Next Article in Journal
Scale Design of Dual-Layer Polyphenylsulfone/Sulfonated Polyphenylsulfone Hollow Fiber Membranes for Nanofiltration
Previous Article in Journal
Nanomembranes-Affiliated Water Remediation: Chronology, Properties, Classification, Challenges and Future Prospects
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Conductive CsH2PO4 Membranes with PVDF-Based Polymers Additives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improving PFSA Membranes Using Sulfonated Nanodiamonds

by
Alexandr V. Shvidchenko
1,*,
Alexei S. Odinokov
2,
Oleg N. Primachenko
3,
Iosif V. Gofman
3,
Natalia P. Yevlampieva
4,
Elena A. Marinenko
3,
Vasily T. Lebedev
5,
Alexander I. Kuklin
6 and
Yuri V. Kulvelis
5,*
1
Ioffe Institute, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia
2
Russian Research Center of Applied Chemistry, 193232 St. Petersburg, Russia
3
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199004 St. Petersburg, Russia
4
Physical Faculty, St. Petersburg State University, 198504 St. Petersburg, Russia
5
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute Named by B.P. Konstantinov of National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, 188300 Gatchina, Russia
6
Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2023, 13(8), 712; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080712
Submission received: 9 June 2023 / Revised: 21 July 2023 / Accepted: 28 July 2023 / Published: 1 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Proton-Conducting Membranes)

Abstract

:
Aquivion®-type perfluorosulfonic acid membranes with a polytetrafluoroethylene backbone and short side chains with sulfonic acid groups at the ends have great prospects for operating in hydrogen fuel cells. To improve the conducting properties of membranes, various types of nanofillers can be used. We prepared compositional Aquivion®-type membranes with embedded detonation nanodiamond particles. Nanodiamonds were chemically modified with sulfonic acid groups to increase the entire amount of ionogenic groups involved in the proton conductivity mechanism in compositional membranes. We demonstrated the rise of proton conductivity at 0.5–2 wt.% of sulfonated nanodiamonds in membranes, which was accompanied by good mechanical properties. The basic structural elements, conducting channels in membranes, were not destroyed in the presence of nanodiamonds, as follows from small-angle neutron scattering data. The prepared compositional membranes can be used in hydrogen fuel cells to achieve improved performance.

1. Introduction

The development of the hydrogen energy industry, based mainly on membrane technologies, is one of the most important fields in the decarbonization of economics. The fuel cell (FC) industry is major technology to implement hydrogen energy into practical use and shows a strong trend of increasing in future decades [1,2,3,4]. In addition to hydrogen energy, the implementation of renewable energy sources (solar, wind, hydropower) should be considered in trends of decarbonization [5]. Most renewable energy sources are intermittent, not continuously available for consumers [5], and thus may serve generally as additional sources of energy, which require the presence of a stable primary source. Normally, the renewable energy can be used for stationary power devices, while transport vehicles need special vehicle-to-grid technology to replace the gasoline-powered engine and the use of renewable energy sources [6]. To solve these problems, special energy storage systems for power grids should be developed, where PEM (proton exchange membranes or polymer electrolyte membranes) may be involved, due to their proved effectivity in electrochemical energy conversion systems [5,7]. Thus, renewable energy sources and hydrogen energy can be effectively combined for stable energy generation [8].
PEM fuel cells are based mainly on perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) Nafion®-type membranes, which were first implemented into working power devices.
Nafion® membranes, based on a polytetrafluoroethylene backbone with sulfonic acid groups at the end of the long side chains, demonstrated high physical and mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and a high ionic (proton) conductivity [3,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Later research demonstrated that PFSA Aquivion® membranes with shortened side chains have advantages over Nafion® due to larger values of proton conductivity and better thermal stability [16,17,18,19]. Further improving the membranes’ properties may involve various types of modifying additives embedded into the membranes’ structure [9,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
One of the possible modifiers for PFSA membranes can serve diamond nanoparticles (nanodiamonds). Nunn et al. reports various classes of nanodiamond particles, methods of their synthesis, and structural features [30]. Size, shape, crystallographic core, surface chemical composition, internal defects, impurities, and presence of sp2 carbon in nanodiamonds are observed, as well as their relationship with various fields of application [30]. Nanodiamonds and nanostructures based on diamonds have remarkable electrochemical properties and may be used in the fields of electroanalysis, energy storage, as nanoelectrodes, etc. [31]. Diamond nanoparticles, produced by detonation synthesis (detonation nanodiamonds, DND) are of special interest. DND particles with a typical mean size of 4–5 nm have a chemical inert core and may have various functional groups on the surface, allowing them to regulate the sign of ζ-potential—positively or negatively charged surfaces in aqueous or other mediums. Postnov et al. reported composites with nanodiamonds based on Nafion® and Aquivion® materials, where a rise of proton conductivity was demonstrated under low humidity conditions [32].
Recently, we have studied PFSA Aquivion®-type compositional membranes with either negatively charged carboxylated nanodiamonds [33] with a negative ζ-potential (DND Z−) [34,35,36] or positively charged protonated nanodiamonds [37] with a positive ζ-potential (DND Z+) [36,38]. We demonstrated that DND Z+ distributed in the membrane matrix much more homogeneously, forming rough aggregates below 300 nm in size, while DND Z− strongly agglomerated to micron-size particles. The homogeneous distribution of DND Z+, due to their attraction to sulfonic acid groups of the polymer, resulted in a more effective rise of proton conductivity in compositional membranes, compared to DND Z−, while saving their mechanical properties. DND Z+ at 0.5 wt.% embedded in compositional membranes have significantly improved membrane properties and performance in membrane-electrode assemblies (MEA) at temperatures up to 120 °C [38].
Sulfonated compounds embedded as fillers for PFSA composites are of greatest interest in order to increase the number of ionogenic sulfonic acid groups in the membrane involved in the proton exchange mechanism [39,40,41,42]. Sulfonated nanodiamonds, if they have been prepared, are excellent candidates for this purpose. Kuznetsov et al. described a two-stage synthesis of sulfonated DNDs [43], when nanodiamonds, functionalized with phenyl radicals, were sulfonated in oleum, resulting in a -SO3H-group attached to the diamond particle through a benzene ring. Lei et al. reported a one-stage synthesis of sulfonated DNDs based on their surface modification with sulfanilic acid [44]. Again, the sulfonic acid group in this case is chemically connected with the DND surface through an additional benzene ring.
To further improve the distribution of DND in membranes and their functional properties, in the current work, we applied a direct sulfonation of DND Z+ particles by oleum and introduced sulfonated DNDs into Aquivion®-type membranes for the first time.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Sample Preparation

2.1.1. Sulfonation of Nanodiamonds

Sulfonation was applied using oleum on the initial protonated DND with a positive ζ-potential (DND Z+), obtained from industrial nanodiamonds produced by the Scientific and Production Closed Joint Stock Company “Sinta” (Minsk, Belarus), using the approach described by Williams et al. [37]). The industrial DND was annealed in molecular hydrogen at 600 °C for 3 h. A hydrosol of annealed DND was prepared by ultrasonic dispersion of DND powder in deionized water. The prepared hydrosol was centrifuged (1.8 × 104× g, 40 min) to separate remaining aggregates from individual 4–5 nm diamond particles. The particles of DND Z+ had a mean size of 4–5 nm and ζ-potential +70 mV (Hückel) in the supernatant. The nature of the protonated DNDs still remains discussable [45,46].
Sulfonation of the DND Z+ sample was carried out as follows. A glass tube of 10 mL volume was filled with 0.63 g HgSO4, 1.13 g DND Z+, and 6.55 g of oleum (SO3 65% in H2SO4). The tube was heated in a sealed steel ampoule (pressure under 15 MPa) at 150 °C for 4 h, then cooled to the ambient temperature for 3 h. The obtained black reaction mass was diluted by the slow addition of 10 mL of distilled water and mixing. The obtained mixture was washed out by adding 30 mL of deionized water, ultrasonication (20 min), centrifugation (1.8 × 104× g, 30 min), and decantation multiple times. The resulting sediment was dried to a constant weight (237 mg) and mixed with 12.28 g of dimethylformamide (DMF). The mixture was treated in ultrasonic baths (60 kHz, 20 min and 22 kHz, 20 min) and centrifuged (1.8 × 104× g, 5 min.) to isolate a supernatant with small particles (DND-S sample) from aggregates because sulfonated diamonds are partially dispersed in DMF. The supernatant contained 47% (110 mg) from an initial amount of DND. The resulting sol of DND-S 0.5 wt.% in DMF was stable for a prolonged period, having a mean particle size of 8–10 nm and a positive ζ-potential: 21 mV (Smoluchowski) or 31 mV (Hückel). This is consistent with the results described earlier for aqueous suspensions of DND Z+ [47], demonstrating a weak association of DND-S particles in DMF, which is expected when a less polar medium is used.

2.1.2. Preparation of Compositional Membranes

A perfluorinated copolymer with short side chains, having an equivalent weight (EW) of 890 g-eq/mol, was synthesized by an aqueous-emulsion technique [48]. A monomer FS-81 (perfluoro-3-octapentensulfonilfluoride) was copolymerized with tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) [16,48]. Membranes were prepared by a solution casting technique using a DMF solution of a –SO3Li form of copolymer (2 wt.%), when the solvent was removed at 70–80 °C followed by annealing at 170–200 °C for 1–2 h and reducing to a –SO3H form, according to the adopted method [18]. This technique provides high thermal stability of the obtained membranes, as demon-strated in Figure S1. Compositional membranes were prepared from the mixture of suspensions of DND-S in DMF and perfluorinated copolymer in DMF. The DND-S suspension in DMF was prepared from dried DND-S hydrosol after removing water and dispersing in DMF using an ultrasonic generator. Then, 2 wt.% of copolymer solution was mixed with 0.5 wt.% DND-S suspension with the variable ratio of the components to obtain an assigned DND content in the membranes from 0.25 to 5 wt.% after evaporating the solvent. The adopted method of membrane preparation for pure polymers without diamonds was repeated in the presence of DND-S to obtain compositional membranes. Thus, six membranes were prepared with 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 wt.% of DND-S. The thickness of the membranes in air-dry conditions was 60–70 μm.

2.2. Methods of Investigation

2.2.1. Energy-Dispersive X-ray Analysis

Elemental analysis was carried out using a scanning electron microscope (Tescan Vega 3) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis unit (Oxford Instruments). The accelerating voltage of the electron beam was 30 kV (penetration depth is ~1 μm). The electron beam was directed normally to the silicon substrate surface with a diamond film. The pressure in the chamber was ~10−7 mm Hg.

2.2.2. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

FTIR spectra of the initial and sulfonated DNDs were recorded using an IR-Fourier-spectrometer InfraLum FT-08 (Lumex, St. Petersburg, Russia) with diffuse reflection accessory PIKE EasyDiff. Sample powders were placed in the sample cups and were heated in air at 80 °C for 1 h to reduce the interference from the adsorbed water. Heated cups were transferred into the sample chamber of the spectrometer to measure the FTIR spectra.

2.2.3. ζ-Metric Titrations

Electrophoretic mobilities of the DND particles in hydrosols were analyzed by the Phase Analysis Light Scattering using Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). Values of ζ-potential were calculated from electrophoretic mobilities using Henry’s equation [49]. HCl and NaOH aqueous solutions with concentrations of 0.1 M each were used as acid and base titrants. pH values of hydrosols were measured using an ion meter I-160 (Gomel Plant of Measuring Instruments, Gomel, Belarus) equipped with an H+-sensitive glass electrode and a silver chloride reference electrode.

2.2.4. Proton Conductivity Measurements

The impedance spectroscopy method was used to measure the proton conductivity at 20 and 50 °C in an equilibrium state of saturation with water. Membranes were conditioned in boiling water (100 °C) for 1 h as an equivalent of ultimate moisture content (RH = 100%). A Z-3000X impedance meter (Elins, Moscow, Russia), using a measuring cell with stainless steel electrodes in a four-electrode scheme, was used in a frequency range of 10 Hz–150 kHz. Equation (1) was used to calculate the proton conductivity (σH):
σH = L/(R × h × b).
σH is the membrane’s specific conductivity of the (S·cm−1), L is the distance between voltage electrodes (cm), and R is the measured protonic resistance (Ohm) of the membrane with an average thickness h (cm) and an average width b (cm).

2.2.5. Stress-Strain Mechanical Tests

Mechanical properties of the membranes were tested at an AG-100X Plus universal setup (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) at the stretching velocity of 100 mm·min−1, using the uniaxial extension mode. The working length of the membrane samples was 25 mm. Controlled climatic conditions were applied during the tests: relative humidity (RH) in the air of 50 ± 2% and a temperature of 23 ± 1 °C. Elastic modulus E, yield strength σY, ultimate tensile strength σT, and ultimate deformation before destruction εD were defined.

2.2.6. Small-Angle Neutron Scattering

Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) was performed at the YuMO instrument (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia) in the range (dynamic range also [50]) of momentum transfer q = (4π/λ) sin(θ/2) = 0.07–6 nm−1, where θ is the scattering angle, and the neutron wavelength is λ = 0.5–8 Å [51]. This q-range allows for revealing fine structure peculiarities on a scale of ~2π/q ~1–100 nm. Neutron scattering curves (scattering intensities, I vs. momentum transfer, q) were recalculated to thicknesses of the samples and normalized to absolute values of the scattering cross-section dΣ/DΩ (q) using vanadium as a standard for absolute intensity calibration in the SAS program package [52].
To obtain optimal scattering intensity, samples were packed in several-layer stacks for measurements. All samples were studied in an air-dry condition and measured at ambient temperature, 20 °C.

2.2.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The surface structure of the prepared membranes was studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at Zeiss AURIGA Laser (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) multifunctional analytical system with crossed ion and electron beams. The device, equipped with a GEMINI® electron optical column (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany), used a field emission cathode as an electron source. SEM images were obtained at secondary electron detectors (In-Lens and an Everhart-Thornley SE2 (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany)). The magnification parameter at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV in the SEM mode was 12× −1,000,000×; the spatial resolution was 1 nm. The working accelerating voltage was in the range of 0.1–30 kV, and a beam current was 10 pA–20 nA. The SmartSEM® 6.00 software package (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) was used to process the resulting images.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Identification of Sulfonated Nanodiamonds

The EDX method was used to study the DND-S powder and initial protonated DND Z+ to discover the results of sulfonating. It was found that the amount of S rises from 0.07 to 0.20 at.% after sulfonating, which means that a number of S atoms rises from 6 to 16–17 per one DND particle (size 4–5 nm, 8000 C atoms).
The FTIR spectra of DND Z+ and DND-S were recorded to determine if S atoms form –SO3H-groups on the surface.
Figure 1 shows the obtained FTIR spectra of the studied DNDs. Analysis of the characteristic bands of the DND Z+ surface functional groups shows that hydrocarbon groups CHn are present on the particles’ surface. They correspond to a set of bands in the region 3000–2800 cm−1, related to symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations, as well as weak bands 1460 cm−1 and 1375 cm−1, corresponding to their bending vibrations. The spectrum also contains characteristic bands 3350, 3400, and 1635 cm−1 related to adsorbed water. In addition, the presence of free hydroxyls was revealed (3695 cm−1). A number of bands corresponding to ketones (1710 cm−1), ethers (1160 and 846 cm−1), and esters (1710, 1160, and 952 cm−1) were observed in the 1750–500 cm−1 spectral region. Bands corresponding to stretching and bending vibrations of hydroxyl groups in the configuration of secondary alcohols (1325, 1043 and 650 cm−1) also appeared in this region. The band at 1325 cm−1 can be also interpreted as C–C stretching vibration of the diamond lattice [53].
Sulfonation of DND Z+ leads to a change in the composition of its surface functional groups. A number of bands of the –SO3H-group stretching vibrations appear: SO2 (1380 and 1124 cm−1), the ionized groups –SO3 (1220 and 1050 cm−1), C–S bonds (962 cm−1), and S–OH (798 cm−1) [54]. Our FTIR results, demonstrating the presence of sulfonic acid groups on the nanodiamond surface, agree well with work by Lei et al., who used sulfanilic acid to functionalize nanodiamonds with –OH groups [44].
The results of ζ-metric titration also indicate the addition of sulfonic acid groups to the nanodiamond surface. The dissociation of these groups leads to a decrease in ζ-potential values of sulfonated particles compared to ζ-potentials of the initial particles in a wide range of pH (Figure 2). The observed ζ-potential values convergence of the studied samples in the strongly acidic pH region indicates that the association of sulfonic acid groups occurs; as a result, their influence on the positive charge of the particles disappears. The DND-S particles also turned out to be less stable than initial particles in the alkaline region. The stability region of sulfonated particles is limited to pH 9.5, while DND Z+ has a stability in the region up to pH 10.5.

3.2. Proton Conductivity of the Membranes

Figure 3 shows proton conductivity vs. DND content in membranes. At 20 °C, the conductivity in the compositional membranes decreases after DND-S loading to 0.5 wt.%, further filling results in the rise of conductivity with the local maximum at 2 wt.% of DND. At 50 °C, the doping of nanodiamonds results in the maximum of conductivity at 1 wt.% of DND, which is 10% higher than in the pure membrane without DND.
This complicated behavior of conductivity may be realized due to the nature of DND-S, having both positive and negative charges. At low DND content, DND particles, rarely located in the membrane, do not create a connected network as an additional pathway for protons, but may block some conducting channels, which leads to a decrease in conductivity. At higher DND-S contents, the connected network is created, which may help the protons to move along the membrane. The temperature should be an accelerating factor. The measured rise of conductivity at 50 °C allows for the expected larger effect at the typical working temperatures of these membranes ~130 °C.
We performed structural investigations using the SANS and SEM methods to find the peculiarities of DND-S distribution in membranes.

3.3. Mechanical Tests of the Membranes

Figure 4a demonstrates the measured stress-strain curves. All tested membranes are low-modulus polymeric materials (elastic modulus ~215–240 MPa) with high-strain resources (ultimate deformation before destruction for compositional membranes is of 130–250%). All tested membranes demonstrate a clearly identified transition over the yield strength (pronounced inflection on stress-strain curves) at stains of ~5–10%. This transition looks like the local maximum for the curve with a low DND-S content (0.25 wt.%). After this transition, the area of deformation strengthening of the material is observed.
While DND-S are introduced into the polymer matrix, a non-monotonic dependence of the mechanical properties was found (Figure 4b,c). At DND-S content ≤ 0.5 wt.%, rigidity of the films (elastic modulus and yield strength) decreases. A further increase in DND-S concentration in membranes leads to growth of these parameters and a decrease in ultimate deformation. The tendency of Young’s modulus to rise, as well as the decrease in εD and σT, was also found earlier for similar membranes filled with protonated nanodiamonds [38], as well as for carboxylated nanodiamonds [34]. Parameter σY in the current work and in the abovementioned cases is close to constant value with some deviations, demonstrating good elastic properties of membranes when DND has little effect on their elastic properties even at a high DND content.

3.4. Structural Studies of the Membranes by Small-Angle Neutron Scattering

SANS was performed to find the fine structure features of the compositional Aquivion®-type membranes with DND-S. Figure 5 shows SANS curves dΣ/dΩ(q), where the remaining of the ionomer peak is detected for all studied membranes. Similar profiles were earlier found for Aquivion®-type membranes with other types of DNDs—carboxylated DND with a negative charge [34] and protonated DND with a positive charge [38]. The ionomer peak remained almost unchanged in both series of the membranes, being a little more blurred at the presence of positive DNDs, while the distribution of positively charged DNDs in membranes was found to be much more uniform due to the coulombic attraction of DND to negatively charged sulfonic acid groups of the copolymer. Negatively charged carboxylated DNDs were not prone to attract either to sulfonic acid groups or to the backbone of the copolymer and formed a separate phase in the membranes on the border of hydrophilic and hydrophobic parts of the copolymer. In this work, sulfonated DNDs, being prepared from positively charged protonated DNDs, have obtained –SO3H-groups, negatively charged in the polar medium, but the total sign of ζ-potential of DND-S remained positive. Thus, the structure of such composites is of special interest. The remaining of the ionomer peak at Figure 5a demonstrates that the correlation between fine structural elements of the membranes—the conducting channels—is not disturbed, with a typical distance between neighboring channels R ~2π/q ~3 nm [17,55]. So, the presence of DND-S, as well as two other types of DNDs, does not change the general channel structure of the compositional membrane.
SANS at Figure 5a shows an additional wide peak (matrix knee) for pure Aquivion®-type membranes without DNDs in the q-range 0.4–1.0 nm−1, which disappears at the presence of DNDs. This peak demonstrates an ordering of channel bundles at a distance in the range of ~10–20 nm, which was described earlier [38] and is typical for Aquivion® in dry conditions. When this peak disappears, the membrane structure at these scales may become more uniform at the presence of the DNDs. Similar behavior in compositional membranes was also observed for two other types of DNDs used earlier as fillers for PFSA membranes [34,38]. So, DND particles, which do not disturb conducting channels, may be localized in clusters on the next structural level—on a scale between bundles of channels. As in our previous work [38], we performed a subtraction of the SANS data for the pristine membrane from the curves of the compositional membranes to find the diamond contribution to scattering from polymer-diamond composites (Figure 5b). As a diamond scatters much more than a polymer at q < 1 nm−1, the analysis of the differential curves ∆σ(q) will give a good definition of how diamond particles are distributed in membranes even if the structure of the polymer in compositional membranes may undergo some changes. It was found that at low q < 1 nm−1, all differential SANS curves correspond to the power law ∆σ(q) = σ0·q−D with a slope of D = 2.3–2.5. It corresponds to the scattering from fractal objects [56,57,58]—clusters of DND particles with a fractal dimension D. Diamond particles, associated into branched chain clusters in DND hydrosols [47,59,60,61], and dispersions in other solvents have a similar behavior. The area at q > 1 nm−1, demonstrating a power law with a slope of 4.3, corresponds to primary diamond particles with sharp facets [59]. Similar to the earlier-studied membranes with positively charged DNDs [38], the diamond component retains its structure after drying from the DMF mixture with a polymer solution, integrating the diamond particles into the polymer structure. The inset in Figure 5b shows the value of σ0 of the differential curves in the range of smaller q, normalized to DND content, vs. DND content in membranes. This value remains almost constant, with a slight tendency to decrease, meaning the additivity of SANS intensity from a diamond component is not quite universal. This slight decrease, similar to that described in [38], corresponds to an increase in the distribution uniformity of DND particles on a scale of 10–100 nm; therefore, there is a decrease in the nanosized diamond clusters fraction and a possible growth of submicron clusters.
The differential SANS curves in the range of smallest q were fitted by Guinier function (2)
∆𝜎(q) = ∆𝜎0·exp(−(qRG)2/3),
to find cross-sections at the low q approximation 𝛥𝜎0 and gyration radii RG of diamond aggregates (Figure 6). The values of Δσ0 = (ΔKDP)2φvPnA were then used to calculate the aggregation numbers of diamond particles nA from the known contrast factor between diamonds and a polymer for neutrons (ΔKDP), volume fraction of diamonds (φ), and a volume of a single diamond particle (vP) with a diameter dP = 4.5 nm. The parameters RG and nA were plotted and analyzed against the DND content (C) in membranes (Figure 7).
The parameters in Figure 7 are plotted in a logarithmic scale, where the logarithmic decrease of the aggregates’ sizes (Figure 7a) is detected according to (3):
RG(C) = RG1 − αR·ln(C),
where the parameter RG1 = 14.38 ± 0.04 nm corresponds to the DND concentration C = C1 = 1 wt.%, and a coefficient αR = 0.42 ± 0.04 characterizes the dynamics of the radius changing with the DND content.
The aggregation numbers (Figure 7b) also decrease logarithmically (4) with the exception of the membrane with the lowest DND content (0.25 wt.%):
nA(C) = nA1 − αn·ln(C),
with the corresponding parameters nA1 = 50.4 ± 0.5, αn = 8.0 ± 0.4.
Equations (3) and (4) demonstrate the correlation of the structural parameters with linear dependence (5):
nA(C) − nA1 = (αnR)[RG(C) − RG1)],
where the ratio of the parameters αnR = 19.0 ± 2.1 = dnA/dRG is a derivative of the aggregation number with respect to the gyration radius.
Thus, the enrichment of membranes with diamonds, contrary to the expected increase in diamond aggregation, leads to a decrease in their gyration radius and the mass of nanosized aggregates. This fact demonstrates an increase in the integration of diamonds into the polymer, which is supported by the presence of sulfonic acid groups on the DND surface. So, sulfonated DNDs were found to be quite compatible with a short side chain PFSA ionomer. DNDs are well integrated into the polymer structure, saving the mechanical properties and improving ionic conductivity of compositional membranes.

3.5. Surface Structure of Membranes from Scanning Electron Microscopy

The prepared Aquivion®-type membranes with DND-S (0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 wt.% DND) were studied by SEM. A cellular structure with globule sizes of ~150 nm is detected on the surface of membrane without diamonds (Figure 8a), already reported [38], which is also consistent with earlier atomic force microscopy (AFM) data [17]. On the surface of the composite membranes, diamond clusters are found, with maximal sizes from ~100 to 200–300 nm, which rise as the content of DND-S in the membrane increases (Figure 8 b–f). Even in the presence of 5 wt.% of DND-S, diamonds on the membrane’s surface are in the form of rough clusters of up to 100–150 nm in size (Figure 8e,f), which is smaller than in the case of the initial DND-Z+ [38], and rather uniformly distributed over the membrane’s area. Large and dense clusters are not detected. Thus, a 10-fold rise of DND content in the compositional membranes results in a few growths of the size of the submicron DND clusters, leading mainly to a denser distribution of DND-S clusters, which confirms our assumption above, based on the SANS data. Additional SEM images for compositional Aquivion®-type membranes with DND-S are provided in Figures S2–S9.
Apparently, the nature of DND-S, having both negative and positive charges on its surface, provides the most homogeneous distribution among all types of DNDs used (DND Z+, DND Z−, and DND-S). This is also consistent with the proton conductivity data, where a prolonged maximum is observed without a significant drop, even at 5 wt.% of DND-S.

4. Conclusions

Sulfonated nanodiamonds (DND-S), prepared from DND Z+ (hydrogynated nanodiamonds) by partial sulfonation using oleum, integrate well into Aquivion®-type PFSA membranes. Compositional membranes with DND-S, prepared by a solution casting technique, demonstrate excellent mechanical properties and elevated proton conductivity. The optimal content of DND-S in compositional membranes is ~1 wt.%, where the maximum of proton conductivity at 50 °C is observed, supported with good rigidity and ultimate tensile strength. The maximum of proton conductivity value is shifted to larger DND content, compared to initial DND Z+, due to more homogeneous DND-S distribution in a polymer matrix. This is determined by negatively charged –SO3—groups on the DND surface, while having a positive charge in total, and allows the introduction of more DND additive with ionogenic groups along with the preservation of the membranes’ structure.
Small-angle neuron scattering of compositional membranes with DND-S demonstrate a retaining of the fine structure of proton-conducting channels in membranes. DND-S particles form branched rough clusters in the polymer matrix, which aggregation numbers decrease from ~95 to ~40, while the DND content in membrane rises from 0.25 wt.% to 5 wt.%.
The effective introduction of DND-S into Aquivion®-type membranes allowed us to obtain membranes with improved properties for use in hydrogen fuel cells and opens a new field of further investigations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/membranes13080712/s1, Figure S1: TGA tests of SSC-1 (EW 790 g-eq/mol, blue) and SSC-2 (EW 870 g-eq/mol, green) membranes, Figure S2: SEM image of Aquivion®-type compositional membrane with 0.5 wt.% of DND-S, Figure S3: SEM image of Aquivion®-type compositional membrane with 0.5 wt.% of DND-S, Figure S4: SEM image of Aquivion®-type compositional membrane with 1 wt.% of DND-S, Figure S5: SEM image of Aquivion®-type compositional membrane with 1 wt.% of DND-S, Figure S6: SEM image of Aquivion®-type compositional membrane with 2 wt.% of DND-S, Figure S7: SEM image of Aquivion®-type compositional membrane with 2 wt.% of DND-S, Figure S8: SEM image of Aquivion®-type compositional membrane with 5 wt.% of DND-S, Figure S9: SEM image of Aquivion®-type compositional membrane with 5 wt.% of DND-S.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.T.L. and Y.V.K.; methodology, O.N.P. and Y.V.K.; software, N.P.Y. and A.I.K.; validation, Y.V.K., V.T.L. and A.V.S.; formal analysis, Y.V.K., O.N.P., A.V.S. and I.V.G.; investigation, O.N.P., Y.V.K., N.P.Y., A.S.O., E.A.M., A.V.S., I.V.G. and A.I.K.; resources, O.N.P., A.S.O. and A.V.S.; data curation, Y.V.K., V.T.L. and A.V.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.V.K. and V.T.L.; writing—review and editing, O.N.P., Y.V.K. and A.V.S.; visualization, Y.V.K.; supervision, Y.V.K.; project administration, Y.V.K. and V.T.L.; funding acquisition, V.T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation grant No 23-23-00129, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-23-00129/ (accessed on 7 June 2023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Energy dispersive X-ray analysis was performed using the equipment of the Engineering Center of the St. Petersburg State Technological Institute (Technical University), the authors thank Elena Yudina for assistance. The authors also thank the Interdisciplinary Resource Center for Nanotechnology of St. Petersburg State University for performing the SEM measurements and IBR-2 reactor staff (JINR, Dubna) for providing SANS experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Filippov, S.P.; Yaroslavtsev, A.B. Hydrogen energy: Development prospects and materials. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2021, 90, 627–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, F.; Zhao, P.; Niu, M.; Maddy, J. The survey of key technologies in hydrogen energy storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 14535–14552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kusoglu, A.; Weber, A.Z. New insights into perfluorinated sulfonic-acid ionomers. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 987–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alent’ev, A.Y.; Volkov, A.V.; Vorotyntsev, I.V.; Maksimov, A.L.; Yaroslavtsev, A.B. Membrane technologies for decarbonization. Membr. Membr. Technol. 2021, 3, 255–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sun, C.; Negro, E.; Vezzù, K.; Pagot, G.; Cavinato, G.; Nale, A.; Bang, Y.H.; Di Noto, V. Hybrid inorganic-organic proton-conducting membranes based on SPEEK doped with WO3 nanoparticles for application in vanadium redox flow batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 309, 311–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fathabadi, H. Utilizing solar and wind energy in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 156, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dunn, B.; Kamath, H.; Tarascon, J.-M. Electrical Energy Storage for the Grid: A Battery of Choices. Science 2011, 334, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sun, C.; Zhang, H. Review the development of first-generation redox flow batteries: Iron-chromium system. ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202101798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ivanchev, S.S.; Myakin, S.V. Polymer membranes for fuel cells: Manufacture, structure, modification, properties. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2010, 79, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Danilczuck, M.; Lancucki, L.; Schlick, S.; Hamrock, S.J.; Haugen, G.M. In-depth profiling of degradationin processes in a fuel cell: 2D spectral-spatial FTIR spectra of Nafion membranes. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Banergjee, S.; Curtin, D.E. Nafion® perfluorinated membranes in fuel cell. J. Fluor. Chem. 2004, 125, 1211–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hiesgen, R.; Aleksandrova, E.; Meichsner, G.; Wehl, I.; Roduner, E.; Friedrich, K.A. High-resolution imaging of ion conductivity of Nafion® membranes with electrochemical atomic force microscopy. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 55, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xie, T. Tunable polymer multi-shape memory effect. Nature 2010, 464, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Komarov, P.V.; Khalatur, P.G.; Khokhlov, A.R. Large-scale atomistic and quantum-mechanical simulations of a Nafion membrane: Morphology, proton solvation and charge transport. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2013, 4, 567–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Xiao, P.; Li, J.; Cho, C. Experimental investigation and discussion on the mechanical endurance limit of Nafion membrane used in proton membrane fuel cell. Energies 2014, 7, 6401–6411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Primachenko, O.N.; Marinenko, E.A.; Odinokov, A.S.; Kononova, S.V.; Kulvelis, Y.V.; Lebedev, V.T. State of the art and prospects in the development of proton conducting perfluorinated membranes with short side chains: A review. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021, 32, 1386–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kulvelis, Y.V.; Ivanchev, S.S.; Lebedev, V.T.; Primachenko, O.N.; Likhomanov, V.S.; Török., G. Structure characterization of perfluorosulfonic short side chain polymer membranes. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 73820–73826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Primachenko, O.N.; Odinokov, A.S.; Barabanov, V.G.; Tyul’mankov, V.P.; Marinenko, E.A.; Gofman, I.V.; Ivanchev, S.S. Relationship between the morphology, nanostructure, and strength properties of Aquivion® type perfluorinated proton-conducting membranes prepared by casting from solution. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2018, 91, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Safronova, E.Y.; Osipov, A.K.; Yaroslavtsev, A.B. Short Side Chain Aquivion Perfluorinated Sulfonated Proton-Conductive Membranes: Transport and Mechanical Properties. Pet. Chem. 2018, 58, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, F.; Mu, S. Nanoceramic Oxide Hybrid Electrolyte Membranes for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014, 14, 1169–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wong, C.Y.; Wong, W.Y.; Ramya, K.; Khali, M.; Loh, K.S.; Daud, K.L.; Lim, W.R.W.; Walvekar, R.; Kadhum, A.A.H. Additives in proton exchange membranes for low and high-temperature fuel cell applications: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 6116–6135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bakangura, E.; Wu, L.; Ge, L.; Yang, Z.; Xu, T. Mixed matrix proton exchange membranes for fuel cells: State of the art and perspectives. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 57, 103–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, H.; Hu, Q.; Zheng, X.; Yin, Y.; Wu, H.; Jiang, Z. Incorporating phosphoric acid-functionalized polydopamine into Nafion polymer by in situ sol-gel method for enhanced proton conductivity. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 570, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ying, Y.P.; Kamarudin, S.K.; Masdar, M.S. Silica-related membranes in fuel cell applications: An overview. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 16068–16084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Park, J.-S.; Shin, M.-S.; Kim, C.-S. Proton exchange membranes for fuel cell operation at low relative humidity and intermediate temperature: An updated review. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2017, 5, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pethaiah, S.S.; Kalaignan, G.P.; Ulaganathan, M.; Arunkumar, J. Preparation of durable nanocatalyzed MEA for PEM fuel cell applications. Ionics 2011, 17, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kim, D.J.; Jo, M.J.; Nam, S.Y. A review of polymer-nanocomposite electrolyte membranes for fuel cell application. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 21, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Porozhnyy, M.V.; Shkirskaya, S.A.; Butylskii, D.Y.; Dotsenko, V.V.; Safronova, E.Y.; Yaroslavtsev, A.B.; Deabate, S.; Huguet, P.; Nikonenko, V.V. Physicochemical and electrochemical characterization of Nafion-type membranes with embedded silica nanoparticles: Effect of functionalization. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 370, 137689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yadav, R.; Subhash, A.; Chemmenchery, N.; Kandasubramanian, B. Graphene and Graphene Oxide for Fuel Cell Technology. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 9333–9350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nunn, N.; Torelli, M.; McGuire, G.; Shenderova, O. Nanodiamond: A high impact nanomaterial. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2017, 21, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, N.; Foord, J.S.; Jiang, X. Diamond electrochemistry at the nanoscale: A review. Carbon 2016, 99, 90–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Postnov, V.N.; Mel’nikova, N.A.; Shul’meister, G.A.; Novikov, A.G.; Murin, I.V.; Zhukov, A.N. Nafion- and Aquivion-Based Nanocomposites Containing Detonation Nanodiamonds. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2017, 87, 2754–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aleksenskiy, A.E.; Eydelman, E.D.; Vul’, A.Y. Deagglomeration of detonation nanodiamonds. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2011, 3, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kulvelis, Y.V.; Primachenko, O.N.; Odinokov, A.S.; Shvidchenko, A.V.; Bairamukov, V.Y.; Gofman, I.V.; Lebedev, V.T.; Ivanchev, S.S.; Vul, A.Y.; Kuklin, A.I. Composite proton-conducting membranes with nanodiamonds. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2020, 28, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Primachenko, O.N.; Kulvelis, Y.V.; Lebedev, V.T.; Odinokov, A.S.; Bayramukov, V.Y.; Marinenko, E.A.; Gofman, I.V.; Shvidchenko, A.V.; Vul, A.Y.; Ivanchev, S.S. Perfluorinated proton-conducting membrane composites with functionalized nanodiamonds. Membr. Membr. Technol. 2020, 2, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kulvelis, Y.V.; Primachenko, O.N.; Gofman, I.V.; Odinokov, A.S.; Shvidchenko, A.V.; Yudina, E.B.; Marinenko, E.A.; Lebedev, V.T.; Vul, A.Y. Modification of the mechanism of proton conductivity of the perfluorinated membrane copolymer by nanodiamonds. Russ. Chem. Bull. Int. Ed. 2021, 70, 1713–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Williams, O.A.; Hees, J.; Dieker, C.; Jager, W.; Kirste, L.; Nebel, C.E. Size-Dependent Reactivity of Diamond Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4824–4830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Primachenko, O.N.; Kulvelis, Y.V.; Odinokov, A.S.; Glebova, N.V.; Krasnova, A.O.; Antokolskiy, L.A.; Nechitailov, A.A.; Shvidchenko, A.V.; Gofman, I.V.; Marinenko, E.A.; et al. New Generation of Compositional Aquivion®-Type Membranes with Nanodiamonds for Hydrogen Fuel Cells: Design and Performance. Membranes 2022, 12, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Simari, C.; Stallworth, P.; Peng, J.; Coppola, L.; Greenbaum, S.; Nicotera, I. Graphene oxide and sulfonated-derivative: Proton transport properties and electrochemical behavior of Nafion-based nanocomposites. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 297, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sgambetterra, M.; Brutti, S.; Allodi, V.; Mariotto, G.; Panero, S.; Navarra, M.A. Critical filler concentration in sulfated titania-added Nafion™ membranes for fuel cell applications. Energies 2016, 9, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Vinothkannan, M.; Kim, A.R.; Ramakrishnan, S.; Yu, Y.-T.; Yoo, D.J. Advanced Nafion nanocomposite membrane embedded with unzipped and functionalized graphite nanofibers for high-temperature hydrogen-air fuel cell system: The impact of filler on power density, chemical durability and hydrogen permeability of membrane. Composites Part B. 2021, 215, 108828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rambabu, G.; Nagaraju, N.; Bhat, S.D. Functionalized fullerene embedded in Nafion matrix: A modified composite membrane electrolyte for direct methanol fuel cells. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 306, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kuznetsov, O.; Sun, Y.; Thaner, R.; Bratt, A.; Shenoy, V.; Wong, M.S.; Jones, J.; Billups, W.E. Water-soluble nanodiamond. Langmuir 2012, 28, 5243–5248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Lei, Y.; Huang, Q.; Gan, D.; Huang, H.; Chen, J.; Deng, F.; Liu, M.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Y. A novel one-step method for preparation of sulfonate functionalized nanodiamonds and their utilization for ultrafast removal of organic dyes with high efficiency: Kinetic and isotherm studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Petit, T.; Girard, H.A.; Trouvé, A.; Batonneau-Gener, I.; Bergonzo, P.; Arnault, J.-C. Surface transfer doping can mediate both colloidal stability and selfassembly of nanodiamonds. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 8958–8962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ginés, L.; Mandal, S.; Cheng, C.-L.; Sow, M.; Williams, O.A. Positive zeta potential of nanodiamonds. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 12549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Vul, A.Y.; Eidelman, E.D.; Aleksenskiy, A.E.; Shvidchenko, A.V.; Dideikin, A.T.; Yuferev, V.S.; Lebedev, V.T.; Kul’velis, Y.V.; Avdeev, M.V. Transition sol-gel in nanodiamond hydrosols. Carbon 2017, 114, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Primachenko, O.N.; Odinokov, A.S.; Marinenko, E.A.; Kulvelis, Y.V.; Barabanov, V.G.; Kononova, S.V. Influence of sulfonyl fluoride monomers on the mechanism of emulsion copolymerization with the preparation of proton-conducting membrane precursors. J. Fluor. Chem. 2021, 244, 109736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Delgado, A.V.; González-Caballero, F.; Hunter, R.J.; Koopal, L.K.; Lyklema, J. Measurement and interpretation of electrokinetic phenomena. J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 2007, 309, 194–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kuklin, A.I.; Ivankov, O.I.; Rogachev, A.V.; Soloviov, D.V.; Islamov, A.K.; Skoi, V.V.; Kovalev, Y.S.; Vlasov, A.V.; Ryzhykau, Y.L.; Soloviev, A.G.; et al. Small-Angle Neutron Scattering at the Pulsed Reactor IBR-2: Current Status and Prospects. Crystallogr. Rep. 2021, 66, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kuklin, A.I.; Ivankov, A.I.; Soloviov, D.V.; Rogachev, A.V.; Kovalev, Y.S.; Soloviev, A.G.; Islamov, A.K.; Balasoiu, M.; Vlasov, A.V.; Kutuzov, S.A. High-throughput SANS experiment on two-detector system of YuMO spectrometer. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 994, 012016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Soloviev, A.G.; Solovjeva, T.M.; Ivankov, O.I.; Soloviov, D.V.; Rogachev, A.V.; Kuklin, A.I. SAS program for two-detector system: Seamless curve from both detectors. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2017, 848, 012020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Petit, T.; Puskar, L. FTIR spectroscopy of nanodiamonds: Methods and interpretation. Diam. Rel. Mat. 2018, 89, 52–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Danilczuk, M.; Lin, L.; Schlick, S.; Hamrock, S.J.; Schaberg, M.S. Understanding the fingerprint region in the infra-red spectra of perfluorinated ionomer membranes and corresponding model compounds: Experiments and theoretical calculations. J. Pow. Sourc. 2011, 196, 8216–8224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kulvelis, Y.V.; Ivanchev, S.S.; Primachenko, O.N.; Lebedev, V.T.; Marinenko, E.A.; Ivanova, I.N.; Kuklin, A.I.; Ivankov, O.I.; Soloviov, D.V. Structure and property optimization of perfluorinated short side chain membranes for hydrogen fuel cells using orientational stretching. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 108864–108875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Teixeira, J. Small-angle scattering by fractal systems. J. Appl. Cryst. 1988, 21, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Grigoriev, S.V.; Iashina, E.G.; Bairamukov, V.Y.; Pipich, V.; Radulescu, A.; Filatov, M.V.; Pantina, R.A.; Varfolomeeva, E.Y. Switch of fractal properties of DNA in chicken erythrocytes nuclei by mechanical stress. Phys. Rev. E 2020, 102, 032415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Iashina, E.G.; Varfolomeeva, E.Y.; Pantina, R.A.; Bairamukov, V.Y.; Kovalev, R.A.; Fedorova, N.D.; Pipich, V.; Radulescu, A.; Grigoriev, S.V. Bifractal structure of chromatin in rat lymphocyte nuclei. Phys. Rev. E 2021, 104, 064409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lebedev, V.; Kulvelis, Y.; Kuklin, A.; Vul, A. Neutron Study of Multilevel Structures of Diamond Gels. Cond. Matter. 2016, 1, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Avdeev, M.V.; Tomchuk, O.V.; Ivankov, O.I.; Alexenskii, A.E.; Dideikin, A.T.; Vul, A.Y. On the structure of concentrated detonation nanodiamond hydrosols with a positive ζ potential: Analysis of small-angle neutron scattering. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016, 658, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tomchuk, O.V.; Mchedlov-Petrossyan, N.O.; Kyzyma, O.A.; Kriklya, N.N.; Bulavin, L.A.; Zabulonov, Y.L.; Ivankov, O.I.; Garamus, V.M.; Ōsawa, E.; Avdeev, M.V. Cluster-cluster interaction in nanodiamond hydrosols by small-angle scattering. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 354, 118816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of nanodiamonds before (DND Z+) and after sulfonation (DND-S).
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of nanodiamonds before (DND Z+) and after sulfonation (DND-S).
Membranes 13 00712 g001
Figure 2. ζ-potentials of initial (DND Z+) and sulfonated (DND-S) nanodiamonds as a function of pH in an aqueous medium.
Figure 2. ζ-potentials of initial (DND Z+) and sulfonated (DND-S) nanodiamonds as a function of pH in an aqueous medium.
Membranes 13 00712 g002
Figure 3. Proton conductivity of compositional membranes at 20 and 50 °C vs. DND content.
Figure 3. Proton conductivity of compositional membranes at 20 and 50 °C vs. DND content.
Membranes 13 00712 g003
Figure 4. Mechanical properties of compositional membranes: (a) stress-strain profiles (wt. percentage of DND in membranes is displayed on the curves), (b) Young’s modulus E and ultimate deformation before destruction εD, (c) yield strength σY and ultimate tensile strength σT.
Figure 4. Mechanical properties of compositional membranes: (a) stress-strain profiles (wt. percentage of DND in membranes is displayed on the curves), (b) Young’s modulus E and ultimate deformation before destruction εD, (c) yield strength σY and ultimate tensile strength σT.
Membranes 13 00712 g004aMembranes 13 00712 g004b
Figure 5. Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) on dry Aquivion®-type membranes with sulfonated DNDs: (a) SANS profiles of membranes with a DND content of 0–5 wt.%; (b) differential SANS curves of membranes without DND subtracted from compositional membranes with DNDs, demonstrating the DND distribution in membranes: the points are experimental data, solid lines are power-law approximations, and the inset shows the intensity of the power-law fitting normalized by the DND content in membranes vs. the DND content.
Figure 5. Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) on dry Aquivion®-type membranes with sulfonated DNDs: (a) SANS profiles of membranes with a DND content of 0–5 wt.%; (b) differential SANS curves of membranes without DND subtracted from compositional membranes with DNDs, demonstrating the DND distribution in membranes: the points are experimental data, solid lines are power-law approximations, and the inset shows the intensity of the power-law fitting normalized by the DND content in membranes vs. the DND content.
Membranes 13 00712 g005
Figure 6. Guinier approximation of differential SANS curves for membranes with 0.25 wt.% (1); 1 wt.% (2) and 5.0 wt.% (3) of DND.
Figure 6. Guinier approximation of differential SANS curves for membranes with 0.25 wt.% (1); 1 wt.% (2) and 5.0 wt.% (3) of DND.
Membranes 13 00712 g006
Figure 7. Gyration radii RG(C) (a) and aggregation numbers nA(C) (b) of diamond structures in membranes vs. DND content (C) from SANS data. Points are experimental data, dashed lines demonstrate logarithmic decrease for RG (1) and nA (2).
Figure 7. Gyration radii RG(C) (a) and aggregation numbers nA(C) (b) of diamond structures in membranes vs. DND content (C) from SANS data. Points are experimental data, dashed lines demonstrate logarithmic decrease for RG (1) and nA (2).
Membranes 13 00712 g007
Figure 8. SEM images of Aquivion®-type compositional membranes with DND-S: (a) 0% DND (without nanodiamonds); (b) 0.5 wt.% DND; (c) 1 wt.% DND; (d) 2 wt.% DND; (e) and (f) 5 wt.% DND (different scales).
Figure 8. SEM images of Aquivion®-type compositional membranes with DND-S: (a) 0% DND (without nanodiamonds); (b) 0.5 wt.% DND; (c) 1 wt.% DND; (d) 2 wt.% DND; (e) and (f) 5 wt.% DND (different scales).
Membranes 13 00712 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shvidchenko, A.V.; Odinokov, A.S.; Primachenko, O.N.; Gofman, I.V.; Yevlampieva, N.P.; Marinenko, E.A.; Lebedev, V.T.; Kuklin, A.I.; Kulvelis, Y.V. Improving PFSA Membranes Using Sulfonated Nanodiamonds. Membranes 2023, 13, 712. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080712

AMA Style

Shvidchenko AV, Odinokov AS, Primachenko ON, Gofman IV, Yevlampieva NP, Marinenko EA, Lebedev VT, Kuklin AI, Kulvelis YV. Improving PFSA Membranes Using Sulfonated Nanodiamonds. Membranes. 2023; 13(8):712. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080712

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shvidchenko, Alexandr V., Alexei S. Odinokov, Oleg N. Primachenko, Iosif V. Gofman, Natalia P. Yevlampieva, Elena A. Marinenko, Vasily T. Lebedev, Alexander I. Kuklin, and Yuri V. Kulvelis. 2023. "Improving PFSA Membranes Using Sulfonated Nanodiamonds" Membranes 13, no. 8: 712. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080712

APA Style

Shvidchenko, A. V., Odinokov, A. S., Primachenko, O. N., Gofman, I. V., Yevlampieva, N. P., Marinenko, E. A., Lebedev, V. T., Kuklin, A. I., & Kulvelis, Y. V. (2023). Improving PFSA Membranes Using Sulfonated Nanodiamonds. Membranes, 13(8), 712. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080712

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop