1. Introduction
Ingrown toenail, or onychocryptosis, is a prevalent foot disorder characterized by the nail plate encroaching into the surrounding soft tissues, leading to significant pain and inflammation [
1]. Its etiology is multifactorial, involving a complex interplay of improper nail trimming, abnormal nail and nail-fold morphology, hyperhidrosis, ill-fitting footwear, poor hygiene, obesity, genetic predisposition, trauma, fungal infections, and various anatomical factors [
2]. Clinically, as the nail plate penetrates the periungual soft tissue, patients present with a spectrum of symptoms, including excruciating pain, swelling, discharge, abscess formation, and hypertrophic granulation tissue [
3,
4]. Among these, stabbing pain and functional discomfort are the most common complaints [
5], predominantly affecting adolescents and young adults, thereby significantly impairing their daily and occupational activities [
2]. If left untreated, the condition frequently progresses to a chronic inflammatory state with recurrent local infections, resulting in permanent nail deformity and persistent symptomatic distress [
6,
7].
While various surgical interventions have been described, the Winograd procedure [
8] remains one of the most widely utilized techniques [
3]. This procedure involves a partial nail plate avulsion combined with a formal excision of the germinal matrix (matricectomy), followed by primary closure of the soft tissue [
4,
5]. It is recognized as an effective treatment due to its relatively low recurrence rates and high patient satisfaction, and its suitability for outpatient settings minimizes postoperative recovery time [
4,
5].
Despite its popularity, there is a distinct lack of literature directly comparing outcomes of the Winograd procedure specifically in the presence versus absence of active, severe local infection. Given that ingrown toenails frequently present with secondary paronychia or soft tissue infection, surgeons often face clinical uncertainty regarding whether to delay surgery for infection control or proceed with immediate source removal. To address this clinical uncertainty, the primary objective of this study was to compare the postoperative clinical course and complication rates of the Winograd procedure for ingrown toenails of the great toes between patients with and without chronic severe preoperative local infection. Based on the traditional rationale regarding surgical site contamination, we explicitly hypothesized that chronic severe preoperative local infection would be associated with an increased incidence of postoperative surgical site infection, a prolonged duration of antibiotic therapy, and higher recurrence rates.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patient Selection
A retrospective cohort design was adopted to efficiently analyze a large single-center sample over a 10-year period while avoiding the ethical and logistical constraints of prospectively randomizing or delaying surgical intervention in patients presenting with severe, painful infections. We retrospectively identified consecutive patients from our institutional surgical database who underwent the Winograd procedure for ingrown toenails of the great toe (ICD-10 code L60.0) during a 10-year period from March 2015 to March 2025. (The study data collection and analysis were conducted in April 2026 following institutional protocols.)
Patients were included if they underwent the Winograd procedure for great toe ingrown toenails and completed a minimum clinical follow-up of 6 months, evaluated either through routine chart review or standardized telephone recall. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) radiographic or clinical evidence of osteomyelitis progression, and (2) a history of prior surgery at the same site. Patients lost to follow-up due to a lack of response during telephone recall were also excluded from the final analysis. Eligible cases were categorized into two groups based on the clinical status of the affected great toe at the time of surgery: Group 1 (chronic severe preoperative local infection) and Group 2 (no or mild preoperative local infection). In this study, “chronic” was operationally defined as symptomatic local infection persisting or recurring for at least 4 weeks despite conservative treatment. “Severe” was operationally defined as the presence of advanced infectious physical signs, including exuberant hypertrophic granulation tissue formation, overt purulent discharge, or localized. Conversely, Group 2 comprised patients with no or mild preoperative infection presenting with localized erythema, edema, or focal tenderness without prominent tissue hyper-trophy or purulent discharge.
2.2. Sample Size Calculation
To ensure adequate statistical power for comparing the two groups, the required sample size was calculated based on the primary endpoint: the postoperative recurrence rate. Based on previously reported data regarding the Winograd procedure, we assumed a baseline recurrence rate of approximately 12% [
9]. To detect a 15% difference in recurrence rates between the chronic severe preoperative local infection and non-severe infection groups with a two-sided significance level (α) of 0.05 and a statistical power (1 − β) of 80%, a minimum of 68 patients per group was required. Given that our final analysis included 76 great toes in the chronic severe local infection group and 312 in the no or mild local infection group, the sample size was deemed sufficient to provide adequate power for the statistical comparisons.
2.3. Operative Technique
All surgeries were performed by two fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons (JYC, JSS) under local digital nerve blocks. A tourniquet was applied at the base of the great toe to maintain a bloodless surgical field. First, a longitudinal incision was made through the nail plate and the overlying eponychium, extending proximally to the germinal matrix (
Figure 1A,B). In patients with chronic severe local infection associated with granulation tissue, a thorough debridement was performed to excise all inflammatory and hypertrophic tissues (
Figure 1B). A wedge resection was then executed, encompassing the affected nail portion, the underlying sterile and germinal matrix (
Figure 1C). During the matricectomy, the soft tissue was meticulously excised until the periosteum of the distal phalanx was clearly visualized to ensure complete removal of the germinal cells. To further minimize the risk of recurrence, the remaining germinal matrix and nail bed underwent thorough electrocauterization. After ensuring hemostasis, the remaining soft tissue of the lateral nail fold was sutured to the nail plate using non-absorbable sutures to obliterate the dead space (
Figure 1D). A sterile compression dressing was applied. Postoperatively, a standardized oral antibiotic regimen consisting of Cefatrizine (Cephamethyl
®; a first-generation cephalosporin, 500 mg per tablet) was routinely prescribed at a dosage of 1000 mg (two tablets) three times daily (total 3000 mg/day) for 5 to 7 days. In cases where superficial surgical site infection persisted during follow-up, the duration of antibiotic administration was extended until clinical eradication was achieved. Wound cultures were not routinely performed given the outpatient setting; however, in select cases with overt abscess formation where cultures were obtained, Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated pathogen, all of which responded well to the primary empirical cephalosporin regimen. All sutures were removed 3 weeks after the surgery once the wound had sufficiently healed.
2.4. Assessments
Patient demographic data were extracted from the institutional electronic medical records, including age at the time of surgery, sex, smoking status at the time of surgery, and past medical history such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, end-stage renal disease, and thyroid diseases. Regarding the surgical site, the affected side (right or left) and the specific location of the ingrown toenail (medial, lateral, or both) were documented for each great toe. The follow-up duration was recorded for all included cases to ensure a minimum clinical tracking period. The primary clinical focus was the comparison of the postoperative course between Group 1 and 2. Therefore, the following parameters were evaluated and analyzed: the mean duration of oral antibiotic administration after the surgery, the occurrence of superficial surgical site infections (defined as an infection occurring within 30 days postoperatively involving only the skin and subcutaneous tissue, accompanied by purulent drainage or localized signs such as pain, erythema, and warmth), and cases of “persistent surgical site infection” defined as an infection lasting more than three weeks postoperatively. In these persistent cases, the total duration of antibiotic use was further quantified.
Additionally, postoperative recurrence, defined as the regrowth of the nail spicule or the return of ingrown symptoms requiring further intervention, was documented. Regarding cases followed up via telephone recall, a structured interview was conducted to assess recurrence and complications. Patients were specifically asked about the presence of purulent discharge, the need for prolonged antibiotic use, and the regrowth of any nail spicules. To ensure data integrity and minimize investigator bias, all clinical data and outcomes were independently extracted and reviewed by two orthopedic researchers (JYY, YBL) using predefined operational definitions. In cases of disagreement regarding outcome categorization or complication presence, final decisions were reached through joint case review and consensus with a senior attending orthopedic surgeon (JSS).
2.5. Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software (version 21.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Continuous numeric variables between the two groups were compared using the independent t-test, whereas categorical variables and proportions were analyzed using the chi-square test. To control for baseline discrepancies between the groups, multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. Confounding variables included in the model (age and smoking status) were selected based on baseline clinical relevance and statistically significant differences observed between Group 1 and Group 2 in univariate comparisons (). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined for each outcome. Additionally, to evaluate the robustness of our findings against potential recall bias from telephone follow-up, a sensitivity analysis was performed restricting the multivariable logistic regression to patients whose outcomes were documented exclusively through in-person chart reviews (). Missing data resulting from loss to follow-up during telephone recall (78 cases, 16.7%) were managed using complete case analysis, with these incomplete cases excluded from the final analytical dataset. For the remaining 388 included great toes, all demographic and clinical variable records were complete, with no missing outcome or covariate data requiring statistical imputation. For all comparisons, statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
4. Discussion
Our data suggested that chronic severe preoperative local infection does not negatively impact the clinical outcomes of the Winograd procedure for ingrown toenails. Although patients with chronic severe preoperative local infection were significantly younger and had a higher prevalence of smoking compared to those without it, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding postoperative complication rates, duration of antibiotic use, or recurrence rates. Specifically, the recurrence rate was 13.2% in the group with chronic severe preoperative local infection and 15.3% in the group with no or mild infection. Furthermore, the incidence of superficial surgical site infection and persistent infection lasting more than three weeks was comparable regardless of the chronic severe preoperative local infection. These findings contrasted with our initial hypothesis, which assumed that chronic severe preoperative local infection would lead to a higher incidence of postoperative complications and recurrence. Instead, our results imply that immediate surgical intervention—focusing on the radical excision of infected and hypertrophic granulation tissue alongside the offending nail spicule—is still an effective strategy.
To assess the severity of ingrown toenails and to guide therapeutic decision-making, the Heifetz classification is widely utilized [
10,
11,
12]. This system categorizes the disease into three distinct stages: Stage 1 is characterized by mild erythema and edema; Stage 2 involves increased inflammation with associated infection; and Stage 3 is defined by chronic inflammation with the formation of exuberant granulation tissue and hypertrophy of the nail fold. Surgical intervention is generally recommended for Stage 2 and Stage 3 cases that prove refractory to conservative management. In our study, the group with severe preoperative local infection—characterized by purulent discharge and significant granulation tissue—corresponds to Heifetz Stage 3. Conversely, cases with no or mild preoperative infection primarily encompassed patients in Stage 1 or Stage 2, where acute inflammatory symptoms remained mild to moderate. By demonstrating that outcomes in Stage 3 cases (Group 1) were comparable to those in earlier stages (Group 2), our results further validate the efficacy of the Winograd procedure across the full spectrum of advanced ingrown toenail severity.
The traditional Winograd procedure [
8], which involves a wedge resection of the nail plate and nail bed followed by primary closure, is recognized for its simplicity, safety, and rapid recovery [
13]. However, concerns regarding potential cosmetic deformities and reported recurrence rates of approximately 12% have typically limited its application to mild-to-moderate cases [
13]. To address these limitations, various modifications have been proposed, such as the modified Winograd technique using curettage and electrocautery to minimize soft tissue excision while precisely removing the matrix [
4,
14,
15]. In our practice, we also incorporated electrocauterization of the remaining nail bed to further minimize recurrence risk. Moreover, we performed wedge resection in all cases regardless of the presence of chronic severe local infection. For severely infected cases, a more extensive debridement of inflammatory and hypertrophic tissues was performed as necessary. Despite our more radical debridement in infected cases, primary wound closure was consistently achievable due to the relatively abundant soft tissue surrounding the great toe. Our results showed an overall recurrence rate of approximately 15%, which is similar to the outcomes reported in existing literature. These findings suggest that the Winograd procedure, when augmented with thorough debridement and electrocautery, remains a viable option even for chronic advanced cases, obviating the need for more morbid, aggressive procedures.
The primary motivation for this study was to determine whether performing immediate surgery on an ingrown toenail with chronic severe local infection increases postoperative complication rates or adversely affects clinical progress. When managing such cases, two surgical strategies can be considered: a delayed Winograd procedure after initial infection control, or an immediate procedure that includes the excision of infected tissues. While the former may allow for a more precise resection in a less inflamed environment, it inevitably prolongs the total treatment duration. Furthermore, as long as the offending nail plate continues to penetrate the soft tissue, the structural cause of the infection remains, which can lead to limited infection control or frequent exacerbations. In contrast, an immediate surgical approach allows for the concurrent removal of the nail plate and germinal matrix, thereby directly addressing the underlying cause of the infection. Potentially facilitating shorter overall treatment periods and more rapid symptomatic relief, such a strategy shares a conceptual parallel with the fundamental surgical principles applied to other musculoskeletal infections, such as septic arthritis, soft tissue abscesses, and chronic osteomyelitis [
16,
17,
18,
19]. In these conditions, as long as the infectious focus persists, the inflammatory response will be maintained. Therefore, the radical and prompt removal of the infection source is considered a more critical therapeutic principle than relying solely on antibiotic therapy for infection control. Our findings support the application of this “source control” principle to ingrown toenail management, suggesting that immediate surgical intervention may represent a feasible and clinically reasonable strategy without an unacceptable increase in complication risks. However, formal non-inferiority trials would be needed to definitively confirm equivalent safety profiles.
This study has several limitations that warrant consideration. First, its retrospective nature may have introduced inherent biases in data collection and documentation. Second, we did not employ validated objective clinical scoring systems, such as the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score or the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure [
20], which limits our ability to quantitatively assess functional improvement and patient-reported quality of life beyond satisfaction and recurrence rates. Third, while our overall sample size was large, the number of cases in Group 1 was relatively small (
n = 76) compared to Group 2, which may affect the statistical power to detect subtle differences in complications. Fourth, a significant portion of the initial cohort was evaluated via telephone recall (179 toes, 46.1%) rather than direct chart review (209 toes, 53.9%), and 78 toes (16.7%) were lost to follow-up, which potentially introduces attrition bias. This loss to follow-up could affect outcome estimates in opposite ways: asymptomatic patients with successful outcomes might have lacked incentive to respond to phone recalls, whereas patients experiencing late complications or dissatisfaction might have sought care at secondary clinics and been uncontactable. Nevertheless, the overall loss rate of 16.7% remains within a reasonable range for long-term retrospective study designs. Furthermore, our sensitivity analysis restricted to the sub-cohort evaluated exclusively through in-person chart reviews (
n = 209) demonstrated virtually identical comparative outcomes between groups, confirming that loss to follow-up is unlikely to have systematically biased our primary conclusions regarding the safety and efficacy of the immediate Winograd procedure. Furthermore, outcome ascertainment differed between direct chart review (
n = 209) and telephone recall (
n = 179). Because telephone assessments relied on patient self-reports, minor asymptomatic recurrences or mild, self-limiting postoperative surgical site infections might have been underreported compared to objective in-person clinical examinations. To mitigate this information bias, telephone interviews were strictly conducted using a standardized protocol focusing on concrete clinical endpoints (e.g., visible nail spicule regrowth, purulent discharge, and extended antibiotic prescriptions). Crucially, our sensitivity analysis restricted to patients evaluated solely via objective chart reviews (
n = 209) yielded findings identical to those of the overall cohort, confirming that the mode of outcome assessment did not alter our primary conclusion that chronic severe preoperative infection does not adversely affect outcomes of the Winograd procedure. Fifth, formal interobserver agreement metrics (such as Cohen’s kappa) and prospective assessor calibration were not evaluated for outcome determination, although data extraction was performed independently using standardized operational criteria and consensus resolution. Finally, the diagnosis of chronic severe preoperative local infection was based on clinical signs rather than standardized laboratory or microbiological markers, which may lead to variability in classification. Further prospective, multi-center trials using standardized functional scores and objective inflammatory markers are needed to validate these findings. Finally, the diagnosis of chronic severe preoperative local infection was based on clinical signs rather than standardized laboratory or microbiological markers, which may lead to variability in classification. Regarding generalizability, while the Winograd procedure and oral cephalosporin therapy are widely practiced clinical standards globally, all operations in this study were conducted at a single tertiary center by fellowship-trained foot and ankle specialists utilizing meticulous matricectomy, electrocautery, and thorough debridement. Consequently, these favorable outcomes may not automatically generalize to primary care settings or non-specialized surgical practices. Further prospective, multi-center trials using standardized functional scores and objective inflammatory markers are needed to validate these findings across broader clinical settings.