Next Article in Journal
Immunogenicity and Tolerance of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Mid-Term Estimates of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness against the A(H1N1)pdm09 Prevalent Circulating Subtype in the 2023/24 Season: Data from the Sicilian RespiVirNet Surveillance System
Previous Article in Journal
MV130 in the Prevention of Recurrent Respiratory Tract Infections: A Retrospective Real-World Study in Children and Adults
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination and Early Antiviral Treatment in Reducing Pneumonia Risk in Severe Influenza Cases

by
Pere Godoy
1,2,*,
Núria Soldevila
2,3,
Ana Martínez
2,4,
Sofia Godoy
1,5,
Mireia Jané
2,4,
Nuria Torner
2,4,
Lesly Acosta
4,
Cristina Rius
2,6,
Àngela Domínguez
2,3 and
The Surveillance of Hospitalized Cases of Severe Influenza in Catalonia Working Group
1
Institut de Recerca Biomédica de Lleida (IRBLleida), Universitat de Lleida, 25006 Lleida, Spain
2
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
3
Departament de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
4
Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
5
Institut Català de la Salut, 08007 Lleida, Spain
6
Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, 08023 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The Surveillance of Hospitalized Cases of Severe Influenza in Catalonia Working Group are listed in the Acknowledgment section.
Vaccines 2024, 12(2), 173; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12020173
Submission received: 27 December 2023 / Revised: 24 January 2024 / Accepted: 1 February 2024 / Published: 7 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccine Development for Influenza Virus)

Abstract

:
Introduction: Influenza vaccination may be effective in preventing influenza infection and may reduce the risk of influenza-associated pneumonia. The study aim was to evaluate the effect of influenza vaccination in preventing pneumonia when it failed to prevent influenza hospitalization. Methods: This was a case–control study comparing hospitalized cases of influenza with and without pneumonia in patients aged ≥18 years in 16 hospitals in Catalonia over 10 influenza seasons (2010–11 to 2019–20). Data on sociodemographic, virological characteristics, comorbidities, vaccination history, and antiviral treatment were collected and analysed. The crude odds ratio (OR) and adjusted OR (aOR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) values were calculated. Results: In total, 5080 patients hospitalized for severe influenza were included, 63.5% (3224/5080) of whom had pneumonia—mostly men (56.8%; 1830/3224) and mostly in the ≥75 age group (39.3%; 1267/3224)—and of whom 14.0% died (451/3224). Virus A and virus B accounted for 78.1% (2518/3224) and 21.9% (705/3224) of influenza types, respectively. Starting antiviral treatment ≤48 h after symptom onset (aOR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.53–0.90) and a history of seasonal influenza vaccination (aOR = 0.85; 95%CI: 0.72–0.98) were protective factors in developing pneumonia. Conclusions: Adherence to seasonal influenza vaccination and starting antiviral treatment within 48 h of symptom onset can reduce pneumonia risk in severe influenza cases.

1. Introduction

Every year, around 5–20% of the population are infected by the influenza virus, resulting in about 3–5 million cases of severe illness and 300,000–500,000 deaths [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has underlined the need to monitor the clinical severity of cases and to collect data on comorbidities to identify factors that contribute to greater severity and mortality [2].
One of the main complications of influenza is community-acquired pneumonia, resulting from direct influenza virus infection of the lung parenchyma or from secondary bacterial infection [3,4,5]. Influenza causes ciliary dysfunction and airway obstruction secondary to increased mucus production and oedema, which may contribute to subsequent bacterial colonization [6,7]. Influenza-associated reduced neutrophil granulocyte production and impaired alveolar macrophage function [6,8] may also contribute to the severity of bacterial pneumonia.
Several studies indicate that starting antiviral treatment early after the onset of symptoms can reduce the risk of hospitalization and death and, conversely, that effectiveness in preventing severity may be reduced when antiviral treatment is not started until 48 h after symptom onset [9,10,11,12].
Vaccination also reduces the risk of severe influenza, and is especially recommended for individuals at greater risk of presenting complications, such as patients with comorbidities and the elderly [13,14]. Annual vaccination effectiveness in preventing influenza infection can be as high as 80% if the vaccine matches the circulating strain during epidemic activity [13,14,15,16] and is associated with more effective treatment and better survival of patients with pneumonia [3,6].
We hypothesize that a history of previous influenza vaccination reduces the risk of pneumonia even if infection is not prevented. Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing pneumonia in severe hospitalized laboratory-confirmed influenza cases registered by the influenza surveillance system of Catalonia (PIDIRAC) over 10 influenza seasons.

2. Methods

We conducted a case–control study of severe hospitalized laboratory-confirmed influenza (SHLCI) cases to compare the characteristics and risk factors associated with SHLCI cases with and without pneumonia.
The monitoring of patients hospitalized for severe laboratory-confirmed influenza began in 2010 in Catalonia, a region in northeastern Spain with 7.5 million inhabitants. The influenza surveillance system of Catalonia (PIDIRAC) included 16 hospitals with a catchment area of 5,610,858 inhabitants (73.8% of the total population of Catalonia), which reported SHLCI cases admitted during each influenza epidemic season (from October to May) [16,17].
The study population consisted of individuals aged ≥18 years hospitalized with severe laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection in one of the sixteen surveillance hospitals over 10 influenza seasons (2010–2011 to 2019–2020).
We included patients hospitalized for ≥24 h with severe ILI in one of the 16 sentinel hospitals. ILI was defined as a combination of (i) sudden onset of symptoms, (ii) ≥1 of the following symptoms: fever (≥38 °C), headache, myalgia, malaise, and (iii) ≥1 of the following respiratory symptoms: cough, sore throat, dyspnea. Patients were recruited at the participating hospitals by a sentinel physician who evaluated all patients with severe ILI. We defined severe laboratory-confirmed influenza as cases infected with influenza virus that require hospital admission due to their severity (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, septic shock, multi-organ failure, or any other serious condition, including admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) or death) [16]. We obtained a nasopharyngeal or pharyngeal swab: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) or, for patients admitted to the ICU, tracheal aspirate (TA). Influenza virus infection was detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
Cases with pneumonia were defined as patients with severe influenza, aged ≥18 years, with pulmonary infiltrate evidenced by chest X-ray, a history of fever, and at least one sign or symptom of lower respiratory tract infection (cough, sputum, or focal signs of pneumonia on auscultation). Controls were patients hospitalized during the same influenza season as cases presenting with severe laboratory-confirmed influenza but without pneumonia.
Information on cases and controls was collected by epidemiological surveillance staff from interviews and a structured questionnaire (as used by the Catalan Epidemiological Surveillance Network). Medical records were reviewed to collect sociodemographic data and clinical data on obesity (body mass index (BMI) > 40); pregnancy; chronic conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), immunodeficiency (human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other infections), chronic cardiovascular disease (CVD), and chronic liver disease (CLD); diagnosis; symptom onset; hospital admission and discharge dates; complications (primary or secondary pneumonia with and without bacterial co-infection, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and multiple organ failure); antiviral treatment; influenza vaccination (defined as vaccination at least 14 days before the onset of symptoms); ICU admission; and death.

2.1. Laboratory Data

Patients’ clinical samples were analysed by real-time RT-PCR for influenza A and B viruses after manual nucleic acid extraction in the surveillance hospitals’ laboratories.
Amplification was performed in an ABI 7500 thermocycler. Samples with no typed influenza viruses were sent to the Catalan Influenza Reference Centre to determine the type, where adequate positive samples were typed for viruses known to be circulating at the time, namely type A (subtypes H1N1pdm09 and H3N2) and type B. Molecular subtyping determined the HA subtype for influenza A. Two specific one-step multiplex real-time PCR techniques using Stratagene Mx3000P QPCR Systems (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were carried out to type A. Samples for which typing failed due to a low viral load were classified as unidentifiable.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Cases of severe influenza with pneumonia were compared with all other cases of severe influenza considering the following variables: sex, age group (18–64, 65–74, and ≥75 years), influenza virus type, comorbidities (COPD, diabetes, obesity, CKD, immunodeficiency, chronic CVD, and CLD), complications, and antiviral treatment. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables were compared using a t-test.
A bivariate analysis explored the relationships between the dependent variable (severe influenza with/without pneumonia) and the independent variables, for which the crude odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) values were calculated. For multivariate logistic regression analysis, based on backward selection of variables according to a cut-off point of p < 0.2, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and the corresponding 95% CI values were calculated.
Analyses were performed using the SPSS v.24 statistical package and R v3.5.0 statistical software (http://cran.r-project.org, accessed on 1 July 2023).

2.3. Ethics Statement

All data used in the analysis were collected during routine public health surveillance activities as part of the legislated mandate of the Health Department of Catalonia, the competent authority for the surveillance of communicable diseases, which is officially authorized to receive, treat, and temporarily store personal data on cases of infectious disease. Therefore, data were exempt from institutional board review and did not require informed consent. All data were completely anonymized before analysis [18].

3. Results

Of a total of 5080 patients hospitalized for severe laboratory-confirmed influenza included in the study, 63.5% (3224/5080) had pneumonia and 13.5% died (686/5080). Women accounted for 44.4% (2254/5080) of patients included, and 27.7% (1391/5080) were aged 45–64 years (Table 1).
Most patients (79.3% (4028/5080)) were infected by type A influenza virus (H1N1 = 1230, H3N2 = 1000, and unsubtyped = 1798), and the majority (77.7%) had one or more comorbidities (3948/5080), especially CVD (33.8% (1709/5080)), diabetes (26.6% (1339/5080)), and COPD (26.1% (1324/5080)). Only 32.8% (1632/5080) had received the influenza vaccine, and 58.5% (2856/5080) had started antiviral treatment 48 h after symptom onset (Table 1).
Compared with influenza patients without pneumonia, the group with pneumonia had fewer women (43.2% versus 46.3%), individuals aged 65–74 years (19.9% versus 22.0%) and individuals aged ≥75 years (39.3% versus 47.1%) and had lower rates of COPD (22.5% versus 31.9%), obesity (7.7% versus 11.4%), CKD (15.9% versus 18.6%), and CVD (32.7% versus 35.7%) (Table 2).
However, in the patients with pneumonia, the severity profile was greater, as reflected in the greater risk of ICU admission (25.8% versus 18.8%) and of mortality (14.0% versus 12.7%). Additionally, a higher percentage had started antiviral treatment 48 h after symptom onset (63.0% versus 50.5%), and a smaller percentage had been vaccinated against influenza (30.3% versus 37.2%) (Table 3). The profile of severity and the effectiveness of the vaccine and antivirals was maintained in the analysis stratified by age groups, although, for some characteristics, the differences were not statistically significant due to the lower number of patients in these groups (Supplementary Tables S1–S3).
In the regression model, the protective factors in developing pneumonia were sex (aOR = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.72–0.94), starting antiviral treatment ≤48 h after symptom onset (aOR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.53–0.90), and a history of seasonal influenza vaccination (aOR = 0.85; 95%CI: 0.72–0.98) (Table 4).

4. Discussion

A high percentage of severe hospitalized laboratory-confirmed influenza cases had pneumonia (63.5%), required ICU admission (23.2%), and resulted in death (13.5%). Despite serious risk factors for influenza, a high percentage of those individuals were only started on antiviral treatment 48 h after symptom onset. Furthermore, although most also had comorbidities as well as risk factors, influenza vaccination coverage was only 32.8%, corroborating findings reported by other studies [14,19].
Starting antiviral treatment in the first 48 h can mitigate the pneumonia risk, while delaying treatment to after 48 h may be a risk factor [20,21]. Antiviral treatment can reduce pneumonia risk and the risk of hospital admission by reducing lesions, and thus inflammation and pulmonary oedema, and by improving immune system response at the pulmonary level. In a meta-analysis that included 3376 patients, Venkatesan et al. [22] estimated 76% effectiveness for neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) treatment in reducing hospital admission risk and also reported that effectiveness was even greater in patients treated in the first 48 h. In another meta-analysis that included 78 studies, Mothuri et al. [9] reported a reduced mortality risk for both antiviral treatment administered within 2 days of symptom onset compared with delayed treatment (aOR = 0.48; p < 0.001) and for early treatment versus no treatment (aOR = 0.50; p < 0.001). Dominguez et al. [23], in a study of 1727 hospitalized patients in Catalonia, reported a reduced mortality risk (aOR = 0.37; p < 0.001) for patients receiving NAI treatment in the first 48 h after clinical symptom onset. Similar results have been observed in a surveillance data survey conducted in 11 European countries [24]. Nonetheless, despite the evidence available on the effectiveness of antivirals in preventing severity, several barriers to their systematic use exist and clinical practice is quite variable [13,25].
Controlling for the effect of antiviral treatment, in our study, a history of vaccination was 15% effective in reducing the pneumonia risk in severe cases of influenza, a finding similar to that observed in other studies [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. While this result may, on the face of it, seem to be less than spectacular, it needs to be considered in a context of pneumonia representing a greater risk of ICU admission and death for our patients, despite their relatively younger age and despite the greater severity profile for the control group due to higher rates of obesity, COPD, and ARDS.
The study has some limitations. Some patients may have been vaccinated in private centres and so their vaccination status was not in their medical records, although this is unlikely given that the Catalan vaccination programme is free and universal. Since symptom onset is difficult to determine in some patients, an inaccurate record may have delayed antiviral treatment, leading to an underestimation of pneumonia risk, as has been reported elsewhere [24]. While more influenza diagnostic tests may have been ordered for unvaccinated patients, this seems unlikely since healthcare providers were unaware of vaccination histories at the time of ordering the tests. The effectiveness of the influenza vaccine may be underestimated due to the lack of matching among the virus strains in circulation and the vaccine strains in some seasons. Pneumonia in the elderly may be underestimated because it often presents with few symptoms and age may have a confounding effect, but the stratified analysis by age groups yields similar results (Supplementary Tables S1–S3). The existence of residual confounders cannot be ruled out, although this is unlikely as most of the confounders described in the literature were assessed in the multivariate logistic regression model. As for strengths, the study was performed over 10 epidemic influenza seasons and data were collected by a stable and robust epidemiological surveillance service covering over 60% of the Catalan population.

5. Conclusions

Influenza vaccination and starting antiviral treatment within 48 h of symptom onset can reduce pneumonia risk in severe influenza cases.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vaccines12020173/s1, Table S1. Patients 18–64 years with severe influenza with and without pneumonia during the 2010/2011–2019/2020 flu seasons in Catalonia (Spain); Table S2. Patients 65–74 years with severe influenza with and without pneumonia during the 2010/2011–2019/2020 flu seasons in Catalonia (Spain); Table S3. Patients ≥75 years with severe influenza with and without pneumonia during the 2010/2011–2019/2020 flu seasons in Catalonia (Spain).

Author Contributions

P.G. contributed to the conceptualization, study design, figures, data collection, formal data analysis, data interpretation, and writing of the original draft. P.G., N.S., À.D., M.J. and A.M. contributed to the study design, data collection, dataset access, data analysis, data interpretation, and critical review of the manuscript. P.G., N.S., N.T., L.A., À.D., M.J., A.M., C.R. and S.G. contributed to data collection, data interpretation and critical review of the manuscript. All co-authors had access to and verified the reported data used in the study. The Surveillance of Hospitalized Cases of Severe Influenza in Catalonia Working Group have participated in data collection. The corresponding author had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Programme of Prevention, Surveillance and Control of Transmissible Diseases (PREVICET), CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid and the Catalan Agency for the Management of Grants for University Research (AGAUR Grant Number 2017/SGR 1342 and Grant Number 2021/SGR 00702). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study because the data were collected as part of routine public health surveillance activities according to the legal mandate of the Department of Health of Catalonia, which is authorized to receive, process, and temporarily store personal data in cases of infectious diseases [25]. All data were fully anonymized. All study activities formed part of public health surveillance and were exempt from institutional board review. Decret 203/2015, de 15 de Setembre, pel Qual es Crea la Xarxa de Vigilància Epidemiològica i es Regulen els Sistemes de Notificació de Malalties de Declaració Obligatòria i els Brots Epidèmics. DOGC, 17 September 2015. Available online: https://portaljuridic.gencat.cat/eli/es-ct/d/2015/09/15/203 (accessed on 23 January 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the data were collected as part of routine public health surveillance activities according to the legal mandate of the Department of Health of Catalonia, which is authorized to receive, process, and temporarily store personal data in cases of infectious diseases [25], all data were fully anonymized before analysed and the patients were blinded to the investigators.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Collaborators: The Surveillance of Hospitalized Cases of Severe Influenza in Catalonia Working Group: Alsedà M, Álvarez J, Arias C, Balañà PJ, Camps N, Carol M, Curto L, Ferràs J, Ferrús G, Follia N, Bach P, Minguell S, Parrón I, Plasència E, Sala-Farré MR, Torra R, Torres J (Public Health Agency of Catalonia); Barrabeig I, Godoy P, Jané M, Martínez A, Torner N (Public Health Agency of Catalonia and CIBERESP); Garcia M, Gorrindo P (Public Health Agency of Barcelona), Rius C (Public Health Agency of Barcelona and CIBERESP); Marcos MA, Mosquera MM, Vila J, Vilella A (Hospital Clínic, Barcelona); Antón A, Pumarola T, Campins M (Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebrón, Barcelona); García D, Oller Perez-Hita A (Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona); Andres M, Espejo E (Hospital Terrassa); Freixas N, Lopez M, Porta C, Riera Garcia M (Mútua Terrassa); Maraver E, Mas D, Pérez R, (Hospital Altahia Manresa); Rebull J (Hospital Verge de la Cinta, Tortosa); Muñoz S, Pou J (Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues); García-Pardo G, Olona M (Hospital Joan XXIII, Tarragona); Barcenilla F, Castellana D (Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida); Navarro-Rubio G (Consorci Sanitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell); Force LL (Hospital Mataró); Mena G, Mòdol-Deltell JM (Hospital Gemans Trias i Pujol); Alvarez A, Massuet C, Ramon JM (Hospital Universitari Bellvitge); Lopez AF, Iftimie SM, Garrido P (Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus); Blancas D, Moreno E (Hospital Residència Sant Camil).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Iuliano, A.D.; Roguski, K.M.; Chang, H.H.; Muscatello, D.J.; Palekar, R.; Tempia, S.; Cohen, C.; Gran, J.M.; Schanzer, D.; Cowling, B.J.; et al. Estimates of global seasonal influenza-associated respiratory mortality: A modelling study. Lancet 2018, 391, 1285–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Epidemiological Surveillance Standards for Influenza; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013; Available online: https://apps.who.int/%0Airis/handle/10665/311261 (accessed on 1 December 2023).
  3. Musher, D.M.; Thorner, A.R. Community-Acquired Pneumonia. New Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 1619–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alimi, Y.; Lim, W.S.; Lansbury, L.; Leonardi-Bee, J.; Nguyen-Van-Tam, J.S. Systematic review of respiratory viral pathogens identified in adults with community-acquired pneumonia in Europe. J. Clin. Virol. 2017, 95, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Y.N.; Zhang, Y.F.; Xu, Q.; Qiu, Y.; Lu, Q.B.; Wang, T.; Zhang, X.A.; Lin, S.H.; Lv, C.L.; Jiang, B.G.; et al. Infection and co-infection patterns of community-acquired pneumonia in patients of different ages in China from 2009 to 2020: A national surveillance study. Lancet Microbe 2023, 4, e330–e339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mandell, L.A. Community-acquired pneumonia: An overview. Postgrad. Med. 2015, 127, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ono, A.; Okada, F.; Takata, S.; Hiramatsu, K.; Ando, Y.; Nakayama, T.; Maeda, T.; Mori, H. A comparative study of thin-section CT findings between seasonal influenza virus pneumonia and Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia. Br. J. Radiol. 2014, 87, 20140051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jain, S.; Self, W.H.; Wunderink, R.G.; Fakhran, S.; Balk, R.; Bramley, A.M.; Reed, C.; Grijalva, C.G.; Anderson, E.J.; Courtney, D.M.; et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. adults. New Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 415–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Muthuri, S.G.; Venkatesan, S.; Myles, P.R.; Leonardi-Bee, J.; Al Khuwaitir, T.S.A.; Al Mamun, A.; Anovadiya, A.P.; Azziz-Baumgartner, E.; Báez, C.; Bassetti, M.; et al. Effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in reducing mortality in patients admitted to hospital with influenza A H1N1pdm09 virus infection: A meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet Respir. Med. 2014, 2, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schünemann, H.J.; Santesso, N.; Brozek, J. RE: Antivirals for treatment of influenza. Ann. Intern. Med. 2012, 157, 386–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, J.W.; Lin, S.H.; Wang, L.C.; Chiu, H.Y.; Lee, J.A. Comparison of antiviral agents for seasonal influenza outcomes in healthy adults and children: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e2119151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Katzen, J.; Kohn, R.; Houk, J.L.; Ison, M.G. Early oseltamivir after hospital admission is associated with shortened hospitalization: A 5-year analysis of oseltamivir timing and clinical outcomes. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 69, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Seasonal Influenza Vaccination and Antiviral Use in EU/EEA Member States; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Stockholm, Sweden, 2018; ISBN 9789294982964. [Google Scholar]
  14. Adlhoch, C.; Gomes Dias, J.; Bonmarin, I.; Hubert, B.; Larrauri, A.; Oliva Domínguez, J.A.; Delgado-Sanz, C.; Brytting, M.; Carnahan, A.; Popovici, O.; et al. Determinants of fatal outcome in patients admitted to intensive care units with influenza, european union 2009–2017. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019, 6, ofz462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Castilla, J.; Guevara, M.; Martinez-Baz, I.; Ezpeleta, C.; Delfrade, J.; Irisarri, F.; Moreno-Iribas, C. Enhanced estimates of the influenza vaccination effect in preventing mortality: A prospective cohort study. Medicine 2015, 94, e1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Godoy, P.; Romero, A.; Soldevila, N.; Torner, N.; Jané, M.; Martínez, A.; Caylà, J.A.; Rius, C.; Domínguez, A.; Alsedà, M.; et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness in reducing severe outcomes over six influenza seasons, a case-case analysis, Spain, 2010/11 to 2015/16. Euro Surveill. 2018, 23, 1700732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Basile, L.; Torner, N.; Martínez, A.; Mosquera, M.M.; Marcos, M.A.; Jane, M. Vacunas Seasonal influenza surveillance: Observational study on the 2017–2018 season with predominant B influenza virus circulation. Vacunas 2019, 20, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Decret 203/2015, de 15 de Setembre, pel Qual es Crea la Xarxa de Vigilància Epidemiològica i es Regulen els Sistemes de Notificació deMalalties de Declaració Obligatòria i els Brots Epidèmics. DOGC, 17 September 2015. Available online: https://portaljuridic.gencat.cat/ca/document-del-pjur/?documentId=702922 (accessed on 23 January 2024).
  19. Gómez-Gómez, A.; Magaña-Aquino, M.; Bernal-Silva, S.; Araujo-Meléndez, J.; Comas-García, A.; Alonso-Zúñiga, E.; Torres-Torres, E.; Noyola, D.E. Risk factors for severe influenza A virus pneumonia in adult cohort, Mexico, 2013–2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1554–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Groeneveld, G.H.; Marbus, S.D.; Ismail, N.; de Vries, J.J.C.; Schneeberger, P.; Oosterheert, J.J.; van Dissel, J.T.; de Boer, M.G.J. Effectiveness of oseltamivir in reduction of complications and 30-day mortality in severe seasonal influenza infection. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 106155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Shah, N.S.; Greenberg, J.A.; McNulty, M.C.; Gregg, K.S.; Riddell, J.; Mangino, J.E.; Weber, D.M.; Hebert, C.L.; Marzec, N.S.; Barron, M.A.; et al. Bacterial and viral co-infections complicating severe influenza: Incidence and impact among 507 U.S. patients, 2013–2014. J. Clin. Virol. 2016, 80, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Venkatesan, S.; Myles, P.R.; Leonardi-Bee, J.; Muthuri, S.G.; Al Masri, M.; Andrews, N.; Bantar, C.; Dubnov-Raz, G.; Grardin, P.; Koay, E.S.C.; et al. Impact of outpatient neuraminidase inhibitor treatment in patients infected with Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 at high risk of hospitalization: An individual participant data metaanalysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 64, 1328–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Domínguez, A.; Romero-Tamarit, A.; Soldevila, N.; Godoy, P.; Jané, M.; Martínez, A.; Torner, N.; Caylà, J.A.; Rius, C. Effectiveness of antiviral treatment in preventing death in severe hospitalised influenza cases over six seasons. Epidemiol. Infect. 2018, 146, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Adlhoch, C.; Delgado-Sanz, C.; Carnahan, A.S.; Larrauri, A.; Popovici, O.; Bossuyt, N.; Thomas, I.; Kynčl, J.; Slezak, P.; Brytting, M.; et al. Effect of neuraminidase inhibitor (oseltamivir) treatment on outcome of hospitalised influenza patients, surveillance data from 11 EU countries, 2010 to 2020. Euro Surveill. 2023, 28, 2200340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Brendish, N.J.; Malachira, A.K.; Lillie, P.J.; Clark, T.W. Neuraminidase inhibitor use in adults presenting to hospital with suspected influenza: A questionnaire-based survey of practice among hospital physicians. Clin. Infect. Pract. 2021, 11, 100075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tessmer, A.; Welte, T.; Schmidt-Ott, R.; Eberle, S.; Barten, G.; Suttorp, N.; Schaberg, T. Influenza vaccination is associated with reduced severity of community-acquired pneumonia. Eur. Respir. J. 2011, 38, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Van Kerkhove, M.D.; Cooper, M.J.; Cost, A.A.; Sanchez, J.L.; Riley, S. Risk factors for severe outcomes among members of the United States military hospitalized with pneumonia and influenza, 2000–2012. Vaccine 2015, 33, 6970–6976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics, virological data, and comorbidities of patients with severe influenza during the 2010/2011–2019/2020 flu seasons in Catalonia (Spain).
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics, virological data, and comorbidities of patients with severe influenza during the 2010/2011–2019/2020 flu seasons in Catalonia (Spain).
Severe Hospitalized Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza Patients (SHLCI)
N = 5080 (%)
Influenza vaccination (4977)
Yes1632 (32.8)
No3345 (67.2)
Sex
Female 2254 (44.4)
Male 2826 (55.6)
Age, years
18–44495 (9.7)
45–641391 (27.4)
65–741052 (20.7)
≥752142 (42.2)
ICU admission
Yes1179 (23.2)
No3901 (76.8)
Death
Yes686 (13.5)
No4394 (86.5)
≥1 comorbidities
Yes3948 (77.7)
No1132 (22.3)
COPD (5072)
Yes1324 (26.1)
No3748 (73.9)
Obesity (5007)
Yes452 (9.0)
No4555 (91.0)
Diabetes (5042)
Yes1339 (26.6)
No3703 (73.4)
CKD (5066)
Yes855 (16.9)
No4211 (83.1)
Immunodeficiency (5056)
Yes913 (18.1)
No4143 (81.9)
CVD (5060)
Yes1709 (33.8)
No3351 (66.2)
CLD (5047)
Yes294 (5.8)
No4753 (94.2)
Antiviral treatment (5069)
Yes 4735 (93.4)
No334 (6.6)
Antiviral treatment (4883)
≤48 h before symptom onset 1693 (34.7)
>48 h after symptom onset 2856 (58.5)
No334 (6.8)
Hospital stay, days (5075)
0–14 3653 (72.0)
>14 1422 (28.0)
ARDS (4884)
Yes2070 (42.4)
No2814 (57.6)
Multiple organ failure (4952)
Yes423 (8.5)
No4529 (91.5)
Influenza virus type
A4028 (79.3)
B1048 (20.6)
C4 (0.1)
Influenza season
2010–11168 (3.3)
2011–12122 (2.4)
2012–13118 (2.3)
2013–14343 (6.7)
2014–15423 (8.3)
2015–16546 (10.7)
2016–17579 (11.4)
2017–181241 (24.4)
2018–191046 (20.6)
2019–20494 (9.7)
Abbreviations: ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome. CKD: chronic kidney disease. CLD: chronic liver disease. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CVD: cardiovascular disease. ICU: intensive care unit.
Table 2. Comparison of severe influenza patients with and without pneumonia according to sociodemographic characteristics, virological data, and comorbidities during the 2010/2011–2019/2020 influenza seasons in Catalonia (Spain).
Table 2. Comparison of severe influenza patients with and without pneumonia according to sociodemographic characteristics, virological data, and comorbidities during the 2010/2011–2019/2020 influenza seasons in Catalonia (Spain).
Patients with Pneumonia
(N = 3224)
Patients without Pneumonia
(N = 1856)
OR (95%CI)p Value
Sex
Female 1394 (43.2%)860 (46.3%)0.88 (0.79–0.99)0.03
Male 1830 (56.8%)996 (53.7%)Ref.
Age
18–44367 (11.4%)128 (6.9%)1.34 (1.07–1.69)0.01
45–64947 (29.4%)444 (23.9%)Ref.
65–74643 (19.9%)409 (22.0%)0.74 (0.62–0.87)<0.01
≥751267 (39.3%)875 (47.1%)0.68 (0.59–0.78)<0.01
≥1 comorbidities
Yes2406 (74.6%)1542 (83.1%)0.60 (0.52–0.69)<0.01
No818 (25.4%)314 (16.9%)Ref.
COPD
Yes725 (22.5%)589 (31.9%)0.62 (0.55–0.71)<0.01
No2491 (77.5%)1257 (68.1%)Ref.
Obesity
Yes243 (7.7%)209 (11.4%)0.65 (0.53–0.79)<0.01
No2927 (92.3%)1628 (88.6%)Ref.
Diabetes
Yes824 (25.7%)515 (28.1%)0.89 (0.78–1.01)0.07
No2382 (74.3%)1321 (71.9%)Ref.
CKD
Yes510 (15.9%)345 (18.6%)0.82 (0.71–0.96)0.01
No2706 (84.1%)1505 (81.4%)Ref.
Immunodeficiency
Yes603 (18.8%)305 (16.6%)1.16 (1.00–1.35)0.05
No2608 (81.2%)1535 (83.4%)Ref.
CVD
Yes1051 (32.7%)658 (35.7%)0.88 (0.78–0.99)0.03
No2165 (67.3%)1186 (64.3%)Ref.
CLD
Yes197 (6.1%)97 (5.3%)1.17 (0.91–1.51)0.21
No3012 (93.9%)1741 (94.7%)Ref.
Hospital stay, days
0–142324 (72.2%)1329 (71.6%)1.03 (0.90–1.17)0.69
>14896 (27.8%)526 (28.4%)Ref.
ARDS
Yes1029 (32.7%)1141 (62.0%)0.30 (0.26–0.34)<0.01
No2115 (67.3%)699 (38.0%)Ref.
Multiorgan failure
Yes287 (9.2%)145 (7.9%)1.18 (0.96–1.45)0.12
No2839 (90.8%)1690 (92.1%)Ref.
Viral type
A2518 (78.1%)1510 (81.4%)Ref.
B705 (21.9%)343 (18.5%)1.23 (1.07–1.42)0.004
C1 (0.0%)3 (0.2%)0.20 (0.02–1.92)0.16
Flu season
2010–11127 (3.9%)41 (2.2%)3.39 (2.29–5.02)<0.01
2011–1294 (2.9%)28 (1.5%)3.67 (2.32–5.80)<0.01
2012–1387 (2.7%)31 (1.7%)3.07 (1.96–4.79)<0.01
2013–14222 (6.9%)121 (6.5%)2.01 (1.51–2.66)<0.01
2014–15330 (10.2%)93 (5.0%)3.88 (2.90–5.18)<0.01
2015–16432 (13.4%)114 (6.1%)4.14 (3.16–5.44)<0.01
2016–17356 (11.0%)223 (12.0%)1.75 (1.37–2.23)<0.01
2017–18785 (24.3%)456 (24.6%)1.88 (1.52–2.32)<0.01
2018–19555 (17.2%)491 (26.5%)1.24 (0.98–1.53)0.05
2019–20236 (7.3%)258 (13.9%)Ref.
Abbreviations: ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome. CI: confidence interval. CKD: chronic kidney disease. CLD: chronic liver disease. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CVD: cardiovascular disease. OR: odds ratio.
Table 3. Comparison of severe influenza patients with and without pneumonia according to antiviral treatment, influenza vaccination, intensive care unit admission, and death, during the 2010/2011–2019/2020 influenza seasons in Catalonia (Spain).
Table 3. Comparison of severe influenza patients with and without pneumonia according to antiviral treatment, influenza vaccination, intensive care unit admission, and death, during the 2010/2011–2019/2020 influenza seasons in Catalonia (Spain).
Patients with Pneumonia
(N = 3224)
Patients without Pneumonia
(N = 1856)
OR (95%CI)p Value
Influenza vaccination
Yes960 (30.3%)672 (37.2%)0.73 (0.65–0.83)<0.01
No2212 (69.7%)1133 (62.8%)Ref.
ICU admission
Yes831 (25.8%)348 (18.8%)1.50 (1.31–1.73)<0.01
No2393 (74.2%)1508 (81.3%)Ref.
Death
Yes451 (14.0%)235 (12.7%)1.12 (0.95–1.33)0.18
No2773 (86.0%)1621 (87.3%)Ref.
Antiviral treatment
Yes 2994 (93.1%)1741 (94.0%)0.86 (0.68–1.08)0.20
No223 (6.9%)111 (6.0%)Ref.
Antiviral treatment
≤48 h before symptom onset927 (29.8%)766 (43.2%)0.60 (0.47–0.77)<0.01
>48 h after symptom onset1961 (63.0%)895 (50.5%)1.09 (0.86–1.39)0.48
No223 (7.2%)111 (6.3%)Ref.
Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval. ICU: intensive care unit. OR: odds ratio.
Table 4. Logistic multivariate regression model of pneumonia risk factors for the 2010/2011–2019/2020 influenza seasons in Catalonia (Spain).
Table 4. Logistic multivariate regression model of pneumonia risk factors for the 2010/2011–2019/2020 influenza seasons in Catalonia (Spain).
aOR (95% CI)p Value
Influenza vaccination
  Yes0.85 (0.72–0.98)0.03
  NoRef.
Sex
  Female0.82 (0.72–0.94)0.01
  MaleRef.
Age
  18–441.20 (0.93–1.55)0.16
  45–64Ref.
  65–740.82 (0.68–0.99)0.04
  ≥750.74 (0.62–0.87)<0.01
Antiviral treatment
  ≤48 h before symptom onset0.69 (0.53–0.90)<0.01
  >48 h after symptom onset1.16 (0.90–1.50)0.26
  NoRef.
Abbreviations: aOR: adjusted odds ratio (adjusted for all variables in the table and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, immunodeficiency, antiviral treatment, and flu season). CI: confidence interval.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Godoy, P.; Soldevila, N.; Martínez, A.; Godoy, S.; Jané, M.; Torner, N.; Acosta, L.; Rius, C.; Domínguez, À.; The Surveillance of Hospitalized Cases of Severe Influenza in Catalonia Working Group. Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination and Early Antiviral Treatment in Reducing Pneumonia Risk in Severe Influenza Cases. Vaccines 2024, 12, 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12020173

AMA Style

Godoy P, Soldevila N, Martínez A, Godoy S, Jané M, Torner N, Acosta L, Rius C, Domínguez À, The Surveillance of Hospitalized Cases of Severe Influenza in Catalonia Working Group. Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination and Early Antiviral Treatment in Reducing Pneumonia Risk in Severe Influenza Cases. Vaccines. 2024; 12(2):173. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12020173

Chicago/Turabian Style

Godoy, Pere, Núria Soldevila, Ana Martínez, Sofia Godoy, Mireia Jané, Nuria Torner, Lesly Acosta, Cristina Rius, Àngela Domínguez, and The Surveillance of Hospitalized Cases of Severe Influenza in Catalonia Working Group. 2024. "Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination and Early Antiviral Treatment in Reducing Pneumonia Risk in Severe Influenza Cases" Vaccines 12, no. 2: 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12020173

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop