Next Article in Journal
Impact of Axial Eye Size on Retinal Microvasculature Density in the Macular Region
Next Article in Special Issue
Expression of Pinopodes in the Endometrium from Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Women. Role of Thrombomodulin and Ezrin
Previous Article in Journal
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and the Aging Spine: Introduction to the Special Issue
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/jcm9082536
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation of the PD-1 and PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Molecules Throughout Healthy Human Pregnancy and in Nonpregnant Women

by
Matyas Meggyes
1,2,*,
David U. Nagy
3 and
Laszlo Szereday
1,2
1
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Pecs, 7624 Pecs, Hungary
2
Janos Szentagothai Research Centre, 7624 Pecs, Hungary
3
Medical Centre, Cochrane Hungary, University of Pécs, 7623 Pécs, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(8), 2536; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082536
Submission received: 2 July 2020 / Revised: 30 July 2020 / Accepted: 3 August 2020 / Published: 6 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immunology of Human Reproduction)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: A growing body of evidence supports the importance of PD-1 and PD-L1, especially in the materno-fetal interface, although limited information is available about the peripheral expression of these molecules during the trimesters of pregnancy. Methods: 13 healthy women were enrolled from the 1st, 10 from the 2nd and 12 from the 3rd trimester of pregnancy at the same time, 10 healthy, age-matched nonpregnant women formed the control group. From peripheral blood, mononuclear cells were separated and stored at –80 °C. From freshly thawed samples, surface and intracellular staining were performed for flow cytometric analyses. CD107a degranulation assay was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity. Results: significant alternation was detected in PD-1 expression by CD8+T cells and in PD-L1 expression by CD8+T, CD4+T and Treg cells. An interesting relationship was revealed between the PD-1 and PD-L1 expression by the investigated subpopulations in 2nd trimester of pregnancy. Different expression patterns of an activation receptor NKG2D by the PD-1+ CD8+T cells was observed during pregnancy. The notable relationship was further determined in cytotoxicity between PD-1+ and NKG2D+ CD8+T cells throughout pregnancy. Conclusions: the different PD-1 presence and the relationship with NKG2D could contribute to the dynamic changes of the Th1 and Th2 predominance throughout the three trimesters of a healthy pregnancy.

1. Introduction

During a healthy pregnancy, the adaptation of the maternal immune system is mandatory to support adequate fetal development. Maternal immune tolerance is a complex reaction of the immune system to the presence of the fetus, which is much more complicated than previously thought. Thirty years ago, the theory of Th1/Th2 shift was usually used to explain the phenomenon of maternal immunotolerance since Th2-type immune responses are more dominant than the Th1-type ones, therefore protecting the fetus from maternal Th1-type immunity and providing proper fetal development [1]. In the 2000s, the Th1/Th2 thesis was completed into the Th1/Th2/Th17 and Regulatory T (Treg) cells paradigm [2], which added a more complex explanation about pregnancy-related immune regulation [3,4,5]. T-helper cells can be classified into Th1 cells, which produce interleukin IL-2, IL-10 IFN-γ and TNF-α/β and are involved in cellular immunity, Th2 cells, which produce IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 and are involved in humoral immunity and Th17 cells, which produce the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-17, play important roles for the induction of inflammation. Now, it is established that during the 1st trimester, Th1 immunity is predominant, and this controlled inflammation is required for the implantation processes and early development of the embryo. Turning to the 2nd trimester, Th2 immune responses will be dominant hence promoting fetal allograft tolerance and evoking a balance between the mother and the fetus. At the end of the pregnancy, Th1 immunity will be dominant again and play a significant role in the induction of labor [6]. This alternation of the Th1 and Th2 prevalence of the immune responses during pregnancy is primarily restricted to the materno-fetal interface, although our knowledge about the periphery is unclear.
The full activation of T cells depends on two different signals: signal one is derived from the interaction between antigenic peptide Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) on the surface of Antigen Presenting Cells (APCs) and the T cell receptor, and signal two requires antigen-independent co-signaling molecules. T cell activation is tightly regulated by co-stimulators or co-inhibitors known as immune checkpoints.
These immune checkpoint molecules are the key players in maintaining immunological homeostasis. These receptor-ligand interactions are provided by a co-activatory or/and co-inhibitory signal, which are crucial in optional T cell activation. Co-stimulatory signals through activating receptors can induce T cell proliferation and cytotoxic functions. At the same time, co-inhibitory checkpoint molecules could downregulate the effector cells, reduce their cytotoxicity or induce apoptosis.
Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1, CD279) is a transmembrane receptor that encoded by the PDCD1 gene [7] and a novel part of the B7− CD28 immunoglobulin family. PD-1 is one of the most investigated inhibitory receptors and primarily expressed on the surface of T-cells, B cells, monocytes, dendritic cells and Treg too [8,9]. Although under physiological conditions PD-1 expression can be constitutive on immature CD4− and CD8− thymocytes, activated CD4+ and CD8+T cells, B cells, monocytes, Natural Killer (NK) cells and Dendritic Cells (DCs) it can also be induced by different cytokines including IL-10 or TGF-b on APCs, myeloid DC and monocytes [10] as well as under different pathological conditions such as preeclampsia, chronic viral infections and cancer. Moreover, the high expression of PD-1 molecule is a characteristic of exhausted T cells [10,11]. On the other hand, PD-L1 expression which is constitutive in different host cells and immune cells including activated T and B cells, DCs and monocytes, can also be induced by different inflammatory cytokines and interferon INF-g [10,12], being highly expressed by different cancer cells. PD-1 mediated co-inhibitory signal is manifested after binding its ligand molecules PD-L1 (B7-H1; CD274) and PD-L2 (B7-DC; CD273). Both ligands are expressed on the surface of APCs, including macrophages and DCs while PD-L1 is present on resting T cells, B cells, endothelial- and epithelial cells [13,14]. Several tumor types also express PD-L1, including NSCLC, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma and gastric cancer [15,16,17]. The connection of PD-1 with PD-L1 results in an inhibition of the T cell activation hence can induce peripheral tolerance [18] or redound tumor immune escape mechanisms [19]. The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway plays an important role in the regulation of immune suppression via reduced T cell proliferation, induced T cell anergy and exhaustion, diminished cytokine production and increased Treg cell function [20].
Besides the extensive research in the field of tumor immunology in recent years, many studies have been published about the importance of PD-1 and PD-L1 in reproductive immunology. Several investigations, including ours, proved the presence of PD-1 receptors in the surface of decidual immune cells in the 1st trimester of healthy pregnancy [21,22]. Furthermore, other publications reported a sharp PD-L1 expression pattern in the outer side of the syncytiotrophoblast layer but not in the inner side as well as not on cytotrophoblasts [23,24]. Therefore the connection of PD-1 with PD-L1 can be assumed at the materno-fetal region, which could induce immune tolerance mechanisms against the fetus. Besides the membrane-bound receptor-ligand formation, soluble forms of sPD-L1 also can be a part of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway at the same time; sPD-1 can rather be a competitive inhibitor by blocking this interaction [25]. A recent pregnancy study reported an elevated sPD-L1 level in the serum of healthy pregnant women compared to nonpregnant women [26]. At the same time, another research published a higher sPD-1 level in women with preeclampsia [27]. Further investigations using murine pregnancy models revealed that the blockade of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 results in insufficient tolerance mechanisms accompanied by the upregulated T-cell response and reduced Treg function at the materno-fetal interface [28]. According to these findings, the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway could have an important role in the establishment of immune tolerance mechanisms at the materno-fetal interface.
NKG2D is an activating receptor present on all murine and human NK cells, which is constitutively expressed by human CD8+T cells and can also be expressed by NKT-like cells, γδ T cells and a small subgroup of CD4+T cells [29]. After binding to its ligands such as UL16 binding proteins (members of the ULBP family), or the MHC-class-related molecules A and B (MICA, MICB) it has a costimulatory function and contribute to the cytotoxic activity of these effector cells [30]. Numerous studies have investigated the importance of NKG2D receptor and ligands in pregnancy-related immunoregulation [31,32,33]. Furthermore, an increasing number of studies have found a connection between the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint pathway and the NKG2D activatory receptor. In a previous work, we demonstrated a high expression of NKG2D in the surface of decidual PD-1-positive CD8+T cells. We also found that the cytotoxic potential of decidual PD1/NKG2D double-positive CD8+T cells was significantly decreased compared to the peripheral counterparts [21].
Although numerous studies have examined the possible role of the PD-1 and PD-L1 immune checkpoint molecules related to healthy or pathological pregnancies, there is no available data about the expression pattern of these molecules in the periphery during human pregnancy. We aimed to investigate the peripheral PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint pathway and their possible relation with NKG2D throughout the three trimesters of a healthy human pregnancy and in the nonpregnant condition.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee aligned to the Medical School, University of Pecs (Ethical approval code: 6149-PTE 2019). The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. Informed written consent was obtained from each participating woman.

2.2. Participants and Sample Collection

To investigate the PD-1 and PD-L1 immune checkpoint molecules, 13 healthy women were involved from the first trimester, 10 from the second and 12 from the third trimester of pregnancy in cooperation with Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the University of Pecs (Table 1). Ten nonpregnant, healthy, age-matched women were also recruited to form the control group from the National Blood Bank, Regional Centre, Pecs. Under the EU-GDPR and due to the Privacy, Informational and Health data act, regulations, all personal and health-related data obtained about the donors during blood donation were processed anonymously, confidentially and securely, and were not provided to the research team for further demographic analysis. The health status of the participating women was identified: none of them had a significant medical history, were taking medications or had current or recent illnesses. All women affected by pregnancy-related complications and/or infection, prepregnancy disease, in vitro fertilization pregnancies, immune-associated disease, diabetes mellitus and AIDS were excluded.
Venous blood (10 mL) was taken in heparinized tubes and transported immediately to the laboratory for further investigations.
Statistical comparisons were made in R using one-way ANOVA tests. Data are shown as the mean value (range). Statistical differences among the investigated cohorts were not detected.

2.3. Lymphocyte Separation, Cryopreservation and Thawing

Using Ficoll-Paque (GE-Healthcare), density gradient peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from heparinized venous blood. Separated cell fractions were then washed in complete Rosewell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI) 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), counted and centrifuged. Cells were resuspended in inactivated human serum containing 10% DMSO for cryoprotection. Next, the cells were aliquoted in cryovials and stored in a −80 °C mechanical freezer. On the day of fluorescent cell labelling, the samples were thawed as quickly as possible in a 37 °C water bath, resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium and washed twice to remove the remaining DMSO content.

2.4. Antibodies

For flow cytometric analyses, surface and intracellular staining were performed from freshly thawed PBMC. The following monoclonal antibodies were used in recommended concentration according to the manufacturer: fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-human CD4 (Clone: RPA-T4, Cat. No.: 555346, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), FITC-conjugated anti-human CD107a (Clone H4A3, Cat. No.: 555800, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human PD-1 (Clone: PD1.3, Cat. No.: B30634, Beckmann-Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA), phycoerythrin/Cy7 (PE/Cy7)-conjugated anti-human NKG2D (Clone: 1D11, Cat. No.: 562365, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-human CD56 (Clone: B159, Cat. No.: 555518, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), APC-conjugated anti-human FoxP3 (Clone: 236A/E7, Cat. No.: 17-4777-42, eBioscience, Waltham, MA, USA), APC/H7-conjugated anti-human CD8 (Clone: SK1, Cat. No.: 560179, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), Brilliant Violet (BV)421-conjugated anti-human PD-L1 (Clone: MIH1, Cat. No.: 563738, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). The incubation time of the antibodies was 30 min, except anti-human CD107 (4 h) and anti-human FoxP3 (1 h).

2.5. Labelling Lymphocytes for Flow Cytometric Analysis

Briefly, the DMSO-free cell suspensions were incubated with a combination of fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies for 30 min in complete darkness. The cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed in 300 μL PBS containing 1% paraformaldehyde and stored at 4 °C in darkness until fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Multicolour flow cytometric measurements were performed by FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) equipped with the FACSDIVA V6. software program (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). Data analyses were performed with FCS Express V4 (De Novo Software, Pasadena, CA, USA).

2.6. CD107a Cytotoxicity Assay

To evaluate the cytotoxic activity by the CD8+T cells and NKT-like cells, surface expression of CD107a molecule was measured by flow cytometry. After DMSO removal PBMC were incubated in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS, penicillin and streptomycin (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland), ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and phorbol myristate acetate (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) in the presence of anti-human CD107a monoclonal antibody for 4 h at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. At the end of stimulation, the cells were washed in PBS, resuspended, then stained with anti-human CD3 and CD8 or anti-human CD3 and CD56 antibodies together with anti-human PD-1 and anti-human NKG2D antibodies for 30 min at room temperature in complete darkness. Finally, the cells were washed in PBS, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA), and analyzed by flow cytometry.

2.7. Intracellular Staining of Treg Cells

To examine the Treg cell population, intracellular FoxP3 transcription factor was labelled using the FoxP3 Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer protocol. Briefly, after the surface labelling, PBMC were permeabilized in 1 mL fixation/permeabilization buffer (concentrate/diluent 1:4) at 4 °C for 1 h in complete darkness. Next, the samples were washed twice in a staining buffer and stained with the anti-human FoxP3 monoclonal antibody at 4 °C for 1 h in darkness. Then the cells were washed twice again in the staining buffer, fixed with 1% PFA and evaluated by flow cytometry.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using R, version 3.5.3 [34]. Multiple comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA. PD-1 expression by CD8+ cells, PD-1 expression by NKT-like cells, PD-L1 expression by CD8+ cells, PD-L1 expression by NKT-like cells, percentage of PD-1+ CD8+T in PD-1+ cell population (%), percentage of PD-1+ NKT-like in PD-1+ cell population, percentage of PD-1+/PD-L1 double positive CD8+T cells (%), CD107a expression by PD-1+ CD8+T cells (%), CD107a expression by PD-1- CD8+T cells (%) and CD107a expression by PD-1+ NKT-like T cells (%) were loge transformed after graphical normality testing according to Crawley (2014) [35]. For pairwise comparisons Tukey post hoc tests were applied [36].
To test the relationship between PD1-PDL1 and PD1-NKG2D in each trimester, linear regression analyses were performed. Applicability of linear regression models were tested graphically using QQ-plots and residual plots. p values and coefficients of determination (R2) were calculated in R.

2.9. Results

Phenotype characteristics of different T cell subpopulations throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women.
The ratio of different immune cell subpopulations (CD3+T cells, CD4+T cells, CD8+T cells, Treg cells, and NKT-like cells) was measured using multicolour flow cytometry from the peripheral blood of healthy pregnant and nonpregnant women. Following the comparison of the percentage of the CD3+T, CD4+T, CD8+T, Treg and NKT-like cells, no significant difference was detected between the three trimesters of healthy pregnancy and nonpregnant status (Table 2).
Statistical comparisons were made in R using one-way ANOVA tests. The results were presented as the mean value ± SD. Statistical differences among the investigated cohorts were not detected.
PD-1 receptor and PD-L1 ligand expression by different T cell subpopulations throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women.
The surface expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 molecules by CD8+T cells, CD4+T cells, Treg cells and NKT-like cells was measured by multicolour flow cytometry.
Significantly elevated PD-1 expression was measured by the CD8+T cell subset in the nonpregnant cohort compared to the groups from the 1st and the 3rd trimester of pregnancy (Figure 1A). Furthermore, the expression level of the PD-1 receptor by CD8+T cells was significantly higher in 2nd trimester compared to the 1st trimester of pregnancy (Figure 1A). The PD-1 receptor expression by the other investigated subpopulations (CD4+T, Treg and NKT-like) statistically did not differ between pregnant and nonpregnant conditions (Figure 1B–D).
By examining the presence of PD-L1 molecule on the surface of CD8+T and CD4+T cells, a significant reduction was observed in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy compared to nonpregnant controls (Figure 2A,B). Moreover, in CD4+T cells significant difference in PD-L1 expression was observed between the 2nd and 3rd trimester of pregnancy (Figure 2B). Analyzing the ligand expression by Treg cells, significantly higher PD-L1 presence was revealed in the 1st and 2nd trimester of pregnancy compared to nonpregnant controls (Figure 2C). In the case of NKT-like cells, a significant difference was not observed among the investigated groups (Figure 2D).
By investigating the percentage of the PD-1+ CD8+T cells in the PD-1+ cell population, a significant reduction was observed during pregnancy compared to the nonpregnant control group (Figure 3A). Statistical difference in the percentage of the PD-1+ NKT-like cells in PD-1+ cell population was defined only between the 1st and 2nd trimester of pregnancy (Figure 3B). Significantly decreased PD-1/PD-L1 double-positive CD8+T cell subset ratio was also revealed in the 1st and 3rd trimester of pregnancy compared to nonpregnant women (Figure 3C).
Linear regression analyses of PD-1 receptor and PD-L1 ligand molecules on the surface of different T cell subpopulations throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women.
To reveal a possible relationship between the presence of PD-1 and PD-L1 on the surface of different T cell subsets, linear regression analyses were performed. In the case of CD8+T, CD4+T and NKT-like cells a positive relationship between the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was observed only in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy (Figure 4A–C) at the same time, we did not find any relationship in the case of the Treg cell population (Figure 4D).
Connection between NKG2D activator receptor and PD-1 inhibitory immune checkpoint receptor expression on CD8+T cells throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women.
By examining the NKG2D expression by the CD8+T cell population, no significant difference was detected between the investigated groups (Figure 5A). At the same time, significantly decreased activator receptor expression was measured by the PD-1+ CD8+T cells in the 1st and 3rd trimester of pregnancy compared to nonpregnant controls (Figure 5B). Furthermore, after a linear regression test, a negative relationship was observed between NKG2D and PD-1 receptor expression on the surface of CD8+T cells in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy only (Figure 5C).
Cytotoxic potential of peripheral PD-1 positive and negative CD8+T cells and NKT-like cells during pregnancy and in nonpregnant women.
By examining the CD107a expression by the PD-1 positive CD8+T cells, a significant decrease was observed in the 1st and 3rd trimester of pregnancy compared to the nonpregnant condition (Figure 6A), at the same time, a significant difference was detected in degranulation by the PD-1 negative CD8+T cells between the 3rd trimester and the nonpregnant group (Figure 6B). In the case of NKT-like cells, a statistical difference was not revealed in cytotoxicity by the PD-1 positive and negative subsets among the investigated groups (Figure 6C,D).
Linear regression of CD107a expression by PD-1 and NKG2D positive/negative subpopulations in CD8+T and NKT-like cells.
Analyzing the possible relationship between NKG2D activatory and PD-1 inhibitory receptors, a linear regression of the cytotoxic activity was measured by receptor-positive and negative CD8+T and NKT-like cells subpopulations.
Positive linear regression was observed between the cytotoxic activity of PD-1 positive and NKG2D positive CD8+T cells during the three trimesters of pregnancy but not in nonpregnant conditions (Figure 7A). A weaker relationship was detected in the cytotoxicity of PD-1 positive and NKG2D negative CD8+T cells only in the 1st and 2nd trimester of pregnancy (Figure 7B), while in the case of the CD107a expression by the PD-1 negative and NKG2D positive CD8+T subsets a stronger linear regression was determined during pregnancy but not in nonpregnant women (Figure 7C).
Similarly to CD8+T cells, a positive relationship was observed between the cytotoxic activity of the PD-1 positive and NKG2D positive NKT-like cell populations throughout pregnancy but not in the nonpregnant control group (Figure 8A). Examining the connection of the CD107a expression by PD-1 positive and NKG2D negative NKT-like cells, a weak positive relationship was observed only in the 2nd and 3rd trimester of pregnancy (Figure 8B). Moreover, strong positive linear regression was defined between the cytotoxicity in PD-1 negative and NKG2D positive NKT-like cells during the healthy pregnancy but not nonpregnant condition (Figure 8C).

3. Discussion

Immune checkpoint molecules are primarily investigated in tumor immunology, although notable literature exists about their importance in other fields of immunology like autoimmunity, transplant immunology or infection immunology. Although the knowledge about the immune checkpoint pathways in reproductive immunology is emerging, and mainly focusing on the materno-fetal interface, the exact role of these regulator molecules is still unknown, especially in the periphery. Our previous work is the only one to examine immune checkpoint molecules from peripheral blood during the three trimesters of a healthy pregnancy, revealing notable differences regarding the TIM-3/Gal-9 checkpoint inhibitor pathway, especially in NK cells [37]. Since only CD56dim NK cells express a high level of PD-1 receptor in 25% of healthy individuals, in this study, we focused only on different T cell populations, their PD-1/PD-L1 expression and its connection with the activatory receptor NKG2D.
After phenotypical analyses of PD-1 receptor, a significant difference was detected only in the case of CD8+T cells, which shows the importance of the inhibitory effect on cytotoxic T cells. A significant decrease regarding the expression of inhibitory PD-1 receptor in the 1st and 3rd trimester of pregnancy could be a part of the above-mentioned Th1 predominance in these trimesters. We hypothesize that the Th1 predominance could lead to the increase of PD-1 expression by CD8+T cells to a level seen in the 2nd trimester. For the implementation of the PD-1 mediated inhibitory effect, the presence of the ligand molecule is also crucial. We found a decrease of PD-L1 expression on the surface of CD4+T and CD8+T cells in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, which could affect the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway resulting in a Th1 predominance before and during delivery. Although, a recent publication revealed an increased soluble PD-L1 level in women from the 3rd trimester of pregnancy [38], which seems contradictory to our results. The source of circulating PD-L1 molecules could be either on placental trophoblast or from the surface of PD-L1 positive CD4+T and CD8+T cells, since it has not been defined in pregnancy yet [26,27,39,40]. The regulatory role of Treg cells during pregnancy is extensively investigated [41,42,43] hence the increased level of the PD-L1 molecule on the surface of Tregs in the 1st trimester of pregnancy in parallel with the elevated PD-L1 expression by decidual Treg cells [21,44], which could be part of the controlled inflammation process during implantation and early pregnancy. At the same time, the higher expression level of PD-L1 molecule by Treg cells in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy may help to maintain Th2 predominance by inhibiting the effector Th1 cells through binding to PD-1. In connection with these findings, an interesting relationship was revealed in the expression level of PD-1 and PD-L1 by the same cell surface only in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy. A recently published study considers a possible option that PD-L1/PD-1 cis interaction on the surface of T cells could trigger a signaling pathway in the absence of trans ligands or receptors [45]. A positive regression between PD-1 and PD-L1 could be a self-regulating mechanism by the surface of CD8+T, CD4+T and NKT-like cells, and may contribute to the Th2 character in the 2nd trimester.
To clarify the possible role of the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint pathway, a novel activatory receptor NKG2D was involved in our investigations, which is highly expressed on the surface of CD8+T and NKT-like cells and stable during pregnancy. A recent study published interesting data that a high level of circulating NKG2D ligands are associated with poor efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint therapy [46]. Hence we tested the connection between PD-1 and NKG2D receptors on the surface of CD8+T and NKT-like cells. Investigating the NKG2D receptor expression by CD8+T cells did not find any significant difference between the investigated groups. However a negative relationship was revealed between NKG2D and PD-1 receptors regarding CD8+T cells in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy. The increased PD-1 expression by the same CD8+T cell subset might relate to the Th2 predominance in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy.
After phenotypical examinations, CD107a degranulation assay was performed to collect further information about the functionality of PD-1 and NKG2D expressing CD8+T and NKT-like cells. A significantly decreased CD107a expression only by the PD-1 expressing CD8+T cells in 1st trimester of pregnancy may be a part of a compensatory mechanism via downregulating cytotoxic T cells maintaining the immunological balance in this Th1 mediated trimester. This study also found that PD-1-positive CD8+T cells showed a significant decrease in CD107a expression in the 1st and 3rd trimester of pregnancy compared to the nonpregnant condition while PD-1-negative CD8+T cells had a significantly decreased degranulation only in the 3rd trimester compared to the nonpregnant group. The decreased cytotoxic potential regarding PD-1-positive CD8+T cells could be partly explained by their exhaustion. A strong positive relationship in the cytotoxicity of PD-1- and NKG2D-positive CD8+T cells during pregnancy may indicate the importance of the CD107a degranulation in maternal immune regulation, although it seems independent from PD-1 or NKG2D expression in the periphery. Nevertheless, cytotoxic activity showed a really strong regression between the PD-1-negative and NKG2D-positive CD8+T cells, which might relate to maternal immune responses toward the presence of paternal antigens.
In summary, our results about the peripheral expression of PD-1, PD-L1 and the connection with NKG2D, primarily in the case of CD8+T and NKT-like cells, could contribute to the changes of the Th1/Th2/Th1 predominance and can help to maintain maternal immunotolerance in the periphery too.

Author Contributions

M.M. conceptualization, resources, methodology, investigation, writing—original draft; D.U.N. formal analysis, visualization; L.S. conceptualization, resources, writing—review and editing, supervision. The final version of the manuscript for submission was approved by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH K119529) and grants from the University of Pecs (KA-2018-07).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the women who participated in the study. The research was performed in collaboration with the Flow Cytometry Core Facility at the Szentágothai Research Centre of the University of Pécs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wegmann, T.G.; Lin, H.; Guilbert, L.; Mosmann, T.R. Bidirectional cytokine interactions in the maternal-fetal relationship: Is successful pregnancy a TH2 phenomenon? Immunol. Today 1993, 14, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peck, A.; Mellins, E.D. Plasticity of T-cell phenotype and function: The T helper type 17 example. Immunology 2010, 129, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Saito, S.; Nakashima, A.; Shima, T.; Ito, M. Th1/Th2/Th17 and Regulatory T-Cell Paradigm in Pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nakashima, A.; Ito, M.; Yoneda, S.; Shiozaki, A.; Hidaka, T.; Saito, S. Circulating and decidual Th17 cell levels in healthy pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Polese, B.; Gridelet, V.; Araklioti, E.; Martens, H.; D’Hauterive, S.P.; Geenen, V. The endocrine milieu and CD4 T-lymphocyte polarization during pregnancy. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2014, 5, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Dutta, S.; Sengupta, P. Defining pregnancy phases with cytokine shift. J. Pregnancy Reprod. 2017, 1, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ceeraz, S.; Nowak, E.C.; Noelle, R.J. B7 family checkpoint regulators in immune regulation and disease. Trends Immunol. 2013, 34, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Keir, M.E.; Butte, M.J.; Freeman, G.J.; Sharpe, A.H. PD-1 and Its Ligands in Tolerance and Immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 26, 677–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Francisco, L.M.; Salinas, V.H.; Brown, K.E.; Vanguri, V.K.; Freeman, G.J.; Kuchroo, V.K.; Sharpe, A.H. PD-L1 regulates the development, maintenance, and function of induced regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 3015–3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seliger, B. Basis of PD1/PD-L1 Therapies. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kula, A.; Dawidowicz, M.; Kiczmer, P.; Seńkowska, A.P.; Świętochowska, E. The role of genetic polymorphism within PD-L1 gene in cancer. Review. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2020, 116, 104494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pesce, S.; Greppi, M.; Grossi, F.; Del Zotto, G.; Moretta, L.; Sivori, S.; Genova, C.; Marcenaro, E. PD/1-PD-Ls checkpoint: Insight on the potential role of NK cells. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Latchman, Y.; Wood, C.R.; Chernova, T.; Chaudhary, D.; Borde, M.; Chernova, I.; Iwai, Y.; Long, A.J.; Brown, J.A.; Nunes, R.; et al. PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD-1 and inhibits T cell activation. Nat. Immunol. 2001, 2, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Grabie, N.; Gotsman, I.; DaCosta, R.; Pang, H.; Stavrakis, G.; Butte, M.J.; Keir, M.E.; Freeman, G.J.; Sharpe, A.H.; Lichtman, A.H. Endothelial programmed death-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) regulates CD8+ T-cell mediated injury in the heart. Circulation 2007, 116, 2062–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. He, J.; Hu, Y.; Hu, M.; Li, B. Development of PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway in Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Spranger, S.; Spaapen, R.M.; Zha, Y.; Williams, J.; Meng, Y.; Ha, T.T.; Gajewski, T.F. Up-regulation of PD-L1, IDO, and Tregs in the melanoma tumor microenvironment is driven by CD8+ T cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 200ra116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Thompson, R.H.; Gillett, M.D.; Cheville, J.C.; Lohse, C.M.; Dong, H.; Webster, W.S.; Chen, L.; Zincke, H.; Blute, M.L.; Leibovich, B.C.; et al. Costimulatory molecule B7-H1 in primary and metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 2005, 104, 2084–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Catakovic, K.; Klieser, E.; Neureiter, D.; Geisberger, R. T cell exhaustion: From pathophysiological basics to tumor immunotherapy. Cell Commun. Signal. 2017, 15, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Li, J.; Jie, H.B.; Lei, Y.; Gildener-Leapman, N.; Trivedi, S.; Green, T.; Kane, L.P.; Ferris, R.L. PD-1/SHP-2 inhibits Tc1/Th1 phenotypic responses and the activation of t cells in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 508–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ghiotto, M.; Gauthier, L.; Serriari, N.; Pastor, S.; Truneh, A.; Nunès, J.A.; Olive, D. PD-L1 and PD-L2 differ in their molecular mechanisms of interaction with PD-1. Int. Immunol. 2010, 22, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meggyes, M.; Miko, E.; Szigeti, B.; Farkas, N.; Szereday, L. The importance of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway at the maternal-fetal interface. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019, 19, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Habicht, A.; Dada, S.; Jurewicz, M.; Fife, B.T.; Yagita, H.; Azuma, M.; Sayegh, M.H.; Guleria, I. A Link between PDL1 and T Regulatory Cells in Fetomaternal Tolerance. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 5211–5219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Veras, E.; Kurman, R.J.; Wang, T.L.; Shih, I.M. PD-L1 expression in human placentas and gestational trophoblastic diseases. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2017, 36, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Holets, L.M.; Hunt, J.S.; Petroff, M.G. Trophoblast CD274 (B7-H1) is differentially expressed across gestation: Influence of oxygen concentration. Biol. Reprod. 2006, 74, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Amancha, P.K.; Hong, J.J.; Rogers, K.; Ansari, A.A.; Villinger, F. In vivo blockade of the programmed cell death-1 pathway using soluble recombinant PD-1-Fc enhances CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses but has limited clinical benefit. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 6060–6070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Enninga, E.A.L.; Harrington, S.M.; Creedon, D.J.; Ruano, R.; Markovic, S.N.; Dong, H.; Dronca, R.S. Immune checkpoint molecules soluble program death ligand 1 and galectin-9 are increased in pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 79, e12795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gu, Y.; Morgan, J.; Lewis, D.F.; Cooper, D.B.; McCathran, C.E.; Wang, Y. Maternal soluble PD-1 levels are significantly increased in women with preeclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2020, 83, e13193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, Y.-Y.; Wang, S.-C.; Li, D.-J.; Du, M.-R. Co-Signaling Molecules in Maternal-Fetal Immunity. Trends Mol. Med. 2017, 23, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prajapati, K.; Perez, C.; Rojas, L.B.P.; Burke, B.; Guevara-Patino, J.A. Functions of NKG2D in CD8+ T cells: An opportunity for immunotherapy. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 15, 470–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wensveen, F.M.; Jelenčić, V.; Polić, B. NKG2D: A master regulator of immune cell responsiveness. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vinnars, M.-T.; Björk, E.; Nagaev, I.; Ottander, U.; Bremme, K.; Holmlund, U.; Sverremark-Ekström, E.; Mincheva-Nilsson, L. Enhanced Th1 and inflammatory mRNA responses upregulate NK cell cytotoxicity and NKG2D ligand expression in human pre-eclamptic placenta and target it for NK cell attack. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 80, e12969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cox, S.T.; Danby, R.; Hernandez, D.; Alejandro Madrigal, J.; Saudemont, A. Functional characterisation and analysis of the soluble NKG2D ligand repertoire detected in umbilical cord blood plasma. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mincheva-Nilsson, L.; Nagaeva, O.; Chen, T.; Stendahl, U.; Antsiferova, J.; Mogren, I.; Hernestål, J.; Baranov, V. Placenta-derived soluble MHC class I chain-related molecules down-regulate NKG2D receptor on peripheral blood mononuclear cells during human pregnancy: A possible novel immune escape mechanism for fetal survival. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 3585–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 29 July 2020).
  35. Crawley, M.J. Statistics: An Introduction Using R; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; ISBN 9781118941096. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hothorn, T.; Bretz, F.; Westfall, P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom. J. 2008, 50, 346–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Meggyes, M.; Miko, E.; Polgar, B.; Bogar, B.; Farkas, B.; Illes, Z.; Szereday, L. Peripheral blood TIM-3 Positive NK and CD8+ T cells throughout pregnancy: TIM-3/Galectin-9 interaction and its possible role during pregnancy. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Okuyama, M.; Mezawa, H.; Kawai, T.; Urashima, M. Elevated Soluble PD-L1 in Pregnant Women’s Serum Suppresses the Immune Reaction. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Tominaga, T.; Akiyoshi, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Taguchi, S.; Mori, S.; Nagasaki, T.; Fukunaga, Y.; Ueno, M. Clinical significance of soluble programmed cell death-1 and soluble programmed cell death-ligand 1 in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ha, H.; Nam, A.R.; Bang, J.H.; Park, J.E.; Kim, T.Y.; Lee, K.H.; Han, S.W.; Im, S.A.; Kim, T.Y.; Bang, Y.J.; et al. Soluble programmed death-ligand 1 (sPDL1) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts survival in advanced biliary tract cancer patients treated with palliative chemotherapy. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 76604–76612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Figueiredo, A.S.; Schumacher, A. The T helper type 17/regulatory T cell paradigm in pregnancy. Immunology 2016, 148, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Tsuda, S.; Nakashima, A.; Shima, T.; Saito, S. New paradigm in the role of regulatory T cells during pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ruocco, M.G.; Chaouat, G.; Florez, L.; Bensussan, A.; Klatzmann, D. Regulatory T-cells in pregnancy: Historical perspective, state of the art, and burning questions. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Li, G.; Lu, C.; Gao, J.; Wang, X.; Wu, H.; Lee, C.; Xing, B.; Zhang, Q. Association between PD-1/PD-l1 and T regulate cells in early recurrent miscarriage. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 6512–6518. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Zhao, Y.; Harrison, D.L.; Song, Y.; Ji, J.; Huang, J.; Hui, E. Antigen-Presenting Cell-Intrinsic PD-1 Neutralizes PD-L1 in cis to Attenuate PD-1 Signaling in T Cells. Cell Rep. 2018, 24, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. López-Soto, A.; Gonzalez, S.; Galluzzi, L. Soluble NKG2D ligands limit the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade. Oncoimmunology 2017, 6, e1346766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 09 02536 g001 550
Figure 1. PD-1 receptor expression by different T cell throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. The expression of PD-1 molecule by CD8+T cell (A), CD4+T (B), Regulatory T (Treg) (C) and NKT-like (D) subpopulations. The solid bars represent medians of 10, 13, 10 and 12 samples, the boxes indicate the interquartile ranges and the lines show the most extreme observations. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-values ≤ 0.05. Variables with the same letter indicate no statistically significant difference, while different letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Figure 1. PD-1 receptor expression by different T cell throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. The expression of PD-1 molecule by CD8+T cell (A), CD4+T (B), Regulatory T (Treg) (C) and NKT-like (D) subpopulations. The solid bars represent medians of 10, 13, 10 and 12 samples, the boxes indicate the interquartile ranges and the lines show the most extreme observations. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-values ≤ 0.05. Variables with the same letter indicate no statistically significant difference, while different letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Jcm 09 02536 g001
Jcm 09 02536 g002 550
Figure 2. PD-L1 ligand expression by different T cell subpopulations throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. The expression of PD-L1 molecule by CD8+T cell (A), CD4+T (B), Treg (C) and NKT-like (D) subpopulations. The solid bars represent medians of 10, 13, 10 and 12 samples, the boxes indicate the interquartile ranges, and the lines show the most extreme observations. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-values ≤ 0.05. Variables with the same letter indicate no statistically significant difference, while different letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Figure 2. PD-L1 ligand expression by different T cell subpopulations throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. The expression of PD-L1 molecule by CD8+T cell (A), CD4+T (B), Treg (C) and NKT-like (D) subpopulations. The solid bars represent medians of 10, 13, 10 and 12 samples, the boxes indicate the interquartile ranges, and the lines show the most extreme observations. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-values ≤ 0.05. Variables with the same letter indicate no statistically significant difference, while different letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Jcm 09 02536 g002
Jcm 09 02536 g003 550
Figure 3. Percentage of PD-1+ immune cell subpopulations in PD-1+ cells and the percentage of PD-1/PD-L1 double-positive CD8+T cells throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. The percentage of the PD-1+ CD8+T cells (A) and PD-1+ NKT-like (B) cells in the PD-1+ cell population (A) and the percentage of PD-1+/PD-L1 double-positive CD8+T cells (C) The solid bars represent medians of 10, 13, 10 and 12 samples, the boxes indicate the interquartile ranges, and the lines show the most extreme observations. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-values ≤ 0.05. Variables with the same letter indicate no statistically significant difference, while different letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Figure 3. Percentage of PD-1+ immune cell subpopulations in PD-1+ cells and the percentage of PD-1/PD-L1 double-positive CD8+T cells throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. The percentage of the PD-1+ CD8+T cells (A) and PD-1+ NKT-like (B) cells in the PD-1+ cell population (A) and the percentage of PD-1+/PD-L1 double-positive CD8+T cells (C) The solid bars represent medians of 10, 13, 10 and 12 samples, the boxes indicate the interquartile ranges, and the lines show the most extreme observations. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-values ≤ 0.05. Variables with the same letter indicate no statistically significant difference, while different letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Jcm 09 02536 g003
Jcm 09 02536 g004 550
Figure 4. Relationship between the PD-1 receptor and the PD-L1 ligand on the surface of different T cell throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. Linear regression analyses between the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 surface molecules in CD8+T cells (A), CD4+T cells (B), NKT-like cells (C) and Treg cells (D) in women during healthy pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. p values and coefficients of determination (R2) were calculated in R.
Figure 4. Relationship between the PD-1 receptor and the PD-L1 ligand on the surface of different T cell throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. Linear regression analyses between the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 surface molecules in CD8+T cells (A), CD4+T cells (B), NKT-like cells (C) and Treg cells (D) in women during healthy pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. p values and coefficients of determination (R2) were calculated in R.
Jcm 09 02536 g004
Jcm 09 02536 g005 550
Figure 5. Connection between NKG2D activator receptor and PD-1 inhibitory immune checkpoint receptor expression on CD8+T cells throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. The surface expression of NKG2D receptor by CD8+T cells (A) and PD-1+ CD8+T cells (B). The solid bars represent medians of 10, 13, 10 and 12 samples, the boxes indicate the interquartile ranges and the lines show the most extreme observations. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-values ≤ 0.05, Variables with the same letter indicate no statistically significant difference, while different letters indicate a statistically significant difference. Linear regression analyses between PD-1 and NKG2D surface receptor expressions by CD8+T cells (C) in women during healthy pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. p values and coefficients of determination (R2) were calculated in R.
Figure 5. Connection between NKG2D activator receptor and PD-1 inhibitory immune checkpoint receptor expression on CD8+T cells throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. The surface expression of NKG2D receptor by CD8+T cells (A) and PD-1+ CD8+T cells (B). The solid bars represent medians of 10, 13, 10 and 12 samples, the boxes indicate the interquartile ranges and the lines show the most extreme observations. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-values ≤ 0.05, Variables with the same letter indicate no statistically significant difference, while different letters indicate a statistically significant difference. Linear regression analyses between PD-1 and NKG2D surface receptor expressions by CD8+T cells (C) in women during healthy pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. p values and coefficients of determination (R2) were calculated in R.
Jcm 09 02536 g005
Jcm 09 02536 g006 550
Figure 6. Cytotoxic activity of peripheral PD-1 positive and negative CD8+T cells and NKT-like cells throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. The expression of CD107a molecule by PD-1 positive (A), PD-1 negative (B) CD8+T cells and PD-1 positive (C), PD-1 negative (D) NKT-like cells. The solid bars represent medians of 10, 13, 10 and 12 samples, respectively, the boxes indicate the interquartile ranges and the lines show the most extreme observations. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-values ≤ 0.05. Variables with the same letter indicate no statistically significant difference, while different letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Figure 6. Cytotoxic activity of peripheral PD-1 positive and negative CD8+T cells and NKT-like cells throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. The expression of CD107a molecule by PD-1 positive (A), PD-1 negative (B) CD8+T cells and PD-1 positive (C), PD-1 negative (D) NKT-like cells. The solid bars represent medians of 10, 13, 10 and 12 samples, respectively, the boxes indicate the interquartile ranges and the lines show the most extreme observations. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-values ≤ 0.05. Variables with the same letter indicate no statistically significant difference, while different letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Jcm 09 02536 g006
Jcm 09 02536 g007 550
Figure 7. The regression of the CD107a expression by PD-1 and NKG2D positive/negative subpopulations in CD8+T cells throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. Linear regression analyses between the CD107a expression by the PD-1+/NKG2D+ (A), PD-1+/NKG2D− (B) and PD-1−/NKG2D+ (C) subpopulations in CD8+T cells in women during healthy pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. p values and coefficients of determination (R2) were calculated in R.
Figure 7. The regression of the CD107a expression by PD-1 and NKG2D positive/negative subpopulations in CD8+T cells throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. Linear regression analyses between the CD107a expression by the PD-1+/NKG2D+ (A), PD-1+/NKG2D− (B) and PD-1−/NKG2D+ (C) subpopulations in CD8+T cells in women during healthy pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. p values and coefficients of determination (R2) were calculated in R.
Jcm 09 02536 g007
Jcm 09 02536 g008 550
Figure 8. Regression analyses of the CD107a expression by PD-1 and NKG2D positive/negative subpopulations in NKT-like cells throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. Linear regression analyses between the CD107a expression by the PD-1+/NKG2D+ (A), PD-1+/NKG2D− (B) and PD-1−/NKG2D+ (C) subpopulations in NKT-like cells in women during healthy pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. p values and coefficients of determination (R2) were calculated in R.
Figure 8. Regression analyses of the CD107a expression by PD-1 and NKG2D positive/negative subpopulations in NKT-like cells throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. Linear regression analyses between the CD107a expression by the PD-1+/NKG2D+ (A), PD-1+/NKG2D− (B) and PD-1−/NKG2D+ (C) subpopulations in NKT-like cells in women during healthy pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. p values and coefficients of determination (R2) were calculated in R.
Jcm 09 02536 g008
Table
Table 1. Gynecological and demographic data of the participating women.
Table 1. Gynecological and demographic data of the participating women.
Nonpregnant1st Trimester2nd Trimester3rd Trimester
No. of women10131012
Age (years)31 (19–44)29 (20–34)30 (26–35)33.5 (26–43)
Gestation age at sampling (weeks)-12.09 (11–14)26.18 (25–28)36.00 (35–37)
Gestation age at birth (weeks)-37.55 (36–41)39.11 (38–41)38.80 (37–41)
Gravidity-2.701.913.00
Parity-1.601.001.00
Table
Table 2. Phenotype characteristics of peripheral blood mononuclear cell populations throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women.
Table 2. Phenotype characteristics of peripheral blood mononuclear cell populations throughout pregnancy and in nonpregnant women.
Nonpregnant1st Trimester2nd Trimester3rd Trimester
CD3+T cells63.06 ± 8.6567.36 ± 6.8166.14 ± 7.6670.77 ± 9.68
CD8+T cells20.91 ± 5.4223.18 ± 5.7718.51 ± 3.6623.21 ± 8.38
CD4+T cells36.07 ± 8.3835.50 ± 7.8940.41 ± 8.7342.15 ± 9.67
Treg cells2.19 ± 0.771.71 ± 0.792.75 ± 1.562.66 ± 1.38
NKT-like cells3.55 ± 3.373.74 ± 2.152.34 ± 1.062.52 ± 2.01

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meggyes, M.; Nagy, D.U.; Szereday, L. Investigation of the PD-1 and PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Molecules Throughout Healthy Human Pregnancy and in Nonpregnant Women. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2536. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082536

AMA Style

Meggyes M, Nagy DU, Szereday L. Investigation of the PD-1 and PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Molecules Throughout Healthy Human Pregnancy and in Nonpregnant Women. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(8):2536. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082536

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meggyes, Matyas, David U. Nagy, and Laszlo Szereday. 2020. "Investigation of the PD-1 and PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Molecules Throughout Healthy Human Pregnancy and in Nonpregnant Women" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 8: 2536. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082536

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop