Next Article in Journal
Osteoarthritis Changes Hip Geometry and Biomechanics Regardless of Bone Mineral Density—A Quantitative Computed Tomography Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Machine Learning Application for Rupture Risk Assessment in Small-Sized Intracranial Aneurysm
Previous Article in Journal
Association between CT-Measured Abdominal Skeletal Muscle Mass and Pulmonary Function
Previous Article in Special Issue
Developing a Diagnostic Decision Support System for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Using a Deep-Learning Model
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Severe Complications after Bariatric Surgery

1
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, 70182 Örebro, Sweden
2
Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
3
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182 Örebro, Sweden
4
Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, 18288 Stockholm, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(5), 668; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050668
Received: 3 April 2019 / Revised: 8 May 2019 / Accepted: 10 May 2019 / Published: 12 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Medicine)
  |  
PDF [4017 KB, uploaded 14 May 2019]
  |  

Abstract

Background: Severe obesity is a global public health threat of growing proportions. Accurate models to predict severe postoperative complications could be of value in the preoperative assessment of potential candidates for bariatric surgery. So far, traditional statistical methods have failed to produce high accuracy. We aimed to find a useful machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict the risk for severe complication after bariatric surgery. Methods: We trained and compared 29 supervised ML algorithms using information from 37,811 patients that operated with a bariatric surgical procedure between 2010 and 2014 in Sweden. The algorithms were then tested on 6250 patients operated in 2015. We performed the synthetic minority oversampling technique tackling the issue that only 3% of patients experienced severe complications. Results: Most of the ML algorithms showed high accuracy (>90%) and specificity (>90%) in both the training and test data. However, none of the algorithms achieved an acceptable sensitivity in the test data. We also tried to tune the hyperparameters of the algorithms to maximize sensitivity, but did not yet identify one with a high enough sensitivity that can be used in clinical praxis in bariatric surgery. However, a minor, but perceptible, improvement in deep neural network (NN) ML was found. Conclusion: In predicting the severe postoperative complication among the bariatric surgery patients, ensemble algorithms outperform base algorithms. When compared to other ML algorithms, deep NN has the potential to improve the accuracy and it deserves further investigation. The oversampling technique should be considered in the context of imbalanced data where the number of the interested outcome is relatively small. View Full-Text
Keywords: machine learning; bariatric surgery; severe complication; prediction; comparative study machine learning; bariatric surgery; severe complication; prediction; comparative study
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, Y.; Fang, X.; Ottosson, J.; Näslund, E.; Stenberg, E. A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Severe Complications after Bariatric Surgery. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 668.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Clin. Med. EISSN 2077-0383 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top