Next Article in Journal
Associations of Serum CXCL12α and CK Levels with Skeletal Muscle Mass in Older Adults
Previous Article in Journal
MINOCA Associated with a Myocardial Bridge: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Dual-Source Photon-Counting Computed Tomography—Part III: Clinical Overview of Vascular Applications beyond Cardiac and Neuro Imaging

by
Antonella Meloni
1,2,
Filippo Cademartiri
1,*,
Laura Pistoia
1,
Giulia Degiorgi
1,
Alberto Clemente
1,
Carmelo De Gori
1,
Vincenzo Positano
1,2,
Simona Celi
3,
Sergio Berti
4,
Michele Emdin
5,
Daniele Panetta
6,
Luca Menichetti
6,
Bruna Punzo
7,
Carlo Cavaliere
7,
Eduardo Bossone
8,
Luca Saba
9,
Riccardo Cau
9,
Ludovico La Grutta
10 and
Erica Maffei
1
1
Department of Radiology, Fondazione Monasterio/CNR, 56124 Pisa, Italy
2
Department of Bioengineering, Fondazione Monasterio/CNR, 56124 Pisa, Italy
3
BioCardioLab, Department of Bioengineering, Fondazione Monasterio/CNR, 54100 Massa, Italy
4
Cardiology Unit, Ospedale del Cuore, Fondazione Monasterio/CNR, 54100 Massa, Italy
5
Department of Cardiology, Fondazione Monasterio/CNR, 56124 Pisa, Italy
6
Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Council of Research, 56124 Pisa, Italy
7
Department of Radiology, IRCCS SynLab-SDN, 80131 Naples, Italy
8
Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Cardarelli, 80131 Naples, Italy
9
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, 09042 Monserrato, CA, Italy
10
Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties-ProMISE, Department of Radiology, University Hospital “P. Giaccone”, 90127 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(11), 3798; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113798
Submission received: 16 March 2023 / Revised: 29 May 2023 / Accepted: 30 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Nuclear Medicine & Radiology)

Abstract

:
Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) is an emerging technology that is expected to radically change clinical CT imaging. PCCT offers several advantages over conventional CT, which can be combined to improve and expand the diagnostic possibilities of CT angiography. After a brief description of the PCCT technology and its main advantages we will discuss the new opportunities brought about by PCCT in the field of vascular imaging, while addressing promising future clinical scenarios.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is actually considered the “gold” standard for the non-invasive assessment and diagnosis of vascular abnormalities [1,2]. CTA exploits the adequate opacification of the contrast of the target vessel following the intravenous administration of an iodinated contrast medium at high-flow rates [2]. The main advantages of CTA are the widespread availability, the short acquisition time, and the excellent spatial and temporal resolutions, while the main drawback is the exposure to ionizing radiation [1,2]. Moreover, the use of iodinated contrast media is not totally risk-free [3]. However, there is no doubt that CTA is far superior to invasive catheter-based angiographic techniques in terms of safety, costs, and even accuracy for most anatomical districts; and, even though CTA has been clinically implemented for several vascular territories, some limitations still persist and affect the reliability of the vascular assessment, especially when smaller arteries have to be assessed.
Current cutting-edge clinical CT systems are equipped with energy-integrating detectors (EIDs), which can provide images with quantitative information such as tissue-specific images and maps of the iodine concentration. With this technology, the spatial and contrast resolutions have been improving with quite small steps over the years. A different detection concept, which has gained increasing interest and is expected to substantially modify clinical CT imaging, is photon-counting detectors (PCDs). PCDs have multiple potential advantages over conventional EIDs, which can be combined to improve and expand the diagnostic possibilities of the CTA [4,5,6].
After a brief description of the photon-counting CT (PCCT) technology and its main advantages, this review will focus on its clinical applicability in the realm of vascular imaging, without considering the coronary and carotid districts. We will describe both the existing literature, which is still limited, and our current experience, with the aim of providing an idea of the potential clinical implementation and diagnostic impact. Therefore, several PCCT images acquired in our department will be provided as a proof of concept.

2. Photon-Counting CT Technology

Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of EIDs and PCDs.
EIDs are composed of scintillator elements and septa. The scintillator converts the incident X-rays into visible light photons, that are then absorbed by a photodiode which produces an electrical signal proportional to the energy deposited and comprising also electronic noise [4]. The septa channel the light towards the sensor.
Instead, PCDs consist of a single thick layer of a semiconductor diode on which a large voltage is applied; incoming X-ray photons are directly converted into electronic signals [4,6,7]. The electrical signal is amplified and shaped, and its peak height is proportional to the energy of the individual X-ray photon.
Since PCDs do not require septa, there is no technical limitation for the pixel pitch and its size can be significantly reduced without negatively impacting the geometric detection efficiency. This translates into an increased spatial resolution, that can be exploited to generate sharper images and visualize finer details [7,8].
In conventional EIDs, the attenuation is dominated by the highest energies present in the X-ray tube spectrum. This affects the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), since the contrast between different materials is enhanced at low X-ray energies. Conversely, PCDs uniformly weight all photons and can provide a better signal to lower-energy photons, allowing for the improved signal of those substances that are highly attenuating at low energies, such as iodine and calcium, and the optimal CNR [9,10,11,12,13]. The energy-discriminating ability also represents the key to the elimination of the electronic noise achievable with PCDs. The electronics system of the detector counts how many pulses have a height exceeding a preset threshold level. By setting the lower threshold at a level higher than the electronic noise level, the signal resulting from the electronic noise, characterized by a low amplitude, is effectively discarded and only the pulses generated by incoming photons are counted. The lowest threshold energy is approximately 20 keV. Below this energy threshold, there are no X-rays in the primary beam of the X-ray tube, because they are removed by a prefilter.
The reduced electronic noise and the enhanced CNR and visualization of small objects contribute to the improvement of the dose efficiency [14,15], promoting the development of new low-dose CT acquisitions. Comparison studies between PCCT and conventional CT demonstrated that PCCT allowed for scanning with a lower radiation dose (43–50% reduction) while retaining a similar or better objective or subjective image quality [16,17,18]. Moreover, not only may be the radiation dose potentially decreased, but also the iodine contrast concentrations, which may be particularly beneficial for patients with decreased kidney function.
In addition to the weighting of energy, the other primary mechanism for employing the energy information from spectral PCCT data is material decomposition. The application of algorithms for material decomposition from a number of energy-selective images generates a set of basis image maps. The number of bases depends on the number of spectral data (N bases for N spectral data) and can be increased to N+1 by imposing mass or volume conservation constraints, which, if not correct, can cause inaccuracies [19]. Each base image map contains the equivalent material concentration displayed through a voxel-by-voxel approach. The basis material images can be displayed directly, revealing the distribution of a certain material, such as a contrast agent, or they can be processed to obtain virtual monochromatic images (VMI) [20,21,22], virtual non-contrast images [23], or material-specific color-overlay images [24]. Since EID-based CT acquires data in two energy regimes, it can accurately separate, without assumptions, one contrast agent, e.g., iodine, from the background, but it is not able to discriminate between two contrast materials with a high atomic number (high Z). PCDs differentiate photons of different energies based on the pulse-height and enable simultaneous multi-energy (N ≥ 2) acquisitions with supreme spatial and temporal registrations and without spectral overlap [25]. The increase in the number of energy regimens improves the precision in the measurement of each photon energy, resulting in better material-specific or weighted images [26] and improved quantitative imaging. Indeed, the concentrations of materials, such as contrast agents and calcium, can be quantitatively assessed, independent of acquisition parameters. Another benefit associated with the use of multiple energy measurements is the possibility to quantify elements with a K-edge in the diagnostic energy range and, consequently, to employ alternative contrast agents from iodine, such as gold, platinum, silver, bismuth, or ytterbium [27,28,29,30], or to design new types of contrast agents such as nanoparticles targeted at specific cells or enzymes [31,32,33,34]. This unique opportunity clears the way for molecular and functional CT imaging and for the simultaneous multi-contrast agent imaging. As clearly demonstrated in animal or proof-of-concept (in silico) studies, PCDs allows for the clear differentiation of more than two contrast agents in each voxel at the time of acquisition, with different pharmacokinetics within the same biological system [24,35,36,37]. For each component, it is possible to generate separate quantitative maps, showing its specific distribution, which may potentially result in additional clinical information.
Another important benefit of PCCT is the reduction of common image artifacts. The elimination of the electronic noise allows for a marked reduction of the streak and shading artifacts [13]. The constant weighting decreases the beam-hardening artifacts [38,39]. In particular, the high-energy bin image offers the highest advantages in the improved immunity to beam-hardening effects [40,41]. PCDs reduce metal and calcium blooming as a result of the improved spatial resolution (reduction in voxel size and partial voluming) and the improved material decomposition [42].

3. Vascular Applications of PCCT beyond Cardiac and Neuro Imaging

Table 1 summarizes the previous studies on PCCT in vascular imaging, excluding the coronary and carotid districts.
Figure 2 summarizes some of the potential vascular applications of PCCT.

3.1. Pulmonary Vascularization

Pulmonary vascular diseases encompass a broad and heterogeneous group of conditions including acute and chronic pulmonary thromboembolism, pulmonary hypertension, congenital abnormalities, and inflammatory vasculitis.
Pulmonary embolism (PE), that is the blockage of one of the pulmonary arteries caused by thromboembolic material, is associated with high morbidity and mortality [52].
Multi-detector computed tomography permits the rapid accurate exclusion and diagnosis of PE and has become the imaging modality of choice for these purposes [53,54]. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), allowing the reconstruction of VMI at arbitrary energy levels (in keV), offers the advantage of providing both morphological and functional data. Indeed, the iodine maps accurately depict the consequences of PE in terms of parenchymal perfusion, improving the detection of small occluding emboli and enabling a quantitative analysis of the perfusion defect volume [55,56,57]. The extent of perfusion defects was demonstrated to correlate with adverse clinical outcomes, allowing the identification of high-risk patients requiring intensified monitoring and treatment [58]. Figure 3 shows a PCCT iodine perfusion map of the lung parenchyma. In phantom studies, PCCT demonstrated promising results in terms of VMI reconstruction. It showed accuracy in iodine quantification and a VMI CT number similar to that obtained with EID-based CT scanners, while offering a perfect temporal and spatial alignment to prevent motion artifacts, high spatial resolution, and the improvement of image noise and CNR [21,59]. Therefore, VMI obtained with a PCCT may improve lesion detection and promote the reduction of the contrast agent and radiation dose. Yalynska et al., evaluated in vivo the impact of different VMI energies in the diagnosis of PE with PCCT and detected the lowest levels of pulmonary artery attenuation and image noise corresponding with the highest-evaluated VMI energy (70 keV). Moreover, although the highest SNR was obtained with the lowest VMI (40 keV), the best subjective PE visibility was achieved at 50 keV, almost certainly due to the decreased image noise and number of hardening artifacts [43]. Importantly, with PCCT, the usage of low monoenergetic images would allow us to foster iodine attenuation, helping to decrease the amount of iodinated contrast agent for a pulmonary CT angiography.
In the study from Kopp et al., a custom-made lung phantom and a rabbit lung were imaged with a preclinical PCCT and a conventional CT in standard and high-resolution (HR-CT) modes [44]. According to the opinion of one experienced radiologist, the PCCT images showed a superior image quality in terms of spatial resolution and visibility of lung vessels compared to the HR-CT images.
Hagen et al. scanned one hundred consecutive oncologic patients with both PCCT and DECT and demonstrated that the radiation dose for the contrast-enhanced chest CT could be remarkably decreased (43% dose reduction based on size-specific dose estimates) with PCCT without scarifying the image quality. Combining the measurements of pulmonary vessels and the aorta resulted in a significantly higher CNR for PCCT compared to DECT [18].
The improved performance of PCCT may open the doors for a better detection and quantification of the changes in the proximal and distal pulmonary vascular tree. The accurate monitoring of the distal pulmonary vascular involvement is of particular interest in the setting of the chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). CTEPH, currently classified as a group 4 pulmonary hypertension (PH), is a rare but progressive disease, requiring timely diagnosis and treatment [60]. CTEPH involves not only persistent thrombi in proximal pulmonary arteries, but also a microvasculopathy which is crucial for the development and progression of the disease, contributing to severe hemodynamics [61]. The pulmonary vasculature is a possible target in COVID-19 and several mechanisms are involved in the pathophysiology of the damage [62]. Microvasculopathy with the formation of microthrombi plays a role in the COVID-19-related hypoxemia [63]. Thus, the early and accurate recognition of the pulmonary vascular signs may help to improve the outcome of several COVID-19 patients.
A study performed on 60 patients showed that a gadolinium chelate could be used as an alternative contrast agent for the CT examination of the pulmonary vasculature in patients for whom the administration of iodinated contrast material is contraindicated. The vascular enhancement was good/excellent and provided diagnostic information in 92% of the patients [64]. However, the attenuation values in the pulmonary vessels were much lower in comparison to that measured in typical iodine-based CT examinations (350–400 HU). Gadolinium is an ideal candidate for K-edge CT imaging, not feasible with DECT. Since the threshold settings for energy bins on both sides of a K-edge strongly influence the spectral image quality with regard to the contrast and noise level, the optimal partition of the two energy bins around a K-edge is critical. Several approaches have been introduced to optimize the energy bin width [65,66]. It may be expected that K-edge imaging by spectral CT may allow us to enhance the overall image quality (signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio) and the diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced CT angiograms.

3.2. Hepatic Vasculature

The accurate and robust definition of hepatic vascular structures, known as liver vessel segmentation, is critical for the diagnosis and the radio-frequency ablation and surgical treatments of liver diseases [67], and plays an important role in liver transplant programs, for the accurate selection of potential donors [68]. Due to the high variability of the liver and vascular anatomy and the generally low contrast between vessels and the surrounding tissue, liver segmentation in conventional contrast-enhanced liver CT images remains challenging [69]. Baek et al. demonstrated that PCCT, enhancing the contrast of iodine-injected vascular structures in the liver, allowed for accurate liver vessel segmentation [46]. They proposed a deep-learning approach for liver vessel segmentation and used it for both PCCT and conventional CT images, generated with abdominal simulation phantoms, iodine-enhanced for the liver blood vessels. The PCD-CT datasets were created by using the multi-energy information. The segmentation using PCD-CT outperformed the one using conventional CT in terms of both the dice overlap score and 3D vascular structure visualization, and, in many cases, allowed to avoid the incorrect segmentation of the peripheral part of the vessels.
Si-Mohamed et al., evaluated in vivo in adult rats the capability of PCCT with high spatial resolution to discriminate between two contrast agents: gadolinium and iodine, which were administered simultaneously, one with an intraperitoneal injection and the other one with intravenous injections [45]. A clear visual separation of the contrast agents was present in the contrast material maps, with organs and vessels well-delineated. Importantly, very small structures such as the hepatic veins and the mesenteric vessels were detectable all along their way.

3.3. Thoraco-Abdominal Aorta

The endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with a stent graft represents a valid alternative to open surgery for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms [70,71]. However, in 25% of patients, EVAR is complicated by endoleaks [72]. CT angiography represents the standard of reference in both pre-operative planning and post-procedural surveillance [73]. Despite the undeniable benefits of triphasic CT scanning, the associated radiation exposure is inherently high compared to single-phase CT examinations [74]. Although a single-phase, dual-energy CT with a split-bolus technique and the reconstruction of virtual non-enhanced images can significantly reduce the radiation dose without having an impact on the endoleak detection rate [75], it does not allow the precise determination of the type of endoleak (either low- or high-flow). Dangelmaier et al., demonstrated in an abdominal aortic aneurysm phantom the capability of PCCT in combination with a dual-contrast agent injection (gadolinium and iodine) to replace multi-phase CT scans in the native, arterial, and delayed phase to efficiently capture endoleak dynamics [47]. The derived material maps could differentiate iodine, gadolinium, and calcium, enabling the reliable distinction of leaking contrast media and intra-aneurysmatic calcifications in a single scan, with a significant reduction of radiation exposure. With regard to the imaging of multiple contrast agents, Symons et al. demonstrated in vitro and in vivo in a large animal model the possibility of using PCCT with four energy bins to separate three contrast agents (gadolinium, iodine, and bismuth) [24]. Time-attenuation curves for gadolinium and iodine, in the regions of interest delineated in the aorta, showed a clear differentiation of the contrast materials.
Sigovan et al., demonstrated the ability of PCCT to improve vascular imaging in the presence of metallic stents [76]. Stents composed of different metals, positioned inside plastic tubes containing hydroxyapatite spheres simulating vascular calcifications and in the abdominal aorta of one New Zealand white rabbit, were imaged with a PCCT prototype, a dual-energy CT system, and a 64-channel CT system. Compared to the other CT systems, PCCT led to a superior lumen delineation and visualization of the stent’s metallic mesh, by virtue of the enhanced spectral and spatial resolution which allowed for a significant reduction of blooming artifacts. Moreover, with PCCT, the platinum-specific K-edge imaging allowed for the exclusive visualization of the stent made of platinum and the elimination of other backgrounds and contrast media.
The study of Higashigaito et al. was the first to assess the quality of contrast-enhanced abdominal PCCT acquired in a clinical setting [48]. Thirty-nine patients underwent both PCCT and EID-based CT with the same contrast media protocol. In PCCT, VMI were reconstructed in 10 keV intervals (40–90 keV). At the equivalent radiation dose, clinical PCCT with the reconstruction of VMI at 40, 50, and 60 keV showed the significantly higher CNR of vascular structures (abdominal aorta, inferior cava vein, and portal vein) compared to conventional EID-CT. This improvement may be used to further optimize the radiation dose and/or contrast media volume. In accordance with this study, Euler et al. showed in a cohort of forty patients that PCCT angiography of the thoraco-abdominal aorta with VMI at 40 and 45 keV led to a significantly increase in CNR compared with EID-CT at an identical radiation dose [49]. The CNR gain of PCCT was 34% higher for overweight patients compared with normal-weight patients. Very recently, the same group published a study involving 100 patients scanned with both EID-CT and PCCT and divided into two groups [50]. In the first group of 40 patients, where the same contrast media protocol was adopted for both scans, PCCT of the thoracoabdominal aorta using VMI at 50 keV provided, compared with EID-CT, the best trade-off between CNR (25% increase) and overall subjective image quality, which took into account image noise, vessel attenuation, and vessel sharpness. In the second group of 60 patients, the contrast media volume during the PCCT scan was reduced by 25%. No difference in the CNR and subjective image quality between EID-CT and PCCT at 50 keV with a reduced contrast media was found, demonstrating that the gain of image quality achievable with PCCT could be effectively translated into a low-volume contrast media protocol.
A PCCT angiography of abdominal aorta is displayed in Figure 4 while Figure 5 shows a PCCT angiography of abdominal arteries in a patient with severe calcifications of the arterial walls at the level of the aorta.

3.4. Renal Vasculature

Volume-rendered CTA has become the key modality for the non-invasive assessment of conditions affecting the renal vasculature, including both arterial disorders such as renal artery stenosis, renal artery aneurysms, and dissection, as well as venous disorders such as thrombosis, splenorenal shunts, and intravascular tumor extension [77]. Moreover, CTA accurately displays the changes in the renal vascular structures, which should be detected before any type of renal surgery or interventional radiologic procedure [78].
The inherent advantages of PCCT could be particularly beneficial also in the evaluation of the renal vasculature. First of all, the enabled dose-efficient high-spatial-resolution imaging may impact several diagnostic pathways, such as the detection of renal artery stenosis (RAS) in children. Indeed, the decreased caliber of the renal arteries in children compared to adults and the frequent second- and third-order branch stenosis may affect the utility and performance of CTA in the diagnosis of pediatric RSA [79]. Otherwise, it is largely appreciated that aneurysms secondary to small-vessel vasculitis are difficult to identify in CTA, due to the limited resolution. A technical feasibility study tested a high-resolution PCCT protocol (0.25 mm at the isocenter) in phantom, animals, and eight human subjects, and demonstrated an improved spatial resolution and reduced image noise and, above all, a better visualization of distal vessels in the lung images [51].
Another high-impact clinical benefit of PCCT is represented by its multi-energy capability. In RAS, as well as in coronary artery disease, the fibrous tissue is the most prominent plaque composition, followed by fibro-fatty, necrotic core, and dense calcium tissue [80]. The absence of predictive indices for the favorable patient and lesion selection conditions the clinical benefits associated with the percutaneous revascularization of atherosclerotic RAS [81]. The accurate evaluation of the RAS plaque composition may enable the identification of those lesions more likely to result in embolization during stenting [82]. In this context, the current limitations associated with the conventional CT may be overcome by the multi-energy PCCT imaging combined with nanoparticles loaded with novel CT contrast agents. In particular, the gold nanoparticles designed for uptake by monocytes and macrophages have been demonstrated, in animal studies, to accumulate in atherosclerotic plaque [83]. Cormode et al. demonstrated in a phantom of an artery the ability of PCCT to accurately discriminate between the gold nanoparticle contrast agent, iodine-based contrast agent, and calcium-rich material [32], thus showing the potential for the complex pathophysiologic characterization of plaque.

3.5. Peripheral Arterial Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the partial or complete obstruction of any part of the peripheral arterial tree, mainly caused by arteriosclerosis [84]. CTA is the preferred image modality for the cross-sectional imaging of PAD since it allows us to delineate the arterial tree and to determine the amount of atherosclerotic burden [85]. However, the diagnostic accuracy may be compromised by the presence of dense calcifications [85,86] which can cause blooming and partial volume artifacts. These artefacts can result in an overestimation of stenotic disease [87,88]. Moreover, the attenuation properties may be comparable between calcifications and the iodinated lumen.
PCCT, with its intrinsic possibility of reducing blooming by means of improved spatial resolution and material decomposition, may allow for a more detailed and non-invasive characterization of PAD. Li et al., developed a method for quantifying the percent area of stenosis based on the material decomposition of dual-energy and multiple-energy CT images, without the need of segmentation [89]. The ability of this method to reduce the partial volume and blooming effects was proven by computer simulations. The experiments, conducted on phantoms with different stenosis severity, vessel diameters, and calcification densities, showed more accurate and precise stenosis measurements for four-threshold PCCT images than for DECT and two-threshold PCCT images. In addition, the three-basis-material decomposition made directly on four-threshold PCCT images permitted to produce calcium, iodine, and water image maps.
A recent review highlighted as the combination of ultra-high-resolution CT (UHRCT) with advanced post-processing techniques, such as subtraction techniques, has allowed us to reduce the impact of calcium blooming [90]. However, this approach has not been fully validated at this moment and comes with a reduction of dose efficiency. The UHR imaging technique has been implemented also on PCD-based CT systems [91]. A study performed on anthropomorphic phantoms and cadaveric specimens has demonstrated a 29% reduction of noise in UHR PCD images compared to the UHR EID images, which can be translated in a potential dose savings of 50% for identical image noise [91].
At present, there is no systematic study demonstrating in vivo the performance of PCCT for noninvasive imaging and the treatment planning of peripheral arterial disease.
Figure 6 and Figure 7 show a PCCT angiography of superficial femoral arteries while Figure 8 shows a PCCT angiography of the lower limbs.

4. Conclusions

The key benefits of PCCT, such as improved spatial resolution, signal and contrast behavior, significant noise reduction, dose efficiency, and multi-energy capability, may provide the opportunity to further enhance the diagnostic and prognostic value of CTA. In any case, more extensive research is needed to demonstrate how the theoretical and proven advantages of PCDs can be transferred into clinical practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C.; Investigation, A.M., G.D., A.C., C.D.G., D.P., B.P., C.C., E.B., L.S. and R.C.; Resources, S.B. and M.E.; Visualization, A.M. and L.P.; Supervision, L.L.G. and E.M.; writing—original draft, A.M., F.C. and E.M.; writing—review and editing, L.P., G.D., A.C., C.D.G., V.P., S.C., S.B., M.E., D.P., L.M., B.P., C.C., E.B., L.S., R.C. and L.L.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent for publication was obtained from all patients whose images were included in this review.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are deeply grateful to all the patients for their co-operation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Met, R.; Bipat, S.; Legemate, D.A.; Reekers, J.A.; Koelemay, M.J. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2009, 301, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rajiah, P. Updates in Vascular Computed Tomography. Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 58, 671–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Isaka, Y.; Hayashi, H.; Aonuma, K.; Horio, M.; Terada, Y.; Doi, K.; Fujigaki, Y.; Yasuda, H.; Sato, T.; Fujikura, T.; et al. Guideline on the use of iodinated contrast media in patients with kidney disease 2018. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2020, 24, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Willemink, M.J.; Persson, M.; Pourmorteza, A.; Pelc, N.J.; Fleischmann, D. Photon-counting CT: Technical Principles and Clinical Prospects. Radiology 2018, 289, 293–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Danielsson, M.; Persson, M.; Sjölin, M. Photon-counting X-ray detectors for CT. Phys. Med. Biol. 2021, 66, 03TR01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Esquivel, A.; Ferrero, A.; Mileto, A.; Baffour, F.; Horst, K.; Rajiah, P.S.; Inoue, A.; Leng, S.; McCollough, C.; Fletcher, J.G. Photon-Counting Detector CT: Key Points Radiologists Should Know. Korean J. Radiol. 2022, 23, 854–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leng, S.; Rajendran, K.; Gong, H.; Zhou, W.; Halaweish, A.F.; Henning, A.; Kappler, S.; Baer, M.; Fletcher, J.G.; McCollough, C.H. 150-μm Spatial Resolution Using Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Technology: Technical Performance and First Patient Images. Investig. Radiol. 2018, 53, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bartlett, D.J.; Koo, C.W.; Bartholmai, B.J.; Rajendran, K.; Weaver, J.M.; Halaweish, A.F.; Leng, S.; McCollough, C.H.; Fletcher, J.G. High-Resolution Chest Computed Tomography Imaging of the Lungs: Impact of 1024 Matrix Reconstruction and Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography. Investig. Radiol. 2019, 54, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Iwanczyk, J.S.; Nygård, E.; Meirav, O.; Arenson, J.; Barber, W.C.; Hartsough, N.E.; Malakhov, N.; Wessel, J.C. Photon Counting Energy Dispersive Detector Arrays for X-ray Imaging. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2009, 56, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shikhaliev, P.M. Energy-resolved computed tomography: First experimental results. Phys. Med. Biol. 2008, 53, 5595–5613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shikhaliev, P.M.; Fritz, S.G. Photon counting spectral CT versus conventional CT: Comparative evaluation for breast imaging application. Phys. Med. Biol. 2011, 56, 1905–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Silkwood, J.D.; Matthews, K.L.; Shikhaliev, P.M. Photon counting spectral breast CT: Effect of adaptive filtration on CT numbers, noise, and contrast to noise ratio. Med. Phys. 2013, 40, 051905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yu, Z.; Leng, S.; Jorgensen, S.M.; Li, Z.; Gutjahr, R.; Chen, B.; Halaweish, A.F.; Kappler, S.; Yu, L.; Ritman, E.L.; et al. Evaluation of conventional imaging performance in a research whole-body CT system with a photon-counting detector array. Phys. Med. Biol. 2016, 61, 1572–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Symons, R.; Cork, T.E.; Sahbaee, P.; Fuld, M.K.; Kappler, S.; Folio, L.R.; Bluemke, D.A.; Pourmorteza, A. Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT: A feasibility study. Phys. Med. Biol. 2017, 62, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rajagopal, J.R.; Farhadi, F.; Solomon, J.; Sahbaee, P.; Saboury, B.; Pritchard, W.F.; Jones, E.C.; Samei, E. Comparison of Low Dose Performance of Photon-Counting and Energy Integrating CT. Acad. Radiol. 2021, 28, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Symons, R.; Pourmorteza, A.; Sandfort, V.; Ahlman, M.A.; Cropper, T.; Mallek, M.; Kappler, S.; Ulzheimer, S.; Mahesh, M.; Jones, E.C.; et al. Feasibility of Dose-reduced Chest CT with Photon-counting Detectors: Initial Results in Humans. Radiology 2017, 285, 980–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Graafen, D.; Emrich, T.; Halfmann, M.C.; Mildenberger, P.; Düber, C.; Yang, Y.; Othman, A.E.; O’ Doherty, J.; Müller, L.; Kloeckner, R. Dose Reduction and Image Quality in Photon-counting Detector High-resolution Computed Tomography of the Chest: Routine Clinical Data. J. Thorac. Imaging 2022, 37, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hagen, F.; Walder, L.; Fritz, J.; Gutjahr, R.; Schmidt, B.; Faby, S.; Bamberg, F.; Schoenberg, S.; Nikolaou, K.; Horger, M. Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Contrast-Enhanced Chest-CT Acquired on a Clinical Photon-Counting Detector CT vs. Second-Generation Dual-Source CT in an Oncologic Cohort: Preliminary Results. Tomography 2022, 8, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yveborg, M.; Danielsson, M.; Bornefalk, H. Theoretical comparison of a dual energy system and photon counting silicon detector used for material quantification in spectral CT. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2015, 34, 796–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Symons, R.; Reich, D.S.; Bagheri, M.; Cork, T.E.; Krauss, B.; Ulzheimer, S.; Kappler, S.; Bluemke, D.A.; Pourmorteza, A. Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Vascular Imaging of the Head and Neck: First In Vivo Human Results. Investig. Radiol. 2018, 53, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leng, S.; Zhou, W.; Yu, Z.; Halaweish, A.; Krauss, B.; Schmidt, B.; Yu, L.; Kappler, S.; McCollough, C. Spectral performance of a whole-body research photon counting detector CT: Quantitative accuracy in derived image sets. Phys. Med. Biol. 2017, 62, 7216–7232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Laukamp, K.R.; Lennartz, S.; Neuhaus, V.F.; Große Hokamp, N.; Rau, R.; Le Blanc, M.; Abdullayev, N.; Mpotsaris, A.; Maintz, D.; Borggrefe, J. CT metal artifacts in patients with total hip replacements: For artifact reduction monoenergetic reconstructions and post-processing algorithms are both efficient but not similar. Eur. Radiol. 2018, 28, 4524–4533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mergen, V.; Racine, D.; Jungblut, L.; Sartoretti, T.; Bickel, S.; Monnin, P.; Higashigaito, K.; Martini, K.; Alkadhi, H.; Euler, A. Virtual Noncontrast Abdominal Imaging with Photon-counting Detector CT. Radiology 2022, 305, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Symons, R.; Krauss, B.; Sahbaee, P.; Cork, T.E.; Lakshmanan, M.N.; Bluemke, D.A.; Pourmorteza, A. Photon-counting CT for simultaneous imaging of multiple contrast agents in the abdomen: An in vivo study. Med. Phys. 2017, 44, 5120–5127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kappler, S.; Henning, A.; Kreisler, B.; Schoeck, F.; Stierstorfer, K.; Flohr, T. Photon Counting CT at Elevated X-ray Tube Currents: Contrast Stability, Image Noise and Multi-Energy Performance; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2014; Volume 9033. [Google Scholar]
  26. Shikhaliev, P.M. Computed tomography with energy-resolved detection: A feasibility study. Phys. Med. Biol. 2008, 53, 1475–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schirra, C.O.; Brendel, B.; Anastasio, M.A.; Roessl, E. Spectral CT: A technology primer for contrast agent development. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2014, 9, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pan, D.; Schirra, C.O.; Senpan, A.; Schmieder, A.H.; Stacy, A.J.; Roessl, E.; Thran, A.; Wickline, S.A.; Proska, R.; Lanza, G.M. An early investigation of ytterbium nanocolloids for selective and quantitative “multicolor” spectral CT imaging. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 3364–3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Müllner, M.; Schlattl, H.; Hoeschen, C.; Dietrich, O. Feasibility of spectral CT imaging for the detection of liver lesions with gold-based contrast agents—A simulation study. Phys. Med. 2015, 31, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, J.; Bar-Ness, D.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Coulon, P.; Blevis, I.; Douek, P.; Cormode, D.P. Assessment of candidate elements for development of spectral photon-counting CT specific contrast agents. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Si-Mohamed, S.; Cormode, D.P.; Bar-Ness, D.; Sigovan, M.; Naha, P.C.; Langlois, J.-B.; Chalabreysse, L.; Coulon, P.; Blevis, I.; Roessl, E.; et al. Evaluation of spectral photon counting computed tomography K-edge imaging for determination of gold nanoparticle biodistribution in vivo. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 18246–18257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cormode, D.P.; Roessl, E.; Thran, A.; Skajaa, T.; Gordon, R.E.; Schlomka, J.P.; Fuster, V.; Fisher, E.A.; Mulder, W.J.; Proksa, R.; et al. Atherosclerotic plaque composition: Analysis with multicolor CT and targeted gold nanoparticles. Radiology 2010, 256, 774–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Balegamire, J.; Vandamme, M.; Chereul, E.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Azzouz Maache, S.; Almouazen, E.; Ettouati, L.; Fessi, H.; Boussel, L.; Douek, P.; et al. Iodinated polymer nanoparticles as contrast agent for spectral photon counting computed tomography. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 5715–5728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dong, Y.C.; Kumar, A.; Rosario-Berríos, D.N.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Hsu, J.C.; Nieves, L.M.; Douek, P.; Noël, P.B.; Cormode, D.P. Ytterbium Nanoparticle Contrast Agents for Conventional and Spectral Photon-Counting CT and Their Applications for Hydrogel Imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 39274–39284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Muenzel, D.; Daerr, H.; Proksa, R.; Fingerle, A.A.; Kopp, F.K.; Douek, P.; Herzen, J.; Pfeiffer, F.; Rummeny, E.J.; Noël, P.B. Simultaneous dual-contrast multi-phase liver imaging using spectral photon-counting computed tomography: A proof-of-concept study. Eur. Radiol. Exp. 2017, 1, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Symons, R.; Cork, T.E.; Lakshmanan, M.N.; Evers, R.; Davies-Venn, C.; Rice, K.A.; Thomas, M.L.; Liu, C.Y.; Kappler, S.; Ulzheimer, S.; et al. Dual-contrast agent photon-counting computed tomography of the heart: Initial experience. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2017, 33, 1253–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cormode, D.P.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Bar-Ness, D.; Sigovan, M.; Naha, P.C.; Balegamire, J.; Lavenne, F.; Coulon, P.; Roessl, E.; Bartels, M.; et al. Multicolor spectral photon-counting computed tomography: In vivo dual contrast imaging with a high count rate scanner. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shikhaliev, P.M. Beam hardening artefacts in computed tomography with photon counting, charge integrating and energy weighting detectors: A simulation study. Phys. Med. Biol. 2005, 50, 5813–5827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lee, C.-L.; Park, J.; Nam, S.; Choi, J.; Choi, Y.; Lee, S.; Lee, K.-Y.; Cho, M. Metal artifact reduction and tumor detection using photon-counting multi-energy computed tomography. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yu, Z.; Leng, S.; Kappler, S.; Hahn, K.; Li, Z.; Halaweish, A.F.; Henning, A.; McCollough, C.H. Noise performance of low-dose CT: Comparison between an energy integrating detector and a photon counting detector using a whole-body research photon counting CT scanner. J. Med. Imaging 2016, 3, 043503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gutjahr, R.; Halaweish, A.F.; Yu, Z.; Leng, S.; Yu, L.; Li, Z.; Jorgensen, S.M.; Ritman, E.L.; Kappler, S.; McCollough, C.H. Human Imaging with Photon Counting-Based Computed Tomography at Clinical Dose Levels: Contrast-to-Noise Ratio and Cadaver Studies. Investig. Radiol. 2016, 51, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Si-Mohamed, S.A.; Boccalini, S.; Lacombe, H.; Diaw, A.; Varasteh, M.; Rodesch, P.-A.; Dessouky, R.; Villien, M.; Tatard-Leitman, V.; Bochaton, T.; et al. Coronary CT Angiography with Photon-counting CT: First-In-Human Results. Radiology 2022, 303, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yalynska, T.; Polacin, M.; Frauenfelder, T.; Martini, K. Impact of Photon Counting Detector CT Derived Virtual Monoenergetic Images on the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kopp, F.K.; Daerr, H.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Sauter, A.P.; Ehn, S.; Fingerle, A.A.; Brendel, B.; Pfeiffer, F.; Roessl, E.; Rummeny, E.J.; et al. Evaluation of a preclinical photon-counting CT prototype for pulmonary imaging. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Si-Mohamed, S.; Thivolet, A.; Bonnot, P.E.; Bar-Ness, D.; Képénékian, V.; Cormode, D.P.; Douek, P.; Rousset, P. Improved Peritoneal Cavity and Abdominal Organ Imaging using a Biphasic Contrast Agent Protocol and Spectral Photon Counting Computed Tomography K-Edge Imaging. Investig. Radiol. 2018, 53, 629–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Baek, S.; Lee, O.; Ye, D. Iodine-Enhanced Liver Vessel Segmentation in Photon Counting Detector-Based Computed Tomography Using Deep Learning; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2022; Volume 12304. [Google Scholar]
  47. Dangelmaier, J.; Bar-Ness, D.; Daerr, H.; Muenzel, D.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Ehn, S.; Fingerle, A.A.; Kimm, M.A.; Kopp, F.K.; Boussel, L.; et al. Experimental feasibility of spectral photon-counting computed tomography with two contrast agents for the detection of endoleaks following endovascular aortic repair. Eur. Radiol. 2018, 28, 3318–3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Higashigaito, K.; Euler, A.; Eberhard, M.; Flohr, T.G.; Schmidt, B.; Alkadhi, H. Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT with Clinical Photon-Counting Detector CT: Assessment of Image Quality and Comparison with Energy-Integrating Detector CT. Acad. Radiol. 2022, 29, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Euler, A.; Higashigaito, K.; Mergen, V.; Sartoretti, T.; Zanini, B.; Schmidt, B.; Flohr, T.G.; Ulzheimer, S.; Eberhard, M.; Alkadhi, H. High-Pitch Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Angiography of the Aorta: Intraindividual Comparison to Energy-Integrating Detector Computed Tomography at Equal Radiation Dose. Investig. Radiol. 2022, 57, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Higashigaito, K.; Mergen, V.; Eberhard, M.; Jungblut, L.; Hebeisen, M.; Rätzer, S.; Zanini, B.; Kobe, A.; Martini, K.; Euler, A.; et al. CT Angiography of the Aorta Using Photon-counting Detector CT with Reduced Contrast Media Volume. Radiol. Cardiothorac. Imaging 2023, 5, e220140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Pourmorteza, A.; Symons, R.; Henning, A.; Ulzheimer, S.; Bluemke, D.A. Dose Efficiency of Quarter-Millimeter Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: First-in-Human Results. Investig. Radiol. 2018, 53, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ng, A.C.; Chung, T.; Yong, A.S.; Wong, H.S.; Chow, V.; Celermajer, D.S.; Kritharides, L. Long-term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality of 1023 patients with confirmed acute pulmonary embolism. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2011, 4, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, L.J.; Lu, G.M.; Meinel, F.G.; McQuiston, A.D.; Ravenel, J.G.; Schoepf, U.J. Computed tomography of acute pulmonary embolism: State-of-the-art. Eur. Radiol. 2015, 25, 2547–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hong, Y.J.; Shim, J.; Lee, S.M.; Im, D.J.; Hur, J. Dual-Energy CT for Pulmonary Embolism: Current and Evolving Clinical Applications. Korean J. Radiol. 2021, 22, 1555–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Leithner, D.; Wichmann, J.L.; Vogl, T.J.; Trommer, J.; Martin, S.S.; Scholtz, J.-E.; Bodelle, B.; De Cecco, C.N.; Duguay, T.; Nance, J.W.J.; et al. Virtual Monoenergetic Imaging and Iodine Perfusion Maps Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography with Suboptimal Contrast Attenuation. Investig. Radiol. 2017, 52, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Weidman, E.K.; Plodkowski, A.J.; Halpenny, D.F.; Hayes, S.A.; Perez-Johnston, R.; Zheng, J.; Moskowitz, C.; Ginsberg, M.S. Dual-Energy CT Angiography for Detection of Pulmonary Emboli: Incremental Benefit of Iodine Maps. Radiology 2018, 289, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dane, B.; Patel, H.; O’Donnell, T.; Girvin, F.; Brusca-Augello, G.; Alpert, J.B.; Niu, B.; Attia, M.; Babb, J.; Ko, J.P. Image Quality on Dual-energy CTPA Virtual Monoenergetic Images: Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment. Acad. Radiol. 2018, 25, 1075–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Apfaltrer, P.; Bachmann, V.; Meyer, M.; Henzler, T.; Barraza, J.M.; Gruettner, J.; Walter, T.; Schoepf, U.J.; Schoenberg, S.O.; Fink, C. Prognostic value of perfusion defect volume at dual energy CTA in patients with pulmonary embolism: Correlation with CTA obstruction scores, CT parameters of right ventricular dysfunction and adverse clinical outcome. Eur. J. Radiol. 2012, 81, 3592–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Booij, R.; van der Werf, N.R.; Dijkshoorn, M.L.; van der Lugt, A.; van Straten, M. Assessment of Iodine Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Virtual Monoenergetic Images Reconstructed from Dual-Source Energy-Integrating CT and Photon-Counting CT Data. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Simonneau, G.; Robbins, I.M.; Beghetti, M.; Channick, R.N.; Delcroix, M.; Denton, C.P.; Elliott, C.G.; Gaine, S.P.; Gladwin, M.T.; Jing, Z.-C.; et al. Updated Clinical Classification of Pulmonary Hypertension. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, S43–S54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Onishi, H.; Taniguchi, Y.; Matsuoka, Y.; Yanaka, K.; Izawa, Y.; Tsuboi, Y.; Mori, S.; Kono, A.; Nakayama, K.; Emoto, N.; et al. Evaluation of microvasculopathy using dual-energy computed tomography in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Pulm. Circ. 2021, 11, 2045894020983162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ai, J.; Hong, W.; Wu, M.; Wei, X. Pulmonary vascular system: A vulnerable target for COVID-19. MedComm 2021, 2, 531–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Parry, A.H.; Wani, A.H. Novel pulmonary vascular imaging signs in COVID-19: Pathophysiology, significance and management. BJR Open. 2021, 2, 20210001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Remy-Jardin, M.; Bahepar, J.; Lafitte, J.J.; Dequiedt, P.; Ertzbischoff, O.; Bruzzi, J.; Delannoy-Deken, V.; Duhamel, A.; Remy, J. Multi-detector row CT angiography of pulmonary circulation with gadolinium-based contrast agents: Prospective evaluation in 60 patients. Radiology 2006, 238, 1022–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. He, P.; Wei, B.; Cong, W.; Wang, G. Optimization of K-edge imaging with spectral CT. Med. Phys. 2012, 39, 6572–6579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Meng, B.; Cong, W.; Xi, Y.; De Man, B.; Wang, G. Energy Window Optimization for X-ray K-Edge Tomographic Imaging. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2016, 63, 1623–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Conversano, F.; Franchini, R.; Demitri, C.; Massoptier, L.; Montagna, F.; Maffezzoli, A.; Malvasi, A.; Casciaro, S. Hepatic vessel segmentation for 3D planning of liver surgery experimental evaluation of a new fully automatic algorithm. Acad. Radiol. 2011, 18, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Low, G.; Wiebe, E.; Walji, A.H.; Bigam, D.L. Imaging evaluation of potential donors in living-donor liver transplantation. Clin. Radiol. 2008, 63, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kaftan, J.N.; Tek, H.; Aach, T. A two-stage approach for fully automatic segmentation of venous vascular structures in liver CT images. In Proceedings of the Medical Imaging, Orlando, FL, USA, 7–12 February 2009. [Google Scholar]
  70. Parodi, J.C.; Palmaz, J.C.; Barone, H.D. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 1991, 5, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Prinssen, M.; Verhoeven, E.L.; Buth, J.; Cuypers, P.W.; van Sambeek, M.R.; Balm, R.; Buskens, E.; Grobbee, D.E.; Blankensteijn, J.D. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 1607–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. White, S.B.; Stavropoulos, S.W. Management of Endoleaks following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Semin. Interv. Radiol. 2009, 26, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chaikof, E.L.; Brewster, D.C.; Dalman, R.L.; Makaroun, M.S.; Illig, K.A.; Sicard, G.A.; Timaran, C.H.; Upchurch, G.R., Jr.; Veith, F.J. SVS practice guidelines for the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Executive summary. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009, 50, 880–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kalef-Ezra, J.A.; Karavasilis, S.; Ziogas, D.; Dristiliaris, D.; Michalis, L.K.; Matsagas, M. Radiation burden of patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009, 49, 283–287; discussion 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Javor, D.; Wressnegger, A.; Unterhumer, S.; Kollndorfer, K.; Nolz, R.; Beitzke, D.; Loewe, C. Endoleak detection using single-acquisition split-bolus dual-energy computer tomography (DECT). Eur. Radiol. 2017, 27, 1622–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sigovan, M.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Bar-Ness, D.; Mitchell, J.; Langlois, J.B.; Coulon, P.; Roessl, E.; Blevis, I.; Rokni, M.; Rioufol, G.; et al. Feasibility of improving vascular imaging in the presence of metallic stents using spectral photon counting CT and K-edge imaging. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Urban, B.A.; Ratner, L.E.; Fishman, E.K. Three-dimensional volume-rendered CT angiography of the renal arteries and veins: Normal anatomy, variants, and clinical applications. Radiographics 2001, 21, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Hekimoglu, A.; Ergun, O. Evaluation of renal vascular variations with computed tomography. Afr. J. Urol. 2022, 28, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Orman, G.; Masand, P.M.; Kukreja, K.U.; Acosta, A.A.; Guillerman, R.P.; Jadhav, S.P. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography for renal artery stenosis in children. Pediatr. Radiol. 2021, 51, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kataoka, T.; Mathew, V.; Rubinshtein, R.; Rihal, C.S.; Lennon, R.; Lerman, L.O.; Lerman, A. Association of plaque composition and vessel remodeling in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: A comparison with coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2009, 2, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Bax, L.; Woittiez, A.J.; Kouwenberg, H.J.; Mali, W.P.; Buskens, E.; Beek, F.J.; Braam, B.; Huysmans, F.T.; Schultze Kool, L.J.; Rutten, M.J.; et al. Stent placement in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and impaired renal function: A randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 150, 840–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Prasad, A.; Ilapakurti, M.; Hu, P.; Zafar, N.; Palakodeti, V.; Tsimikas, S.; Mahmud, E. Renal artery plaque composition is associated with changes in renal frame count following renal artery stenting. J. Invasive Cardiol. 2011, 23, 227–231. [Google Scholar]
  83. Cormode, D.P.; Skajaa, T.; van Schooneveld, M.M.; Koole, R.; Jarzyna, P.; Lobatto, M.E.; Calcagno, C.; Barazza, A.; Gordon, R.E.; Zanzonico, P.; et al. Nanocrystal Core High-Density Lipoproteins: A Multimodality Contrast Agent Platform. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3715–3723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ouma, G.O.; Jonas, R.A.; Usman, M.H.U.; Mohler, E.R. Targets and delivery methods for therapeutic angiogenesis in peripheral artery disease. Vasc. Med. 2012, 17, 174–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shwaiki, O.; Rashwan, B.; Fink, M.A.; Kirksey, L.; Gadani, S.; Karuppasamy, K.; Melzig, C.; Thompson, D.; D’Amico, G.; Rengier, F.; et al. Lower extremity CT angiography in peripheral arterial disease: From the established approach to evolving technical developments. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 37, 3101–3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Meyer, B.C.; Werncke, T.; Foert, E.; Kruschewski, M.; Hopfenmüller, W.; Ribbe, C.; Wolf, K.J.; Albrecht, T. Do the cardiovascular risk profile and the degree of arterial wall calcification influence the performance of MDCT angiography of lower extremity arteries? Eur. Radiol. 2010, 20, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kruk, M.; Noll, D.; Achenbach, S.; Mintz, G.S.; Pręgowski, J.; Kaczmarska, E.; Kryczka, K.; Pracoń, R.; Dzielińska, Z.; Sleszycka, J.; et al. Impact of coronary artery calcium characteristics on accuracy of CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2014, 7, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zhang, S.; Levin, D.C.; Halpern, E.J.; Fischman, D.; Savage, M.; Walinsky, P. Accuracy of MDCT in assessing the degree of stenosis caused by calcified coronary artery plaques. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008, 191, 1676–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Li, Z.; Leng, S.; Halaweish, A.F.; Yu, Z.; Yu, L.; Ritman, E.L.; McCollough, C.H. Overcoming calcium blooming and improving the quantification accuracy of percent area luminal stenosis by material decomposition of multi-energy computed tomography datasets. J. Med. Imaging 2020, 7, 053501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Tanaka, R.; Yoshioka, K.; Takagi, H.; Schuijf, J.D.; Arakita, K. Novel developments in non-invasive imaging of peripheral arterial disease with CT: Experience with state-of-the-art, ultra-high-resolution CT and subtraction imaging. Clin. Radiol. 2019, 74, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Leng, S.; Yu, Z.; Halaweish, A.; Kappler, S.; Hahn, K.; Henning, A.; Li, Z.; Lane, J.; Levin, D.L.; Jorgensen, S.; et al. Dose-efficient ultrahigh-resolution scan mode using a photon counting detector computed tomography system. J. Med. Imaging 2016, 3, 043504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of a PCD (top) and of a conventional EID (bottom).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of a PCD (top) and of a conventional EID (bottom).
Jcm 12 03798 g001
Figure 2. Potential applications of PCCT in the realm of the vascular imaging, without considering the coronary and carotid districts.
Figure 2. Potential applications of PCCT in the realm of the vascular imaging, without considering the coronary and carotid districts.
Jcm 12 03798 g002
Figure 3. PCCT spectral iodine perfusion map of the lung parenchyma. The figure shows a PCCT spectral iodine perfusion map of the lung parenchyma acquired with a routine ECG-gated spiral acquisition through the entire chest in the arterial phase ((A) axial; and (B) coronal). The homogeneous distribution of the iodine map in all sectors represents a normal arterial perfusion of the lung parenchyma.
Figure 3. PCCT spectral iodine perfusion map of the lung parenchyma. The figure shows a PCCT spectral iodine perfusion map of the lung parenchyma acquired with a routine ECG-gated spiral acquisition through the entire chest in the arterial phase ((A) axial; and (B) coronal). The homogeneous distribution of the iodine map in all sectors represents a normal arterial perfusion of the lung parenchyma.
Jcm 12 03798 g003
Figure 4. PCCT angiography of abdominal aorta. PCCT angiography of abdominal aorta showing the severe atherosclerotic alterations of the infra-renal section with multiple aneurysmatic segments until the carrefour (AD). In (A,B) the orthogonal longitudinal curved MPR shows the aorta and the right ileo-femoral arterial axis, while, in (C,D) it shows the aorta and the left ileo-femoral arterial axis. Calcifications are spread throughout the aortic wall and the ileo-femoral axes with no impact on the capability of assessment of the lumen reduction due to the atherosclerotic alterations.
Figure 4. PCCT angiography of abdominal aorta. PCCT angiography of abdominal aorta showing the severe atherosclerotic alterations of the infra-renal section with multiple aneurysmatic segments until the carrefour (AD). In (A,B) the orthogonal longitudinal curved MPR shows the aorta and the right ileo-femoral arterial axis, while, in (C,D) it shows the aorta and the left ileo-femoral arterial axis. Calcifications are spread throughout the aortic wall and the ileo-femoral axes with no impact on the capability of assessment of the lumen reduction due to the atherosclerotic alterations.
Jcm 12 03798 g004
Figure 5. PCCT angiography of abdominal arteries. PCCT angiography of the abdominal arteries in a patient with severe calcifications of the arterial walls both at the level of the aorta and at the level of common iliac arteries (AD). While MIP curved longitudinal reconstructions show extensive severe calcifications (B,D) which may hamper lumen assessment, in (A,C) the visualized segments are perfectly assessable, regardless of the amount of arterial wall calcifications. Renal arteries appear to be very wide and patent bilaterally (B,D).
Figure 5. PCCT angiography of abdominal arteries. PCCT angiography of the abdominal arteries in a patient with severe calcifications of the arterial walls both at the level of the aorta and at the level of common iliac arteries (AD). While MIP curved longitudinal reconstructions show extensive severe calcifications (B,D) which may hamper lumen assessment, in (A,C) the visualized segments are perfectly assessable, regardless of the amount of arterial wall calcifications. Renal arteries appear to be very wide and patent bilaterally (B,D).
Jcm 12 03798 g005
Figure 6. PCCT angiography of superficial femoral arteries. Cinematic rendering (A) and thin-MIP (B) PCCT angiography of superficial femoral arteries with severe and diffuse atherosclerotic calcified plaques bilaterally. The proximal part and the middle third of the right superficial femoral artery is occluded with wide collateralization through the right deep femoral artery. Very thin collateral arteries are easy to visualize on post-processed images.
Figure 6. PCCT angiography of superficial femoral arteries. Cinematic rendering (A) and thin-MIP (B) PCCT angiography of superficial femoral arteries with severe and diffuse atherosclerotic calcified plaques bilaterally. The proximal part and the middle third of the right superficial femoral artery is occluded with wide collateralization through the right deep femoral artery. Very thin collateral arteries are easy to visualize on post-processed images.
Jcm 12 03798 g006
Figure 7. PCCT angiography of superficial femoral arteries. 3D volume rendering (A) and thin-MIP (B) PCCT angiography of superficial femoral arteries with severe and diffuse atherosclerotic calcified plaques bilaterally (A,B). The proximal part and middle third of the superficial femoral arteries is occluded bilaterally ((A,B): arrowheads) with wide collateralization through the deep femoral arteries. Very thin collateral arteries are easy to visualize on post-processed images.
Figure 7. PCCT angiography of superficial femoral arteries. 3D volume rendering (A) and thin-MIP (B) PCCT angiography of superficial femoral arteries with severe and diffuse atherosclerotic calcified plaques bilaterally (A,B). The proximal part and middle third of the superficial femoral arteries is occluded bilaterally ((A,B): arrowheads) with wide collateralization through the deep femoral arteries. Very thin collateral arteries are easy to visualize on post-processed images.
Jcm 12 03798 g007
Figure 8. PCCT angiography of lower limbs. PCCT angiography of the lower limbs displayed with volumetric MIP post-processing in angio-mode (A,B). In A, there is a bilateral total chronic occlusion of the proximal and middle third of the superficial femoral arteries with wide bilateral collateralization through branches of the deep femoral arteries. In (B), there is a bilateral total chronic occlusion of the tibialis anterior and posterior; relatively preserved is the flow and patency of both interosseous arteries.
Figure 8. PCCT angiography of lower limbs. PCCT angiography of the lower limbs displayed with volumetric MIP post-processing in angio-mode (A,B). In A, there is a bilateral total chronic occlusion of the proximal and middle third of the superficial femoral arteries with wide bilateral collateralization through branches of the deep femoral arteries. In (B), there is a bilateral total chronic occlusion of the tibialis anterior and posterior; relatively preserved is the flow and patency of both interosseous arteries.
Jcm 12 03798 g008
Table 1. Studies on PCCT for vascular applications beyond cardiac and neuro imaging.
Table 1. Studies on PCCT for vascular applications beyond cardiac and neuro imaging.
AuthorsYearsModelNumber of PatientsClinical ApplicationResults
Yalinska et al. [43]2022In vivo (human)8Pulmonary vascularizationIn multi-energy PCCT images, the best signal was achieved at the lowest VMI (40 keV), while the best visualization of the pulmonary embolism was obtained at 50 keV, due to decreased image noise and hardening artefacts.
Kopp et al. [44]2022In vitro Pulmonary vascularizationCompared to conventional and HR CT images, PCCT offered an increased spatial resolution and better visibility of lung vessels.
Hagen et al. [18]2022In vivo (human)100Pulmonary vascularizationCombining vessel measurements of the aorta and pulmonary vessels resulted in a significantly higher CNR of PCCT compared to EID-CT.
Si-Mohamed et al. [45]2018In vivo (animal) Hepatic vasculatureVery small structures such as the hepatic veins and the mesenteric vessels were accurately detected all along their way with PCCT.
Baek et al. [46]2022Simulation Hepatic vasculaturePCCT outperformed the standard deep-learning segmentation method with conventional CT in terms of 3D vascular structure visualization.
Symons et al. [24]2017In vitro and in vivo (animal) AortaA simultaneous material decomposition of three contrast agents in vivo (gadolinium, iodine, and bismuth) was possible with PCCT.
Dangelmaier et al. [47]2018In vitro AortaPCCT in combination with a dual-contrast agent injection was able to capture endoleak dynamics and the obtained material maps could differentiate iodine, gadolinium, and calcium.
Higashigaito et al. [48]2022In vivo (human)39AortaPCCT with reconstructions of VMI at 40, 50, and 60 keV showed a significantly increased CNR at similar image quality compared to EID-CT at identical radiation dose.
Euler et al. [49]2022In vivo (human)40AortaCompared with EID-CT at matched radiation dose, PCCT angiography of the aorta with VMI at 40 and 45 keV resulted in a significant increase of CNR. The CNR gain was higher in overweight patients.
Higashigaito et al. [50]2023In vivo (human)100AortaAngiography of the aorta with PCCT was associated with higher CNR compared to conventional CT. PCCT with a low-volume contrast media protocol gave comparable image quality to that of EID-CT at the same radiation dose.
Pourmorteza et al. [51]2018In vitro and in vivo (animal and human)8Renal vasculature High-resolution PCCT improved the visualization of distal vessels in lung images.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meloni, A.; Cademartiri, F.; Pistoia, L.; Degiorgi, G.; Clemente, A.; De Gori, C.; Positano, V.; Celi, S.; Berti, S.; Emdin, M.; et al. Dual-Source Photon-Counting Computed Tomography—Part III: Clinical Overview of Vascular Applications beyond Cardiac and Neuro Imaging. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3798. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113798

AMA Style

Meloni A, Cademartiri F, Pistoia L, Degiorgi G, Clemente A, De Gori C, Positano V, Celi S, Berti S, Emdin M, et al. Dual-Source Photon-Counting Computed Tomography—Part III: Clinical Overview of Vascular Applications beyond Cardiac and Neuro Imaging. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(11):3798. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113798

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meloni, Antonella, Filippo Cademartiri, Laura Pistoia, Giulia Degiorgi, Alberto Clemente, Carmelo De Gori, Vincenzo Positano, Simona Celi, Sergio Berti, Michele Emdin, and et al. 2023. "Dual-Source Photon-Counting Computed Tomography—Part III: Clinical Overview of Vascular Applications beyond Cardiac and Neuro Imaging" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 11: 3798. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113798

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop