Next Article in Journal
Identification of Conserved Cross-Reactive B-Cell Epitopes in CPV1 and CPV2 L1 Proteins with Vaccine Potential
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Preliminary Mechanistic Evaluation of a Novel Liposomal QS-21 and CpG ODNs Adjuvant System for Enhancing Vaccine Immunogenicity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Brief Report

MMR Vaccination and Hen’s Egg Allergy: Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Clinical Practice

by
Weronika Marta Balas
1,*,
Maja Kaczor
1,
Joanna Strzelecka
1 and
Adam Jerzy Sybilski
1,2
1
Clinical Department of Pediatrics and Allergology, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Pediatrics, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2026, 14(6), 511; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14060511 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 16 May 2026 / Revised: 3 June 2026 / Accepted: 4 June 2026 / Published: 5 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccine Advancement, Efficacy and Safety)

Abstract

Background: Measles has re-emerged in recent years as a public health concern in the context of insufficient vaccination coverage. Some children experience significant delays in receiving, or refuse to take, the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination, often due to concerns related to hen’s egg allergy (HEA). Methods: In this study, we retrospectively assessed the safety of MMR vaccination (Priorix®, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium) in patients with HEA hospitalised at our clinic. Detailed medical histories were collected, along with skin prick tests and measurements of specific IgE against milk and egg proteins or extracts. The study included 39 patients with a mean age of 19 months, of whom 15 had previously experienced an anaphylactic reaction after egg ingestion. Results: None of these patients experienced a systemic reaction to vaccination. One patient developed a generalised maculopapular rash, which resolved after a single dose of an antihistamine. Vaccination was postponed in 63% of patients, with the longest delay extending to 113 months. Conclusions: Severe adverse reactions following MMR vaccination in patients with HEA are generally rare and are outweighed by the risks associated with natural infection and its complications. Effective communication of vaccine safety data and strengthening public trust in healthcare professionals are crucial.
Keywords: immunisation safety; food allergy; vaccine hesitancy; paediatric allergy; anaphylaxis risk immunisation safety; food allergy; vaccine hesitancy; paediatric allergy; anaphylaxis risk

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Balas, W.M.; Kaczor, M.; Strzelecka, J.; Sybilski, A.J. MMR Vaccination and Hen’s Egg Allergy: Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Clinical Practice. Vaccines 2026, 14, 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14060511

AMA Style

Balas WM, Kaczor M, Strzelecka J, Sybilski AJ. MMR Vaccination and Hen’s Egg Allergy: Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Clinical Practice. Vaccines. 2026; 14(6):511. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14060511

Chicago/Turabian Style

Balas, Weronika Marta, Maja Kaczor, Joanna Strzelecka, and Adam Jerzy Sybilski. 2026. "MMR Vaccination and Hen’s Egg Allergy: Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Clinical Practice" Vaccines 14, no. 6: 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14060511

APA Style

Balas, W. M., Kaczor, M., Strzelecka, J., & Sybilski, A. J. (2026). MMR Vaccination and Hen’s Egg Allergy: Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Clinical Practice. Vaccines, 14(6), 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14060511

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop