Next Article in Journal
Second Trimester Ultrasound Diagnosis of External Hydrocephalus in Two Fetuses with Noonan Syndrome—Case Report Series
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Electrically Evoked Muscle Hypertrophy on Spasticity in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Intra-Abdominal Infection Caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

1
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Zuoying Armed Forces General Hospital, Kaohsiung 81300, Taiwan
2
Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan
3
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital, Taoyuan 32551, Taiwan
4
Department of Pathology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 11490, Taiwan
5
Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli 35053, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3974; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113974
Submission received: 24 April 2025 / Revised: 24 May 2025 / Accepted: 3 June 2025 / Published: 4 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
Background: Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia have rarely been reported. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality among patients with S. maltophilia IAIs. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on inpatients with IAIs caused by S. maltophilia at Tri Service General Hospital from 2004 to 2017. Clinical and microbiologic data of the included cases were reviewed via medical charts and microbiology databases. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for in-hospital death. Results: In total, 110 patients were diagnosed with S. maltophilia IAIs. Malignancy (56.3%) and liver cirrhosis (35.3%) were the most commonly identified underlying diseases. The major causes of S. maltophilia IAIs were biliary tract infection (42.7%), recent abdominal surgery (35.4%), and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (20.0%). Polymicrobial infections were observed in 84 (76.4%) patients. In addition to S. maltophilia, co-cultured bacteria (n = 140) included Enterobacterales, representing 19.3% (27/140) of the total isolates, and non-fermentative aerobes, comprising 29.3% (41/140). In addition, anaerobic bacteria and fungi accounted for 9.2% (13/140) and 10% (14/140), respectively. The overall mortality rate was 40.9%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and malignancies were independent risk factors for mortality, while the immediate administration of appropriate antibiotics targeting S. maltophilia was a protective factor (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with an underlying malignancy or liver cirrhosis were at risk for IAIs caused by S. maltophilia. The prompt initiation of effective antibiotics against S. maltophilia is critical for achieving favorable outcomes.

1. Introduction

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia—formerly known as Pseudomonas or Xanthomonas maltophilia—is an aerobic Gram-negative bacillus that can survive and be isolated from a wide variety of aqueous environments [1,2]. In recent years, S. maltophilia has emerged as a significant nosocomial pathogen due to its ability to cause various infections in immunocompromised inpatients [3,4]. The World Health Organization lists S. maltophilia as an important Gram-negative multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogen in hospitals [5]. Various types of infections caused by S. maltophilia have been reported, with pneumonia being the most common, followed by bloodstream infections, while other infections are less frequent [1]. Previously reported risk factors for acquiring S. maltophilia infection include prolonged hospitalization, the retention of intravascular catheters, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, extended mechanical ventilation, and underlying conditions such as neutropenia caused by malignancy [1,5]. Treating S. maltophilia infections is challenging due to this bacterium’s intrinsic and acquired resistance to a wide range of antibiotics. Several molecular antibiotic resistance mechanisms have been reported in S. maltophilia, including β-lactamase production and the presence of efflux pumps, as well as integrins carrying a variety of gene cassettes encoding antibiotic resistance [6,7,8]. Despite low virulence, a considerable attributable mortality rate (up to 37.5%) and overall mortality (69%) due to S. maltophilia infections have been reported [9,10].
Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) represent a broad spectrum of infectious processes, including peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscesses, appendicitis, and hepatobiliary infections. These infections are often polymicrobial in nature, with pathogens originating primarily from the gastrointestinal flora. Among the various types of infection caused by S. maltophilia, intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) have been rarely reported due to their lower prevalence. The Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) surveillance program, conducted in China from 2002 to 2009, investigated the causative pathogens of IAIs [11]. The most frequently isolated organisms were members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, particularly Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. S. maltophilia accounted for only 1.5% of the aerobic and facultative Gram-negative bacilli recovered from IAI specimens in the SMART study. Due to the low prevalence of intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) caused by S. maltophilia, the available literature is limited to case reports or small case series. These reports suggest that S. maltophilia IAIs typically occur in immunocompromised individuals, such as those with malignancies, organ dysfunction, or receiving immunosuppressive therapy [12,13,14]. Some cases have also occurred after abdominal surgery and/or are associated with prior antibiotic exposure [12,13,14]. Gastrointestinal colonization or mucosal disruption has also been implicated as a potential endogenous source [12]. However, due to the limited number of cases, it remains difficult to draw comprehensive conclusions about the role of S. maltophilia in patients with IAIs.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality in patients with IAIs caused by S. maltophilia from a single center between 2004 and 2017, with the goal of providing a clearer understanding of this rare clinical entity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Data Collection

This longitudinal observational study was conducted from 2004 to 2017 at the Tri-Service General Hospital, a tertiary referral center in northern Taiwan. The research ethics committee of Tri-Service General Hospital reviewed and approved the study (TSGHIRB approval number: 2-101-05-074, 9 February 2018). Hospitalized adult patients with their first episode of S. maltophilia isolated from various clinical specimens between January 2004 and December 2017 were initially identified using a computerized microbiologic database. Cases with S. maltophilia isolated from abdominal specimens were further reviewed through the hospital’s electronic medical record (EMR) system to identify intra-abdominal infections. Patients were defined as having S. maltophilia IAIs if they had a positive S. maltophilia culture from an abdominal specimen and clinical symptoms consistent with sepsis [15], or if evidence of an intra-abdominal infection was observed during an operative procedure or imaging studies (such as CT or ultrasound) based upon the medical records. Patients younger than 18 years, those not admitted to the hospital, and those without clinical signs consistent with sepsis were excluded. Specimens of abdominal origin were collected using aseptic procedures from ascitic fluid via paracentesis, aspirates from the drainage tube of the intra-abdominal cavity, or samples from the abdominal viscera (liver, gallbladder, spleen, and pancreas). Relevant clinical data on the identified patients, including age, gender, underlying diseases, disease severity, antibiotic treatment, and outcomes were also recorded via the EMR system. The different occurrence locations of IAIs caused by S. maltophilia were categorized as community-acquired, hospital-acquired, and healthcare-associated, based on previously reported criteria [16]. Hospital-acquired infection was defined as an infection diagnosed ≥48 h after hospital admission, with the time counted from the first admission date of the transferred patients. Healthcare-associated infection was defined as an infection present at the time of admission or within 48 h of admission in patients who met at least one of the following criteria: (1) received intravenous therapy, wound care, or specialized nursing care at home within the previous 30 days; (2) attended a hospital or hemodialysis clinic or received intravenous chemotherapy in the prior 30 days; (3) had been hospitalized in an acute care facility for ≥2 days within the past 90 days; or (4) resided in a nursing home or long-term care facility. Community-acquired infection was used to define infections that did not meet any of the above healthcare-associated criteria. The Charlson comorbidity index was calculated based on the collected comorbidities [17]. The severity of patients was assessed using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [18]. Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of less than 1500 cells/μL at the time of sepsis onset. Septic shock was defined by the presence of systolic blood pressure lower than 90 mmHg or when inotropic agents were required to maintain blood pressure with evidence of organ hypoperfusion [15]. In-hospital mortality was defined as death for any cause after IAI onset at any time within current admission, and 30-day mortality was defined as death within 30 days of the index culture. Previous antibiotic exposure was defined as the administration of any systemic antibiotic within 14 days prior to the onset of S. maltophilia-related IAIs. Hospital stay before isolation was defined as the interval between the date of hospital admission and the date of S. maltophilia isolation from abdominal specimens associated with sepsis onset. Other concomitant pathogens isolated from the same specimens were also documented. Appropriate antibiotic therapy was defined as the administration of at least one antimicrobial agent to which the S. maltophilia isolate was susceptible, given within 48 h of sepsis onset. The infection control measure was defined as the performance of either percutaneous drainage or surgical debridement to manage S. maltophilia–related IAIs.

2.2. Microbiology Examination

Clinical specimens of abdominal origin were submitted to the microbiology laboratory for aerobic, anaerobic, and fungal cultures. For aerobic cultures, colonies were grown on Trypticase Soy Agar with 5% sheep blood (Nippon Becton Dickinson, Tokyo, Japan), MacConkey Agar, and Columbia CNA Agar (Creative Microtech Corp., New Taipei City, Taiwan) under standard incubation conditions. For anaerobic cultures, specimens were plated onto CDC Anaerobe Blood Agar (Nippon Becton Dickinson, Tokyo, Japan), Anaerobic Base Plate, and KVLB Agar (both from Creative Microtech Corp., Taiwan). Cultures were incubated in an anaerobic workstation (Concept Plus, BAKER RUSKINN, Bridgend, UK) under a gas mixture composed of 10% CO2, 10% H2, and 80% N2. For fungal cultures, specimens were inoculated onto ICG Agar, Chromogenic Candida Agar, and Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) Agar (all from Creative Microtech Corp., Taiwan) and incubated at 30 °C for up to 2–4 weeks. Well-isolated colonies were then selected for further identification using VITEK 2 software (version R02.03) via VITEK 2 automated system (bioMérieux) with GN, GP, or YST identification cards, as appropriate. Susceptibility tests for levofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were carried out using a VITEK 2 automatic system, and breakpoint interpretation was aligned with the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute CLSI guidelines for S. maltophilia.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

All results were analyzed using a commercially available software package (SPSS, version 21.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables are described as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs), and categorical variables are expressed as numbers and percentages. A comparison between survivors and non-survivors was made among patients with IAIs included in this study. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to assess the normal distribution of continuous variables. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U-test, as appropriate. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Variables with a p value < 0.1 after univariate analysis were entered into the multivariable model to identify independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with S. maltophilia IAIs, with the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) reported. All p-values were two-tailed, and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

During the study period, the annual incidence of S. maltophilia infections/colonizations per 1000 patient discharges from 2004 to 2017 ranged from 5 to 20 cases, as shown in Figure 1a. During the same period, the incidence of IAIs due to S. maltophilia among patients with S. maltophilia colonizations/infections ranged from 0.5% to 2%, as shown in Figure 1b. The incidence of IAIs caused by S. maltophilia remained stable throughout the study period.
Based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 110 adult inpatients with IAIs caused by S. maltophilia were included in the final analysis after exclusion. A flow diagram for patient identification is shown in Figure 2. Among the 110 cases, 43 (39.1%) were from medical wards, 42 (38.2%) from surgical wards, and 25 (22.7%) from intensive care units; no cluster cases were identified.
Baseline characteristics of patients with IAIs due to S. maltophilia are shown in Table 1. Overall, the cohort consisted predominantly of older male patients with high comorbidity burdens, with most infections acquired in healthcare settings. The median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 6.5, reflecting significant underlying disease.
Malignancy was the most common comorbidity, particularly gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Among patients with a malignancy (n = 62), the vast majority (87.1%) had GI cancers. Liver cancer was the most common subtype (n = 26), followed by bile duct (n = 9), stomach (n = 8), colorectal (n = 5), gallbladder (n = 4), and pancreatic cancer (n = 2). The remaining non-GI malignancies (12.9%) included lung cancer (n = 2), bladder or kidney cancer (n = 3), cervix cancer (n = 1), and lymphoma (n = 2).
Biliary tract infections and abdominal surgery-related infections were the leading causes of IAIs. At disease onset, the median SOFA score among patients was 4, and neutropenia was observed in only one patient (0.9%). Most patients had received prior antibiotics (94.5%), including substantial proportions of carbapenems (39.1%). Appropriate antibiotic treatment targeting S. maltophilia was administered within 48 h in only 15 (13.6%) patients. Infection control measures, including drainage procedures or surgical debridement, were frequently performed in addition to antibiotic therapy (74.5%). Among the 82 patients who received infection control measures, 22 received surgical debridement, and others (n = 60) received a drainage procedure. The 30-day mortality rate was 12.7% (n = 12), while the in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher at 45 patients (40.9%). Among the 65 surviving patients, the median length of hospital stay after S. maltophilia-related IAI onset was 15 days. A comparison of patients who died and survived during hospitalization from S. maltophilia-related IAIs is also provided in Table 1. Several significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality were identified, including a longer hospital stay before isolation, an underlying malignancy, a higher Charlson comorbidity index, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, a higher SOFA score, and shock (all p < 0.05). Immediate antibiotic targeting for S. maltophilia within 48 h of sepsis onset was a protective factor for mortality with borderline statistical significance (p = 0.065).
Among the 110 S. maltophilia isolates, 87 (79.1%) were susceptible to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), while 23 (20.9%) were resistant. For levofloxacin, 88 isolates (80.0%) were susceptible, 2 (1.8%) were intermediate, and 20 (18.2%) were resistant. Notably, 11 isolates (10.0%) were resistant to both TMP/SMX and levofloxacin. Polymicrobial infections were observed in 84 (76.4%) patients. Only three (2.7%) patients had concurrent S. maltophilia bacteremia. In total, 140 concomitant pathogens isolated from abdominal specimens were observed, as shown in Table 2. Aerobic bacteria accounted for 80.7% (n = 113), with the top five most frequently isolated aerobic bacteria being Enterococcus spp. (n = 25), Pseudomonas spp. (n = 15), Escherichia coli (n = 12), Acinetobacter spp. (n = 10), and Chryseobacterium indologenes (n = 8). Isolated bacteria belonging to Enterobacterales (Citobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Serratia marcescens) comprised 19.3% (27/140) of the total isolates, while non-fermentative aerobic bacteria (Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Acinetobacter spp., Burkholderia cepacia, Chryseobacterium indologenes, Chyseobacterium meningosepticus, Delftia acidororans, Pseudomonas spp., Rhizobium radiobacter, Sphingomonas paucimobilis) represented 29.3% (41/140) of all isolates. Anaerobic bacteria and fungi were also identified, accounting for 9.2% (13/140) and 10% (14/140), respectively, with Bacteroides spp. (n = 10) and Candida spp. (n = 14) being the most common.
In the univariate analysis (Table 3), the presence of a malignancy (p = 0.011), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (p = 0.019), shock (p < 0.01), and a SOFA score (p < 0.01) were significantly associated with mortality. Appropriate antibiotic targeting for S. maltophilia within 48 h led to increasingly improved outcomes (p = 0.089). In the multivariate logistic regression model, three independent predictors of mortality were identified: Appropriate antibiotic administration within 48 h was protective (OR: 0.168, 95% CI: 0.034–0.837, p = 0.029), while higher SOFA scores were associated with an increased risk of mortality (OR: 1.312, 95% CI: 1.109–1.552, p = 0.002). Additionally, malignancy remained a strong independent risk factor for mortality (OR: 4.533, 95% CI: 1.585–12.394, p = 0.005).

4. Discussion

S. maltophilia is considered an emerging nosocomial pathogen causing invasive infections among immunocompromised inpatients [1]. Bloodstream infections and respiratory tract infections caused by S. maltophilia have been widely studied, with various at-risk populations identified in the literature [19]. Additionally, an underlying hematological malignancy is commonly present in patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia [20,21]. The source of bacteremia is frequently associated with an infected central venous catheter, and prompt removal of the catheter, in combination with appropriate antibiotic therapy, has been shown to reduce mortality [22,23]. In contrast, S. maltophilia-related respiratory infections often occur in patients with chronic lung disease or in critically ill patients receiving care in intensive care units [24,25]. IAIs have not been well studied in previous research. Aside from several case reports, only two cohort studies partly describing IAIs caused by S. maltophilia have been previously published. One study by TL. Lin et al. focused on patients with IAIs following abdominal surgery, revealing that patients with IAIs caused by S. maltophilia had a higher mortality rate than those with infections from other pathogens. Other causes leading to IAIs, apart from abdominal surgery, were not mentioned in that study [26]. Another study by Ru Ma et al. evaluating the prognosis of patients with positive cultures of S. maltophilia from different sources also showed that S. maltophilia isolates of abdominal origin led to high mortality among infected patients. The lack of a distinction between infection and colonization in that study limited interpretation of the results [27]. Despite certain limitations, the results from both studies indicated a substantial impact of S. maltophilia on outcomes among patients with IAIs and should not be overlooked.
Our study is the first to comprehensively describe IAIs caused by S. maltophilia in the literature. In contrast to previous studies that focused upon S. maltophilia bacteremia or respiratory tract infections, our cohort examined patients with IAIs, revealing several significant findings. Similarly to patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia, malignancy was the most common underlying condition. However, gastrointestinal malignancies predominated, whereas hematologic malignancies and neutropenia were rare. Moreover, chronic lung diseases were less prevalent in our cohort, and only 25 patients (22.7%) were in intensive care units at the time of IAI onset. We also found that biliary tract infections, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and recent abdominal surgery accounted for the majority of cases. Several case reports in the literature have described different S. maltophilia abdominal infection sites, including liver abscesses [28], pancreatitis [29], continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis [30], enterocolitis [31], and intra-abdominal abscesses following abdominal surgery [26]. Besides IAIs related to recent abdominal surgery, two other major causes of S. maltophilia IAIs in our study were biliary tract infection and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, which have not been described previously. S. maltophilia can be isolated from a wide variety of aquatic or humid environmental sources, as well as medical equipment in hospital settings [19]. Therefore, IAIs related to recent abdominal surgery may result from contaminated surgical instruments or the hospital environment during the operation as reported [13]. However, for patients with biliary tract infections and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis caused by S. maltophilia in the current study, no recent abdominal surgery was noted. In addition to being isolated from environmental aqueous-associated sources, several reports have shown that S. maltophilia can be isolated from human feces, suggesting its ability to colonize the gastrointestinal tract, particularly in cancer patients [12,32]. Although we did not perform stool cultures on the patients in the present study, the high prevalence of malignancy among them—known to be a risk factor for S. maltophilia gastrointestinal colonization—may contribute to subsequent invasive IAIs, as previously reported [31]. Therefore, we speculate that endogenous intestinal colonization by S. maltophilia is the most likely source of IAIs among our patients without a recent history of abdominal surgery. Taken together, these findings suggest that patients with S. maltophilia IAIs represent a distinct clinical entity that differs from the classical paradigm of bacteremia in cancer patients or pneumoniae in critically ill patients. Our study has important implications for early recognition, microbiologic workup, and empirical therapy in this emerging subgroup.
Polymicrobial infections accounted for the majority of cases in the present study. A wide range of copathogens, in addition to S. maltophilia, were isolated from abdominal specimens. These included Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, both aerobic and anaerobic, as well as yeast. Non-fermenting bacteria accounted for 29.3% of isolates, while Enterobacterales accounted for 19.3%. These findings differed from those in previous reports, which indicated that Enterobacterales accounted for nearly 80% of isolates obtained from patients with IAIs [11]. This discrepancy may be attributable to differences in study populations since our study population focused on the S. maltophilia IAI subgroups, rather than overall IAI cases. Generally speaking, patients with S. maltophilia infections had previously been exposed to broad-spectrum antibiotics, which may be selected for more non-fermenting pathogens and even fungi, as shown in our results [1,33]. Since IAIs caused by S. maltophilia presented a more diverse distribution of co-pathogens compared to overall IAIs, the early application of broad-spectrum antibiotics and even antifungal agents should be considered to cover multiple drug-resistant pathogens and fungi.
Only 2.7% (3/110) of patients with S. maltophilia IAIs had concurrent bacteremia, yet the overall mortality was as high as 40.9%. These results were consistent with those in a previous study demonstrating that S. maltophilia had a significant impact on mortality among patients. Further analysis revealed that patients with high SOFA scores and an underlying malignancy were associated with a high risk of mortality, indicating that disease severity and host factors played a significant role in mortality. This result is consistent with previous results from patients with S. maltophilia infections [10]. Notably, immediate antibiotic use targeting S. maltophilia within 48 h was associated with improved outcomes even though only 15 (13.6%) received immediate antibiotic use targeting S. maltophilia. Although S. maltophilia had low virulence and was usually co-cultured with other pathogens, our results suggest that patients still benefit from immediate targeted antibiotic use and should not be disregarded when isolated alongside other pathogens from abdominal specimens.
As the first study to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with IAIs caused by S. maltophilia, several limitations warrant consideration. First, the retrospective design of the study may have introduced selection and recall biases. Second, given that the study spanned approximately 14 years, changes over time in routine infectious disease care—such as changes in empirical antimicrobial strategies, the adoption of advanced microbiological diagnostics, and updates in clinical practice guidelines—may have impacted patient outcomes analysis. Third, differentiating between colonization and true infection is challenging due to the limited pathogenicity of S. maltophilia. Although only patients who met the sepsis criteria were included in this analysis, colonization could not be entirely ruled out, which may have introduced bias. Fourth, other concomitant pathogens were frequently isolated from patients with IAIs due to S. maltophilia, making it difficult to clearly define the pathogenic role of S. maltophilia and its impact on mortality. Finally, the results were derived from a single-center study, which limited the generalizability of the findings to institutions in other geographical regions.
IAIs caused by S. maltophilia were less frequent than those caused by Enterobacterales [11]. In our study, these infections were observed primarily among inpatients with gastrointestinal malignancies, liver cirrhosis, or recent abdominal surgery and were associated with high overall mortality, particularly among patients with underlying malignancies and elevated SOFA scores. Prompt initiation of targeted antibiotic therapy against S. maltophilia in at-risk patients with IAIs is crucial for improving clinical outcomes. Given the limitations of our study, a multicenter study with a larger sample size is urgently needed to validate our findings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-L.C., J.-C.L. and C.-H.W.; methodology, F.-Y.C. and C.-M.Y.; software, F.-Y.C.; validation, C.-M.Y.; formal analysis, H.-S.S., Y.-S.Y. and L.-K.S.; investigation, C.-C.T.; resources, C.-C.T.; data curation, W.-P.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-L.C.; writing—review and editing, C.-C.T., W.-P.C., F.-Y.C., C.-M.Y., H.-S.S., L.-K.S., Y.-S.Y., J.-C.L. and C.-H.W.; visualization, C.-H.W.; supervision, C.-H.W.; project administration, J.-C.L. and L.-K.S.; funding acquisition, J.-C.L. and L.-K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from Tri-Service General Hospital [TSGH-D-114136, TSGH-C107-099, and TSGH-D-113143] and the Ministry of National Defense-Medical Affairs Bureau [MAB-106-076, MAB-107-095 and MAB-108-038]. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board from Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGHIRB approval number: 2-101-05-074, 9 February 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived, due to a low risk of harm given the retrospective nature of the study.

Data Availability Statement

The study data are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
IAIIntra-abdominal infection
SOFASequential Organ Failure Assessment
IQRInterquartile range
OROdds ratio
CIConfidence interval

References

  1. Looney, W.J.; Narita, M.; Muhlemann, K. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: An emerging opportunist human pathogen. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2009, 9, 312–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Denton, M.; Kerr, K.G. Microbiological and clinical aspects of infection associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 57–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Senol, E. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: The significance and role as a nosocomial pathogen. J. Hosp. Infect. 2004, 57, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Brooke, J.S. New strategies against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A serious worldwide intrinsically drug-resistant opportunistic pathogen. Expert. Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2014, 12, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brooke, J.S. Advances in the Microbiology of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2021, 34, e0003019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kullar, R.; Wenzler, E.; Alexander, J.; Goldstein, E.J.C. Overcoming Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Resistance for a More Rational Therapeutic Approach. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2022, 9, ofac095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chang, Y.T.; Lin, C.Y.; Chen, Y.H.; Hsueh, P.R. Update on infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with particular attention to resistance mechanisms and therapeutic options. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chang, L.L.; Chen, H.F.; Chang, C.Y.; Lee, T.M.; Wu, W.J. Contribution of integrons, and SmeABC and SmeDEF efflux pumps to multidrug resistance in clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 53, 518–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Falagas, M.E.; Kastoris, A.C.; Vouloumanou, E.K.; Rafailidis, P.I.; Kapaskelis, A.M.; Dimopoulos, G. Attributable mortality of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: A systematic review of the literature. Future Microbiol. 2009, 4, 1103–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paez, J.I.; Costa, S.F. Risk factors associated with mortality of infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A systematic review. J. Hosp. Infect. 2008, 70, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, Q.; Wang, H.; Chen, M.; Ni, Y.; Yu, Y.; Hu, B.; Sun, Z.; Huang, W.; Hu, Y.; Ye, H.; et al. Surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility of aerobic and facultative Gram-negative bacilli isolated from patients with intra-abdominal infections in China: The 2002–2009 Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART). Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2010, 36, 507–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Apisarnthanarak, A.; Fraser, V.J.; Dunne, W.M.; Little, J.R.; Hoppe-Bauer, J.; Mayfield, J.L.; Polish, L.B. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia intestinal colonization in hospitalized oncology patients with diarrhea. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 37, 1131–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hirai, J.; Mori, N.; Sakanashi, D.; Shibata, Y.; Asai, N.; Hagihara, M.; Mikamo, H. Intra-Abdominal Abscess and Bacteremia Due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia After Total Gastrectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review. Infect. Drug Resist. 2023, 16, 7197–7204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tzanetou, K.; Triantaphillis, G.; Tsoutsos, D.; Petropoulou, D.; Ganteris, G.; Malamou-Lada, E.; Ziroyiannis, P. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia peritonitis in CAPD patients: Susceptibility to antibiotics and treatment outcome: A report of five cases. Perit. Dial. Int. 2004, 24, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Levy, M.M.; Fink, M.P.; Marshall, J.C.; Abraham, E.; Angus, D.; Cook, D.; Cohen, J.; Opal, S.M.; Vincent, J.L.; Ramsay, G.; et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Intensive Care Med. 2003, 29, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Friedman, N.D.; Kaye, K.S.; Stout, J.E.; McGarry, S.A.; Trivette, S.L.; Briggs, J.P.; Lamm, W.; Clark, C.; MacFarquhar, J.; Walton, A.L.; et al. Health care–associated bloodstream infections in adults: A reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections. Ann. Intern. Med. 2002, 137, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Charlson, M.; Szatrowski, T.P.; Peterson, J.; Gold, J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1994, 47, 1245–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singer, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.W.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016, 315, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brooke, J.S. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: An emerging global opportunistic pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 2–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guo, W.; Lin, Q.; Li, J.; Feng, X.; Zhen, S.; Mi, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, F.; Xiao, Z.; Jiang, E.; et al. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in adult patients with hematological diseases: Clinical characteristics and risk factors for 28-day mortality. Microbiol. Spectr. 2025, 13, e01011-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gill, E.L.; Gill, C.M.; McEvoy, C. Validation of a Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infection prediction score in the hematologic malignancy population. Ann. Hematol. 2024, 103, 1745–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Boktour, M.; Hanna, H.; Ansari, S.; Bahna, B.; Hachem, R.; Tarrand, J.; Rolston, K.; Safdar, A.; Raad, I. Central venous catheter and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in cancer patients. Cancer 2006, 106, 1967–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Huang, C.; Lin, L.; Kuo, S. Risk factors for mortality in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia—A meta-analysis. Infect. Dis. 2024, 56, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hansen, C.R. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: To be or not to be a cystic fibrosis pathogen. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2012, 18, 628–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, N.; Tang, C.; Wang, L. Risk Factors for Acquired Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 808391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lin, T.L.; Chang, P.H.; Liu, Y.W.; Lai, W.H.; Chen, Y.J.; Chen, I.L.; Li, W.F.; Wang, C.C.; Lee, I.K. Gram-negative bacterial infections in surgical intensive care unit patients following abdominal surgery: High mortality associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2024, 13, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, R.; Chen, Q.; Huang, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Wang, X.; Xia, L.; Hu, L. The Prognosis of Patients Tested Positive for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from Different Sources. Infect. Drug Resist. 2023, 16, 4779–4787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Husain, U.; Gupta, V. Liver abscess caused by multidrug-resistant pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A rare case report. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2023, 12, 174–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dar, S.; Merza, N.; Haider, M.; Zafar, Y.; Din, N.; Ligresti, R.; Sebti, R. Necrotizing Pancreatitis Infected with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: An Emerging Rare Multidrug-Resistant Organism. Case Rep. Gastrointest. Med. 2023, 2023, 8071158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Azak, A.; Kocak, G.; Huddam, B.; Iscan, G.; Duranay, M. An unusual cause of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-associated outpatient peritonitis: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Am. J. Infect. Control 2011, 39, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kaito, S.; Sekiya, N.; Najima, Y.; Sano, N.; Horiguchi, S.; Kakihana, K.; Hishima, T.; Ohashi, K. Fatal Neutropenic Enterocolitis Caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A Rare and Underrecognized Entity. Intern. Med. 2018, 57, 3667–3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kerr, K.G.; Corps, C.M.; Hawkey, P.M. Infections due to Xanthomonas maltophilia in patients with hematologic malignancy. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1991, 13, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tatsuta, K.; Taki, Y.; Nakatani, E.; Higashizono, K.; Nagai, E.; Nishida, M.; Sato, S.; Ohata, K.; Watanabe, M.; Kanemoto, H.; et al. Risk Factors for Candidiasis as an Intra-Abdominal Infection after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 75, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Annual incidence trend (cases per 1000 discharges per year) of S. maltophilia infection/colonization from 2004 to 2017; (b) the annual incidence trend of IAIs among patients with S. maltophilia infection/colonization from 2004 to 2017. IAIs, intra-abdominal infections.
Figure 1. (a) Annual incidence trend (cases per 1000 discharges per year) of S. maltophilia infection/colonization from 2004 to 2017; (b) the annual incidence trend of IAIs among patients with S. maltophilia infection/colonization from 2004 to 2017. IAIs, intra-abdominal infections.
Jcm 14 03974 g001
Figure 2. Flow diagram of patients with S. maltophilia–related intra-abdominal infections.
Figure 2. Flow diagram of patients with S. maltophilia–related intra-abdominal infections.
Jcm 14 03974 g002
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and a bivariable analysis of risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality among patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) caused by S. maltophilia.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and a bivariable analysis of risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality among patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) caused by S. maltophilia.
VariablesTotal
(n = 110)
Survivors
(n = 65)
Non-Survivors
(n = 45)
p-Value
Age, years a60 (49–69)58 (48.5–68.5)61 (51.5–71.0)0.275
Male, n (%)76 (69.1)45 (69.2)31 (68.9)0.970
Community-acquired, n (%)3 (2.7)2 (3.1)1 (2.2)1.000
Hospital stay before isolation a16 (4–32.25)13 (3.5–24)26 (8–43)0.005
Underlying disease, n (%)
Cerebrovascular accident15 (13.6)9 (13.8)6 (13.3)0.939
Heart failure8 (7.3)3 (4.6)5 (11.1)0.179
Chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease
4 (3.6)4 (6.2)0 (0)0.117
Diabetes Mellitus30 (27.2)15 (23.1)15 (33.3)0.166
Chronic kidney disease b27 (24.5)16 (24.6)11 (24.4)0.584
Peptic ulcer disease38 (34.5)19 (29.2)19 (42.2)0.114
Malignancy62 (56.3)30 (46.2)32 (71.1)0.008
Liver cirrhosis39 (35.5)20 (30.8)19 (42.2)0.151
Charlson comorbidity index a6.5 (4–8)5 (3–8)7 (6–8.5)0.012
Causes of intra-abdominal infection, n (%)
Biliary tract infection47 (42.7)30 (46.2)17 (37.8)0.383
Abdominal surgery-related39 (35.4)26 (40.0)13 (28.9)0.231
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis22 (20.0)8 (12.3)14 (31.1)0.015
Others c2 (1.8)1 (1.5)1 (2.2)1.000
Previous antibiotic use before IAI onset, n (%)104 (94.5)62 (95.4)42 (93.3)0.687
Polymicrobial infection, n (%)84 (76.4)47 (72.3)37 (82.2)0.165
Disease severity, n (%)
SOFA score a4 (2–8)3 (1–5)7 (4–9.5)<0.001
Neutropenia, n (%)1 (0.9)0 (0)1 (2.2)0.409
Septic shock, n (%)23 (20.9)5 (7.7)18 (40.0)<0.01
Appropriate antibiotic targeting for
S. maltophilia within 48 h, n (%)
15 (13.6)12 (18.5)3 (6.7)0.065
Infection control measures, n (%)82 (74.5)49 (75.4)33 (73.3)0.808
SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. a Data are presented as median (interquartile range). b Blood creatinine levels above 2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). c One case was related to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-associated. peritonitis; the other was due to a perforated colon.
Table 2. Distribution of concurrent pathogens in patients with an intra-abdominal infection due to S. maltophilia.
Table 2. Distribution of concurrent pathogens in patients with an intra-abdominal infection due to S. maltophilia.
PathogenTotal (n = 140)
Gram-positive aerobic bacteria
Enterococcus spp.25
Lactobacillus spp.1
Leuconostoc spp.1
Coagulase-negative staphylococci7
Staphylococcus saprophyticus2
Staphylococcus aureus5
Viridans streptococci2
Subtotal43
Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria
Clostridium sporogenes1
Peptostreptococcus magnus1
Subtotal2
Gram-negative aerobic bacteria
Achromobacter xylosoxidans2
Acinetobacter spp.10
Aeromonas hydrophila2
Burkholderia cepacia1
Burkholderia multivorans1
Chryseobacterium indologenes8
Chryseobacterium meningosepticus1
Citrobacter freundii1
Delftia acidovorans1
Enterobacter cloacae5
Escherichia coli12
Klebsiella pneumoniae5
Pseudomonas spp.15
Rhizobium radiobacter1
Serratia marcescens4
Sphingomonas paucimobilis1
Subtotal70
Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria
Bacteroides spp.10
Fusobacterium nucleatum1
Subtotal11
Fungi
Candida spp.14
Subtotal14
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for in-hospital deaths under intra-abdominal infection with S. maltophilia.
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for in-hospital deaths under intra-abdominal infection with S. maltophilia.
VariableUnadjusted OR
(95% CI)
p-ValueAdjusted OR
(95% CI)
p-Value
Age1.013 (0.989–1.038)0.299
Sex0.984 (0.433–2.239)0.970
Underlying disease
Cerebrovascular accident0.957 (0.315–2.907)0.939
Heart failure2.583 (0.585–11.411)0.210
Diabetes Mellitus1.667 (0.715–3.887)0.237
Chronic kidney disease0.991 (0.410–2.397)0.984
Peptic ulcer disease1.769 (0.797–3.927)0.161
Malignancy2.872 (1.280–6.445)0.0114.433 (1.585–12.394)0.005
Liver cirrhosis1.644 (0.745–3.630)0.219
Causes of intra-abdominal Infection
Biliary tract infection0.708 (0.326–1.538)0.383
Abdominal surgery-related0.609 (0.270–1.375)0.233
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis3.218 (1.217–8.510)0.0192.144 (0.666–6.897)0.201
Disease severity
SOFA score1.298 (1.150–1.466)<0.011.312 (1.109–1.552)0.002
Shock8.000 (2.690–23.793)<0.012.302 (0.538–9.859)0.261
Appropriate antibiotic targeting for S. maltophilia within 48 h0.315 (0.084–1.191)0.0890.168 (0.034–0.837)0.029
Infection control measures0.608 (0.256–1.443)0.259
Further multivariate. 4 SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, C.-L.; Tsai, C.-C.; Chen, W.-P.; Chang, F.-Y.; Yu, C.-M.; Shang, H.-S.; Siu, L.-K.; Yang, Y.-S.; Lin, J.-C.; Wang, C.-H. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Intra-Abdominal Infection Caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3974. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113974

AMA Style

Chen C-L, Tsai C-C, Chen W-P, Chang F-Y, Yu C-M, Shang H-S, Siu L-K, Yang Y-S, Lin J-C, Wang C-H. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Intra-Abdominal Infection Caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(11):3974. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113974

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Chien-Liang, Chun-Chou Tsai, Wei-Ping Chen, Feng-Yee Chang, Ching-Mei Yu, Hung-Sheng Shang, Leung-Kei Siu, Ya-Sung Yang, Jung-Chung Lin, and Ching-Hsun Wang. 2025. "Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Intra-Abdominal Infection Caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 11: 3974. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113974

APA Style

Chen, C.-L., Tsai, C.-C., Chen, W.-P., Chang, F.-Y., Yu, C.-M., Shang, H.-S., Siu, L.-K., Yang, Y.-S., Lin, J.-C., & Wang, C.-H. (2025). Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Intra-Abdominal Infection Caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(11), 3974. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113974

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop