Next Article in Journal
Current Concepts of Radiographic Evaluation and Surgical Treatment for Hallux Valgus Deformity
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Pandemic on the Clinical Status of Patients Admitted to Hospital for Diabetic Foot: A Retrospective Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adherence to Intranasal Corticosteroids in Patients with Severe Asthma and Nasal Polyposis: Pharmacological and Clinical Factors Involved

by
Elena Villamañán
1,2,3,
Daniel Laorden
3,4,*,
María Enriqueta Ibáñez
1,*,
Leticia De las Vecillas
3,5,
Carlos Carpio
2,3,4,
Carolina Alfonso
6,7,
Javier Domínguez-Ortega
3,5,
David Romero
3,4,
Santiago Quirce
3,5 and
Rodolfo Álvarez-Sala
2,3,4,† on behalf of Asma Grave HULP Study Group
1
Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain
2
Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28047 Madrid, Spain
3
La Paz University Hospital Research Institute (IdiPAZ), 28046 Madrid, Spain
4
Pulmonology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain
5
Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain
6
Otorhinolaryngology (ENT) Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain
7
Surgical Deparment, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28047 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membership of the Group Name is provided in the Acknowledgments.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 5070; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145070
Submission received: 29 May 2025 / Revised: 26 June 2025 / Accepted: 9 July 2025 / Published: 17 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Respiratory Medicine)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Patients with severe asthma (SA) commonly present with coexisting nasal polyposis (NP), often requiring treatment with intranasal corticosteroids (INC). However, adherence to INC in this population remains inadequately characterized despite its clinical significance. This study aimed to evaluate adherence to INC in patients with SA and NP and to identify clinical and pharmacological factors associated with adherence levels. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study including adult patients with SA and NP treated with INC and followed at a tertiary asthma unit in Madrid during 2024. Adherence was assessed via medication possession ratio (MPR) over six months, with poor adherence defined as MPR < 50%. Pharmacological, clinical and demographic variables were analyzed for associations with adherence. Results: Of the 188 patients evaluated, 86 (45.7%) were prescribed INC. Poor adherence was observed in 53.5% of these patients. Women exhibited significantly lower adherence compared to men (p < 0.05). Fluticasone was the most commonly prescribed INC (54.6%), with no significant adherence differences across corticosteroid types. Patients on maintenance systemic corticosteroids had higher adherence (85.7%, p < 0.05), whereas those receiving biologic therapies tended toward lower adherence (51% poor adherence), though this was not statistically significant. Higher adherence was associated with increased disease severity, as indicated by multiple endoscopic sinus surgeries (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in spirometry or Asthma Control Test scores. Conclusions: Adherence to INC in patients with SA and NP is suboptimal, particularly among women and patients on biologics. Greater disease severity correlates with improved adherence. Targeted interventions are necessary to enhance adherence and optimize disease management in this population.

1. Introduction

The respiratory system, though anatomically divided into upper and lower tracts, operates as an integrated functional unit. Numerous studies have revealed shared inflammatory mechanisms underlying diseases that affect both tracts, such as asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), with or without nasal polyposis (NP). Patients with CRS are 3.5 times more likely to develop asthma. Moreover, individuals with CRS and nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) who also have comorbid asthma tend to experience more severe disease, including higher recurrence rates of NP. Asthma in patients with NP is also more difficult to control and is associated with greater corticosteroid dependence than asthma alone (4% vs. 1%) [1,2].
The current pharmacological management of NP relies heavily on the continuous and prolonged use of high-dose intranasal corticosteroids (INC) [3,4,5]. Despite this, up to 40% of patients report inadequate disease control, often necessitating endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) [6,7,8]. Post-surgical maintenance therapy with INC remains essential to prevent recurrence and improve outcomes [9].
Over the past decade, biologics have become increasingly common in the treatment of severe asthma and, more recently, in the management of NP. Biologics such as omalizumab (anti-IgE) [10,11], mepolizumab [12], reslizumab (anti-IL-5) [13] and dupilumab (anti-IL4Rα) have demonstrated efficacy in reducing NP size, improving nasal symptoms (including smell), and enhancing quality of life. Mepolizumab and dupilumab [12,14,15,16] in particular, have shown modest reductions in surgical intervention needs. Moreover, tezepelumab has been proven to reduce nasal polyp size and the need for surgery or systemic glucocorticoids compared to placebo in adults with severe, uncontrolled (CRSwNP) [17]. Nevertheless, despite these promising outcomes, INC therapy remains a critical component of disease control in NP patients.
Adherence to INC therapy, however, is well-documented to be suboptimal [18,19,20,21]. Valverde-Monje et al. [22] reported that only 43% of patients with asthma and NP adhered to prescribed INC regimens, with overall adherence rates falling below 50%. A review by Norelli et al. [23] highlighted that the majority of CRSwNP studies involving biologics did not assess INC adherence. Among 17 studies reviewed—including randomized controlled trials and real-world investigations—only three examined adherence, and just one explored factors contributing to poor adherence. This lack of data presents a potential bias in interpreting the effectiveness of biologic treatments.
Although INC adherence has been broadly studied [21,23], to our knowledge, no studies have specifically assessed it in patients with both severe asthma (SA) and NP. Many of these patients are prescribed biologics for SA, which also benefit NP. It is plausible that those receiving biologics might demonstrate even lower INC adherence than those not on biologics.
This gap in the literature prompted our study. Our objective was to evaluate adherence to INC therapy in patients with SA and NP and to identify adherence differences based on clinical and pharmacological characteristics. The aim was to pinpoint potential areas for intervention to optimize the management of this complex patient population.

2. Materials and Methods

This retrospective observational study included patients diagnosed with severe asthma. Participants were managed by a multidisciplinary team at an asthma clinic within a tertiary care hospital in Madrid, Spain. The study was conducted between January and December 2024. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of La Paz University Hospital (IRB protocol No. PI-6272). As this was an observational study, informed consent was not required.
These patients typically exhibited uncontrolled asthma despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids combined with long-acting β2-agonists or oral corticosteroids (GINA Step 5 [24] and GEMA Step 6 guidelines [25]. Many of them are under biologic therapy based on guideline indications.
The proportion of patients demonstrating poor adherence to INC therapy was assessed as the primary outcome. Adherence was assessed using pharmacy dispensing data through the medication possession ratio (MPR), using the following formula:
MPR = (total number of INC units dispensed ÷ total number of INC units prescribed) × 100
Prescription and pharmacy refill data from the previous six months were analyzed. Based on the previously reported low adherence rates in patients with severe asthma, a threshold of >50% MPR was considered indicative of acceptable adherence, in line with the existing literature [21,22,26,27,28].
Secondary outcomes included adherence differences according to demographic characteristics, pharmacological variables (type of INC, use of biologics, and need for systemic corticosteroids), and clinical variables such as presence of asthma (patients requiring high doses of inhaled corticosteroids), allergic rhinitis (IgE-mediated inflammatory disorder of the nasal mucosa triggered by exposure to environmental allergens), the presence and severity of nasal polyposis according to international guidelines [29], prior endoscopic sinus surgeries, respiratory function, and comorbidities.
Inclusion criteria for the enrolled patients were the total patients with intranasal corticosteroids (INC) that were evaluated in our severe asthma clinic during 2024.
Data were collected from electronic health records and pharmacy refill systems.
Quantitative variables were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons of continuous variables were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Cohen’s kappa statistic was used to assess concordance. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 19.0, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics

Out of 188 patients evaluated by the Severe Asthma Clinic in 2024, a total of 86 patients (45.7%) were prescribed intranasal corticosteroids (INC). Among these, 60 patients (69.8%) were women. The median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 57–71 years).
Regarding comorbid conditions associated with severe asthma, 65 of 86 patients (75.6%) presented with at least one related comorbidity. The most frequently reported were gastroesophageal reflux disease (37.8%), allergic rinitis (35.6%), and bronchiectasis (33.3%), similar to other studies performed in our Severe Asthma Clinic [30,31], and no patients had cystic fibrosis or primary ciliary dyskinesia. Additionally, the vast majority of patients (93.3%) were non-smokers. A detailed summary of patient characteristics is presented in Table 1.

3.2. Adherence to Intranasal Corticosteroids

Among the 86 patients prescribed intranasal corticosteroids (INC), 46 (53.5%) demonstrated poor adherence, defined as a medication possession ratio (MPR) of less than 50%.
When stratified by sex, a significant difference in adherence was observed: female patients exhibited significantly lower adherence to INC therapy compared to male patients (p < 0.05). These results are summarized in Table 2.

3.3. Pharmacological Variables and Adherence

Among patients prescribed intranasal corticosteroids (INC), fluticasone was the most frequently prescribed agent, used by 47 of 86 patients (54.6%). In this group, the distribution of adherence was roughly balanced between acceptable and poor. In contrast, adherence to mometasone was notably poorer (Table 3).
Additionally, long-term systemic corticosteroids were used by 7 of 86 patients (8.1%). Among these, 6 patients (85.7%) demonstrated acceptable adherence to INC therapy (p < 0.05), suggesting a statistically significant association between systemic corticosteroid use and improved INC adherence (Table 3).

3.4. Adherence to Inhaled Therapies and Use of Biologics

Adherence to inhaled maintenance therapies in patients with severe asthma (SA) was generally high. Among those with nasal polyposis (NP), 64 of 86 patients (74.4%) demonstrated acceptable adherence (MPR > 50%). This rate was comparable to that observed in SA patients without NP, 78 of 102 patients (76.5%), indicating no significant difference in adherence between the two groups.
In contrast, overuse of rescue inhalers—defined as the use of more than three canisters per year—was observed in 31 of 86 patients (36%) with NP, highlighting a subgroup with potentially poor symptom control.
Regarding biologic therapy, 56.9% of patients with SA and NP were receiving biologic treatment. The most commonly prescribed biologic was tezepelumab, which was used in 30.6% of cases (Figure 1).

3.5. Adherence to Intranasal Corticosteroids Among Patients on Biological Therapy

Among patients receiving biologic therapy, 51% demonstrated poor adherence to intranasal corticosteroids (INC), with a medication possession ratio (MPR) below 50%. Although this trend suggests lower adherence among biologic-treated patients, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.397).
When analyzing adherence by specific biologic agents, patients treated with dupilumab and tezepelumab were more likely to exhibit acceptable adherence to INC. In contrast, patients receiving benralizumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab showed higher rates of poor adherence compared to acceptable adherence (Table 4).

3.6. Adherence and Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for actively severe symptoms demonstrated significantly higher adherence to intranasal corticosteroids, with adherence increasing alongside the number of surgeries performed (p < 0.05) (Table 5).

3.7. Spirometry and Asthma Control

No statistically significant differences were observed in spirometry parameters or Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores between the groups analyzed (Table 6).

4. Discussion

According to our results, there is a high proportion of patients with severe asthma and NP associated needing INC (45.7%). In alignment with previous studies [32], we found a high prevalence of upper airway comorbidities, particularly allergic rhinitis and nasal polyps, among patients with severe asthma.
A key observation was the low adherence to INC, with 53.5% of patients demonstrating poor adherence (MPR < 50%). This is consistent with prior studies reporting suboptimal adherence to intranasal therapies, especially among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis or allergic rhinitis [22].
This finding underscores the importance of addressing treatment adherence in this population, as low adherence can compromise disease control and increase the need for more invasive interventions, such as surgery.
Regarding pharmacological variables, we observed that fluticasone was the most prescribed INC (54.6% of patients), reflecting its widespread use in managing NP. However, no significant differences in adherence were found among different types of INC, suggesting that the choice of INC is not a determining factor in adherence. This finding is consistent with previous systematic reviews that have found no conclusive evidence that one type of INC is superior to another in terms of efficacy [32]. Although the difference was not statistically significant, the previous literature suggests that factors such as dosing frequency, device usability, sensory perception (e.g., taste or nasal irritation), and patient preference may influence adherence [33].
On the other hand, patients receiving maintenance systemic corticosteroids showed higher adherence to INC (85.7% with adherence >50%, p < 0.05). This could be explained by the fact that these patients have worse symptom control, leading them to be more adherent to intranasal treatments [34]. In contrast, patients receiving short-course systemic corticosteroids showed significantly lower adherence (p < 0.05), suggesting that improving INC adherence in this population could reduce the need for systemic corticosteroids.
Notably, female patients showed lower adherence rates, consistent with existing evidence linking female sex to reduced medication adherence across various chronic illnesses, a pattern that has been described in other chronic diseases and has been linked to gender-based differences in treatment perception, side-effect concerns, and medication beliefs [35]. Also, sociocultural factors, including caregiving responsibilities and healthcare engagement patterns, may contribute to this disparity. Although broad meta-analyses report no overall sex differences, subgroup analyses suggest that older women may be particularly vulnerable to poor adherence, emphasizing the need for gender-sensitive patient education strategies [36,37,38].
As expected, taking into account the benefits for NP of biologics used for SA [39], patients receiving biologic therapies tended to exhibit poorer adherence to INC (51% poor adherence), though this trend did not reach statistical significance. This may be explained by symptomatic improvement associated with biologics, potentially leading patients to underestimate the necessity of continued intranasal corticosteroid use. Biologics have demonstrated significant improvements in both lower and upper airway symptoms, including reductions in nasal polyp burden, potentially reinforcing the value of concomitant topical therapy. Although the differences in adherence by biologic type were not statistically significant, this trend warrants further investigation, mainly real-world studies [40].
Furthermore, adherence positively correlated with disease severity, as patients who underwent multiple endoscopic sinus surgeries demonstrated significantly better adherence (p < 0.05). This suggests that heightened disease burden and the tangible consequences of recurrence promote greater patient engagement with prescribed therapies. Despite these adherence differences, no significant variations were detected in pulmonary function tests or Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, suggesting that INC adherence may primarily influence nasal symptomatology rather than overall respiratory function in this cohort.

Study Limitations

This study has several limitations inherent to its retrospective design, which restricts the ability to establish causality between adherence and clinical outcomes. Adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR) derived from pharmacy refill data, which may not accurately capture actual medication usage or patient behavior. Moreover, the association found between systemic corticosteroid use and higher adherence may reflect more severe disease rather than better behavior.
Additionally, the relatively small sample size may have limited statistical power to detect significant differences in certain subgroups, particularly regarding the impact of biologic therapies on adherence. Furthermore, the study was conducted at a single tertiary care center, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations or healthcare settings. Future prospective, multicenter studies employing direct measures of adherence and larger cohorts are warranted to confirm and expand upon these findings.

5. Conclusions

Adherence to intranasal corticosteroids among patients with severe asthma and nasal polyposis remains suboptimal, particularly in women and those treated with biologics. Conversely, patients with more severe disease manifestations—such as those requiring multiple surgeries or maintenance systemic corticosteroids—demonstrate higher adherence levels, indicating that disease severity may serve as a motivating factor for treatment compliance.
These findings highlight the need to implement tailored educational and follow-up interventions aimed at improving adherence in this vulnerable population. Focused efforts on high-risk groups could enhance disease control, reduce the need for systemic corticosteroids, and potentially diminish the frequency of surgical interventions, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.V.; methodology, E.V.; software, D.L.; validation, D.L.; formal analysis, E.V., D.L. and L.D.l.V.; investigation, E.V. and D.L.; resources, E.V., D.L., L.D.l.V., C.C., C.A., J.D.-O., D.R., Asma Grave HULP Study Group, S.Q. and R.Á.-S.; data curation, M.E.I. and D.L.; writing—original draft preparation, E.V.; writing—review and editing, M.E.I.; visualization, M.E.I. and E.V.; supervision, E.V.; project administration, E.V., D.L. and Asma Grave HULP Study Group. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of La Paz University Hospital (protocol code PI-6272, approved in 6 July 2024) for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the fact that this was an observational study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to data protection law.

Acknowledgments

Asma Grave HULP Study Group: Rodolfo Álvarez-Sala, Daniel Laorden, David Romero, Carlos Carpio, Santiago Quirce, Javier Domínguez-Ortega, Leticia de las Vecillas, Inés Torrado Español, Juan Alberto Luna, Magdalena LLuch, Javier Contreras, Mar Gandolfo, Elena Villamañán, Paula Granda, Carmen Sobrino, Susana De Andrés, Marta Moro, Alicia Herrero, Carolina Alfonso, Blanca Martínez, Laura Sanz.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
SASevere asthma
NPNasal polyposis
INCIntranasal corticosteroids
MPRMedication possession ratio
CRSChronic rhinosinusitis
CRSwNPChronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis
IQRInterquartile ranges
ESSEndoscopic sinus surgery
ACTAsthma Control Test

References

  1. Klossek, J.M.; Neukirch, F.; Pribil, C.; Jankowski, R.; Serrano, E.; Chanal, I.; El Hasnaoui, A. Prevalence of nasal polyposis in France: A cross-sectional, case-control study. Allergy 2005, 60, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stevens, W.W.; Peters, A.T.; Hirsch, A.G.; Nordberg, C.M.; Schwartz, B.S.; Mercer, D.G.; Mahdavinia, M.; Grammer, L.C.; Hulse, K.E.; Kern, R.C.; et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, asthma, and aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2017, 5, 1061–1070.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stjärne, P.; Blomgren, K.; Cayé-Thomasen, P.; Salo, S.; Søderstrøm, T. The efficacy and safety of once-daily mometasone furoate nasal spray in nasal polyposis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006, 126, 606–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Small, C.B.; Hernandez, J.; Reyes, A.; Schenkel, E.; Damiano, A.; Stryszak, P.; Staudinger, H.; Danzig, M. Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in nasal polyposis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005, 116, 1275–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chong, L.Y.; Head, K.; Hopkins, C.; Philpott, C.; Burton, M.J.; Schilder, A.G.M. Different types of intranasal steroids for chronic rhinosinusitis. Cochr. Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 4, CD011993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Van der Veen, J.; Seys, S.F.; Timmermans, M.; Levie, P.; Jorissen, M.; Fokkens, W.J.; Hellings, P.W. Real-life study showing uncontrolled rhinosinusitis after sinus surgery in a tertiary referral centre. Allergy 2017, 72, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rimmer, J.; Fokkens, W.; Chong, L.Y.; Hopkins, C. Surgical versus medical interventions for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Cochr. Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 2014, CD006991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Leung, R.M.; Dinnie, K.; Smith, T.L. When do the risks of repeated courses of corticosteroids exceed the risks of surgery? Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014, 4, 871–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Vashishta, R.; Soler, Z.M.; Nguyen, S.A.; Schlosser, R.J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of asthma outcomes following endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013, 3, 788–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gevaert, P.; Calus, L.; van Zele, T.; Blomme, K.; de Ruyck, N.; Bauters, W.; Hellings, P.; Brusselle, G.; De Bacquer, D.; van Cauwenberge, P.; et al. Omalizumab is effective in allergic and nonallergic patients with nasal polyps and asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 131, 110–116.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gevaert, P.; Omachi, T.A.; Corren, J.; Mullol, J.; Han, J.; Lee, S.E.; Kaufman, D.; Ligueros-Saylan, M.; Howard, M.; Zhu, R.; et al. Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in nasal polyposis: 2 randomized phase 3 trials. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 146, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bachert, C.; Sousa, A.R.; Lund, V.J.; Scadding, G.K.; Gevaert, P.; Nasser, S.; Durham, S.R.; Cornet, M.E.; Kariyawasam, H.H.; Gilbert, J.; et al. Reduced need for surgery in severe nasal polyposis with mepolizumab: Randomized trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 140, 1024–1031.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gevaert, P.; van Bruaene, N.; Cattaert, T.; van Steen, K.; van Zele, T.; Acke, F.; De Ruyck, N.; Blomme, K.; Sousa, A.R.; Marshall, R.P.; et al. Mepolizumab, a humanized anti-IL-5 mAb, as a treatment option for severe nasal polyposis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 128, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bachert, C.; Hellings, P.W.; Mullol, J.; Hamilos, D.L.; Gevaert, P.; Naclerio, R.M.; Joish, V.N.; Chao, J.; Mannent, L.P.; Amin, N.; et al. Dupilumab improves health-related quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Allergy 2020, 75, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bachert, C.; Mannent, L.; Naclerio, R.M.; Mullol, J.; Ferguson, B.J.; Gevaert, P.; Hellings, P.; Jiao, L.; Wang, L.; Evans, R.R.; et al. Effect of Subcutaneous Dupilumab on Nasal Polyp Burden in Patients with Chronic Sinusitis and Nasal Polyposis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016, 315, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bachert, C.; Han, J.K.; Desrosiers, M.; Hellings, P.W.; Amin, N.; Lee, S.E.; Mullol, J.; Greos, L.S.; Bosso, J.V.; Laidlaw, T.M.; et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 and LIBERTY NP SINUS-52): Results from two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 trials. Lancet 2019, 394, 1638–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lipworth, B.J.; Han, J.K.; Desrosiers, M.; Hopkins, C.; Lee, S.E.; Mullol, J.; Pfaar, O.; Li, T.; Chen, C.; Almqvist, G.; et al. Tezepelumab in Adults with Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. N. Engl. J. Med. 2025, 392, 1178–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rudmik, L.; Xu, Y.; Liu, M.; Bird, C.; Kukec, E.; Quan, H. Utilization Patterns of Topical Intranasal Steroid Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Canadian Population-Based Analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016, 142, 1056–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Phillips, K.M.; Hoehle, L.P.; Caradonna, D.S.; Gray, S.T.; Sedaghat, A.R. Intranasal corticosteroids and saline: Usage and adherence in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Laryngoscope 2020, 130, 852–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Philpott, C.; Erskine, S.; Smith, R.; Hopkins, C.; Kara, N.; Farboud, A.; Salam, M.; Robertson, A.; Almeyda, R.; Kumar, B.; et al. Current use of baseline medical treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis: Data from the National Chronic Rhinosinusitis Epidemiology Study (CRES). Clin. Otolaryngol. 2018, 43, 509–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ortega-Martin, L.; Betancor, D.; Barroso, B.; Valverde-Monge, M.; Santillan, J.; Villacampa, J.M.; Sastre, J. Where Has All The Nasal Polyposis Gone? J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2021, 31, 500–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Valverde-Monge, M.; Barroso, B.; Ortega-Martin, L.; Betancor, D.; Santillan, J.; Villacampa, J.M.; Sastre, J. Exploring Adherence to Treatment in Nasal Polyposis. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2022, 32, 299–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Norelli, F.; Schiappoli, M.; Senna, G.; Pinter, P.; Olivieri, B.; Ottaviano, G.; De Corso, E.; Caminati, M. Adherence to Intranasal Steroids in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis Prior to and during Biologic Therapy: A Neglected Matter. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  24. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention (2021 Update) [Internet]; GINA: Fontana, WI, USA, 2021; Available online: https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GINA-2024-Strategy-Report-24_05_22_WMS.pdf (accessed on 19 December 2024).
  25. GEMA 5.4. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma [Internet]. Available online: http://www.gemasma.com (accessed on 21 June 2024).
  26. Granda, P.; Villamañán, E.; Carpio, C.; Laorden, D.; Sobrino, C.; Herrero, A.; Quirce, S.; Álvarez-Sala, R. Adherence to inhalers in patients with severe asthma treated with anti-interleukin-5 biologics. Farm. Hosp. 2022, 46, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Plaza, V.; Lopez-Vina, A.; Entrenas, L.M.; Fernandez-Rodriguez, C.; Melero, C.; Perez Llano, L.; Gutiérrez-Pereyra, F.; Tarragona, E.; Palomino, R.; Cosio, B.G. Differences in adherence and non-adherence behaviour patterns to inhaler devices between COPD and asthma patients. COPD J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2016, 13, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bourdin, A.; Halimi, L.; Vachier, I.; Paganin, F.; Lamouroux, A.; Gouitaa, M.; Vairon, E.; Godard, P.; Chanez, P. Adherence in severe asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2012, 42, 1566–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Alobid, I.; Colás, C.; Castillo, J.A.; Arismendi, E.; Del Cuvillo, A.; Gómez-Outes, A.; Sastre, J.; Mullol, J.; POLINA group. Spanish Consensus on the Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (POLIposis NAsal/POLINA 2.0). J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2023, 33, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Laorden, D.; Hernández, I.; Domínguez-Ortega, J.; Romero, D.; Álvarez-Sala, R.; Quirce, S. A real-life cohort of mepolizumab treatment in severe eosinophilic asthma. Eur. Ann. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2024, 56, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Castillo Vizuete, J.A.; Sastre, J.; Del Cuvillo Bernal, A.; Picado, C.; Martínez Moragón, E.; Ignacio García, J.M.; Serrano, C.C.; Gutiérrez, F.J.Á.; Miret, J.M. Asthma, rhinitis, and nasal polyp multimorbidities. Arch. Bronconeumol. (Engl. Ed.) 2019, 55, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, E.; Wechsler, M.E.; Tran, T.N.; Heaney, L.G.; Jones, R.C.; Menzies-Gow, A.N.; Busby, J.; Jackson, D.J.; Pfeffer, P.E.; Rhee, C.K.; et al. Characterization of Severe Asthma Worldwide: Data From the International Severe Asthma Registry. Chest 2020, 157, 790–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bridgeman, M.B. Overcoming barriers to intranasal corticosteroid use in patients with uncontrolled allergic rhinitis. Integr. Pharm. Res. Pract. 2017, 6, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Manjit Singh, P.K.; Krishnan, E.K.; Mat Lazim, N.; Yaacob, N.M.; Abdullah, B. Medication Adherence to Intranasal Corticosteroids in Allergic Rhinitis Patients with Comorbid Medical Conditions. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Venditti, V.; Bleve, E.; Morano, S.; Filardi, T. Gender-Related Factors in Medication Adherence for Metabolic and Cardiovascular Health. Metabolites 2023, 13, 1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Biffi, A.; Rea, F.; Iannaccone, T.; Filippelli, A.; Mancia, G.; Corrao, G. Sex differences in the adherence of antihypertensive drugs: A systematic review with meta-analyses. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e036418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rolnick, S.J.; Pawloski, P.A.; Hedblom, B.D.; Asche, S.E.; Bruzek, R.J. Patient characteristics associated with medication adherence. Clin. Med. Res. 2013, 11, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lau, E.S.; Braunwald, E.; Morrow, D.A.; Giugliano, R.P.; Antman, E.M.; Gibson, C.M.; Scirica, B.M.; Bohula, E.A.; Wiviott, S.D.; Bhatt, D.L.; et al. Sex, Permanent Drug Discontinuation, and Study Retention in Clinical Trials: Insights From the TIMI trials. Circulation 2021, 143, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Geng, B.; Dilley, M.; Anterasian, C. Biologic Therapies for Allergic Rhinitis and Nasal Polyposis. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2021, 21, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Fokkens, W.J.; Viskens, A.S.; Backer, V.; Conti, D.; De Corso, E.; Gevaert, P.; Scadding, G.K.; Wagemann, M.; Bernal-Sprekelsen, M.; Chaker, A.; et al. EPOS/EUFOREA update on indication and evaluation of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps 2023. Rhinology 2023, 61, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Patients under biologic therapy and intranasal corticosteroids concomitantly.
Figure 1. Patients under biologic therapy and intranasal corticosteroids concomitantly.
Jcm 14 05070 g001
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
CharacteristicN = 86
Median age63 (IQR 57−71)
Female 60 (69.8%)
Comorbidity associated with severe asthma N = 65/86 (75.6%)
Gastroesophageal reflux17 (37.8%)
Allergic rhinitis16 (35.6%)
Bronchiectasis15 (33.3%)
Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease 9 (20.0%)
Anxiety/Depression5 (11.1%)
Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis 3 (6.7%)
Table 2. Adherence to intranasal corticosteroids according to patient’s characteristics.
Table 2. Adherence to intranasal corticosteroids according to patient’s characteristics.
CharacteristicAcceptable Adherence to INC (>50%)Poor Adherence to INC (<50%)p-Value
Gender
 Females23 (57.5)37 (80.4)0.038
 Males17 (42.5)9 (19.6)
Asthma-related comorbidities
 Gastroesophageal reflux9 (39.1)8 (36.4)1.000
 Allergic rhinitis9 (39.1)7 (31.8)0.841
 Bronchiectasis10 (43.5)5 (22.7)0.246
 Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease9 (20)3 (13.6)0.502
 Anxiety/depression4 (11.1)1 (4.5)0.370
 Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis1 (4.3)2 (9.1)0.968
Table 3. Adherence to intranasal corticosteroids according to corticotherapy type.
Table 3. Adherence to intranasal corticosteroids according to corticotherapy type.
CorticosteroidAcceptable adherence
to INC (>50%)
Poor adherence
to INC (<50%)
p-Value
Nasal corticosteroid40460.285
Fluticasone23 (26.7)24 (27.9)
Mometasone16 (18.6)20 (23.2)
Triamcinolona-1 (2.2)
Mometasona + olopatadine1 (2.5)-
Concomitant systemic corticosteroids
 Long-term systemic corticosteroids 6 (85.7)1 (14.3)0.027
 Short courses of systemic corticosteroids3 (21.4)11 (78.6)0.006
Table 4. Adherence to intranasal corticosteroids according to biologic therapies.
Table 4. Adherence to intranasal corticosteroids according to biologic therapies.
Biologic TherapyAcceptable Adherence to INC (>50%)Poor adherence to INC (<50%)
Dupilumab7 (29.2)4 (16)
Tezepelumab8 (33.3)7 (28)
Benralizumab5 (20.8)6 (24)
Mepolizumab4 (16.7)5 (20)
Omalizumab-3 (12)
INC: intranasal corticosteroids.
Table 5. Adherence to intranasal corticosteroids in patients under biologics according to previous nasal polyposis surgeries.
Table 5. Adherence to intranasal corticosteroids in patients under biologics according to previous nasal polyposis surgeries.
Acceptable Adherence to INC (>50%)
N = 40
Poor Adherence to INC (<50%)
N = 46
p-Value
Number of endoscopic sinus surgery2.00 [1.00, 3.25]0.50 [0.00, 1.75]0.042
INC: intranasal corticosteroids.
Table 6. Adherence to intranasal corticosteroids according to respiratory function.
Table 6. Adherence to intranasal corticosteroids according to respiratory function.
Respiratory OutcomesAcceptable Adherence to INC (>50%)Poor Adherence to INC (<50%)p-Value
FEV 1 pre-biologic %
(median(IQR))
79.00 [66.00, 91.75]77.00 [72.00, 88.00]0.704
FEV 1 mL pre (median(IQR))2,01 [1.537, 2.895]2095 [1.852, 3.307]0.978
FVC pre-biologic %
(median(IQR))
88.50 [77.00, 105.50]93.00 [87.50, 105.00]0.244
FVC ml pre (median(IQR))3.005 [2.435, 4.145]2800 [2.640, 3.790]1.000
FEV 1/FVC pre-biologic %
(median(IQR))
72.02 [64.61, 79.32]67.87 [60.94, 76.94]0.109
FENO pre-biologic %
(median(IQR))
36.00 [18.50, 57.90]24.00 [10.82, 45.63]0.242
FEV 1 post-biologic %
(median(IQR))
83.00 [77.00, 94.00]78.00 [65.75, 92.00]0.464
FEV 1 mL post (median(IQR))2030 [1960, 3140]2330 [1.960, 2.615]0.808
FVC post-biologic %
(median(IQR))
114.00 [99.00, 115.00]98.00 [88.75, 104.25]0.092
FVC ml post (median(IQR))3780 [3.290, 4.100]3110 [2.820, 3.805]0.465
FEV 1/FVC post-biologic %
(median(IQR))
62.00 [60.28, 66.25]66.22 [61.81, 71.35]0.558
FENO post-biologic %
(median(IQR))
37.00 [20.00, 51.00]24.50 [15.50, 30.00]0.380
ACT pre-biologic %
(median(IQR))
18.00 [10.00, 20.00]20.00 [17.00, 21.00]0.130
ACT post-biologic %
(median(IQR))
20.00 [16.50, 22.00]21.00 [18.75, 24.00]0.400
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Villamañán, E.; Laorden, D.; Ibáñez, M.E.; De las Vecillas, L.; Carpio, C.; Alfonso, C.; Domínguez-Ortega, J.; Romero, D.; Quirce, S.; Álvarez-Sala, R., on behalf of Asma Grave HULP Study Group. Adherence to Intranasal Corticosteroids in Patients with Severe Asthma and Nasal Polyposis: Pharmacological and Clinical Factors Involved. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 5070. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145070

AMA Style

Villamañán E, Laorden D, Ibáñez ME, De las Vecillas L, Carpio C, Alfonso C, Domínguez-Ortega J, Romero D, Quirce S, Álvarez-Sala R on behalf of Asma Grave HULP Study Group. Adherence to Intranasal Corticosteroids in Patients with Severe Asthma and Nasal Polyposis: Pharmacological and Clinical Factors Involved. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(14):5070. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145070

Chicago/Turabian Style

Villamañán, Elena, Daniel Laorden, María Enriqueta Ibáñez, Leticia De las Vecillas, Carlos Carpio, Carolina Alfonso, Javier Domínguez-Ortega, David Romero, Santiago Quirce, and Rodolfo Álvarez-Sala on behalf of Asma Grave HULP Study Group. 2025. "Adherence to Intranasal Corticosteroids in Patients with Severe Asthma and Nasal Polyposis: Pharmacological and Clinical Factors Involved" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 14: 5070. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145070

APA Style

Villamañán, E., Laorden, D., Ibáñez, M. E., De las Vecillas, L., Carpio, C., Alfonso, C., Domínguez-Ortega, J., Romero, D., Quirce, S., & Álvarez-Sala, R., on behalf of Asma Grave HULP Study Group. (2025). Adherence to Intranasal Corticosteroids in Patients with Severe Asthma and Nasal Polyposis: Pharmacological and Clinical Factors Involved. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(14), 5070. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145070

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop