Next Article in Journal
Impella 5.0/5.5 Implantation via Innominate Artery: Further Expanding the Opportunities for Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
Previous Article in Journal
Epidermal Junctions and Skin Inflammation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Do We Need Psychological Outcome Measures in the Management of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET)?

by
Dimitrios Stasinopoulos
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos 28, Egaleo, 12243 Athens, Greece
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(19), 5916; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195916
Submission received: 3 October 2022 / Revised: 3 October 2022 / Accepted: 5 October 2022 / Published: 7 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Sports Medicine)
Many outcome measures have been developed in the evaluation of LET. The recommended outcome measures for LET assessment according to the Bateman et al. study [1] are:
  • The Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation for Disability
  • Time off work,
  • Pain-free grip strength and
  • a Numerical Rating Scale measuring pain on gripping.
All the above outcome measures should also be used until future studies recommend alternative, more robust, measures of participation in life activities, physical function capacity, and pain on activity/load [1].
However, I wonder if psychological factors such as kinesiophobia, depression, stress, and catastrophization can affect the management of LET. Their influence on, or association with, lower limb tendinopathies is beginning to emerge in the literature [2]. These associations have led to the suggestion that sensitization of the nervous system, and impaired pain processing, may explain persistent tendinopathy pain states, and ongoing loss of function that can occur following tissue-based intervention in tendinopathy [3].
I believe that the above psychological factors can affect LET rehabilitation and that researchers should find ways to assess these factors. Researchers can assess the psychological factors using:
5.
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to detect and measure the severity of depression and anxiety
6.
The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) to measure fear of movement
7.
The Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) to measure dispositional optimism or pessimism.
On the other hand, future studies should investigate the psychometric properties of these instruments for the LET population. Further research is needed to indicate which of the above scales is more representative of the LET condition. Finally, if the above-recommended scales are not appropriate for LET patients, new validated measures should be developed.
Overall, these additional outcome measures may assist in the identification of factors that predict chronicity and poor treatment results in LET patients.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bateman, M.; Evans, J.P.; Vuvan, V.; Jones, V.; Watts, A.C.; Phadnis, J.; Bisset, L.M.; Vicenzino, B. COS-LET Authorship Group. Development of a core outcome set for lateral elbow tendinopathy (COS-LET) using best available evidence and an international consensus process. Br. J. Sports Med. 2022, 56, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mest, J.; Vaughan, B.; Mulcahy, J.; Malliaras, P. The Prevalence of Self-Reported Psychological Characteristics of Adults with Lower Limb Tendinopathy. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2020, 10, 659–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jayaseelan, D.J.; Weber, M.J.; Jonely, H. Potential Nervous System Sensitization in Patients with Persistent Lower Extremity Tendinopathies: 3 Case Reports. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2019, 49, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stasinopoulos, D. Do We Need Psychological Outcome Measures in the Management of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET)? J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5916. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195916

AMA Style

Stasinopoulos D. Do We Need Psychological Outcome Measures in the Management of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET)? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(19):5916. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195916

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stasinopoulos, Dimitrios. 2022. "Do We Need Psychological Outcome Measures in the Management of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET)?" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 19: 5916. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195916

APA Style

Stasinopoulos, D. (2022). Do We Need Psychological Outcome Measures in the Management of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET)? Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(19), 5916. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195916

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop