Next Article in Journal
Mathematical Estimation of Axial Length Increment in the Control of Myopia Progression
Next Article in Special Issue
Trends in Caesarean Section Rate According to Robson Group Classification among Pregnant Women with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Single-Center Large Cohort Study in Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence and Corneal Confocal Microscopy: The Start of a Beautiful Relationship
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk Factors Associated with Severe Disease and Intensive Care Unit Admission of Pregnant Patients with COVID-19 Infection—A Retrospective Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Cardiovascular Complications of COVID-19 among Pregnant Women and Their Fetuses: A Systematic Review

1
Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2
School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3
Faculty of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Science, Kashan, Iran
4
Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5
Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
6
Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Critical Care Quality Improvement Research Center, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(20), 6194; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206194
Submission received: 18 September 2022 / Revised: 6 October 2022 / Accepted: 11 October 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022

Abstract

:
Background: COVID-19 is a viral infectious disease leading to a spectrum of clinical complications, especially cardiovascular. Evidence shows that this infection can potentially accompany a worse outcome in pregnant women. Cardiovascular complications in mothers and their fetuses are reported by previous studies. Objective: In this systematic review, we aim to investigate the cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 during pregnancy in the mothers and fetus, according to the published literature. Method: We systematically searched the online databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, using relevant keywords up to April 2022. We included all observational studies reporting cardiovascular complications among COVID-19-affected pregnant women and their fetuses. Results: We included 74 studies containing 47582 pregnant COVID-19 cases. Pre-eclampsia, hypertensive disorders, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, myocardial infarction, thrombosis formation, alterations in maternal–fetal Doppler patterns, and maternal and fetal arrhythmia were reported as cardiovascular complications. The highest incidences of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia among COVID-19 pregnant cases, reported by studies, were 69% and 62%, and the lowest were 0.5% and 3%. The highest and lowest incidences of fetal bradycardia were 20% and 3%, and regarding fetal tachycardia, 5.4% and 1%, respectively. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy can potentially be associated with cardiovascular complications in the mother, particularly pre-eclampsia and heart failure. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy can potentially cause cardiovascular complications in the fetus, particularly arrhythmia.

1. Introduction

Since 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused considerable changes in the clinical management of pregnant women, their fetuses or neonates, and healthcare delivery, as the accessibility of healthcare resources, scientific data, and infection rates continue to evolve. COVID-19 is a highly transmittable virus with various symptom presentations from mild or asymptomatic to critical conditions [1]. Its mild symptoms include dry cough, gastrointestinal symptoms, anosmia, dyspnea, sore throat, headache, ageusia, and fatigue. Moreover, serious issues including thromboembolism and cardiovascular complications such as acute myocardial damage, cardiogenic shock, and arrhythmia, have been indicated in adult COVID-19 patients [2,3]. The prevalence of COVID-19 infection across pregnant women has been announced to be 14–15%, with most (50–90%) pregnant women being asymptomatic [4,5,6,7]. Only a small portion of pregnant women show severe symptoms, principally in the third trimester of pregnancy. Among those with severe symptoms, the risk of death and severe complications is higher [8,9,10,11].
It was believed that because of the weakened immune system, which is noticeable by certain raised pro-inflammatory cytokines and reduced lymphocytes in pregnant women, they are in a riskier situation in the case of encountering COVID-19 [12], but in recent studies, it was described that pregnancy does not raise the risk of COVID-19 infection; however, it aggravates the clinical outcome of COVID-19 in contrast to non-pregnant women [13,14].
In addition to the common symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms and complications such as hypoxemia and heart failure due to peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) were well described [15,16]. Moreover, in critical and severe COVID-19 pregnant cases, myocardial injury and bradycardia are especially noted [17]. COVID-19 infection in pregnant women can result in an elevated risk of pregnancy complications such as pre-term premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), pre-term birth, pre-eclampsia, and cesarean. It may cause maternal death in rare cases.
The primary aim of the current systematic review study is to summarize the current literature on the maternal and fetal cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19 infection reported during pregnancy. Moreover, we aim to investigate the potential association between COVID-19 infection during pregnancy and cardiovascular outcomes including pre-eclampsia and hypertensive disorders.

2. Methods

This study was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocol for reporting systematic reviews.

2.1. Search Strategy

This article assessed qualitative data on the COVID-19 cardiovascular complications in pregnant women. Two authors (A.B. and R.H) searched the medical subject headings (MeSH) in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases to find all related research articles. All relevant articles published before April 2022, mostly in 2020–2021, were evaluated. The following search terms were used ((“Pregnant Women”[Mesh]) OR (“fetus”[Mesh]) OR (“Pregnancy”[Mesh])) AND (“COVID-19”[Mesh]) AND ((“Heart”[Mesh]) OR (“Cardiovascular Abnormalities”[Mesh]) OR (“Cardiovascular System”[Mesh]) OR (cardio*)). In addition, the reference list of the relevant papers was reviewed to avoid missing any publication. All searched studies were included in the Endnote software for screening.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

We included studies with the following criteria: (1) observational studies with prospective, case-control, cross-sectional, case series, or case report designs; (2) studies that reported the cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 among pregnant women; (3) studies that reported the cardiovascular complications of COVID-19 among the fetuses of affected pregnant women; (4) English language studies; and (5) studies that diagnosed COVID-19 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) during pregnancy.
We excluded non-English articles, interventional studies, review articles, studies that did not use PCR to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection, case reports that diagnosed COVID-19 after delivery, and studies that did not report any cardiovascular disease complications among affected pregnant women or their fetuses.
Two authors (M.D. and R.H.) conducted title–abstract and full-text screening independently and in parallel. The disagreements between authors were finally resolved via consultation with a third author (S.Y). The title, abstract, and full-text screening of all the related articles resulted in 18 final studies. The extracted information from each of the identified studies is as follows: sample size, the number of pregnant women with a positive COVID-19 test, the number of pregnant women with a negative COVID-19 test, trimester, the mean age of positive and negative subjects, and key findings.

2.3. Data Extraction

Two authors (M.D. and A.B.) extracted the following information: first author’s name, the date of publication, the country of origin, the demographic characteristics of the participants (age range or mean age and gestational age), the number of pregnant women and number of COVID-19-affected pregnant cases, and cardiovascular complications reported in the COVID-19-affected pregnant women and their fetuses.

2.4. Quality Assessment

Two authors (M.D. and A.B.) conducted a critical appraisal of all observational studies to assess the quality of those that were included. Disagreements were resolved through consensus with another author (S.E.). We separately applied the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) checklists for cohort and case-control studies. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist to assess case series and case reports (Tables S1 and S2).
This study was approved by the Iranian National Committee for Ethics in Biomedical Sciences (Code of Ethics: IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1400.840).

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

A total number of 1386 records were identified by database searching. After removing duplicated articles, authors screened the titles and abstracts, and 214 articles remained. In the next step, 74 articles were included in our systematic review study after considering the eligibility of full texts (Figure 1).

3.2. Demographic Characteristics and Cardiovascular Comorbidities

In total, 41 cohorts, cross-sectional, or case-control studies were included, containing a total of 47,582 pregnant COVID-19 patients with a mean age of 27.8 years. In addition, 38 case reports and case series studies were reviewed. Hypertension was a cardiovascular comorbidity reported by several studies. The highest prevalence of this comorbidity in pregnant cases was 51.2% [18] and 33.4% [19], and the lowest was 1.5% [20] and 1.4% [21] (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4).

3.3. Pre-Eclampsia and Hypertensive Disorders

Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, including pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, were among the reported cardiovascular events in pregnant COVID-19 cases. Pre-eclampsia is a condition diagnosed by a blood pressure of >140/90 mmHg coincidence with proteinuria or end-organ dysfunction after the 20th week of pregnancy [22]. In a group of studies, pre-eclampsia and hypertension were reported as complications that occur in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2. Adhikari et al., in a cohort study, evaluated the adverse outcomes of COVID-19 on 245 pregnant patients. Wu et al. also reported that among 29 pregnant COVID-19 cases, two had hypertensive disorders (6.90%) [23]. Vaezi et al. reported severe pre-eclampsia in three and hypertension in one of 24 COVID-19-positive pregnant patients [24]. Leal et al. indicated that hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases occur in 10.3% of pregnant COVID-19 cases as a comorbidity [25].
In some of the studies reviewed, two groups of pregnant women with and without COVID-19 are compared, and pre-eclampsia is considered to occur in COVID-19-infected pregnant women more than in non-infected controls. Pre-eclampsia with severe features was a cardiovascular outcome observed among 11% of recorded patients, which was higher than the healthy controls (p < 0.05 [26]. Jayaram et al. [27] studied 75 pregnant women with coronavirus disease in a cohort study. Of the cases, 24% were diagnosed with pre-eclampsia, which was higher than the controls (p < 0.001 Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi et al. [28] conducted a cohort study on 150 pregnant women (56 cases confirmed with positive COVID-19 and 94 controls). Pre-eclampsia occurred in 19.8% of cases and 7.4% of controls (p = 0.037). In a study by Ahlberg et al. [29] on 155 COVID-19-positive and 604 matched negative pregnant women, pre-eclampsia was seen in 7.7% of positive women and 4.3% of negative controls. Antoun et al. [30] studied a group of 23 pregnant patients prospectively, 16 of whom were confirmed with positive COVID-19 in the third trimester. A total of two out of 16 cases (10.5%) developed pre-eclampsia. Cruz Melguizo et al. [20] compared a group of 1347 COVID-19-infected with 1607 non-infected pregnant women. They reported that a higher proportion of SARS-CoV-2-infected women were diagnosed with severe pre-eclampsia (40.6% vs. 15.6%; p < 0.001), whereas moderate pre-eclampsia occurred more frequently in the non-infected group. A higher rate of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia was observed in pregnant patients infected with COVID-19 compared to healthy pregnant women, as demonstrated by Epelboin et al. (4.8% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001) [31]. Gurol-Urganci and colleagues [32] showed a higher risk of pre-eclampsia in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients in their study (3.9%; p < 0.001). Mahajan et al. [33] evaluated the effect of COVID-19 on multiple gestation pregnancies. Based on their study, the risk of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia was higher in MGPs with COVID-19 than MGPs before the pandemic (50.0% vs. 12.7%) and singleton pregnancies (41.6% vs. 7.9%). Papageorghiou et al. [34] indicated a risk ratio of 1.86 for pre-eclampsia among pregnant COVID-19 patients. A prospective cohort study on 199 women (66 COVID-19-infected and 133 non-infected) indicated an adjusted risk ratio of 2.02 for pre-eclampsia [35]. Serrano et al. [36] indicated a higher risk for developing pre-eclampsia in 231 pregnant women in comparison with the general population (19.0% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.012). Soto-Torres et al. reported no significant difference in the abundance of hypertensive disorders between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative pregnant cases (16% vs. 17.5%; p = 0.8); however, they recorded a trend toward greater rates of pre-eclampsia in the positive cases (19.8% vs. 10.7%; p = 0.08) [10]. Jering et al. studied 6380 pregnant women with coronavirus disease and 400,066 controls without COVID-19. They reported that the incidence rate of pre-eclampsia was slightly higher among SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant cases than pregnant cases without this infection (8.8% vs. 6.8%; p < 0.001). In addition, they found that eclampsia among pregnant COVID-19 patients was correlated with greater odds of in-hospital death or mechanical ventilation [37].
Some studies concentrated on the severity of COVID-19 and its effect on the incidence of pre-eclampsia. Arslan et al. [38] observed pre-eclampsia in 11 out of 110 pregnant patients with COVID-19, with a higher percentage in non-severe patients (p-value = 0.09). A prospective observational study, conducted by Mendoza et al. [39], studied 34 cases of non-severe and eight cases of severe COVID-19 pregnant women. Five cases, all infected by severe COVID-19, developed pre-eclampsia. Osaikhuwnomwan et al. [40] described pre-eclampsia as the most common co-morbidity of pregnancy. They demonstrated that pre-eclampsia was highly related to severe COVID-19 (p = 0.028).
Several studies reported no important difference in the incidence or risk of pre-eclampsia between COVID-19 infected and non-infected pregnant women. Rosenbloom et al. [41] reported hypertensive disorders of pregnancy among pregnant patients, including gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia. The prevalence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy among cases was not significantly higher than that of controls (28.9% vs. 27.7%; p = 0.84). In the case-control study conducted by Daclin et al. [42], there was no significant difference in the incidence of pre-eclampsia between pregnant women before the pandemic and pregnant women infected by COVID-19 (p-value = 0.36). Ferrara et al. [43] demonstrated no significant difference in the incidence of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia between pregnant women with/without SARS-CoV-2 infection (hazard ratio adjusted for age: 1.41). Trilla et al. [44] studied 124 COVID-19 pregnant patients infected in the first trimester compared to 693 non-infected pregnant women. They indicated no significant difference in the risk of developing pre-eclampsia between the two groups (p = 0.422). Guida et al. [19] also observed the same result; pre-eclampsia occurred in 10.3% vs. 13.1% of pregnant women with and without COVID-19, respectively (p = 0.41). Mullins et al. [45] also reported the same result. In a cohort study on 64 pregnant patients with COVID-19, only two patients developed pre-eclampsia [46]. Hill et al. calculated a relative risk of 0.98 for pre-eclampsia and 0.88 for gestational hypertension among COVID-19 patients [21].
In a case series by Juusela et al., one of the presented COVID-19 pregnant patients developed pre-eclampsia [47]. In the study reported by Askary et al. [48], two maternal deaths occurred due to pre-eclampsia in a series of 16 COVID-19-positive pregnant women.
In a case reported by Ahmed et al., SARS-CoV-2 is a risk factor for pre-eclampsia and hypertension in a pregnant patient [49]. Azarkish et al. observed a case of a pregnant woman with severe COVID-19 developing pre-eclampsia [50]. The study published by Hansen et al. described a case of a pregnant woman diagnosed with COVID-19 and pre-eclampsia together at the same time [51]. Naeh et al. reported a case of a COVID-19-positive pregnant woman with secondary hypertension [52] (Table 1 and Table 3).

3.4. Cardiomyopathy, Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and ECG Changes

Yousefzadeh et al. assessed the changes in the ECG of 89 pregnant women with coronavirus disease in their retrospective study [53]. Based on their report, 64 patients manifested normal ECG, AV block was observed in 3.4% of patients, and 17% of patients showed long QTC intervals. In a group of 154 pregnant coronavirus patients studied by Mercedes et al. [54], 15 (9.7%) developed myocardial injury. All 15 patients manifested left ventricular dysfunction with a mean ejection fraction of 37.67.
Mousavi Seresht et al. described four cases of cardiomyopathy in pregnant women associated with COVID-19. Two cases underwent heart transplant [55]. Juusela et al. presented two cases of COVID-19-related cardiomyopathy in pregnancy. These two severe COVID-19 patients developed cardiac dysfunction with moderately decreased left ventricular ejection fractions (40% and 45%) and global hypokinesis [47]. Moreover, Bhattacharyya et al. reported a case of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy at the 38th week of pregnancy [56]. In a case of a young pregnant woman reported by Nejadrahim et al., cardiomiopathy with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% was observed [57]. Soofi et al. reported acute heart failure and venous thrombosis in a case of a 25-year-old pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2. Significant dysfunction of the left ventricle during systole with an ejection fraction of only 15% was observed in this case [58]. Another peripartum cardiomyopathy case was reported by De Vita et al. The presented case also had clinical manifestations of congestive heart failure that were consistent with radiologic findings. A chest CT scan indicated interstitial and alveolar thickening in the right middle and inferior lobes, cardiomegaly, and bilateral pericardial and pleural effusion. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) demonstrated an oval-shaped, enlarged left ventricle with normal thickness, left ventricle walls diffuse hypokinesis with reduced systolic function, enlargement of the right ventricle with diffuse hypokinesis, and impaired contractile function. Echocardiography showed a severely dilated heart with reduced ejection fraction [16]. In the case reported by Franca and colleagues [59], a pregnant woman with a history of heart disease underwent premature labor due to COVID-19 infection, which resulted in the death of the mother. Gulersen et al. reported a case of a COVID-19-positive pregnant woman with myocarditis and an elevation of inflammatory markers. Khodamoradi et al. observed acute pulmonary embolism and COVID-19 in a postpartum patient [60]. In the case reported by Mevada et al., a pregnant patient presented COVID-19 and cardiomyopathy together. Cardiomyopathy and heart failure were observed in a pregnant woman with confirmed COVID-19 infection in the study conducted by Stout et al. [61] (Table 1 and Table 3).

3.5. Thrombotic Events in COVID-19 Patients during Pregnancy

The SARS-CoV-2-positive pregnant patient reported by De Vita et al. also had thrombosis in a branch of the pulmonary artery and the left ventricular apex [16]. Agarwal et al. reported a pregnant COVID-19 case who experienced portal hypertension due to portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Khodamoradi et al. observed acute pulmonary embolism and COVID-19 in a postpartum patient [62]. Zarrintan et al. reported a case of a 39-year-old pregnant woman manifesting pulmonary thromboembolism and severe COVID-19 [63]. Goudarzi et al. presented a case of pulmonary embolism in a 22-year-old pregnant woman with coronavirus disease [64] (Table 1 and Table 3).

3.6. Heart Rate Disorders

In the study conducted by Sinaci et al., tachycardia and bradycardia were observed in 5.4% and 1.3% of COVID-19 pregnant patients, respectively [65]. In a case series of seven patients, one pregnant women with coronavirus disease manifested tachycardia [66]. Tachycardia was observed in five out of 16 pregnant women with COVID-19-positive infection in the case series reported by Askary et al. [48]. Pachtman Shetty et al. recorded bradycardia and maternal heart rate nadir among the primary outcomes of pregnant patients with COVID-19 [17]. Donovan et al. presented a case of fetal heart rate acceleration in a COVID-19 pregnant mother [67] (Table 1 and Table 3).

3.7. Doppler Findings and Fetal Complications

A prospective study conducted by Rizzo et al. [68] on 54 infected and 108 non-infected pregnant women indicated no statistically important difference in umbilical vein blood flow/abdominal circumference (UVBF/AC) (p = 0.07) in the left and right Atrial Area (AA) (left 1.30 vs. 1.28 p = 0.221 and right 1.33 vs. 1.31 p = 0.324), as well as in the ventricular sphericity indices (SI) (left 1.75 vs. 1.77 p = 0.208 and right 1.51 vs. 1.54 p = 0.121) between the two groups. Fetal cardiac output (CO) was evaluated in 48 pregnant women with severe COVID-19 and 50 controls by Turgut et al. [69]. They demonstrated that fetal left CO dramatically decreased in women with severe disease after recovery compared to the controls (285.1 ± 114.7 vs. 246.7 ± 109.0 p = 0.058). Sule et al. reported fetal pulmonary artery Doppler parameters in 55 pregnant women with COVID-19 and 93 controls. Acceleration time (AT) was higher in the COVID-19-positive group than in the control group controls (54 ± 15.4 vs. 50 ± 14.9; p = 0.044). However, the ejection time (ET) (223 ± 45.4 vs. 220 ± 41.3; p = 0.960) and acceleration/ejection time ratio (PATET) (0.25 ± 0.07 vs. 0.23 ± 0.07; p = 0.191) parameters were not significantly different between the groups [70]. A study by Anuk et al. [71] indicated that the pulsatility and resistance indices (PI and RI) of both the umbilical and uterine artery had a significant increase in pregnant cases that were recovered from COVID-19 in comparison with the controls (p < 0.05). Moreover, in a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the PI and RI of the mean uterine artery were independently associated with disease (p = 0.009 and p = 0.049, respectively).
Mercedes et al. [54] reported that among 15 pregnant COVID-19 infected pregnant women with myocardial injury, three (20%) developed fetal bradycardia. In a cohort study by Adhikari et al. [65], 27% of patients and 33% of controls underwent caesarean delivery, for which the reason was abnormal fetal heart rate in 3% of patients and 5% of controls. The prevalence of abnormal fetal heart rate was not significantly different between patients and controls (p = 0.13). In the study by Soto-Torres et al. [10], abnormal Doppler findings were present in eight of 106 patients (7%) vs. two of 103 controls (2%). There was no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.08). Doppler parameters were not significantly different between patients and controls. The umbilical artery PI was 0.67 (sd = 1.49) among patients and 0.4 and (sd = 1.04) among controls (p = 0.22). Gracia-Perez-Bonfils et al. studied 12 patients with coronavirus disease and evaluated the cardiotocograph of their fetuses. An increased baseline fetal heart rate (more than 10%) was observed in all fetuses [72].
Kato et al. reported tachycardia in the fetus of a pregnant woman with COVID-19 [73]. On the other hand, Cetera et al. reported bradycardia in the fetus of the three reported pregnant COVID-19 cases [74]. Pelayo et al. presented a case of a pregnant COVID-19 patient who underwent caesarean due to a non-reassuring heart rate of the fetus [75]. Gubbary et al. presented a case of fetal myocarditis associated with COVID-19 with an ejection fraction of 35%, which was followed by non-immune hydrops [76]. (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4).
Table 1. Characteristics and maternal outcomes of the included cohort/cross-sectional/case-control studies.
Table 1. Characteristics and maternal outcomes of the included cohort/cross-sectional/case-control studies.
First AuthorYearStudy DesignCountryNumber of CasesNumber of ControlsPregnancy PhaseMean Age of CasesMean Age of ControlsCardiovascular Comorbidities Among Cases (Percentage)Maternal Cardiovascular Complications Among Cases (Percentage)
HypertensionOthersPre-eclampsia/Eclampsia/Gestational Hypertensive DisordersArrhythmia (Type)Thrombotic EventsDoppler FindingsOthers
Kalahroudi et al. [28]2021CohortIran569431.9 ± 8.22 weeks31.6 ± 6.1 years 6 (10.7%) 10 (19.8%) Pre-term labor (34.5%), caesarean delivery (67.3%)
Antoun et al. [30]2020CohortUK236756Third trimester n = 19
Second trimester n = 4
29.0 2/23 (8.7%) Pre-term labor 7/19 (36.4%), caesarean delivery 16/19 (68.4%)
Arslan et al. [38]2021CohortTurkey1106508Third trimester n = 106 (96.4%)
Second trimester n = 4 (3.6%)
31.0 ± 6.0 years 11 (10%) Pre-term labor n = 37 (33.6%)
Melguizo et al. [20]2021CohortSpain13471607 33.033.019/1304 (1.5%)Baseline heart disease 15/1316 (1.1%)69 (5.1%)
(Severe pre-eclampsia n = 28/69 (40.6%))
Venous thrombotic events (1.5%), DVT n = 10 (0.7%), pulmonary embolism n = 4 (0.3%)Positive ultrasound prematurity screening n = 16 (1.4%)Pre-term delivery (11.1%), premature rupture of
membranes (15.5%), maternal mortality n = 2 (0.1%)
Daclin et al. [42]2021Case-controlFrance868639.29 ± 2.65 weeks32.131.9 58/3235 (1.7%) Pre-term delivery 6.2%, stillbirth n = 14/3235 (0.4%)
Epelboin et al. [31]2021CohortFrance874243,771Third trimester31.1 ± 5.930.5 ± 5.417/874 (1.9%) 42/874 (4.8%) Pre-term birth n = 146/874 (16.7%), caesarean delivery
n = 288/847 (32.9%), mortality n = 2/874 (0.2%), gestational hypertension n = 20/874 (2.3%)
Ferrera et al. [43]2022CohortUSA133242,554 28.8 ± 5.530.8 ± 5.2301/1332 (22.6%) 20/1332
(1.5%)
Venous thromboembolism n = 4/1332 (0.3%) Pre-term birth n = 143/1332 (10.7%), gestational hypertension n = 34/1332 (2.6%), caesarean delivery n = 357/1332 (26.8%), stillbirth n = 9/1332 (0.7%)
Guida et al. [19]2022Case-controlBrazil21 (COVID-19 with pre-eclampsia)
10.3%
182 (COVID-19 without pre-eclampsia)
89.7%
Third trimester 131
Second trimester
49
First trimester
23
>35: n = 7/21
=<35: n = 14/21
7/21 (33.4%) Eclampsia n = 1/21 (0.5%), imminent eclampsia n = 5/21 (2.5%) Maternal death n = 2/21 (9.5%), pre-term birth n = 10/21 (47.6%/), caesarean delivery n = 19/21 (90.5%)
Gurol et al. [32]2021CohortEngland3527338,553 =<19: n = 94/3527
20–24: n = 581/3527
25–29:
n = 1040/3527
30–34:
n = 1079/3527
35–39:
n = 587/3527
+40:
n = 146/3527
139/3527 (3.9%) Pre-term birth n = 369/3047 (12.1%), fetal death n = 30/3527 (0.85%), emergency caesarean delivery n = 975/3527, (27.6%)
Hill et al. [21]2021CohortUSA218413Third trimester29.730.13/218 (1.4%) 9/218 (4.2%) Gestational hypertension n = 7/218 (3.3%), pre-term delivery n = 50/218 (22.93%)
Jayaram et al. [27]2021CohortUSA75334Third trimester27.028.012/75 (16.0%) 18/75 (24.0%) Gestational HTN n = 8/75 (10.6%)
Ahlberg et al. [77]2020CohortSweden155604 32.032.1 12/155 (7.7%) Pre-term birth n = 14/155 (9%)
Mahajan [33]2020Retrospective study (historic cohort)India8796338 and 34.5 weeks27.0 Pre-eclampsia n = 50 (5.68%)/, eclampsia n = 4 (0.45%) Dyspnea n = 38 (4.32%)
Melguizo [20]2020CohortSpain1347160739 weeks and 2 days33.033.019 (1.5%)Congenital heart disease n = 15 (1.1%)Pre-eclampsia n = 69 (5.1%) Thrombotic events: n = 7 (0.5%), deep vein thrombosis n = 10 (0.7%), pulmonary embolism n = 4 (0.3%)
Mendoza [39]2020CohortSpain834Third trimester, 31.6 weeks39.430.9 Pre-eclampsia n = 5 (62.5%) UtAPI n = 1 (12.5% of cases and 2.3% of total)
Mercedes et al. [54]2020CohortDominican Republic1513932.31 weeks29.829.8 Palpitation n = 2 (13.3% of cases), atrial fibrillation and torsades de pointes and ventricular tachycardia n = 2 (13.3%), sinus tachycardia n = 4 (26.6%) Elevated BNP and troponin in all cases group n = 15 (100%), BBB n = 5 (33.3%), ST depression and T-invert n = 6 (40%)
Molteni [78]2020Replication cohortUSA, UK and Sweden16,7181,328,24814% in the first trimester, 43% in the second trimester, and 43%
in the third trimester
31.031.0 Dyspnea n = 20/29 (73.6%), chest pain: 17 of 29 (62.3%)
Mullins et al. [45]2020–2021Prospective web-based registry—an observational cohort studyUK, Italy, China, Greece, Indonesia, India, Argentina, China, Czech Republic, Albania, Austria, Egypt and Chile58241923 34.034.0 Pre-eclampsia n = 389/8189 (4.8%), eclampsia n = 41/8192 (0.5 %)
Chavan et al. [79]April 2020–June 2021Prospective observational (cohort/cross sectional)India17Not mentioned (but the whole numbers of data were 460)Not mentioned2626 Pre-eclampsia n = 6/17 (35.2 %)
Osaikhuwuomwan et al. [40]2020Cross-sectionalNigeria196930.4 weeks31.431.4 Pre-eclampsia/eclampsia n = 5/19 (26.3%)
Palomo et al. [80]2020CohortSpain171039.135.636.9Hypertension n = 2 (11.7% of cases)
Papageorghiou et al. [34]2021CohortArgentina, Brazil, Egypt, France, Ghana,
India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico,
Nigeria, North Macedonia, Pakistan,
Russia, Spain, Switzerland, the United
Kingdom, and the United States
7251459 29.9530.31n = 26/725 (3.58%) Pre-eclampsia n = 59/725 (8.13%)
Pierce-Williams et al. [46]2020CohortUSA442032 weeks3333Chronic hypertension and cardiomyopathy n =11 (17%) Pre-eclampsia n = 2 (3%) Cardiac arrest n = 1 (3%)
Pirjani et al. [35]2020CohortIran6613332.64 weeks30.9728.79- -Tachycardia n = 5 (7.57 %) -Dyspnea n = 27 (40.9%)
Serrano et al [36]2021Observational retrospective study (cross-sectional)/
historic cohort
Spain23113,033First trimester (0–12 weeks)31.832.6Chronic hypertension n = 6/218 (2.8%), history of pre-eclampsia n = 9/218 (4.1 %)High risk for pre-eclampsia n = 44/23 (19%)
Trilla et al. [44]2020Prospective population-based
study (cohort)
Spain124639First, second and third trimester33.133.9Chronic hypertension n = 4/124 (3.2%)pre-eclampsia n = 8/113 (7.3%)
Yousefzadeh et al. [53]2020Cross-sectionalIran89111Mean = 29.59 weeks
third trimester
3131- -Bradycardia n = 4 (4.5%), tachycardia n = 18 (20.5%) ECG findings:
atrioventricular (AV) block n = 3 (3.4%), first-degree AV block type (PR interval >200 ms) n = 3 (3.4%),
mean QTC interval = 428.6 ± 37.4 ms, long QTC intervals (QTC ≥ 460 ms) n = 15 (17%), bundle branch block (QRS > 100 msec) (4.4%) of which three patients
were RBBB and one was LBBB
Adhikari et al. [26]2020CohortUSA2453035First, second and third trimester2727 26 (11%)
Anuk et al. [71]2021Case-controlTurkey3040Median = 31.5Median = 30Median = 29 Increased PI and RI of uterine artery, mean uterine artery PI = 1 (sd = 1), mean uterine artery RI = 0.6 (sd = 0.2), pre-term delivery n = 6 (20%)
Wu et al. [23]2020CohortChina29- 29 2 (6.90%)
Pachtman et al. [17]2021CohortUSA20- 5 (25%) Bradycardia (defined as <60 bpm), and maternal heart rate (HR) nadir n = 10/31 (32%) Elevated cardiac troponins (I, T, or high sensitivity) n = 4/18 (22%), elevated BNP n = 3/10 (30%)
Berengueet et al. [18]2020CohortSpain4035 2052/4010 (51.2%)Chronic heart disease n = 932/3994 (23.3%)
Brandt et al. [81]2021Case-controlUSA61122 2 (3.3%)
Jering et al. [37]2021CohortUSA6380400066 288 (4.5%) Pre-eclampsia n = 564 (8.8%), eclampsia n = 8 (0.1%) VTE n = 15 (0.2%),
thrombotic event n = 22 (0.3%)
Myocardial infarction n = 8 (0.1%)
Soto-Torres et al. [10]2021Case-controlUSA106103 Pre-eclampsia n = 21 (19.8%),
other hypertensive disorders n = 17 (16%)
Rosenbloom et al. [41]2021CohortIsrael8316639 w262810 (12.1%) Gestational hypertension n = 10 (12.1%), pre-eclampsia n = 14(16.9%), other hypertensive disorders n = 24 (28.9)
DVT = deep vein thrombosis, BBB = bundle branch block, PI = pulsatility indices, RI = resistance indices, UtA = uterine artery, VTE = venous thromboembolism, sd = standard deviation.
Table 2. Characteristics and fetal outcomes of the included cohort/cross-sectional/case-control studies.
Table 2. Characteristics and fetal outcomes of the included cohort/cross-sectional/case-control studies.
First AuthorYearStudy DesignCountryNumber of CasesNumber of ControlsPregnancy PhaseMean Age of CasesMean Age of ControlsCardiovascular Comorbidities among Cases (%)Fetal Cardiovascular Complications among Cases (%)
HypertensionOthersArrhythmia (Type)Thrombotic EventsCardiomyopathy/Heart FailureDoppler Findings
Ayhan et al. [82]2022Case-controlTurkey454532 ± 4
weeks
33 ± 1
weeks
Aortic peak velocity = 79.4 cm/s, pulmonary peak velocity = 67.4 cm/s, left myocardial performance index = 0.57 ± 0.14, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) = 6.87 mm, mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPASE) = 6.69 mm
Mercedes et al. [54]2020CohortDominican Republic1513932.31 week29.8729.87 -Fetal bradycardia n =3 (20% of patients)
Sinaci et al. [65]2020CohortTurkey224Over 150,00037 weeks28Not mentioned -Tachycardia n = 12 (5.4%),
bradycardia n = 3 (1.3%)
Adhikari et al. [26]2020CohortUSA2453035 272726 (11%) Abnormal fetal heart rate n = 7 (3%)
Anuk et al. [71]2021Case-controlTurkey3040Median = 31.53029 Increased PI and RI of umbilical arteries,
mean umbilical artery PI = 1 (IQR = 0.2), mean umbilical artery RI = 0.6 (IQR = 0.1), mean uterine artery PI = 1 (IQR = 1), mean uterine artery PI = 0.6 (IQR = 0.2)
Soto-Torres et al. [10]2021Case-controlUSA106103 Fetal tachycardia n = 1 (1%), premature atrial contractions n = 1 (1%) Abnormal Doppler findings n = 8 (7%), mean PI of umbilical artery = 0.67 (No significant difference between patients and controls)
Sule et al. [70]2021CohortUSA5593 Higher AT of pulmonary artery in patients, no significant difference in ET and PATET of pulmonary artery between patients and controls
PI = pulsatility indices, RI = resistance indices, AT = acceleration time, ET = ejection time, PATET = acceleration/ejection time ratio.
Table 3. Characteristics and maternal outcomes of the included case report/case series studies.
Table 3. Characteristics and maternal outcomes of the included case report/case series studies.
First AuthorYearStudy DesignCountryNumber of CasesPregnancy PhaseMean AgeCardiovascular ComorbiditiesMaternal Cardiovascular Complications
HypertensionOthersPre-eclampsia/EclampsiaArrhythmia (Type)Thrombotic EventsCardiomyopathy/Heart FailureDoppler FindingsOthers
Ahmed et al. [49]2020Case reportUK137 weeks26173/111 mmHg Pre-eclampsia HELLP syndrome
Askary et al. [48]2020Case seriesIran16Third trimester 10,
second trimester 5,
first trimester 1
30.06 7/16 Pulmonary thromboembolism n = 1Massive myocardial infarction n = 1 Pre-term labor n = 6/16, caesarean delivery n = 9/12, premature labor pain (PLP) n = 2, placenta accreta n = 2
Azarkish et al. [50]2021Case reportIran138 weeks19140/90 mmHg Sinus tachycardiaElevated PTTCardiorespiratory arrest and death
Breslin et al. [66]2020Case seriesUSA733.2 weeks33.85 Bronchospasm,
tachycardia
Hypertension
Seresht et al. [55]2022Case seriesIran425 weeks29.25 Large atrial septal defect Tachycardia 4/4 (1) Minimal pericardial effusion, EF 25%, heart failure
(2) Severe acute cardiac failure,
acute left ventricular failure, EF 20%
(3) EF 30%, pulmonary edema
(4) Heart failure, EF 35%
Severe mitral valve regurgitationIntrauterine fetal demise with oligohydramnios, expired n = 2/4
Donovan et al. [67]2022Case reportUSA135 weeks and 5 days36 Tachycardia 110 beats/min
Franca et al. [59]2022Case reportBrazil128 weeks26 Mitral valve replacement in 2011 due to mitral valve stenosis Tachycardia >145 beats/minute,
ventricular tachyarrhythmia,
mitral murmur
High blood pressure (147/95 mmHg), death
Goudarzi et al. [64]2022Case reportIran1Third trimester22 Massive pulmonary embolismRight and left-sided heart failure First echocardiography
showed a very dilated right atria and ventricle
fetal death.
Second echocardiography
showed
right ventricle enlargement, severe dysfunction, McConnell’s sign, moderate tricuspid regurgitation, dilated pulmonary artery, mild pulmonary insufficiency, dilated inferior vena cava,
respiratory cardiovascular arrest and death
Gulersen et al. [60]2021Case reportUSA128 weeks and 4 days31 YesTachycardia (heart rate 122 beats per minute),
sinus tachycardia
Multiple risk factors for venous thromboembolismPericardial effusion
biventricular dysfunction
Caesarean birth
Hansen et al. [51]2020Case reportUSA134 weeks31162/86 mm Hg Presumed pre-eclampsia Caesarean birth
Khodamoradi et al. [62]2020Case reportIran137 weeks and 2 days36 Pulmonary embolism,
hypercoagulable state
Had elective scheduled caesarean section
Leal et al. [25]2020Case seriesBrazil5469First trimester: n = 378 6.9 %,
second trimester: n = 985 18%,
third trimester: n = 2475 45.25%,
postpartum and postabortion: n = 1393 25.4%
30n = 562 (10.2%) Chest pain:
n = 107 (2%)
Naeh et al. [52]2021Case reportCanada128 week (third trimester)39152/132 mm Hg Sinus tachycardia PR = 141 Dyspnea
Nejadrahim et al. [57]2020Case reportIran1Postpartum38 Severe pre-eclampsiaTachycardia PR = 115 Postpartum
cardiomyopathy/heart failure with LVEF of 30%, global hypokinesis, LV enlargement
(LV end diastolic size 5.8 cm)
Dyspnea/
pulmonary edema
Pelayo et al.2020Case reportUSA136 week and 2 days35 Tachycardia Cardiomyopathy as evidenced with 45%
ejection fraction on echocardiography
Pulmonary embolism
Radoi et al. [83]2021Case reportRomania126 weeks19 Pre-eclampsia BP = 178,110Tachycardia Heart failure with ejection
fraction less than 30%
Dyspnea, cyanosis, pulmonary edema, chest pain, pulmonary hypertension, VSD and Mirror and Eisenmenger Syndrome, increased jugular venous pressure
Soofi et al. [58]2020Case reportSaudi Arabia134 weeks25 Sinus tachycardia and occasional PVCsDVT in the right superficial femoral
Vein
Acute heart failure on echocardiography
exhibited features of severe left ventricle systolic dysfunction.
Cardiac MRI displayed severe global LV and RV systolic dysfunction,
Pleuritic chest pain with dyspnea
Stout et al. [61]2020Case reportUK136 weeks and 4 days28 Tachycardia PR = 120,
ventricular fibrillation,
ventricular
escape rhythm
---Cardiac arrest
Vaezi et al. [24]2020Case seriesIran24Third trimester (15 cases,
62.5%), 6 cases were in their second trimester (25%), and
only 3 cases (12.5%) were under 14 weeks
26.5n = 1 (4.16%)HELLP n = 1 (4.16%)Severe pre-eclampsia n = 3 (12.5%)Tachycardia n = 3 (12.5%) Dyspnea n = 10 (41.6 %)
Zarrintan et al. [63]2020Case reportIran134 weeks39 Sinus tachycardiaPulmonary thromboembolismEchocardiography showed an ejection
fraction of 45–50%. Severe right ventricle enlargement
was also evident, with moderate to severe dysfunction
of the right ventricle.
Dyspnea, chest discomfort. ECG showed an S wave in the lead I, q wave in lead II and sinus tachycardia, suggestive of right ventricle straining.
Agarwal et al. [84]2021Case reportIndia1Third trimester28 Portal hypertension due to portal vein thrombosis (PVT)
Bhattacharyya et al. [56]2020Case reportIndia138 w Takotsubo cardiomyopathy
De Vita et al. [16]2020Case reportItaly1Third trimester35 Thrombosis both in the apical left ventricle and in a branch of the pulmonary arteryPeripartum cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure
Juusela et al. [47]2020Case seriesUSA239 w 2 d–33 w 6 d Pre-eclampsia Cardiomyopathy
(cardiac dysfunction with moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fractions of 40% and 45% and hypokinesis)
DVT = deep vein thrombosis, LV = left ventricle, RV = right ventricle, VSD = ventricular septal defect.
Table 4. Characteristics and fetal outcomes of the included case report/case series studies.
Table 4. Characteristics and fetal outcomes of the included case report/case series studies.
First AuthorYearStudy DesignCountryNumber of CasesPregnancy PhaseMean AgeFetal Cardiovascular Complications
Arrhythmia (Type)Thrombotic EventsCardiomyopathy/Heart FailureOthers
Cetera et al. [74]2021Case seriesItaly3 Fetal bradycardia 1 Type 2 fetal cardiotocography n = 1
fetal demise n = 2
Perez et al. [72]2020Case seriesSpain1237.80 weeks Gross fetal
tachycardia (>210 bpm) n = 1/12, absence of accelerations n = 12/12, prolonged decelerations n = 10/12, zigzag pattern n = 4/12 (33%)
Absence of cycling n = 7/12 (58.3%)
Gubbari et al. [76]2022Case reportIndia134 weeks17 daysPersistent tachycardia Right ventricular dilationEchocardiography revealed pulmonary hypertension biventricular hypertrophy, severe mitral and tricuspid regurgitation with EF = 35% on day 2
Kato et al. [73]2022Case reportJapan121 weeks Tachycardia (165 bpm)Intrauterine fetal death
The RT-PCR test result from a dead neonatal nasopharyngeal swab was positive
Mevada et al. [85]2020Case reportIndia1Third trimester (GA: 36.5 by date and 37 by scan)30Tachycardia (PR = 110) PPCM or viral cardiomyopathyEchocardiography: global left ventricular hypokinesia, EF 25–30%
Radoi et al. [83]2021Case reportRomania126 weeks19 Hydrops fetalis, Mirror syndrome
Vaezi [24]2020Case seriesIran24Third trimester (15 cases,
62.5%), 6 cases were in their second trimester (25%), and
only 3 cases (12.5%) were under 14 weeks
26.5Fetal bradycardia n = 1 (4.16%)
Mongula et al. [86]2020Case reportNetherlands131w4d Fetal tachycardia
Wang et al. [87]2022Case reportUSA131w5d Supraventricular tachycardia
PPCM = post-partum cardiomyopathy, EF = ejection fraction.

4. Discussion

This review article showed that COVID-19 infection could potentially be associated with some cardiovascular outcomes among pregnant women. According to the reviewed articles, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, hypertensive disorders, cardiomyopathy heart failure, MI thrombosis, and bradycardia were reported as cardiovascular complications among the COVID-19 infected pregnant women [26,47,56]. Moreover, there was evidence of increased pulsatility and resistance indices of the umbilical and uterine artery in maternal-fetal Doppler patterns among pregnant women who recovered from COVID-19 [71]. In addition, there was evidence of cardiovascular complications in the fetus of infected pregnant women, including arrhythmia and a higher AT of the pulmonary artery in the Doppler study [86].
During pregnancy, the cardiovascular system undergoes several changes. Cardiac output increases by 20% until eight weeks of gestational age. Peripheral vasodilation is mediated by factors such as nitric oxide, which is upregulated by vasodilatory prostaglandins (PGI2) and estradiol. Due to this action, systemic vascular resistance falls by 25–30%, and for compensation, during pregnancy, cardiac output increases by about 40%. This action happens by an increase in stroke volume, but heart rate also increases somewhat during pregnancy. Cardiac output reaches its maximum at about 20–28 weeks gestation and falls somewhat at term [88].
Researchers observed that SARS-CoV-2 could result in a spectrum of cardiovascular diseases, including thromboembolism, arrhythmia, myocarditis, and acute coronary syndrome [89,90,91]. The cardiac injury caused by COVID-19 results from cytokine storm, viral myocarditis, and ischemia [89,90,92]. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) studies illustrated the indications of myocardial inflammation, fibrosis, left ventricle (LV) enlargement, and biventricular involvement in COVID-19 [93,94,95]. Similarly, normal pregnancy has multiple cardiovascular effects, including increased heart rate, cardiac output, and vascular volume; dyspnea on exertion; ejection murmurs over the pulmonary artery and aorta; and decreased venous return to the heart, which may lead to a presyncope condition [89,90,91,96,97,98].
The previous reviews reported 41 to 47% of pre-term labor among infected pregnant women [99,100]. According to a meta-analysis by Di Mascio et al., among hospitalized mothers infected with coronavirus, the most prevalent adverse pregnancy outcome was pre-term birth. Their results show that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was significantly associated with higher rates of pre-term birth, pre-eclampsia, cesarean, and perinatal death [101]. Moreover, Lassi et al. reported a 2.4 fold higher risk of pre-term birth among pregnant cases in comparison with controls [102].
The SARS-CoV-2 virus enters the host cells via the receptor-angiotensin-converting enzyme2 (ACE-2), leading to dysfunction of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) [103]. The ACE-2 is an upregulated receptor during normal pregnancy [98]. This upregulation results in the modification of angiotensin II, which is a vasoconstrictor agent, to angiotensin-(1–7); these are vasodilators and can lower the blood pressure during normal pregnancy [104]. However, SARS-CoV-2, which binds to ACE-2, downregulates the level of ACE-2 and angiotensin-(1–7), which eventuates vasoconstriction, pre-eclampsia, uterine constrictions, and pre-term labor [104]. Moreover, endothelial cells express ACE-2 receptors [105], and endothelial cell infection and immune cell-mediated endothelial damage are reported in COVID-19 [106]. As endothelial failure is a key characteristic of pre-eclampsia, infection with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy may resemble or induce microvascular dysfunction by inducing endothelins [107]. Furthermore, the virus invades the cells, which over-activates the inflammatory response and increases TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels and establishes cytokine storm [65,108,109,110,111]. This hyperproduction increases the risk of vascular hyperpermeability and possibly causes hypertensive disorders [112]. These mechanisms can explain the mentioned hypertensive disorders among pregnant COVID-19 cases (Figure 2).
Another cardiovascular complication among pregnant COVID-19 cases was cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Heart failure as a potential complication of COVID-19 stems from various myocardial aggression mechanisms, including direct myocardial damage through viral action, direct and indirect inflammatory damage, imbalance of O2 supply, and inducing atherothrombotic events because of the inflammatory destabilization of atheromatous plaques, thus, causing acute myocardial dysfunction [113,114]. SARS-CoV-2 interacts with the myocardial tissue through binding the viral glycoprotein Spike 1 to ACE-2 receptors. ACE-2 receptors are especially expressed within cardiac pericytes. This interaction leads to a direct tissue injury [114]. Due to the higher presence of ACE2 receptors in postmortem cardiac pericytes isolated from patients with heart disease compared to those without prior disease, the concept of the cumulative effect of previous CV disease and troponin increase was proposed [115].
By multiple mechanisms, COVID-19 can lead to cardiac injury. Due to these mechanisms, extreme inflammatory response with myocarditis and endothelial injury occurs. In some situations during pregnancy, acute heart failure should be considered, including viral myocarditis, noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, and peripartum cardiomyopathy [116]. Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a potentially dangerous situation presenting in the last month of pregnancy as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The etiology of PPCM is not well known. Host susceptibility and systemic angiogenic imbalance are considered to be important in the pathophysiology of PPCM. Probable factors causing PPCM are viral infections, genetic predisposition, inflammation, low selenium levels, stress-activated cytokines, the induction of antiangiogenic factors, autoimmune reaction, pathological response to hemodynamic stress, and unbalanced oxidative stress [117].
Other cardiovascular events among pregnant COVID-19 cases were MI and thrombotic events. A German cohort study among non-pregnant patients reported that 71% of 100 patients had elevated cardiac biomarkers, including cardiac troponin (CTn) and pro-BNP, which indicate myocardial inflammation [118,119]. However, in a series of 31 positive SARS-CoV-2 pregnant women, 22% had elevated troponin levels, and 30% in BNP levels. Studies suggest that increased troponin and BNP levels are associated with malignant arrhythmia, ventricular tachycardia [120], and fibrillation [114,121].
It has been reported that thromboembolic complications are higher among infected pregnant women [122,123]. Acute viremia such as SARS-CoV-2 activates monocytes and macrophages, which trigger the blood coagulation system via producing interleukin 6 (IL_6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [124]. Moreover, a recent study illustrates a connection between IL_6 and fibrinogen levels in patients with COVID-19 infection [125]. Furthermore, the activation of monocytes causes a loss of heparin sulfate from the endothelial surface, platelet activation, the downregulation of thrombomodulin, and nitric oxide production [126]. These contingencies lead to a prothrombotic state and increase the risk of VTE in infected patients. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 may directly attack the vascular endothelium, resulting in inflammation and the infiltration of inflammatory cells [127]. Eventually, this inflammation causes intravascular coagulation and thrombosis. A study showed increased levels of D-dimer among infected pregnant women. D-dimers are produced through fibrinolysis [128]. Subsequently, the D-dimer level was measured in infected pregnant women in the third trimester as a risk factor to evaluate the risk of thromboembolism compared to non-infected pregnant women [95]. However, the increased D-dimer level was strongly decreased after 2–3 days of anticoagulant therapy [95]. Meanwhile, in the coagulant therapy the risk of hemorrhage must be considered in pregnant women [129].
Discoagulation and vein thrombosis are also seen as cardiovascular damages in COVID-19 infection. The endothelial dysfunction caused by COVID-19 is developed by mediating leukocyte inflammation and adjusting the vessels’ integrity, leading to pro-coagulative condition, which is the leading cause of multi-organ damage such as cardiomyopathy during COVID-19 infection [130,131,132]. During normal pregnancy, a physiological hypercoagulation state is prepared for the bleeding caused by delivery [88]. There is an increased level of clotting factors, including factor VIII, IX, and X, as well as fibrinogen level [133].
On the other hand, the levels of anticoagulants such as antithrombin and protein S and the fibrinolytic activity are decreased. Since SARS-CoV-2 increases the production of inflammatory cytokines and activates the thrombin and coagulation system and clot formation, this can eventually lead to thrombosis [112]. The studies of Abouzaripour M. et al. and Martinelli et al. reported ovarian vein thrombosis and pulmonary emboli among COVID-19-positive pregnant women [134,135]. Thus, VTE risk assessment should be accomplished on all COVID-19 infected pregnant women, and VTE prophylaxis with LMWH is recommended for pregnant patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 infection [136,137]. Based on the guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 infected pregnant women, if the bleeding risk is low and labor is not expected within 12 h, LMWH is recommended for all hospitalized patients and patients with an increased VTE risk score (≥3) and should be continued for 10–42 days [138]. Moreover, a low-dose aspirin for the prevention of pre-eclampsia is prescribed for high-risk pregnant women. However, the risk of bleeding and emergency caesarean must be considered [139].
Furthermore, increased pulsatility and resistance indices of the umbilical and uterine artery in maternal-fetal Doppler patterns among pregnant women who recovered from COVID-19 were reported. A case report represented supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in a fetus borne by a 26-year-old COVID-19-positive mother [87]. Fetus SVT is one of the most common arrhythmias in the presence of maternal COVID-19 infection [140]. Doppler ultrasound is used to assess fetal vessels’ well-being and is useful for predicting pre-eclampsia [141]. Khalil et al. found that the incidence of stillbirth was remarkably higher during the COVID-19 pandemic using uterine artery Doppler [142]. Furthermore, Ali T. Anuk and colleagues used Doppler ultrasonographic assessments of the uterine arteries (UTA) and umbilical artery among 30 COVID-19-positive pregnant women in their third trimester, which indicated a considerable increase in pulsatility and resistance of UTA and umbilical artery compared to the control group [71]. However, Ayhan et al. found no significant differences in the fetal Doppler parameters [143].
There are contradictory reports about vertical transmission. Fenizia et al. demonstrated that the SARS-CoV-2 genome had been discovered in umbilical cord blood, amniotic fluid, and maternal vaginal mucosa, although the infection of infants is rare. Further, if the newborns became infected, it was asymptomatic or mild in most cases [144]. However, the study of Corasso and colleagues determined both IgG and IgM antibodies against COVID-19 in seronegative newborns from infected mothers [145]. The source of these immunoglobulins might be the maternal blood, cord blood, and amniotic cord [127,146]. Moreover, research in China has not shown any virus in breast milk, but more studies are needed [147]. On the other hand, some studies did not discover any vertical transmission results [148]. Furthermore, in analyzing the coagulation indexes of these newborns, some had higher MYO, CK-MB, and D-dimer levels, which may lead to coagulopathy in neonates [149].
According to Shu Qin Wei’s study, severe COVID-19, compared to mild COVID-19, is strongly associated with pre-term birth, ICU admission, gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, caesarean delivery, NICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and low birth weight. The comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 during pregnancy is that symptomatic COVID-19 increases the risk of caesarean delivery and pre-term birth, but it is not associated with gestational diabetes. They have also shown that SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, compared with healthy pregnant women, is associated with pre-term birth, pre-eclampsia, NICU admission, lower birth weight, ICU admission, and stillbirth. Compared with no infection, COVID-19 is not associated with postpartum hemorrhage, gestational diabetes, neonatal death, or caesarean delivery.
Cardiovascular complications also occur in the fetus of infected pregnant women, including arrhythmia and a higher acceleration time (AT) of the pulmonary artery in the Doppler study. The fetal pulmonary artery blood flow’s AT is an advent for monitoring pulmonary artery pressure [150,151]. Turgu et al. used pulmonary artery Doppler to assess the fetal lung development in women who had recovered from COVID-19 [152]. This study indicated that the main pulmonary artery peak systolic velocity was higher, and pulsatility, AT, and ejection time (ET) were remarkably higher in these women [152]. These Doppler evaluations may show insufficient lung development in the fetus and cause respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in newborns [153].
There is a particular concern about the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women. According to Prasad’s study, the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines in vaccinated pregnant women one week after a second dose against confirmed SARS-CoV-2 was 89.5%, and the chance of still birth was lower in this group. They also found no evidence of adverse outcomes such as placental abruption, miscarriage, pulmonary embolism, maternal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant women that received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines [154].
Kirschbaum et al. reviewed seven women with heart disease (including congenital heart disease, acute myocarditis, and rheumatic valve disease) who were infected by COVID-19 during their pregnancies. Serious adverse outcomes were due to recurrent atrial flutter that caused hemodynamic instability, respiratory failure (ARDS), cardiogenic shock, and acute pulmonary edema. They also recommend that the overlapping of three conditions including pregnancy, heart disease, and COVID-19 is dangerous and pregnancy for women with heart disease should be planned after vaccination [155].
New drugs are widely used for the treatment of COVID-19, but our knowledge is limited to the usage of these drugs during pregnancy. Azithromycin is an antibiotic with anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and potential antiviral effects. Although the role of this drug in COVID-19 treatment is not well established, the immunomodulatory effect of azithromycin can slow down cytokine storm. Prolonged QT interval is one of the side effects of azithromycin, which should be handled for pregnant women with heart disease during pregnancy [156].
The main limitation of this systematic review was the lack of studies investigating cardiovascular complications among pregnant COVID-19 cases. Therefore, we included case series and case reports as well. Another limitation was that several included studies did not provide sufficient data on the reported complications in details. For instance, regarding arrhythmia, we could not result which types of arrhythmia were more common among cases.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy can potentially be associated with cardiovascular complications in mothers and their fetuses. Pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, hypertensive disorders, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, MI and thrombosis, and bradycardia were reported as cardiovascular complications among the COVID-19-infected pregnant women. Additionally, the increased pulsatility and resistance indices of the umbilical and uterine artery in maternal–fetal Doppler patterns among pregnant women who recovered from COVID-19 were reported. Moreover, there was some evidence of cardiovascular complications in the fetuses of infected pregnant women, including arrhythmia and a higher AT of the pulmonary artery in the Doppler study. Further research is needed to attain comprehensive information on the prevalence and risk of maternal and fetal cardiovascular complications during the COVID-19 infection pandemic.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm11206194/s1, Table S1: Quality assessment of the included cohort, case-control, (and cross-sectional) studies; Table S2: Quality assessment of the included case series, and case report studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y. and M.H.; methodology, S.Y.; data extraction, M.D., A.B. and Z.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.F., K.V., Z.T., A.B., M.D., R.H. and T.Y.; writing—review and editing, M.F., K.V. and S.E.; supervision, M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study is related to the project (NO. 1400/62964) from Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Iranian National Committee for Ethics in Biomedical Sciences (protocol code: IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1400.840 and date of approval: January 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This review study was not registered, and a protocol was not prepared. This study followed the PRISMA checklist. The template data-collection forms, data extracted from included studies, and any other materials used in this review were not publicly available.

Acknowledgments

We also appreciate the “Student Research Committee” and “Research & Technology Chancellor” in Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for their financial support of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, F.; Deng, L.; Zhang, L.; Cai, Y.; Cheung, C.W.; Xia, Z. Review of the Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2020, 35, 1545–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Li, L.Q.; Huang, T.; Wang, Y.Q.; Wang, Z.P.; Liang, Y.; Huang, T.B.; Zhang, H.Y.; Sun, W.; Wang, Y. COVID-19 patients’ clinical characteristics, discharge rate, and fatality rate of meta-analysis. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zheng, Y.Y.; Ma, Y.T.; Zhang, J.Y.; Xie, X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020, 17, 259–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Sutton, D.; Fuchs, K.; D’Alton, M.; Goffman, D. Universal Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in Women Admitted for Delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2163–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Crovetto, F.; Crispi, F.; Llurba, E.; Pascal, R.; Larroya, M.; Trilla, C.; Camacho, M.; Medina, C.; Dobaño, C.; Gomez-Roig, M.D.; et al. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Population-Based Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, 1768–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cosma, S.; Borella, F.; Carosso, A.; Sciarrone, A.; Cusato, J.; Corcione, S.; Mengozzi, G.; Preti, M.; Katsaros, D.; Di Perri, G.; et al. The “scar” of a pandemic: Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 during the first trimester of pregnancy. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 537–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pineles, B.L.; Alamo, I.C.; Farooq, N.; Green, J.; Blackwell, S.C.; Sibai, B.M.; Parchem, J.G. Racial-ethnic disparities and pregnancy outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 infection in a universally-tested cohort in Houston, Texas. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 254, 329–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Martinez-Portilla, R.J.; Sotiriadis, A.; Chatzakis, C.; Torres-Torres, J.; Espino, Y.S.S.; Sandoval-Mandujano, K.; Castro-Bernabe, D.A.; Medina-Jimenez, V.; Monarrez-Martin, J.C.; Figueras, F.; et al. Pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection are at higher risk of death and pneumonia: Propensity score matched analysis of a nationwide prospective cohort (COV19Mx). Ultrasound Obs. Gynecol. 2021, 57, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Y.; Bai, J. Maternal and infant outcomes of full-term pregnancy combined with COVID-2019 in Wuhan, China: Retrospective case series. Arch. Gynecol. Obs. 2020, 302, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Soto-Torres, E.; Hernandez-Andrade, E.; Huntley, E.; Mendez-Figueroa, H.; Blackwell, S.C. Ultrasound and Doppler findings in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 58, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vigil-De Gracia, P.; Caballero, L.; Sánchez, J.; Espinosa, J.; Campana, S.; Quintero, A.; Luo, C.; Ng, J. Pregnancies recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection in second or third trimester: Obstetric evolution. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 56, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Phoswa, W.N.; Khaliq, O.P. Is pregnancy a risk factor of COVID-19? Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 252, 605–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zambrano, L.D.; Ellington, S.; Strid, P.; Galang, R.R.; Oduyebo, T.; Tong, V.T.; Woodworth, K.R.; Nahabedian, J.F., 3rd; Azziz-Baumgartner, E.; Gilboa, S.M.; et al. Update: Characteristics of Symptomatic Women of Reproductive Age with Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Pregnancy Status—United States, January 22–October 3, 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 1641–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Turan, O.; Hakim, A.; Dashraath, P.; Jeslyn, W.J.L.; Wright, A.; Abdul-Kadir, R. Clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and maternal and neonatal outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection among hospitalized pregnant women: A systematic review. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. Off. Organ Int. Fed. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2020, 151, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhu, H.; Wang, L.; Fang, C.; Peng, S.; Zhang, L.; Chang, G.; Xia, S.; Zhou, W. Clinical analysis of 10 neonates born to mothers with 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Transl. Pediatr. 2020, 9, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Vita, S.; Ippolito, S.; Caracciolo, M.M.; Barosi, A. Peripartum cardiomyopathy in a COVID-19-infected woman: Differential diagnosis with acute myocarditis-A case report from a Hub Institution during the COVID-19 outbreak. Echocardiography 2020, 37, 1673–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pachtman Shetty, S.L.; Meirowitz, N.; Blitz, M.J.; Gadomski, T.; Weinberg, C.R. Myocardial injury associated with coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 224, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Berenguer, J.; Ryan, P.; Rodríguez-Baño, J.; Jarrín, I.; Carratalà, J.; Pachón, J.; Yllescas, M.; Arriba, J.R.; Aznar Muñoz, E.; Gil Divasson, P.; et al. Characteristics and predictors of death among 4035 consecutively hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Spain. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 1525–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guida, J.P.; Cecatti, J.G.; Souza, R.T.; Pacagnella, R.C.; Ribeiro-do-Valle, C.C.; Luz, A.G.; Lajos, G.J.; Surita, F.G.; Nobrega, G.M.; Griggio, T.B. Preeclampsia among women with COVID-19 during pregnancy and its impact on maternal and perinatal outcomes: Results from a national multicenter study on COVID in Brazil, the REBRACO initiative. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2022, 28, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Melguizo, S.C.; Conty, M.L.D.; Payan, P.C.; Abascal-Saiz, A.; Recarte, P.P.; Rodriguez, L.G.; Marin, C.C.; Varea, A.M.; Cuesta, A.B.O.; Rodriguez, P.P.; et al. Pregnancy Outcomes and SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The Spanish Obstetric Emergency Group Study. Viruses 2021, 13, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hill, J.; Patrick, H.S.; Ananth, C.V.; O’Brien, D.; Spernal, S.; Horgan, R.; Brandt, J.S.; Schwebel, M.; Miller, R.C.; Straker, M.J. Obstetrical outcomes and follow-up for patients with asymptomatic COVID-19 at delivery: A multicenter prospective cohort study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2021, 3, 100454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Moodley, J.; Soma-Pillay, P.; Buchmann, E.; Pattinson, R.C. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: 2019 National guideline. S. Afr. Med. J. 2019, 109. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu, Y.-T.; Liu, J.; Xu, J.-J.; Chen, Y.-F.; Yang, W.; Chen, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, C. Neonatal outcome in 29 pregnant women with COVID-19: A retrospective study in Wuhan, China. PLoS Med. 2020, 17, e1003195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vaezi, M.; Mirghafourvand, M.; Hemmatzadeh, S. Characteristics, clinical and laboratory data and outcomes of pregnant women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to Al-Zahra tertiary referral maternity center in Iran: A case series of 24 patients. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Leal, L.F.; Merckx, J.; Fell, D.B.; Kuchenbecker, R.; Miranda, A.E.; de Oliveira, W.K.; Platt, R.W.; Antunes, L.; Silveira, M.F.; Barbieri, N.B. Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection and other severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) in Brazil from January to November 2020. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 25, 101620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Adhikari, E.H.; Moreno, W.; Zofkie, A.C.; MacDonald, L.; McIntire, D.D.; Collins, R.R.J.; Spong, C.Y. Pregnancy Outcomes Among Women With and Without Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2029256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jayaram, A.; Buhimschi, I.A.; Aldasoqi, H.; Hartwig, J.; Owens, T.; Elam, G.L.; Buhimschi, C.S. Who said differentiating preeclampsia from COVID-19 infection was easy? Pregnancy Hypertens. 2021, 26, 8–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi, M.; Sehat, M.; Vahedpour, Z.; Talebian, P. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant patients with COVID-19: A prospective cohort study. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021, 153, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahlberg, M.; Neovius, M.; Saltvedt, S.; Söderling, J.; Pettersson, K.; Brandkvist, C.; Stephansson, O. Association of SARS-CoV-2 Test Status and Pregnancy Outcomes. JAMA 2020, 324, 1782–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Antoun, L.; El Taweel, N.; Ahmed, I.; Patni, S.; Honest, H. Maternal COVID-19 infection, clinical characteristics, pregnancy, and neonatal outcome: A prospective cohort study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 252, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Epelboin, S.; Labrosse, J.; De Mouzon, J.; Fauque, P.; Gervoise-Boyer, M.-J.; Levy, R.; Sermondade, N.; Hesters, L.; Bergère, M.; Devienne, C. Obstetrical outcomes and maternal morbidities associated with COVID-19 in pregnant women in France: A national retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2021, 18, e1003857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gurol-Urganci, I.; Jardine, J.E.; Carroll, F.; Draycott, T.; Dunn, G.; Fremeaux, A.; Harris, T.; Hawdon, J.; Morris, E.; Muller, P.; et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of birth in England: National cohort study. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2021, 225, 522.e1–522.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mahajan, N.N.; Ansari, M.; Gaikwad, C.; Jadhav, P.; Tirkey, D.; Pophalkar, M.P.; Bhurke, A.V.; Modi, D.N.; Mahale, S.D.; Gajbhiye, R.K. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 on multiple gestation pregnancy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obs. 2021, 152, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Papageorghiou, A.T.; Deruelle, P.; Gunier, R.B.; Rauch, S.; García-May, P.K.; Mhatre, M.; Usman, M.A.; Abd-Elsalam, S.; Etuk, S.; Simmons, L.E.; et al. Preeclampsia and COVID-19: Results from the INTERCOVID prospective longitudinal study. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2021, 225, 289.e1–289.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pirjani, R.; Hosseini, R.; Soori, T.; Rabiei, M.; Hosseini, L.; Abiri, A.; Moini, A.; Shizarpour, A.; Razani, G.; Sepidarkish, M. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in COVID-19 infected pregnancies: A prospective cohort study. J. Travel. Med. 2020, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Serrano, B.; Mendoza, M.; Garcia-Aguilar, P.; Bonacina, E.; Garcia-Ruiz, I.; Garcia-Manau, P.; Gil, J.; Armengol-Alsina, M.; Fernandez-Hidalgo, N.; Sulleiro, E.; et al. Shared risk factors for COVID-19 and preeclampsia in the first trimester: An observational study. Acta Obs. Gynecol. Scand. 2022, 101, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jering, K.S.; Claggett, B.L.; Cunningham, J.W.; Rosenthal, N.; Vardeny, O.; Greene, M.F.; Solomon, S.D. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Hospitalized Women Giving Birth With and Without COVID-19. JAMA Intern. Med. 2021, 181, 714–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Arslan, B.; Bicer, I.G.; Sahin, T.; Vay, M.; Dilek, O.; Destegul, E. Clinical characteristics and hematological parameters associated with disease severity in COVID-19 positive pregnant women undergoing cesarean section: A single-center experience. J. Obs. Gynaecol. Res. 2022, 48, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mendoza, M.; Garcia-Ruiz, I.; Maiz, N.; Rodo, C.; Garcia-Manau, P.; Serrano, B.; Lopez-Martinez, R.M.; Balcells, J.; Fernandez-Hidalgo, N.; Carreras, E.; et al. Pre-eclampsia-like syndrome induced by severe COVID-19: A prospective observational study. Bjog 2020, 127, 1374–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Osaikhuwuomwan, J.; Ezeanochie, M.; Uwagboe, C.; Ndukwu, K.; Yusuf, S.; Ande, A. Clinical characteristics and outcomes for pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 disease at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria. Pan. Afr. Med. J. 2021, 39, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rosenbloom, J.I.; Raghuraman, N.; Carter, E.B.; Kelly, J.C. Coronavirus disease 2019 infection and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2021, 224, 623–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Daclin, C.; Carbonnel, M.; Rossignol, M.; Abbou, H.; Trabelsi, H.; Cimmino, A.; Delmas, J.; Rifai, A.S.; Coiquaud, L.A.; Tiberon, A.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 infection in pregnancy and neonates: A case control study. J. Gynecol. Obs. Hum. Reprod. 2022, 51, 102366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ferrara, A.; Hedderson, M.M.; Zhu, Y.; Avalos, L.A.; Kuzniewicz, M.W.; Myers, L.C.; Ngo, A.L.; Gunderson, E.P.; Ritchie, J.L.; Quesenberry, C.P.; et al. Perinatal Complications in Individuals in California With or Without SARS-CoV-2 Infection During Pregnancy. JAMA Intern. Med. 2022, 182, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Trilla, C.; Mora, J.; Crovetto, F.; Crispi, F.; Gratacos, E.; Llurba, E. First-Trimester SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Clinical Presentation, Inflammatory Markers, and Obstetric Outcomes. Fetal Diagn. 2022, 49, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mullins, E.; Perry, A.; Banerjee, J.; Townson, J.; Grozeva, D.; Milton, R.; Kirby, N.; Playle, R.; Bourne, T.; Lees, C. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19: The PAN-COVID study. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2022, 276, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pierce-Williams, R.A.M.; Burd, J.; Felder, L.; Khoury, R.; Bernstein, P.S.; Avila, K.; Penfield, C.A.; Roman, A.S.; DeBolt, C.A.; Stone, J.L.; et al. Clinical course of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 in hospitalized pregnancies: A United States cohort study. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. MFM 2020, 2, 100134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Juusela, A.; Nazir, M.; Gimovsky, M. Two cases of coronavirus 2019-related cardiomyopathy in pregnancy. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. MFM 2020, 2, 100113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Askary, E.; Poordast, T.; Shiravani, Z.; Ali, M.A.; Hashemi, A.; Naseri, R.; Moradialamdarloo, S.; Karimi, Z.; Izanloo, E.; Najib, F.S. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) manifestations during pregnancy in all three trimesters: A case series. Int. J. Reprod. Biomed. 2021, 19, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ahmed, I.; Eltaweel, N.; Antoun, L.; Rehal, A. Severe pre-eclampsia complicated by acute fatty liver disease of pregnancy, HELLP syndrome and acute kidney injury following SARS-CoV-2 infection. BMJ Case Rep. 2020, 13, e237521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Azarkish, F.; Sheikhi, F.; Mirkazehi, Z.; Kalkali, S.; Moghadam, P.B.; Zahirniya, M. Preeclampsia and the crucial postpartum period for COVID-19 infected mothers: A case report. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2021, 23, 136–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hansen, J.N.; Hine, J.; Strout, T.D. COVID-19 and preeclampsia with severe features at 34-weeks gestation. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2021, 39, 252.e3–252.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Naeh, A.; Berezowsky, A.; Yudin, M.H.; Dhalla, I.A.; Berger, H. Preeclampsia-Like Syndrome in a Pregnant Patient With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). J. Obs. Gynaecol. Can. 2022, 44, 193–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yousefzadeh, M.; Asgarian, A.; Ahangari, R.; Vahedian, M.; Mirzaie, M. Electrocardiographic changes in pregnant women with COVID-19. J. Pract. Cardiovasc. Sci. 2022, 8, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mercedes, B.R.; Serwat, A.; Naffaa, L.; Ramirez, N.; Khalid, F.; Steward, S.B.; Feliz, O.G.C.; Kassab, M.B.; Karout, L. New-onset myocardial injury in pregnant patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A case series of 15 patients. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 224, 387.e1–387.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mousavi Seresht, L.; Dehghan, M.; Fakhrolmobasheri, M.; Kawakita, T.; Mazaheri Tehrani, S.; Rastegar, A. Peripartum cardiomyopathy and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated cardiomyopathy: Case series and review of literature. Authorea 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bhattacharyya, P.J.; Attri, P.K.; Farooqui, W. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in early term pregnancy: A rare cardiac complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection. BMJ Case Rep. 2020, 13, e239104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nejadrahim, R.; Khademolhosseini, S.; Kavandi, H.; Hajizadeh, R. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2- or pregnancy-related cardiomyopathy, a differential to be considered in the current pandemic: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2021, 15, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Soofi, M.A.; Shah, M.A.; Mhish, O.H.; AlSamadi, F. COVID-19 Infection During Pregnancy With Acute Heart Failure, Venous Thrombosis And Pneumonia. J. Ayub Med. Coll. Abbottabad. 2022, 34, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. França, A.; Pereira, D.D.V.; Rodrigues, E.V.; Vieira, F.N.; Machado, K.S.; Nogueira, P.A.; Fonseca, R.R.S.; Machado, L.F.A. Severe COVID-19 in Cardiopath Young Pregnant Patient without Vertical Transmission. Viruses 2022, 14, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gulersen, M.; Staszewski, C.; Grayver, E.; Tam, H.T.; Gottesman, E.; Isseroff, D.; Rochelson, B.; Bonanno, C. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)–related multisystem inflammatory syndrome in a pregnant woman. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 137, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Stout, A.; Crichton, R.; Tahmasebi, F. Maternal death secondary to COVID-19 infection: A case report and review of the literature. Obstet. Med. 2020, 14, 248–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Khodamoradi, Z.; Boogar, S.S.; Shirazi, F.K.H.; Kouhi, P. COVID-19 and Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Postpartum Patient. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 1937–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zarrintan, A.; Boeoofeh, B.; Rabieipour, M.; Mohammadi, A.; Khademvatani, K.; Pirnejad, H.; Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari, M. Pulmonary Thromboembolism in a Pregnant Patient with Severe COVID19: A Novel Case Report and Review of Literature. Arch. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Goudarzi, S.; Firouzabadi, F.D.; Mahmoudzadeh, F.; Aminimoghaddam, S. Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy with COVID-19 infection: A case report. Clin. Case Rep. 2021, 9, 1882–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sinaci, S.; Ocal, D.F.; Ozden Tokalioglu, E.; Halici Ozturk, F.; Aydin Senel, S.; Keskin, L.H.; Moraloglu Tekin, O.; Sahin, D. Cardiotocographic features in COVID-19 infected pregnant women. J. Perinat. Med. 2022, 50, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Breslin, N.; Baptiste, C.; Miller, R.; Fuchs, K.; Goffman, D.; Gyamfi-Bannerman, C.; D’Alton, M. Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: Early lessons. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2020, 2, 100111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Donovan, B.M.; Spiel, M. Peripartum Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: Fetal and Neonatal Implications. NeoReviews 2022, 23, e345–e353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rizzo, G.; Mappa, I.; Pietrolucci, M.E.; Lu, J.L.A.; Makatsarya, A.; D’Antonio, F. Effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on fetal umbilical vein flow and cardiac function: A prospective study. J. Perinat. Med. 2022, 50, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Turgut, E.; Sakcak, B.; Uyan Hendem, D.; Oluklu, D.; Goncu Ayhan, S.; Sahin, D. Decreased fetal cardiac output in pregnant women with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Echocardiography 2022, 39, 803–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sule, G.A.; Aysegul, A.; Selcan, S.; Atakan, T.; Eda, O.T.; Deniz, O.; Filiz, H.O.; Ozlem, M.T.; Dilek, S. Effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on fetal pulmonary artery Doppler parameters. Echocardiography 2021, 38, 1314–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Anuk, A.T.; Tanacan, A.; Yetiskin, F.D.Y.; Buyuk, G.N.; Senel, S.A.; Keskin, H.L.; Moraloglu, O.; Uygur, D. Doppler assessment of the fetus in pregnant women recovered from COVID-19. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2021, 47, 1757–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Gracia-Perez-Bonfils, A.; Martinez-Perez, O.; Llurba, E.; Chandraharan, E. Fetal heart rate changes on the cardiotocograph trace secondary to maternal COVID-19 infection. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 252, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kato, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Maegawa, Y.; Komine-Aizawa, S.; Kondo, E.; Ikeda, T. Intrauterine fetal death during COVID-19 pregnancy: Typical fetal heart rate changes, coagulopathy, and placentitis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2022, 48, 1978–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Cetera, G.E.; D’Ambrosi, F.; Iurlaro, E.; Cesano, N.; Carbone, I.F.; De Marinis, S.; Ferrazzi, E. COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and unfavorable obstetric outcomes in the third trimester of pregnancy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2022, 157, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Pelayo, J.; Pugliese, G.; Salacup, G.; Quintero, E.; Khalifeh, A.; Jaspan, D.; Sharma, B. Severe COVID-19 in Third Trimester Pregnancy: Multidisciplinary Approach. Case Rep. Crit. Care 2020, 2020, 8889487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gubbari, C.; Govindarajan, V.; Reddy, C.; Raman, P.; Supriya, M. Newborn with Nonimmune Hydrops Secondary to Fetal COVID-19 Myocarditis. Indian J. Pediatr. 2022, 89, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Patel, M.; Thornburg, N. Stubblefield WB, Talbot HK, Coughlin MM, Feldstein LR, Self WH. Change in Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Over 60 Days Among Health Care Personnel in Nashville, Tennessee. JAMA 2020, 324, 1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Molteni, E.; Astley, C.M.; Ma, W.J.; Sudre, C.H.; Magee, L.A.; Murray, B.; Fall, T.; Gomez, M.F.; Tsereteli, N.; Franks, P.W.; et al. Symptoms and syndromes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity in pregnant women from two community cohorts. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chavan, N.; Shikhanshi; Kapote, D.; Deshmukh, P.; Sakhalkar, A. Study of maternal deaths with COVID-19 infection in a tertiary care centre. Int. J. Reprod. Contracept. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 11, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Palomo, M.; Youssef, L.; Ramos, A.; Torramade-Moix, S.; Moreno-Castaño, A.B.; Martinez-Sanchez, J.; Bonastre, L.; Pino, M.; Gomez-Ramirez, P.; Martin, L.; et al. Differences and similarities in endothelial and angiogenic profiles of preeclampsia and COVID-19 in pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 227, 277.e1–277.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Brandt, J.S.; Hill, J.; Reddy, A.; Schuster, M.; Patrick, H.S.; Rosen, T.; Sauer, M.V.; Boyle, C.; Ananth, C.V. Epidemiology of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: Risk factors and associations with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 224, 389.e1–389.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Goncu Ayhan, S.; Turgut, E.; Ozden Tokalioglu, E.; Oluklu, D.; Sakcak, B.; Uyan Hendem, D.; Tanacan, A.; Moraloglu Tekin, O.; Sahin, D. Post-COVID-19 fetal cardiac evaluation in moderate infection group of pregnant women. J. Clin. Ultrasound 2022, 50, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Radoi, V.; Pop, L.G.; Bacalbasa, N.; Panaitescu, A.M.; Ciobanu, A.M.; Cretoiu, D.; Toader, O.D. Fatal Association of Mirror and Eisenmenger Syndrome during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Medicina 2021, 57, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Agarwal, M.; Singh, S.; Sinha, U.; Bhushan, D. Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis in a pregnant patient with COVID-19: A rare thrombotic event survivor. BMJ Case Rep. 2021, 14, e243697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Mevada, S.A.; Mehendale, M.A.; Nayak, A.H.; Gite, P.M.; Khan, N.S. Cardiomyopathy in Pregnancy with COVID-19: An Enigma. J. South Asian Fed. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2020, 12, 243–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mongula, J.E.; Frenken, M.W.E.; van Lijnschoten, G.; Arents, N.L.A.; de Wit-Zuurendonk, L.D.; Schimmel-de Kok, A.P.A.; van Runnard Heimel, P.J.; Porath, M.M.; Goossens, S. COVID-19 during pregnancy: Non-reassuring fetal heart rate, placental pathology and coagulopathy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 56, 773–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, G.; Stapley, E.; Peterson, S.; Parrott, J.; Clark-Ganheart, C. Persistent Fetal SVT in a COVID-19 Positive Pregnancy. Case Rep. Obs. Gynecol. 2022, 2022, 9933520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Soma-Pillay, P.; Nelson-Piercy, C.; Tolppanen, H.; Mebazaa, A. Physiological changes in pregnancy: Review articles. Cardiovasc. J. Afr. 2016, 27, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Clerkin, K.J.; Fried, J.A.; Raikhelkar, J.; Sayer, G.; Griffin, J.M.; Masoumi, A.; Jain, S.S.; Burkhoff, D.; Kumaraiah, D.; Rabbani, L. COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2020, 141, 1648–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. ESC guidance for the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: Part 2—Care pathways, treatment, and follow-up. Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 1059–1103. [CrossRef]
  91. Dehghan, H.; Soleimani, A. Pulmonary thromboembolism with multiple right heart mural thrombus in a patient with COVID-19. J. Echocardiogr. 2020, 20, 124–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Bansal, M. Cardiovascular disease and COVID-19. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2020, 14, 247–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Shafiabadi Hassani, N.; Talakoob, H.; Karim, H.; Mozafari Bazargany, M.H.; Rastad, H. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings in 2954 COVID-19 adult survivors: A comprehensive systematic review. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2022, 55, 866–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Karamitsos, T.D.; Arvanitaki, A.; Karvounis, H.; Neubauer, S.; Ferreira, V.M. Myocardial tissue characterization and fibrosis by imaging. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, 1221–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wang, Y.; Liang, X.; Wang, H.; Li, L.; Xiong, G.; Mi, L. A considerable asymptomatic proportion and thromboembolism risk of pregnant women with COVID-19 infection in Wuhan, China. J. Perinat. Med. 2021, 49, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Mehta, L.S.; Warnes, C.A.; Bradley, E.; Burton, T.; Economy, K.; Mehran, R.; Safdar, B.; Sharma, G.; Wood, M.; Valente, A.M. Cardiovascular considerations in caring for pregnant patients: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020, 141, e884–e903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Regitz-Zagrosek, V.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W.; Bauersachs, J.; Blomström-Lundqvist, C.; Cifkova, R.; De Bonis, M.; Iung, B.; Johnson, M.R.; Kintscher, U.; Kranke, P. 2018 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: The task force for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 3165–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Taranikanti, M. Physiological changes in cardiovascular system during normal pregnancy: A review. Indian J. Cardiovasc. Dis. Women-WINCARS 2018, 3, 062–067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Zaigham, M.; Andersson, O. Maternal and perinatal outcomes with COVID-19: A systematic review of 108 pregnancies. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2020, 99, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Mullins, E.; Evans, D.; Viner, R.; O’Brien, P.; Morris, E. Coronavirus in pregnancy and delivery: Rapid review. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 55, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Di Mascio, D.; Khalil, A.; Saccone, G.; Rizzo, G.; Buca, D.; Liberati, M.; Vecchiet, J.; Nappi, L.; Scambia, G.; Berghella, V.; et al. Outcome of coronavirus spectrum infections (SARS, MERS, COVID-19) during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. MFM 2020, 2, 100107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Lassi, Z.S.; Ana, A.; Das, J.K.; Salam, R.A.; Padhani, Z.A.; Irfan, O.; Bhutta, Z.A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of data on pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19: Clinical presentation, and pregnancy and perinatal outcomes based on COVID-19 severity. J. Glob. Health 2021, 11, 05018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Gheblawi, M.; Wang, K.; Viveiros, A.; Nguyen, Q.; Zhong, J.-C.; Turner, A.J.; Raizada, M.K.; Grant, M.B.; Oudit, G.Y. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: SARS-CoV-2 receptor and regulator of the renin-angiotensin system: Celebrating the 20th anniversary of the discovery of ACE2. Circ. Res. 2020, 126, 1456–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Narang, K.; Enninga, E.A.L.; Gunaratne, M.D.; Ibirogba, E.R.; Trad, A.T.A.; Elrefaei, A.; Theiler, R.N.; Ruano, R.; Szymanski, L.M.; Chakraborty, R. SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 during pregnancy: A multidisciplinary review. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020, 95, 1750–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ferrario, C.M.; Trask, A.J.; Jessup, J.A. Advances in biochemical and functional roles of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and angiotensin-(1-7) in regulation of cardiovascular function. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2005, 289, H2281–H2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Varga, Z.; Flammer, A.J.; Steiger, P.; Haberecker, M.; Andermatt, R.; Zinkernagel, A.S.; Mehra, M.R.; Schuepbach, R.A.; Ruschitzka, F.; Moch, H. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet 2020, 395, 1417–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Garovic, V.D.; Hayman, S.R. Hypertension in pregnancy: An emerging risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Nat. Clin. Pract. Nephrol. 2007, 3, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chen, G.; Wu, D.; Guo, W.; Cao, Y.; Huang, D.; Wang, H.; Wang, T.; Zhang, X.; Chen, H.; Yu, H. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 2620–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Chousterman, B.G.; Swirski, F.K.; Weber, G.F. Cytokine storm and sepsis disease pathogenesis. Semin. Immunopathol. 2017, 39, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ye, Q.; Wang, B.; Mao, J. The pathogenesis and treatment of theCytokine Storm’in COVID-19. J. Infect. 2020, 80, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mehta, P.; McAuley, D.F.; Brown, M.; Sanchez, E.; Tattersall, R.S.; Manson, J.J. COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020, 395, 1033–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Di Renzo, G.C.; Giardina, I. Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: Consider thromboembolic disorders and thromboprophylaxis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 223, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Inciardi, R.M.; Lupi, L.; Zaccone, G.; Italia, L.; Raffo, M.; Tomasoni, D.; Cani, D.S.; Cerini, M.; Farina, D.; Gavazzi, E.; et al. Cardiac Involvement in a Patient With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Guo, T.; Fan, Y.; Chen, M.; Wu, X.; Zhang, L.; He, T.; Wang, H.; Wan, J.; Wang, X.; Lu, Z. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 811–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Chen, L.; Li, X.; Chen, M.; Feng, Y.; Xiong, C. The ACE2 expression in human heart indicates new potential mechanism of heart injury among patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020, 116, 1097–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Avila, W.S.; de Carvalho, R.C. COVID-19: A New Challenge in Pregnancy and Heart Disease. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2020, 115, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bauersachs, J.; König, T.; van der Meer, P.; Petrie, M.C.; Hilfiker-Kleiner, D.; Mbakwem, A.; Hamdan, R.; Jackson, A.M.; Forsyth, P.; de Boer, R.A. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of peripartum cardiomyopathy: A position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Study Group on peripartum cardiomyopathy. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2019, 21, 827–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lippi, G.; Lavie, C.J.; Sanchis-Gomar, F. Cardiac troponin I in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Evidence from a meta-analysis. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 63, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hantoushzadeh, S.; Nabavian, S.M.; Soleimani, Z.; Soleimani, A. COVID-19 Disease During Pregnancy and Peripartum Period: A Cardiovascular Review. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2022, 47, 100888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Avila, W.S.; Kirschbaum, M.; Devido, M.S.; Demarchi, L.M.M.F. COVID-19, congenital heart disease, and pregnancy: Dramatic conjunction—Case report. Eur. Heart J.-Case Rep. 2021, 5, ytab291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Shi, S.; Qin, M.; Shen, B.; Cai, Y.; Liu, T.; Yang, F.; Gong, W.; Liu, X.; Liang, J.; Zhao, Q. Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 802–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Rabinovich, A.; Abdul-Kadir, R.; Thachil, J.; Iba, T.; Othman, M.; Erez, O. DIC in obstetrics: Diagnostic score, highlights in management, and international registry-communication from the DIC and Women’s Health SSCs of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2019, 17, 1562–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Servante, J.; Swallow, G.; Thornton, J.G.; Myers, B.; Munireddy, S.; Malinowski, A.K.; Othman, M.; Li, W.; O’Donoghue, K.; Walker, K.F. Haemostatic and thrombo-embolic complications in pregnant women with COVID-19: A systematic review and critical analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Levi, M.; Sivapalaratnam, S. Disseminated intravascular coagulation: An update on pathogenesis and diagnosis. Expert Rev. Hematol. 2018, 11, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ranucci, M.; Ballotta, A.; Di Dedda, U.; Baryshnikova, E.; Dei Poli, M.; Resta, M.; Falco, M.; Albano, G.; Menicanti, L. The procoagulant pattern of patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 1747–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Hunt, B.J.; Jurd, K.M. Endothelial cell activation: A central pathophysiological process. Br. Med. J. 1998, 316, 1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Ackermann, M.; Verleden, S.E.; Kuehnel, M.; Haverich, A.; Welte, T.; Laenger, F.; Vanstapel, A.; Werlein, C.; Stark, H.; Tzankov, A. Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Idell, S. Coagulation, fibrinolysis, and fibrin deposition in acute lung injury. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 31, S213–S220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Obi, A.T.; Barnes, G.D.; Wakefield, T.W.; Brown, S.; Eliason, J.L.; Arndt, E.; Henke, P.K. Practical diagnosis and treatment of suspected venous thromboembolism during COVID-19 pandemic. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2020, 8, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bermejo-Martin, J.F.; Almansa, R.; Torres, A.; González-Rivera, M.; Kelvin, D.J. COVID-19 as a cardiovascular disease: The potential role of chronic endothelial dysfunction. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020, 116, e132–e133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Jin, Y.; Ji, W.; Yang, H.; Chen, S.; Zhang, W.; Duan, G. Endothelial activation and dysfunction in COVID-19: From basic mechanisms to potential therapeutic approaches. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Teuwen, L.-A.; Geldhof, V.; Pasut, A.; Carmeliet, P. COVID-19: The vasculature unleashed. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 389–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Herrey, A.S.; Osman, A.; Soma-Pillay, P.; Sliwa, K.; Ntusi, N.A. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system in pregnancy. SA Heart 2020, 17, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Mohammadi, S.; Abouzaripour, M.; Hesam Shariati, N.; Hesam Shariati, M.B. Ovarian vein thrombosis after coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection in a pregnant woman: Case report. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2020, 50, 604–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Martinelli, I.; Ferrazzi, E.; Ciavarella, A.; Erra, R.; Iurlaro, E.; Ossola, M.; Lombardi, A.; Blasi, F.; Mosca, F.; Peyvandi, F. Pulmonary embolism in a young pregnant woman with COVID-19. Thromb. Res. 2020, 191, 36–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Tang, N.; Bai, H.; Chen, X.; Gong, J.; Li, D.; Sun, Z. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 1094–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. IoOaG, R. COVID-19 Infection Guidance for Maternity Services. Inst. Obstet. Gynaecol.-R. Coll. Physicians Irel. (RCPI) 2020, 21. [Google Scholar]
  138. D’Souza, R.; Malhamé, I.; Teshler, L.; Acharya, G.; Hunt, B.J.; McLintock, C. A critical review of the pathophysiology of thrombotic complications and clinical practice recommendations for thromboprophylaxis in pregnant patients with COVID-19. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2020, 99, 1110–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kwiatkowski, S.; Borowski, D.; Kajdy, A.; Poon, L.; Rokita, W.; Wielgos, M. Why we should not stop giving aspirin to pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 55, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Yuan, S.-M. Fetal arrhythmias: Surveillance and management. Hell. J. Cardiol. 2019, 60, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Aldemir, O.; Karahanoğlu, E.; Esinler, D.; Yerebasmaz, N.; Fadıllıoğlu, E. Umbilical artery Doppler findings in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Gynecol. Obstet. Reprod. Med. 2014, 20, 143–145. [Google Scholar]
  142. Khalil, A.; Von Dadelszen, P.; Draycott, T.; Ugwumadu, A.; O’Brien, P.; Magee, L. Change in the incidence of stillbirth and preterm delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA 2020, 324, 705–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Ayhan, S.G.; Tanacan, A.; Atalay, A.; Sinaci, S.; Tokalioglu, E.O.; Sahin, D.; Tekin, O.M. Assessment of fetal Doppler parameters in pregnant women with COVID-19 infection: A prospective case-control study. J. Perinat. Med. 2021, 49, 697–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Fenizia, C.; Biasin, M.; Cetin, I.; Vergani, P.; Mileto, D.; Spinillo, A.; Gismondo, M.R.; Perotti, F.; Callegari, C.; Mancon, A. Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission during pregnancy. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Carosso, A.; Cosma, S.; Serafini, P.; Benedetto, C.; Mahmood, T. How to reduce the potential risk of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during vaginal delivery? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 250, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Jiang, X.; Gao, X.; Zheng, H.; Yan, M.; Liang, W.; Shao, Z.; Li, W.; Zhang, E.; Hu, Y.; Hai, R. Specific immunoglobulin g antibody detected in umbilical blood and amniotic fluid from a pregnant woman infected by the coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2004, 11, 1182–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Chen, H.; Guo, J.; Wang, C.; Luo, F.; Yu, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, J.; Zhao, D.; Xu, D.; Gong, Q. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: A retrospective review of medical records. Lancet 2020, 395, 809–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Shek, C.C.; Ng, P.C.; Fung, G.P.; Cheng, F.W.; Chan, P.K.; Peiris, M.J.; Lee, K.H.; Wong, S.F.; Cheung, H.M.; Li, A.M. Infants born to mothers with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Pediatrics 2003, 112, e254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Yang, P.; Wang, X.; Liu, P.; Wei, C.; He, B.; Zheng, J.; Zhao, D. Clinical characteristics and risk assessment of newborns born to mothers with COVID-19. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 127, 104356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Büke, B.; Akkaya, H. A non-invasive method to rule out transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN): Fetal pulmonary artery acceleration to ejection time ratio. J. Perinat. Med. 2018, 46, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Azpurua, H.; Norwitz, E.R.; Campbell, K.H.; Funai, E.F.; Pettker, C.M.; Kleine, M.; Bahtiyar, M.O.; Malkus, H.; Copel, J.A.; Thung, S.F. Acceleration/ejection time ratio in the fetal pulmonary artery predicts fetal lung maturity. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 203, 40.e1–40.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Turgut, E.; Ayhan, S.G.; Oluklu, D.; Tokalioglu, E.O.; Tekin, O.M.; Sahin, D. Fetal pulmonary artery Doppler evaluation in pregnant women after recovery from COVID-19. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021, 155, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Liu, J. Lung ultrasonography for the diagnosis of neonatal lung disease. J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014, 27, 856–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Prasad, S.; Kalafat, E.; Blakeway, H.; Townsend, R.; O’Brien, P.; Morris, E.; Draycott, T.; Thangaratinam, S.; Le Doare, K.; Ladhani, S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and perinatal outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Kirschbaum, M.; Devido, M.; Azeka, E.; Demarchi, L.; Santos, J.; Pinto, D.; Hajjar, L.; Tarasoutchi, F.; Park, M.; Avila, W. COVID-19 in pregnant women with heart diseases. Adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Case series from InCor registry of Pregnancy and Heart Disease. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, ehab724.2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Şahin, D.; Tanaçan, A.; Webster, S.N.; Tekin, Ö.M. Pregnancy and COVID-19: Prevention, vaccination, therapy, and beyond. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 51, 3312–3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Jcm 11 06194 g001
Figure 2. Association of SARS-CoV-2 with hypertensive disorders and pre-eclampsia. SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE-2 and reduces ACE-2 and ANG-(1–7) levels. Reduced ANG-(1–7) decreases its vasodilatory effect and, therefore, enhances vasoconstriction. Endothelial cells also express ACE2 receptors and SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause immune cell-mediated endothelial damage, which is a hallmark of pre-eclampsia. Additionally, the virus invades the cells, activating the inflammatory response by increasing TNF-, IL-6, IL-1. This cytokine hyperproduction increases the risk of vascular hyperpermeability, which can lead to hypertensive diseases. These mechanisms could explain the hypertension problems seen in COVID-19 individuals who are pregnant. (ACE2= Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, ANG = angiotensin, IL = interleukin, TNF-a = tumor necrosis factor α).
Figure 2. Association of SARS-CoV-2 with hypertensive disorders and pre-eclampsia. SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE-2 and reduces ACE-2 and ANG-(1–7) levels. Reduced ANG-(1–7) decreases its vasodilatory effect and, therefore, enhances vasoconstriction. Endothelial cells also express ACE2 receptors and SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause immune cell-mediated endothelial damage, which is a hallmark of pre-eclampsia. Additionally, the virus invades the cells, activating the inflammatory response by increasing TNF-, IL-6, IL-1. This cytokine hyperproduction increases the risk of vascular hyperpermeability, which can lead to hypertensive diseases. These mechanisms could explain the hypertension problems seen in COVID-19 individuals who are pregnant. (ACE2= Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, ANG = angiotensin, IL = interleukin, TNF-a = tumor necrosis factor α).
Jcm 11 06194 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yaghoobpoor, S.; Fathi, M.; Vakili, K.; Tutunchian, Z.; Dehghani, M.; Bahrami, A.; Hajibeygi, R.; Eslami, S.; Yaghoobpour, T.; Hajiesmaeili, M. Cardiovascular Complications of COVID-19 among Pregnant Women and Their Fetuses: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6194. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206194

AMA Style

Yaghoobpoor S, Fathi M, Vakili K, Tutunchian Z, Dehghani M, Bahrami A, Hajibeygi R, Eslami S, Yaghoobpour T, Hajiesmaeili M. Cardiovascular Complications of COVID-19 among Pregnant Women and Their Fetuses: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(20):6194. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206194

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yaghoobpoor, Shirin, Mobina Fathi, Kimia Vakili, Zohreh Tutunchian, Mina Dehghani, Ashkan Bahrami, Ramtin Hajibeygi, Samira Eslami, Tina Yaghoobpour, and Mohammadreza Hajiesmaeili. 2022. "Cardiovascular Complications of COVID-19 among Pregnant Women and Their Fetuses: A Systematic Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 20: 6194. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206194

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop