Next Article in Journal
Sterilized Polyhexanide-Releasing Chitosan Membranes with Potential for Use in Antimicrobial Wound Dressings
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogen-Tolerant La0.6Ca0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3–d Oxygen Transport Membranes from Ultrasonic Spray Synthesis for Plasma-Assisted CO2 Conversion
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Membranes
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/membranes13110876
membranes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in the Field of Potentiometric Sensors: A Review

by
Nikola Lenar
1,
Robert Piech
1,
Cecylia Wardak
2 and
Beata Paczosa-Bator
1,*
1
Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Krakow, Mickiewicza 30, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry, Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Maria Curie-Sklodowska Square 3, PL-20031 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2023, 13(11), 876; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13110876
Submission received: 3 October 2023 / Revised: 26 October 2023 / Accepted: 4 November 2023 / Published: 7 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Membrane Surfaces and Interfaces)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Recently, there has been rapid development of electrochemical sensors, and there have been numerous reports in the literature that describe new constructions with improved performance parameters. Undoubtedly, this is due to the fact that those sensors are characterized by very good analytical parameters, and at the same time, they are cheap and easy to use, which distinguishes them from other analytical tools. One of the trends observed in their development is the search for new functional materials. This review focuses on potentiometric sensors designed with the use of various metal oxides. Metal oxides, because of their remarkable properties including high electrical capacity and mixed ion-electron conductivity, have found applications as both sensing layers (e.g., of screen-printing pH sensors) or solid-contact layers and paste components in solid-contact and paste-ion-selective electrodes. All the mentioned applications of metal oxides are described in the scope of the paper. This paper presents a survey on the use of metal oxides in the field of the potentiometry method as both single-component layers and as a component of hybrid materials. Metal oxides are allowed to obtain potentiometric sensors of all-solid-state construction characterized by remarkable analytical parameters. These new types of sensors exhibit properties that are competitive with those of the commonly used conventional electrodes. Different construction solutions and various metal oxides were compared in the scope of this review based on their analytical parameters.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, due to the dynamic socioeconomic development, greater attention is being paid to the protection of the environment and human health. At the same time, the requirements for analytical methods used to assess patient health, environmental conditions, and quality of products are increasing [1]. There is a constant search for methods characterized by a short waiting time for the analysis result, accuracy, and reliability, while at the same time generating low costs of performing a single analysis [2,3]. An analytical technique that meets these requirements is potentiometry, within which a group of potentiometric sensors has been developed. In the last thirty years, there has been rapid advancement of this group of electrodes, and there have been many reports in the literature that describe new constructions with improved performance parameters [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Undoubtedly, this is due to the fact that potentiometric sensors are characterized by very good analytical parameters, and at the same time, they are cheap and easy to use, which distinguishes them from other analytical tools. One of the observed trends in the development of potentiometric sensors is the search for new functional materials and the miniaturization of electrodes.
The constant search for new materials and construction solutions for potentiometric sensors emerges from the need for reliable analytical tools characterized by low costs, rapid responses, and miniature size. Conventional electrodes with an inner solution including the commonly known glass electrode (for pH measurements) exhibit satisfying analytical parameters; however, their construction results in a number of limitations. Thanks to years of research, conventional electrodes can now be replaced by all-solid-state sensors such as solid-contact electrodes, paste electrodes, or screen-printed electrodes, which are characterized by both great analytical and performance parameters.
Recently, there has been rapid development of all-solid-state potentiometric sensors, and there have been a lot of publications describing innovative designs with improved performance. This research focuses on achievements in the field of potentiometric sensors because of the use of metal oxides.
Metal oxides of nanostructured morphology are of both scientific and technical importance and have found application in numerous scientific disciplines, e.g., biomedicine, optics, electronics and electrochemical methods [10,11]. With a high surface-to-volume ratio, nanostructured metal oxides have been found to enhance the sensitivity, selectivity, catalytic activity, and electrical capacity of electrochemical devices. Metal oxides have been applied to date in electrochemical sensors either as a sensing material [12] or as a solid-contact layer (or paste) under the sensing membrane [13]. Electrochemical sensors can be used in association with various electrochemical detection methods, and these include conductometric, chronopotentiometric, voltammetric, amperometric, impedimetric, coulometric, and potentiometric measurements [14].

2. Potentiometric Sensors

With reference to the entire group of electrochemical sensors, they can be characterized as analytical tools with a small size and low purchase and maintenance cost, which account for their remarkable practicality and the possibility of performing analyses in field conditions. The use of sensors does not require high energy consumption and special laboratory conditions [8,15]. The aforementioned features of the sensors have contributed to their rapid development over the past few years.
The principle of electrochemical sensors is based on the interaction between “electricity” and “chemistry.” The part of the sensor in which “chemistry” plays the key role is the receptor part, which is responsible for the specific interaction of the analyzed ions with the sensor. The other part of the sensor converts the received chemical signal into an electrical signal (usually in the form of a current or potential change) [4]. One of the largest and most used groups of electrochemical sensors is potentiometric sensors.
Potentiometric sensors have adopted various designs over the years and have been used for the determination of ionic analytes in samples of varying matrix and origin [13,16]. The first ion-selective electrode described in the literature was a conventional design electrode, that is, one characterized by the presence of an internal solution and an ion-exchange membrane [17]. An example of a sensor with a design of this type is a glass electrode containing an electrode that generates a membrane potential and acts as an ion-to-electron conductor (which is an Ag/AgCl semi-cell) along with an internal solution of fixed composition and a glass membrane [18,19,20,21]. Conventional electrodes with an inner solution including the commonly known glass electrode (for pH measurements) exhibit satisfying analytical parameters; however, their construction results in a number of limitations, and the main one is their fragility, which makes the electrode vulnerable to any mechanical damage and large size, which preclude the analysis of small volume samples. Conventional electrodes are also associated with the disadvantages caused by the presence of an inner solution. This construction of an electrode requires a vertical position, a stable temperature, and pressure to avoid the phase change of the inner solution. Figure 1 presents a schematic representation of the construction of the conventional electrode.
A milestone in the development of sensors was the elimination of the internal electrolyte from the electrode construction, resulting in the establishment of a new broad group of potentiometric sensors [22].
A characteristic element of the design of potentiometric sensors is the sensing layer, which is an ion-selective membrane or, in the case of screen-printed electrodes, the sensing material layer. At the sensor–solution interface, a potential difference arises. In ion-selective electrodes with a membrane, the potential depends mainly on the activity of the potential-forming ion located in the membrane and in the solution, passing from one phase to the other. In a potentiometric sensor without the membrane, where the sensing functional material is responsible for the recognition of analyzed ions, the potential arises because the redox reaction occurs near the surface of the material. The potential is created due to the exchange reactions taking place between the sensor and the analyzed solution [4,7,8,17].
The first construction of an electrode without the inner solution was presented in the literature in the early 1970s by Cattrall et al. [23]. This construction was obtained by indirectly casting the ion-selective membrane onto the surface of the electrode (as presented in Figure 2). The construction is much simpler compared to that of the conventional electrode and more resistant to mechanical damage. However, the analytical parameters of this type of sensor are noticeably worse—the potential stability is poor, and the time of response is prolonged in contrast to the electrode with the inner solution. It turned out that in order to ensure efficient ion-to-electron exchange properties, the presence of the “key” between the ion-selective membrane and the electrode is crucial.
This led to the introduction of a new group of sensors, the solid-contact electrodes, characterized by the presence of the solid-contact layer in between the membrane and the electrode. A schematic representation of the construction of the solid-contact electrode is presented in Figure 2. The presence of material that exhibits both ionic and electronic transduction properties allows the charge between the sensor and the solution to be transferred efficiently.
Materials used as solid-contact layers can be divided into materials with a high redox capacity and materials with a high double-layer capacity [7,9]. The high redox capacity is related to the electronic and ionic conductivity of materials in which exchange processes occur because of reversible redox reactions. The first group of materials implemented into the sensor was the group of conducting polymers introduced in the literature in the early 1990s by Cadogan et al., who presented the use of poly(pyrrole) (PPy) [24]. When talking about conducting polymers, the following polymers should also be mentioned: poly(3-octylthiophene) (POT) [25], poly(aniline) (PANI) [26], poly(3,4-ethylene-1,4-dioxythiophene) (PEDOT) [27], and PEDOT doped with other ions: PEDOT(PSS) and PEDOT(Cl) [27]. The group of materials with high redox capacity also includes lipophilic silver complexes [28], ferrocene [29], Prussian blue [30], Co(II)/Co(III) cobalt salts [31], molecular organic compounds such as 7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) [32] and tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) and their salts [33]. It is also worth mentioning the composite materials included in this group, such as the TTF-TCNQ material [34] or self-stabilizing monolayers based on fullerenes and TTF [35].
The second group of materials is represented by materials with a high surface area resulting from the nanometric size of particles or pores in the material structure. This group includes carbon nanomaterials (carbon nanotubes [36], carbon nanohorns [37,38], graphene [39], carbon black [40], three-dimensionally ordered macroporous (3DOM) carbon [41], fullerenes [42], mesoporous carbon colloidal CIM [43]) and metal nanoparticles—gold nanoparticles [44], platinum [45], and nanoporous gold films [46]. By combining the materials mentioned above, composite materials were obtained, such as platinum nanoparticles stabilized on PtNPs-CB carbon black [45] or PtNPs-GR graphene [47] or carbon nanotubes with bimetallic gold and copper particles MWCNTs-AuCuNPs [48]. From the point of view of the presented division, metal oxides can be classified into both groups of materials. They are described both as materials with a high redox capacity and a high double-layer capacity because they exhibit redox sensitivity and are characterized by a large surface area [49].
The alternative construction of solid-contact electrodes with the solid-contact layer between the membrane and the electrode is the construction of a paste electrode in which the material fills the electrode corpus (as presented in Figure 3). In 1958, Adams was the first to incorporate carbon paste electrodes for analytical purposes [50]. The filling material is a paste of components mixed with paraffin oil, which is placed in the cavity of the electrode [51,52,53,54,55]. The leveled surface of the paste acts as a modified electrode substrate. This construction allows for the reduction in the consumption of toxic organic solvents, such as dimethylformamide and tetrahydrofuran, which are commonly used for the preparation of the solid-contact layer solution. The reduction in the use of solvents, ease of preparation, and the simplicity of construction are the main advantages of paste electrodes. In addition, paste electrodes are reusable because, after surface renewal, the electrode can be repeatedly covered with an ion-selective membrane.
Aside from the paste electrode, the construction of the solid-contact electrode can be further simplified by removing the ion-selective membrane and using metal oxide nanoparticles as the sensing layer. This approach can be applied to pH sensors, as some metal oxides are sensitive to hydrogen ions [49].
Various methods are used to manufacture pH sensors from metal oxides. Manufacturing methods include thermal or anodic oxidation of the metal, decomposition of a metal salt onto a back contact, and pressing of oxide pellets to hold the oxide in an inert matrix. MOx-based sensors can be manufactured using screen printing [56,57,58,59], sputtering [60,61], sol-gel [62,63], and electrodeposition [64,65] methods. One of the most common methods is to use thick-film screen-printing techniques [66,67,68,69]. Planar technologies are employed for developing solid-state sensors of low cost, small size, and high reproducibility. Screen printing is strongly recommended as a simple and fast method for the mass production of disposable electrochemical sensors. pH sensors were one of the first types of potentiometric sensors investigated for implementation using thick-film technology. The primary studies focused on the attempt to mimic the structure of a conventional glass pH electrode in a thick-film form [70]. The screen-printing technique allows one to produce microelectrodes by casting a small amount of material with a controlled thickness [71]. An exemplary and schematic construction of a screen-printed metal oxide-based electrode is presented in Figure 4.

3. Metal Oxides

This review focuses on the application of metal oxides in potentiometric sensors. In this chapter, we provide the characterization of metal oxides in the context of designing several types of sensors.

3.1. Characterization of Metal Oxides as Electrode Materials

One of the most known constructions of a potentiometric sensor is the solid-contact electrode. When choosing the material for solid-contact layers in potentiometric sensors, some key aspects must be taken into careful consideration.
Firstly, the material must enable an efficient ion-electron exchange process at the electrode | ion-selective membrane interface. Those processes are associated with either high redox capacitance or high double-layer capacitance. Redox capacitance is associated with the electron and ionic conductivity of materials in which exchange processes occur through reversible redox reactions, while double-layer capacitance surface development results from the nanometric size of particles or pores in the material structure.
Due to the nanometric size of its particles, nanostructured metal oxides are characterized by a high surface area. Besides its favorable morphology, some metal oxide nanomaterials such as ruthenium or iridium dioxide exhibit excellent redox properties. One of the mechanisms proposed by Fog et al. in [49] is that in contact with hydrogen ions, the oxide undergoes a redox reaction in which ions and protons are exchanged. This mechanism decides the ability of the oxide to transduce both ions and electrons through the layer, which simplifies the processes on the interface between the ion-selective membrane and the electronic conductor. The combination of those two properties—high surface area and high redox capacitance [4]—in one material makes it a great choice for the solid-contact layer.
In addition to the basic criterion of the presence of mixed ion-electron conductivity and high electrical capacitance, materials for solid-contact layers must meet a number of other requirements, including high hydrophobicity, chemical stability of the material, and the absence of side reactions occurring during the electron-ion exchange process [22,27,72,73].
The wettability of the solid-contact material is of particular importance in the context of the formation of an undesirable aqueous layer between the ion-selective membrane and the electron conductor. In the literature, hydrophilic materials (characterized by low values of the wetting angle below 90°) introduced into the electrode design did not prevent the formation of a water layer, unlike hydrophobic materials (with wetting angles above 90°), which have been repeatedly proven to protect sensors from the unwanted water layer and susceptibility to drop off of the ion-selective membrane [35,74,75]. Metal oxides, especially hydrous forms of oxides, are characterized by low wetting angle values and are defined as a hydrophilic material. Besides this property, even after prolonged use and conditioning of the electrodes in aqueous solutions, an aqueous layer did not form. This may be due to a specific reaction occurring on the surface of the ruthenium oxide layer [49] and/or large surface development that conditions the solid-contact layer to adhere strongly to the membrane, preventing it from peeling off the electrode surface.
The opposite requirements concerning wettability relate to electrodes without an ion-selective membrane. In this construction of an electrode, the metal oxide nanoparticle layer contacts the analyzed fluid and must be easily wettable by aqueous solutions. Taking this into account, hydrophilic metal oxides with contact angles below 30 degrees are perfect for the sensing layer in potentiometric sensors for pH measurement.
In the context of the design of paste electrodes, the material used as a paste should meet certain requirements. These include providing a quick and reversible transition from ionic to electronic conductivity and having a nonpolarizable surface between the paste and the high-capacity red-ox or double-layer ISM. In addition, the paste should be hydrophobic and characterized by low water absorption, which prevents the formation of a water layer. Moreover, the materials for the paste should be readily available and non-toxic. Similar to the case of solid-contact electrodes, metal oxides were proven to be great materials for paste electrode modification and production [76].
In addition, metal oxides exhibit a combination of unique properties, such as high thermal and chemical stability and low resistivity [11].

3.2. The Action Mechanism of Metal Oxides

The action mechanism is described based on the behavior of ruthenium oxide after contacting the electrolyte. According to the reaction mechanism proposed by Fog and Buck [49], ruthenium oxide in contact with hydrogen ions undergoes redox reactions, in which both ions and charged elementary parts are exchanged. The action mechanism of metal oxides is based on the redox reactions. These processes are initiated by electrons (e−) and protons (H+) introduced to the surface of the dioxide from the electrolyte, as presented in the following reaction [77]:
RuO2 + xH + xe = RuO2 − x(OH)x, where 0 ≤ x ≤ 2
This mechanism is used indirectly when designing sensors for pH determination with metal oxides acting both as a sensing layer and as a solid-contact layer.
In the literature [78], it was noted that the insertion of other cations, for example, potassium ions, into the porous dioxide layer also participates in the mentioned mechanism. As presented by Wen et al. [79], monovalent cations may act as hydrogen ions in the presented reaction and, as protons, lead to faradaic reactions. This feature was used when designing potentiometric sensors with an ion-selective membrane based on metal oxides for potassium determination [80].
The schematic representation of the charge storage mechanism that occurs via the proton-electron transfer for the metal oxide (MOx) layer is presented in Figure 5.

4. Metal Oxide Nanoparticles as a Sensing Material

Metal oxides as sensing materials are mostly used in pH sensors. Historically, the use of metal oxides in potentiometric sensors began in the 1980s when Fog and Buck introduced them for the first time as a sensing material for pH detection [49]. Some of the metal oxides were successfully applied as pH sensor materials and showed a near-Nernstian response in the pH range of 2–12. This research was followed by many publications by scientists searching for a replacement for the glass-membrane electrode.
Among the oxides used for the fabrication of pH sensors, the most commonly known and used are ruthenium oxide RuO2 and iridium oxide IrO2, characterized by remarkable sensitivity to hydrogen ions and high accuracy. Furthermore, we can distinguish tantalum(V) oxide Ta2O5, titanium dioxide TiO2, tin(IV) oxide SnO2, cerium dioxide CeO2, tungsten trioxide WO3, lead dioxide PbO2, and mixed oxides: Bi2O3-Nb2O5, IrO2-TiO2, and RuO2-TiO2 for pH sensor applications. In addition to this, some work has been conducted in the area of metal/MOx-based pH sensors such as those based on antimony and bismuth. In these couples, the redox equilibrium between the metal/MOx phases (e.g., Sb-Sb2O3) is attributed to the origin of their pH sensitivity [81,82,83]. The sensitivity of the MOx pH sensor significantly depends on the type of material composition and the deposition method since both factors can influence the microstructure, porosity, surface homogeneity, and crystalline structure of the material. This leads to variation in the sensitivity of the electrodes. The sensitivity of the pH sensors is expressed in terms of the Nernstian response (the sensor is expected to show 59.14 mV/pH at 25 °C derived from the Nernst equation). We investigated the sensitivity of different MOx including IrO2 [84,85], RuO2 [58,60,86,87,88,89], TiO2 [86,89,90], SnO2 [88,91], Ta2O5 [58,61], WO3 [92,93], CeO2 [94], PbO2 [95], MnO2 [96], and CoO2 [97] and compared them with the theoretical sensitivity. Table 1 presents the comparison of analytical parameters of MOx-based sensors such as pH measurement range, slope of calibration curve, and time of response.

5. Metal Oxide Nanoparticles as Solid-Contact Layers

One of the observed trends in the development of potentiometric sensors is the search for new functional materials for the construction of solid-contact electrodes. These electrodes are characterized by sandwich-like construction with a solid-contact layer between the substrate electrode and the ion-selective membrane. The properties of the solid-contact layer directly translate into the properties of the sensors, allowing them to achieve lower and lower limits of determination, higher potential stability, and lower response times.
As already mentioned, one of the trends in modern potentiometry is the search for new materials for solid-contact layers, which, because of their properties, will improve the analytical and performance of solid-contact ion-selective electrodes. Since the 1990s, when conductive polymers were first introduced as a solid-contact layer, up to the present day, various types of materials have been introduced into electrode design with varying results [4,13].
A group of metal oxides can be classified as high redox capacity and high double-layer capacity materials, as they exhibit both high redox sensitivity and high surface area [49]. The implementation of metal oxide macro/nanomaterials as solid-contact layers, to support the ion-to-electron transduction processes, relies on two strategies: High specific surface area and high redox activity. Some of the tested metal oxides also appeared to meet all the other requirements for solid-contact layers; hence, they were considered promising materials for solid-contact electrode design.
The mechanism of the selective response to hydrogen ions, described and applied by Fog and Buck [49], was later implemented by many research groups in the design of ion-selective electrodes with solid-contact layers based on metal oxide.
The first implementation of metal oxide in membrane-based potentiometric sensors dates back to 2013 when the Khun group introduced ZnO nanorods as solid-contact material for Cr2+-ISEs and ZnO nanotubes in I-ISEs [98]. The hollow structures of ZnO nanotubes can provide a larger surface area than ZnO nanorods. Later, the same group presented the use of CuO nanoflowers in Cd2+-ISEs [99]. These electrodes exhibit a very advantageous LOD (level of detection) at the nanomolar level. In other studies, the Qin group proposed MoO2 microspheres as an ion-to-electron transducer (2017) [100]. Compared to the coated-disc electrodes, the introduction of MoO2 microspheres improves the sensor performance to some extent as a result of the enhanced double-layer capacitance. In 2019, Yang et al. manufactured solid-contact K+-ISEs based on MnO2 nanosheets for the determination of K+ in the blood [101]. The MnO2 nanosheets turned out to have a wrinkled morphology, thereby preventing their dense accumulation and maintaining the advantage of a large surface area, which is advantageous for achieving a large double-layer capacitance. Also in 2019, the Paczosa-Bator group introduced hydrous RuO2 nanoparticles into solid-contact H+—and K+-ISEs as ion-to-electron transducers. Remarkably, these RuO2 nanoparticle-based sensors exhibit a large redox capacitance at the millifarad level. Other oxides introduced by the Paczosa-Bator group in the construction of ion-selective electrodes were hydrous IrO2 (2021) [102], and a year later, hydrous CeO2 (2022) [103]. In 2022, Wardak’s group presented a paper on the use of ZnO, CuO, and Fe2O3 in potassium-sensitive electrodes [104].

Metal Oxide Nanoparticles-Based Hybrid Materials as Solid-Contact Layers

Metal oxides were also used as components of hybrid materials with remarkable success. In 2019, Zeng et al. introduced TiO2-PANI material into the Pb2+- selective electrodes. This material possessed a large specific capacitance, thereby effectively promoting ion-to-electron transduction and enhancing the potential response stability of electrodes [105].
Later, the Paczosa-Bator group presented composite materials containing RuO2 nanoparticles and conducting polymers POT (RuO2–POT) [106] and PEDOT:PSS [107] and composite material containing ruthenium dioxide and carbon nanomaterials [108]. All the mentioned hybrids were applied as solid-contact layers in K+- selective electrodes.
The RuO2–POT composite exhibits superhydrophobic properties (a contact angle of 149°). The results of electrochemical techniques demonstrate that these solid-contact electrodes possess a large capacitance of approximately 1.2 mF, which is much larger than that of the coated-disc electrode. Compared to single-component counterparts, K+-ISE based on the RuO2-POT composite exhibits a shorter equilibration time and better potential stability and reproducibility.
The RuO2-PEDOT:PSS composite allowed the acquisition of electrodes with an electrical capacitance of as much as 7 mF. It is worth mentioning that the value of 7.2 mF is one of the highest values presented in the literature for this type of electrode.
The addition of graphene, the representative of the carbon materials group, to ruthenium dioxide allowed the capacitance to increase to 2.6 mF, which is 2.5 times higher compared to the oxide alone.
In 2021, Su et al. designed electrodes with MoS2-Fe3O4 as an ion-electron transduction layer for the determination of serum potassium [109]. These sensors present high performance in potential reproducibility and long-term stability.
In 2022, Lenar et al. presented a composite material based on iridium dioxide, creating a hybrid material of not two but three different components. The layer of IrO2-POT-MWCNT turned out to be superhydrophobic with a contact angle of 178°, which resulted in great stability in potentiometric response and long lifetime. This layer was introduced in K+ [110] and H+ [111] selective electrodes.
A year later, the group of Wardak presented the CuO-MWCNT material, applied as a solid-contact layer in Cu2+-selective electrodes [112]. These electrodes were characterized by a low detection limit (1.5 × 10–8 mol L–1) and very good potential stability.

6. Metal Oxides Nanoparticles in Paste Electrodes

Both metal oxides and their composites were used as a component in the paste electrodes. Niemiec et al. designed carbon black paste electrodes modified with poly(3-octylthiophene-2,5-diyl) and transition metal oxides: Ruthenium and iridium dioxide [77].
In this research, electrodes with carbon paste based on carbon black and modified with hydrated transition metal oxides, namely hydrous ruthenium dioxide and hydrous iridium dioxide, were presented. The paste with hydrous ruthenium dioxide, characterized by the best capacitance (470 μF), was extra modified by poly(3-octylthiophene-2,5-diyl). This modification results in a PVC-based electrode with the highest capacitance (130 μF) and, consequently, the lowest drift of the potentiometric response. The developed electrodes can be used to determine nitrate ions in liquid samples and soil samples [77].

7. Comparative Study

Table 2 presents a comparison between the analytical parameters of the solid-contact electrodes sensitive to various ions with the solid-contact layer based on the nanoparticles of the metal oxide.
Parameters were selected according to their importance and influence on the sensor performance. For each sensor presented in the literature, the slope of the calibration curve, linear range, stability of the potentiometric response described by the potential drift, and electrical capacitance parameters were compared. To provide the reader with comparable data, the potential drift values in the table refer to the potential drift parameter determined during the long-term potentiometric measurement. Since there are only a few methods that allow the determination of the electrical capacity of an electrode and may vary depending on the electrochemical technique used, the electrical capacitance parameter provided in the table is the parameter obtained from the chronopotentiometric measurement.

8. Summary

This review reveals that metal oxides are widely used for the design of potentiometric sensors. In the literature, many reports can be found on the usage of metal oxide nanoparticles in sensors of various constructions: Solid-contact electrodes, paste electrodes, and screen-printed electrodes. Because of their unique properties, metal oxides can be applied both as sensing layers in pH sensors and as solid-contact layers in sensors with a polymeric membrane. Metal oxide nanoparticles were incorporated into H+-selective thin-film screen-printed electrodes as the sensing material and in solid-contact and paste electrodes with a polymeric membrane for the determination of various ions. The presence of a membrane allows for designing sensors sensitive to various ions, not only H+ ions. The comparative study performed within the scope of this review displays that the presence of metal oxides in the sensor construction allows for obtaining robust analytical tools with a short response time and great potential stability. This is guaranteed by the high electrical capacity of the metal oxides, thanks to their remarkable redox properties and the nanometric size of the particles. Because of the great analytical parameters, low cost of the equipment and single analysis, and endless modification possibilities, potentiometry with the use of metal oxide-based electrodes can be considered a forward-looking method for future problems.
The challenges in the field of potentiometric sensors that still need to be faced concern lowering the detection limit for trace-level analysis and improving the stability of potentiometric response in order to eliminate the need for calibration in the future.
Based on the many literature reports, it can be stated that the application of metal oxides is promising in the context of designing potentiometric sensors, and their introduction into sensor construction may be considered a breakthrough in this field. Because of their high electrical capacity, metal oxides improve the stability of the potentiometric response of sensors and allow for a reduction in the number of necessary calibrations. As a consequence, this may lead to the creation of calibration-free sensors, which is the most sought-after feature in research on electrochemical sensors.
The area of metal oxides will possibly continue to develop towards composite materials designed with the use of substrates representing various groups of materials. This approach allows one to combine the best features into one material of new, unique properties and to modify metal oxides by enhancing their electrical capacity or hydrophobicity.
The application of ion-selective membrane over the metal oxide layer in solid-contact electrodes allows for the detection of various ions and there is a great possibility to extend their detection capabilities beyond common ions. The miniaturization and creation of flexible versions of potentiometric sensors achieved by thick-film technologies can broaden the application fields of metal oxide screen-printed electrodes, such as in vivo biomedical measurements and wearable point-of-care analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.P.-B. and N.L.; methodology and formal analysis, N.L.; validation, B.P.-B., R.P. and C.W.; investigation, N.L.; resources, B.P.-B., R.P. and C.W.; data curation, N.L; writing—original draft preparation, N.L.; writing—review and editing, B.P.-B.; visualization, N.L.; supervision, B.P.-B.; project administration, B.P.-B.; funding acquisition, B.P.-B. and R.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research project supported by program “Excellence initiative-research university” for the AGH University of Science and Technology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Karimi-Maleh, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Darabi, R.; Orooji, Y.; Karaman, C.; Karimi, F.; Baghayeri, M.; Rouhi, J.; Fu, L.; et al. Calf Thymus Ds-DNA Intercalation with Pendimethalin Herbicide at the Surface of ZIF-8/Co/rGO/C3N4/Ds-DNA/SPCE; A Bio-Sensing Approach for Pendimethalin Quantification Confirmed by Molecular Docking Study. Chemosphere 2023, 332, 138815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Raccary, B.; Loubet, P.; Peres, C.; Sonnemann, G. Evaluating the environmental impacts of analytical chemistry methods: From a critical review towards a proposal using a life cycle approach. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 147, 116525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yin, T.; Yu, H.; Ding, J.; Qin, W. An integrated screen-printed potentiometric strip for determination of Ca2+ in seawater. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, B589–B593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zdrachek, E.; Bakker, E. Potentiometric Sensing. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 2–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bakker, E.; Pretsch, E. Potentiometric sensors for trace-level analysis. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2005, 24, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rousseau, C.R.; Bühlmann, P. Calibration-free potentiometric sensing with solidcontact ion-selective electrodes. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 140, 116277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, J.; Stein, A.; Bühlmann, P. Rational design of all-solid-state ion-selective electrodes and reference electrodes. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 76, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bobacka, J.; Ivaska, A.; Lewenstam, A. Potentiometric Ion Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 329–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shao, Y.; Ying, Y.; Ping, J. Recent advances in solid-contact ion-selective electrodes: Functional materials, transduction mechanisms, and development trends. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 4405–4465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mallakpour, S.; Madani, M. A review of current coupling agents for modification of metal oxide nanoparticles. Prog. Org. Coat. 2015, 86, 194–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Prataap, R.K.V.; Arunachalam, R.; Pavul Raj, R.; Mohan, S.; Peter, L. Effect of electrodeposition modes on ruthenium oxide electrodes for supercapacitors. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2018, 18, 1143–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Manjakkal, L.; Szwagierczak, D.; Dahiya, R. Metal oxides based electrochemical pH sensors: Current progress and future perspectives. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 109, 100635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bakker, E.; Telting-Diaz, M. Electrochemical Sensors. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 2781–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Simões, F.R.; Xavier, M.G. Nanoscience and Its Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 155–178. [Google Scholar]
  15. van de Velde, L.; d’Angremont, E.; Olthuis, W. Solid contact potassium selective electrodes for biomedical applications—A review. Talanta 2016, 160, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Huang, M.R.; Li, X.G. Highly sensing and transducing materials for potentiometric ion sensors with versatile applicability. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2022, 125, 100885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bakker, E. Encyclopedia of Analytical Science, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 231–251. [Google Scholar]
  18. Haber, F.; Klemensiewicz, Z.Z.F. Über elektrische Phasengrenzkräfte. Phys. Chem. 1909, 67, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Graham, D.J.; Jaselskis, B.; Moore, C.E. Development of the glass electrode and the pH response. J. Chem. Educ. 2013, 90, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dole, M.J. The theory of the glass electrode. Am. Chem. Soc. 1931, 53, 4260–4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rechnitz, G.A.; Hameka, H.F. A theory of glass electrode response. Z. Analyt. Chem. 1965, 1059, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nikolskii, B.P.; Materova, E. Solid contact in membrane ion-selective electrodes. Ion. Select. Electr. Rev. 1985, 7, 3–39. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cattrall, R.W.; Freiser, H. Coated wire ion-selective electrodes. Anal. Chem. 1971, 43, 1905–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cadogan, A.; Gao, Z.; Lewenstam, A.; Diamond, D. All-solid-state sodium-selective electrode based on a calixarene ionophore in a poly(vinyl chloride) membrane with a polypyrrole solid contact. Anal. Chem. 1992, 64, 2496–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bobacka, J.; McCarrick, M.; Lewenstam, A.; Ivaska, A. All solid-state poly(vinyl chloride) membrane ion-selective electrodes with poly(3-octylthiophene) solid internal contact. Analyst 1994, 119, 1985–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bobacka, J.; Lindfors, T.; McCarrick, M.; Ivaska, A.; Lewenstam, A. Single-piece all-solid-state ion-selective electrode. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 3819–3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bobacka, J. Potential Stability of All-Solid-State Ion-Selective Electrodes Using Conducting Polymers as Ion-to-Electron Transducers. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 4932–4937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liu, D.; Meruva, R.K.; Brown, R.B.; Meyerhoff, M.E. Enhancing EMF stability of solid-state ion-selective sensors by incorporating lipophilic silver-ligand complexes within polymeric films. Anal. Chim. Acta 1996, 321, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grygołowicz-Pawlak, E.; Wygla̧dacz, K.; Sȩk, S.; Bilewicz, R.; Brzózka, Z.; Malinowska, E. Studies on ferrocene organothiol monolayer as an intermediate phase of potentiometric sensors with gold inner contact. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 111–112, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gabrielli, C.; Hémery, P.; Liatsi, P.; Masure, M.; Perrot, H. An Electrogravimetric Study of an All-Solid-State Potassium Selective Electrode with Prussian Blue as the Electroactive Solid Internal Contact. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, H219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zou, X.U.; Cheong, J.H.; Taitt, B.J.; Buhlmann, P. Solid Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes with a Well-Controlled Co(II)/Co(III) Redox Buffer Layer. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 9350–9355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Paczosa-Bator, B.; Pięk, M.; Piech, R. Application of Nanostructured TCNQ to Potentiometric Ion-Selective K+ and Na+ Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 1718–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pięk, M.; Piech, R.; Paczosa-Bator, B. Improved Nitrate Sensing Using Solid Contact Ion Selective Electrodes Based on TTF and Its Radical Salt. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, B257–B263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pięk, M.; Piech, R.; Paczosa-Bator, B. TTF-TCNQ solid contact layer in all-solid-state ion-selective electrodes for potassium or nitrate determination. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, B60–B65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fibbioli, M.; Morf, W.E.; Badertscher, M.; De Rooij, N.F.; Pretsch, E. Potential drifts of solid-contacted ion- selective electrodes due to zero-current ion fluxes through the sensor membrane. Electroanalysis 2000, 12, 1286–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Crespo, G.A.; Macho, S.; Rius, F.X. Ion-selective electrodes using carbon nanotubes as ion-to-electron transducers. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 1316–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, X.; Ying, Y.; Ping, J. Structure, synthesis, and sensing applications of single-walled carbon nanohorns. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 167, 112495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jiang, C.; Yao, Y.; Cai, Y.; Ping, J. All-solid-state potentiometric sensor using single-walled carbon nanohorns as transducer. J. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 283, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ping, J.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Ying, Y. Development of an All-Solid-State Potassium Ion-Selective Electrode Using Graphene as the Solid-Contact Transducer. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 1529–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Paczosa-Bator, B. All-solid-state selective electrodes using carbon black. Talanta 2012, 93, 424–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lai, C.Z.; Fierke, M.A.; Stein, A.; Bühlmann, P. Ion-selective electrodes with three-dimensionally ordered macroporous carbon as the solid contact. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 4621–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fouskaki, M.; Chaniotakis, N. Fullerene-Based Electrochemical Buffer Layer for Ion-Selective Electrodes. Analyst 2008, 133, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hu, J.; Zou, X.U.; Stein, A.; Bühlmann, P. Ion-selective electrodes with colloid-imprinted mesoporous carbon as solid contact. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 7111–7118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jaworska, E.; Wójcik, M.; Kisiel, A.; Mieczkowski, J.; Michalska, A. Gold Nanoparticles Solid Contact for Ion-Selective Electrodes of Highly Stable Potential Readings. Talanta 2011, 85, 1986–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Paczosa-Bator, B.; Cabaj, L.; Piech, R.; Skupien, K. Potentiometric sensors with carbon black supporting platinum nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 10255–10261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yin, T.; Pan, D.; Qin, W. All-solid-state polymeric membrane ion-selective miniaturized electrodes based on a nanoporous gold film as solid contact. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 11038–11044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Paczosa-Bator, B.; Piech, R.; Wardak, C.; Cabaj, L. Application of Graphene Supporting Platinum Nanoparticles Layer in Electrochemical Sensors with Potentiometric and Voltammetric Detection. Ionics 2018, 24, 2455–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yan, R.; Gao, Y.; Wang, P. Bimetallic AuCu Nanoparticles Coupled with Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Ion-to-Electron Transducers in Solid-Contact Potentiometric Sensors. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 331, 135370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fog, A.; Buck, R.P. Electronic semiconducting oxides as pH sensors. Sens. Actuators 1984, 5, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Adams, R.N. Carbon Paste Electrodes. Anal. Chem. 1958, 30, 1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Radić, J.; Perović, D.; Gričar, E.; Kolar, M. Potentiometric Determination of Maprotiline Hydrochloride in Pharmaceutical and Biological Matrices Using a Novel Modified Carbon Paste Electrode. Sensors 2022, 22, 9201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Radić, J.; Buljac, M.; Genorio, B.; Gričar, E.; Kolar, M. A Novel Reduced Graphene Oxide Modified Carbon Paste Electrode for Potentiometric Determination of Trihexyphenidyl Hydrochloride in Pharmaceutical and Biological Matrices. Sensors 2021, 21, 2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zayed, M.A.; Mahmoud, W.H.; Abbas, A.A.; Ali, A.E.; Mohamed, G.G. A highly sensitive, selective and renewable carbon paste electrode based on a unique acyclic diamide ionophore for the potentiometric determination of lead ions in polluted water samples. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 17552–17560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fanjul-Bolado, P.; Hernández-Santos, D.; Lamas-Ardisana, P.J.; Martín-Pernía, A.; Costa-García, A. Electro-chemical characterization of screen-printed and conventional carbon paste electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 3635–3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rice, M.E.; Galus, Z.; Adams, R.N. Graphite paste electrodes: Effects of paste composition and surface states on electron-transfer rates. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1983, 143, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Martínez-Máñez, R.; Soto, J.; García-Breijo, E.; Gil, L.; Ibáñez, J.; Gadea, E. A multisensor in thick-film technology for water quality control. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2005, 120, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhuiykov, S. Morphology of Pt-doped RuO2 nanocomposited and their application in water quality monitoring sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2009, 136, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Manjakkal, L.; Zaraska, K.; Cvejin, K.; Kulawik, J.; Szwagierczak, D. Potentiometric RuO2–Ta2O5 pH sensors fabricated using thick film and LTCC technologies. Talanta 2016, 147, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Labrador, R.H.; Soto, J.; Martínez-Máñez, R.; Coll, C.; Benito, A.; Ibáñez, J.; García-Breijo, E.; Gil, L. An electrochemical characterization of thick-film electrodes based on RuO2-containing resistive pastes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2007, 611, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liao, Y.H.; Chou, J.C. Preparation and characteristics of ruthenium dioxide for pH array sensors with real-time measurement system. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2008, 128, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kwon, D.H.; Cho, B.W.; Kim, C.S.; Sohn, B.K. Effects of heat treatment on Ta2O5 sensing membrane for low drift and high sensitivity pH-ISFET. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1996, 34, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chou, J.C.; Wang, Y.F. Preparation and study on the drift and hysteresis properties of the tin oxide gate ISFET by the sol-gel method. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2002, 86, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Huang, W.D.; Cao, H.; Deb, S.; Chiao, M.; Chiao, J.C. A Flexible pH Sensor Based on the Iridium Oxide Sensing Film. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2011, 169, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Santos, L.; Neto, J.P.; Crespo, A.; Nunes, D.; Costa, N.; Fonseca, I.M.; Barquinha, P.; Pereira, L.; Silva, J.; Martins, R.; et al. WO3 Nanoparticle-Based Conformable pH Sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 12226–12234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Prats-Alfonso, E.; Abad, L.; Casañ-Pastor, N.; Gonzalo-Ruiz, J.; Baldrich, E. Iridium oxide pH sensor for biomedical applications. Case urea-urease in real urine samples. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 39, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mihell, J.A.; Atkinson, J.K. Planar thick-film pH electrodes based on ruthenium dioxide hydrate. Sens. Actuators B. Chem. 1998, 48, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Glanc-Gostkiewicz, M.; Sophocleous, M.; Atkinson, J.K.; Garcia-Breijo, E. The effect on performance of fabrication parameter variations of thick-film screen printed silver/silver chloride potentiometric reference electrodes. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2013, 202, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. McMurray, H.N.; Douglas, P.; Abbot, D. Novel thick film pH sensor based on Ruthenium dioxide glass composites. Sens. Actuators B. Chem. 1995, 28, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Parr, R.A.; Wilson, J.C.; Kelly, R.G. A hybrid microelectronic pH sensor. J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum. 1986, 19, 1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Koncki, R.; Mascini, M. Screen-printed ruthenium dioxide electrodes for pH measurements. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 351, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Goldberg, H.D.; Brown, R.B.; Liu, D.P.; Meyerhoff, M.E. Screen printing: A technology for the batch fabrication of integrated chemical-sensor arrays. Sens. Actuators B. Chem. 1994, 21, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yin, T.; Qin, W. Applications of nanomaterials in potentiometric sensors. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 51, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. De Marco, R.; Veder, J.-P.; Clarke, G.; Nelson, A.; Prince, K.; Pretsch, E.; Bakker, E. Evidence of a water layer in solid-contact polymeric ion sensors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Papp, S.; Bojtár, M.; Gyurcsányi, R.E.; Lindfors, T. Potential Reproducibility of Potassium-Selective Electrodes Having Perfluorinated Alkanoate Side Chain Functionalized Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxytiophene) as a Hydrophobic Solid Contact. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 9111–9118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Guzinski, M.; Jarvis, J.M.; D’Orazio, P.; Izadyar, A.; Pendley, B.D.; Lindner, E. Solid-Contact pH Sensor without CO2 Interference with a Superhydrophobic PEDOT-C14 as Solid Contact: The Ultimate “Water Layer” Test. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 8468–8475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Niemiec, B.; Piech, R.; Paczosa-Bator, B. All-Solid-State Carbon Black Paste Electrodes Modified by Poly(3-octylthiophene-2,5-diyl) and Transition Metal Oxides for Determination of Nitrate Ions. Molecules 2023, 28, 4313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Augustyn, V.; Simon, P.; Dunn, B. Pseudocapacitive oxide materials for high-rate electrochemical energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1597–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Majumdar, D.; Maiyalagan, T.; Jiang, Z. Recent Progress in Ruthenium Oxide-Based Composites for Supercapacitor Applications. ChemElectroChem 2019, 6, 4343–4372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wen, S.; Lee, J.; Yeo, I.; Park, J.; Mho, S. The role of cations of the electrolyte for the pseudocapacitive behavior of metal oxide electrodes, MnO2 and RuO2. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 50, 849–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lenar, N.; Paczosa-Bator, B.; Piech, R. Ruthenium Dioxide as High-Capacitance Solid-Contact Layer in K+-Selective Electrodes Based on Polymer Membrane. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, B1470–B1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Edwall, G. Improved antimony-antimony (III) oxide pH electrodes. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1978, 16, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kurzweil, P. Metal Oxides and Ion-Exchanging Surfaces as pH Sensors in Liquids: State-of-the-Art and Outlook. Sensors 2009, 9, 4955–4985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Głąb, S.; Hulanicki, A.; Edwall, G.; Folke, F.; Ingman, I.; Koch, W.F. Metal-metal oxide and metal oxide electrodes as pH sensors. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 1989, 21, 29–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Marzouk, S.A.M.; Ufer, S.; Buck, R.P.; Johnson, T.A.; Dunlap, L.A.; Cascio, W.E. Electrodeposited iridium oxide pH electrode for measurement of extracellular myocardial acidosis during acute ischemia. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 5054–5061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shervedani, R.K.; Mehrdjardi, H.R.Z.; Ghahfarokhi, S.H.K. Electrochemical characterization and application of Ni-RuO2 as a pH sensor for determination of petroleum oil acid number. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2007, 4, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. da Silva, G.M.; Lemos, S.G.; Pocrifka, L.A.; Marreto, P.D.; Rosario, A.V.; Pereira, E.C. Development of low-cost metal oxide pH electrodes based on the polymeric precursor method. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 616, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Xu, B.; Zhang, W. Modification of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes with RuO2 for a solid-state pH sensor. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 2859–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Manjakkal, L.; Cvejin, K.; Kulawik, J.; Zaraska, K.; Szwagierczak, D.; Stojanovic, G. Sensing mechanism of RuO2–SnO2 thick film pH sensors studied by potentiometric method and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2015, 759, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liao, Y.H.; Chou, J.C. Preparation and characterization of the titanium dioxide thin films used for pH electrode and procaine drug sensor by sol–gel method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 114, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pocrifka, L.A.; Gonçalves, C.; Grossi, P.; Colpa, P.C.; Pereira, E.C. Development of RuO2–TiO2 (70–30) mol% for pH measurements. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2006, 113, 1012–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tsai, C.N.; Chou, J.C.; Sun, T.P.; Hsiung, S.K. Study on the time-dependent slow response of the tin oxide pH electrode. IEEE Sens. J. 2006, 6, 1243–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chiang, J.L.; Jan, S.S.; Chou, J.C.; Chen, Y.C. Study on the temperature effect, hysteresis and drift of pH-ISFET devices based on amorphous tungsten oxide. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2001, 76, 624–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, W.D.; Xu, B. A solid-state pH sensor based on WO3-modified vertically aligned multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 1038–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Betelu, S.; Polychronopoulou, K.; Rebholz, C.; Ignatiadis, I. Novel CeO2-based screen-printed potentiometric electrodes for pH monitoring. Talanta 2011, 87, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Razmi, H.; Heidari, H.; Habibi, E. pH-sensing properties of PbO2 thin film electrodeposited on carbon ceramic electrode. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2008, 12, 1579–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Telli, L.; Brahimi, B.; Hammouche, A. Study of a pH sensor with MnO2 and montmorillonite-based solid-state internal reference. Solid State Ionics 2000, 128, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Qingwen, L.; Guoan, L.; Youqin, S. Response of nanosized cobalt oxide electrodes as pH sensors. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 409, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ibupoto, Z.H.; Khun, K.; Willander, M. A Selective Iodide Ion Sensor Electrode Based on Functionalized ZnO Nanotubes. Sensors 2013, 13, 1984–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Khun, K.; Ibupoto, Z.H.; Willander, M. Urea Assisted Synthesis of Flower Like CuO Nanostructures and Their Chemical Sensing Application for the Determination of Cadmium Ions. Electroanalysis 2013, 25, 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zeng, X.; Qin, W. A solid-contact potassium-selective electrode with MoO2 microspheres as ion-to-electron transducer. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 982, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yang, C.; Song, C.Q.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Qu, Y. Determination of Concentration of Serum Potassium Ion Using All-Solid-State Potassium Ion Selective Electrode Based on Two-Dimensional Manganese Dioxide Nanosheet. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2019, 47, 765–771. [Google Scholar]
  102. Lenar, N.; Piech, R.; Wyrwa, J.; Paczosa-Bator, B. Potassium-Selective Solid-Contact Electrode with High-Capacitance Hydrous Iridium Dioxide in the Transduction Layer. Membranes 2021, 11, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Lenar, N.; Piech, R.; Paczosa-Bator, B. Hydrous Cerium Dioxide-Based Materials as Solid-Contact Layers in Potassium-Selective Electrodes. Membranes 2022, 12, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Pietrzak, K.; Krstulović, N.; Blažeka, D.; Car, J.; Malinowski, S.; Wardak, C. Metal oxide nanoparticles as solid contact in ion-selective electrodes sensitive to potassium ions. Talanta 2022, 243, 123335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Zeng, X.; Jiang, W.; Jiang, X.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, L. Stable Pb2+ ion-selective electrodes based on polyaniline-TiO2 solid contacts. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1094, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Lenar, N.; Paczosa-Bator, B.; Piech, R.; Królicka, A. Poly(3-octylthiophene-2,5-diyl)-nanosized ruthenium dioxide composite material as solid-contact layer in polymer membrane-based K+-selective electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 322, 134718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lenar, N.; Piech, R.; Paczosa-Bator, B. Potentiometric Sensor with High Capacity Composite Composed of Ruthenium Dioxide and Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) Polystyrene Sulfonate. Materials 2021, 14, 1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lenar, N.; Piech, R.; Paczosa-Bator, B. High Capacity Nanocomposite Layers Based on Nanoparticles of Carbon Materials and Ruthenium Dioxide for Potassium Sensitive Electrode. Materials 2021, 14, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Su, Y.; Liu, T.; Song, C.; Fan, A.; Zhu, N.; Sun, B.; Yang, C. Using MoS2/Fe3O4 as Ion-Electron Transduction Layer to Manufacture All-Solid-State Ion-Selective Electrode for Determination of Serum Potassium. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lenar, N.; Piech, R.; Paczosa-Bator, B. Carbon Nanomaterials-Poly(3-octylthiophene-2,5-diyl)–Hydrous Iridium Dioxide Triple Composite Materials as Superhydrophobic Layers for Ion-Selective Electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 127508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lenar, N.; Piech, R.; Paczosa-Bator, B. The New Reliable pH Sensor Based on Hydrous Iridium Dioxide and Its Composites. Materials 2023, 16, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wardak, C.; Pietrzak, K.; Morawska, K. Nanocomposite of copper oxide nanoparticles and multi-walled carbon nanotubes as a solid contact of a copper-sensitive ion-selective electrode: Intermediate layer or membrane component–comparative studies. Appl. Nanosci. 2023, 13, 7017–7028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lenar, N.; Paczosa-Bator, B.; Piech, R. Ruthenium dioxide nanoparticles as a high-capacity transducer in solid-contact polymer membrane-based pH-selective electrodes. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Lenar, N.; Paczosa-Bator, B.; Piech, R. Optimization of ruthenium dioxide solid contact in ion-selective electrodes. Membranes 2020, 10, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Membranes 13 00876 g001
Figure 1. The schematic representation of the conventional electrode.
Figure 1. The schematic representation of the conventional electrode.
Membranes 13 00876 g001
Membranes 13 00876 g002
Figure 2. The schematic representation of the coated disc and solid-contact electrode.
Figure 2. The schematic representation of the coated disc and solid-contact electrode.
Membranes 13 00876 g002
Membranes 13 00876 g003
Figure 3. The schematic representation of the paste electrode.
Figure 3. The schematic representation of the paste electrode.
Membranes 13 00876 g003
Membranes 13 00876 g004
Figure 4. The schematic representation of the screen-printed electrode.
Figure 4. The schematic representation of the screen-printed electrode.
Membranes 13 00876 g004
Membranes 13 00876 g005
Figure 5. Mechanism of ion-electron exchange at phase boundaries using a metal oxide (MOx) layer.
Figure 5. Mechanism of ion-electron exchange at phase boundaries using a metal oxide (MOx) layer.
Membranes 13 00876 g005
Table 1. pH sensors based on metal oxides—metal oxides as sensing materials.
Table 1. pH sensors based on metal oxides—metal oxides as sensing materials.
MaterialpH RangeSlope [mV/pH]Response TimeReference
RuO21–1355.64-[60]
RuO2-TiO22–1256.03-[90]
RuO2-Ni1.5–12.552-[86]
RuO2-NT2–1255<40 s[87]
RuO2-Ta2O52–1256<8 s[58]
RuO2-SnO22–1256.5<5 s[88]
IrO22–1063.5~1 min[84]
IrO2-TiO21–1359.1120 s[85]
Ta2O52–1258–59<0.3 s[61]
SnO22–1258.1-[91]
TiO21–1158.73-[89]
WO31–744.85-[92]
WO3-NT2–1241<90 s[93]
CeO27.2–10.838-[94]
PbO21.5–12.564.82<1 s[95]
MnO22–1278.3few seconds[96]
CoO21–1254.9<1 min[97]
List of abbreviations: NT—nanotubes, IrO2—iridium dioxide, RuO2—ruthenium dioxide, MnO2—manganium dioxide, CeO2—cerium dioxide, TiO2—titanium dioxide, Ta2O5—tantalum(V) oxide, SnO2—tin(IV) oxide, WO3—tungsten trioxide, PbO2—lead dioxide, CoO2—cobalt(II) oxide.
Table 2. The comparison of analytical parameters of solid-contact electrodes with solid-contact layer based on metal oxides nanoparticles—metal oxides as solid-contact layers.
Table 2. The comparison of analytical parameters of solid-contact electrodes with solid-contact layer based on metal oxides nanoparticles—metal oxides as solid-contact layers.
Solid-ContactIonSlope,
pX/dec		Linear Range,
M		Potential Drift *,
mV/h		Electrical Capacity **,
μF		Reference
RuO2H+59.31 10−12–10−20.151120[113]
IrO2H+54.12 10−11–10−20.166[111]
IrO2-NTH+54.40 10−11–10−20.077174[111]
IrO2-NT-POTH+57.18 10−11.5–10−20.036387[111]
MoO2
microspheres		K+55.010−3–10−50.01286[100]
MnO2
nanosheets		K+51.8510−2–10−5-29[96]
CuOK+56.6810−1–10−50.540.104[104]
ZnOK+56.1810−1–10−50.160.026[104]
Fe2O3K+55.1110−1–10−51.400.010[104]
RuO2K+57.3710−1–10−60.00151233[114]
RuO2-POTK+58.6410−6–10−10.0281170[106]
RuO2-
PEDOT:PSS		K+58.9310−6–10−10.0777200[107]
RuO2-GRK+58.9510−6–10−1-2600[108]
RuO2-NTK+58.2510−6–10−1-1050[108]
RuO2-CBK+58.0310−6–10−1-1080[108]
IrO2K+59.2910−6–10−10.063920[102]
IrO2-POT-NTK+57.3310−6–10−10.0431500[110]
CeO2K+55.3210−5–10−10.0869[103]
CeO2-NTK+58.9010−6–10−10.095610[103]
CeO2-POTK+58.2110−6–10−10.2496[103]
ZnO
nanorods		Cr2+28.6510−6–10−1--[98]
ZnO
nanotubes		I−6210−6–10−1--[98]
CuO
nanoflowers		Cd2+29.310−9–10−1--[99]
TiO2-PANIPb2+2910−9–10−1-8.1[105]
MoS2-Fe3O4K+55.210−5–10−2-350[109]
CuO-NTCu2+30.15 × 10−8–3 × 10−2--[112]
CB-IrO2
(paste)		NO3−−57.210−5–10−10.1186[76]
CB-RuO2
(paste)		NO3−−57.210−5–10−10.1198[76]
CB-RuO2-POT (paste)NO3−−56.910−5–10−10.02130[76]
* Potential drift parameter determined during the long-term potentiometric measurement. ** Electrical capacitance parameter obtained from the chronopotentiometric measurement. List of abbreviations: POT—poly(3-octylthiophene-2,5-diyl, NT—nanotubes, IrO2—iridium dioxide, RuO2—ruthenium dioxide, MoO2—molybdenum dioxide, MnO2—manganium dioxide, CuO—copper oxide, ZnO—zinc oxide, Fe2O3—iron(III) oxide, PEDOT:PSS—poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate, GR—graphene, CB—carbon black, CeO2—cerium dioxide, PANI—polyaniline, TiO2—titanium dioxide, Fe3O4—iron(II,III) oxide, MoS2—molybdenum disulfide.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lenar, N.; Piech, R.; Wardak, C.; Paczosa-Bator, B. Application of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in the Field of Potentiometric Sensors: A Review. Membranes 2023, 13, 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13110876

AMA Style

Lenar N, Piech R, Wardak C, Paczosa-Bator B. Application of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in the Field of Potentiometric Sensors: A Review. Membranes. 2023; 13(11):876. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13110876

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lenar, Nikola, Robert Piech, Cecylia Wardak, and Beata Paczosa-Bator. 2023. "Application of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in the Field of Potentiometric Sensors: A Review" Membranes 13, no. 11: 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13110876

APA Style

Lenar, N., Piech, R., Wardak, C., & Paczosa-Bator, B. (2023). Application of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in the Field of Potentiometric Sensors: A Review. Membranes, 13(11), 876. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13110876

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop