Next Article in Journal
Sonographic Features of Onychopapilloma: A Single Center Retrospective Observational Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Putative Role of Neuroinflammation in the Interaction between Traumatic Brain Injuries, Sleep, Pain and Other Neuropsychiatric Outcomes: A State-of-the-Art Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/jcm12051794
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Prognostic Significance of Early Glycemic Profile in Acute Ischemic Stroke Depends on Stroke Subtype

by
Paola Forti
1,2,*,† and
Fabiola Maioli
3,†
1
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
2
Division of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
3
Department of Integrated Health Care, Maggiore Hospital, 40133 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(5), 1794; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051794
Submission received: 25 January 2023 / Revised: 16 February 2023 / Accepted: 19 February 2023 / Published: 23 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
It is still unclear whether early glycemic profile after admission for acute ischemic stroke (IS) has the same prognostic significance in patients with lacunar and non-lacunar infarction. Data from 4011 IS patients admitted to a Stroke Unit (SU) were retrospectively analyzed. Lacunar IS was diagnosed by clinical criteria. A continuous indicator of early glycemic profile was calculated as the difference of fasting serum glucose (FSG) measured within 48 h after admission and random serum glucose (RSG) measured on admission. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association with a combined poor outcome defined as early neurological deterioration, severe stroke at SU discharge, or 1-month mortality. Among patients without hypoglycemia (RSG and FSG > 3.9 mmol/L), an increasing glycemic profile increased the likelihood of a poor outcome for non-lacunar (OR, 1.38, 95%CI, 1.24–1.52 in those without diabetes; 1.11, 95%CI, 1.05–1.18 in those with diabetes) but not for lacunar IS. Among patients without sustained or delayed hyperglycemia (FSG < 7.8 mmol/L), an increasing glycemic profile was unrelated to outcome for non-lacunar IS but decreased the likelihood of poor outcome for lacunar IS (OR, 0.63, 95%CI, 0.41–0.98). Early glycemic profile after acute IS has a different prognostic significance in non-lacunar and lacunar patients.

1. Introduction

A transitory hyperglycemia is frequent in the earliest phase of ischemic stroke (IS) as a part of the acute stress reaction [1]. In IS patients, admission hyperglycemia has a robust association with infarct size, initial clinical severity, neurological worsening, and short-term outcome [1,2]. Although a causal association is still unproven, some evidence suggests that hyperglycemia can worsen brain damage by fueling inflammatory mechanisms in the hypoperfused, but still potentially salvageable, area around the ischemic core (penumbra), thus exacerbating reperfusion injury [1].
Lacunar stroke is thought to have a more favorable outcome than other IS subtypes because of its very low acute mortality, but up to 30% of lacunar patients actually develop early neurological deterioration that often leads to important disability [3,4]. Lacunar stroke, being typically caused by the occlusion of small perforating end arteries, usually lacks an ischemic penumbra [4,5]. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that admission hyperglycemia might be unrelated to short-term outcome of lacunar IS or even be beneficial by providing readily available fuel for the viable brain tissue around the ischemic core [6,7]. However, available clinical cohort studies of this issue are few, inconsistent, and based on a single glucose measurement [8,9,10,11]. In acute IS patients without diabetes, stroke onset is usually accompanied by a moderate glycemia increase (<10 mmol/L) followed by a physiological decrease within the subsequent 24 h [12]. However, persistent and delayed hyperglycemia within the first 48 h after stroke can also occur, and these glycemic trajectories seem to have a stronger association with poor short-term outcomes of IS than a single glycemic measure on admission [13,14].
Spontaneous hypoglycemia is also a known predictor of adverse short-term outcomes in both critical [15] and non-critical [16] inpatients but has received small attention by stroke researchers, because it is thought to be a rare occurrence on admission for acute IS [17]. In particular, it is unknown whether its prognostic significance is affected by IS subtype.
In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated whether IS subtype affects the association between early glycemic profile and short-term stroke outcome.

2. Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective, observational single-center study based on a cohort of 4052 IS patients aged ≥18 years who, between January 2006 and December 2018, were consecutively admitted to the Emergency Department of the Maggiore Hospital (Bologna, Italy) within 24 h after symptom onset and subsequently transferred to the local Stroke Unit (SU). At SU admission, written informed consent for future research use of all data included in their medical records was sought from patients or their legally authorized representatives. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Maggiore Hospital Ethics Committee approved the study (approval number CE16092). The dataset is not publicly available due to privacy reasons, but data in anonymized form are available on request from the corresponding author.
All patients had at least one CT-head scan at hospital admission. IS was classified as lacunar if presenting with one of the five classic lacunar syndromes (pure motor hemiparesis, sensorimotor stroke, ataxic hemiparesis, pure sensory syndrome, and dysarthria-clumsy hand syndrome) [18]. Neuroimaging evidence of lacunar infarction was defined as a subcortical brain infarct <15 mm [4] on CT or MRI. Non-lacunar IS included large artery atherosclerosis, cardioembolic, and other or unknown etiologies as determined at the time of the patient’s discharge [19]. Patients were treated according to standard guidelines for management of acute stroke, which recommend avoidance of intravenous fluids containing glucose and set the glucose target for glycemic control between 7.8 and 10.0 mmol/L [20]. Information about demographic, medical characteristics, and stroke outcome was obtained from medical records.
Random serum glucose (RSG) was measured at the Emergency Department, usually within 3 h of admission. Fasting serum glucose (FSG) and glycated hemoglobin ((HbA1c), Diabetes Control and Complications Trial aligned results) were determined the morning after SU admission (median time after admission, 24 h; range, 12–48 h) as a part of the routine biochemistry tests performed on venous blood samples drawn after an overnight fast. All measurements were performed using automated methods at the same central laboratory. Hyperglycemia was defined as serum glucose ≥ 7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL), corresponding to the standard threshold for treatment in acute stroke [20]. Hypoglycemia was defined as serum glucose < 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL), corresponding to the standard glucose alert value in clinical practice [21].
Diabetes was defined as pre-admission diagnosis (self-report, evidence from available medical records, or use of antidiabetic agents), new diagnosis made during SU stay, or retrospective diagnosis based on admission HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol) [22]. Although not fully concordant with traditional blood glucose criteria [23], HbA1c is a convenient choice for diabetes screening in acute stroke because, differently from blood glucose, it remains unaffected by stress response [24].
Prestroke disability was defined as admission modified Rankin Scale ≥ 2 [25]. Initial stroke severity was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) measured at ED arrival [26]. Acute reperfusion treatment on admission was also recorded.
We defined a composite poor outcome including early neurological deterioration (increase in NIHSS score ≥ 4 points or death within 24 h after admission) [27], very severe stroke at SU discharge (NIHSS score ≥25 [28]), or death within 30 days after stroke onset as ascertained from the Italian Regional Mortality Registry.
Variables were reported as median (25th–75th percentile) or number (percentage). Univariate associations were tested using the Mann–Whitney or chi-square test as appropriate. In preliminary univariate analyses, patients were categorized into five glycemic trajectories based on RSG and FSG values: hypoglycemia (low FSG or FSG), persistent normoglycemia (normal RSG and normal FSG); persistent hyperglycemia (high RSG and high FSG), delayed hyperglycemia (normal RSG and high FSG), and decreasing hyperglycemia (high RSG and normal FSG). Univariate analyses suggested the possibility of non-linear associations but also showed that for some glycemic trajectories, lacunar patients were so few as to preclude any subsequent reliable statistical estimation by multivariable models based on the multiple categorization of predictors or complex non-linear functions. Therefore, multivariable analysis was performed by a logistic regression model testing for the interaction of IS subtype with both admission RSG and a continuous indicator of early glycemic profile calculated as the difference of FSG and RSG. We assumed that a positive difference in this value indicated a trend toward increasing glucose values, whereas a negative difference indicated a trend toward decreasing glucose values. The model also tested for the interaction of continuous glucose measurements with diabetes, which is known to weaken the adverse prognostic impact of stress hyperglycemia in acute stroke [13]. Covariates included age, sex, disability, reperfusion therapy, and admission NIHSS (log-transformed). Based on results from univariate analyses, this logistic regression model was applied to two partially overlapping subsets of subjects. The first subset included only patients with RSG and FSG > 3.9 mmol in order to focus on the association of poor outcome with high admission RSG and increasing early glycemic profile in the absence of hypoglycemia. The second subset included only patients with FSG <7.8 mmol/L in order to test whether high admission RSG or increasing glycemic profile could take a favorable prognostic significance in the absence of persistent or delayed hyperglycemia. Corollary analyses did not evidence interactions of reperfusion therapy with either admission RSG or early glycemic profile.
Analyses were performed with R software version 3.5.3 and Harrell’s rms package [29]. Significance for p value was set at 0.050 (two-tailed). The study power was 0.80 for an OR of 1.3.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Patients

The final cohort included 4011 patients (age range 19 to 101 years). We excluded 22 patients who refused/were unable to provide informed consent, nine patients with missing clinical or laboratory data, and 10 patients lost at follow-up after SU discharge. Excluded patients did not differ by age, sex, and admission NIHSS. Reperfusion therapy was administered to 678 patients (560 intravenous fibrinolysis, 29 mechanical thrombectomy, and 89 both). A lacunar stroke syndrome was clinically diagnosed in 834 patients, the most frequent presentation being pure motor (61%), followed by ataxic (16%), and sensory-motor (9%). Only 269 (32.2%) of these patients had evidence of lacunar infarction at the CT scan routinely performed at day 3 after admission. Of the 565 patients with negative CT scan, only 129 also underwent MRI (based on clinical judgment of the attending physician), but lacunar infarction was confirmed in 119 of them (92.2%).
The most frequent etiology for non-lacunar IS (n = 3177) was cryptogenetic (44.2%), which was followed by cardioembolic (40.3%) and large artery atherosclerosis (12.5%). Diabetes was diagnosed in 1161 patients (844 known at admission, 88 newly diagnosed during SU stay, and 229 retrospectively diagnosed based on HbA1c). Table 1 compares baseline characteristics by IS subtype.
Lacunar patients were more likely to be younger, men and without prestroke disability than non-lacunar patients. They were also less likely to present with high NIHSS and to undergo reperfusion treatment. Lacunar patients had lower RSG and higher prevalence of hypoglycemia and persistent normoglycemia than non-lacunar patients. However, continuous early glycemic profile did not differ by stroke subtype. The overall prevalence of hypoglycemia in the cohort was 7.8%, with only 13 cases due to low admission RSG. Serious hypoglycemia (<3 mmol/L) [21] was rare (less than 1%). As expected, single poor outcomes as well as composite poor outcome were more likely in non-lacunar IS, with early neurological deterioration being the most common occurrence.

3.2. Univariate Association of Glucose Profile Categories with Poor Outcome

Table 2 show the distribution of combined poor outcome across different glycemic trajectories by IS subtype. In non-lacunar patients, poor outcome appeared markedly associated with hyperglycemic trajectories, delayed hyperglycemia having the highest proportion of cases. In lacunar patients, conversely, the highest proportion of cases was found for hypoglycemia, but numerosity was too small for a reliable statistical test.

3.3. Multivariable Analysis

When applied to the 3699 patients without hypoglycemia, multivariable logistic analysis for prediction of poor outcome showed that IS subtype had a significant interaction with both admission RSG (p-value = 0.032) and early glycemic profile (p-value = 0.028). Significant interactions were also found between diabetes and both glucose predictors (p-value < 0.001). Figure 1 shows how higher admission RSG and increasing glycemic profile were both associated with higher likelihood of poor outcome in non-lacunar but not in lacunar IS. In non-lacunar IS, the adverse prognostic significance of both predictors was weaker if the patient had diabetes. When applied to the 3539 patients without persistent or delayed hyperglycemia, multivariable logistic analysis showed significant interactions of IS subtype with both admission RSG (p-value 0.004) and glycemic profile (p-value 0.003); no significant interactions were found with diabetes.
Figure 2 shows how, in non-lacunar IS, both higher admission RSG and increasing glycemic profile remained associated with poor outcome. In lacunar IS, conversely, admission RSG was no more a statistically significant predictor, and patients with an increasing glycemic profile even had a lower likelihood of poor outcome.
In corollary analyses contrasting patients with hypoglycemia against the rest of the study cohort, there was no significant association with poor outcome and no significant interaction with IS subtype or diabetes (p-value > 0.200 for all).

4. Discussion

This study shows that admission RSG and early glycemic profile do not have a similar prognostic significance in patients with lacunar and non-lacunar IS. Higher admission RSG and increasing glycemic profile were both associated with a composite poor outcome in non-lacunar IS, even if the associations were weakened in patients with diabetes. No similar associations were found in lacunar patients, among whom an increasing glycemic profile might even take a favorable prognostic significance when blood glucose remained below the threshold for hyperglycemia.
According to findings from animal models and human cohorts [1,7], the adverse association of stress hyperglycemia with severity and outcome of IS depends on the presence of an ischemic penumbra around the irreversibly injured tissue of the infarct core. From an evolutionary perspective, stress hyperglycemia is an adaptive response that aims to provide the brain with ready fuel during an acute threat [30]. In the ischemic penumbra of a brain infarction, however, glucose excess would favor anaerobic glycolysis, so promoting harmful intra- and extra-cellular processes (acidosis from release of lactic acid, accumulation of glutamate, oxygen radicals production) that can accelerate the transition to irreversible injury, expand infarct size, and increase the risk of hemorrhagic transformation [1,2,6,31]. Collateral circulation is a critical determinant of cerebral perfusion in acute cerebral ischemia and may also be important in maintaining perfusion to penumbral regions [32]. A study of 309 IS patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy clearly showed how higher blood glucose levels significantly reduced the likelihood of good outcome in patients with good collaterals but not in those with poor collaterals [33].
Lacunar infarction usually lacks an ischemic penumbra because this IS subtype generally results from the occlusion of small cerebral arteries with poor collateral circulation [5]. Therefore, in lacunar IS, stress hyperglycemia has been hypothesized to be indifferent to stroke outcome or even to have a favorable effect by acting as a fuel source for the vital brain cells around the ischemic core [7]. However, available literature on this subject is conflicting and limited to few studies, all of which used a single admission RSG measurement and a composite outcome of death or functional disability. In 635 patients from the placebo arm of the TOAST trial [8], those with lacunar IS and higher glycemia had a better 3-month outcome than their normoglycemic counterparts, whereas the opposite occurred in those with non-lacunar IS. A similar finding was reported in 1375 IS patients from two clinical trials of lubeluzole [11]. Conversely, two prospective studies, of 1012 [10] and 2020 patients [9], respectively, reported no association of admission hyperglycemia with poor outcome in lacunar IS. A comparison of these studies is difficult, because only the first one used admission RSG as a continuous variable [8], while the others dichotomized it at different cutoffs (from 6.1 [9] to 8 mmol/L [10,11]).
Our study confirmed that an increasing glycemic profile in the early phase of acute IS was unrelated to the short-term outcome of lacunar patients without hypoglycemia. However, our study also showed that an increasing glycemic profile was associated with lower risk of poor outcome in lacunar patients who did not develop sustained or delayed hyperglycemia during the earliest phase of admission. A possible explanation is that this subgroup of lacunar patients includes those with a smaller and more stable infarction. However, some lacunar IS actually have a penumbra area [4]. Moreover, even when well perfused, the brain tissue surrounding an infarct core is exposed to inflammatory damage, excitotoxicity, and a spreading depolarization wave that can affect blood flow and promote enlargement of the infarction [34]. These mechanisms might be exacerbated by an increased glucose availability [35,36]. Since lacunar IS is small by definition, these events may have no clinical relevance unless blood glucose reaches consistently high levels. This might explain the apparent protective effect of an increasing glycemic profile observed in our lacunar patients whose blood levels remained below the threshold for hyperglycemia. These patients might just be the ones with the better trade-off between the pros and cons of an increased glucose availability in their brain. The finding that suggests this favorable association, however, should be considered with caution, because we performed multiple statistical analyses on overlapping subsets of the same population, so increasing the possibility of obtaining statistically significant results by chance alone.
A noticeable corollary finding of this study is the lack of association between hypoglycemia and poor outcome regardless of IS subtype and other confounders. Mechanisms by which hypoglycemia could worsen acute ischemic brain damage include: direct neurodamage by bioenergetic deficit; stress of the cardiovascular system as a consequence of the autonomic response; pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic effects worsening ischemic damage; and alterations of cerebral vasoregulation [1,31,37]. Stroke literature mostly focused on iatrogenic hypoglycemia occurring during trials of tight glucose control [38]. In these trials, hypoglycemia was usually unrelated to stroke clinical outcomes [39,40,41,42]. The only exception is the GIST-UK trial [43], reporting higher mortality among the insulin-treated patients with the greatest blood glucose reductions. Experimental data from animal stroke models are few and conflicting [2,44]. Data about spontaneous hypoglycemia on admission in IS cohort studies are also limited [45,46,47,48,49]. Reported occurrence of this issue varies from zero [45] to 49% [47]. Evidence of its association with higher risk of death or poor functional status at 3 months is similarly unclear [46,48]. Although there is consistent evidence that spontaneous hypoglycemia is a mortality predictor in patients hospitalized because of several acute conditions, the existence of a true causal relationship is still debated [15,16]. Studies of older inpatients suggest that spontaneous admission hypoglycemia might be just an epiphenomenon of poor pre-admission health [50].
The strengths of our study include the large number of participants, the use of two subsequent glucose measures to define an indicator of early glycemic profile, and the attention paid to identifying diabetes, which might confer a higher cellular tolerance to acute hyperglycemia [15].
Our study has also several major limitations. First, about one-half of the patients with lacunar syndromes lacked neuroradiologic confirmation, and an MRI scan was not systematically performed. Although classic lacunar syndromes are highly suggestive of small deep cerebral infarction, the correlation between clinical syndromes, neuroradiological features and histological findings is not absolute [4], and different etiologies can be found in about 17% of cases [51,52]. However, the radiologic confirmation of lacunar IS can be problematic in clinical practice: TC and conventional MRI often lack the necessary resolution to detect lacunar infarctions, while systematic recourse to techniques with superior precision, such as diffusion-weighted MRI, is not routinely feasible in clinical settings [53]. Second, our measure of glycemic profile was very approximative because it was based only on two, not fully comparable, glucose measurements. Third, since we performed multiple analyses on overlapping subsets of the same population, we cannot exclude that some of our statistically significant results were actually due to chance. Fourth, the study retrospective design prevents from drawing causal inferences. Fifth, although analyses were adjusted for admission clinical severity, no direct measure of infarction size was available. Information about occurrence of epileptic seizures would also have been of interest, as this disorder can be exacerbated under conditions of hyper- or hypoglycemia. Unfortunately, however, such information was not available. Finally, our database did not include information about a major clinical outcome such as post-discharge disability.
In conclusion, this study shows that early glycemic profile after acute IS has a different prognostic significance in lacunar and non-lacunar patients. An increasing glycemic profile is clearly associated with poor short-term outcome in non-lacunar patients, but the unfavorable association is not evident in lacunar patients. So far, clinical trials have failed to identify clinical benefits from intensive glucose control by insulin in acute stroke inpatients [1,2,31]. However, other antidiabetic agents, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors, are under consideration [1]. Our results suggest that future trials of glucose-lowering agents in acute IS should take into account the possibility of different management standards for lacunar and non-lacunar patients.

Author Contributions

P.F. and F.M. equally contributed to the study concept and design, acquisition and analysis of data, original draft preparation, conceptualization, methodology, and revised manuscript preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Basic Oriented Research Grant from the University of Bologna (grant number RFO2022).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The Maggiore Hospital Ethics Committee approved the study (approval number CE16092).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent for research and publishing use of all data included in their medical records was sought from patients or their legally authorized representatives.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset is not publicly available to privacy reasons, but data in anonymized form are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank their colleague Anne Fitzgerald for her help in the English revision of the text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ferrari, F.; Moretti, A.; Villa, R.F. Hyperglycemia in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Physiopathological and Therapeutic Complexity. Neural Regen. Res. 2022, 17, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Piironen, K.; Putaala, J.; Rosso, C.; Samson, Y. Glucose and Acute Stroke. Stroke 2012, 43, 898–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Del Bene, A.; Palumbo, V.; Lamassa, M.; Saia, V.; Piccardi, B.; Inzitari, D. Progressive Lacunar Stroke: Review of Mechanisms, Prognostic Features, and Putative Treatments. Int. J. Stroke 2012, 7, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rudilosso, S.; Rodríguez-Vázquez, A.; Urra, X.; Arboix, A. The Potential Impact of Neuroimaging and Translational Research on the Clinical Management of Lacunar Stroke. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Regenhardt, R.W.; Das, A.S.; Lo, E.H.; Caplan, L.R. Advances in Understanding the Pathophysiology of Lacunar Stroke: A Review. JAMA Neurol. 2018, 75, 1273–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Xie, J.; Kittur, F.S.; Li, P.A.; Hung, C.-Y. Rethinking the Necessity of Low Glucose Intervention for Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2022, 17, 1397–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Robbins, N.M.; Swanson, R.A. Opposing Effects of Glucose on Stroke and Reperfusion Injury: Acidosis, Oxidative Stress, and Energy Metabolism. Stroke 2014, 45, 1881–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bruno, A.; Biller, J.; Adams, H.P.; Clarke, W.R.; Woolson, R.F.; Williams, L.S.; Hansen, M.D. Acute Blood Glucose Level and Outcome from Ischemic Stroke. Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Investigators. Neurology 1999, 52, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wu, B.; Liu, M. Hyperglycaemia in Acute Lacunar Stroke: A Chinese Hospital-Based Study. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 2013, 10, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Miedema, I.; Luijckx, G.-J.; Brouns, R.; De Keyser, J.; Uyttenboogaart, M. Admission Hyperglycemia and Outcome after Intravenous Thrombolysis: Is There a Difference among the Stroke-Subtypes? BMC Neurol. 2016, 16, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Uyttenboogaart, M.; Koch, M.W.; Stewart, R.E.; Vroomen, P.C.; Luijckx, G.-J.; De Keyser, J. Moderate Hyperglycaemia Is Associated with Favourable Outcome in Acute Lacunar Stroke. Brain 2007, 130, 1626–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Gray, C.S.; Hildreth, A.J.; Alberti, G.K.M.M.; O’Connell, J.E. Poststroke Hyperglycemia. Stroke 2004, 35, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Hou, D.; Zhong, P.; Ye, X.; Wu, D. Persistent Hyperglycemia Is a Useful Glycemic Pattern to Predict Stroke Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Neurol. 2021, 21, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yong, M.; Kaste, M. Dynamic of Hyperglycemia as a Predictor of Stroke Outcome in the ECASS-II Trial. Stroke 2008, 39, 2749–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Krinsley, J.S.; Meyfroidt, G.; van den Berghe, G.; Egi, M.; Bellomo, R. The Impact of Premorbid Diabetic Status on the Relationship between the Three Domains of Glycemic Control and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2012, 15, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Borzì, V.; Fontanella, A. The Clinical Impact of Hypoglycemia in Hospitalized Patients. Ital. J. Med. 2015, 9, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fuentes, B.; Ortega-Casarrubios, M.d.L.Á.; Díez-Tejedor, E. Letter by Fuentes et al. Regarding Article, “J-Shaped Association between Serum Glucose and Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke”. Stroke 2011, 42, e362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bamford, J.; Sandercock, P.; Dennis, M.; Warlow, C.; Burn, J. Classification and Natural History of Clinically Identifiable Subtypes of Cerebral Infarction. Lancet 1991, 337, 1521–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Adams, H.P.; Bendixen, B.H.; Kappelle, L.J.; Biller, J.; Love, B.B.; Gordon, D.L.; Marsh, E.E. Classification of Subtype of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Definitions for Use in a Multicenter Clinical Trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993, 24, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Fuentes, B.; Ntaios, G.; Putaala, J.; Thomas, B.; Turc, G.; Díez-Tejedor, E. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Guidelines on Glycaemia Management in Acute Stroke. Eur. Stroke J. 2018, 3, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seaquist, E.R.; Anderson, J.; Childs, B.; Cryer, P.; Dagogo-Jack, S.; Fish, L.; Heller, S.R.; Rodriguez, H.; Rosenzweig, J.; Vigersky, R.; et al. Hypoglycemia and Diabetes: A Report of a Workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 1845–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. American Diabetes Association Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2018. Diabetes Care 2018, 41, S13–S27. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lipska, K.J.; De Rekeneire, N.; Van Ness, P.H.; Johnson, K.C.; Kanaya, A.; Koster, A.; Strotmeyer, E.S.; Goodpaster, B.H.; Harris, T.; Gill, T.M.; et al. Identifying Dysglycemic States in Older Adults: Implications of the Emerging Use of Hemoglobin A1c. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 5289–5295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kernan, W.N. Screening for Diabetes after Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2013, 36, 290–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. van Swieten, J.C.; Koudstaal, P.J.; Visser, M.C.; Schouten, H.J.; van Gijn, J. Interobserver Agreement for the Assessment of Handicap in Stroke Patients. Stroke 1988, 19, 604–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lyden, P. Using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: A Cautionary Tale. Stroke 2017, 48, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Seners, P.; Baron, J.-C. Revisiting ‘Progressive Stroke’: Incidence, Predictors, Pathophysiology, and Management of Unexplained Early Neurological Deterioration Following Acute Ischemic Stroke. J. Neurol. 2018, 265, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lindley, R.I.; Wardlaw, J.M.; Whiteley, W.N.; Cohen, G.; Blackwell, L.; Murray, G.D.; Sandercock, P.A.G.; Trial Steering Committee; Baigent, C.; Chadwick, D.; et al. Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Outcomes by Clinically Important Subgroups in the Third International Stroke Trial. Stroke 2015, 46, 746–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Harrell, F.E., Jr. rms: Regression Modeling Strategies (R package version 6.3-0). 2022. Available online: https//CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms (accessed on 20 February 2022).
  30. Marik, P.E.; Bellomo, R. Stress Hyperglycemia: An Essential Survival Response! Crit. Care 2013, 17, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Klingbeil, K.D.; Koch, S.; Dave, K.R. Potential Link between Post-Acute Ischemic Stroke Exposure to Hypoglycemia and Hemorrhagic Transformation. Int. J. Stroke 2020, 15, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Liebeskind, D.S. Collateral Circulation. Stroke 2003, 34, 2279–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Kim, J.-T.; Liebeskind, D.S.; Jahan, R.; Menon, B.K.; Goyal, M.; Nogueira, R.G.; Pereira, V.M.; Gralla, J.; Saver, J.L. Impact of Hyperglycemia According to the Collateral Status on Outcomes in Mechanical Thrombectomy. Stroke 2018, 49, 2706–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fernández-Serra, R.; Martínez-Alonso, E.; Alcázar, A.; Chioua, M.; Marco-Contelles, J.; Martínez-Murillo, R.; Ramos, M.; Guinea, G.V.; González-Nieto, D. Postischemic Neuroprotection of Aminoethoxydiphenyl Borate Associates Shortening of Peri-Infarct Depolarizations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bahniwal, M.; Little, J.P.; Klegeris, A. High Glucose Enhances Neurotoxicity and Inflammatory Cytokine Secretion by Stimulated Human Astrocytes. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2017, 14, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lin, B.; Ginsberg, M.D.; Busto, R.; Li, L. Hyperglycemia Triggers Massive Neutrophil Deposition in Brain Following Transient Ischemia in Rats. Neurosci. Lett. 2000, 278, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Smith, L.; Chakraborty, D.; Bhattacharya, P.; Sarmah, D.; Koch, S.; Dave, K.R. Exposure to Hypoglycemia and Risk of Stroke. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2018, 1431, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cerecedo-Lopez, C.D.; Cantu-Aldana, A.; Patel, N.J.; Aziz-Sultan, M.A.; Frerichs, K.U.; Du, R. Insulin in the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2020, 136, e514–e534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bruno, A.; Kent, T.A.; Coull, B.M.; Shankar, R.R.; Saha, C.; Becker, K.J.; Kissela, B.M.; Williams, L.S. Treatment of Hyperglycemia in Ischemic Stroke (THIS): A Randomized Pilot Trial. Stroke 2008, 39, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Johnston, K.C.; Hall, C.E.; Kissela, B.M.; Bleck, T.P.; Conaway, M.R. GRASP Investigators Glucose Regulation in Acute Stroke Patients (GRASP) Trial: A Randomized Pilot Trial. Stroke 2009, 40, 3804–3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Johnston, K.C.; Bruno, A.; Pauls, Q.; Hall, C.E.; Barrett, K.M.; Barsan, W.; Fansler, A.; Van de Bruinhorst, K.; Janis, S.; Durkalski-Mauldin, V.L.; et al. Intensive vs. Standard Treatment of Hyperglycemia and Functional Outcome in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SHINE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019, 322, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. McCormick, M.; Hadley, D.; McLean, J.R.; Macfarlane, J.A.; Condon, B.; Muir, K.W. Randomized, Controlled Trial of Insulin for Acute Poststroke Hyperglycemia. Ann. Neurol. 2010, 67, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gray, C.S.; Hildreth, A.J.; Sandercock, P.A.; O’Connell, J.E.; Johnston, D.E.; Cartlidge, N.E.F.; Bamford, J.M.; James, O.F.; Alberti, K.G.M.M. GIST Trialists Collaboration Glucose-Potassium-Insulin Infusions in the Management of Post-Stroke Hyperglycaemia: The UK Glucose Insulin in Stroke Trial (GIST-UK). Lancet Neurol. 2007, 6, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhu, C.Z.; Auer, R.N. Optimal Blood Glucose Levels While Using Insulin to Minimize the Size of Infarction in Focal Cerebral Ischemia. J. Neurosurg. 2004, 101, 664–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fuentes, B.; Castillo, J.; San José, B.; Leira, R.; Serena, J.; Vivancos, J.; Dávalos, A.; Nuñez, A.G.; Egido, J.; Díez-Tejedor, E.; et al. The Prognostic Value of Capillary Glucose Levels in Acute Stroke: The GLycemia in Acute Stroke (GLIAS) Study. Stroke 2009, 40, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ntaios, G.; Egli, M.; Faouzi, M.; Michel, P. J-Shaped Association between Serum Glucose and Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 2010, 41, 2366–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Nukui, S.; Akiyama, H.; Soga, K.; Takao, N.; Tsuchihashi, Y.; Iijima, N.; Hasegawa, Y. Risk of Hyperglycemia and Hypoglycemia in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2019, 28, 104346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rinkel, L.A.; Nguyen, T.T.M.; Guglielmi, V.; Groot, A.E.; Posthuma, L.; Roos, Y.B.W.E.M.; Majoie, C.B.L.M.; Lycklama, À.; Nijeholt, G.J.; Emmer, B.J.; et al. High Admission Glucose Is Associated With Poor Outcome After Endovascular Treatment for Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 2020, 51, 3215–3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kim, Y.S.; Kim, C.; Jung, K.-H.; Kwon, H.-M.; Heo, S.H.; Kim, B.J.; Kim, Y.D.; Kim, J.-M.; Lee, S.-H. Range of Glucose as a Glycemic Variability and 3–Month Outcome in Diabetic Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Abdelhafiz, A.H.; Rodríguez-Mañas, L.; Morley, J.E.; Sinclair, A.J. Hypoglycemia in Older People—A Less Well Recognized Risk Factor for Frailty. Aging Dis. 2015, 6, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Cannistraro, R.J.; Badi, M.; Eidelman, B.H.; Dickson, D.W.; Middlebrooks, E.H.; Meschia, J.F. CNS Small Vessel Disease: A Clinical Review. Neurology 2019, 92, 1146–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arboix, A.; Massons, J.; García-Eroles, L.; Targa, C.; Comes, E.; Parra, O. Clinical Predictors of Lacunar Syndrome Not Due to Lacunar Infarction. BMC Neurol. 2010, 10, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Norrving, B. Long-Term Prognosis after Lacunar Infarction. Lancet Neurol. 2003, 2, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 12 01794 g001 550
Figure 1. Association of continuous glucose predictors with poor outcome of ischemic stroke (IS) in patients without hypoglycemia. Odds ratios (OR) are for a unit increase in random serum glucose (RSG) on admission and early glucose profile (defined as the difference of fasting serum glucose measured the morning after admission and admission RSG). The logistic model was adjusted for age, sex, prestroke disability, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and reperfusion therapy. Patients were stratified by IS subtype, and diabetes status because the logistic model included significant interactions of RSG and early glycemic profile with both these characteristics. Poor outcome was defined as early neurological deterioration, severe stroke at Stroke Unit discharge, or death at 30 days after stroke onset. Analysis included only patients with RSG and FSG ≥ 3.9 mmol/L. Data are for 2088 non-lacunar patients without diabetes (400 cases), 862 non-lacunar patients with diabetes (205 cases), 508 lacunar patients without diabetes (23 cases), and 241 lacunar patients with diabetes (3 cases). Significant ORs (p-value < 0.05) are marked with *.
Figure 1. Association of continuous glucose predictors with poor outcome of ischemic stroke (IS) in patients without hypoglycemia. Odds ratios (OR) are for a unit increase in random serum glucose (RSG) on admission and early glucose profile (defined as the difference of fasting serum glucose measured the morning after admission and admission RSG). The logistic model was adjusted for age, sex, prestroke disability, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and reperfusion therapy. Patients were stratified by IS subtype, and diabetes status because the logistic model included significant interactions of RSG and early glycemic profile with both these characteristics. Poor outcome was defined as early neurological deterioration, severe stroke at Stroke Unit discharge, or death at 30 days after stroke onset. Analysis included only patients with RSG and FSG ≥ 3.9 mmol/L. Data are for 2088 non-lacunar patients without diabetes (400 cases), 862 non-lacunar patients with diabetes (205 cases), 508 lacunar patients without diabetes (23 cases), and 241 lacunar patients with diabetes (3 cases). Significant ORs (p-value < 0.05) are marked with *.
Jcm 12 01794 g001
Jcm 12 01794 g002 550
Figure 2. Association of continuous glucose predictors with poor outcome of ischemic stroke (IS) in patients without persistent or delayed hyperglycemia. Odds ratios (OR) are for a unit increase in random serum glucose (RSG) on admission and early glucose profile (defined as the difference of fasting serum glucose measured the morning after admission and RSG). The logistic model was adjusted for age, sex, prestroke disability, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and reperfusion therapy. Patients were stratified by IS subtype because the model included significant interactions of admission RSG and early glycemic profile with this characteristic. Poor outcome was defined as early neurological deterioration, severe stroke at Stroke Unit discharge, or death at 30 days after stroke onset. Analysis included only patients with FSG < 7.8 mmol/L. Data are for 2781 non-lacunar patients (501 cases) and 758 lacunar patients (31 cases). Significant ORs (p-value < 0.05) are marked with *.
Figure 2. Association of continuous glucose predictors with poor outcome of ischemic stroke (IS) in patients without persistent or delayed hyperglycemia. Odds ratios (OR) are for a unit increase in random serum glucose (RSG) on admission and early glucose profile (defined as the difference of fasting serum glucose measured the morning after admission and RSG). The logistic model was adjusted for age, sex, prestroke disability, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and reperfusion therapy. Patients were stratified by IS subtype because the model included significant interactions of admission RSG and early glycemic profile with this characteristic. Poor outcome was defined as early neurological deterioration, severe stroke at Stroke Unit discharge, or death at 30 days after stroke onset. Analysis included only patients with FSG < 7.8 mmol/L. Data are for 2781 non-lacunar patients (501 cases) and 758 lacunar patients (31 cases). Significant ORs (p-value < 0.05) are marked with *.
Jcm 12 01794 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics and outcomes by ischemic stroke subtype.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics and outcomes by ischemic stroke subtype.
CharacteristicsNon-Lacunar
(n = 3177)		Lacunar
(n = 834)		p Value
Demographic and clinical data
   Age, years80 (71–86)76 (67–84)<0.001
   Male sex1426 (45.8)471 (56.5)<0.001
   Prestroke disability987 (31.1)223 (26.7)0.015
   Diabetes901 (28.4)260 (31.2)0.111
   Admission NIHSS score8 (3–17)3 (2–5)<0.001
   Reperfusion therapy595 (18.7)83 (10.0)< 0.001
Glucose measurements
   Admission RSG, mmol/L6.7 (5.7–8.4)6.2 (5.4–7.7)<0.001
   FSG, mmol/L5.2 (4.5–6.4)4.9 (4.3–5.6)<0.001
   Early glycemic profile, mmol/L−1.4 (−0.5–−2.6)−1.4 (−0.6–−2.4)0.697
   Early glycemic profile categories <0.001
      Hypoglycemia227 (7.2)85 (10.2)
      Persistent normoglycemia1901 (59.8)545 (65.4)
      Decreasing hyperglycemia654 (20.6)128 (15.3)
      Persistent hyperglycemia318 (10.0)65 (7.8)
      Delayed hyperglycemia77 (2.4)11 (1.3)
Outcome
   Early neurological deterioration201 (6.3)19 (2.3)<0.001
   NIHSS > 24 at Stroke Unit discharge92 (2.9)1 (0.1)0.001
   1-month mortality427 (14.9)14 (1.7)<0.001
   Composite poor outcome644 (20.3)32 (3.8)<0.001
Data are reported as n (%) or median and (25th–75th percentile). p values are for Mann–Whitney or chi-square test. To convert mmol/L to mg/dL, multiply by 18.018. Glycemic profile was defined as the difference of FSG and RSG. Abbreviations: FSG, fasting serum glucose; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; RSG, random serum glucose.
Table
Table 2. Univariate association of categorical early glycemic trajectories with poor outcome by stroke subtype.
Table 2. Univariate association of categorical early glycemic trajectories with poor outcome by stroke subtype.
HypoglycemiaPersistent
Normoglycemia		Decreasing
Hyperglycemia		Persistent
Hyperglycemia		Delayed
Hyperglycemia		p-Value
Non-lacunar39/227 (17.2)309/1901 (16.3)153/654 (23.4)105/318 (33.0)38/77 (49.4)<0.001
Lacunar6/85 (7.1)19/545 (3.5)6/128 (4.7)1/65 (1.5)0/11 (0.0)0.380
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Forti, P.; Maioli, F. The Prognostic Significance of Early Glycemic Profile in Acute Ischemic Stroke Depends on Stroke Subtype. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1794. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051794

AMA Style

Forti P, Maioli F. The Prognostic Significance of Early Glycemic Profile in Acute Ischemic Stroke Depends on Stroke Subtype. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(5):1794. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051794

Chicago/Turabian Style

Forti, Paola, and Fabiola Maioli. 2023. "The Prognostic Significance of Early Glycemic Profile in Acute Ischemic Stroke Depends on Stroke Subtype" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 5: 1794. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051794

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop