Next Article in Journal
Effects of Repeated Contrast Therapy on Forearm Microcirculatory and Neuromechanical Recovery After Climbing-Specific Fatigue in Amateur Climbers: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Distinct Regulatory DNA Methylation Signatures Across Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica, and Neurological Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Post Endoscopy Cholecystectomies in Pediatric Population—Longitudinal, Nationwide Data from Poland
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Tranexamic Acid Versus Epinephrine as Submucosal Injectate During Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colorectal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

1
Gonczarowski Family Institute of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), Zerifin 703301, Israel
2
Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Klatzkin St 35, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6997801, Israel
3
Department of Gastroenterology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 12000, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(13), 4969; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15134969 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 April 2026 / Revised: 13 June 2026 / Accepted: 22 June 2026 / Published: 25 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)

Abstract

Background and Aims: Bleeding and post-procedural pain are common adverse events after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large colorectal lesions. Epinephrine is frequently added to submucosal injectates, although its benefit for delayed bleeding is inconsistent and associated with post-procedural pain. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent used to prevent bleeding in several medical conditions, has not been evaluated during colorectal EMR. We compared TXA with epinephrine for bleeding outcomes, safety, and post-procedural pain. Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled pilot trial, adults undergoing EMR for colorectal lesions ≥20 mm were randomized 1:1 to receive a TXA-containing or epinephrine-containing submucosal injectate. Primary outcomes were intraprocedural bleeding severity and delayed bleeding. Secondary outcomes included post-procedural pain, post-polypectomy syndrome, and thromboembolic events. Results: The study included 121 patients (TXA, n = 60; epinephrine, n = 61). Intraprocedural bleeding rates and severity were similar between groups, and hemostasis was achieved endoscopically in all cases. Delayed bleeding occurred in 8.3% of patients in the TXA group and 11.5% in the epinephrine group (p = 0.762); clinically significant delayed bleeding occurred in 6.7% and 6.6%, respectively. Lesion size was the only independent predictor of delayed bleeding. Post-procedural pain was significantly less frequent with TXA (5.0% vs. 39.3%; p < 0.001), and no TXA-treated patients required opioid analgesia compared with 18% in the epinephrine group (p < 0.001). No major adverse events were observed in the TXA group. Conclusions: In this pilot study, TXA achieved bleeding outcomes comparable to epinephrine while significantly reducing post-procedural pain in large colorectal EMR procedures, warranting further evaluation in larger trials.
Keywords: tranexamic acid; endoscopic mucosal resection; colorectal polyps; delayed post-polypectomy bleeding; submucosal injection; epinephrine; post-procedural pain; hemostasis; randomized controlled trial; advanced endoscopy tranexamic acid; endoscopic mucosal resection; colorectal polyps; delayed post-polypectomy bleeding; submucosal injection; epinephrine; post-procedural pain; hemostasis; randomized controlled trial; advanced endoscopy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bermont, A.; Cohen, D.L.; Malkin, D.; Ben Shimol, A.; Matalon, S.; Shirin, H.; Vosko, S. Tranexamic Acid Versus Epinephrine as Submucosal Injectate During Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colorectal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 4969. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15134969

AMA Style

Bermont A, Cohen DL, Malkin D, Ben Shimol A, Matalon S, Shirin H, Vosko S. Tranexamic Acid Versus Epinephrine as Submucosal Injectate During Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colorectal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(13):4969. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15134969

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bermont, Anton, Daniel L. Cohen, Daniela Malkin, Ariel Ben Shimol, Shay Matalon, Haim Shirin, and Sergei Vosko. 2026. "Tranexamic Acid Versus Epinephrine as Submucosal Injectate During Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colorectal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 13: 4969. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15134969

APA Style

Bermont, A., Cohen, D. L., Malkin, D., Ben Shimol, A., Matalon, S., Shirin, H., & Vosko, S. (2026). Tranexamic Acid Versus Epinephrine as Submucosal Injectate During Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Colorectal Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(13), 4969. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15134969

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop