Next Article in Journal
His Bundle Pacing: Predicting Mortality and Major Complications in Mid-Term Follow-Up
Next Article in Special Issue
A Prospective Observational Study of Frailty in Geriatric Revitalization Aimed at Community-Dwelling Elderly
Previous Article in Journal
Ten Future Challenges in the Field of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair
Previous Article in Special Issue
Validation of a Brief Form of the Self-Administered Multidimensional Prognostic Index: The SELFY-BRIEF-MPI Project
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/jcm13061801
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pre-Therapeutic Assessment of Older People in Sub-Saharan Africa: Introduction to the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

by
Marie-Josiane Ntsama Essomba
1,
Berthe Sabine Esson Mapoko
1,
Junette Arlette Metogo Mbengono
2,
Nadine Simo-Tabue
3,
Andre Pascal Kengne
4,5,
Simeon Pierre Choukem
6,
Eugène Sobngwi
1,
Jacqueline Ze Minkande
7 and
Maturin Tabue Teguo
3,*
1
Department of Internal Medicine and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde P.O. Box 812, Cameroon
2
Department of Surgery and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Douala, Douala P.O. Box 2701, Cameroon
3
Pôle de Geriatrie/Gérontologie CHU de Martinique, Equipe EpiCliV, Université des Antilles, 97233 Fort-de-France-Martinique, France
4
Non-Communicable Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7700, South Africa
5
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha 5700, South Africa
6
Department of Internal Medicine and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang P.O. Box 96, Cameroon
7
Department of Surgery and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde P.O Box 812, Cameroon
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(6), 1801; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061801
Submission received: 27 December 2023 / Revised: 9 March 2024 / Accepted: 19 March 2024 / Published: 21 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multidimensional Frailty: The Role of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Objectives: With the ongoing epidemiological transition in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), conditions that require invasive treatment (surgery, cancer, and anaesthesia, etc.) will become increasingly common. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidisciplinary diagnostic process aimed at identifying older people at risk of negative outcomes. It is important to know whether this approach integrates care management strategies for older people in a context where health services for older people are scarce, and staff members have little training in geriatrics. The current work is a situational analysis on the use of CGA on invasive care (cancer, surgery, etc.) among older people in SSA. Methods: We searched PubMed-MEDLINE and other sources for studies reporting on CGA and conditions requiring invasive treatment in older patients in SSA. Results/Conclusions: We found no study that had comprehensively examined CGA and invasive care in SSA. There is, however, evidence that the offer of invasive care to older people has improved in SSA. Further research is needed to explore the applicability of CGA in SSA. Similarly, more investigations are needed on the role of CGA in the care trajectories of older people in SSA, in terms of outcomes and affordability.

1. Introduction

In 2020, people aged 65 and over have outnumbered children younger than 5 years worldwide [1]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), nearly 70% of people aged 60 and over currently live in developing countries, and this proportion is expected to increase further [2]. With the ongoing epidemiological transition in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), there is a rising trend in non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including conditions requiring surgical procedures and anesthetic care [3,4]. The prevalence of unmet surgical need for older people in Uganda was 27.8% in 2014 [5]. The same year in Ghana, the annual operation rate of people aged 65 and over was 1744 per 100,000 [6]. Although surgical techniques and anesthesia have globally improved during the last decade in SSA, ageing will bring about new challenges. Older surgical patients are prone to postoperative complications, functional decline, prolonged recovery, and increased mortality. Indeed, older people have a higher risk of poor postoperative outcomes, owing to age-related changes, multimorbidity, and frailty [7,8,9]. Furthermore, in the presence of multimorbidity, coordination among multiple specialties can be difficult, and there is less focus on interventions to improve long-term outcomes after surgery. Surgeons and anesthesiologists must consider the balance between the benefits of a potentially life-sustaining surgical procedure versus the risks of developing postoperative disabling complications in older patients. Existing preoperative risk assessment tools are focused on optimizing immediate postoperative care and do not fully predict an older patient’s capacity to withstand the surgical risk [10]. Older people usually present with physical problems but also with functional, psychological, and social issues. In a traditional approach, the standard of care has been mainly focused on treating the disease and has failed to embrace the complex and multifactorial nature of these conditions. In the early 1980s, Rubenstein et al. provided a comprehensive interdisciplinary evaluation and management of frail older patients at high risk of long-term institutionalization following acute hospitalization [11]. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidisciplinary model of care intended to identify frail older patient’s medical, functional, and psychosocial limitations to develop a global plan of treatment and long-term follow-up [12]. Rather than looking only at diseases as occurs in routine medical assessments, CGA involves looking at a range of domains including physical medical conditions, mental health, functioning, and social circumstances. These assessments across multiple domains are required to develop a broad therapeutic plan to enhance recovery and promote the independence of patients. It is, therefore, both a diagnostic and a therapeutic process. This model is designed to reduce the incidence and worsening of functional disability of hospitalized older adults in the context of an acute illness [13,14]. It has been argued that combining usual risk assessment tools and CGA in frail older patients could improve the identification of patients who are likely to exhibit negative outcomes after older patient care [7,15]. Little consideration has been given to issues of aging in SSA, yet several lines of evidence support the importance of the equitable distribution of the available healthcare resources across age groups. Furthermore, out-of-pocket contribution remains the main source of healthcare expenses. But it is not enough, especially when dealing with complex health problems of older adults. In a context where health services dedicated to older people are scarce and few personnel are trained in geriatrics, we aimed to explore the literature on the use of CGA in the management of invasive care for older patients in SSA.
Source of the evidence:
A systematic Medline literature search was conducted on July 2023 without limit of date to identify all articles examining the CGA in SSA. The literature search was performed across mainly PubMed-Medline and other sources (Science Direct, Google Scholar) using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms with the following search strategy: “aging” OR “older” OR “Africa” combined with MeSH terms “surgery” OR “cancer” OR “frailty” OR “CGA” OR “hip fracture” OR “orthogeriatric” OR “oncogeriatric”. To optimize the searches, we used the same terms in the Title/Abstract (TiAb) advanced search option. Screening via title, abstract, and full-text, where appropriate, identified no study on the theme of interest from SSA.
Accordingly, we present in this paper a narrative synthesis of the elements underlying CGA’s interest in strategies for caring for older people.

Geriatric Syndromes and Population Aging in SSA

According to census data and population projections, about 160 million older people will be living in Africa by 2050. The older population is expected to double in the majority of African countries between 2020 and 2050, and these countries will probably need a policy shift to meet the needs of this aging population [16,17,18]. In SSA, life expectancy at the age of 60 years is 16 years for women and 14 years for men, suggesting that for those who survived the challenges in early age, a long old age is a reality [19]. Health systems in SSA are still struggling with the heavy burden of infectious diseases while facing the rising trend of NCDs [3,20]. Indeed, the increasing burden of many chronic diseases including hypertension, diabetes, but also cancer and osteoporosis, is a matter of concern in SSA. Older people usually present with physical problems but also with functional, psychological, and social issues. Furthermore, there are some clinical conditions known as geriatric syndromes, highly prevalent in older people living with frailty that do not fit into discrete disease categories [21]. Geriatric syndromes are multifactorial and associated with substantial morbidity and poor outcomes [22,23]. The main geriatric syndromes include frailty, falls, delirium, cognitive impairment, functional decline, and urinary incontinence [21]. Despite efforts to improve the level of care, mortality remains high in this age group [24,25,26] owing to comorbidities, but the role of geriatric syndromes has also been recognized in SSA [27,28]. The prevalence of frailty has been reported in many SSA countries and varies widely depending of the method of assessment [8,27,29]. According to a systematic review conducted in 2021 by O’Caoimh et al., the highest physical frailty prevalence was reported in Africa compared to other regions of the world [30]. In Nigeria, 63% of hospitalized adults aged 60 years and above were living with frailty [27] while in community-dwellers aged 55 years and above in Cameroon, frailty has been reported in 36% of participants [31]. In a study conducted in an urban setting in 2019, geriatric syndromes were highly prevalent (67%) among Cameroonians aged 55 and above; these included activities of daily living dependency and cognitive impairment in 10% and 30% of cases, respectively [32]. There is also a growing interest on sarcopenia, a geriatric condition characterized by the progressive and generalized loss of muscle mass and strength, associated with high risk of poor outcomes [33]. Indeed, its prevalence in SSA varies between 5 and 53% depending on the diagnostic criteria [34,35,36,37] (Table 1).

2. Surgical Conditions in Older People in SSA

With the ongoing epidemiological transition in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), there is a rising trend in NCDs including conditions requiring surgical procedures and anesthetic care [3,4]. Several older people undergo surgical procedures in SSA, reaching 46% of all admissions in some surgery units [39,40]. People aged 65 years and above accounted for about 31% of admissions in a surgery ward in Ethiopia [41]. The prevalence of the unmet surgical need of older people in Uganda was 27.8% in 2014 [5]. During the same year in Ghana, the annual operation rate of people aged 65 and over was 1744 per 100,000 [6]. It has long been recognized that advanced age can increase the risk of poor outcomes during and after surgery. Older people usually present with a background of complex medical issues including comorbidities but also age-related conditions. Furthermore, a substantial role of neighborhood, social, and community factors in seeking and reaching injury care has been highlighted [42]. A clinical audit conducted in Nigeria found a crude mortality rate of 18.9% in people aged 65 years and above in the general surgery unit [43]. In Cote d’Ivoire, post-operative morbidity and mortality among older people undergoing emergency surgery for acute bowel obstructions were 32.2% and 16.9%, respectively [44]. In a follow-up study including 2530 participants, the hazard of postoperative mortality among older people was three-folds higher than among their younger counterparts in Ethiopia [45]. The reasons of this high mortality were not clearly reported, as pre-existing medical conditions were not investigated in the majority of these studies. It has been suggested that older people face delayed diagnosis and late referral owing to limited access to health facilities and financial issues [5,6,46,47]. However, several authors have highlighted the increasing prevalence of geriatric syndromes in various settings in SSA [8,27,29,32]. Undiagnosed pre-existing cognitive dysfunction was present in about 40% of older elective non-cardiac surgery patients in South Africa [48]. Despite the existing geriatric syndromes and the widespread knowledge that older patients of the same age do not all have the same risk of occurrence of adverse outcomes, reliable data on geriatric assessment in surgery are lacking in many African countries. Several conditions in older people can require surgical management. Surgical techniques and anesthesia have globally improved during the last decade in SSA. Furthermore, the medical diaspora being actively engaged has contributed to this improvement through collaborative partnerships and transfer of skills. The CGA responds to the need to adapt care where necessary, and the specific needs of the older person are taken into account. This assessment can be used as a basis for treatment in cardiology, neurology, pulmonology, etc. Nevertheless, oncology and surgery are two models in which CGA has been used to demonstrate its effectiveness. For the purpose of this narrative review, we focus on cancer and fragility hip fracture.

2.1. Fragility Hip Fractures

The burden of injuries is a global challenge among older people especially, fragility hip fractures (FHFs), owing to their increased risk of falling and high prevalence of osteoporosis. In a study conducted in South Africa, the FHF incidence reported was 19.3 per 100,000, reaching 23.4 in the female group [49], and it was associated with an average of 16 days’ hospital stay following surgery [50]. Falls account for the major causes of FHF in older patients in SSA, often in combination with other geriatric syndromes such as sarcopenia and frailty [8,39,47,51,52]. In Malawi, orthopedic surgery was the most common procedure performed in older patients admitted for trauma with a longer hospital stay and higher mortality [47]. The 1-year mortality rate after hemiarthroplasty was around 34% in South Africa [53]. FHF is an acute stress condition in older people living with frailty, with increased risk of fatal adverse events as well as considerable economic burden [54,55]. In FHF patients, mortality ranges from 8 to 36% within the first year after surgery, and excess annual mortality persists for more than 10 years thereafter [56]. Multimorbidity and geriatric syndromes present difficulties for orthopedic surgeons, leading to multiple medical consultations, thus delaying surgery, extending the length of stay, and finally increasing mortality. To improve outcomes and reduce hospital costs, the full integration of orthopedics and geriatrics in dedicated units has been implemented [57]. Orthogeriatric co-management is a model of care which consists of a systematic collaboration between orthopedic surgeons, geriatricians, and the multidisciplinary geriatric team [58,59]. Consistent meta-analysis has shown that the orthogeriatric co-management of older patients with FHF significantly reduces long-term mortality as well as length of stay [58,59,60]. Despite the burden associated with FHF in older patients in SSA, orthogeriatric co-management is not widely implemented mainly because there are few geriatricians in SSA.

2.2. Cancer

Both cancer cases and cancer-related mortality have increased significantly in Africa [20,61]. Aging is one of the strongest risk factors for cancer development, but cancer screening coverage remains low among older people in SSA [62]. Despite the scarcity of population-based data on the cancer burden in the older African population, prostate cancer, breast cancer, and cervical cancer are frequently reported [63,64,65,66,67]. At least in high-income countries, the prevalence of frailty is high amongst older patients with cancer [68]. Both cancer and cancer treatments are significant stressors that can challenge the physiological reserve; thus, one should note the importance of an early assessment. An integrated oncogeriatric approach provides coordinated healthcare to address both cancer and age-related needs. Actually, several frailty screening tools are available, but the Geriatric 8 (G8) is the most widely used to identify older cancer patients who can benefit from further assessment and appropriate care [69,70]. Several randomized controlled trials suggest that CGA improves outcomes such as quality of life, unplanned hospitalizations, and chemotherapy completion [71,72]. Furthermore, CGA increases communication about age-related concerns and reduced treatment toxicity [73]. Surgery is an essential component for global cancer care in all resource settings. It is often the only curative option for many solid tumors. Detailed information concerning surgical oncology in the African continent is rudimentary.

3. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: A Cornerstone of Modern Geriatric Care

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is defined as a multidimensional interdisciplinary diagnostic process focused on determining frail older patient’s medical, functional, and psychosocial capability in order to develop a coordinated and integrated plan of treatment and long-term follow-up [12,13]. Rather than looking only at diseases as standard medical assessment would do, CGA involves looking at a range of domains including the following: physical medical conditions, mental health, functioning, and social circumstances [13,14]. CGA is delivered according to two broad models: in the first one, patients are admitted in a dedicated ward, usually called Acute Care for Elders (ACE) model with a coordinated multidisciplinary team who perform both assessment and rehabilitation [74,75]. The second model consists of a mobile team who visits patients living with frailty wherever they are admitted in non-geriatric wards. The mobile team assesses the patients and makes recommendations to the physician in charge [76]. The CGA is formalized by the use of standardized scales and tools, although they can be clinically constraining for non-trained healthcare providers (Table 2). These assessments across multiple domains are required to develop a broad therapeutic plan to enhance recovery and promote the independence of patients. It is, therefore, both a diagnostic and a therapeutic process. CGA has been confirmed by high-quality research studies and subsequent meta-analyses as the gold standard for the in-hospital care of geriatric patients [13,15,77]. This model is designed to reduce the incidence and worsening of functional disability of hospitalized older adults in the context of an acute illness [13,14]. A better identification of vulnerable patients also facilitates shared decision-making between patients, families, and caregivers about realistic treatment goals. The interest in frailty is growing with regard to efforts to increase healthy living expectancy and improving care to older people across various settings. Furthermore, the WHO has recently published guidelines to promote integrated care for older people in the community (ICOPE) [78]. ICOPE provides tools and guidance to community health workers to detect the decline in intrinsic capacities, including impaired mobility, malnutrition, visual impairment, hearing loss, cognitive impairment, and depressive symptoms and to deliver interventions for their management [78,79,80,81]. Given the demonstrated benefits from CGA for older people living with frailty, it is important that this model of care is more widely understood especially in the African setting [82].

3.1. Perioperative Optimisation of Older People

Clinical evidence shows that CGA reduces postoperative medical complications and is cost effective in the perioperative setting [15]. With the growing recognition of the need to tailor services to the pathophysiological profile of older people, there is an increasing interest in the Perioperative Optimization of Older People undergoing elective and urgent surgery (POPS). POPS aims to assist older people in choosing whether surgery is the right option, optimizing physiology before surgery, and helping to manage postoperative complications and plan rehabilitation. It can be employed throughout the whole perioperative pathway, allowing for the anticipation and mitigation of postoperative complications and proactive discharge planning [83]. In a traditional approach, CGA is usually delivered by a geriatrician-led multidisciplinary team. Although POPS is a CGA-based model, the scarcity of geriatricians in SSA is a major barrier to the widespread implementation of POPS services for older people.

3.2. Future Perspective

Several pieces of evidence support the implementation of CGA-based interventions for older people living with frailty, but reliable data on CGA in daily practice are lacking in many African countries. There may be a number of reasons that explain the underuse of CGA in SSA. CGA is time- and resource-consuming, which makes it difficult to put in place for surgeons and anesthesiologists usually focused on optimizing immediate postoperative care. Furthermore, geriatric medicine is a new specialty with few trained health caregivers and scarce dedicated wards [84]. Nonetheless, recent data suggest that it is possible to establish a model of care to address older people’s health issues in resource-limited settings [85]. In Cameroon, the Acute Care for Elders model has been implemented in the lone geriatric-dedicated unit of the country since 2019 [28]. A dedicated team has been put in place including geriatricians, general practitioners, advanced practice nurses, and social workers who provide geriatric care and CGA for all hospitalized patients. Their role has been expanded to assess outpatients and older patients admitted in non-geriatric wards. Although the evidence for its use in hospitals remains strong, further work is needed to explore the applicability of CGA in SSA. Perioperative medicine is being established to provide optimal preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care for all patients, but with a particular focus on those at high risk of adverse postoperative outcomes. Education and research are keys in expanding geriatric care to currently underserved areas in SSA. This can be conducted locally through web-based conferences and short workshops, as well as partnership with well-established geriatric departments abroad. In this process, programmes to promote primary prevention in the community are not only relevant, but also necessary in the African setting. The ICOPE approach can serve as a template for further national guidelines, taking into account the available healthcare resources. To achieve this goal, commitment is needed from all relevant stakeholders including governments, researchers, and healthcare professionals in addition to civil society actors.

4. Conclusions

Although surgical techniques and anesthesia have globally improved during the last decade in SSA, ageing will bring about new challenges. Evidence for the existing geriatric syndromes is available, but reliable data on geriatric assessment in invasive care are lacking in many African countries. CGA provides a contrasting model of care to the traditional approach, and its benefits are evidence-based in various settings. Further research is needed to fill the gap on whether this approach can be suitable and implemented in sub-Saharan Africa, taking into account local resources.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-J.N.E. and M.T.T.; M.-J.N.E. and B.S.E.M. drafted the manuscript; M.T.T., J.Z.M., E.S., A.P.K., S.P.C., N.S.-T. and J.A.M.M. provided substantial inputs to the draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sabri, S.M.; Annuar, N.; Rahman, N.L.A.; Musairah, S.K.; Mutalib, H.A.; Subagja, I.K. Major Trends in Ageing Population Research: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2001 to 2021. Proceedings 2022, 82, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Report on Ageing and Health. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/186463 (accessed on 18 April 2023).
  3. Bigna, J.J.; Noubiap, J.J. The Rising Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Glob. Health 2019, 7, e1295–e1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Meara, J.G.; Leather, A.J.M.; Hagander, L.; Alkire, B.C.; Alonso, N.; Ameh, E.A.; Bickler, S.W.; Conteh, L.; Dare, A.J.; Davies, J.; et al. Global Surgery 2030: Evidence and Solutions for Achieving Health, Welfare, and Economic Development. Surg. U. S. 2015, 158, 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tran, T.M.; Fuller, A.T.; Butler, E.K.; Muhumuza, C.; Ssennono, V.F.; Vissoci, J.R.; Makumbi, F.; Chipman, J.G.; Galukande, M.; Haglund, M.M.; et al. Surgical Need among the Ageing Population of Uganda. Afr. Health Sci. 2019, 19, 1778–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gyedu, A.; Stewart, B.; Gaskill, C.; Salia, E.L.; Wadie, R.; Donkor, P.; Mock, C. Enumeration of Operations Performed for Elderly Patients in Ghana: An Opportunity to Improve Global Surgery Benchmarking. World J. Surg. 2019, 43, 1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lin, H.S.; Watts, J.N.; Peel, N.M.; Hubbard, R.E. Frailty and Post-Operative Outcomes in Older Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review. BMC Geriatr. 2016, 16, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Leopold-George, N.T.N.; Nethathe, G.D. Frailty in Perioperative Patients in Three South African Academic Hospitals. S. Afr. Med. J. 2019, 109, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ho, V.P.; Schiltz, N.K.; Reimer, A.P.; Madigan, E.A.; Koroukian, S.M. High Risk Comorbidity Combinations in Older Patients Undergoing Emergency General Surgery. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2019, 67, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Watt, J.; Tricco, A.C.; Talbot-Hamon, C.; Pham, B.; Rios, P.; Grudniewicz, A.; Wong, C.; Sinclair, D.; Straus, S.E. Identifying Older Adults at Risk of Harm Following Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Med. 2018, 16, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rubenstein, L.Z.; Wieland, D.; English, P.; Josephson, K.; Sayre, J.A.; Abrass, I.B. The Sepulveda VA Geriatric Evaluation Unit: Data on Four-Year Outcomes and Predictors of Improved Patient Outcomes. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1984, 32, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rubenstein, L.Z.; Stuck, A.E.; Siu, A.L.; Wieland, D. Impacts of Geriatric Evaluation and Management Programs on Defined Outcomes: Overview of the Evidence. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1991, 39, 8S–16S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Parker, S.G.; Mccue, P.; Phelps, K.; Mccleod, A.; Arora, S.; Nockels, K.; Kennedy, S.; Roberts, H.; Conroy, S. What Is Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)? An Umbrella Review. Age Ageing 2018, 47, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Parker, S.G.; Mcleod, A.; Mccue, P.; Phelps, K.; Bardsley, M.; Roberts, H.C.; Conroy, S.P. New Horizons in Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. Age Ageing 2017, 46, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Partridge, J.S.L.; Harari, D.; Martin, F.C.; Dhesi, J.K. The Impact of Pre-Operative Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment on Postoperative Outcomes in Older Patients Undergoing Scheduled Surgery: A Systematic Review. Anaesthesia 2014, 69, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mathers, C.D.; Loncar, D. Projections of Global Mortality and Burden of Disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006, 3, e442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shetty, P. Grey Matter: Ageing in Developing Countries. Lancet 2012, 379, 1285–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ssensamba, J.T.; Mukuru, M.; Nakafeero, M.; Ssenyonga, R.; Kiwanuka, S.N. Health Systems Readiness to Provide Geriatric Friendly Care Services in Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Geriatr. 2019, 19, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aboderin, I.A.G.; Beard, J.R. Older People’s Health in Sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet 2015, 385, e9–e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Forouzanfar, M.H.; Afshin, A.; Alexander, L.T.; Biryukov, S.; Brauer, M.; Cercy, K.; Charlson, F.J.; Cohen, A.J.; Dandona, L.; Estep, K.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Comparative Risk Assessment of 79 Behavioural, Environmental and Occupational, and Metabolic Risks or Clusters of Risks, 1990–2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016, 388, 1659–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Inouye, S.K.; Studenski, S.; Tinetti, M.E.; Kuchel, G.A. Geriatric Syndromes: Clinical, Research, and Policy Implications of a Core Geriatric Concept. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2007, 55, 780–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ritt, M.; Ritt, J.; Sieber, C.; Gaßmann, K. Comparing the Predictive Accuracy of Frailty, Comorbidity, and Disability for Mortality: A 1-Year Follow-up in Patients Hospitalized in Geriatric Wards. Clin. Interv. Aging 2017, 12, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hao, Q.; Zhou, L.; Dong, B.; Yang, M.; Dong, B.; Weil, Y. The Role of Frailty in Predicting Mortality and Readmission in Older Adults in Acute Care Wards: A Prospective Study. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ntsama, M.J.E.-; Kowo, M.; Ndikum, V.; Nzana, V.; Simeni, R.; Timnou, A.; Ashuntantang, G. Iatrogenic Illness in Elderly Inpatients from a Department of Internal Medicine in Cameroon: A Prospective Study. Health Sci. Dis. 2018, 19, 85–88. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sanya, E.O.; Abiodun, A.A.; Kolo, P.O.; Olanrewaju, T.; Adekeye, K. Profile and Causes of Mortality among Elderly Patients Seen in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Nigeria. Ann. Afr. Med. 2011, 10, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Adebusoye, L.; Owolabi, M.; Kalula, S.; Ogunniyi, A. All-Cause Mortality among Elderly Patients Admitted to the Medical Wards of Hospitals in Africa: A Systematic Review. Niger. J. Health Sci. 2015, 15, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Adebusoye, L.A.; Cadmus, E.O.; Owolabi, M.O.; Ogunniyi, A. Frailty and Mortality among Older Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria. Ghana Med. J. 2019, 53, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Essomba, M.J.N.; Mba, R.M.M.; Ottou, M.Z.; Singwe, M.N. In-Hospital Mortality and Associated Factors in Acute Geriatric Care in Cameroon: A Retrospective Study. Health Sci. Dis. 2023, 24, 15–18. [Google Scholar]
  29. Payne, C.F.; Wade, A.; Kabudula, C.W.; Davies, J.I.; Chang, A.Y.; Gomez-Olive, F.X.; Kahn, K.; Berkman, L.F.; Tollman, S.M.; Salomon, J.A.; et al. Prevalence and Correlates of Frailty in an Older Rural African Population: Findings from the HAALSI Cohort Study. BMC Geriatr. 2017, 17, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. O’Caoimh, R.; Sezgin, D.; O’Donovan, M.R.; Molloy, D.W.; Clegg, A.; Rockwood, K.; Liew, A. Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: A systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age Ageing 2021, 50, 96–104. [Google Scholar]
  31. Metanmo, S.; Simo-Tabue, N.; Kuate-Tegueu, C.; Bonnet, M.; Gbessemehlan, A.; Metanmo, F.; Dramé, M.; Tabue-Teguo, M. Short Physical Performance Battery and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Index in the Exploration of Frailty Among Older People in Cameroon. Int. J. Public Health 2023, 68, 1605900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Essomba, M.J.N.; Atsa, D.; Noah, D.Z.; Zingui-Ottou, M.; Paula, G.; Nkeck, J.R.; Noubiap, J.J.; Ashuntantang, G. Geriatric Syndromes in an Urban Elderly Population in Cameroon: A Focus on Disability, Sarcopenia and Cognitive Impairment. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2020, 37, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sanchez-Rodriguez, D.; Marco, E.; Cruz-Jentoft, A.J. Defining Sarcopenia. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2020, 23, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Metanmo, S.; Kuate-Tegueu, C.; Gbessemehlan, A.; Dartigues, J.-F.; Ntsama, M.-J.; Nguegang Yonta, L.; Kengne, A.-P.; Simo-Tabue, N.; Tabue-Teguo, M. Self-Reported Visual Impairment and Sarcopenia among Older People in Cameroon. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 17694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Marie-Josiane, N.E.; Dimitri, Z.N.; Njonnou, S.; Raoul, S.; Gloria, A. Facteurs Associés à La Sarcopénie Chez Des Patients Âgés de 55 Ans et plus Dans Un Service de Médecine Interne Au Cameroun. Health Sci. Dis. 2022, 23, 58–61. [Google Scholar]
  36. Adebusoye, L.; Ogunbode, A.; Olowookere, O.; Ajayi, S.; Ladipo, M. Factors Associated with Sarcopenia among Older Patients Attending a Geriatric Clinic in Nigeria. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2018, 21, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Echeverría, P.; Bonjoch, A.; Puig, J.; Estany, C.; Ornelas, A.; Clotet, B.; Negredo, E. High Prevalence of Sarcopenia in HIV-Infected Individuals. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 5074923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Witham, M.D.; Davies, J.I.; Bärnighausen, T.; Bountogo, M.; Manne-Goehler, J.; Payne, C.F.; Ouermi, L.; Sie, A.; Siedner, M.J.; Harling, G. Frailty and Physical Performance in the Context of Extreme Poverty: A Population-Based Study of Older Adults in Rural Burkina Faso. Wellcome Open Res. 2019, 4, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Anyanwu, G.; Nwaiwu, C.; Agu, A.; Onwukamuche, C.; Ekezie, J. Mechanisms of Hip Fracture in Owerri, Nigeria, and Its Associated Variables. Ann. Med. Health Sci. Res. 2013, 3, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chukuezi, A.B.; Nwosu, J.N. Mortality Pattern in the Surgical Wards: A Five Year Review at Federal Medical Centre, Owerri, Nigeria. Int. J. Surg. 2010, 8, 381–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Dandena, F.; Leulseged, B.; Suga, Y.; Teklewold, B. Magnitude and Pattern of Inpatient Surgical Mortality in a Tertiary Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Health Sci. 2020, 30, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Owolabi, E.O.; Ferreira, K.; Nyamathe, S.; Ignatowicz, A.; Odland, M.L.; Abdul-Latif, A.-M.; Byiringiro, J.C.; Davies, J.I.; Chu, K.M. Social Determinants of Seeking and Reaching Injury Care in South Africa: A Community-Based Qualitative Study. Ann. Glob Health 2023, 89, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ugwu-Olisa, O.A.; Chidi, E.V.; Emmanuel, E.U.; Chinedu, N.G.; Onyeyirichi, O. Mortality Audit in General Surgery Unit and Lessons Learned at a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital: A Single Centre Observational Study. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2022, 41, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kouakou, K.B.; Anzoua, K.I.; Traore, M.; Leh Bi, I.K.; N’Dri, A.B.; Kakou, A.G.; Ekra, S.A.; Kouakou, B.A.; Bamba, I.; Akowendo, D.E.; et al. Acute Bowel Obstructions of the Elderly in a Low African Country. Surg. Sci. 2022, 13, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Endeshaw, A.S.; Kumie, F.T.; Molla, M.T.; Zeru, G.A.; Abera, K.M.; Zeleke, Z.B.; Lakew, T.J. Incidence and Predictors of Perioperative Mortality in a Low-Resource Country, Ethiopia: A Prospective Follow-up Study. BMJ Open 2023, 13, e069768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Maine, R.G.; Linden, A.F.; Riviello, R.; Kamanzi, E.; Mody, G.N.; Ntakiyiruta, G.; Kansayisa, G.; Ntaganda, E.; Niyonkuru, F.; Mubiligi, J.M.; et al. Prevalence of Untreated Surgical Conditions in Rural Rwanda: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Burera District. JAMA Surg. 2017, 152, e174013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gallaher, J.R.; Haac, B.E.; Geyer, A.J.; Mabedi, C.; Cairns, B.A.; Charles, A.G. Injury Characteristics and Outcomes in Elderly Trauma Patients in Sub-Saharan Africa. World J. Surg. 2016, 40, 2650–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Amado, L.A.; Perrie, H.; Scribante, J.; Ben-Israel, K.A. Preoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Older Elective Noncardiac Surgical Patients in South Africa. Br. J. Anaesth. 2020, 125, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Grundill, M.L.; Burger, M.C. The Incidence of Fragility Hip Fractures in a Subpopulation of South Africa. S. Afr. Med. J. 2021, 111, 896–902. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ntuli, M.; Filmalter, C.J.; White, Z.; Heyns, T. Length of Stay and Contributing Factors in Elderly Patients Who Have Undergone Hip Fracture Surgery in a Tertiary Hospital in South Africa. Int. J. Orthop. Trauma Nurs. 2020, 37, 100748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Saidi, H.; Mutiso, B. Injury Outcomes in Elderly Patients Admitted at an Urban African Hospital. Surg. Sci. 2013, 4, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Buunaaim, A.D.B.; Osman, I.; Salisu, W.J.; Bukari, M.I.S.; Yempabe, T. Epidemiology of Elderly Fractures in a Tertiary Hospital in Northern Ghana: A 3-Year Retrospective Descriptive Review. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. Orthop. Traumatol. 2023, 33, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. du Toit, A.; van der Merwe, J. Mortality Following Hip Fractures Managed with Hemiarthroplasty in the Elderly in South Africa. SA Orthop. J. 2018, 17, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Neuburger, J.; Currie, C.; Wakeman, R.; Tsang, C.; Plant, F.; De Stavola, B.; Cromwell, D.A.; van der Meulen, J. The Impact of a National Clinician-Led Audit Initiative on Care and Mortality after Hip Fracture in England. Med. Care 2015, 53, 686–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Williamson, S.; Landeiro, F.; McConnell, T.; Fulford-Smith, L.; Javaid, M.K.; Judge, A.; Leal, J. Costs of Fragility Hip Fractures Globally: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. Osteoporos. Int. 2017, 28, 2791–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Haentjens, P. Meta-Analysis: Excess Mortality After Hip Fracture Among Older Women and Men. Ann. Intern. Med. 2010, 152, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Baroni, M.; Serra, R.; Boccardi, V.; Ercolani, S.; Zengarini, E.; Casucci, P.; Valecchi, R.; Rinonapoli, G.; Caraffa, A.; Mecocci, P.; et al. The Orthogeriatric Comanagement Improves Clinical Outcomes of Hip Fracture in Older Adults. Osteoporos. Int. 2019, 30, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Grigoryan, K.V.; Javedan, H.; Rudolph, J.L. Orthogeriatric Care Models and Outcomes in Hip Fracture Patients. J. Orthop. Trauma 2014, 28, e49–e55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Van Heghe, A.; Mordant, G.; Dupont, J.; Dejaeger, M.; Laurent, M.R.; Gielen, E. Effects of Orthogeriatric Care Models on Outcomes of Hip Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2022, 110, 162–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Moyet, J.; Deschasse, G.; Marquant, B.; Mertl, P.; Bloch, F. Which Is the Optimal Orthogeriatric Care Model to Prevent Mortality of Elderly Subjects Post Hip Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Current Clinical Practice. Int. Orthop. 2019, 43, 1449–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bray, F.; Parkin, D.M.; Gnangnon, F.; Tshisimogo, G.; Peko, J.F.; Adoubi, I.; Assefa, M.; Bojang, L.; Awuah, B.; Koulibaly, M.; et al. Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa in 2020: A Review of Current Estimates of the National Burden, Data Gaps, and Future Needs. Lancet Oncol. 2022, 23, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Peltzer, K.; Phaswana-Mafuya, N. Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening and Associated Factors among Older Adult Women in South Africa. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014, 15, 2473–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mudie, K.; Mei Jin Tan, M.; Kendall, L.; Addo, J.; dos-Santos-Silva, I.; Quint, J.; Smeeth, L.; Cook, S.; Nitsch, D.; Natamba, B.; et al. Correspondence to: Non-Communicable Diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review of Large Cohort Studies. J. Glob. Health 2019, 2, 020409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kamadjou, C.; Rimtebaye, K.; Eyongeta, D.; Kameni, A.; Kamga, J.; Njinou, B. Diagnosis and Management of Prostate Cancer in Urology. Open J. Urol. 2018, 8, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ekeke, O.; Amusan, O.; Eke, N. Management of Prostate Cancer in Port Harcourt, Nigeria: Changing Patterns. J. West Afr. Coll. Surg. 2012, 2, 58. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Pilleron, S.; Soerjomataram, I.; Charvat, H.; Chokunonga, E.; Somdyala, N.I.M.; Wabinga, H.; Korir, A.; Bray, F.; Jemal, A.; Maxwell Parkin, D. Cancer Incidence in Older Adults in Selected Regions of sub-Saharan Africa, 2008–2012. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 144, 1824–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Nkfusai, N.C.; Cumber, S.N.; Williams, T.; Anchang-Kimbi, J.K.; Yankam, B.M.; Anye, C.S.; Tsoka-Gwegweni, J.M.; Enow, E.-O.G.; Anong, D.N. Cervical Cancer in the Bamenda Regional Hospital, North West Region of Cameroon: A Retrospective Study. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2019, 32, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Handforth, C.; Clegg, A.; Young, C.; Simpkins, S.; Seymour, M.T.; Selby, P.J.; Young, J. The Prevalence and Outcomes of Frailty in Older Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, 1091–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Owusu, C.; Berger, N.A. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in the Older Cancer Patient: Coming of Age in Clinical Cancer Care. Clin. Pract. Lond. Engl. 2014, 11, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Soubeyran, P.; Bellera, C.; Goyard, J.; Heitz, D.; Curé, H.; Rousselot, H.; Albrand, G.; Servent, V.; Saint Jean, O.; van Praagh, I.; et al. Screening for Vulnerability in Older Cancer Patients: The ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e115060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Soo, W.K.; King, M.T.; Pope, A.; Parente, P.; Dārziņš, P.; Davis, I.D. Integrated Geriatric Assessment and Treatment Effectiveness (INTEGERATE) in Older People with Cancer Starting Systemic Anticancer Treatment in Australia: A Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022, 3, e617–e627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, D.; Sun, C.-L.; Kim, H.; Soto-Perez-de-Celis, E.; Chung, V.; Koczywas, M.; Fakih, M.; Chao, J.; Cabrera Chien, L.; Charles, K.; et al. Geriatric Assessment–Driven Intervention (GAIN) on Chemotherapy-Related Toxic Effects in Older Adults with Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2021, 7, e214158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mohile, S.G.; Epstein, R.M.; Hurria, A.; Heckler, C.E.; Canin, B.; Culakova, E.; Duberstein, P.; Gilmore, N.; Xu, H.; Plumb, S.; et al. Communication with Older Patients with Cancer Using Geriatric Assessment. JAMA Oncol. 2020, 6, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Palmer, R.M.; Landefeld, C.S.; Kresevic, D.; Kowal, J. A Medical Unit for the Acute Care of the Elderly. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1994, 42, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Palmer, R.M. The Acute Care for Elders Unit Model of Care. Geriatrics 2018, 3, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Deschodt, M.; Flamaing, J.; Haentjens, P.; Boonen, S.; Milisen, K. Impact of Geriatric Consultation Teams on Clinical Outcome in Acute Hospitals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Med. 2013, 11, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ellis, G.; Whitehead, M.A.; Robinson, D.; O’Neill, D.; Langhorne, P. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Older Adults Admitted to Hospital: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. BMJ 2011, 343, d6553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. WHO Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE): Guidance for Person-Centred Assessment and Pathways in Primary Care 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-FWC-ALC-19.1 (accessed on 18 December 2023).
  79. Meng, L.C.; Hsiao, F.Y.; Huang, S.T.; Lu, W.H.; Peng, L.N.; Chen, L.K. Intrinsic Capacity Impairment Patterns and Their Associations with Unfavorable Medication Utilization: A Nationwide Population-Based Study of 37,993 Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2022, 26, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Tavassoli, N.; de Souto Barreto, P.; Berbon, C.; Mathieu, C.; de Kerimel, J.; Lafont, C.; Takeda, C.; Carrie, I.; Piau, A.; Jouffrey, T.; et al. Implementation of the WHO Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) Programme in Clinical Practice: A Prospective Study. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022, 3, e394–e404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cesari, M.; De Carvalho, I.A.; Thiyagarajan, J.A.; Cooper, C.; Martin, F.C.; Reginster, J.Y.; Vellas, B.; Beard, J.R. Evidence for the Domains Supporting the Construct of Intrinsic Capacity. J. Gerontol.-Ser. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2018, 73, 1653–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Veronese, N.; Custodero, C.; Demurtas, J.; Smith, L.; Barbagallo, M.; Maggi, S.; Cella, A.; Vanacore, N.; Aprile, P.L.; Ferrucci, L.; et al. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Older People: An Umbrella Review of Health Outcomes. Age Ageing 2022, 51, afac104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Partridge, J.S.L.; Moonesinghe, S.R.; Lees, N.; Dhesi, J.K. Perioperative Care for Older People. Age Ageing 2022, 51, afac194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Dotchin, C.L.; Akinyemi, R.O.; Gray, W.K.; Walker, R.W. Geriatric Medicine: Services and Training in Africa. Age Ageing 2013, 42, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Akoria, O.A. Establishing In-Hospital Geriatrics Services in Africa: Insights from the University of Benin Teaching Hospital Geriatrics Project. Ann. Afr. Med. 2016, 15, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Prevalence of frailty in sub-Saharan Africa.
Table 1. Prevalence of frailty in sub-Saharan Africa.
Author, YearSetting Country Sample Size
Mean or Median Age
% Female
Study Design		Frailty
Measure		PrevalenceAssociation between Frailty and Adverse Outcome
Leopold-George et al. [8], 2016In-hospital
surgical ward		South Africa299
50.6
52%
Prospective cohort study		Clinical frailty scale22.4%Desaturation (OR 4.21; p = 0.01),
Blood transfusion requierment (OR 5.36, p = 0.01)
Higher ASA-PS scores (OR 19.01,
p < 0.001)
Adebusoye et al. [27], 2019In-hospital
medical ward		Nigeria450
71.5
52%
Prospective cohort study		Canadian Study
of Health and Aging (CSHA) clinical frailty scale		63.3%The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher among frail respondents (18.8 deaths per 1000 patient days compared with non-frail respondents—11.3 deaths per 1000 patient days)
Metanmo et al. [31], 2023CommunityCameroon403
67.1
49.6%
Cross-sectional study		Study of osteoporotic fractures index35.7%NA
Payne et al. [29], 2017CommunitySouth Africa5059
61.7
54.1%
Longitudinal cohort study		Fried’s criteria5.4% to 13.2%The 17-month all-cause mortality HR 2.65 to 8.91 for frail vs. non-frail
Witham et al. [38], 2019CommunityBurkina Faso2973
54
50.6%
Cross-sectional study		Fried’s criteria7%Frailty was strongly associated with impairment of activities of daily living and with lower wealth, being widowed, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and self-reported diagnoses of tuberculosis or heart disease
ASA-PS The American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status; OR odds ratio; HR hazard ratio.
Table 2. Components of CGA.
Table 2. Components of CGA.
DomainAssessmentExample of Tools
Physical medical conditionsComorbid conditions and disease severity
Medication review		CIRS-G, Charlson’s index
FunctioningCore functions such as mobility and balance
Activities of daily living		ADL
IADL
CognitionCognition
Mood and anxiety		MMSE
GDS-15
NutritionNutritional status MNA
Social network Social networks: informal support available
from family, the wider network of friends
and contacts, and statutory care
Poverty		UCLA-loneliness Scale
Environment Housing: comfort, facilities, and safety
Use or potential use of “telehealth”
Technology
Transport facilities
Accessibility to local resources
ADL: Activities of Daily Living; CGA: comprehensive geriatric assessment; CIRS-G: Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics;. GDS-15: Geriatric Depression Scale 15; IADL: Instrumental Activities Of Daily Living; MMSE: Mini–Mental State Exam; MNA: Mini Nutritional Assessment.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ntsama Essomba, M.-J.; Esson Mapoko, B.S.; Metogo Mbengono, J.A.; Simo-Tabue, N.; Kengne, A.P.; Choukem, S.P.; Sobngwi, E.; Ze Minkande, J.; Tabue Teguo, M. Pre-Therapeutic Assessment of Older People in Sub-Saharan Africa: Introduction to the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061801

AMA Style

Ntsama Essomba M-J, Esson Mapoko BS, Metogo Mbengono JA, Simo-Tabue N, Kengne AP, Choukem SP, Sobngwi E, Ze Minkande J, Tabue Teguo M. Pre-Therapeutic Assessment of Older People in Sub-Saharan Africa: Introduction to the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(6):1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061801

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ntsama Essomba, Marie-Josiane, Berthe Sabine Esson Mapoko, Junette Arlette Metogo Mbengono, Nadine Simo-Tabue, Andre Pascal Kengne, Simeon Pierre Choukem, Eugène Sobngwi, Jacqueline Ze Minkande, and Maturin Tabue Teguo. 2024. "Pre-Therapeutic Assessment of Older People in Sub-Saharan Africa: Introduction to the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 6: 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061801

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop