1. Introduction
The most prevalent valvular defect is mitral regurgitation (MR), with a worldwide prevalence of 2%. Recent meta-analyses estimate that up to 0.057% of the general population presents moderate-to-severe MR, a figure that is expected to continue rising due to the aging population [
1]. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that conservative management of moderate-to-severe MR is associated with a 1.67-fold and 2.36-fold increase in mortality, respectively, compared to individuals without MR. This elevated risk was present in all age groups and MR subtypes, underscoring the importance of timely treatment [
2].
The recent publication of the 2025 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular disease has marked a significant conceptual shift regarding MR classification, with a distinction of organic MR (OMR) (i.e., structural abnormalities of the valve) and functional MR (FMR), with a new subclassification of Atrial MF (AMR), primarily driven by left atrial enlargement and mitral anulus dilation with preserved left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and ventricular MR (VMR), resulting from left ventricle dilation, regional wall abnormalities, reduced LVEF and leaflet tethering [
3]. This distinction is crucial for tailoring therapeutic strategies, especially when considering transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) candidacy. Patients with AMR tend to be older women with atrial fibrillation (AF) and have better long-term prognosis, whereas patients with VMR tend to be male patients with ischemic heart disease and have a worse prognosis [
4].
The indications for TEER have broadened in recent years, driven by strong outcomes of randomized trials and large-scale registries. TEER is now considered a viable option for patients with OMR who are at high or prohibitive surgical risk and present with favorable valve anatomy, offering significant improvements in quality of life and a low incidence of adverse events [
5]. Both the American (ACC/AHA) and European (ESC/EACTS) guidelines recommend TEER as a first-line therapy for FMR, particularly in cases of VMR without coronary artery disease, who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical treatment [
3,
6]. This recommendation is based on compelling evidence, specifically the COAPT trial, which was the first to demonstrate a significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations and deaths due to any cause. The impact of these results was somewhat polarized by the simultaneous publication of the MITRA-FR trial, which showed no significant differences in the same outcomes. After careful evaluation of said trials, the key differences were in patient selection. The COAPT trial enrolled patients with smaller left ventricle size and larger mitral regurgitation compared to the MITRA-FR, with more advanced stages of the disease, with larger ventricle size and less significant MR [
7,
8]. The latest RESHAPE-HF-2 trial enrolled patients with a similar profile to the COAPT and showed a significant reduction in HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death, showing a reduction in cardiovascular death and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations when specific anatomical criteria are met [
9,
10].
Despite the 2025 ESC guidelines introducing new considerations, they still lack specific sex-based treatment recommendations [
3]. Furthermore, there are significant gaps in the evidence regarding pathophysiology, indications, and timing of treatment. Women often present at advanced stages of mitral valve disease and remain consistently underrepresented in both surgical and TEER trials [
11]. Women undergoing MitraClip therapy tend to be older, more frequently present with AMR, and display distinct anatomical and procedural profiles compared to men. These sex-specific differences have a crucial impact on clinical outcomes [
4].
These differences are not merely demographic, while life expectancy is generally recovered in patients with OMR undergoing surgical valve repair, data suggest that women may experience less complete recovery in survival outcomes compared to men. These differences may be attributed to later referrals, distinct anatomical features, and persistent underrepresentation in clinical trials. Regarding TEER, data from the MitraSwiss registry, which included patients treated from 2011 to 2018 and primarily using the third-generation MitraClip device, show that women aged 60 to 89 years achieved a 5-year relative survival rate of 97.4%, closely matching that of age-matched controls [
12]. Similar survival restoration was also observed in male patients aged 80 to 89 years. However, patients with FMR had a residual excess mortality that persisted regardless of sex, highlighting the relation of ventricular pathology and therapeutic response [
13].
The impact of TEER on life expectancy recovery in patients with significant mitral regurgitation remains insufficiently explored, particularly in contemporary cohorts treated with the latest-generation MitraClip device. Taking advantage of the fact that our hospital serves as the reference for this therapy throughout the province, we can compare the relative survival rates of patients of the same age, sex, and geographic area and determine whether patients treated with TEER achieve a life expectancy comparable to that of the general population on long-term follow-up.
4. Discussion
The main findings of this analysis were that symptomatic patients with MR, despite OMT undergoing TEER, presented a reduced RS compared to the general population of the same age, sex, and geographical area in a follow-up of 3.4 ± 2.4 years. Furthermore, there was an interval-specific EM of 7.8% during the first year. After this period, EM remained unchanged, similar to the reference population. For men, the same pattern was followed, with a reduced RS and an EM of 6.6% during the first year. On the contrary, female patients presented a similar RS, and there was no EM from the first year of follow-up (Central Figure). In other words, TEER was effective in recovering life expectancy compared to women of the general population of the same age and region. Finally, male sex tended to predict mortality in the univariable analysis, but this association was not statistically significant in the multivariable analysis.
In this analysis, the main indication for TEER was FMR in over 80% of patients, mainly in those who were younger and had a higher burden of comorbidities. In contrast, women were older and had higher prevalences of OMR and AMR. These results are consistent with those reported in leading real-world registries, such as the GIOTTO trial and German TRAMI. They differ from the MitraSwiss registry and the American TVT registry, where more than half of the patients were OMR [
21,
22,
23,
24].
Contemporary randomized trials, such as CLASP IID, have demonstrated that one-year outcomes following TEER are favorable and comparable between men and women in terms of survival and freedom from major adverse events. Nonetheless, essential nuances in baseline characteristics were observed: female patients presented with fewer comorbidities but were more symptomatic at baseline. Additionally, a significant interaction between sex and the rate of freedom from adverse events at one year was noted in the MitraClip arm. However, after adjusting for baseline differences, female patients achieved safety and effectiveness outcomes comparable to those of male patients (86.0% vs. 85.9%,
p = 0.985). These findings align with our own results, which also show a tendency toward sex-related differences in both the univariable and competing risk analyses. However, after adjusting for baseline characteristics and other covariates in the multivariable model, sex was no longer identified as an independent predictor of outcomes [
25].
Despite differences between men and women, procedural success was achieved in 84.6% of cases, and a similar number of clips was implanted, with a low overall burden of complications during hospitalization, an incidence of stroke < 1%, bleeding < 3% and significant vascular complications <3%. Detachment occurred in 8.3%, which is higher than reported in most trials (0.8% in the GIOTTO trial and 1.3% in the TVT trial) [
21,
23]. However, this data considers partially detached devices detected during the procedure, and in most cases, procedural success was achieved with a second or third device.
Women had a higher prevalence of acute coronary syndrome and acute kidney injury before discharge, but this did not have an impact on hospitalization times (median of 1 day) or in-hospital mortality (3.2%). Hospitalization times were significantly higher in most trials, with a median of 9 days in the German TRAMI trial, 5 days in the GIOTTO trial, and 5 days for the MitraSwiss registry, all with similar in-hospital mortality rates of around 3%. It is worth noting that this is a contemporary cohort, with over 80% of patients treated with the 4th-generation MitraClip device, contrary to the largest registries, which report data from mostly the third generation or older [
21,
22,
23,
24].
After one year, most patients presented in NYHA class I or II, with no meaningful differences between sexes, indicating comparable baseline functional status. Additionally, sustained results were observed after TEER, with only 5.9% of patients exhibiting mitral regurgitation greater than grade 2. All-cause mortality was 11.5% at one year and 21.3% at the end of follow-up, with a numerically higher rate for men (26.4%) compared to women (12.2%). Cardiovascular deaths accounted for almost half of the events. Mortality in our trial was lower at one year and three years compared to the trials mentioned above [
21,
22,
23,
24]. After a multivariable Cox regression analysis, Sex was not found to be an independent predictor of mortality.
Using data from the MitraSwiss registry, Biasco L et al. analyzed 1140 patients from 2011 to 2018, evaluating them using relative survival analysis according to age and MR etiology. The results showed that 50.8% of patients had OMR and 45% had FMR. They presented a cumulative RS of 91.1% (95% CI: 82.5–98.6%) for OMR with an EM of 8.9% and of 71.5% (95% CI: 63.0–79.3%) in FMR with a cumulative EM of 28.5% at 5 years, respectively. When considering patients aged 80–89 years, the cumulative RS was 93% (95% CI: 83.3–101.9%), without significant differences compared to the general Swiss population [
13]. These results are similar to those obtained in the surgical treatment of PMR, where life expectancy may be recovered in selected patients [
26]. Most patients in our cohort presented FMR, and our survival rates were very similar, at 72.7% at the end of follow-up.
In a second analysis by the same author stratified by sex and MR etiology, RS for all patients, men, and women was 80.5% (95% CI, 74.6–86.0), 84.9% (95% CI, 75.8–92.9), and 78.0% (95% CI, 70.2–85.3), respectively [
12]. We observed similar results for men, showing persistently reduced ES compared to age-matched peers, with OS declining from 89.8% at 1 year to 78.7% at 3 years, and a significant EM in year one (6.6%; 95% CI, 2.6–12.8%), which penalized the cumulative RS. In contrast, women recovered relative survival early, maintaining OS of 88.3%, 91.4%, and 87.1% across 1, 2, and 3 years, with consistently low and non-significant EM during follow-up. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, as the study was designed to detect changes in the entire cohort compared to the general population, and the sample size may be insufficient to detect sex-related differences.
Several factors may influence these findings, including the use of the fourth-generation MitraClip, which introduced several pivotal enhancements that directly impact procedural safety and efficacy. These include the expansion to four clip sizes, among them wider clips designed to improve leaflet grasping in cases with significant coaptation gaps and complex lesions. The addition of independent gripper actuation offers operators greater control and precision during deployment, while the redesigned delivery catheter facilitates smoother navigation and clip placement. Collectively, these innovations broaden the therapeutic applicability of TEER, particularly in anatomically challenging scenarios [
5]. Furthermore, we included a more contemporary cohort, as well as the predominance of FMR, all of which may influence procedural success and long-term outcomes.
These findings suggest that sex-specific factors should be considered when evaluating candidacy and timing for TEER, particularly in patients who may benefit from earlier intervention or closer post-procedural monitoring. The future of mitral TEER is promising, with increasingly favorable outcomes being achieved through meticulous patient selection in cases involving complex mitral anatomies (e.g., significant coaptation gaps, commissural lesions, multiple regurgitant jets, or prior failed TEER). Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) may offer a viable alternative and could play a complementary role alongside TEER in patients deemed unsuitable for surgical repair [
27].
Limitations
This study is a retrospective observational analysis conducted at a single center in Spain, which may limit the generalizability of the results. The sample size is relatively modest, and although the cohort reflects real-world practice with contemporary TEER techniques, caution is warranted when extrapolating these results, as the statistical power was not specifically designed for these outcomes. Nevertheless, they may influence patient selection and results. Similarly, we could not explore OS, EM, and RS according to MR etiology. Consequently, larger, multicenter studies are needed to examine sex-specific outcomes and long-term survival following TEER. Our results should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating for future trials to seek external validation.