Next Article in Journal
Reference Limits for Fetal Biventricular Longitudinal Strain Using Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Across Gestational Age Groups: A Single-Center Study
Previous Article in Journal
Corticosteroids and Vertebral Trabecular Bone Quality in Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Diabetes on Periapical Pathology in Treated and Untreated Teeth: A Cross-Sectional Comparison with Non-Diabetic Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effectiveness of an Essential Oil Mouthwash on Halitosis in Obese Patients with Periodontitis: A Short-Term Clinical Evaluation

by
Gabriela Beresescu
1,*,
Despina Luciana Bereczki-Temistocle
1,
Liana Beresescu
1,
Alina Ormenisan
1,
Adriana Monea
1,* and
Ion Razvan-Marius
2,3
1
Faculty of Dental Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania
2
Doctoral School of Medicine and Pharmacy, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Targu Mures, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania
3
2nd Department of Surgery, Mures County Emergency Hospital, 540136 Targu Mures, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5225; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155225
Submission received: 23 May 2025 / Revised: 18 July 2025 / Accepted: 18 July 2025 / Published: 23 July 2025

Abstract

Background: Halitosis is a common condition often rooted in periodontal disease and exacerbated by systemic disorders such as obesity. This short-term clinical evaluation investigates the relationship between halitosis, obesity, and periodontitis, and assesses the efficacy of a natural essential oil mouthwash as an adjunctive oral hygiene intervention. Methods: In this randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 45 obese patients with diagnosed periodontitis and self-reported halitosis were randomly assigned to either a test group (n = 30), receiving an essential oil-based mouthwash, or a control group (n = 15), receiving a placebo. Over 28 days, participants were evaluated using plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), organoleptic scoring, and BANA test results. Both subjective and objective halitosis assessments were performed. Results: The test group showed marked improvements in all parameters compared to controls. PI decreased by 31.5% in the test group versus 9.25% in controls; BOP reduced by 34.5% versus 6.0%; BANA test positivity dropped by 38.1% in the test group. Organoleptic scores improved by 45.9% (examiner-rated) and 36.8% (self-assessed) in the test group. Conclusions: This 28-day clinical evaluation demonstrates the potential of an essential oil-based mouthwash to significantly reduce halitosis and periodontal inflammation in obese individuals with periodontitis. The necessity of future randomized trials is evident to substantiate the sustained benefits and safety of the intervention.

1. Introduction

Halitosis, or oral malodor, is a common condition that adversely affects social interactions, quality of life, and psychological well-being. It is reported to affect 30–50% of the global population, with a higher prevalence noted among individuals with systemic comorbidities such as obesity and diabetes [1,2]. While frequently perceived as a cosmetic issue, halitosis often signifies underlying oral or systemic pathology, particularly in patients with poor oral hygiene or chronic inflammatory conditions [3].
Intraoral halitosis, the most common type, is predominantly caused by volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) such as hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, and dimethyl sulfide. These malodorous compounds arise from the proteolytic degradation of sulfur-containing amino acids by anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria located on the tongue dorsum and within periodontal pockets [4,5,6]. The key microbial species implicated in VSC production include Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia—collectively known as the “red complex” and major contributors to both halitosis and periodontal disease [7,8].
Periodontitis, a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the tissues that support teeth, is among the primary intraoral causes of halitosis. The condition is marked by gingival inflammation, connective tissue destruction, alveolar bone loss, and the formation of periodontal pockets. These pockets serve as optimal anaerobic niches for the proliferation of virulence factors produced by VSC-producing pathogens [9,10]. The most recent classification system proposed by the European Federation of Periodontology (EFP) and the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) delineates four stages and three grades of periodontitis, with the staging system incorporating clinical attachment loss, disease progression, and modifying risk factors such as smoking and obesity [11].
It is now widely recognized that obesity is not only a systemic condition but also functions as a significant modifier of risk for periodontal disease and oral dysbiosis. It is well established that the pathophysiological mechanisms that link obesity and periodontitis are driven by the presence of low-grade, chronic systemic inflammation, which is initiated by proinflammatory cytokines derived from adipose tissue. These include, but are not limited to, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and leptin [12,13,14]. These mediators have been demonstrated to contribute to altered immune responses, delayed tissue repair, and increased susceptibility to infection, all of which have been shown to worsen periodontal outcomes. Furthermore, obesity-related comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can further exacerbate halitosis via xerostomia, increased salivary glucose, and acid reflux into the oral cavity [15,16,17].
Emerging research has begun to explore the gut–oral axis and the potential role of probiotics and prebiotics in modulating oral microbiota and managing halitosis [18,19]. The oral administration of beneficial bacterial strains—such as Lactobacillus salivarius or Streptococcus salivarius—has shown promise in reducing VSC levels and improving breath odor in small-scale trials. These findings underscore the relevance of microbial modulation in halitosis management, especially in patients with systemic dysbiosis, such as those with obesity [13,14].
From a therapeutic standpoint, chlorhexidine (CHX) remains a gold standard for chemical plaque control and halitosis reduction. However, its long-term use is often limited by adverse effects such as mucosal irritation, tooth staining, and altered taste perception [20]. As a result, there is growing interest in natural alternatives, including essential oil-based mouthwashes, which offer antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties with minimal side effects [21,22]. Essential oils such as lemon (Citrus limon), melissa (Melissa officinalis), and grapefruit seed extract have demonstrated inhibitory effects on VSC-producing bacteria and periodontal pathogens in vitro and in clinical settings [23,24,25]. Their incorporation into oral hygiene regimens may be particularly beneficial in patients seeking non-pharmacological options or those at an elevated risk of systemic inflammation.
Despite promising preliminary data, most available studies have focused on healthy individuals or small populations. There remains a paucity of well-designed, placebo-controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of essential oil mouthwashes in high-risk populations—particularly obese patients with periodontitis. Additionally, little is known about the short-term and long-term effectiveness of such interventions on clinical indices of periodontal inflammation and halitosis under real-world conditions.
The objective of the present study is to evaluate the short-term clinical effectiveness of an experimental essential oil mouthwash in reducing halitosis and improving periodontal health parameters in obese patients with chronic periodontitis. The study employs both subjective and objective halitosis assessment methods, microbiological testing (BANA assay), and validated clinical indices (plaque index, bleeding on probing) over a 28-day intervention period.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was designed as a short-term, prospective, randomized, clinical trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a natural essential oil-based mouthwash in reducing halitosis among obese patients diagnosed with chronic periodontitis (according with EFP 2017 guidelines). The study duration was 28 days and focused on assessing both clinical and microbiological parameters. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Romania (Approval No. 1863/15.09.2022). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

2.1. Participants and Eligibility Criteria

Patients were recruited from the university dental clinic between October 2022 and February 2023. Eligible participants were aged between 25 and 65 years and met the following inclusion criteria:
  • Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2, classified according to World Health Organization (WHO) thresholds (Class I: 30–34.9 kg/m2; Class II: 35–39.9 kg/m2; Class III: ≥40 kg/m2).
  • Diagnosis of chronic periodontitis, confirmed by a periodontist and classified according to the EFP 2017 guidelines.
  • Poor oral hygiene, indicated by a plaque index ≥10% and gingival index ≥ 10%.
  • Self-reported halitosis.
Exclusion criteria included the presence of xerostomia, active carious lesions or apical pathology, antibiotic or antiseptic mouthwash use in the previous six months, smoking within 48 h prior to assessment, uncontrolled systemic diseases, or pregnancy.
Out of 53 initially screened individuals, 45 met the inclusion criteria and were randomized into two groups: 30 participants in the test group received the essential oil-based mouthwash, while 15 participants in the control group received a placebo rinse (distilled water). Participants were randomly allocated at a 2:1 ratio into test (n = 30) or control (n = 15) groups, justified by feasibility constraints and a focus on capturing variability in the experimental treatment (Figure 1). Randomization was performed using a computer-generated sequence. The unequal group sizes reflected feasibility and a focus on detecting variability in the experimental intervention.

2.2. Intervention Protocol

All participants received standardized oral hygiene instructions and were provided with identical toothbrushes and fluoridated toothpaste.
The test group was assigned a natural experimental mouthwash containing a blend of essential oils, while the control group received distilled water. Participants were instructed to rinse with 10 mL of their assigned solution twice daily for 30 s after brushing.
The experimental essential oil mouthwash was prepared in a sanitized laboratory setting and consisted of the following ingredients: 250 mL of distilled water, 0.5 g of sodium bicarbonate, 2 drops of Citrus limon (lemon) essential oil, 2 drops of Melissa officinalis (melissa) essential oil, 5 mL of vegetable glycerine as an emulsifier, and 10 drops of grapefruit seed extract as a natural preservative. All components were gently mixed and stored in sterile amber glass bottles to prevent photodegradation. No adverse reactions were reported during the intervention period. The placebo consisted of distilled water matched closely in sensory properties (appearance, taste, and smell), packaging, and labelling to ensure blinding effectiveness. Both mouthwashes were freshly prepared weekly and refrigerated at 4 °C to maintain their stability during the study period.

2.3. Clinical Assessment

Clinical assessments were performed at baseline and after 28 days by a single calibrated periodontist (κ = 0.86), ensuring consistency in data collection. Examiner calibration included repeated intra-examiner agreement tests prior to study initiation. The following indices were recorded:
  • Plaque Index (PI): Assessed using the O’Leary plaque control record, examining representative vestibular and lingual surfaces of molars and incisors.
  • Gingival Index (GI): Evaluated using the Löe and Silness index.
  • Bleeding on Probing (BOP): Recorded as the percentage of sites exhibiting bleeding upon gentle probing.

2.4. Halitosis Evaluation

Halitosis was assessed using both objective and subjective methods:
Organoleptic Measurement: Examiner-rated odor was scored according to Rosenberg’s 0–5 scale. Participants were asked to refrain from eating strong-smelling foods, using mouthwash, or wearing scented products 48 h prior to the examination. The procedure involved the participant keeping their mouth closed for three minutes and then exhaling slowly toward the examiner from a 10 cm distance. The examiner, blinded to group allocation, rated the odor.
Self-Perception Test: Participants were instructed to perform the wrist-lick test and rate their perceived odor on the same 0–5 scale.

2.5. Microbiological Analysis

To assess bacterial load, samples were taken from the dorsal surface of the tongue using sterile swabs. The presence of volatile sulfur compound (VSC)-producing anaerobes—Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia—was detected using the BANA (benzoyl-DL-arginine-naphthylamide) enzymatic assay. Test strips were moistened, incubated at 55 °C for five minutes, and evaluated for color change, which was interpreted as follows:
  • Negative: No color change.
  • Slight Positive: Light blue speckling.
  • Positive: Uniform strong blue color.
This method, although semi-quantitative, offers a practical and validated tool for clinical detection of VSC-producing pathogens associated with halitosis and periodontal disease.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The Shapiro–Wilk test was applied to evaluate the normality of distribution. Parametric tests (paired and independent t-tests) were used for normally distributed data, while non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank) were used for skewed variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

The findings of the present study demonstrate the efficacy of an essential oil mouthwash in mitigating halitosis, as well as its impact on the plaque index, the bleeding index on probing, the bacterial concentration, and the organoleptic examination conducted by both the examiner and the subject. The preliminary findings suggested significant alterations after treatment, with a conspicuous incongruity detected in the test group regarding the plaque index, bleeding on probing, gingival index, BANA test outcomes, and organoleptic examination values.
Initially, a total of 53 patients were assessed for eligibility. Following the screening process, 45 obese individuals afflicted with chronic periodontitis and self-reported halitosis were included in the study and randomly assigned to either the test group (n = 30) or the control group (n = 15) at a 2:1 ratio. All participants completed the 28-day study protocol.
A subsequent demographic analysis confirmed that the baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. The mean age was 43.2 ± 9.4 years in the test group and 42.7 ± 8.8 years in the control group (p = 0.81). The BMI values were found to be comparable as well (32.1 ± 2.4 vs. 31.7 ± 2.3; p = 0.63). The prevalence of smoking was comparable in both groups, with a proportion of 26.7% across both groups. No statistically significant disparities were identified in terms of gender distribution, medical history, or initial periodontal indices.
Demographic analysis confirmed comparable baseline characteristics between groups. The mean age was 43.2 ± 9.4 years in the test group and 42.7 ± 8.8 in the control group (p = 0.81). BMI values were also similar (32.1 ± 2.4 vs. 31.7 ± 2.3; p = 0.63). Smoking prevalence was equivalent in both groups (26.7%), and no significant differences were observed in gender distribution, medical history, or baseline periodontal indices (Table 1).
A comparison of the test and control groups revealed a statistically significant difference in the plaque index (PI), with the test group demonstrating a more pronounced change. There was an average plaque index of 1.333 in the control group before treatment. At baseline, the mean PI was 1.39 ± 0.15 in the test group and 1.33 ± 0.13 in the control group (p = 0.17). After 28 days, the test group showed a statistically significant reduction in PI to 0.95 ± 0.14, representing a 31.5% decrease (p < 0.001). The control group exhibited a modest reduction from 1.33 to 1.21 (↓ 9.25%; p = 0.041). A between-group comparison confirmed a significantly greater PI reduction in the test group (p < 0.001) (Figure 2).
The baseline bleeding on probing (BOP) value was 58.2 ± 6.1% in the test group and 56.4 ± 5.7% in the control group (p = 0.31). After the intervention, the test group BOP decreased significantly to 38.1 ± 5.2% (↓ 34.49%; p < 0.001). In contrast, the control group exhibited a smaller, non-significant change to 53.0 ± 5.5% (↓ 6.02%; p = 0.18). Intergroup analysis showed a statistically significant improvement in BOP in the test group compared to the control group (p < 0.001) (Figure 3).
The BANA test, which detects the enzymatic activity of P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, and T. denticola, revealed substantial microbiological changes. At baseline, 77% of the test group had positive BANA results, which decreased to 38% after 28 days (↓ 38.09%; p < 0.001). In the control group, BANA positivity dropped slightly from 68% to 65% (↓ 4.38%; p = 0.67). The between-group comparison was statistically significant (p < 0.001), indicating superior bacterial suppression in the test group (Figure 4).
Subjective (self-assessed) halitosis scores were evaluated using the wrist-lick test, also on a 0–5 scale. The test group reported a significant decrease from 3.4 ± 0.7 to 2.1 ± 0.6 (↓ 36.84%; p < 0.001). The control group showed a smaller, non-significant reduction from 3.2 ± 0.6 to 2.9 ± 0.5 (↓ 9.52%; p = 0.13). The difference between groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001) (Figure 5).
Objective (organoleptic) scores were evaluated using a standardized examiner-rated scale from 0 (no odor) to 5 (severe odor). The mean baseline score in the test group was 3.1 ± 0.6, which significantly decreased to 1.7 ± 0.5 after the intervention (↓ 45.95%; p < 0.001). The control group showed only a minor change from 3.0 ± 0.5 to 2.8 ± 0.4 (↓ 7.5%; p = 0.21). The intergroup difference was significant (p < 0.001) (Figure 6).
Figure 7 illustrates the percentage change across five core parameters (PI, BOP, BANA, self-reported halitosis, and examiner-rated halitosis). In each category, the test group demonstrated superior improvements compared to the control group:
  • Plaque Index: ↓ 31.5% (test) vs. ↓ 9.25% (control).
  • BOP: ↓ 34.49% (test) vs. ↓ 6.02% (control).
  • BANA Positivity: ↓ 38.09% (test) vs. ↓ 4.38% (control).
  • Self-reported halitosis: ↓ 36.84% (test) vs. ↓ 9.52% (control).
  • Examiner-rated halitosis: ↓ 45.95% (test) vs. ↓ 7.5% (control).
All participants reported adherence to the rinse protocol. No participants experienced mucosal irritation, altered taste, or other adverse effects. Mouthwash compliance was confirmed through returned volume and self-reporting forms.
The results clearly indicate that the essential oil mouthwash was significantly more effective than the placebo in reducing plaque, gingival inflammation, halitosis (both subjective and objective), and microbial burden. These findings support the inclusion of essential oil rinses as an adjunctive therapy in the oral hygiene regimen of obese patients with periodontitis and halitosis.

4. Discussion

The present short-term clinical study demonstrates that a natural essential oil mouthwash significantly reduces halitosis and improves periodontal health among obese patients with periodontitis over a 28-day period. The test group exhibited significant improvements across all measured domains—including plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), microbiological profiles (BANA test), and halitosis scores—when compared to the placebo group. These findings support the short-term clinical effectiveness and tolerability of essential oils as adjuncts in the management of oral halitosis; halitosis is a multifactorial condition with predominant intraoral aetiology, especially among patients with periodontal disease. Anaerobic bacteria such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia metabolize sulfur-containing amino acids to produce volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs), including hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan. These compounds chiefly contribute to oral malodor [1,6,26,27]. These microorganisms thrive in periodontal pockets and tongue coatings, where oxygen tension is low and protein substrates are abundant [8].
Obesity, a global health crisis, is increasingly recognized as a risk modifier for both periodontitis and halitosis. Adipose tissue functions as an endocrine organ, secreting proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and leptin that compromise host immune responses, enhance oxidative stress, and disrupt oral microbial homeostasis [14,28,29]. Studies have confirmed elevated levels of VSC and increased prevalence of P. gingivalis in obese individuals with periodontal disease, suggesting a synergistic pathophysiological link [17,30].
Recent findings by Alzahrani et al. (2024) revealed a significant reduction in VSC-producing bacteria following bariatric surgery, thereby reinforcing the role of obesity in modulating oral microbiota and halitosis [31]. In a similar study, authors observed alterations in periodontal parameters and microbial diversity in response to systemic cytokine-modulating therapy in obese patients with inflammatory conditions [32]. These insights underscore the importance of integrated management approaches targeting both local and systemic factors.
The essential oil mouthwash used in this study—comprising lemon (Citrus limon), melissa (Melissa officinalis), sodium bicarbonate, and grapefruit seed extract—achieved significant reductions in PI (31.5%) and BOP (34.49%), as well as a 38.09% reduction in BANA positivity. These outcomes are consistent with those of previous clinical trials, which demonstrated the antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory efficacy of essential oils in oral health applications [19,33,34].
The mechanisms through which essential oils exert their effects are diverse. These oils have been shown to disrupt bacterial membranes, inhibit quorum sensing, reduce biofilm formation, and modulate local cytokine activity [35]. The presence of citral, limonene, and geraniol contributes to their broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. It is noteworthy that these agents also maintain biocompatibility and patient tolerability, as evidenced by the absence of mucosal irritation or taste disturbance in the present study.
These findings have been confirmed by recent meta-analyses. Dobler et al. (2020) conducted a review of the clinical outcomes of essential oil mouthrinses, confirming reductions in halitosis, plaque, and gingival indices, with fewer adverse effects than chlorhexidine (CHX) [36]. As demonstrated by Alsaffar and Alzoman (2021), the efficacy of citrus-based antioxidant mouthwashes in managing halitosis and inflammation has been substantiated [37].
In the present study, the BANA test effectively captured microbial shifts associated with VSC-producing species. The substantial correlation between the BANA test’s enhancement and the reduction in organoleptic scores validates its application as a pragmatic, cost-effective diagnostic instrument in the management of halitosis [6,38,39,40].
Chlorhexidine (CHX) is widely regarded as the gold standard for chemical plaque control. However, it is associated with several potential drawbacks, including staining, taste alteration, and mucosal irritation, particularly with prolonged use [40,41]. In contrast, essential oil formulations offer a superior safety profile with comparable clinical efficacy in mild-to-moderate inflammation, as evidenced by the findings of Van Strydonck et al. (2012) and Berchier et al. (2010) [22,23].
A significant area of research is the use of probiotics for halitosis and periodontitis management. Probiotic strains, including Streptococcus salivarius K12 and Lactobacillus reuteri, have been shown to possess the capacity to impede the proliferation of VSC-producing pathogens, bolster mucosal immune systems, and re-establish equilibrium among microbial populations [42,43]. Some studies reported improved halitosis and psychosocial outcomes using probiotic lozenges [44,45,46]. Even though the present study did not encompass probiotics, the potential exists for subsequent research to investigate the combination of probiotics and essential oils in a symbiotic approach.
Halitosis, or bad breath, has been shown to have psychosocial consequences, particularly in individuals already vulnerable to stigma due to obesity. Self-perceived halitosis has been demonstrated to exert deleterious effects on interpersonal relationships, increase social anxiety, and reduce treatment adherence [47,48].
In this study, the test group reported a 36.84% improvement in subjective halitosis scores. This finding is noteworthy in that it demonstrates not only a clinical success but also perceived psychosocial benefit. These results suggest that interventions aimed at improving breath quality may enhance patient motivation, adherence to oral hygiene protocols, and overall quality of life outcomes that should be prioritized in future research.
While the findings of this study are encouraging, it is imperative to acknowledge its limitations. Primarily, the limited 28-day duration of the study precludes the evaluation of the long-term efficacy and sustainability of clinical improvements. Future studies should include extended follow-up periods to evaluate the rates at which patients experience relapses and the duration of halitosis control treatment effectiveness. Secondly, it should be noted that the study did not incorporate advanced diagnostic methods, such as gas chromatography or sulfide monitors, to quantify volatile sulfur compounds. Instead, it relied on biogenic amine (BANA) tests and organoleptic scoring, which, while they are clinically valid, offer limited precision. The study’s limitations include its modest sample size and unequal group allocation ratio of 2:1, which may compromise the study’s generalizability. The unequal 2:1 allocation was strategically employed due to practical considerations but is recognized as a limitation. Future research should adopt balanced group sizes to improve comparative robustness. Examiner calibration was thorough, enhancing data reliability, but further methodological standardization is recommended.
Furthermore, the study failed to address the influence of uncontrolled variables on halitosis, including diet, salivary flow, and psychological stress. These variables have been demonstrated to exert a significant impact on halitosis. Finally, the test product, though effective, was a custom-made formulation not yet commercially standardized or evaluated for regulatory compliance.
Future research should prioritize the evaluation of the long-term effects and safety of essential oil-based mouthwashes through the implementation of extended follow-up studies with a duration of at least three to six months. The conducting of comparative trials against established agents such as chlorhexidine and emerging alternatives such as probiotics or symbiotic formulations may facilitate the determination of optimal adjunctive therapies. The integration of sophisticated microbial analysis methodologies, including 16S rRNA sequencing and quantitative PCR, would facilitate a more profound comprehension of the microbial shifts associated with halitosis reduction. Furthermore, the conducting of extensive multicentre trials that incorporate stratification by obesity grade, comorbid conditions, and behavioral factors (e.g., smoking, diet, oral hygiene compliance) is imperative to enhance external validity and inform personalized treatment strategies.

5. Conclusions

This preliminary clinical evaluation indicates that an essential oil-based mouthwash, composed of lemon, melissa, and grapefruit seed extract, has the potential to serve as an effective adjunctive treatment for reducing halitosis, plaque accumulation, gingival bleeding, and microbial burden in obese patients diagnosed with periodontitis. These findings emphasize the interplay between oral dysbiosis, systemic inflammation, and halitosis in this high-risk population. While the results are encouraging, the study’s limitations should be considered. The 28-day duration of the study, the relatively small sample size, and the reliance on semi-objective halitosis measures (e.g., BANA and organoleptic scores) are notable weaknesses. The utilization of gas chromatography and sulfide monitors was precluded due to constraints related to feasibility. The experimental mouthwash formulation was an experimental and non-commercial product.
Consequently, subsequent research endeavors should encompass larger and more heterogeneous cohorts, employ sophisticated microbiological and gas-sensing methodologies, and evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of essential oil-based rinses in comparison to recognized agents such as chlorhexidine.
The present study, within the scope of its methodology, supports the use of essential oil mouthwashes as a potentially safe, patient-friendly approach for improving oral health and quality of life in individuals with coexisting obesity and periodontal disease.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.B. and A.O.; methodology, A.O. and A.M.; software, I.R.-M. and G.B.; validation, L.B., A.O. and A.M.; formal analysis, I.R.-M.; investigation, G.B., A.M. and L.B.; resources, A.M. and A.O.; data curation, I.R.-M. and D.L.B.-T.; writing—original draft preparation, G.B.; writing—review and editing, A.O. and A.M.; visualization, I.R.-M.; supervision, D.L.B.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Romania, Research Grant Number 511/2/17.01.2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Romania (No. 1863/15 September 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Renvert, S.; Noack, M.J.; Lequart, C.; Roldán, S.; Laine, M.L. The Underestimated Problem of Intra-Oral Halitosis in Dental Practice: An Expert Consensus Review. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 2020, 12, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  2. Mento, C.; Lombardo, C.; Milazzo, M.; Whithorn, N.I.; Boronat-Catalá, M.; Almiñana-Pastor, P.J.; Fernàndez, C.S.; Bruno, A.; Muscatello, M.R.A.; Zoccali, R.A. Adolescence, Adulthood and Self-Perceived Halitosis: A Role of Psychological Factors. Medicina 2021, 57, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  3. Du, M.; Li, L.; Jiang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, J. Prevalence and relevant factors of halitosis in Chinese subjects: A clinical research. BMC Oral Health 2019, 19, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  4. Porter, S.R.; Scully, C. Oral malodour (halitosis). BMJ 2006, 333, 632–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  5. Tonzetich, J. Production and origin of oral malodor: A review of mechanisms and methods of analysis. J. Periodontol. 1977, 48, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Loesche, W.J.; Kazor, C. Microbiology and treatment of halitosis. Periodontology 2000 2002, 28, 256–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Takenaka, S.; Sotozono, M.; Ohkura, N.; Noiri, Y. Evidence on the Use of Mouthwash for the Control of Supragingival Biofilm and Its Potential Adverse Effects. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  8. Amou, T.; Hinode, D.; Yoshioka, M.; Grenier, D. Relationship between halitosis and periodontal disease—Associated oral bacteria in tongue coatings. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2014, 12, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Socransky, S.S.; Haffajee, A.D. Periodontal microbial ecology. Periodontology 2000 2005, 38, 135–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tonetti, M.S.; Greenwell, H.; Kornman, K.S. Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2018, 45 (Suppl. S20), S149–S161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Papapanou, P.N.; Sanz, M.; Buduneli, N.; Dietrich, T.; Feres, M.; Fine, D.H.; Flemmig, T.F.; Garcia, R.; Giannobile, W.V.; Graziani, F.; et al. Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J. Periodontol. 2018, 89 (Suppl. S1), S173–S182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Preshaw, P.M.; Alba, A.L.; Herrera, D.; Jepsen, S.; Konstantinidis, A.; Makrilakis, K.; Taylor, R. Periodontitis and diabetes: A two-way relationship. Diabetologia 2012, 55, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Bhuyan, R.; Bhuyan, S.K.; Mohanty, J.N.; Das, S.; Juliana, N.; Juliana, I.F. Periodontitis and Its Inflammatory Changes Linked to Various Systemic Diseases: A Review of Its Underlying Mechanisms. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  14. Saltiel, A.R.; Olefsky, J.M. Inflammatory mechanisms linking obesity and metabolic disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  15. Struch, F.; Schwahn, C.; Wallaschofski, H.; Grabe, H.J.; Völzke, H.; Lerch, M.M.; Meisel, P.; Kocher, T. Self-reported halitosis and gastro-esophageal reflux disease in the general population. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2008, 23, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  16. Barrak, I.; Stájer, A.; Gajdács, M.; Urbán, E. Small, but smelly: The importance of Solobacterium moorei in halitosis and other human infections. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  17. Genco, R.J.; Grossi, S.G.; Ho, A.; Nishimura, F.; Murayama, Y. A proposed model linking inflammation to obesity, diabetes, and periodontal infections. J. Periodontol. 2005, 76 (Suppl. S11), 2075–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shen, S.; Liu, X.; Huang, J.; Sun, Y.; Liu, B.; Song, W.; Meng, L.; Du, M.; Feng, Q. Efficacy of a mouthwash containing ε-poly-L-lysine, funme peptides and domiphen in reducing halitosis and supragingival plaque: A randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2024, 24, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  19. Swamy, M.K.; Akhtar, M.S.; Sinniah, U.R. Antimicrobial Properties of Plant Essential Oils against Human Pathogens and Their Mode of Action: An Updated Review. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2016, 2016, 3012462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  20. Padol, M.V.; Vishwakarma, P.; Dodamani, A.S.; Gore, A.W.; Chachlani, K.S.; Kharkar, S.P. Comparative evaluation of nutmeg mouthwash and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash on halitosis and plaque control: A randomized clinical trial. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2022, 26, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  21. Tariq, S.; Wani, S.; Rasool, W.; Shafi, K.; Bhat, M.A.; Prabhakar, A.; Shalla, A.H.; Rather, M.A. A comprehensive review of the antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral potential of essential oils and their chemical constituents against drug-resistant microbial pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 134, 103580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Van Strydonck, D.A.; Slot, D.E.; Van der Velden, U.; Van der Weijden, F. Effect of a chlorhexidine mouthrinse on plaque, gingival inflammation and staining in gingivitis patients: A systematic review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2012, 39, 1042–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Berchier, C.E.; Slot, D.E.; Van der Weijden, G.A. The efficacy of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse compared with 0.2% on plaque accumulation and periodontal parameters: A systematic review. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2010, 37, 829–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lee, D.S.; Kim, M.; Nam, S.H.; Kang, M.S.; Lee, S.A. Effects of Oral Probiotics on Subjective Halitosis, Oral Health, and Psychosocial Health of College Students: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  25. López-Valverde, N.; López-Valverde, A.; Macedo de Sousa, B.; Rodríguez, C.; Suárez, A.; Aragoneses, J.M. Role of Probiotics in Halitosis of Oral Origin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Studies. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 787908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  26. Takenaka, S.; Ohsumi, T.; Noiri, Y. Evidence-based strategy for dental biofilms: Current evidence of mouthwashes on dental biofilm and gingivitis. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2019, 55, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  27. Khounganian, R.M.; Alasmari, O.N.; Aldosari, M.M.; Alghanemi, N.M. Causes and Management of Halitosis: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2023, 15, e43742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  28. Varra, F.N.; Varras, M.; Varra, V.K.; Theodosis-Nobelos, P. Molecular and pathophysiological relationship between obesity and chronic inflammation in the manifestation of metabolic dysfunctions and their inflammation-mediating treatment options (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2024, 29, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  29. Chung, H.S.; Choi, K.M. Organokines in disease. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2020, 94, 261–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Krongbaramee, T.; Zhu, M.; Qian, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Eliason, S.; Shu, Y.; Qian, F.; Akkouch, A.; Su, D.; Amendt, B.A.; et al. Plasmid encoding microRNA-200c ameliorates periodontitis and systemic inflammation in obese mice. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2021, 23, 1204–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  31. Alzahrani, H.G.; AlSarhan, M.A.; Aldohayan, A.; Bamehriz, F.; Alzoman, H.A. Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on the levels of oral volatile sulfur compounds and halitosis-related bacteria. Saudi Dent. J. 2024, 36, 940–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  32. Toy, V.E.; Ataoglu, T.; Eltas, A.; Otlu, H.G.; Karabulut, A.B. Obesity as a modifying factor of periodontal therapy outcomes: Local and systemic adipocytokines and oxidative stress markers. Clin. Oral Investig. 2023, 27, 2763–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Alam, M.; Bano, N.; Ahmad, T.; Sharangi, A.B.; Upadhyay, T.K.; Alraey, Y.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Rauf, M.A.; Saeed, M. Synergistic Role of Plant Extracts and Essential Oils against Multidrug Resistance and Gram-Negative Bacterial Strains Producing Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  34. Chouhan, S.; Sharma, K.; Guleria, S. Antimicrobial Activity of Some Essential Oils-Present Status and Future Perspectives. Medicines 2017, 4, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  35. Romero-Montero, A.; Melgoza-Ramírez, L.J.; Ruíz-Aguirre, J.A.; Chávez-Santoscoy, A.; Magaña, J.J.; Cortés, H.; Leyva-Gómez, G.; Del Prado-Audelo, M.L. Essential-Oils-Loaded Biopolymeric Nanoparticles as Strategies for Microbial and Biofilm Control: A Current Status. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 25, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  36. Dobler, D.; Runkel, F.; Schmidts, T. Effect of essential oils on oral halitosis treatment: A review. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2020, 128, 476–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Alsaffar, D.; Alzoman, H. Efficacy of antioxidant mouthwash in the reduction of halitosis: A randomized, double blind, controlled crossover clinical trial. J. Dent. Sci. 2021, 16, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  38. Szalai, E.; Tajti, P.; Szabó, B.; Hegyi, P.; Czumbel, L.M.; Shojazadeh, S.; Varga, G.; Németh, O.; Keremi, B. Daily use of chlorine dioxide effectively treats halitosis: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0280377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  39. Huang, N.; Li, J.; Qiao, X.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, C.; Li, L. Efficacy of probiotics in the management of halitosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e060753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  40. Charles, C.H.; Mostler, K.M.; Bartels, L.L.; Mankodi, S.M. Comparative antiplaque and antigingivitis effectiveness of a chlorhexidine and an essential oil mouthrinse: 6-month clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2004, 31, 878–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Nagappan, N.; Palaneeswaran, K.; Nalankilli, A.V.; Nyklesh, V.; Mani, M.; Aziz, M.B.A. Antibacterial Efficacy of Herbal and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Mouth Rinse Against Oral Pathogens—An In vitro Study. J. Pharm. Bioallied. Sci. 2024, 16 (Suppl. S2), S1453–S1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  42. Jansen, P.M.; Abdelbary, M.M.H.; Conrads, G. A concerted probiotic activity to inhibit periodontitis-associated bacteria. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  43. Park, J.A.; Lee, G.R.; Lee, J.Y.; Jin, B.H. Oral Probiotics, Streptococcus salivarius K12 and M18, Suppress the Release of Volatile Sulfur Compounds and a Virulent Protease from Oral Bacteria: An In-Vitro Study. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2023, 21, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  44. Huang, G.; Li, N. Efficacy of Probiotic Tablets in the Reduction of Halitosis: A Randomised, Single Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2024, 22, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  45. Lai, S.; Lingström, P.; Cagetti, M.G.; Cocco, F.; Meloni, G.; Arrica, M.A.; Campus, G. Effect of Lactobacillus brevis CD2 containing lozenges and plaque pH and cariogenic bacteria in diabetic children: A randomised clinical trial. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021, 25, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  46. Homayouni Rad, A.; Pourjafar, H.; Mirzakhani, E. A comprehensive review of the application of probiotics and postbiotics in oral health. Front. Cell. Infect Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1120995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  47. Briceag, R.; Caraiane, A.; Raftu, G.; Horhat, R.M.; Bogdan, I.; Fericean, R.M.; Shaaban, L.; Popa, M.; Bumbu, B.A.; Bratu, M.L.; et al. Emotional and Social Impact of Halitosis on Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review. Medicina 2023, 59, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  48. Kahraman, E.N.; Erensoy, Ş.; Dikilitaş, A.; Gülşahı, A.; Aydın, E.Ö.; Özalp Ateş, F.S. Awareness and knowledge of halitosis among students at two different dental universities in Turkey: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Oral Health 2025, 25, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
Figure 1. The flow chart of the study.
Figure 1. The flow chart of the study.
Jcm 14 05225 g001
Figure 2. Plaque index before and after treatment in both groups.
Figure 2. Plaque index before and after treatment in both groups.
Jcm 14 05225 g002
Figure 3. BOP before and after treatment in both groups.
Figure 3. BOP before and after treatment in both groups.
Jcm 14 05225 g003
Figure 4. Changes in BANA test before and after treatment in test group.
Figure 4. Changes in BANA test before and after treatment in test group.
Jcm 14 05225 g004
Figure 5. Self-rated halitosis improvement.
Figure 5. Self-rated halitosis improvement.
Jcm 14 05225 g005
Figure 6. Examiner-rated halitosis Improvement.
Figure 6. Examiner-rated halitosis Improvement.
Jcm 14 05225 g006
Figure 7. Comparative improvement in clinical parameters after 28 days.
Figure 7. Comparative improvement in clinical parameters after 28 days.
Jcm 14 05225 g007
Table 1. Demographic results.
Table 1. Demographic results.
ParameterTest Group (n = 30)Control Group (n = 15)p-Value
Mean Age (years)43.2 ± 9.442.7 ± 8.80.81
Gender (M/F)16/148/70.92
BMI (kg/m2)32.1 ± 2.431.7 ± 2.30.63
Smokers (%)26.7%26.6%0.98
Baseline PI1.39 ± 0.151.33 ± 0.130.17
Baseline BOP (%)58.2 ± 6.156.4 ± 5.70.31
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Beresescu, G.; Bereczki-Temistocle, D.L.; Beresescu, L.; Ormenisan, A.; Monea, A.; Razvan-Marius, I. Effectiveness of an Essential Oil Mouthwash on Halitosis in Obese Patients with Periodontitis: A Short-Term Clinical Evaluation. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155225

AMA Style

Beresescu G, Bereczki-Temistocle DL, Beresescu L, Ormenisan A, Monea A, Razvan-Marius I. Effectiveness of an Essential Oil Mouthwash on Halitosis in Obese Patients with Periodontitis: A Short-Term Clinical Evaluation. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(15):5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155225

Chicago/Turabian Style

Beresescu, Gabriela, Despina Luciana Bereczki-Temistocle, Liana Beresescu, Alina Ormenisan, Adriana Monea, and Ion Razvan-Marius. 2025. "Effectiveness of an Essential Oil Mouthwash on Halitosis in Obese Patients with Periodontitis: A Short-Term Clinical Evaluation" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 15: 5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155225

APA Style

Beresescu, G., Bereczki-Temistocle, D. L., Beresescu, L., Ormenisan, A., Monea, A., & Razvan-Marius, I. (2025). Effectiveness of an Essential Oil Mouthwash on Halitosis in Obese Patients with Periodontitis: A Short-Term Clinical Evaluation. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(15), 5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155225

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop