C-Reactive Protein–Albumin–Lymphocyte Index and the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score as Predictors of Early Mortality After Palliative Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Patient Selection
2.2. Data Collection
2.3. Ethical Approval
2.4. Procedural Details
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Patient Characteristics
3.2. Changes in Laboratory Parameters After PTBD
3.3. Univariable and Multivariable Cox Regression Analyses for 30-Day Mortality
3.4. Risk Stratification Using CALLY Index and mGPS
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sutter, C.M.; Ryu, R.K. Percutaneous Management of Malignant Biliary Obstruction. Tech. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2015, 18, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pu, L.Z.; Singh, R.; Loong, C.K.; de Moura, E.G. Malignant Biliary Obstruction: Evidence for Best Practice. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2016, 2016, 3296801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, M.; van der Leij, C.; Katoh, M.; Benten, D.; Hendriks, B.M.F.; Hatzidakis, A. CIRSE Standards of Practice on Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography, Biliary Drainage and Stenting. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 2021, 44, 1499–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Delden, O.M.; Laméris, J.S. Percutaneous drainage and stenting for palliation of malignant bile duct obstruction. Eur. Radiol. 2008, 18, 448–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagino, M.; Hayakawa, N.; Nimura, Y.; Dohke, M.; Kitagawa, S. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with malignant biliary obstruction of the hepatic confluence. Hepatogastroenterology 1992, 39, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Leng, J.-J.; Zhang, N.; Dong, J.-H. Percutaneous transhepatic and endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant biliary tract obstruction: A meta-analysis. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2014, 12, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bang, J.Y.; Hawes, R.; Varadarajulu, S. Endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better–endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound? Dig. Endosc. 2022, 34, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, G.Y.; Li, W.T.; Peng, W.J.; Li, G.D.; He, X.H.; Xu, L.C. Clinical outcomes and prediction of survival following percutaneous biliary drainage for malignant obstructive jaundice. Oncol. Lett. 2014, 7, 1185–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turan, A.S.; Jenniskens, S.; Martens, J.M.; Rutten, M.; Yo, L.S.F.; van Strijen, M.J.L.; Drenth, J.P.H.; Siersema, P.D.; van Geenen, E.J.M. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage, a multicenter observational study. Abdom. Radiol. 2022, 47, 3338–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vandenabeele, L.A.M.; Dhondt, E.; Geboes, K.P.; Defreyne, L. Percutaneous stenting in malignant biliary obstruction caused by metastatic disease: Clinical outcome and prediction of survival according to tumor type and further therapeutic options. Acta Gastroenterol. Belg. 2017, 80, 249–255. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Y.; Liu, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Li, J.; Fu, W. Prognostic value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in biliary tract cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2024, 28, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, D.; Wang, X.; Shi, G.; Sun, H.; Ge, G. Prognostic and clinical significance of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of 4629 patients. Aging 2021, 13, 1410–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- He, L.; Li, H.; Cai, J.; Chen, L.; Yao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, W.; Geng, L.; Yang, M.; Chen, P. Prognostic value of the Glasgow prognostic score or modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for patients with colorectal cancer receiving various treatments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 51, 1237–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Utsumi, M.; Inagaki, M.; Kitada, K.; Tokunaga, N.; Kondo, M.; Yunoki, K.; Sakurai, Y.; Hamano, R.; Miyasou, H.; Tsunemitsu, Y.; et al. Preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio as a prognostic factor in biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2023, 102, e33656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Geng, Y.; Qi, Q.; Sun, M.; Chen, H.; Wang, P.; Chen, Z. Prognostic nutritional index predicts survival and correlates with systemic inflammatory response in advanced pancreatic cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 41, 1508–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Migita, K.; Takayama, T.; Saeki, K.; Matsumoto, S.; Wakatsuki, K.; Enomoto, K.; Tanaka, T.; Ito, M.; Kurumatani, N.; Nakajima, Y. The prognostic nutritional index predicts long-term outcomes of gastric cancer patients independent of tumor stage. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2013, 20, 2647–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, M.; Shi, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhou, Q.; Lian, Y.; Wang, D.; Ma, T.; Zhang, Y.; Mi, Y.; Gu, X. Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of systemic immune-inflammation index in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2020, 12, 1758835920937425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.; Ma, Y.; Li, J.; Wen, L.; Liu, L.; Su, J.; Wu, J.; Wang, P.; Zhang, G.; Huang, C.; et al. Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of C-reactive protein–albumin–lymphocyte(CALLY) in patients with digestive system neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2025, 23, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collins, G.S.; Reitsma, J.B.; Altman, D.G.; Moons, K.G. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement. BMJ 2015, 102, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elinav, E.; Nowarski, R.; Thaiss, C.A.; Hu, B.; Jin, C.; Flavell, R.A. Inflammation-induced cancer: Crosstalk between tumours, immune cells and microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 759–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leone, R.D.; Powell, J.D. Metabolism of immune cells in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2020, 20, 516–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, H.; Ren, D.; Jin, X.; Wu, H. The prognostic value of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis. Cancer Cell Int. 2020, 20, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, K.; Vigneswaran, G.; Modi, S.; Sew Hee, C.; Maclean, D.; Stedman, B.; Bryant, T.; Maher, B. Identifying predictive markers for survival in malignant biliary obstruction following percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Clin. Radiol. 2025, 82, 106772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rees, J.; Mytton, J.; Evison, F.; Mangat, K.S.; Patel, P.; Trudgill, N. The outcomes of biliary drainage by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography for the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction in England between 2001 and 2014: A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e033576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahinli, H.; Özet, A. Prognostic and predictive factors in cancer patients with obstructive jaundice treated by percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: A single-center experience. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2020, 16, S99–S103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heedman, P.A.; Åstradsson, E.; Blomquist, K.; Sjödahl, R. Palliation of Malignant Biliary Obstruction: Adverse Events are Common after Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage. Scand. J. Surg. 2018, 107, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakosek, M.; Bulatovic, D.; Pavlovic, V.; Filipovic, A.; Igic, A.; Galun, D.; Jovanovic, D.; Sisevic, J.; Masulovic, D. Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as Predictors of Short-Term Survival in Patients with Advanced Malignant Biliary Obstruction Treated with Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

| Characteristic | Total (n = 179) | No 30-Day Mortality (n = 134, 74.9%) | 30-Day Mortality (n = 45, 25.1%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic Characteristics | |||
| Female sex, No. (%) | 83 (46.4) | 60 (44.8) | 23 (51.1) |
| Male sex, No. (%) | 96 (53.6) | 74 (55.2) | 22 (48.9) |
| BMI ≤ 22.5 kg/m2, No. (%) | 67 (37.4) | 51 (38.1) | 16 (35.6) |
| BMI > 22.5 kg/m2, No. (%) | 112 (62.6) | 83 (61.9) | 29 (64.4) |
| ECOG 0–1, No. (%) | 107 (59.8) | 98 (73.1) | 9 (20.0) |
| ECOG ≥ 2, No. (%) | 72 (40.2) | 36 (26.9) | 36 (80.0) |
| Primary Tumor Type, No. (%) | |||
| Pancreatic | 65 (36.3) | 55 (41.0) | 10 (22.2) |
| Cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder | 47 (26.3) | 41 (30.6) | 6 (13.3) |
| Colorectal | 13 (7.3) | 10 (7.5) | 3 (6.7) |
| Gastric | 27 (15.1) | 16 (11.9) | 11 (24.4) |
| Other * | 27 (15.1) | 12 (9.0) | 15 (33.3) |
| Baseline Laboratory Findings | |||
| Albumin ≥ 30.0 g/L, No. (%) | 95 (53.1) | 80 (59.7) | 15 (33.3) |
| Albumin < 30.0 g/L, No. (%) | 84 (46.9) | 54 (40.3) | 30 (66.7) |
| Total bilirubin < 12.65 mg/dL, No. (%) | 79 (44.1) | 61 (45.5) | 18 (40.0) |
| Total bilirubin ≥ 12.65 mg/dL, No. (%) | 100 (55.9) | 73 (54.5) | 27 (60.0) |
| Inflammatory and Nutritional Indices | |||
| mGPS 0–1, No. (%) | 57 (31.8) | 53 (39.6) | 4 (8.9) |
| mGPS 2, No. (%) | 122 (68.2) | 81 (60.4) | 41 (91.1) |
| PNI ≥ 40, No. (%) | 68 (38.0) | 60 (44.8) | 8 (17.8) |
| PNI < 40, No. (%) | 111 (62.0) | 74 (55.2) | 37 (82.2) |
| CALLY ≥ 67, No. (%) | 92 (51.4) | 82 (61.2) | 10 (22.2) |
| CALLY < 67, No. (%) | 87 (48.6) | 52 (38.8) | 35 (77.8) |
| CAR < 12.2, No. (%) | 90 (50.3) | 78 (58.2) | 12 (26.7) |
| CAR ≥ 12.2, No. (%) | 89 (49.7) | 56 (41.8) | 33 (73.3) |
| SII < 1532, No. (%) | 89 (49.7) | 74 (55.2) | 15 (33.3) |
| SII ≥ 1532, No. (%) | 90 (50.3) | 60 (44.8) | 30 (66.7) |
| Procedural and Treatment-Related Characteristics | |||
| Prior ERCP performed, No. (%) | 30 (16.8) | 25 (18.7) | 5 (11.1) |
| No prior ERCP, No. (%) | 149 (83.2) | 109 (81.3) | 40 (88.9) |
| History of surgery, No. (%) | 53 (29.6) | 40 (29.9) | 13 (28.9) |
| No history of surgery, No. (%) | 126 (70.4) | 94 (70.1) | 32 (71.1) |
| Chemotherapy before PTBD, No. (%) | 66 (36.9) | 43 (32.1) | 23 (51.1) |
| No chemotherapy before PTBD, No. (%) | 113 (63.1) | 91 (67.9) | 22 (48.9) |
| Chemotherapy discontinued after PTBD, No. (%) | 96 (53.6) | 59 (44.0) | 37 (82.2) |
| Chemotherapy continued after PTBD, No. (%) | 83 (46.4) | 75 (56.0) | 8 (17.8) |
| Chemotherapy regimen prior to PTBD | |||
| No systemic chemotherapy | 43 (24.0) | 26 (19.4) | 16 (35.6) |
| Fluoropyrimidine-based doublet | 58 (32.4) | 43 (32.1) | 15 (33.3) |
| Gemcitabine-based regimens | 34 (19.0) | 30 (22.4) | 4 (8.9) |
| Intensified triplet regimens (FOLFIRINOX-based) | 26 (14.5) | 25 (18.7) | 1 (2.2) |
| Other regimens | 18 (10.1) | 10 (7.5) | 8 (17.8) |
| Metastatic Disease Pattern | |||
| Liver-only metastasis | 102 (57.0) | 72 (53.7) | 30 (66.7) |
| Non-liver metastasis only | 39 (21.8) | 33 (24.6) | 6 (13.3) |
| Liver + extrahepatic metastasis | 28 (15.6) | 24 (17.9) | 4 (8.9) |
| Multiple metastatic sites (≥2 organs) | 10 (5.6) | 5 (3.7) | 5 (11.1) |
| Index | AUC (95% CI) | Optimal Cut-Off | Sensitivity % | Specificity % | PPV % | NPV % | Accuracy % | Youden Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAR | 0.66 (0.57–0.74) | ≥12.2 | 73.3 | 58.2 | 37.1 | 86.7 | 62.0 | 0.315 |
| SII | 0.64 (0.56–0.72) | ≥1532 | 66.7 | 55.2 | 33.3 | 83.1 | 58.1 | 0.219 |
| CALLY index | 0.72 (0.64–0.80) | <67 | 77.8 | 61.2 | 40.2 | 89.1 | 65.4 | 0.390 |
| Parameter | Pre-PTBD (Mean ± SD) | Post-PTBD (Mean ± SD) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBC (×103/µL) | 9.41 ± 4.55 | 11.52 ± 6.38 | <0.001 |
| Neutrophils (/µL) | 7777 ± 6672 | 9244 ± 5991 | 0.014 |
| Lymphocytes (/µL) | 1196 ± 658 | 1304 ± 949 | 0.063 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 13.82 ± 7.03 | 7.36 ± 5.42 | <0.001 |
| Direct bilirubin (mg/dL) | 10.42 ± 5.49 | 5.51 ± 3.99 | <0.001 |
| ALT (U/L) | 111.3 ± 91.4 | 55.8 ± 47.0 | <0.001 |
| AST (U/L) | 122.4 ± 100.7 | 70.0 ± 62.6 | <0.001 |
| GGT (U/L) | 561.1 ± 407.9 | 284.5 ± 251.9 | <0.001 |
| ALP (U/L) | 685.6 ± 527.1 | 367.2 ± 279.9 | <0.001 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 59.6 ± 61.0 | 102.9 ± 83.3 | <0.001 |
| Variable | Comparison (High-Risk vs. Reference) | HR (95% CI) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Female vs. male | 0.78 (0.39–1.53) | 0.461 |
| BMI | ≤22.5 vs. >22.5 kg/m2 | 1.11 (0.55–2.25) | 0.768 |
| ECOG | ≥2 vs. 0–1 | 1.47 (0.79–2.74) | 0.223 |
| Pancreaticobiliary tumors | vs. others | 3.45 (1.85–6.67) | <0.001 |
| mGPS | 2 vs. 0–1 | 6.71 (2.27–19.82) | <0.001 |
| PNI | <40 vs. ≥40 | 2.83 (1.40–5.72) | 0.008 |
| CALLY | <67 vs. ≥67 | 3.70 (1.95–7.01) | <0.001 |
| CAR | ≥12.2 vs. <12.2 | 3.83 (1.82–8.07) | <0.001 |
| SII | ≥1532 vs. <1532 | 2.47 (1.22–5.00) | 0.017 |
| Prior ERCP | Yes vs. no | 1.84 (0.66–5.12) | 0.244 |
| History of surgery | Yes vs. no | 1.05 (0.50–2.20) | 0.909 |
| Metastatic site | Non-liver only vs. liver-only | 0.54 (0.22–1.31) | 0.176 |
| Liver + extrahepatic vs. liver-only | 1.42 (0.67–3.01) | 0.357 | |
| Multiple sites vs. liver-only | 2.61 (1.12–6.06) | 0.026 |
| Risk Group | Definition | n | 30-Day Mortality, n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | CALLY ≥ 67 & mGPS 0–1 | 50 | 4 (8.0) |
| Intermediate | Other combinations | 52 | 7 (13.5) |
| -Subgroup A | CALLY ≥ 67 & mGPS 2 | 42 | 6 (14.3) |
| -Subgroup B | CALLY < 67 & mGPS 0–1 | 10 | 1 (10.0) |
| High | CALLY < 67 & mGPS 2 | 77 | 34 (44.1) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ayyıldız Sevim, H.; Yücel, K.B.; Uyar, G.C.; Şahinli, H. C-Reactive Protein–Albumin–Lymphocyte Index and the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score as Predictors of Early Mortality After Palliative Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 4608. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124608
Ayyıldız Sevim H, Yücel KB, Uyar GC, Şahinli H. C-Reactive Protein–Albumin–Lymphocyte Index and the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score as Predictors of Early Mortality After Palliative Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(12):4608. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124608
Chicago/Turabian StyleAyyıldız Sevim, Hatice, Kadriye Bir Yücel, Galip Can Uyar, and Hayriye Şahinli. 2026. "C-Reactive Protein–Albumin–Lymphocyte Index and the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score as Predictors of Early Mortality After Palliative Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 12: 4608. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124608
APA StyleAyyıldız Sevim, H., Yücel, K. B., Uyar, G. C., & Şahinli, H. (2026). C-Reactive Protein–Albumin–Lymphocyte Index and the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score as Predictors of Early Mortality After Palliative Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(12), 4608. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124608

