Next Article in Journal
Unveiling the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Cytokines in Preeclampsia: A Review of Ιnterleukins IL-15, IL-16, IL-17 and IL-35
Previous Article in Journal
Acral Melanoma in Ethnic Lebanese Arab Patients: 12-Year Experience with a Rare Disease in the MENA Region
Previous Article in Special Issue
Relationship Between Simple Renal Cysts and Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Antihypertensive Treatment Adherence on Premature Mortality over Seven Years: A Follow-Up Investigation

by
Nafisa Mhna Kmbo Elehamer
1,2,3,4,
Mohammed Merzah
1,5,
Sami Najmaddin Saeed
1,3,
János Sándor
1,4,* and
Árpád Czifra
1
1
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4028 Debrecen, Hungary
2
Department of Health Education, Faculty of Public and Environmental Health, University of Khartoum, Khartoum 11115, Sudan
3
Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
4
HUN-REN-DE Public Health Research Group, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4012 Debrecen, Hungary
5
Department of Community Health Techniques, Polytechnic College- Karbala, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Kufa 54001, Iraq
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(23), 8321; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238321 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 7 October 2025 / Revised: 8 November 2025 / Accepted: 21 November 2025 / Published: 23 November 2025

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Despite the availability of highly effective medications, hypertension is among the most important risk factors for mortality. Because medication adherence is challenging worldwide, enhancing it to improve the prognosis of hypertension is useful. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of antihypertensive medication nonadherence among individuals aged 18–64 years in a deprived Hungarian population and its determinant factors, and to quantify the impact of antihypertensive medication nonadherence on premature mortality. Methods: We used data from a cohort of hypertensive individuals aged 18–64 years linked to the Health Insurance Fund’s medication purchasing data. The antihypertensive treatment adherence appropriateness (ATAP) was computed as the ratio of the observed time when a patient was properly treated to their observed survival time. ATAP was dichotomized by an observed mean of 0.872. Using adjusted odds ratios (AORs) from multivariate logistic regression models with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), we analyzed the factors influencing the mortality risk in 4962 participants over seven years of follow-up. Results: A total of 493 deaths occurred. An extremely high mortality risk was observed among patients with inappropriate adherence (AOR = 56.2, 95%CI: 41.9–75.4), which could be attributed partly to residual confounding. Significant protective factors were female sex and high education attainment. However, older age and all investigated comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer) were significantly associated with an increased risk of a lethal outcome. Similarly, smoking was also a risk factor. Conclusions: Our investigation revealed the following: (1) in the studied group of patients aged 18–64 years from an extremely disadvantaged Hungarian population, 87.2% of the person-time was covered by the appropriate redemption of medications; (2) nonadherence to medication was more common among younger adults, men, Roma people, current smokers, and COPD patients, whereas the likelihood of appropriate adherence was higher among patients with diabetes mellitus; (3) medication nonadherence was an extremely strong risk factor for a lethal outcome of HTN during the 7-year follow-up period; and (4) methods by which nonadherent patient behavior can be detected should be applied rigorously, and the detected nonadherence should be considered a signal for intervention to improve the prognosis of HTN.

1. Introduction

Hypertension (HTN) or high blood pressure (BP) is a critical medical condition that can increase the risk of brain, heart, kidney, and other diseases [1,2,3]. It is considered a serious public health concern worldwide and a notable cause of premature death, making it a leading cause of health loss, with up to one in four men and one in five women experiencing this condition [1]. Among people aged 30–79 years, approximately 10 million deaths per year can be attributed to HTN [4,5,6]. Unfortunately, in many patients, HTN is not properly treated or controlled [1]. Approximately 50–70% of individuals diagnosed with HTN do not redeem antihypertensive medication (AHM) per prescription [7], and improper antihypertensive adherence (AH) leads to considerable disease progression, which increases cardiovascular complications and decreases therapeutic effectiveness [8,9].
In Europe, despite the 30–45% prevalence of HTN, which increases considerably with age, less than half of hypertensive individuals achieve the recommended BP targets, leading to high morbidity and mortality and considerable health care costs [10]. In contrast, Hungary has a higher prevalence of HTN than the rest of Europe, and HTN screening has revealed high rates of uncontrolled BP [1,11]. According to a World Health Organization report, the prevalence of HTN in Hungarian adults aged 30–79 years is above the average global prevalence of 48%, and the prevalence of uncontrolled HTN in Hungary is among the highest in Europe [1,12]. Although cardiovascular mortality is the main component of avoidable causes of death among adults under 75 years of age [13], we do not have epidemiological data on the extent to which individual risk factors for cardiovascular mortality in this age group contribute to the very high avoidable mortality in Hungary. The prognostic factors of HTN have been well established through comprehensive clinical research. Given this comprehensive understanding, the effective use of available therapeutic interventions is essential for optimizing patient outcomes [14]. Maintenance of high medication adherence is among the most important prognostic factors [15,16].
Many interventions have been shown to be effective at improving medication adherence. These include dose modification and a reduction in the number of medications, timely reminders and improved scheduling, patient education, expansion of the role of pharmacists, improved patient–provider communication, better descriptions of illness and medication, patient follow-up with support and motivation, and timely responses to patient feedback [17,18,19,20,21,22,23].
Despite the extensively documented importance of treatment adherence in HTN management, global adherence rates remain suboptimal. Given the persistent gap between existing adherence levels and optimal therapeutic outcomes, there is a pressing need for structured, organized, and multidisciplinary approaches [24,25,26,27,28]. Recent Hungarian investigations have also revealed considerable challenges related to primary medication adherence (59.4% of the cardiovascular prescriptions are dispensed [29]), and to the persistent use of antihypertensive medication for single-pill combinations; free equivalent dose combinations are 82–85% and 58–73%, respectively [30,31]. The importance of medication nonadherence in determining the poor Hungarian premature cardiovascular mortality has not yet been thoroughly investigated.
Our study was based on a cohort established by an interventional study and took advantage of the cohort members’ administrative records being traceable in the administrative database of the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF). It aimed to (1) describe the prevalence of antihypertensive medication nonadherence among individuals aged 18–64 years in Hungary, (2) explore the determinant factors, (3) quantify the impact of antihypertensive medication nonadherence on premature mortality, and (4) evaluate the adequacy of methods used to control medication nonadherence as part of primary hypertension care.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Setting

This was a cohort study. The cohort was established by a regional health examination survey (HES) conducted from November 2013 to June 2016, which was focused on one of the most deprived regions of Hungary, with the goal of reaching all adults aged ≥ 18 years in the targeted areas. Trained health professionals and nurses collected data, which included sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, lifestyle, and health status. Participants’ health insurance identifiers were also recorded [32,33,34,35]. Further details of the survey have been published elsewhere [34].
Records from the survey (N = 19,789) were linked to the administrative database of the NHIF using individual health insurance identifiers. Participants whose records included mistyped health insurance identifiers (N = 190), who had incorrect HES data (N = 9), and who did not reside in the intervention area (N = 550) were excluded. Because follow-up was possible for the period of 2016–2022 in the NHIF databases, the investigated sample was restricted to records from the HES conducted in 2014 and 2015. The original sample was restricted to individuals with hypertension detected at the HES who were aged 18–64 years. Participants with incomplete records were excluded from our analysis. A total of 4962 records were used in the statistical analyses (Figure 1). These participants were followed up in the NHIF administrative database for 7 years.

2.2. Variables

Patients’ sex (male and female), age group (18–45 and 46–64 years), educational attainment (≤8 years of schooling, vocational school, graduation, and advanced), self-declared ethnicity (Roma and non-Roma), and smoking status (nonsmoker, current smoker, and former smoker) were recorded at the HES.
BP was measured at the HES and was recorded as the mean of two SBP and DBP measurements. Patients were considered hypertensive if their SBP was ≥140 mmHg and their DBP was ≥90 mmHg, in accordance with the European Heart Association guidelines [36].
Comorbidities during the follow-up period determined on the basis of the NHIF’s drug consumption and hospital discharge records included diabetes mellitus (DM), ischemic heart disease (IHD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cancer (CA) [33]. The date of death during the follow-up for lethal outcomes was also determined using the NHIF database.
The antihypertensive treatment adherence appropriateness (ATAP, a medication possession ratio adapted to the structure of the available data) was computed for each participant using the NHIF’s drug consumption database. The number of years a person was treated during the follow-up was counted (treatment-years). The treatment status for each year was recorded as a binary value. A person was considered treated if they redeemed antihypertensive medications four times a year continuously because general medical practitioners (GPs) are allowed to prescribe antihypertensive drugs every three months. The survival time for each participant was determined as the number of years from the HES to either the year of death or the end of the follow-up period for those still alive (survival duration). The ratio of the treatment-years to the survival duration indicates the proportion of survival time during which treatment was administered, which offers a measure of treatment exposure relative to follow-up length. The mean ATAP was 0.872. ATAP was categorized as below or equal to the mean (treated inappropriately) or above the mean (treated appropriately).

2.3. Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to determine the frequencies and crude percentages of explanatory variables for patients treated appropriately and for patients treated inappropriately. The chi-square test was applied to evaluate variations in proportions across groups.
A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine the risk factors for a lethal outcome. ATAP, sex, age, level of education, Roma ethnicity, smoking status, and comorbidities (DM, IHD, COPD, and CA) were the tested explanatory variables. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals were computed.
The data were analyzed using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 28.0 (Armonk, NY, USA).

2.4. Ethical Aspects

The Ethics Committee of the Hungarian National Scientific Council on Health approved the study protocol (approval code: TUKEB 16676-3/2016/EKU, 0361/16; approval date: 30 March 2016). Prior to the commencement of HES data collection, all participants provided written informed consent to participate in the HES and allowed the storage and analysis of their data. The data used in this study were deidentified to protect participant privacy, and all data analyses were conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients’ health insurance numbers were processed exclusively on computers within the National Institute of Health Insurance Fund by designated staff members who routinely handled sensitive data as part of their regular work duties. No other study personnel were permitted to access these data [32,33,34,35].

3. Results

Our study comprised 4962 individuals with HTN. A total of 78.2% (N = 3881) demonstrated appropriate treatment adherence, and 21.8% (N = 1081) had inappropriate treatment adherence (Figure 1).
Table 1 shows the baseline sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics of the patients and their comorbidities and vital status recorded during follow-up according to their antihypertensive treatment adherence appropriateness. Inappropriate antihypertensive treatment adherence was significantly more frequent among younger adults, men, Roma people, current smokers, and COPD patients. Among DM patients, appropriate ATAP was more likely.
A total of 493 (9.94%) deaths occurred among participants with hypertension during the follow-up period. Patients with inappropriate ATAP experienced a higher risk of lethal outcomes (33.48%; 362 deaths among 1081 patients) than patients with appropriate ATAP (3.38%; 131 deaths among 3881 patients).
The crude mortality rate was higher in patients with inappropriate ATAP (334.8/1000) than in those who were appropriately treated (33.7/1000).
Univariate analysis revealed a significantly increased risk of lethal outcome among inappropriate ATAP patients (OR = 14.4, 95%CI: 11.6–17.8), patients aged 46–64 years (OR = 5.11, 95%CI: 3.78–6.91), current smokers (OR = 2.51, 95%CI: 2.00–3.15), former smokers (OR = 2.12, 95%CI: 1.61–2.78), DM patients (OR = 2.79, 95%CI: 2.14–3.63), IHD patients (OR = 4.17, 95%CI: 2.66–6.52), COPD patients (OR = 4.81, 95%CI: 3.36–6.88), and CA patients (OR = 3.85, 95%CI: 2.67–5.56). Female sex (OR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.41–0.61) and high educational attainment (ORvocational school = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.54–0.84; ORgraduation = 0.45, 95%CI: 0.35–0.58; ORadvanced = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.23–0.56) appeared to have a protective effect.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed the results of the univariate analyses. The significant protective factors were female sex (AOR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.43–0.75) and high educational attainment (AORvocational school = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.43–0.82; AORgraduation = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.31–0.64; AORadvanced = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.17–0.56). However, inappropriate treatment adherence (AOR = 56.2, 95%CI: 41.9–75.4), older age (46–64 years; AOR = 29.8, 95%CI: 20.4–43.5) and all investigated comorbidities (AORDM = 2.61, 95%CI: 1.76–3.86; AORIHD =2.76, 95%CI: 1.47–5.18; AORCOPD = 2.37, 95%CI: 1.36–4.12; AORCA = 3.28, 95%CI: 1.88–5.70) were significantly associated with an increased risk of lethal outcome. Similarly, smoking was also a risk factor (AORcurrent smoker = 2.46, 95%CI: 1.81–3.34; AORformer smoker = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.08–2.30) (Table 2).

4. Discussion

4.1. Main Findings

Our study investigated the role of nonadherence in the midterm vital prognosis of HTN among middle-aged patients. This cohort study, with 7 years of follow-up, controlled for well-known sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical risk factors and highlighted the prominent role of medication nonadherence. The crude mortality among HTN patients at 7 years was 334.8/1000. The risk-increasing role of inappropriate ATAP was an order of magnitude greater than those of comorbidities such as DM, IHD, COPD, and CA; smoking; male sex; and low education level. The AOR for inappropriate ATAP was extremely high (AOR = 56.2; 95%CI: 41.9–75.4).
According to a recent systematic review, both all-cause mortality (HR = 1.32; 95%CI: 1.14–1.51) and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 1.61; 95%CI: 1.43–1.781) were higher among HTN patients with low adherence [37]. Papers published after this review have confirmed low medication adherence as a risk factor of mortality, and the effect size was in the range observed in this review [38,39,40,41,42]. Our study demonstrated that in the deprived population targeted by the HES, the role of medication adherence is much stronger than usual.
Our findings related to each studied confounding factor, except for Roma ethnicity, met expectations. Because the increased risks associated with older age [43,44], male sex [45,46,47,48], low education level [49], smoking [50,51], and accompanying chronic diseases [51,52] have been demonstrated by many investigations, these results are fully consistent with mainstream knowledge. Roma ethnicity has been consistently described as a risk factor for the prognosis of cardiovascular diseases [35,53,54,55,56]. The inability of our study to demonstrate this association could be due to the small number of patients of Roma ethnicity in the sample, to the misclassification caused by the self-declaration of the ethnicity, and to the homogeneity of the population in the study area. The intervention study was intentionally conducted in a severely disadvantaged community where the lifestyles of Roma and non-Roma people differ little.
International publications are consistent with our observations of the associations between low adherence, indicated by inappropriate ATAP in our study, and younger age [56,57], male sex [56], and current smoking status [58,59]. However, the expected association between a low level of education and low adherence [45,59] was not observed in our study. Furthermore, the finding of Roma ethnicity as a risk factor for low antihypertensive treatment adherence in our investigation contradicted the findings of previous publications of increased medication adherence among Roma people [60].

4.2. Strengths and Limitations

We considered the most important sociodemographic and lifestyle-related confounding factors as well as the most common relevant comorbidities, thereby diminishing the impact of confounding bias. Data were collected by trained staff members at the HES and using standardized methods in the NHIF’s IT system. Misclassification was minimized by these approaches. Because the NHIF covers the entire population of Hungary, the dropout did not reduce the effectiveness of follow-up. The HES ensured highly completed records. Altogether, 4.15% of patients were excluded from the analysis because of the record incompleteness.
This study has several limitations. Some potential confounders (alcohol consumption, diet, physical activity, types of antihypertensive drugs applied and clinical severity of HTN) were not included in the data collection; and there were comorbidities (e.g.,: chronic kidney diseases) not included in the regression model. Self-reporting of ethnicity may have led to an underestimation of the number of patients of Roma ethnicity, which may have resulted in misclassification. Because the health insurance records contain only the date of death and not the cause of death, we could not separate deaths due to HTN and deaths due to other diseases in our analysis. This may have led to misclassification of the outcome. Further studies are needed to evaluate the specific impact of medication nonadherence on the cardiovascular death risk.
Because the exact dates of drug redemptions were not available for our study, we could not directly assess survival time after the discontinuation of medication. Due to this limitation of exposure assessment, we were unable to apply the Cox model.
The unusually strong association between poor adherence and mortality within 7 years observed in our study, which was conducted in an unusually disadvantaged population, warrants further study. The role of residual confounding should be clarified. Confirming the observed finding, clarifying the role of residual confounding, and exploring the mechanisms that translate extreme poverty to extremely poor adherence, thus leading to extreme mortality, are necessary.

4.3. Implications

The pivotal role of medication nonadherence in midterm hypertension prognosis observed in our sample can be explained by the extremely high cardiovascular medication nonadherence observed in Hungary, where 59.4% of cardiovascular prescriptions are dispensed [61]. Given that the dispensed-to-written prescription ratio (DWR) is highly variable across Hungarian GMPs, the NHIF’s primary health care monitoring system should incorporate the DWR to identify GMPs that require interventions, as recommended by the World Health Organization [62].
The direct practical conclusion from our study concerns the importance of regular patient-level checks for the redemption of prescribed medications. Fortunately, the recent development of IT-supported GMPs in Hungary makes this activity technically possible. The GP or the nurse can check whether the prescribed medicine is dispensed. Given that interventions can help patients who are not willing or able to redeem the prescribed medicine [29], this opportunity should be integrated much more rigorously into the primary health care protocol for HTN.

5. Conclusions

Taken together, our results revealed the following: (1) in the studied group of patients aged 18–64 years, 87.2% of the person-time of antihypertensive treatment is covered by the appropriate redemption of medications in a Hungarian, extremely disadvantaged population; (2) nonadherence to medication is more common among younger adults, men, Roma people, current smokers and COPD patients, whereas the likelihood of appropriate adherence is higher among DM patients; (3) according to the multivariable modeling, medication nonadherence is an extremely strong risk factor for a lethal outcome of HTN during the 7-year follow-up period; and (4) the method by which the GMP-level aggregate indicators can be produced in a routine manner as well as patient-level routine checks on medication nonadherence should be applied much more rigorously, as detected nonadherence should be considered a signal for necessary intervention at both the GMP and patient levels to improve the prognosis of HTN.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Á.C. and J.S.; methodology, J.S. and N.M.K.E.; software, N.M.K.E.; validation, N.M.K.E.; formal analysis, M.M., S.N.S., N.M.K.E. and J.S.; investigation, N.M.K.E.; resources, J.S.; data curation, N.M.K.E. and J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.M.K.E.; writing—review and editing, Á.C., M.M., S.N.S., N.M.K.E. and J.S.; visualization, J.S.; supervision, Á.C.; project administration, Á.C. and J.S.; funding acquisition, Á.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Stipenduim Hungaricum, grant number SHE-00714-004/2020 to N.K.M.E. and the project was co-financed by the Hungarian Research Network—HUN-REN (TKCS-2021/32).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Hungarian National Scientific Council on Health’s Ethics Committee (TUKEB 16676-3/2016/EKU, 0361/16; approval date: 30 March 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Prior to the commencement of the Health Examination Survey (HES) data collection, informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study, allowing for the storage and analysis of their information.

Data Availability Statement

Upon reasonable request, the corresponding author will provide access to the datasets utilized or examined in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

AHMAntihypertensive medication
AORAdjusted odds ratio
ATAPAntihypertensive treatment adherence appropriateness
BPBlood pressure
CACancer
COPDChronic obstructive pulmonary disease
CVDsCardiovascular diseases
DBPDiastolic blood pressure
DMDiabetes mellitus
DWRDispensed to written prescription ratio
HESHealth examination survey
HTNHypertension
IHDIschemic heart disease
NIHIFNational Health Insurance Fund
OROdds ratio
SBPSystolic blood pressure
USPSTFUnited States Preventive Services Task Force

References

  1. World Health, Organization (WHO). Global Report on Hypertension: The Race Against a Silent Killer. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240081062 (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Heart Disease. Heart Disease Risk Factors. 2024. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/heart-disease/risk-factors/index.html (accessed on 31 October 2025).
  3. UN News, Highblood Pressure Now More Common in Low and Middle-Income Countries, New Reportfinds. 2021. Available online: https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/08/1098342 (accessed on 31 October 2025).
  4. World Health Organization (WHO). Hypertension. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  5. Zhou, B.; Carrillo-Larco, R.M.; Danaei, G.; Riley, L.M.; Paciorek, C.J.; Stevens, G.A.; Gregg, E.W.; Bennett, J.E.; Solomon, B.; Singleton, R.K.; et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: A pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet 2021, 398, 957–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. World Heart Federation. World Hypertension Day: Taking Action Against the Silent Epidemic of High Blood Pressure [Internet]. World Heart Federation. 2022. Available online: https://world-heart-federation.org/news/world-hypertension-day-taking-action-against-the-silent-epidemic-of-high-blood-pressure/ (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  7. Pristianty, L.; Hingis, E.S.; Priyandani, Y.; Rahem, A. Relationship between knowledge and adherence to hypertension treatment. J. Public Health Afr. 2023, 14, 2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sharma, S.; Sharma, C.R.; Aryal, S.; Bhandari, B. Adherence to antihypertensive medication and its associated factors among patients with hypertension attending a tertiary hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0305941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peeters, L.; van Gelder, T.; van Dijk, L.; Koch, B.; Versmissen, J. Lessons learned from conducting a randomized controlled trial to improve non-adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment. Blood Press. 2023, 32, 2281316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zuin, M.; Tognola, C.; Maloberti, A.; Parati, G.; Di Fusco, S.A.; Gil Ad, V.; Armata, D.; Valle, C.D.; Colivicchi, F.; Bilato, C.; et al. Advances in Hypertension Management: Insights from the Latest European Guidelines. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2025, 12, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nemcsik, J.; Páll, D.; Nemes-Nagy, Z.; Bacskai, M.; Kovács, T.; Benczúr, B.; Kiss, A.; Ábrahám, G.; Barna, I.; Beaney, T.; et al. May Measurement Month 2019: An analysis of blood pressure screening results from Hungary. Eur. Hear. J. Suppl. 2021, 23, B70–B72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. EUROSTAT: Standardised Preventable and Treatable Mortality, 2011–2022. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/product/page/SDG_03_42 (accessed on 23 September 2025). [CrossRef]
  13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. European Commission Eurostat: Avoidable Mortality: OECD/Eurostat Lists of Preventable and Treatable Causes of Death (Jan 2022 version). Available online: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/data/datasets/oecd-health-statistics/avoidable-mortality-2019-joint-oecd-eurostat-list-preventable-treatable-causes-of-death.pdf (accessed on 23 September 2025).
  14. Vamvakis, A.; Lazaridis, A.; Grammatikopoulou, M.G.; Malliora, A.; Tsiroukidou, K.; Tzimos, C.; Di Blasio, A.; Izzicupo, P.; Gkaliagkousi, E. Impact of Dietary Patterns on the Lipidemic Profile and the Cardiovascular Risk in Stage 1 Hypertension: A Post Hoc Analysis of the HINTreat Trial. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hossain, A.; Ahsan, G.U.; Hossain, M.Z.; Hossain, M.A.; Sutradhar, P.; Alam, S.-E.; Sultana, Z.Z.; Hijazi, H.; Rahman, S.A.; Alameddine, M. Medication adherence and blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients: First follow-up findings from the PREDIcT-HTN study in Northern Bangladesh. BMC Public Health 2025, 25, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tomasino, C.; Tomasino, M. Medication adherence and non-adherence in arterial hypertension: A narrative review. Explor. Med. 2025, 6, 1001276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schedlbauer, A.; Davies, P.; Fahey, T. Interventions to improve adherence to lipid lowering medication. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010, CD004371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Claxton, A.J.; Cramer, J.; Pierce, C. A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin. Ther. 2001, 23, 1296–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Torres-Robles, A.; Wiecek, E.; Tonin, F.S.; Benrimoj, S.I.; Fernandez-Llimos, F.; Garcia-Cardenas, V. Comparison of Interventions to Improve Long-Term Medication Adherence Across Different Clinical Conditions: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Banning, M. A review of interventions used to improve adherence to medication in older people. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2009, 46, 1505–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, C.-Y.; Nguyen, P.-A.A.; Clinciu, D.L.; Hsu, C.-K.; Lu, J.-C.R.; Yang, H.; Wu, C.-C.; Tsai, W.-C.; Chou, Y.-C.; Kuo, T.B.; et al. A personalized medication management platform (PMMP) to improve medication adherence: A randomized control trial. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2017, 140, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ferdinand, K.C.; Senatore, F.F.; Clayton-Jeter, H.; Cryer, D.R.; Lewin, J.C.; Nasser, S.A.; Fiuzat, M.; Califf, R.M. Improving Medication Adherence in Cardiometabolic Disease. JACC 2017, 69, 437–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Farris, K.B.; Salgado, T.M.; Batra, P.; Piette, J.D.; Singh, S.; Guhad, A.; Newman, S.; Marshall, V.D.; An, L. Confirming the theoretical structure of expert-developed text messages to improve adherence to anti-hypertensive medications. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2016, 12, 578–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McNally, R.J.; Teo, V.; Imran, H.; Wright, A.; Waters, B.; Faconti, L.; Patel, J.; Stevenson, J.; Chowienczyk, P.J.; Weinman, J. Pharmacist interventions in the control of hypertension and adherence to anti-hypertensive treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int. J. Pharm. Pract. 2024, 32, ii6–ii7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rashid, A.; Ejara, D.; Deybasso, H.A. Adherence to antihypertensive medications and associated factors in patients with hypertension, Oromia, Ethiopia: A multicenter study. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Alruwaili, B.F. Evaluation of Hypertension-Related Knowledge, Medication Adherence, and Associated Factors Among Hypertensive Patients in the Aljouf Region, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Medicina 2024, 60, 1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Suleiman, S.Z.; Htay, M.N.N.; Soe, H.H.K.; Low, C.L.Y.; Alias, S.H.; Yussof, S.; Keng, W.X.; Chong, K.; Sahiran, M.F.; Harun, M.H.; et al. Association between medication adherence and blood pressure control and factors associated with antihypertensive medication adherence in the Melaka Tengah District: A cross-sectional survey. Malays. Fam. Physician 2024, 19, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Radic, J.; Dogas, H.; Vuckovic, M.; Kolak, E.; Gelemanovic, A.; Nenadic, D.B.; Radic, M. MEDICATION ADHERENCE AND GENDER DIFFERENCE IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS. J. Hypertens. 2023, 41, e314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Harsha, N.; Papp, M.; Kőrösi, L.; Czifra, Á.; Ádány, R.; Sándor, J. Enhancing Primary Adherence to Prescribed Medications through an Organized Health Status Assessment-Based Extension of Primary Healthcare Services. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Farsang, C.; Burnier, M.; Narkiewicz, K.; Rokszin, G.; Abonyi-Tóth, Z.; Kovács, G.; Potukuchi, P.K.; Abdel-Moneim, M.; Simonyi, G. IMPACT OF RAMIPRIL/AMLODIPINE DOSE COMBINATIONS OF SINGLE-PILL VERSUS FREE EQUIVALENT COMBINATIONS ON PERSISTENCE AND MAJOR ADVERSE CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS: A REAL-WORLD ANALYSIS. J. Hypertens. 2023, 41, e81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Simonyi, G.; Burnier, M.; Narkiewicz, K.; Rokszin, G.; Abonyi-Tóth, Z.; Kovács, G.; Potukuchi, P.K.; Abdel-Moneim, M.; Farsang, C. Effect of single-pill versus free equivalent combinations on persistence and major adverse cardiovascular events in hypertension: A real-world analysis. J. Hypertens. 2024, 43, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sándor, J.; Nagy, A.; Jenei, T.; Földvári, A.; Szabó, E.; Csenteri, O.; Vincze, F.; Sipos, V.; Kovács, N.; Pálinkás, A.; et al. Influence of patient characteristics on preventive service delivery and general practitioners’ preventive performance indicators: A study in patients with hypertension or diabetes mellitus from Hungary. Eur. J. Gen. Pract. 2018, 24, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pálinkás, A.; Sándor, J.; Papp, M.; Kőrösi, L.; Falusi, Z.; Pál, L.; Bélteczki, Z.; Rihmer, Z.; Döme, P. Associations between untreated depression and secondary health care utilization in patients with hypertension and/or diabetes. Chest 2018, 54, 255–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sándor, J.; Kósa, K.; Papp, M.; Fürjes, G.; Kőrösi, L.; Jakovljevic, M.; Ádány, R. Capitation-Based Financing Hampers the Provision of Preventive Services in Primary Health Care. Front. Public Health 2016, 4, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sándor, J.; Nagy, A.; Földvári, A.; Szabó, E.; Csenteri, O.; Vincze, F.; Sipos, V.; Kovács, N.; Pálinkás, A.; Papp, M.; et al. Delivery of cardio-metabolic preventive services to Hungarian Roma of different socio-economic strata. Fam. Pract. 2016, 34, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vidal-Petiot, E. Thresholds for Hypertension Definition, Treatment Initiation, and Treatment Targets: Recent Guidelines at a Glance. Circulation 2022, 146, 805–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Peng, X.; Wan, L.; Yu, B.; Zhang, J. The link between adherence to antihypertensive medications and mortality rates in patients with hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2025, 25, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, H.-J.; Kim, B.S.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.; Shin, J.-H.; Sung, K.-C. Impact of blood pressure and medication adherence on clinical outcomes in patients with hypertension. Front. Med. 2025, 12, 1564791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hamrahian, S.M.; Maarouf, O.H.; Fülöp, T. A Critical Review of Medication Adherence in Hypertension: Barriers and Facilitators Clinicians Should Consider. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2022, ume 16, 2749–2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Salazar, M.R. Early adherence to antihypertensive drugs and long—Erm cardiovascular mortality in the “real world”. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2021, 23, 1703–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, J.S.; Escano, R.S.; Therrien, N.L.; Kumar, A.; Bhatt, A.; Pollack, L.M.; Jackson, S.L.; Luo, F. Antihypertensive Medication Adherence and Medical Costs, Health Care Use, and Labor Productivity Among People with Hypertension. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2024, 13, e037357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dalli, L.L.; Olaiya, M.T.; Kim, J.; Andrew, N.E.; Cadilhac, D.A.; Ung, D.; Lindley, R.I.; Sanfilippo, F.M.; Thrift, A.G.; Nelson, M.R.; et al. Antihypertensive Medication Adherence and the Risk of Vascular Events and Falls After Stroke: A Real-World Effectiveness Study Using Linked Registry Data. Hypertension 2023, 80, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Aune, D.; Huang, W.; Nie, J.; Wang, Y. Hypertension and the Risk of All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: An Outcome-Wide Association Study of 67 Causes of Death in the National Health Interview Survey. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 9376134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, M.; Wu, T.; Yu, C.; Gao, W.; Lv, J.; Wu, Y.; Qin, X.; Tang, X.; Gao, P.; Zhan, S.; et al. Association between blood pressure levels and cardiovascular deaths: A 20-year follow-up study in rural China. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e035190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chambergo-Michilot, D.; Rebatta-Acuña, A.; Delgado-Flores, C.J.; Toro-Huamanchumo, C.J. Socioeconomic determinants of hypertension and prehypertension in Peru: Evidence from the Peruvian Demographic and Health Survey. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lombardi, M.; Severi, P.; Mazza, A.; Bendini, M.G.; Caldarone, E.; Armeni, M.; D’Emidio, S.; Leggio, M. Sex Differences in Hypertension: A Question worth Asking? Ann. Clin. Hypertens. 2017, 1, 001–005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. SenthilKumar, G.; Katunaric, B.; Bordas-Murphy, H.; Sarvaideo, J.; Freed, J.K. Estrogen and the Vascular Endothelium: The Unanswered Questions. Endocrinology 2023, 164, bqad079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Roerecke, M.; Tobe, S.W.; Kaczorowski, J.; Bacon, S.L.; Vafaei, A.; Hasan, O.S.M.; Krishnan, R.J.; Raifu, A.O.; Rehm, J. Sex-Specific Associations Between Alcohol Consumption and Incidence of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2018, 7, e008202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yu, S.; Guo, X.; Li, G.; Yang, H.; Zheng, L.; Sun, Y. Low educational status correlates with a high incidence of mortality among hypertensive subjects from Northeast Rural China. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 951930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Sun, W.; Huo, Y.; Liu, Q.; Ahn, A.C.; Zhou, J.; Yu, R.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H. Attributable risk of all-cause mortality in hypertensive adults based on disease risk prediction model: A Chinese cohort study. J. Infect. Public Health 2020, 13, 1290–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lim, K.H.; Cheong, Y.L.; Lim, H.L.; Kee, C.C.; Ghazali, S.M.; Singh, B.S.G.P.; Omar, M.A.; Hashim, M.H.M.; Cheah, Y.K.; Lim, J.H. Assessment of association between smoking and all-cause mortality among Malaysian adult population: Findings from a retrospective cohort study. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2022, 20, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ouyang, F.; Cheng, X.; Zhou, W.; He, J.; Xiao, S. Increased Mortality Trends in Patients with Chronic Non-communicable Diseases and Comorbid Hypertension in the United States, 2000–2019. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 753861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Weiss, E.; Badila, E.; Japie, C.; Balahura, A.M.; Bartos, D. Target Organ Damage and Cardiovascular Risk in a Hypertensive Roma Sample Population in Romania. Maedica 2018, 13, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Casillas-Clot, J.; Pereyra-Zamora, P.; Nolasco, A. Health conditions contribution to disability burden in Spain and the role of ethnicity and migrant status: A nation-wide study. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0306526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Angelov, A.; Atanassov, A.; Atanasov, V.; Gyoshev, S.; Saraivanova, J.; Volodina, V. Circulatory diseases and the wide sex and ethnic life expectancy gaps in Bulgaria since 2010. Public Health 2024, 236, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vallée, A.; Grave, C.; Gabet, A.; Blacher, J.; Olié, V. Treatment and adherence to antihypertensive therapy in France: The roles of socioeconomic factors and primary care medicine in the ESTEBAN survey. Hypertens. Res. 2021, 44, 550–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sekkarie, A.; Fang, J.; Hayes, D.; Loustalot, F. Prevalence of Self-Reported Hypertension and Antihypertensive Medication Use Among Adults—United States, 2017–2021. Mmwr-Morbidity Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2024, 73, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jin, Q.; Mei, J.; Wong, Y.C.; Lam, C.L.K.; Wan, E.Y.F. Associations and attributable burden between risk factors and all-cause and cause-specific mortality at different ages in patients with hypertension. Hypertens. Res. 2024, 47, 2053–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Xu, M.; Lo, S.H.S.; Miu, E.Y.N.; Choi, K.C. Educational programmes for improving medication adherence among older adults with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2025, 161, 104924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Bekele, B.B.; Harsha, N.; Kőrösi, L.; Vincze, F.; Czifra, Á.; Ádány, R.; Sándor, J. Is Prescription Nonredemption a Source of Poor Health Among the Roma? Cross-Sectional Analysis of Drug Consumption Data From the National Health Insurance Fund of Hungary. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 616092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Harsha, N.; Kőrösi, L.; Pálinkás, A.; Bíró, K.; Boruzs, K.; Ádány, R.; Sándor, J.; Czifra, Á. Determinants of Primary Nonadherence to Medications Prescribed by General Practitioners Among Adults in Hungary: Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Health Insurance Data. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. World Health Organization (WHO). How to Investigate Drug Use in Health Facilities. Selected Drug Use Indicators [Internet]. 1993. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-dap-93.1 (accessed on 15 January 2025).
Figure 1. Flow diagram of patients’ cohort establishment.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of patients’ cohort establishment.
Jcm 14 08321 g001
Table 1. Distribution of the characteristics of hypertensive patients according to their antihypertensive treatment adherence appropriateness.
Table 1. Distribution of the characteristics of hypertensive patients according to their antihypertensive treatment adherence appropriateness.
VariablesCategoriesAppropriate Treatment Adherence
N (%)
Inappropriate Treatment Adherence
N (%)
Total
N
p-Value *
Age18–45 years
46–64 years
1019 (61%)
2862 (87%)
642 (39%)
439 (13%)
1661
3301
<0.001
SexMale
Female
1762 (71%)
2119 (85%)
715 (29%)
366 (15%)
2477
2485
<0.001
Educational levelEight years of school
Vocational school
Graduation
Advanced
1259 (78%)
1267 (80%)
1017 (77%)
338 (78%)
363 (22%)
313 (20%)
312 (23%)
93 (22%)
1622
1580
1329
431
0.100
Roma ethnicityNon-Roma
Roma
3653 (79%)
228 (69%)
979 (21%)
102 (31%)
4632
330
<0.001
SmokingNon-smokers
Current smokers
Former smokers
1654 (80%)
1456 (74%)
771 (82%)
407 (20%)
506 (26%)
168 (18%)
2061
1962
939
<0.001
Diabetes mellitusNo
Yes
3568 (78%)
313 (82%)
1014 (22%)
67 (18%)
4582
380
0.040
Ischemic heart diseaseNo
Yes
3808 (78%)
73 (77%)
1059 (22%)
22 (23%)
4867
95
0.740
COPDNo
Yes
3784 (79%)
97 (66%)
1032 (21%)
49 (34%)
4816
146
<0.001
CancerNo
Yes
3771 (78%)
110 (73%)
1040 (22%)
41 (27%)
4811
151
0.100
Lethal outcomeSurvived
Died
3750 (84%)
131 (27%)
719 (16%)
362 (73%)
4469
493
<0.001
Total 388110814962
* chi-square test.
Table 2. Risk factors for lethal outcomes among patients with hypertension during the 7-year follow-up period according to univariate and multivariable logistic regression models.
Table 2. Risk factors for lethal outcomes among patients with hypertension during the 7-year follow-up period according to univariate and multivariable logistic regression models.
VariablesCategoriesLethal Outcome
N (%)
Survived
N (%)
Crude Mortality Rate
/1000
OR
[95%CI] *
aOR
[95%CI] *
Antihypertensive treatment adherence appropriatenessAppropriate
Inappropriate
131 (27%)
362 (73%)
3750 (84%)
719 (16%)
33.7
334.8
Ref **
14.4 [11.6–17.8]
Ref
56.2 [41.9–75.4]
Age18–45 years
46–64 years
49 (10%)
444 (90%)
1612 (36%)
2857 (64%)
29.5
134.5
Ref
5.11 [3.78–6.91]
Ref
29.8 [20.4–43.5]
SexMale
Female
320 (65%)
173 (35%)
2157 (48%)
2312 (52%)
129.1
69.6
Ref
0.50 [0.41–0.61]
Ref
0.56 [0.43–0.75]
Educational levelEight years of school
Vocational school
Graduation
Advanced
224 (45%)
155 (32%)
90 (18%)
24 (5.0%)
1398 (31%)
1425 (32%)
1239 (28%)
407 (9.0%)
138.1
98.1
67.7
55.6
Ref
0.67 [0.54–0.84]
0.45 [0.35–0.58]
0.36 [0.23–0.56]
Ref
0.59 [0.43–0.82]
0.44 [0.31–0.64]
0.31 [0.17–0.56]
Roma ethnicityNon-Roma
Roma
454 (92%)
39 (8.0%)
4178 (93%)
291 (7.0%)
98.0
118.1
Ref
1.23 [0.87–1.74]
Ref
0.93 [0.57–1.51]
SmokingNon-smokers
Current smokers
Former smokers
120 (24%)
264 (54%)
109 (22%)
1941 (43%)
1698 (38%)
830 (19%)
58.2
134.5
116.0
Ref
2.51 [2.00–3.15]
2.12 [1.61–2.78]
Ref
2.46 [1.81–3.34]
1.58 [1.08–2.30]
Diabetes mellitusNo
Yes
411 (83%)
82 (17%)
4171 (93%)
298 (7.0%)
89.6
215.7
Ref
2.79 [2.14–3.63]
Ref
2.61 [1.76–3.86]
Ischemic heart diseaseNo
Yes
464 (94%)
29 (6.0%)
4403 (98%)
66 (2.0%)
95.3
305.2
Ref
4.17 [2.66–6.52]
Ref
2.76 [1.47–5.18]
COPDNo
Yes
445 (90%)
48 (10%)
4371 (98%)
98 (2.0%)
92.4
328.7
Ref
4.81 [3.36–6.88]
Ref
2.37 [1.36–4.12]
CancerNo
Yes
450 (91%)
43 (9.0%)
4361 (98%)
108 (2.0%)
93.5
284.7
Ref
3.85 [2.67–5.56]
Ref
3.28 [1.88–5.70]
* 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; ** Ref: reference category; statistically significant results are shown in bold; Nagelkerke r2 for multivariable model: 0.528.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elehamer, N.M.K.; Merzah, M.; Saeed, S.N.; Sándor, J.; Czifra, Á. Impact of Antihypertensive Treatment Adherence on Premature Mortality over Seven Years: A Follow-Up Investigation. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 8321. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238321

AMA Style

Elehamer NMK, Merzah M, Saeed SN, Sándor J, Czifra Á. Impact of Antihypertensive Treatment Adherence on Premature Mortality over Seven Years: A Follow-Up Investigation. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(23):8321. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elehamer, Nafisa Mhna Kmbo, Mohammed Merzah, Sami Najmaddin Saeed, János Sándor, and Árpád Czifra. 2025. "Impact of Antihypertensive Treatment Adherence on Premature Mortality over Seven Years: A Follow-Up Investigation" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 23: 8321. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238321

APA Style

Elehamer, N. M. K., Merzah, M., Saeed, S. N., Sándor, J., & Czifra, Á. (2025). Impact of Antihypertensive Treatment Adherence on Premature Mortality over Seven Years: A Follow-Up Investigation. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(23), 8321. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238321

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop