Next Article in Journal
RNA Vaccines against Infectious Diseases: Vital Progress with Room for Improvement
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a Candidate Multi-Epitope Subunit Vaccine against Klebsiella aerogenes: Subtractive Proteomics and Immuno-Informatics Approach
Previous Article in Journal
The COVID-19 mRNA BNT163b2 Vaccine Was Well Tolerated and Highly Immunogenic in Young Adults in Long Follow-Up after Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Associations between Allelic Variants of the Human IgH 3′ Regulatory Region 1 and the Immune Response to BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/vaccines9111210
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Immunoinformatics and Immunogenetics-Based Design of Immunogenic Peptides Vaccine against the Emerging Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV) and Its Validation through In Silico Cloning and Immune Simulation

by
Muhammad Suleman
1,†,
Muhammad Tahir ul Qamar
2,
Kiran
3,
Samreen Rasool
4,
Aneela Rasool
5,
Aqel Albutti
6,*,
Noorah Alsowayeh
7,
Ameen S. S. Alwashmi
8,
Mohammad Abdullah Aljasir
8,
Sajjad Ahmad
9,
Zahid Hussain
1,
Muhammad Rizwan
1,
Syed Shujait Ali
1,
Abbas Khan
10,† and
Dong-Qing Wei
10,11,12,*
1
Centre for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat 19200, Pakistan
2
College of Life Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
3
Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
4
Department of Biochemistry, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
5
Department of Botany, University of Okara, Okara 56300, Pakistan
6
Department of Medical Biotechnology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Biology, College of Education, Majmaah University, Al Majma’ah 15341, Saudi Arabia
8
Department of Medical Laboratories, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
9
Department of Health and Biological Sciences, Abasyn University, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan
10
Department of Bioinformatics and Biological Statistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
11
State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Shanghai-Islamabad-Belgrade Joint Innovation Center on Antibacterial Resistances, Joint Laboratory of International Cooperation in Metabolic and Developmental Sciences, Ministry of Education and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
12
Peng Cheng Laboratory, Vanke Cloud City Phase I Building 8, Xili Street, Nashan District, Shenzhen 518055, China
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Contributed equally: Muhammad Suleman and Abbas Khan.
Vaccines 2021, 9(11), 1210; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111210
Submission received: 7 September 2021 / Revised: 5 October 2021 / Accepted: 6 October 2021 / Published: 20 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomic Medicine and Advances in Vaccine Technology and Development 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pegivirus, HPgV, earlier known as Gb virus and hepatitis G virus, is an enveloped, positive-stranded RNA and lymphotropic virus classified into the Flaviviridae family. The transmission routes primarily involve blood products, with infections worldwide, leading up to 25% of persistent infections. To date, no effective therapeutic means are available to resolve Pegivirus infections. Effective vaccine therapeutics are the best alternative to manage this disease and any associated potential pandemic. Thus, whole proteome-based mining of immunogenic peptides, i.e., CTL (cytotoxic T lymphocytes), HTL (helper T lymphocytes) and B cell epitopes were mapped to design a vaccine ensemble. Our investigation revealed that 29 different epitopes impart a critical role in immune response induction, which was also validated by exploring its physiochemical properties and experimental feasibility. In silico expression and host immune simulation using an agent-based modeling approach confirmed the induction of both primary and secondary immune factors such as IL, cytokines and antibodies. The current study warrants further lab experiments to demonstrate its efficacy and safety.

1. Introduction

The arboviruses (arthropod-borne viruses) of the genus flavivirus (family Flaviviridae) are transmitted to vertebrates through infected mosquitoes and ticks. These mosquito-borne and tick-borne flaviviruses are the major cause of jaundice, hemorrhagic disease, fever, rashes, and encephalitis in human beings [1]. Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), a member of tick-borne encephalitis virus complex endemic in Eurasia, is transmitted by ticks (ixodid ticks) and causes a neurological disease known as tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) [2]. During a biphasic course, the disease symptoms are initially similar to influenza, followed by a symptom-free phase, and finally, the neurological disease occurs [3]. Meningitis is a mild form of the disease, whereas the severe form of the disease, encephalitis, may lead to spinal cord paralysis, myelitis, and death [4]. In Eurasia, more than 10,000 infection cases are reported annually due to TBEV [5,6].
Phylogenetic reconstructions based on E protein data identified Siberian (TBEV-Sib), Far-Eastern (TBEV-FE), and European (TBEV-Eu) subtypes of TBEV. Furthermore, recent investigations also favor the recognition of the Himalayan (TBEV-Him) and Baikalian (TBEV-Bkl) subtypes in TBEV [5,7]. The mortality rates of TBEV-Sib, TBEV-FE, and TBEV-Eu are 6–8%, 40%, and 1–2%, respectively, depending on the patient’s age and immunity [8,9].
The virus is a positive single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) of 11 kb, packed into an envelope having a diameter of around 50 nm [10]. The genome encodes a polyprotein that is processed co- and post-transcriptionally into three structural proteins, i.e., envelope glycoprotein (E), pre-membrane (preM) and capsid (C), and seven non-structural proteins (NS1, NS2a, NS2b, NS3, NS4a, NS4b, and NS5) [11]. Secondary structures of the 5′ and 3′ UTRs have an essential role in the life cycle of the virus [12,13].
To date, several licensed vaccines are available, which are based on different strains of Far-Eastern and European TBEV subtype. These vaccines can be categorized as Russian, European and Chinese [14]. Two European vaccines, German isolate K23 (Encepur) and Austrian isolate Neudoerfl (FSME-IMMUN) are currently available and both contain TBEV-Eu strains [15]. The Russian licensed TBEV vaccines are based on Far-Eastern strain 205 (EnceVir) and TBEV-FE isolates Sofjin (TBE vaccine Moscow and Tick-E-Vac/Klesch-E-Vac). In China, TBEV-FE strain Sen-Zhang is used in the approved SenTaiBao vaccine [16]. It has been reported that these vaccines cause mild to moderate local and systemic adverse effects, such as headache, fever, redness and swelling. Moreover, as they are whole organism-based vaccines, the viruses may, rarely, be reactivated and cause meningoencephalitis with substantial mortality [10]. The immunogenicity of these vaccines is also low. Considering this, new safe, broad-spectrum effective, and targeted vaccines are needed to support the above-mentioned vaccine in eradicating TBEV.
Recent advancements and great strides in bioinformatics have generated diverse in-silico approaches for the identification of novel vaccine and drug targets [17]. These in-silico approaches were helpful in developing cost-effective vaccines and drugs while reducing the time span [18]. Diverse in-silico studies were conducted over the last 10 years for the identification of mutations, novel vaccine candidates, and drug targets for controlling various pathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis [17], Bartenolla bacilliformis [19], Norovirus [18], Mayaro virus [20], Epstein-Barr virus [21], Mycobacterium tuberculosis [22,23], Staphylococcus aureus [24], SARS-CoV2 [25,26] and Streptococcus pneumonia [27]. Immunoinformatics approaches are the most effective tools for the development of specific, stable, and multi-epitope vaccines. Immunoinformatics approaches are reliable, precise, and speedy, and therefore, this study was designed to develop a multi-epitopes subunit vaccine against TBE. For this purpose, antigenic proteins of TBEV were used for the prediction of CTL and HTL epitopes. The final vaccine construct was generated by combining the selected CTL and HTL epitopes. In silico cloning and immune simulation confirmed the therapeutic potential of the designed candidate vaccine.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Retrieval

The study was started by fetching the complete proteome of tick-borne encephalitis (U27495) from Gene Bank Database of NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 25 November 2020) [28] available under accession number: U27495. The stepwise flow of the study is illustrated in Figure 1.

2.2. Data Processing

2.2.1. Prediction of Immunogenic Epitopes

CTL epitopes were identified in the polyprotein sequence using NetCTL 1.2, available at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetCTL/ (accessed on 25 November 2020) [29]. This prediction combines three elements: first, it performs prediction for the MHC-I binding peptide, followed by C-terminal proteasomal cleavage, and lastly, executing the transportation efficiency Transporter Associated with Antigen Processing (TAP) program. The first two parameters were estimated via artificial neural networks, whereas TAP transporter efficacy was calculated through the weight matrix. The cut-off value used for CLT epitopes prediction was allowed at 0.75. Furthermore, HTL epitopes of 15-mer amino acids length were predicted showing a good affinity for human alleles: HLA-DRB1*01:02, HLA-DRB1*01:01, HLA-DRB1*01:04, HLA-DRB1*01:03, HLA-DRB1*01:05 using IEDB server at http://www.iedb.org/ (accessed on 25 November 2020) [30]. The predicted peptides were sorted based on an IC50 score and were grouped as: IC50 value < 50 nM (good binders), IC50 score < 500 nM (intermediate binders) and <5000 nM (low affinity binders). The percentile ranking was inversely proportional to the epitopes’ binding affinity, implying that a lower percentile rank is the depiction of higher binding affinity. To trigger the protective host antibody response, B cell epitopes were predicted using BCPred webserver. To predict Linear B cell epitopes in the virus polypeptide, an online web tool of BCPred was used [31]. To filter the best predicted B cell epitopes, a cut-off score of 0.8 was defined in the process. ElliPro [30] was further utilized to predict conformational B-cell epitopes. The ranking was based on the protrusion index (PI) score, which was assigned to each predicted epitope.

2.2.2. Multiple-Epitope Vaccine Designing and Evaluation

Predicted epitopes prioritized in the previous steps were fused carefully to achieve a multi-epitope peptide vaccine construct. For this, CTL, HTL, and B cell epitopes were linked via AAY, GPGPG, and KK linkers, respectively [32]. Then, adjuvant was added at the N terminal of the vaccine sequence [33]. Allergenicity of the vaccine sequence was determined using a well reputed AlgPred server. This server can be accessed online at http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/algpred/ (accessed on 25 November 2020) [34] and predicts allergic sequences at an accuracy of around 85%. Allergenic sequence can be identified if it has a score greater than threshold (>0.4).

2.2.3. Prediction of Vaccine Antigenicity

The vaccine construct needed to be antigenic for eliciting the proper immune response. VaxiJen server was employed to predict antigenicity of the vaccine keeping the threshold at default 0.4 [35]. VaxiJen uses a new alignment-free approach for antigen prediction, which is based on auto-cross covariance (ACC) transformation of protein sequences into uniform vectors of principal amino acid properties. Additionally, allergenicity was predicted with the help of AlgPred server (http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/algpred/ accessed on 25 November 2020) at an accuracy of around 85% [34] to check whether or not the vaccine construct will trigger the autoimmune reaction. AlgPred uses a consensus approach for the prediction of allergenicity scores. Allergenic sequence can be identified when there is a score greater than the threshold (>0.4).
Different physicochemical properties of the vaccine such as amino acid composition, molecular weight, theoretical pI, in vivo and in vitro half-life, instability index, aliphatic index, and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) were unveiled for the vaccine through online ProtParam [36]. Secondary structure of the vaccine was predicted using a freely available online tool of PSIPRED [37].

2.2.4. Multiple-Epitope Vaccine 3D Structure Prediction and Validation

For tertiary structure prediction, RaptorX (http://raptorx.uchicago.edu/ accessed on 25 November 2020) was utilized [38]. RaptorX also allows the prediction of secondary structure elements, solvent accessibility, and binding regions in the input sequence. The server also uses the confidence parameter to assess the quality of the predicted 3D structures. The quality of the models was examined using p-value, which is a global quality indicator, along with a global distance test (GDT) and un-normalized GDT (uGDT). Vaccine 3D structure was subjected to refinement using Galaxy Refine [39] for the purpose of improving local and global structure quality of the vaccine. During the process, the protein side-chain was reconstructed and repacked by employing CASP10 refinement and then relaxed through MD simulation. Quality of the vaccine 3D model was tested using online tools such as ERRAT and ProSA-web. The latter is commonly used in protein structure validation to investigate input 3D model quality [40], which is assessed by means of a quality score. In cases when the score of the input structure is within the score’s range of experimentally determined structure, the question structure most likely has no errors. The quality of the predicted 3D structure can be estimated by using the ProSA-web server, thus making it easy for users to improve the overall structure quality. ERRAT [41] is mainly deployed to find and fix non-bonded interactions present in the given structure.

2.2.5. Ensemble Vaccine Folding Evaluation through MD Simulation

Proper folding of protein ensembles is required for cellular protein network regulation which plays different biological functions, i.e., immune response triggering, cell-cell communication and vice versa [42]. Herein, the protein folding of the designed vaccine construct was evaluated through all-atoms molecular dynamics simulation. Using AMBER20 [43,44], the structure was neutralized and solvated with TIP3PBOX of 14.0 Å. To relax the structure and remove bad contacts, a two step gentle minimization of 6000 and 3000 steps was performed. The system was then heated and equilibrated. MD was run for 100 ns to evaluate the structural-dynamic properties of the vaccine ensemble. For protein stability, folding and flexibility CPPTRAJ and PTRAJ packages embedded in AMBER20 were used [45].

2.3. Evaluation of the Immune Response Triggering Properties of MEVC

2.3.1. Molecular Docking of the Vaccine

The vaccine was docked with TLR4 (PDB ID:3FXI) using the PatchDock [46] server to disclose the binding orientation and interactions of the vaccine with TLR4. The docking was run by PatchDock, involving the separation of a molecule’s surface into small but proper shape patches. These patches provide a basis for complex patterning and can be visualized as puzzle pieces. Shape matching algorithms were then used to identify the best fixing patches for predicting the best possible, stable orientation of one molecule to another. Moreover, Fast Interaction Refinement in Molecular Docking (FireDock) [47] was applied to the solutions of PatchDock to guide the selection of the complex with the lowest global binding energy. The global energy can be split into the following components: atomic contact energy, van der Waals interaction energy, both attractive and repulsive, and hydrogen bonding energy.

2.3.2. Binding Free Energy Calculation

The binding free energy of the MEVC and TLR4 was estimated by using the MM-GBSA approach. The HawkDock server calculates the vdW, electrostatic energy, generalized born, and the total binding free energy of a protein-protein complex by using the MMPBSA.py package of AMBER simulation package [48].

2.3.3. In Silico Cloning and Expression

For maximum expression in the host cell, codon optimization was performed. Herein, Escherichia coli K12 was considered as an expression host. To optimize the sequence, Jcat tool (Java Codon Adaptation Tool) [49] was utilized to reverse translate the given protein sequence and obtain an optimized nucleotide sequence with suitable restriction sites. For in silico expression, pET28a (+) plasmid was selected, and snap gene software was used to perform the expression [50].

2.3.4. Immune Simulation

Using immune simulation, the interaction between the foreign particles and the immune system may be projected. To this purpose, an online C-ImmSim server was used. As an agent-based modeling approach, this server is used to comprehend the host immune system’s dynamics in response to a foreign particle [51]. The relevance of learning via organism-environment interactions is emphasized in the agent-based concept. This method is part of a current trend in computational learning and development models that focuses on researching autonomous organisms in virtual or actual environments. Using the PSSM model, the server measures the reaction of the immune system against the antigen. Production of various immune substances such as antibodies, interferon, and cytokines production upon vaccine administration is estimated. Additionally, Th1 (T helper cell 01) and Th2 (T helper cell 02) responses are also predicted by the webserver. The server plotted Simpson Index or D (a measure of diversity) at default parameters.

3. Results

3.1. Sequence Retrieval and Antigenicity Profiling

The proteome of the tick-borne virus was fetched from the NCBI database and scanned for potential humoral immunity mediating B cell and cellular immunity mediating T cell epitopes, to subsequently be used in the design of a multi-epitope peptide vaccine ensemble. Figure 1 represents the overall flow of the work. The whole polyprotein, which includes three structural and seven non-structural proteins, were subjected to a vaccine designing pipeline.

3.2. Unveiling Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTL) Epitopes

From the whole proteome of the tick-borne virus, a total of 31 peptides each 9-mer in length were predicted as potential CTL epitopes, as tabulated in Table 1. Further, filtration based on good binding affinity score and efficient antigenic nature showed only nine epitopes were considered as final CTL epitopes. The final selection of CTL epitopes was based on the highest combined score. These nine epitopes were then added to the final multi-epitopes’ vaccine construct.

3.3. Prioritizing Helper T Lymphocytes (HTL) Epitopes

While predicting HTL epitopes, five human alleles, namely HLA- DRB1*01:02, HLA-DRB1*01:01, HLA-DRB1*01:04, HLA-DRB1*01:05, and HLA DRB1*01:03, were considered as to which virus sequence peptides bind with high efficiency. Epitopes with the lowest percentile rank were selected for the final multi-epitope vaccine construct. Previously, epitopes with lowest percentile ranks were also reported to possess strong antigenic properties. The selected HTL epitopes include: 73–87 (HLA-DRB1*07:01), 76–90 (HLA-DRB1*07:01), 65–79 (HLA-DRB5*01:01), 63–77 (HLA-DRB5*01:01), 35–49 (HLA-DRB1*15:01), 33–47 (HLA-DRB1*15:01) and 36–50 (HLA-DRB1*15:01), as presented in Table 2. Both CTL and HTL epitopes were ranked on antigenic and high binding affinity for the MHC alleles.

3.4. Prediction of B Cell Epitopes

B cell epitopes are key mediators in provoking the humoral immune response and long-term immunity. Prediction of B cell epitopes with the highest scores are favorable for MEVC. The higher the score, the most potential the epitope. Thus, epitopes of 20-mer in length and scores >0.9 were selected for the MEVC. Table 3 shortlists the ten epitopes with the highest score. The ten epitopes with a score greater than default and length 20-mer were selected for downward analysis. Conformational B-cell epitopes were predicted through ElliPro. The finally selected B-cell epitopes are given in Figure 2. The score for these predicted B cell epitopes ranged from 1 to 0.99.

3.5. Multi-Epitope Peptide Vaccine Design

The selected 9 CTL epitopes, 7 HTL epitopes, and 13 B-cell epitopes were fused with each other using different linkers. For CTL epitopes, AAY linkers were used, whereas GPGPG linkers were employed for linking HTL epitopes. Additional joining of B cell epitopes to the T cell epitopes peptide was performed through the KK linker. The total length of the final epitope was 665 amino acids. Schematically, the final ensemble vaccine structure is provided in Figure 3.

3.6. Prediction of Vaccine 3D Structure and Validation

For the vaccine construct, five 3D models were produced from its amino acid sequence by the Robetta ab initio modeling server. The models were assessed using the Ramachandran plot, in addition to ProSA-web and ERRAT. The selected 3D model of the vaccine was then subjected to a structure assessment phase. ProCheck for protein model showed that 91.9% of amino acids were plotted in the most favorable areas, 7.7% in allowed areas, and only 0.4% in disallowed areas.
Similarly, ERRAT and ProSA-web calculated and verified the overall quality of the basic 3D model. The resulted overall quality factor reported by ERRAT was 97.3%, and the ProSA-web showed a score of −7.9 for the 3D model of the vaccine construct, which proved the accuracy of the model. Results from ProSA-web and rampage are given in Figure 4. All the mentioned analyses found model 2 as the most optimal model for the vaccine hence considered in further analyses.

3.7. D Structure Validation

The best model initiated by the Robetta server, that was selected on the basis of certain factors such as RMSD value and high GDT-HA score, was further used for 3D structure analysis. Moreover, ProCheck results for the vaccine construct showed 90.6% amino acids in the favored region, and 9.4% amino acid, were plotted in allowed regions (Figure 4A). ProSA–web and ERRAT validated the three-dimensional structure of the vaccine construct with a quality factor of 94.1%, and Z-score −6.48, by ERRAT and ProSA-web, respectively (Figure 4C,D).

3.8. Prediction of Allergenicity

Allergenicity of the multi-epitope vaccine was examined, and demonstrated to harbor no sequence responsible for allergenic reactions. The E-value of the vaccine was <threshold 0.001 value. The nearest protein was UniProtKB accession number Q8IWY9.

3.9. Antigenicity of the Vaccine Construct

The antigenicity score for the final vaccine construct was predicted to be 0.5, which was greater than the threshold of 0.4. This demonstrates the vaccine possesses significant antigenic properties and is capable of provoking strong immune responses.

3.10. Physiochemical Properties of the Designed Vaccine

The molecular weight of the vaccine was 71.3 kDa and thus can be purified easily in follow up wet-lab experimentation. The theoretical protrusion index (PI) of the vaccine was 9.66, referring to its basic nature. In vivo half-life of the vaccine in E. coli was >10 h. The instability value was determined as stable, as it had a predicated instability score of 25.67 (<40 is categorized as stable). The aliphatic index score was 75.17, which means the vaccine thermostable nature at different temperatures. The Grand Average of Hydropathy value reported for the vaccine was −0.35, making it a hydrophilic molecule.

3.11. Prediction of Secondary Structure Elements

The secondary structure elements of the vaccine are comprised of coils (39.88%), strand (29.91%), helix (28.04%), and beta-turn (2.18%). Graphically, the secondary structure of the vaccine is given in Figure 5.

3.12. Protein Folding Evaluation through All-Atoms MD Simulation

Prior to validation of the vaccine ensemble and its interaction with the immune receptor, the folding of the designed MEVC was evaluated. MD simulation-based stability and folding is of great interest to reveal different dynamic properties such as the function of a loop in a protein, importance of different residues in interaction with different proteins, the impact of protein-protein interfaces, and mutations [52,53]. Herein, the stable folding of the MEVC was revealed through root mean square deviation (RMSD) as a function of time. As given in Figure 6A, the folding of the MEVC was very stable and did not deviate from the mean structure significantly. The system reached the equilibrium position at 20 ns, and for the rest of the simulation time the folding pattern remained uniform.
This shows that the structural folding was already stabilized at 20 ns, and revealed that MEVC had proper stable folding. Similarly, the compactness of the protein evaluated as Rg (radius of gyration), Figure 6B, also showed that the structural compactness remained high during the first 20 ns and gradually decreased over the simulation time, and soon after reaching 40 ns the Rg difference between the initial structure and the structure at 40 ns was ~6.0 Å, explaining that the protein folding reached an equilibrium point, and this pattern remained consistent until 100 ns. Moreover, the residual flexibility remained less than 1.5 Å, which shows that the uniformly dispersed helices and beta-sheets have stabilized the structural folding. The RMSF (root mean square fluctuation) of the MEVC is shown in Figure 6C. Conclusively, this shows that the protein behavior in a dynamic environment revealed stabilized folding. For instance, the results of an all-atoms simulation and experimental protein evaluation were reported to be greatly uniform [52,54].

3.13. Protein-Peptide Docking of the Vaccine to TLR4

The PatchDock server generated 100 docked solutions of the vaccine with respect to the TLR receptor and ranked as per geometry and electrostatic interdependence of the receptor surface. Refinement in FireDock re-scored the docked solutions and ordered them on the basis of global binding energy (KJ/mol). Additionally, graphical information of intermolecular interactions was elucidated via the online PDBsum and PDBePISA databases. Chemically, 8 hydrogen bonds were found between the vaccine (Chain A) and TLR4 (Chain B); 460–131, 381–191, 360–191, 262–188, 321–237, 341–236, 458–202, and 431–203. Additionally, 414 non-bonded interactions were revealed in the formation of vaccine and TLR4 complex (Figure 7A). Moreover, we also performed the docking of MEVC with TLR4 in complex with MD2 as shown in Figure 7B. The data show that the binding of the MEVC was conserved even if MD2 was available. The MEVC occupied the same site and blocked the same residues as reported in the TLR4-MEVC complex alone. This shows that the designed MEVC accessibility of the binding site is highly accurate.

3.14. Binding Free Energy Evaluation of MEVC-TLR4

Binding free energy is a widely practiced approach to reveal the binding affinity of protein-protein, protein-ligand, and protein-DNA/RNA complexes accurately [55,56,57,58,59]. The binding energy of the MEVC-TLR4 was estimated using MM-PBSA.py script. The results revealed that the complex had the total binding energy of −87.50 kcal/mol, while the other contributing factors, such as vdW, electrostatic and SA, were reported to be −168.72 kcal/mol, −4858.53 kcal/mol and 4958.08, respectively. This shows a more robust interaction of the MEVC with the host immune receptor TLR4.

3.15. Codon Optimization and In Silico Cloning

The vaccine sequence codon usage was adjusted according to E. coli (strain K12) system to achieve its high expression (Figure 8). The sequence length of the optimized codons sequence was 1998 nucleotides. The vaccine had a Codon Adaptation Index (CAI) score of 0.93, with a GC content of 49% (optimum range is between 30% and 70%), both pointing to the vaccine’s high expression in E. coli cell. Afterwards, the optimized sequence of the vaccine was cloned into the pET28a (+) vector.

3.16. Immune Simulation Analysis

The human immune system response was monitored through in silico immune simulation upon the injection of the antigen in several doses. It can be seen (Figure 9A) that the immune response was significantly triggered, and the antibody titer was very high after the injection. It can clearly be observed that the combined IgM + IgG titer remained 4 × 107 xx/mL. The IgM alone titer was reported to be around 3.5 × 107 xx/mL, while Ig1 was reported as 3.2 × 107 xx/mL. The graph shows that the antigen titer was initially lower until the 5th day after the injection, then the titer increased, however after five days the titer gradually decreased and the IgM + IgG, Ig1 production was increased. At the 13th day the total neutralization of the antigen was observed with the production of other immune factors. We also checked the interleukin (IL) and cytokines responses. As presented in Figure 9B the IFN-g and IL-2 titer were significantly high. This shows the consistent and robust immune triggering response upon the injection. The cellular immune system response to pathogen identification at the re-encounter was also very strong, including the development of memory cells. The population of the T cell was reported to >1700 cells/mm3. The maximum concentration of 380 cells/mm3 for the phagocytic natural killer cell population was reported, while the dendritic cells and phagocytic macrophage population were reported to be 200 cell/mm3, respectively. In the case of the TLR4 response, the production of TNF-alpha in higher titer is associated with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) designed vaccine which are bacterial and absent in viruses [60], implying that the production of IL-6 in higher titer works in the neutralization of viral antigen. Hence these results confirm that our vaccine candidate effectively triggered the immune response upon the injection. For instance, negative control results show that the antigen titer was given as high as 3.1 × 102 but still the response could not be provoked efficiently. The antigen remained in higher load for the first 20 days and different injections. This shows that the positive MEVC triggered a more robust immune response than the negative construct. The results of immune server are shown in Figure 9A–F.
In summary, the current study uses computational modeling approaches to design MEVC for tick-borne virus. This multi-steps methodology followed a conventional pipeline initiated by retrieving the key targets and the prediction of antigenic and allergenic properties. In the second step CTL, HTL and B cell epitopes were predicted and shortlisted based on combined score, percentile rank and total score. Next, a multi-epitopes vaccine was constructed based on the selected epitopes joining with linkers. Adjuvant was also added for immunogenic properties augmentation. In the next steps, evaluation of the MEVC was carried out using molecular docking, immune simulation, MD simulation, binding free energy calculations, in silico cloning and expression. The final vaccine candidate was reported to be antigenic and non-allergenic, and potentially triggers the host immune response.

4. Discussion

Infectious agents spread by tick bites are sparked by tick-borne pathogens that afflict humans and other species. Infection of a host of diseases, including rickettsia and other forms of bacteria, viruses, and protozoa, cause them. Since more than one disease-causing agent can be identified in human ticks, patients can be afflicted with more than one virus at the same time, exacerbating the complexity of diagnosis and treatment [61]. Factors that facilitate their survival in infection are required to be identified for drugs and vaccine designing. Demonstration of surface-visible antigenic epitopes is necessary for successful control and full eradication of this virus. This should be the primary target for effective vaccines’ potential production [62]. In the efficient prevention of infectious diseases, vaccination plays an integral role [63]. Multi-epitope-based peptide vaccines are advantageous because, relative to traditional vaccines, they are viable, extremely safe, non-toxic, and simple in the engineering process, which may have several issues in immune susceptible people [64,65]. These peptides-based therapeutic vaccines designed from the proteome of a pathogen are highly targeted and immunogenic [23,66]. In addition, such vaccines have the potential to evoke both cell mediated and humoral immunity. A number of multi-epitopes-based vaccines have been designed against different pathologies including cholera, leishmaniasis, cancers and dengue, and their benefits have been further revealed in Schistosoma, Helicobacter, and cancer [18,20,67,68,69,70]. Immunization is the most efficient and secure tool for the prevention of infectious diseases and public health. The advancement and development of multi-epitope subunit vaccines have increased the opportunity to find new antigenic targets by applying immunoinformatics approaches, due to the rapid expansion and accessibility of enormous proteomics results [20]. As the prevalence of tick-borne diseases grows and the regional areas in which they are found growing, the complex, and sometimes overlapping, clinical manifestations of these diseases must continually be differentiated by health professionals. The tick-human spread of illness has caused many high-profile deaths, including the death at the age of 66 of former Senator Kay Hagan in the United States in 2019 [71]. These methods were widely applied by different studies to design a multi-epitopes vaccine against bacterial and viral pathogens [18,63,67,72,73]. Herein, we have also used computational methods to mine the tick-borne virus proteome to design a multi-epitopes subunit vaccine.
Our analysis showed that there were ten proteins, of which three were structural, while seven were non-structural. Our analysis revealed that the polyprotein possessed antigenic properties and was the best option for vaccine design. Our analysis predicted 9 CTL epitopes, 7 HTL epitopes, and 13 B-cells as the most potential antigenic peptides considered for the final vaccine construct. The final vaccine construct using adjuvant and linkers to join these epitopes was used, and the vaccine candidate was classified as non-allergenic and strong antigenic. Furthermore, the physicochemical properties also revealed that the candidate vaccine properties were acceptable. The docking and in silico cloning further confirmed its interaction with TLR-4 and its expression in the E. coli host for downstream processing. Any mutation in the protein sequence may not potentially affect the efficacy of this vaccine for different variants of tick-borne, if they emerged, because the combination of different antigenic epitopes from different proteins preserves the antigenic properties and could not be significantly affected because of the multiple proteins’ epitopes combination. This is unlike the current vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 which are either entirely based on receptor-binding domain (RBD) or Spike protein.
Furthermore, immune simulation revealed that the vaccine candidate efficiently triggered the immune response, and the host immune factors were released in higher titer. Thus, these results suggest that our proposed vaccine candidate has the potential to be tested in clinical trials at the earliest opportunity. Our vaccine construct’s safety, efficacy, and other properties make it a suitable choice for in vitro and in vivo analysis.
Conclusively, in response to the recent outbreak of tick-borne disease, we have attempted to design a multi-epitopes vaccine using computational modeling approaches. Our vaccine candidate efficiently triggered the immune response using a computational algorithm for immune response prediction. We suggest the clinical testing of this vaccine candidate for its therapeutic potential both in vitro and in vivo to fight against tick-borne disease-causing pathogens.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study provides a deep insight into the structural basis for vaccine development against tick-borne viruses. The designed multi-epitopes subunit vaccine could trigger robust immune response and hence demands the in vitro and in vivo investigation for the eradication of tick diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S., M.T.u.Q., K., A.R., A.A., M.A.A., M.R., A.K. and D.-Q.W.; data curation, M.S., N.A., M.A.A. and Z.H.; formal analysis, M.S., S.R., S.A. and A.K.; funding acquisition, A.A., M.T.u.Q., M.A.A. and D.-Q.W.; investigation, K. and A.R.; methodology, M.T.u.Q., N.A., Z.H. and S.S.A.; project administration, K. and A.A.; resources, S.R., A.S.S.A., M.R. and D.-Q.W.; software, A.S.S.A., M.A.A. and Z.H.; supervision, A.A. and D.-Q.W.; validation, A.R., A.S.S.A. and S.A.; visualization, S.R., S.A. and A.K.; writing—original draft, A.A., M.R. and S.A.; writing—review and editing, A.K. and D.-Q.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, Qassim University, for funding the publication of this project. “Dong-Qing Wei is supported by grants from the Key Research Area Grant 2016YFA0501703 of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32070662, 61832019, 32030063), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No.: 19430750600), as well as SJTU JiRLMDS Joint Research Fund and Joint Research Funds for Medical and Engineering and Scientific Research at Shanghai Jiao Tong University (YG2021ZD02)”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data will be provided on reasonable demand.

Acknowledgments

The researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, Qassim University for funding the publication of this project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mansfield, K.; Johnson, N.; Phipps, L.; Stephenson, J.; Fooks, A.; Solomon, T. Tick-borne encephalitis virus—A review of an emerging zoonosis. J. Gen. Virol. 2009, 90, 1781–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gould, E.; Solomon, T. Pathogenic flaviviruses. Lancet 2008, 371, 500–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lindquist, L.; Vapalahti, O. Tick-borne encephalitis. Lancet 2008, 371, 1861–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Süss, J. Tick-borne encephalitis in europe and beyond—The epidemiological situation as of 2007. Eurosurveillance 2008, 13, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bogovic, P.; Strle, F. Tick-borne encephalitis: A review of epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management. World J. Clin. Cases 2015, 3, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Taba, P.; Schmutzhard, E.; Forsberg, P.; Lutsar, I.; Ljøstad, U.; Mygland, Å.; Levchenko, I.; Strle, F.; Steiner, I. Ean consensus review on prevention, diagnosis and management of tick-borne encephalitis. Eur. J. Neurol. 2017, 24, 1214–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Heinze, D.; Gould, E.; Forrester, N. Revisiting the clinal concept of evolution and dispersal for the tick-borne flaviviruses by using phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 8663–8671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Danielová, V.; Daniel, M.; Schwarzová, L.; Materna, J.; Rudenko, N.; Golovchenko, M.; Holubová, J.; Grubhoffer, L.; Kilián, P. Integration of a tick-borne encephalitis virus and borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato into mountain ecosystems, following a shift in the altitudinal limit of distribution of their vector, ixodes ricinus (krkonoše mountains, Czech republic). Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010, 10, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Radda, A.; Hofmann, H.; Pretzmann, G. Threshold of viraemia in apodemus flavicollis for infection of ixodes ricinus with tick-borne encephalitis virus. Acta Virol. 1969, 13, 74. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kubinski, M.; Beicht, J.; Gerlach, T.; Volz, A.; Sutter, G.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F. Tick-borne encephalitis virus: A quest for better vaccines against a virus on the rise. Vaccines 2020, 8, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Proutski, V.; Gould, E.A.; Holmes, E.C. Secondary structure of the 3′ untranslated region of flaviviruses: Similarities and differences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kovalev, S.; Mukhacheva, T. Reconsidering the classification of tick-borne encephalitis virus within the siberian subtype gives new insights into its evolutionary history. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017, 55, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dai, X.; Shang, G.; Lu, S.; Yang, J.; Xu, J. A new subtype of eastern tick-borne encephalitis virus discovered in qinghai-tibet plateau, china. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lu, Z.; Bröker, M.; Liang, G. Tick-borne encephalitis in mainland china. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008, 8, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kollaritsch, H.; Paulke-Korinek, M.; Holzmann, H.; Hombach, J.; Bjorvatn, B.; Barrett, A. Vaccines and vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2012, 11, 1103–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barrett, P.N.; Schober-Bendixen, S.; Ehrlich, H.J. History of tbe vaccines. Vaccine 2003, 21, S41–S49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, S.; Ali, S.S.; Zaheer, I.; Saleem, S.; Ziaullah; Zaman, N.; Iqbal, A.; Suleman, M.; Wadood, A.; Rehman, A.U.; et al. Proteome-wide mapping and reverse vaccinology-based b and t cell multi-epitope subunit vaccine designing for immune response reinforcement against porphyromonas gingivalis. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ahmad, I.; Ali, S.S.; Shah, I.; Khan, S.; Khan, M.; Ullah, S.; Ali, S.; Khan, J.; Ali, M.; Khan, A.; et al. Computational vaccinology based development of multi-epitope subunit vaccine for protection against the norovirus infections. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gul, H.; Ali, S.S.; Saleem, S.; Khan, S.; Khan, J.; Wadood, A.; Rehman, A.U.; Ullah, Z.; Ali, S.; Khan, H.; et al. Subtractive proteomics and immunoinformatics approaches to explore bartonella bacilliformis proteome (virulence factors) to design b and t cell multi-epitope subunit vaccine. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 85, 104551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khan, S.; Khan, A.; Rehman, A.U.; Ahmad, I.; Ullah, S.; Khan, A.A.; Ali, S.S.; Afridi, S.G.; Wei, D.-Q. Immunoinformatics and structural vaccinology driven prediction of multi-epitope vaccine against mayaro virus and validation through in-silico expression. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 73, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ali, A.; Khan, A.; Kaushik, A.C.; Wang, Y.; Ali, S.S.; Junaid, M.; Saleem, S.; Cho, W.C.; Mao, X.; Wei, D.-Q. Immunoinformatic and systems biology approaches to predict and validate peptide vaccines against epstein–barr virus (ebv). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Uddin, R.; Siddiqui, Q.N.; Azam, S.S.; Saima, B.; Wadood, A. Identification and characterization of potential druggable targets among hypothetical proteins of extensively drug resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis (xdr kzn 605) through subtractive genomics approach. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 114, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Weinreich Olsen, A.; Hansen, P.R.; Holm, A.; Andersen, P. Efficient protection against mycobacterium tuberculosis by vaccination with a single subdominant epitope from the esat-6 antigen. Eur. J. Immunol. 2000, 30, 1724–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ul Qamar, M.T.; Ahmad, S.; Fatima, I.; Ahmad, F.; Shahid, F.; Naz, A.; Abbasi, S.W.; Khan, A.; Mirza, M.U.; Ashfaq, U.A.; et al. Designing multi-epitope vaccine against staphylococcus aureus by employing subtractive proteomics, reverse vaccinology and immuno-informatics approaches. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021, 132, 104389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kathwate, G.H. In silico design and characterization of multiepitopes vaccine for SARS-CoV2 from its spike proteins. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ul Qamar, M.T.; Shahid, F.; Aslam, S.; Ashfaq, U.A.; Aslam, S.; Fatima, I.; Fareed, M.M.; Zohaib, A.; Chen, L.-L. Reverse vaccinology assisted designing of multiepitope-based subunit vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2020, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Singh, S.; Malik, B.; Sharma, D. Metabolic pathway analysis of s. Pneumoniae: An in silico approach towards drug-design. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 2007, 5, 135–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Johnson, M.; Zaretskaya, I.; Raytselis, Y.; Merezhuk, Y.; McGinnis, S.; Madden, T.L. Ncbi blast: A better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, W5–W9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Larsen, M.V.; Lundegaard, C.; Lamberth, K.; Buus, S.; Lund, O.; Nielsen, M. Large-scale validation of methods for cytotoxic t-lymphocyte epitope prediction. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ponomarenko, J.; Bui, H.-H.; Li, W.; Fusseder, N.; Bourne, P.E.; Sette, A.; Peters, B. Ellipro: A new structure-based tool for the prediction of antibody epitopes. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Saha, S.; Raghava, G.P. Prediction methods for b-cell epitopes. In Immunoinformatics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 387–394. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sabourin, M.; Tuzon, C.T.; Fisher, T.S.; Zakian, V.A. A flexible protein linker improves the function of epitope-tagged proteins in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2007, 24, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Lee, S.J.; Shin, S.J.; Lee, M.H.; Lee, M.-G.; Kang, T.H.; Park, W.S.; Soh, B.Y.; Park, J.H.; Shin, Y.K.; Kim, H.W.; et al. A potential protein adjuvant derived from mycobacterium tuberculosis rv0652 enhances dendritic cells-based tumor immunotherapy. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Saha, S.; Raghava, G. Algpred: Prediction of allergenic proteins and mapping of ige epitopes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W202–W209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zaharieva, N.; Dimitrov, I.; Flower, D.; Doytchinova, I. Vaxijen dataset of bacterial immunogens: An update. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 2019, 15, 398–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wilkins, M.R.; Gasteiger, E.; Bairoch, A.; Sanchez, J.C.; Williams, K.L.; Appel, R.D.; Hochstrasser, D.F. Protein identification and analysis tools in the expasy server. Methods Mol. Biol. 1999, 112, 531–552. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. McGuffin, L.J.; Bryson, K.; Jones, D.T. The psipred protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 2000, 16, 404–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Peng, J.; Xu, J. Raptorx: Exploiting structure information for protein alignment by statistical inference. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2011, 79, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Giardine, B.; Riemer, C.; Hardison, R.C.; Burhans, R.; Elnitski, L.; Shah, P.; Zhang, Y.; Blankenberg, D.; Albert, I.; Taylor, J.; et al. Galaxy: A platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Res. 2005, 15, 1451–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wiederstein, M.; Sippl, M.J. Prosa-web: Interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W407–W410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lengths, M.; Angles, M. Limitations of structure evaluation tools errat. Quick Guidel. Comput. Drug Des. 2018, 16, 75. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bhardwaj, V.K.; Purohit, R. Targeting the protein-protein interface pocket of aurora-a-tpx2 complex: Rational drug design and validation. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 39, 3882–3891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Salomon-Ferrer, R.; Case, D.A.; Walker, R.C. An overview of the amber biomolecular simulation package. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2013, 3, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Salomon-Ferrer, R.; Gotz, A.W.; Poole, D.; Le Grand, S.; Walker, R.C. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with amber on gpus. 2. Explicit solvent particle mesh ewald. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 3878–3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Roe, D.R.; Cheatham, T.E., III. Ptraj and cpptraj: Software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 3084–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Schneidman-Duhovny, D.; Inbar, Y.; Nussinov, R.; Wolfson, H.J. Patchdock and symmdock: Servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W363–W367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Andrusier, N.; Nussinov, R.; Wolfson, H.J. Firedock: Fast interaction refinement in molecular docking. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2007, 69, 139–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hou, T.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, W. Assessing the performance of the mm/pbsa and mm/gbsa methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Inf. Modeling 2011, 51, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Grote, A.; Hiller, K.; Scheer, M.; Münch, R.; Nörtemann, B.; Hempel, D.C.; Jahn, D. Jcat: A novel tool to adapt codon usage of a target gene to its potential expression host. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W526–W531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. G Biotech. Snapgene viewer. Glick B, editor 3.
  51. Rapin, N.; Lund, O.; Bernaschi, M.; Castiglione, F. Computational immunology meets bioinformatics: The use of prediction tools for molecular binding in the simulation of the immune system. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Hollingsworth, S.A.; Dror, R.O. Molecular dynamics simulation for all. Neuron 2018, 99, 1129–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Suleman, M.; ul Qamar, M.T.; Saleem, S.; Ahmad, S.; Ali, S.S.; Khan, H.; Akbar, F.; Khan, W.; Alblihy, A.; Alrumaihi, F.; et al. Mutational landscape of pirin and elucidation of the impact of most detrimental missense variants that accelerate the breast cancer pathways: A computational modelling study. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Heo, L.; Feig, M. Experimental accuracy in protein structure refinement via molecular dynamics simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 13276–13281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Khan, A.; Ali, S.S.; Khan, M.T.; Saleem, S.; Ali, A.; Suleman, M.; Babar, Z.; Shafiq, A.; Khan, M.; Wei, D.-Q. Combined drug repurposing and virtual screening strategies with molecular dynamics simulation identified potent inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 main protease (3clpro). J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 39, 4659–4670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hussain, I.; Pervaiz, N.; Khan, A.; Saleem, S.; Shireen, H.; Wei, D.-Q.; Labrie, V.; Bao, Y.; Abbasi, A.A. Evolutionary and structural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 specific evasion of host immunity. Genes Immun. 2020, 21, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Khan, A.; Zia, T.; Suleman, M.; Khan, T.; Ali, S.S.; Abbasi, A.A.; Mohammad, A.; Wei, D.-Q. Higher infectivity of the SARS-CoV-2 new variants is associated with k417n/t, e484k, and n501y mutants: An insight from structural data. J. Cell. Physiol. 2021, 236, 7045–7057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Khan, A.; Heng, W.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, J.; Wei, X.; Peng, S.; Saleem, S.; Khan, M.; Ali, S.S.; Wei, D.-Q. In silico and in vitro evaluation of kaempferol as a potential inhibitor of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease (3clpro). Phytother. Res. 2021, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Khan, A.; Khan, S.; Saleem, S.; Nizam-Uddin, N.; Mohammad, A.; Khan, T.; Ahmad, S.; Arshad, M.; Ali, S.S.; Suleman, M.; et al. Immunogenomics guided design of immunomodulatory multi-epitope subunit vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 new variants, and its validation through in silico cloning and immune simulation. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021, 133, 104420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lin, W.J.; Yeh, W.C. Implication of toll-like receptor and tumor necrosis factor alpha signaling in septic shock. Shock 2005, 24, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Beard, C.B.; Nelson, C.A.; Mead, P.S.; Petersen, L.R. Bartonella spp. Bacteremia and rheumatic symptoms in patients from lyme disease–endemic region. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. McGowin, C.L.; Totten, P.A. The unique microbiology and molecular pathogenesis of mycoplasma genitalium. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, S382–S388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Khan, A.; Junaid, M.; Kaushik, A.C.; Ali, A.; Ali, S.S.; Mehmood, A.; Wei, D.-Q. Computational identification, characterization and validation of potential antigenic peptide vaccines from hrhpvs e6 proteins using immunoinformatics and computational systems biology approaches. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Black, M.; Trent, A.; Tirrell, M.; Olive, C. Advances in the design and delivery of peptide subunit vaccines with a focus on toll-like receptor agonists. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2010, 9, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Li, W.; Joshi, M.D.; Singhania, S.; Ramsey, K.H.; Murthy, A.K. Peptide vaccine: Progress and challenges. Vaccines 2014, 2, 515–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Apellániz, B.; Nieva, J.L. The use of liposomes to shape epitope structure and modulate immunogenic responses of peptide vaccines against hiv mper. In Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 99, pp. 15–54. [Google Scholar]
  67. Khan, M.; Khan, S.; Ali, A.; Akbar, H.; Sayaf, A.M.; Khan, A.; Wei, D.-Q. Immunoinformatics approaches to explore helicobacter pylori proteome (virulence factors) to design b and t cell multi-epitope subunit vaccine. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Khatoon, N.; Pandey, R.K.; Prajapati, V.K. Exploring leishmania secretory proteins to design b and t cell multi-epitope subunit vaccine using immunoinformatics approach. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Pandey, M.; Langshaw, E.; Hartas, J.; Lam, A.; Batzloff, M.R.; Good, M.F. A synthetic m protein peptide synergizes with a cxc chemokine protease to induce vaccine-mediated protection against virulent streptococcal pyoderma and bacteremia. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 5915–5925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Baseer, S.; Ahmad, S.; Ranaghan, K.E.; Azam, S.S. Towards a peptide-based vaccine against shigella sonnei: A subtractive reverse vaccinology based approach. Biologicals 2017, 50, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Rahlenbeck, S.; Fingerle, V.; Doggett, S. Prevention of tick-borne diseases: An overview. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2016, 66, 492–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Khan, A.; Khan, M.; Saleem, S.; Babar, Z.; Ali, A.; Khan, A.A.; Sardar, Z.; Hamayun, F.; Ali, S.S.; Wei, D.-Q. Phylogenetic analysis and structural perspectives of rna-dependent rna-polymerase inhibition from SARS-CoV-2 with natural products. Interdiscip. Sci. Comput. Life Sci. 2020, 12, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Khan, A.; Khan, M.T.; Saleem, S.; Junaid, M.; Ali, A.; Ali, S.S.; Khan, M.; Wei, D.-Q. Structural insights into the mechanism of rna recognition by the n-terminal rna-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid phosphoprotein. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 2174–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vaccines 09 01210 g001 550
Figure 1. Hierarchical flow of the whole work. Antigenic factors were screened for the CTL, HTL, and B-Cell epitopes prediction. The final vaccine construct was obtained and checked for various properties. In silico cloning and expression was performed to check the efficacy of the final construct.
Figure 1. Hierarchical flow of the whole work. Antigenic factors were screened for the CTL, HTL, and B-Cell epitopes prediction. The final vaccine construct was obtained and checked for various properties. In silico cloning and expression was performed to check the efficacy of the final construct.
Vaccines 09 01210 g001
Vaccines 09 01210 g002 550
Figure 2. Showing each component of the final vaccine. Adjuvant, linkers, CTL, HTL, and B-cell epitopes are colored differently.
Figure 2. Showing each component of the final vaccine. Adjuvant, linkers, CTL, HTL, and B-cell epitopes are colored differently.
Vaccines 09 01210 g002
Vaccines 09 01210 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Schematic presentation of the final multi-epitope vaccine. Nine CTL, seven HTL, and thirteen B-cell epitopes were fused together using EAAK, AAY, GPGPG, and KK linkers. Adjuvant was also added to increase the stability and folding of the construct. (B) 3D structure of the final vaccine construct.
Figure 3. (A) Schematic presentation of the final multi-epitope vaccine. Nine CTL, seven HTL, and thirteen B-cell epitopes were fused together using EAAK, AAY, GPGPG, and KK linkers. Adjuvant was also added to increase the stability and folding of the construct. (B) 3D structure of the final vaccine construct.
Vaccines 09 01210 g003
Vaccines 09 01210 g004 550
Figure 4. Vaccine 3D structure modeling and validation. (a) Ramachandran plot of the predicted 3D structure (b) PROSA Z-score of the vaccine, (c) ERRAT validation for the predicted structure.
Figure 4. Vaccine 3D structure modeling and validation. (a) Ramachandran plot of the predicted 3D structure (b) PROSA Z-score of the vaccine, (c) ERRAT validation for the predicted structure.
Vaccines 09 01210 g004
Vaccines 09 01210 g005 550
Figure 5. Graphical depiction of the vaccine secondary structure. Each secondary structure element is represented by a different symbol given above each region.
Figure 5. Graphical depiction of the vaccine secondary structure. Each secondary structure element is represented by a different symbol given above each region.
Vaccines 09 01210 g005
Vaccines 09 01210 g006 550
Figure 6. Stability, compactness and flexibility evaluation of the MEVC. (A) shows the RMSD, (B) represents the compactness (Rg), while (C) shows the residual flexibility as RMSF.
Figure 6. Stability, compactness and flexibility evaluation of the MEVC. (A) shows the RMSD, (B) represents the compactness (Rg), while (C) shows the residual flexibility as RMSF.
Vaccines 09 01210 g006
Vaccines 09 01210 g007 550
Figure 7. (A) Vaccine-TLR4 docked complex. (B) Vaccine-TLR4-MD2 docked complex. The receptor TLR4 is colored as magenta to contrast the blue color vaccine. The MD2 is shown as cyan in panel (B). The complex is also shown as a sphere. (C) Interacting residues are also given as right panel.
Figure 7. (A) Vaccine-TLR4 docked complex. (B) Vaccine-TLR4-MD2 docked complex. The receptor TLR4 is colored as magenta to contrast the blue color vaccine. The MD2 is shown as cyan in panel (B). The complex is also shown as a sphere. (C) Interacting residues are also given as right panel.
Vaccines 09 01210 g007
Vaccines 09 01210 g008 550
Figure 8. In silico cloning of the vaccine (shown in blue) into the pET28a (+) vector (shown by red color). The calculated CAI value 0.93 and the GC contents 49% shown after codon optimization by JCat server.
Figure 8. In silico cloning of the vaccine (shown in blue) into the pET28a (+) vector (shown by red color). The calculated CAI value 0.93 and the GC contents 49% shown after codon optimization by JCat server.
Vaccines 09 01210 g008
Vaccines 09 01210 g009 550
Figure 9. (A) Antibodies titer, (B) cytokines and interleukins concentrations, (C) T cell population, (D) NK cell population (E) dendritic cell population, and (F) macrophage population production in response to the antigen.
Figure 9. (A) Antibodies titer, (B) cytokines and interleukins concentrations, (C) T cell population, (D) NK cell population (E) dendritic cell population, and (F) macrophage population production in response to the antigen.
Vaccines 09 01210 g009
Table
Table 1. Predicted CTL epitopes. The selection of appropriate candidates was based on C-terminal cleavage, TAP scores, and antigenicity. The CTL epitopes shown in bold are the finally selected epitopes for multi-epitopes vaccine construct.
Table 1. Predicted CTL epitopes. The selection of appropriate candidates was based on C-terminal cleavage, TAP scores, and antigenicity. The CTL epitopes shown in bold are the finally selected epitopes for multi-epitopes vaccine construct.
Residue No.Peptide SequenceMHC Binding AffinityRescale Binding AffinityC-Terminal Cleavage AffinityTransport AffinityPrediction ScoreMHC-I BindingAntigenecity Score
2237SSDDNKLAY0.76933.26620.91502.97403.5521YESNon-antigenic
184NVDGVYLEY0.69682.95870.97883.05603.2583YES0.876
3035STLNGGLFY0.61832.62510.94563.02202.9180YESNon-antigenic
98ATDWMSWLL0.58512.48420.92290.95502.6704YESNon-antigenic
1788SIAARGHLY0.44181.87590.93373.10002.1710YES0.524
3262ETACLSKAY0.43691.85500.22002.84802.0304YES0.691
2130CVSALDVFY0.40111.70290.79493.15001.9797YESNon-antigenic
3018GVEGISLNY0.39201.66420.97152.89401.9546YES1.4
451KTILTMGEY0.39151.66210.77602.91201.9241YES0.494
422KVEPHTGDY0.35831.52130.97173.07301.8207YES0.707
971HTDQSLWMR0.37811.60550.72471.20501.7744YESNon-antigenic
3077ATTIMQKAY0.35781.51920.43623.05901.7375YES0.454
1955RQDGRTDEY0.32971.39980.95043.03801.6942YESNon-antigenic
800EVSEWYDNY0.32691.38790.94762.98701.6794YESNon-antigenic
2530CTREEFFVY0.30721.30450.96813.05201.6023YES0.617
1783WTDPHSIAA0.35021.48690.47220.78301.5185YESNon-antigenic
2214MAGVALIFY0.28641.21610.59393.00201.4553YES0.532
2855MTDTTAFGQ0.33951.44160.07030.10201.4470YESNon-antigenic
2813RTWQYWGSY0.25551.08480.97753.26701.3948YESNon-antigenic
3342VMEWRDVPY0.23010.97700.90723.09601.2679YES1.79
980SMKNDTGTY0.22360.94920.94953.22901.2530YESNon-antigenic
1143VALFVVLEY0.20020.85010.97473.06601.1496YES0.652
1235VTTYFLLLV0.21860.92790.73550.35501.0560YESNon-antigenic
598PTDSGHDTV0.23701.00620.39200.20901.0545YES0.425
553VAHIEGTKY0.17850.75790.97392.92401.0502YESNon-antigenic
2133ALDVFYTLM0.20870.88610.97600.34601.0498YESNon-antigenic
1634AQGVVVGLY0.18060.76670.82693.12201.0469YES0.718
1677WTSKGQITV0.21260.90250.88310.23201.0466YES1.19
448SSEKTILTM0.21010.89220.94170.26301.0466YESNon-antigenic
411VYDANKIVY0.17650.74940.89883.05201.0369YESNon-antigenic
994VTDLRNCSW0.19870.84370.91800.79701.0212YES1.377
Table
Table 2. Predicted HTL epitopes. The table shows the specific allele against which the HTL epitopes are predicted. Furthermore, it also shows the methods and percentile rank of each peptide. The HTL epitopes shown in bold are the finally selected epitopes for multi-epitopes vaccine construct.
Table 2. Predicted HTL epitopes. The table shows the specific allele against which the HTL epitopes are predicted. Furthermore, it also shows the methods and percentile rank of each peptide. The HTL epitopes shown in bold are the finally selected epitopes for multi-epitopes vaccine construct.
S. No.AlleleStartEndPeptide SequenceMethodPercentile Rank
1HLA-DRB1*07:017387AALRKIKRTVSALMVConsensus (comb.lib./smm/nn)0.03
2HLA-DRB1*07:017286TAALRKIKRTVSALMConsensus (comb.lib./smm/nn)0.04
3HLA-DRB1*07:017488ALRKIKRTVSALMVGConsensus (comb.lib./smm/nn)0.06
4HLA-DRB1*07:017589LRKIKRTVSALMVGLConsensus (comb.lib./smm/nn)0.06
5HLA-DRB1*07:017690RKIKRTVSALMVGLQConsensus (comb.lib./smm/nn)0.06
6HLA-DRB5*01:016579SVPLKQATAALRKIKConsensus (smm/nn/sturniolo)0.08
7HLA-DRB5*01:016680VPLKQATAALRKIKRConsensus (smm/nn/sturniolo)0.08
8HLA-DRB1*07:017791KIKRTVSALMVGLQKConsensus (comb.lib./smm/nn)0.13
9HLA-DRB5*01:016478NSVPLKQATAALRKIConsensus (smm/nn/sturniolo)0.14
10HLA-DRB5*01:016377WNSVPLKQATAALRKConsensus (smm/nn/sturniolo)0.43
11HLA-DRB1*15:013549NGLVLMRMMGILWHAConsensus (smm/nn/sturniolo)0.72
12HLA-DRB1*15:013347MPNGLVLMRMMGILWConsensus (smm/nn/sturniolo)0.73
13HLA-DRB1*15:013448PNGLVLMRMMGILWHConsensus (smm/nn/sturniolo)0.73
14HLA-DRB5*01:016882LKQATAALRKIKRTVConsensus (smm/nn/sturniolo)0.75
15HLA-DRB5*01:016781PLKQATAALRKIKRTConsensus (smm/nn/sturniolo)0.81
16HLA-DRB1*15:013650GLVLMRMMGILWHAVConsensus (smm/nn/sturniolo)0.88
17HLA-DRB1*15:013751LVLMRMMGILWHAVAConsensus (smm/nn/sturniolo)0.93
Table
Table 3. Predicted linear B-cell epitopes for the virus polypeptide. The predicted score for each peptide is given against each B-Cell epitope.
Table 3. Predicted linear B-cell epitopes for the virus polypeptide. The predicted score for each peptide is given against each B-Cell epitope.
S. NoPositionEpitopeScore
13KKAILKGKGGGPPRRVSKET1
21578EEKWKGETVQVHAFPPGRAH0.999
3870DPTDYRGGVPGLLKKGKDIK0.999
4401CEAKKKATGHVYDANKIVYT0.999
51809MTATPPGKSEPFPESNGAIT0.999
62654VMCDIGESSPDAAVEGERTR0.998
71493VFSGQGGRERGDRPFEVKDG0.995
81518SPGLFWGQNQVGVGYGSKGV0.995
92812YRTWQYWGSYRTAPTGSAAS0.995
102870KVDTKAQEPQPGTRVIMRAV0.995
112049TDRSWTWEGPEANAVDEASG0.993
121987DNITTLRGPVATFYGPEQDK0.993
133362LVGRRERAEWAKNIWGAVEK0.99
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suleman, M.; ul Qamar, M.T.; Kiran; Rasool, S.; Rasool, A.; Albutti, A.; Alsowayeh, N.; Alwashmi, A.S.S.; Aljasir, M.A.; Ahmad, S.; et al. Immunoinformatics and Immunogenetics-Based Design of Immunogenic Peptides Vaccine against the Emerging Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV) and Its Validation through In Silico Cloning and Immune Simulation. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111210

AMA Style

Suleman M, ul Qamar MT, Kiran, Rasool S, Rasool A, Albutti A, Alsowayeh N, Alwashmi ASS, Aljasir MA, Ahmad S, et al. Immunoinformatics and Immunogenetics-Based Design of Immunogenic Peptides Vaccine against the Emerging Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV) and Its Validation through In Silico Cloning and Immune Simulation. Vaccines. 2021; 9(11):1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suleman, Muhammad, Muhammad Tahir ul Qamar, Kiran, Samreen Rasool, Aneela Rasool, Aqel Albutti, Noorah Alsowayeh, Ameen S. S. Alwashmi, Mohammad Abdullah Aljasir, Sajjad Ahmad, and et al. 2021. "Immunoinformatics and Immunogenetics-Based Design of Immunogenic Peptides Vaccine against the Emerging Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV) and Its Validation through In Silico Cloning and Immune Simulation" Vaccines 9, no. 11: 1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop