Next Article in Journal
Multidisciplinary Guidelines for the Rational Use of Topical Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for Musculoskeletal Pain (2022)
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Prenatal Paracetamol Exposure on the Development of Asthma and Wheezing in Childhood: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Lung Injury in COVID-19 Has Pulmonary Edema as an Important Component and Treatment with Furosemide and Negative Fluid Balance (NEGBAL) Decreases Mortality
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reduced Skeletal Muscle Mass Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Asthma Control and Exacerbation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/jcm12041543
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Exposure to Selected Heavy Metals and Blood Eosinophil Counts in Asthmatic Adults: Results from NHANES 2011–2018

by
Jun Wen
†,
Mohan Giri
†,
Li Xu
and
Shuliang Guo
*
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(4), 1543; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041543
Submission received: 12 December 2022 / Revised: 31 January 2023 / Accepted: 14 February 2023 / Published: 15 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Allergy and Asthma: Issues, Strategies, and Future Directions)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Heavy metals are widely used and dispersed in the environment and people’s daily routines. Many studies have reported an association between heavy metal exposure and asthma. Blood eosinophils play a crucial role in the occurrence, progression, and treatment of asthma. However, there have thus far been few studies that aimed to explore the effects of heavy metal exposure on blood eosinophil counts in adults with asthma. Our study aims to discuss the association between metal exposure and blood eosinophil counts among asthmatic adults. (2) Methods: A total of 2026 asthmatic individuals were involved in our research from NHANES with metal exposure, blood eosinophils, and other covariates among the American population. A regression model, the XGBoost algorithm, and a generalized linear model (GAM) were used to explore the potential correlation. Furthermore, we conducted a stratified analysis to determine high-risk populations. (3) Results: The multivariate regression analysis indicated that concentrations of blood Pb (log per 1 mg/L; coefficient β, 25.39; p = 0.010) were positively associated with blood eosinophil counts. However, the associations between blood cadmium, mercury, selenium, manganese, and blood eosinophil counts were not statistically significant. We used stratified analysis to determine the high-risk group regarding Pb exposure. Pb was identified as the most vital variable influencing blood eosinophils through the XGBoost algorithm. We also used GAM to observe the linear relationship between the blood Pb concentrations and blood eosinophil counts. (4) Conclusions: The study demonstrated that blood Pb was positively correlated with blood eosinophil counts among asthmatic adults. We suggested that long-time Pb exposure as a risk factor might be correlated with the immune system disorder of asthmatic adults and affect the development, exacerbation, and treatment of asthma.

1. Introduction

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by chronic airway inflammation and respiratory symptoms [1,2]. It is one of the most common chronic respiratory disorders affecting approximately 358 million people worldwide [3,4], and 250,000 deaths are directly caused by asthma every year. The prevalence of asthma has increased in many countries in recent decades, and the prevalence of asthma in children and adults is estimated to be 8.1% and 7.9% in America, respectively [3,5]. According to a report, the US treatment and mortality costs for asthma have been estimated at USD 81 billion during 2008–2013 [6].
For many years, the presence of eosinophils in asthmatic inflammation has been recognized as an essential factor in the pathophysiology of the disease [7], and eosinophils are key inflammatory cells of “T2 high” asthma [8]. When monitoring patients with asthma, measurement of blood eosinophil counts is often used in clinical practice. As is known to us, the blood eosinophil count is a readily available biomarker, and existing research demonstrates that the blood eosinophil correlates reasonably well with sputum eosinophilia [9,10,11]. Among patients with asthma, elevated blood eosinophil counts have been associated with increased mortality [12] and are used to adjust treatment with corticosteroids, anti-IL-5, anti-IL-5-receptor-alpha or anti-IL-4 receptor alpha antibodies in asthma, resulting in improved asthma control and reduced exacerbation frequency [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Additionally, a high blood eosinophil count has been shown to be a risk factor for future asthma exacerbations in adults with persistent asthma [14,21,22,23]. In conclusion, blood eosinophils play a crucial role in the occurrence, progression, and treatment of asthma.
Heavy metals are widely used and dispersed in the environment, including the air, water, soil, dust, diet, and the manufacturing industry [24]. The general population is usually exposed to low concentrations of metals by ingesting contaminated water and food or inhaling environmental air pollution [25]. According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and so on are the top-priority contaminants. Heavy metals exposed to the environment may adhere to fine particles in the air and cause asthma as environmental allergens [26]. Previous studies observed that asthma induced by heavy metals was triggered by the immune system, indicating that heavy metals have great inflammatory potential and immunomodulatory effects on individuals [27,28]. Many studies have reported the association between heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg and Mn) and asthma [24,29,30,31,32,33].
In addition, some studies still demonstrated the correlation between common heavy metals (Pb, Hg, Cd, etc.) and blood eosinophil counts [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. For example, previous studies have demonstrated that Pb exposure was implicated in alterations in humoral and cell-mediated immunity and the development of allergic conditions, including the production of serum IgE, eosinophil migration and proliferation, activation of Th2 cytokines, as well as an abnormality of bronchial responsiveness [37,38]. An experimental animal study in Iran indicated levels of total protein, total white blood cell counts, histamine, and eosinophils were elevated after guinea pigs inhaled aerosol Pb, which supported the proinflammatory effect of Pb poisoning [39]. Another experimental animal study demonstrated an elevation of circulating eosinophils after Cd exposure [40]. Additionally, a Korean study found Hg was not associated with blood eosinophil counts in 311 Korean children but was associated with increased blood lymphocyte counts [41]. Chao-Hsin Huang et al. conducted a study in which urine Mn was not associated with blood eosinophil counts among 2447 adults [34]. A small study involving 25 adult asthmatic patients and healthy subjects found that the asthma group had lower serum Se concentrations and higher indicators of oxidative stress [42].
However, there have been few studies that aimed to explore the effects of different kinds of exposure to heavy metals on blood eosinophil counts in adults with asthma so far. To explore the association between heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg, Se, and Mn) and blood eosinophil counts, in our study, we used a nationally representative sample of adults who participated in the 2011–2018 NHANES in the USA. We also comprehensively explored whether the association was different in various populations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

The NHANES, which was conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of America, collected information regarding the health and nutritional status of the US population every 2 years. NHANES used a complex, stratified sampling design, which can select representative samples of non-institutionalized civilians. The survey ethics review board of the CDC approved the NHANES procedures and protocols, and all participants provided written informed consent.

2.2. Study Population

Four cycles of NHANES data (2011–2012, 2013–2014, 2015–2016 and 2017–2018) were integrated into our study. These data included demographic data, examination data, laboratory data, and questionnaire data for the second analysis. A total of 39,156 participants were included in the NHANES from 2011 to 2018. We excluded individuals: (1) aged < 18 years old (n = 15331); (2) missing blood eosinophil data (n = 2147); (3) missing blood Pb, Cd, Hg, Se, and Mn data (n = 5573); (4) participants without asthma (n = 13673); (5) missing data about covariates in at least one of following (n = 406): education level, marital status, the ratio of family income to poverty, BMI, smoking status, hypertension history, diabetes history, blood urea nitrogen, blood creatinine and blood cotinine. Eventually, a large nationally representative sample (n = 2026) of American adults with asthma was enrolled in our study. The flow chart of the screening process is shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Measurement of Metal Exposures

The measurements of all the exposures of whole-blood lead, cadmium, mercury, selenium, and manganese were tested by inductively coupled plasma-dynamic reaction mass spectrometry (ICP-DRC-MS) on an ELAN 6100 DRC Plus or ELAN DRC II (PerkinElmer Instruments, Headquarters Office, 710 Bridgeport Ave., Shelton, CT 06,484–4794) at the CDC’s National Center for Environmental Health. Values of concentrations below the limit of detection (LOD) were imputed values of LOD/sqrt [2]. Detailed information on laboratory quality assurance and monitoring is available on the NHANES website.

2.4. Blood Eosinophil Count Measurement

Blood differential counts were performed in NHANES 2011–2018 using the Beckman Coulter HMX (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, Calif), a quantitative and automated hematologic analyzer and leukocyte differential cell counter for in vitro diagnostic use in clinical laboratories. A detailed description of the laboratory methods can be found on the NHANES website.

2.5. Covariates and Asthma Assessment

Covariates were chosen a priori based on previous studies. Demographic data included gender, age (years old), race/ethnicity (Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, others), educational level (less than high school, high school, more than high school), poverty-to-income ratio, and marital status (married, single, living with a partner). Secondly, we also included examination data and personal life history data involving body mass index (kg/m2), smoking (smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life), diagnosis with hypertension (yes or no), and diagnosis with diabetes (yes, no, or borderline). Finally, variables of laboratory data included blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L), blood creatinine (mol/L), and blood cotinine (ng/mL). The assessment of asthma was based on the information from the questionnaire section of the US National Health Interview Survey. In order to assess asthma, participants were asked, “Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you have asthma?” If the participant responded “yes”, he or she was regarded as an asthma patient. A more detailed description of variables can be obtained on the NHANES official website (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/, 6 January 2023).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

According to the criteria of the CDC guidelines, we conducted a statistical analysis of blood metal concentration and blood eosinophil count. Blood metal concentration, blood eosinophil count, and other continuous variables were expressed as the mean and 95% CIs. The categorical variables were expressed in frequency or percentage. Firstly, we divided blood eosinophil count as a continuous variable into four quartiles. The weighted chi-square test was used to calculate the p-value of the characteristics of the analyzed population’s categorical variables. In the case of continuous variables, we used the Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum test to calculate the p-value (Table 1). Secondly, all blood metal levels were initially naturally log-transformed for further analysis because their distributions were skewed. We constructed three kinds of weighted multiple linear regression models that adjusted various variables shown in Table 2 to identify the association between the blood metal concentrations and blood eosinophil count (non-adjusted model, minimally adjusted model, and fully adjusted model). Thirdly, we constructed the machine learning XGBoost algorithm model to predict the relative importance of blood metal on the effect of blood eosinophil count (Figure 2). The XGBoost model was used to analyze blood metal contribution (gain) to blood eosinophil count. Next, we found the statistical difference between the blood lead and blood eosinophil count. Therefore, we further conducted a stratified analysis to determine the stratified association between the blood lead and blood eosinophil count through stratified multivariate logistic regression. Finally, based on the penalty spline method, we constructed a smooth curve using a generalized additive model (GAM) model with a fully adjusted model to explore the potential linear relationship between blood lead concentration and blood eosinophil count. A two-piecewise linear regression model was applied if a non-linear correlation was detected to determine the threshold effect of blood lead concentration on blood eosinophil count. When the ratio between blood lead concentration and blood eosinophil count appeared obvious in a smooth curve, the recursive method automatically calculated the inflection point, where the maximum model likelihood was used. To prevent the bias caused by missing data, we curated the NHANES database to improve the accuracy of the analysis by using the MICE package to account for missing data. We found the results of data without missing covariates were basically consistent with those of data with missing covariates and multiple imputation data. All in all, univariate and multiple analysis results were based on the calculated dataset as well as Rubin’s rules. All kinds of statistical analyses were performed by R software (Version 4.2.0) using the R package. The software EmpowerStats offered significant help in the analysis process, as well (http://www.empowerstats.com, 6 January 2023, X&Y Solutions, Inc., Boston, MA, USA). In our study, a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Participants

The baseline characteristics, which were of a weighted distribution, are shown in Table 1, including the demographic data, examination data, laboratory data, and questionnaire data of selected participants from the NHANES (2011–2018) survey. In our study, the average age of selected participants was 45.46 years old, and non-Hispanic Whites were the main population. Then, we divided different blood eosinophil counts into four quartiles (Q1–Q4). The distribution of race, education, marital status, poverty-to-income ratio, smoking status, diabetes history, blood urea nitrogen and blood cotinine in Q1–Q4 of blood eosinophil count indicated no statistical difference (p-value > 0.05), and gender, age, BMI, hypertension history, blood creatinine showed statistical differences (p-values < 0.05). Compared with the various groups, the distribution difference of blood Pb showed statistical significance, which may indicate a difference in exposure to Pb. However, blood Cd, Hg, Se, and Mn showed no exposure difference between the four quartile groups of blood eosinophil count.

3.2. The Associations between the Blood Metal Concentrations and Blood Eosinophil Counts

After all blood metal concentrations were naturally log-transformed, we applied the weighted multivariate linear regression model to assess the association of blood metal concentrations with blood eosinophil count in three different models (Table 2). According to the results, we found that only blood Pb was positively correlated with blood eosinophil count in the non-adjusted model and fully adjusted model, which was statistically significant. In the non-adjusted model, the blood eosinophil count increased by 24.76 (8.22, 41.30)/uL for each additional unit of blood lead of natural logarithmic conversion (ug/dL) (p < 0.05). In the fully adjusted model, which adjusted for gender, age, race/ethnicity, education level, marital status, poverty income ratio, BMI, smoking status, hypertension history, diabetes history, blood urea nitrogen, blood creatinine, and blood cotinine, the blood eosinophil count increased by 25.39 (6.91, 43.88)/uL for each additional unit of blood lead of natural logarithmic conversion (ug/dL) (p < 0.05). In the minimally adjusted model, which adjusted for gender, age, race/ethnicity, blood Pb also showed a positive association with blood eosinophil count but without statistical significance (p > 0.05). The above results indicated that long-time Pb exposure as an independent risk factor may increase the blood eosinophil counts of adults with asthma.

3.3. Stratified Associations between Blood Pb Concentrations and Blood Eosinophil Counts

To confirm the stability of multivariate linear regression analysis results, we further analyzed stratified associations between the blood Pb concentrations and blood eosinophil counts in a specific subgroup by gender, age, race, education level, marital status, poverty-to-income ratio, BMI, smoking status, hypertension history, and diabetes history (Figure 2). According to stratified analysis results, it was possible that males, age < 40 and ≥60 years old, non-Hispanic Whites, those who declared their marital status to be single, the low and middle group of poverty-to-income ratio, 25 < BMI ≤ 28, those who had smoked <100 cigarettes and ≥100 cigarettes in life, those who were without hypertension, and those who were without diabetes had higher blood eosinophil counts, with increasing blood Pb concentrations displaying a significant trend (p < 0.05). Furthermore, we found that the variables of gender, poverty-to-income ratio, and blood Pb may have an interaction effect associated with blood eosinophil counts (p for interaction < 0.05).

3.4. Using Machine Learning from the XGBoost Algorithm Model to Explore the Blood Metals’ Relative Importance

To identify which metal exposure affected blood eosinophil counts of adults with asthma most, we constructed the machine learning XGBoost algorithm to determine the relative importance among all selected blood metals. The blood metal variables we selected included blood Pb, Cd, Hg, Se, and Mn. In light of the results of each blood metal’s contribution according to the XGBoost model, we observed that blood Pb was the most critical variable in the blood eosinophil counts, followed by blood Se, Mn, Hg, and Cd (Figure 3). The above analysis was conducted using logarithmically transformed blood metal data. Ultimately, blood Pb, as the most relative variable, was further applied to constructing smooth curve models in our study.

3.5. Exploring Dose-Response Relationships of Blood Pb Concentrations with Blood Eosinophil Counts by the Generalized Additive Model (GAM)

The GAM is very sensitive to identifying linear relationships or non-linearity. To verify the reliability and stability of the analysis results, we used the GAM to explore the linear relationship between the blood Pb concentrations and blood eosinophil counts. Based on the fully adjusted model (Figure 4), we constructed a smooth fit curve to reflect the possible association. These analyses were conducted using logarithmically transformed blood Pb data. We observed the linear relationship between blood Pb concentrations with blood eosinophil counts after adjusting gender, age, race/ethnicity, education level, marital status, poverty-to-income ratio, BMI, smoking status, hypertension history, diabetes history, blood urea nitrogen, blood creatinine, and blood cotinine. In addition, we still used the segmented regression model to further verify the linear relationship of blood Pb concentrations with blood eosinophil counts (Table 3). The log-likelihood ratio test showed that p was more than 0.05, indicating that there was no significant difference between model 1 (one-line model) and model 2 (segmented regression model). Thus, it was more suitable to use the one-line model, and the inflection point was not statistically significant. All the above results indicated that the blood Pb concentration was linearly and positively correlated with blood eosinophil counts.

4. Discussion

Environmental factors were generally considered to be related to the occurrence and progression of asthma. Blood eosinophils play a crucial role in the occurrence, progression, and treatment of asthma [43,44,45,46,47]. However, according to previous studies, the results investigating the correlation between metal elements and the occurrence and progression of asthma were inconsistent [31,48,49]. Meanwhile, the studies on the impact of metal elements on blood eosinophil counts among adults with asthma are few. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the relationship between blood metal concentrations (Pb, Cd, Hg, Mn and Se) and blood eosinophil counts among 2026 adults with asthma who participated in the NHANES survey from 2011 to 2018 (2011–2012, 2013–2014, 2015–2016, 2017–2018) in the USA. In order to rank the relative importance of exposure to different metals to blood eosinophil counts, we first constructed the machine learning XGBoost model to determine the order of selected metals. We found that blood Pb is the most important metal on blood eosinophil counts, followed by blood Se, Mn, Hg, and Cd. Next, we constructed three weighted linear models (the non-adjusted model, minimally adjusted model, and fully adjusted model) by multivariate regression analysis to determine which metal exposure might be regarded as the independent risk factor. Our study indicated that natural log-transformed blood Pb concentrations were positively associated with blood eosinophil counts in the non-adjusted model and fully adjusted model with statistical significance. In contrast, the association between blood Se, Mn, Hg, Cd, and blood eosinophil counts was not statistically significant in the three models. The above results suggested that long-time Pb exposure as a risk factor might be correlated with the immune system disorder of asthmatic adults and affect the occurrence, development, and exacerbation of asthma.
To our knowledge, Pb is a ubiquitous environmental contaminant with potential immunotoxicity [50]. Though Pb exposures in the environment, as a result of the phase-out of leaded gasoline, have been significantly reduced, Pb is still found in paint, food, and lead-containing consumer products and detected in the general population. Especially among the population of low socioeconomic status, people are increasingly concerned about the possible adverse impacts of exposure to environmental Pb [37]. The immune system is shown to be one of the most sensitive targets for lead toxicity [51]. An epidemiological study in the USA reported that Ellen M. Wells et al. observed a significant association of lead with increased eosinophils among non-Hispanic Whites with asthma after control confounding factors [52]. Additionally, another cross-sectional study involving 2447 participants also observed a positive association between blood Pb concentrations and blood eosinophil counts [34]. However, this cross-sectional study did not conduct stratified analyses in different populations to verify the stability and reliability of this association. In the same way, we found that the association between blood Pb concentrations and blood eosinophil counts demonstrated population differences among American adults with asthma. We identified the high-risk group for Pb exposure through stratified analysis, including males aged less than 40 years old and 60 years old or older, non-Hispanic Whites, those who reported their marital status as single, the low and middle group of the poverty-to-income ratio, those who had a BMI between 25 and 28, non-Hispanic blacks, those who were without hypertension, and those who were without diabetes. Furthermore, we observed a linear relationship between natural log-transformed blood Pb concentrations and blood eosinophil counts, which indicated that the disorder of the immune system might be associated with the accumulation of Pb exposures.
In our study, the selected metal exposure included Cd, Hg, Mn, and Se in addition to lead. However, few studies investigated the associations between Cd, Hg, Mn, and Se exposures and blood eosinophil count. Cd exposure can occur through contaminated water, contaminated food, smoking, and occupational settings [53,54]. In an epidemiological study, Chao-Hsin Huang et al. reported that a high concentration of Cd was associated with a high eosinophil count [34]. Hg is a ubiquitous heavy metal, which is a growing public concern owing to its wide distribution and serious adverse health impacts. Some studies have reported modulatory effects of Hg on the immune system [55,56]. In an experimental animal study, Adam M. Schaefer et al. observed an inverse relationship of blood Hg concentrations with blood eosinophils among free-ranging bottlenose dolphins [57]. Similarly, another American study demonstrated developmental exposure to environmental Hg had no correlation with blood eosinophil counts in childhood. Mn and Se are necessary nutrients, but the intake of these elements’ concentrations beyond the homeostatic capacity of the body may cause adverse effects [58]. A previous study including 2447 adults found urine Mn was not associated with blood eosinophil counts [34]. Another small case-control study found that the asthma group had lower serum Se concentrations and higher indicators of oxidative stress [42]. In our study, in three models, we observed that the associations between blood Cd, Hg, Mn, Se, and blood eosinophil counts were not statistically significant among asthmatic adults in the USA.
Compared with previous studies, our study has several advantages. First, our study provides a nationally representative, relatively large sample of asthmatic adults, which includes information on quite a few potential confounders. Second, considering that confounders may affect the results, we identify the high-risk group on the Pb exposures and verify the stability of the results through stratified analysis. Next, we use the machine learning XGBoost algorithm to determine which type of metal exposure affects blood eosinophil counts most. Then, we observed the linear relationship between blood Pb concentrations and blood eosinophil counts by constructing a smooth curve.
Nonetheless, some limitations in interpreting our results need to be taken into account. Though our study is nationally broad, most of the data are based on the American population. Data on populations of countries with less developed economies are still lacking, and heavy metal exposure may be different due to differences in national development. Secondly, this study is a cross-sectional survey, so we cannot distinguish a causal relationship. Thirdly, we cannot determine the drug use of participants. Finally, some other potential confounders, such as information on IgE-dependent sensitization, allergic diseases, parasitic diseases, and so on, may not be taken into consideration. In conclusion, we suggest constructing more predictive models between metal exposures and body biomarkers, including blood eosinophils, in the future clinical setting to guide clinical prevention and therapy.

5. Conclusions

In our study, we observed that blood Pb was positively and independently correlated with blood eosinophil counts among American adults with asthma. We suggested that long-time Pb exposure as a risk factor might be correlated with the immune system disorder of asthmatic adults and affect the occurrence, development, and exacerbation of asthma. Though our study did not elucidate the exact mechanism of action of Pb on the development and exacerbation of asthma, our findings would help to better identify the association of Pb and asthma from an epidemiological perspective. Finally, we wished to attract more attention to the association between metal exposure and asthma.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and design, M.G., J.W., S.G. and L.X.; Acquisition and analysis of the data, M.G. and J.W.; Interpretation of the data, J.W. and M.G.; Writing—original draft, J.W. and M.G.; Writing—review and editing and critical analysis of the results, J.W., M.G., S.G. and L.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Famous talents and teachers in Chongqing (Guo Shuliang).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data can be obtained on the NHANES official website (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/, 6 January 2023).

Acknowledgments

The NHANES protocol was approved by the NCHS Research Ethics Review Board. The authors also wish to extend their great thanks to Joan, who supported them the most.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Wenzel, S. Severe asthma: From characteristics to phenotypes to endotypes. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2012, 42, 650–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chung, K.F.; Wenzel, S.E.; Brozek, J.L.; Bush, A.; Castro, M.; Sterk, P.J.; Adcock, I.M.; Bateman, E.D.; Bel, E.H.; Bleecker, E.R.; et al. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 43, 343–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. GBD 2015 Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Res. Med. 2017, 5, 691–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Wang, H.; Naghabi, M.; Allen, C.; Barber, R.M.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Carter, A.; Caset, D.C.; Charlson, F.J.; Chen, A.Z.; Coates, A.J.; et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016, 388, 1459–1544. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pate, C.A.; Zahran, H.S.; Qin, X.; Johnson, C.; Hummelman, E.; Malilay, J. Asthma Surveillance—United States, 2006–2018. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveill. Summ. 2021, 70, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nurmagambetov, T.; Kuwahara, R.; Garbe, P. The Economic Burden of Asthma in the United States, 2008–2013. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2018, 15, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Denlinger, L.C.; Phillips, B.R.; Ramratnam, S.; Ross, K.; Bhakta, N.R.; Cardet, J.C.; Castro, M.; Peters, S.P.; Phipatanakul, W.; Aujla, S.; et al. Inflammatory and Comorbid Features of Patients with Severe Asthma and Frequent Exacerbations. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 195, 302–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Carr, T.F.; Zeki, A.A.; Kraft, M. Eosinophilic and Noneosinophilic Asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 197, 22–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fowler, S.J.; Tavernier, G.; Niven, R. High blood eosinophil counts predict sputum eosinophilia in patients with severe asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 822–824.e2. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wagener, A.H.; de Nijs, S.B.; Lutter, R.; Sousa, A.R.; Weersink, E.J.; Bel, E.H.; Sterk, P.J. External validation of blood eosinophils, FE(NO) and serum periostin as surrogates for sputum eosinophils in asthma. Thorax 2015, 70, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hastie, A.T.; Moore, W.C.; Li, H.; Rector, B.M.; Ortega, V.E.; Pascual, R.M.; Peters, S.P.; Meyers, D.A.; Bleecker, E.R. Biomarker surrogates do not accurately predict sputum eosinophil and neutrophil percentages in asthmatic subjects. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 72–80.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ulrik, C.S.; Frederiksen, J. Mortality and markers of risk of asthma death among 1,075 outpatients with asthma. Chest 1995, 108, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kupczyk, M.; Haque, S.; Middelveld, R.J.; Dahlén, B.; Dahlén, S.E. Phenotypic predictors of response to oral glucocorticosteroids in severe asthma. Respir. Med. 2013, 107, 1521–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Malinovschi, A.; Fonseca, J.A.; Jacinto, T.; Alving, K.; Janson, C. Exhaled nitric oxide levels and blood eosinophil counts independently associate with wheeze and asthma events in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey subjects. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 821–827.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wark, P.A.; McDonald, V.M.; Gibson, P.G. Adjusting prednisone using blood eosinophils reduces exacerbations and improves asthma control in difficult patients with asthma. Respirology 2015, 20, 1282–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Corren, J.; Weinstein, S.; Janka, L.; Zangrilli, J.; Garin, M. Phase 3 Study of Reslizumab in Patients With Poorly Controlled Asthma: Effects Across a Broad Range of Eosinophil Counts. Chest 2016, 150, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Goldman, M.; Hirsch, I.; Zangrilli, J.G.; Newbold, P.; Xu, X. The association between blood eosinophil count and benralizumab efficacy for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma: Subanalyses of the Phase III SIROCCO and CALIMA studies. Curr. Med Res. Opin. 2017, 33, 1605–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rabe, K.F.; Nair, P.; Brusselle, G.; Maspero, J.F.; Castro, M.; Sher, L.; Zhu, H.; Hamilton, J.D.; Swanson, B.N.; Khan, A.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Glucocorticoid-Dependent Severe Asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 2475–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. FitzGerald, J.M.; Bleecker, E.R.; Nair, P.; Korn, S.; Ohta, K.; Lommatzsch, M.; Ferguson, G.T.; Busse, W.W.; Barker, P.; Sproule, S.; et al. An anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody, as add-on treatment for patients with severe, uncontrolled, eosinophilic asthma (CALIMA): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016, 388, 2128–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bleecker, E.R.; FitzGerald, J.M.; Chanez, P.; Papi, A.; Weinstein, S.F.; Barker, P.; Sproule, S.; Gilmartin, G.; Aurivillius, M.; Werkström, V.; et al. Efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma uncontrolled with high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β(2)-agonists (SIROCCO): A randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016, 388, 2115–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vedel-Krogh, S.; Nielsen, S.F.; Lange, P.; Vestbo, J.; Nordestgaard, B.G. Association of Blood Eosinophil and Blood Neutrophil Counts with Asthma Exacerbations in the Copenhagen General Population Study. Clin. Chem. 2017, 63, 823–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Price, D.B.; Rigazio, A.; Campbell, J.D.; Bleecker, E.R.; Corrigan, C.J.; Thomas, M.; Wenzel, S.E.; Wilson, A.M.; Small, M.B.; Gopalan, G.; et al. Blood eosinophil count and prospective annual asthma disease burden: A UK cohort study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2015, 3, 849–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zeiger, R.S.; Schatz, M.; Dalal, A.A.; Chen, W.; Sadikova, E.; Suruki, R.Y.; Kawatkar, A.A.; Qian, L. Blood Eosinophil Count and Outcomes in Severe Uncontrolled Asthma: A Prospective Study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pr. 2017, 5, 144–153.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wu, K.-G.; Chang, C.-Y.; Yen, C.-Y.; Lai, C.-C. Associations between environmental heavy metal exposure and childhood asthma: A population-based study. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2019, 52, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Menke, A.; Guallar, E.; Cowie, C.C. Metals in Urine and Diabetes in U.S. Adults. Diabetes 2016, 65, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zeng, X.; Xu, X.; Zheng, X.; Reponen, T.; Chen, A.; Huo, X. Heavy metals in PM2.5 and in blood, and children’s respiratory symptoms and asthma from an e-waste recycling area. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 210, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, I.J.; Karmaus, W.J.J.; Yang, C.C. Lead exposure, IgE, and the risk of asthma in children. J. Exp. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2017, 27, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lehmann, I. Environmental pollutants as adjuvant factors of immune system derived diseases. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 2017, 60, 592–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Feiler, M.O.; Pavia, C.J.; Frey, S.M.; Parsons, P.J.; Thevenet-Morrison, K.; Canfield, R.L.; Jusko, T.A. Early life blood lead levels and asthma diagnosis at age 4–6 years. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2021, 26, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Park, S.; Lee, E.-H.; Kho, Y. The association of asthma, total IgE, and blood lead and cadmium levels. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 138, 1701–1703.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Huang, X.; Xie, J.; Cui, X.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, X.; Lu, W.; Shen, Y.; Yuan, J.; Chen, W. Association between Concentrations of Metals in Urine and Adult Asthma: A Case-Control Study in Wuhan, China. PloS ONE 2016, 11, e0155818. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosa, M.J.; Benedetti, C.; Peli, M.; Donna, F.; Nazzaro, M.; Fedrighi, C.; Zoni, S.; Marcon, A.; Zimmerman, N.; Wright, R.; et al. Association between personal exposure to ambient metals and respiratory disease in Italian adolescents: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pulm. Med. 2016, 16, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Urushidate, S.; Matsuzaka, M.; Okubo, N.; Iwasaki, H.; Hasebe, T.; Tsuya, R.; Iwane, K.; Inoue, R.; Yamai, K.; Danjo, K.; et al. Association between concentration of trace elements in serum and bronchial asthma among Japanese general population. J. Trace Elements Med. Biol. 2010, 24, 236–242. [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang, C.-H.; Hsieh, C.-Y.; Wang, C.-W.; Tu, H.-P.; Chen, S.-C.; Hung, C.-H.; Kuo, C.-H. Associations and Interactions between Heavy Metals with White Blood Cell and Eosinophil Count. Int. J. Med Sci. 2022, 19, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oulhote, Y.; Shamim, Z.; Kielsen, K.; Weihe, P.; Grandjean, P.; Ryder, L.P.; Heilmann, C. Children’s white blood cell counts in relation to developmental exposures to methylmercury and persistent organic pollutants. Reprod. Toxicol. 2017, 68, 207–214. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cornwell, C.R.; Egan, K.B.; Zahran, H.S.; Mirabelli, M.C.; Hsu, J.; Chew, G.L. Associations of blood lead levels with asthma and blood eosinophils in US children. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2020, 31, 695–699. [Google Scholar]
  37. Min, K.-B.; Min, J.-Y. Environmental lead exposure and increased risk for total and allergen-specific IgE in US adults. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 275–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bellanger, A.-P.; Bosch-Cano, F.; Millon, L.; Ruffaldi, P.; Franchi, M.; Bernard, N. Reactions of airway epithelial cells to birch pollen grains previously exposed to in situ atmospheric Pb concentrations: A preliminary assay of allergenicity. Biol. Trace Element Res. 2012, 150, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Farkhondeh, T.; Boskabady, M.H.; Kohi, M.K.; Sadeghi-Hashjin, G.; Moin, M. Lead exposure affects inflammatory mediators, total and differential white blood cells in sensitized guinea pigs during and after sensitization. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 37, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guardiola, F.A.; Cuesta, A.; Meseguer, J.; Martínez, S.; Martínez-Sánchez, M.J.; Pérez-Sirvent, C.; Esteban, M.A. Accumulation, histopathology and immunotoxicological effects of waterborne cadmium on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2013, 35, 792–800. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kim, J.H.; Lee, K.-H.; Hong, S.-C.; Lee, H.-S.; Lee, J.; Kang, J.W. Association between serum mercury concentration and leukocyte differential count in children. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2015, 32, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Guo, C.H.; Liu, P.J.; Hsia, S.; Chuang, C.J.; Chen, P.C. Role of certain trace minerals in oxidative stress, in-flam-mation, CD4/CD8 lymphocyte ratios and lung function in asthmatic patients. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2011, 48 Pt 4, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Zeiger, R.S.; Schatz, M.; Li, Q.; Chen, W.; Khatry, D.B.; Gossage, D.; Tran, T.N. The association of blood eo-sinophil counts to future asthma exacerbations in children with persistent asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. In Pract. 2015, 3, 283–287.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Foster, P.S.; Hogan, S.P.; Yang, M.; Mattes, J.; Young, I.G.; Matthaei, K.I.; Kumar, R.K.; Mahalingam, S.; Webb, D.C. Interleukin-5 and eosinophils as therapeutic targets for asthma. Trends Mol. Med. 2002, 8, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Casciano, J.; Krishnan, J.A.; Small, M.B.; Buck, P.O.; Gopalan, G.; Li, C.; Kemp, R.; Dotiwala, Z. Burden of asthma with elevated blood eosinophil levels. BMC Pulm. Med. 2016, 16, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Anderson, H.M.; Lemanske, R.F., Jr.; Arron, J.R.; Holweg, C.T.J.; Rajamanickam, V.; Gangnon, R.E.; Gern, J.E.; Jackson, D.J. Relationships among aeroallergen sensitization, peripheral blood eosinophils, and periostin in pediatric asthma development. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 790–796. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Nakagome, K.; Nagata, M. Involvement and Possible Role of Eosinophils in Asthma Exacerbation. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2220. [Google Scholar]
  48. Thomson, C.D.; Wickens, K.; Miller, J.; Ingham, T.; Lampshire, P.; Epton, M.J.; Town, G.I.; Pattemore, P.; Crane, J. Selenium status and allergic disease in a cohort of New Zealand children. Clin. Exp. Allergy J. Br. Soc. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 42, 560–567. [Google Scholar]
  49. Li, X.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, X.; Huang, Z.; Yu, M.; Xu, Q.; Han, X.; Lu, C.; Wang, X. Association be-tween selected urinary heavy metals and asthma in adults: A retrospective cross-sectional study of the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 5833–5844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mishra, K.P. Lead exposure and its impact on immune system: A review. Toxicol. Vitr. 2009, 23, 969–972. [Google Scholar]
  51. Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B.; Kim, R.; Cho, S.-I.; Paek, M. Blood lead levels and increased bronchial responsiveness. Biol. Trace Element Res. 2008, 123, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wells, E.M.; Bonfield, T.L.; Dearborn, D.G.; Jackson, L.W. The relationship of blood lead with immunoglobulin E, eosinophils, and asthma among children: NHANES 2005–2006. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2014, 217, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Cao, Z.R.; Cui, S.M.; Lu, X.X.; Chen, X.M.; Yang, X.; Cui, J.P.; Zhang, G.H. Effects of occupational cadmium exposure on workers’ cardiovascular system. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi Zhonghua Laodong Weisheng Zhiyebing Zazhi/Chin. J. Ind. Hyg. Occup. Dis. 2018, 36, 474–477. [Google Scholar]
  54. Huo, J.; Huang, Z.; Li, R.; Song, Y.; Lan, Z.; Ma, S.; Wu, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, L. Dietary cadmium exposure assessment in rural areas of Southwest China. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Nyland, J.F.; Fillion, M.; Barbosa, F., Jr.; Shirley, D.L.; Chine, C.; Lemire, M.; Mergler, D.; Silbergeld, E.K. Bi-omarkers of methylmercury exposure immunotoxicity among fish consumers in Amazonian Brazil. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011, 119, 1733–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kim, K.-N.; Bae, S.; Park, H.Y.; Kwon, H.-J.; Hong, Y.C. Low-level Mercury Exposure and Risk of Asthma in School-age Children. Epidemiology 2015, 26, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Schaefer, A.M.; Stavros, H.-C.W.; Bossart, G.D.; Fair, P.A.; Goldstein, J.D.; Reif, J.S. Associations between mercury and hepatic, renal, endocrine, and hematological parameters in Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) along the eastern coast of Florida and South Carolina. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2011, 61, 688–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rayman, M.P. Selenium and human health. Lancet 2012, 379, 1256–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 12 01543 g001 550
Figure 1. Flowchart for selecting analyzed participants.
Figure 1. Flowchart for selecting analyzed participants.
Jcm 12 01543 g001
Jcm 12 01543 g002 550
Figure 2. Stratified association of blood Pb on blood eosinophil counts in the prespecified and exploratory subgroups. Above adjusts for gender, age, race/ethnicity, education level, marital status, poverty to income ratio, BMI, smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life, hypertension, diabetes, blood urea nitrogen, blood creatinine and blood cotinine. In each case, the model was not adjusted for the stratification variable itself.
Figure 2. Stratified association of blood Pb on blood eosinophil counts in the prespecified and exploratory subgroups. Above adjusts for gender, age, race/ethnicity, education level, marital status, poverty to income ratio, BMI, smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life, hypertension, diabetes, blood urea nitrogen, blood creatinine and blood cotinine. In each case, the model was not adjusted for the stratification variable itself.
Jcm 12 01543 g002
Jcm 12 01543 g003 550
Figure 3. XGBoost model reveals the relative importance of each blood metal on blood eosinophil counts and the corresponding variable importance score. The X-axis is the importance score, the relative number of a variable used to distribute the data; the Y-axis is the blood metal.
Figure 3. XGBoost model reveals the relative importance of each blood metal on blood eosinophil counts and the corresponding variable importance score. The X-axis is the importance score, the relative number of a variable used to distribute the data; the Y-axis is the blood metal.
Jcm 12 01543 g003
Jcm 12 01543 g004 550
Figure 4. Dose-response relationships of blood Pb concentrations with blood eosinophil counts. The solid line and shadow area represented the corresponding β values and 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 4. Dose-response relationships of blood Pb concentrations with blood eosinophil counts. The solid line and shadow area represented the corresponding β values and 95% confidence intervals.
Jcm 12 01543 g004
Table
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the study population disaggregated by quartiles of blood eosinophil count.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the study population disaggregated by quartiles of blood eosinophil count.
Q1Q2Q3Q4p-Value
Gender (%) 0.039
Male37.41 (26.44, 49.85)37.87 (32.63, 43.41)39.27 (33.83, 44.98)46.96 (42.24, 51.74)
Female62.59 (50.15, 73.56)62.13 (56.59, 67.37)60.73 (55.02, 66.17)53.04 (48.26, 57.76)
Age, mean (95% CI) (years)45.46 (41.40, 49.52)43.48 (41.89, 45.06)45.41 (43.54, 47.28)46.64 (44.97, 48.30)0.038
Race/ethnicity (%) 0.361
Mexican American4.73 (1.52, 13.79)4.91 (3.34, 7.16)6.13 (4.14, 8.99)7.03 (4.96, 9.88)
Other Hispanic6.84 (2.44, 17.76)6.14 (4.17, 8.96)7.20 (5.22, 9.86)6.56 (4.61, 9.24)
Non-Hispanic White63.01 (44.80, 78.14)67.54 (60.54, 73.84)66.28 (59.36, 72.58)68.35 (63.38, 72.93)
Non-Hispanic Black20.79 (12.00, 33.56)13.01 (9.69, 17.26)11.36 (8.75, 14.64)10.40 (7.98, 13.46)
Other race4.63 (1.79, 11.40)8.40 (5.51, 12.61)9.02 (6.42, 12.54)7.66 (5.75, 10.13)
Education (%) 0.502
Less than high school16.70 (9.34, 28.08)10.86 (8.44, 13.86)14.20 (10.82, 18.42)13.28 (9.82, 17.72)
High school23.31 (12.86, 38.51)20.27 (16.29, 24.92)19.30 (14.90, 24.63)22.88 (18.43, 28.03)
More than high school59.98 (44.64, 73.59)68.88 (63.79, 73.55)66.49 (60.71, 71.82)63.84 (57.45, 69.79)
Marital status (%) 0.501
Married45.22 (31.88, 59.29)50.45 (45.43, 55.46)46.76 (41.46, 52.14)51.84 (47.29, 56.35)
Single50.68 (36.51, 64.74)41.19 (36.81, 45.73)46.01 (40.48, 51.64)40.95 (37.12, 44.89)
Living with a partner4.10 (1.21, 13.00)8.36 (5.87, 11.77)7.22 (4.98, 10.36)7.21 (5.06, 10.19)
Poverty-to-income ratio, mean (95% CI)2.60 (2.07, 3.13)2.88 (2.68, 3.08)2.65 (2.43, 2.88)2.75 (2.53, 2.96)0.241
BMI, mean (95% CI) (kg/m2)28.05 (25.90, 30.20)29.41 (28.55, 30.26)31.03 (29.96, 32.10)31.70 (30.80, 32.59)0.001
Smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life (%) 0.224
Yes50.51 (34.88, 66.05)43.61 (37.64, 49.77)45.57 (39.23, 52.06)51.05 (44.87, 57.20)
No49.49 (33.95, 65.12)56.39 (50.23, 62.36)54.43 (47.94, 60.77)48.95 (42.80, 55.13)
Hypertension (%) 0.003
Yes36.62 (23.68, 51.82)29.25 (24.35, 34.68)37.71 (32.22, 43.53)41.20 (36.32, 46.25)
No63.38 (48.18, 76.32)70.75 (65.32, 75.65)62.29 (56.47, 67.78)58.80 (53.75, 63.68)
Diabetes (%) 0.394
Yes13.66 (6.13, 27.72)8.60 (6.62, 11.09)12.50 (9.65, 16.04)13.57 (10.14, 17.92)
No82.01 (66.25, 91.36)88.34 (84.69, 91.22)85.06 (80.97, 88.39)84.24 (79.54, 88.03)
Borderline4.33 (0.98, 17.18)3.06 (1.32, 6.94)2.44 (1.26, 4.67)2.19 (1.29, 3.70)
BUN, mean (95% CI) (mmol/L)4.72 (4.20, 5.24)4.65 (4.50, 4.80)4.79 (4.58, 5.00)4.97 (4.80, 5.15)0.075
Cr, mean (95% CI) (umol/L)73.95 (69.17, 78.72)74.05 (72.23, 75.86)77.18 (74.93, 79.42)80.06 (77.99, 82.13)0.0002
Blood cotinine, mean (95% CI) (ng/mL)94.98 (52.24, 137.72)53.90 (38.51, 69.29)61.44 (49.13, 73.75)68.29 (51.47, 85.12)0.200
Blood Pb, mean (95% CI) (ug/dL)1.20 (0.92, 1.49)1.00 (0.91, 1.08)1.03 (0.94, 1.13)1.17 (1.06, 1.28)0.007
Blood Cd, mean (95% CI) (ug/dL)0.56 (0.42, 0.71)0.46 (0.37, 0.55)0.49 (0.44, 0.54)0.59 (0.50, 0.69)0.106
Blood Hg, mean (95% CI) (ug/dL)1.53 (1.00, 2.06)1.40 (1.14, 1.65)1.24 (1.05, 1.42)1.13 (0.88, 1.37)0.126
Blood Se, mean (95% CI) (ug/dL)197.90 (190.03, 205.77)194.14 (191.52, 196.75)192.45 (189.50, 195.40)194.60 (191.24, 197.97)0.567
Blood Mn, mean (95% CI) (ug/dL)9.62 (8.37, 10.88)10.15 (9.81, 10.49)10.10 (9.77, 10.42)9.72 (9.39, 10.06)0.179
Note: Data are expressed as weighted means (95% Cis) or proportions. Q1–Q4: Grouped by quartile according to the blood eosinophil counts. Our data included blood metal concentrations, blood eosinophil counts, demographic data, examination data, laboratory data, and questionnaire data for the second analysis. BUN: blood urea nitrogen; Cr: blood creatinine; Pb: lead; Cd: cadmium; Hg: mercury; Se: selenium; Mn: manganese.
Table
Table 2. Multivariate weighted linear model analysis reveals the association between the blood metal and blood eosinophil count.
Table 2. Multivariate weighted linear model analysis reveals the association between the blood metal and blood eosinophil count.
Non-Adjusted ModelMinimally Adjusted ModelFully Adjusted Model
β (95% CI) p valueβ (95% CI) p valueβ (95% CI) p value
Log blood Pb (ug/dL)24.76 (8.22, 41.30) 0.00517.66 (−0.78, 36.09) 0.06625.39 (6.91, 43.88) 0.010
Log blood Cd (ug/dL)4.18 (−7.55, 15.91) 0.4877.18 (−5.56, 19.92) 0.27417.51 (−0.43, 35.45) 0.063
Log blood Hg (ug/dL)−1.91 (−11.32, 7.50) 0.693−4.35 (−14.13, 5.43) 0.387−3.23 (−13.20, 6.75) 0.530
Log blood Se (ug/dL)14.48 (−68.49, 97.45) 0.734−6.99 (−86.32, 72.35) 0.864−7.60 (−82.84, 67.64) 0.844
Log blood Mn (ug/dL)−14.27 (−40.80, 12.26) 0.296−6.18 (−37.67, 25.31) 0.702−5.87 (−37.43, 25.68) 0.717
Note: Non-adjusted model adjusts for none. Minimally adjusted model adjusts for age, race/ethnicity. Fully adjusted model adjusts for gender, age, race/ethnicity, education level, marital status, poverty to income ratio, BMI, smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life, hypertension, diabetes, blood urea nitrogen, blood creatinine and blood cotinine.
Table
Table 3. Threshold effect analysis of between blood Pb and blood eosinophil count using the two-piecewise linear regression model.
Table 3. Threshold effect analysis of between blood Pb and blood eosinophil count using the two-piecewise linear regression model.
β (95% CI) p-Value
Model I
Linear effect25.39 (10.53, 40.26) 0.001
Model II
Inflection point (K)−0.87
Log blood Pb < K56.23 (−5.73, 118.19) 0.075
Log blood Pb > K21.30 (4.43, 38.18) 0.013
Log likelihood ratio0.312
Note: Models I and II all adjusted for gender, age, race/ethnicity, education level, marital status, poverty-to-income ratio, BMI, smoking status, hypertension history, diabetes history, blood urea nitrogen, blood creatinine, and blood cotinine.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wen, J.; Giri, M.; Xu, L.; Guo, S. Association between Exposure to Selected Heavy Metals and Blood Eosinophil Counts in Asthmatic Adults: Results from NHANES 2011–2018. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041543

AMA Style

Wen J, Giri M, Xu L, Guo S. Association between Exposure to Selected Heavy Metals and Blood Eosinophil Counts in Asthmatic Adults: Results from NHANES 2011–2018. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(4):1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041543

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wen, Jun, Mohan Giri, Li Xu, and Shuliang Guo. 2023. "Association between Exposure to Selected Heavy Metals and Blood Eosinophil Counts in Asthmatic Adults: Results from NHANES 2011–2018" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 4: 1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041543

APA Style

Wen, J., Giri, M., Xu, L., & Guo, S. (2023). Association between Exposure to Selected Heavy Metals and Blood Eosinophil Counts in Asthmatic Adults: Results from NHANES 2011–2018. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(4), 1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041543

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop