Next Article in Journal
Lactic Acid Permeation through Deep Eutectic Solvents-Based Polymer Inclusion Membranes
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Nanofiltration with Reverse Osmosis in Reclaiming Tertiary Treated Municipal Wastewater for Irrigation Purposes
Previous Article in Journal
Cu Homeostasis in Bacteria: The Ins and Outs
Article

Effect of Membrane Fouling on Fertilizer-Drawn Forward Osmosis Desalination Performance

Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2020, 10(9), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090243
Received: 10 August 2020 / Revised: 2 September 2020 / Accepted: 10 September 2020 / Published: 18 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Surface Modification and Functionalization)
Fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis (FDFO) has garnered immense attention for its application in the agricultural field and its potential to reuse wastewater sustainably. Membrane fouling, however, remains to be a challenge for the process. This study aims to investigate the influence of membrane fouling on the performance of the FDFO process. Synthetic wastewater (SWW) and multi-component fertilizer (MCF) were used as feed solution (FS) and draw solution (DS) with cellulose triacetate (CTA) forward osmosis (FO) membrane orientation. The performance was evaluated through water flux (WF), percentage recovery and percentage of salt reject. The WF declined from 10.32 LMH (L/m2·h) to 3.30 LMH when ultra-pure water as FS was switched with concentration FS indicating the dependence of the performance on the type of FS used. Accelerated fouling experiments conducted to verify the fouling behavior showed a decline in the water flux from 8.6 LMH to 3.09 LMH with SWW and 13.1 LMH to 3.42 LMH when deionized water was used as FS. The effects of osmotic backwashing and in situ flushing as physical cleaning methods of the foul membrane were studied through water flux and salt recovery percentage. Both cleaning methods yielded a WF close to the baseline. Osmotic backwashing yielded better results by eliminating foulant–foulant and foulant–membrane adhesion. The cleaning methods were able to recover 75% of phosphate and 60% of nitrate salts. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) results validated the effectiveness of the methods for the physical cleaning of foul membranes. This study underlines the importance of the FS used in FDFO and the effectiveness of osmotic backwashing as a cleaning method of FO membranes. View Full-Text
Keywords: forward osmosis; fertilizer draw solute; fouling; aquaculture wastewater; desalination forward osmosis; fertilizer draw solute; fouling; aquaculture wastewater; desalination
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Khraisheh, M.; Gulied, M.; AlMomani, F. Effect of Membrane Fouling on Fertilizer-Drawn Forward Osmosis Desalination Performance. Membranes 2020, 10, 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090243

AMA Style

Khraisheh M, Gulied M, AlMomani F. Effect of Membrane Fouling on Fertilizer-Drawn Forward Osmosis Desalination Performance. Membranes. 2020; 10(9):243. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090243

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khraisheh, Majeda, Mona Gulied, and Fares AlMomani. 2020. "Effect of Membrane Fouling on Fertilizer-Drawn Forward Osmosis Desalination Performance" Membranes 10, no. 9: 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090243

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop