Next Article in Journal
Differentiating Outcomes and Complications Between Extraplexal Tendon Transfers and Arthrodesis for Shoulder Reanimation Following Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury: A Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Beyond Lipids and Platelets: A Review of Anti-Inflammatory Strategies in Secondary Prevention of Acute Coronary Syndromes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fatal Free Falls: A Clinical and Forensic Analysis of Skeletal Injury Patterns Using PMCT and Autopsy

1
Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 8b, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Correct, Clinical, and Imaging Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, Jaczewskiego 4, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Orthopedics and Movement Traumatology, Provincial Integrated Hospital, Szpitalna 45, 62-504 Konin, Poland
4
Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Konstantynów 1H, 20-708 Lublin, Poland
5
Department of Machine Design and Mechatronics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(22), 7912; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14227912
Submission received: 12 October 2025 / Revised: 3 November 2025 / Accepted: 4 November 2025 / Published: 7 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)

Abstract

Background: Free fatal falls (FFF) are a frequent occurrence in forensic medicine. Many variables, such as the victim’s sex, BMI, intoxication, height of the fall, and mental illness, can influence injury patterns. Previous studies identified fracture patterns and frequencies mostly with general anatomical detail, focusing on broad areas. As specific fractures might be roots for new statistical connections, this leaves a gap in our understanding. Using postmortem computed tomography, we aim to establish fracture frequencies and identify possible new statistical connections. Methods: In total, we retrospectively analyzed seventy-nine cases of confirmed deaths due to falls using the database of the Department and Institute of Forensic Medicine in Lublin. Our inclusion criteria were death due to free fall onto hard, non-deformable surfaces. We excluded cases of ground-level falls. All victims must have undergone postmortem computed tomography. Furthermore, each analyzed case documented individual intrinsic variables (sex, age, body mass, height, pre-existing mental conditions, and drug or alcohol use) and extrinsic variables (fall height, landing surface, time between the fall and death, and known cause of the fall). Results: Injuries in free fatal falls tend to focus on the axial skeleton. Suicides experience more severe, bilateral fractures, often involving the pelvis and limbs, while accidents tend to have unilateral injuries with rare limb involvement. We established new correlations with the height of the fall for the maxilla, mandible, anterior and posterior regions of the occipital bone, and the temporal bone. Moreover, our research confirmed previously noted correlations between the height of the fall and fractures of the limbs (and their individual bones), the lumbar vertebrae, and the chest. Conclusions: Our findings highlight that free fatal falls are characterized by distinct skeletal injury patterns that differ between accidents and suicides, with bilateral pelvic and limb fractures being particularly indicative of intentional falls. The integration of PMCT with autopsy improves the detection of these patterns. It provides valuable diagnostic and medico-legal insights, supporting a more precise determination of the cause and manner of death.

1. Introduction

Falls from height are classified as the second most common cause of blunt trauma, following motor vehicle accidents [1]. They can be fatal and lead to violent death [2,3]. Fatal free falls (FFF) result from suicide, homicide, or accident [4] with work-related incidents and intentional acts being the most common. These events account for a significant proportion of traumatic fatal injuries globally, comprising 23% to 56% of intentional deaths and 35% to 37% of construction work-related deaths [5]. FFFs occur more frequently in urban settings, with balconies, buildings, and trees being the most common locations. Some studies have focused on analyzing the characteristics of individuals statistically associated with a higher occurrence of such incidents. These analyses indicate that men are most often affected, likely because they are more often involved in jobs that require work at significant heights than women. In contrast, women account for a higher proportion of suicide-related FFFs than men. The average age of individuals involved in these incidents varies considerably across studies, highlighting that people of all ages are at risk of FFFs [6,7].
Due to the numerous factors involved, the consequences of falls can vary. Outcomes depend on body mass, fall height, surface type, secondary impacts, point of first contact, and age-related comorbidities. The manner of the fall—whether intentional or accidental—also plays a crucial role [8,9]. Suicides tend to land on their feet, while accidental fallers reportedly have a higher frequency of skull and upper extremities fractures [10]. Despite these differences, it has been observed that, in general, victims of FFF most commonly demonstrate fractures of the skull, vertebrae, and thoracic cavity, followed by fractures of the lower extremities, upper extremities, and pelvis [11]. This suggests that victims of FFF show specific patterns of skeletal blunt force trauma. Such a distribution of injuries results from the unique force interactions involved [12].
FFF is associated with high-energy vertical deceleration [13]. Literature indicates that injury patterns are related to fall height and the kinetic energy at impact, as the body undergoes rapid deceleration upon striking the ground [14]. During this process, kinetic energy is transferred to the ground and exerted back onto the body, resulting in injuries [15]. Significant correlations have been established between the height of the fall, the energy imparted to the body during BFT, and the distribution and extent of skeletal injuries [16].
Osseous injuries play a significant role in forensic pathology. These fractures can be identified using post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) [17], external body examination, and forensic autopsy. Forensic pathologists investigating victims of falls from height are required to evaluate injuries, establish correlations between injury severity and fall height, and assess the medico-legal aspects of the incident. Providing such information can be particularly challenging in several scenarios. First, in the absence of eyewitness accounts, determining whether a fall from height resulted from homicide, suicide, or an accident becomes more difficult. Another challenge arises from ambiguous injuries, which could suggest either a fall from height or other causes of violent death, such as motor vehicle accidents [18,19]. PMCT may play a significant role in addressing these difficulties. It serves as an essential complement to conventional autopsy in trauma victims, facilitating the detection of numerous additional injuries. PMCT has proven useful across a broad range of forensic applications, including the assessment of blunt-force injuries, firearm and sharp-force trauma, blast injuries, asphyxic injuries, pediatric deaths, and archaeological/anthropological examinations [20,21,22]. However, there is a limited number of studies that include analyses of PMCT in victims of FFF and report fracture frequencies with anatomical detail. As that information might be the root of new correlations, this leaves gaps in our understanding of FFF.
Furthermore, complex pelvic injuries in fatal falls might be underreported in autopsy studies because the pelvis is not typically dissected. Using postmortem computed tomography, we identified complex blunt trauma patterns commonly associated with falls, including faller’s fractures, Bilateral pubic rami fractures, and pelvic injuries classified by the Young–Burgess system.
The faller’s fracture, typically seen in suicide jumpers, results from massive axial loading and presents as a horizontal sacral fracture with bilateral vertical extensions, forming an H-shaped pattern [23]. Bilateral fractures of the superior and inferior pubic rami are often caused by falls in a position where the thighs are abducted [24].
The Young–Burgess classification categorizes pelvic injuries into:
  • APC (anterior–posterior compression): progressing from pubic symphysis disruption to sacroiliac injury.
  • LC (lateral compression): associated with pubic rami and sacral ala or iliac wing fractures.
  • PAC (posterior–anterior compression): associated with faller’s fracture or double vertical fractures of the posterior aspect of the pelvis.
  • VS (vertical shear): from axial loading, causing vertical displacement of one hemipelvis and disruption of pelvic ligaments [25,26,27].
This study aims to investigate whether FFF are characterized by a specific pattern of skeletal injuries that distinguishes them from other types of violent deaths. It also sought to determine whether such a pattern enables a reliable assessment of the cause and circumstances of death, thereby contributing to the improvement of postmortem diagnostics. The study includes an analysis of PMCT in FFF victims.

2. Materials and Methods

We analyzed 134 cases of fatal falls from 1 January 2016 to 7 September 2024, using the database of the Department and Institute of Forensic Medicine in Lublin, Poland.
Our inclusion criteria were death due to free fall onto hard, non-deformable surfaces. For this study, a free fall was defined as a vertical descent from a height occurring without intermediate obstacles, secondary impacts, or collisions with other structures. Falls involving multiple impacts or any intermediate obstructions (such as tree branches, balconies, or glass surfaces) were excluded from analysis. We excluded all cases of ground-level falls, defined as falls from the standing or sitting position without a vertical drop. The described injuries could not be attributed to any causes other than the fall itself. Furthermore, each analyzed case must have documented individual intrinsic variables (sex, age, body mass, height, pre-existing mental conditions, drug or alcohol use) and extrinsic variables (height of the fall, landing surface, time between the fall and death, and known cause of the fall). Any cases without complete documentation were excluded from the study. Within our department, it is standard procedure for all trauma-related cadavers to undergo PMCT before autopsy; consequently, all cases incorporated into this study had accessible scans. PMCT assessments were performed independently and blinded to autopsy results. Following both examinations, the findings were compared, and any inconsistencies were resolved during a second consensus evaluation of the available data.
Of the 134 cases initially reviewed, 16 were excluded as non–free-fall incidents (e.g., falls on stairs or falls obstructed by glass, furniture, or other objects), 13 as ground-level falls, 10 due to additional trauma sustained before the fall (such as assault or traffic accidents), and 16 because of incomplete documentation. Seventy-nine cases met the inclusion criteria for this study.
Using autopsy reports and PMCT, victims were assessed for skeletal injuries. The Department and Institute of Forensic Medicine in Lublin possess a Toshiba TSX-034A Astelion Advance Edition Computer Tomography system (Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan) and a dedicated imaging data archiving subsystem (PACS) with scalable disk space (NAS), which provides access to all previously performed examinations. All cases were analyzed for skeletal trauma using the RadiAnt DICOM Viewer program (Version 2025.2, Medixant, 2025), which implements 3D reconstruction, alongside the Viterea diagnostic console certified for clinical diagnostics (MD) with an MD-class EIZO RX440 monitor (EIZO Corporation, Hakusan, Ishikawa, Japan).
This study’s analysis was divided into two sections based on the cause of the fall: suicide or accident. The gathered data were examined for bone fractures, first categorizing them into six main categories: head, spine, thorax, pelvis, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Fractures were further classified by creating additional anatomical subcategories, including individual bones and their respective parts. The study accounted for the height of the fall, dividing it into two classifications. The first classification is based on the literature and comprises two groups: falls from less than 3 m and falls from 3 m or more. The second classification consists of eight groups: falls less than or equal to 3 m, falls from 3 to 6 m, falls from 6 to 10 m, falls from 10 to 15 m, falls from 15 to 20 m, falls from 20 to 25 m, falls from 25 to 30 m, and falls of 30 m or higher. These groups were formed to perform a statistical analysis, as using regular intervals would yield insufficient subject numbers in each height group. In cases where the height of the fall was reported in stories instead of meters, it was assumed that a story is approximately 3 m high (3-story building = ground floor + 3 floors = 3 m + 3 × 3 m =12 m). The study also accounted for the kinetic energy of the fall, calculated from the potential energy using the formula Epot = mgh (m: body mass, g: acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s2), and h: height in m).
All data were analyzed using Statistica software (StatSoft, version 13), with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05. Depending on the type of data and its distribution (whether normal or not), various tests were employed, including Student’s t-test (T-test), Mann–Whitney U test (MWU), Chi-squared test (χ2 test), Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ), and Kruskal–Wallis test (ANOVA). To assess the influence of the studied variables, we used Binary Logistic Regression.

3. Results

Seventy-nine cases of fatal falls from height were analyzed, including 22 women (28%) and 57 men (72%). The average age was 54; the median was 55, including the minimum age of the fatal fall victim—17—and the maximum age of 93. The average BMI was 25.08 kg/m2, with a median of 24.11 kg/m2, ranging from 15.15 kg/m2 to 40.64 kg/m2.
Of the victims, 26 (32.91%) were under the influence of alcohol, including four women (18.18%) and 22 men (38.60%). The maximum concentration of alcohol in the victim’s blood was 7.48 g/L. Of the examined cases, mental illness was reported in 20 cases (25.32%), including 11 women (50%) and nine men (15.79%). The remaining 59 cases (74.68%), including 11 women (50%) and 48 men (84.21%), had no mental illness history. A psychiatric history was significantly more prevalent among females than among males (χ2 test, p = 0.0017). Additionally, individuals with mental illness tended to be under the influence of alcohol (χ2 test, p = 0.0116).
Of the examined cases of falling from a height, an accident occurred in 36 cases (45.57%), and a suicide occurred in 43 cases (54.43%). Among the deceased, there were 20 low falls (25.32%), including 2 women (9.09%) and 18 men (31.58%). Falls above 3 m were classified as high falls, which accounted for 59 cases (74.68%), including 20 female falls (90.91%) and 39 male falls (68.42%). High falls were divided into specific fall height ranges. The average fall was 22.30 m, the median was 7 m, the minimum fall height was 1.5 m, and the maximum fall height was 1000 m. Women, on average, fell from higher elevations than men (MWU, p = 0.0276); however, within the suicide group, men experienced falls from greater heights (MWU, p = 0.001).
The time of death varied from death on site- 46 cases (58.23%), including 13 among women (59.09% of surveyed women) and 33 among men (57.89%), to death after more than 10 days from fall—2 cases (2.53%), which were exclusively men (3.51%). The maximum time to death from a fall was 20 days. In one case, the exact time of death from the fall was unrecorded; however, it was known to occur within several hours. The collected data are presented in Table 1.
  • Accidents
Of the 79 cases of falls from height, 36 were caused by accident (45.57%), including four women (18.18% of all female falls) and 32 men (56.14% of all male falls). The minimum fall height was 1.5 m, and the maximum was 1000 m. The average height of fall was 5.94 m. Considering the presence of a parachutist who fell from a height of 1000 m in the accident, it is not included in the average due to its false inflation. The median was 4 m.
Falls from a low height occurred in 15 cases (41.67% of accident victims), all of whom were men (46.88% of accidents among men). Falls from a high height (3–15 m) occurred in 19 cases (52.78%), including 4 cases involving women (100%) and 15 among men (46.88%). Falls from a height higher than or equal to 15 m concerned 2 cases (5.56% of cases), all of which were exclusively among men (6.25% of men).
Of the accident victims, 17 of them were under the influence of alcohol (47.22% of accident victims), including one woman (25% of women) and 16 men (50% of men). Higher alcohol intoxication was statistically correlated with accidental deaths (χ2 test, p = 0.0133). Three victims had a documented mental illness (8.33% of accident victims), including one woman (25% women) and two men (6.25% of men). The particulars were presented in the Table 2.
  • Suicide
Of the 79 cases of fatal falls from height, 43 were caused by suicide (54.43%), including 18 women (81.82% of all female falls) and 25 men (43.86% of all male falls). The minimum fall height for suicide was 3 m, and the maximum was 33 m. The average height of falls was 12.88 m. The median was 9 m. Females were more likely to die by suicide, whereas males were more frequently victims of accidental falls (p = 0.0024). Additionally, a significant correlation was observed between fall height and manner of death, with suicides occurring from greater altitudes (MWU, p = 0.00013).
Falls from low height occurred in 5 cases (11.63% of suicide victims), including two among women (11.11% of women) and three among men (12% of men). Falls from a high height (3–15 m) occurred in 24 cases (55.81%), including nine among women (50%) and 15 among men (60%). Falls from a height of 15 m or higher were involved in 14 cases (32.56% of cases), including 7 cases among women (38.89% of women) and seven among men (28% of men). Furthermore, we found that suicides tend to have greater kinetic energy (MWU, p = 0.0044) and lower BMIs (MWU, p = 0.0163) than accidents.
Of the suicide victims, 9 of them were under the influence of alcohol (20.93% of suicide victims), including three among women (16.67% of women) and six among men (24% of men). Seventeen victims had documented mental illness (39.53% of suicide victims), including 10 among women (55.56% of women) and seven among men (28% of men). Psychiatric history had a positive correlation with suicide (χ2 test, p = 0.0015). The particulars were presented in the Table 3.
  • Skull
Skull fractures occurred in 47 victims who fell from a height. We observed a bimodal distribution of skull fractures, with peaks at altitudes below 6 m and above 20 m (χ2 test, p = 0.010). Neurocranial fractures were more common among males (χ2 test, p = 0.003). Fracture frequencies are presented in Table 4.
Positive correlation was found between maxillary fractures and both the height of the fall (MWU, p = 0.01) and its kinetic energy (MWU, p = 0.008). Additionally, fractures of the mandible showed positive correlations with the fall height category (MWU, p = 0.009) and the fall’s kinetic energy (MWU, p = 0.008). Furthermore, logistic regression analysis showed that as skull fractures increase, pelvic fractures decrease by almost 70% (OR = 1.065; 95% CI: 1.01–1.12; LRT: p = 0.011).
  • Accidents vs. suicides
Comparison between injuries to the skull in suicides and accidents is shown in Figure 1.
Table 5. Skull fractures in accidental fatal falls.
Table 5. Skull fractures in accidental fatal falls.
Damaged StructureAll Cases% of CasesBilateral/Complex Injury
Sphenoid bone17687—complex injury
Body of the sphenoid bone1040-
Greater wing of the sphenoid bone12485
Pterygoid process of the sphenoid bone141
Temporal bone15605
Petrous part of the sphenoid bone9364
Squamous part of the sphenoid bone11442
Occipital bone1872
Posterior part of the occipital bone9364—Anterior + posterior part
Anterior part of occipital bone1352
Maxilla7283
Frontal bone520-
Parietal bone8323
Nasal bone3122
Ethmoid bone312-
Palatine bone140
Vomer312-
Zygomatic bone4160
Separation of the zygomatic bone281
Zygomatic arch7281
Mandible520-
Body of the mandible4161—Body + Left and Right ramus
Ramus of the mandible3121
Table 6. Skull fractures in the suicide group.
Table 6. Skull fractures in the suicide group.
Damaged StructureAll Cases% of CasesBilateral/Complex Injury
Sphenoid bone1770.838—complex injury
Body of the sphenoid bone729.17-
Greater wing of the sphenoid bone1458.334
Pterygoid process of the sphenoid bone14.171
Temporal bone1562.57
Petrous part of the sphenoid bone1145.836
Squamous part of the sphenoid bone1458.333
Occipital bone937.5
Posterior part of the occipital bone6254—Anterior + posterior part
Anterior part of occipital bone729.17
Maxilla12505
Frontal bone1145.83-
Parietal bone12504
Nasal bone520.834
Ethmoid bone520.83-
Palatine bone312.52
Vomer14.17-
Zygomatic bone833.333
Separation of the zygomatic bone312.51
Zygomatic arch12502
Mandible937.5
Body of the mandible833.330—Body + Left and Right ramus
Ramus of the mandible28.330
In statistical analysis, the anterior part of the occipital bone was fractured more frequently in suicides than in accidents (χ2 test, p = 0.043).
  • Rib cage
Among 79 cases of fatal falls, rib cage injury occurred in 70 cases (88.61% of all cases). The fracture frequencies in the studied population are shown in Table 7.
Rib cage fractures increased with fall height (ANOVA, p = 0.00022) across categories of less than 3 m, 6–10 m, 20–25 m, and 25–30 m, with similar trends observed for individual rib fractures. Additionally, higher kinetic energy correlated with a greater total number of chest fractures (ρ, p = 0.0002). Males sustained rib cage fractures more frequently than females (MWU, p = 0.0066), and individuals with mental illness exhibited more severe rib cage injuries (MWU, p = 0.0123).
  • Accident vs. Suicide
Among 36 victims of the accident, 27 had a rib cage injury (75% of all accident victims). No statistical correlation was found between the height of the fall and rib cage injuries (MWU, p = 0.513). Fracture frequencies are presented in Table 8 and Figure 2.
All 43 suicide fall victims suffered chest injuries. Bilateral rib fractures were significantly more frequent in suicides, while unilateral fractures were more prevalent in accidents (χ2 test, p = 0.0001). Fracture frequencies are presented in Table 9.
  • Vertebrae:
Among the 79 victims, 61 cases (77.22% of all cases) had a vertebral injury, including 18 women (81.82% of women) and 43 men (72.88% of men). Fracture frequencies are presented in Table 10.
We observed a statistically significant correlation between the height of the fall and the presence of vertebral fractures (MWU, p = 0.043). Every meter fallen increased the chance for a spinal fracture by 8.7% (OR = 1.087; 95% CI: 0.99–1.20; LRT: p = 0.034). Moreover, the lumbar spine was the only spinal segment to show a correlation with fall height (MWU, p = 0.000004). The differences were most pronounced at height groups of less than 3 m, 20–25 m, and over 30 m. The most significant differences were observed between the less than 3 m and the above 30 m categories. Additionally, a relationship was found between vertebral fractures and the kinetic energy of the fall (MWU, p = 0.033).
Binary logistic regression revealed a strong and statistically significant association between sternocostal and vertebral fractures, with the odds of vertebral injury increasing nearly tenfold as the number of sternocostal fractures rose (OR = 9.67; 95% CI: 2.12–44.15; LRT p = 0.0024).
  • Accident vs. Suicide
Comparison between spinal column injuries in accidents and suicides is shown in Figure 3.
Among the 36 victims of the accident, 26 suffered spinal injuries (72.22% of all accident victims). Fracture frequencies are presented in Table 11.
Among the 43 victims of a suicidal fall from a height, spinal injuries occurred in 35 cases (81.40% of all suicide victims). Fracture frequencies are presented in Table 12.
  • Pelvis
Of the 38 individuals with pelvic fractures, a significant correlation was found with female sex (χ2 test, p = 0.026). Pelvic fracture frequencies are shown in Table 13.
In the statistical analysis, we observed that fractures of the inferior pubic ramus were more likely to occur in individuals with lower BMI than in those without this damage (MWU, p = 0.035). Additionally, the base (MWU, p = 0.016) and middle part (MWU, p = 0.027) of the sacrum were more likely to be affected in cases with a lower BMI. Logistic regression analysis showed that body mass was a significant predictor of pelvic damage, and with every kg of mass, the probability of pelvic fracture decreased 5.4% 17.9% (OR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.91–0.98; LRT: p = 0.0019). Another observation was that fractures of the pubis (χ2 test, p = 0.025), sacrum (χ2 test, p = 0.004), and ischium (χ2 test, p = 0.015) were more common in females than in males.
The study identified a significant relationship between the kinetic energy of a fall and fractures of the pelvis (MWU, p = 0.0001) and its specific regions, including the pubic bone (MWU, p = 0.001), bilateral pubic fractures (MWU, p = 0.006), the sacrum (MWU, p = 0.001), its middle part (MWU, p = 0.034), and the apex (MWU, p = 0.03). Additionally, kinetic energy was associated with pubic symphysis rupture (MWU, p = 0.018), Bilateral pubic rami fractures (MWU, p = 0.042), and upward displacement of pelvic structures (MWU, p = 0.015). Higher kinetic energy was observed in groups with these injuries. Every additional meter in height of the fall increased the chances of pelvic fractures by 17.9% (OR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.076–1.29; LRT: p = 0.000011). Furthermore, individuals with shorter stature experienced a higher frequency of pelvic (T-test, p = 0.003), pubic bone (T-test, p = 0.003), inferior ramus (T-test, p = 0.003), superior ramus (T-test, p = 0.001), and sacral fractures (T-test, p = 0.003).
  • Accident vs. Suicide
Comparison between pelvic injury in accidents and suicides is shown in Figure 4.
There were 11 cases of individuals who had a pelvic fracture as a result of an accident-related fall from a height. Fractures are presented in Table 14.
The cohort of suicides with pelvic injuries included 27 individuals. Fracture frequencies in the suicide group are presented in Table 15.
Cases of suicide, compared to accidents, showed a higher frequency of fractures in the pelvis (χ2 test, p = 0.004) and pubic bone (χ2 test, p = 0.005).
  • Upper Limb
The group of people who suffered a fracture of the upper limb in an accident from height numbered 54. Fracture frequencies are presented in Table 16.
A positive statistical correlation was found between upper limb fractures (MWU, p = 0.001), humerus fractures (MWU, p = 0.013), and forearm bone fractures (MWU, p = 0.038) with the height of the fall. Additionally, other components of the upper limb—scapula (unilateral MWU, p = 0.001; bilateral MWU, p = 0.004), clavicle (unilateral MWU, p = 0.008; bilateral MWU, p = 0.003), and ulna (MWU, p = 0.044)—showed similar relationships. For every additional meter fallen, the risk of upper limb damage increased 26% (OR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.062–1.50; LRT: p = 0.00036). Meanwhile, no statistically significant correlation was observed between radial bone fractures and the fall category. Furthermore, differences in height categories between groups were more evident for bilateral fractures of the scapula and clavicle.
Statistical analysis indicated that victims with a fractured forearm (either the ulna, radius, or both) (MWU, p = 0.002), as well as those with fractures of the ulna (MWU, p = 0.01) and radius (MWU, p = 0.003), alone, had a lower BMI compared to those without such injuries. Moreover, the kinetic energy from falls was correlated with fractures of the scapula (MWU, p = 0.005), bilateral scapula fractures (MWU, p = 0.012), clavicle fractures (MWU, p = 0.018), bilateral clavicle fractures (MWU, p = 0.01), and humerus fractures (MWU, p = 0.016).
  • Accident vs. Suicide
Comparison between upper limb injuries in accidents and suicides is shown in Figure 5, Table 17 and Table 18.
In comparison of these two groups, it was observed that fractures of the upper limb (χ2 test, p = 0.001), scapula (χ2 test, p = 0.018), clavicle (χ2 test, p = 0.004), and forearm (χ2 test, p = 0.033) are more common in suicides than in accidents. Analysis of logistic regression showed that suicides have an eight times higher risk of upper limb fracture than accidents (OR = 8.089; 95% CI: 2.17–30.19; LRT: p= 0.00083).
  • Lower Limbs
Among 79 victims, fractures in the lower limb (L.L.) occurred in 35 cases (44.30% of all cases). Fracture frequencies are presented in Table 19.
Lower limb fractures were positively correlated with the kinetic energy of the fall (MWU, p = 0.000021) and female sex (χ2 test, p = 0.00158). Fractures of the right (χ2 test, p = 0.00352) and left (χ2 test, p = 0.048) femurs, as well as the right (χ2 test,, p = 0.00148) and left (χ2 test, p = 0.00025) tibias, right (χ2 test, p = 0.00148) and left (χ2 test, p = 0.01631) fibulae were positively associated with the height of the fall. For every meter, the probability of lower limb damage increased 12% (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.022–1.23; LRT: p = 0.00086)
The sums of all left (ρ, p = 0.000001) and right (ρ, p = 0.000016) L.L. fractures were correlated with the height of the fall. Additionally, bilateral lower limb fractures occurred in 18 cases, which were strongly associated with the height of the fall (ANOVA, p = 0.0003). Fractures in the right foot (tarsals, metatarsals, and digits) also showed a positive correlation with the height of the fall (ρ, p = 0.004278) and, additionally, with a suicidal manner of death (MWU, p = 0.0154). We found a statistically significant correlation between left L.L. injury and mental illness (MWU, p = 0.00415).
Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of lower limb fractures increased the probability of pelvic fractures by over three times (OR = 3.21; 95% CI: 1.044–9.86; LRT: p = 0.040)—moreover, the best predictors for the L.L damage were upper limb fractures (OR = 14.0; 95% CI: 2.88–68.058; LRT: p = 0.000073).
  • Accident vs. Suicide
Comparison of lower limb damage in accidental and suicidal fatal falls is shown in Figure 6. Note that the accident group is significantly smaller.
Of the 35 cases with lower limb injuries, 7 were victims of accidents (20% had damaged lower limbs). Fracture frequencies are presented in Table 20.
Of the 35 cases with lower limb injuries, 28 of them occurred as a result of a suicidal fall from a height (80% damaged L.L.). Fractures in the suicides are presented in Table 21.
Injuries to both the right (MWU, p = 0.00283) and left (MWU, p = 0.000146) L.L. were significantly more common in suicides; this was also true for the right femur (χ2 test, p = 0.02904). Fractures of both the right (χ2 test, p = 0.01567) and left (χ2 test, p = 0.00535) tibia, as well as the right (χ2 test, p = 0.01567) and left fibula (χ2 test, p = 0.00078), showed a positive correlation with suicide cases. Bilateral lower limb fractures were found in 16 cases; they were more frequent in suicides than accidents (χ2 test, p = 0.00278). Logistic regression analysis shows that suicides had a four times higher risk of lower limb fracture than accidents (OR = 3.96; 95% CI: 1.20–13.13; LRT: p = 0.022).

4. Discussion

Our study population was consistent with previous reports. The majority of participants were male, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.6:1. Men outnumbered women across all categories of fatality, a trend consistent with most prior studies, further reinforcing that FFF primarily affects men. High-risk occupations, particularly in construction, are predominantly held by males. In the case of suicides, men tend to prefer more lethal and violent methods, such as FFF. Contrary to the previous literature, suicides were more prominent in our sample than accidents [15,28,29,30].
The BMI distribution was approximately normal, with most individuals classified as normal weight or overweight and a small proportion as obese or underweight [6].
Alcohol is the most frequently encountered toxin in accidental FFF, as well as a fairly common drug among suicide victims [31]. Our study seems to confirm this notion, with almost ½ of the included accidental and ¼ of the suicidal falls being under the influence. Moreover, statistical analysis revealed that alcohol intoxication was correlated positively with accidents and had no connection with suicides (χ2 test, p = 0.0133). Alcohol causes postural instability, which increases the risk of accidental FFF [32]. Suicide victims often plan their actions and approach the jump cool-minded. Furthermore, this notion ties in with the observed interplay between alcohol and mental illness. In our study, the mentally ill victims were less likely to test positive for alcohol and more likely to commit suicide. The widespread accessibility of alcohol may also contribute to accidental fatalities.
Previous research has established a correlation between the use of psychoactive substances and upper limb fractures, indicating that uncontrolled flailing movements during falls may contribute to such injuries [11]. Nevertheless, our study did not reproduce this finding. A plausible explanation is the predominance of alcohol consumption within our cohort, as opposed to substances with more pronounced psychostimulant effects. Alcohol, acting as a central nervous system depressant, impairs reaction time and reduces reflex responses [33]. Consequently, individuals under the influence may be less likely to demonstrate protective reflexes during a fall, thereby decreasing the risk of upper limb fractures.
Mental illness typically concerns suicide victims of FFF, with little to no cases of accidents. It is also more common among women. Despite that, FFF are more common among males, both suicidal and accidental [30,34,35]. Our study confirms that over 50% of females have a known psychiatric history, and males outnumber females in both manner-of-death groups. Mental illness was also connected with suicidal intention and the lower height of the fall. Many psychiatric diseases cause suicidal thoughts. However, the exact causes of why one would choose falling over other methods of suicide are a complicated issue [32].
The average fall height of 22.30 m, with a median of 7 m, illustrates the diversity of fall heights among the included victims. Our study seems to be in accordance with the literature, where most fatal falls occur at heights of less than 10 m [7,18]. Similarly, the notion that higher falls are more common among suicide victims was confirmed by our work. Individuals seeking a place to jump from usually choose higher altitudes to ensure lethality [36]. Women had statistically higher falls, most probably because most of them were in the suicide group.
The general injury pattern in our work is broadly consistent with that observed in the literature. It primarily concerns the axial skeleton, with the chest being the most commonly damaged part [37]. Amid many contradictory results, most works agree that rib fractures are the most frequently encountered in FFF. Ribs are directly or indirectly affected in every impact position and type of landing surface. Because of their location and susceptibility, FFF without them is unlikely [9,12,38]. The probability of a rib fracture increases with the height of the fall and kinetic energy, an effect confirmed in our work [39]. This also explains the significantly higher frequency of rib cage fractures among males, as FFF in this group were characterized by greater BMIs. Furthermore, bilateral rib fractures were shown to be more common in suicides and unilateral fractures in accidents. This effect was previously observed and is likely a byproduct of the impact position. Individuals attempting suicide by jumping from a height may employ various techniques, such as running and jumping, stepping off the edge, hanging and releasing, diving head-first, or falling backward intentionally. These controlled or semi-controlled actions often result in a feet-first or buttocks-first landing. In contrast, accidental falls—typically resulting from slips, trips, or unintended loss of balance—more frequently lead to lateral or whole-body impacts, reflecting the unpredictable and unprepared nature of such events. Thus, injuries in suicidal FFF are more symmetrical, and in accidental FFF, they are shifted to one side [38]. The statistical correlation between an increase in rib fractures and mental illness was not described in previous literature. It might stem from differences in impact positions and higher overall altitudes in this group. This effect warrants further investigation.
Skull fractures in the FFF literature have three different distributions depending on the height of the fall, bimodal [5,16], linear rising [6,40], and linear falling [41]. Bimodal distribution—cranial fractures are more prevalent in falls below 10–15 m, less common between 10 and 20 m, and reemerge in falls exceeding 20 m. Experimental and modeling investigations have demonstrated that the initial position predominantly influences the ultimate impact orientation, with impacts to the head being more likely in short falls and landings to the feet or sides more common at intermediate heights due to body angular rotation. At significantly high falls, even impacts to the feet can transmit sufficient energy to induce cranial fractures.
This bimodal pattern contrasts with findings from other studies, which report a linear increase in skull fractures correlating with fall height. Such discrepancies may be attributable to differing ratios of accidental to suicidal falls. Suicides originating from various heights and positions tend to produce more linear distributions, whereas accidental falls—generally lower and more uniform in trajectory—tend to display bimodality. Further comparative research is warranted to substantiate this observation. Finally, some studies report only a decrease in skull fractures with increasing fall height. These might reflect heterogeneity across studies.
Our study falls into the first category, arguing that at lower heights, fallers have little time for the body to rotate. Consequently, the head or upper part of the chest strikes the ground first, leading to cranial fractures. At mid-range (10–20 m), the body has more time to rotate, often landing in a way that spares the skull. However, the potential energy transmitted through the axial skeleton at greater heights becomes significant enough to cause cranial fractures, regardless of the exact impact position.
Skull base fractures typically occur at a distance from the initial point of impact, whereas skull vault fractures are generally found closer to the site of contact. This spatial relationship is influenced by factors such as the victim’s body height and the specific mechanics of the fall. However, the diagnostic value of this distinction is limited. The most common fracture type—linear fractures—can occur both proximally and distally from the impact zone. In such cases, identifying skull base and vault fractures may offer the only anatomical clues to the location and dynamics of the impact [42,43]. The absence of sphenoid fractures among the aforementioned statistical connections may be due to protection from direct impact by the zygomatic arch.
The statistical association between higher BMIs and posterior occipital fractures is quite puzzling, as no such association has been previously described in FFF. Being overweight was even shown to decrease the probability of head and neck injuries [6]. We hypothesize that this effect is best explained by higher potential energies, as per the formula Epot = mgh. Further research is needed to elaborate on those findings.
The inverse association between pelvic and cranial fractures likely reflects biomechanical differences in impact dynamics. During head-first impacts, the cranial region absorbs the majority of kinetic energy, thereby reducing the transmission of force to the pelvis. The facial skeleton received limited attention in previous FFF studies. Some articles have noticed a correlation between the height of the fall and the resulting fractures [14,38]. But this was not universally attested [44]. Our study found statistical correlations between maxillary and mandible fractures, the height of the fall, and kinetic energy, suggesting that facial skeleton injuries may provide helpful forensic clues. Impacts other than feet, knees, or buttocks first should, at least in some cases, injure salient elements of the facial skeleton [45]. This relationship also suggests that the facial skeleton was not damaged in the “second impact” after bouncing off the ground.
The spine was the second most frequently injured region in our study, a finding that differs from most reports in the current literature [46,47]. This discrepancy may be attributed to the use of postmortem PMCT, which enhances the detection of deep fractures.
Spinal fractures are known to correlate with fall height, as fall-related injuries predominantly affect the axial skeleton [44,48]. Given this, we expected kinetic energy to be associated with spinal injuries. Interestingly, when analyzing specific spinal regions, only the lumbar vertebrae showed a significant correlation with fall height. This stands with previous studies on living individuals that have identified the thoracolumbar junction as the most commonly fractured area in fall-related injuries [49]. No correlations were found for specific parts of each vertebra, suggesting that their relation with other variables is either complex or unpredictable.
The strong association between spinal and thoracic trauma revealed by logistic regression is anatomically and biomechanically plausible, as the axial skeleton is primarily affected in falls from height. In all impact orientations, the vertebrae absorb a substantial portion of the impact energy. Pelvic fractures pose a significant risk due to the potential for severe hemorrhage. They typically occur in feet-first, buttocks-first, or whole-body impacts, which arise from either direct horizontal deceleration or indirect vertical force transmission, primarily through the femur. Consequently, these injuries are often centered around major joints— sacroiliac joints and pubic symphysis, although they differ structurally, being partly fibrous and cartilaginous, respectively [9,29,38]. Pelvis fractures increase with the height of the fall and are more common among suicides [50]. Although not all studies find this relationship [18].
Our study confirmed that the incidence of pelvic (p = 0.001), pubic (p = 0.003), and sacral (p = 0.008) fractures increases with fall height. However, kinetic energy showed a stronger correlation, as expected given its critical role in trauma severity. Nearly all severe pelvic injuries were linked to higher kinetic energy levels. Lower body height is connected to lower bone mineral density [51]. This might explain why shorter individuals are statistically more likely to experience pelvic fractures.
Logistic regression identified key predictors of skeletal injuries in fatal falls. Both body mass and fall height significantly influenced pelvic fractures; each extra kilogram decreased pelvic injury odds by 5.4% (OR = 0.95; p = 0.0019), while each additional meter increased the odds by 17.9% (OR = 1.18; p < 0.001). The presence of lower limb fractures more than tripled the odds of pelvic fractures (OR = 3.21; p = 0.040). Fall height also predicted lower limb injuries (OR = 1.12/meter; p < 0.001), with upper limb fractures strongly linked (OR = 14.0; p < 0.001). Suicides significantly raised the odds of upper limb (OR = 8.09; p < 0.001) and lower limb fractures (OR = 3.96; p = 0.022) compared to accidental falls. Thoracic trauma markedly increased the likelihood of spinal injury, with vertebral fractures nearly tenfold when sternocostal fractures were present (OR = 9.67; p = 0.0024).
Interestingly, our findings contradict previous research suggesting that obesity serves as a protective factor against specific injuries, including pelvic fractures [52]. This discrepancy may be explained by the heterogeneity of the studied populations and the role of body fat as padding. Additionally, our study reinforces the well-documented association between pelvic fractures and suicidal falls. Possibly because of the association between higher falls and suicides explored earlier.
Bilateral pubic rami fracture was present in ⅕ of all pelvic injuries in our study group, which is much more common than in clinical literature. As fatal falls tend to happen with greater kinetic energy and more extensive injuries, this is not surprising [53]. The low incidence of fallers’ fractures aligns with the existing literature, establishing it as a rare but characteristic finding [23]. No statistical correlations were found for these injuries.
According to the Young and Burgess classification, lateral compression injuries were the most prevalent in our study, consistent with the current literature. In real-life falls, it is rare for individuals to land in a perfectly vertical or horizontal posture with symmetrical force distribution. Instead, victims often strike the ground on their side or buttock, introducing a lateral force vector that drives inward rotation of the hemipelvis, leading to characteristic coronal-plane fractures of the pubic rami and sacrum.
Anterior–posterior compression injuries were the second most frequent. This is likely due to the wide variability in landing positions during high-energy falls. Victims who land in a semi-upright, supine, or extended-leg position may transmit front-to-back forces through the pelvis, resulting in symphysis pubis widening and disruption of the pelvic floor and sacroiliac ligaments, consistent with APC injury patterns. Such mechanisms are commonly observed in falls from height involving axial loading combined with torso hyperextension or leg abduction.
Vertical shear injuries, caused by asymmetrical axial loading (e.g., landing on one leg), were rare. This supports the notion that such unilateral, high-magnitude impacts are relatively uncommon in fatal falls. Likewise, posterior–anterior compression patterns—resulting from a posteriorly directed force—are infrequent.
Upper limb injuries remain highly contested in the literature. Some studies see them as almost random and without a specific pattern [39,41], and others connect them with the height of the fall [12,15,54]. Our study aligns with the latter. The body’s defense mechanisms include extending the arms in preparation for impact, which increases the risk of fractures in both the first and second impacts. Although a feet-first landing is the most common, any other position would also involve this reflex [55]. The strong correlation between bilateral clavicle and scapular fractures, fall height, and kinetic energy may be attributed to their proximity to the axial skeleton and the body’s impact position. This suggests that these fractures could serve as potential markers for estimating fall altitude. Additionally, given that suicidal falls typically involve higher kinetic energies, this factor likely contributes to the increased frequency of clavicle and scapular fractures observed in suicides. Suicides had an increased probability of upper limb fractures compared to accidents (OR = 8.089). Additionally, upper limb fractures were the best predictor for lower limb fractures. These relations might stem from the overall higher kinetic energy of suicide falls.
In the study, fractures of the pelvis and its bones, excluding the iliac bone, were more frequently noted in females than in males. Fractures of the forearm and radial bone showed analogous patterns. Furthermore, we observed a correlation between lower BMIs and pelvic injuries. These relationships can be explained by the higher risk of osteoporosis in females and the typical fracture sites, namely the pelvis and forearm. Moreover, lower BMI may reflect frail bones [56].
As expected, fractures of the lower limbs—both unilateral and bilateral—were primarily influenced by the height of the fall and the associated kinetic energy. Interestingly, the presence of such fractures was the most distinguishing factor between low and very high falls, suggesting that lower limb fractures could serve as a valuable indicator in altitude estimation.
Notably, in suicides, both individual and bilateral lower limb fractures were significantly more frequent than in accidental falls (OR = 3.96), likely due to differences in impact positioning. Suicide victims may initiate a free fall through multiple mechanisms, including running and jumping, stepping over an edge, hanging and releasing, or leaning forward from a height. The majority of these actions lead to a descent feet-first, which, in the absence of substantial body rotation, probably explains the high incidence of lower limb injuries documented in such cases. This aligns with previous literature. Some studies have proposed that fractures of the dominant lower limb are more common in fatal fall suicides, as the final step before jumping is typically taken with the dominant leg, increasing its likelihood of striking the ground first [57,58]. Our findings reinforce this idea, showing that nearly all lower limb bones exhibited a correlation with fall height and suicidal intent, except for the left femur and foot. Specifically, fractures of the right femur and foot were more prevalent in suicides but not in accidents, possibly reflecting the dominance-related mechanism mentioned earlier. However, recent studies have not consistently supported this association [12], highlighting the need for further research to clarify these findings.
The discrepancies between our results and earlier studies may arise from methodological and population differences. In contrast to many previous reports that included mixed fall types or impacts on deformable surfaces, our dataset was restricted to free falls onto rigid, non-deformable substrates, which likely resulted in more extensive skeletal trauma. Moreover, the use of high-resolution PMCT enabled the identification of subtle or incomplete fractures that might have been missed in autopsy-based investigations. Differences in demographic structure—particularly age distribution and the predominance of urban falls in our material—may also have influenced injury configurations. Together, these factors could explain part of the variation in reported fracture prevalence and distribution across studies.
Our study had several limitations. The sample size was relatively small, and many cases were excluded due to missing data, such as fall height or an unclear cause of death. This may have introduced bias in the reported fracture frequencies and their statistical correlations. Rare fractures might have been overlooked. Additionally, PMCT has limitations in detecting fractures in thin or less ossified bones, including the ethmoid bone. Given the unique nature of forensic cases, studied populations tend to be heterogeneous, making it challenging to generalize findings across different groups. This study standardized the surface type to impact on hard, non-deformable surfaces. Fracture patterns resulting from deformable or yielding surfaces require separate examination to determine potential differences. Toxicological parameters, particularly alcohol levels, were analyzed in relation to the manner of death. The body position at impact could not be reliably documented retrospectively, as all included fatal falls lacked direct witnesses; therefore, it was not assessed. This limitation may have influenced the interpretation of specific fracture patterns observed in our study.
Furthermore, free-fall trauma remains unpredictable due to the multitude of variables influencing each incident. Statistical analysis may identify certain fractures and correlations as more characteristic of suicidal or accidental falls; however, the overall skeletal injury patterns exhibit considerable overlap between the two groups. Consequently, the correlations established in this study should not be regarded as universally diagnostic. Instead, our findings should be interpreted as offering a set of supportive indicators—arguments for or against a particular manner of death—within the broader context of forensic evaluation. This study primarily analyzed fracture frequencies in fatal falls for each bone. Additionally, we identified novel relationships between key variables and specific injuries, including correlations between facial skeletal fractures and fall height, posterior occipital bone fractures and BMI, and the association between the cause of the fall and the fractured side of the body. Many of our findings align with previous research, and in several cases, we were able to refine them to the level of individual bones. Furthermore, we uncovered new insights that may help differentiate between suicides and accidental falls.
From a clinical perspective, our findings might be helpful for emergency care and trauma support. The most essential findings are presented in Table 22.
Although the finding that the number and severity of injuries increase with both the height of the fall and the resulting increase in kinetic energy is not novel, our study identified several anatomical regions that are particularly prone to injury. These include the facial skeleton, the occipital and temporal bones, the lumbar vertebrae, the ribs, and the lower limb bones. Recognizing these vulnerable areas may help clinicians assess and plan treatment for victims of free-fall injuries.
Understanding how intrinsic factors such as BMI and sex influence injury patterns can further inform risk assessment and clinical expectations. Emergency physicians and trauma care personnel should also be aware of the distinct differences between suicidal and accidental fall injuries. Suicidal falls tend to produce more severe, bilateral, and complex fractures; therefore, patients presenting after a suspected suicide attempt by fall should be managed as high-priority trauma cases. Extensive injuries involving both the axial and appendicular skeletons are to be anticipated. Notably, facial fractures may compromise airway patency, while spinal trauma often requires urgent stabilization.
In subsequent care, the evaluation of injury distribution may also contribute to the differentiation between suicidal and accidental mechanisms. Because suicidal individuals may sometimes misrepresent their intent, awareness of these characteristic patterns may aid both in accurate medico-legal interpretation and in the planning of appropriate psychiatric follow-up and preventive interventions. Postmortem CT is not the sole emerging technique capable of augmenting fall investigations. Biomechanical experiments have been successfully employed to distinguish between conflicting reports of the incident (e.g., accidental versus homicidal falls). Furthermore, computer-based simulations have recreated fracture patterns that were subsequently verified during autopsy in numerous cases. Similar results were achieved by Henningsen et al.: subject-specific finite-element head models were used to predict PMCT and autopsy findings, with relative success. Collectively, these methodologies underscore promising new avenues for reconstructing and interpreting free-fall events [59,60,61].
Future studies should further explore bone fractures using post-mortem computed tomography. This approach will enable forensic experts to replace ambiguous terms, such as “limb fracture,” with more precise descriptions. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence are promising in this regard, with AI models being used to assess fracture morphology [62].
Additionally, the correlation between body mass index and fractures of the skull and pelvis needs further investigation. Our findings related to the maxilla and mandible should also be examined more closely. The effects of intoxication and mental illness on fracture patterns should be examined in greater detail. Ongoing research should aim to identify new markers for accidental and suicidal fatal falls. The topic of homicidal fatal falls requires comprehensive study, as such cases are rare; conducting a multicenter study could provide a larger sample size for analysis.

5. Conclusions

FFFs are commonly encountered phenomena in forensic practice. Many variables, such as the victim’s sex, BMI, intoxication, height of the fall, and mental illness, influence injury patterns. Injuries in free fatal falls tend to focus on the axial skeleton. Suicides experience more severe, bilateral fractures, often involving the pelvis and limbs, while accidents tend to have unilateral injuries with rare limb involvement. Fracture frequencies rise with height and the kinetic energy of the fall.
This study demonstrated that victims of fatal free falls present distinct skeletal injury patterns, which differ between suicides and accidents. Postmortem computed tomography proved to be a highly valuable complement to conventional autopsy, enabling the detection of complex fractures that may otherwise remain underreported, particularly in the skull base and pelvis. From a clinical perspective, the identification of specific trauma configurations may improve diagnostic precision in emergency medicine and trauma care, supporting the differentiation of injury mechanisms in survivors of high-energy falls. In forensic practice, the combined use of autopsy and PMCT enhances the reliability of medico-legal evaluations, allowing for more accurate determination of the manner of death and contributing to the reconstruction of circumstances in disputed cases. Overall, integrating PMCT into routine forensic protocols should be considered a standard approach to increase diagnostic accuracy and medico-legal certainty.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.T., R.K., F.W. and J.B.; methodology, F.W.; writing—original draft preparation, F.W., K.K., Ł.B., J.S. (Jolanta Sado), J.S. (Justyna Sagan), K.B., M.P. and T.C.; writing—review and editing, G.T., R.K. and J.B.; supervision, G.T., R.K. and J.B.; project administration, J.B.; funding acquisition, R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The authors declare that the study complies with the ethical guidelines and applicable local law. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the applicable national and international regulations, including the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and the European Union Directive 2004/23/EC on the use of human tissues. The study was designed as a retrospective, cross-sectional review of post-mortem imaging data. Results of postmortem computed tomography were obtained as a part of routine forensic medical examinations commissioned by the prosecutor’s office and performed at the Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Poland. Ethics approval was not required for this type of study, in accordance with Polish national legislation. Ethics approval was not required for this type of study, in accordance with Polish national legislation. In Poland, working on anonymized autopsy data from deceased persons does not require additional consent or bioethics committees.

Informed Consent Statement

According to Polish national law, and the institutional policy of the Department of Forensic Medicine, no additional consent from the next of kin is required for scientific analyses based on anonymized cadaveric material obtained during medicolegal autopsy. Summoning the family members of the deceased was not possible as it would badly interfere with the grieving process. All collected data were fully anonymized and used exclusively for research and educational purposes in accordance with the applicable ethical standards and legal regulations. The current Polish legislation neither requires the family’s consent or ethical approval for a postmortem studies, as long as the data are kept strictly anonymous (Act of 5 December 1996 on the Professions of Doctor and Dentist, Journal of Laws 1997, No. 28, item 152). Consent from next of kin was waived since according to the Polish law, data obtained during post-mortem examinations can also be used for medical research other than that related to investigation of the cause of death.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We thank Julia Wolińska for designing the figures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AIArtificial Intelligence
APCAnterior–Posterior Compression
ANOVAAnalysis of Variance
BMIBody Mass Index
BFTBlunt Force Trauma
CIConfidence Interval
DICOMDigital Imaging and Communications in Medicine
FFFFree Fatal Falls
LCLateral Compression
MWUMann–Whitney U test
NASNetwork Attached Storage
OROdds Ratio
PACPosterior–Anterior Compression
PACSPicture Archiving and Communication System
PMCTPost-Mortem Computed Tomography
T-testStudent’s t-test
VSVertical Shear

References

  1. Taviloğlu, K.; Aydın, A.; Çuhalı, B.D.; Demiralp, T.; Güloğlu, R.; Ertekin, C. The evaluation of the suitability of our cases for referral to a level I trauma center. Turk. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2001, 7, 146–150. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, G.S.; Nguyen, B.L.; Lyons, B.H.; Sheats, K.J.; Wilson, R.F.; Betz, C.J.; Fowler, K.A. Surveillance for Violent Deaths—National Violent Death Reporting System, 48 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2020. Surveill. Summ. 2020, 72, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. López-Amador, N.; Calderón-Garcidueñas, A.L.; Ruiz-Ramos, R.; Carvajal-Zarrabal, O. Violent death in Mexican children: Could fatalities be prevented? Cogent. Soc. Sci. 2019, 5, 1662588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rissep, D.; Bijnsch, A.; Schneiderb, B.; Bauer, G. Risk of Dying after a Free Fall from Height. Forensic Sci. Int. 1996, 78, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Obeid, N.R.; Bryk, D.J.; Lee, T.; Hemmert, K.C.; Frangos, S.G.; Simon, R.J.; Pachter, H.L.; Cohen, S.M. Fatal falls in New York City: An autopsy analysis of injury patterns. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 2016, 37, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Çakı, İ.E.; Karadayı, B.; Çetin, G. Relationship of injuries detected in fatal falls with sex, body mass index, and fall height: An autopsy study. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2021, 78, 102113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Türkoğlu, A.; Sehlikoğlu, K.; Tokdemir, M. A study of fatal falls from height. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2019, 61, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Richter, D.; Hahn, M.P.; Ostermann, P.A.W.; Ekkernkamp, A.; Muhr, G. Vertical deceleration injuries: A comparative study of the injury patterns of 101 patients after accidental and intentional high falls. Injury 1996, 27, 655–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bruno, C.M.; Alessio, B.; Alberto, B.; Cristina, C. The injury pattern in fatal suicidal falls from a height: An examination of 307 cases. Forensic Sci. Int. 2014, 244, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Piazzalunga, D.; Rubertà, F.; Fugazzola, P.; Allievi, N.; Ceresoli, M.; Magnone, S.; Pisano, M.; Coccolini, F.; Tomasoni, M.; Montori, G.; et al. Suicidal fall from heights trauma: Difficult management and poor results. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2020, 46, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rowbotham, S.K.; Blau, S.; Hislop-Jambrich, J.; Francis, V. An Anthropological Examination of the Types of Skeletal Fractures Resulting from Fatal High (˃3 m) Free Falls. J. Forensic Sci. 2019, 64, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rowbotham, S.K.; Blau, S.; Hislop-Jambrich, J.; Francis, V. An Assessment of the Skeletal Fracture Patterns Resulting from Fatal High (˃3 m) Free Falls. J. Forensic Sci. 2019, 64, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Isbister, E.S.; Roberts, J.A. Autokabalesis: A Study of Intentional Vertical Deceleration Injuries. Injury 1992, 32, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Casali, M.B.; Blandino, A.; Grignaschi, S.; Florio, E.M.; Travaini, G.; Genovese, U.R. The pathological diagnosis of the height of fatal falls: A mathematical approach. Forensic Sci. Int. 2019, 302, 109883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gupta, S.M.; Chandra, J.; Dogra, T.D. Blunt force lesions related to the height of a fall. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 1982, 3, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Weilemann, Y.; Thali, M.J.; Kneubuehl, B.P.; Bolliger, S.A. Correlation between skeletal trauma and energy in falls from great height detected by post-mortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Forensic Sci. Int. 2008, 180, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bolliger, S.A.; Thali, M.J.; Ross, S.; Buck, U.; Naether, S.; Vock, P. Virtual autopsy using imaging: Bridging radiologic and forensic sciences. A review of the Virtopsy and similar projects. Eur. Radiol. 2008, 18, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chelly, S.; Mtira, A.; Gharesellaoui, S.; Hassine, M.; Jedidi, M.; Mahjoub, M.; Masmoudi, T. Fatal Falls from Great Height in Sousse (Tunisia): Study of 141 Medicolegal Autopsy Cases [Les Chutes Mortelles de Grande Hauteur Dans La Région de Sousse (Tunisie): Etude Autopsique de 141 Cas]. Tunis Med. 2023, 101, 800–804. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tavone, A.M.; Marinelli, R.; Cazzato, F.; Piizzi, G.; Piselli, F.; Ceccobelli, G.; Giuga, G.; Vella, R.; Romaniello, N.; Oliva, A.; et al. Distinguishing injury patterns in fatal falls from heights versus pedestrian impacts: An autopsy study for differential diagnosis in ambiguous cases. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2024, 21, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jalalzadeh, H.; Giannakopoulos, G.F.; Berger, F.H.; Fronczek, J.; van de Goot, F.R.W.; Reijnders, U.J.; Zuidema, W.P. Post-mortem imaging compared with autopsy in trauma victims—A systematic review. Forensic Sci. Int. 2015, 257, 29–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dedouit, F.; Ducloyer, M.; Elifritz, J.; Adolphi, N.L.; Yi-Li, G.W.; Decker, S.; Ford, J.; Kolev, Y.; Thali, M. The current state of forensic imaging—Post mortem imaging. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2025, 139, 1141–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cianci, V.; Mondello, C.; Cracò, A.; Cianci, A.; Bottari, A.; Gualniera, P.; Gaeta, M.; Asmundo, A.; Sapienza, D. Hyoid Bone Fracture Pattern Assessment in the Forensic Field: The Importance of Post Mortem Radiological Imaging. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kelly, M.; Zhang, J.; Humphrey, C.A.; Gorczyca, J.T.; Mesfin, A. Surgical management of U/H type sacral fractures: Outcomes following iliosacral and lumbopelvic fixation. J. Spine Surg. 2018, 4, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yoon, Y.C.; Ma, D.S.; Lee, S.K.; Oh, J.K.; Song, H.K. Posterior pelvic ring injury of straddle fractures: Incidence, fixation methods, and clinical outcomes. Asian J. Surg. 2021, 44, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dalal, S.A.; Urgess, A.R.; Siegel, J.H.; Young, J.W.; Brumback, R.J.; Poka, A.; Dunham, C.M.; Gens, D.; Bathon, H. Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: Classification by mechanism is key to pattern of organ injury, resuscitative requirements, and outcome. J. Trauma 1989, 29, 981–1000, discussion 1000-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Young, J.W.R.; Burgess, A.R.; Brumback, R.J.; Poka, A. Pelvic Fractures: Value of Plain Radiography in Early Assessment and Management. Radiology 1986, 160, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Alton, T.B.; Gee, A.O. Classifications in brief: Young and Burgess classification of pelvic ring injuries. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2014, 472, 2338–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Goren, S.; Subasi, M.; Týrasci, Y.; Gurkan, F. Fatal falls from heights in and around Diyarbakir, Turkey. Forensic Sci. Int. 2003, 137, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. UKDA Goonetilleke. Injuries Caused by Falls from Heights. Med. Sci. Law 1980, 20, 262–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Katz, K.; Gonen, N.; Goldberg, I.; Mizrahi, J.; Radwan, M.; Yosipovitch, Z. Injuries in Attempted Suicide by Jumping from a Height. Injury 1988, 19, 371–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fanton, L.; Bévalot, F.; Schoendorff, P.; Lalliard, S.; Jdeed, K.; Malicier, D. Toxicologic aspects of deaths due to falls from height. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 2007, 28, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Peng, T.-A.; Lee, C.-C.; Lin, J.C.-C.; Shun, C.-T.; Shaw, K.-P.; Weng, T.I. Fatal falls from height in Taiwan. J. Forensic Sci. 2014, 59, 978–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Abroms, B.D.; Fillmore, M.T.; Marczinski, C.A. Alcohol-induced impairment of behavioral control: Effects on the alteration and suppression of prepotent responses. J. Stud. Alcohol 2003, 64, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Maestre-Miquel, C.; López-de-Andrés, A.; Ji, Z.; de Miguel-Diez, J.; Brocate, A.; Sanz-Rojo, S.; López-Farre, A.; Carabantes-Alarcon, D.; Jiménez-García, R.; Zamorano-León, J.J. Gender differences in the prevalence of mental health, psychological distress and psychotropic medication consumption in Spain: A nationwide population-based study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Atanasijevic, T.C.; Popovic, V.M.; Nikolic, S.D. Characteristics of chest injury in falls from heights. Leg. Med. 2009, 11 (Suppl. S1), S315–S317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tsellou, M.; Dona, A.; Antoniou, A.; Goutas, N.; Skliros, E.; Papadopoulos, I.N.; Spiliopoulou, C.; Papadodima, S.A. A comparative autopsy study of the injury distribution and severity between suicidal and accidental high falls. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2022, 18, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Woliński, F.; Kraśnik, K.; Bryliński, Ł.; Sado, J.; Sagan, J.; Brylińska, K.; Teresiński, G.; Cywka, T.; Karpiński, R.; Baj, J. Fracture Patterns in Fatal Free Falls: A Systematic Review of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Risk Factors and the Role of Postmortem CT. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 6305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Petaros, A.; Slaus, M.; Coklo, M.; Sosa, I.; Cengija, M.; Bosnart, A. Retrospective analysis of free-fall fractures with regard to height and cause of fall. Forensic Sci. Int. 2013, 226, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kandeel, F.S.; Azab, R. Fatal Falls from Height: Pattern of Injuries and Effect of Level of Fall. Egypt J. Forensic Sci. Appl. Toxicol. 2022, 22, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rowbotham, S.K.; Blau, S.; Hislop-Jambrich, J.; Francis, V. Skeletal Trauma Resulting from Fatal Low (≤3 m) Free Falls: An Analysis of Fracture Patterns and Morphologies. J. Forensic Sci. 2018, 63, 1010–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kohli, A.; Banerjee, K.K. Pattern of injuries in fatal falls from buildings. Med. Sci. Law 2006, 46, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gurdjian, E.S.; Webster, E.; Lissner, H.R. The Mechanism of Skull Fracture. Radiology 1950, 54, 313–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Freeman, M.D.; Eriksson, A.; Leith, W. Head and neck injury patterns in fatal falls: Epidemiologic and biomechanical considerations. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2014, 21, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Abder-Rahman, H.; Jaber, M.S.O.; Al-Sabaileh, S.S. Injuries sustained in falling fatalities in relation to different distances of falls. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2018, 54, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mollica, P.G.; McEwen, E.C.; Hoffman, G.R. Falls from Height, Facial Injuries and Fatalities: An Institutional Review. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2022, 15, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lukas, G.M.; Hutton, J.E.; Lim, R.C.; Mathewson, C. Injuries Sustained from High Velocity Impact with Water. J. Trauma: Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 1981, 21, 612–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lafave, M.; LaPorta, A.J.; Hutton, J.; Mallory, P.L. History of high-velocity impact water trauma at Letterman Army Medical Center: A 54-year experience with the Golden Gate Bridge. Mil. Med. 1995, 160, 197–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Türk, E.E.; Tsokos, M. Pathologic features of fatal falls from height. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 2004, 25, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bensch, F.V.; Kiuru, M.J.; Koivilkko, M.P.; Koskinen, S.K. Spine fractures in falling accidents: Analysis of multidetector CT findings. Eur. Radiol. 2004, 14, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Papadopoulos, I.N.; Kanakaris, N.K.; Bonovas, S.; Konstantoudakis, G.; Petropoulou, K.; Christodoulou, S.; Kotsilianou, O.; Leukidis, C. Patients with pelvic fractures due to falls: A paradigm that contributed to autopsy-based audit of trauma in Greece. J. Trauma Manag. Outcomes 2011, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ibrahim, S.A.; Samy, M.A.; Matter, M.K.; Saleh, A.O.L. Bone mineral density in Egyptian adolescents and adults with short stature: Results of a national survey. East Mediterr. Health J. 2011, 17, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Prieto-Alhambra, D.; Premaor, M.O.; Avilés, F.F.; Hermosilla, E.; Martinez-Laguna, D.; Carbonell-Abella, C.; Nogués, X.; Compston, J.E.; Díez-Pérez, A. The association between fracture and obesity is site-dependent: A population-based study in postmenopausal women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2012, 27, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kanakaris, K.N.; Boon Tan, H.; Mallina, R.; Giannoudis, P.V. Straddle Fractures of the Pelvic Ring: Clinical Profile, Methods of Fixation and Outcomes. Orthop. Proc. 2012, 94-B, 58. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kusior, M.E.; Pejka, K.; Knapik, M.; Sajuk, N.; Kłaptocz, S.; Konopka, T. Analysis of the nature of injuries in victims of fall from height. Arch. Med. Sadowej Kryminol. 2016, 66, 106–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Giddins, G.; Giddins, H. Wrist and hand postures when falling and description of the upper limb falling reflex. Injury 2021, 52, 869–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Papa, M.V.; Ceolin, C.; Simonato, C.; Termini, G.; Vilona, F.; Ruggiero, A.; Bertocco, A.; Curreri, C.; Talomo, R.; Coin, A.; et al. The correlation between bone mineral density measured at the forearm and at the lumbar spine or femoral neck: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2025, 26, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Abel, S.M.; Ramsey, S. Patterns of skeletal trauma in suicidal bridge jumpers: A retrospective study from the southeastern United States. Forensic Sci. Int. 2013, 231, 399.e1–399.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kremer, C.; Racette, S.; Dionne, C.; Sauvageau, A. Discrimination of Falls and Blows in Blunt Head Trauma: Systematic Study of the Hat Brim Line Rule in Relation to Skull Fractures. J. Forensic Sci. 2008, 53, 716–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jones, M.D.; Cory, C.Z. A Fatal Fall from a Balcony? A biomechanical approach to resolving conflicting witness accounts. Med. Sci. Law 2006, 46, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lindgren, N.; Henningsen, M.J.; Jacobsen, C.; Villa, C.; Kleiven, S.; Li, X. Prediction of skull fractures in blunt force head traumas using finite element head models. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 2024, 23, 207–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Henningsen, M.J.; Lindgren, N.; Kleiven, S.; Li, X.; Jacobsen, C.; Villa, C. Subject-specific finite element head models for skull fracture evaluation—A new tool in forensic pathology. Int. J. Legal Med. 2024, 138, 1447–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ibanez, V.; Jucker, D.; Ebert, L.C.; Franckenberg, S.; Dobay, A. Classification of rib fracture types from postmortem computed tomography images using deep learning. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2024, 20, 1208–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Comparison between main skull fractures in accidental and suicidal cases. For details on the subparts of every bone, refer to the Table 5 and Table 6.
Figure 1. Comparison between main skull fractures in accidental and suicidal cases. For details on the subparts of every bone, refer to the Table 5 and Table 6.
Jcm 14 07912 g001
Figure 2. Comparison between rib and sternal fractures of accidental and suicidal FFF. For more information, refer to the tables.
Figure 2. Comparison between rib and sternal fractures of accidental and suicidal FFF. For more information, refer to the tables.
Jcm 14 07912 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of accidental and suicidal fractures of the spinal column. (a1,a2)—Fractures in the area of the spine, (b1,b2)—fractures of individual vertebrae. The most significant differences were observed in the lumbar vertebrae.
Figure 3. Comparison of accidental and suicidal fractures of the spinal column. (a1,a2)—Fractures in the area of the spine, (b1,b2)—fractures of individual vertebrae. The most significant differences were observed in the lumbar vertebrae.
Jcm 14 07912 g003
Figure 4. Comparison between accidental and suicidal cases with damage to the pelvis.
Figure 4. Comparison between accidental and suicidal cases with damage to the pelvis.
Jcm 14 07912 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of upper limb fracture frequencies in accidents and suicides.
Figure 5. Comparison of upper limb fracture frequencies in accidents and suicides.
Jcm 14 07912 g005
Figure 6. Lower limb fractures in accidents and suicides.
Figure 6. Lower limb fractures in accidents and suicides.
Jcm 14 07912 g006
Table 1. General Information about the Study Population. Note a high percentage of mental illnesses and alcohol intoxication cases.
Table 1. General Information about the Study Population. Note a high percentage of mental illnesses and alcohol intoxication cases.
DataAll Cases% of CasesFemale% Among WomenMale% Among Men
Cases791002210057100
Accident3645.57418.183256.14
Suicide4354.431881.822543.86
Height of the fall
≤3 m2025.3229.091831.58
3 < x < 6 m810.1329.09610.53
6 ≤ x < 10 m2126.58731.821424.56
10 m ≤ x < 15 m1417.72418.181017.54
15 m ≤ x < 20 m33.8029.0911.75
20 m ≤ x < 25 m56.3329.0935.26
25 m ≤ x < 30 m45.0629.0923.51
30 m ≤ x45.0614.5535.26
Time of death from the fall
Died on site4658.231359.093357.89
<1 h67.59313.6435.26
Several hours1316.4614.551221.05
1–2 days33.8029.0911.75
3–4 days56.3314.5547.02
5–10 days33.8014.5523.51
>10 days22.5300.0023.51
Unmarked11.2714.5500.00
Intrinsic Variables
Alcohol present2632.91418.182238.60
Accident1721.5214.551628.07
Suicide911.39313.64610.53
Documented mental illness2025.321150.00915.79
Alcoholism45.0600.0047.02
Dementia22.5329.0900.00
Depression56.33313.6423.51
Schizophrenia45.0614.5535.26
Unspecified56.33522.7300.00
No mental illness5974.681150.004884.21
Table 2. Accidental deaths across main variables. Note the higher concentration of accidental deaths at lower altitudes and prominent alcohol intoxication cases.
Table 2. Accidental deaths across main variables. Note the higher concentration of accidental deaths at lower altitudes and prominent alcohol intoxication cases.
DataAll Cases% of CasesFemale% Among WomenMale% Among Men
Accident36100410032100
Height of the fall
≤3 m1541.6700.001546.88
3 < x < 6 m616.67250.00412.50
6 ≤ x < 10 m616.6700.00618.75
10 m ≤ x < 15 m719.44250.00515.63
15 m ≤ x < 20 m00.0000.0000.00
20 m ≤ x < 25 m12.7800.0013.13
25 m ≤ x < 30 m00.0000.0000.00
30 m ≤ x12.7800.0013.13
Intrinsic Variables
Alcohol present1747.22125.001650.00
Documented mental illness38.33125.0026.25
Alcoholism25.5600.0026.25
Dementia12.78125.0000.00
Depression00.0000.0000.00
Schizophrenia00.0000.0000.00
Unmarked00.0000.0000.00
No mental illness3391.67375.003093.75
Table 3. Suicides across main variables. Note that suicides have a higher rate of psychiatric diseases as well as higher altitudes.
Table 3. Suicides across main variables. Note that suicides have a higher rate of psychiatric diseases as well as higher altitudes.
DataAll Cases% of CasesFemale% Among WomenMale% Among Men
Suicide 431001810025100
Height of the fall
≤3 m511.63211.11312.00
3 < x < 6 m24.6500.0028.00
6 ≤ x < 10 m1534.88738.89832.00
10 m ≤ x < 15 m716.28211.11520.00
15 m ≤ x < 20 m36.98211.1114.00
20 m ≤ x < 25 m49.30211.1128.00
25 m ≤ x < 30 m49.30211.1128.00
30 m ≤ x36.9815.5628.00
Intrinsic Variables 0.00
Alcohol present920.93316.67624.00
Documented mental illness1739.531055.56728.00
Alcoholism24.6500.0028.00
Dementia12.3315.5600.00
Depression511.63316.6728.00
Schizophrenia49.3015.56312.00
Unmarked511.63527.7800.00
No mental illness2660.47844.441872.00
Table 4. Skull fracture frequencies in the studied population.
Table 4. Skull fracture frequencies in the studied population.
Damaged StructureAll Cases% of CasesBilateral/Complex Injury
Sphenoid bone3472.34-
Body of the sphenoid bone1736.17-
Greater wing of the sphenoid bone2655.319
Pterygoid process of the sphenoid bone24.252
Temporal bone3063.8212
Petrous part of sphenoid bone2042.5510
Squamous part of sphenoid bone2553.195
Occipital bone2757.44-
Posterior part of occipital bone1531.918—Anterior + posterior part
Anterior part of occipital bone2042.55
Maxilla1940.428
Frontal bone1634.04-
Parietal bone2042.557
Nasal bone817.026
Ethmoid bone817.02-
Palatine bone48.512
Vomer48.51-
Zygomatic bone1225.533
Separation of the zygomatic bone510.632
Zygomatic arch1940.423
Mandible1429.78
Body of the mandible1225.531—Body + Left and Right ramus
Ramus of the mandible510.63
Table 7. Rib cage injuries in the studied population.
Table 7. Rib cage injuries in the studied population.
Damaged StructureAll of the Cases% of CasesThe Most Common Type of Injury
Rib cage70100-
Sternum4057.1412.5% − manubrium + sternum
manubrium2637.1480.77% of fractures − single fracture
body1927.1478.95% of fractures − single fracture
Rib6897.1476.47% of fractures − bilateral
Right ribs5882.8670.18% of fractures − single fracture
Left ribs6288.5769.93% of fractures − single fracture
Table 8. Rib cage fracture frequencies in the accident group.
Table 8. Rib cage fracture frequencies in the accident group.
Damaged StructureAll of the Cases% of CasesThe Most Common Type of Injury
Rib cage27100-
Sternum1348.1523.08% − manubrium + sternum
manubrium725.9385.71% of fractures − single fracture
body933.3388.89% of fractures − single fracture
Rib2592.5960.00% of fractures − bilateral
Right ribs1866.6766.66% of fractures − single fracture
Left ribs2281.4870.23% of fractures − single fracture
Table 9. Rib cage fracture frequencies in the suicide group.
Table 9. Rib cage fracture frequencies in the suicide group.
Damaged StructureAll of the Cases% of CasesThe Most Common Type of Injury
Rib cage43100-
Sternum2762.797.41% − manubrium + sternum
manubrium1944.1978.95% of fractures − single fracture
body1023.2670.00% of fractures − single fracture
Rib4310083.72% of fractures − bilateral
Right ribs3990.771.43% of fractures − single fracture
Left ribs4093.0269.80% of fractures − single fracture
Table 10. Spinal injuries in the studied population.
Table 10. Spinal injuries in the studied population.
Damaged StructureAll Cases with Vertebral Injury% of Cases with Vertebral InjuryThe Most Injured Vertebra of the LevelThe Most Common Type of Injury
Vertebral injury61100%L2—50.82% of cases, L3—50.82% of cases-
Cervical vertebrae1931.15%C2—47.37% cases-
C146.56%--
Anterior arch1---
Posterior arch2
Left transverse process1
Right transverse process0
Bilateral transverse process fracture0
C2914.75%--
single fracture of the body2---
Multiple fractures (compression) of the body0
Arch6
Left transverse process1
Right transverse process0
Bilateral transverse process fracture0
Spinal process3
C3–C71524.59%C7—46.66% of cases73.08% of fractured vertebras—Spinous process fracture
Thoracic vertebrae4573.77%Th7—44.44% of cases, Th8—44.44% of cases52.50% of fractured vertebras Th1–Th10—Spinous process fracture, 47.62% of fractured vertebras Th11–Th12—multipe fratures of the body
Lumbar vertebrae4472.13%L2—70.45% of cases, L3—70.45% of cases85.16% of fractured vertebras—fracture of the costal process
Rupture of the spine26.56%--
Cervical vertebrae00%--
Thoracic vertebrae23.28%Th7–Th8 and Th8–Th9
Lumbar vertebrae23.28%L4–L5 and L1–L2
Coccyx34.92%--
Table 11. Spinal fractures in the accident group.
Table 11. Spinal fractures in the accident group.
Damaged StructureAll Cases with Vertebral Injury% of Cases with Vertebral InjuryThe Most Injured Vertebra of the LevelThe Most Common Type of Injury
Vertebral injury26100%L1—38.46% of cases, L2—38.46% of cases, L3—38.46% of cases-
Cervical vertebrae934.62%C2—44.44% of cases, C7—44.44% of cases-
C113.85%--
Anterior arch0---
Posterior arch1
Left transverse process0
Right transverse process0
Bilateral transverse process fracture0
C2415.38%--
single fracture of the body1---
Multiple fractures (compression) of the body0
Arch3
Left transverse process0
Right transverse process0
Bilateral transverse process fracture0
Spinal process1
C3–C7519.23%C7—80.00% of cases69.23% of fractured vertebras—spinous process fracture
Thoracic vertebrae1973.08%Th7—42.11% of cases41.51% of fractured vertebras Th1–Th10—Spinous process fracture, 88.89% of fractured vertebras Th11–Th12—fratures of the body
Lumbar vertebrae1557.69%L1—66.67% of cases, L2—66.67% of cases, L3—66.67% of cases87.8% of fractured vertebras—fracture of costal process
Rupture of the spine00%--
Cervical vertebrae00%--
Thoracic vertebrae00%-
Lumbar vertebrae00%-
Coccyx27.69%--
Table 12. Spinal injuries in the suicide group.
Table 12. Spinal injuries in the suicide group.
Damaged StructureAll Cases with Vertebral Injury% of Cases with Vertebral InjuryThe Most Injured Vertebra of the LevelThe Most Common Type of Injury
Vertebral injury35100%L2—60.00% of cases, L3—60.00% of cases-
Cervical vertebrae1028.57%C2—50.00% of cases-
C138.57%--
Anterior arch1---
Posterior arch1
Left transverse process1
Right transverse process0
Bilateral transverse process fracture0
C2514.28%--
single fracture of the body1---
Multiple fractures (compression) of the body0
Arch3
Left transverse process1
Right transverse process0
Bilateral transverse process fracture0
Spinal process2
C3–C7822.86%C7—87.5% of cases76.92% of fractured vertebras—Spinous process fracture
Thoracic vertebrae2674.29%Th8—50.00% of cases, Th10—50.00% of cases58.49% of fractured vertebras Th1–Th10—Spinous process fracture, 50% of fractured vertebras Th11–Th12—multipe fratures of the body
Lumbar vertebrae2982.26%L2—72.41% of cases, L3—72.41% of cases83.91% of fractured vertebras—fracture of costal process
Rupture of the spine211.43%--
Cervical vertebrae00%--
Thoracic vertebrae25.71%Th7–Th8 and Th8–Th9
Lumbar vertebrae25.71%L4–L5 and L1–L2
Coccyx12.86%--
Table 13. Pelvic fracture frequencies in the study population.
Table 13. Pelvic fracture frequencies in the study population.
Damaged StructureAll Cases% of CasesBilateralThe Most Common Type of Injury
Pubis3181.5818-
Superior pubic ramus2771.051473.17% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Inferior pubic ramus2771.051576.19% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Body of pubis25.26--
Bilateral pubic rami fracture821.05--
Rupture of symphysis pubis615.79--
Ilium1847.372-
ALa of ilium1539.47053.33% of fractures—monofragmentary fracture
Body of ilium1026.32258.33% of fractures—monofragmentary fracture
Ischium1026.323-
Body of ischium513.16183.33% of fractures—monofragmentary fracture
Ischial tuberosity410.53050.00% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Ramus of ischium410.53283.33% of fractures—monofragmentary fracture
Sacrum2771.05-8—complex injury
Base of sacrum513.16-5—comminuted fracture
Central part of sacrum821.05-4—vertical fracture
Lateral part of sacrum2463.16891.66% of fractures—vertical fracture, 1 fragmentacja
Apex of sacrum718.42-85.71% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Sacroiliac joint1026.323-
Faller’s fracture12.63--
Upward displacement of part of the pelvis513.16--
Flexion fracture1231.58--
Young–Burgess classification38100.00
LC compression2360.53--
APC compression1026.32--
VS compression25.26--
PAC compression37.89--
Table 14. Pelvis fractures in the accident group.
Table 14. Pelvis fractures in the accident group.
Damaged StructureAll Cases% of CasesBilateralThe Most Common Type of Injury
Pubis872.737-
Superior pubic ramus763.64661.54% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Inferior pubic ramus654.55666.67% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Body of pubis00.000-
Bilateral pubic rami fracture 436.36--
Rupture of symphysis pubis19.09--
Ilium545.450-
Ala of ilium436.36075.55% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Body of ilium327.27066.67% of fractures—single fracture
Ischium436.360-
Body of ischium218.180100.00% of fractures—single fracture
Ischial tuberosity218.180100.00% of fractures—single fracture
Ramus of ischium19.090100.00% of fractures—single fracture
Sacrum981.82-3—complex injury
Base of sacrum19.09-100.00% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Central part of sacrum218.18-50.00% of fractures—horizontal fracture
Lateral part of sacrum872.73387.50% of fractures—vertical fracture
Apex of sacrum327.27-66.67% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Sacroiliac joint218.180-
Faller’s fracture19.09--
Upward displacement of part of the pelvis19.09--
Flexion fracture436.36--
Young–Burgess classification11100.00
LC compression763.64--
APC compression218.18--
VS compression00.00--
PAC compression218.18--
Table 15. Fracture frequencies in the suicide group.
Table 15. Fracture frequencies in the suicide group.
Damaged StructureAll Cases% of CasesBilateralThe Most Common Type of Injury
Pubis2385.1911-
Superior pubic ramus2074.07878.57% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Inferior pubic ramus1970.37985.71% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Body of pubis27.410100.00% of fractures—single fracture
Bilateral pubic rami fracture414.81--
Rupture of symphysis pubis518.52--
Ilium1348.152-
Ala of ilium1140.74081.82% of fractures—singular fracture
Body of ilium829.63155.56% of fractures—singular fracture
Ischium622.223-
Body of ischium311.11175.00% of fractures—singular fracture
Ischial tuberosity27.410100% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Ramus of ischium518.52280.00% of fractures—singular fracture
Sacrum1866.67--
Base of sacrum414.81-100% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Central part of sacrum622.22-66.67% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Lateral part of sacrum1659.26593.75% of fractures—vertical fracture
Apex of sacrum414.81-100% of fractures—comminuted fracture
Sacroiliac joint829.633-
Faller’s fracture00.00--
Upward displacement of part of the pelvis414.81--
Flexion fracture829.63--
Young–Burgess classification27100.00
LC compression1659.26--
APC compression829.63--
VS compression27.41--
PAC compression13.70--
Table 16. Upper limb fractures in the studied population.
Table 16. Upper limb fractures in the studied population.
Damaged StructureAll CasesRightLeft% of CasesBilateral
Clavicle2818 (61.11%—monofragmentary fracture)16(50.00%—comminuted fracture)51.856
Scapula3125 (60.00%—monofragmentary fracture)15 (60.00%—comminuted fracture)57.419
Humerus136 (33.33%—single fracture of the body)9 (33.33%—comminuted fracture of proximal end)24.072
Ulna158 (37.50%—comminuted fracture of distal end)9 (44.44%—comminuted fracture of distal end)27.782
Radius156 (100.00%—comminuted fracture of distal end)12 (66.66%—comminuted fracture of distal end)27.784
Carpal bones5329.260
Metacarpal bones1101.850
Phalanges1101.850
Table 17. Upper limb fractures in the accident group.
Table 17. Upper limb fractures in the accident group.
Damaged StructureAll CasesRightLeft% of CasesBilateral
Clavicle62 (50.00%—comminuted fracture)5 (60.00%—comminuted fracture) 1
Scapula97 (71.43%—monofragmentary fracture)4 (75.00%—comminuted fracture) 2
Humerus42 (comminuted fracture and single fracture of proximal end)3 (66.66%—comminuted fracture of proximal end) 1
Ulna42 (single fracture 50.00% of—distal end, 50.00% of proximal end)3 (66.66%—comminuted fracture of distal end) 1
Radius31 (comminuted fracture of distal end)2 (50.00%—comminuted fracture of distal end, 50.00%—single fracture of proximal end) 0
Carpal bones202 0
Metacarpal bones000 0
Phalanges000 0
Table 18. Upper limb fractures in the suicide group.
Table 18. Upper limb fractures in the suicide group.
Damaged StructureAll CasesRightLeft% of CasesBilateral
Clavicle2216 (62.50%—single fracture)11 (54.55%—comminuted fracture) 5
Scapula2218 (55.56%—single fracture)11 (54.55%—comminuted fracture) 7
Humerus94 (50.00%—single fracture of the body)6 (33.33%—comminuted fracture of the body, 33.33%—single fracture of the body, 33.33%—comminuted fracture of the distal end) 1
Ulna116 (50.00%—comminuted fracture of distal end)6 (33.33%—comminuted fracture of distal end, 33.33%—comminuted fracture of proximal end) 1
Radius126 (83.33%—comminuted fracture of distal end)10 (70.00%—comminuted fracture of distal end) 0
Carpal bones330 0
Metacarpal bones110 0
Phalanges000 0
Table 19. Lower limb fractures in the studied population.
Table 19. Lower limb fractures in the studied population.
Damaged StructureAll Cases with Lower Limb InjuryRightLeft% Damaged Lower LimbBilateral
Lower limb35203310018
Femur2012 (58.33% of fractures—comminuted fracture of distal end)16 (31.25% of fractures—comminuted fracture of shaft, 31.25% of fractures—single fracture of proximal end)57.148
Patella43 (66.67% of fractures—comminuted fracture)2 (50.00% of fractures—single fracture, 50.00% of fractures—comminuted fracture)11.431
Tibia1710 (40.00% of fractures—comminuted fracture of proximal end)15 (33.33% of fractures—comminuted fracture of proximal end)48.578
Fibula2010 (40.00% of fractures—comminuted fracture of proximal end)15 (40.00% of fractures—comminuted fracture of proximal end)57.145
Tarsal bones147 (40.00% of fractures—fracture of calcaneus, 40.00% of fractures—fracture of navicular)12 (50.00% of fractures—fractures of calcaneus)405
Metatarsals106528.571
Phalanges2205.710
Table 20. Lower limb fractures in the accidental fatal falls.
Table 20. Lower limb fractures in the accidental fatal falls.
Damaged StructureAll Cases with Lower Limb InjuryRightLeft% Damaged Lower LimbBilateral
Lower limb7361002
Femur42 (50% of fractures—comminuted fracture of distal end, 50% of fractures—comminuted fracture of shaft)4 (50% of fractures—fracture of proximal end)57.142
Patella11 (100% of fractures—single fracture)014.290
Tibia21 (100% of fractures—comminuted fracture of proximal end)2 (50.00% of fractures—comminuted fracture of distal end, 50.00% of fractures—single fracture of proximal end)28.571
Fibula21 (100% of fractures—single fracture of distal end)1 (100% of fractures—single fracture of proximal end)28.570
Tarsal bones41 (100% of fractures—navicular fracture)3 (25% of fractures—calcaneus, 25% of fractures—navicular, 25% of fractures—cuboid, 25% of fractures—cuneiform bones)57.140
Metatarsals20028.570
Phalanges00000
Table 21. Fractures in the suicide group.
Table 21. Fractures in the suicide group.
Damaged StructureAll Cases with Lower Limb InjuryRightLeft% Damaged Lower LimbBilateral
Lower limb28172710016
Femur1610 (70.00% of fractures—comminuted fracture of distal end)12 (33.33% of fractures—single fracture of proximal end, 33.33% of fractures—comminuted fracture of shaft)57.146
Patella32 (100.00% of fractures—comminuted fracture)2 (50.00% of fractures—single fracture, 50.00% of fractures—comminuted fracture)10.711
Tibia159 (33.33% of fractures—comminuted fracture of distal end, 33.33% of fractures—comminuted fracture of proximal end, 33.33% of fractures—single fracture of proximal end)13 (38.46% of fractures—comminuted fracture of proximal end)53.577
Fibula189 (44.44% of fractures—comminuted fracture of proximal end)14 (48.26% of fractures—comminuted fracture of proximal end)64.295
Tarsal bones106 (66.67% of fractures—calcaneus)9 (55.56% of fractures—calcaneus)35.715
Metatarsals86628.574
Phalanges2207.140
Table 22. Clinical correlations of the strongest statistical findings.
Table 22. Clinical correlations of the strongest statistical findings.
Variable Associated Fractures Statistical Value Clinical Implication
Height of the fall Fractures of maxilla, mandible, occipital bone (anterior/posterior), temporal bone, lumbar vertebrae, ribs, femur, tibia, fibulaMWU, χ2, ANOVA (p < 0.01)Higher fall height correlates with more extensive axial and limb trauma
BMILower BMI → higher frequency of pelvic (pubic, sacral) and forearm fracturesMWU (p < 0.05)Low body mass may predispose to more severe skeletal injury
Manner of death (suicide vs. accident)Suicides → bilateral fractures (pelvis, limbs, ribs); Accidents → unilateral injuriesχ2 (p < 0.01)Bilateral injury distribution may indicate intentional (suicidal) falls
SexFemales → pubis and sacral fractures χ2 (p < 0.05)Pelvic trauma is more common in female fall victims
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Woliński, F.; Sado, J.; Kraśnik, K.; Sagan, J.; Bryliński, Ł.; Brylińska, K.; Teresiński, G.; Cywka, T.; Prządka, M.; Karpiński, R.; et al. Fatal Free Falls: A Clinical and Forensic Analysis of Skeletal Injury Patterns Using PMCT and Autopsy. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 7912. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14227912

AMA Style

Woliński F, Sado J, Kraśnik K, Sagan J, Bryliński Ł, Brylińska K, Teresiński G, Cywka T, Prządka M, Karpiński R, et al. Fatal Free Falls: A Clinical and Forensic Analysis of Skeletal Injury Patterns Using PMCT and Autopsy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(22):7912. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14227912

Chicago/Turabian Style

Woliński, Filip, Jolanta Sado, Kacper Kraśnik, Justyna Sagan, Łukasz Bryliński, Katarzyna Brylińska, Grzegorz Teresiński, Tomasz Cywka, Marcin Prządka, Robert Karpiński, and et al. 2025. "Fatal Free Falls: A Clinical and Forensic Analysis of Skeletal Injury Patterns Using PMCT and Autopsy" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 22: 7912. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14227912

APA Style

Woliński, F., Sado, J., Kraśnik, K., Sagan, J., Bryliński, Ł., Brylińska, K., Teresiński, G., Cywka, T., Prządka, M., Karpiński, R., & Baj, J. (2025). Fatal Free Falls: A Clinical and Forensic Analysis of Skeletal Injury Patterns Using PMCT and Autopsy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(22), 7912. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14227912

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop