Next Article in Journal
The Relative Cerebral Blood Volume (rCBV) < 42% Is Independently Associated with Collateral Status in Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion
Previous Article in Journal
Oral Health Status and Factors Related to Oral Health in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Matched Case-Control Observational Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Autophagy-Related Gene ATG7 Polymorphism Could Potentially Serve as a Biomarker of the Progression of Atrophic Gastritis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/jcm13061587
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Risk Factors for Developing Metachronous Superficial Gastric Epithelial Neoplasms after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

by
Tsunehiro Suzuki
1,
Kenichi Goda
1,*,
Manabu Ishikawa
1,
Shintaro Yamaguchi
1,
Tomonori Yoshinaga
1,
Masayuki Kondo
1,
Mimari Kanazawa
1,
Yasuhito Kunogi
1,
Takanao Tanaka
1,
Akira Kanamori
1,
Keiichiro Abe
1,
Akira Yamamiya
1,
Takeshi Sugaya
1,
Keiichi Tominaga
1,
Hidetsugu Yamagishi
2,
Hironori Masuyama
3 and
Atsushi Irisawa
1
1
Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi Mibu, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan
2
Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, 880 Kitakobayashi Mibu, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan
3
Masuyama Gastroenterology Clinic, 83-413 Kajiya Otawara, Tochigi 324-0046, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(6), 1587; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061587
Submission received: 29 January 2024 / Revised: 6 March 2024 / Accepted: 8 March 2024 / Published: 10 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Diagnostic and Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal-Disease-Related Gut Microbiota and Helicobacter)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) provides a high rate of curative resection, the remaining gastric mucosa after ESD is at risk for metachronous superficial gastric epithelial neoplasms (MSGENs). It leaves room for risk factors for developing MSGENs after ESD. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological risk factors for the occurrence of MSGENs, and to evaluate the association of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) with the MSGENs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 369 patients with 382 lesions that underwent ESD for adenoma/early gastric cancer. Results: Twenty-seven MSGENs occurred. The subjects were divided into MSGEN and not-MSGEN groups. There was a significantly higher frequency of histological intestinal metaplasia (HIM) and initial neoplasm location in the upper or middle parts (INUM) in the MSGEN group. The HIM and INUM groups had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of MSGENs. We compared 27 patients from the MSGEN group and 27 patients from the not-MSGEN group that were matched to the MSGEN group for variables including HIM and INUM. There was a significantly higher frequency of the spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori in the MSGEN group. Conclusions: HIM, INUM, and the spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori may be clinicopathological risk factors for developing MSGENs after ESD.

1. Introduction

Gastric cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide [1]. It has a high prevalence in East Asia, with approximately 75% of gastric cancer cases worldwide occurring in East Asia. Gastric cancer is the third-highest main cause of all cancer deaths in Japan, and the widespread use of endoscopy and diagnostic advances have allowed for the early detection of gastric cancer. Endoscopic resection (ER) is a well-known treatment for early gastric cancer. Recently, the rapid widespread adoption of a new ER technique, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), has led to this being performed in between 60% and 70% of all gastric cancer cases [2]. Similar to open surgery, ESD allows en bloc resection regardless of the lesion size if the superficial cancer has a negligible risk for lymph node metastasis. The most important merit of endoscopic treatment, including ESD, is the preservation of the stomach that can offer a significantly better quality of life compared to surgical resection. However, it involves the disadvantage of the remaining gastric mucosa having a high risk of carcinogenesis. Specifically, metachronous gastric cancers following ER have an occurrence rate of 2.5–14% [3,4,5,6].
Recent largescale cohort studies showed a reduced risk of developing metachronous cancer (included in MSGENs) following Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) therapy after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer and adenoma [7,8,9]; therefore, H. pylori therapy is recommended for H. pylori-positive patients who have undergone ER of the superficial gastric epithelial neoplasms (SGENs). Contrastingly, other studies have reported that the risk of developing metachronous cancer does not decrease significantly after H. pylori therapy [5,6,10]. Thus, there is controversy regarding whether H. pylori therapy is associated with the risk of developing MSGENs following ER, particularly ESD which has been widely used in recent times. It still leaves room for clinicopathological risk factors for developing MSGENs, including H. pylori therapy, especially after ESD.
Studies from Japan demonstrated that early gastric cancer was rarely derived from gastric mucosa with previous H. pylori infection-induced atrophic gastritis (e.g., early gastric cancer cases having no history of H. pylori therapy and being negative for H. pylori tests but having severe gastric gastritis including cases with the spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori) at a frequency of 10% or 13.8% in patients with early gastric cancer treated by endoscopy [11,12]. It is noteworthy that the risk of gastric cancer development in cases with the spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori with no history of H. pylori therapy and severe atrophy (0.53–0.87% per year [13,14,15,16]) was slightly higher than that in post-H. pylori therapy cases with severe atrophy (0.31–0.62% per year [13,17,18,19]). There is little known about the associations between the spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori and MSGENs following ESD.
This retrospective cohort study aimed to identify the clinicopathological risk factors, including the spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori, for developing MSGENs in patients who underwent ESD for SGENs including MSGENs after previous ESD.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

We identified 519 patients (531 lesions) who underwent ESD for SGENs at DokkyoMedical University Hospital from January 2014 to December 2018. We performed abdominal/chest CT for all of the patients. The criteria for ESD were superficial gastric neoplasms involving gastric adenoma suspected of being cancerous and differentiated type adenocarcinomas in situ or with slight invasion to the submucosa with no evidence of lymph node metastasis on preoperative CT (abdomen and chest).
We excluded 132 patients who did not undergo endoscopic follow-up observation within <1 year after ESD, 4 patients with gastric remnant cancer, and 13 patients who did not undergo R0 resection; finally, we included 369 patients (382 lesions) (Figure 1). This study did not include patients with gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes (e.g., gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach, familial adenomatous polyposis, and Juvenile polyposis syndrome).
The criteria for additional surgery after ESD were non-R0 resection corresponding to cancerous lesions with massive invasion to the submucosa deeper than 500 μm, being positive for lymphatic/vascular invasions, and positive vertical margin in ESD specimens.
This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan, for clinical research (Registration No. R23-3J). This study was conducted in compliance with the revised Helsinki Declaration (1989). Regarding the patients’ informed consent, as this study was retrospective, the documents approved by the ethics committee were posted on the hospital website. We disclosed the information about this study and provided the patients with an opportunity to refuse.

2.2. Methods

This retrospective cohort study extracted the following data from the patients’ electronic medical records and the endoscopy database: clinical findings (age, sex, body mass index, history of alcohol consumption, history of smoking), pre-ESD H. pylori infection status, endoscopic findings (location of initial neoplasm (U, upper part; M, middle part; L, lower part), presence of atrophic change [yes vs. no] and their scope), and histological findings (intestinal metaplasia, tumor size, histological type, invasion depth, R0 resection, synchronous multicentric cancers [yes vs. no]). Atrophy of gastric mucosa was determined by endoscopy was classified into three groups according to the Kimura and Takemoto classification as follows: no atrophy, closed type (mild), and open type (severe) [20].
This study included 369 patients with 382 SGEN lesions. Thirteen patients had two SGENs. A lesion with a larger diameter or deeper invasion was regarded as the initial SGENs for each of the thirteen patients.
We not only included patients with early gastric cancer in this study, but also included those with adenoma. According to Correa’s multi-stage cascade of gastric oncogenesis, prolonged mucosal inflammation causes changes in atrophy and intestinal metaplasia [21]. Further progression leads to low- or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Gastric adenoma is classified as low- or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in the Revised Vienna classification [22]. Gastric adenoma is an advanced precancerous lesion that may progress into invasive gastric cancer [21]. Previous studies showed that gastric adenomas occasionally coexist with mucosal gastric cancer and demonstrated neoplastic progression to invasive carcinomas [23,24]. Additionally, a recent study showed that 34% of gastric adenomas progressed to gastric cancer lesions in the period of follow-up [25]. We reported diagnostic difficulty in differentiating gastric adenoma from early gastric cancer [26]. Endoscopic resection for superficial gastric neoplasms can be performed safely and gastric adenomas are usually a good candidate for endoscopic resection in Japan. As mentioned previously, gastric adenomas have background gastric mucosa which has a high risk of developing metachronous cancer as with early gastric cancer. Therefore, we included cases of gastric adenomas in this study.
Regular endoscopic surveillance was performed after ESD every 6 months to 1 year. According to a study on MSGEN, secondary SGENs identified within 1 year after endoscopic treatment were defined as synchronous because synchronous multiple tumors might have been overlooked during the initial ESD. Thus, SGENs identified > 1 year after endoscopic treatment were defined as MSGENs [27].
Spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori was defined as having no history of H. pylori therapy and testing negative for H. pylori infection but having severe mucosal atrophy corresponding to open-type atrophic gastritis (the Kimura–Takemoto classification) [13,20].
To elucidate the relationship between post-ESD MSGENs and H. pylori eradication therapy, we additionally established a matched not-MSGEN (Mnot-MSGEN) group, which was matched with the MSGEN group according to the clinicopathological risk factors identified in this study, age, and sex. Subsequently, we performed a statistical analysis based on whether H. pylori therapy was performed (yes vs. no) and the age at which H. pylori therapy was performed.

2.3. Confirmation of H. pylori Status

Serum antibody testing (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) was performed for patients without H. pylori therapy before ESD. Moreover, the urea breath test (UBT; Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) was performed for patients with H. pylori therapy before ESD to identify infection at the time. A positive result in at least one of these tests was considered evidence of H. pylori infection. Post-ESD H. pylori therapy was performed on patients who tested positive for H. pylori infection. The primary H. pylori therapy method was performed using combination therapies using a proton pump inhibitor (PPI; Lansoprazole 60 mg [Takeda Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan]) or a potassium-competitive acid blocker (Vonoprazan 40 mg [Takeda Pharmaceutical]), and the two antibiotics Amoxicillin 1500 mg (Takeda Pharmaceutical) and Clarithromycin 400 mg (Takeda Pharmaceutical). The secondary H. pylori therapy method was applied in case the primary H. pylori therapy method had not been successful. The secondary H. pylori therapy method was performed as combination therapies using Lansoprazole 60 mg (Takeda Pharmaceutical) or Vonoprazan 40 mg (Takeda Pharmaceutical), and the two antibiotics, Amoxicillin 1500 mg (Takeda Pharmaceutical) and metronidazole 500 mg (Takeda Pharmaceutical). The success or failure of H. pylori therapy was evaluated after 4 to 6 months using UBT or serum antibody testing. We collected data regarding H. pylori status, including whether patients had a history of H. pylori therapy, from their medical records.

2.4. Histopathologic Analysis

We used the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma, 15th edition [28], to determine the histopathologic diagnosis of early gastric cancer, location (U; M, L, lower), cancerous histological type (Differentiated (tub1/tub2), Undifferentiated (por/sig), invasion depth (M, mucosal layer; SM, submucosal layer), ulcer (yes vs. no), and lymphatic/venous invasion. We defined early gastric cancer as the invasion being limited to the submucosa (SM). Gastric adenoma was classified into tub1 and mucosal cancer in this study. Histological intestinal metaplasia (yes vs. no) was determined using hematoxylin and eosin staining and periodic acid–Schiff staining of background mucosa in ESD specimens. One pathologist who has expertise in gastrointestinal tumors (H.Y.) diagnosed all pathologic findings.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

We performed statistical analysis designed to identify risk factors for the MSGEN group using the t-test/Mann–Whitney U test and the Chi-squared test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. We calculated the cumulative incidence of MSGENs using the Kaplan–Meier method in order to confirm the risks. The follow-up period was calculated from the day of the initial ESD. Regular endoscopic surveillance (every 6 months to 1 year) was performed after ESD; moreover, the follow-up period ended upon MSGENs occurrence. The incidence of MSGENs was analyzed using the person–years method. Univariate analysis was performed using the log-rank test; moreover, we longitudinally analyzed the relation between identified significant factors with significant and MSGEN development. Statistical significance was set at p-value < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20 (SPSS Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan).

3. Results

Table 1 shows the clinical findings for the 369 patients included. The median age (IQR) was 73 (67–79) years, and the male-to-female ratio was 2.3:1. There were 369 SGENs lesions, 66 histological adenoma lesions, and 303 adenocarcinoma lesions (M: 264 lesions, SM: 39 lesions) that underwent ESD. We found twenty-seven patients (27 lesions; 7.0%: two patients with adenomas, twenty-five patients with carcinoma) with post-ESD MSGENs. Eleven or 2/14 lesions of MSGEN were located in U, M/L parts. Table 2 shows the clinicopathological findings for the 342 and 27 patients in the not-MSGEN and MSGENs groups, respectively.
Table 2 demonstrates a comparison of clinicopathologic factors between the “not-MSGEN” and “MSGEN” groups. There was a significantly higher incidence of MSGENs in cases of histological intestinal metaplasia (HIM; p = 0.04) and initial neo-plasm location in the U or M parts (INUM; p = 0.04). There was also a significant difference between the locations (U or M/L) of the initial SGENs and MSGENs (10 or 13/4 vs. 11 or 2/14: p < 0.01).
Figure 2 shows the results of our analysis of the cumulative incidence of MSGENs using the Kaplan–Meier method. The median duration (IQR) from initial ESD to MSGENs was 95 (54–127) months. The shortest and longest durations from ESD to MSGENs detection were 18 months and 151 months, respectively.
Comparisons after classifying the 369 patients based on the HIM (yes vs. no) and the initial neoplasm location (U/M vs. L) revealed a significantly higher cumulative incidence in the HIM (p = 0.036) and INUM groups (p = 0.022) (Figure 3a and Figure 3b, respectively).
We extracted 27 patients from the not-MSGEN group and matched them to the MSGENs group according to HIM, INUM, age, sex, and histological type (i.e., Mnot-MSGEN group). Table 3 shows a comparison of the clinicopathologic factors between the Mnot-MSGENs and MSGENs groups. No significant between-group difference was found for variables unrelated to H. pylori therapy. Regarding H. pylori therapy, there was no significant between-group difference in the age at the time of H. pylori therapy (p = 0.261). All H. pylori-positive patients received successful H. pylori therapy. Compared with the Mnot-MSGENs group, the MSGENs group had a significantly higher number of patients with spontaneous disappearances of H. pylori (i.e., patients who have no history of H. pylori therapy and negative tests for H. pylori infection but severe atrophy of their gastric mucosa) (p = 0.003).
Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 show some representative cases of post-ESD MSGENs. There is a depressed lesion (0-IIc) measuring 12 mm in diameter and presenting a reddish coloration associated with a marginal elevation in the lesser curvature of the upper (U) part (Figure 4a,b). In the region surrounding the depressed lesion, there are granular mucosal changes (indicated by the dashed line in Figure 5a) and atrophic changes over a wide area that is associated with a visible vascular pattern, which are consistent with the endoscopic appearance of intestinal metaplasia (Figure 5a). Histological findings identified in the ESD specimens indicated differentiated adenocarcinoma (tub1) localized within the mucosa; moreover, both vascular invasion and the resection stump were negative, which indicated complete curative resection (Figure 5b).
Figure 6 shows endoscopic images of an MSGEN which developed 37 months after ESD in the same patient that can be seen in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The endoscopic images show a slightly elevated (0-IIa) 7 mm lesion in the angle of the lesser curvature of the stomach. It was difficult to identify in the observation under white light endoscopy since it had unclear borders. Indigocarmine chromoendoscopy made the borders clear, which allowed for it to be identified as a slightly elevated lesion. The histology of the ESD resection sample showed differentiated adenocarcinoma (tub1) confined to the mucosal layer; moreover, it was negative for both vascular invasion and resection margins, which indicated complete curative resection (R0 resection).

4. Discussion

Our findings suggest that HIM and INUM are independent clinicopathological risk factors for MSGENs in patients who underwent ESD for SGENs. This is because the patients with the factors have a significantly higher cumulative incidence of MSGENs compared to those without the factors. After group-matching according to these two risk factors, our analysis revealed a significant association between development of MSGENs and the spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori.
Our identified risk factors, HIM and INUM, will be influenced by long-term H. pylori infection [29] because HIM could be caused by decreased gastric motility and increased intestinal fluid reflux due to long-term H. pylori infection [30]. Although we utilized histological confirmation, intestinal metaplasia can be diagnosed with a high accuracy by using magnification endoscopy or image enhanced endoscopy such as linked color imaging [31,32]. This suggests that the degree of risk for developing MSGENs can be estimated by endoscopic inspection.
Regarding the other risk factor, INUM, there is a strong association with atrophic mucosa, a precancerous condition, which may develop over a wide area from the middle (M) to the upper (U) part surrounding the initial SGEN lesion. A longer period of H. pylori infection is related to the greater expansion of mucosal atrophy. Consequently, a greater expansion of atrophic mucosa can bring a higher risk of cancer development [33]. This suggests that a greater expansion of atrophic mucosa may be associated with the higher risk of MSGENs onset after ESD.
Studies have shown that severe atrophic changes (i.e., wide expansion of atrophic mucosa) could also increase the risk of initial gastric cancer onset [34,35,36,37,38]. This could be attributed to the chronic inflammation related to H. pylori infection causing the accumulation of various DNA methylation abnormalities, with the degree being correlated to the risk of gastric cancer onset [39,40]. Additionally, the mucosa remaining after ESD in patients with gastric cancer who have accumulated DNA methylation abnormalities caused by chronic inflammation could be at high risk of cancer onset. Our finding on HIM/INUM and previous studies’ results suggest that severe atrophic changes may be a risk factor for the initial onset of both SGENs and MSGENs.
International research showed that the spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori is associated with a high risk of initial gastric cancer onset [13,40]. This study showed that the spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori was significantly associated with the development of MSGENs after ESD. In this study, all nine of the patients with spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori had the most severe open-type (grade O3) atrophic gastritis. Although the grades of gastric mucosal atrophy (no/closed/open) were not significantly different according to the frequencies of the development of MSGENs, the most severe atrophic gastritis (grade O3) in the spontaneous disappearance cases may generate a strong effect on the significant differences in the MSGENs (4% vs. 33%). This is because the most severe atrophic gastritis (grade O3) results in very long-term continuous chronic inflammation, which results in highly advanced DNA methylation abnormalities that could contribute to the onset of MSGENs in this study.
Considering the risk factors identified in this study and the accumulation of DNA methylation, H. pylori eradication therapy could contribute to reducing the risk of developing initial gastric cancer [33] as well as reducing the risk of MSGENs onset [4] following ESD. Although H. pylori therapy has been widely used across the world, a recent systematic review demonstrated that there was no significant decrease in the overall infection rates of H. pylori in the periods between 2000–2008 and 2009–2016, with the rates being 46.8% and 44.9%, respectively [41]. Therefore, H. pylori eradication therapy should be performed in SGEN patients who have been proven to be positive for H. pylori infection as soon as possible. Earlier eradication in H. pylori-positive patients before the development of atrophic gastritis may facilitate the prevention of post-ESD MSGENs.
According to this study, the median period for the onset of multiple tumors was 95 months; moreover, the longest amount of time was 151 months, which is over 12 years. Since 18 patients underwent ESD for MSGENs during the observation period in this study, MSGENs onset can occur even >12 years after ESD. This suggests that we should perform surveillance endoscopies after ESD over long periods of time 10 years.
A large-scale study showed that more than 95% of metachronous multiple gastric cancers can be treated with endoscopic resection by follow-up through annual endoscopic surveillance [42]. In this study, regular endoscopic surveillance was performed after ESD every six months or once a year. Twenty-seven MSGENs were detected as being adenoma (n = 2) or intramucosal adenocarcinomas of differentiated type (n = 25), and we achieved curative resections for all of the MSGENs by ESD. Thus, endoscopic surveillance at least once a year will be acceptable for patients who received ESD for SGENs. Particularly for the patients with significant risk factors suggested in this study, endoscopic surveillance every six months may be favorable.
This study has several limitations. First, this was a single-center retrospective study with a relatively small number of patients with MSGENs. Moreover, the number of MSGEN cases was too small to perform matched analysis. The small number of cases may affect the statistical power of the analysis and the validity of the results. Therefore, this study’s results need to be confirmed by a further large-scale multicenter study. Second, it was difficult to survey the time frame for the establishment of the H. pylori infection even though this could have been achieved by conducting a follow-up survey; therefore, it was impossible to accurately assess the period of infection. Third, we did not have a biopsy protocol for assessing the extent of atrophic gastritis/HIM in the non-neoplastic gastric mucosa and a pepsinogen test was only performed for some of the patients to estimate the degree of gastric mucosal atrophy. Fourth, we did not measure the accumulation of DNA methylation abnormalities. Fifth, we did not evaluate other associations with the development of MSGENs such as genetic predispositions (e.g., CDH-1 gene mutation in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer and APC exon 1B mutations in gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis) and dietary factors (nitrate or nitrite, pickled vegetables, and salted fish), and comorbidities (e.g., asbestos and EBV infection) [43]. Sixth, the identified risk factors for HIM, INUM, and the spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori can be putative confounders for each other because all of them are closely associated with severe atrophic gastritis and long-term H. pylori infection. Finally, regarding the secondary endpoint, we only performed a χ2 test in the comparison of cumulative incidences of MSGEN between the two patient groups (with/without spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori). This is because two Kaplan–Meier curves of cumulative incidences of MSGEN in the two patient groups (with/without spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori) crossed. When two Kaplan–Meier curves cross each other, it may have be difficult to use the log-rank test and hazard ratio to properly assess the difference between the two groups. Although the studies proposed special tests for the crossed Kaplan–Meier curves, the evidence level will now be low [44,45]. The aforementioned small number of patients who experienced the spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori (n = 10) may affect that the two Kaplan–Meier curves crossed and unavailability to use the statistical analysis.
In conclusion, this study suggested that HIM and INUM were independent clinicopathological risk factors for developing MSGENs after ESD for SGENs. Additionally, the spontaneous disappearance of H. pylori may be a risk factor for MSGENs in the ESD patients who have HIM and INUM. A larger prospective trial with long-term follow-up is warranted to validate the three risk factors in clinical practice to overcome the limitations of this study.

Author Contributions

Conception and design, K.G.; analysis and interpretation of the data, T.S. (Tsunehiro Suzuki), A.K., M.I., S.Y., T.Y., M.K. (Masayuki Kondo), M.K. (Mimari Kanazawa), Y.K., T.T. and K.A.; drafting of the article, T.S. (Tsunehiro Suzuki), K.G. and H.Y.; critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, K.G., A.Y., T.S. (Takeshi Sugaya), K.T. and H.M.; final approval of the article, K.G. and A.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Dokkyo Medical University (Registration No. R23-3J and date of approval: 25 June 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

As this study was retrospective, the documents approved by the ethics committee were posted on the hospital website. We disclosed the information about this study and provided the patients with an opportunity to refuse.

Data Availability Statement

Data is unavailable due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Ishida M, Iizuka S, and Nishimoto M (Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University) for their technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Freddie, B.; Jacques, F.; Isabelle, S.; Rebbeca, L.; Lindsey, A.; Ahmedin, J. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ono, H.; Yao, K.; Fujishiro, M.; Oda, I.; Uedo, N.; Nimura, S.; Yahagi, N.; Iishi, H.; Oka, M.; Ajioka, Y.; et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer (second edition). Dig. Endosc. 2021, 33, 4–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shiotani, A.; Haruma, K.; Graham, D.Y. Metachronous gastric cancer after successful Helicobacter pylori eradication. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 11552–11559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fukase, K.; Kato, M.; Kikuchi, S.; Inoue, K.; Uemura, N.; Okamoto, S.; Terao, S.; Amagai, K.; Hayashi, S.; Asaka, M. Effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori on incidence of metachronous gastric carcinoma after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: An open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2008, 372, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Maehata, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Fujisawa, K.; Esaki, M.; Moriyama, T.; Asano, K.; Fuyuno, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Egashira, I.; Kim, H.; et al. Long-term effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on the development of metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012, 75, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Choi, J.; Kim, S.G.; Yoon, H.; Im, J.P.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, W.H.; Jung, H.C. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori after endoscopic resection of gastric tumors does not reduce incidence of metachronous gastric carcinoma. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 12, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Choi, I.J.; Kook, M.C.; Kim, Y.I.; Cho, S.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, C.G.; Park, B.; Nam, B.H. Helicobacter pylori therapy for the prevention of metachronous gastric cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 1085–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yoo, H.W.; Hong, S.J.; Kim, S.H. Helicobacter pylori treatment and gastric cancer risk after en-doscopic resection of dysplasia: A nationwide cohort study. Gastroenterology 2023, 166, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Noh, C.K.; Lee, E.; Park, B.; Lim, S.G.; Shin, S.J.; Lee, K.M.; Lee, G.H. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment on meta-chronous gastric neoplasm prevention following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenoma. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kato, M.; Nishida, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Hayashi, S.; Kitamura, S.; Yabuta, T.; Yoshio, T.; Nakamura, T.; Komori, M.; Kawai, N.; et al. Scheduled endoscopic surveillance controls secondary cancer after curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study by Osaka University ESD study group. Gut 2013, 62, 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ono, S.; Kato, M.; Suzuki, M.; Ishigaki, S.; Takahashi, M.; Haneda, M.; Mabe, K.; Shimizu, Y. Frequency of Helicobacter pylori-negative gastric cancer and gastric mucosal atrophy in a Japanese endoscopic submucosal dissection series including histological, endoscopic and serological atrophy. Digestion 2012, 86, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Boda, T.; Ito, M.; Yoshihara, M.; Kitamura, Y.; Matsuo, T.; Oka, S.; Tanaka, S.; Chayama, K. Advanced method for evaluating of gastric cancer risk by serum marker: Determination of true low-risk subjects for gastric neoplasia. Helicobacter 2013, 19, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kishikawa, H.; Ojiro, K.; Nakamura, K.; Katayama, T.; Arahata, K.; Takarabe, S.; Miura, S.; Kanai, T.; Nishida, J. Previous Helicobacter pylori infection–induced atrophic gastritis: A distinct disease entity in an understudied population without a history of eradication. Helicobacter 2020, 25, e12669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ikeda, F.; Shikata, K.; Hata, J.; Fukuhara, M.; Hirakawa, Y.; Ohara, T.; Mukai, N.; Nagata, M.; Yoshida, D.; Yonemoto, K.; et al. Combination of Helicobacter pylori antibody and serum pepsinogen as a good predictive tool of gastric cancer incidence: 20-year prospective data from the Hisayama study. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 26, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Watabe, H.; Mitsushima, T.; Yamaji, Y.; Okamoto, M.; Wada, R.; Kokubo, T.; Doi, H.; Yoshida, H.; Kawabe, T.; Omata, M. Predicting the development of gastric cancer from combining Helicobacter pylori antibodies and serum pepsinogen status: A prospective endoscopic cohort study. Gut 2005, 54, 764–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yamaji, Y.; Watabe, H.; Yoshida, H.; Kawabe, T.; Wada, R.; Mitsushima, T.; Omata, M. High-risk population for gastric cancer development based on serum pepsinogen status and lifestyle factors. Helicobacter 2009, 14, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ohata, H.; Kitauchi, S.; Yoshimura, N.; Mugitani, K.; Iwane, M.; Nakamura, H.; Yoshikawa, A.; Yanaoka, K.; Arii, K.; Tamai, H.; et al. Progression of chronic atrophic gastritis associated with Helicobacter pylori infection increases risk of gastric cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 109, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kaji, K.; Hashiba, A.; Uotani, C.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Ueno, T.; Ohno, K.; Takabatake, I.; Wakabayashi, T.; Doyama, H.; Ninomiya, I.; et al. Grading of atrophic gastritis is useful for risk stratification in endoscopic screening for gastric cancer. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 114, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Take, S.; Mizuno, M.; Ishiki, K.; Yoshida, T.; Ohara, N.; Yokota, K.; Oguma, K.; Okada, H.; Yamamoto, K. The long-term risk of gastric cancer after the successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori. J. Gastrotenterol. 2011, 46, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kimura, K.; Takemoto, T. An endoscopic recognition of the atrophic border and its significance in chronic gastritis. Endoscopy 1969, 1, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Correa, P. Human gastric carcinogenesis: A multistep and multifactorial process—First American Cancer Society award lecture on cancer epidemiology and prevention. Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 6735–6740. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dixon, M.F. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited. Gut 2002, 51, 130–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kamiya, T.; Morishita, T.; Asakura, H.; Miura, S.; Munakata, Y.; Tsuchiya, M. Long-term follow-up study on gastric adenoma and its relation to gastric protruded carcinoma. Cancer 1982, 50, 2496–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rugge, M.; Cassaro, M.; Di Mario, F.; Leo, G.; Leandro, G.; Russo, V.M.; Pennelli, G.; Farinati, F. The long term outcome of gastric non-invasive neoplasia. Gut 2003, 52, 1111–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Okamoto, Y.; Kanzaki, H.; Tanaka, T.; Sakae, H.; Abe, M.; Iwamuro, M.; Kawano, S.; Kawahara, Y.; Okada, H. Gastric Adenoma: A High Incidence Rate of Developing Carcinoma and Risk of Metachronous Gastric Cancer according to Long-Term Follow-Up. Digestion 2021, 102, 878–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tamai, N.; Kaise, M.; Nakayoshi, T.; Katoh, M.; Sumiyama, K.; Gohda, K.; Yamasaki, T.; Arakawa, H.; Tajiri, H. Clinical and endoscopic characterization of depressed gastric adenoma. Endoscopy 2006, 38, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mori, G.; Nakajima, T.; Asada, K.; Shimazu, T.; Yamamichi, N.; Maekita, T.; Yokoi, C.; Fujishiro, M.; Gotoda, T.; Ichinose, M.; et al. Incidence of and risk factors for metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection and successful Helicobacter pylori eradication: Results of a large-scale, multicenter cohort study in Japan. Gastric Cancer 2016, 19, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma, 15th ed.; Kanehara & Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kodama, M.; Murakami, K.; Okimoto, T.; Abe, H.; Sato, R.; Ogawa, R.; Mizukami, K.; Shiota, S.; Nakagawa, Y.; Soma, W.; et al. Histological characteristics of gastric mucosa prior to Helicobacter pylori eradication may predict gastric cancer. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 48, 1249–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lahner, E.; Carabotti, M.; Annibale, B. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in atrophic gastritis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 24, 2373–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Uedo, N.; Ishihara, R.; Iishi, H.; Yamada, T.; Imanaka, K.; Takeuchi, Y.; Higashino, K.; Ishiguro, S.; Tatsuta, M. A new method of diagnosing gastric intestinal metaplasia: Narrowband imaging with magnifying endoscopy. Endoscopy 2006, 38, 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ono, S.; Kato, M.; Tsuda, M.; Miyamoto, S.; Abiko, S.; Shimizu, Y.; Sakamoto, N. Lavender Color in Linked Color Imaging Enables Noninvasive Detection of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia. Digestion 2018, 98, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Uemura, N.; Okamoto, S.; Yamamoto, S.; Matsumura, N.; Yamaguchi, S.; Yamakido, M.; Taniyama, K.; Sasaki, N.; Schlemper, R.J. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 345, 784–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Correa, P. Helicobacter pylori and gastric carcinogenesis. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1995, 19, S37–S43. [Google Scholar]
  35. Take, S.; Mizuno, M.; Ishiki, K.; Nagahara, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Yokota, K.; Oguma, K. Baseline gastric mucosal atrophy is a risk factor associated with the development of gastric cancer after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in patients with peptic ulcer diseases. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007, 42, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sakitani, K.; Hirata, Y.; Watabe, H.; Yamada, A.; Sugimoto, T.; Yamaji, Y.; Yoshida, H.; Maeda, S.; Omata, M.; Koike, K. Gastric cancer risk according to the distribution of intestinal metaplasia and neutrophil infiltration. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011, 26, 1570–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Parisa, K.; Farhad, I.; Sharmila, A.; Neal, D.F.; Frain, K. Gastric cancer: Descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2014, 23, 700–713. [Google Scholar]
  38. Asada, K.; Nakajima, T.; Shimazu, T.; Yamamichi, N.; Maekita, T.; Yokoi, C.; Oda, I.; Ando, T.; Yoshida, T.; Nanjo, S.; et al. Demonstration of the usefulness of epigenetic cancer risk prediction by a multicentre prospective cohort study. Gut 2015, 64, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yamaguchi, Y.; Nagata, Y.; Hiratsuka, R.; Kawase, Y.; Tominaga, T.; Takeuchi, S.; Sakagami, S.; Ishida, S. Gastric cancer screening by combined assay for serum anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody and serum pepsinogen levels—The ABC method. Digestion 2016, 93, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. IARC Helicobacter pylori Working Group. Helicobacter pylori Eradication as a Strategy for Preventing Gastric Cancer; IARC Working Group Reports, No. 8; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zamani, M.; Ebrahimtabar, F.; Zamani, V.; Miller, W.H.; Alizadeh-Navaei, R.; Shokri-Shirvani, J.; Derakhshan, M.H. Systematic review with meta-analysis: The worldwide prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 47, 868–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nakajima, T.; Oda, I.; Gotoda, T.; Hamanaka, H.; Eguchi, T.; Yokoi, C.; Saito, D. Metachronous gastric cancers after endoscopic resection: How effective is annual endoscopic surveillance? Gastric Cancer 2006, 9, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Carneiro, F.; Fukayama, M.; Grabsch, H.I.; Yasui, W. Gastric adenocarcinoma. In WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumors, 5th ed.; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2019; Volume 1, pp. 85–95. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dormuth, I.; Liu, T.; Xu, J.; Yu, M.; Pauly, M.; Ditzhaus, M. Which test for crossing survival curves? A user’s guideline. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2022, 30, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zheng, S.; Wang, D.; Qiu, J.; Chen, T.; Gamalo, M. A win ratio approach for comparing crossing survival curves in clinical trials. J. Biopharm. Stat. 2023, 33, 488–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 13 01587 g001
Figure 1. Flowchart of study patients.
Figure 1. Flowchart of study patients.
Jcm 13 01587 g001
Jcm 13 01587 g002
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier analysis for the cumulative incidence of MSGEN after ESD.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier analysis for the cumulative incidence of MSGEN after ESD.
Jcm 13 01587 g002
Jcm 13 01587 g003
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier analysis for the cumulative incidence of MSGEN by histological intestinal metaplasia (a), and location of initial SGEN (b). (a): Histological intestinal metaplasia (presence vs. absence). (b): Location of initial SEGN (U/M vs. L).
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier analysis for the cumulative incidence of MSGEN by histological intestinal metaplasia (a), and location of initial SGEN (b). (a): Histological intestinal metaplasia (presence vs. absence). (b): Location of initial SEGN (U/M vs. L).
Jcm 13 01587 g003
Jcm 13 01587 g004
Figure 4. Initially developed early gastric cancer (tub 1, white arrows in (b). Endoscopic images of white light endoscopy (a) and indigocarmine chromoendoscopy (b) which were taken prior to the initial ESD.
Figure 4. Initially developed early gastric cancer (tub 1, white arrows in (b). Endoscopic images of white light endoscopy (a) and indigocarmine chromoendoscopy (b) which were taken prior to the initial ESD.
Jcm 13 01587 g004
Jcm 13 01587 g005
Figure 5. (a) Endoscopic images of intestinal metaplasia (granular surface within the white dashed line) found around the initially developed early gastric cancer (white arrows). (b) Histological findings at the boundary of the peritumor region of intestinal metaplasia and the early gastric cancer (the extent of well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma in the mucosal layer indicated by black arrows).
Figure 5. (a) Endoscopic images of intestinal metaplasia (granular surface within the white dashed line) found around the initially developed early gastric cancer (white arrows). (b) Histological findings at the boundary of the peritumor region of intestinal metaplasia and the early gastric cancer (the extent of well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma in the mucosal layer indicated by black arrows).
Jcm 13 01587 g005
Jcm 13 01587 g006
Figure 6. Endoscopic images of MSGEN, early gastric cancer (tub 1), which developed in the same patient as seen in Figure 4 and Figure 5. Endoscopic images of white light endoscopy (a) and indigocarmine chromoendoscopy ((b): white arrows indicating the early cancer lesion) taken prior to the second ESD.
Figure 6. Endoscopic images of MSGEN, early gastric cancer (tub 1), which developed in the same patient as seen in Figure 4 and Figure 5. Endoscopic images of white light endoscopy (a) and indigocarmine chromoendoscopy ((b): white arrows indicating the early cancer lesion) taken prior to the second ESD.
Jcm 13 01587 g006
Table 1. Characteristics of patients and lesions.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients and lesions.
Sex, Male: Female; n (%)257 (70):112 (30)
Age, median (IQR)73 (67–79)
Adenoma: adenocarcinoma, n (%)66 (18): 303 (82)
Size of initial SGENs: mm,
median (IQR)		15 (10–23)
Location of initial SGENs
U:M:L, n (%)		88 (24):133 (36):148 (40)
MSGENs, n (%)27 (7.1)
Location of MSGENs
U:M:L, n (%)		11 (41):2 (7):14 (52)
IQR, interquartile range; SGENs, superficial gastric epithelial neoplasms; U/M/L; the upper/middle/lower area; MSGENs, metachronous superficial gastric epithelial neoplasms.
Table 2. Comparison of clinicopathologic factors between the “not-MSGEN” and “MSGEN” group.
Table 2. Comparison of clinicopathologic factors between the “not-MSGEN” and “MSGEN” group.
FindingsNot-MSGEN
n = 342		MSGEN
n = 27		p
Age, years; median (IQR)73 (66–78)77 (72–81)0.20 #
Sex, male/female; n235/10722/50.32 †
Body mass index, median (IQR)24 (21–26)24 (20–26)0.35 ‡
Alcohol drinking, n (%)141 (41)12 (44)0.84 †
Smoking, n (%)181 (53)13 (48)0.29 †
Gastric mucosal atrophy (no/closed/open)10/29/3030/0/270.24 †
Histological intestinal metaplasia (HIM), n (%)279 (82)27 (100)0.04 †
Hp infection, current/past or negative, n (%)213 (62)/102 (30) or 27 (8)16 (59)/2 (7) or 9 (34)0.05 †
Location of initial SGENs (U, M/L)78, 120/14410, 13/40.04 †
Histologic type (differentiated/undifferentiated) *330/1227/00.08 †
Size, mm; median (IQR)15 (10–23)12 (10–19)0.08 #
Depth of initial tumor, M/SM305/3725/20.44 †
Ulcer (−/+)310/3223/40.50 †
Lymphovascular invasion (−/+)342/027/00.78 †
Vessel invasion (−/+)342/027/00.97 †
IQR, interquartile range; Hp, Helicobacter pylori; SGENs, superficial gastric epithelial neoplasms; U/M/L, the upper/middle/lower parts; M/SM, mucosal/submucosal layers. * Adenoma classified into differentiated cancer (tub1) and tumor depth of M; † χ2 test; ‡ t-test; # Mann–Whitney U-test.
Table 3. Comparison of clinicopathologic factors between adjusted “Mnot-MSGEN” and “MSGEN” groups.
Table 3. Comparison of clinicopathologic factors between adjusted “Mnot-MSGEN” and “MSGEN” groups.
FindingsMnot-MSGEN
n = 27		MSGEN
n = 27		p
Age, years; median (IQR)70 (66–78)77 (72–81)0.29 #
Sex, male/female; n23/422/50.72 †
Body mass index, median (IQR)23 (17–30)24 (20–226)0.76 ‡
Alcohol drinking, n (%)10 (37)12 (44)0.31 †
Smoking, n (%)16 (59)13 (48)0.26 †
Gastric mucosal atrophy (no/closed/open)3/1/230/0/270.06 †
Histological intestinal metaplasia (HIM), n (%)21 (78)27 (100)0.09 †
Hp infection, current/past or negative, n (%)19 (70)/7 (26) or 1 (4)16 (59)/2 (7) or 9 (34)0.45 †
Location of initial SGENs (U, M/L)8, 10/910, 13/40.21 †
Histologic type (differentiated/undifferentiated) *25/227/00.49 †
Size, mm; median (IQR)15 (10–23)12 (10–19)0.57 #
Depth of initial tumor, M/SM26/125/20.09 †
Ulcer (−/+) 24/323/40.69 †
Lyphovascular invasion (−/+) 27/027/0-
Vessel invasion (−/+) 27/027/0-
Synchronous SGEN, n (%)0 (0.0)2 (7.4)0.07 †
Age of Hp therapy, years (IQR)73 (63–82)70 (63–77)0.261 ‡
Spontaneous disappearance of Hp, n (%) **1 (4)9 (33)0.003 †
IQR, interquartile range; Hp, Helicobacter pylori; SGENs, superficial gastric epithelial neoplasms; U/M/L, the upper/middle/lower parts; M/SM, mucosal/submucosal layers. * Adenoma classified into differentiated cancer (tub1) and tumor depth of M; ** Hp-negative patients with no history of Hp therapy but having severe atrophy; † χ2 test; ‡ t-test; # Mann–Whitney U-test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suzuki, T.; Goda, K.; Ishikawa, M.; Yamaguchi, S.; Yoshinaga, T.; Kondo, M.; Kanazawa, M.; Kunogi, Y.; Tanaka, T.; Kanamori, A.; et al. Risk Factors for Developing Metachronous Superficial Gastric Epithelial Neoplasms after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061587

AMA Style

Suzuki T, Goda K, Ishikawa M, Yamaguchi S, Yoshinaga T, Kondo M, Kanazawa M, Kunogi Y, Tanaka T, Kanamori A, et al. Risk Factors for Developing Metachronous Superficial Gastric Epithelial Neoplasms after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(6):1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061587

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suzuki, Tsunehiro, Kenichi Goda, Manabu Ishikawa, Shintaro Yamaguchi, Tomonori Yoshinaga, Masayuki Kondo, Mimari Kanazawa, Yasuhito Kunogi, Takanao Tanaka, Akira Kanamori, and et al. 2024. "Risk Factors for Developing Metachronous Superficial Gastric Epithelial Neoplasms after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 6: 1587. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061587

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop