Next Article in Journal
A Novel Numerical Procedure to Estimate the Electric Charge in the Pore from Filtration of Single-Salt Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study of a Heat Pump for Simultaneous Cooling and Desalination by Membrane Distillation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Normally-Off p-GaN Gated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs with ALD-Grown Al2O3/AlN Composite Gate Insulator

1
Department of Electronics Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
2
Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
3
Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
4
Department of Electronics Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung 407, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2021, 11(10), 727; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11100727
Submission received: 7 August 2021 / Revised: 15 September 2021 / Accepted: 18 September 2021 / Published: 23 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Membrane Processing and Engineering)

Abstract

:
A metal–insulator–semiconductor p-type GaN gate high-electron-mobility transistor (MIS-HEMT) with an Al2O3/AlN gate insulator layer deposited through atomic layer deposition was investigated. A favorable interface was observed between the selected insulator, atomic layer deposition–grown AlN, and GaN. A conventional p-type enhancement-mode GaN device without an Al2O3/AlN layer, known as a Schottky gate (SG) p-GaN HEMT, was also fabricated for comparison. Because of the presence of the Al2O3/AlN layer, the gate leakage and threshold voltage of the MIS-HEMT improved more than those of the SG-HEMT did. Additionally, a high turn-on voltage was obtained. The MIS-HEMT was shown to be reliable with a long lifetime. Hence, growing a high-quality Al2O3/AlN layer in an HEMT can help realize a high-performance enhancement-mode transistor with high stability, a large gate swing region, and high reliability.

1. Introduction

High-electron-mobility transistors (HEMTs) are crucial for high-frequency and high-power applications because of their outstanding thermal properties, high breakdown fields, and high mobility levels. For fail-safe reasons, the power integrated circuits usually require high-performance normally-off devices [1]. Several strategies, such as the use of fluorine ion treatment [2], gate recess [3], and a p-type GaN cap layer [4,5], have been employed in normally-off HEMT devices. Normally-off devices fabricated with p-GaN gate technology offer low on-state resistance and large positive threshold voltage. However, to uniformly etch away the p-GaN in the non-gated access region and to overcome the plasma-induced damage during the p-GaN removal are extremely challenging tasks. Therefore, several teams are investigating the p-GaN etching process, such as etching stop technique [6], oxidation technique [7], and H plasma technique [8]. A positive threshold voltage can be obtained in HEMTs with p-type GaN layers, without affecting channel mobility; therefore, strategies involving the use of a p-type GaN layer are widely considered as the most effective among the strategies mentioned above. However, uniformly etching p-GaN away from the ungated access region and mitigating plasma-induced damage [9] during p-GaN removal are challenging. Cl2-based ion etching is typically used to remove the p-GaN layer. If the etching is imprecise, the surface becomes rough with plasma bumps and in-surface defects, which may cause gate lag [10]. To control the etching depth, an AlN etch stop layer [6] is inserted between the p-GaN and barrier layers. This helps achieve highly selective etching to obtain superior etching uniformity, lower gate leakage, and lower dynamic on-resistance. Usually, the low hole concentration of p-GaN limits the threshold voltage; when this occurs, the resulting product is unsatisfactory practical applications. Moreover, the p–n junction gate turns on at strong forward bias, leading to a considerably high gate leakage current. In this study, to minimize the defects that may arise after p-GaN etching and increase the gate swing region, we deposited Al2O3 and AlN layers [11] on the surface of the device through atomic layer deposition (ALD); these layers also improved the device performance, increased the turn-on voltage, reduced the gate leakage current, and increased the device stability at high temperatures.

2. Device Structure

The HEMT structures used for proposed devices were grown on 6-inch Si (111) substrates through metal–organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). A 300-nm-thick undoped GaN channel was deposited on top of a 4-μm-thick undoped GaN buffer transition layer. Subsequently, a 12-nm-thick Al0.17Ga0.83N layer, a 1-nm-thick AlN layer, and a 70-nm-thick p-type GaN top layer were deposited. The Al2O3/AlN interlayer was deposited through ALD. A schematic representation of the device is shown in Figure 1a.
The device was thermally annealed in an MOCVD chamber at 720 °C for 10 min in a N2 atmosphere. The activated Mg concentration was determined to be 1 × 1018 /cm3 using the Hall measurement. The device was fabricated using mesa isolation with inductively coupled plasma (ICP) in the first step. Second, a p-GaN layer was etched through ICP etching with Cl2/BCl3/SF6 as the etching gas. When the mixed gas reached the AlN layer, the SF6 plasma [12] reacted with the Al atoms and formed a thin AlF3 etch stop layer. Subsequently, the sample was soaked in a diluted HF/NH4F solution to remove AlF3. Then, a Ti/Al/Ni/Au (25/120/25/150 nm) ohmic metal stack was deposited through electron beam (e-gun) evaporation to serve as the source and drain; the metal stack was annealed at 875 °C for 30 s in a N2 atmosphere in an RTA system, and the contact resistance of the MIS-HEMT and SG-HEMT were 7.6 × 10−6 and 8.1 × 10−6 Ω·cm2, respectively. The oxide/insulator layer Al2O3/AlN (9/2.5 nm) was deposited through ALD, as shown in Figure 1b. In addition, Trimethylaluminum, O2, and N2 were used as metal precursors, O and N source, respectively. The RF power and chamber temperature were 60 W and 300 ℃. Then, an ohmic via was etched using buffered oxide etching. Ti/Au (25/120 nm) layers were then deposited through e-gun evaporation to serve as gate electrodes. By contrast, the gate metal of the SG-HEMT was just a deposited Ti/Au (25/120 nm) layer.
Figure 2 shows the conduction bands of the MIS-HEMT and SG-HEMT, which were obtained through TCAD simulation. The aim of this study was to increase VTH and the gate voltage swing of the device by using Al2O3/AlN to increase the conduction band. The 2DEG height of the MIS-HEMT was more than that of the SG-HEMT, which resulted in the MIS-HEMT exhibiting better characteristics than the SG-HEMT.

3. Experimental Result and Discussion

For examining the effect of the Al2O3/AlN/p-GaN interface on device performance and for investigating the relationship of the AlN layer formed through ALD with an AlN etch stop layer at the sidewall and ungated region, we measured the I–V characteristics of the devices. Because an Al2O3/AlN layer can fill the nitrogen vacancies on the surfaces of p-GaN and AlN, depositing an Al2O3/AlN layer had the same effect as passivation. The I–V curve revealed that the gate leakage current was suppressed. Furthermore, because the polarization effect was enhanced due to the presence of the Al2O3/AlN layer, the MIS-HEMT had a higher drain current density and on/off ratio than the SG-HEMT. The off-state drain currents of the MIS-HEMT and SG-HEMT were 6 × 10−6 and 2 × 10−4 mA/mm, respectively, at VGS = 0 V and VDS = 10 V, as shown in Figure 3a. The IDS–VDS characteristics are shown in Figure 3b. The saturated drain currents of the MIS-gate and metal-gate devices were 363 and 247 mA/mm at VDS = 10 V. Figure 3c shows the MIS-gate HEMT data. The figure indicates that the Al2O3/AlN layer had a high gate voltage swing of more than 20 V [13]. To determine the device reliability, we measured off-state breakdown voltage; when measuring the off-state breakdown voltage, the device gate must be biased to 0 V to ensure that the device is in the off state. The results are plotted in Figure 3d. Because the Al2O3/AlN layer exhibited an effect similar to passivation and minimized any damage that might have been caused by etching, the Al2O3/AlN gate device had a higher off-state breakdown voltage of 656 V.
To analyze the higher off-state breakdown voltage of the MIS-HEMT, we simulated the electric field distributions of the MIS-HEMT and SG-HEMT using TCAD. Figure 4 shows the schematic cross-sections of the two devices. The electric field was always concentrated at the gate edge in the drain side, and the electric field distributions of both devices were simulated at VGS = 0 V and VDS = 650 V. A comparison of the two devices shows that the electric field of the MIS-HEMT was low at the gate edge owing to the electric field being dispersed by the insulator layer. Negative charges appeared at the interface between the insulator and AlGaN owing to the negative polarization, which reduced the electric field near the gate edge at the drain side [14]. Consequently, MIS-HEMT had a higher off-state breakdown voltage due to the presence of the AlN/Al2O3 stack.
Typical C-V characteristics were measured at 500 kHz, as shown in Figure 5. As the gate bias increases above a certain voltage, the capacitance value starts increasing and saturates. MIS-HEMT showed higher capacitance than SG-HEMT due to the Al2O3/AlN stacking. Figure 6a shows the dynamic on-resistance to static on-resistance ratio (RDynamic, on, RStatic,on) at different quiescent gate voltages. There are two bias conditions that must be considered: pulse voltage (VGSP, VDSP) and quiescent voltage (VGSQ, VDSQ). During the measurement, when the pulse voltage switched to the quiescent voltage rapidly with a 2 μs pulse width and 200 μs period, the charge carriers were trapped by defects. The quiescent gate bias was swept from 0 to −15 V in increments of −5 V. As seen in the figure, the MIS-HEMT had a lower dynamic Ron than the SG-HEMT; the MIS-HEMT had a dynamic Ron of 1.18, whereas the SG-HEMT had a dynamic Ron of 2.13. Therefore, the MIS-HEMT had a lower surface trap density surface, which inhibited current collapse. In this study, forward TDDB measurements were performed on the MIS-HEMT to assess the strength of the Al2O3/AlN gate dielectric. Figure 6b shows the variation in gate current during the TDDB experiments at three different gate voltages (14, 15, and 16 V). The gate current was initially low, owing to the accumulation of negative charges under the gate. Then, the gate leakage current became noisy owing to the formation of a percolation path. This was followed by a sudden increase in the gate leakage current owing to the hard breakdown of the gate dielectric [15]. A Weibull plot was drawn based on the time-to-breakdown distributions. The slope shows a tight distribution and less variability, as shown in Figure 6c. Moreover, lifetimes of 1% and 63.2% were investigated and are shown in Figure 6d. The gate leakage mechanisms at the measured gate bias region were determined to be 8.5 V at a failure rate of 63.2% and 6.1 V at a failure rate of 1%. Therefore, the MIS p-GaN can effectively suppress the trapping/detrapping behavior and then enhance the gate reliability. Figure 7 compares the VG_BD–IG characteristics of the MIS-HEMT with that of other reported p-GaN gate HEMTs [5,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. The MIS-HEMT fabricated in this study exhibited the highest VG_BD and lowest gate leakage current.

4. Conclusions

A normally-off p-GaN HEMT with an Al2O3/AlN layer was investigated. The device exhibited excellent I–V characteristics. The turn-on voltage was higher than 20 V, with a threshold voltage of 3 V and a high saturation drain current of approximately 363 mA/mm. Moreover, the gate leakage current and instability were suppressed. The device off-state breakdown voltage in the MIS gate was increased because of the presence of the Al2O3/AlN layer deposited using ALD; this layer helped form an excellent interface between p-GaN and AlN. The lower trap density and trapping/detrapping effects were analyzed using pulse measurement. Overall, an Al2O3/AlN dielectric gate layer considerably improves the performance, reliability, and stability of HEMTs. Therefore, the as-developed design has a high potential for use in the manufacture of normally-off p-GaN gate HEMTs, which would allow them to be used in practical applications.

Author Contributions

Project administration, H.-C.C., C.-H.L., C.-R.H., C.-C.C., H.-C.W., H.-L.K.; Investigation, F.-T.C., S.-Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saito, W.; Takada, Y.; Kuraguchi, M.; Tsuda, K.; Omura, I.; Ogura, T.; Ohashi, H. High breakdown voltage AlGaN-GaN power-HEMT design and high current density switching behavior. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2003, 50, 2528–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cai, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, K.J.; Lau, K.M. High-performance enhancement-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMTs using fluoride-based plasma treatment. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2005, 26, 435–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Palacios, T.; Suh, C.; Chakraborty, A.; Keller, S.; DenBaars, S.P.; Mishra, U.K. High-performance E-mode AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2006, 27, 428–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hwang, I.; Oh, J.; Choi, H.S.; Kim, J.; Choi, H.; Kim, J.; Chong, S.; Shin, J.; Chung, U.I. Source-Connected p-GaN Gate HEMTs for Increased Threshold Voltage. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2013, 34, 605–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, T.-L.; Marcon, D.; You, S.; Posthuma, N.; Bakeroot, B.; Stoffels, S.; Van Hove, M.; Groeseneken, G.; Decoutere, S. Forward Bias Gate Breakdown Mechanism in Enhancement-Mode p-GaN Gate AlGaN/GaN High-Electron Mobility Transistors. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2015, 36, 1001–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chiu, H.-C.; Chang, Y.-S.; Li, B.-H.; Wang, H.-C.; Kao, H.-L.; Chien, F.-T.; Hu, C.-W.; Xuan, R. High Uniformity Normally-OFF p-GaN Gate HEMT Using Self-Terminated Digital Etching Technique. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 4820–4825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, X.; Chiu, H.-C.; Liu, C.-H.; Kao, H.-L.; Chiu, C.-W.; Wang, H.-C.; Ben, J.; He, W.; Huang, C.-R. Normally-off p-GaN Gated AlGaN/GaN HEMTs Using Plasma Oxidation Technique in Access Region. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2020, 8, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hao, R.; Xu, N.; Yu, G.; Song, L.; Chen, F.; Zhao, J.; Deng, X.; Li, X.; Cheng, K.; Fu, K.; et al. Studies on fabrication and reliability of GaN highresistivity- cap-layer HEMT. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 1314–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tajalli, A. Impact of sidewall etching on the dynamic performance of GaN-on-Si E-mode transistors. Microelectron. Reliab. 2018, 88–90, 572–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hao, R.; Li, W.; Fu, K.; Yu, G.; Song, L.; Yuan, J.; Li, J.; Deng, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Q.; et al. Breakdown Enhancement and Current Collapse Suppression by High-Resistivity GaN Cap Layer in Normally-Off AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38, 1567–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Takhar, K. Al2O3 formed by post plasma oxidation of Al as a Gate dielectric for AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 481, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Buttari, D.; Chini, A.; Chakraborty, A.; Mccarthy, L.; Xing, H.; Palacios, T.; Shen, L.; Keller, S.; Mishra, U.K. Selective dry etching of GaN over AlGaN in BCl3/SF6 mixtures. Proc. IEEE Lester Eastman Conf. High Perform. Devices 2004, 14, 756–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pu, T.; Wang, X.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, T.; Li, X.; Li, L.; Ao, J.-P. Normally-Off AlGaN/GaN Heterojunction Metal-Insulator-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors with Gate-First Process. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2019, 40, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, K.J. AlN passivation by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition for GaN-based power switches and power amplifiers. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2013, 28, 074015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Degraeve, R. Degradation and breakdown in thin oxide layers: Mechanisms, models and reliability prediction. Microelectron. Reliab. 1999, 39, 1445–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ťapajna, M.; Hilt, O.; Bahat-Treidel, E.; Würfl, J.; Kuzmík, J. Gate Reliability Investigation in Normally-Off p-Type-GaN Cap/AlGaN/GaN HEMTs Under Forward Bias Stress. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016, 37, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tallarico, A.N. Perimeter driven transport in the p-GaN gate as a limiting factor for gate reliability. Proc. IEEE Int. Rel. Phys. Symp. (IRPS) 2019, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. He, J.; Wei, J.; Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, K.; Chen, K.J. Frequency- and Temperature-Dependent Gate Reliability of Schottky-Type p-GaN Gate HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2019, 66, 3453–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stockman, A.; Masin, F.; Meneghini, M.; Zanoni, E.; Meneghesso, G.; Bakeroot, B.; Moens, P. Gate Conduction Mechanisms and Lifetime Modeling of p-Gate AlGaN/GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 5365–5372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, C.; Hua, M.; Yang, S.; Zhang, L.; Chen, K.J. E-mode p-n Junction/AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with Enhanced Gate Reliability. In Proceedings of the 2020 32nd International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (ISPSD), Vienna, Austria, 13–18 September 2020; pp. 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, L.; Zheng, Z.; Yang, S.; Song, W.; He, J.; Chen, K.J. p-GaN Gate HEMT With Surface Reinforcement for Enhanced Gate Reliability. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2021, 42, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhou, G.; Wan, Z.; Yang, G.; Jiang, Y.; Sokolovskij, R.; Yu, H.; Xia, G. Gate Leakage Suppression and Breakdown Voltage Enhancement in p-GaN HEMTs Using Metal/Graphene Gates. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2020, 67, 875–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the device structure with LGS/LG/LGD/WG = 2/4/10/100 µm. (b) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) photograph of the device.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of the device structure with LGS/LG/LGD/WG = 2/4/10/100 µm. (b) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) photograph of the device.
Membranes 11 00727 g001
Figure 2. Energy band diagrams of schottky-gated high electron mobility transistor (SG-HEMT) and metal–insulator–semiconductor-high electron mobility transistor (MIS-HEMT) obtained through TCAD simulation.
Figure 2. Energy band diagrams of schottky-gated high electron mobility transistor (SG-HEMT) and metal–insulator–semiconductor-high electron mobility transistor (MIS-HEMT) obtained through TCAD simulation.
Membranes 11 00727 g002
Figure 3. (a) Log-scale IDS–VGS transfer characteristics, (b) IDS–VDS output characteristics, (c) IGS–VGS characteristics, and (d) off-state breakdown voltages of the MIS-HEMT and SG-HEMT.
Figure 3. (a) Log-scale IDS–VGS transfer characteristics, (b) IDS–VDS output characteristics, (c) IGS–VGS characteristics, and (d) off-state breakdown voltages of the MIS-HEMT and SG-HEMT.
Membranes 11 00727 g003
Figure 4. Electric field distributions of the SG-HEMT and MIS-HEMT simulated using TCAD.
Figure 4. Electric field distributions of the SG-HEMT and MIS-HEMT simulated using TCAD.
Membranes 11 00727 g004
Figure 5. C–V characteristics of SG-HEMT and MIS-HEMT.
Figure 5. C–V characteristics of SG-HEMT and MIS-HEMT.
Membranes 11 00727 g005
Figure 6. (a) Gate lag behavior and dynamic Ron, (b) TDDB gate current with three different gate voltages, (c) Weibull plot of the time-to-breakdown distributions, and (d) lifetime prediction with failure rate of 63.2% and 1% of MIS-HEMT.
Figure 6. (a) Gate lag behavior and dynamic Ron, (b) TDDB gate current with three different gate voltages, (c) Weibull plot of the time-to-breakdown distributions, and (d) lifetime prediction with failure rate of 63.2% and 1% of MIS-HEMT.
Membranes 11 00727 g006
Figure 7. Comparison between the VG_BD–IG characteristics of the proposed device and those of other devices [5,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
Figure 7. Comparison between the VG_BD–IG characteristics of the proposed device and those of other devices [5,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
Membranes 11 00727 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiu, H.-C.; Liu, C.-H.; Huang, C.-R.; Chiu, C.-C.; Wang, H.-C.; Kao, H.-L.; Lin, S.-Y.; Chien, F.-T. Normally-Off p-GaN Gated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs with ALD-Grown Al2O3/AlN Composite Gate Insulator. Membranes 2021, 11, 727. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11100727

AMA Style

Chiu H-C, Liu C-H, Huang C-R, Chiu C-C, Wang H-C, Kao H-L, Lin S-Y, Chien F-T. Normally-Off p-GaN Gated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs with ALD-Grown Al2O3/AlN Composite Gate Insulator. Membranes. 2021; 11(10):727. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11100727

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiu, Hsien-Chin, Chia-Hao Liu, Chong-Rong Huang, Chi-Chuan Chiu, Hsiang-Chun Wang, Hsuan-Ling Kao, Shinn-Yn Lin, and Feng-Tso Chien. 2021. "Normally-Off p-GaN Gated AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs with ALD-Grown Al2O3/AlN Composite Gate Insulator" Membranes 11, no. 10: 727. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11100727

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop