Next Article in Journal
Physician-Led Thoracic Trauma Management in a Specialist Emergency Care Centre
Next Article in Special Issue
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Pregnancy: When Dreams Meet Reality. State of the Art, Management and Outcome of 41 Cases, Nilotinib Placental Transfer
Previous Article in Journal
Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin (αSMA) Immunohistochemistry Use in the Differentiation of Pancreatic Cancer from Chronic Pancreatitis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Combined Inhibition of Bcl2 and Bcr-Abl1 Exercises Anti-Leukemia Activity but Does Not Eradicate the Primitive Leukemic Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 10
Issue 24
10.3390/jcm10245805
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Shedding Light on Targeting Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells

by
Mohammad Houshmand
1,
Alireza Kazemi
2,
Ali Anjam Najmedini
2,
Muhammad Shahzad Ali
1,
Valentina Gaidano
3,
Alessandro Cignetti
4,
Carmen Fava
1,
Daniela Cilloni
1,
Giuseppe Saglio
1,* and
Paola Circosta
1
1
Department of Clinical Biological Sciences, University of Turin, San Luigi University Hospital, 10043 Turin, Italy
2
Department of Hematology and Blood Banking, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1971653313, Iran
3
Division of Hematology, A.O. SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15121 Alessandria, Italy
4
Division of Hematology and Cell Therapy, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, 10128 Turin, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(24), 5805; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245805
Submission received: 26 November 2021 / Accepted: 6 December 2021 / Published: 11 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prognosis and Therapy of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells (CML LSCs) are a rare and quiescent population that are resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). When TKI therapy is discontinued in CML patients in deep, sustained and apparently stable molecular remission, these cells in approximately half of the cases restart to grow, resuming the leukemic process. The elimination of these TKI resistant leukemic stem cells is therefore an essential step in increasing the percentage of those patients who can reach a successful long-term treatment free remission (TFR). The understanding of the biology of the LSCs and the identification of the differences, phenotypic and/or metabolic, that could eventually allow them to be distinguished from the normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are therefore important steps in designing strategies to target LSCs in a rather selective way, sparing the normal counterparts.

1. Introduction

The development of different generations of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has led the overall survival (OS) of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients to become almost similar to that of a control population without leukemia. However in most of the patients who discontinue the TKI therapy, a regrowth of the leukemic clone and a molecular recurrence of the disease can be observed and only approximately half of those who are achieving a very deep molecular response and therefore approximately only 15–20% of the entire CML population, can definitely and successfully suspend the therapy [1]. This is due to the persistence of leukemic stem cells that are able to survive in spite of the TKI therapy and may have the clonogenic capacity to resume the leukemic process once the TKI therapy has been interrupted. Therefore, alternative approaches for the elimination of TKI resistant leukemic stem cells are essential to increase the percentage of those who can reach a successful long-term treatment free remission (TFR) and possibly a definitive cure of the disease [2]. Considering that loss of long-term TFR can be due to the persistence of an even small number of leukemic stem cells (LSCs) showing a minimal, but extreme form of resistance to the TKI therapy, that may be due not to BCR-ABL1 mutations but mainly to BCR-ABL1 independent mechanisms, several studies attempting to identify possible metabolic and/or phenotypic differences between LSCs and normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are currently ongoing. Here we focus on the peculiar features of CML leukemic stem cells (CML LSCs) that have been so far discovered and that could be potentially useful as targets in designing therapeutic strategies aiming to eliminate in a rather selective way the residual LSCs while sparing their normal counterparts.

2. Metabolic Pathways Potentially Useful for Targeting CML LSCs

2.1. WNT Signaling Pathway

The WNT signaling pathway has been shown to have a significant role in the development of several organs including the hematopoietic system while perturbation of this crucial pathway sparks induction of various types of cancers. In the resting condition, the WNT-β catenin network forms a destruction complex including AXIN, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), Casein kinase 1 (CK1) and Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) and links to β-catenin, providing a binding site for the ubiquitin ligase that leads to β catenin degradation in the proteasome. By contrast, following attachment of WNT to the frizzled receptor (FR), GSK3, CK1, and AXIN bind Lipoprotein receptor-related proteins (LRP) and leave β-catenin free for nucleus localization where it interacts with transcription factors of the TCF/LEF family and promotes gene expression. It has been demonstrated that β-catenin is of paramount importance for self-renewal and long-term maintenance of both HSCs and LSCs [3]. After induction of BCR-ABL in β-catenin null mice, defect in self-renewal and in engraftment potential of CML LSCs has been observed and this shows that this pathway is essential for normal and leukemic stem cells survival [4]. It has been shown that BCR-ABL has direct contact with β-catenin and mediates the nucleus transition by making this protein more stable. Furthermore, expression of β-catenin increases with CML progression and is responsible for the increased self-renewal of CML progenitors in blast crisis [5]. In the bone marrow niche, mesenchymal cells may interact with CML LSCs through the WNT/β- catenin pathway enhancing their proliferation. Therefore, increased expression of β-catenin can be seen as a form of resistance of LSCs allowing their survival [6,7] and a combination of WNT/β-catenin inhibitors and TKI could potentially help to get rid of CML LSCs. However, unfortunately this approach has been demonstrated to be too toxic also for normal HSCs as well as for the stem cells of other organs and, at least for the moment, has been abandoned [8,9].

2.2. Hedgehog Signaling Pathway

The Hedgehog signaling pathway which is essential for hematopoiesis, is deregulated in several solid tumors. It is initiated through binding of hedgehog (Hh) ligands (Sonic Hh, Indian Hh, and Desert Hh) to a seven transmembrane receptor called Patched (Ptch). After the consequent activation of the Smoothened protein (Smo) by Ptch, Glioma-Associated Oncogene Homolog (Gli) family transcription factors are activated, which are able to transcribe target genes such as Gli1, Ptch1, bcl2, Cyclin D, and MYC [10]. In CML high mRNA expression of Hedgehog cascade related proteins underlines the role of this pathway in driving leukemogenesis [11]. ABL kinase is not needed for the salvation of this cascade [12]. Whereas studies suggest that Smo targeting does not affect the engraftment potential and the fate decision of normal HSCs, it has been shown that it may potentially reduce the engraftment ability and the colony formation of CML LSCs. Therefore, hitting this pathway should selectively affect LSCs but not normal HSCs [12,13]. Indeed, exposure of CML cells containing both wild type BCR-ABL and BCR-ABL1 mutated T315I cells to an Smo inhibitor led to the purging of the mutated clone [14]. Another study demonstrated that the use of Hedgehog inhibitors not only propels CML LSCs into cycling condition but also restores their susceptibility to TKI [13,15]. Again, however clinical trials testing the usefulness of this approach have shown that Hh pathway inhibitors are too toxic and have been finally abandoned.

2.3. PI3K-AKT Pathway

The known participation of the Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway in the maintenance and function of normal HSCs drove the attention on the possible role of this cascade in the LSC population. By phosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol (3,4)-bisphosphate (PIP2) by PI3K and formation of phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3), Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Kinase 1 (PDK1) is recruited and associated to PIP3 and phosphorylates AKT, that subsequently activates mTORC1 and phosphorylates the Forkhead box O (FOXO) transcription factors family [16]. It has been shown that this signaling pathway is activated by BCR-ABL1 and so, in the Ph-positive cell population, it may be more specific with respect to the WNT and Hedgehog signaling pathways. When the BCR-ABL TK activity is on, AKT phosphorylates FOXO transcription factors and does not allow their shift to the nucleus, but TKIs blocking BCR-ABL1 TK activity can promote FOXO nucleus relocalization, restoring their transcriptional activity. Expression of BCL6, that is considered essential for the survival of CML stem cells, and also ATM and CDKN1C, is enhanced by the FOXO transcriptional activity [16,17]. Inhibition of mTORC1 did not show an evident effect on CML LSCs, but inhibition of PI3K can restore the vulnerability of CML LSCs to TKIs [18].

2.4. JAK-STAT Pathway

In addition, the JAK-STAT pathway plays an important role in CML, but in a strong association with BCR-ABL1 kinase activity. Indeed, STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 can be activated by BCR-ABL1 directly or indirectly through JAK2 induction and activation by BCR-ABL1. JAK2 activation can be also stimulated by growth factors produced by the mesenchymal cells of the hematopoietic bone marrow niche [19,20]. It has been shown that inhibition of the JAK2 by ruxolitinib may reduce the level of BCR-ABL1 protein and may help to overcome resistance [21]. It was also seen that the combination of Imatinib + INFγ is able to decrease the phosphorylation of STAT5, but it increases the phosphorylation of STAT1, an up-regulator of the survival hint induced by BCL6, clearly delineating another potential pitfall of imatinib and of TKI therapy in general [22]. In line with these concepts, the use of ruxolitinib (a JAKs inhibitor) together with nilotinib fruitfully in vitro showed activity in suppressing the CML LSC population, without affecting the HSCs. However clinical trials testing this strategy were unsuccessful. It has also been reported that STAT3 dysregulates CML LSC metabolism, and its inhibition may eradicate these resistant cells [23]. Meanwhile, glitazones an antidiabetic drug by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) reduces expression of STAT5 that might lead to the elimination of the CML LSC population [24].
Possible signaling pathways are shown in Figure 1.

2.5. Other Players

2.5.1. Blk

It has been shown that Blk as a tyrosine kinase protein has a diminished expression in CML LSCs in contrast to normal cells. Although Blk is regarded as a tumor suppressor, in CML LSCs, via upregulation of p27, BCR-ABL1 downsizes the expression of this protein by modulation of c-myc and Pax5. Meanwhile, overexpression of Blk in CML LSCs inhibits the self-renewal and increases the apoptosis rate, while Blk knock-down does not interfere with the regular HSC activity [25].

2.5.2. EZH2

EZH2 as part of the PRC2 complex mediates repression of various genes by trimethylation of histone H3 (H3K27me3). Amplification of EZH2 in CML LSCs and reduction after TKI therapy shows its engagement in the pathogenesis of CML and its dependency on BCR-ABL1 TK activity. It has also been reported that EZH2 inhibitor increases the possibility of CML LSC eradication while sparing the normal HSCs. This effect is enhanced by the combination of TKI and EZH2 Inhibitor [26].

2.5.3. Fap-1

Another pathway associated with resistance to elimination is the enhanced expression of Fap-1 in CML LSCs. Fap-1 with its phosphatase activity blocks Fas mediated apoptosis and also stabilizes β-catenin by targeting its inhibitor Gsk3β. Fap-1 activity is accompanied by persistence of CML stem cells and Fap-1 inhibition promotes TKI response and hampers the progression of leukemic cells [27].

2.5.4. HIF-1

Hypoxia inducible factor (HIF), constituted of α and β subunits, increases when oxygen concentration is low in order to facilitate the cell adaptation to this new environment. HIF-1 as a transcription factor has a crucial role in regulating survival, proliferation, and maintenance of CML LSCs. Cheloni et al., posited that using acriflavine, an HIF-1 inhibitor, significantly affects the fate of CML cells by c-MYC down regulation and decrease of stemness genes like NANOG, SOX2, and OCT4. As CML LSCs are more dependent on HIF-1 than normal HSCs, the combination of an HIF-1 inhibitor with TKI could represent a new form of strategy to target resistant CML LSCs that reside in the hypoxic region [28,29].

2.5.5. PML

The promyelocyte leukemia protein (PML), by attending in the formation of PML-nuclear bodies (PML-NBs), acts as a tumor suppressor and transcription factor and plays a pivotal role in apoptosis and senescence of normal cells [30]. The PML gene is already well known because of its involvement in the t(15;17) translocation that causes the fusion of PML with retinoic acid receptor alpha (RAR-alpha) in acute promyelocyte leukemia (APL), determining a differentiation arrest [31]. Besides, up-regulation of PML in CML LSCs may hamper the cycling of these cells and cause a decrease in their sensitivity to TKIs. It has been shown that targeting PML in CML cells by arsenic trioxide (As2O3) leads to PML degradation and triggers cycling of these quiescent cells. This strategy may promote the exhaustion of the CML LSCs restoring their sensitivity to the TKIs [32].

2.5.6. PP2A

Protein phosphatase 2 A (PP2A), a serine/threonine phosphatase which is composed by the scaffold (A), regulatory (B), and catalytic (C) subunits, has a role in directing β-catenin pathway, programmed cell death and cell cycle progression [33]. Until now our knowledge about the role of PP2A in CML LSCs has been limited to its tumor inhibitory effect. In CML this protein is regulated by SET protein activity, and enhancement of SET during the progression of CML from chronic to more advanced phases of the disease determines the downregulation of PP2A. It has been shown that in the LSC population, PP2A reduction provides a stimulus for self-renewal of leukemic cells. Restoring its activity could therefore be useful to decrease the LSC pool [34]. Various isoforms of PP2A, however are present and while some of them play a suppressive role in many cancers, other isoforms can act differently [33]. Recently, however, Lai et al. demonstrated that inhibition of PP2A and TKI may efficiently suppress CML LSCs [35].

2.5.7. ALOX5

ALOX5 encodes 5-lypoxygenase (5-LO) that converts arachidonic acid into leukotrienes and is involved in inflammatory condition and cancer development [36]. Targeting ALOX5 hampers the differentiation, the function, and the survival of CML LSCs, while normal HSCs remain uninfluenced. Zileuton (5-LO inhibitor) impairs CML LSC development [37], but although the oncogenicity of ALOX5 in the mouse model seemed to be compelling, in CML patients it has a low expression and the use of a 5-LO inhibitor does not show particular consequences [38].

2.5.8. SIRT1

Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) is a histone deacetylase that regulates gene expression, metabolic activity and aging within cells [39]. SIRT1 overexpression in primary CML cells deacetylates many transcription factors including P53, Ku70, and FOX01. This genetic modification promotes drug resistance, survival, and propagation of the leukemic fraction [40,41]. SIRT1 targeting in CML LSCs, both by inhibition or knock-down, enhances acetylation of P53 which gives rise to apoptosis and reduction of their growth [42]. So, applying the combination of TKI and SIRT1 inhibitor maybe a potential approach to tackle leukemogenesis.
Considering the role of different molecules in supporting CML LSC survival and proliferation, many clinical trials have been designed to target these players and are summarized in Table 1.

2.5.9. microRNAs

microRNAs (miRNA), a class of non-coding RNAs, in physiological conditions regulate various cellular process such as differentiation [43], proliferation, metabolism, and apoptosis through mechanisms of repression of translation and mRNA cleavage [44]. Dysregulation of miRNAs is a crucial determinant in the pathogenesis of multiple cancers [45] and some data suggest a possible active involvement of several microRNAs also in CML LSC resistance, self-renewal, and maintenance processes. miR-126 is considered to be the regulator of dormancy of CML LSCs and HSCs. Active BCR-ABL1 phosphorylates SPRED1 which in turn depletes the amount of mature miR-126. This depletion should be compensated for by an external source to keep up stemness features. In bone marrow niche endosteal Sca-1+ cells can provide a high amount of miR-126 through extracellular vesicles. Conversely, the TKI therapy can reverse the mechanism of miR-126 inhibition and elevate the mature miR-126 level, contributing to maintaining the CML LSCs. Considering this mechanism, decreasing the activity of miR-126 may sensitize LSCs to TKI and facilitate their elimination [46]. On the other hand, the parallel enhanced activity of the JAK-STAT pathway as described before may induce ADAR1 expression and activity, an enzyme that converts adenosine to inosine and regarded as a post transcriptional regulator able to control the stability of mRNA and miRNAs. ADAR1 can in turn impair the biogenesis of mir-let7, a tumor suppressor, and modulate the self-renewal of CML LSCs [47]. Exposure of primitive CML cells to imatinib is associated with an elevation of miR- 21 and may culminate in TKI resistance. So, depletion of miR-21 through amplification of PDCD4 and PTEN by interrupting the PI3K/AKT pathway may restore the sensitivity of CML LSCs to TKI [48]. In another experiment mir-30a downregulation following imatinib treatment allowed autophagy related proteins Beclin1 and ATG5 to push LSCs towards resistance [49]. Therefore, although, the role of long non-coding RNAs in the CML LSC fraction have not been totally defined, participation of mi-RNAs supports a role for these non-coding RNAs in LSC persistence.

3. The Environment

Bone Marrow Niche

At the time of introducing the term “niche” by Schofield in 1978, many experiments had been accomplished to uncover the mysterious role of this spatial structure in the normal and leukemic state. This microenvironment not only encompasses stromal cells, HSCs, endothelial cells, and neural cells but also interactions, secretions of varied molecules, and signaling pathways are included in the definition [49]. As normal hematopoiesis hinges upon the equilibrium between osteoblastic niche for preserving stemness and vascular niche for differentiation strategy, in the leukemic condition, an erratic contest between LSCs and HSCs leads to creation of the leukemic niche [50]. It has been postulated that expression and signaling of CXCR4 are modulated by the level of BCR-ABL [51] and higher expression of BCR-ABL both in mRNA and protein levels in CML stem cells [52] may cause downregulation of CXCR4 and release of CML stem cells into the peripheral blood. Simultaneously, as mentioned above, CD26 by disruption of CXCL12 as an accompaniment is deeply involved in this process [53]. In the interim, enhancement of CXCR4 by imatinib may be mediated by suppression of BCR-ABL, triggering the homing process [51]. This lodgment into the bone marrow niche induces CML stem cells to become quiescent, chemoresistant, and constitute the leukemic stem cell reservoir [51,54]. In addition, CML LSCs in contrast with their normal counterpart are not dependent on VLA-4 and VLA-5 for homing. It has been reported that E and L-selectin and related ligands such as CD44 play an important role in CML LSC homing. Meanwhile, TKI exposure may lead to adhesion of CML LSCs to stromal cells through N-cadherin that may result in activation of the B-catenin pathway and protection against TKIs [50]. It has been demonstrated that CML cells by secretion of exosome containing amphiregulin, switch on epidermal growth factor (EGFR) pathway in stromal cells. This interface increases the secretion of IL-8 and increases cell adhesion and survival of leukemic cells [55]. Besides, multiple mechanisms amalgamate to promote evasion of CML LSCs from destruction in the bone marrow niche by common TKIs. For instance, higher expression of BMPR1b in more primitive CML cells and activation via BMP4 through both the paracrine and autocrine loop boosts expression of TWIST1, a contributor to drug resistance [56]. Other studies indicated that the presence of stromal cells whether by reduction of ROS or production of FGF2 support chemoresistance and act as the sanctuary of CML LSCs [57,58,59]. However, we should take note that these mesenchymal stem cells are not the precedent ones due to the many genetic changes in dealing with the leukemic niche [60,61]. Meanwhile, participation of the adipose tissue in the treatment circumvention reminds us that endosteal and vascular milieus are only the tip of the iceberg. CML LSCs in the adipose niche consume free fatty acid as a source of energy, and by enhancing lipolysis have a hand in progression, drug resistance, and body weight loss [62]. Aside from these scenarios in niches, numerous signaling pathways in BCR-ABL dependent and independent manner are ongoing and should be taken into account in baring the facts of CML LSC persistence.

4. Phenotypic Differences

The CML LSCs reside in the CD34+/CD38− fraction as the normal ones [63], and a good CD marker useful to distinguish them is expected to be preferentially expressed in one of the two populations, the leukemic or the normal one. Indeed, different studies have identified several surface markers potentially able to allow the recognition of CML LSCs, although in some cases these markers are simply expressed by both populations in a different or asynchronous way. In this category we can insert CD33, that is expressed by normal HSCs as well as by blasts of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), but not at a high level as in CML LSCs [64]. Similarly, CD36, a scavenger receptor, shows a low expression on normal HSCs, but it is highly expressed in CML LSCs [65]. Other markers such as CD25, CD26, and IL-1RAP that are also highly expressed by CML LSCs appear more suitable. In the CD34+/CD38− fraction, CD25 (IL-2Rα) is exclusively expressed by CML LSCs as we cannot detect it on normal HSCs. A low amount of CD25 on the surface of normal HSCs becomes however detectable in the CD34+/CD38+ fraction [66]. Interleukin 1 receptor accessory protein (IL-1RAP) is not expressed by HSCs and theoretically can be used to detect CML LSCs. According to some studies however not all the IL-1RAP expressing cells are Ph+ LSCs [67]. Furthermore, expression of IL-1RAP is much more pronounced in the advanced phases of the disease with respect to that of the CML LSCs present in the chronic phase [68], making this marker more suitable for resistant cases rather than to increase the percentage of those reaching a successful TFR, who are per definition in the category of very good responders. On the contrary, CD26 (DPP4, a serine exopeptidase with a cleavage activity against diverse substrates and able to demolish SDF1 on the SDF1-CXCR4 axis contributing in this way to the release of the CML LSCs into the peripheral blood) [53,69] is aberrantly expressed by CML LSCs/progenitor cells and has no expression on normal HSC/progenitor cell population [70]. It has been reported that CD26+ cells are detectable in newly diagnosed and resistant CML patients and also in those who are in TFR [71]. In a normal context, CD26 is expressed mainly by activated T cells and has a relation with the proliferation of these cells. In certain other conditions including autoimmune diseases, lung adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, B-chronic lymphoblastic leukemia, and T acute lymphoblastic leukemia, enhanced expression of CD26 is detectable, but previous reports claimed that inhibition of CD26 does not suppress the activation and cytotoxic effect of T cells [68,69,72]. Until now, among the suggested markers, CD26 can therefore be considered to be the best option for CML LSC detection and targeting. Indeed, in a recent study a monoclonal antibody against CD26 called Begelomab (used in clinics for the treatment of acute graft versus host disease, aGvHD) [70] has been conjugated to a PEGylated liposome. Using this immunoliposome (IL), it was demonstrated that LSCs from primary CML samples could be selectively targeted, but not their normal counterparts. As Begelomab alone had no toxicity in treated cells, the immunoliposome was used as a carrier for venetoclax, a BCL2 inhibitor already demonstrated as being efficacious in eliminating CML LSCs. This anti CD26 immunoliposome carrying venetoclax not only eliminated CD26+ cells but also reduced the drug concentration that was required to induce apoptosis in leukemic cell lines. This strategy consisting in recognizing specific antigens on the surface of the LSCs, demonstrates therefore higher efficiency in comparison to free drug administration and can also decrease the toxicity due to off-target effects of the drugs. In addition to CD26, CD93 has been reported to be another antigen for targeting. It has been reported that CD93 has a role in the self-renewal and proliferation of the CML LSCs and CD93 expressing LSCs showed resistance to TKIs [73,74].
The phenotypic characteristic of CML LSCs is summarized in Table 2.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Different durations of deep molecular response (DMR) have been seen to be associated with different probabilities of achieving TFR. However, even in the presence of the theoretically best conditions to maintain a long TFR, a threshold of 70–75% for successful TFR cannot be exceeded. This has been ascribed to the presence of LSCs resistant to TKI therapy because of the BCR-ABL1 independent mechanisms of resistance, that can persist even in patients in DMR and that, on discontinuation of the TKI therapy, can resume the leukemic process. Time to loss TFR varies from patient to patient and might be germane to the heterogeneity in the LSC population. It has been hypothesised that patients with a faster LSC cell growth rate might face a faster molecular relapse. As reviewed above, several phenotypic and biological characteristics can theoretically distinguish between CML LSCs and their normal counterparts and can therefore represent potential targets to hit these TKI resistant LSC subclones, increasing the percentage of those able to achieve a long-term TFR, and that after five years of duration can be regarded as a definitive cure of the disease, at least from an operational point of view. Currently, however, many attempts of trying to achieve this goal with various forms of combination therapy have failed. Indeed, in most cases this is not due to lack of efficacy, but to a level of toxicity that, if acceptable for patients in critical clinical situations, is unacceptable for patients that are doing well and have a normal life expectancy and a good quality of life even continuing TKI therapy. Therefore, in order to offer a clinical advantage, all that we have learned in terms of biology of the LSCs and about their differences with respect to those of normal HSCs, requires to be translated into therapeutical approaches that are mild and safe for patients. These kinds of approaches cannot be easily tested when using new drugs, because generally new treatments are first offered to patients without other therapeutical options, where both efficacy and toxicity are tested in a totally different scenario with respect to that of patients already having good response and in complete remission. Possible options can be represented by testing these new approaches only when absolutely needed as in the patients who have failed the first attempt to reach TFR and who, because of side effects or for the strong wish to discontinue the therapy in any case, may accept the risk of mild additional toxicity, at least for a limited period of time. In the end only time will tell us whether the investment in studying CML LSCs will be of clinical value, as we all really hope.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.H., P.C., G.S.; writing original draft preparation: M.H., A.C. and V.G.; editing review; D.C., A.K., A.A.N., M.S.A., C.F. and G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by AIRC (Italian Association for Cancer Research) investigator grant to GS (IG-23344).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saglio, G.; Gale, R.P. Prospects for achieving treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2020, 190, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Houshmand, M.; Simonetti, G.; Circosta, P.; Gaidano, V.; Cignetti, A.; Martinelli, G.; Saglio, G.; Gale, R.P. Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. Leukemia 2019, 33, 1543–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. MacDonald, B.T.; Tamai, K.; He, X. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: Components, mechanisms, and diseases. Dev. Cell 2009, 17, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zhao, C.; Blum, J.; Chen, A.; Kwon, H.Y.; Jung, S.H.; Cook, J.M.; Lagoo, A.; Reya, T. Loss of beta-catenin impairs the renewal of normal and CML stem cells in vivo. Cancer Cell 2007, 12, 528–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Jamieson, C.H.; Ailles, L.E.; Dylla, S.J.; Muijtjens, M.; Jones, C.; Zehnder, J.L.; Gotlib, J.; Li, K.; Manz, M.G.; Keating, A.; et al. Granulocyte-macrophage progenitors as candidate leukemic stem cells in blast-crisis CML. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhang, B.; Li, M.; McDonald, T.; Holyoake, T.L.; Moon, R.T.; Campana, D.; Shultz, L.; Bhatia, R. Microenvironmental protection of CML stem and progenitor cells from tyrosine kinase inhibitors through N-cadherin and Wnt-beta-catenin signaling. Blood 2013, 121, 1824–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liu, N.; Zang, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, W.; Liu, Q.; Ji, M.; Ma, D.; Ji, C. FZD7 regulates BMSCs-mediated protection of CML cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 6175–6187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Zhou, H.; Mak, P.Y.; Mu, H.; Mak, D.H.; Zeng, Z.; Cortes, J.; Liu, Q.; Andreeff, M.; Carter, B.Z. Combined inhibition of beta-catenin and Bcr-Abl synergistically targets tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia blasts and progenitors in vitro and in vivo. Leukemia 2017, 31, 2065–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Douglas, L.; Li, S. beta-Catenin is essential for survival of leukemic stem cells insensitive to kinase inhibition in mice with BCR-ABL-induced chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2009, 23, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hanna, A.; Shevde, L.A. Hedgehog signaling: Modulation of cancer properies and tumor mircroenvironment. Mol. Cancer 2016, 15, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Su, W.; Meng, F.; Huang, L.; Zheng, M.; Liu, W.; Sun, H. Sonic hedgehog maintains survival and growth of chronic myeloid leukemia progenitor cells through beta-catenin signaling. Exp. Hematol. 2012, 40, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dierks, C.; Beigi, R.; Guo, G.R.; Zirlik, K.; Stegert, M.R.; Manley, P.; Trussell, C.; Schmitt-Graeff, A.; Landwerlin, K.; Veelken, H.; et al. Expansion of Bcr-Abl-positive leukemic stem cells is dependent on Hedgehog pathway activation. Cancer Cell 2008, 14, 238–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sadarangani, A.; Pineda, G.; Lennon, K.M.; Chun, H.J.; Shih, A.; Schairer, A.E.; Court, A.C.; Goff, D.J.; Prashad, S.L.; Geron, I.; et al. GLI2 inhibition abrogates human leukemia stem cell dormancy. J. Transl. Med. 2015, 13, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zhao, C.; Chen, A.; Jamieson, C.H.; Fereshteh, M.; Abrahamsson, A.; Blum, J.; Kwon, H.Y.; Kim, J.; Chute, J.P.; Rizzieri, D.; et al. Hedgehog signalling is essential for maintenance of cancer stem cells in myeloid leukaemia. Nature 2009, 458, 776–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Cea, M.; Cagnetta, A.; Cirmena, G.; Garuti, A.; Rocco, I.; Palermo, C.; Pierri, I.; Reverberi, D.; Nencioni, A.; Ballestrero, A.; et al. Tracking molecular relapse of chronic myeloid leukemia by measuring Hedgehog signaling status. Leuk. Lymphoma 2013, 54, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Martelli, A.M.; Evangelisti, C.; Chiarini, F.; Grimaldi, C.; Cappellini, A.; Ognibene, A.; McCubrey, J.A. The emerging role of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling network in normal myelopoiesis and leukemogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1803, 991–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Pellicano, F.; Scott, M.T.; Helgason, G.V.; Hopcroft, L.E.; Allan, E.K.; Aspinall-O'Dea, M.; Copland, M.; Pierce, A.; Huntly, B.J.; Whetton, A.D.; et al. The antiproliferative activity of kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia cells is mediated by FOXO transcription factors. Stem. Cells 2014, 32, 2324–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Airiau, K.; Mahon, F.X.; Josselin, M.; Jeanneteau, M.; Belloc, F. PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibitors sensitize chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells to nilotinib and restore the response of progenitors to nilotinib in the presence of stem cell factor. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chai, S.K.; Nichols, G.L.; Rothman, P. Constitutive activation of JAKs and STATs in BCR-Abl-expressing cell lines and peripheral blood cells derived from leukemic patients. J. Immunol. 1997, 159, 4720–4728. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xie, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Sun, T.; Wilson, M.B.; Smithgall, T.E.; Arlinghaus, R.B. Involvement of Jak2 tyrosine phosphorylation in Bcr-Abl transformation. Oncogene 2001, 20, 6188–6195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Samanta, A.; Perazzona, B.; Chakraborty, S.; Sun, X.; Modi, H.; Bhatia, R.; Priebe, W.; Arlinghaus, R. Janus kinase 2 regulates Bcr-Abl signaling in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2011, 25, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Madapura, H.S.; Nagy, N.; Ujvari, D.; Kallas, T.; Krohnke, M.C.L.; Amu, S.; Bjorkholm, M.; Stenke, L.; Mandal, P.K.; McMurray, J.S.; et al. Interferon gamma is a STAT1-dependent direct inducer of BCL6 expression in imatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Oncogene 2017, 36, 4619–4628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Patel, S.B.; Nemkov, T.; Stefanoni, D.; Benavides, G.A.; Bassal, M.A.; Crown, B.L.; Matkins, V.R.; Camacho, V.; Kuznetsova, V.; Hoang, A.T.; et al. Metabolic alterations mediated by STAT3 promotes drug persistence in CML. Leukemia 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Prost, S.; Relouzat, F.; Spentchian, M.; Ouzegdouh, Y.; Saliba, J.; Massonnet, G.; Beressi, J.P.; Verhoeyen, E.; Raggueneau, V.; Maneglier, B.; et al. Erosion of the chronic myeloid leukaemia stem cell pool by PPARgamma agonists. Nature 2015, 525, 380–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, H.; Peng, C.; Hu, Y.; Li, H.; Sheng, Z.; Chen, Y.; Sullivan, C.; Cerny, J.; Hutchinson, L.; Higgins, A.; et al. The Blk pathway functions as a tumor suppressor in chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Scott, M.T.; Korfi, K.; Saffrey, P.; Hopcroft, L.E.; Kinstrie, R.; Pellicano, F.; Guenther, C.; Gallipoli, P.; Cruz, M.; Dunn, K.; et al. Epigenetic Reprogramming Sensitizes CML Stem Cells to Combined EZH2 and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition. Cancer Discov. 2016, 6, 1248–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Huang, W.; Luan, C.H.; Hjort, E.E.; Bei, L.; Mishra, R.; Sakamoto, K.M.; Platanias, L.C.; Eklund, E.A. The role of Fas-associated phosphatase 1 in leukemia stem cell persistence during tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2016, 30, 1502–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cheloni, G.; Tanturli, M.; Tusa, I.; Ho DeSouza, N.; Shan, Y.; Gozzini, A.; Mazurier, F.; Rovida, E.; Li, S.; Dello Sbarba, P. Targeting chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells with the hypoxia-inducible factor inhibitor acriflavine. Blood 2017, 130, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, H.; Li, H.; Xi, H.S.; Li, S. HIF1alpha is required for survival maintenance of chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. Blood 2012, 119, 2595–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Lallemand-Breitenbach, V.; de The, H. PML nuclear bodies. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a000661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kakizuka, A.; Miller, W.H., Jr.; Umesono, K.; Warrell, R.P., Jr.; Frankel, S.R.; Murty, V.V.; Dmitrovsky, E.; Evans, R.M. Chromosomal translocation t(15;17) in human acute promyelocytic leukemia fuses RAR alpha with a novel putative transcription factor, PML. Cell 1991, 66, 663–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ito, K.; Bernardi, R.; Morotti, A.; Matsuoka, S.; Saglio, G.; Ikeda, Y.; Rosenblatt, J.; Avigan, D.E.; Teruya-Feldstein, J.; Pandolfi, P.P. PML targeting eradicates quiescent leukaemia-initiating cells. Nature 2008, 453, 1072–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hong, C.S.; Ho, W.; Zhang, C.; Yang, C.; Elder, J.B.; Zhuang, Z. LB100, a small molecule inhibitor of PP2A with potent chemo- and radio-sensitizing potential. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2015, 16, 821–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Neviani, P.; Harb, J.G.; Oaks, J.J.; Santhanam, R.; Walker, C.J.; Ellis, J.J.; Ferenchak, G.; Dorrance, A.M.; Paisie, C.A.; Eiring, A.M.; et al. PP2A-activating drugs selectively eradicate TKI-resistant chronic myeloid leukemic stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2013, 123, 4144–4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lai, D.; Chen, M.; Su, J.; Liu, X.; Rothe, K.; Hu, K.; Forrest, D.L.; Eaves, C.J.; Morin, G.B.; Jiang, X. PP2A inhibition sensitizes cancer stem cells to ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors in BCR-ABL(+) human leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Massoumi, R.; Sjolander, A. The role of leukotriene receptor signaling in inflammation and cancer. Sci. World J. 2007, 7, 1413–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Peng, C.; Li, S. Loss of the Alox5 gene impairs leukemia stem cells and prevents chronic myeloid leukemia. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41, 783–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dolinska, M.; Piccini, A.; Wong, W.M.; Gelali, E.; Johansson, A.S.; Klang, J.; Xiao, P.; Yektaei-Karin, E.; Stromberg, U.O.; Mustjoki, S.; et al. Leukotriene signaling via ALOX5 and cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 is dispensable for in vitro growth of CD34(+)CD38(-) stem and progenitor cells in chronic myeloid leukemia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 490, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rahman, S.; Islam, R. Mammalian Sirt1: Insights on its biological functions. Cell Commun. Signal. 2011, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yuan, H.; Wang, Z.; Li, L.; Zhang, H.; Modi, H.; Horne, D.; Bhatia, R.; Chen, W. Activation of stress response gene SIRT1 by BCR-ABL promotes leukemogenesis. Blood 2012, 119, 1904–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wang, Z.; Yuan, H.; Roth, M.; Stark, J.M.; Bhatia, R.; Chen, W.Y. SIRT1 deacetylase promotes acquisition of genetic mutations for drug resistance in CML cells. Oncogene 2013, 32, 589–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Li, L.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Wang, Z.; Ho, Y.; McDonald, T.; Holyoake, T.L.; Chen, W.; Bhatia, R. Activation of p53 by SIRT1 inhibition enhances elimination of CML leukemia stem cells in combination with imatinib. Cancer Cell 2012, 21, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Houshmand, M.; Nakhlestani Hagh, M.; Soleimani, M.; Hamidieh, A.A.; Abroun, S.; Nikougoftar Zarif, M. MicroRNA Microarray Profiling during Megakaryocyte Differentiation of Cord Blood CD133+ Hematopoietic Stem Cells. Cell J. 2018, 20, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cai, Y.; Yu, X.; Hu, S.; Yu, J. A brief review on the mechanisms of miRNA regulation. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2009, 7, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Peng, Y.; Croce, C.M. The role of MicroRNAs in human cancer. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2016, 1, 15004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Zhang, B.; Nguyen, L.X.T.; Li, L.; Zhao, D.; Kumar, B.; Wu, H.; Lin, A.; Pellicano, F.; Hopcroft, L.; Su, Y.L.; et al. Bone marrow niche trafficking of miR-126 controls the self-renewal of leukemia stem cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zipeto, M.A.; Court, A.C.; Sadarangani, A.; Delos Santos, N.P.; Balaian, L.; Chun, H.J.; Pineda, G.; Morris, S.R.; Mason, C.N.; Geron, I.; et al. ADAR1 Activation Drives Leukemia Stem Cell Self-Renewal by Impairing Let-7 Biogenesis. Cell Stem. Cell 2016, 19, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, W.Z.; Pu, Q.H.; Lin, X.H.; Liu, M.Y.; Wu, L.R.; Wu, Q.Q.; Chen, Y.H.; Liao, F.F.; Zhu, J.Y.; Jin, X.B. Silencing of miR-21 sensitizes CML CD34+ stem/progenitor cells to imatinib-induced apoptosis by blocking PI3K/AKT pathway. Leuk. Res. 2015, 39, 1117–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yu, Y.; Yang, L.; Zhao, M.; Zhu, S.; Kang, R.; Vernon, P.; Tang, D.; Cao, L. Targeting microRNA-30a-mediated autophagy enhances imatinib activity against human chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Leukemia 2012, 26, 1752–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Houshmand, M.; Blanco, T.M.; Circosta, P.; Yazdi, N.; Kazemi, A.; Saglio, G.; Zarif, M.N. Bone marrow microenvironment: The guardian of leukemia stem cells. World J. Stem. Cells 2019, 11, 476–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Jin, L.; Tabe, Y.; Konoplev, S.; Xu, Y.; Leysath, C.E.; Lu, H.; Kimura, S.; Ohsaka, A.; Rios, M.B.; Calvert, L.; et al. CXCR4 up-regulation by imatinib induces chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cell migration to bone marrow stroma and promotes survival of quiescent CML cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Jiang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Smith, C.; Gasparetto, M.; Turhan, A.; Eaves, A.; Eaves, C. Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells possess multiple unique features of resistance to BCR-ABL targeted therapies. Leukemia 2007, 21, 926–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Herrmann, H.; Sadovnik, I.; Cerny-Reiterer, S.; Rulicke, T.; Stefanzl, G.; Willmann, M.; Hoermann, G.; Bilban, M.; Blatt, K.; Herndlhofer, S.; et al. Dipeptidylpeptidase IV (CD26) defines leukemic stem cells (LSC) in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2014, 123, 3951–3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Weisberg, E.; Azab, A.K.; Manley, P.W.; Kung, A.L.; Christie, A.L.; Bronson, R.; Ghobrial, I.M.; Griffin, J.D. Inhibition of CXCR4 in CML cells disrupts their interaction with the bone marrow microenvironment and sensitizes them to nilotinib. Leukemia 2012, 26, 985–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Corrado, C.; Saieva, L.; Raimondo, S.; Santoro, A.; De Leo, G.; Alessandro, R. Chronic myelogenous leukaemia exosomes modulate bone marrow microenvironment through activation of epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2016, 20, 1829–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Grockowiak, E.; Laperrousaz, B.; Jeanpierre, S.; Voeltzel, T.; Guyot, B.; Gobert, S.; Nicolini, F.E.; Maguer-Satta, V. Immature CML cells implement a BMP autocrine loop to escape TKI treatment. Blood 2017, 130, 2860–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Traer, E.; Javidi-Sharifi, N.; Agarwal, A.; Dunlap, J.; English, I.; Martinez, J.; Tyner, J.W.; Wong, M.; Druker, B.J. Ponatinib overcomes FGF2-mediated resistance in CML patients without kinase domain mutations. Blood 2014, 123, 1516–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Bourgeais, J.; Ishac, N.; Medrzycki, M.; Brachet-Botineau, M.; Desbourdes, L.; Gouilleux-Gruart, V.; Pecnard, E.; Rouleux-Bonnin, F.; Gyan, E.; Domenech, J.; et al. Oncogenic STAT5 signaling promotes oxidative stress in chronic myeloid leukemia cells by repressing antioxidant defenses. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 41876–41889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Aggoune, D.; Tosca, L.; Sorel, N.; Bonnet, M.L.; Dkhissi, F.; Tachdjian, G.; Bennaceur-Griscelli, A.; Chomel, J.C.; Turhan, A.G. Modeling the influence of stromal microenvironment in the selection of ENU-induced BCR-ABL1 mutants by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncoscience 2014, 1, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Aggoune, D.; Sorel, N.; Bonnet, M.L.; Goujon, J.M.; Tarte, K.; Herault, O.; Domenech, J.; Rea, D.; Legros, L.; Johnson-Ansa, H.; et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) gene profiling in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients at diagnosis and in deep molecular response induced by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Leuk. Res. 2017, 60, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Civini, S.; Jin, P.; Ren, J.; Sabatino, M.; Castiello, L.; Jin, J.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Marincola, F.; Stroncek, D. Leukemia cells induce changes in human bone marrow stromal cells. J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Ye, H.; Adane, B.; Khan, N.; Sullivan, T.; Minhajuddin, M.; Gasparetto, M.; Stevens, B.; Pei, S.; Balys, M.; Ashton, J.M.; et al. Leukemic Stem Cells Evade Chemotherapy by Metabolic Adaptation to an Adipose Tissue Niche. Cell Stem. Cell 2016, 19, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Eisterer, W.; Jiang, X.; Christ, O.; Glimm, H.; Lee, K.H.; Pang, E.; Lambie, K.; Shaw, G.; Holyoake, T.L.; Petzer, A.L.; et al. Different subsets of primary chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells engraft immunodeficient mice and produce a model of the human disease. Leukemia 2005, 19, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Herrmann, H.; Cerny-Reiterer, S.; Gleixner, K.V.; Blatt, K.; Herndlhofer, S.; Rabitsch, W.; Jager, E.; Mitterbauer-Hohendanner, G.; Streubel, B.; Selzer, E.; et al. CD34(+)/CD38(-) stem cells in chronic myeloid leukemia express Siglec-3 (CD33) and are responsive to the CD33-targeting drug gemtuzumab/ozogamicin. Haematologica 2012, 97, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Landberg, N.; von Palffy, S.; Askmyr, M.; Lilljebjorn, H.; Sanden, C.; Rissler, M.; Mustjoki, S.; Hjorth-Hansen, H.; Richter, J.; Agerstam, H.; et al. CD36 defines primitive chronic myeloid leukemia cells less responsive to imatinib but vulnerable to antibody-based therapeutic targeting. Haematologica 2018, 103, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Sadovnik, I.; Hoelbl-Kovacic, A.; Herrmann, H.; Eisenwort, G.; Cerny-Reiterer, S.; Warsch, W.; Hoermann, G.; Greiner, G.; Blatt, K.; Peter, B.; et al. Identification of CD25 as STAT5-Dependent Growth Regulator of Leukemic Stem Cells in Ph+ CML. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 2051–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Landberg, N.; Hansen, N.; Askmyr, M.; Agerstam, H.; Lassen, C.; Rissler, M.; Hjorth-Hansen, H.; Mustjoki, S.; Jaras, M.; Richter, J.; et al. IL1RAP expression as a measure of leukemic stem cell burden at diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia predicts therapy outcome. Leukemia 2016, 30, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Zhao, K.; Yin, L.L.; Zhao, D.M.; Pan, B.; Chen, W.; Cao, J.; Cheng, H.; Li, Z.Y.; Li, D.P.; Sang, W.; et al. IL1RAP as a surface marker for leukemia stem cells is related to clinical phase of chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2014, 7, 4787–4798. [Google Scholar]
  69. Matteucci, E.; Giampietro, O. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (CD26): Knowing the function before inhibiting the enzyme. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009, 16, 2943–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Houshmand, M.; Garello, F.; Stefania, R.; Gaidano, V.; Cignetti, A.; Spinelli, M.; Fava, C.; Nikougoftar Zarif, M.; Galimberti, S.; Pungolino, E.; et al. Targeting Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem/Progenitor Cells Using Venetoclax-Loaded Immunoliposome. Cancers 2021, 13, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bocchia, M.; Sicuranza, A.; Abruzzese, E.; Iurlo, A.; Sirianni, S.; Gozzini, A.; Galimberti, S.; Aprile, L.; Martino, B.; Pregno, P.; et al. Residual Peripheral Blood CD26(+) Leukemic Stem Cells in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients During TKI Therapy and During Treatment-Free Remission. Front. Oncol 2018, 8, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Culen, M.; Borsky, M.; Nemethova, V.; Razga, F.; Smejkal, J.; Jurcek, T.; Dvorakova, D.; Zackova, D.; Weinbergerova, B.; Semerad, L.; et al. Quantitative assessment of the CD26+ leukemic stem cell compartment in chronic myeloid leukemia: Patient-subgroups, prognostic impact, and technical aspects. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 33016–33024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kinstrie, R.; Horne, G.A.; Morrison, H.; Irvine, D.; Munje, C.; Castaneda, E.G.; Moka, H.A.; Dunn, K.; Cassels, J.E.; Parry, N.; et al. CD93 is expressed on chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells and identifies a quiescent population which persists after tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Leukemia 2020, 34, 1613–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Riether, C.; Radpour, R.; Kallen, N.M.; Burgin, D.T.; Bachmann, C.; Schurch, C.M.; Luthi, U.; Arambasic, M.; Hoppe, S.; Albers, C.E.; et al. Metoclopramide treatment blocks CD93-signaling-mediated self-renewal of chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. Cell Rep. 2021, 34, 108663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sadovnik, I.; Herrmann, H.; Eisenwort, G.; Blatt, K.; Hoermann, G.; Mueller, N.; Sperr, W.R.; Valent, P. Expression of CD25 on leukemic stem cells in BCR-ABL1(+) CML: Potential diagnostic value and functional implications. Exp. Hematol. 2017, 51, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Herrmann, H.; Sadovnik, I.; Eisenwort, G.; Rulicke, T.; Blatt, K.; Herndlhofer, S.; Willmann, M.; Stefanzl, G.; Baumgartner, S.; Greiner, G.; et al. Delineation of target expression profiles in CD34+/CD38- and CD34+/CD38+ stem and progenitor cells in AML and CML. Blood Adv. 2020, 4, 5118–5132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Majeti, R.; Chao, M.P.; Alizadeh, A.A.; Pang, W.W.; Jaiswal, S.; Gibbs, K.D., Jr.; van Rooijen, N.; Weissman, I.L. CD47 is an adverse prognostic factor and therapeutic antibody target on human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Cell 2009, 138, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Chung, S.S.; Eng, W.S.; Hu, W.; Khalaj, M.; Garrett-Bakelman, F.E.; Tavakkoli, M.; Levine, R.L.; Carroll, M.; Klimek, V.M.; Melnick, A.M.; et al. CD99 is a therapeutic target on disease stem cells in myeloid malignancies. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Kikushige, Y.; Shima, T.; Takayanagi, S.; Urata, S.; Miyamoto, T.; Iwasaki, H.; Takenaka, K.; Teshima, T.; Tanaka, T.; Inagaki, Y.; et al. TIM-3 is a promising target to selectively kill acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Cell Stem. Cell 2010, 7, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Jcm 10 05805 g001 550
Figure 1. Possible signaling pathways in CML LSCs.
Figure 1. Possible signaling pathways in CML LSCs.
Jcm 10 05805 g001
Table
Table 1. Clinical trials that used non-TKI agents for the treatment of CML.
Table 1. Clinical trials that used non-TKI agents for the treatment of CML.
CML Clinical Trial with New Therapeutic Agents (Non-TKIs)
Generic NameBrand NameClinical Trial IdentifierTargetStart DateStatus
SirolimusRapamuneNCT00101088mTOR inhibitors10-Jan-05Terminated
SorafenibNexavarNCT00661180Multikinase inhibitors, VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors18-Apr-08Completed
SunitinibSutentNCT00387426Multikinase inhibitors, VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors13-Oct-06Completed
RuxolitinibJakafiNCT02253277JAK/STAT inhibitors1-Oct-14Completed
AxitinibInlytaNCT02782403Multikinase inhibitors, VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors25-May-16Terminated
IbrutinibImbruvicaNCT03267186BTK inhibitors30-Aug-17Ongoing
MidostaurinRydaptNCT02115295Multikinase inhibitors16-Apr-14Ongoing
PRI-724-NCT01606579Wnt/β-catenin inhibitors25-May-12Completed
BP1001-NCT02923986Grb25-Oct-16Withdrawn
TipifarnibZarnestraNCT00040105Farnesyl transferase21-Jun-02Completed
LonafarnibSCH66336NCT00047502Farnesyl transferase9-Oct-02Completed
RapamycinSirolimusNCT00780104mTOR27-Oct-08Completed
RAD001EverolimusNCT01188889mTOR26-Aug-10Withdrawn
PanobinostatLBH589NCT00451035Histone deacetylase22-Mar-07Terminated
AzacytidineVidazaNCT03895671Hypomethylating agents29-Mar-19Ongoing
MK-0457TozasertibNCT00405054Aurora kinase pathway inhibitors29-Nov-06Terminated
VenetoclaxVenclextaNCT02689440BCL-2 inhibitors24-Feb-16Ongoing
TemsirolimusToriselNCT00101088mTOR10-Jan-05Terminated
AbemaciclibVerzenioNCT03878524CDK 4/6 inhibitors18-Mar-19Ongoing
AlemtuzumabLemtrada/campathNCT00626626CD52 monoclonal antibodies29-Feb-08Terminated
BevacizumabAvastinNCT00023920VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors27-Jan-03Terminated
BlinatumomabBlincytoNCT02790515Miscellaneous antineoplastic6-Jun-16Ongoing
IpilimumabYervoyNCT00732186Anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies11-Aug-08Withdrawn
NivolumabOpdivoNCT02011945Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies16-Dec-13Completed
RituximabRituxanNCT03455517Antirheumatics, CD20 monoclonal antibodies6-Mar-18Terminated
Table
Table 2. Phenotypic characteristic of CML LSCs.
Table 2. Phenotypic characteristic of CML LSCs.
Marker NameCD NameCML CellsNormal CellsReferences
LSCsProgenitor CellsStem CellsProgenitor Cells
CD34+/CD38−CD34+/CD38+CD34+/CD38−CD34+/CD38+
IL-2RαCD25++/−−+/−[75]
DPPIVCD26++/−−−[53]
Siglec-3CD33+++/−+/−[76]
SCARB3CD36+++/−+[65]
Pgp-1CD44++++[76]
IAPCD47++++[77]
Campath-1CD52+−+/−+/−[76]
MXRA4 (C1qR1)CD93++/−+/−+/−[73,76]
MIC2CD99−unknown++[78]
SCFR (KIT)CD117++++[76]
IL-3RαCD123++++[76]
AC133CD133++/−++[76]
BST1CD157++++[76]
CLL-1CD371−+−+[76]
TIM-3-−unknown+/−+/−[79]
IL-1RAP-++−+[68]
CML LSC: Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells; IL-2Rα: Interleukin-2 receptor alpha; DPPIV: Dipeptidyl peptidase IV; Siglec-3: Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectin-3; SCARB3: Mast/stem cell growth factor receptor; Pgp-1: Phagocytic glycoprotein-1; IAP: Integrin associated protein; SCFR: Stem cell factor receptor; IL-3Rα: Interleukin receptor subunit α; CLL-1: C-type lectin-like molecule-1; TIM-3: T-cell immunoglobulin mucin-3; IL-1RAP: Interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Houshmand, M.; Kazemi, A.; Anjam Najmedini, A.; Ali, M.S.; Gaidano, V.; Cignetti, A.; Fava, C.; Cilloni, D.; Saglio, G.; Circosta, P. Shedding Light on Targeting Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5805. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245805

AMA Style

Houshmand M, Kazemi A, Anjam Najmedini A, Ali MS, Gaidano V, Cignetti A, Fava C, Cilloni D, Saglio G, Circosta P. Shedding Light on Targeting Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(24):5805. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245805

Chicago/Turabian Style

Houshmand, Mohammad, Alireza Kazemi, Ali Anjam Najmedini, Muhammad Shahzad Ali, Valentina Gaidano, Alessandro Cignetti, Carmen Fava, Daniela Cilloni, Giuseppe Saglio, and Paola Circosta. 2021. "Shedding Light on Targeting Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 24: 5805. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245805

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop