Next Article in Journal
Modeling, Degradation Study, Failures Diagnosis and Faulty Operating Management of Electrolyzers
Next Article in Special Issue
Monoethanolamine (MEA) Degradation: Influence on the Electrodialysis Treatment of MEA-Absorbent
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation, Characterization, and Activation of Natural Glassy Carbon Paste Electrodes as New Sensors for Determining the Total Antioxidant Capacity of Plant Extracts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Theoretical Analysis of Electroconvection in the Electrodialysis Desalination Channel under the Action of Direct Current
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Applying Chitin Enhanced Diafiltration Process (CEFP) in Removing Cobalt from Synthetic Wastewater

Membranes 2022, 12(12), 1194; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12121194
by Noureddine Elboughdiri 1,2,*, Djamel Ghernaout 1,3, Aicha Gasmi 4, Muhammad Imran Khan 5 and Badia Ghernaout 6
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Membranes 2022, 12(12), 1194; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12121194
Submission received: 18 October 2022 / Revised: 23 November 2022 / Accepted: 23 November 2022 / Published: 27 November 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper “Applying Chitin Enhanced Diafiltration Process (CEFP) in Re- 2 moving Cobalt from Synthetic Wastewater” by  Elboughdiri et al. aims to prove the efficiency of Chitin in heavy metal ions removal from waste water.

The paper is well written and the effect of several parameters have been analyzed. Nevertheless, the main concern is related to the statement of authors who say they want to study the efficiency of Chitin in removing Cobalt anions (This study aims to demonstrate the employment of Chitin as a biosorbent for the retention of Cobalt anions utilizing CEFP). They add cobalt as CoCl2*6H2O, so they used  Cobalt cations. Starting from that also the explanation of the observed rheological behaviour falls.

Please reformulate sentence lines 146-147: it is not so clear.

Authors should explain the reason they choose such a narrow range of stress to evaluate the viscosity trend

Author Response

Thank you to see the attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

  

  1. Abstract - Delete the first sentence or move it to another section
  2. The Introduction section should further highlight the novelty of their study.
  3. In the Introduction and Conclusions, the importance of research should be emphasized
  4. The choice of cobalt among other toxic metals must be justified.
  5. Line 58:  “metal anion like Co”  and Line 61 „of Cobalt anions” - should be corrected or clarified
  6.  Figure 4 - unreadable line equation

 

 

Author Response

Thank you to see the attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Reviewer 1: I read the manuscript entitled as "Applying Chitin Enhanced Diafiltration Process (CEFP) in Removing Cobalt from Synthetic Wastewater". In my opinion the presented manuscript can be published in "membranes" after minor revision. My comments are as follows:

1.      The authors need to proofread the manuscript due to grammatical errors

2.      Mention the novelty of work in the last paragraph of Introduction.

3.      Line 73: the powdered Chitin was weighed and solubilized in an acetic acid (CH3COOH) solution (0.05 M), is chitin soluble in acetic acid?

4.      Use error bars in figures 1,2,3,4,…..,14.

5.      Add new references 2021,2022, I suggest to cite the following papers:

DOI: 10.3390/ma15155392, DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114294, DOI: 10.3390/w13182598

 

6.      The conclusions should be rewritten

Author Response

Thank you to see the attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper has been significantly improved 

Back to TopTop