Three-Year Outcomes and Safety of the XEN63 Gel Stent: A Multicenter Prospective Study in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Study Population and Eligibility Criteria
2.3. Surgical Technique
2.4. Follow-Up Schedule
2.5. Outcome Definitions
2.6. Study Groups
2.7. Study Outcomes
2.8. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Study Sample
3.2. Preoperative Demographic and Clinical Characteristics
3.3. Surgical Success
3.4. Intraocular Pressure
3.5. Ocular Hypotensive Treatment
3.6. Best Corrected Visual Acuity
3.7. Risk Factors
3.8. Safety Outcomes
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| BCVA | best corrected visual acuity |
| IOP | Intraocular pressure |
| LFUV | Last-follow-up visit |
| MIBS | Minimally invasive bleb-forming surgery |
| MIGS | Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery |
| MMC | Mitomycin-C |
| POAG | Primary open-angle glaucoma |
References
- Tham, Y.C.; Li, X.; Wong, T.Y.; Quigley, H.A.; Aung, T.; Cheng, C.Y. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014, 121, 2081–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayaram, H.; Kolko, M.; Friedman, D.S.; Gazzard, G. Glaucoma: Now and beyond. Lancet 2023, 402, 1788–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pazos, M.; Traverso, C.E.; Viswanathan, A.; European Glaucoma Society. European Glaucoma Society—Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma, 6th Edition. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2025, 109, 1–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heijl, A.; Leske, M.C.; Bengtsson, B.; Hyman, L.; Bengtsson, B.; Hussein, M.; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: Results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2002, 120, 1268–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boland, M.V.; Ervin, A.M.; Friedman, D.S.; Jampel, H.D.; Hawkins, B.S.; Vollenweider, D.; Chelladurai, Y.; Ward, D.; Suarez-Cuervo, C.; Robinson, K.A. Comparative effectiveness of treatments for open-angle glaucoma: A systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med. 2013, 158, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lichter, P.R.; Musch, D.C.; Gillespie, B.W.; Guire, K.E.; Janz, N.K.; Wren, P.A.; Mills, R.P.; CIGTS Study Group. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology 2001, 108, 1943–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Newman-Casey, P.A.; Robin, A.L.; Blachley, T.; Farris, K.; Heisler, M.; Resnicow, K.; Lee, P.P. The most common barriers to glaucoma medication adherence: A cross-sectional survey. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 1308–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Landers, J.; Martin, K.; Sarkies, N.; Bourne, R.; Watson, P. A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: Risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 694–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinod, K.; Gedde, S.J.; Feuer, W.J.; Panarelli, J.F.; Chang, T.C.; Chen, P.P.; Parrish, R.K., 2nd. Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery: A survey of the American Glaucoma Society. J. Glaucoma 2017, 26, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jampel, H.D.; Musch, D.C.; Gillespie, B.W.; Lichter, P.R.; Wright, M.M.; Guire, K.E.; Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study Group. Perioperative complications of trabeculectomy in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS). Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2005, 140, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gedde, S.J.; Herndon, L.W.; Brandt, J.D.; Budenz, D.L.; Feuer, W.J.; Schiffman, J.C.; Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Postoperative complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 153, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bar-David, L.; Blumenthal, E.Z. Evolution of glaucoma surgery in the last 25 years. Rambam Maimonides Med. J. 2018, 9, e0024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abegão Pinto, L.; Sunaric Mégevand, G.; Stalmans, I.; Azuara-Blanco, A.; Bron, A.; Garcia Feijoo, J.; Garway Heath, T.; Grehn, F.; King, A.; Kirwan, J.; et al. European Glaucoma Society—A guide on surgical innovation for glaucoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 107, 1–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lewis, R.A. Ab interno approach to the subconjunctival space using a collagen glaucoma stent. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2014, 40, 1301–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shute, T.S.; Dietrich, U.M.; Baker, J.F.; Carmichael, K.P.; Wustenberg, W.; Ahmed, I.I.; Sheybani, A. Biocompatibility of a novel microfistula implant in nonprimate mammals for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 3594–3600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussein, I.M.; De Francesco, T.; Ahmed, I.I.K. Intermediate outcomes of the novel 63-μm gelatin microstent versus the conventional 45-μm gelatin microstent. Ophthalmol. Glaucoma 2023, 6, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fea, A.M.; Menchini, M.; Rossi, A.; Posarelli, C.; Malinverni, L.; Figus, M. Early experience with the new XEN63 implant in primary open-angle glaucoma patients: Clinical outcomes. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fea, A.M.; Menchini, M.; Rossi, A.; Posarelli, C.; Malinverni, L.; Figus, M. Outcomes of XEN 63 device at 18-month follow-up in glaucoma patients: A two-center retrospective study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evers, C.; Böhringer, D.; Kallee, S.; Keye, P.; Philippin, H.; Piotrowski, T.; Reinhard, T.; Lübke, J. XEN®-63 compared to XEN®-45 gel stents to reduce intraocular pressure in glaucoma. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voykov, B.; Nasyrov, E.; Neubauer, J.; Gassel, C.J. New XEN63 gel stent implantation in open-angle glaucoma: A two-year follow-up pilot study. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2023, 17, 2243–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-de-la-Casa, J.M.; Marcos-Parra, M.T.; Millá-Griñó, E.; Laborda, T.; Giménez-Gomez, R.; Larrosa, J.M.; Urcola, A.; Teus, M.Á.; Perucho-Martínez, S. Effectiveness and safety of XEN63 in patients with primary-open-angle glaucoma. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 4561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertolani, Y.; Rigo-Quera, J.; Sánchez-Vela, L.; Pujol-Carreras, O.; Amilburu, M.; Dou, A.; Castany, M. Efficacy and safety of open-conjunctiva ab externo 63 µm vs. 45 µm XEN® gel stent in glaucoma surgery: One-year follow-up. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sacchi, M.; Giammaria, S.; Roberti, G.; Tomaselli, D.; Monsellato, G.; Agnifili, L.; Posarelli, C.; Abbruzzese, G.; Ronchi, L.; Tatti, F.; et al. Efficacy and safety of XEN63 gel stent implant over 6 months for treatment of glaucoma. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Glaucoma Association. The Global Glaucoma Network. Guidelines on Design & Reporting Glaucoma Trials. Available online: https://wga.one/wpfd_file/guidelines-on-design-reporting-glaucoma-trials/ (accessed on 5 April 2026).
- Lo, P.F.; Lim, S.T.; Wang, X.; Wong, T.T. Current Challenges of Managing Fibrosis Post Glaucoma Surgery and Future Perspectives. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 8548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lenzhofer, M.; Kersten-Gomez, I.; Sheybani, A.; Gulamhusein, H.; Strohmaier, C.; Hohensinn, M.; Burkhard Dick, H.; Hitzl, W.; Eisenkopf, L.; Sedarous, F.; et al. Four-year results of a minimally invasive transscleral glaucoma gel stent implantation in a prospective multi-centre study. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2019, 47, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lavin-Dapena, C.; Cordero-Ros, R.; D’Anna, O.; Mogollón, I. XEN 63 gel stent device in glaucoma surgery: A 5-years follow-up prospective study. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 31, 1829–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Betzler, B.K.; Lim, S.Y.; Lim, B.A.; Yip, V.C.H.; Ang, B.C.H. Complications and post-operative interventions in XEN45 gel stent implantation in the treatment of open angle glaucoma—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye 2023, 37, 1047–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gan, L.; Wang, L.; Chen, J.; Tang, L. Complications of XEN gel stent implantation for the treatment of glaucoma: A systematic review. Front. Med. 2024, 11, 1360051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Overall (n = 85) | XEN Alone (n = 46) | XEN + Phaco (n = 39) | p a | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 0.0610 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 71.5 (10.0) | 73.4 (9.5) | 69.3 (10.3) | |
| Median (IqR) | 72.0 (66.0 to 78.0) | 74.0 (69.0 to 78.8) | 71.0 (66.0 to 75.8) | |
| Sex, n (%) | 0.8299 b | |||
| Women | 38 (44.7) | 20 (43.5) | 18 (46.2) | |
| Men | 47 (55.3) | 26 (56.5) | 21 (53.8) | |
| Race, n (%) | 1.0000 b | |||
| Caucasian | 85 (100.0) | 46 (100.0) | 39 (100.0) | |
| Eye, n (%) | 0.0836 b | |||
| Right | 44 (51.8) | 28 (60.9) | 16 (41.0) | |
| Left | 41 (48.2) | 18 (39.1) | 23 (59.0) | |
| Comorbidities *, n (%) | 0.9695 c | |||
| None | 44 (51.8) | 21 (45.7) | 23 (59.0) | |
| HBP | 17 (20.0) | 9 (19.6) | 8 (20.5) | |
| Dyslipidemia | 25 (29.4) | 12 (26.1) | 13 (33.3) | |
| DM | 11 (12.9) | 6 (13.0) | 5 (12.8) | |
| CVD | 6 (7.1) | 4 (8.7) | 2 (5.1) | |
| Respiratory diseases | 3 (3.5) | 1 (2.2) | 2 (5.1) | |
| Other | 15 (17.7) | 7 (15.2) | 8 (20.5) | |
| Glaucoma type, n (%) | 1.0000 b | |||
| POAG | 85 (100.0) | 46 (100.0) | 39 (100.0) | |
| Preoperative IOP, mmHg | 0.0080 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 21.3 (4.7) | 22.3 (4.9) | 20.1 (4.2) | |
| Median (IqR) | 20.0 (18.0 to 24.0) | 22.0 (19.0 to 24.0) | 19.0 (18.0 to 21.8) | |
| NOHM, n | 0.0121 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 2.3 (0.8) | 2.5 (0.7) | 2.1 (0.9) | |
| Median (IqR) | 2.0 (2.0 to 3.0) | 3.0 (2.0 to 3.0) | 2.0 (1.0 to 3.0) | |
| NOHM, n (%) | 0.0382 c | |||
| 1 | 14 (16.5) | 3 (6.5) | 11 (28.2) | |
| 2 | 35 (41.2) | 19 (41.3) | 16 (41.0) | |
| 3 | 31 (36.5) | 21 (45.7) | 10 (25.6) | |
| 4 | 5 (5.9) | 3 (6.5) | 2 (5.1) | |
| Pachymetry, µm | 0.3407 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 533.2 (35.5) | 536.8 (34.2) | 529.0 (38.8) | |
| Median (IqR) | 532.5 (514.3 to 551.0) | 532.8 (520.0 to 555.0) | 532. 0 (510.3 to 548.0) | |
| BCVA ** | 0.0993 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 0.62 (0.27) | 0.69 (0.27) | 0.55 (0.27) | |
| Median (IqR) | 0.60 (0.40 to 0.80) | 0.70 (0.50 to 0.80) | 0.60 (0.40 to 0.80) | |
| VF damage, dB | 0.0959 | |||
| MD | ||||
| Mean (SD) | −6.33 (3.73) | −7.30 (4.08) | −5.46 (3.18) | |
| Median (IqR) | −5.94 (−8.67 to −3.30) | −6.87 (−11.55 to −3.97) | −4.84 (−8.08 to −3.26) |
| Mean IOP Lowering | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XEN63-Standalone | XEN63 + Phaco | Difference | p a | |
| Day1 | 0.2387 | |||
| n | 41 | 36 | ||
| Mean (SE) | −14.2 (0.9) | −12.5 (1.0) | −1.7 (1.4) | |
| 95% CI | −16.0 to −12.4 | −14.5 to −10.6 | −4.4 to 1.1 | |
| Week 1 | 0.3314 | |||
| n | 43 | 38 | ||
| Mean (SE) | −12.6 (0.9) | −11.3 (1.0) | −1.3 (1.4) | |
| 95% CI | −14.4 to −10.9 | −13.2 to −9.4 | −4.1 to 1.4 | |
| Month 1 | 0.5857 | |||
| n | 45 | 38 | ||
| Mean (SE) | −7.5 (1.1) | −8.4 (1.2) | 0.9 (1.7) | |
| 95% CI | −9.6 to −5.4 | −10.7 to −6.1 | −2.4 to 4.2 | |
| Month 3 | 0.5773 | |||
| n | 43 | 39 | ||
| Mean (SE) | −8.6 (0.7) | −8.1 (0.7) | −0.5 (1.0) | |
| 95% CI | −9.9 to −7.3 | −9.4 to −6.7 | −2.5 to 1.4 | |
| Month 6 | 0.3285 | |||
| n | 42 | 37 | ||
| Mean (SE) | −8.0 (0.6) | −7.1 (0.6) | −0.9 (0.9) | |
| 95% CI | −9.2 to −6.8 | −8.3 to −5.8 | −2.7 to 0.9 | |
| Month 12 | 0.7524 | |||
| n | 44 | 37 | ||
| Mean (SE) | −7.3 (0.6) | −7.0 (0.7) | −0.3 (1.0) | |
| 95% CI | −8.6 to −6.1 | −8.4 to −5.6 | −2.2 to 1.6 | |
| Month 18 | 0.6539 | |||
| n | 42 | 35 | ||
| Mean (SE) | −7.4 (0.7) | −7.0 | −0.4 (1.0) | |
| 95% CI | −8.7 to −6.1 | −8.4 to −5.5 | −2.5 to 1.6 | |
| Month 24 | 0.0854 | |||
| n | 41 | 34 | ||
| Mean (SE) | −7.8 (0.6) | −6.2 (0.7) | −1.6 (0.9) | |
| 95% CI | −9.0 to −6.6 | −7.5 to −4.9 | −3.4 to 0.2 | |
| Month 30 | 0.0581 | |||
| n | 34 | 31 | ||
| Mean (SE) | −7.9 (0.6) | −6.0 (0.7) | −1.9 (1.0) | |
| 95% CI | −9.1 to −6.6 | −7.4 to −4.7 | −3.8 to 0.1 | |
| Month 36 | 0.0569 | |||
| n | 31 | 25 | ||
| Mean (SE) | −8.9 (0.7) | −6.7 (0.8) | −2.2 (1.1) | |
| 95% CI | −10.3 to −7.5 | −8.3 to −5.1 | −4.4 to 0.1 | |
| Surgery Failure (Overall Success) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Variable | Univariable | |
| HR (95% CI) | p | |
| Age, per additional year | 1.00 (0.96–1.04) | 0.9225 |
| Sex, female | 1.35 (0.64–2.85) | 0.4250 |
| Surgery, XEN + Phaco | 2.23 (1.03–4.83) | 0.0420 |
| MMC concentration, 0.02% | 0.92 (0.42–2.04) | 0.8459 |
| Preoperative IOP, per mmHg increased | 0.94 (0.86–1.03) | 0.1837 |
| Preoperative NOHM, per additional medication | 1.05 (0.65–1.68) | 0.8531 |
| Day 1 IOP, per mmHg increased | 0.99 (0.93–1.07) | 0.8440 |
| Week 1 IOP, per mmHg increased | 1.02 (0.96–1.09) | 0.5809 |
| Day 1 IOP lowering, per mmHg lowered | 1.01 (0.97–1.06) | 0.5582 |
| Week 1 IOP lowering, per mmHg lowered | 1.02 (0.98–1.08) | 0.2890 |
| Surgery failure (Complete success) | ||
| Variable | Univariable | |
| HR (95% CI) | p | |
| Age, per additional year | 1.00 (0.96–1.03) | 0.7811 |
| Sex, female | 1.16 (0.65–2.06) | 0.6198 |
| Surgery, XEN + Phaco | 1.14 (0.64–2.04) | 0.6486 |
| MMC concentration, 0.02% | 0.84 (0.45–1.58) | 0.5925 |
| Preoperative IOP, per mm Hg increased | 0.98 (0.92–1.05) | 0.5562 |
| Preoperative NOHM, per additional medication | 1.07 (0.74–1.55) | 0.7129 |
| Day 1 IOP, per mmHg increased | 0.99 (0.94–1.05) | 0.7248 |
| Week 1 IOP, per mmHg increased | 1.01 (0.96–1.06) | 0.6700 |
| Day 1 IOP lowering, per mmHg lowered | 1.00 (0.97–1.04) | 0.9376 |
| Week 1 IOP lowering, per mmHg lowered | 1.01 (0.97–1.05) | 0.6173 |
| Complication, n | Day1 | Week1 | Month1 | Month3 | Month6 | Month12 | Month24 | Month36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transient Hypotony * | 20 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hypotonic maculopathy | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IOP Spikes ** | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hyphema | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Corneal Dellen | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AC Blood *** | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maculopathy | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shallow AC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bleb leakage | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Choroidal detachment | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retinal detachment 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Vitreous wick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fibrin in AC | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Endophthalmitis 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Surgical revision | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| XEN removal | 0 | 0 | 1 † | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Martínez-de-la-Casa, J.M.; Marcos-Parra, M.T.; Millá-Griñó, E.; Laborda, T.; Giménez, R.; Larrosa, J.M.; Urcola, A.; Teus, M.Á.; Perucho-Martínez, S. Three-Year Outcomes and Safety of the XEN63 Gel Stent: A Multicenter Prospective Study in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093528
Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, Marcos-Parra MT, Millá-Griñó E, Laborda T, Giménez R, Larrosa JM, Urcola A, Teus MÁ, Perucho-Martínez S. Three-Year Outcomes and Safety of the XEN63 Gel Stent: A Multicenter Prospective Study in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(9):3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093528
Chicago/Turabian StyleMartínez-de-la-Casa, José María, María Teresa Marcos-Parra, Elena Millá-Griñó, Teresa Laborda, Rafael Giménez, José Manuel Larrosa, Aritz Urcola, Miguel Ángel Teus, and Susana Perucho-Martínez. 2026. "Three-Year Outcomes and Safety of the XEN63 Gel Stent: A Multicenter Prospective Study in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 9: 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093528
APA StyleMartínez-de-la-Casa, J. M., Marcos-Parra, M. T., Millá-Griñó, E., Laborda, T., Giménez, R., Larrosa, J. M., Urcola, A., Teus, M. Á., & Perucho-Martínez, S. (2026). Three-Year Outcomes and Safety of the XEN63 Gel Stent: A Multicenter Prospective Study in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(9), 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093528

