes (%) | 33 | 33 | 1 |
Estimated GFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2) | 73 ± 21 | 70 ± 21 | 0.55 |
Overt heart failure (%) | 5 | 5 | 1 |
Ejection fraction (%) | 45 ± 17 | 42 ± 11 | 0.44 |
Oral anticoagulants before intervention (%) | 24 | 12 | 0.28 |
Treated vessel (%) | |||
LAD and/or Dg1/2 | 48 | 52 | 0.80 |
RCA | 19 | 25 | 0.77 |
LCx | 33 | 10 | 0.03 |
Mg1/2 | 0 | 10 | 0.33 |
LMCA | 0 | 3 | 1 |
Procedural data | |||
Lesion predilation (%) | 76 | 80 | 0.76 |
Predilation balloon maximal pressure (atm.) | 16.1 ± 4.6 | 13.5 ± 5.8 | 0.13 |
Predilation balloon size (mm) | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 0.15 |
Predilation balloon length (mm) | 16.3 ± 3.2 | 17.6 ± 3.5 | 0.22 |
Stent deployment maximal pressure (atm.) | 15.0 ± 2.9 | 14.6 ± 3.1 | 0.70 |
Maximal stent diameter (mm) | 3.4 ± 0.7 | 3.3 ± 0.7 | 0.91 |
Total stent length (mm) | 26.9 ± 14.4 | 22.8 ± 10.0 | 0.23 |
Stent postdilation (%) | 29 | 45 | 0.21 |
Postdilation balloon maximal pressure (atm.) | 19.3 ± 10.3 | 17.1 ± 6.1 | 0.48 |
Postdilation balloon size (mm) | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.9 | 0.47 |
Postdilation balloon length (mm) | 12.2 ± 2.3 | 16.1 ± 6.4 | 0.21 |
Cutting balloon (%) | 5 | 2 | 0.45 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Surdacki, M.A.; Major, M.; Chyrchel, M.; Kleczyński, P.; Rakowski, T.; Bryniarski, L.; Ujda, M.; Wysocka, R.; Żmuda, W.; Wiśniewski, A.; et al. Urgent Pericardiocentesis Is More Frequently Needed After Left Circumflex Coronary Artery Perforation. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3043. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9093043
Surdacki MA, Major M, Chyrchel M, Kleczyński P, Rakowski T, Bryniarski L, Ujda M, Wysocka R, Żmuda W, Wiśniewski A, et al. Urgent Pericardiocentesis Is More Frequently Needed After Left Circumflex Coronary Artery Perforation. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(9):3043. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9093043
Chicago/Turabian StyleSurdacki, Michał A., Marcin Major, Michał Chyrchel, Paweł Kleczyński, Tomasz Rakowski, Leszek Bryniarski, Marek Ujda, Renata Wysocka, Witold Żmuda, Andrzej Wiśniewski, and et al. 2020. "Urgent Pericardiocentesis Is More Frequently Needed After Left Circumflex Coronary Artery Perforation" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 9: 3043. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9093043
APA StyleSurdacki, M. A., Major, M., Chyrchel, M., Kleczyński, P., Rakowski, T., Bryniarski, L., Ujda, M., Wysocka, R., Żmuda, W., Wiśniewski, A., Nosal, M., Maliszewski, M., Rzeszutko, M., Legutko, J., Surdacki, A., Bartuś, S., & Rzeszutko, Ł. (2020). Urgent Pericardiocentesis Is More Frequently Needed After Left Circumflex Coronary Artery Perforation. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(9), 3043. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9093043