Next Article in Journal
Prognostic Factors of the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease and the Development of End-Stage Renal Disease in Patients with Lupus Nephritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Public Unawareness of Renal Function: A Questionnaire Survey at a Health Promotion Seminar
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving Stroke Outcome Prediction Using Molecular and Machine Learning Approaches in Large Vessel Occlusion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gender-Based Differences in Stroke Types and Risk Factors Among Young Adults: A Comparative Retrospective Analysis

1
Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
2
Department of Public Health Sciences, Health Services Academy, Park Rd, Chak Shahzad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
3
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
4
Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(3), 663; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030663
Submission received: 23 July 2024 / Revised: 13 January 2025 / Accepted: 15 January 2025 / Published: 21 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stroke Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Stroke is considered the second-leading cause of mortality and a primary contributor to adult disability among both men and women. The primary aim of this research is to conduct a comprehensive investigation into gender disparities and stroke subtypes concerning symptoms, risk factors, and clinical and laboratory aspects of stroke, with a specific focus on young stroke patients. Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, a total of 185 stroke patients were selected through random sampling from the neurology department of a local hospital in Pakistan between August 2022 and March 2024. Data collection was carried out using a standardized questionnaire, and the collected data were cleaned, processed, input, and analyzed using SPSS software version 24.0. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables, and descriptive statistics were utilized to present the frequency, percentages, means, and standard deviations of the variables. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of <0.05. Results: Out of the 185 participants in this study, 122 (65.9%) were male and 63 (34.1%) were female. The comparison of laboratory, clinical, and risk factors between males and females revealed a higher prevalence of smoking in males compared to females (p = 0.014). Additionally, higher levels of LDL and triglycerides were noted in males, while females showed a greater prevalence of vertigo (p = 0.002). No statistically significant differences were found in the comparison of laboratory and clinical characteristics among stroke types. In ischemic stroke patients, significant associations were found with symptoms such as loss of strength or weakness (p = 0.002), headache (p = 0.00001), and fever (p < 0.00001), although these associations did not differ by gender. Conclusions: The outcomes of this study underscore the disparities in stroke types and risk factors between genders, providing valuable insights for the development of gender-specific approaches for stroke assessment and prevention among young individuals in Pakistan.

1. Introduction

Stroke remains one of the major causes of death and long-term disability worldwide, raising serious health concerns [1]. Since the condition typically affects the middle-aged and elderly, strokes in young adults are very rare [2]. The World Health Organization has defined stroke as a condition characterized by the rapid onset of clinical symptoms indicating a focal or global impairment of cerebral function. These symptoms typically last for more than 24 h or result in death, with no identifiable cause other than of vascular origin [3].
Strokes are grouped into two main groups: ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. The Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification system is the most widely used mechanistic sub-classification system for patients with ischemic stroke, defining five subtypes: (i) large-artery atherosclerosis, (ii) cardio embolic, (iii) small vessel occlusion, (iv) stroke of other determined etiology, and (v) stroke of undetermined etiology [4]. Hemorrhagic stroke may be further subdivided into intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) [5].
Over the last decade, sex differences in stroke epidemiology, risk factors, management, and outcomes have been thoroughly investigated, and there is now enough evidence to suggest that stroke pathophysiology is gender-specific. The fundamental cause of sex-related gaps in stroke is variations in sex steroid hormones, notably the estrogen hormone. This theory is supported by sex differences in ischemic stroke in animal models [6]. Furthermore, the hormone estradiol in females dilates the vascular endothelium and increases blood flow, whereas testosterone in males constricts the endothelial and reduces blood flow [7]. Genetic and anatomical factors may influence sex variations in stroke incidence, etiology, and clinical outcomes [8].
The classic risk factors for stroke in the majority of people, such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, obesity, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and heart disease, are also present in young adults, but there are other characteristics unique to the young population that can increase the risk of stroke: migraines, oral contraceptive use, pregnancy and the postpartum period, patent foramen ovale, and recreational drug use [9].
Young strokes occur frequently in patients aged 15 to 45, or in those under 50 [2]. Stroke prevalence ranges from 5 to 10% in developed nations and from 19 to 30% in developing nations for those under 45 years old [10]. Stroke is the second most prevalent cause of death worldwide, affecting 16.9 million people each year [11]. In comparison to the rest of the world, South Asia has a higher prevalence rate of stroke, younger ages at which stroke occurs, higher mortality rates, an increased number of modifiable risk factors for stroke, and several understudied non-conventional risk factors [12].
Pakistan, the sixth most populated country in the world, has insufficient population-based, rigorous data on the prevalence and risk factors of stroke [13]. A decade ago, in Karachi, a city in Pakistan, only two small-scale population-based studies were conducted. The prevalence of stroke reported in these studies was 4.8% [14] and 19.1% [15], which is the highest in the region.
An extensive, population-based investigation was required to determine the prevalence of stroke in Pakistan’s rural and urban areas. There is a lack of comprehensive data concerning sex disparities in stroke-related risk factors, clinical profiles, and both preventive and care strategies, especially regarding different types of strokes and their associated clinical and laboratory characteristics in young stroke patients. The objective of this study is to conduct a thorough analysis of gender differences and stroke subtypes with the symptoms, risk factors, and clinical and laboratory aspects of stroke, focusing specifically on young stroke patients. It is important to have comprehensive and detailed information on these variations to develop more effective strategies for preventing and managing stroke.

2. Methods

This retrospective, comparative study was carried out in a local hospital in Pakistan from August 2022 to March 2024. Patients who were admitted with a diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident based on clinical and radiological findings (non-contrast brain CT scan) were included in this study. All 185 patients were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

2.1. Inclusion Criteria

Young individuals with first-ever stroke who met the following criteria were eligible for inclusion: (1) age range of 18 to less than 45 years; (2) cerebral and hemorrhagic infarction confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

2.2. Exclusion Criteria

The following criteria were followed while excluding patients: transient ischemic attack; (1) venous infarction; (2) head trauma-related stroke; (3) iatrogenic stroke, including stroke resulting from major surgery, angiography, or carotid endarterectomy; (4) patients with recurrent stroke; (5) patients with severe stroke; or aphasia (6) patients who died as a result of their stroke.

2.3. Data Collection

Questionnaire responses were gathered from multiple sources, including a review of medical records, direct interviews during follow-up appointments, and telephone interviews for patients unable to attend in person. This study employed a patient questionnaire to collect subjective information directly from participants, while objective data, such as laboratory and imaging test results, were obtained separately from the patient’s medical records. We utilized the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) for the assessment of laboratory characteristics [16].
To maintain confidentiality, code numbers were used instead of patient names when entering the collected data into SPSS.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The data gathered for this study were cleaned, processed, fed, and analyzed using SPSS software version 24.0. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s chi-squared test. The study participants were described using frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. Variables with a p-value less than 0.05 are considered significant. The results are presented in the form of text and summary tables.

3. Results

3.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Study Population

Out of the 185 study participants, 122 (65.9%) were male and 63 (34.1%) were female (Figure 1). The average age of the male patients was 13.36 ± 34.82 years, and the average age of the female patients was 15.26 ± 35.59 years. The age categories are presented in Table 1, revealing that within the 41–45 age category, male patients exhibit a higher incidence of stroke. The majority of patients, 171 (92.4%), experienced ischemic strokes, while 14 (7.6%) experienced hemorrhagic strokes. The stroke etiology, as per the TOAST criteria, is detailed in Table 1. Large-artery atherosclerosis was the most prevalent at 124 (67.0%), with cardiac embolism at 1 (0.5%) and small vessel disease at 25 (13.5%), making them less common. Hemorrhagic strokes were further categorized as intracerebral hemorrhage at seven (3.8%) and subarachnoid hemorrhage at seven (3.8%).

3.2. Characteristics and Symptoms by Gender in Young Stroke Patients

The distribution of clinical characteristics among genders is outlined in Table 2. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and smoking was notably higher among males compared to females (p = 0.01 for smoking).
HDL was found to be more common among males than females, with statistically significant differences (p = 0.01 for HDL) (Table 3).
The variations in symptoms between males and females are presented in Figure 2. Upon admission to the hospital, the most frequently reported clinical presentation was loss of strength or weakness, observed in 94 males (66.7%) and 47 females (33.3%). Similarly, vomiting was predominantly reported by females, affecting 109 individuals (89.3%) versus 13 males (10.7%).

3.3. Comparative Analysis of Clinical, Laboratory Characteristics, and Symptoms by Stroke Type in Young Patients

The distribution of clinical characteristics among stroke types is outlined in Table 4. Hypertension (36.2), diabetes (26.5%), and obesity (30.8%), were more common in ischemic stroke than in hemorrhagic stroke, with no statistical significance.
The distribution of clinical characteristics among stroke types is outlined in Table 5. The table compares the distribution of various lipid profile components (LDL, HDL, cholesterol, and triglycerides) between patients with ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke, which shows no statistical significance.
The differences in symptoms between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke are presented in Table 6. The majority of patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke commonly present with symptoms such as loss of strength or weakness (73%), headaches (7.6%), and fever (2.1%), in comparison to those diagnosed with hemorrhagic stroke. The statistical analysis shows a significant difference in ischemic stroke with p-values of 0.002 for loss of strength or weakness, p = 0.00001 for headache, and p ≤ 0.00001 for fever.

4. Discussion

Stroke is a prevalent issue in developing countries; however, it is currently being given inadequate attention. Approximately 86% of all stroke-related fatalities globally occur in low- and middle-income countries [17]. Although there is no extensive epidemiological research available to ascertain Pakistan’s actual stroke incidence, the country’s estimated yearly incidence of stroke is 250/100,000 [18]. Based on our current understanding, this study is the first of its kind to explore gender differences in stroke subtypes, risk factors, clinical presentations, and laboratory results at a single stroke center in Pakistan.
The majority of patients, 171 (92.4%), experienced ischemic strokes, while 14 (7.6%) experienced hemorrhagic strokes. This finding aligns with multiple research findings that indicate that ischemic stroke is more common than hemorrhagic stroke. Research conducted in Libya, Africa, revealed that of their stroke cases, 23% were hemorrhagic stroke cases and 77% were ischemic stroke cases (including subarachnoid and intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke) [19]. In Morocco, there were 12.7% hemorrhagic strokes and 87.3% ischemic strokes, with a lower proportion of hemorrhagic stroke [20]. Another six-month study, conducted in the Neurology Department at the Mayo Hospital in Lahore from 6 February 2018 to 6 August 2018, showed that a significant number of patients with ischemic stroke are female [21]. The increased incidence of ischemic stroke may be ascribed to modifiable risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, and lifestyle-related influences, which are prevalent within our population. Cultural and dietary practices, such as excessive salt consumption and insufficient physical activity, may further exacerbate vascular risk profiles.
In the present study, the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and smoking was notably higher in males compared to females. Smoking was identified as a significant risk factor among males. These findings are consistent with a study conducted in India, which demonstrated that the increased prevalence of risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, alcoholism, and sedentary lifestyles is strongly associated with the rising incidence of stroke cases [22]. The higher prevalence of smoking among males, along with cultural acceptance of this behavior, notably heightens their vascular risk. Conversely, research indicates that women may have a greater prevalence of hypertension and atrial fibrillation. This could be associated with hormonal changes, especially following menopause, as well as disparities in healthcare access. Furthermore, other studies have indicated that while hypertension and atrial fibrillation are more prevalent among women, smoking and vascular diseases are more commonly observed in men. These results corroborate previous research that emphasizes sex-based differences in stroke risk factors [23].
Numerous studies have indicated that reduced levels of total cholesterol (TC) and higher-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) are correlated with an elevated risk of cerebral hemorrhage [24]. In our analysis, the HDL levels were p = 0.018. This observed gender-based discrepancy implies potential variations in lipid metabolism and cardiovascular risk profiles, which may influence the differing presentations and outcomes of strokes between males and females.
Vertigo is characterized as a particular kind of vertigo that combines nausea/vomiting, unsteadiness in walking, and an uncomfortable distortion of static gravitational direction. It makes up 3–5% of all visits and is the third most frequent main symptom to appear in general medicine clinics [25]. In the present study, a significantly higher number of females presented with vertigo (116 or 62.7%). This finding highlights the potential existence of gender-related differences in the prevalence or reporting of vertigo, necessitating further investigation into the biological, hormonal, or psychosocial factors that may contribute to this disparity.
This study further found the prevalence of hypertension (36.2%), diabetes (26.5%), and obesity (30.8%) in ischemic stroke compared to hemorrhagic stroke to reflect existing research trends, although our findings did not reach statistical significance. This correlation is supported by studies such as those conducted by Willmot et al. (2004) [26] and Strazzullo et al. (2010) [27], which emphasize the role of obesity in increasing stroke risk through mechanisms such as insulin resistance and systemic inflammation. Despite the lack of statistical significance in our study, these connections underscore the importance of effectively managing these risk factors to prevent ischemic strokes.
The lipid profiles in stroke etiology are compared between ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. It is commonly believed that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is linked to atherosclerosis and the risk of ischemic stroke. However, our study did not find a significant difference in LDL levels between patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. This aligns with the INTERSTROKE study by O’Donnell et al. (2010) [28], which emphasized the complex and sometimes unclear role of LDL in different types of strokes. Research, such as the Framingham Heart Study conducted by Castelli et al. (1986) [29], has shown a connection between high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels and the risk of ischemic stroke. Despite these findings, our study did not identify a significant disparity in HDL levels between patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Our study found that there was no significant variation in total cholesterol levels between patients who experienced ischemic strokes and those who had hemorrhagic strokes. This is in line with previous research, such as the Copenhagen City Heart Study (Nordestgaard et al., 2007) [30], which also found no significant disparities in cholesterol levels between different types of strokes. This suggests that other factors may be more influential in the development of strokes.
Triglycerides, a type of fat present in the bloodstream, have been linked to cardiovascular events, including strokes. Higher levels of triglycerides have been associated with an increased risk of ischemic strokes, as indicated by the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study [31]. This study did not identify any statistically significant variance in triglyceride levels between patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. This outcome is consistent with prior research, such as the study conducted by Amarenco et al. in 2006 [32], which indicated that while triglycerides play a role in cardiovascular risk factors, their specific impact on distinguishing between types of strokes remains uncertain. Analysis comparing symptoms between ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, as presented in Table 6, reveals noteworthy distinctions in their clinical manifestations.
The high occurrence of weakness or loss of strength in ischemic stroke patients aligns with studies suggesting that motor impairments are common following ischemic strokes due to localized brain ischemia [33]. The significant difference in headache occurrence (p = 0.00001) supports the assertion that headaches are more prevalent and severe in hemorrhagic strokes, likely attributable to elevated intracranial pressure [34]. Furthermore, the increased incidence of fever in patients with ischemic stroke (p < 0.00001) may suggest the presence of an inflammatory reaction linked to cerebral infarction [35]. The variation in symptom prevalence between ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes highlights the distinct pathophysiological pathways involved in each stroke subtype.
Consequently, individualized treatment strategies specific to the type of stroke are warranted. Recognizing unique symptom patterns can aid healthcare professionals in timely and accurate stroke diagnosis, potentially resulting in improved patient outcomes through tailored interventions.

5. Limitations

This study presents several limitations that should be considered when interpreting its findings. Firstly, it is a single-center investigation, which may restrict the generalizability of the results to wider populations. The outcomes are derived from a specific cohort of patients treated at one institution, potentially introducing selection bias and possibly not reflecting the full diversity of stroke patients in other geographic regions or healthcare settings.
Furthermore, the retrospective design of this study presents inherent challenges in establishing causality. The reliance on historical data and medical records may contribute to incomplete or inconsistent information, particularly concerning risk factors that were not systematically evaluated or documented. Examples of these risk factors include genetic predispositions, persistent foramen ovale (PFO), and antiphospholipid syndrome. The absence of comprehensive information regarding these common risk factors for young stroke further restricts the overall scope of the findings.
Additionally, the limited sample size of this study may hinder the statistical power necessary to identify more nuanced associations or differences among subgroups. Although the research offers valuable insights into ischemic stroke patterns, the relatively small number of participants, particularly among younger individuals, diminishes the robustness of the conclusions regarding specific risk factors.
To address these gaps, future studies should employ comprehensive diagnostic methods, including thrombophilia screening, genetic testing, and advanced cardiac imaging techniques. These investigations will clarify the role of specific risk factors in the development of strokes, particularly in younger adults, and contribute to a more thorough understanding of stroke etiology across all age groups.

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, the findings of this study contribute to a deeper comprehension of the variety of risk factors, stroke types, diagnostic methods, and gender disparities in stroke among young adults seen at a hospital in Pakistan. It is imperative to conduct large community-based prospective cohort studies with sufficient statistical power to corroborate these results. This study’s identification of gender disparities in risk factors and causes of stroke offers valuable insights for developing gender-specific strategies for stroke assessment and prevention among young adults in Pakistan. Our findings highlight the need for validation through a prospective study using standardized methods. Furthermore, it is essential to undertake extensive longitudinal studies on a larger scale to gain a comprehensive understanding of the underlying causes and risk factors associated with stroke occurrence in younger patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.H.K.; methodology, S.G. and R.W.A.; software, R.W.A.; validation, B.H.K., S.G., and R.W.A.; formal analysis, A.M.H.; investigation, A.A. and A.M.H.; resources, B.H.K. and S.G.; data curation, A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, B.H.K.; writing—review and editing, B.H.K., S.G., R.W.A., A.M.H., and A.A.; visualization, A.A. and A.M.H.; supervision, B.H.K.; project administration, B.H.K.; funding acquisition, A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2025R552) King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of the National Bioethics Committee Pakistan and approved by the Research Ethics and Review Committee of the International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan (IIUI/ORIC/Bioethics/110-3078) on 25 July 2022.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before conducting this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data collected from patients are confidential, so it cannot be made available online, but it can be provided on demand under prescribed rules and regulations.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the hospital administrators and record personnel for allowing us to see the admitted patients’ documentation. We also thank all the study participants whose information was used in this investigation, as well as the data collectors. The authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2025R552) King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Bennett, D.A.; Krishnamurthi, R.V.; Barker-Collo, S.; Forouzanfar, M.H.; Naghavi, M.; Connor, M.; Lawes, C.M.; Moran, A.E.; Anderson, L.M.; Roth, G.A.; et al. The global burden of ischemic stroke: Findings of the GBD 2010 study. Glob. Heart 2014, 9, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rashid, M.H.U.; Kashem, M.A.; Biswas, S.; Hoque, M.M. Risk factors in young stroke. J. Med. 2020, 21, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aho, K.; Harmsen, P.; Hatano, S.; Marquardsen, J.; Smirnov, V.E.; Strasser, T. Cerebrovascular disease in the community: Results of a WHO collaborative study. Bull. World Health Organ. 1980, 58, 113–130. [Google Scholar]
  4. Adams, H.P., Jr.; Bendixen, B.H.; Kappelle, L.J.; Biller, J.; Love, B.B.; Gordon, D.L.; Marsh, E.E., 3rd. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993, 24, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hemorrhagic Stroke. Available online: https://www.stroke.org/en/about-stroke/types-of-stroke/hemorrhagic-strokes-bleeds (accessed on 21 May 2024).
  6. Reeves, M.J.; Bushnell, C.D.; Howard, G.; Gargano, J.W.; Duncan, P.W.; Lynch, G.; Khatiwoda, A.; Lisabeth, L. Sex differences in stroke: Epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes. Lancet Neurol. 2008, 7, 915–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Krause, D.N.; Duckles, S.P.; Pelligrino, D.A. Influence of sex steroid hormones on cerebrovascular function. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2006, 101, 1252–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haast, R.A.; Gustafson, D.R.; Kiliaan, A.J. Sex differences in stroke. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2012, 32, 2100–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bukhari, S.; Yaghi, S.; Bashir, Z. Stroke in Young Adults. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hathidara, M.Y.; Saini, V.; Malik, A.M. Stroke in the Young: A Global Update. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2019, 19, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mehndiratta, P.; Wasay, M.; Mehndiratta, M.M. Implications of female sex on stroke risk factors, care, outcome and rehabilitation: An Asian perspective. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2015, 39, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kulshreshtha, A.; Anderson, L.M.; Goyal, A.; Keenan, N.L. Stroke in South Asia: A systematic review of epidemiologic literature from 1980 to 2010. Neuroepidemiology 2012, 38, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hafeez, A.; Dangel, W.J.; Ostroff, S.M.; Kiani, A.G.; Glenn, S.D.; Abbas, J.; Afzal, M.S.; Afzal, S.; Ahmad, S.; Ahmed, A.; et al. The state of health in Pakistan and its provinces and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Glob. Health 2023, 11, e229–e243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jafar, T.H. Blood pressure, diabetes, and increased dietary salt associated with stroke: Results from a community-based study in Pakistan. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2006, 20, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kamal, A.K.; Itrat, A.; Murtaza, M.; Khan, M.; Rasheed, A.; Ali, A.; Akber, A.; Akber, Z.; Iqbal, N.; Shoukat, S.; et al. The burden of stroke and transient ischemic attack in Pakistan: A community-based prevalence study. BMC Neurol. 2009, 9, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002, 106, 3143–3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Owolabi, M.O.; Akarolo-Anthony, S.; Akinyemi, R.; Arnett, D.; Gebregziabher, M.; Jenkins, C.; Tiwari, H.; Arulogun, O.; Akpalu, A.; Sarfo, F.S.; et al. The burden of stroke in Africa: A glance at the present and a glimpse into the future. Cardiovasc. J. Afr. 2015, 26 (Suppl. S1), S27–S38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hashmi, M.; Khan, M.; Wasay, M. Growing burden of stroke in Pakistan: A review of progress and limitations. Int. J. Stroke 2013, 8, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Namaganda, P.; Nakibuuka, J.; Kaddumukasa, M.; Katabira, E. Stroke in young adults, stroke types and risk factors: A case control study. BMC Neurol. 2022, 22, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chraa, M.; Louhab, N.; Kissani, N. Stroke in young adults: About 128 cases. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2014, 17, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, S.; Ali, U.; Ahmad, N.; Khan, M. Gender Differences in Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Six-Month Study at Mayo Hospital, Lahore. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2018, 34, 1394–1398. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hedau, V.N.; Patil, T. Mounting Stroke Crisis in India: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2024, 16, e57058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Marzona, I.; Proietti, M.; Farcomeni, A.; Romiti, G.F.; Romanazzi, I.; Raparelli, V.; Basili, S.; Lip, G.Y.; Nobili, A.; Roncaglioni, M.C. Sex differences in stroke and major adverse clinical events in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 993,600 patients. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018, 269, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Deng, Q.W.; Liu, Y.K.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Chen, X.L.; Jiang, T.; Hou, J.K.; Shi, H.C.; Lu, M.; Zhou, F.; Wang, W.; et al. Low triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio predicts hemorrhagic transformation in large atherosclerotic infarction of acute ischemic stroke. Aging 2019, 11, 1589–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Newman-Toker, D.E.; Della Santina, C.C.; Blitz, A.M. Vertigo and hearing loss. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2016, 136, 905–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Willmot, M.; Leonardi-Bee, J.; Bath, P.M. High blood pressure in acute stroke and subsequent outcome: A systematic review. Hypertension 2004, 43, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Strazzullo, P.; D’Elia, L.; Cairella, G.; Garbagnati, F.; Cappuccio, F.P.; Scalfi, L. Excess body weight and incidence of stroke: Meta-analysis of prospective studies with 2 million participants. Stroke 2010, 41, e418–e426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. O'Donnell, M.J.; Xavier, D.; Liu, L.; Zhang, H.; Chin, S.L.; Rao-Melacini, P.; Rangarajan, S.; Islam, S.; Pais, P.; McQueen, M.J.; et al. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): A case-control study. Lancet 2010, 376, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Castelli, W.P.; Doyle, J.T.; Gordon, T.; Hames, C.G.; Hjortland, M.C.; Hulley, S.B.; Kagan, A.; Zukel, W.J. HDL cholesterol and other lipids in coronary heart disease. The cooperative lipoprotein phenotyping study. Circulation 1977, 55, 767–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nordestgaard, B.G.; Benn, M.; Schnohr, P.; Tybjaerg-Hansen, A. Nonfasting triglycerides and risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and death in men and women. JAMA 2007, 298, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tirschwell, D.L.; Smith, N.L.; Heckbert, S.R.; Lemaitre, R.N.; Longstreth, W.T.; Psaty, B.M. Association of cholesterol with stroke risk varies in stroke subtypes and patient subgroups. Neurology 2004, 63, 1868–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Amarenco, P.; Labreuche, J.; Touboul, P.J. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and risk of stroke. Stroke 2006, 37, 1365–1370. [Google Scholar]
  33. Salvadori, E.; Papi, G.; Insalata, G.; Rinnoci, V.; Donnini, I.; Martini, M.; Falsini, C.; Hakiki, B.; Romoli, A.; Barbato, C.; et al. Comparison between Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Strokes in Functional Outcome at Discharge from an Intensive Rehabilitation Hospital. Diagnostics 2020, 11, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Qureshi, A.I.; Mendelow, A.D.; Hanley, D.F. Intracerebral haemorrhage. Lancet 2009, 373, 1632–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chamorro, Á. Role of Inflammation in Stroke and Atherothrombosis. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2004, 17 (Suppl. S3), 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution of stroke types by gender.
Figure 1. Distribution of stroke types by gender.
Jcm 14 00663 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of symptoms by gender.
Figure 2. Distribution of symptoms by gender.
Jcm 14 00663 g002
Table 1. Baseline demographic and clinical information on stroke patients overall and by sex.
Table 1. Baseline demographic and clinical information on stroke patients overall and by sex.
DemographicsAll n (%)Genderp-Value
AllMale n (%)Female n (%)
185122 (65.9)63 (34.1)
Age in years: mean + (SD)M: 39.1
SD: 5.5
M: 39.3
SD: 5.3
M: 38.7
SD: 5.9
Stay in hospital (in days)M:15.9
SD:37.6
M: 13.3
SD 34.8
M: 15.2
SD 35.5
Age185122 (65.9)63 (34.1)
  18–25 2 (1.0)4 (2.1)
  26–30 5 (2.7)1 (0.5)
 31–35 19 (1.02)5 (2.7)0.21
  36–40 36 (19.4)21 (11.3)
  41–45 60 (32.4)32 (17.2)
Ischemic stroke (TOAST)171 (92.4)112 (65.5)59 (34.5)
  Large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA)124 (67.0)82 (44.3)42 (22.7)
  Cardioembolism (CA)1 (0.5)01 (0.5)0.39
  Small-vessel occlusion (SVD)25 (13.5)16(8.6)9 (4.8)
  Stroke of determined cause9 (4.9)4(2.1)5 (2.7)
  Stroke of undetermined cause12 (6.5)10(5.4)2 (1.0)
  Hemorrhagic stroke14 (7.6)10(71.4)4 (28.6)
  Intracerebral hemorrhage7 (3.8)6 (3.2)1 (0.5)0.23
  Subarachnoid hemorrhage7 (3.8)4 (2.1)3 (1.6)
Table 2. Clinical characteristics of young stroke patients by gender.
Table 2. Clinical characteristics of young stroke patients by gender.
Male n (%)Female n (%)p-Value
Hypertensive
Yes47 (25.4)27 (14.6)0.5
No75 (40.5)36 (19.5)
Diabetes
Normal57 (30.8)24 (13)
Pre-diabetic14 (7.6)12 (6.5)0.23
Diabetic32 (17.3)21 (11.4)
Unknown19 (10.2)6 (3.2)
Body mass index (kg/m2)
Underweight: BMI < 18.5 kg/m239 (21.1)20 (10.8)
Normal weight: BMI 18.5–24.99 kg/m240 (21.6)23 (12.4)0.60
Overweight: BMI 25–29.99 kg/m236 (19.5)19 (10.3)
Obese: BMI ≥ 30 kg/m27 (3.8)1 (0.5)
Smoking
Yes15 (8.1)107 (57.8)0.014 *
No1 (0.5)62 (33.5)
* means highly significant values.
Table 3. Laboratory characteristics of young stroke patients by gender.
Table 3. Laboratory characteristics of young stroke patients by gender.
Laboratory CharacteristicsMale n (%)Female n (%)p-Value
LDL (mg/dL)
Optimal (<100 mg/dL)32 (17.3)21 (11.3)
High (>160 mg/dL)12 (6.5)5 (2.7)
Borderline (130–160 mg/dL)25 (13.5)5 (2.7)0.22
Above optimal (<130 mg/dL)26 (14.1)14 (7.6)
Unknown27 (14.6)18 (9.7)
HDL (mg/dL)
Major risk factor for heart diseases (<40 mg/dL)70 (37.8)23 (12.4)
Negative risk for heart disease
(≥ 60 mg/dL)
47 (25.4)38 (20.5)0.018 *
Unknown5 (2.7)2 (1.1)
Cholesterol (mg/dL)
Desirable (<200 mg/dL)69 (37.2)38 (20.5)
Borderline (200–239 mg/dL)17 (9.1)6 (3.2)0.50
High (>240 mg/dL)8 (4.3)2 (1.1)
Unknown25 (13.5)17 (9.1)
Triglycerides (mg/dL)
Normal (<150 mg/dL)57 (30.8)29 (15.7)
Borderline (150–190 mg/dL)9 (4.9)6 (3.2)0.60
High (200–499 mg/dL)24 (13)8 (4.3)
Unknown32 (17.3)20 (10.8)
* means highly significant values.
Table 4. Clinical characteristics of young patients by stroke type.
Table 4. Clinical characteristics of young patients by stroke type.
Clinical CharacteristicsIschemic StrokeHemorrhagic Strokep-Value
Hypertensive 0.427
Yes67 (36.2)7 (3.8)
No104 (56.2)7 (3.8)
Diabetes
Normal74 (40)7 (3.8)0.397
Pre-diabetic26 (14.0)0
Diabetic49 (26.5)4 (2.1)
Unknown22 (11.9)3 (1.6)
Body mass index (kg/m2)
Underweight: BMI < 18.5 kg/m28 (4.3)00.70
Normal weight: BMI 18.5–24.99 kg/m256 (30.2)3 (1.6)
Overweight: BMI 25–29.99 kg/m250 (27.0)5 (2.7)
Obese: BMI ≥ 30 kg/m257 (30.8)6 (3.2)
Smoking
Yes16 (8.6)00.77
No155 (83.8)14 (17.6)
Table 5. Laboratory characteristics of young patients by stroke type.
Table 5. Laboratory characteristics of young patients by stroke type.
Laboratory CharacteristicsIschemic StrokeHemorrhagic Strokep-Value
LDL(mg/dL)
Optimal (<100 mg/dL)51 (27.6)2 (1.1)0.15
High (>160 mg/dL)17 (9.2)0
Borderline (130–160 mg/dL)28 (15.3)2 (1.1)
Above optimal (<130 mg/dL)37 (20)3 (1.6)
Unknown38 (20.5)7(3.8)
HDL (mg/dL)
Major risk factor for heart diseases (<40 mg/dL)89 (48.1)4 (2.2)0.127
Negative risk for heart disease75 (40.5)10
Unknown7 (3.8)0
Cholesterol (mg/dL)
Desirable (<200 mg/dL)102 (55.1)5 (2.7)0.87
Borderline (200–239 mg/dL)22 (11.9)1 (0.5)
High (>240 mg/dL)9 (4.9)1 (0.5)
Unknown35 (19)7 (3.8)
Triglycerides (mg/dL)
Normal (<150 mg/dL)80 (43.2)6 (3.2)0.191
Borderline (150–190 mg/dL)15 (8.1)0
High (200–499 mg/dL)31 (16.7)1 (0.5)
Unknown45 (24.37 (3.8)
Table 6. Clinical presentations of stroke at the time of admission to the neurology ward.
Table 6. Clinical presentations of stroke at the time of admission to the neurology ward.
SymptomsIschemic Stroke n (%)Hemorrhagic Stroke n (%)p-Value
Loss of Strength/Weakness
Yes135 (73)6 (3.2)0.002 *
No36 (19.4)8 (4.3)
Headache
Yes14 (7.6)8 (4.3)0.00001 *
No157 (84.9)6 (3.2)
Fever
Yes4 (2.1)0<0.00001*
No167 (90.2)14 (7.6)
Vertigo
Yes89 (48.1)5 (2.7)0.08
No82 (44.3)9 (4.9)
Vomiting
Yes18 (9.7)3 (1.6)0.21
No153 (82.7)11 (5.9)
Speech/Language Disturbance
Yes89 (48.1)5 (2.7)0.24
No82 (44.3)9 (4.9)
* means highly significant values.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gulzar, S.; Kiani, B.H.; Akram, R.W.; Hussein, A.M.; Alamri, A. Gender-Based Differences in Stroke Types and Risk Factors Among Young Adults: A Comparative Retrospective Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030663

AMA Style

Gulzar S, Kiani BH, Akram RW, Hussein AM, Alamri A. Gender-Based Differences in Stroke Types and Risk Factors Among Young Adults: A Comparative Retrospective Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(3):663. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030663

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gulzar, Sumaira, Bushra Hafeez Kiani, Raja Waseem Akram, Ahmed M. Hussein, and Abdulaziz Alamri. 2025. "Gender-Based Differences in Stroke Types and Risk Factors Among Young Adults: A Comparative Retrospective Analysis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 3: 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030663

APA Style

Gulzar, S., Kiani, B. H., Akram, R. W., Hussein, A. M., & Alamri, A. (2025). Gender-Based Differences in Stroke Types and Risk Factors Among Young Adults: A Comparative Retrospective Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(3), 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030663

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop