Next Article in Journal
Echocardiography and Electrocardiography in Detecting Atrial Cardiomyopathy: A Promising Path to Predicting Cardioembolic Strokes and Atrial Fibrillation
Next Article in Special Issue
The Short-Term Efficacy of a Three-Week Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program among Patients with Obstructive Lung Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Using Multi-Modal Electronic Health Record Data for the Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Long COVID Using the Super Learner Algorithm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pulmonary Rehabilitation with and without a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Breathlessness in People Living with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 23
10.3390/jcm12237314
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical Characteristics of Individuals with Interstitial Lung Diseases and Indication of End-of-Life Care

by
Gabriela Krinski
1,2,†,
Larissa Dragonetti Bertin
1,2,†,
Heloise Angélico Pimpão
1,2,
Humberto Silva
1,2,
Brunna Luiza Tavares
1,2,
Leonardo Lunardelli
1,2,
Geovana Alves do Prado
1,2,
Fabio Pitta
1,2 and
Carlos Augusto Camillo
1,2,3,*
1
Laboratory of Research in Respiratory Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, State University of Londrina, Londrina 86038-350, Brazil
2
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Pitágoras Unopar Anhanguera University, Campus Piza, Londrina 86041-140, Brazil
3
Department of Physiotherapy, School of Technology and Sciences, Campus Presidente Prudente, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente 19060-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(23), 7314; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237314
Submission received: 26 September 2023 / Revised: 17 November 2023 / Accepted: 22 November 2023 / Published: 25 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Pulmonary Rehabilitation)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
End-of-life care (EOLC) is palliative support provided in the last 6 months to 1 year of a patient’s life. Although there are established criteria for its indication, few studies describe the clinical and functional characteristics of individuals with interstitial lung diseases (ILD) in EOLC. ILD individuals underwent various assessments, including lung function, exercise capacity (6 min walk test), physical activity in daily life (PADL), peripheral muscle strength, maximal respiratory pressures, body composition, quality of life (SGRQ-I), symptoms of anxiety and depression, dyspnea (MRC scale), and sleep quality. Fifty-eight individuals were included and divided into two groups according to the indication for commencing EOLC (ILD with an indication of EOLC (ILD-EOLC) or ILD without an indication of EOLC (ILD-nEOLC). There were differences between the groups, respectively, for steps/day (2328 [1134–3130] vs. 5188 [3863–6514] n/day, p = 0.001), time spent/day carrying out moderate-to-vigorous physical activities (1 [0.4–1] vs. 10 [3–19] min/day, p = 0.0003), time spent/day in standing (3.8 [3.2–4.5] vs. 4.8 [4.1–6.7] h/day, p = 0.005), and lying positions (5.7 [5.3–6.9] vs. 4.2 [3.6–5.1] h/day, p = 0.0004), the sit-to-stand test (20 ± 4 vs. 26 ± 7 reps, p = 0.01), 4 m gait speed (0.92 ± 0.21 vs. 1.05 ± 0.15 m/s, p = 0.02), quadriceps muscle strength (237 [211–303] vs. 319 [261–446] N, p = 0.005), SGRQ-I (71 ± 15 vs. 50 ± 20 pts, p = 0.0009), and MRC (4 [3–5] vs. 2 [2–3] pts, p = 0.001). ILD individuals with criteria for commencing EOLC exhibit reduced PADL, functional performance, peripheral muscle strength, quality of life, and increased dyspnea.

1. Introduction

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) encompass a heterogeneous group of conditions with similar clinical, radiological, and functional features [1,2,3]. In addition to respiratory impairment, individuals with ILD commonly present systemic manifestations such as reduced participation in activities of daily living, poor exercise tolerance and exercise desaturation, muscle weakness, cough, fatigue, dyspnea, and symptoms of anxiety and depression [4,5]. Following diagnosis, the average life span of patients with the most prevalent ILD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), varies from 3 to 5 years in different studies, but its clinical course is variable [6,7,8].
The unpredictable course of ILD ma”es its prognosis challenging; therefore, the current guidelines recommend early palliative care for these individuals [7,9]. Palliative care is an approach aimed at improving the quality of life for patients and families facing life-threatening illness-related issues [10]. These interventions are applicable from the early stages of the disease through early identification, assessment, and treatment of symptoms in physical, psychosocial, and spiritual contexts [10]. Palliative care is underutilized in ILD individuals, with referral rates ranging from 0 to 38%, often only occurring in the last month of life [7,9].
Specific end-of-life palliative support is known as end-of-life care (EOLC) and is estimated to occur in the last 6 months to 1 year of a patient’s life [8,11]. The primary goal of EOLC is to promote comfort and improve quality of life until the moment of death [4,6,7]. Patients receiving EOLC require fewer visits to the emergency department and hospitalizations towards the end of their lives, shorter hospital stays, fewer admissions to intensive care units, and in-hospital deaths [6]. There are criteria in the literature for initiating EOLC in ILD individuals, considering factors such as hospitalizations in the past year, resting arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), exercise capacity, diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension, lung function, and the emergence of new severe comorbidities [8]. However, there is limited current evidence comprehensively describing different clinical and functional characteristics in ILD individuals receiving EOLC.
Understanding the various clinical and functional aspects affected in ILD individuals receiving EOLC would assist in symptom management and improve functionality and quality of life. This study aims to characterize various clinical and functional aspects of ILD individuals with clinical indications to receive EOLC by comparing them with individuals without indications for EOLC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Ethical Aspects

This is a cross-sectional study conducted in the physiotherapy outpatient clinic of the University Hospital of the State University of Londrina (Londrina, Brazil). This study is an analysis of data collected for an ongoing cohort (BELIEVE-ILD #NCT03400839) approved by the local ethics committee of the institution (#2.484.871). Before participating in the study, all participants signed an informed consent form.

2.2. Sample Characteristics

Individuals between 40 and 75 years of age with a diagnosis of interstitial lung disease according to international guidelines [3] were included. Individuals with a stable clinical condition (no exacerbations) for at least 1 month before inclusion and without any clinical conditions that could interfere with the assessments (e.g., musculoskeletal limitations, severe or unstable cardiovascular disease, and neuromuscular disease) were included. Individuals whose interstitial lung disease could not be confirmed by pulmonary function testing or who showed characteristics of another lung disease in pulmonary function testing, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were excluded.
After inclusion, participants underwent the following assessments: medical history, lung function, disease severity, exercise capacity, physical activity in daily life (PADL), functional performance, peripheral and respiratory muscle strength, body composition, health-related quality of life, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and sleep quality. The assessments are detailed below.

2.3. Assessments

During the initial assessment, personal and health-related anthropometric data and general health information such as diagnosis duration, home oxygen therapy use, number of hospitalizations in the last year, comorbidities, and medication use were collected.
A complete lung function assessment was performed using spirometry, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO), and measurements of lung volumes using a whole-body plethysmograph (Vmax, CareFusion, Yorba Linda, CA, USA) [12,13]. Disease severity staging (i.e., I, II, or III) was performed using the Gender–Age–Physiology (GAP) index [14]. The six-minute walk test (6MWT) was conducted to assess exercise capacity according to international standards [14,15]. Objective monitoring of physical activity in daily life (PADL) was performed using an activity monitor (Actigraph wGT3X-BT®, ActiGraph LLC, Pensacola, FL USA) [16]. Subjects were instructed to wear the activity monitor on their waist for six consecutive days, for 24 h, including sleeping time. The PADL assessment was considered valid if the subject wore the monitor for at least 8 h/day for at least 4 days [16]. The PADL measurement data were analyzed by the ActiLife® software v6.13.4 (Actigraph, Pensacola, FL, USA).
Functional performance was assessed using the timed up-and-go test (usual protocol), 1 min sit-to-stand test, and 4 m walking speed test [17,18,19]. Reference values, according to Furlanetto et al., were used [20]. The peripheral muscle strength of the pectorallis major, latissimus dorsi, triceps, and biceps brachii muscles, as well as the quadriceps femoris, was evaluated using maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) with a dynamometer (EMG System®, Sao Paulo, Brazil) [21]. The positions adopted for each test were determined according to the muscle function tests [22].
Respiratory muscle strength was assessed using maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (PImax and PEmax, respectively) with a digital manovacuometer (MVD 300, Globalmed, Porto Alegre, Brazil) [23,24]. Body composition was assessed using a bioelectrical impedance analysis (Model 310, Biodynamics, Shoreline, WA, USA), and data on the percentage of body fat, percentage of lean mass, metabolic rate, and body mass index (BMI) were collected [25].
Quality of life was assessed using the Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire specific for pulmonary fibrosis (SGRQ-I), validated for ILD individuals [26,27]. The dyspnea sensation related to physical activity was evaluated using the modified Medical Research Council scale (MRC) and the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD-SOBQ) [28,29,30]. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [31,32]. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was applied to assess sleep quality, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) was used to assess daytime sleepiness [33,34].

2.4. Indication for End-of-Life Care

Participants were allocated to two groups according to the indication to commence EOLC following internationally accepted criteria (Table 1) [8]. Individuals with an indication of EOLC (i.e., the ILD-EOLC group) had at least two of the criteria described in Table 1. The results of the clinical testing were compared with the data of individuals without an indication to commence EOLC (the ILD-nEOLC group).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using SAS® OnDemand for Academics software (https://welcome.oda.sas.com, accessed on 1 June 23, SAS, Cary, NC, USA). Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Variables were described as the mean and standard deviation or the median and interquartile range. Categorical data were reported as frequencies. To compare data between the ILD-EOLC and ILD-nEOLC groups, unpaired t-tests, Mann–Whitney tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and chi-square tests were conducted, depending on the data distribution. To confirm if the allocation within the ILD-EOLC group was associated with an increased risk of 1-year mortality, an exploratory analysis using the Kaplan–Meier method with the log-rank test was conducted. Furthermore, to ascertain the impact of the outcomes on mortality, both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out. Statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05.

3. Results

Sixty-three individuals were initially recruited for study participation. Of these, 5 were excluded, resulting in a total of 58 individuals (the ILD-EOLC group n = 14 and the ILD-nEOLC group n = 44) in the data analysis (Figure 1).
Table 2 describes the characteristics of the individuals in both groups. No differences were found regarding sex, age, the time of diagnosis, drug treatment, and the presence of comorbidities. The most common comorbidities in the ILD-EOLC group were gastroesophageal reflux, coronary artery disease, and type II diabetes mellitus. Among the individuals in the ILD-nEOLC group, the most common comorbidities were gastroesophageal reflux, depression, and type II diabetes mellitus. From the included sample, only two patients were following regular exercise training programs before inclusion. After the commencement of the study, 16% of patients in the ILD-nEOLC group and 50% in the ILD-EOLC group were enrolled in regular exercise training programs.
The most prevalent diagnosis in the ILD-EOLC group was idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), while most individuals in the ILD-nEOLC group had a diagnosis of ILD associated with connective tissue diseases. The individuals in the ILD-EOLC group had a worse disease stage compared to the ILD-nEOLC group and a higher frequency of home oxygen therapy use. Furthermore, more deaths occurred within 1 year after inclusion in the study in the ILD-EOLC group. Importantly, none of the individuals included in the study were receiving or had ever received palliative care or end-of-life care, even in the group with an indication for that (ILD-EOLC).
Table 3 demonstrates a comparison of the outcomes used in the classification for the indication of EOLC. As expected, the individuals in the ILD-EOLC group exhibited worse results in nearly all outcomes, except for the presence of pulmonary hypertension.
The comparison of the clinical outcomes investigated in this study can be found in Table 4. Except for body composition, respiratory muscle strength, symptoms of anxiety and depression, sleep quality, and daytime sleepiness, the individuals in the ILD-EOLC group exhibited worse results in all the other outcomes. The Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log-rank test revealed a significant difference in mortality between the groups (log-rank: 0.004). The univariate logistic regression analysis identified DLCO (<0.001) and the number of steps per day (0.01) as factors associated with mortality. However, in the multivariate analysis, none of the outcomes exhibited a statistically significant difference.

4. Discussion

The findings of this study show that individuals with ILD with an indication to commence EOLC present worse levels of daily physical activity, functional performance, peripheral muscle strength, quality of life, and dyspnea. There were no significant differences in respiratory muscle strength, body composition, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, and symptoms of anxiety and depression.
It is expected that individuals in EOLC have a more severe disease, a poorer overall health status, and a worse prognosis [6,9,35,36]. Indeed, in the current study, the majority of individuals in EOLC had a GAP staging ≥ 2 (i.e., 93%), had 4 to 6 comorbidities (50%), and were using corticosteroids and immunosuppressants (35%). Furthermore, 78% of individuals in the ILD-EOLC group died within one year of follow-up, confirming the severity of the disease in this group. However, some aspects of this severity need to be analyzed in further detail.
The main criteria that led to the allocation of our individuals into the ILD-EOLC group were hospitalizations, reduced lung function, and peripheral oxygen saturation < 88% at rest. Previous studies have shown that a reduction in the 6 min walk test (6MWT) distance is directly associated with mortality [37,38,39]. Surprisingly, although individuals in this group had a shorter 6MWT distance, only one patient in the ILD-EOLC group met the criterion for reduced exercise capacity (i.e., <212 m) [8]. The 212 m cut-off may be too low for the Brazilian population, as it has been shown that Brazilian individuals with chronic respiratory diseases cover longer distances in the test [40].
Since we observed heterogeneity in the indications for EOLC in these individuals, it is possible to question whether these factors can be used to assess a patient’s overall condition. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to evaluate a wide range of physical and functional factors in individuals with ILD with an indication to commence EOLC. In fact, it was possible to observe that several characteristics showed some degree of impairment in these individuals. For example, the individuals in the ILD-EOLC group had lower levels of physical activity in all the investigated domains, except for time spent sitting. Although patients in the ILD-nEOLC group already present a reduction in the number of daily steps, the further reduction in the ILD-ELOC group is worrisome and highlights how little these patients are moving during their daily lives. Previous evidence pointed to an increased risk of mortality with reduced levels of physical activity in ILD [41]. Also, Wallaert et al. suggested that patients with less than 3287 steps/day are at a higher risk of mortality [42], corroborating the findings in our study. The reductions found in peripheral muscle strength and functional performance have previously been associated with mortality in other respiratory diseases [43,44]. In the present cohort, the patients in the ILD-EOLC group presented a lower 1 min sit-to-stand outcome (35% predicted). Although the test measures functional performance, it can be used as a surrogate for muscle endurance and implies that muscle function, not only strength, is compromised in this group of patients. Given the fact that these outcomes were also worse in the ILD-EOLC group, it is possible to suggest that future studies with the power to analyze such associations investigate their connection with mortality in individuals with ILD.
Other domains related to a patient’s perception of their health status showed impairments in the ILD-EOLC group. There was a statistically significant reduction in quality of life, mainly in the domains of activity and disease impact. This result is not surprising, as there is evidence of a worsening quality of life in ILD-EOLC individuals [4,6,35,36]. Furthermore, in the present study, individuals in the ILD-EOLC group had worse scores on both tools used to assess dyspnea (i.e., MRC and UCSD-SOBQ). Dyspnea affects up to 94% of respiratory individuals in EOL care and is usually more common and intense in ILD than in oncology individuals [45].
A controversial finding in our study was the absence of worsened symptoms of anxiety and depression in the ILD-EOLC group. There is evidence that the presence of anxiety and depression in ILD individuals may be intensified at the end of life due to a high symptom burden, worsening functionality, and difficulty in performing activities of daily living [4,6,7,8,35,36]. A likely explanation for this difference is that 42% of the EOLC individuals were taking medications to control these symptoms, while in the ILD-nEOLC group, only 27% were. Similarly, we did not find a significant difference between the groups for sleep quality and daytime sleepiness, as both groups had poor sleep quality (PSQI ranging from 5 to 10) and no daytime sleepiness (ESS ≤ 10) [33,34]. These results suggest that the reduction in sleep quality does not depend on disease severity and that sleepiness does not impact ILD individuals to a large extent [46,47].
The results of the present study should be interpreted with caution due to several limitations, including the small sample size, particularly in the EOLC group, and the use of internationally unvalidated criteria for group allocation in the Brazilian population. Future studies may be conducted to validate or develop new criteria for the commencement of end-of-life care.

5. Conclusions

Individuals with interstitial lung disease (ILD) with an indication for end-of-life care (EOLC) exhibit lower levels of physical activity in daily life, functional performance, peripheral muscle strength, quality of life, and worse sensations of dyspnea. There were no significant differences in respiratory muscle strength, body composition, sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, or symptoms of anxiety and depression. Understanding these findings contributes to the early management of debilitating functional symptoms and improves the quality of palliative care.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.K. and C.A.C.; methodology, C.A.C.; software, G.K., H.S. and L.D.B.; validation, C.A.C. and F.P.; formal analysis, G.K. and C.A.C.; investigation, H.S., B.L.T., L.L. and G.A.d.P.; resources, F.P. and C.A.C.; data curation, B.L.T., L.L. and G.A.d.P.; writing—original draft preparation, G.K.; writing—review and editing, F.P, H.S., L.D.B. and H.A.P.; visualization, H.A.P. and H.S.; supervision, C.A.C.; project administration, G.K. and L.D.B.; funding acquisition, F.P. and C.A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was partially funded by CNPq, Brazil (426509/2018-8).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of State University of Londrina #69598317.5.0000.5231. Ethical approval date: 10 November 2022.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study may be available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Travis, W.D.; Costabel, U.; Hansell, D.M.; King, T.E.; Lynch, D.A.; Nicholson, A.G.; Ryerson, C.J.; Ryu, J.H.; Selman, M.; Wells, A.U.; et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: Update of the international multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 188, 733–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Guedes Baldi, B.; Alberto, C.; Pereira, C.; Rubin, A.S.; Nicodemos, A.; Santana, C.; Costa, N.; Roberto, C.; Carvalho, R.; Algranti, E.; et al. Destaques das Diretrizes de Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia. J. Bras. Pneumol. 2012, 38, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Raghu, G.; Remy-Jardin, M.; Myers, J.L.; Richeldi, L.; Ryerson, C.J.; Lederer, D.J.; Behr, J.; Cottin, V.; Danoff, S.K.; Morell, F.; et al. Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical practice guideline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 198, e44–e68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rajala, K.; Lehto, J.T.; Sutinen, E.; Kautiainen, H.; Myllärniemi, M.; Saarto, T. Marked deterioration in the quality of life of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis during the last two years of life. BMC Pulm. Med. 2018, 18, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Aronson, K.I.; Swigris, J.J.; Bajwah, S.; Bianchi, P.; Corte, T.J.; Danoff, S.K.; Lee, J.S.; Lindell, K.O.; Maher, T.; Martinez, F.J.; et al. Patient-centered outcomes research in interstitial lung disease: An official american thoracic society research statement. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021, 204, E3–E23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rajala, K.; Lehto, J.T.; Saarinen, M.; Sutinen, E.; Saarto, T.; Myllärniemi, M. End-of-life care of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. BMC Palliat. Care 2016, 15, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kreuter, M.; Bendstrup, E.; Russell, A.M.; Bajwah, S.; Lindell, K.; Adir, Y.; Brown, C.E.; Calligaro, G.; Cassidy, N.; Corte, T.J.; et al. Palliative care in interstitial lung disease: Living well. Lancet Respir. Med. 2017, 5, 968–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Marsaa, K.; Gundestrup, S.; Jensen, J.U.; Lange, P.; Løkke, A.; Roberts, N.B.; Shaker, S.B.; Sørensen, A.R.; Titlestad, I.L.; Thomsen, L.H.; et al. Danish respiratory society position paper: Palliative care in patients with chronic progressive non-malignant lung diseases. Eur. Clin. Respir. J. 2018, 5, 1530029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chai, G.T.; Neo, H.Y.; Abisheganaden, J.; Hum, A.Y.M. Impact of Palliative Care in End-of-Life of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Patients. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Med. 2022, 39, 1443–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. World Health Organization. National Cancer Control Programmes: Policies and Managerial Guidelines; WHO Library: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002; Volume 2, pp. 1–181. [Google Scholar]
  11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guidelines. End of Life Care for Adults: Service Delivery; NICE: London, UK, 2019; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  12. Alberto, C.; Pereira, C.; Sato, T.; Rodrigues, S.C. New reference values for forced spirometry in white adults in Brazil. J. Bras. Pneumol. 2007, 33, 397–406. [Google Scholar]
  13. Crapo, R.O.; Morris, A.H. Standardized Single Breath Normal Values for Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1981, 123, 185–189. [Google Scholar]
  14. Holland, A.E.; Spruit, M.A.; Troosters, T.; Puhan, M.A.; Pepin, V.; Saey, D.; McCormack, M.C.; Carlin, B.W.; Sciurba, F.C.; Pitta, F.; et al. An official European respiratory society/American thoracic society technical standard: Field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 44, 1428–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Britto, R.R.; Probst, V.S.; Dornelas De Andrade, A.F.; Samora, G.A.R.; Hernandes, N.A.; Marinho, P.E.M.; Karsten, M.; Pitta, F.; Parreira, V.F. Reference equations for the six-minute walk distance based on a Brazilian multicenter study. Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 2013, 17, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Byrom, B.; Rowe, D.A. Measuring free-living physical activity in COPD patients: Deriving methodology standards for clinical trials through a review of research studies. Contemp. Clin. Trials 2016, 47, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Podsiadlo, D.; Richardson, S. The Timed Up and Go: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1991, 39, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lord, S.R.; Murray, S.M.; Chapman, K.; Munro, B.; Tiedemann, A. Sit-to-stand performance depends on sensation, speed, balance, and psychological status in addition to strength in older people. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2002, 57, 539–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zamboti, C.L.; Gonçalves, A.F.L.; Garcia, T.; Krinski, G.G.; Bertin, L.D.; Almeida, H.d.S.; Pimpão, H.A.; Fujisawa, D.S.; Ribeiro, M.; Pitta, F.; et al. Functional performance tests in interstitial lung disease: Impairment and measurement properties. Respir. Med. 2021, 184, 106413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Furlanetto, K.C.; Correia, N.S.; Mesquita, R.; Morita, A.A.; do Amaral, D.P.; Mont’Alverne, D.G.B.; Pereira, D.M.; Pitta, F.; Dal Corso, S. Reference Values for 7 Different Protocols of Simple Functional Tests: A Multicenter Study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2022, 103, 20–28.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hopkinson, N.S.; Tennant, R.C.; Dayer, M.J.; Swallow, E.B.; Hansel, T.T.; Moxham, J.; Polkey, M.I. A prospective study of decline in fat free mass and skeletal muscle strength in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir. Res. 2007, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kendall, F.P.; McCreary, E.; Provance, P.; Rodgers, M.; Romani, W. Músculos Provas e Funções, 5th ed.; MANOLE: Barueri, Brazil, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hyatt, R.; Black, L. Maximal Respiratory Pressures: Normal Values and relationship to age and sex. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1969, 99, 696–702. [Google Scholar]
  24. Neder, J.A.; Andreoni, S.; Lerario, M.C.; Nery, L.E. Muscle respiratory strength in healthy subjects. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 1999, 32, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lukaski, H.C. Methods for the assessment of human body composition: Traditional and new. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1987, 46, 537–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yorke, J.; Jones, P.W.; Swigris, J.J. Development and validity testing of an ipf-specific version of the St George’s respiratory questionnaire. Thorax 2010, 65, 921–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Aguiar, W.F.; Mantoani, L.C.; Silva, H.; Zamboti, C.L.; Garcia, T.; Cavalheri, V.; Ribeiro, M.; Yorke, J.; Pitta, F.; Camillo, C.A. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis-specific version of the Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-I) for patients with interstitial lung disea. Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 2021, 25, 794–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bestall, J.C.; Paul, E.A.; Garrod, R.; Garnham, R.; Jones, P.W.; Wedzicha, J.A. Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 1999, 54, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Eakin, E.G.; Resnikoff, P.M.; Prewitt, L.M.; Ries, A.L.; Kaplan, R.M. Validation of a new dyspnea measure: The UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire. Chest 1998, 113, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Silva, H.; Mantoani, L.C.; Zamboti, C.L.; Aguiar, W.F.; Ries, A.L.; Gonçalves, A.F.L.; da Silva, T.G.; Ribeiro, M.; Pitta, F.; Camillo, C.A. Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire in patients with interstitial lung disease. J. Bras. Pneumol. 2021, 47, e20210172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Snaith, R.; Zigmond, A. The hospital anxiety anddepression scale. Br. Med. J. 1986, 1, 344–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Botega, N.J.; Bio, M.R.; Zomignani, M.A.; Garcia, C., Jr.; Pereira, W.A.B. Transtornos do humor em enfermaria de clínica médica e validação de escala de medida (HAD) de ansiedade e depressão. Rev. Saude Publica 1995, 29, 359–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Buysse, D.J.; Reynolds, C.F.; Monk, T.H.; Berman, S.R.; Kupfer, D.J. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989, 28, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Johns, M.W. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: The Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 1991, 14, 540–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zou, R.H.; Nouraie, M.; Chen, X.; Saul, M.I.; Kaminski, N.; Gibson, K.F.; Kass, D.J.; Lindell, K.O. Assessing Patterns of Palliative Care Referral and Location of Death in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Sixteen-Year Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. J. Palliat. Med. 2019, 22, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zou, R.H.; Kass, D.J.; Gibson, K.F.; Lindell, K.O. The Role of Palliative Care in Reducing Symptoms and Improving Quality of Life for Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Review. Pulm. Ther. 2020, 6, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Caminati, A.; Bianchi, A.; Cassandro, R.; Rosa Mirenda, M.; Harari, S. Walking distance on 6-MWT is a prognostic factor in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir. Med. 2009, 103, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lederer, D.J.; Arcasoy, S.M.; Wilt, J.S.; D’Ovidio, F.; Sonett, J.R.; Kawut, S.M. Six-minute-walk distance predicts waiting list survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 174, 659–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Holland, A.E.; Dowman, L.; Fiore, J.; Brazzale, D.; Hill, C.J.; McDonald, C.F. Cardiorespiratory responses to 6-minute walk test in interstitial lung disease: Not always a submaximal test. BMC Pulm. Med. 2014, 14, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mancuzo, E.V.; Soares, M.R.; Pereira, C.A.d.C. Six-minute walk distance and survival time in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Brazil. J. Bras. Pneumol. 2018, 44, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rocha, V.; Paixão, C.; Marques, A. Physical activity, exercise capacity and mortality risk in people with interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2022, 25, 903–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wallaert, B.; Monge, E.; Le Rouzic, O.; Wémeau-Stervinou, L.; Salleron, J.; Grosbois, J.M. Physical activity in daily life of patients with fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Chest 2013, 144, 1652–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Puhan, M.A.; Siebeling, L.; Zoller, M.; Muggensturm, P.; Riet, G. Ter Simple functional performance tests and mortality in COPD. Eur. Respir. J. 2013, 42, 956–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Marquis, K.; Debigaré, R.; Lacasse, Y.; Leblanc, P.; Jobin, J.; Carrier, G.; Maltais, F. Midthigh muscle cross-sectional area is a better predictor of mortality than body mass index in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002, 166, 809–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Matsunuma, R.; Takato, H.; Takeda, Y.; Watanabe, S.; Waseda, Y.; Murakami, S.; Kawaura, Y.; Kasahara, K. Patients with end-stage interstitial lung disease may have more problems with dyspnea than end-stage lung cancer patients. Indian J. Palliat. Care 2016, 22, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bosi, M.; Milioli, G.; Parrino, L.; Fanfulla, F.; Tomassetti, S.; Melpignano, A.; Trippi, I.; Vaudano, A.E.; Ravaglia, C.; Mascetti, S.; et al. Quality of life in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: The impact of sleep disordered breathing. Respir. Med. 2019, 147, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cho, J.G.; Teoh, A.; Roberts, M.; Wheatley, J. The prevalence of poor sleep quality and its associated factors in patients with interstitial lung disease: A cross-sectional analysis. ERJ Open Res. 2019, 5, 00062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 12 07314 g001
Figure 1. Recruitment and inclusion flowchart of study participants. ILD = interstitial lung disease; EOLC = end-of-life care; nEOLC = no indication for end-of-life care.
Figure 1. Recruitment and inclusion flowchart of study participants. ILD = interstitial lung disease; EOLC = end-of-life care; nEOLC = no indication for end-of-life care.
Jcm 12 07314 g001
Table 1. End-of-life care indications for individuals with interstitial lung diseases.
Table 1. End-of-life care indications for individuals with interstitial lung diseases.
Indications of EOLC for Individuals with ILD
  • Two or more respiratory hospitalizations in the last year.
  • Peripheral oxygen saturation < 88% at rest.
  • Reduced exercise capacity (i.e., 6 min walk for a distance < 212 m).
  • Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension.
  • Pulmonary function: FVC < 50% predicted, a decline in %FVC > 10% predicted, or a decline in DLCO > 15% in 6 months.
m = meters; FVC = Forced Vital Capacity; DLCO = Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide.
Table 2. Sample characteristics.
Table 2. Sample characteristics.
VariablesILD-EOLC (n = 14)ILD-nEOLC (n = 44)p
Sex, female (%)8 (57%)25 (59%)0.89
Age, years62 ± 1060 ± 100.27
Time since diagnosis, months60 [24–102]72 [36–132]0.18
Home oxygen therapy, n6 (42%)8 (18%)0.02
Deaths, number11 (78%)3 (7%)<0.0001
Time of death, months3 [2–11]7 [5–10]0.14
Diagnosis
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, n11 (79%)17 (39%)0.01
Connective-tissue-disease-associated ILD, n3 (21%)22 (50%)0.07
Sarcoidosis, n0 (0%)2 (5%)0.99
Asbestosis, n0 (0%)1 (2%)0.99
Non-specific interstitial pneumonia, n0 (0%)1 (2%)0.99
Other ILD, n0 (0%)1 (2%)0.99
Disease Staging
GAP I, %1 (7%)33 (75%)
GAP II, %8 (57%)11 (25%)
GAP III, %5 (36%)0 (0%)<0.0001
Comorbidities, n
0–34 (29%)21 (48%)
4–67 (50%)11 (25%)
≥73 (21%)12 (27%)0.20
Pharmacological treatment
Antifibrotics1 (7%)1 (2%)0.42
Corticosteroids5 (35%)17 (38%)0.93
Immunosuppressants5 (35%)21 (47%)0.54
% = percentage; ILD = interstitial lung disease; GAP = gender–age–physiology index.
Table 3. Criteria for end-of-life care indication.
Table 3. Criteria for end-of-life care indication.
VariablesILD-EOLC (n = 14)ILD-nEOLC (n = 44)p
Hospitalized in the last year, n11 (78%)10 (22%)0.0009
Peripheral oxygen saturation < 88% at rest, n6 (42%)5 (11%)0.016
Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension, n1 (7%)8 (18%)0.43
Lung Function
FVC, % of predicted52 ± 2477 ± 180.002
FEV1, % of predicted56 ± 2477 ± 180.003
DLCO, % of predicted22 ± 1050 ± 13<0.0001
TLC, % of predicted51 [34–70]74 [64–93]0.009
FRC, % of predicted58 [43–95]64 [56–81]0.13
IC, % of predicted51 [34–70]77 [63–93]0.002
RV, % of predicted75 [54–88]78 [54–111]0.21
Exercise Capacity
6MWT, meters399 ± 106468 ± 1000.0004
6MWT, % of predicted64 ± 2087 ± 160.0005
% = percentage; ILD = interstitial lung disease; FVC = forced vital capacity; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume; DLCO = diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide; TLC = total lung capacity; FRC = functional residual capacity; IC = inspiratory capacity; RV = residual volume; 6MWT = six-minute walk test.
Table 4. Comparison of clinical outcomes.
Table 4. Comparison of clinical outcomes.
VariablesILD-EOLC (n = 14)ILD-nEOLC (n = 44)p
Physical Activity in Daily Life
Steps, n/day2727 ± 22435170 ± 23730.001
Light activity, min/day194 ± 98309 ± 1030.001
Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, min/day1 [0.4–1]10 [3–19]0.0003
Time standing, hours/day3.9 ± 1.25.3 ± 1.80.005
Time sitting, hours/day6.8 ± 1.97.6 ± 1.70.14
Time lying down, hours/day6.4 ± 1.64.4 ± 1.50.0004
Functional performance
Timed-up-and-go usual, seconds11.1 [9.4–13.2]9.9 [9.4–11.5]0.19
Timed-up-and-go usual,% of predicted80 ± 1586 ± 180.10
1 min sit-to-stand test, repetitions20 ± 426 ± 70.01
1 min sit-to-stand test, % of predicted35 ± 845 ± 130.005
4-metre gait speed, m/s0.92 ± 0.211.05 ± 0.150.02
4-metre gait speed, % of predicted90 ± 20105 ± 130.007
Peripheral muscle strength
Deltoid, MVIC (N) 91 [71–126]118 [97–167]0.01
Pectoralis major, MVIC (N)78 [65–94]112 [71–128]0.02
Latissimus dorsi, MVIC (N) 52 [41–66]79 [58–114]0.008
Biceps brachii, MVIC (N)177 [248–204]201 [164–243]0.09
Triceps brachii, MVIC (N)107 [97–138]138 [110–182]0.008
Quadriceps femoris, MVIC (N)237 [211–303]319 [261–446]0.005
Respiratory muscle strength
Maximal inspiratory pressure, mmHg71 ± 2385 ± 350.14
Maximal inspiratory pressure, % of predicted80 ± 3092 ± 350.13
Maximal expiratory pressure, mmHg99 ± 1997 ± 440.28
Maximal expiratory pressure, % of predicted110 ± 36104 ± 400.42
Body composition
BMI, kg/m225.2 ± 4.0727.9 ± 5.50.08
Body fat percentage, %25 ± 924 ± 90.35
Percentage of lean mass, %42 ± 1049 ± 100.08
Basal metabolic rate, kcal1335 [−1162–1519]1424 [1166–1677]0.30
Health-related quality of life
SGRQ-I totals, points71 ± 1550 ± 200.0009
SGRQ-I symptoms, points72 ± 1961 ± 350.08
SGRQ-I activity, points84 ± 2259 ± 280.001
SGRQ-I impacts, points62 ± 1544 ± 210.005
Dyspnea in daily life
UCSD-SOBQ, points63 [41–92]37 [17–53]0.006
MRC, points4 [3–5]2 [2–3]0.001
Anxiety and depression symptoms
HADS Anxiety, points6 [4–8]5 [3–8]0.19
HADS Depression, points5 [3–7]4 [2–8]0.49
Sleep quality and daytime sleepiness
PSQI, points7 [6–8]8 [6–10]0.20
ESS, points5 [2–10]6 [4–10]0.15
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range; % = percentage; m/s = meters per second; Min = minutes; MVIC = maximum voluntary isometric contraction; N = Newtons; mmHg = millimeters of mercury; Kcal = kilocalories; SGRQ-I = Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire for FPI individuals; UCSD-SOBQ = University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire; MRC = medical research council scale; PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; ESS = Epworth Sleepiness Scale.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krinski, G.; Bertin, L.D.; Pimpão, H.A.; Silva, H.; Tavares, B.L.; Lunardelli, L.; Alves do Prado, G.; Pitta, F.; Camillo, C.A. Clinical Characteristics of Individuals with Interstitial Lung Diseases and Indication of End-of-Life Care. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 7314. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237314

AMA Style

Krinski G, Bertin LD, Pimpão HA, Silva H, Tavares BL, Lunardelli L, Alves do Prado G, Pitta F, Camillo CA. Clinical Characteristics of Individuals with Interstitial Lung Diseases and Indication of End-of-Life Care. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(23):7314. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237314

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krinski, Gabriela, Larissa Dragonetti Bertin, Heloise Angélico Pimpão, Humberto Silva, Brunna Luiza Tavares, Leonardo Lunardelli, Geovana Alves do Prado, Fabio Pitta, and Carlos Augusto Camillo. 2023. "Clinical Characteristics of Individuals with Interstitial Lung Diseases and Indication of End-of-Life Care" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 23: 7314. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237314

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop