Next Article in Journal
Alternative Erythropoietin Receptors in the Nervous System
Next Article in Special Issue
Update on the Non-Pharmacological Management of Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Incidence Trends in the United States (2000–2014)
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperReview
J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7(2), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7020023

Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Rationale, Implementation, Case Selection and Limitations of Current Technology

Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 19 December 2017 / Revised: 14 January 2018 / Accepted: 17 January 2018 / Published: 30 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Interventional Cardiology and Vascular Medicine)
Full-Text   |   PDF [3984 KB, uploaded 5 February 2018]   |  

Abstract

Interventional cardiologists have witnessed an explosive growth in the field. A wide array of percutaneous procedures allow us to treat numerous cardiac conditions less invasively. However, the way we work has changed very little over the past decades. We continue to stand at the tableside for prolonged periods of time, exposing ourselves to the very real risks of radiation exposure as well as to the associated orthopedic injuries from radiation protection. The precision of our procedures is limited by the distance from the fluoroscopic images and, furthermore, patients are potentially at risk from operator fatigue caused by a physician standing at the table for prolonged periods while wearing cumbersome radiation protection gear. Robotic-assisted coronary intervention removes the operator from the radiation field and has been shown to markedly reduce operator exposure as well as allow for more precise positioning of balloons and stents. This technology holds great promise for making interventional procedures safer and more comfortable for the operators as well as reducing fatigue, potentially improving patient outcomes. Currently, we are in an ‘early adopter’ phase of this technology and this paper reviews the rationale, methodology, optimal case selection, and limitations of robotic-assisted coronary intervention. View Full-Text
Keywords: coronary intervention; robotics; coronary artery disease; radiation exposure; occupational hazards coronary intervention; robotics; coronary artery disease; radiation exposure; occupational hazards
Figures

Figure 1a

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ragosta, M.; Singh, K.P. Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Rationale, Implementation, Case Selection and Limitations of Current Technology. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 23.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Clin. Med. EISSN 2077-0383 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top