Next Article in Journal
Proton Pump Inhibitor Use May Increase the Risk of Diverticulitis but Not It’s Severity among Patients with Colonic Diverticulosis: A Multicenter Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Cardiac Complications Following Cardiac Surgery Procedures
Previous Article in Journal
Perceval or Trifecta to Prevent Patient–Prosthesis Mismatch
Previous Article in Special Issue
Late Outcome after Surgery for Type-A Aortic Dissection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characteristics of Trauma Mortality in Patients with Aortic Injury in Harris County, Texas

1
Division of Vascular Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
2
Center for Translational Injury Research, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3
College of Nursing, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77030, USA
4
Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
5
Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
6
Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA
7
HCA Houston Healthcare, Gulf Coast Division, Houston, TX 77004, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(9), 2965; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092965
Submission received: 1 August 2020 / Revised: 6 September 2020 / Accepted: 9 September 2020 / Published: 14 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Updates on Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery)

Abstract

:
Background: The National Academies of Science have issued a call for zero preventable trauma deaths. The mortality characteristics in all patients with aortic injury are not well described. Methods: All prehospital and hospital medical examiner records for deaths occurring in Harris County, Texas in 2014 were retrospectively reviewed, and patients with traumatic aortic injury were selected. The level of aortic injury was categorized by zone (0 through 9) and further grouped by aortic region (arch, zones 0 to 2; descending thoracic, zones 3 to 5; visceral abdominal, zones 6 to 8; infrarenal, zone 9). Multiple investigators used standardized criteria to categorize deaths as preventable, potentially preventable, or non-preventable. Results: Of 1848 trauma deaths, 192 (10%) had aortic injury. There were 59 (31%) aortic arch, 144 (75%) descending thoracic, 19 (10%) visceral abdominal, and 20 (10%) infrarenal aortic injuries. There were 178 (93%) non-preventable deaths and 14 (7%) potentially preventable deaths, and none were preventable. Non-preventable deaths were associated with blunt trauma (69%) and the arch or thoracic aorta (93%), whereas potentially preventable deaths were associated with penetrating trauma (93%) and the visceral abdominal or infrarenal aorta (79%) (all p < 0.05). Half of potentially preventable deaths (n = 7) occurred at the scene, and half occurred at a trauma center. Conclusion: Potentially preventable deaths after aortic injury were associated with penetrating mechanism and injury to the visceral abdominal and/or infrarenal aorta. Optimal prehospital and ED treatment include temporizing hemorrhage control, hemostatic resuscitation, and faster transport to definitive treatment.

1. Introduction

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable trauma death [1,2]. A retrospective study by Eastridge et al., of 4596 combat casualty mortalities from 2001 to 2011 reported that 24% of deaths were potentially preventable, of which 90% were related to inadequate hemorrhage control [3]. A National Academies of Sciences Report in 2016 estimated the civilian preventable trauma death rate to be 20%, or 30,000 deaths per year, and called for zero preventable trauma deaths [4]. This report discussed the military’s use of near 100% autopsy rate to identify strategies where targeted interventions could improve trauma patient outcomes. For example, Eastridge et al., reported decreased exsanguination rate due to peripheral hemorrhage by 85% (from 23.3 to 3.5 deaths per year) after implementation of increased military tourniquet use that resulted from a review of military autopsy data [3]. Translation of tourniquet use to the civilian sector in the form of the Stop the Bleed Campaign has also yielded positive results [5,6]. Recently, Drake et al. conducted a retrospective review of all death-related (including prehospital and hospital medical examiner) records that occurred during 2014 in Harris County, Texas and determined the preventable and potentially preventable trauma death rate to be 36% [7]. Although great progress has been made in control of peripheral hemorrhage, truncal hemorrhage (e.g., from aortic injury) remains a significant cause of trauma mortality [8]. Similar to the military’s methodology, the objective of the present study was to describe the anatomic characteristics and preventability of aortic injuries in deceased civilian trauma patients to identify potential targets for intervention.

2. Methods

This is a secondary analysis of a study by Drake et al. that examined all death-related records in 2014 in Harris County, TX [7], the third most populous county in the United States (4.4 million), which includes the Greater Houston area. Drake et al., included 1848 trauma deaths, of which 70% had an autopsy and the remaining 30% had extensive radiographic records. Each case was assigned a preventability level (preventable, potentially preventable, and non-preventable) by multidisciplinary review based on anatomic findings predominantly at autopsy. We defined preventable as clearly survivable anatomic injuries if appropriate steps had been taken (including deaths due to deviations from standard of care), potentially preventable as severe anatomic injuries that could be survivable with optimal care, and non-survivable as death due to anatomic injuries. Examples of non-survivable anatomic injuries include catastrophic brain injury (transcranial penetrating injury, brainstem disruption, etc.); atlanto-occipital dissociation; proximal cervical spinal cord transection; intra-thoracic airway transection; significant transmural lacerations to the heart, aorta, or main pulmonary artery with free hemorrhage; complete liver disruption; and catastrophic abdominopelvic injury (e.g., traumatic hemipelvectomy) [7]. Disagreements regarding preventability level were resolved by consensus according to an established protocol [9]. Causes of death were determined by the medical examiner and defined as the physiologic derangement leading to death [10]. Additional details regarding the study methods have been published previously [11]. Importantly, we included all deaths under the jurisdiction of the Harris County Medical Examiner, including prehospital deaths and those occurring in non-trauma centers, in addition to those occurring in trauma centers. The subset of patients with aortic injury was selected. Autopsy photographs and reports were reviewed by investigators. The location of aortic injury was categorized by zone (0 to 9) consistent with reporting standards for endovascular aortic treatment (Figure 1) [12]. Injuries in contiguous zones were treated as one injury. Those in non-contiguous zones were treated as multiple injuries. For each injury, the most proximal zone and the number of zones involved were recorded. To facilitate analyses, injuries were also categorized by aortic region (arch, zones 0 to 2; descending thoracic, zones 3 to 5; visceral abdominal, zones 6 to 8; and infrarenal, zone 9) with single injuries spanning multiple contiguous zones possibly involving multiple regions. This study was approved by the institutional review boards at both The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX, USA). Informed consent was not required.
Stata 15.1 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA) was used for all calculations. Data are summarized as median and interquartile range (IQR) or proportions as appropriate. Non-parametric univariate comparisons of continuous data were performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Comparisons of categorical data were performed with Chi-Squared test or Fisher’s exact test for categories with ≤5 expected cases. Statistical significance was defined as two-tailed alpha at 0.05 level.

3. Results

3.1. Demographics and Death Characteristics

Of 1848 trauma deaths in Harris County, TX in 2014, 192 (10.4%) had aortic injury, of which 191 (99%) had an autopsy. There were 178 (93%) non-preventable deaths (NP), 14 (7%) potentially preventable deaths (PP), and no preventable deaths. Demographics and death data are summarized in Table 1. There were no differences in age between NP and PP deaths. The incidence of blunt rather than penetrating trauma, death at the scene, and/or death with traumatic brain injury (TBI) were all more likely in the NP than PP groups (all p < 0.05).

3.2. Anatomic Description of Aortic Injuries

Aortic injuries as defined by most proximal involved zone are summarized in Table 2. There were no differences between NP and PP groups in the average number of zones involved per injury (1.46 vs. 1.31) and incidence of multiple injuries (13% vs. 14%) (both p > 0.05). Aortic injuries as defined by region are summarized in Table 3. NP deaths were more likely a result of injuries to the aortic arch or descending thoracic aorta, whereas PP deaths were more likely a result of injuries to the abdominal visceral or infrarenal aorta (all p < 0.05). Of 170 deaths who had any injuries to the arch or descending thoracic aorta, 166 (98%) were NP. Of 22 deaths who had aortic injuries confined to the visceral abdominal and/or infrarenal aorta, 10 (45%) were PP.

3.3. Subgroup Analysis of PP Deaths

PP deaths (n = 14) were examined in greater detail to better understand areas of potential improvement. Aortic injuries for seven patients who expired at the scene (Table 4) ranged from the descending thoracic aorta (zone 5) to the infrarenal aorta (zone 9). Of these, five had multiple zones injured and six sustained gunshot wounds and died of hemorrhage. The remaining seven patients survived to ED presentation (Table 5). All suffered from gunshot wounds, were transported to a trauma center by ground EMS, and had hemorrhage as the cause of death. None received prehospital transfusions as blood products were not available on ground EMS during the study period. The predominant zone of injury was the infrarenal aorta (zone 9). Three patients who presented to a level 3 trauma center were declared expired shortly after ED arrival. Four patients underwent resuscitative thoracotomy in the ED. Of these, three patients who presented to a level 1 trauma center underwent operative intervention for definitive hemorrhage control, of which two survived to ICU admission.

4. Discussion

We performed a secondary analysis of a study by Drake et al. which analyzed all trauma deaths that occurred in Harris County, TX in 2014. Of 192 cases with aortic injury, the autopsy rate was 99%, which allowed us to precisely describe the anatomic location of injury and categorize them by aortic zone and region. The majority of deaths were NP (93%), which were more often a result of blunt trauma and involved the thoracic aorta, while PP deaths (7%) were more often a result of penetrating trauma and involved the abdominal aorta. The maximum survival time after ED presentation was less than 9 h, there were no preventable deaths, and PP deaths were primarily due to hemorrhage. In contrast, Drake et al., reported an overall preventable/possibly preventable trauma (P/PP) death rate of 36%, with 43% of these dying after discharge from initial hospitalization [7]. Important causes of P/PP death in the overall study were hemorrhage and TBI initially, as well as sepsis, multiple organ failure, pulmonary embolism, and comorbid conditions after the initial period. Notably, the results of the present study are similar to those of a case series by Parmley et al., published in 1958 that analyzed 275 cases of blunt aortic injury and had >99% autopsy rate [13]. They reported 86% were dead on arrival, long-term (>1 year) survival of 2%, and aortic isthmus (zone 3) as the most common site of injury (37%). Comparatively, we report 81% dead at the scene, potentially preventable death rate of 7%, and the proximal descending thoracic aorta (zone 4) as the most common site of injury (31%). These similarities, which have persisted over six decades, are a testament to the gravity of this problem and the challenges in its prevention and treatment.
Diagnosis and management of traumatic aortic injuries have changed significantly over the last twenty years with the widespread use of computed tomography imaging for trauma and advent of endovascular treatment of aortic lesions. Endovascular treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injury is now widely accepted [14], although its role in penetrating injuries to the chest [15] and blunt or penetrating injury to the abdominal aorta are unclear [16]. In much the same way that increased prehospital tourniquet use has improved outcomes in patients with extremity hemorrhage [3,5,6], effective prehospital control of non-compressible torso hemorrhage could save many lives [17]. Thus, one impetus for the current study is to generate data to inform the development of techniques for control of non-compressible torso hemorrhage that can be used in the pre-operating room phase of care (including the prehospital phase, ED, and non-trauma centers). Additionally, the increasing prevalence of trauma hybrid operating rooms, where open and endovascular techniques can be used as needed [18], will lead to increased and more rapid endovascular treatment options for major vascular injuries. We previously reported anatomic descriptions of non-compressible torso hemorrhage in 543 trauma patients treated at four level 1 trauma centers in Houston, TX and San Antonio, TX between 2008 and 2012 [8], and the current study furthers our understanding in this area. The current study demonstrates that the greatest opportunity for intervention in aortic trauma is patients with penetrating abdominal injury. Of 14 PP deaths, 12 cases (including all 7 who arrived to a trauma center) exsanguinated from gunshot wounds (Table 4 and Table 5). In patients such as these, interventions are needed in the pre-operating room phase of care to extend the period of salvageability and ultimately save lives. These interventions include temporary hemorrhage control by earlier use of established methods such as resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) or novel therapies such as self-expanding intra-abdominal foam [19], hemostatic resuscitation (ideally by whole blood [20]), and faster transport to the operating room for definitive hemorrhage control [17].
The limitations of this study are as follows. Since we only included trauma deaths, we do not capture the total incidence of traumatic aortic injury. Several factors affecting trauma mortality such as distance to major trauma centers at time of injury and other concomitant injuries were not analyzed. One difficulty in translating the success of the military experience to civilian trauma is notification. In the military, injuries usually occur when other team members are immediately available to assist and notify medical personnel. Civilian gunshot trauma, on the other hand, is more often in the context of homicide and suicide where the people involved try to avoid discovery. Indeed, we used time of EMS notification as a surrogate for time of injury (Table 1 and Table 5) since the latter was not known in all cases. Operative reports to review the aortic repair techniques used were not available. We also report a modest incidence of potentially preventable deaths with aortic injury: 14 patients per year, equal to 7% of all deaths with aortic injury (n = 192) or 2% of all preventable or potentially preventable deaths in Harris County in 2014 (n = 668) [7]. These limitations are counterbalanced by the strengths of this study, which include review of all trauma deaths in the region, the high autopsy rate, and precise anatomic descriptions of aortic injury. When taken in conjunction with our previous work [8], this study better elucidates the scope of the problem as well as potential solutions.
In conclusion, aortic trauma is highly lethal, with 7% of deaths with traumatic aortic injury being potentially preventable and no deaths being preventable. This is in contrast to the 36% preventable/potentially preventable rate in the overall population. Non-preventable deaths were more often a result of blunt trauma and involved the thoracic aorta, whereas potentially preventable deaths were more often a result of penetrating trauma and involved the abdominal aorta. Optimal prehospital and ED treatment include temporizing hemorrhage control, hemostatic resuscitation, and faster transport to definitive treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C., S.A.D., J.B.H., and K.M.C.-O.; methodology, S.A.D., J.B.H., and K.M.C.-O.; software, R.C. and C.E.W.; validation, R.C., S.A.D., J.B.H., G.P., C.E.W. and K.M.C.-O.; data curation, R.C., S.A.D., and G.P.; writing—original draft preparation, R.C.; writing—review and editing, R.C. and K.M.C.-O.; supervision, S.A.D., J.B.H., and K.M.C.-O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was in part funded from two internal UTHealth sources: UTHealth Cizik School of Nursing PARTNERS Grant and Center for Translational Injury Research (CeTIR). No external funding was utilized for this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Houston Fire Department; Cyfair Fire Department; Harris County Emergency Corp; Cypress Fairbanks Emergency Medical Service; Memorial Hermann Hospital trauma system programs; Harris County Hospital District trauma system programs; Texas Children’s Hospital; Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences; Jeff Tomasek, Susan Guerrero; Hannah Wang, Ned Levine, Tom Reynolds; Southeast Texas Regional Area Council; Cizik School of Nursing.

Conflicts of Interest

Charlton-Ouw is a consultant with W.L. Gore & Associates and Medtronic. Holcomb is a co-founder and on the Board of Directors of Decisio Health, on the Board of Directors of QinFlow and Zibrio, a Co-inventor of the Junctional Emergency Tourniquet Tool, and an adviser to Arsenal Medical, Cellphire, Spectrum, PotentiaMetrics, Thermal Logistics, and Wake Forest Institute of Regenerative Medicine.

References

  1. Chang, R.; Kerby, J.D.; Kalkwarf, K.J.; Van Belle, G.; Fox, E.E.; Cotton, B.A.; Cohen, M.J.; Schreiber, M.A.; Brasel, K.; Bulger, E.M.; et al. Earlier time to hemostasis is associated with decreased mortality and rate of complications: Results from the Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratio trial. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019, 87, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kotwal, R.S.; Montgomery, H.R.; Champion, H.R.; Butler, F.K.; Mabry, R.L.; Cain, J.S.; Blackbourne, L.H.; Mechler, K.K.; Holcomb, J.B. Eliminating preventable death on the battlefield. Arch. Surg. 2011, 146, 1350–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Eastridge, B.J.; Mabry, R.L.; Seguin, P.; Cantrell, J.; Tops, T.; Uribe, P.; Mallett, O.; Zubko, T.; Oetjen-Gerdes, L.; Rasmussen, T.E.; et al. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): Implications for the future of combat casualty care. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012, 73 (Suppl. S5), 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. National Academies of Sciences. A National Trauma Care System: Integrating Military and Civilian Trauma Systems to Achieve Zero Preventable Deaths after Injury. 2016. Available online: http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2016/A-National-Trauma-Care-System-Integrating-Militaryand-Civilian-Trauma-Systems.aspx (accessed on 17 October 2018).
  5. Scerbo, M.H.; Holcomb, J.B.; Taub, E.; Gates, K.; Love, J.D.; Wade, C.E.; Cotton, B.A. The trauma center is too late: Major limb trauma without a pre-hospital tourniquet has increased death from hemorrhagic shock. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017, 83, 1165–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Teixeira, P.G.R.; Brown, C.V.R.; Emigh, B.; Long, M.; Foreman, M.; Eastridge, B.; Gale, S.; Truitt, M.S.; Dissanaike, S.; Duane, T.; et al. Civilian prehospital tourniquet use is associated with improved survival in patients with peripheral vascular injuries. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2018, 226, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Drake, S.A.; Holcomb, J.B.; Yang, Y.; Thetford, C.; Myers, L.; Brock, M.; Wolf, D.A.; Cron, S.; Persse, D.; McCarthy, J.; et al. Establishing a Regional Trauma Preventable/Potentially Preventable Death Rate. Ann. Surg. 2020, 271, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chang, R.; Fox, E.E.; Greene, T.J.; Eastridge, B.J.; Gilani, R.; Chung, K.K.; DeSantis, S.M.; DuBose, J.J.; Tomasek, J.S.; Fortuna, G.R.; et al. Multicenter retrospective study of noncompressible torso hemorrhage: Anatomic locations of bleeding and comparison of endovascular versus open approach. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017, 83, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hartnett, T. Consensus-Oriented Decision Making: The CODM Model for Facilitating Groups Widespread Agreement; New Society Publishers: Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hanzlick, R. Principles for including or excluding ‘‘mechanisms’’ of death when writing cause-of-death statements. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1997, 121, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Drake, S.A.; Wolf, D.A.; Meininger, J.C.; Cron, S.G.; Reynold, T.; Wade, C.E.; Holcomb, J.B. Methodology to reliably measure preventable trauma death rate. Trauma Surg. Acute Care Open 2017, 2, e000106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Fillinger, M.F.; Greenberg, R.K.; McKinsey, J.F.; Chaikof, E.L. Society for Vascular Surgery Ad Hoc Committee on TEVAR Reporting Standards. Reporting standards for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). J. Vasc. Surg. 2010, 52, 1022–1033. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Parmley, L.F.; Mattingly, T.W.; Manion, W.C.; Jahnke, E.J.J. Nonpenetrating traumatic injury of the aorta. Circulation 1958, 17, 1086–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Fox, N.; Schwartz, D.; Salazar, J.H.; Haut, E.R.; Dahm, P.; Black, J.H.; Brakenridge, S.C.; Como, J.J.; Hendershot, K.; King, D.R.; et al. Evaluation and management of blunt traumatic aortic injury: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015, 78, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Branco, B.C.; DuBose, J.J. Endovascular solutions for the management of penetrating trauma: An update on REBOA and axillo-subclavian injuries. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2016, 42, 687–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dayama, A.; Rivera, A.; Olorunfemi, O.; Mahmoud, A.; Fontecha, C.A.; McNelis, J. Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Injury Repair Outcomes in Polytrauma Patients. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2017, 42, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Holcomb, J.B. Transport Time and Preoperating Room Hemostatic Interventions Are Important: Improving Outcomes After Severe Truncal Injury. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 46, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Holcomb, J.B.; Fox, E.E.; Scalea, T.M.; Napolitano, L.; Albarado, R.; Gill, B.; Dunkin, B.J.; Kirkpatrick, A.W.; Cotton, B.A.; Inaba, K.; et al. Current opinion on catheter-based hemorrhage control in trauma patients. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014, 76, 888–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Duggan, M.; Rago, A.; Sharma, U.; Zugates, G.; Freyman, T.; Busold, R.; Caulkins, J.; Pham, Q.; Chang, Y.; Mejaddam, A.; et al. Self-expanding polyurethane polymer improves survival in a model of noncompressible massive abdominal hemorrhage. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013, 74, 1462–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Sheppard, F.R.; Mitchell, T.A.; Cap, A.P.; Schaub, L.J.; Macko, A.R.; Glaser, J.J. Prehospital whole blood resuscitation prevents coagulopathy and improves acid-base status at hospital arrival in a nonhuman primate hemorrhagic shock model. Transfusion 2019, 59, 2238–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Zones of aortic injury [12].
Figure 1. Zones of aortic injury [12].
Jcm 09 02965 g001
Table 1. Demographics and death data.
Table 1. Demographics and death data.
Non-Preventable (n = 178)Potentially Preventable (n = 14)p
Age (y)37 (24, 52)43 (27, 56)0.36
Blunt mechanism (n, %)123 (69%)1 (7%)<0.01
Death location (n, %)
Scene149 (84%)7 (50%)<0.01 *
Level 1 trauma ctr14 (8%)3 (21%)
ED9 (64%)0 (0%)
ICU2 (14%)2 (14%)
OR3 (22%)1 (7%)
Level 3 trauma ctr 12 (7%)4 (29%)
Level 4 trauma ctr 1 (<1%)0 (0%)
Non-trauma ctr 2 (1%)0 (0%)
Time from EMS notified to death (min)0 (0, 10)18 (0, 91)<0.05
Reason for death (n, %)
Hemorrhage129 (72%)12 (86%)0.36
TBI97 (54%)2 (14%)<0.01
EMS, Emergency Medical Service; TBI, traumatic brain injury. * p value for scene vs. non-scene death; All deaths were in ED; Not mutually exclusive.
Table 2. Location of aortic injury by proximal zone.
Table 2. Location of aortic injury by proximal zone.
Non-Preventable (n = 178)Potentially Preventable (n = 14)
Zone 046 (26%)1 (7%)
Zone 14 (2%)0 (0%)
Zone 28 (4%)0 (0%)
Zone 329 (16%)0 (0%)
Zone 458 (33%)1 (7%)
Zone 538 (21%)3 (21%)
Zone 67 (4%)1 (7%)
Zone 72 (1%)0 (0%)
Zone 84 (2%)2 (14%)
Zone 96 (3%)8 (57%)
Multiple injuries24 (13%)2 (14%)
Table 3. Location of aortic injury by region.
Table 3. Location of aortic injury by region.
Non-Preventable (n = 178)Potentially Preventable (n = 14)p
Thoracic166 (93%)5 (36%) <0.01
Arch58 (33%)1 (7%)
Descending140 (79%)4 (29%)
Abdominal22 (37%)11 (79%)<0.01
Visceral15 (8%)4 (29%)
Infrarenal12 (7%)9 (64%)
Multiple regions42 (24%)4 (29%)1.00
Table 4. Possibly preventable deaths who expired at the scene.
Table 4. Possibly preventable deaths who expired at the scene.
PatientZone of Aortic InjuryInjury MechanismCause of Death
Patient 15, 9Motorcycle collisionTBI
Patient 26, 7GSWHemorrhage
Patient 38, 9GSWHemorrhage
Patient 45GSWHemorrhage
Patient 59GSWHemorrhage
Patient 68GSWHemorrhage
Patient 75 to 8GSWHemorrhage and TBI
Table 5. Possibly preventable deaths who expired in-hospital. All patients suffered gunshot wounds and died of hemorrhage.
Table 5. Possibly preventable deaths who expired in-hospital. All patients suffered gunshot wounds and died of hemorrhage.
PatientZone of Aortic InjuryLocation of DeathISSPrehospital InterventionsDistance from Scene to Nearest Level 1 Trauma Center (Miles)Ed SBPAdditional Ed InterventionsTime from Ems Notified to Ed Arrival (min)Time from Ed Arrival to Death (min)
Patient 89Level 3 trauma center EDUnknownCPR, laryngeal airway20.20None592
Patient 99Level 3 trauma center ED29CPR, intubation16.30Chest tube, blood products, resuscitative thoracotomy2423
Patient 109Level 3 trauma center ED16CPR, intubation17.30None391
Patient 110Level 3 trauma center ED26CPR, intubation, needle chest thoracostomy12.30None2312
Patient 124, 9Level 1 trauma center OR75CPR17.60Intubation, blood products, resuscitative thoracotomy3160
Patient 139Level 1 trauma center ICU50CPR7.80Intubation, blood products, resuscitative thoracotomy38511
Patient 149Level 1 trauma center ICU26None1282CPR, Intubation, blood products, resuscitative thoracotomy20437
ED, Emergency Department; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; OR, operating room.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, R.; Drake, S.A.; Holcomb, J.B.; Phillips, G.; Wade, C.E.; Charlton-Ouw, K.M. Characteristics of Trauma Mortality in Patients with Aortic Injury in Harris County, Texas. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2965. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092965

AMA Style

Chang R, Drake SA, Holcomb JB, Phillips G, Wade CE, Charlton-Ouw KM. Characteristics of Trauma Mortality in Patients with Aortic Injury in Harris County, Texas. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(9):2965. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092965

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Ronald, Stacy A. Drake, John B. Holcomb, Garrett Phillips, Charles E. Wade, and Kristofer M. Charlton-Ouw. 2020. "Characteristics of Trauma Mortality in Patients with Aortic Injury in Harris County, Texas" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 9: 2965. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092965

APA Style

Chang, R., Drake, S. A., Holcomb, J. B., Phillips, G., Wade, C. E., & Charlton-Ouw, K. M. (2020). Characteristics of Trauma Mortality in Patients with Aortic Injury in Harris County, Texas. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(9), 2965. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092965

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop