Next Article in Journal
Protective MVA-ST Vaccination Robustly Activates T Cells and Antibodies in an Aged-Hamster Model for COVID-19
Previous Article in Journal
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Deficient in PdtaS Cytosolic Histidine Kinase Displays Attenuated Growth and Affords Protective Efficacy against Aerosol M. tuberculosis Infection in Mice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/vaccines12010051
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Herpes Zoster Vaccine Uptake and Active Campaign Impact, a Multicenter Retrospective Study in Italy

by
Andrea Ceccarelli
1,2,
Federica Tamarri
1,
Raffaella Angelini
3,
Elizabeth Bakken
4,
Ilaria Concari
4,
Elsa Giannoccaro
4,
Giada Domeniconi
1,
Michela Morri
4,
Chiara Reali
1,
Francesca Righi
1,
Silvia Serra
3,
Gianmaria Semprini
4,
Giulia Silvestrini
3,
Valentina Turri
3,
Davide Gori
2 and
Marco Montalti
1,2,*
1
Operative Unit of Hygiene and Public Health-Forlì and Cesena, Department of Public Health, Romagna Local Health Authority, 47522 Cesena, Italy
2
Unit of Hygiene and Medical Statistics, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
3
Operative Unit of Hygiene and Public Health-Ravenna, Department of Public Health, Romagna Local Health Authority, 48121 Ravenna, Italy
4
Operative Unit of Hygiene and Public Health-Rimini, Department of Public Health, Romagna Local Health Authority, 47924 Rimini, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2024, 12(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12010051
Submission received: 17 November 2023 / Revised: 29 December 2023 / Accepted: 1 January 2024 / Published: 3 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Epidemiology)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Herpes Zoster (HZ) vaccination has proven both safe and effective in alleviating conditions related to HZ, leading to significant cost savings in national healthcare and social systems. In Italy, it is recommended and provided free of charge to individuals aged 65 and older. To achieve broad vaccination coverage, alongside ordinary immunization campaigns, active and catch-up campaigns were implemented. This retrospective observational study aimed to observe the vaccination coverage achieved in the Romagna Local Health Authority (LHA) during the 2023 active campaign, with a secondary goal of assessing the impact of the 2022 catch-up campaign and the 2023 active campaign compared to ordinary campaigns. As of 3 July 2023, an overall vaccine uptake of 13.5% was achieved among individuals born in 1958, with variations among the four LHA centers ranging from 10.2% to 17.7%. Catch-up and active campaigns together contributed to nearly half of the achieved coverage in Center No. 1 and a quarter in Center No. 2. Notably, individuals born in 1957, not included in the Center No. 2 catch-up campaign, reached significantly lower vaccination coverage compared to other cohorts and centers. Analyzing the use of text messages for active campaigns, it was observed that cohort groups did not show substantial differences in text-message utilization for warnings. However, having relatives who had experienced HZ-related symptoms significantly reduced the reliance on text messages as warnings. These results highlighted how catch-up and active campaigns effectively increased vaccine coverage. Nevertheless, differences in uptake among different centers within the same LHA and the limited contribution of other information sources compared to text messages suggest the necessity of designing campaigns involving all available channels and stakeholders to maximize vaccine uptake.

1. Introduction

Vaccination holds the potential to significantly mitigate the occurrence of herpes zoster (HZ)-related conditions and the subsequent development of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), leading to substantial cost savings within national healthcare and social systems [1]. However, the global landscape of HZ vaccination remains characterized by a lack of uniformity and diversity [2,3,4]. This disparity likely stems from the intricate interplay of various socio-environmental factors rather than being solely attainable through individual endeavors [5].
Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is a major constraint in achieving vaccine targets. It is internationally known that there are multiple psychological and socio-demographic factors that can increase VH, such as lack of confidence, uncomfortableness, calculation, and complacency as barriers to influenza vaccine uptake in at-risk groups [6]. Other factors investigated by the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control included “doubts about vaccine safety” and “information deficit” as two of the main determinants of VH [7].
In addition, various patient-related factors that contribute to HZ-specific VH have been identified, including age, gender, education level, economic status, health conditions, access to accurate information, perceived obstacles, belief in disease control without vaccination, and prior history of shingles [8,9]. Furthermore, a sense of societal responsibility and concern for the welfare of others has emerged as a notable determinant of overall vaccine acceptance among the populace [10]. Consequently, a strategic focus on the societal benefits of achieving robust vaccination coverage within public health messaging could potentially address the issue of VH [11,12]. The pivotal role of General Practitioners (GPs) in promoting vaccination is evident, as their counsel has demonstrated a positive influence on individuals’ inclination to receive vaccines. Similarly, personal familiarity with a family member, friend, or acquaintance who has suffered from HZ appears to bolster vaccine acceptance, likely due to an increased awareness of the disease and its consequences [13,14].
The systematic analysis of the underlying determinants of VH is one of the priorities of public health systems and prevention departments, and the World Health Organization Strategic Advisory Group of Experts has emphasized the importance of implementing impactful public health interventions that consider local geographical nuances and cater to specific target populations [15].
Fostering collaborative engagements among stakeholders is crucial. This might involve deeper collaboration with GPs, the implementation of joint educational initiatives, and the establishment of intervention protocols such as ‘catch-up’ and active campaigns. The orchestration of vaccination programs and campaigns should be spearheaded by public health medical services [16]. It is noteworthy that Italy’s Ministry of Health presently does not monitor the uptake rates of HZ vaccines.
In the Italian context, starting in 2017, the administration of the HZ vaccine has been consistently expanded annually to include individuals aged 65 and above. Moreover, individuals have the choice to privately finance the vaccine in subsequent years [17]. Additionally, individuals aged 18 and above who are exposed to heightened risk factors are also eligible for HZ vaccination at no cost [18]. Local Health Authorities (LHAs) in Italy are empowered to initiate active and catch-up vaccination campaigns targeting individuals who have not adhered to the national immunization schedules [19]. A concrete example of this can be seen in the Calabria Region, where eligible 65- and 70-year-olds were offered a combination of HZ and pneumococcal vaccinations [20].
Aligned with the national vaccination program, the Romagna Local Health Authority (LHA) conducts an annual HZ vaccination campaign specifically targeting individuals who are turning 65 in the respective year and have not previously received the vaccine. During 2022, a catch-up campaign, which concentrated on cohorts born in 1955, 1956, and 1957, was carried out due to missed calls during the COVID-19 pandemic, achieving in the Romagna LHA an adherence rate of 11.4–12.4% [21].
The primary objective of this study was to assess the level of compliance with the 2023 HZ vaccination campaign within the Romagna LHA. A secondary aim was to assess the impact of the 2022 catch-up campaign in relation to the activities of the regular campaign.

2. Materials and Methods

This observational study retrospectively examined the entirety of the Public Health Department (PHD) across the four divisions within an Italian LHA. The LHA covers a geographical expanse of around 5000 square kilometers and a population of 1,124,896 individuals.

2.1. Study Population

In 2023, the active vaccine campaign specifically centered around individuals born in 1958 who had not previously received the herpes zoster vaccine. Meanwhile, the 2022 catch-up campaign focused on individuals born in 1955, 1956, and 1957 due to a response to missed chances for targeted engagement by the LHA during the COVID-19 pandemic.

2.2. Study Setting

The HZ active vaccination campaign slightly differed in terms of timelines and strategies between the four participating centers:
  • Center No. 1: On 8 March 2023, 5 days prior to the campaign launch, text messages were sent to the campaign cohort. This cohort comprised 2719 individuals born in 1958. Individuals without a valid or known mobile number (n = 153) were informed with a phone call. Additionally, At the start of the month, PHD staff sent informative emails to GPs, and a promotional campaign through press and online advertising was executed roughly 2 weeks before the campaign’s commencement. The campaign itself lasted two weeks, from 13 March to 31 March.
  • Center No. 2: On 8 March 2023, 5 days prior to the vaccination campaign, text messages were sent to the campaign cohort (n = 5117 born in 1958). Individuals without a valid or known mobile number (n = 355) were informed with a landline phone call. At the start of the month, PHD staff sent informative emails to GPs, and a promotional campaign through press and online advertising was executed prior to the campaign commencement. Dedicated vaccination sessions were carried out from 13 March to 14 April.
  • Center No. 3: On 8 March 2023 (approximately 14 days before the start of the vaccination campaign), text messages were sent to the cohort involved in the campaign (n = 4520 born in 1958). The individuals without a valid or known mobile number (n = 939) were informed with a landline phone call. At the start of the month, PHD staff sent informative emails to GPs, and a promotional campaign through press and online advertising was executed prior to the campaign commencement. Dedicated vaccination sessions were organized from 16 March to 24 March.
  • Center No. 4: On 8 March 2023, approximately 5 days prior to the campaign launch, text messages were sent to the campaign cohort. This cohort comprised 2402 individuals born in 1958. Individuals without a valid or known mobile number (n = 192) were informed with a landline phone call. Additionally, at the start of the month, PHD staff sent informative emails to GPs, and a promotional campaign through press and online advertising was executed roughly 2 weeks before the campaign’s commencement. The campaign itself lasted two weeks, from 13 March to 31 March.
The text message, the same for all four LHA centers, was: ‘Ausl Romagna: March 2023 vaccination campaign against Herpes Zoster for those born in 1958. Book now through Cup and CupTel channels” (channels to use for independently scheduling one’s vaccination).
In addition to booking appointments during the dedicated sessions organized throughout the active campaign, every user could continue to schedule appointments throughout the year within sessions organized as part of the PHD’s routine immunizations for the general population.
In all centers, a prerequisite step before administering vaccinations was conducting an interview with a medical doctor or other PHD personnel. This interview aimed to gather participants’ vaccination and medical histories. In all centers, vaccinations for Herpes Zoster were made available, including both the recombinant technology vaccine and the live attenuated vaccine. Different operational approaches (strategies and timelines) of the 2022 catch-up campaign at Centers No. 1 and No. 2 were discussed in a study conducted by the research team in the previous year [21].

2.3. Data Extraction

Data pertaining to the 2023 active vaccination campaign were anonymously extracted from participants’ vaccination history records by four independent reviewers (A.C., G.D., S.S., and M.M.) in June 2023. Any disagreements in the extracted data were resolved through discussion with an impartial arbiter (F.R.). The variables extracted from each record included: “Type of HZ vaccine”, “Gender”, “Age”, “Neurological disorders”, “Primary immunodeficiency”, “Allergies”, “Vaccine allergies”, “Iatrogenic immunosuppression”, “Personal history of HZ”, “Family history of HZ”, and “Source of information used to learn about the active vaccination campaign”. Personal and familial histories of HZ were also considered, as they were deemed potential factors influencing vaccine acceptance. Data were collected and managed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation).
Aggregate data concerning the uptake achieved during the 2022 catch-up campaign were obtained from a previous research effort conducted by the research team [21]. Additionally, aggregated data (by cohort and gender) concerning the overall coverage rates achieved for each cohort across all four centers in 2022 and the early months of 2023 were extracted from the vaccination registry of the Romagna LHA.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Variables were characterized using both absolute frequencies and percentages. The factors influencing the utilization of a specific information source, namely text messages, to acquire information about the primary form of information, were evaluated through a multivariate analysis. The results of the multivariate analyses are displayed as odds ratios (ORs) accompanied by their standard errors (SE) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). A backward stepwise analysis was carried out to identify the variables to be included in the ultimate multiple logistic regression model, guided by the principles of parsimony and biological plausibility. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were executed using Stata Statistical Software 15, developed by StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA.

3. Results

3.1. Main Sample Features

Table 1 presents a comprehensive overview of the study sample’s main characteristics, consisting of a total of 1039 participants across four different centers: No. 1 (n = 282), No. 2 (n = 419), No. 3 (n = 188), and No. 4 (n = 150). The participants were categorized by various attributes, including vaccine type, gender, age, pathological anamnesis, history of herpes zoster, and sources of vaccination campaign information. Notably, the vaccine distribution indicated a predominance of live attenuated virus vaccines across all centers, with the highest administration rate seen in Center No. 4 (n = 141; 94%). The gender distribution showed slight variations, with male participants comprising 43% in Center No. 3 and 51% in Center No. 4. In terms of age, most participants fell within the targeted cohort (98%) except for a small minority in each center.
When exploring medical histories, allergies were the most common pathological anamnesis variable (ranging from 9% in Center No. 3 to 18% in Center No. 2). Regarding the history of HZ, a significant portion of participants reported having relatives with the infection (ranging from 31% to 45%) and personal experiences of the infection (ranging from 15% to 20%).
The vaccination campaign’s primary sources of information were text messages, accounting for the majority of responses (ranging from 83% to 93%), followed by landline phone calls, family/friends, and general practitioners.

3.2. Herpes Zoster Vaccine Uptake and Active Campaign Impact

Among the cohort born in 1958, as shown in Table 2, a cumulative HZ vaccination uptake of 13.5% was achieved in the Romagna LHA, with 1993 individuals vaccinated. The overall uptake represents the ongoing vaccination coverage up to 3 July 2023. Table 2 provides a comprehensive view of vaccination trends among the various centers, highlighting the uptake differences between the active and ordinary vaccination campaigns.
Regarding vaccinations administered during the active campaigns, it is evident that these have had varying impacts on the overall vaccinations across different centers: 10.4% out of 17.7% at Center No. 1, 8.2% out of 13.4% at Center No. 2, 4.2% out of 10.2% at Center No. 3, and 6.2% out of 15.5% at Center No. 4. A subgroup analysis based on gender is also shown, although notable differences are not found.
A comprehensive assessment of the impact of the active and catch-up campaign on the ordinary campaign is presented in Table 3, where data from the catch-up campaigns of Center No. 1 and Center No. 2 involving cohorts born in 1955, 1956, and 1957 are compared with the overall vaccine coverages achieved within these cohorts throughout the year.
It is notable that the percentages of vaccinations administered during the extraordinary campaign are higher in Center No. 1 compared to Center No. 2 for the cohorts born in 1955 and 1956, despite similar overall coverage rates for these two centers. For the cohort born in 1955, Center No. 1 recorded an 11.5% acceptance rate in catch-up vaccinations and 13.2% in ordinary vaccinations, contributing to an overall uptake of 24.7%. In Center No. 2, the corresponding figures were 6.4% for catch-up vaccinations and 17.6% for ordinary vaccinations, resulting in an overall uptake of 24.0%. For the cohort born in 1956, Center No. 1 reported a 10.6% participation rate in catch-up vaccinations and 12.5% in ordinary vaccinations, resulting in an overall uptake of 23.1%. In Center No. 2, 5.5% of individuals engaged in catch-up vaccinations and 16.4% in ordinary vaccinations, leading to an overall uptake of 22.0%.
However, concerning the overall coverage achieved within the cohort born in 1957, while Center No. 1 reached an 11.0% involvement in catch-up vaccinations and 11.5% in ordinary vaccinations, resulting in an overall uptake of 22.5%, in Center No. 2, only 0.4% of individuals were involved in catch-up vaccinations, while 14.2% were involved in ordinary vaccinations, resulting in a more modest overall uptake of 14.7%.

3.3. Multiple Regression Analysis

Table 4 provides insights into the factors influencing the utilization of text messages as a warning mechanism for the vaccination campaign, as determined by a regression model. The odds ratios (OR), standard errors (SE), p-values, and 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) are listed for each center, history of HZ, and cohort group. In terms of the centers, Center No. 1 serves as the reference point, and it was found that Center No. 2 (OR: 0.66, SE: 0.11, p = 0.017, 95% C.I.: 0.47–0.93) and Center No. 4 (OR: 0.44, SE: 0.12, p = 0.003, 95% C.I.: 0.25–0.76) displayed a significant decrease in the likelihood of using text messages for campaign warnings compared to Center No. 1. When considering the history of herpes zoster, while personal experiences did not show any significant association with text-message utilization, having relatives who had experienced HZ showed a significant decrease in the likelihood (OR: 0.67, SE: 0.10, p = 0.005, 95% C.I.: 0.50–0.89). Furthermore, the cohort groups, represented by ages 55 to 58, did not demonstrate substantial differences in text-message utilization for vaccination warnings.

4. Discussion

This study identified the impact of both active and catch-up campaigns on routine immunizations, with text messages serving as the primary informational conduit for the HZ catch-up and active vaccination campaign administered within an LHA. The overall vaccination coverage within the annual targeted cohort of 1958 individuals was observed to be 13.5% as of July 2023. Nonetheless, higher uptake rates were noted in cohorts from previous years, albeit with significant disparities between cohorts and different centers within the LHA, ranging from 14.7% to 24.7%.
Currently, there is a lack of substantial evidence regarding the vaccination coverage rate for Herpes Zoster at both the Italian and international levels. The Italian Ministry of Health does not currently provide vaccination coverage rates for Herpes Zoster but merely indicates an optimal coverage of 50% [22]. Recent international studies have reported varied uptake rates, ranging from approximately 8% in Saudi Arabia to 46.9% in Australia, with a similar uptake observed in Greece (12%) [23,24,25].
Rates achieved during the 2022 and 2023 catch-up and active campaigns allowed us to observe that approximately 50% of all vaccinations conducted in the four centers of the LHA were carried out during these campaigns. This impact became even more evident when considering the case of the 1957 cohort in Center No. 2. In this instance, due to organizational reasons, the cohort had not yet received either the catch-up campaign in 2022 or the active campaign in 2023, resulting in an overall uptake rate of only 14.7%, the lowest among the two centers where the campaigns of the last two years were analyzed. This finding is consistent with the existing scientific literature, which indicates that active and catch-up campaigns are highly efficient approaches to accelerate population protection against vaccine-preventable diseases [26,27], and it aligns with other studies that have measured the impact of extraordinary campaigns on routine campaigns, albeit with the administration of different vaccines [28,29].
The primary source of information contributing to higher vaccination coverage was the receipt of text messages, which served as the main reason for individuals to participate in the active vaccination campaign. This approach corroborates previous findings in the literature that have emphasized the effectiveness of text messages in promoting vaccine adherence [29,30,31]. This observation prompts consideration of potential extensions of this practice to other vaccination programs, particularly among vulnerable individuals with multiple comorbidities [32,33].
It is worth noting that all other sources of information, including advice from GPs, recommendations from family and friends, online resources, news outlets, landline phone calls, and others, demonstrated minimal impact on vaccine acceptance. This revelation encourages the exploration of alternative interventions, such as educational initiatives involving GPs. A substantial body of literature already underscores the positive effect of educational interventions conducted by GPs on vaccine uptake [34,35]. A study conducted in France [36] highlights the constructive influence of consultations with general practitioners on adherence to national vaccination campaigns, particularly in the context of competing vaccination programs, such as those related to COVID-19.
Moreover, it is documented in the literature that information sources like the Internet and news outlets play pivotal roles in vaccination campaigns [37]. This topic necessitates consideration of ways to enhance these information channels for future catch-up campaigns, as a synergistic approach involving all available channels appears to be the most effective strategy [38].
Additionally, we observed in our study that having a relative who had experienced HZ symptoms emerged as a significant motivator for HZ vaccination. This discovery aligns with expectations, given the potential severity of HZ symptoms, and is consistent with existing literature indicating that having a relative with HZ constitutes a driver, particularly among older age groups [39,40]. Furthermore, in two centers, the utilization of text messages as a means of communication was more likely to be the most frequently used source of information compared to other centers.
Variations in vaccine uptake were also observed among different centers. Indeed, as of July 2023, the overall uptake rate for individuals born in 1958 was 13.5%, with fluctuations ranging from 10.2% to 17.7% among the various centers. This outcome is not particularly surprising, given both the geographical expanse of the LHA and the substantial number of individuals under its care. It is well-established that vaccine hesitancy is a phenomenon strongly influenced by local contexts [41,42], and one of the centers, in particular, has historically exhibited greater hesitancy toward vaccinations [43,44]. Nonetheless, this result underscores the need to devise strategies aimed at standardizing uptake rates across the area, potentially through the implementation of specific initiatives in areas with lower uptake.
Furthermore, it is intriguing to note that, in comparison to the vaccine coverage achieved by the cohort born in 1958 as of July 2023, vaccination coverage for HZ tends to increase progressively among cohorts born in previous years. This trend necessitates ongoing monitoring to determine whether it signifies a genuine rise in vaccination adherence among these cohorts or, more likely, reflects the additional time available for the 1955-born cohort to adhere to the vaccination campaign.
While the findings of this study contribute valuable insights into the specific context and population under investigation, several limitations must be acknowledged in relation to external generalizability. The sample, primarily drawn from a specific geographic region and demographic profile, may limit the broader applicability of the results to more diverse populations. Additionally, even if the study employed a four-site design, the four centers employed slightly different methods and timelines in the management of the active and catch-up campaigns. These limitations highlight the need for caution when extending the findings beyond the current study’s scope, emphasizing the importance of future research to explore the generalizability of these results in diverse populations and settings. Furthermore, the pathological anamnesis and history of HZ infection were reliant on self-reporting and were not cross-referenced with previous medical records, potentially introducing reporting bias. Additionally, the personnel responsible for collecting medical histories varied among the four centers. This variability led to instances where patient records were incomplete for certain study variables, as exemplified by the absence of remote pathological history documentation in Center No. 4. However, it is noteworthy that the absence of these data did not significantly impact the core findings of the study. Moreover, to promote consistency in database creation, only four reviewers were involved in the review of vaccination history records. Lastly, it is important to acknowledge that all vaccination uptake rates for the different cohorts are reflective of data updated as of July 2023.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study underscores the crucial contribution of active and catch-up vaccination campaigns to achieving vaccination rate targets, albeit with variations observed among distinct cohorts and healthcare centers. Our findings underscored the potential of text-based interventions in the realm of public health initiatives at the local level. Additionally, the disparities in local vaccine uptake highlight the necessity for customized strategies, and the rising vaccine coverage among older cohorts underscores the significance of timely vaccination efforts. This study suggests directing attention in future research towards those who do not come forward for vaccination and could provide valuable insights for those tasked with devising active or catch-up vaccination activities across various tiers of community healthcare.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, all authors contributed equally; methodology, A.C., F.R. and M.M. (Marco Montalti); data acquisition, all authors contributed equally; formal analysis and data curation, M.M. (Marco Montalti); investigation, A.C., G.D., S.S. and M.M. (Marco Montalti); writing—original draft preparation, A.C. and M.M. (Marco Montalti); writing—review and editing, all authors contributed equally; supervision, D.G. and M.M. (Marco Montalti). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

As the information presented did not enable the identification of individual participants, this study did not pose a plausible risk of harm or stigma to the involved individuals. The study adhered to an anonymous and observational design, distinct from that of a clinical trial. Consequently, in accordance with Italian law (Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 76, dated 31 March 2008), a preliminary evaluation by an Ethical Committee or Institutional Review Board was not deemed necessary for this study.

Informed Consent Statement

Prior to the collection of their vaccination history record charts, all participants provided informed consent. The study was executed in alignment with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, and the subsequent data analysis was undertaken by the Local Health Authority (LHA) itself. It is important to note that all results were presented in an aggregated format, ensuring the confidentiality and anonymity of individual subjects.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Volpi, A.; Boccalini, S.; Dari, S.; Clarke, C.; Curran, D.; Loiacono, I.; Pitrelli, A.; Puggina, A.; Tosatto, R.; Van Oorschot, D.; et al. The Potential Public Health Impact of Herpes Zoster Vaccination in the 65 Years of Age Cohort in Italy. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2020, 16, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. The Department of Health and Aged Care. Communicable Diseases Intelligence 2023—Volume 47. Available online: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/cdi-2023-index (accessed on 17 November 2023).
  3. Andrews, N.; Stowe, J.; Kuyumdzhieva, G.; Sile, B.; Yonova, I.; de Lusignan, S.; Ramsay, M.; Amirthalingam, G. Impact of the Herpes Zoster Vaccination Programme on Hospitalised and General Practice Consulted Herpes Zoster in the 5 Years after Its Introduction in England: A Population-Based Study. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e037458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lewis, C.Y.; Mishra, K.; Sun, Y.; Sechrist, S.J.; Arnold, B.F.; Acharya, N.R. Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Coverage in the United States: An Analysis of Claims-Based Data. Vaccine 2023, 41, 3493–3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shuvo, S.; Hagemann, T.; Hohmeier, K.; Chiu, C.-Y.; Ramachandran, S.; Gatwood, J. The Role of Social Determinants in Timely Herpes Zoster Vaccination among Older American Adults. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2021, 17, 2043–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Schmid, P.; Rauber, D.; Betsch, C.; Lidolt, G.; Denker, M.-L. Barriers of Influenza Vaccination Intention and Behavior—A Systematic Review of Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy, 2005–2016. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Rapid Literature Review on Motivating Hesitant Population Groups in Europe to Vaccinate; Publications Office: Luxembourg, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bricout, H.; Torcel-Pagnon, L.; Lecomte, C.; Almas, M.F.; Matthews, I.; Lu, X.; Wheelock, A.; Sevdalis, N. Determinants of Shingles Vaccine Acceptance in the United Kingdom. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ventola, C.L. Immunization in the United States: Recommendations, Barriers, and Measures to Improve Compliance. Pharm. Ther. 2016, 41, 492–506. [Google Scholar]
  10. Briggs, L.; Fronek, P.; Quinn, V.; Wilde, T. Perceptions of Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccine Uptake by Older Persons in Australia. Vaccine 2019, 37, 4454–4459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nicholls, L.A.B.; Gallant, A.J.; Cogan, N.; Rasmussen, S.; Young, D.; Williams, L. Older Adults’ Vaccine Hesitancy: Psychosocial Factors Associated with Influenza, Pneumococcal, and Shingles Vaccine Uptake. Vaccine 2021, 39, 3520–3527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Valente, N.; Lupi, S.; Stefanati, A.; Cova, M.; Sulcaj, N.; Piccinni, L.; GPs Study Group; Gabutti, G. Evaluation of the Acceptability of a Vaccine against Herpes Zoster in the over 50 Years Old: An Italian Observational Study. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e011539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bonanni, P.; Bonaccorsi, G.; Lorini, C.; Santomauro, F.; Tiscione, E.; Boccalini, S.; Bechini, A. Focusing on the Implementation of 21st Century Vaccines for Adults. Vaccine 2018, 36, 5358–5365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ates Bulut, E.; Badak, S.O.; Aksoy, H.; Fadiloglu, A.; Isik, A.T. The Awareness and Attitude of Physicians to Older Adult Routine Vaccination Scheme. Clin. Interv. Aging 2022, 17, 1581–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Larson, H.J.; Jarrett, C.; Eckersberger, E.; Smith, D.M.D.; Paterson, P. Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy around Vaccines and Vaccination from a Global Perspective: A Systematic Review of Published Literature, 2007–2012. Vaccine 2014, 32, 2150–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Betsch, C.; Böhm, R.; Chapman, G.B. Using Behavioral Insights to Increase Vaccination Policy Effectiveness. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 2015, 2, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ministero della Salute. Piano Nazionale Prevenzione Vaccinale 2017–2019. Available online: http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_2571_allegato.pdf (accessed on 17 November 2023).
  18. Anderson, T.C. Use of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Immunocompromised Adults Aged ≥19 Years: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices—United States, 2022. Am. J. Transplant. 2022, 22, 986–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Catch-Up Vaccination. Available online: https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/essential-programme-on-immunization/implementation/catch-up-vaccination (accessed on 17 November 2023).
  20. Giuffrida, S. Calabria: A Successful Experience Implementing Herpes Zoster Vaccination Strategies. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2019, 31, 421–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ceccarelli, A.; Scrimaglia, S.; Fossi, V.; Ceccaroni, L.; Federici, A.; Reali, C.; Angelini, R.; Silvestrini, G.; Sintoni, F.; Fantini, M.P.; et al. Adherence to Herpes Zoster (Shingles) Catch-Up Campaign at the Romagna Local Health Authority (Italy), a Multi-Center Retrospective Observational Study. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Repertory of Act n.193/CSR “Agreement, Pursuant to Article 8, Paragraph 6, of Law 5 June 2003, n.131, between the Italian Government, the Regions and the Autonomous Provinces of Trento and Bolzano, on the Document Containing the “Plan national Prevention Vaccination Program (PNPV) 2023–2025” and on the Document Containing the “National Vaccination Calendar”. Available online: https://www.statoregioni.it/it/conferenza-stato-regioni/sedute-2023/seduta-del-2-agosto-2023/atti-02-agosto-2023/repertorio-atto-n-193csr/ (accessed on 29 December 2023).
  23. AlMuammar, S.; Albogmi, A.; Alzahrani, M.; Alsharef, F.; Aljohani, R.; Aljilani, T. Herpes zoster vaccine awareness and acceptance among adults in Saudi Arabia: A survey-based cross-sectional study. Trop. Dis. Travel Med. Vaccines 2023, 9, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, J.; Wood, J.G.; Bernardo, C.; Stocks, N.P.; Liu, B. Herpes zoster vaccine coverage in Australia before and after introduction of a national vaccination program. Vaccine 2020, 38, 3646–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tsiligianni, I.; Bouloukaki, I.; Papazisis, G.; Paganas, A.; Chatzimanolis, E.; Kalatharas, M.; Platakis, I.; Tirodimos, I.; Dardavesis, T.; Tsimtsiou, Z. Vaccination coverage and predictors of influenza, pneumococcal, herpes zoster, tetanus, measles, and hepatitis B vaccine uptake among adults in Greece. Public Health 2023, 224, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ho, L.L.; Gurung, S.; Mirza, I.; Nicolas, H.D.; Steulet, C.; Burman, A.L.; Danovaro-Holliday, M.C.; Sodha, S.V.; Kretsinger, K. Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Vaccine-Preventable Disease Campaigns. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 119, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mancarella, M.; Natarelli, F.; Bertolini, C.; Zagari, A.; Enrica Bettinelli, M.; Castaldi, S. Catch-up Vaccination Campaign in Children between 6 and 8 Years Old during COVID-19 Pandemic: The Experience in a COVID Hub in Milan, Italy. Vaccine 2022, 40, 3664–3669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Flasche, S.; Ojal, J.; Le Polain de Waroux, O.; Otiende, M.; O’Brien, K.L.; Kiti, M.; Nokes, D.J.; Edmunds, W.J.; Scott, J.A.G. Assessing the Efficiency of Catch-up Campaigns for the Introduction of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine: A Modelling Study Based on Data from PCV10 Introduction in Kilifi, Kenya. BMC Med. 2017, 15, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Esteban-Vasallo, M.D.; Domínguez-Berjón, M.F.; García-Riolobos, C.; Zoni, A.C.; Aréjula Torres, J.L.; Sánchez-Perruca, L.; Astray-Mochales, J. Effect of Mobile Phone Text Messaging for Improving the Uptake of Influenza Vaccination in Patients with Rare Diseases. Vaccine 2019, 37, 5257–5264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Khuwaja, S.S.; Peck, J.L. Increasing HPV Vaccination Rates Using Text Reminders: An Integrative Review of the Literature. J. Pediatr. Health Care 2022, 36, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Buttenheim, A.; Milkman, K.L.; Duckworth, A.L.; Gromet, D.M.; Patel, M.; Chapman, G. Effects of Ownership Text Message Wording and Reminders on Receipt of an Influenza Vaccination: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e2143388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Norman, D.A.; Barnes, R.; Pavlos, R.; Bhuiyan, M.; Alene, K.A.; Danchin, M.; Seale, H.; Moore, H.C.; Blyth, C.C. Improving Influenza Vaccination in Children With Comorbidities: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 2021, 147, e20201433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lehnert, J.D.; Shevach, A.; Walker, S.; Wang, R.; Fitzgerald, T.J.; Graitcer, S.B. Development and Pilot Testing of a Text Message Vaccine Reminder System for Use during an Influenza Pandemic. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2018, 14, 1647–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kawczak, S.; Mooney, M.; Mitchner, N.; Senatore, V.; Stoller, J.K. The Impact of a Quality Improvement Continuing Medical Education Intervention on Physicians’ Vaccination Practice: A Controlled Study. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2020, 16, 2809–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. You, Y.; Li, X.; Jiang, S.; Liang, J.; Xie, P.; Zou, X.; Liu, G.; Han, X. Can Primary Care Physician Recommendation Improve Influenza Vaccine Uptake among Older Adults? A Community Health Centre-Based Experimental Study in China. BMC Prim. Care 2023, 24, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hurtaud, A.; Coomans, C.; Vuillemin, B.; Benamar, A.; Couraud, M.; Pham, B.-N.; Sanchez, S.; Barbe, C. Impact of a DTcaP Booster Vaccine Awareness Campaign Initiated by the French National Health Insurance for Adults Aged 25 Years in 2021. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2023, 23, 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, Y.; Fekadu, G.; You, J.H.-S. Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Digital Health Technology for Improving the Uptake of Vaccination Programs: Systematic Review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2023, 25, e45493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cataldi, J.R.; Kerns, M.E.; O’Leary, S.T. Evidence-Based Strategies to Increase Vaccination Uptake: A Review. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2020, 32, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Marra, F.; Parhar, K.; Huang, B.; Vadlamudi, N. Risk Factors for Herpes Zoster Infection: A Meta-Analysis. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020, 7, ofaa005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tseng, H.F.; Chi, M.; Hung, P.; Harpaz, R.; Schmid, D.S.; LaRussa, P.; Sy, L.S.; Luo, Y.; Holmquist, K.; Takhar, H.; et al. Family History of Zoster and Risk of Developing Herpes Zoster. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 66, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. MacDonald, N.E. SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy Vaccine Hesitancy: Definition, Scope and Determinants. Vaccine 2015, 33, 4161–4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Salomoni, M.G.; Di Valerio, Z.; Gabrielli, E.; Montalti, M.; Tedesco, D.; Guaraldi, F.; Gori, D. Hesitant or Not Hesitant? A Systematic Review on Global COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance in Different Populations. Vaccines 2021, 9, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Carrieri, V.; Madio, L.; Principe, F. Vaccine Hesitancy and (Fake) News: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Italy. Health Econ. 2019, 28, 1377–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gori, D.; Ialonardi, M.; Odone, A.; Ricci, B.; Pascucci, M.G.; Frasca, G.; Venturi, S.; Signorelli, C.; Fantini, M.P. Vaccine Hesitancy and Mandatory Immunizations in Emilia-Romagna Region: The Case of MMR Vaccine. Acta Biomed. 2019, 90, 394–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Main Characteristics of the study sample.
Table 1. Main Characteristics of the study sample.
CenterOverall (n = 1039)
No. 1 (n = 282)No. 2 (n = 419)No. 3 (n = 188)No. 4 (n = 150)
VaccineLive attenuated virus251 (89)367 (88)173 (92)141 (94)932 (90)
Recombinant vaccine31 (11)52 (12)15 (8)9 (6)107 (10)
GenderMale121 (43)190 (45)95 (51)70 (47)476 (46)
Female161 (57)229 (55)93 (49)80 (53)563 (54)
Age65275 (98)403 (96)185 (98)150 (100)1013 (98)
Other7 (2)16 (4)3 (2)0 (0)26 (2)
Pathological AnamnesisNeurological disorders11 (4)9 (2)1 (1)n.a.21 (2)
Primary immunodeficiency12 (4)13 (3)2 (1)n.a.27 (3)
Allergies31 (11)76 (18)16 (9)24 (16)147 (14)
Vaccine allergies0 (0)1 (0)0 (0) n.a.1 (0)
Iatrogenic immunosuppression15 (5)14 (3)1 (1)n.a.30 (3)
History of Herpes ZosterPersonal41 (15)64 (16)14 (8)30 (20)149 (15)
Relatives88 (31)162 (41)82 (45)65 (43)397 (40)
Vaccination Campaign—source of informationText message234 (84)363 (93)169 (90)125 (83)891 (88)
General practitioner7 (3)5 (1)1 (1)3 (2)16 (2)
Family/friends17 (6)10 (3)5 (3)5 (3)37 (4)
Web2 (1)1 (0)0 (0)0 (0)3 (0)
News1 (0)2 (1)4 (2)1 (1)8 (1)
Phone call11 (4)2 (1)5 (3)15 (10)33 (3)
Other7 (3)4 (1)4 (2)1 (1)16 (2)
Table 2. Active and ordinary Herpes Zoster vaccination campaign uptake among 1958 cohort.
Table 2. Active and ordinary Herpes Zoster vaccination campaign uptake among 1958 cohort.
Cohort2023
No. 1 (n = 2719)No. 2 (n = 5117)No. 3 (n = 4520)No. 4 (n = 2402)Overall
(n = 14.791)
ActiveOrdinaryOverall Uptake *ActiveOrdinaryOverall Uptake *ActiveOrdinaryOverall Uptake *ActiveOrdinaryOverall Uptake *
1958M121 (4.5)79 (2.9)480 (17.7)190 (3.7)182 (3.6)685 (13.4)95 (2.1)112 (2.5)459 (10.2)70 (2.9)103 (4.3)372 (15.5)1993 (13.5)
F161 (5.9)119 (4.4)229 (4.5)84 (1.6)93 (2.1)159 (3.5)80 (3.3)119 (5.0)
* Cohort vaccination coverage until 3 July 2023.
Table 3. Catch-up and ordinary Herpes Zoster vaccination campaign uptake.
Table 3. Catch-up and ordinary Herpes Zoster vaccination campaign uptake.
Cohort2022–2023
Catch-UpOrdinaryOverall Uptake *Catch-UpOrdinaryOverall Uptake *
Center No. 1 (n = 2410)Center No. 2 (n = 4740)
1955278 (11.5)318 (13.2)596 (24.7)303 (6.4)833 (17.6)1136 (24.0)
Center No. 1 (n = 2631)Center No. 2 (n = 5067)
1956280 (10.6)329 (12.5)609 (23.1)278 (5.5)832 (16.4)1110 (22.0)
Center No. 1 (n = 2709)Center No. 2 (n = 5504)
1957299 (11.0)311 (11.5)610 (22.5)24 (0.4)784 (14.2)808 (14.7)
* Cohort vaccination coverage until 3 July 2023.
Table 4. Variables associated with the source of information used in a multiple regression analysis (Statistically significant p-Value are indicated in bold).
Table 4. Variables associated with the source of information used in a multiple regression analysis (Statistically significant p-Value are indicated in bold).
Use of Text Messages as a Warning for the Vaccination Campaign ORSEp-Value95% C.I.
CenterCenter No. 11
Center No. 20.660.110.0170.47–0.93
Center No. 30.730.220.300.41–1.32
Center No. 40.440.120.0030.25–0.76
History of Herpes ZosterPersonal0.790.150.2130.55–1.14
Relatives0.670.100.0050.50–0.89
Cohort551
560.890.210.6170.57–1.40
570.700.200.2200.41–1.23
580.830.180.5240.58–1.32
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ceccarelli, A.; Tamarri, F.; Angelini, R.; Bakken, E.; Concari, I.; Giannoccaro, E.; Domeniconi, G.; Morri, M.; Reali, C.; Righi, F.; et al. Herpes Zoster Vaccine Uptake and Active Campaign Impact, a Multicenter Retrospective Study in Italy. Vaccines 2024, 12, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12010051

AMA Style

Ceccarelli A, Tamarri F, Angelini R, Bakken E, Concari I, Giannoccaro E, Domeniconi G, Morri M, Reali C, Righi F, et al. Herpes Zoster Vaccine Uptake and Active Campaign Impact, a Multicenter Retrospective Study in Italy. Vaccines. 2024; 12(1):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12010051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ceccarelli, Andrea, Federica Tamarri, Raffaella Angelini, Elizabeth Bakken, Ilaria Concari, Elsa Giannoccaro, Giada Domeniconi, Michela Morri, Chiara Reali, Francesca Righi, and et al. 2024. "Herpes Zoster Vaccine Uptake and Active Campaign Impact, a Multicenter Retrospective Study in Italy" Vaccines 12, no. 1: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12010051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop