Next Article in Journal
Role of Interleukin-6 in the Antigen-Specific Mucosal Immunoglobulin A Responses Induced by CpG Oligodeoxynucleotide-Loaded Cationic Liposomes
Previous Article in Journal
The ESCRT Machinery: Remodeling, Repairing, and Sealing Membranes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Membranes
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/membranes12060634
membranes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Pressurized Aeration on the Biodegradation of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins by Escherichia coli Strain 2

by
Yongxing Qian
1,2,
Wanling Han
1,2,
Fuhai Zhou
3,
Bixiao Ji
1,2,
Huining Zhang
1,2,* and
Kefeng Zhang
1,2
1
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, NingboTech University, Ningbo 315000, China
2
Ningbo Research Institute, Zhejiang University, Ningbo 315100, China
3
Zhejiang Haiyi Environmental Protection Equipment Engineering Co., Ltd., Quzhou 324000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2022, 12(6), 634; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12060634
Submission received: 11 May 2022 / Revised: 15 June 2022 / Accepted: 16 June 2022 / Published: 19 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Processes for Removing Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Water and Wastewater)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) were defined as persistent organic pollutants in 2017, and they can migrate and transform in the environment, accumulate in organisms, and amplify through the food chain. Although they pose a serious threat to environmental safety and human health, there are few papers on their removal. The current SCCP removal methods are expensive, require severe operating conditions, involve time-consuming biological treatment, and have poor removal specificities. Therefore, it is important to seek efficient methods to remove SCCPs. In this paper, a pressurized reactor was introduced, and the removal performance of SCCPs by Escherichia coli strain 2 was investigated. The results indicated that moderate pure oxygen pressurization promoted bacterial growth, but when it exceeded 0.15 MPa, the bacterial growth was severely inhibited. When the concentration of SCCPs was 20 mg/L, the removal rate of SCCPs was 85.61% under 0.15 MPa pure oxygen pressurization for 7 days, which was 25% higher than at atmospheric pressure (68.83%). In contrast, the removal rate was only 69.28% under 0.15 MPa air pressure. As the pressure continued to increase, the removal rate of SCCPs decreased significantly. The total amount of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) increased significantly upon increasing the pressure, and the amount of tightly bound EPS (TB-EPS) was higher than that of loosely bound EPS (LB-EPS). The pressure mainly promoted the secretion of proteins in LB-EPS. Furthermore, an appropriate pure oxygen pressure of 0.15 MPa improved the dehydrogenase activity. The gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) results indicated that the degradation pathway possibly involved the cleavage of the C–Cl bond in SCCPs, which produced Cl−, followed by C–C bond breaking. This process degraded long-chain alkanes into short-chain alkanes. Moreover, the main degradation products detected were 2,4-dimethylheptane (C9H20), 2,5-dimethylheptane (C9H20), and 3,3-dimethylhexane (C8H18).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Chlorinated paraffins (CPs) are chlorinated from n-alkane raw materials, whose degree of chlorination is usually 30–70 wt.%. According to the different carbon chain lengths, CPs can be divided into short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs, C10–C13), middle-chain chlorinated paraffins (MCCPs, C14–C17), and long-chain chlorinated paraffins (LCCPs, C18–C30) [1]. Due to their excellent flame retardancy, electrical insulation, and low volatility, CPs can generally be used as high-temperature lubricants, plasticizers, flame retardants, adhesives, paints, rubbers, and sealants as additives [2,3]. China is a major producer and exporter of CPs [4], with a total production capacity of 2.08 million tons and an actual output that reached 0.835 million tons in 2018. Compared with MCCPs and LCCPs, SCCPs pose a greater environmental threat. They are carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic and have the highest toxicity. They were finally included in the list of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in Annex A of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants in 2017 [5]. As one of the parties to the Stockholm Convention and a major producer and user of halogenated flame retardants, China faces tremendous pressure and is making every effort to abate SCCPs in the environment.
To date, SCCPs have been reduced by treatment with metal sodium dispersion dechlorination [6], zero-valent iron [7], and photocatalytic degradation [8,9,10]. However, the current use of physicochemical treatment methods to remove SCCPs is expensive, and the operating conditions are also severe. Biological methods are favored over physicochemical methods because of their simple process, low costs, and environmental friendliness. Among them, bacterial degradation methods show greater prospects for the treatment of SCCPs. Allpress et al. [11] first reported the Gram-positive strain of Rhodococcus sp. S45-1, which utilized SCCPs as their only carbon and energy source for metabolic degradation. However, the strain required a long degradation time of 30–100 days. Gram-negative bacteria can also degrade SCCPs. Heath et al. [12] screened Pseudomonas sp. strain 273, which dechlorinated chlorinated alkanes, but just like the strain screened by Allpress, the dechlorination cycle of this strain lasted 20 days or longer. Similarly, Lu [13] obtained Pseudomonas strain N35 from dehydrated sludge collected in a secondary sedimentation tank. The pure strain effectively degraded SCCPs with a dechlorination rate of 57.5% within 20 days using SCCPs as the carbon and energy source. Adding bacteria to the sludge removed 73.4% of SCCPs, but the degradation time was too long, requiring 30 days. Therefore, improving the biodegradation efficiency of pollutants is a crucial factor for expanding the applications of biological methods.
Dissolved oxygen (DO) can influence the efficiency of aerobic microbial wastewater treatment. According to Henry’s law and the double-membrane theory of gas transfer, increasing the gas pressure in a bioreactor will increase the concentration of saturated dissolved gases in water, breaking through the atmospheric supply limit, and thereby promoting the biodegradation of organics in wastewater. Pressurization technology has been widely used to improve the biological treatment of activated sludge and granular sludge [14,15,16,17]. Previous studies have shown that pressure affects the growth state, morphology, and secretion of microorganisms, but a few researchers have pointed out that moderate pressure will not cause microbial changes. Jin et al. [15] reported that moderate pressure helped the degradation of pesticide wastewater by activated sludge. Under 0.3 MPa, the removal rate of chemical oxygen demand (COD) in pesticide wastewater was much higher than that under atmospheric pressure. Zhang et al. [17] pointed out that the removal rate of COD was the highest when the pressure was 0.4 MPa. Due to an increase in the DO concentration in water under moderate oxygen pressure, DO was no longer the limiting factor for microbial degradation of pollutants.
Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) are microbial secretions that are metabolites or autolysates that are attached to or surround microorganisms. They are mainly composed of proteins, polysaccharides, and a small number of nucleic acids. Various studies have shown that EPS play a pivotal role in pollutant removal processes. EPS can adsorb pollutants, such as dyes [18], refractory organics [19], and heavy metals [20], or transfer phosphorus and electrons to promote interactions between pollutants and microbes [21,22]. Moreover, EPS affect bacterial attachment and movement and is often the culprit for the fouling of membrane modules [23]. Shi et al. [24] provided an excellent review of the role of EPS in biological treatment methods. They showed that the characteristics of EPS were affected by the feed substances, operating conditions, and substances in the environment. Despite these studies, the impact of pressure on EPS has not been investigated. Thus, studying the impact of EPS under pressure on the microbial degradation of pollutants can supplement our understanding of the effect of EPS at atmospheric pressure and help to provide certain basic experimental data for adding membrane modules to the pressurized membrane bioreactor and preventing its fouling.
Here, to improve the efficiency of the microbial removal of SCCPs, pressurized bioreactors were utilized. In this work, the synergistic effect of E. coli strain 2 on the removal of SCCPs was studied in a pressurized system, and the removal performance under different working conditions (rotation speed, initial SCCP concentration, pressure, and type of gas) was compared and analyzed in pressurized bioreactors. Moreover, the transformation law of E. coli strain 2 parameters, including bacterial growth, EPS, and dehydrogenase (DHA), was revealed in the pressurized system. Moreover, the changes in EPS that were the culprit for the fouling of membrane modules in different pressurized reactors were investigated. Based on this, changes in bacterial morphology and possible degradation pathways of SCCPs in the pressurized system were clarified.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Materials

Industrial short-chain chlorinated paraffins were purchased from a chlorinated paraffin production factory (Henan, China). Methanol (chromatographically pure), acetone, reagent sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, and pure xylene were purchased from Sinopharm (Shanghai, China). All the other chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade. Ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm) was obtained from a Milli-Q purification system (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The SCCP-degrading pure bacterium E. coli strain 2 (preliminary experiments implied that the bacteria had an excellent dechlorination effect on SCCPs) used in this study was quickly screened from activated sludge in a local wastewater treatment plant (Ningbo, China).

2.2. The Pressurized Bioreactor

The pressurized bioreactor used in this work is seen in Figure S1a. The outer diameter of the tank was 64 mm, and the height was 140 mm. The pressurized bioreactor was made of steel with a 48 mm diameter, 110 mm height, and 200 mL effective volume. All the pressurization experiments were conducted in the tank (Figure S1b). The inlet pipe (inner pipe length: 90 mm) went deep into the bottom of the tank, which was conducive to gas–liquid two-phase mass transfer. This prolonged the residence time of reactive substances in the tank and reduced the impact of high-pressure airflow on the inner wall of the tank.
During the experiment, the reactor shell was immersed in a constant-temperature heating magnetic stirrer as a water bath, and the built-in rotor stirred the reaction medium to improve the probability of contact between microorganisms and pollutants. Furthermore, batch experiments were conducted within the operating pressure range of 0–0.3 MPa. All the pressures in this paper were the operating pressure, that is, the gauge pressure of the pressurized reactor (where 0 MPa pressure in the reactor represents 0.1 MPa atmospheric pressure). In addition, the experimental temperature of all the reactors in this study was set to 33 °C (Figure S2). The pressurized reactor was cleaned with acetone before the reaction and then sterilized by an ultraviolet lamp.

2.3. Preparation of SCCP Stock Solution and Culture Medium

Since SCCPs are difficult to dissolve in water, acetone was utilized as a cosolvent. SCCPs (0.1 g) were dissolved in 100 mL acetone to obtain a 1 g/L SCCPs stock solution, which was stored at 4 °C for further use.
The beef extract peptone medium was composed of 5.0 g/L beef extract, 10.0 g/L peptone, 5.0 g/L K2SO4, and 20.0 g/L agar (if solid culture). The mixture was autoclaved at 121 °C for 30 min. The pH was in the range of 7.0–7.4.
The SCCP degradation medium was obtained by adding a definite volume of SCCP stock solution (sterilized by a 0.22 μm membrane filter) to the autoclaved beef extract peptone medium.

2.4. Biodegradation Experiments

To improve the utilization rate of the SCCP carbon source by E. coli strain 2, the amount of additional carbon source was reduced. The concentration of beef extract in the nutrient solution was reduced to 0.2 g/L. The effect of rotation speed on the removal of SCCPs and bacterial growth was studied at 320, 640, and 960 rpm. The effect of different initial concentrations of SCCPs on the bacterial removal of SCCPs was studied at 20, 30, and 50 mg/L concentrations at 0.15 MPa pressure. Moreover, SCCP (20 mg/L) removal experiments were conducted under different types of pressurized gas (pure oxygen and air) and different pressures (0–0.3 MPa). In the early stages of the first 2 days, samples of effluent water were collected every 12 h. Afterward, samples were taken every other day to determine bacterial growth and SCCP concentration, and the EPS and DHA were measured after 7 days.
For the biodegradation experiments, exponentially growing cells were harvested by centrifugation (9000× g, 5 min) and washed three times with 0.01 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) before use.

2.5. Analytical Methods

2.5.1. Determination of Bacterial Indices

The measurement of bacterial indices in the experiments included the bacterial biomass (expressed by the bacteria’s optical density (OD600)), volatile suspended solids (VSS), EPS (mainly loosely bound EPS (LB-EPS) and tightly bound EPS (TB-EPS]), and DHA. A stable reaction was achieved on the 7th day of culture. The bacterial growth was measured by a UV–VIS spectrophotometer to measure the OD600, and the determination of DHA was performed as described by Lee et al. [25].

2.5.2. SCCPs, EPS, and CSH Determination

The concentration of SCCPs was determined by gas chromatography (GC-2030, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an electron capture detector with liquid–liquid extraction pretreatment. The specific method was as described by Jiang’s research group [26] with modifications. The specific determination conditions were as follows: a 1 μL sample was injected by an AOC-20i automatic injector into an InertCap 5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, Shimadzu). The injection inlet temperature was 300 °C. Samples were injected in split mode with a split ratio of 30:1 after pretreatment. Nitrogen was the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1.1 mL/min. The temperature of the detector (ECD) was 320 °C, and the oven temperature program for the SCCPs was as follows: hold at 100 °C for 1 min, increase to 160 °C at 30 °C/min, hold for 5 min, increase to 310 °C at 30 °C/min, hold for 17 min.
LB-EPS and TB-EPS were extracted using a modified thermal extraction method [27]. Proteins (PN) and polysaccharides (PS) were determined by Coomassie bright blue G-250 and phenol–sulfuric acid colorimetry [28]. This work used the Tromans thermodynamic equation [29] to describe the initial DO concentration inside the reactor under different pressures. To understand the cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) of E. coli strain 2 before and after EPS extraction, the improved bath method [30] was used for determination. Detailed descriptions of Tromans thermodynamic equation and CSH value calculated Equation are provided in the supporting information.

2.5.3. SEM and Metabolite Identification

The samples obtained during the 7-day pressurization reaction were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Zeiss Sigma 300, Jena, Germany) to observe the morphological changes of the bacterial surface structure and the EPS produced by the bacteria under different pressures.
The concentration of chloride ions was determined using an ion chromatograph (ICS-600, Dionex; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), equipped with a 250 mm IonPac AS23 column (inner diameter: 4 × 250 mm), as well as a guard column and a current suppressant. The eluant was 4.5 mm Na2CO3/0.8 mm NaHCO3. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, the column temperature was 30 °C, the suppression current was 25 mA, and the injection volume was 10 μL with nitrogen as the carrier gas.
To further clarify the removal of the metabolites of SCCPs by E. coli strain 2 under atmospheric pressure (0 MPa) and at optimal conditions (0.15 MPa) after reacting for 7 days, a 7890A/5975C gas chromatography–mass spectrometer (GC–MS, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was employed. The intermediate products produced during the degradation of SCCPs were detected and identified.

2.6. Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)

To prevent potential background contamination of SCCPs, all the bottles used in the sample extraction were either triple-rinsed with acetone or heated overnight at 500 °C in a muffle furnace. After that, all bottles were ultrasonically cleaned with ultrapure water three times before use. All the experiments were conducted in triplicate.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Rotation Speed on SCCP Removal

To explore the influence of different reaction speeds on SCCP removal by E. coli strain 2 under pressurization, 1% (v/v) E. coli strain 2 was added into the pressurized reactors (Figure S2) with 20 mg/L SCCPs. The pressure in the reactor was adjusted to 0.1 MPa using high-purity oxygen. The reaction speed in the pressurized reactor was adjusted by using magnetic stirring, which was set to a low speed of 320 rpm (the visible bacterial suspension was not sufficiently mixed, and the vortex was small), medium speed of 640 rpm (the visible bacterial suspension was just mixed, and the vortex was moderate), and high speed of 960 rpm (the visible bacterial suspension was just mixed, and the vortex was large). After 7 days, the OD600 of these bacteria was roughly stable at approximately 2.0 (Figure S3a). The three growth curves showed good overlap, indicating that the effect of rotation speed on bacterial growth was insignificant under pressure. The removal efficiency of SCCPs at 320, 640, and 960 rpm were 77.81%, 77.42%, and 78.37% on day 7, respectively (Figure S3b). In any case, a high rotation speed would cause wear to the rotor, and the mixing of the bacterial suspension was not adequate at a low rotation speed, while the wear to the rotor was small at a medium rotation speed, and the bacterial suspension was well blended. Therefore, 640 rpm was chosen for subsequent experiments.

3.2. Effect of Initial Concentration on Bacterial SCCP Removal

The growth of E. coli strain 2 decreased significantly upon increasing the SCCPs’ initial concentration under 0.15 MPa (Figure S4a). After 48 h, the growth of E. coli strain 2 at each concentration stabilized. When the concentration of SCCPs increased from 20 to 50 mg/L, the OD600 of E. coli strain 2 decreased from 2.430 to 0.750 on the 7th day, indicating that a high concentration of SCCPs significantly inhibited the growth of E. coli strain 2. Generally, the concentration of pollutants affects the growth of microorganisms. For example, when the concentration of lindane was increased from 1 to 5 and 10 mg/L, by measuring the diameter of the colony in the petri dish, increasing the concentration of lindane partially or completely inhibited the mycelial growth of seven types of white-rot fungi [31]. A high concentration of tetracycline [32] (concentration > 100 mg/L) also delayed the growth of bacteria in the anaerobic digestion tank of a sewage treatment plant. When the concentration reached 250 mg/L, almost no bacterial growth was observed within 2 days. Furthermore, the abundance of filamentous bacteria in the aerobic biofilm reactor decreased upon increasing the antibiotic concentration from 5 to 25 mg/L, which confirmed that the pollutants were toxic to microorganisms and decreased their growth. Higher concentrations of pollutants were more toxic to the microorganisms. They significantly inhibited the growth and abundance of microorganisms [33]. Figure S4a shows that the growth of bacteria was the best when the concentration was 20 mg/L. There was no significant difference between the growth of bacteria at atmospheric pressure and 0.15 MPa at this concentration, suggesting that moderate pressure did not affect the normal growth of bacteria.
Figure S4b shows that the initial concentration had a significant impact on the SCCP removal within a certain concentration range. The SCCP removal rate reached the highest at 20 mg/L at 82.48% (0.15 MPa) and 71.64% (0 MPa) after 7 days. The removal rate of SCCPs at 0.15 MPa at the same concentration was better than that at atmospheric pressure. When the initial SCCP concentration was increased to 30 and 50 mg/L, respectively, the SCCP removal rate at 0.15 MPa decreased from 82.48% to 68.05% and 60.66%, respectively. The rate of decrease at 50 mg/L was significantly greater than that at 30 mg/L, implying that a higher concentration inhibited the removal of SCCPs by bacteria. As previously reported by Lu [13], the SCCP concentration decreased from 20, 50, 100, and 200 mg/L to 1.5, 10.3, 37.5, and 96.8 mg/L after 20 days of degradation, respectively. When studying the degradation of SCCPs by Pseudomonas N35, the corresponding degradation rates were 92.7%, 79.3%, 62.5%, and 51.6%, respectively. This is similar to the previous result in which the initial concentration of sulfamethoxazole was 5, 10, and 20 mg/L in the ultrasonic/PW12/KI/H2O2 combined system. The removal rates after 60 min were 95%, 94%, and 78%, respectively, demonstrating that the pollutant removal decreased significantly upon increasing the initial pollutant concentration [34]. Overall, a higher initial concentration of SCCPs significantly inhibited the removal of pollutants by pure strains.

3.3. Effect of Pressurization on Bacterial SCCP Removal

To further analyze the effect of pressure on the removal of SCCPs by E. coli strain 2, the effect of different pressures on the degradation of 20 mg/L SCCPs by E. coli strain 2 was studied at a rotating speed of 640 rpm. To explore the effect of E. coli strain 2 on SCCP removal during pressurization, 1% (v/v) of activated E. coli strain 2 in an atmospheric pressure shaker was sequentially transferred to a pressurized reactor with a pressure of 0–0.3 MPa. The SCCP removal rate, OD600, EPS, and DHA were measured when the reaction was stable. Thus, the influence of different pressures on the removal of SCCPs by the bacteria could be explored using different pressurization gases (oxygen or air).

3.3.1. Pure Oxygen Pressurization

(1)
Effects on bacterial growth and SCCP removal
Oxygen pressurization had a greater impact on the growth of E. coli strain 2. Upon increasing the pressure, the bacterial growth increased first and then decreased significantly. At pressures of 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 MPa, the OD600 value of bacteria was 1.879, 1.928, 1.973, 2.077, 0.900, 0.775, and 0.479 on day 7, respectively. Particularly at 0.15 MPa, the OD600 value of the bacteria increased to 1.262 after 12 h of growth and reached 1.998 after 2 days (Figure 1a). The results showed that a moderate pressure (0.05–0.15 MPa) promoted the effect of E. coli strain 2, possibly because a higher pressure rapidly increased the dissolution rate of oxygen in water, and supersaturated DO promoted the growth of bacteria. However, when the pressure was 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 MPa, the growth rate of E. coli strain 2 slowed, which was consistent with the results of Scoma et al., who found that a continuous culture of Alcanivorax sp. for 4 days at a pressure of 10 MPa (20 °C) significantly decreased in growth [35]. Moreover, Wang et al. [36] found that the optimal growth condition of Gram-positive pressure-tolerant Bacillus DSK25 isolated from sediments of the Japan Trench was 0.1 MPa. Its growth rate decreased upon increasing the pure oxygen pressure from 0.1 to 60 MPa.
The results of bacterial removal SCCPs (20 mg/L) under a high pure oxygen pressure are shown in Figure 1b. When the pressure increased from 0 to 0.15 MPa, the SCCP removal rate of the three reactors increased from 68.83% to 85.61% after 7 days, respectively, indicating that a moderate pressure promoted the removal of SCCPs. Under 0.15 MPa, the SCCP removal rate was nearly 25% higher than that of 0 MPa. A moderate increase in pressure accelerated the speed at which the DO passed through the bacterial cell membrane and accelerated the catabolism and anabolism of substances. Such a pressure maintained a high DO concentration in the culture medium, which improved the activity of microorganisms, thus accelerating the substrate utilization [37]. When the pressure increased from 0.15 to 0.3 MPa, the SCCP removal rate decreased from 85.61% to 60.33%. When the pressure exceeded 0.15 MPa, the DO was no longer a limiting factor for biochemical reactions and actually became an inhibiting factor. Excessively high pressure did not promote the normal growth of bacteria and may have even deformed and ruptured bacterial cells, ultimately killing them. Thus, it was not conducive to the degradation of pollutants by bacteria [38]. When Jin et al. [15] applied the pressurized activated sludge method to treat high-concentration pesticide wastewater, they found that when the critical pressure (0.3 MPa) was reached, the COD removal rate stopped increasing. Zhang et al. [17] showed that when the pressure further increased to 0.5 MPa, the COD removal rate declined from 86% to 81%. However, in this study, pressures above 0.15 MPa were not conducive to the bacterial degradation of SCCPs, and the pressure upper limit was much lower than that reported in the above literature. This might be because the pressure resistance of the screened pure bacteria was lower than that of the bacteria mixture in activated sludges.
(2)
Variations in EPS
Many studies have shown that the microenvironment can affect the microbial secretion of EPS, which plays a key role in the removal of pollutants [18,19,20]. However, there are few studies on the changes of bacterial EPS under pressurization, and an investigation of the effect of oxygen pressure on EPS can supplement the results obtained under atmospheric pressure. Figure 2a displays the changes of EPS components (LB-EPS and TB-EPS) under high-purity oxygen pressurization. Upon increasing the pressure (0–0.3 MPa), the total EPS content increased significantly. When the pressure increased from 0 to 0.3 MPa, the EPS concentration increased from 53.06 to 171.38 mg/g VSS. TB-EPS occupied the dominant position, accounting for >50% of the total EPS. However, the growth rate of LB-EPS was faster and increased more rapidly compared with that of TB-EPS at pressures above 0.15 MPa (Figure 2a).
Moreover, upon increasing the pressure (Figure 2b), the protein (PN) in EPS increased by 14.80%, 59.35%, 101.04%, 486.59%, 605.65%, and 727.88%, indicating that extreme conditions, such as a high pressure, may significantly increase the PN produced by bacteria. It was noted that although the increased PS was not as obvious as that of PN upon increasing the pressure, the total content was still greater than that of PN. Figure 2c indicates the changes in the PS and PN in LB-EPS and TB-EPS under pressurization. Compared with TB-EPS, the pressure had a greater impact on the PN and PS in LB-EPS. For instance, the PN concentration in LB-EPS increased from 2.41 to 39.29 mg/g VSS at 0.3 MPa, an increase of approximately 15-fold. This meant that a high pressure promoted the secretion of PN in LB-EPS. Furthermore, Figure 2d shows that PN/PS generally increased upon increasing the pressure, which implied that PN became the dominant component of EPS when the pressure increased. However, the phenomenon in which EPS increased with pressure in this experiment was different from that reported by Zhuang et al. They reported that in a conventional oxygen-aerated membrane bioreactor, a higher DO concentration enhanced the metabolic activities of microorganisms in activated sludge, resulting in less EPS release or more EPS biodegradation [39]. Xu et al. [37] also found that under 0.3 MPa, more consumption of oxygen promoted the biodegradation of organic matter and consumed more EPS in activated sludge. This difference might be due to microorganisms because activated sludges (a mixture of bacteria) usually contain bacteria that degrade EPS, which may degrade EPS in the presence of sufficient oxygen. However, for pure bacteria, due to the lack of other bacteria that could degrade EPS [40], EPS increased even though there was sufficient oxygen.
(3)
Variations in DHA
DHA is an intracellular enzyme that can degrade pollutants and directly reflect the degradative ability of organisms [41]. As plotted in Figure S5, the DHA increased from 0.391 to 0.477 mmol/g VSS when the pressure increased from 0 to 0.15 MPa. However, when the pressure was above 0.15 MPa, the DHA concentration decreased from 0.477 to 0.351 mmol/g VSS (0.3 MPa). This indicated that when the pressure exceeded the maximum pressure that E. coli strain 2 could withstand, the bacterial metabolism was significantly inhibited. It was hypothesized that the enhanced removal of SCCPs was attributed to the fact that pure oxygen provided a high DO concentration, which affected the biomass activity by affecting the enzyme activity. Since a higher pure oxygen transfer efficiency improved the biomass activity [42], pure oxygen met the high oxygen demand, even at lower flow rates [43]. However, when the oxygen transfer efficiency reached a high-enough level, the effect of oxygen transfer rate was not significant. DHA played an important role in the removal of SCCPs, and pure oxygen enhanced DHA, thus promoting the removal of pollutants.

3.3.2. Air Pressurization

(1)
Effects on bacterial growth and SCCP removal
Figure 3a shows the growth curve of bacteria under air pressurization. E. coli strain 2 grew well under 0 MPa, and the OD600 value was 1.879 on the 7th day. However, the OD600 value dropped significantly upon a further increase in air pressure, indicating that air pressurization greatly inhibited the growth of bacteria.
As shown in Figure 3b, the 20 mg/L SCCP removal rate did not greatly change under oxygen pressure. The SCCP removal rate increased and reached the highest value of 69.28% at 0.15 MPa at 7 days, but it was not much different from the removal rate at 0 MPa (68.83%). However, when the pressure continued to increase to 0.3 MPa, the SCCP removal rate decreased to 54.13%. This phenomenon may be caused by the adaptability of microorganisms to moderate pressure so that the SCCP removal rate remained stable [15,17]. In addition, since the oxygen content in the air was only 21% (v/v), and there was a low DO concentration during air pressurization, other reactors had a poor SCCP removal rate (<60%) at 0.05–0.3 MPa, except for 0.15 MPa. Therefore, it could be hypothesized that a DO deficiency weakened the promoting performance of pressure on SCCP removal, possibly because a high pressure and low DO were unsuitable microenvironments for bacterial survival. Thus, the inhibitory effect of pressure on SCCP removal increased under a low DO concentration.
(2)
Variations in EPS
As shown in Figure 4a, the EPS first increased from 53.06 to 75.23 mg/g VSS, then decreased to 63.39 mg/g VSS as the pressure increased from 0 to 0.3 MPa. As the pressure increased, the EPS content tended to increase. Bacteria secrete more EPS to form a protective barrier in adverse environments, which promotes their survival [24]. TB-EPS accounted for more than 50% of the total EPS in all the reactors, accounting for 78.91%, 71.66%, 59.83%, 67.11%, 74.76%, 52.60%, and 58.17%. Figure 4b provides the concentrations of PN and PS produced by the bacteria, where PS accounted for the majority, but the content of PN increased with the pressure. The microbes secreted more extracellular PN that were resistant to adverse environments. In addition, the PS production also increased as part of the stress response [44]. Previous studies confirmed that PS also played a key role in microbial aggregation [45]. The EPS concentration reflects the DO content, and it has been reported that PS plays the dominant role in EPS produced by bacteria, regardless of the DO concentration [46]. Figure 4c shows that more PS was produced than PN under each pressure for both LB-EPS and TB-EPS. PS is generally more biodegradable than PN, which allows PN to more easily attach to the thallus and become part of the EPS produced, resulting in a higher PN/PS ratio in EPS, as shown in Figure 4d. Since the PS content in the total EPS was significantly higher than the PN content, a higher PS content decreased the PN/PS ratio, which indicated that bacteria tended to produce PS to adapt to a high-pressure environment. The low PN/PS ratio under 0.15 MPa in Figure 4d may have been because EPS was consumed to maintain microbial growth as the substrate was consumed. Wang et al. [47] reported the biodegradability of EPS and found that 50% EPS was utilized by its producers under aerobic starvation.
(3)
Variations in DHA
Figure S6 describes changes in the DHA under air pressurization. When the pressure was 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 MPa, the DHA was 0.153, 0.233, 0.371, 0.266, 0.239, and 0.224 mmol/g VSS, respectively. There was no significant positive correlation between the DHA and air pressure, but the highest DHA was obtained at 0.15 MPa. The reason was hypothesized that high-pressure conditions negatively impacted the cell structure of bacteria and their metabolic processes and viability [48]. Microorganisms can be adversely affected by high-pressure conditions, depending on the intensity of the pressure [49]. However, the SCCP removal rate significantly correlated with the DHA in this experiment. In addition, the DHA (0.391 mmol/g VSS) under 0 MPa was higher than that under pressurization, and the DHA decreased upon increasing the air pressurization time, which may be because the microorganisms exceeded the tolerable concentration when the pressurization lasted longer. Thus, the metabolism of microorganisms was significantly inhibited, and the enzyme activity was reduced. It was inferred that a continuous pressure reduced the DHA of bacteria and the antipressure shock performance of the microorganisms [50].

3.3.3. Summary of Pressurized Gas Type Comparison

Detailed index analytical conditions are described in Table 1, including changes in different parameters (SCCP removal rate, bacterial growth, EPS, and DHA) under pure oxygen and air pressurization. The prevention and control of membrane fouling in the membrane treatment process is a large concern, and the main substance that causes membrane fouling is EPS [51]. The results in our investigation (Table 1) indicated that pressurization with pure oxygen mainly led to an increase of TB-EPS in EPS and PN but not PS in LB-EPS, which both had little effect on the fouling of membrane modules. Because some studies have shown that the fouling of membrane modules was mainly caused by the large increase in PS in LB-EPS [52,53], this provides feasibility for the addition of subsequent membrane modules in a pressurized reactor.

3.4. Micromorphological Changes of Bacteria under Pressure Conditions

To better explain the experimental phenomenon, SEM images with magnifications of 4500× and 8000× (Figure 5 and Figure 6) were taken to reveal the morphological characteristics of E. coli strain 2 under different pressures at 20 mg/L SCCPs. As displayed in Figure 5, the distribution of bacteria growing under atmospheric pressure was loose, and the bacterial surface was smooth. In contrast, the bacterial distribution under pressurization was tight, and the surface became rough and depressed, and filamentous substances surrounded the bacteria, particularly at 0.3 MPa. This might be due to the increased pressure, which caused microorganisms to produce many dense EPS to protect their own cells and tissues, which prevented them from directly contacting the pollutant SCCPs, thereby reducing the internal damage caused by SCCPs [54]. The higher-magnification 8000× images (Figure 6) showed that the individual bacterial cells were the largest and easily distinguishable under atmospheric pressure, while those grown under pressure were not. Additionally, the cells grown under pressure were compressed, resulting in agglomerates and filaments, which aggregated and appeared denser than those grown under atmospheric pressure. Moreover, there were many thin-film tangles on the cell surface after 7 days of culture, and the cell surface appeared to be sticky and uneven. This may have been caused by the accumulation of EPS produced by the strain.
Briefly, adverse conditions or environmental pressure promoted the production of EPS, which is a bacterial self-protection function. EPS provides a complete protective layer for microorganisms to resist severe external conditions, such as toxic organic compounds [18,19] and heavy metals [20], among others. Unfavorable environments may also change the EPS composition, leading to higher levels of cell death and lysis, or even the release of proteins and polysaccharides into bacterial suspensions.

3.5. Effects of Different Bacterial Structures on SCCP Removal

3.5.1. Cell Surface Hydrophobicity Analysis

The cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) of bacteria is a significant parameter that regulates the interactions between bacteria and hydrophobic substrates and other solid surfaces. It also affects the adsorption and degradation of hydrophobic organic matter by bacteria [55]. The changes in the cell surface hydrophobicity of E. coli strain 2 before and after EPS extraction are listed in Table 2. The hydrophobicity before extraction was 12.0 ± 0.4%, while the surface hydrophobicity of E. coli strain 2 after extraction was 15.2 ± 0.2%. As a typical POP, SCCPs are relatively hydrophobic, with an octanol/water partition coefficient logKow between 4.8 and 7.6 [1]. Therefore, they are easily adsorbed by the hydrophobic region of the bacterial surface. In other words, the increased hydrophobicity of the surface of E. coli strain 2 after EPS extraction was more conducive to the adsorption of hydrophobic substances.

3.5.2. Adsorption of SCCPs before and after Bacterial Extraction of EPS

Considering the influence of EPS on the bacterial adsorption of SCCPs, the experiment also extracted the EPS of bacteria and investigated the adsorption removal of SCCPs by LB-EPS, TB-EPS, and E. coli strain 2 after complete EPS extraction and E. coli strain 2 without EPS extraction. As indicated in Figure S7, the adsorption removal of extracted LB-EPS and TB-EPS on SCCPs was not apparent (<5%). The adsorption effect of E. coli strain 2 after complete EPS extraction was approximately 38%, while that of E. coli strain 2 without EPS extraction was worse, removing only 35.95% of the SCCPs. This was consistent with the surface hydrophobicity of E. coli strain 2 after EPS extraction (15.2 ± 0.2%). This indicated that the EPS had little effect on the adsorption of SCCPs by E. coli strain 2, and it was hypothesized that the lipids absorbed most of the SCCPs [56]. Previous observations have revealed that the surface hydrophobicity of bacteria is closely related to the content of surface lipopolysaccharides in the outer bacterial cell walls [57].
Moreover, by extracting all the parts of the bacteria, it was found that LB-EPS and TB-EPS had no obvious adsorption removal effect on SCCPs (both were lower than 5%). The adsorption removal effect of bacteria with EPS (35.95%) was little worse than that of bacteria without EPS (38%).

3.6. Possible Degradation Mechanism of Bacterial SCCP Removal

As shown in Figure 7a, when the concentration of SCCPs was 20 mg/L, the peak of SCCPs in a gas chromatogram had obviously decreased after the SCCPs were removed by E. coli strain 2. In addition, E. coli strain 2 degraded the SCCPs rather than adsorbing them because chloride ions were produced in the reaction solution (Figure 7b).
Furthermore, the GC–MS spectrum is shown in Figure S8. The industrial SCCPs selected for the experiment were mixed pollutants, and the mixture obtained by the GC–MS included medium-chain and long-chain chlorinated paraffins in addition to short-chain chlorinated paraffins. The GC–MS spectrum results show that the mixture in SCCPs was reduced from more than 100 to less than 70, and long chains became short chains after biodegradation. There were no C–Cl bonds in the products, demonstrating that the degradation process of SCCPs may have begun with the rupture of a C–Cl bond [7,13,58], producing Cl−. Subsequently, the rupture of a C–C bond occurred [11,13,59]. Since the industrial short-chain chlorinated paraffins were purchased, approximately 10–15% medium- and long-chain chlorinated paraffins were also present. However, after the degradation by E. coli strain 2, the GC–MS data show that SCCPs were oxidized and dechlorinated by E. coli strain 2 oxidase to generate short-chain alkanes (C8 and C9), and the three products, 2,4-dimethylheptane (C9H20), 2,5-dimethylheptane (C9H20), and 3,3-dimethylhexane (C8H18) (Figure S9), were determined.
Furthermore, the products obtained under 0.15 MPa and 0 MPa were identical, which implied that pressurization only enhanced the degradation rate of SCCPs by E. coli strain 2, without affecting the degradation pathway (data not shown). In general, SCCP congeners with lower chlorination degrees have greater bioavailability to microorganisms, while short-chain alkanes after dechlorination are less toxic [13]. Moreover, there might be other intermediates that could not be detected, possibly because they were unstable or their concentration was lower than the detection limit.

4. Conclusions

In the pressurized system, compared with air pressurization, a moderate pure oxygen pressurization was more conducive to the removal of SCCPs by bacteria. A removal rate of 20 mg/L SCCPs by E. coli strain 2 increased by 25% at 0.15 MPa. The total amount of EPS increased significantly upon increasing the SCCP concentration and pressure (0–0.3 MPa), and the TB-EPS content was greater than that of LB-EPS. A high pressure mainly promoted the secretion of PN in LB-EPS. The increase in TB-EPS and PN rather than PS in LB-EPS all had little effect on the fouling of membrane modules in the subsequent pressurized membrane reactor. Furthermore, the GC–MS results indicated that the degradation pathway involved the cleavage of the C–Cl bond in SCCPs and the subsequent production of Cl−, followed by the cleavage of C–C bonds. In this way, long-chain alkanes were degraded into short-chain alkanes. The main degradation products detected by GC–MS were 2,4-dimethylheptane (C9H20), 2,5-dimethylheptane (C9H20), and 3,3-dimethylhexane (C8H18), regardless of pressurization.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/membranes12060634/s1, Figure S1: Pressurized bioreactor: (a) installation diagram; (b) schematic diagram; Figure S2: Pressurized bioreactor devices (constant temperature reaction at 33 °C); Figure S3: The relationship between different rotation speeds and (a) the growth of E. coli strain 2; (b) SCCPs removal rate in a pressurized reactor; Figure S4: The relationship between the concentration of SCCPs and (a) the growth of E. coli strain 2; (b) SCCPs removal rate in a pressurized reactor; Figure S5: The relationship between different high-purity oxygen pressures and DHA in a pressurized reactor; Figure S6: The relationship between different air pressures and DHA in a pressurized reactor; Figure S7: The adsorption of SCCPs by the extraction of E. coli strain 2; Figure S8: The GC-MS image of E. coli strain 2 degradation of SCCPs; Figure S9: GC-MS spectra of the degradation products of SCCPs removed by E. coli strain 2; Table S1: Dissolved oxygen concentration at each pressure in the reactor.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Q. and H.Z.; methodology, Y.Q.; validation, H.Z.; formal analysis, W.H.; investigation, W.H. and B.J.; resources, F.Z. and Y.Q.; data curation, W.H. and B.J.; writing—original draft preparation, W.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.Q., H.Z. and F.Z.; visualization, Y.Q. and B.J.; supervision, H.Z.; project administration, H.Z. and K.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.Q., K.Z. and H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21808200) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (CN) (LGF20E080003).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fiedler, H. Short-chain chlorinated paraffins: Production, use and international regulations. In Chlorinated Paraffins; Boer, J., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  2. Van Mourik, L.M.; Gaus, C.; Leonards, P.E.G.; de Boer, J. Chlorinated paraffins in the environment: A review on their production, fate, levels and trends between 2010 and 2015. Chemosphere 2016, 155, 415–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, C.; Chen, A.; Li, L.; Peng, W.; Weber, R.; Liu, J. Distribution and emission estimation of short- and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins in Chinese products through detection-based mass balancing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 7335–7343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wu, H.Z. The development direction of chlorinated paraffin production under the new situations. Chlor-Alkali Ind. 2019, 55, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jiang, W.; Huang, T.; Mao, X.; Wang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Jia, C.; Wang, Y.; Gao, H.; Ma, J. Gridded emission inventory of short-chain chlorinated paraffins and its validation in China. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 220, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fujimori, T.; Ogura, M.; Eguchi, A.; Takaoka, M. Dechlorination of short-chain chlorinated paraffins by the metal sodium dispersion method. Chemosphere 2021, 283, 131201–131208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Z.Y.; Lu, M.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Xiao, M.; Zhang, M. Dechlorination of short chain chlorinated paraffins by nanoscale zero-valent iron. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 243, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Koh, I.O.; Thiemann, W. Study of photochemical oxidation of standard chlorinated paraffins and identification of degradation products. J. Photoch. Photobio. A Chem. 2001, 139, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Friesen, K.J.; El-Morsi, T.M.; Abd-El-Aziz, A.S. Photochemical oxidation of short-chain polychlorinated n-alkane mixtures using H2O2/UV and the photo-Fenton reaction. Int. J. Photoenergy. 2004, 6, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. DiMento, B.P.; Tusei, C.L.; Aeppli, C. Photochemical degradation of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in aqueous solution by hydrated electrons and hydroxyl radicals. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 134732–134740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Allpress, J.D.; Gowland, P.C. Biodegradation of chlorinated paraffins and long-chain chloroalkanes by Rhodococcus sp. S45-1. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 1999, 43, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Heath, E.; Brown, W.A.; Jensen, S.R.; Bratty, M.P. Biodegradation of chlorinated alkanes and their commercial mixtures by Pseudomonas sp. strain 273. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 33, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lu, M. Degradation of short chain polychlorinated paraffins by a new isolate: Tests in pure culture and sewage sludge. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 88, 1273–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Li, B.; Xu, R.X.; Wang, G.X.; Zhou, Y.; Xie, B. Effects of pressurized aeration on organic degradation efficiency and bacterial community structure of activated sludge treating saline wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 222, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jin, Z.; Pan, Z.; Yu, S.; Lin, C. Experimental study on pressurized activated sludge process for high concentration pesticide wastewater. J. Environ. Sci. 2010, 22, 1342–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, P.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, L.; Zhang, H.; Lian, M.; Li, B. Oil-field wastewater treatment by hybrid membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) system. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 264, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Q.; Liu, S.; Yang, C.; Chen, F.; Lu, S. Bioreactor consisting of pressurized aeration and dissolved air flotation for domestic wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 138, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Z.; Xia, S.; Wang, X.; Yang, A.; Xu, B.; Chen, L.; Zhu, Z.; Zhao, J.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N.; Leonard, D. A novel biosorbent for dye removal: Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) of Proteus mirabilis TJ-1. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhu, X.; Zeng, J.; Zhao, Q.; Jiang, X. Extracellular polymeric substances govern the development of biofilm and mass transfer of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for improved biodegradation. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 193, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wei, X.; Fang, L.; Cai, P.; Huang, Q.; Chen, H.; Liang, W.; Rong, X. Influence of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on Cd adsorption by bacteria. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 1369–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiao, Y.; Zhang, E.; Zhang, J.; Dai, Y.; Yang, Z.; Christensen, H.E.M.; Ulstrup, J.; Zhao, F. Extracellular polymeric substances are transient media for microbial extracellular electron transfer. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Wang, F.; Yang, X.; Gu, C.; Kengara, F.O.; Hong, Q.; Lv, Z.; Jiang, X. Extracellular polymeric substances enhanced mass transfer of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the two-liquid-phase system for biodegradation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90, 1063–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chen, Y.Q.; Wang, M.L.; Zhou, X.W.; Fu, H.Y.; Qu, X.L.; Zhu, D.Q. Sorption fractionation of bacterial extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on mineral surfaces and associated effects on phenanthrene sorption to EPS-mineral complexes. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128264–128273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shi, Y.; Huang, J.; Zeng, G.; Gu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Hu, Y.; Tang, B.; Zhou, J.; Yang, Y.; Shi, L. Exploiting extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) controlling strategies for performance enhancement of biological wastewater treatments: An overview. Chemosphere 2017, 180, 396–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lee, S.M.; Jung, J.Y.; Chung, Y.C. Measurement of ammonia inhibition of microbial activity in biological wastewater treatment process using dehydrogenase assay. Biotechnol. Lett. 2000, 22, 991–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Y.J.; Wang, Y.W.; Jiang, Y.G. Solid-phase extraction for analysis of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in water samples. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2018, 46, 118–124. [Google Scholar]
  27. Li, X.Y.; Yang, S.F. Influence of loosely bound extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on the flocculation, sedimentation and dewaterability of activated sludge. Water Res. 2007, 41, 1022–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, Y.; He, H.; Liu, H.; Li, H.; Zeng, G.; Xia, X.; Yang, C. Effect of salinity on removal performance and activated sludge characteristics in sequencing batch reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 249, 890–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tromans, D. Temperature and pressure dependent solubility of oxygen in water: A thermodynamic analysis. Hydrometallurgy 1998, 48, 327–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rosenberg, M.; Gutnick, D.; Rosenberg, E. Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1980, 9, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Quintero, J.C.; Moreira, M.T.; Feijoo, G.; Lema, J.M. Screening of white rot fungal species for their capacity to degrade lindane and other isomers of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH). Cien. Inv. Agr. 2008, 35, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Grabert, R.; Boopathy, R.; Nathaniel, R.; LaFleur, G. Effect of tetracycline on ammonia and carbon removal by the facultative bacteria in the anaerobic digester of a sewage treatment plant. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 267, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, R.F.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Qi, R. Investigation for filamentous bacteria community diversity in activated sludge under various kinds and concentration conditions of nntibiotics. Environ. Sci. 2015, 36, 2239–2244. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Duan, B.; Jiang, S. Degradation of sulfamethoxazole in water by a combined system of ultrasound/PW12/KI/H2O2. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 270, 118790–118797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Scoma, A.; Barbato, M.; Hernandez-Sanabria, E.; Mapelli, F.; Daffonchio, D.; Borin, S.; Boon, N. Microbial oil-degradation under mild hydrostatic pressure (10 MPa): Which pathways are impacted in piezosensitive hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria? Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23526–23539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Wang, J.; Li, J.; Dasgupta, S.; Zhang, L.; Golovko, M.Y.; Golovko, S.A.; Fang, J. Alterations in membrane phospholipid fatty acids of gram-positive piezotolerant bacterium Sporosarcina sp. DSK25 in response to growth pressure. Lipids 2014, 49, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xu, R.X.; Li, B.; Zhang, Y.; Si, L.; Zhang, X.Q.; Xie, B. Response of biodegradation characteristics of unacclimated activated sludge to moderate pressure in a batch reactor. Chemosphere 2016, 148, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Atamaleki, A.; Miranzadeh, M.B.; Mostafaii, G.R.; Akbari, H.; Iranshahi, L.; Ghanbari, F.; Salem, A. Effect of coagulation and sonication on the dissolved air flotation (DAF) process for thickening of biological sludge in wastewater treatment. Environ. Health Eng. Manage. J. 2020, 7, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhuang, H.; Hong, X.; Han, H.; Shan, S. Effect of pure oxygen fine bubbles on the organic matter removal and bacterial community evolution treating coal gasification wastewater by membrane bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 221, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Flemming, H.C.; Wingender, J. Relevance of microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs)-Part I: Structural and ecological aspects. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, H.; Wang, H.; Jie, M.; Zhang, K.; Qian, Y.; Ma, J. Performance and microbial communities of different biofilm membrane bioreactors with pre-anoxic tanks treating mariculture wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 295, 122303–122313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, S.; Kim, M.H. Fouling characteristics in pure oxygen MBR process according to MLSS concentrations and COD loadings. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 428, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sears, K.; Oleszkiewicz, J.A.; Lagasse, P. Nitrification in pure oxygen activated sludge systems. J. Environ. Eng. 2003, 129, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sutherland, I.W. Biofilm exopolysaccharides: A strong and sticky framework. Microbiology 2001, 147, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Yang, F.; Li, H.; Wang, S.; Zhao, F.; Fang, F.; Guo, J.; Long, M.; Shen, Y. Differences in exopolysaccharides of three microbial aggregates. Environ. Technol. 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gao, D.W.; Fu, Y.; Tao, Y.; Li, X.X.; Xing, M.; Gao, X.H.; Ren, N.Q. Linking microbial community structure to membrane biofouling associated with varying dissolved oxygen concentrations. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 5626–5633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, Z.W.; Liu, Y.; Tay, J.H. Biodegradability of extracellular polymeric substances produced by aerobic granules. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 74, 462–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bartlett, D.H. Pressure effects on in vivo microbial processes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1595, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Picard, A.; Daniel, I. Pressure as an environmental parameter for microbial life—A review. Biophys. Chem. 2013, 183, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ren, Q.K.; Yu, Y.; Zhu, S.Y.; Bian, D.J.; Huo, M.X.; Zhou, D.D.; Huo, H.L. Characterization of a novel micro-pressure swirl reactor for removal of chemical oxygen demand and total nitrogen from domestic wastewater at low temperature. Biodegradation 2017, 28, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Teng, J.H.; Wu, M.F.; Chen, J.R.; Lin, H.J.; He, Y.M. Different fouling propensities of loosely and tightly bound extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) and the related fouling mechanisms in a membrane bioreactor. Chemosphere 2020, 255, 126953–126963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Reid, E.; Liu, X.R.; Judd, S.J. Effect of high salinity on activated sludge characteristics and membrane permeability in an immersed membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 283, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Luo, W.H.; Hai, F.I.; Kang, J.G.; Price, W.E.; Guo, W.S.; Ngo, H.H.; Yamamoto, K.; Nghiem, L.D. Effects of salinity build-up on biomass characteristics and trace organic chemical removal: Implications on the development of high retention membrane bioreactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 177, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Zhang, P.; Chen, Y.P.; Peng, M.W.; Guo, J.S.; Shen, Y.; Yan, P.; Zhou, Q.H.; Jiang, J.; Fang, F. Extracellular polymeric substances dependence of surface interactions of Bacillus subtilis with Cd2+ and Pb2+: An investigation combined with surface plasmon resonance and infrared spectra. Colloids Surf. B 2017, 154, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cao, Y.; Guo, P.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Cao, J.C.; Qiu, K.X.; Liu, M.Z.; Huang, L.; Liu, J.B. Cell surface hydrophobicity and degradation characteristics of high efficiency diesel degrading bacteria. J. Environ. Health 2018, 12, 1078–1084. [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu, W.C.; Zhou, H.T.; Qiu, Z.Q.; Liu, T.T.; Yuan, Y.N.; Guan, R.N.; Li, N.Q.; Wang, W.L.; Li, X.; Zhao, C.Y. Effect of short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) on lipid membranes:Combination of molecular dynamics and membrane damage experiments. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 144906–144913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chen, D.Z.; Jiang, N.X.; Ye, J.X.; Cheng, Z.W.; Zhang, S.H.; Chen, J.M. Comparative investigation on a hexane-degrading strain with different cell surface hydrophobicities mediated by starch and chitosan. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 3829–3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. El-Morsi, T.M.; Budakowski, W.R.; Abd-El-Aziz, A.S.; Friesen, K.J. Photocatalytic degradation of 1,10-dichlorodecane in aqueous suspensions of TiO2: A reaction of adsorbed chlorinated alkane with surface hydroxyl radicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 1018–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, W.; Gao, Y.; Qin, Y.; Wang, M.; Wu, J.; Li, G.; An, T. Photochemical degradation kinetics and mechanism of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in aqueous solution: A case of 1-chlorodecane. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 247, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Membranes 12 00634 g001 550
Figure 1. Relationship between different high-purity oxygen pressures and (a) the growth of E. coli strain 2; (b) SCCP removal rate in a pressurized reactor. SCCPs, short-chain chlorinated paraffins.
Figure 1. Relationship between different high-purity oxygen pressures and (a) the growth of E. coli strain 2; (b) SCCP removal rate in a pressurized reactor. SCCPs, short-chain chlorinated paraffins.
Membranes 12 00634 g001
Membranes 12 00634 g002 550
Figure 2. Relationship between different high-purity oxygen pressures and (a) LB-EPS and TB-EPS components; (b) PS, PN components; (c) EPS components; and (d) PN/PS ratio of EPS in a pressurized reactor. EPS, extracellular polymeric substances; LB-EPS, loosely bound EPS; PN, protein; PS, polysaccharide; TB-EPS, tightly bound EPS.
Figure 2. Relationship between different high-purity oxygen pressures and (a) LB-EPS and TB-EPS components; (b) PS, PN components; (c) EPS components; and (d) PN/PS ratio of EPS in a pressurized reactor. EPS, extracellular polymeric substances; LB-EPS, loosely bound EPS; PN, protein; PS, polysaccharide; TB-EPS, tightly bound EPS.
Membranes 12 00634 g002
Membranes 12 00634 g003 550
Figure 3. Relationship between different air oxygen pressures and (a) the growth of E. coli strain 2; (b) SCCP removal rate in a pressurized reactor. SCCPs, short-chain chlorinated paraffins.
Figure 3. Relationship between different air oxygen pressures and (a) the growth of E. coli strain 2; (b) SCCP removal rate in a pressurized reactor. SCCPs, short-chain chlorinated paraffins.
Membranes 12 00634 g003
Membranes 12 00634 g004 550
Figure 4. Relationship between different air pressures and (a) LB-EPS and TB-EPS components; (b) PS and PN components; (c) EPS components; and (d) PN/PS ratio of EPS in a pressurized reactor. EPS, extracellular polymeric substances; PN, proteins; PS, polysaccharides.
Figure 4. Relationship between different air pressures and (a) LB-EPS and TB-EPS components; (b) PS and PN components; (c) EPS components; and (d) PN/PS ratio of EPS in a pressurized reactor. EPS, extracellular polymeric substances; PN, proteins; PS, polysaccharides.
Membranes 12 00634 g004
Membranes 12 00634 g005a 550Membranes 12 00634 g005b 550
Figure 5. SEM images of E. coli strain 2 under different pressures: (a) 0 MPa, (b) 0.1 MPa, (c) 0.15 MPa, (d) 0.2 MPa, and (e) 0.3 MPa (the magnification is 4500×; the scale bar = 2 μm). SEM, scanning electron microscopy.
Figure 5. SEM images of E. coli strain 2 under different pressures: (a) 0 MPa, (b) 0.1 MPa, (c) 0.15 MPa, (d) 0.2 MPa, and (e) 0.3 MPa (the magnification is 4500×; the scale bar = 2 μm). SEM, scanning electron microscopy.
Membranes 12 00634 g005aMembranes 12 00634 g005b
Membranes 12 00634 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM images of E. coli strain 2 under different pressures: (a) 0 MPa, (b) 0.1 MPa, (c) 0.15 MPa, (d) 0.2 MPa, and (e) 0.3 MPa (the magnification is 8000×; the scale bar = 2 μm). SEM, scanning electron microscopy.
Figure 6. SEM images of E. coli strain 2 under different pressures: (a) 0 MPa, (b) 0.1 MPa, (c) 0.15 MPa, (d) 0.2 MPa, and (e) 0.3 MPa (the magnification is 8000×; the scale bar = 2 μm). SEM, scanning electron microscopy.
Membranes 12 00634 g006
Membranes 12 00634 g007 550
Figure 7. E. coli strain 2 degradation of SCCPs: (a) changes in the SCCPs; (b) changes in the concentration of chloride ions in solution. SCCPs, short-chain chlorinated paraffins.
Figure 7. E. coli strain 2 degradation of SCCPs: (a) changes in the SCCPs; (b) changes in the concentration of chloride ions in solution. SCCPs, short-chain chlorinated paraffins.
Membranes 12 00634 g007
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the parameters of pure oxygen and air pressurization.
Table 1. Comparison of the parameters of pure oxygen and air pressurization.
ParameterPressurization (0–0.3 MPa)
Pure Oxygen PressurizationAir Pressurization
SCCP removal rateThe maximum removal rate was 85.61% (0.15 MPa), which was greater than 0.05 and 0.1 MPa, while the removal rate decreased (>0.15 MPa).The removal rate reached the highest value of 69.28% (0.15 MPa), and the removal rate decreased (>0.15 MPa).
OD600In the range of 0.05–0.15 MPa, the pressure did not affect the growth of microorganisms, but it was severely inhibited (>0.15 MPa).Pressure did not promote bacterial growth (compared with 0 MPa).
EPSUpon increasing the pressure, the EPS content increased significantly, among which TB-EPS was the main EPS type. A high pressure promoted the secretion of PN in LB-EPS.The EPS content under pressurization increased compared with EPS under atmospheric pressure. TB-EPS accounted for more than 50% of the total EPS, and more PS was always generated than PN.
DHAThe DHA was promoted by an appropriate low pressure but inhibited by a high pressure (>0.15 MPa).The DHA was lower than at atmospheric pressure.
Note: SCCPs, short-chain chlorinated paraffins; EPS, extracellular polymeric substances; PN, proteins; PS, polysaccharides; DHA, dehydrogenase.
Table
Table 2. Cell surface hydrophobicity for E. coli strain 2 cell surface before and after EPS extraction.
Table 2. Cell surface hydrophobicity for E. coli strain 2 cell surface before and after EPS extraction.
SampleCell Surface Hydrophobicity of Bacteria
E. coli strain 2 before extraction of EPS12.0 ± 0.4%
E. coli strain 2 after extraction of EPS15.2 ± 0.2%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qian, Y.; Han, W.; Zhou, F.; Ji, B.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, K. Effects of Pressurized Aeration on the Biodegradation of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins by Escherichia coli Strain 2. Membranes 2022, 12, 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12060634

AMA Style

Qian Y, Han W, Zhou F, Ji B, Zhang H, Zhang K. Effects of Pressurized Aeration on the Biodegradation of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins by Escherichia coli Strain 2. Membranes. 2022; 12(6):634. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12060634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qian, Yongxing, Wanling Han, Fuhai Zhou, Bixiao Ji, Huining Zhang, and Kefeng Zhang. 2022. "Effects of Pressurized Aeration on the Biodegradation of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins by Escherichia coli Strain 2" Membranes 12, no. 6: 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12060634

APA Style

Qian, Y., Han, W., Zhou, F., Ji, B., Zhang, H., & Zhang, K. (2022). Effects of Pressurized Aeration on the Biodegradation of Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins by Escherichia coli Strain 2. Membranes, 12(6), 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12060634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop