Next Article in Journal
Permeability-Selectivity Analysis of Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration Membranes: Effect of Pore Size and Shape Distribution and Membrane Stretching
Next Article in Special Issue
A Short Review of Membrane Fouling in Forward Osmosis Processes
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of PAC Fines in Fouling of Polymeric and Ceramic Low-Pressure Membranes for Drinking Water Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
PES Surface Modification Using Green Chemistry: New Generation of Antifouling Membranes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combining Coagulation/MIEX with Biological Activated Carbon Treatment to Control Organic Fouling in the Microfiltration of Secondary Effluent

School of Engineering, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne 3001, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2016, 6(3), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes6030039
Submission received: 30 May 2016 / Revised: 11 July 2016 / Accepted: 22 July 2016 / Published: 30 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membranes: Fouling, Scaling and Aging)

Abstract

Coagulation, magnetic ion exchange resin (MIEX) and biological activated carbon (BAC) were examined at lab scale as standalone, and sequential pre-treatments for controlling the organic fouling of a microfiltration membrane by biologically treated secondary effluent (BTSE) using a multi-cycle approach. MIEX gave slightly greater enhancement in flux than coagulation due to greater removal of high molecular weight (MW) humic substances, although it was unable to remove high MW biopolymers. BAC treatment was considerably more effective for improving the flux than coagulation or MIEX. This was due to the biodegradation of biopolymers and/or their adsorption by the biofilm, and adsorption of humic substances by the activated carbon, as indicated by size exclusion chromatography. Coagulation or MIEX followed by BAC treatment further reduced the problematic foulants and significantly improved the flux performance. The unified membrane fouling index showed that the reduction of membrane fouling by standalone BAC treatment was 42%. This improved to 65%, 70%, and 93% for alum, ferric chloride and MIEX pre-treatment, respectively, when followed by BAC treatment. This study showed the potential of sequential MIEX and BAC pre-treatment for controlling organic fouling and thus enhancing the performance of microfiltration in the reclamation of BTSE.
Keywords: biological activated carbon; biopolymers; coagulation; magnetic ion exchange; membrane fouling; secondary effluent biological activated carbon; biopolymers; coagulation; magnetic ion exchange; membrane fouling; secondary effluent

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pramanik, B.K.; Roddick, F.A.; Fan, L. Combining Coagulation/MIEX with Biological Activated Carbon Treatment to Control Organic Fouling in the Microfiltration of Secondary Effluent. Membranes 2016, 6, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes6030039

AMA Style

Pramanik BK, Roddick FA, Fan L. Combining Coagulation/MIEX with Biological Activated Carbon Treatment to Control Organic Fouling in the Microfiltration of Secondary Effluent. Membranes. 2016; 6(3):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes6030039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pramanik, Biplob Kumar, Felicity A. Roddick, and Linhua Fan. 2016. "Combining Coagulation/MIEX with Biological Activated Carbon Treatment to Control Organic Fouling in the Microfiltration of Secondary Effluent" Membranes 6, no. 3: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes6030039

APA Style

Pramanik, B. K., Roddick, F. A., & Fan, L. (2016). Combining Coagulation/MIEX with Biological Activated Carbon Treatment to Control Organic Fouling in the Microfiltration of Secondary Effluent. Membranes, 6(3), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes6030039

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop