You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Correction
  • Open Access

13 June 2025

Correction: Papacharalambous et al. Comparative Effects of Neurodynamic Slider and Tensioner Mobilization Techniques on Sympathetic Nervous System Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5098

,
,
,
and
1
Department of Health Sciences, School of Sciences, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus
2
Department of Life and Health Sciences, Frederick University, Limassol 3080, Cyprus
3
Department of Physiotherapy, University of West Attica, 122 43 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Manual Therapy for the Prevention and Management of Musculoskeletal and Related Disorders across the Life Course

Errors in Tables

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Tables 1 and 3. In Table 1, the standard deviation baseline values for demographic and environmental variables were not presented accurately. In Table 3, the mean and standard deviation for percentage change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were not presented correctly. The corrected Table 1 and Table 3 appear below.
Table 1. Baseline values of sex, age, weight, height, BMI, and room-temperature measurements of the three groups. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Table 3. Outcome-measure values from the intervention phase to the final resting phase for the slider, tensioner, and control groups for the left and right legs. Values are presented as mean ± SD.

Text Correction

  • Changes to Section 2.9. Statistical Analysis
The fourth sentence should be corrected to “A two-way mixed-design ANOVA was performed to examine the main effects and interactions of treatment (tensioner NDT, slider NDT and control) and sides (left and right) on mean subject-based dependent measures.”
  • Changes to Section 3.1. Baseline-to-Intervention Phase
The first paragraph should be corrected to read: “The statistical analysis showed that for the percentage changes in SC, the two-way interaction of intervention phase × side did not have a significant effect. However, as expected, there was a significant two-way interaction for the intervention phase × treatment group [F(2,174) = 41.3; p < 0.001].”
  • Changes to Section 3.3. Baseline Phase to the Final Resting Phase
The first sentence should be corrected to: “For percentage changes in SC, as shown in Table 4, the 3 × 2 mixed-measures ANOVA revealed a significant group × site interaction [F(3,174) = 16.4; p < 0.001].”
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Papacharalambous, C.; Savva, C.; Karagiannis, C.; Paraskevopoulos, E.; Pamboris, G.M. Comparative Effects of Neurodynamic Slider and Tensioner Mobilization Techniques on Sympathetic Nervous System Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.