Next Article in Journal
Incidence of Pneumothorax and Pneumomediastinum in 497 COVID-19 Patients with Moderate–Severe ARDS over a Year of the Pandemic: An Observational Study in an Italian Third Level COVID-19 Hospital
Next Article in Special Issue
Shedding Light on Targeting Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Coping Strategies and Their Impact on Quality of Life and Physical Disability of People with Multiple Sclerosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of BCR-ABL1 Transcript Type on Response, Treatment-Free Remission Rate and Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Imatinib
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 23
10.3390/jcm10235606
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combined Inhibition of Bcl2 and Bcr-Abl1 Exercises Anti-Leukemia Activity but Does Not Eradicate the Primitive Leukemic Cells

by
Michele Massimino
1,2,*,
Paolo Vigneri
1,2,
Stefania Stella
1,2,
Elena Tirrò
1,2,
Maria Stella Pennisi
1,2,
Laura Nunziatina Parrinello
3,
Calogero Vetro
3,
Livia Manzella
1,2,
Fabio Stagno
3 and
Francesco Di Raimondo
3
1
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
2
Center of Experimental Oncology and Hematology, A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Rodolico-S. Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy
3
Division of Hematology, A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Rodolico-S. Marco”, 95123 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(23), 5606; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235606
Submission received: 13 October 2021 / Revised: 13 November 2021 / Accepted: 25 November 2021 / Published: 29 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prognosis and Therapy of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The management of Philadelphia Chromosome-positive (Ph+) hematological malignancies is strictly correlated to the use of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, these drugs do not induce leukemic stem cells death and their persistence may generate a disease relapse. Published reports indicated that Venetoclax, a selective BCL2 inhibitor, could be effective in Ph+ diseases, as BCL2 anti-apoptotic activity is modulated by BCR-ABL1 kinase. We, therefore, investigated if BCL2 inhibition, alone or combined with Nilotinib, a BCR-ABL1 inhibitor, affects the primitive and committed Ph+ cells survival. Methods: We used Ph+ cells isolated from leukemic patients at diagnosis. To estimate the therapeutic efficacy of BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 inhibition we employed long-term culture, proliferation and apoptosis assay. Immunoblot was used to evaluate the ability of treatment to interfere with the down-stream targets of BCR-ABL1. Results: Blocking BCL2, we observed reduced proliferation and clonogenic potential of CML CD34-positive cells and this cytotoxicity was improved by combination with BCR-ABL1 inhibitor. However, BCL2 inhibition, alone or in combination regiment with BCR-ABL1 inhibitor, did not reduce the self-renewal of primitive leukemic cells, while strongly induced cell death on primary Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). Conclusion: Our results suggest that primitive CML leukemic cells are not dependent on BCL2 for their persistence and support that committed CML and Ph + ALL cells are dependent by BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 cooperation for their survival. The antileukemic activity of BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 dual targeting may be a useful therapeutic strategy for Ph+ ALL patients.

1. Introduction

The chromosome translocation (t9;22) forming the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+) generates the chimeric BCR-ABL1 oncogene, which triggers the Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and the Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL). BCR-ABL1 oncogene encodes for an oncoprotein with constitutive tyrosine kinase activity causing stem cells transformation and leukemic clone expansion [1]. ABL-directed inhibitors, commonly named tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), represented by first-generation Imatinib (IM), second-Nilotinib, Dasatinib (DAS), Bosutinib (BOS) and third-generation Ponatinib (PON), are the first line treatment for CML and Ph+ B-ALL patients, inducing complete hematological, molecular and cytogenetic responses [2,3].
Although TKIs are effective in the eradication of committed Ph+ cells, they fail to induce leukemic stem cells eradication, hence, the persistence of this cell population may cause disease progression. Furthermore, Ph+ stem cells can accumulate several BCR-ABL1-dependent or -independent molecular alterations providing a reservoir generating a drug-resistance clone. In fact, about 50% of CML and most of Ph+ ALL patients show a transient benefit from these drugs, hence, curing Ph+ diseases with TKIs is rare and new therapeutic approaches are requested [4,5,6]. Drug-resistance clones have also been observed in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes, following anti-tumor therapies with hypomethylating agents [7].
The mitochondrial BCL2 family proteins consist of both anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic members. Dependent on their structure the BCL2 family is classified in three groups including (i) BCL2, BCL-xL and BCL-w exercising anti-apoptotic effect, (ii) Bax and Bak having a pro-apoptotic role and (iii) Bik and Bid which display pro-apoptotic functions as well. Hence, BCL2 family proteins play a critical role in the survival of leukemic cells [8,9]. Different authors report that BCL2 protein is consistently expressed in normal stem cells and that these high levels are maintained after BCR-ABL1-mediated transformation [10,11]. Published data indicate that BCR-ABL1 exercises its pro-survival activity by increasing BCL2 family proteins expression [12,13]. On the basis of these observations, the BCL2 inhibition alone or combined with a BCR-ABL1 inhibitor might represent a useful strategy to eradicate the leukemic cells.
A selective BCL2 inhibitor, ABT-199 known as Venetoclax, is demonstrated to have a strong antileukemic effect against several hematological malignances such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia and in-vitro and in-vivo CML models where this cytotoxicity improves the BCR-ABL1 inhibitors efficacy [14,15,16,17,18,19]. To support these results, two clinical studies are ongoing (NCT02689440, NCT02115295) in order to evaluate the efficacy of Venetoclax in combination with other drugs in CML patients in chronic or blast phase.
We investigated the effect of BCL2 inhibition by Venetoclax alone or combined with Nilotinib [19] in cells derived from chronic phase CML (CP-CML) and Ph+ ALL patients expressing p210 and p190 BCR-ABL1 isoforms, respectively. Using long-term culture-initiating cells (LTC-IC), cell death analysis, clonogenic and proliferation assays we determined the role of BCL2 in the BCR-ABL1-mediated survival activity. Furthermore, we analyzed the effect of this regimen on BCR-ABL1 down-stream targets STAT5 and CRKL proteins [3].
We demonstrate that BCL2 inhibition, alone or combined with Nilotinib have been effective on CML CD34-positive progenitors and Ph+ B-ALL cells but failed to interfere with self-renewal properties of CML primitive cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

Chronic Phase CML patients (p210 CP-CML, n = 4) and Ph+ B-ALL patients (p190 B-ALL, n = 3) were diagnosed by real-time PCR as previously reported [20]. For B-ALL patients’ peripheral neoplastic cells expressing > 80% CD19-positive were eligible for this study. All patients were followed in the Division of Hematology of the A.O.U. Policlinico–G. Rodolico-S. Marco and signed an informed consent releasing anonymously their samples for research purposes in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Isolation and Culture of Ph+ Primary Cells

CD34-positive cells were immunomagnetically separated from aspirated bone marrow of CML patients at diagnosis as previously published [21] and grown in presence of low cytokines concentration (FLT3 ligand 5 ng/mL, stem cell factor 5 ng /mL, IL-3 and IL-6 1 ng/mL, all from Stem Cell technologies) to avoid impairing BCR-ABL1-dependent proliferation. To isolate Ph+ B-ALL cells we used peripheral blood of patient at diagnosis showing 80% of lymphoblastic cells obtained by gradient separation using Ficoll Paque Premium, cultivated in RPMI supplemented with 10% of non-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (EuroClone), 2 mM of glutamine, 100 µg/mL and 50 µg/mL of streptomycin (all from Sigma-Aldrich). Nilotinib was provided by Novartis while Venetoclax was purchased from Santa Cruz.

2.3. Drug Treatment

Cells were exposed to Nilotinib and Venetoclax, alone or in combination, at concentration of 2 µM [22] and 400 nM [19], respectively. For all experiments, cells were exposed to drug treatment for 24 h.

2.4. Trypan Blue Exclusion Assay

Cells were counted by mixing 10 µL of each cell suspension with 10 µL of 0.4% of trypan blue solution and their number determined in a hemocytometer.

2.5. Long Term Culture-Initiating Cells (LTC-ICs) Assays

LTC-IC frequency was calculated by Limiting Dilution Analysis (LDA). As feeder layers in 96-well plates, 1.5 × 104 M2-10B4 mouse fibroblast (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver CAN) were established and blocked for 24 h with 2 µg/mL Mytomicin C (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis USA) [23]. Bone morrow CML CD34-positive progenitors were pretreated or not for 24 h with Nilotinib, Venetoclax or their combination. At this time were co-cultivated on feeder cells using 40 replicates of two-fold cell dilutions (from 50 to 400 initial test cells) in long-term culture medium (MyeloCult H5100 from StemCell Technologyes) for 5 weeks with weekly half-medium changes. After 5 weeks, cells were overlaid with methylcellulose (Methocult H4435, StemCell Technologies) supplemented with conditioned medium derived from 5637 cells [24]. Colonies were counted under the microscope after two additional weeks. LTC-IC frequency was calculated using the L-Calc software (StemCell Technologies) [25,26,27]. Number of LTC-IC was obtained by ratio between the number of initial cells tested used in bulk analysis and the LTC-IC frequency value calculated by LDA analysis [25,28].
LTC-IC-derived CFUs were measured performing LTC-IC assays bulk analysis. A total of 5 × 104 CD34-positive initial tested cells were cultivated on 445 × 103 M2-10B4 feeder cells, treated as described above, in a 35 mm dish. After 5 weeks, adherent and non-adherent cells were collected and 5 × 104 hematopoietic cells were resuspended in methylcellulose (H4435) as previously described [25,26,27,29,30]. LTC-IC-derived CFUs were expressed as the number of clonogenic progenitors obtained after 15 days of methylcellulose culture (number of colonies multiplied by the total number of hematopoietic cells counted after 5 weeks of culture) divided by the number of initial test cells seeded on fibroblasts. LTC-IC division rate was obtained from ratio between the LTC-IC-derived CFUs and the number of LTC-IC [25].

2.6. Colony Forming Unit (CFUs) and Secondary Re-Plating (CFUs-r) Assays

For colony forming units (CFUs) and secondary re-plating assays (CFUs-r), 500 CML bone marrow CD34-postive cells, untreated or exposed to Nilotinib, Venetoclax or in combination regiment for 24 h, were seeded in methylcellulose medium (Methocult H4435, StemCell Technologies). Total myeloid colonies were counted after 15 days of culture for CFUs. For secondary re-plating the total CFUs-r were counted and collected after 10 days. The methylcellulose was dissolved in 2 mL of Iscove’s D-MEM supplemented with 2% FBS. Cells were then centrifuged at 1200 RPM for 10 min at room temperature, and 1 × 104 cells re-implanted (secondary re-plating) in methocult as above. The colonies were counted after 15 days [31,32]. For all colonies count an optical microscope (Olympus IX71) was used.

2.7. Western Blotting, Immunoblotting and Densitometric Analysis

In total, 3 × 105/mL CD34-positive and 1 × 106/mL B-ALL cells were left untreated or exposed to Nilotinib, Venetoclax or their combination for 24 h. Cells were then lysed in Laemmli buffer [62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% w/v SDS, 10% glycerol, 50 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.01% w/v bromophenol blue], sonicated, denaturated and each protein lysate was separated by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred on nitrocellulose membranes which were hybridized using the following antibodies: anti-phospho-CRKL (Tyr207) (clone 3181), anti-CRKL (clone 32H4), anti-STAT5 (clone 94205) and anti-pSTAT5 (Y694) (clone 9351) (all from Cell Signaling); anti-Actin from Sigma-Aldrich. After incubation with primary antibodies, appropriate horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies (Amersham Biosciences) were added and proteins were then detected using the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent Star (Euroclone) or WesternSure PREMIUM (Li-cor). Chemiluminescent images were digitally captured on the c-Digit blot scanner and a densitometric analysis was performed using the Image J software. For each protein, relative densitometric units were obtained normalizing for actin. The final relative densitometric units were obtained by calculating the ratio between phosphorylated versus total protein fractions.

2.8. Cell Death Assay

A total of 3 × 105/mL CD34-positive and 1 × 106/mL Ph+ B-ALL cells were exposed or no to Nilotinib, Venetoclax or in combination regiment for 24 h. At this time cells were stained by Annexin V/7-AAD (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and analyzed by cytofluorimetric analysis employing Cytomics FC500.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical significance was calculated using the Prism Software version 8.0 applying analysis of variance (ANOVA) plus Bonferroni’s posttests.

3. Results

3.1. BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 Kinase Dual Inhibition Exercises Anti-Clonogenic and Anti-Proliferation Activity on Committed CP-CML Progenitors

To investigate the cytotoxic activity of BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibition, we exposed CP-CML CD34-positive progenitors to Venetoclax and Nilotinib or their combination for 24 h (Figure 1). The treatment with Nilotinib did not reduce cell number (fold reduction 1.07), while Venetoclax showed a significant but modest effect (fold reduction 1.35, p < 0.05). Interestingly, we observed that Venetoclax increased the Nilotinib cytotoxicity, strongly reducing the number of committed CP-CML cells (fold reduction UT, Nilotinib and Venetoclax vs. Nilotinib + Venetoclax 2.7, 2.6 and 2.2, respectively, p < 0.001) (Figure 1A). Different results were observed when we performed the colony-forming unit assay. Compared to the untreated condition, although with less efficacy than Nilotinib, Venetoclax reduced the clonogenic potential of committed CP-CML cell (fold reduction Nilotinib 1.8 p < 0.001, Venetoclax 1.3 p < 0.01). In turn, Nilotinib + Venetoclax regimen was more potent than two drugs alone, inhibiting the colonies formation of 3.2 (p < 0.001), 1.8 (p < 0.01) and 3 (p < 0.001) folds when compared to untreated, Nilotinib or Venetoclax alone, respectively (Figure 1B). Next, we wanted to evaluate if Venetoclax alone or combined with Nilotinib interferes with the ability of CP-CML progenitors to perpetuate the colonies formation. To this end, we performed a primary and secondary re-plating in methylcellulose. For primary plating the colonies were counted after 10 days (Figure 1C), observing comparable data reported in Figure 2B. When we counted the colonies obtained after secondary re-plating, we detected a significant cytotoxicity by Nilotinib (fold 3.7, p < 0.05) and Nilotinib + Venetoclax (fold 3, p < 0.05) but not by Venetoclax (fold 2.4) (Figure 1D). Overall, Venetoclax + Nilotinib combination was significantly more potent than the drugs alone, with the exception of secondary replating experiment. All together these findings support that Venetoclax + Nilotinib combined treatment eliminates the committed CML cells, while the more primitive cells were less sensitive to BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibition.

3.2. BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 Kinase Co-Targeting Kills Committed CP-CML Progenitors

In order to investigate if Venetoclax- or Venetoclax + Nilotinib-mediated cytotoxicity was dependent on apoptosis induction, we exposed CP-CML CD34-positive progenitors to Nilotinib, Venetoclax or their combination for 24 h and then we stained them by Annexin V and 7AAD (Figure 2A–D). Compared to untreated cells, Venetoclax was significantly more potent than Nilotinib to kill leukemic cells (Venetoclax: 58.5%, p < 0.01, Nilotinib: 44.3%) and Nilotinib + Venetoclax combination was strongly cytotoxic (Nilotinib + Venetoclax:83.4%, p < 0.001) (Figure 2E) showing a cooperative effect. Hence, these results indicate that the BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 kinase co-inhibition exercises a potent pro-apoptotic effect on committed CP-CML cells.

3.3. BCL2 Inhibition Does Not Affect the Activity of BCR-ABL1-Dependent Pro-Survival Mediator STAT5

To investigate if the antileukemic activity of the BCL2 inhibition was dependent on its ability to interfere with BCR-ABL1-dependent pro-survival mediator STAT5, we analyzed its phosphorylation level using CRKL as control of the BCR-ABL1 suppression activity [24]. Relative densitometric units revealed STAT5 and CRKL phosphorylation reduction induced only by Nilotinib (fold 37.4) or its combination with Venetoclax (fold 37.5) (Figure 3) suggesting that this event was dependent on Nilotinib-mediated BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibition.
These results suggest that antileukemic activity mediated by Venetoclax is not dependent on BCR-ABL1 signaling alteration in CML progenitors.

3.4. Primitive CP-CML Cells Are Not Dependent on BCL2 Antiapoptotic Activity for Their Survival

Previously, data demonstrated that BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 kinase dual inhibition eradicates CML stem cells derived from patients in blast crisis [19]. We investigated the cytotoxic effects of BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibition by Venetoclax and Nilotinib, alone or in combination, on self-renewal properties of primitive CP-CML cells. Using LDA assay we observed that Venetoclax was not able to reduce the LTC-IC frequency, (untreated = 1:532, Venetoclax = 1:580), and although its combination with Nilotinib reduced the frequency of leukemic cells significantly, (Venetoclax + Nilotinib = 1:692, p < 0.05) this effect was less potent then Nilotinib alone (1:806, p < 0.05) (Figure 4A). Moreover, comparing to untreated condition, while Nilotinib + Venetoclax combination reduced equaling the LTC-IC absolute number than Nilotinib alone (LTC-IC number untreated = 117, Venetoclax + Nilotinib = 96, p < 0.05, Nilotinib = 91, p < 0.05), Venetoclax failed in this effect (LTC-IC number Venetoclax = 110) (Figure 4B). Subsequently, we measured the clonogenic and division rate of CP-CML primitive leukemic cells by bulk analysis (Figure 4C, D). We detected a significant reduction in both LTC-IC-derived CFUs and division rate after Nilotinib treatment (p < 0.05), while no significant cytotoxicity was observed after Venetoclax alone or combined with Nilotinib (LTC-IC-derived CFUs untreated = 290, Nilotinib = 143, Venetoclax = 241, Venetoclax + Nilotinib = 237) (Figure 4C) (Division rate untreated = 3.4, Nilotinib = 1.5, p < 0.05, Venetoclax = 2.8, Venetoclax + Nilotinib = 3.4, p < 0.05) (Figure 4D).
All together these data support the hypothesis that primitive CP-CML cells are not dependent on BCL2 protein for their survival as the self-renewal reduction observed after BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibition was dependent only by Nilotinib exposure.

3.5. BCR-ABL1-Positive B-ALL Cells Are Sensitivity to BCL2 Inhibition

To evaluate if BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 inhibition was effective against Ph+ B-ALL cells, we exposed them to Nilotinib, Venetoclax or their combination, measuring both proliferation and cell death (Figure 5). Although statistically not significant, compared to untreated cells, Nilotinib reduced the number of cells after 24 h (fold 1.5) while Venetoclax and Venetoclax + Nilotinib were more potent in this effect, showing a statistically significant reduction of 3 (p < 0.001) and 4.5 (p < 0.001) fold, respectively (Figure 5A). Staining the cells by Annexin V and 7AAD (Figure 5B–E), we observed a not statistically significant cell death after Nilotinib exposure (staining 40.15%) comparable to untreated condition (Figure 5F). Interestingly, when we exposed the cells to Venetoclax we found a statistically significant increase in stained cells (staining 77.7%, p < 0.001), weakly improved by Nilotinib combination (staining 83.15%, p < 0.001). Hence, these finding support an important implication suggesting that BCL2 protein plays a critical role in Ph+ B-ALL cells survival.

3.6. BCL2 Targeting Exercises Antileukemic Activity by Phosphorylation Reduction in Pro-Survival Factor STAT5 in Ph+ Positive B-ALL Cells

Subsequently, we analyzed the impact of the BCL2 inhibition on BCR-ABL1 downstream targets STAT5 in Ph+ B-ALL cells using CRKL as control for BCR-ABL1 kinase suppression [24] (Figure 6). We used densitometric analysis to detect the differences in the phosphorylation levels of STAT5 and CRKL. As expected, Nilotinib reduced the phosphorylation levels of STAT5 (4.3- and 4.2- fold in pt1 and pt2) and CRKL (fold reduction of 10 and 22 for pt1 and pt2) compared to untreated cells. Unexpectedly, we observed that BCL2 inhibition alone reduced the phosphorylation levels of both STAT5 (4-fold in pt1 and 4.5-fold in pt2) and CRKL (5- and 2.5-fold in pt1 and pt2). Furthermore, this effect was maintained after its combination with Nilotinib for both STAT5 (fold reduction of 2.6 and 4.2 for pt1 and pt2) and CRKL (fold reduction of 10 and 25 for pt1 and pt2) proteins. These results highlight the relationship between BCR-ABL1 downstream targets and BCL2 activity in Ph+ B-ALL cells.

4. Discussion

Although the introduction of ABL-directed inhibitors, commonly named TKIs, induced long-term survival of CML patients, about 50% of them and patients affected by Ph+ B-ALL do not completely benefit from these drugs, often requiring an additional therapeutic approach [4]. The reasons of this failing are related to the development of BCR-ABL1-dependent [33,34,35,36] or -independent [37,38,39,40] resistance mechanisms as well as the “non-oncogene addicted” property shown by leukemic stem cells [41,42]. Hence, on the basis of the concept of precision medicine, which increased the survival of patients affected by different tumor types [43,44,45,46,47,48,49] the identification of new therapeutic targets, able to overcome the TKIs inefficacy, may result in useful strategies for patients failing the conventional therapy.
Different authors demonstrated the cytotoxic effect of BCL2 inhibition in Ph- [10,50,51,52] and Ph+ [19,53,54,55] leukemia cells. Furthermore, we have previously reported that Venetoclax alone or combined with Nilotinib was strongly cytotoxic in primary Ph+ p210B-ALL cells [56]. Hence, all together these data demonstrate a direct involvement of BCL2 protein in leukemogenesis, also confirming published data reporting that BCL2-mediated antiapoptotic effect is regulated by BCR-ABL1 kinase [12,57]. Despite these results, other authors demonstrated that BCR-ABL1-dependent or -independent resistance mechanisms might not be driven by BCL2-mediated antiapoptotic effect [58] and the role of BCL2 protein in the leukemic transformation and drug resistance in Ph+ cells is not clear.
In this work we analyzed the cytotoxic effect of BCL2 inhibition by Venetoclax alone or in combination regimen with Nilotinib in primitive and committed CP-CML as well as in Ph+ B-ALL cells. We observed that Venetoclax was able to kill committed CML precursors, but not to interfere with the self-renewal properties of more primitive CP-CML cells, an effect that was observed after Nilotinib exposure [24] and, though less marked, after Venetoclax + Nilotinib combination. Although these data are in contrast with those reported by Carter et al. [19], it is possible that this discordance is dependent on different used models. In fact, Carter used a mouse model to mimic human CP-CML and the primitive leukemic cells were derived from CML patients in blast crisis, while our experiments were conducted on cells collected from patients in chronic phase. Furthermore, the reduced efficacy of BCL2 inhibition on more primitive leukemic cells, was confirmed when we performed a secondary replating experiment, establishing thus that this therapeutic approach does not alter the BCR-ABL1-mediated survival in these cells. Hence, CML disease status may reflect a diverse intracellular network responsible for different responses to BCL2 inhibition alone or combined with BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibitor. Furthermore, we detected that Nilotinib and Venetoclax combination did not reduce both number of LTC-IC CFU and division rate. We hypothesize that this phenomenon could be dependent on the primitive state of leukemic progenitors derived from long term culture.
The observation that, in committed CML cells, BCL2 inhibition induced apoptosis, also increasing the BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibitor efficacy, implicates the role of BCL2 in the BCR-ABL1-mediated pro-survival activity. However, this cytotoxicity was not dependent on modification of BCR-ABL1 downstream targets by BCL2 inhibition, suggesting that other pathways are involved in the anti-leukemic effect of Venetoclax.
Ph+ B-ALL cells are sensitive to different cytotoxic agents, but complete remissions are not durable, and up to 75% of patients show disease relapse. ABL-directed inhibitors, such as imatinib (IM), were proposed in combination therapy with different cytotoxic drugs to improve their effects [59]. Here, we report that the effect of Venetoclax might be different on Ph+ ALL cells compared to CML cells. We have confirmed the published data regarding high sensitivity of these cells to Venetoclax. BCL2 inhibition by Venetoclax, alone, is sufficient to induce cell death in Ph+ B-ALL cells and this effect was maintained and, also, weakly improved by Nilotinib combination. However, we observed a phosphorylation reduction in STAT5, indicating that, in contrast to CML, the antileukemic effect of Venetoclax, could be dependent on its ability to interfere with pro-survival intracellular signaling mediated by BCR-ABL1 and STAT5 in Ph+ B-ALL cells. Different authors reported direct and indirect correlation between BCL2 protein and STATs or CRKL in different tumor models [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67], supporting, thus, our data.
Collectively, our preclinical results demonstrate that, although the committed CP-CML progenitors have been strongly sensitive to Venetoclax, CP-CML primitive leukemic cells do not dependent on BCL2 protein for their persistence. In committed CP-CML cells, the BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 kinase dual targeting demonstrated superior antileukemic activity, compared to either inhibition alone, suggesting that more differentiated leukemic cells are dependent on BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 kinase cooperation for their survival. On the contrary, in Ph+ B-ALL cells, BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibition showed strong antileukemic activity and this cytotoxic effect is mediated by the BCL2 inhibitor, Venetoclax. In conclusion, these results support that the antileukemic activity of BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 dual targeting does not eradicate the primitive leukemic cells in CP-CML patients but may be a useful therapeutic strategy for Ph+ ALL patients.

Author Contributions

M.M. participated study design, researched data, wrote the manuscript and prepared the figures; P.V., S.S., E.T. and M.S.P. participated to the study design, researched data and revised the manuscript; L.N.P. performed FACS analysis and discussed experiments; C.V. and F.S. participated to patients enrollment and discussed experimental results; L.M. participated to study design and discussed experimental results; F.D.R. study design, supervised and discussed experimental results, revised and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Piano Sanitario Nazionale 2015, Linea Progettuale 6-Azione 6.3.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board Approval

According to the guidelines of our Institute, no ethical review is necessary. This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the A.O.U. Policlinico “G. Rodolico–San Marco” and no ethical was required. Patients were followed in the Division of Hematology of the A.O.U. Policlinico–G. Rodolico S. Marco–and signed an informed consent releasing anonymously their samples for research purposes. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

References

  1. Ren, R. Mechanisms of BCR-ABL in the pathogenesis of chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cuellar, S.; Vozniak, M.; Rhodes, J.; Forcello, N.; Olszta, D. BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. J. Oncol. Pharm. Pract. 2018, 24, 433–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Massimino, M.; Stella, S.; Tirro, E.; Pennisi, M.S.; Vitale, S.R.; Puma, A.; Romano, C.; Di Gregorio, S.; Tomarchio, C.; Di Raimondo, F.; et al. ABL1-Directed Inhibitors for CML: Efficacy, Resistance and Future Perspectives. Anticancer Res. 2020, 40, 2457–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Massimino, M.; Stella, S.; Tirro, E.; Romano, C.; Pennisi, M.S.; Puma, A.; Manzella, L.; Zanghi, A.; Stagno, F.; Di Raimondo, F.; et al. Non ABL-directed inhibitors as alternative treatment strategies for chronic myeloid leukemia. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Westerweel, P.E.; Te Boekhorst, P.A.W.; Levin, M.D.; Cornelissen, J.J. New Approaches and Treatment Combinations for the Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bhatia, R. Novel approaches to therapy in CML. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program 2017, 2017, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Stomper, J.; Rotondo, J.C.; Greve, G.; Lubbert, M. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes: Mechanisms of resistance and novel HMA-based therapies. Leukemia 2021, 35, 1873–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lampson, B.L.; Davids, M.S. The Development and Current Use of BCL-2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 2017, 12, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Perini, G.F.; Ribeiro, G.N.; Pinto Neto, J.V.; Campos, L.T.; Hamerschlak, N. BCL-2 as therapeutic target for hematological malignancies. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 11, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goff, D.J.; Court Recart, A.; Sadarangani, A.; Chun, H.J.; Barrett, C.L.; Krajewska, M.; Leu, H.; Low-Marchelli, J.; Ma, W.; Shih, A.Y.; et al. A Pan-BCL2 inhibitor renders bone-marrow-resident human leukemia stem cells sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibition. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12, 316–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Quintas-Cardama, A.; Qiu, Y.H.; Post, S.M.; Zhang, Y.; Creighton, C.J.; Cortes, J.; Kornblau, S.M. Reverse phase protein array profiling reveals distinct proteomic signatures associated with chronic myeloid leukemia progression and with chronic phase in the CD34-positive compartment. Cancer 2012, 118, 5283–5292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Aichberger, K.J.; Mayerhofer, M.; Krauth, M.T.; Skvara, H.; Florian, S.; Sonneck, K.; Akgul, C.; Derdak, S.; Pickl, W.F.; Wacheck, V.; et al. Identification of mcl-1 as a BCR/ABL-dependent target in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): Evidence for cooperative antileukemic effects of imatinib and mcl-1 antisense oligonucleotides. Blood 2005, 105, 3303–3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Horita, M.; Andreu, E.J.; Benito, A.; Arbona, C.; Sanz, C.; Benet, I.; Prosper, F.; Fernandez-Luna, J.L. Blockade of the Bcr-Abl kinase activity induces apoptosis of chronic myelogenous leukemia cells by suppressing signal transducer and activator of transcription 5-dependent expression of Bcl-xL. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 191, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Herman, S.E.; Barr, P.M.; McAuley, E.M.; Liu, D.; Wiestner, A.; Friedberg, J.W. Fostamatinib inhibits B-cell receptor signaling, cellular activation and tumor proliferation in patients with relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia 2013, 27, 1769–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pan, R.; Hogdal, L.J.; Benito, J.M.; Bucci, D.; Han, L.; Borthakur, G.; Cortes, J.; DeAngelo, D.J.; Debose, L.; Mu, H.; et al. Selective BCL-2 inhibition by ABT-199 causes on-target cell death in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2014, 4, 362–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Okabe, S.; Tauchi, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Ohyashiki, K. Anti-Leukemic Effects of Venetoclax on Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Leukemia Cells. Blood 2016, 128, 5428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maiti, A.; Franquiz, M.J.; Ravandi, F.; Cortes, J.E.; Jabbour, E.J.; Sasaki, K.; Marx, K.; Daver, N.G.; Kadia, T.M.; Konopleva, M.Y.; et al. Venetoclax and BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Combinations: Outcome in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Advanced Myeloid Leukemias. Acta Haematol. 2020, 143, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cang, S.; Iragavarapu, C.; Savooji, J.; Song, Y.; Liu, D. ABT-199 (Venetoclax) and BCL-2 inhibitors in clinical development. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2015, 8, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Carter, B.Z.; Mak, P.Y.; Mu, H.; Zhou, H.; Mak, D.H.; Schober, W.; Leverson, J.D.; Zhang, B.; Bhatia, R.; Huang, X.; et al. Combined targeting of BCL-2 and BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase eradicates chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 355ra117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Stella, S.; Zammit, V.; Vitale, S.R.; Pennisi, M.S.; Massimino, M.; Tirro, E.; Forte, S.; Spitaleri, A.; Antolino, A.; Siracusa, S.; et al. Clinical Implications of Discordant Early Molecular Responses in CML Patients Treated with Imatinib. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Massimino, M.; Consoli, M.L.; Mesuraca, M.; Stagno, F.; Tirro, E.; Stella, S.; Pennisi, M.S.; Romano, C.; Buffa, P.; Bond, H.M.; et al. IRF5 is a target of BCR-ABL kinase activity and reduces CML cell proliferation. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 1132–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bradeen, H.A.; Eide, C.A.; O’Hare, T.; Johnson, K.J.; Willis, S.G.; Lee, F.Y.; Druker, B.J.; Deininger, M.W. Comparison of imatinib mesylate, dasatinib (BMS-354825), and nilotinib (AMN107) in an N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-based mutagenesis screen: High efficacy of drug combinations. Blood 2006, 108, 2332–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Ponchio, L.; Duma, L.; Oliviero, B.; Gibelli, N.; Pedrazzoli, P.; Robustelli della Cuna, G. Mitomycin C as an alternative to irradiation to inhibit the feeder layer growth in long-term culture assays. Cytotherapy 2000, 2, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Konig, H.; Holtz, M.; Modi, H.; Manley, P.; Holyoake, T.L.; Forman, S.J.; Bhatia, R. Enhanced BCR-ABL kinase inhibition does not result in increased inhibition of downstream signaling pathways or increased growth suppression in CML progenitors. Leukemia 2008, 22, 748–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, M.; Miller, C.L.; Eaves, C.J. Human long-term culture initiating cell assay. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 946, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sutherland, H.J.; Lansdorp, P.M.; Henkelman, D.H.; Eaves, A.C.; Eaves, C.J. Functional characterization of individual human hematopoietic stem cells cultured at limiting dilution on supportive marrow stromal layers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 3584–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Pettengell, R.; Luft, T.; Henschler, R.; Hows, J.M.; Dexter, T.M.; Ryder, D.; Testa, N.G. Direct comparison by limiting dilution analysis of long-term culture-initiating cells in human bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, and blood stem cells. Blood 1994, 84, 3653–3659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Massimino, M.; Tirro, E.; Stella, S.; Manzella, L.; Pennisi, M.S.; Romano, C.; Vitale, S.R.; Puma, A.; Tomarchio, C.; Di Gregorio, S.; et al. Impact of the Breakpoint Region on the Leukemogenic Potential and the TKI Responsiveness of Atypical BCR-ABL1 Transcripts. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 669469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Heaney, N.B.; Pellicano, F.; Zhang, B.; Crawford, L.; Chu, S.; Kazmi, S.M.; Allan, E.K.; Jorgensen, H.G.; Irvine, A.E.; Bhatia, R.; et al. Bortezomib induces apoptosis in primitive chronic myeloid leukemia cells including LTC-IC and NOD/SCID repopulating cells. Blood 2010, 115, 2241–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Koller, M.R.; Manchel, I.; Smith, A.K. Quantitative long-term culture-initiating cell assays require accessory cell depletion that can be achieved by CD34-enrichment or 5-fluorouracil exposure. Blood 1998, 91, 4056–4064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, S.; Gao, R.; Kobayashi, M.; Yu, H.; Yao, C.; Kapur, R.; Yoder, M.C.; Liu, Y. Pharmacological inhibition of AKT activity in human CD34(+) cells enhances their ability to engraft immunodeficient mice. Exp. Hematol. 2017, 45, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. von Palffy, S.; Landberg, N.; Sanden, C.; Zacharaki, D.; Shah, M.; Nakamichi, N.; Hansen, N.; Askmyr, M.; Lilljebjorn, H.; Rissler, M.; et al. A high-content cytokine screen identifies myostatin propeptide as a positive regulator of primitive chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Haematologica 2020, 105, 2095–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Buffa, P.; Romano, C.; Pandini, A.; Massimino, M.; Tirro, E.; Di Raimondo, F.; Manzella, L.; Fraternali, F.; Vigneri, P.G. BCR-ABL residues interacting with ponatinib are critical to preserve the tumorigenic potential of the oncoprotein. FASEB J. 2014, 28, 1221–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Vigneri, P.; Stagno, F.; Stella, S.; Cupri, A.; Forte, S.; Massimino, M.; Antolino, A.; Siragusa, S.; Mannina, D.; Impera, S.S.; et al. High BCR-ABL/GUS(IS) Levels at Diagnosis of Chronic Phase CML Are Associated with Unfavorable Responses to Standard-Dose Imatinib. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 7189–7198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Chandrasekhar, C.; Kumar, P.S.; Sarma, P. Novel mutations in the kinase domain of BCR-ABL gene causing imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Castagnetti, F.; Gugliotta, G.; Breccia, M.; Iurlo, A.; Levato, L.; Albano, F.; Vigneri, P.; Abruzzese, E.; Rossi, G.; Rupoli, S.; et al. The BCR-ABL1 transcript type influences response and outcome in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated frontline with imatinib. Am. J. Hematol. 2017, 92, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Loscocco, F.; Visani, G.; Galimberti, S.; Curti, A.; Isidori, A. BCR-ABL Independent Mechanisms of Resistance in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Jordanides, N.E.; Jorgensen, H.G.; Holyoake, T.L.; Mountford, J.C. Functional ABCG2 is overexpressed on primary CML CD34+ cells and is inhibited by imatinib mesylate. Blood 2006, 108, 1370–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. White, D.L.; Saunders, V.A.; Dang, P.; Engler, J.; Venables, A.; Zrim, S.; Zannettino, A.; Lynch, K.; Manley, P.W.; Hughes, T. Most CML patients who have a suboptimal response to imatinib have low OCT-1 activity: Higher doses of imatinib may overcome the negative impact of low OCT-1 activity. Blood 2007, 110, 4064–4072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Ishii, Y.; Nhiayi, M.K.; Tse, E.; Cheng, J.; Massimino, M.; Durden, D.L.; Vigneri, P.; Wang, J.Y. Knockout Serum Replacement Promotes Cell Survival by Preventing BIM from Inducing Mitochondrial Cytochrome C Release. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Morotti, A.; Panuzzo, C.; Fava, C.; Saglio, G. Kinase-inhibitor-insensitive cancer stem cells in chronic myeloid leukemia. Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther. 2014, 14, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Corbin, A.S.; Agarwal, A.; Loriaux, M.; Cortes, J.; Deininger, M.W.; Druker, B.J. Human chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells are insensitive to imatinib despite inhibition of BCR-ABL activity. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 396–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Massimino, M.; Tirro, E.; Stella, S.; Frasca, F.; Vella, V.; Sciacca, L.; Pennisi, M.S.; Vitale, S.R.; Puma, A.; Romano, C.; et al. Effect of Combined Epigenetic Treatments and Ectopic NIS Expression on Undifferentiated Thyroid Cancer Cells. Anticancer Res. 2018, 38, 6653–6662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Baudino, T.A. Targeted Cancer Therapy: The Next Generation of Cancer Treatment. Curr. Drug Discov. Technol. 2015, 12, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Peters, G.J. From ‘Targeted Therapy’ to Targeted Therapy. Anticancer Res. 2019, 39, 3341–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pelster, M.S.; Amaria, R.N. Combined targeted therapy and immunotherapy in melanoma: A review of the impact on the tumor microenvironment and outcomes of early clinical trials. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2019, 11, 1758835919830826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Gupta, S.K.; Kizilbash, S.H.; Daniels, D.J.; Sarkaria, J.N. Editorial: Targeted Therapies for Glioblastoma: A Critical Appraisal. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Masoud, V.; Pages, G. Targeted therapies in breast cancer: New challenges to fight against resistance. World J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 8, 120–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Manzella, L.; Massimino, M.; Stella, S.; Tirro, E.; Pennisi, M.S.; Martorana, F.; Motta, G.; Vitale, S.R.; Puma, A.; Romano, C.; et al. Activation of the IGF Axis in Thyroid Cancer: Implications for Tumorigenesis and Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Chong, S.J.F.; Davids, M.S. Breaking through BCL-2 inhibition in CLL. Blood 2020, 135, 709–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. McBride, A.; Houtmann, S.; Wilde, L.; Vigil, C.; Eischen, C.M.; Kasner, M.; Palmisiano, N. The Role of Inhibition of Apoptosis in Acute Leukemias and Myelodysplastic Syndrome. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lagadinou, E.D.; Sach, A.; Callahan, K.; Rossi, R.M.; Neering, S.J.; Minhajuddin, M.; Ashton, J.M.; Pei, S.; Grose, V.; O’Dwyer, K.M.; et al. BCL-2 inhibition targets oxidative phosphorylation and selectively eradicates quiescent human leukemia stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Ko, T.K.; Chuah, C.; Huang, J.; Ng, K.P.; Ong, S.T. The BCL-2 Inhibitor ABT-199 Enhances Imatinib-Induced Cell Death In Chronic Phase CML Progenitors. Blood 2013, 122, 3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Inoue, C.; Sobue, S.; Aoyama, Y.; Mizutani, N.; Kawamoto, Y.; Nishizawa, Y.; Ichihara, M.; Abe, A.; Hayakawa, F.; Suzuki, M.; et al. BCL2 inhibitor ABT-199 and JNK inhibitor SP600125 exhibit synergistic cytotoxicity against imatinib-resistant Ph+ ALL cells. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2018, 15, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ko, T.K.; Chuah, C.T.; Huang, J.W.; Ng, K.P.; Ong, S.T. The BCL2 inhibitor ABT-199 significantly enhances imatinib-induced cell death in chronic myeloid leukemia progenitors. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 9033–9038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Massimino, M.; Tirro, E.; Stella, S.; Pennisi, M.S.; Vitale, S.R.; Puma, A.; Romano, C.; Di Gregorio, S.; Romeo, M.A.; Di Raimondo, F.; et al. Targeting BCL-2 as a Therapeutic Strategy for Primary (p210)BCR-ABL1-positive B-ALL Cells. In Vivo 2020, 34, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Sanchez-Garcia, I.; Grutz, G. Tumorigenic activity of the BCR-ABL oncogenes is mediated by BCL2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 5287–5291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Amarante-Mendes, G.P.; McGahon, A.J.; Nishioka, W.K.; Afar, D.E.; Witte, O.N.; Green, D.R. Bcl-2-independent Bcr-Abl-mediated resistance to apoptosis: Protection is correlated with up regulation of Bcl-xL. Oncogene 1998, 16, 1383–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Malagola, M.; Papayannidis, C.; Baccarani, M. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: Facts and perspectives. Ann. Hematol. 2016, 95, 681–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Dai, Y.; Jin, S.; Li, X.; Wang, D. The involvement of Bcl-2 family proteins in AKT-regulated cell survival in cisplatin resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 1354–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Asnaghi, L.; Calastretti, A.; Bevilacqua, A.; D’Agnano, I.; Gatti, G.; Canti, G.; Delia, D.; Capaccioli, S.; Nicolin, A. Bcl-2 phosphorylation and apoptosis activated by damaged microtubules require mTOR and are regulated by Akt. Oncogene 2004, 23, 5781–5791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Mortenson, M.M.; Galante, J.G.; Gilad, O.; Schlieman, M.G.; Virudachalam, S.; Kung, H.J.; Bold, R.J. BCL-2 functions as an activator of the AKT signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer. J. Cell Biochem. 2007, 102, 1171–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, G.; Miskimen, K.L.; Wang, Z.; Xie, X.Y.; Brenzovich, J.; Ryan, J.J.; Tse, W.; Moriggl, R.; Bunting, K.D. STAT5 requires the N-domain for suppression of miR15/16, induction of bcl-2, and survival signaling in myeloproliferative disease. Blood 2010, 115, 1416–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Waibel, M.; Solomon, V.S.; Knight, D.A.; Ralli, R.A.; Kim, S.K.; Banks, K.M.; Vidacs, E.; Virely, C.; Sia, K.C.; Bracken, L.S.; et al. Combined targeting of JAK2 and Bcl-2/Bcl-xL to cure mutant JAK2-driven malignancies and overcome acquired resistance to JAK2 inhibitors. Cell Rep. 2013, 5, 1047–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Simpson, H.M.; Furusawa, A.; Sadashivaiah, K.; Civin, C.I.; Banerjee, A. STAT5 inhibition induces TRAIL/DR4 dependent apoptosis in peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 16792–16806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, J.; Gao, X.; Schmit, F.; Adelmant, G.; Eck, M.J.; Marto, J.A.; Zhao, J.J.; Roberts, T.M. CRKL Mediates p110beta-Dependent PI3K Signaling in PTEN-Deficient Cancer Cells. Cell Rep. 2017, 20, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ota, J.; Kimura, F.; Sato, K.; Wakimoto, N.; Nakamura, Y.; Nagata, N.; Suzu, S.; Yamada, M.; Shimamura, S.; Motoyoshi, K. Association of CrkL with STAT5 in hematopoietic cells stimulated by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or erythropoietin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 252, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 10 05606 g001 550
Figure 1. BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibition improves the anti-proliferative and anti-clonogenic activity of Venetoclax in committed CML CD34-positive cells. (A) Bone marrow CD34-positve cells derived from CML patients (n = 4) at diagnosis, were exposed for 24 h to the indicated drugs (Venetoclax 400 nM, Nilotinib 2 μΜ). Histograms report the viability of cells obtained setting arbitrary at 100% the number of cells implanted at the start of the experiment. (B) The same CD34-positive progenitors, treated as reported in (A), were implanted in methylcellulose in the presence of the same drugs regimen. Histograms report the number of colonies obtained after 15 days of culture. (C,D) CD34-positive progenitors treated as reported in (B) was used for primary (C) and secondary (D) plating performed as indicated in method. Histo-grams show the number of colonies counted after 10 (C) and 15 (D) days of culture. For all experiments, bars indicate the standard deviation derived from two experiments performed in duplicate. Statistical significance was calculated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) plus Bonferroni’s posttests (p < 0.05 *, p < 0.01 **, p < 0.001 ***). UT = Untreated, VEN = Venetoclax, NIL = Nilotinib.
Figure 1. BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibition improves the anti-proliferative and anti-clonogenic activity of Venetoclax in committed CML CD34-positive cells. (A) Bone marrow CD34-positve cells derived from CML patients (n = 4) at diagnosis, were exposed for 24 h to the indicated drugs (Venetoclax 400 nM, Nilotinib 2 μΜ). Histograms report the viability of cells obtained setting arbitrary at 100% the number of cells implanted at the start of the experiment. (B) The same CD34-positive progenitors, treated as reported in (A), were implanted in methylcellulose in the presence of the same drugs regimen. Histograms report the number of colonies obtained after 15 days of culture. (C,D) CD34-positive progenitors treated as reported in (B) was used for primary (C) and secondary (D) plating performed as indicated in method. Histo-grams show the number of colonies counted after 10 (C) and 15 (D) days of culture. For all experiments, bars indicate the standard deviation derived from two experiments performed in duplicate. Statistical significance was calculated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) plus Bonferroni’s posttests (p < 0.05 *, p < 0.01 **, p < 0.001 ***). UT = Untreated, VEN = Venetoclax, NIL = Nilotinib.
Jcm 10 05606 g001
Jcm 10 05606 g002 550
Figure 2. Pro-apoptotic effect of BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 dual targeting in committed CML CD34-positve cells. (A–D) Representative experiment of bone marrow CD34-progenitors untreated (A) or treated with Nilotinib (2 μM) (B), Venetoclax (400 nM) (C) or their combination (D). After 24 h cells were collected and stained with Annexin V/7-AAD. Scatter plots indicate the unstained (AJ3) and Annexin V (AJ4), Annexin V/7-AAD (AJ2) or 7-AAD (AJ1) stained cells. (E) Histograms report the average percentage of Annexin and 7-AAD cells obtained from CML patients (n = 3). Bars indicate the standard deviation resulting from average of three patients. Statistical significance was calculated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) plus Bonferroni’s posttests (p < 0.05 *, p < 0.01 **, p < 0.001 ***). UT: Untreated, NIL: Nilotinib, Ven: Venetoclax.
Figure 2. Pro-apoptotic effect of BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 dual targeting in committed CML CD34-positve cells. (A–D) Representative experiment of bone marrow CD34-progenitors untreated (A) or treated with Nilotinib (2 μM) (B), Venetoclax (400 nM) (C) or their combination (D). After 24 h cells were collected and stained with Annexin V/7-AAD. Scatter plots indicate the unstained (AJ3) and Annexin V (AJ4), Annexin V/7-AAD (AJ2) or 7-AAD (AJ1) stained cells. (E) Histograms report the average percentage of Annexin and 7-AAD cells obtained from CML patients (n = 3). Bars indicate the standard deviation resulting from average of three patients. Statistical significance was calculated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) plus Bonferroni’s posttests (p < 0.05 *, p < 0.01 **, p < 0.001 ***). UT: Untreated, NIL: Nilotinib, Ven: Venetoclax.
Jcm 10 05606 g002
Jcm 10 05606 g003 550
Figure 3. BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 co-targeting reduces the STAT5 and CRKL phosphorylation levels in committed CML CD34-positive cells. A Bone marrow CD34-positve progenitors (CML patients n = 3) were exposed to the indicated drugs (Venetoclax 400 nM, Nilotinib 2 μM) and derived cell lysates separated by SDS-PAGE. Nitrocellulose membrane was hybridized with specified antibodies. Actin was used as loading control. The numbers indicate the densitometric analysis obtained using Image J software. VEN = Venetoclax, NIL = Nilotinib.
Figure 3. BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 co-targeting reduces the STAT5 and CRKL phosphorylation levels in committed CML CD34-positive cells. A Bone marrow CD34-positve progenitors (CML patients n = 3) were exposed to the indicated drugs (Venetoclax 400 nM, Nilotinib 2 μM) and derived cell lysates separated by SDS-PAGE. Nitrocellulose membrane was hybridized with specified antibodies. Actin was used as loading control. The numbers indicate the densitometric analysis obtained using Image J software. VEN = Venetoclax, NIL = Nilotinib.
Jcm 10 05606 g003
Jcm 10 05606 g004 550
Figure 4. BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibition does not eliminate the primitive CML population. The scatter plot shows the LTC-IC frequency (A), number of LTC-IC (B), LTC-IC-derived CFU (C) and LTC-IC division rate (D) of the bone marrow primitive CD34-positive cells derived from CML patients (n = 4) at diagnosis (Venetoclax 400 nM and Nilotinib 2 μΜ). Data are reported as median with range obtained from each experiment performed in duplicate. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired one-tailed t-tests with 95% confidence intervals (p < 0.05 *). UT = Untreated, VEN = Venetoclax, NIL = Nilotinib.
Figure 4. BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibition does not eliminate the primitive CML population. The scatter plot shows the LTC-IC frequency (A), number of LTC-IC (B), LTC-IC-derived CFU (C) and LTC-IC division rate (D) of the bone marrow primitive CD34-positive cells derived from CML patients (n = 4) at diagnosis (Venetoclax 400 nM and Nilotinib 2 μΜ). Data are reported as median with range obtained from each experiment performed in duplicate. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired one-tailed t-tests with 95% confidence intervals (p < 0.05 *). UT = Untreated, VEN = Venetoclax, NIL = Nilotinib.
Jcm 10 05606 g004
Jcm 10 05606 g005 550
Figure 5. Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity of BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 co-inhibition in Ph+ lymphoblastic B-ALL cells. (A). Peripheral B-ALL cells derived from B-ALL patients (n = 3) at diagnosis were exposed for 24 h to the indicated drugs (Venetoclax 400 nM, Nilotinib 2 μM). Histograms report the viability cells obtained setting arbitrary at 100% the number of cells implanted at the start of the experiment. (B–E) Representative experiment of peripheral B-ALL cells untreated (B) or treated with Nilotinib (C), Venetoclax (D) or their combination (F). After 24 h cells were collected and stained with Annexin V/7-AAD. Scatter plots indicate the unstained (AJ3), Annexin V (AJ4), Annexin V/7-AAD (AJ2) or 7-AAD (AJ1) stained cells (n = 2). F Histograms report the average percentage of Annexin and 7-AAD cells obtained from B-ALL patients. Bars indicate the standard deviation resulting from the average of two patients. Statistical significance was calculated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) plus Bonferroni’s posttests (p < 0.01 **, p < 0.001 ***). UT:Untreated, NIL:Nilotinib, Ven: Venetoclax.
Figure 5. Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity of BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 co-inhibition in Ph+ lymphoblastic B-ALL cells. (A). Peripheral B-ALL cells derived from B-ALL patients (n = 3) at diagnosis were exposed for 24 h to the indicated drugs (Venetoclax 400 nM, Nilotinib 2 μM). Histograms report the viability cells obtained setting arbitrary at 100% the number of cells implanted at the start of the experiment. (B–E) Representative experiment of peripheral B-ALL cells untreated (B) or treated with Nilotinib (C), Venetoclax (D) or their combination (F). After 24 h cells were collected and stained with Annexin V/7-AAD. Scatter plots indicate the unstained (AJ3), Annexin V (AJ4), Annexin V/7-AAD (AJ2) or 7-AAD (AJ1) stained cells (n = 2). F Histograms report the average percentage of Annexin and 7-AAD cells obtained from B-ALL patients. Bars indicate the standard deviation resulting from the average of two patients. Statistical significance was calculated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) plus Bonferroni’s posttests (p < 0.01 **, p < 0.001 ***). UT:Untreated, NIL:Nilotinib, Ven: Venetoclax.
Jcm 10 05606 g005
Jcm 10 05606 g006 550
Figure 6. Single or combined BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 inhibition represses the STAT5 and CRKL phosphorylation in Ph+ B-ALL cells. Peripheral blood lymphoblastic cells derived from Ph+ B-ALL patients (n = 2) were exposed to the indicated drugs (Venetoclax 400 nM, Nilotinib 2 μΜ). Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and nitrocellulose membrane hybridized by specified antibodies. Actin was used as loading control. The numbers indicate the densitometric analysis obtained using Image J software. VEN = Venetoclax, NIL = Nilotinib.
Figure 6. Single or combined BCL2 and BCR-ABL1 inhibition represses the STAT5 and CRKL phosphorylation in Ph+ B-ALL cells. Peripheral blood lymphoblastic cells derived from Ph+ B-ALL patients (n = 2) were exposed to the indicated drugs (Venetoclax 400 nM, Nilotinib 2 μΜ). Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and nitrocellulose membrane hybridized by specified antibodies. Actin was used as loading control. The numbers indicate the densitometric analysis obtained using Image J software. VEN = Venetoclax, NIL = Nilotinib.
Jcm 10 05606 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Massimino, M.; Vigneri, P.; Stella, S.; Tirrò, E.; Pennisi, M.S.; Parrinello, L.N.; Vetro, C.; Manzella, L.; Stagno, F.; Di Raimondo, F. Combined Inhibition of Bcl2 and Bcr-Abl1 Exercises Anti-Leukemia Activity but Does Not Eradicate the Primitive Leukemic Cells. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5606. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235606

AMA Style

Massimino M, Vigneri P, Stella S, Tirrò E, Pennisi MS, Parrinello LN, Vetro C, Manzella L, Stagno F, Di Raimondo F. Combined Inhibition of Bcl2 and Bcr-Abl1 Exercises Anti-Leukemia Activity but Does Not Eradicate the Primitive Leukemic Cells. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(23):5606. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235606

Chicago/Turabian Style

Massimino, Michele, Paolo Vigneri, Stefania Stella, Elena Tirrò, Maria Stella Pennisi, Laura Nunziatina Parrinello, Calogero Vetro, Livia Manzella, Fabio Stagno, and Francesco Di Raimondo. 2021. "Combined Inhibition of Bcl2 and Bcr-Abl1 Exercises Anti-Leukemia Activity but Does Not Eradicate the Primitive Leukemic Cells" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 23: 5606. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235606

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop