1. Background
True and pseudoaneurysms of the left ventricle (LV) are potentially life-threatening complications, resulting from acute transmural myocardial infarction (MI). In the acute stage of transmural MI, mechanical complications such as left LV free wall rupture, interventricular septum rupture, and papillary muscle rupture leading to acute mitral regurgitation (MR) may occur. These serious conditions necessitate immediate surgical intervention, often involving patch reconstruction in the event of a rupture. In a more post-acute phase, patients may present with an expanding true or pseudoaneurysm. When accompanied by heart failure symptoms or when cardiac function is compromised due to its location or size, surgical correction is required.
Diagnostic differentiation between these types often relies on clinical variables and medical history, as well as echocardiographic observations such as the thickness of the ventricular wall (<5 mm), an acute and sharp border between contract myocardium and aneurysm, the presence of a continuous pericardial layer, and wall motion abnormalities, such as akinesia or dyskinesia [
1,
2,
3,
4]. The incidence of both true and pseudoaneurysms is relatively low, and both entities are rarely described in literature.
2. Clinical Summary
A 62-year-old female patient presented in October 2021 with an MI due to occlusion of the posterolateral branch of the circumflex artery. A conservative approach was chosen at the patient’s request. The patient remained entirely asymptomatic and clinically stabile in the following month. One month later, she was re-admitted to the hospital with dyspnea and a rapid and weak pulse. Auscultation revealed signs of pulmonary edema. At that time there was clinical concern for looming cardiogenic shock; however, hemodynamic and biochemical parameters remained within normal limits. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed an impending LV free wall rupture with pericardial tamponade, necessitating emergency surgery. Intraoperatively, a posterolateral-located LV free wall rupture was observed. The infarcted and necrotic myocardial tissue surrounding the rupture site was debrided until viable margins were achieved. The distinction between viable and non-viable myocardium is often unclear, as the demarcation of necrotic tissue may not yet be apparent. Reconstruction was accomplished by securing a bovine pericardial patch over the defect using running sutures. The patient was weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass without incident. The postoperative course was uneventful. One year later, the patient was re-evaluated due to progressive symptoms of left-sided heart failure, most notably increasing dyspnea during minimal exertion and orthopnea. She reported a marked decline in exercise tolerance, becoming noticeably more fatigued and short of breath with activities that had previously posed no difficulty, such as walking short distances or performing light household tasks. She also reported recurrent episodes of syncope. The syncopal episodes were most consistent with orthostatic hypotension and were not associated with palpitations or other features of an arrhythmogenic origin. TTE showed a dilated left atrium and ventricle with decreased function and the presence of a LV pseudoaneurysm located at the posterolateral wall. Furthermore, moderate MR and mild tricuspid regurgitation (TR) were observed. During her follow-up in 2023, she missed her biannual outpatient appointments. By the year’s end, she began experiencing increasing heart failure symptoms (New York Heart Association, class II). Routine blood tests including troponin, leukocyte count, and C-reactive protein were within normal limits. A subsequent TTE showed worsening of her MR and TR, alongside with pulmonary hypertension. More importantly, the TTE also revealed the pseudoaneurysm had increased in size, displaying a broad neck and exerting mass effect on adjacent structures. A chest X-ray, as shown in
Figure 1, revealed a markedly enlarged cardiac silhouette, with a cardiothoracic ratio exceeding 0.5, and a conspicuously dilated LV contour. Additionally, Kerley B lines were observed in the right lateral lung field, accompanied by linear pleuropulmonary opacities, indicative of interstitial congestion. Consequently, she was referred from her hospital to our multidisciplinary Heart Team for high-risk patients, where she was accepted for re-operation: LV pseudoaneurysmectomy, mitral valve repair, and tricuspid valve repair.
Preoperative TTE showed a moderately dilated LV with a biplane Simpson-derived ejection fraction of 31%. A giant pseudoaneurysm was identified, communicating with the true LV cavity through a broad neck, and containing a mural thrombus. No recurrent pericardial effusion was seen. Additionally, severe functional MR and TR were observed, due to systolic leaflet restriction and annular dilatation. A computed tomography angiography (CTA) illustrated an impressive LV pseudoaneurysm measuring 12.5 × 11.6 × 8.0 cm (
Figure 2 and
Figure 3).
The patient was scheduled dated 18 March 2024 for urgent surgery. After median resternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass was installed using central aortic cannulation and right femoral vein and superior caval vein canulation; the inferior vena cava was inaccessible due to the pseudoaneurysm. After dissecting the heart, the aneurysm was opened at arrested heart. After debridement and removal of the dehiscent patch material, the neck of the aneurysm in the inferior wall could be visualized and reconstructed using a Dacron patch (3 × 4 cm), which was subsequently covered with a large xenopericardial patch for hemostatic purposes, as seen in
Figure 4. No histological examination of the resected pseudoaneurysm was conducted, as it was not deemed necessary for clinical decision-making. Additionally, a restrictive mitral annuloplasty using an Edwards Physio ring (size 28, downsized by 2 ring sizes) and TVP (using a size 30 Edwards Physio Tricuspid annuloplasty ring) was performed.
Following the procedure, a TTE indicated the complete exclusion of the LV pseudoaneurysm with no residual shunt. The LV shape appeared almost normal, although there was decreased systolic function, with an ejection fraction of 25%. A trace of MR (<grade I) and a mean transmitral gradient of 3 mmHg and a mild (grade I) TR were observed.
Postoperatively, the patient’s course was relatively unremarkable. She initially required vasopressors and diuretics, but she could be transferred from the ICU to the ward at postoperative day 2. She was discharged home on postoperative day 7 in good clinical condition. TTE at discharge showed no significant abnormalities, and the LV ejection fraction had largely recovered to its preoperative function (31%).
3. Comment
One of the most dreaded complications of a MI is an early LV free wall rupture or the formation of a true or pseudoaneurysm of the LV over time. While a free wall rupture necessitates prompt surgery, post-acute true and pseudoaneurysms of the LV can evolve differently. A pseudoaneurysm may increase in size over time and pose risks such as thrombus formation, progressing heart failure, or life-threatening arrhythmias. In rare occasions, these pseudoaneurysms can grow as large as the LV itself, necessitating surgery due to the risk of rupture. The treatment of choice involves closing the neck of the LV aneurysm using a Dacron patch, which also serves to reconstruct the LV geometry, and overlaying it with a xenopericardial patch to enhance hemostasis. In this case report, a pseudoaneurysm had formed likely due to the insufficient excision margin of the damaged myocardium and the use of a xenopericardial patch to reconstruct the LV during the primary correction of the LV free wall rupture.
The 2018 guidelines from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommend LV aneurysmectomy primarily based on outcomes from the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial (
n = 49). This recommendation (class IIa, level C) emphasizes the importance of aneurysmectomy in conjunction with coronary artery bypass grafting, especially in cases involving large LV aneurysms with or without thrombus formation, and where the aneurysm poses a risk of life-threatening arrhythmias [
5,
6,
7,
8]. Notably, these guidelines do not distinguish between true and pseudoaneurysms. Given the low class and level of evidence, there is a pressing need for further research. The current literature quality is inadequate for guiding management strategies specifically for true or pseudoaneurysm formation following MI.
4. Conclusions
LV aneurysmectomy offers a favorable prognosis when adequate excision margins of non-viable myocardium are taken, combined with a Dacron patch to restore ventricular geometry and prevent new aneurysm formation, augmented by an overlay of xenopericardial patch to reinforce hemostasis and mitigate suture-line complications.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, B.U.B. and M.P.; methodology, B.U.B.; validation, B.U.B., P.K. and J.L.S.; formal analysis, B.U.B.; investigation, B.U.B.; resources, R.J.M.K. and M.P.; data curation, B.U.B.; writing—original draft preparation, B.U.B.; writing—review and editing, P.K., J.L.S., R.J.M.K. and M.P.; visualization, J.L.S.; supervision, R.J.M.K. and M.P.; project administration, M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
According to Leids University Medical Center policy, Institutional Review Board approval is waived for case reports. Ethical review and approval were waived for this study as it concerns a single case report without experimental intervention, in line with institutional and national guidelines.
Informed Consent Statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this paper, including all clinical data and images.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. Further details are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, with respect for patient privacy and institutional regulations.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the clinical and administrative staff of the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery at Amsterdam UMC and Leids UMC for their support in patient care and logistics.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The hospitals had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- Sheikh, W.R.; Sehgal, P.; Verma, A.; Haldar, M.; Jaiswal, S. Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm post myocardial infarction. Int. J. Crit. Illn. Inj. Sci. 2019, 9, 43–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Dubnow, M.H.; Burchell, H.B.; Titus, J.L. Postinfarction ventricular aneurysm. A clinicomorphologic and electrocardiographic study of 80 cases. Am. Heart J. 1965, 70, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sattar, Y.; Alraies, M.C. Ventricular Aneurysm. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555955/ (accessed on 1 April 2024).
- Grosu, A.; Pedrotti, P.; Quarta, G.; Brambilla, P.; Roghi, A.; Gavazzi, A.; Senni, M. The Truth Behind False Aneurysms. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. [Internet]. Available online: https://scmr.org/cases-of-scmr/number-14-12/ (accessed on 1 April 2024).
- Neumann, F.J.; Sousa-Uva, M.; Ahlsson, A.; Alfonso, F.; Banning, A.P.; Benedetto, U.; Byrne, R.A.; Collet, J.P.; Falk, V.; Head, S.J.; et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 40, 87–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajakumar, A.P.; Ravikumar, M.S.; Palanisamy, V.; Raman, K.; Mohanraj, A.; Jamesraj, J.; Kurian, V.M.; Ajit, M.; Sethuratnam, R. Role of surgical ventricular restoration post surgical treatment of heart failure (STICH) trial. Indian J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2019, 35, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oh, J.K.; Velazquez, E.J.; Menicanti, L.; Pohost, G.M.; Bonow, R.O.; Lin, G.; Hellkamp, A.S.; Ferrazzi, P.; Wos, S.; Rao, V.; et al. Influence of baseline left ventricular function on the clinical outcome of surgical ventricular reconstruction in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, R.H.; Velazquez, E.J.; Michler, R.E.; Sopko, G.; Oh, J.K.; O’Connor, C.M.; Hill, J.A.; Menicanti, L.; Sadowski, Z.; Desvigne-Nickens, P.; et al. Coronary bypass surgery with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 1705–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).