Next Article in Journal
Estetrol Inhibits the Prostate Cancer Tumor Stimulators FSH and IGF-1
Previous Article in Journal
Resting Energy Expenditure in Patients with Extreme Obesity: Comparison of the Harris–Benedict Equation with Indirect Calorimetry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Operating Table Height on the Difficulty of Mask Ventilation and Laryngoscopic View

1
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
2
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
3
Department of Anesthesiology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(19), 5994; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195994
Submission received: 25 August 2024 / Revised: 1 October 2024 / Accepted: 4 October 2024 / Published: 8 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Anesthesiology)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Airway management techniques, including mask ventilation and tracheal intubation, are vital across medical settings. However, these procedures can be challenging, especially when environmental conditions are less than ideal. This study explores how the height of the operating table affects the difficulty of anesthesia techniques involving mask ventilation and tracheal intubation. Methods: Twenty anesthesiologists participated in this study. We assessed the difficulty of procedures such as mask ventilation, Macintosh laryngoscopy, and video laryngoscopy using McGRATH and AWS, on a four-level scale. The operating table’s height was adjusted at four points: the operator’s umbilicus, the inferior margin of the 12th rib, the xiphoid process, and the nipple. Results: Mask ventilation was easiest at the operating table’s height aligned with the inferior margin of the 12th rib. Conversely, direct laryngoscopic exposure was perceived as easier at higher table heights, with nipple height being optimal. The McGRATH laryngoscopy showed consistent difficulty across table heights, whereas the AWS tended to be somewhat more difficult at greater heights. Conclusions: The optimal bed height for video laryngoscopy coincided with that for mask ventilation. Video laryngoscopy offers enhanced flexibility in optimal patient positioning compared to Macintosh laryngoscopy, contributing to its advantages in tracheal intubation procedures.
Keywords: airway management; mask ventilation; laryngoscopic view; operating table height airway management; mask ventilation; laryngoscopic view; operating table height

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ikeda, T.; Miyoshi, H.; Xia, G.-Q.; Kido, K.; Sumii, A.; Watanabe, T.; Kamiya, S.; Narasaki, S.; Kato, T.; Tsutsumi, Y.M. Impact of Operating Table Height on the Difficulty of Mask Ventilation and Laryngoscopic View. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5994. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195994

AMA Style

Ikeda T, Miyoshi H, Xia G-Q, Kido K, Sumii A, Watanabe T, Kamiya S, Narasaki S, Kato T, Tsutsumi YM. Impact of Operating Table Height on the Difficulty of Mask Ventilation and Laryngoscopic View. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(19):5994. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195994

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ikeda, Tsuyoshi, Hirotsugu Miyoshi, Guo-Qiang Xia, Kenshiro Kido, Ayako Sumii, Tomoyuki Watanabe, Satoshi Kamiya, Soshi Narasaki, Takahiro Kato, and Yasuo M. Tsutsumi. 2024. "Impact of Operating Table Height on the Difficulty of Mask Ventilation and Laryngoscopic View" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 19: 5994. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195994

APA Style

Ikeda, T., Miyoshi, H., Xia, G.-Q., Kido, K., Sumii, A., Watanabe, T., Kamiya, S., Narasaki, S., Kato, T., & Tsutsumi, Y. M. (2024). Impact of Operating Table Height on the Difficulty of Mask Ventilation and Laryngoscopic View. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(19), 5994. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195994

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop