Next Article in Journal
A Multicenter Experience of the Treatment of Type Di Tympanojugular Paragangliomas: Total vs. Partial Resection and Residue Management
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Aneurysm in a Caucasian Population Cohort: Evaluating the Agreement Between Japanese Criteria and Different Z Score Formulas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Lifestyle Modifications Prior to Pregnancy and Their Impact on Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes: A Review

1
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA
2
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
3
Institute for Digital Health and Innovation, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(18), 6582; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186582
Submission received: 31 July 2025 / Revised: 9 September 2025 / Accepted: 15 September 2025 / Published: 18 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics & Gynecology)

Abstract

Background/Objective: The preconception period serves as a time for patients to modify behaviors, pre-existing disease, and potential perinatal risk factors. The purpose of this review is to review preconception behavioral modification and its effect on pregnancy outcomes. Methods: Electronic databases (PUBMED, CINAHL, and Embase) were searched. The search terms used were “healthy lifestyle” OR “life style” AND “fertility” OR “preconception care” OR “pre-pregnancy care” OR “pregnancy preparation”. Years searched were 1990–2024. Papers had to be in English. Results: Of the 301 abstracts identified, 189 full articles were selected to form this review. Preconception care (weight management, nutrition, management of pre-existing conditions, cessation of substance use, limitation to harmful environmental exposures, optimization of maternal mental health) has been shown to improve perinatal outcomes. While the benefit of preconception care has been established, compliance among reproductive aged patients is low. Reasons for low compliance in optimal preconception behavior appear to be multifactorial. While some programs have demonstrated promise in improving preconception care, more research needs to be done to improve counseling from providers as well as compliance among patients with the ultimate goal of optimizing perinatal outcomes. Conclusions: A comprehensive approach to physical, emotional, nutritional, environmental, and social well-being is essential to preconception care.

1. Introduction

The preconception period has been defined as a time prior to or between pregnancies. It includes the 100 days prior to conception and is a time period when lifestyle changes can be made to enhance maternal health prior to pregnancy. Any underlying medical conditions and health concerns that may impact maternal and perinatal health can be treated to optimize maternal health before conception. Pre-conception interventions shown to be helpful include diet and micronutrient supplementation, physical activity, obesity/weight management, cessation of smoking/recreational drug use/alcohol, addressing mental health issues, and oral hygiene [1].
Risk factors that can influence pregnancy outcomes include genetic diseases in individuals or their families, a history of prior miscarriages, premature births, fetal growth restriction, and chronic maternal diseases (hypertension, diabetes, renal disease, autoimmune disorders) [2]. Concerns in the environment such as air pollution and presence of heavy metals are also important concerns in preconception care (PCC) [3].
The effects of individual lifestyles, prior pregnancy outcomes, genetic disorders, and chronic underlying medical conditions are known to impact conception and maternal/perinatal outcomes. Although it is well known that PCC and counseling are beneficial and protocols for intervention are available, less than half of health care providers in one study used these protocols [4]. Implementation of lifestyle modifications prior to pregnancy has the potential to transform maternal and perinatal health [5].
While the focus of this paper is on maternal lifestyle modifications and preconception counseling, it is important to note that paternal health and lifestyle modification also plays a role in pregnancy [6].
The purpose of this review is to analyze maternal healthcare preconception interventions to determine their influence on maternal and perinatal health.

2. Methods

A literature search was carried out by a university librarian at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS). The search engines used were PUBMED, CINAHL, and Embase. The search terms used were “healthy lifestyle” OR “life style” AND “fertility” OR “preconception care” OR “pre-pregnancy care” OR “pregnancy preparation”. The search was limited to the English language, and the years searched were 1990 to 5/3/2024. The authors independently reviewed the literature search for relevant abstracts. A total of 301 abstracts were identified. The full papers of the abstracts that were relevant to lifestyle modifications or pre-pregnancy preparations in anticipation of becoming pregnant were obtained and read. After removing duplicate papers and papers not relevant to this review, we determined that 189 articles contained applicable information for this review. The references for these full articles were examined for any additional applicable articles. A final total of 198 articles were identified and became the basis of this review (Figure 1).

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Lifestyle Modifications on Pregnancy Outcomes

Even though PCC and lifestyle modifications are acknowledged as having a beneficial impact, evidence of their effect on live births remains mixed. Some studies suggest that PCC and preconception lifestyle modifications have no influence on the live birth rate or perinatal outcomes [6,7]. Other interventions including the addition of folic acid to the diet and reducing alcohol use have shown significant behavioral improvements when implemented prior to and in early pregnancy [8]. In one comparative study, adverse birth outcomes were significantly less frequent in the group receiving PCC [9]. Despite the acknowledgement of the benefits of PCC, nonpregnant women exhibit markedly lower adherence to lifestyle modifications and guidelines compared to pregnant women regardless of pregnancy risk as determined by contraceptive use status [10]. Surveys across Italy and the Netherlands demonstrate a very high prevalence of risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes in non-pregnant women [11,12].
Maternal preconception lifestyle interventions have been shown to profoundly impact their children’s cardiovascular and metabolic health, particularly in obese populations [13]. The offspring of women with obesity who participated in preconception interventions demonstrated improved cardiovascular health (higher left ventricular ejection fractions and less interventricular septal thickening). These findings suggest improved cardiac function and structure [14]. Higher vegetable and fruit consumption in a Dutch study of overweight and obese women correlated with lower diastolic blood pressure and arterial stiffness in their children [15]. Other studies have demonstrated that following a healthy preconception lifestyle, which was defined as maintaining a healthy BMI, smoking cessation, ≥150 min/week of physical activity, consuming a nutritious diet, and folic acid supplementation resulted in a reduction of offspring obesity risk by up to 75% [16], significantly lowered the risk of hypertension and pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants [17]. Additionally, maintenance of low stress levels and a healthy diet during the preconception period/early pregnancy was linked with a 70% reduction in preterm birth (PTB) [18]. In a trial of preconception blood pressures and reproductive outcomes, each 10 mmHg increase in preconception diastolic blood pressure increased the subsequent risk of pregnancy loss by 18% [19].
While some high risk behaviors such as smoking and alcohol may be reduced in pregnancy, dietary habits often remain unchanged, particularly among younger women with less education [20]. Diets abundant in fruit, nuts, and low-fat dairy and particularly when combined with physical activity, have been correlated with reduced GDM risk [21,22]. In one study, higher healthy eating Index scores were related to increased birthweights after adjustment for gestational age and independent of the maternal BMI [23]. Childhood immune function and allergies are affected by the maternal diet. Maternal consumption of low and high-fat dairy products and fresh fruit has been shown to reduce childhood eczema, wheezing, and rhinitis; while diets high in poultry and fruit juice were linked with adverse immune outcomes [24].
The world-wide increase in obesity during pregnancy and its link to metabolic syndrome in the offspring of those pregnancies is very concerning [25,26]. Many of the women who are now becoming pregnant are overweight or obese. Many of these women have sub-optimal behavior in relation to their weight and limited engagement with health care professionals [27] despite high self-reported interest in preconception weight management [28]. Preconception weight loss improves fertility, metabolic function, reduces inflammatory profiles [29,30], and may help reverse intergenerational trends in obesity [31]. An example of reversing this trend is a study who followed 262 children whose mothers participated in gestational weight gain restriction programs; these children had a lower BMI at age five compared to younger siblings [32].
Smoking, alcohol, and substance use prior to, and during, early pregnancy increases adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Women with unplanned pregnancies are more likely to smoke and consume alcohol during pregnancy compared to those whose pregnancies were planned [33]. A third of Danish women in one study, despite widely publicized recommendations, reported binge drinking and smoking during early pregnancy [34]. Smoking cessation prior to pregnancy is important because it reduces the risk of fetal growth restriction, GDM, and hypertension [17]. Alcohol cessation prior to pregnancy is important as it is linked to early pregnancy loss, fetal alcohol syndrome, fetal growth restriction and other adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in children [35]. During pregnancy, a mother’s future fertility and fecundability may be affected by weight, vitamin and iodine intake, alcohol and caffeine consumption, smoking, substance abuse, stress, environmental pollutants, vaccinations, and oxidative stress [36,37]. In IVF settings, it has been observed that smoking and high BMI independently and cumulatively impair the quality of the oocyte [38]. Maternal caffeine intake (>300 mg/day) is associated with a 31% higher risk of fetal loss, preconception alcohol consumption is associated with a 30% increase in the risk of a spontaneous abortion and smoking nearly triples the risk of congenital heart defects [35].
Although it is known that physical activity improves reproductive health, maternal outcomes, and mental well-being before, during, and after pregnancy, fewer than half of women in one study met the recommended activity levels [39]. Higher participation rates in the physical activity recommended for pregnancy improves fertility and sexual function [40,41]. Physical activity also reduces fasting and post-load glucose levels leading to a significantly lowered risk of GDM [22,42,43] and PTB [44]. Postpartum mental health reflected benefits in women who were physically active before and during pregnancy, as 34% were less likely to report anhedonia following pregnancy [45].
Management of mental health disorders are fundamental components of PCC as they affect fertility, pregnancy outcomes, and postpartum well-being [41,46]. Fecundability has been shown to be reduced 46% by stress [47]. Additionally, preconception stressful life events are correlated with increased tobacco and alcohol use before and during pregnancy with subsequent risk of lower neonatal birth weight [48,49]. Mental health disparities are frequently encountered during the preconception period. Foreign born women in Sweden reported lower alcohol and tobacco use compared to Nordic-born women, but they were more likely to report depressive symptoms [50]. Beneficial lifestyle changes during pregnancy are achieved when positive attitudes and personal values are aligned with health priorities [51].

3.2. Evidence for Preconception Lifestyle Modifications

3.2.1. Weight Management

The increasing number of women who are overweight/obese and their associated increased risk for maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality create significant challenges since weight reduction before pregnancy can improve health, fertility, and pregnancy outcomes [52,53,54]. Survey data reveals that women recognize the importance of preconception weight reduction and are interested in dietary counseling, weight reduction, and participating in physical activity [28,55]. Despite this interest and recommendations for lifestyle interventions, particularly those focusing on diet and exercise, evidence regarding their effectiveness remains uncertain [56].
In women with infertility, interventions such as structured dietary and physical activity have improved fertility compared to infertility treatment alone [57,58].
Nonpharmacologic interventions including very low-energy diets [54] and habit-forming mobile applications combined with motivational interviewing [59] have been found to be helpful for preconception obesity management [15]. One meta-analysis demonstrated improved natural conception rates and pregnancy duration, but reported no significant effect on the live birth rate and an observed an increased rate of miscarriage [60]. Similarly, one randomized controlled trial showed significant weight loss with an associated increase in ovulation rates in the lifestyle modification intervention group, but no significant effect on live birth rates [61].
Sedentary behaviors among reproductive-age women present significant physical and mental health risk to those preparing to conceive. In a Canadian survey, only 5% of respondents met all recommended guidelines for physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep, and screen time. Women who were obese, depressed, and had poor self-perceived health were associated with lower compliance for the guidelines [62]. An Ethiopian study observed that among reproductive-age women, watching television at least once a week increased the odds of being overweight and obese, especially if they resided in urban areas, had a higher education, or belonged to higher wealth categories [63].
Cultural and social influences can also shape physical activity. In Iran, observational learning emerged as the strongest predictor of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in women preparing for pregnancy [64].

3.2.2. Nutrition Supplementation

Maternal nutrition including diet and micronutrient supplementation plays a critical role in lifestyle modifications prior to and during pregnancy.
Folic acid is essential before and during pregnancy to prevent congenital neural tube defects. Daily supplementation with 400 mcg reduces the incidence of NTDs by up to 72% [65]. Additional protection to prevent open neural tube defects is observed at higher intake levels of dietary and total folate [65]. Despite the information available linking folate insufficiency and open neural tube defects, approximately 3000 babies are born annually with these defects [66,67]. Furthermore, studies have shown that higher pre-pregnancy folate intake reduces the risk of GDM even after adjustments for other micronutrient intake [68]. Folic acid levels have been shown to lower the risk for autism spectrum disorders, while air pollution had been shown to increase the risk for autism spectrum disorders [69].
Folic acid supplementation during preconception and early pregnancy remains an underutilized intervention despite its well-known benefits in preventing neural tube defects (NTDs). Only 30% of women aged 18 to 24 take folic acid supplements, and only 6% understand the appropriate timing for supplementation [67]. Preconception folic acid supplementation remains at a low level across multiple countries: 16.8% in Italy, 33.6% in Lebanon, and 56% in Belgium with similar low levels observed in Spain, Australia, and the U.S. [70,71,72,73,74,75,76]. Even women with a history of open neural tube defect often fail to meet folic acid intake guidelines [77]. Obstacles include unplanned pregnancies, lower educational attainment, and substance use; while a higher level of folic acid use is observed among older women and those with earlier pregnancy detection [67,77,78].
In addition to folic acid supplementation, other recommendations for diet and micronutrients are summarized in Table 1.

3.2.3. Management of Preexisting Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes

Early and effective management of preexisting diabetes (Type 1 [T1DM] or Type 2 [T2DM]) is critical to improving both maternal and fetal outcomes.
These pregnancies are at risk for congenital anomalies, stillbirth, large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants, and maternal complications of hypertension and nephropathy [87,88,89,90,91]. Tight glycemic control through diet, physical activity, and insulin therapy, when necessary, is essential for optimal maternal/fetal outcomes. In pregnancies complicated by T1DM, intensive insulin regimens via multiple daily injections, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, or hybrid closed-loop systems assist in reducing hypoglycemia and maintain stability of insulin requirements as they fluctuate throughout pregnancy [92]. Insulin analogs like insulin lispro and insulin aspart offer further control and are pregnancy compatible [93].
Adolescent T1DM pregnancies frequently have poor glycemic control, often underestimating the consequences of uncontrolled diabetes on pregnancy and fetal development. This is emphasized in a study where 20% of respondents reported being sexually active, nearly 25% had HbA1c levels above 9%, and half fell between 7.5–9% [94]. In contrast, women with T2DM may underestimate the severity of their diabetes when pregnant, but often have the added challenges of obesity, PCOS, sedentary lifestyles, and barriers to early pregnancy healthcare. Metformin therapy can improve ovulatory function in PCOS, while transitioning to insulin prior to conception further supports glycemic optimization [95].
Preconception glycemic control in T1DM or T2DM is highlighted in a population-based study from Ontario. For each 0.5% net decline in HbA1c, the congenital anomalies rate was lowered by 6% overall, reduced cardiac anomalies by 11%, reduced PTB risk by 11%, and decreased severe maternal morbidity or death by 10% [96]. GDM affects 6–7% of pregnancies in the US and UK and increases the likelihood of LGA infants, posing significant risks for both mother and child [90,97]. Women with a history of GDM face a recurrence risk of 40–73% in a subsequent pregnancy with a significantly increased lifetime risk of developing T2DM, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. This risk is not just limited to the mother, but also extends to their offspring [97,98].
Management of these risks includes early screening for GDM in at-risk pregnancies (women with impaired fasting glucose, normoglycemic obesity, or a prior history of GDM [99]. Postpartum glucose screening is currently strongly encouraged for all women diagnosed with GDM [100,101,102]. GDM can now be detected sooner in at-risk pregnancies allowing for earlier classification. One identified model integrated four features: HbA1c, mean arterial blood pressure, fasting insulin, and triglycerides-to-HDL ratio labeling these as strong predictors for GDM and an increased risk for preterm delivery [103]. Likewise another model featured five clinical risk factors—race/ethnicity, age at delivery, pre-pregnancy BMI, family history of diabetes, preexisting hypertension—and classified women as at risk for GDM; this model has been validated [104].
When lifestyle interventions fail to maintain glycemic control, the gold standard treatment is insulin. If the patient is unable or unwilling to take insulin, metformin and glyburide are viable oral substitutes [105]. In the RADIEL trial conducted in Finland, women with a history of GDM and/or a pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (intervention group) had a 39% reduction in their risk of developing GDM pursuing diet, physical activity, and weight-management counseling in addition to standard prenatal care [106]. The National Diabetes Prevention Program has reported decreased periconceptional obesity and hyperglycemia early in pregnancy among a diverse, low-income group of women in the United States [52]. Other health strategies emphasize postpartum and between-pregnancies screening for diabetes, regular cardiometabolic monitoring, long-term contraception for optimal pregnancy timing, and breastfeeding support [98,102]. The CDC and a number of other organizations have endorsed similar measures to lessen the long-term disease burden of diabetes [52,107].
The goal is to incorporate preconception counseling, early diabetic screening, lifestyle changes, and ongoing management during postpartum and between pregnancies to effectively address women with T1DM, T2DM, or GDM and improve maternal and fetal health [108,109,110].

3.2.4. Smoking, Alcohol, Substance Use and Environmental Exposures

Exposure to caffeine, alcohol, and substance use -both during preconception and pregnancy—increase the risks for pregnancy fetal growth restriction, congenital anomalies and developmental disorders [35]. Community and policy level interventions targeting these modifiable risk factors have proven effective. One example of the benefits of targeting these behaviors was a study of over 41,000 Chinese women. This study emphasized avoiding secondhand smoke, reducing alcohol consumption, and managing stress; improvements were observed in the patient’s diet and in their level of physical activity [111]. In a study evaluating maternal smoking patterns, education, poverty status, and depression investigators categorized participants as persistent smokers, temporary quitters, and delayed initiators, effectively identifying women at high risk and more in need of directed intervention [112]. Government led initiatives have also been used.
A Dutch campaign increased the odds of reducing alcohol use prior to pregnancy by 72% [113], and a Shanghai initiative offered free pre-pregnancy health assessments resulting in improvements in folic acid supplementation, smoking cessation, and alcohol abstinence [114].
Integrating lifestyle modifications into preconception counseling during routine clinical care is beneficial. A personalized program of preconception interventions resulted in 30% of smokers to quit smoking and 50% of patients with obesity to lose an average of 6.1 kg before IVF treatment [115]. In women with inflammatory bowel disease, PCC improved medication adherence, folic acid intake, smoking cessation, and significantly lowered the risk of IBD relapse and low birth weight in their offspring [116].
Digital tools and mobile health platforms assist in dealing with access issues and barriers in PCC by changing the behaviors of smoking and alcohol consumption in pregnancy [117,118]. These studies’ “Smarter Pregnancy” program improved dietary scores and increased pregnancy rates, particularly in underserved communities and when male partners were engaged [119,120,121,122]. The success of these programs have inspired programs elsewhere, such as the “Jom Mama” program planned in Malaysia [123].
Web-based questionnaires like Zwangerwijzer.nl and reproduktivlivsplan.se have been well received by both users and clinicians for enabling preconception pregnancy risk assessments and fertility planning [124,125]. Adapted digital education, as demonstrated in a cohort of Italian women, improves folic acid use and decreases alcohol intake [126], though gaps remain in information obtained between public search behavior and evidence-based information [127].
Environmental exposures occurring in pre-conception and in early pregnancy affect fetal and neurodevelopmental health. Environmental contaminants (air particulates, heavy metals, and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are connected to an increased risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and adverse perinatal outcomes [3,69]. While many maternity care providers lack formal training in environmental toxicology, this ‘window of opportunity’ can be leveraged for anticipatory guidance [128]. For example, findings from the TIDES cohort suggest that phthalate exposure, a known endocrine disrupting chemical, does not significantly differ between planned and unplanned pregnancies [129]. Other areas that could be environmental risks include living in high HIV prevalence areas or in malaria-endemic areas. Introducing early interventions, such as antiplatelet agents for pre-eclampsia prevention may reduce the risk of SGA infants for these at-risk populations [130].

3.2.5. Maternal Mental Health and Stress Management

Mental health and stress assessments in the preconception period or in early pregnancy can improve both maternal and child health outcomes. In a systematic review, seven key factors (knowledge, beliefs about capabilities and consequences, goals, intentions, social support, and environmental context) were recognized as influencing women’s external preconception behaviors of diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol use, and supplement intake [131]. In these women, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) could be particularly effective. In women with polycystic ovary syndrome, management consisting of weight loss and oral contraceptive therapy has been shown to improve health-related life conditions and decrease the symptoms of depression and anxiety [132]. A multidisciplinary CBT intervention over a 12 month period of time combined diet and physical activity, resulting in maintainable 5–10% weight loss in women with PCOS, improved metabolic and reproductive outcomes (including rates of ovulation), and psychological well-being [133,134].
Health education workshops also appear to be helpful. An Iranian randomized controlled trial established the benefits of a short-term workshop. Participants significantly improved their control and self-efficacy related to physical activity [135]. Another study included six group counseling sessions over three weeks and demonstrated significant improvements in preconception lifestyle practices. Women in the intervention group scored higher on lifestyle indices compared to the control group at 4 and 8 weeks post-intervention assessment [136].

3.2.6. Knowledge Gaps in Understanding Lifestyle Factors

Although the benefits of preconception and early pregnancy lifestyle are known, significant knowledge gaps exist in understanding those behaviors and their impact on maternal and perinatal outcomes. Investigations reliably reveal that most couples have lifestyle-related risk factors that require modification prior to a pregnancy, yet many are unaware of how sedentary activity, alcohol use, and inadequate nutritional supplement intake impact pregnancy outcomes [137,138,139]. Australian, Italian, and UK surveys emphasize the inadequate understanding of preconception health, particularly among those who are not actively pursuing fertility treatments [140,141]. Even among women attending infertility clinics, critical knowledge is lacking regarding alcohol consumption, risks related to advanced maternal age, and exposure to infections [142]. Despite these knowledge gaps, preconception consultations have been successful in increasing the use of folic acid during preconception and in reducing binge drinking [143].

3.2.7. Association of Health Beliefs and Pregnancy Planning

Research exposes a disconnect between pregnancy planning and observance of a healthy lifestyle with women feeling ‘healthy enough’, avoiding preconception counseling, and engaging in high-risk behaviors [144,145]. For example, women with mental illness or T2DM are less likely to plan for pregnancy [146]. This lack of pre-pregnancy preparation extends to environmental exposures and lifestyle behaviors [129]. Women with lower pregnancy preparation scores were more likely to engage in binge drinking [34], and the preconception stressors of bereavement and infertility, were associated with higher use of alcohol and tobacco during pregnancy [49]. Women with infertility who track their basal body temperature, evaluate their cervical mucus, and monitor luteinizing hormone levels are much more likely to become pregnant [147]. Although some women have reduced their caffeine use during conception attempts [148], others fall short in engaging in physical exercise and nutritional supplements [149,150,151]. Lifestyle modifications are also less likely in women with socioeconomic disparities and multiparity [152]. In contrast, women actively seeking preconception counseling are more likely to adopt healthier diets, eliminate alcohol consumption, and consume folic acid [153,154].

3.2.8. Education and Peer Support

Educational and peer support may be helpful in increasing participation in lifestyle modifications. Common obstacles that prevent PCC include stress, confusion, and misinformation [155]. When women receive targeted preconception information, they are more likely to stop consuming alcohol and adopt healthier diets [153,156]. It has been observed in younger women that peer-led and group-based programs on college campuses or integrated into existing healthcare visits enhance self-efficacy and preconception engagement [135,157,158,159].

3.2.9. Psychosocial Planning

Psychological planning, especially for the first pregnancy, begins before conception involving maternal mental images of the pregnancy and emotional attachment to the pregnancy as the pregnancy is planned [160]. If prior pregnancies have involved recurrent pregnancy losses, the counseling offers reassurance, support, recommendations for genetic screening, and information about healthy lifestyle modifications [161]. Personal values and the importance of family help shape preconception priorities, with healthier behaviors more likely when parenthood is perceived as an important life goal [51].

3.3. Barriers to Pregnancy Planning and Lifestyle Modification

3.3.1. Socioeconomic and Demographic Discrepancies

Socioeconomic status, marital status, and educational levels shape preconception and maternal health behaviors, impacting both lifestyle modification and healthcare access. However, systemic barriers, particularly in high-minority or low-income areas, limit access to educational materials, specialist referrals, and financial resources [162]. In Malawi for instance, proactive pregnancy preparation such as adopting healthier diets and saving money was reported by only 36.1% of women, with married women and those spacing births at least two years apart showing significantly higher preparedness [163]. In countries such as Spain and Belgium, making significant preconception lifestyle changes was found to be less likely among women of younger age, lower social class, those with lower educational attainment, or those facing financial difficulties [73,152]. In West Virginia only 47% of women reported dental cleanings before pregnancy. Although younger, those with private health insurance and women with higher education levels were more likely to receive dental care [164].

3.3.2. Cultural and Ethnic Influences

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face the burden of both inadequate nutrition and obesity. Although there is good evidence that antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation reduces the risks of stillbirths, low birth weight, SGA births, and childhood malnutrition the treatment prior to and during pregnancy of micronutrient supplementation remains limited in LMICs [165,166] Migrant women in Australia often have limited awareness of preconception and early pregnancy lifestyle modifications, with many pregnancies being unplanned and with language and cultural barriers, this limitation further impedes reproductive health discussions [167]. In the Nordic region, non-European women demonstrate lower alcohol and tobacco use than Nordic-born women but report higher rates of depressive symptoms. Religious beliefs generally correlate with healthier behaviors; although integration levels do not extensively influence lifestyle choices, it underscores the importance of culturally explicit mental health strategies [50]. In another study of foreign-born Latinas, they exhibited healthier dietary examples compared to U.S.-born Latinas and non-Latina whites by consuming fewer calories from fat and with higher intakes of carbohydrates, fiber, folate, and vitamin C in their diet [168]. A separate study noted similar patterns of illicit drug use, binge drinking, smoking and BMI [169]. A distinction is drawn in indigenous groups from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the U.S. who experience higher infant mortality rates associated with smoking, alcohol consumption, and inadequate nutrition [170]. Regional differences in the same country are also observed in a study from China where there were significant differences between provinces, with women in Jiangsu reporting better health and higher education levels than those in Hebei [171]. In the U.S. Mississippi Delta, women’s preconception health was poorer than in other Mississippi regions, and were 1.3–1.7 times less likely to meet optimal physical activity and nutrition recommendations [172]. Race and ethnicity along with genetic predisposition, environmental influences and pharmacogenomics affect preterm birth rates [173]. Preventive strategies require a deeper understanding of sociodemographic factors, nutrition, lifestyle habits, and individual genetic variations, with data-driven approaches offering promising directions for reducing PTB risks [173].

3.3.3. Special Populations: Disabilities and Adolescents

Certain populations, including adolescents and women with disabilities face unique barriers to effective PCC. Women with disabilities report higher rates of low education, lower income, insufficient dental care, obesity, current smoking, binge drinking, and physical inactivity [174]. Adolescents, particularly those with conditions like T1DM, are often inadequately informed with little guidance on reproductive health and often have inadequate education on pregnancy-related risks [94,175,176].

3.3.4. Shortcomings in Healthcare Systems, Counseling, and Knowledge

Despite the proven benefits of preconception counseling, many healthcare systems lack a focused approach. Studies have shown significant gaps in women’s awareness of preconception risks, with many relying on informal online sources rather than professional healthcare advice [140,156,177]. Inconsistencies in PCC guidelines between professional organizations and from different countries further complicate access to consistent, reliable information, with specific gaps noted for women of advanced maternal age and other vulnerable groups [127,178,179]. Evidence from surveys of healthcare providers demonstrates focused counseling on lifestyle changes, like diet and exercise, shows promise if implemented [180,181].

3.3.5. Tools for Assessment and Collaborative Approaches

A number of components are essential for a useful PCC including accurate tools, inclusive program design, multidisciplinary care teams, and cross-cultural communication [182,183]. The Preconception Health Knowledge Questionnaire (PHKQ) is a valuable tool due to its high validity in assessing reproductive health knowledge, highlighting the need for education tailored to demographic specifics [184]. Co-design proposals with diverse community input help ensure PCC programs meet the needs of different populations, highlighting the importance of a strong community network and accessible healthcare services [185,186,187].

3.3.6. Summary of Studies on Lifestyle Modification

All studies used in this review have been divided by type of study, intervention/exposure, and findings into four supplemental tables. Supplementary Table S1 is labeled as meta-analysis, Supplementary Table S2 as experimental studies, Supplementary Table S3 as observational studies on specific lifestyle modifications and Supplementary Table S4 as observational studies focused on the importance of lifestyle modifications [Supplementary Tables S1–S4].

3.3.7. Guideline Reviews of Lifestyle Modifications by Professional and National Organizations

Considering the multitude of publications on lifestyle modifications prior to pregnancy, including recommendations (Over 750 in PubMed), a review of guidelines established by national organizations is useful. We searched the websites of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF), Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO), Japanese Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (JAOG), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Royal Australian New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RANZCOG), Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). We conducted a review of guidelines on preconception lifestyle recommendations. Among the organizations examined, three (CNGOF, FMF, and SMFM) did not provide any recommendations. However, nine organizations provided clear guidance on various aspects of preconception health. A summary of these recommendations is outlined in Table 2 [188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195].

4. Discussion

Achieving optimal preconception health requires a holistic, integrative approach that supports the physical, emotional, nutritional, environmental, and social well-being of both prospective parents. Rather than viewing individual health behaviors in isolation, this framework emphasizes lifestyle, mental health, partner involvement, and structural access to care. A summary diagram (see Figure 2) visually consolidates these preconception recommendations across physical, nutritional, behavioral, environmental, and psychosocial domains.
Optimal metabolic health begins with achieving and maintaining a healthy body mass index of 18.5–24.9 prior to conception. For overweight or obese individuals, structured weight-loss programs that combine diet and physical activity under supervision are recommended. Women with high BMI or a history of GDM should consider enrollment in structured interventions such as lifestyle coaching or the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP). This focus is informed by evidence linking high pre-pregnancy BMI to increased risks of GDM, hypertensive disorders, macrosomia, cesarean sections, and long-term obesity in offspring. Such interventions not only improve metabolic markers but also enhance ovulation and pregnancy rates; although, the impact on live birth outcomes may vary.
Nutritional recommendations emphasize early initiation of folic acid supplementation (400–800 mcg/day) at least one month before conception to significantly reduce the risk of neural tube defects. Prospective mothers are advised to adopt a nutrient dense, anti-inflammatory diet such as the Mediterranean or DASH diets that prioritize fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean proteins, and healthy fats while avoiding sugary beverages and processed foods. Screening for and addressing deficiencies in key micronutrients like iodine, vitamin D, iron, and B12 are also critical. This nutritional strategy is backed by evidence showing that a quality preconception diet can mitigate the risk of GDM, influence fetal growth, and improve cardiovascular outcomes in offspring, and have been shown to enhance the success of assisted reproductive technology.
Physical activity, an integral component of preconception care, is recommended at a threshold of at least 150 min of moderate-intensity activity per week. Activities should promote cardiovascular fitness, strength, and flexibility. Efforts should be made to reduce sedentary behaviors, particularly excessive screen time, and encourage movement throughout the day. The benefits of such activity extend beyond physical health, improving mental health and fertility, and reducing the risks of GDM and depressive symptoms during pregnancy.
Recommendations strongly advocate for abstaining from tobacco, alcohol, and recreational drugs, with early screening for substance use and support for cessation. Additionally, avoiding exposure at home or in occupational environments to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, heavy metals, and secondhand smoke is imperative. Smoking and alcohol use not only elevate the risk of miscarriage and SGA infants but also contribute to GDM and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in children, while environmental toxins have been linked to increased rates of infertility and autism spectrum disorders. While preconception cessation of vape use is recommended, further research needs to be done on its preconception use and effects on pregnancy outcomes.
Mental health screenings for depression, anxiety, and high stress levels are essential during preconception visits with options for counseling, peer support, or cognitive-behavioral interventions provided as needed. Stress management practices such as mindfulness, regular exercise, and maintaining good sleep hygiene are recommended to support mental well-being. Research demonstrates that psychological distress can diminish fecundability and elevate risky pregnancy behaviors, whereas mental health interventions can substantially improve both behavioral adherence and postpartum outcomes.
Effective preconception care includes a comprehensive review of medications, with an aim to discontinue any teratogenic drugs while continuing effective management of chronic conditions such as diabetes, thyroid disease, and hypertension. Employing a reproductive life plan can guide the timing and intentions surrounding pregnancy by enhancing preparedness and improving health behaviors.
Involving male partners in preconception health efforts is vital, including counseling for smoking cessation, alcohol moderation, and weight management. Addressing paternal health optimizes fertility and improves offspring health outcomes. Evidence indicates that male BMI, smoking, and alcohol use can negatively impact sperm quality, time to pregnancy, and child health, while couple-based interventions are known to improve adherence to health recommendations and overall outcomes [6].
Integrating preconception counseling into routine visits with primary care providers, OB/GYNs, endocrinology, behavioral health specialties, and family planning clinics is essential. Leveraging digital tools and community outreach can enhance awareness, particularly among underserved groups, adolescents and other at-risk groups. Interventions should be tailored to meet diverse cultural, socioeconomic, and language needs.
While this synthesis offers insight into preconception health strategies, several limitations should be considered. Heterogeneity among included studies, such as differences in population characteristics, intervention delivery, outcome definitions, and follow-up durations, can reduce generalizability of findings. Publication bias may skew results toward more favorable outcomes, particularly if null or negative studies remain unpublished. Furthermore, many included studies rely on observation data which may limit the ability to infer causality and the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Critically, there is a notable gap in high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials specifically targeting the preconception period, especially those evaluating long-term offspring outcomes and real-world implementation strategies. Addressing these gaps in research is essential to develop equitable, evidence-based models of care that support all individuals preparing for pregnancy.
Optimizing health prior to conception through targeted interventions spanning nutrition, physical activity, mental wellness, substance avoidance, optimization of chronic conditions, environmental safety, and chronic disease management plays a pivotal role in enhancing fertility, pregnancy outcomes, and long-term health outcomes for both parents and offspring. These strategies are most effective when approached holistically. A comprehensive and inclusive preconception care model that integrates clinical guidance with culturally sensitive, community-based, and partner-inclusive approaches has the potential to meaningfully reduce adverse reproductive outcomes and promote intergenerational health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm14186582/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Meta-Analysis; Supplementary Table S2: Experimental Studies; Supplementary Table S3: Observational Studies on Specific Lifestyle Modifications; Supplementary Table S4: observational Studies Focused on the Importance of Lifestyle Modifications.

Author Contributions

All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lang, A.Y.; Boyle, J.A.; Fitzgerald, G.; Teede, H.; Mazza, D.; Moran, L.J.; Harrison, C. Optimizing preconception health in women of reproductive age. Minerva Ginecol. 2018, 70, 99–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Witters, I.; Bogaerts, A.; Fryns, J.P. Preconception care. Genet. Couns. 2010, 21, 169–182. [Google Scholar]
  3. Simon, C. Introduction: Preconceptional care: Do we have to care? Fertil. Steril. 2019, 112, 611–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Scheele, J.; Smith, S.; Wahab, R.; Bais, B.; Steegers–Theunissen, R.; Gaillard, R.; van der Vliet-Torij, H.W.H. Current preconception care practice in the Netherlands—An evaluation study among birth care professionals. Midwifery 2023, 127, 103855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. van Zundert, S.K.M.; van Rossem, L.; Schoenmakers, S.; Steegers-Theunissen, R.P.M. Lifestyle care for transformation of medical care using an early life course approach. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2022, 45, 847–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Boedt, T.; Vanhove, A.C.; Vercoe, M.A.; Matthys, C.; Dancet, E.; Lie Fong, S. Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 4, Cd008189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lumley, J.; Donohue, L. Aiming to increase birth weight: A randomised trial of pre-pregnancy information, advice and counselling in inner-urban Melbourne. BMC Public Health 2006, 6, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  8. Caut, C.; Schoenaker, D.; McIntyre, E.; Vilcins, D.; Gavine, A.; Steel, A. Relationships between Women’s and Men’s Modifiable Preconception Risks and Health Behaviors and Maternal and Offspring Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2022, 40, 170–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elsinga, J.; de Jong-Potjer, L.C.; van der Pal-de Bruin, K.M.; le Cessie, S.; Assendelft, W.J.; Buitendijk, S.E. The effect of preconception counselling on lifestyle and other behaviour before and during pregnancy. Women’s Health Issues 2008, 18 (Suppl. S6), S117–S125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xaverius, P.K.; Tenkku, L.E.; Salas, J.; Morris, D. Exploring health by reproductive status: An epidemiological analysis of preconception health. J. Women’s Health 2009, 18, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pandolfi, E.; Agricola, E.; Gonfiantini, M.V.; Gesualdo, F.; Romano, M.; Carloni, E.; Mastroiacovo, P.; Tozzi, A.E. Women participating in a web-based preconception study have a high prevalence of risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014, 14, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vink-van Os, L.C.; Birnie, E.; van Vliet-Lachotzki, E.H.; Bonsel, G.J.; Steegers, E.A. Determining Pre-Conception Risk Profiles Using a National Online Self-Reported Risk Assessment: A Cross-Sectional Study. Public Health Genom. 2015, 18, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Durand, E.F.; Logan, C.; Carruth, A. Association of maternal obesity and childhood obesity: Implications for healthcare providers. J. Community Health Nurs. 2007, 24, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Harink, T.D.; Schuppen, J.; Marciniak, M.; Voet, K.A.; Planken, R.N.; Hoek, A.; Groen, H.; Gemke, R.J.B.J.; Mol, B.W.; Blom, N.A.; et al. A preconception lifestyle intervention in women with obesity and cardiovascular health in their children. Pediatr. Res. 2023, 94, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. van Elten, T.M.; van de Beek, C.; Geelen, A.; Gemke, R.J.; Groen, H.; Hoek, A.; Mol, B.W.; van Poppel, M.N.; Roseboom, T.J. Preconception Lifestyle and Cardiovascular Health in the Offspring of Overweight and Obese Women. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dhana, K.; Zong, G.; Yuan, C.; Schernhammer, E.; Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Hu, F.B.; Chavarro, J.E.; Field, A.E.; Sun, Q. Lifestyle of women before pregnancy and the risk of offspring obesity during childhood through early adulthood. Int. J. Obes. 2018, 42, 1275–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maas, V.Y.; Poels, M.; Ruiter, M.L.-D.; Kwee, A.; Bekker, M.N.; Franx, A.; Koster, M.P. Associations between periconceptional lifestyle behaviours and adverse pregnancy outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, Y.; Hedderson, M.M.; Brown, S.D.; Badon, S.E.; Feng, J.; Quesenberry, C.P.; Ferrara, A. Healthy preconception and early-pregnancy lifestyle and risk of preterm birth: A prospective cohort study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 114, 813–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nobles, C.J.; Mendola, P.; Mumford, S.L.; Naimi, A.I.; Yeung, E.H.; Kim, K.; Park, H.; Wilcox, B.; Silver, R.M.; Perkins, N.J.; et al. Preconception Blood Pressure Levels and Reproductive Outcomes in a Prospective Cohort of Women Attempting Pregnancy. Hypertension 2018, 71, 904–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Crozier, S.R.; Robinson, S.M.; Borland, S.E.; Godfrey, K.M.; Cooper, C.; Inskip, H.M. Do women change their health behaviours in pregnancy? Findings from the Southampton Women’s Survey. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2009, 23, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Asadi, M.; Shahzeidi, M.; Nadjarzadeh, A.; Hashemi Yusefabad, H.; Mansoori, A. The relationship between pre-pregnancy dietary patterns adherence and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in Iran: A case-control study. Nutr. Diet. 2019, 76, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mijatovic-Vukas, J.; Capling, L.; Cheng, S.; Stamatakis, E.; Louie, J.; Cheung, N.W.; Markovic, T.; Ross, G.; Senior, A.; Brand-Miller, J.C.; et al. Associations of Diet and Physical Activity with Risk for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2018, 10, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Siega-Riz, A.M.; Vladutiu, C.J.; Butera, N.M.; Daviglus, M.; Gellman, M.; Isasi, C.R.; Stuebe, A.M.; Talavera, G.A.; Van Horn, L.; Sotres-Alvarez, D. Preconception Diet Quality Is Associated with Birth Weight for Gestational Age Among Women in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2021, 121, 458–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Grieger, J.A.; Pelecanos, A.M.; Hurst, C.; Tai, A.; Clifton, V.L. Pre-Conception Maternal Food Intake and the Association with Childhood Allergies. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Boyle, J.A.; Dodd, J.; Gordon, A.; Jack, B.W.; Skouteris, H. Policies and healthcare to support preconception planning and weight management: Optimising long-term health for women and children. Public Health Res. Pract. 2022, 32, e3232227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sauder, K.A.; Ritchie, N.D. Reducing intergenerational obesity and diabetes risk. Diabetologia 2021, 64, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shaikh, H.; Robinson, S.; Teoh, T.G. Management of maternal obesity prior to and during pregnancy. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010, 15, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Funk, K.L.; LeBlanc, E.S.; Vesco, K.K.; Stevens, V.J. Women’s attitudes towards a pre-conception healthy lifestyle programme. Clin. Obes. 2015, 5, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. McLean, M.; Wellons, M.F. Optimizing natural fertility: The role of lifestyle modification. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2012, 39, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Melzer, K.; Schutz, Y. Pre-pregnancy and pregnancy predictors of obesity. Int. J. Obes. 2010, 34 (Suppl. S2), S44–S52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Claesson, I.M.; Josefsson, A.; Olhager, E.; Oldin, C.; Sydsjö, G. Effects of a gestational weight gain restriction program for obese women: Sibling pairs’ weight development during the first five years of life. Sex. Reprod. Healthc. 2018, 17, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Haire-Joshu, D.; Tabak, R. Preventing Obesity Across Generations: Evidence for Early Life Intervention. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2016, 37, 253–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yu, P.; Jiang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Li, K.; Xu, Y.; Meng, F.; Zhou, Y. Association between pregnancy intention and smoking or alcohol consumption in the preconception and pregnancy periods: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Nurs. 2022, 31, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Iversen, M.L.; Sørensen, N.O.; Broberg, L.; Damm, P.; Hedegaard, M.; Tabor, A.; Hegaard, H.K. Alcohol consumption and binge drinking in early pregnancy. A cross-sectional study with data from the Copenhagen Pregnancy Cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015, 15, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lassi, Z.S.; Imam, A.M.; Dean, S.V.; Bhutta, Z.A. Preconception care: Caffeine, smoking, alcohol, drugs and other environmental chemical/radiation exposure. Reprod. Health 2014, 11 (Suppl. S3), S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kermack, A.J.; Macklon, N. Preconception care and fertility. Minerva Ginecol. 2013, 65, 253–269. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Anderson, K.; Nisenblat, V.; Norman, R. Lifestyle factors in people seeking infertility treatment—A review. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010, 50, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Joelsson, L.S.; Elenis, E.; Wanggren, K.; Berglund, A.; Iliadou, A.N.; Cesta, C.E.; Mumford, S.L.; White, R.; Tydén, T.; Skalkidou, A.; et al. Investigating the effect of lifestyle risk factors upon number of aspirated and mature oocytes in in vitro fertilization cycles: Interaction with antral follicle count. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0221015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. St-Laurent, A.; Savard, C.; Plante, A.-S.; Gagnon, M.; Robitaille, J.; Lemieux, S.; Ruchat, S.-M.; Morisset, A.-S. Health-Related Preconception Factors: Adherence to Guidelines and Associations with Weight Status. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2022, 122, 1911–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. The S-PRESTO Study Group; Loo, E.X.L.; Soh, S.-E.; Loy, S.L.; Ng, S.; Tint, M.T.; Chan, S.-Y.; Huang, J.Y.; Yap, F.; Tan, K.H.; et al. Cohort profile: Singapore Preconception Study of Long-Term Maternal and Child Outcomes (S-PRESTO). Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2021, 36, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Loy, S.L.; Ku, C.W.; Cheung, Y.B.; Godfrey, K.M.; Chong, Y.-S.; Shek, L.P.-C.; Tan, K.H.; Yap, F.K.P.; Bernard, J.Y.; Chen, H.; et al. Fecundability in reproductive aged women at risk of sexual dysfunction and associated risk factors: A prospective preconception cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bernard, J.Y.; Ng, S.; Natarajan, P.; Loy, S.L.; Aris, I.M.; Tint, M.T.; Chong, Y.; Shek, L.; Chan, J.; Godfrey, K.M.; et al. Associations of physical activity levels and screen time with oral glucose tolerance test profiles in Singaporean women of reproductive age actively trying to conceive: The S-PRESTO study. Diabet. Med. 2019, 36, 888–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Baptiste-Roberts, K.; Ghosh, P.; Nicholson, W.K. Pregravid physical activity, dietary intake, and glucose intolerance during pregnancy. J. Women’s Health 2011, 20, 1847–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guendelman, S.; Pearl, M.; Kosa, J.L.; Graham, S.; Abrams, B.; Kharrazi, M. Association between preterm delivery and pre-pregnancy body mass (BMI), exercise and sleep during pregnancy among working women in Southern California. Matern. Child Health J. 2013, 17, 723–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ersek, J.L.; Brunner Huber, L.R. Physical activity prior to and during pregnancy and risk of postpartum depressive symptoms. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2009, 38, 556–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Walker, R.; Quong, S.; Olivier, P.; Wu, L.; Xie, J.; Boyle, J. Empowerment for behaviour change through social connections: A qualitative exploration of women’s preferences in preconception health promotion in the state of Victoria, Australia. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Akhter, S.; Marcus, M.; Kerber, R.A.; Kong, M.; Taylor, K.C. The impact of periconceptional maternal stress on fecundability. Ann. Epidemiol. 2016, 26, 710–716.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Witt, W.P.; Mandell, K.C.; Wisk, L.E.; Cheng, E.R.; Chatterjee, D.; Wakeel, F.; Park, H.; Zarak, D. Infant birthweight in the US: The role of preconception stressful life events and substance use. Arch. Women’s Ment. Health 2016, 19, 529–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Witt, W.P.; Mandell, K.C.; Wisk, L.E.; Cheng, E.R.; Chatterjee, D.; Wakeel, F.; Park, H.; Zarak, D. Predictors of alcohol and tobacco use prior to and during pregnancy in the US: The role of maternal stressors. Arch. Women’s Ment. Health 2015, 18, 523–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hultstrand, J.N.; Tydén, T.; Målqvist, M.; Ragnar, M.E.; Larsson, M.; Jonsson, M. Foreign-born women’s lifestyle and health before and during early pregnancy in Sweden. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2020, 25, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nowicki, G.J.; Misztal-Okońska, P.; Ślusarska, B.; Rudnicka-Drożak, E.; Młynarska, M.; Czekierdowski, A. Analysis of Health Behaviors and Personal Values of Childless Women, Pregnant Women and Women Who Recently Delivered. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ritchie, N.D.; Sauder, K.A.; Kostiuk, M. Reducing Maternal Obesity and Diabetes Risks Prior to Conception with the National Diabetes Prevention Program. Matern. Child Health J. 2023, 27, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. van Elten, T.M.; Karsten, M.D.A.; Geelen, A.; Gemke, R.J.B.J.; Groen, H.; Hoek, A.; van Poppel, M.N.M.; Roseboom, T.J. Preconception lifestyle intervention reduces long term energy intake in women with obesity and infertility: A randomised controlled trial. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2019, 16, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Price, S.; Nankervis, A.; Permezel, M.; Prendergast, L.; Sumithran, P.; Proietto, J. Health consequences for mother and baby of substantial pre-conception weight loss in obese women: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018, 19, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ku, C.W.; Leow, S.H.; Ong, L.S.; Erwin, C.; Ong, I.; Ng, X.W.; Tan, J.J.X.; Yap, F.; Chan, J.K.Y.; Loy, S.L. Developing a lifestyle intervention program for overweight or obese preconception, pregnant and postpartum women using qualitative methods. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Legro, R.S.; Hansen, K.R.; Diamond, M.P.; Steiner, A.Z.; Coutifaris, C.; Cedars, M.I.; Hoeger, K.M.; Usadi, R.; Johnstone, E.B.; Haisenleder, D.J.; et al. Effects of preconception lifestyle intervention in infertile women with obesity: The FIT-PLESE randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2022, 19, e1003883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. van Elten, T.M.; Karsten, M.D.A.; Geelen, A.; van Oers, A.M.; van Poppel, M.N.M.; Groen, H.; Gemke, R.J.B.J.; Mol, B.W.; Mutsaerts, M.A.Q.; Roseboom, T.J.; et al. Effects of a preconception lifestyle intervention in obese infertile women on diet and physical activity; A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Davis, A.M. Collateral Damage: Maternal Obesity During Pregnancy Continues to Rise. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2020, 75, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Skau, J.K.H.; Nordin, A.B.A.; Cheah, J.C.H.; Ali, R.; Zainal, R.; Aris, T.; Ali, Z.M.; Matzen, P.; Biesma, R.; Aagaard-Hansen, J.; et al. A complex behavioural change intervention to reduce the risk of diabetes and prediabetes in the pre-conception period in Malaysia: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2016, 17, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kim, S.Y.; Park, E.S.; Kim, H.W. Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Overweight or Obese Infertile Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Legro, R.S.; Dodson, W.C.; Kris-Etherton, P.M.; Kunselman, A.R.; Stetter, C.M.; Williams, N.I.; Gnatuk, C.L.; Estes, S.J.; Fleming, J.; Allison, K.C.; et al. Randomized Controlled Trial of Preconception Interventions in Infertile Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 4048–4058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dennis, C.-L.; Birken, C.S.; Brennenstuhl, S.; Wrottesley, S.; Marini, F.; Bell, R.C.; Tremblay, M.S.; Prioreschi, A. Describing 24-hour movement behaviours among preconception and recently pregnant Canadian parents: Who do we need to target? Behav. Med. 2023, 49, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ahmed, M.; Seid, A.; Kemal, A. Does the Frequency of Watching Television Matters on Overweight and Obesity among Reproductive Age Women in Ethiopia? J. Obes. 2020, 2020, 9173075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kazemi, A.; Toghiyani, Z.; Nekoei-Zahraei, N. Using social cognitive theory to explain physical activity in Iranian women preparing for pregnancy. Women Health 2020, 60, 1024–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Thompson, S.J.; Torres, M.E.; Stevenson, R.E.; Dean, J.H.; Best, R.G. Periconceptional multivitamin folic acid use, dietary folate, total folate and risk of neural tube defects in South Carolina. Ann. Epidemiol. 2003, 13, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Van der Windt, M.; Schoenmakers, S.; van Rijn, B.; Galjaard, S.; Steegers-Theunissen, R.; van Rossem, L. Epidemiology and (Patho)Physiology of Folic Acid Supplement Use in Obese Women before and during Pregnancy. Nutrients 2021, 13, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lane, S.H.; Hines, A.; Krowchuk, H. Predicting folic acid intake among college students. MCN Am. J. Matern. Child Nurs. 2015, 40, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Li, M.; Li, S.; Chavarro, J.E.; Gaskins, A.J.; Ley, S.H.; Hinkle, S.N.; Wang, X.; Ding, M.; Bell, G.; Bjerregaard, A.A.; et al. Prepregnancy Habitual Intakes of Total, Supplemental, and Food Folate and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study. Diabetes Care 2019, 42, 1034–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lyall, K.; Schmidt, R.J.; Hertz-Picciotto, I. Maternal lifestyle and environmental risk factors for autism spectrum disorders. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 43, 443–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gazzino, R.; Marrocco, W.; D’Ingianna, A.P.; Poggiogalle, E.; Giusti, A.M.; Pinto, A.; Lenzi, A.; Donini, L.M. Folic acid supplementation in Italian women during pregnancy: A cross-sectional study conducted in general practice. Nutrition 2020, 79–80, 110886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Medawar, G.; Wehbe, T.; Jaoude, E.A. Awareness and Use of Folic Acid among Women of Childbearing Age. Ann. Glob. Health 2019, 85, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ceulemans, M.; Van Calsteren, K.; Allegaert, K.; Foulon, V. Health products’ and substance use among pregnant women visiting a tertiary hospital in Belgium: A cross-sectional study. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2019, 28, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Olmedo-Requena, R.; Gómez-Fernández, J.; Mozas-Moreno, J.; Lewis-Mikhael, A.M.; Bueno-Cavanillas, A.; Jiménez-Moleón, J.J. Factors associated with adherence to nutritional recommendations before and during pregnancy. Women Health 2018, 58, 1094–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Cuervo, M.; Sayon-Orea, C.; Santiago, S.; Martínez, J.A. Dietary and health profiles of Spanish women in preconception, pregnancy and lactation. Nutrients 2014, 6, 4434–4451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Livock, M.; Anderson, P.J.; Lewis, S.; Bowden, S.; Muggli, E.; Halliday, J. Maternal micronutrient consumption periconceptionally and during pregnancy: A prospective cohort study. Public Health Nutr. 2017, 20, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Manniën, J.; de Jonge, A.; Cornel, M.C.; Spelten, E.; Hutton, E.K. Factors associated with not using folic acid supplements preconceptionally. Public Health Nutr. 2014, 17, 2344–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Richard-Tremblay, A.A.; Sheehy, O.; Audibert, F.; Ferreira, E.; Bérard, A. Concordance between periconceptional folic acid supplementation and Canadian Clinical Guidelines. J. Popul. Ther. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012, 19, e150–e159. [Google Scholar]
  78. Paulik, E.; Császár, J.; Kozinszky, Z.; Nagymajtényi, L. Preconceptional and prenatal predictors of folic acid intake in Hungarian pregnant women. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2009, 145, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kyozuka, H.; Nishigori, H.; Murata, T.; Fukuda, T.; Yamaguchi, A.; Kanno, A.; Yasuda, S.; Sato, A.; Ogata, Y.; Kuse, M.; et al. Prepregnancy antiinflammatory diet in pregnant women with endometriosis: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Nutrition 2021, 85, 111129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Salavati, N.; Vinke, P.C.; Lewis, F.; Bakker, M.K.; Erwich, J.J.H.; der Beek, E.M. Offspring Birth Weight Is Associated with Specific Preconception Maternal Food Group Intake: Data from a Linked Population-Based Birth Cohort. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lowensohn, R.I.; Stadler, D.D.; Naze, C. Current Concepts of Maternal Nutrition. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2016, 71, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Cohain, J.S. The latest research on preconception and prenatal nutrition. Midwifery Today Int. Midwife 2013, 106, 52–54. [Google Scholar]
  83. Katko, M.; Gazso, A.A.; Hircsu, I.; Bhattoa, H.P.; Molnar, Z.; Kovacs, B.; Andrasi, D.; Aranyosi, J.; Makai, R.; Veress, L.; et al. Thyroglobulin level at week 16 of pregnancy is superior to urinary iodine concentration in revealing preconceptual and first trimester iodine supply. Matern. Child Nutr. 2018, 14, e12470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Gaskins, A.J.; Nassan, F.L.; Chiu, Y.-H.; Arvizu, M.; Williams, P.L.; Keller, M.G.; Souter, I.; Hauser, R.; Chavarro, J.E.; EARTH Study Team. Dietary patterns and outcomes of assisted reproduction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 220, 567.e1–567.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Inskip, H.M.; Crozier, S.R.; Godfrey, K.M.; Borland, S.E.; Cooper, C.; Robinson, S.M. Women’s compliance with nutrition and lifestyle recommendations before pregnancy: General population cohort study. BMJ 2009, 338, b481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hammiche, F.; Laven, J.S.; van Mil, N.; de Cock, M.; de Vries, J.H.; Lindemans, J.; Steegers, E.A.; Steegers-Theunissen, R.P. Tailored preconceptional dietary and lifestyle counselling in a tertiary outpatient clinic in The Netherlands. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 2432–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Raets, L.; Ingelbrecht, A.; Benhalima, K. Management of type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: A narrative review. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1193271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Abell, S.K.; Nankervis, A.; Khan, K.S.; Teede, H.J. Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Preconception and in Pregnancy: Health Impacts, Influence of Obesity and Lifestyle, and Principles of Management. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2016, 34, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Wang, Z.; Nagy, R.A.; Groen, H.; Cantineau, A.E.; van Oers, A.M.; van Dammen, L.; Wekker, V.; Roseboom, T.J.; Mol, B.W.; Tietge, U.J.; et al. Preconception insulin resistance and neonatal birth weight in women with obesity: Role of bile acids. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2021, 43, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Deputy, N.P.; Kim, S.Y.; Conrey, E.J.; Bullard, K.M. Prevalence and Changes in Preexisting Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes Among Women Who Had a Live Birth-United States, 2012–2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2018, 67, 1201–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mathiesen, E.R.; Ringholm, L.; Damm, P. Pregnancy management of women with pregestational diabetes. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2011, 40, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Benhalima, K.; Beunen, K.; Siegelaar, S.E.; Painter, R.; Murphy, H.R.; Feig, D.S.; Donovan, L.E.; Polsky, S.; Buschur, E.; Levy, C.J.; et al. Management of type 1 diabetes in pregnancy: Update on lifestyle, pharmacological treatment, and novel technologies for achieving glycaemic targets. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023, 11, 490–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gottlieb, P.A.; Frias, J.P.; Peters, K.A.; Chillara, B.; Garg, S.K. Optimizing insulin therapy in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Treat. Endocrinol. 2002, 1, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wołoszyn-Durkiewicz, A.; Żalińska, M.; Brandt, A.; Myśliwiec, M.; Ściesińska, M.; Kuhn, J. Assessing the knowledge of the consequences of uncontrolled diabetesin pregnancy and its effects on fetal development, among femaleadolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. 2017, 23, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Downs, J.S.; Arslanian, S.; de Bruin, W.B.; Copeland, V.C.; Doswell, W.; Herman, W.; Lain, K.; Mansfield, J.; Murray, P.J.; White, N.; et al. Implications of type 2 diabetes on adolescent reproductive health risk: An expert model. Diabetes Educ. 2010, 36, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Davidson, A.J.F.; Park, A.L.; Berger, H.; Aoyama, K.; Harel, Z.; Cohen, E.; Cook, J.L.; Ray, J.G. Association of Improved Periconception Hemoglobin A1c with Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Diabetes. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2030207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hayes, C. Long-term prognostic factors in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Br. J. Nurs. 2009, 18, 523–524, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Castorino, K.; Jovanovič, L. The postpartum management of women with gestational diabetes using a continuum model for health care. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 56, 853–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Benhalima, K.; Minschart, C.; Van Crombrugge, P.; Calewaert, P.; Verhaeghe, J.; Vandamme, S.; Theetaert, K.; Devlieger, R.; Pierssens, L.; Ryckeghem, H.; et al. The 2019 Flemish consensus on screening for overt diabetes in early pregnancy and screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Clin. Belg. 2020, 75, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tieu, J.; Shepherd, E.; Middleton, P.; Crowther, C.A. Interconception care for women with a history of gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 8, Cd010211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Phelan, S. Windows of Opportunity for Lifestyle Interventions to Prevent Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Am. J. Perinatol. 2016, 33, 1291–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mielke, R.T.; Kaiser, D.; Centuolo, R. Interconception care for women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2013, 58, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kumar, M.; Ang, L.T.; Png, H.; Ng, M.; Tan, K.; Loy, S.L.; Tan, K.H.; Chan, J.K.Y.; Godfrey, K.M.; Chan, S.-Y.; et al. Automated Machine Learning (AutoML)-Derived Preconception Predictive Risk Model to Guide Early Intervention for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Donovan, B.M.; Breheny, P.J.; Robinson, J.G.; Baer, R.J.; Saftlas, A.F.; Bao, W.; Greiner, A.L.; Carter, K.D.; Oltman, S.P.; Rand, L.; et al. Development and validation of a clinical model for preconception and early pregnancy risk prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in nulliparous women. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Holt, R.I.; Lambert, K.D. The use of oral hypoglycaemic agents in pregnancy. Diabet. Med. 2014, 31, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Rönö, K.; Stach-Lempinen, B.; Klemetti, M.M.; Kaaja, R.J.; Pöyhönen-Alho, M.; Eriksson, J.G.; Koivusalo, S.B. Prevention of gestational diabetes through lifestyle intervention: Study design and methods of a Finnish randomized controlled multicenter trial (RADIEL). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014, 14, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kim, S.Y.; Deputy, N.P.; Robbins, C.L. Diabetes During Pregnancy: Surveillance, Preconception Care, and Postpartum Care. J. Women’s Health 2018, 27, 536–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Trout, K.K.; McCool, W.F.; Homko, C.J. Person-Centered Primary Care and Type 2 Diabetes: Beyond Blood Glucose Control. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2019, 64, 312–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Frayne, J.; Hauck, Y. Enjoying a healthy pregnancy: GPs’ essential role in health promotion. Aust. Fam. Physician 2017, 46, 20–25. [Google Scholar]
  110. Wille, M.C.; Weitz, B.; Kerper, P.; Frazier, S. Advances in preconception genetic counseling. J. Perinat. Neonatal Nurs. 2004, 18, 28–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhao, Y.; Yang, W.; Xian, D.; Huang, J. A Network Analysis of Multiple Preconception Health Behaviors in Chinese Women. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2023, 30, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Mumford, E.A.; Hair, E.C.; Yu, T.C.; Liu, W. Women’s longitudinal smoking patterns from preconception through child’s kindergarten entry: Profiles of biological mothers of a 2001 US birth cohort. Matern. Child Health J. 2014, 18, 810–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Poels, M.; van Stel, H.F.; Franx, A.; Koster, M.P.H. The effect of a local promotional campaign on preconceptional lifestyle changes and the use of preconception care. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2018, 23, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ding, Y.; Li, X.T.; Xie, F.; Yang, Y.L. Survey on the Implementation of Preconception Care in Shanghai, China. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2015, 29, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ockhuijsen, H.D.; Gamel, C.J.; van den Hoogen, A.; Macklon, N.S. Integrating preconceptional care into an IVF programme. J. Adv. Nurs. 2012, 68, 1156–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. de Lima, A.; Zelinkova, Z.; Mulders, A.G.; van der Woude, C.J. Preconception Care Reduces Relapse of Inflammatory Bowel Disease During Pregnancy. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 14, 1285–1292.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Steegers-Theunissen, R.P.M. Periconception mHealth platform for prevention of placental-related outcomes and non-communicable diseases. Placenta 2017, 60, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Smith, S.M.; van der Kleij, R.; Bais, B.; Schermer, M.H.N.; Ismaili M’hamdi, H.; Steegers-Theunissen, R.P.M. Preferences of women with a vulnerable health status towards nudging for adequate pregnancy preparation as investment in health of future generations: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022, 22, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. van Dijk, M.R.; Koster, M.P.H.; Oostingh, E.C.; Willemsen, S.P.; Steegers, E.A.P.; Steegers-Theunissen, R.P.M. A Mobile App Lifestyle Intervention to Improve Healthy Nutrition in Women Before and During Early Pregnancy: Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e15773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Oostingh, E.C.; Ophuis, R.H.; Koster, M.P.; Polinder, S.; Lingsma, H.F.; Laven, J.S.; Steegers-Theunissen, R.P. Mobile Health Coaching on Nutrition and Lifestyle Behaviors for Subfertile Couples Using the Smarter Pregnancy Program: Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019, 7, e13935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. van Dijk, M.R.; Koster, M.P.H.; Willemsen, S.P.; Huijgen, N.A.; Laven, J.S.E.; Steegers-Theunissen, R.P.M. Healthy preconception nutrition and lifestyle using personalized mobile health coaching is associated with enhanced pregnancy chance. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2017, 35, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Gootjes, D.V.; van Dijk, M.R.; Koster, M.P.; Willemsen, S.P.; Steegers, E.A.; Steegers-Theunissen, R.P. Neighborhood Deprivation and the Effectiveness of Mobile Health Coaching to Improve Periconceptional Nutrition and Lifestyle in Women: Survey in a Large Urban Municipality in the Netherlands. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019, 7, e11664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Norris, S.A.; Ho, J.C.C.; Rashed, A.A.; Vinding, V.; Skau, J.K.H.; Biesma, R.; Aagaard-Hansen, J.; Hanson, M.; Matzen, P. Pre-pregnancy community-based intervention for couples in Malaysia: Application of intervention mapping. BMC Public Health 2016, 16, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Landkroon, A.P.; de Weerd, S.; van Vliet-Lachotzki, E.; Steegers, E.A. Validation of an internet questionnaire for risk assessment in preconception care. Public Health Genom. 2010, 13, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ekstrand Ragnar, M.; Niemeyer Hultstrand, J.; Tydén, T.; Larsson, M. Development of an evidence-based website on preconception health. Upsala J. Med. Sci. 2018, 123, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Agricola, E.; Pandolfi, E.; Gonfiantini, M.V.; Gesualdo, F.; Romano, M.; Carloni, E.; Mastroiacovo, P.; Tozzi, A.E. A cohort study of a tailored web intervention for preconception care. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2014, 14, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. D’ambrosio, A.; Agricola, E.; Russo, L.; Gesualdo, F.; Pandolfi, E.; Bortolus, R.; Castellani, C.; Lalatta, F.; Mastroiacovo, P.; Tozzi, A.E.; et al. Web-based surveillance of public information needs for informing preconception interventions. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Genuis, S.J.; Genuis, R.A. Preconception Care: A New Standard of Care within Maternal Health Services. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 6150976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lyden, G.R.; Barrett, E.S.; Sathyanarayana, S.; Bush, N.R.; Swan, S.H.; Nguyen, R.H.N. Pregnancy intention and phthalate metabolites among pregnant women in The Infant Development and Environment Study cohort. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2020, 34, 736–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Grivell, R.; Dodd, J.; Robinson, J. The prevention and treatment of intrauterine growth restriction. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2009, 23, 795–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kandel, P.; Lim, S.; Pirotta, S.; Skouteris, H.; Moran, L.J.; Hill, B. Enablers and barriers to women’s lifestyle behavior change during the preconception period: A systematic review. Obes. Rev. 2021, 22, e13235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Dokras, A.; Sarwer, D.B.; Allison, K.C.; Milman, L.; Kris-Etherton, P.M.; Kunselman, A.R.; Stetter, C.M.; Williams, N.I.; Gnatuk, C.L.; Estes, S.J.; et al. Weight Loss and Lowering Androgens Predict Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life in Women with PCOS. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 2966–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Dietz de Loos, A.L.P.; Jiskoot, G.; Timman, R.; Beerthuizen, A.; Busschbach, J.J.V.; Laven, J.S.E. Improvements in PCOS characteristics and phenotype severity during a randomized controlled lifestyle intervention. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2021, 43, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Jiskoot, G.; Benneheij, S.; Beerthuizen, A.; de Niet, J.; de Klerk, C.; Timman, R.; Busschbach, J.; Laven, J. A three-component cognitive behavioural lifestyle program for preconceptional weight-loss in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): A protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Reprod. Health 2017, 14, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Bastani, F.; Hashemi, S.; Bastani, N.; Haghani, H. Impact of preconception health education on health locus of control and self-efficacy in women. East. Mediterr. Health J. 2010, 16, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ghasemi Yngyknd, S.; Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, S.; Babapour, J.; Mirghafourvand, M. The effect of counselling on preconception lifestyle and awareness in Iranian women contemplating pregnancy: A randomized control trial. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018, 31, 2538–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Bruin, K.M.V.D.P.; Le Cessie, S.; Elsinga, J.; De Jong-Potjer, L.C.; Van Haeringen, A.; Neven, A.K.; Verloove-Vanhorick, S.P.; Assendelft, P. Pre-conception counselling in primary care: Prevalence of risk factors among couples contemplating pregnancy. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2008, 22, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Heyes, T.; Long, S.; Mathers, N. Preconception care: Practice and beliefs of primary care workers. Fam. Pract. 2004, 21, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Musgrave, L.; Homer, C.; Gordon, A. Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours surrounding preconception and pregnancy health: An Australian cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2023, 13, e065055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. McGowan, L.; Lennon-Caughey, E.; Chun, C.; McKinley, M.C.; Woodside, J.V. Exploring preconception health beliefs amongst adults of childbearing age in the UK: A qualitative analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020, 20, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Bortolus, R.; Oprandi, N.C.; Morassutti, F.R.; Marchetto, L.; Filippini, F.; Agricola, E.; Tozzi, A.E.; Castellani, C.; Lalatta, F.; Rusticali, B.; et al. Why women do not ask for information on preconception health? A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017, 17, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Vause, T.D.R.; Jones, L.; Evans, M.; Wilkie, V.; Leader, A. Pre-conception health awareness in infertility patients. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2009, 31, 717–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Sijpkens, M.K.; van Voorst, S.F.; Rosman, A.N.; de Jong-Potjer, L.C.; Denktaş, S.; Koch, B.C.; Bertens, L.C.; Steegers, E.A. Change in Lifestyle Behaviors After Preconception Care: A Prospective Cohort Study. Am. J. Health Promot. 2021, 35, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Cheney, K.; Sim, K.A.; D’Souza, M.; Pelosi, M.; Black, K.I. Unintended pregnancy amongst an early pregnancy clinic cohort: Identifying opportunities for preventative health interventions. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2016, 56, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Maas, V.Y.F.; Poels, M.; de Kievit, M.H.; Hartog, A.P.; Franx, A.; Koster, M.P.H. Planning is not equivalent to preparing, how Dutch women perceive their pregnancy planning in relation to preconceptional lifestyle behaviour change—A cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022, 22, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. De Wolff, M.G.; Johansen, M.; Rom, A.L.; Midtgaard, J.; Tabor, A.; Hegaard, H.K. Degree of pregnancy planning and recommended pregnancy planning behavior among women with and without chronic medical conditions—A large hospital-based cross-sectional study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2021, 100, 1051–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Stanford, J.B.; Willis, S.K.; Hatch, E.E.; Rothman, K.J.; Wise, L.A. Fecundability in relation to use of fertility awareness indicators in a North American preconception cohort study. Fertil. Steril. 2019, 112, 892–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Lum, K.J.; Sundaram, R.; Buck Louis, G.M. Women’s lifestyle behaviors while trying to become pregnant: Evidence supporting preconception guidance. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 205, 203.e1–203.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Barrett, G.; Shawe, J.; Howden, B.; Patel, D.; Ojukwu, O.; Pandya, P.; Stephenson, J. Why do women invest in pre-pregnancy health and care? A qualitative investigation with women attending maternity services. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015, 15, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Nkrumah, I.; North, M.; Kothe, E.; Chai, T.L.; Pirotta, S.; Lim, S.; Hill, B. The Relationship Between Pregnancy Intentions and Diet or Physical Activity Behaviors in the Preconception and Antenatal Periods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2020, 65, 660–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lang, A.Y.; Harrison, C.L.; Barrett, G.; Hall, J.A.; Moran, L.J.; Boyle, J.A. Opportunities for enhancing pregnancy planning and preconception health behaviours of Australian women. Women Birth. 2021, 34, e153–e161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Goossens, J.; Beeckman, D.; Van Hecke, A.; Delbaere, I.; Verhaeghe, S. Preconception lifestyle changes in women with planned pregnancies. Midwifery 2018, 56, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Poels, M.; van Stel, H.F.; Franx, A.; Koster, M.P.H. Actively preparing for pregnancy is associated with healthier lifestyle of women during the preconception period. Midwifery 2017, 50, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Backhausen, M.G.; Ekstrand, M.; Tydén, T.; Magnussen, B.K.; Shawe, J.; Stern, J.; Hegaard, H.K. Pregnancy planning and lifestyle prior to conception and during early pregnancy among Danish women. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2014, 19, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Goossens, J.; Delbaere, I.; Dhaenens, C.; Willems, L.; Van Hecke, A.; Verhaeghe, S.; Beeckman, D. Preconception-related needs of reproductive-aged women. Midwifery 2016, 33, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Khan, N.N.; Boyle, J.A.; Lang, A.Y.; Harrison, C.L. Preconception Health Attitudes and Behaviours of Women: A Qualitative Investigation. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. DeJoy, S.B. Pilot Test of a Preconception and Midwifery Care Promotion Program for College Women. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2014, 59, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Wade, G.H.; Herrman, J.; McBeth-Snyder, L. A preconception care program for women in a college setting. MCN Am. J. Matern. Child Nurs. 2012, 37, 164–170; quiz 170–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Frazzitta, M.A.; Anderson, M.; Egan, E. Babies Need Healthy Moms: An innovative postpartum screening and education class for women who had gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educ. 2013, 39, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Hopkins, J.; Clarke, D.; Cross, W. Inside stories: Maternal representations of first time mothers from pre-pregnancy to early pregnancy. Women Birth 2014, 27, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Saravelos, S.H.; Regan, L. The importance of preconception counseling and early pregnancy monitoring. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2011, 29, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Power, M.L.; Wilson, E.K.; Hogan, S.O.; Loft, J.D.; Williams, J.L.; Mersereau, P.W.; Schulkin, J. Patterns of preconception, prenatal and postnatal care for diabetic women by obstetrician-gynecologists. J. Reprod. Med. 2013, 58, 7–14. [Google Scholar]
  163. Mwase-Musicha, L.; Chipeta, M.G.; Stephenson, J.; Hall, J.A. How do women prepare for pregnancy in a low-income setting? Prevalence and associated factors. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Umer, A.; Haile, Z.T.; Ahmadi-Montecalvo, H.; Chertok, I.R. Factors Associated with Receipt of Pre-pregnancy Preventive Dental Care Among Women in West Virginia: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Survey 2009–2010. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2016, 14, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Cohen, M.A.; Kumar, S.; Hathaway, M. Global Preconception and Contraception Care: Using a Life-Course Approach to Improve Health Outcomes in Lower-Resource Settings. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2022, 49, 647–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Keats, E.C.; Das, J.K.; Salam, R.A.; Lassi, Z.S.; Imdad, A.; Black, R.E.; Bhutta, Z.A. Effective interventions to address maternal and child malnutrition: An update of the evidence. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2021, 5, 367–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Lang, A.Y.; Bartlett, R.; Robinson, T.; Boyle, J.A. Perspectives on preconception health among migrant women in Australia: A qualitative study. Women Birth 2020, 33, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Schaffer, D.M.; Velie, E.M.; Shaw, G.M.; Todoroff, K.P. Energy and nutrient intakes and health practices of Latinas and white non-Latinas in the 3 months before pregnancy. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1998, 98, 876–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Xaverius, P.K.; Salas, J.; Tenkku, L.E. Preconception wellness: Differences in health by immigrant status. J. Immigr. Minor. Health 2012, 14, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Sayers, S.M. Indigenous newborn care. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2009, 56, 1243–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zhao, X.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, J.; Li, G.; He, X.; Ma, F.; Meng, Q.; Cao, Q.; Meng, Y.; Howson, C.; et al. Factors influencing the quality of preconception healthcare in China: Applying a preconceptional instrument to assess healthcare needs. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014, 14, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Bish, C.L.; Farr, S.; Johnson, D.; McAnally, R. Preconception health of reproductive aged women of the Mississippi River delta. Matern. Child Health J. 2012, 16 (Suppl. S2), 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Govindaswami, B.; Jegatheesan, P.; Nudelman, M.; Narasimhan, S.R. Prevention of Prematurity: Advances and Opportunities. Clin. Perinatol. 2018, 45, 579–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Deierlein, A.L.; Litvak, J.; Stein, C.R. Preconception Health and Disability Status Among Women of Reproductive Age Participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2013–2018. J. Women’s Health 2022, 31, 1320–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Ekstrand Ragnar, M.; Grandahl, M.; Stern, J.; Mattebo, M. Important but far away: Adolescents’ beliefs, awareness and experiences of fertility and preconception health. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2018, 23, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Kim, H.W.; Kang, S.Y.; Kim, J. Factors influencing adolescents’ healthy pregnancy preparation behavior: A cross-sectional gender comparison applying the health belief model. Reprod. Health 2022, 19, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Cha, E.; Smart, M.J.; Braxter, B.J.; Faulkner, M.S. Preconception Care to Reduce the Risks of Overweight and Obesity in Women of Reproductive Age: An Integrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Shawe, J.; Delbaere, I.; Ekstrand, M.; Hegaard, H.K.; Larsson, M.; Mastroiacovo, P.; Stern, J.; Steegers, E.; Stephenson, J.; Tydén, T. Preconception care policy, guidelines, recommendations and services across six European countries: Belgium (Flanders), Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2015, 20, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Chronopoulou, E.; Raperport, C.; Serhal, P.; Saab, W.; Seshadri, S. Preconception tests at advanced maternal age. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2021, 70, 28–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Sissons, A.; Grant, A.; Kirkland, A.; Currie, S. Using the theoretical domains framework to explore primary health care practitioner’s perspectives and experiences of preconception physical activity guidance and promotion. Psychol. Health Med. 2020, 25, 844–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Bombard, J.M.; Robbins, C.L.; Dietz, P.M.; Valderrama, A.L. Preconception care: The perfect opportunity for health care providers to advise lifestyle changes for hypertensive women. Am. J. Health Promot. 2013, 27 (Suppl. S3), S43–S49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Kalra, B.; Punyani, H.; Malhotra, N.; Kalra, S. Pre-conception management. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2020, 70, 762–763. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  183. Klein, J.; Boyle, J.; Kirkham, R.; Connors, C.; Whitbread, C.; Oats, J.; Barzi, F.; McIntyre, D.; Lee, I.; Luey, M.; et al. Preconception care for women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A mixed-methods study of provider knowledge and practice. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2017, 129, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Cairncross, Z.; Dennis, C.-L.; Brennenstuhl, S.; Ravindran, S.; Enders, J.; Graves, L.; Mill, C.; Telner, D.; Brown, H.K. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Preconception Health Knowledge Questionnaire. Am. J. Health Promot. 2021, 35, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Poels, M.; Koster, M.P.H.; Franx, A.; van Stel, H.F. Parental perspectives on the awareness and delivery of preconception care. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017, 17, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Gilbert, E.; Collins, R.; Webster, V.; Boyd, N.; Maple-Brown, L.; Boyle, J.; Smith-Vaughan, H.; Smith, J. Using co-design to develop a culturally responsive reproductive health learning resource for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth. Health Promot. J. Aust. 2021, 32 (Suppl. S1), 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Walker, R.; Morris, H.; Lang, S.; Hampton, K.; Boyle, J.; Skouteris, H. Co-designing preconception and pregnancy care for healthy maternal lifestyles and obesity prevention. Women Birth 2020, 33, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Benedetto, C.; Borella, F.; Divakar, H.; O’RIordan, S.L.; Mazzoli, M.; Hanson, M.; O’REilly, S.; Jacobsson, B.; Conry, J.A.; McAuliffe, F.M. Intrauterine device use in women with a history of ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2022, 158, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Good Health Before Pregnancy: Pre-Pregnancy Care. 2023. Available online: https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/good-health-before-pregnancy-prepregnancy-care (accessed on 27 October 2024).
  190. Fowler, J.R.; Jenkins, S.M.; Jack, B.W. Preconception Counseling. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  191. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Preconception Care. 2023. Available online: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/factsheets/preconceptioncare (accessed on 27 October 2024).
  192. NHS Inform. Looking After Yourself and Your Baby. 2023. Available online: https://www.nhsinform.scot/ready-steady-baby/pregnancy/looking-after-yourself-and-your-baby/ (accessed on 27 October 2024).
  193. Tully, K.P.; Stuebe, A.M.; Bogen, D.L. Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with maternal obesity: A review. Pre-Pregnancy Couns. 2017, 22, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
  194. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Pre-Pregnancy Counselling. 2022. Available online: https://ranzcog.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/Pre-Pregnancy-Counselling.pdf (accessed on 27 October 2024).
  195. Canadian Paediatric Society. Lifestyle During Pregnancy. 2023. Available online: https://caringforkids.cps.ca/handouts/pregnancy-and-babies (accessed on 27 October 2024).
Figure 1. Literature review.
Figure 1. Literature review.
Jcm 14 06582 g001
Figure 2. Key Domains of Preconception Care.
Figure 2. Key Domains of Preconception Care.
Jcm 14 06582 g002
Table 1. Diet, Supplementation, and Micronutrient Recommendations.
Table 1. Diet, Supplementation, and Micronutrient Recommendations.
NutrientRecommendationAffected OutcomeComplianceAdditional Comments
A nutrient rich diet includes whole grains, fruits, vegetablesNo specific recommendationAssociated with improved fetal health, normal birth weight, and improved maternal and infant survival rates [79,80,81,82]No dataDiets high in sugar and fat predispose women to diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease [79,80,81,82]
Iodine≥150 µg/day at least four weeks prior to conceptionSignificantly lower serum thyroglobulin levels at 16 weeks [83]No data
CalciumNo specific recommendationVital for fetal developmentNo data
Vitamin CParticularly recommended for patients who continue to smoke [81]Lowers incidence of asthma and wheezing in offspring [81]No data
Vitamin B12No specific recommendationIn combination with “pro-fertility diet” outperformed other popular diets in enhancing live birth [84]No dataDescribed as part of “pro-fertility diet” [83]
Vitamin DNo specific recommendationIn combination with “pro-fertility diet” outperformed other popular diets in enhancing live birth [84]No dateDescribed as part of “pro-fertility diet” [83]
“Pro-fertility diet”Emphasizes folic acid, vitamin B12, vitamin D, low-pesticide fruits and vegetables, whole grains, dairy, soy, and seafood (over other meats) [84]This regimen has outperformed other popular diets in enhancing live birth rates in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology therapy [84]Despite this observation, real-world adherence remains limited [85]In one sub-fertile outpatient cohort, most couples initially failed to meet their dietary targets. After counseling, fruit and fish intake was increased, alcohol use declined, and overall dietary risk scores improved in both women and men [86]
Table 2. Preconception lifestyle recommendations by professional organizations [188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195].
Table 2. Preconception lifestyle recommendations by professional organizations [188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195].
ResourceCountryPreconception Recommendations
ACOGUnited States
  • Follow a healthy diet (MyPlate as a guide); take a prenatal vitamin with 400 mcg folic acid and iron
  • Exercise regularly (150 min/week; include muscle-strengthening exercises 2+ days/week)
  • Achieve and maintain a healthy BMI
  • Avoid unhealthy substances (tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, illegal drugs, nonmedical prescription drugs) for both partners
  • Ensure a safe environment (check for lead, mercury, pesticides, and radiation)
  • Manage chronic health conditions
  • Review medications during PCC visits
  • Get recommended vaccinations before pregnancy
  • Plan pregnancies with appropriate intervals
ASRMUnited States
  • Optimize management of chronic conditions (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, obesity, thyroid disorders, psychiatric disorders, HIV, thrombophilias, autoimmune diseases, cardiopulmonary disorders)
  • Review medications for safety, efficacy, and potential dosing adjustments
  • Collect detailed family history, provide genetic counseling, and offer screening
  • Assess immunization status and provide necessary vaccinations
  • Ensure cervical cancer screening is current
  • Evaluate the need for STI screening and treat any infections found
  • Screen for substance use and exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV)
  • Screen for teratogenic environmental or occupational exposures
  • Discuss safe interpregnancy intervals for patients with recent deliveries
  • Review past pregnancy complications, assess recurrence risks, and discuss mitigation strategies
CNGOFFrance
  • No recommendations
FIGOUnited Kingdom
  • Manage pre-existing medical conditions
  • Maintain a healthy weight (address obesity/low weight)
  • Take folic acid and micronutrient supplements
  • Quit smoking
  • Avoid alcohol and substance use
  • Limit exposure to environmental chemicals
  • Engage in regular physical activity (150 min/week)
  • Check immunization status
  • Ensure adequate interpregnancy intervals (12–24 months)
FMFUnited Kingdom
  • Refers to FIGO’s recommendations.
JAOGJapan
  • Recommend preconception folate supplementation of 400 micrograms/day
NICEUnited Kingdom
  • Plan your reproductive life (number and timing of pregnancies based on values and goals)
  • Adopt a healthy diet: increase fiber by 10 g, reduce sugar-sweetened beverages, limit red/processed meats and animal fats, and replace animal protein with plant-based options
  • Increase folic acid intake (0.4 mg daily)
  • Update vaccinations (consult your healthcare provider)
  • Discuss any medical conditions (diabetes, hypertension, etc.) with your provider
  • Avoid smoking, alcohol, drugs; seek support if needed
  • Achieve a healthy weight before pregnancy
  • Learn your family health history
  • Prioritize mental health to minimize risks during and after pregnancy
NHSUnited Kingdom
  • Exercise regularly; aim for 20 min of walking after meals and engage in light activities like swimming, antenatal yoga, or low-impact exercises
  • Avoid alcohol
  • Start pelvic floor exercises to support your baby and prevent incontinence post-birth
  • Eliminate smoking, vaping, and exposure to second-hand smoke
  • Consult your GP about any medications you are taking to ensure they are safe during pregnancy
  • Take a daily 400 mcg folic acid supplement and ensure proper intake of iron, vitamin D, iodine, and other essential nutrients
  • Focus on healthy foods ich in folic acid, iron, and iodine, limit high-fat and high-sugar foods, and stay hydrated
  • Practice good hygiene by washing hands, cleaning surfaces, and being cautious around animals
  • Maintain oral health by brushing twice daily with fluoride toothpaste and visiting the dentist regularly
  • Wear seatbelts, plan travel carefully, ensure you have necessary vaccinations, and consider the quality of medical care in your destination
RANZCOGAustralia
  • Evaluate medical problems and their impact on pregnancy; stabilize existing conditions and assess mental health
  • Offer genetic counseling and screening for heritable disorders based on history or ethnic background
  • Check and maintain vaccinations for SARS-CoV-2, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella zoster, diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. Consider immunizations for those with incomplete immunity (Hepatitis B, rubella, varicella)
  • Encourage steps to achieve a healthy BMI through diet, exercise, or bariatric surgery if appropriate
  • Recommend taking 0.4 mg of folic acid daily for at least one month before conception and for the first three months of pregnancy
  • Advise cessation of smoking, alcohol, and substance use before conception; inform there is no safe level of alcohol during pregnancy
  • Advise couples to avoid travel to areas with infections during conception attempts; assess and minimize exposure to toxins or radiation at home and work
RCOGUnited Kingdom
  • Base meals on starchy foods (potatoes, bread, rice, pasta), preferably wholegrain
  • Consume at least five portions of different fruits and vegetables daily
  • Minimize consumption of fried foods
  • Limit drinks with added sugars and foods like sweets, cakes, and biscuits; opt for fiber-rich foods (oats, beans, lentils, grains, seeds)
  • Include protein daily; choose lean meats and aim for two portions of fish weekly. Alternatives include lentils, beans, nuts, and eggs
  • Opt for healthier snacks like vegetables, small sandwiches, or fresh/dried fruit
  • Include dairy or calcium-fortified unsweetened dairy alternatives
  • Be mindful of portion sizes; avoid “eating for two”
  • Aim to eat breakfast daily
  • Limit caffeine to less than 200 mg per day
  • Take an additional folic acid supplement of 400 micrograms daily to reduce the risk of birth defects
  • Take 10 micrograms of vitamin D during pregnancy and breast feeding
SMFMUnited States
  • No recommendations
SOGCCanada
  • Inactive vaccines (e.g., influenza, hepatitis B, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis) are safe in pregnancy. Live-attenuated vaccines (e.g., MMR, varicella) are not recommended due to potential risks. Consider vaccinations before pregnancy
  • Adopt a healthy diet prior to conception to manage obesity and promote a healthy pregnancy
  • Discuss mental health with your healthcare provider to create a plan for reducing risks during and after pregnancy
  • Engage in at least 150 min of moderate-intensity physical activity weekly, aiming for activity 3 to 7 days a week. Include aerobic exercises and resistance training (e.g., walking, swimming, low-impact aerobics, cycling, strength training)
ACOG = American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; ASRM = American Society for Reproductive Medicine; CNGOF = The French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; FIGO = International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; FMF = Fetal Medicine Foundation; JAOG = Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; NICE = National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; RANZCOG = Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; RCOG = Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; SMFM = Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine; SOGC = Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kartchner, L.C.; Dunn, A.; Taylor, K.H.; Ali, M.M.; Manning, N.A.; Dajani, N.K.; Magann, E.F. Lifestyle Modifications Prior to Pregnancy and Their Impact on Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes: A Review. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 6582. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186582

AMA Style

Kartchner LC, Dunn A, Taylor KH, Ali MM, Manning NA, Dajani NK, Magann EF. Lifestyle Modifications Prior to Pregnancy and Their Impact on Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes: A Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(18):6582. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186582

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kartchner, Lincoln C., Addison Dunn, Kaitlyn H. Taylor, Mir M. Ali, Nirvana A. Manning, Nafisa K. Dajani, and Everett F. Magann. 2025. "Lifestyle Modifications Prior to Pregnancy and Their Impact on Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes: A Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 18: 6582. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186582

APA Style

Kartchner, L. C., Dunn, A., Taylor, K. H., Ali, M. M., Manning, N. A., Dajani, N. K., & Magann, E. F. (2025). Lifestyle Modifications Prior to Pregnancy and Their Impact on Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes: A Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(18), 6582. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186582

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop