Next Article in Journal
Minimally Invasive Partial vs. Total Adrenalectomy for the Treatment of Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Behavioral Activation through Virtual Reality for Depression: A Single Case Experimental Design with Multiple Baselines
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Recovery Strategies in Motor and Cognitive Functions, before, during and after Home-Confinement COVID-19, for Healthy Adults and Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases: Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/jcm11051264
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Parenting Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder during Crises: Differential Responses between the Financial and the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis

by
Katerina Papanikolaou
1,*,
Vassiliki Ntre
1,
Ioanna-Maria Gertsou
1,
Evdokia Tagkouli
1,
Chara Tzavara
1,
Artemios Pehlivanidis
2 and
Gerasimos Kolaitis
1
1
Department of Child Psychiatry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aghia Sophia Children’s Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece
2
First Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(5), 1264; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051264
Submission received: 26 December 2021 / Revised: 23 February 2022 / Accepted: 24 February 2022 / Published: 25 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of the COVID-19 Emergency on the Quality of Life of the General Population)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Parenting a child with autism can be particularly stressful and challenging, especially during periods of crises. This study focuses on parenting children with autism during the COVID-19 pandemic in comparison to the economic crisis, six years ago. We administered the same set of questionnaires (CES-D, F-COPES, PSI-SF, and WHOQoL-BREF), along with a demographic characteristic and a COVID-19-related questionnaire to the same group of parents of children with autism as we did six years ago. Results indicated that during the COVID-19 crisis, the level of parenting stress and the distress due to personal factors related to demands of parenting, were significantly lower compared to the economic crisis, while the environment facet of quality of life was significantly higher. The depressive symptomatology was elevated during both periods. Finally, when addressing the pandemic crisis, parents were more likely to passively accept problematic issues, less able to obtain social support, and less able to acquire and accept help from others. In our sample, findings differentiate the genre of crises through the parents’ responses regarding the sense of competence in their parental role, their quality of life, and the coping strategies they implemented. The study implies that each crisis must be confronted with particular responses to particular needs.

1. Introduction

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by longstanding deficits in social communication along with stereotyped, restricted, and repetitive patterns of behaviors and interests. Parenting a child with ASD can be particularly stressful and challenging due to the particular characteristics of the disorder, the difficulty obtaining services, and the burden on the family’s finances [1,2,3,4]. Parents of children with ASD report low quality of life, increased parental stress, and more mental health issues compared to parents of children with typical development or other developmental disabilities [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. In particular mothers, who are often reported to be the primary caregivers of children with ASD, are more vulnerable to psychological stress than fathers [2,15,16,17]. Social support, coping style, locus of control, self-efficacy, and positive family functions are among the factors that have been previously found to be associated with resilience in families of individuals with developmental disabilities and autism [18,19].
A crisis is a transitional period in which a person’s biopsychosocial integrity is temporarily disrupted or threatened [20]. The Family Adjustment and Adaptation Response (FAAR) models [21] describe crisis in a family as an imbalance arising from the number of demands exceeding the capacities of the family. More specifically, the crisis in mothers of people with ASD is reported to be composed of the combination of demands, internal capabilities, external resources, and subjective appraisal [22].
The COVID-19 pandemic is the most recent cause of a worldwide crisis. It resulted in unprecedented changes in daily lives that increased demands and has been a source of stress for millions of individuals and families across the world. In Greece during this period, all schools including special education schools were closed, and students were receiving tele-education. Even special treatment centers shut down, and children with ASD or other disabilities had to spend the whole day at home. Moreover, many companies had to suspend their operation resulting in a loss of income in many families. Changes in daily structure, attempts to mitigate lost opportunities for children’s learning and social interactions, increased screen time, and reduced physical activities are factors that have been discussed as important stressors for parents [23,24]. The population of children with disabilities, in particular autism, gained special attention; both opinion [25,26,27] and research papers discussed the possible impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals with ASD [28,29,30,31,32,33] and their families [28,31,32,34,35]. They suggested strategies for them to better accommodate to the situation. Parents of individuals with ASD were more likely to have mental health problems compared to parents whose children had an intellectual disability, a visual or a hearing impairment [36], or parents of typically developing youths [37]. They reported high levels of psychological distress and disruption in their lives during the pandemic [31,34,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Some possible positive aspects of experiences during the pandemic have been also reported by parents of typically developing children [43,44] and caregivers of children with ASD [28,32,35,44,45,46]. These include the elimination of many daily pressures [32,45]; creating a more relaxing environment [28]; having more time to teach new skills, such as autonomy or house care-related skills [46]; having opportunities for increased family interaction and strengthening relationships [35]; developing positive characteristics such as appreciation, gratitude, and tolerance; and finding new hobbies [44].
When the COVID-19 pandemic emerged, Greek parents were in the unpleasant position of already having experienced the devastating impact of a recent financial crisis. Even before the emergence of the pandemic, the economic crisis had depleted Greek people’s psychological and financial resources while public health services deteriorated [47]. Several reports showed that depression and suicide increased in adults during the period of the financial crisis [48,49,50,51]. Child and adolescent mental health services underwent budget cuts leading to some services not being fully operational. Many non-profit child and adolescent mental health centers and psychosocial rehabilitation units, including establishments specialized for autism, also closed during the economic crisis. In addition, parents had to discontinue their children’s treatments because of their inability to cover by their own means the expenses the treatments entail [52].
The aim of the present study was to assess the parental stress, quality of life, coping strategies, and presence of depressive symptoms in a cohort of parents, mainly mothers, of children with ASD during the first phase of the COVID-19 crisis. It also aimed to compare our findings to the responses that the same cohort of parents gave to the same set of questionnaires during the financial crisis, approximately six years ago.

2. Method

Participants and Procedure

During the years 2014–2015, in the heart of the economic crisis, 62 parents of children with ASD completed a set of questionnaires on parenting stress, depressive symptomatology, quality of life, and coping strategies, participating in a research project on the needs, burdens, quality of life, and coping strategies of families with children with ASD [2,3]. The primary caregiver was asked to complete the questionnaires. All parents were attending the ASD Outpatient Clinic of a University Department and constituted consecutive cases coming for follow-up assessments. Their children or adolescents had received an ASD diagnosis according to DSM-5 criteria [53] in the past and had undergone a standard psychometric evaluation. Exclusion criterion was the inability of parents to read or write adequately in Greek.
During the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, two months after the implementation of restrictive measures by the Greek Government, the same parents were asked to respond to a web-based survey, including a questionnaire on demographics and other characteristics of the sample (Table 1) and the same battery of instruments they had completed during the economic crisis period.
Out of 62 parents, 50 mothers and six fathers agreed to participate in the survey. The DSM-5 level of functioning of the youngsters during the two periods remained the same except for the case of one subject, whose level of functioning deteriorated from level 2 to level 3.

3. Instruments

Demographic Characteristics and COVID-19 related Questionnaire. This questionnaire was developed for the needs of the current study and covers the caregivers’ and children’s demographic characteristics and information on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the family (Table 1).
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) [54]. This is a short self-reporting scale designed to measure depressive symptoms in the general population. It consists of 20 items, measuring the presence of depressive symptoms in the past week, on a four-point scale ranging from 0 (rarely) to 3 (most of the time). The possible range of scores is zero to 60. A score of 16 or higher indicates risk of clinical depression. It has been validated in the Greek population, showing a very good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.95) [55,56].
Family Crisis Oriented Personal Scales (F-COPES) [57]. It is a 30-item, self-reporting instrument measuring a family’s coping style. It includes two levels of interaction: (a) the ways a family internally handles difficult situations and problems and (b) the ways the family externally handles problems that emerge outside its boundaries. The responses range from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) and produce a total score and five subscales scores referring to: (a) acquiring social support, (b) reframing, (c) seeking spiritual support, (d) mobilizing family to acquire and accept help, and (e) passive appraisal. It is a reliable and valid tool that measures coping strategies and level of adaptation. The Greek version 0f F-COPES has shown a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.86 and a test–retest reliability of 0.81 [58].
Parenting Stress Index Short-Form (PSI-SF) [59]. It consists of 36 items deriving from the Parenting Stress Index [60] and is a measure of the stresses that a parent is experiencing in his/her role. It comprises three subscales labeled Parental Distress (PD), Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction (PCDI), and Difficult Child (DC). The PD subscale measures the level of distress due to personal factors related to demands of parenting; the PCDI subscale assesses parents’ dissatisfaction with their interactions with their children, and the DC subscale measures parents’ perceptions of the characteristics of their child’s behavior and how difficult it can be to manage. It also includes a Defensive Responding scale indicating parents’ denial or minimization of problems. Participants use a 5-point Likert scale indicating the degree to which they agree with each statement. The Total Stress score is a composite score of the subscale scores. In our study, PSI-SF showed a very good internal consistency both for the total scale (Cronbach’s α = 0.91) and all subscales (0.91: Parenting Distress; 0.82: Parent–Child Dysfunctional Interaction; 0.73: Difficult Child; 0.85: Defensive Responding).
World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQoL-BREF) [61]. The WHOQOL-BREF is an abbreviated version of WHOQOL-100, developed by the World Health Organization [62]. WHOQOL-BREF consists of 24 items corresponding to 24 QOL (thematic) facets, and two items comprising an overall quality of life/general health facet. Items are organized into four domains: (1) physical health, (2) psychological health, (3) social relationships, and (4) environment. The WHOQOL-BREF Greek version has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties [63].

4. Statistical Analysis

Quantitative variables were expressed as mean (Standard Deviation) or as median (interquartile range). Qualitative variables were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies. Paired students’ t-tests were used for comparisons in all study scales between measurements occurring during the economic and pandemic crisis. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was applied to control the false discovery rate for independent tests. In order to examine the differences in all study scales between measurements after adjusting for parental educational level, income after the pandemic, DSM-5, and child’s age, repeated measures ANOVA were conducted. Pearson’s correlations coefficients were used to explore the association of all understudy scales during the pandemic crisis. Multiple linear regression was conducted, in a stepwise method (p for entry 0.05, p for removal 0.10) to find factors associated with the total PSI score. As independent variables, sample characteristics as well as F-COPES subscales were used. All reported p values are two-tailed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 and analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software (version 22.0).

5. Results

The sample consisted of 56 parents with mean age 49.6 years (SD = 7.8) (Table 1 presents sample characteristics). Two PSI subscales, namely Defensive Responding and Parental Distress scores, along with Total PSI score were significantly decreased from the financial to the COVID-19 crisis. Significant reduction in Mobilizing Family to Acquire and Accept Help and Acquiring Social Support subscales was recorded. Moreover, scores on Passive Appraisal had a significant increase. No changes in CES-D scale were recorded from the financial to the COVID-19 crisis. As far as WHO-QOL subscales were concerned, a significant increase in the mean score of the Environment subscale was found (Table 2). Using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, all aforementioned significant comparisons remain statistically significant.
After having adjusted for parental educational level, income after the pandemic, DSM-5, and the child’s age, it was found that Defensive Responding score remained significantly lower during the COVID-19 crisis (p < 0.001), as did Parental Distress score (p = 0.007) and total PSI score (p = 0.005). Moreover, Mobilizing Family to Acquire and Accept Help and Acquiring Social Support subscales were significantly lower during the COVID-19 crisis (p = 0.002 for both subscale), after adjusting for parental educational level, income after the pandemic, DSM-5, and the child’s age. On the contrary, Passive Appraisal and Environment subscales were significantly greater during the COVID-19 crisis after adjusting for parental educational level, income after the pandemic, DSM-5, and the child’s age (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively).
Pearson’s correlation coefficients among all scales are presented in Table 3. In general, greater stress was significantly associated with greater depression, worse coping, and worse quality of life. Moreover, greater depression was significantly associated with worse coping and worse quality of life, while better coping was associated significantly with better quality of life.
When multiple linear regression was conducted it was found that Passive Appraisal (β = −3.17; SE = 1.25; p = 0.015) and Acquiring Social Support β = −1.16; SE = 0.52; and p = 0.032) were significantly associated with total PSI score.

6. Discussion

In the present study, we compared the impact of the two different social crises, the financial and the COVID-19 crises, on the parenting stress, depressive symptomatology, quality of life, and coping strategies of mothers who have children and adolescents with ASD.

6.1. Parenting Stress

Parental Stress as measured in PSI-SF refers to the stresses that a parent is experiencing in his/her role; it does not include all life stresses, just the stress deriving from his/her parenting. In particular, Parental Distress measures the sense of parenting competence, the stress associated with restrictions in life, conflict with the other parent, social support, and depression. As expected from previous findings in a Greek sample [2], parental stress was significantly associated with greater depression, worse coping, and worse quality of life. Moreover, two dysfunctional coping mechanisms, namely increased passive appraisal and reduced social support, predicted elevated parental stress during the pandemic.
Interestingly the parenting stress during the COVID-19 crisis as reflected in the total PSI score and the Parental Distress Score was significantly lower compared to the parenting stress during the economic crisis. Moreover, during the pandemic, mothers made fewer attempts to deny or minimize problems when responding to the questionnaire.
Differences between the two types of crises regarding the impact on daily life and the strategies to accommodate to the change might explain differences in the parental distress measures.
The financial crisis in Greece has been a prolonged and sustained economic downturn. The Greek Government had to implement austerity measures that had various consequences on the daily lives of Greeks. The funding for mental health was reduced. Many parents lost their jobs or had their salaries dramatically reduced resulting in the discontinuation of their children’s treatments. Moreover, parents of both typically developing children and children with autism or other developmental disorders tend to spend a lot of money on their children’s after-school activities [2]. They had, therefore, to face a twofold difficult situation that could affect their sense of competence as parents: first, their children had to discontinue both their treatment and their extra activities because of their parents’ inability to cover expenses, and second, they had to be away from home to find extra financial resources to cover basic family needs.
During the COVID-19 crisis and the restrictions implemented by the Government to control the pandemic, the daily lives of Greeks changed as well, but in a different direction. Approximately 68% of children and adolescents in our study stopped receiving any kind of intervention. Contrary to the economic crisis, parents were spending most of their time at home because of tele-working, because they were entitled to claim special time-off from their work to stay with their children, or because they were temporarily out of work. They lost the support of grandparents whose role in the Greek family is central. However, they had the opportunity to be with their children and strengthen their relationships. Moreover, fathers who are often reported to be less involved in the care of their child with ASD [2] had the chance to spend more time with their child and support the mother. Unfortunately, in our study, 35.8% of the parents reported a decrease in the income of the family. Nevertheless, there was a halting of the continuous race of getting involved in numerous and all sorts of costly activities, which resulted in a decrease of expenses. Moreover, the crisis was a worldwide and pan-European phenomenon, and Greece received financial rescue funds that supported many of these families. This difficult situation was, therefore, probably conceived as a temporary and universal phenomenon imposed by governmental restrictions, not related to parents’ competence to fulfill their role.
During our clinical practice and in the literature, there have been many reports about difficult behaviors of children with ASD during the COVID-19 crisis [29,41]. In our study, 10.7% of the families had to increase the dose of a previously prescribed sedative for their child. Overall, though, it seems that during the first phase of the pandemic crisis the primary caregivers of people with ASD in Greece felt more competent, less restricted, and more supported in their role as a parent compared to the economic crisis period.

6.2. Depressive Symptomatology

Parents of disabled children, and especially parents of children with autism, experience more challenges and are likely to report mental health problems compared to parents of typically developing children [2,64,65]. In particular mothers, as the primary caregivers of children with autism [2,16], report higher levels of psychological stress [15,17]. In accordance with previous findings [2], increased symptoms of depression were significantly associated with more dysfunctional coping strategies and worse quality of life in our study.
Mothers’ depressive symptomatology as reflected in CES-D scoring, showed no difference between the first phase of the COVID-19 and the financial crisis period. In both cases, the CES-D score was elevated. The negative impact of the economic crisis on the depressive symptomatology and wellbeing of the general population has been previously studied [48,50,66] although not in particular in the population of parents with individuals with ASD. Financial difficulties and burdens have been repeatedly reported, though, as important stressors for those parents [3,64]. High levels of depression in parents of disabled children have been described during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis [34,36,67]. It seems that no matter the nature of the crisis, the threatening of an individual’s functioning, values, and goals during this period and the imbalance between demands, family capabilities, external resources, and subjective appraisal that has been described to characterize crises in families of individuals with ASD [22], appears to have an equally strong impact on parents’ levels of depression.

6.3. Quality of Life

Quality of life is a multidimensional concept that incorporates physical health, psychological state, social relationships, and relationships with salient features of the environment [68]. In line with a previous study in a Greek sample of mothers of children with ASD [2], a significant association was found between quality of life and coping mechanisms.
If we compare the two crises periods, no significant change was found in the first three domains, while a significant increase in the Environment subscale score was noted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The environment domain incorporates facets such as financial resources, opportunities for acquiring information, physical safety and security, accessibility to health services, transport, participation in leisure activities, and home environment. Although at first glance one would expect all these areas to be seriously affected by the pandemic crisis, it seems that during the economic crisis, the impact was even higher. There might be many explanations for this finding: as mentioned before, during the pandemic crisis the financial rescue funds alleviated many families from the financial strain. Moreover, information on the new coronavirus, which was the main health issue at the time, was available everywhere. Despite the fear of getting a COVID-19 infection, at that point the situation in Greece was quite satisfactory and staying at home gave a sense of safety. Access to health services was eliminated to emergencies but services did not shut down as they did during the financial crisis. Tele-medicine was available in many instances, and there was no need for transportation. There were no opportunities for outdoor leisure activities, but parents had more time to pursue hobbies at home. Finally, the home environment with social distancing and all kinds of tele-activities can be an autism-friendly environment and less stressful for both people with ASD and some parents with autism broader phenotype features.

6.4. Coping Strategies

Coping consists of “cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage psychological stress” [69]. Both problem-focused (e.g., reappraisal, reframing) and emotion-focused (e.g., social support, spirituality, and respite) coping strategies are used by the parents of individuals with ASD [2,70]. Among the five coping strategies assessed by the F-COPES scales, three strategies showed a significant change during the pandemic crisis compared to the financial one. Lower scores in Mobilizing Family to Acquire and Accept Help and Acquiring Social Support probably reflect the social distancing and other restrictive measures implemented by the government to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Access to resources and social networks was reduced. Families lost contact with relatives, family friends, and most importantly with grandparents, which in Greece usually spend long hours with their grandchildren and support families. At the same time, scores in Passive Appraisal increased. Parents felt less confident in their ability to alter the outcome of a health crisis compared to a financial one. It is probably to be expected that the locus of control when fighting a pandemic is more external than when facing an economic crisis.

6.5. Limitations of the Study

One important limitation of the present study is that there has been a period of six years between the two crises. We cannot exclude the possibility that the differences between the results in the two time periods are related to reasons other than the economic or COVID-19 crisis. Although in our sample the DSM-5 level of functioning of the youngsters remained almost the same, there is evidence that as the individuals with ASD become older their behavioral problems sometimes worsen. Parents have to face stressors associated with transitions across key developmental periods [71,72]. On the contrary, parents obtain the skills to manage problematic situations more effectively. Findings on the impact of children’s age on the wellbeing of their parents have been inconsistent. Some studies revealed higher burden in parents of younger children [71,73,74,75], others suggest increasing stress with age [72,76], while others indicate no influence of age on parenting stress [11]. Although other factors might be important, we cannot ignore the fact that both crises had a perverse impact on the lives of Greek people and both periods were heavily characterized by this impact. Apart from being a limitation, the six years distance between the two crises can also be considered as an advantage since there was less of an overlap between the two periods. Another limitation of the study is the fact that we do not have data on the same cohort during a non-crisis period. Therefore, we can only extrapolate conclusions about differences in parenting during different types of crises and not about the parenting of these families under ordinary conditions. We must also consider the fact that our results apply mainly to mothers, who in the vast majority of cases were the main caregiver of their child. As such, we cannot conclude how different the impact is on fathers. In addition, our sample was not very large, nevertheless, it was a within-subjects comparison, which increases the rigorousness of our findings. Sampling biases should also be considered. The study’s results depended on participants attending a particular ASD outpatient clinic, limiting the wide-range effects of the pandemic on families of children with ASD throughout the country. Finally, our data refer to the first two months of the “stay at home” period of the COVID-19 crisis. It will be very interesting to study the possible additive effects of the prolonged crisis as well as its long-term influence on the wellbeing and coping strategies of parents of individuals with ASD.

7. Conclusions

The findings of the present study indicate that the financial and pandemic crises might elicit different responses from the primary caregivers of individuals with ASD. In our sample, the nature of crisis influenced the sense of competence in their role as parents, facets of their quality of life, and the coping strategies they implemented. In line with findings from parents of both typically developing children and children with ASD, it seems that the lockdown was not a uniformly negative experience for the parents of children with ASD.
The differential responses imply, though, that particular needs have to be addressed during different types of crises. In our sample parents’ sense of competence in their parental role, safety issues, accessibility to services, or participation in leisure were more influenced during an economic crisis. Maintaining access to social networks and adequate resources, and encouraging an internal locus of control, seemed to be more important during the physical and social distance period. Even during “ordinary” periods, factors such as social support, coping style, locus of control, self-efficacy, and positive family functions impact the resilience of families raising a child with developmental disabilities or autism. In times of crises, it seems even more important to turn our lenses to caregivers in addition to focusing on individuals with ASD and addressing their particular needs so as to enhance their resilience and ability to handle adversities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: K.P. and V.N.; Methodology: V.N., E.T. and K.P.; Formal analysis: C.T., I.-M.G. and V.N.; Data Curation: V.N., I.-M.G. and E.T.; Writing-Original Draft: K.P. and I.-M.G.; Writing-Review & Editing: G.K. and A.P.; Supervision: K.P., G.K. and A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement:

The study was conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of “Aghia Sophia” Children’s Hospital (841/05.05.2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed Consent was obtained from all patients involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank all the families that agreed to participate in the study during this difficult period of time.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bonis, S.A.; Sawin, K.J. Risks and Protective Factors for Stress Self-Management in Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Integrated Review of the Literature. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2016, 31, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ntre, V. Burden, Needs and Quality of Life in Families with a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Ph.D. Thesis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ntre, V.; Papanikolaou, K.; Triantafyllou, K.; Giannakopoulos, G.; Kokkosi, M.; Kolaitis, G. Psychosocial and Financial Needs, Burdens and Support, and Major Concerns among Greek Families with Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Int. J. Caring Sci. 2018, 11, 985–995. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vohra, R.; Madhavan, S.; Sambamoorthi, U.; Peter, C.S. Access to services, quality of care, and family impact for children with autism, other developmental disabilities, and other mental health conditions. Autism 2014, 18, 815–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Abbeduto, L.; Seltzer, M.M.; Shattuck, P.; Krauss, M.W.; Orsmond, G.; Murphy, M.M. Psychological well-being and coping in mothers of youths with autism, Down syndrome, or fragile X syndrome. AJMR Am. J. Ment. Retard. 2004, 109, 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Boehm, T.L.; Carter, E.W. Family Quality of Life and Its Correlates among Parents of Children and Adults with Intellectual Disability. Am. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 2019, 124, 99–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Estes, A.; Olson, E.; Sullivan, K.; Greenson, J.; Winter, J.; Dawson, G.; Munson, J. Parenting-related stress and psychological distress in mothers of toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. Brain Dev. 2013, 35, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Karaivazoglou, K.; Papadaki, E.; Iconomou, G.; Touliatos, G.; Kotsopoulos, S.; Assimakopoulos, K. Psychological distress and health-related quality of life in parents of children referred to an outpatient service for children with developmental disorders. Australas. Psychiatry 2019, 27, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Karst, J.S.; Van Hecke, A.V. Parent and Family Impact of Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review and Proposed Model for Intervention Evaluation. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 2012, 15, 247–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kousha, M.; Attar, H.A.; Shoar, Z. Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in Iranian mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Child Health Care 2016, 20, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. McStay, R.L.; Dissanayake, C.; Scheeren, A.; Koot, H.M.; Begeer, S. Parenting stress and autism: The role of age, autism severity, quality of life and problem behaviour of children and adolescents with autism. Autism 2014, 18, 502–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Montes, G.; Halterman, J.S. Psychological Functioning and Coping among Mothers of Children with Autism: A Population-Based Study. Pediatrics 2007, 119, e1040–e1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Marsack, C.N.; Samuel, P.S. Mediating Effects of Social Support on Quality of Life for Parents of Adults with Autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2017, 47, 2378–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vasilopoulou, E.; Nisbet, J. The quality of life of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2016, 23, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dąbrowska-Zimakowska, A.; Pisula, E. Parenting stress and coping styles in mothers and fathers of pre-school children with autism and Down syndrome. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2010, 54, 266–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gray, D.E. Gender and coping: The parents of children with high functioning autism. Soc. Sci. Med. 2003, 56, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Yamada, A.; Suzuki, M.; Kato, M.; Suzuki, M.; Tanaka, S.; Shindo, T.; Taketani, K.; Akechi, T.; Furukawa, T.A. Emotional distress and its correlates among parents of children with pervasive developmental disorders. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2007, 61, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bekhet, A.K.; Johnson, N.L.; Zauszniewski, J.A. Resilience in Family Members of Persons with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review of the Literature. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 2012, 33, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Iacob, C.I.; Avram, E.; Cojocaru, D.; Podina, I.R. Resilience in Familial Caregivers of Children with Developmental Disabilities: A Meta-analysis. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2020, 50, 4053–4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gilliland, B.; James, R. Crisis Intervention Strategies; Brooks/Cole Pub. Co. Calif: Pacific Grove, CA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  21. Patterson, J.M. Families experiencing stress: I. The Family Adjustment and Adaptation Response Model: II. Applying the FAAR Model to health-related issues for intervention and research. Fam. Syst. Med. 1988, 6, 202–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Weiss, J.A.; Wingsiong, A.; Lunsky, Y. Defining crisis in families of individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Autism 2014, 18, 985–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guan, H.; Okely, A.D.; Aguilar-Farias, N.; Del Pozo Cruz, B.; Draper, C.E.; El Hamdouchi, A.; Florindo, A.A.; Jáuregui, A.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Kontsevaya, A.; et al. Promoting healthy movement behaviours among children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2020, 4, 416–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, F. Mitigate the effects of home confinement on children during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet 2020, 395, 945–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ameis, S.H.; Lai, M.-C.; Mulsant, B.H.; Szatmari, P. Coping, fostering resilience, and driving care innovation for autistic people and their families during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Mol. Autism 2020, 11, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fegert, J.M.; Vitiello, B.; Plener, P.L.; Clemens, V. Challenges and burden of the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic for child and adolescent mental health: A narrative review to highlight clinical and research needs in the acute phase and the long return to normality. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health 2020, 14, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Narzisi, A. Handle the Autism Spectrum Condition during Coronavirus (COVID-19) Stay At Home period: Ten Tips for Helping Parents and Caregivers of Young Children. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Asbury, K.; Fox, L.; Deniz, E.; Code, A.; Toseeb, U. How is COVID-19 Affecting the Mental Health of Children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities and Their Families? J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2021, 51, 1772–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Colizzi, M.; Sironi, E.; Antonini, F.; Ciceri, M.L.; Bovo, C.; Zoccante, L. Psychosocial and Behavioral Impact of COVID-19 in Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Online Parent Survey. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Corbett, B.A.; Muscatello, R.A.; Klemencic, M.E.; Schwartzman, J.M. The impact of COVID-19 on stress, anxiety, and coping in youth with and without autism and their parents. Autism Res. 2021, 14, 1496–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gassman-Pines, A.; Ananat, E.O.; Fitz-Henley, J. COVID-19 and Parent-Child Psychological Well-being. Pediatrics 2020, 146, e2020007294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pellicano, E.; Brett, S.; Houting, J.D.; Heyworth, M.; Magiati, I.; Steward, R.; Urbanowicz, A.; Stears, M. COVID-19, social isolation and the mental health of autistic people and their families: A qualitative study. Autism 2021, 13623613211035936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. White, L.C.; Law, J.K.; Daniels, A.M.; Toroney, J.; Vernoia, B.; Xiao, S.; Feliciano, P.; Chung, W.K. The SPARK Consortium Brief Report: Impact of COVID-19 on Individuals with ASD and Their Caregivers: A Perspective from the SPARK Cohort. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2021, 51, 3766–3773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dhiman, S.; Sahu, P.K.; Reed, W.R.; Ganesh, G.S.; Goyal, R.K.; Jain, S. Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on mental health and perceived strain among caregivers tending children with special needs. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2020, 107, 103790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Meral, B.F. Parental Views of Families of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Developmental Disorders during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, S.-Q.; Chen, S.-D.; Li, X.-K.; Ren, J. Mental Health of Parents of Special Needs Children in China during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ersoy, K.; Altın, B.; Bayram Sarıkaya, B.; Güngörmüş Özkardaş, O. The Comparison of Impact of Health Anxiety on Dispositional Hope and Psychological Well-Being of Mothers Who Have Children Diagnosed with Autism and Mothers Who Have Normal Children, in COVID-19 Pandemic. Soc. Sci. Res. J. 2020, 9, 117–126. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee, V.; Albaum, C.; Tablon Modica, P.; Ahmad, F.; Gorte, J.W.; Khanlou, N.; McMorris Lai, J.C.; Harrison, C.; Hedley, T.; Johnston, P.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health and wellbeing of caregivers and families of autistic people: A rapid synthesis review. Canad Inst. Health Res. 2020. Available online: https://covid19mentalhealthresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/WEISS-Initial-Knowledge-Synthesis-Report_2020-06-22.pdf (accessed on 23 February 2022).
  39. Manning, J.; Billian, J.; Matson, J.; Allen, C.; Soares, N. Perceptions of Families of Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder during the COVID-19 Crisis. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2020, 51, 2920–2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Neece, C.; McIntyre, L.L.; Fenning, R. Examining the impact of COVID-19 in ethnically diverse families with young children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2020, 64, 739–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Latzer, I.T.; Leitner, Y.; Karnieli-Miller, O. Core experiences of parents of children with autism during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Autism 2021, 25, 1047–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tamo, A.R.T. An analysis of mother stress before and during COVID-19 pandemic: The case of China. Health Care Women Int. 2020, 41, 1349–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Herbert, J.S.; Mitchell, A.; Brentnall, S.J.; Bird, A.L. Identifying Rewards Over Difficulties Buffers the Impact of Time in COVID-19 Lockdown for Parents in Australia. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 3441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Evans, S.; Mikocka-Walus, A.; Klas, A.; Olive, L.; Sciberras, E.; Karantzas, G.; Westrupp, E.M. From “It Has Stopped Our Lives” to “Spending More Time Together Has Strengthened Bonds”: The Varied Experiences of Australian Families During COVID-19. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rogers, G.; Perez-Olivas, G.; Kroese, B.S.; Patel, V.; Murphy, G.; Rose, J.; Cooper, V.; Langdon, P.E.; Hiles, S.; Clifford, C.; et al. The experiences of mothers of children and young people with intellectual disabilities during the first COVID-19 lockdown period. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. 2021, 34, 1421–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mumbardó-Adam, C.; Barnet-López, S.; Balboni, G. How have youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder managed quarantine derived from COVID-19 pandemic? An approach to families perspectives. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2021, 110, 103860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Simou, E.; Koutsogeorgou, E. Effects of the economic crisis on health and healthcare in Greece in the literature from 2009 to 2013: A systematic review. Health Policy 2014, 115, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Christodoulou, N.G.; Christodoulou, G.N. Financial Crises: Impact on Mental Health and Suggested Responses. Psychother. Psychosom. 2013, 82, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Christodoulou, C.; Efstathiou, V.; Michopoulos, I.; Gkerekou, M.; Paraschakis, A.; Koutsaftis, F.; Douzenis, A. The Economic Crisis in Greece and Its Impact on the Seasonality of Suicides in the Athens Greater Area. Psychiatry Investig. 2017, 14, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Economou, M.; Madianos, M.; Peppou, L.E.; Theleritis, C.; Patelakis, A.; Stefanis, C. Suicidal ideation and reported suicide attempts in Greece during the economic crisis. World Psychiatry 2013, 12, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Economou, M.; Madianos, M.; Theleritis, C.; Peppou, L.E.; Stefanis, C.N. Increased suicidality amid economic crisis in Greece. Lancet 2011, 378, 1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kolaitis, G.; Giannakopoulos, G. Greek financial crisis and child mental health. Lancet 2015, 386, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.: Arlington, VA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Radloff, L.S. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1977, 1, 385–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fountoulakis, K.; Iacovides, A.; Kleanthous, S.; Samolis, S.; Kaprinis, S.G.; Sitzoglou, K.; Kaprinis, G.S.; Bech, P. Reliability, Validity and Psychometric Properties of the Greek Translation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale. BMC Psychiatry 2001, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Madianos, M.G.; Stefanis, C.N. Changes in the prevalence of symptoms of depression and depression across Greece. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 1992, 27, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. McCubbin, H.I.; Olson, D.; Larsen, A. Family crisis oriented personal evaluation scale. In Family Assessment: Resiliency, Coping and Adaptation—Inventories for Research and Practice; McCubbin, H.I., Thompson, A.I., McCubbin, M.A., Eds.; University of Wisconsin System: Madison, WI, USA, 1981; pp. 455–507. [Google Scholar]
  58. Gouva, M.; Dragioti, E.; Konstanti, Z.; Kotrotsiou, E.; Koulouras, V. Translation and Validation of a Greek version of the Family Crisis Oriented Personal Evaluation Scales (F-COPES). Intersci. Health Care 2016, 8, 64–72. [Google Scholar]
  59. Haskett, M.E.; Ahern, L.S.; Ward, C.S.; Allaire, J.C. Factor Structure and Validity of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 2006, 35, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Abidin, R.R. Parenting Stress Index Professional Manual, 3rd ed.; Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  61. Skevington, S.; Lotfy, M.; O’Connell, K. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Qual. Life Res. 2004, 13, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. The Whoqol Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Soc. Sci. Med. 1998, 46, 1569–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ginieri-Coccossis, M.; Triantafillou, E.; Tomaras, V.; Soldatos, C.; Mavreas, V.; Christodoulou, G. Psychometric properties of WHOQOL-BREF in clinical and healthy Greek populations: Incorporating new culture-relevant items. Psychiatriki 2012, 23, 130–142. [Google Scholar]
  64. Montes, G.; Halterman, J.S. Association of Childhood Autism Spectrum Disorders and Loss of Family Income. Pediatrics 2008, 121, e821–e826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Gerstein, E.D.; Crnic, K.A.; Blacher, J.; Baker, B.L. Resilience and the course of daily parenting stress in families of young children with intellectual disabilities. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2009, 53, 981–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Van Hal, G. The true cost of the economic crisis on psychological well-being: A review. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2015, 8, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Willner, P.; Rose, J.; Kroese, B.S.; Murphy, G.H.; Langdon, P.E.; Clifford, C.; Hutchings, H.; Watkins, A.; Hiles, S.; Cooper, V. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of carers of people with intellectual disabilities. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. 2020, 33, 1523–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. WHOQOL Group. World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment. What quality of life? World Health Forum 1996, 17, 354–356. [Google Scholar]
  69. Lazarus, R.S. Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosom. Med. 1993, 55, 234–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lai, W.W.; Oei, T.P.S. Coping in Parents and Caregivers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD): A Review. Rev. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2014, 1, 207–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Lounds, J.; Seltzer, M.M.; Greenberg, J.S.; Shattuck, P.T. Transition and change in adolescents and young adults with autism: Longitudinal effects on maternal well-being. Am. J. Ment. Retard. 2007, 112, 401–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tehee, E.; Honan, R.; Hevey, D. Factors Contributing to Stress in Parents of Individuals with Autistic Spectrum Disorders. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. 2009, 22, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Barker, E.T.; Hartley, S.L.; Seltzer, M.M.; Floyd, F.J.; Greenberg, J.S.; Orsmond, G.I. Trajectories of emotional well-being in mothers of adolescents and adults with autism. Dev. Psychol. 2011, 47, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Fitzgerald, M.; Birkbeck, G.; Matthews, P. Maternal burden in families with children with autistic spectrum disorder. Ir. J. Psychol. 2002, 23, 2–17. [Google Scholar]
  75. Gray, D.E. Ten years on: A longitudinal study of families of children with autism. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 2002, 27, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Konstantareas, M.M.; Homatidis, S. Assessing Child Symptom Severity and Stress in Parents of Autistic Children. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1989, 30, 459–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Sample characteristics.
Table 1. Sample characteristics.
N (%)
Gender
Mother50 (89.3)
Father6 (10.7)
Age, mean (SD)49.6 (7.8)
Educational status
Middle/High school16 (28.6)
University/Post-graduate studies40 (71.4)
Married43 (76.8)
Number of children, median (IQR)2 (2.2)
Child’s age, mean (SD)17.3 (3.3)
Child’s gender
Boys44 (78.6)
Girls12 (21.4)
Income after pandemic
Increased1 (1.8)
Stable35 (62.5)
Decreased17 (30.4)
Nullified3 (5.4)
Recent use of sedatives/psychotropic drugs by the mother12 (21.4)
Need of child’s dosage increase during the pandemic6 (10.7)
Ask for additional psychological support or help
Not at all46 (82.1)
A little5 (8.9)
Moderately3 (5.4)
Much1 (1.8)
Very much1 (1.8)
Child’s treatment continued
No36 (67.9)
Yes, with physical presence of the therapist3 (5.4)
Yes, remotely15 (26.8)
Wisc III score, mean (SD)78 (25.6)
DSM-5—level of functioning
115 (26.8)
220 (35.7)
321 (37.5)
Table
Table 2. Changes in PSI, F-COPES, CES-D, and WhoQolBref subscales from the financial to the COVID-19 crisis.
Table 2. Changes in PSI, F-COPES, CES-D, and WhoQolBref subscales from the financial to the COVID-19 crisis.
Financial CrisisCOVID-19 CrisisChangep Paired t-Test
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
PSI
Defensive Responding18.534.3616.025.26−2.514.77<0.001
Parental Distress34.258.4629.9610.02−4.299.600.003
Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction29.738.2027.917.83−1.827.330.057
Difficult Child34.739.8434.117.69−0.629.810.484
Total PSI score119.1025.87108.0026.22−11.1023.42<0.001
FCOPES
Reframing30.274.1330.095.36−0.186.360.787
Mobilizing Family to Acquire and Accept Help15.582.6514.272.94−1.313.350.008
Seeking Spiritual Support10.713.7111.394.310.694.070.291
Acquiring Social Support26.087.0822.846.77−3.249.130.007
Passive Appraisal10.223.1314.182.953.965.01<0.001
Overall FCOPES93.3513.1595.7513.162.4018.380.523
CES-D17.9011.9517.9311.970.0212.720.845
WhoQolBref
Overall health13.393.0613.362.78−0.033.400.802
Physical health14.452.1914.272.51−0.182.360.513
Psychological health13.292.5213.391.830.102.510.910
Social relationships12.602.8513.192.700.582.980.271
Environment11.562.1112.811.901.252.21<0.001
Table
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients among all understudy scales during the COVID-19 crisis.
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients among all understudy scales during the COVID-19 crisis.
1234567891011121314151617
1. Defensive Responding1.00
2. Parental Distress0.92 ***1.00
3. Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction0.68 ***0.70 ***1.00
4. Difficult Child0.41 **0.40 ***0.671.00
5. Total PSI score0.88 ***0.89 ***0.90 ***0.73 ***1.00
6. Reframing−0.21−0.20−0.29 *−0.22−0.27 *1.00
7. Mobilizing Family to Acquire and Accept Help−0.23−0.25−0.04−0.02−0.160.261.00
8. Seeking Spiritual Support−0.030.000.030.100.040.110.221.00
9. Acquiring Social Support−0.21−0.32 *−0.24−0.17−0.29 *0.28 *0.36 **0.011.00
10. Passive Appraisal−0.20−0.19−0.27 *−0.29 *−0.28 *−0.100.09−0.120.011.00
11. Overall F Copes−0.33 *−0.36 **−0.33 *−0.23−0.37 **0.65 ***0.61 ***0.41 **0.75 ***0.181.00
12. CES-D0.67 ***0.69 ***0.38 **0.28 *0.60 ***−0.30 *−0.23−0.07−0.35 **−0.10−0.44 **1.00
13. Overall health−0.51 ***−0.49 ***−0.38 **−0.19−0.46 ***0.38 **0.27 *0.080.230.120.40 **−0.43 **1.00
14. Physical health−0.50 ***−0.45 ***−0.39 **−0.21−0.45 ***0.56 ***0.250.170.200.070.51 ***−0.72 ***0.54 ***1.00
15. Psychological health−0.64 ***−0.67 ***−0.54 ***−0.27 *−0.62 ***0.36 **0.240.120.42 **0.110.54 ***−0.67 ***0.43 **0.76 ***1.00
16. Social relationships−0.64 ***−0.65 ***−0.52 ***−0.26 *−0.61 ***0.39 **0.37 **0.28 *0.42 **0.28 *0.64 ***−0.68 ***0.63 ***0.65 ***0.61 ***1.00
17. Environment−0.31 *−0.37 **−0.26−0.11−0.31 *0.43 **0.230.040.220.220.43 **−0.53 ***0.47 ***0.62 ***0.56 ***0.49 ***1.00
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Papanikolaou, K.; Ntre, V.; Gertsou, I.-M.; Tagkouli, E.; Tzavara, C.; Pehlivanidis, A.; Kolaitis, G. Parenting Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder during Crises: Differential Responses between the Financial and the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051264

AMA Style

Papanikolaou K, Ntre V, Gertsou I-M, Tagkouli E, Tzavara C, Pehlivanidis A, Kolaitis G. Parenting Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder during Crises: Differential Responses between the Financial and the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(5):1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051264

Chicago/Turabian Style

Papanikolaou, Katerina, Vassiliki Ntre, Ioanna-Maria Gertsou, Evdokia Tagkouli, Chara Tzavara, Artemios Pehlivanidis, and Gerasimos Kolaitis. 2022. "Parenting Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder during Crises: Differential Responses between the Financial and the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 5: 1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051264

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop