Abstract
The current century has witnessed infections of pandemic proportions caused by Coronaviruses (CoV) including severe acute respiratory syndrome-related CoV (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome-related CoV (MERS-CoV) and the recently identified SARS-CoV2. Significantly, the SARS-CoV2 outbreak, declared a pandemic in early 2020, has wreaked devastation and imposed intense pressure on medical establishments world-wide in a short time period by spreading at a rapid pace, resulting in high morbidity and mortality. Therefore, there is a compelling need to combat and contain the CoV infections. The current review addresses the unique features of the molecular virology of major Coronaviruses that may be tractable towards antiviral targeting and design of novel preventative and therapeutic intervention strategies. Plant-derived vaccines, in particular oral vaccines, afford safer, effectual and low-cost avenues to develop antivirals and fast response vaccines, requiring minimal infrastructure and trained personnel for vaccine administration in developing countries. This review article discusses recent developments in the generation of plant-based vaccines, therapeutic/drug molecules, monoclonal antibodies and phytochemicals to preclude and combat infections caused by SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Efficacious plant-derived antivirals could contribute significantly to combating emerging and re-emerging pathogenic CoV infections and help stem the tide of any future pandemics.
1. Introduction
During the 21st century, the world has witnessed infections by emerging Coronaviruses such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in 2003, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012 and the Covid19 virus (SARS-CoV-2) in 2019, which spread rapidly, causing life-endangering respiratory infections associated with high morbidity and mortality [1,2,3,4]. While the SARS-CoV virus has disappeared, the other two Coronaviruses are still actively infecting the human population; particularly, the SARS-CoV-2 virus is rampantly disseminating across the world and poses great challenges to human health world-wide.
The SARS-CoV-2 or the Covid19 virus has been proclaimed as a pandemic on account of its ability to spread rapidly between humans within a short duration. These unprecedented events reveal that novel Coronaviruses or their variants could emerge in the imminent future [5]. Such frequently occurring virus infection outbreaks have led to several global crises with tremendous negative consequences on human health and hence the global economy, impacting financial stability and human lifestyles [6]. Therefore, there is a compelling need to develop therapeutic and prophylactic interventions such as antibodies, vaccines, therapeutic proteins and diagnostic reagents against emerging coronavirus infections to stem the ongoing pandemic and preclude any future outbreaks [7,8,9].
Presently, several vaccines and therapeutic proteins have been approved against Covid19 with many of them under clinical trials. Testing of vaccines is time-consuming, requiring large amounts of drug products to achieve clinical potency [10]. In this context, biopharming in plants affords several advantages such as safety, low-cost and ease of scalability towards the expression of recombinant biopharmaceuticals when compared with conventional mammalian and bacterial expression platforms [11,12].
Plants circumvent several challenges involved in the production of biopharmaceuticals, particularly in pandemic situations, by functioning as rapid, efficacious schemes for manufacturing in bulk amounts on large scales, thus meeting with the requirements of biopharmaceuticals to ameliorate human diseases world-wide. Moreover, previous accmplishments in the successful production of recombinant proteins such as monoclonal antibodies and vaccines against Influenza, Ebola and HIV diseases has shown that plants can function as appealing platforms for generating therapeutic proteins and other biologics to mitigate disease outbreaks [13].
The current review highlights emerging coronavirus infections, the similarities between various beta-Coronaviruses of important concern to human health, and their mitigation using plant-derived immuno-therapeutics and vaccines, in addition to descriptions of plant-based natural metabolites and phytochemicals of great applicability in the prevention/treatment of coronavirus diseases.
3. Genetic Similarities between MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2
Between the various CoV subtypes, beta CoVs, are responsible for serious and fatal diseases while alpha CoV induce mild infections. The genomic sequences of the SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV are largely similar; however, SARS-CoV-2 shows major differences in the composition of its genome compared to that of its predecessors, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV [28,29]. Genomic analysis indicates that SARS-CoV has close relationship with bat CoV (96%) and pangolin CoV (86–92%), which suggests that bats could be the primary reservoir of SARS-CoV-2 [19,30,31].
MERS-CoV bears close relationship with two bat CoVs ((HKU4, HKU5) and has been proposed to originate from bats with dromedary camels functioning as intermediate host, as discerned from serological investigations [32,33]. MERS-CoV RNA was detected in swabs collected from dromedary camels from Qatar which shared relationship with two of the MERS-CoV human cases [34]. A thorough evolutionary correlation study revealed that the MERS-CoV originated from bats by the incidence of recombination events within the S and ORF1ab genes [35,36]. Similar recombination events were also detected in SARS-CoV as regions of likely recombination events were identified using computational genomics [37].
MERS-CoV strains obtained from camels and humans reportedly share more than 99% identity with differences located in S, ORF3 and ORF4b genes [38]. SARS-CoV-2 displays 51% similarity with MERS-CoV and 80% similarity with SARS-CoV [39]. The majority of the coding regions of SARS-CoV-2 contain genomic architecture similar to that of SARS-CoV and CoVs originating from bats. The predicted 12 coding regions are: E, M, lab, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10B, S, N, 13 and 14. The proteins coded for by all three CoVs are for the most part similar in length [40]. Nevertheless, there is major difference in the SARS-CoV-2 S protein length which is greater when compared with the S proteins encoded by MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV and bat CoVs [41].
Several similarities occur in terms of pathogenicity and architecture between the SARS-CoV-2 and the SARS-CoV in contrast to that of MERS-CoV. Decision-tree experiments based on mathematical modeling have revealed notable characteristics of the amino acid sequence of the SARS-CoV-2, which is distinct from that of MERS-CoV. Coronaviruses possess similar S proteins that bind to their respective host cells and, additionally, they use the same host protease for activating their S proteins [42].
The SARS-CoV-2 S protein has 77% sequence similarity with that of the SARS-CoV, the structural proteins show 90% similarity to that of SARS-CoV and 32.79% similarity to that of MERS-CoV. The S2 receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 displays 74% similarity to that of SARS-CoV [43]. The SARS-CoV-2 E protein shows 96% and 36% similarity to that of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, respectively. while the M protein is 89.59% and 39.27% similar to that of the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, and the N protein of SARS-CoV-2 shows 85.41% and 48.47% sequence similarity with that of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, respectively [44]. Accessory proteins function as important factors during viral replication and pathogenesis [45,46]. The SARS-CoV-2 RdRp (nsp12) and 3CLpro (nsp5) proteins act as major mediators in virus replication and production of new virions and share high levels of sequence identity with those of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV [47].
Recent investigations have shown that the SARS-CoV ORF3a and ORF8b proteins catalyze proinflammatory cytokine induction, thereby playing a major role in the regulation of macrophage chemotaxis [48,49]. The SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV ORF8b gene products are also involved with the suppression of interferon (IFN-I) induction [50,51]. Yet another investigation reported that the SARS-CoV-2 variant ORF8b interacts with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and controls its degradation in in vitro cell cultures, implicating ORF8 in immune evasion. Nevertheless, the ORF8 of SARS-CoV-2 shows low level of homology to that of SARS-CoV [52]. In general, there are no homologous accessory proteins found in Coronavirus genera. The ORF3a, 6, 7a, 7b and 9b proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV share over 80% sequence similarities.
7. Phytochemical Inhibitors of MERS-CoV
There are only a few studies investigating the use of phytochemicals as therapeutic compounds against MERS-CoV. A phytochemical, silvestrol from Aglaia sp., was identified to be a robust inhibitor of the replication of MERS-CoV with an EC50 value of 1.3 nM [94]. Silvestrol specifically inhibits RNA helicase eIF4A and therefore represses viral replication, precluding the formation of replication and transcription complexes, leading to the arrest of MERS-CoV protein expression.
One of the most potent inhibitors of MERS-CoV is the lectin, griffithsin, found in the red alga Griffithsia. This compound contains three carbohydrate-binding domains that enables its binding to glycan moieties on the MERS-CoV protein spikes, thereby precluding the attachment of the virus to host cells. In vitro trials demonstrated the high potency of griffithsin against MERS-CoV with an EC50 value of ~0.125 μM [95]. Additionally, it exhibited diminished systemic toxicity and therefore appears highly promising as a primary drug candidate against MERS-CoV as well as other Coronaviruses.
Polyphenols comprise a major class of phytochemicals having antiviral potential due to their abilities to block virus entry precluding viral infection at the early stages. A stilbenoid, resveratrol is an important natural product expressed in plants such as Vaccinium macrocarpon, Polygonum cuspidatum and Vitis vinifera. Resveratrol strongly inhibited infection by MERS-CoV and repressed replication of MERS-CoV in vitro. This compound could hence be considered as a robust anti-MERS agent and shows great promise towards application as an antiviral against SARS-CoV-2 [96].
8. Inhibition of SARS-CoV Using Phytochemicals
Inhibition of viral entry is a propitious area to be explored for the identification of appropriate drug candidates. Coronaviruses enter the cell through recognition and binding of the host cell receptor namely, angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) wherein the virus S protein attaches to the ACE2 receptor. Several phytochemicals have demonstrated capability to strongly inhibit the interaction of the SARS-CoV S protein with the ACE2 receptor. For instance, anthraquinone compounds rhein and emodin as well as a flavonoid, chrysin, obtained from Polygonum and Rheum were studied for their anti-SARS-CoV activity. Amongst these compounds, emodin was found to be the strongest in inhibiting the S protein-ACE2 interaction showing an IC50 value of 200 μM [97].
Flavonoids as well as polyphenolic compounds such as tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose, luteolin and quercetin were shown to strongly inhibit the cellular entry of the SARS-CoV [98] with EC50 values of 4.5 μM, 83.4 μM and 10.6 μM, respectively. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-luc/SARS pseudo-typed virus was investigated for viral entry inhibition using the above three compounds wherein all of these compounds proved to inhibit viral entry, amongst which quercetin was found to have lowered cytotoxicity. Hence, quercetin could be considered as a prospective drug against SARS-CoV-2 and could be promising as an FDA-approved drug.
Licorice roots contain several bioactive compounds inclusive of antivirals, anti-tumorals and anti-inflammatory compounds. Cinatl et al. [99] reported that glycyrrhizin, a saponin expressed in Licorice roots, can block the replication of SARS-CoV with an EC50 value of 300 to 600 mg/L, respectively, during and following virus adsorption. The CC50 value has been reported to be over 20,000 mg/L. This implies that, at this dosage, there occurs only 20–30% decrease in cell viability, making the compound less cytotoxic. Glycyrrhizin at 4000 mg/L completely inhibited virus replication in infected cells. This investigation also found that glycyrrhizin is safer when compared to other antivirals such as ribavirin which causes hemolysis and drastic depletion of hemoglobin in SARS-CoV patients.
Glycyrrhizic acid and its aglycone, glycyrrhetinic acid are effective against a wide range of viruses such as flaviviruses, herpes viruses, HIV, Hepatitis C virus and importantly, SARS-CoV as discerned by in vitro studies. Inhibition of these viruses has been reported in Vero cells and in infected individuals [100,101,102]. Further investigations revealed that replacement of sugar moieties in glycyrrhizic acid led to loss of anti-SARS-CoV activity and therefore its effectuality as an antiviral depends on the presence of its sugar component. During the outbreak of SARS in 2002, glycyrrhizin characteristics and its mechanism of action were not deciphered. Subsequently, studies by Hoever et al., 2005 [103] demonstrated that, when 2-acetamido-β-D-gluco-pyranosylamine was added to the glycoside chain of glycyrrhizin, this resulted in a 10-fold higher activity of glycyrrhizin against SARS-CoV and blocks its entry into cells.
Lycorine, an alkaloid, was fractionated and purified from the L. radiata plant extract and this compound showed an EC50 value of 15.7 ± 1.2 nM as well as a CC50 value of 14,980.0 ± 912.0 nM as demonstrated in cytotoxicity assays. Lycorine inhibited virus replication at concentrations less than glycyrrhizin and could be considered as a potential candidate for generating new drugs against SARS-CoV [104]. SARS-CoV replication can be inhibited by disrupting the major viral protease (Mpro or 3CLpro). Among these, the 3CLpro controls the activities of the virus replication complex and is an important drug target [105]. SARS-CoV replication has also been disrupted by the alkaloid, reserpine obtained from the dried roots of Indian snakeroot, Rauvolfia serpentine and by the saponin, aescin obtained from the European chestnut, Aesculus hippocastanum, which respectively showed EC50 values between 3.4 μM and 6.0 μM as well as CC50 values of 25 μM and 15 μM. Both compounds interfered with virus entry and also successfully inhibited the 3CLpro enzyme activity within the cell [106].
Additionally, plant lectins have been demonstrated to strongly inhibit SARS-CoV entry into cells. Lectins obtained from various plants showed anti-SARS-CoV activity having an EC50 value ranging between 0.45 to >100 μg/mL as well as CC50 value between 50 to 100 μg/mL. Amongst these lectins, the highest antiviral activity was demonstrated for mannose-binding lectins obtained from Allium porrum, having a selectivity index of >222 [107]. This study showed that the lectins interfered with both viral entry and viral replication.
Flavonoids have also been reported to exhibit antiviral activity against Coronaviruses. The flavonoids, including quercetin, luteolin and apigenin purified from ethanolic extracts of leaves from the Asian traditional medicinal plant, Torreya nucifera, showed potent inhibition of the SARS-CoV 3CLpro activity [108] wherein IC50 values of 23.8 μM, 20.2 μM and 280.8 μM were reported, respectively. Amongst these, a carbon moiety present in apigenin displayed stronger activity when compared to the other flavonoids.
Likewise, terpenoids were also shown to be effectual in inhibiting viral replication. Pinusolidic acid, α-cadinol and ferruginol were purified from Chamaecyparis obtuse ethyl acetate extracts, betulonic acid and cedrane-3β,12-diol purified from Juniperus formosana plants and crypto-japonol purified from Cryptomeria japonica. These investigations showed that a majority of the terpenoids inhibited SARS-CoV replication at EC50 values between 3.8 and 7.5 μM and CC50 values more than 250 μM. Through ELISA assays, it was found that the terpenoids blocked the SARS-CoV S protein to inhibit the replication process. This study [109] also demonstrated that the terpenoids displayed potent anti-3CLpro activity and therefore, in their purified from, these terpenoids are favorable drug candidates to counter SARS-CoV infection.
Besides inhibition of virus replication and 3CLpro activities, plant-derived compounds are effectual in inhibiting critical enzymes such as SARS helicase and 64 natural compounds in their purified forms were tested for their activity against SARS helicases. Of these, flavonoids scutellarein and myricetin, purified from Aglaia perviridis, demonstrated notable activities against SARS-CoV ([110]; Figure 1). Colorimetry-based ATP hydrolysis assay and double-strand DNA unwinding assay based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) showed that these flavonoids strongly inhibited SARS-CoV helicase in vitro by impacting the ATPase activity. Scutellarein and myricetin displayed lower IC50 values at concentrations of 2.71 ± 0.19 μM and 0.86 ± 0.48 μM, respectively, and could therefore function well as biochemical inhibitors against SARS-CoV.
Figure 1.
Basic skeleton (C6–C3–C6) of flavonoids and representative examples of compounds able to counteract coronavirus infection. (Reproduced from [111]).
Phytochemicals can also block other steps in SARS-CoV infection. Schwarz et al., 2011 [112] demonstrated that the anthraquinone, emodin, purified from plants belonging to the family Polygonaceae can block the coronavirus 3a ion channel and hence preclude the release of SARS-CoV virus from the infected cells. Besides these, phytochemicals have been effectual in anti-coronavirus immune modulation [113] and can also function as analgesics as well as in symptom regulation such as reduction of dyspnea and hypoxemia. Such studies suggest that these phytochemicals can also be used against SARS-CoV-2 infection.
9. Plant-Based Phytochemical Therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Senna L. constitutes a major genus of legumes (Fabaceae) belonging to the subfamily Caesalpinioideae, comprising 300–350 species [114] that are both diverse and widespread. Several Senna species are typically used in herbal medicines and foods [115]. These plants contain, among others, important bioactive compounds such as terpenes, alkaloids and quinones [116,117,118,119,120]. Aqueous extracts of Senna leaves granted relief from SARS-CoV-2 symptoms in patients [88] and are being explored as a potential herbal therapy against SARS-CoV-2.
A traditional Chinese medicine formula, Lianhuaqingwen (LH), containing a mixture of 13 herbs was demonstrated to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication, alter the morphology of cells infected with the virus and decrease the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [121]. This LH formula, when used in in vitro studies, also showed equivalent antiviral potency. By transmission electron microscopy (TEM), it was demonstrated that there was a great reduction in the number of virus particles in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients when administered with LH at a concentration of 600 µg/mL. The exact mechanism of LH action is not yet clear although it has been reported to decrease cytokine release from virus-infected cells implicating the involvement of multiple levels of activities. Figure 2 shows some examples of phytochemicals capable of preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Figure 2.
Some natural plant products for precluding SARS-CoV-2 infection (Reproduced from [122]).
Health authorities in China have launched several herbal remedy programs to preclude SARS-CoV-2 infection and spread, major among which are the herbal formulas, Glycyrrhizae radix Et Rhizoma (Gancao) and Radix astragali (Huangqi) [123]. Additionally, tender leaf extracts of the popular Chinese vegetable, Toona sinensis Roem have been deemed to be used safely and have been shown to inhibit SARS-CoV in vitro [124]. It is probable that this extract can also be effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-22.
Previous studies showed that herbs capable of inhibiting SARS-CoV also successfully repressed SARS-CoV-2 infection. For instance, studies by Wen et al., 2011 [125] investigating 50 conventional Chinese medicinal herbs for anti-SARS-CoV activity using cytopathic assays based in Vero E6 cells revealed that six of these herbs could be used as probable SARS drug targets. Herbal extracts of the plants Gentianae radix (lóng dǎn), Rhizoma cibotii (gǒu jǐ), Cassiae semen (jué míng zǐ), Dioscoreae rhizoma (shān yào), and Loranthi ramus (sāng jì shēng) showed that all repressed SARS-CoV replication and two impacted SARS-CoV protease activity. Phlorotannins sourced from Ecklonia cava, an edible brown alga, showed that many of these compounds were successful in inhibiting SARS-CoV activity by impacting protease activity. One among these bioactive compounds, dieckol,1 demonstrated the highest antiviral activity. This occurred due to competitive binding within the catalytic site of the viral protease [126]. In this light, it is probable that dieckol could also function as an antiviral against SARS-CoV-2.
15. Regulatory and Safety Aspects of the Application of Phytomedicines and Plant-Based Vaccines/Therapeutics
The search for effectual phytochemicals against SARS-CoV-2 still continues and, considering the novelty of the Covid19 virus and the resulting disease, safety concerns loom large over the application of phytomedicines [88]. In this regard, there is a dearth of available data on the safety, efficacy and quality of the majority of these plants. Uninvestigated use of purified compounds is counter-recommended and these phytochemicals must first undergo proper testing for safety and efficacy. However, despite the fact that every plant product must be properly investigated for unwanted side effects, phytochemicals are inherently safe to use by virtue of their biocompatibility, eco-friendliness and diminished toxicity when compared to xenobiotics.
The FDA has provided directives for the safe use of natural compounds as drugs [320]. Likewise, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has mandated that herbal medicinal compounds can only be used if they have been under usage for at least 3 decades, which includes at least 15 years in the European Union, and are not administered parenterally. Moreover, marketing, and well-established application of the products has to be authorized only after there is availability of sufficient scientific data confirming that the active ingredient or pure constituent of the herbal product has recognized potency [321,322]. Nevertheless, there is a mistaken perception that herbal products are completely safe and devoid of any adverse side effects. There are numerous toxic compounds in plants. In comparison with synthetic compounds, plant-based compounds have demonstrated lowered toxicity and therefore require less rigorous evaluation. Notwithstanding, to preclude the side effects caused by the use of these plant-derived natural products in an unregulated manner, safety regulation on their use is important [323]. Only then can promising plant-based drug candidates against other Coronaviruses be considered for their effectual use against Covid19.
Researchers world-wide are involved in serious efforts to utilize all of the available platforms for the development of safe, effective vaccines against Covid19. With the inception of transient expression technology, plant-based production could be deemed as a viable strategy that is recently gaining the interest of various pharmaceutical companies. Recombinant biopharmaceuticals such as therapeutic proteins and vaccine antigens can be produced in plants at large scales within brief time periods. Several research teams within the plant molecular farming community have ventured into the development of plant-based vaccines. Nevertheless, the use of plant-based vaccines is subject to the regulatory pathway, which is often time-consuming and complex. The benefits of plant-based expression systems can only be realized by surmounting regulatory hurdles.
It is essential to harmonize regulatory procedures for plant-based products both at the international and national levels in order to reduce the time span of plant biologics to be translated from the bench level to the market. Moreover, these plant-derived products must attain good quality standards and meet with the guidelines of stringent GMP regulations assigned for biological products. Presently, very few plant-generated vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have reached up to the stages of preclinical and clinical trials. Despite the slow progress in the commercialization of plant-based vaccines, the success of clinical trials for plant-derived vaccines against Covid19 and influenza in recent years provides great promise towards the commercialization of such plant-made vaccines in the near future.
16. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Within the last 2 decades, three extremely pathogenic Coronaviruses, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, have been identified in the human population. Considerable advances have been made in developing plant-based vaccines and phytochemicals against these viruses through the application of current knowledge and proof-of-concept studies on other vaccine/therapeutic candidates derived from plants. Promising outcomes have been reported regarding plant-generated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates. Similar strategies based on subunit vaccines can be examined for efficacy and safety studies. Particularly, glycosylation plays an important role in determining the antigenic properties of the respective vaccine antigens. Despite the fact that plants are capable of performing post-translational modifications similar to mammalian and human cells, any discrepancies in the glycosylation patterns of the plant-derived mAbs can be circumvented in plants by glycoengineering to obtain humanized forms of the respective proteins [324] that could be used to generate SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates in plants. Plant-based vaccines serve as cost-efficient platforms to produce Covid19 vaccines which enhances their feasibility to be employed in immunization programs on large scales. The evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 subunit and VLP vaccines raised in plants could contribute substantially in advancing this field. Nevertheless, plant-based vaccines need to be developed further to obtain broad-spectrum immuno-protection against re-emerging variants of the virus.
Despite the fact that there exist similar features in the diseases caused by the three major Coronaviruses, distinctive infection characteristics and features have been elucidated in the clinical outcomes and the immunopathology of each of these viral infections. Frequent outbreaks of pathogenic and highly infectious strains of Coronaviruses have caused great burden and threat to the population such as the ongoing Covid19 pandemic that has led to unforeseen health crisis having devastating health and socio-economic outcomes worldwide. All of the three CoVs share immunological features affecting pathological attributes. These viruses replicate in the immune cells of the host which triggers innate immune reactions leading to the elicitation of cytokines and pro-inflammatory cells. Such cytokine storm leads to life-threatening outcomes and, ultimately, the body reacts by generating protective antibodies which clear the infection while conferring immunity to further infection by the same virus.
In vitro investigations have been greatly helpful in discerning the pathological and immunological features of the viruses as well as in performing drug trials to combat these agents. Nevertheless, there is a compelling need for the advancement of clinical research studies, as these viruses can mutate further leading to the generation of variants with increased pathogenicity. Intense, collaborative measures by scientists the world over have enabled advanced discoveries concerned with several aspects of infections against Coronaviruses. Moreover, characterizing the immunopathological and clinical facets of their infection will be of tremendous help in designing safer and more efficacious drugs, vaccines and medicaments to combat the emergence and re-emergence of these pathogenic Coronaviruses. Potential outcomes of clinical investigations of various plant-based antiviral drug candidates and vaccines afford hope that the current pandemic will end soon, and will further help in stemming the tide of any future pandemics.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
CoV: SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, VLPs, Mabs, IC50.
References
- Shanmugaraj, B.; Siriwattananon, K.; Malla, A.; Phoolcharoen, W. Potential for Developing Plant-Derived Candidate Vaccines and Biologics against Emerging Coronavirus Infections. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization MERS Situation Update September 2019. Available online: https://applications.emro.who.int/docs/EMROPub-MERS-SEP-2019-EN.pdf?ua=1&ua=1 (accessed on 16 May 2021).
- World Health Organization. Summary of Probable SARS Cases with Onset of Illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July 2003. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/summary-of-probable-sars-cases-with-onset-of-illness-from-1-november-2002-to-31-july-2003 (accessed on 14 May 2021).
- World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (accessed on 20 April 2021).
- Chan, J.F.-W.; Yuan, S.; Kok, K.-H.; To, K.K.-W.; Chu, H.; Yang, J.; Xing, F.; Liu, J.; Yip, C.C.-Y.; Poon, R.W.-S.; et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: A study of a family cluster. Lancet 2020, 395, 514–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gralinski, L.E.; Baric, R.S. Molecular pathology of emerging coronavirus infections. J. Pathol. 2015, 235, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Shanmugaraj, B.; Siriwattananon, K.; Wangkanont, K.; Phoolcharoen, W. Perspectives on monoclonal antibody therapy as potential therapeutic intervention for Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Asian Pac. J. Allergy Immunol. 2020, 38, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Zhu, X.; Liu, Q.; Du, L.; Lu, L.; Jiang, S. Receptor-binding domain as a target for developing SARS vaccines. J. Thorac. Dis. 2013, 5, 142–148. [Google Scholar]
- Malla, A.; Shanmugaraj, B.; Ramalingam, S. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2): An Emerging Zoonotic Respiratory Pathogen in Humans. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 14, 931–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lagassé, H.A.D.; Alexaki, A.; Simhadri, V.L.; Katagiri, N.H.; Jankowski, W.; Sauna, Z.E.; Kimchi-Sarfaty, C. Recent advances in (therapeutic protein) drug development. F1000Research 2017, 6, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shanmugaraj, B.; Bulaon, C.J.I.; Phoolcharoen, W. Plant molecular farming: A viable platform for recombinant biopharmaceutical production. Plants 2020, 9, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Burnett, M.J.B.; Burnett, A.C. Therapeutic recombinant protein production in plants: Challenges and opportunities. Plants People Planet 2019, 2, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shanmugaraj, B.; Malla, A.; Phoolcharoen, W. Emergence of Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCoV: Need for Rapid Vaccine and Biologics Development. Pathogens 2020, 9, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Masters, P.S. The Molecular Biology of Coronaviruses. Adv. Virus Res. 2006, 66, 193–292. [Google Scholar]
- Fung, S.-Y.; Yuen, K.-S.; Ye, Z.-W.; Chan, C.-P.; Jin, D.-Y. A tug-of-war between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and host antiviral defence: Lessons from other pathogenic viruses. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 558–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, F. Structure, function, and evolution of coronavirus spike proteins. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2016, 3, 237–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, Y.-D.; Chi, W.-Y.; Su, J.-H.; Ferrall, L.; Hung, C.-F.; Wu, T.-C. Coronavirus vaccine development: From SARS and MERS to COVID-19. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cui, J.; Li, F.; Shi, Z.-L. Origin and evolution of pathogenic Coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhou, P.; Yang, X.-L.; Wang, X.-G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.-R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.-L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lauxman, M.A.; Santucci, N.E.; Autrán-Gómez, A.M. The SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus and the COVID-19 Outbreak. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2020, 46, 6–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kuba, K.; Imai, Y.; Penninger, J.M. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in lung diseases. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2006, 6, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hamming, I.; Timens, W.; Bulthuis, M.L.C.; Lely, A.T.; Navis, G.J.; van Goor, H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J. Pathol. 2004, 203, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nguyen, H.L.; Lan, P.D.; Thai, N.Q.; Nissley, D.A.; O’Brien, E.P.; Li, M.S. Does SARS-CoV-2 bind to human ACE2 more strongly than does SARS-CoV? Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124, 7336–7347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rasmussen, S.A.; Watson, A.K.; Swerdlow, D.L. Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mou, H.; Raj, V.S.; van Kuppeveld, F.J.M.; Rottier, P.J.M.; Haagmans, B.L.; Bosch, B.J. The receptor binding domain of the new Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus maps to a 231-residue region in the spike protein that efficiently elicits neutralizing antibodies. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 9379–9383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- van Doremalen, N.; Miazgowicz, K.L.; Milne-Price, S.; Bushmaker, T.; Robertson, S.; Scott, D.; Kinne, J.; McLellan, J.S.; Zhu, J.; Munster, V.J. Host species restriction of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus through its receptor, dipeptidyl peptidase 4. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 9220–9232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Meyerholz, D.K.; Lambertz, A.M.; McCray, P.B., Jr. Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Distribution in the Human Respiratory Tract: Implications for the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Am. J. Pathol. 2016, 186, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rabaan, A.A.; Mutair, A.A.; Alawi, Z.A.; Alhumaid, S.; Mohaini, M.A.; Aldali, J.; Tirupathi, R.; Sule, A.A.; Koritala, T.; Adhikari, R.; et al. Comparative pathology, molecular pathogenicity, immunological features, and genetic characterization of three highly pathogenic human Coronaviruses (MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2). Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 25, 7162–7184. [Google Scholar]
- Ganesh, B.; Rajakumar, T.; Malathi, M.; Manikandan, N.; Nagaraj, J.; Santhakumar, A.; Elangovan, A.; Malik, Y.S. Epidemiology and pathobiology of SARSCoV-2 (COVID-19) in comparison with SARS, MERS: An updated overview of current knowledge and future perspectives. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2021, 10, 100694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Malik, Y.S.; Sircar, S.; Bhat, S.; Sharun, K.; Dhama, K.; Dadar, M.; Tiwari, R.; Chaicumpa, W. Emerging novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)—Current scenario, evolutionary perspective based on genome analysis and recent developments. Vet. Q. 2020, 40, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mohapatra, R.K.; Pintilie, L.; Kandi, V.; Sarangi, A.K.; Das, D.; Sahu, R.; Perekhoda, L. The recent challenges of highly contagious COVID-19, causing respiratory infections: Symptoms, diagnosis, transmission, possible vaccines, animal models, and immunotherapy. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2020, 96, 1187–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- van Boheemen, S.; de Graaf, M.; Lauber, C.; Bestebroer, T.M.; Raj, V.S.; Zaki, A.M.; Osterhaus, A.D.M.; Haagmans, B.L.; Gorbalenya, A.E.; Snijder, E.J.; et al. Genomic characterization of a newly discovered coronavirus associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in humans. MBio 2012, 3, e00473-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Meyer, B.; Müller, M.A.; Corman, V.M.; Reusken, C.B.E.M.; Ritz, D.; Godeke, G.J.; Lattwein, E.; Kallies, S.; Siemens, A.; van Beek, J.; et al. Antibodies against MERS coronavirus in dromedaries, United Arab Emirates, 2003 and 2013. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 552–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Stalin Raj, V.; Farag, E.A.B.A.; Reusken, C.B.E.M.; Lamers, M.M.; Pas, S.D.; Voermans, J.; Smits, S.L.; Osterhaus, A.D.M.; Al-Mawlawi, N.; Al-Romaihi, H.E.; et al. Isolation of MERS coronavirus from dromedary camel, Qatar, 2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1339–1342. [Google Scholar]
- Dudas, G.; Rambaut, A. MERS-CoV recombination: Implications about the reservoir and potential for adaptation. Virus Evol. 2016, 2, vev023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, D.; Shi, W.; Lu, R.; Wang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Deng, Y.; Zhou, W.; Ren, H.; Wu, J.; et al. Origin and possible genetic recombination of the middleeast respiratory syndrome coronavirus from the first imported case in china: Phylogenetics and coalescence analysis. MBio 2015, 6, e01280-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kenney, S.P.; Helmy, Y.A.; Fawzy, M.; Elaswad, A.; Sobieh, A.; Shehata, A.A. The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Review of Taxonomy, Genetics, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Control. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2–29. [Google Scholar]
- Chu, D.K.W.; Hui, K.P.Y.; Perera, R.A.P.M.; Miguel, E.; Niemeyer, D.; Zhao, J.; Channappanavar, R.; Dudas, G.; Oladipo, J.O.; Traoré, A.; et al. MERS Coronaviruses from camels in Africa exhibit region-dependent genetic diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 3144–3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hu, B.; Guo, H.; Zhou, P.; Shi, Z.L. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sahin, A.R.; Erdogan, A.; Agaoglu, P.M.; Dineri, Y.; Cakirci, A.Y.; Senel, M.E.; Okyay, R.A.; Tasdogan, A.M. 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak: A Review of the Current Literature. Eurasian J. Med. Oncol. 2020, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Krishnamoorthy, P.; Raj, A.S.; Roy, S.; Kumar, N.S.; Kumar, H. Comparative transcriptome analysis of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 to identify potential pathways for drug repurposing. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021, 128, 104123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- De Albuquerque, L.P.; Siqueira Patriota, L.L.; de Gonzatto, V.; Pontual, E.V.; Guedes Paiva, P.M.; Napoleão, T.H. Coronavirus Spike (S) Protein: A Brief Review on Structure-Function Relationship, Host Receptors, and Role in Cell Infection. Adv. Res. 2020, 28, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pandey, P.; Rane, J.S.; Chatterjee, A.; Kumar, A.; Khan, R.; Prakash, A.; Ray, S. Targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein of COVID-19 with naturally occurring phytochemicals: An in silico study for drug development. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 2020, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kaur, N.; Singh, R.; Dar, Z.; Bijarnia, R.K.; Dhingra, N.; Kaur, T. Genetic comparison among various coronavirus strains for the identification of potential vaccine targets of SARS-CoV2. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 89, 104490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liu, D.X.; Fung, T.S.; Chong, K.K.L.; Shukla, A.; Hilgenfeld, R. Accessory proteins of SARS-CoV and other Coronaviruses. Antivir. Res. 2014, 109, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Fung, T.S.; Liu, D.X. Similarities and Dissimilarities of COVID-19 and Other Coronavirus Diseases. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 75, 19–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Naqvi, A.A.T.; Fatima, K.; Mohammad, T.; Fatima, U.; Singh, I.K.; Singh, A.; Atif, S.M.; Hariprasad, G.; Hasan, G.M.; Hassan, M.I. Insights into SARS-CoV-2 genome, structure, evolution, pathogenesis and therapies: Structural genomics approach. Biochim. Biophys. Acta—Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Shi, C.S.; Nabar, N.R.; Huang, N.N.; Kehrl, J.H. SARS-Coronavirus Open Reading Frame-8b triggers intracellular stress pathways and activates NLRP3 inflammasomes. Cell Death Discov. 2019, 5, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Yue, Y.; Nabar, N.R.; Shi, C.S.; Kamenyeva, O.; Xiao, X.; Hwang, I.Y.; Wang, M.; Kehrl, J.H. SARS-Coronavirus Open Reading Frame-3a drives multimodal necrotic cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wong, H.H.; Fung, T.S.; Fang, S.; Huang, M.; Le, M.T.; Liu, D.X. Accessory proteins 8b and 8ab of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus suppress the interferon signaling pathway by mediating ubiquitin-dependent rapid degradation of interferon regulatory factor 3. Virology 2018, 515, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wong, L.Y.R.; Ye, Z.W.; Lui, P.Y.; Zheng, X.; Yuan, S.; Zhu, L.; Fung, S.Y.; Yuen, K.S.; Siu, K.L.; Yeung, M.L.; et al. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus ORF8b Accessory Protein Suppresses Type I IFN Expression by Impeding HSP70-Dependent Activation of IRF3 Kinase IKKε. J. Immunol. 2020, 205, 1564–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- V’kovski, P.; Kratzel, A.; Steiner, S.; Stalder, H.; Thiel, V. Coronavirus biology and replication: Implications for SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ioannidis, J.P.A. The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data. medRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Benvenuto, D.; Giovanetti, M.; Ciccozzi, A.; Spoto, S.; Angeletti, S.; Ciccozzi, M. The 2019-new coronavirus epidemic: Evidence for virus evolution. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 455–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, W.; Xu, Z.; Mu, J.; Yang, L.; Gan, H.; Mu, F.; Fan, B.; He, B.; Huang, S.; You, B. Antibody response and viraemia during the course of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus infection. J. Med. Microbiol. 2004, 53, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hung, I.F.N.; Cheng, V.C.C.; Wu, A.K.L.; Tang, B.S.F.; Chan, K.H.; Chu, C.M.; Wong, M.M.L.; Hui, W.T.; Poon, L.L.M.; Tse, D.M.W.; et al. Viral loads in clinical specimens and SARS manifestations. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 1550–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chu, C.M.; Poon, L.L.M.; Cheng, V.C.C.; Chan, K.S.; Hung, I.F.N.; Wong, M.M.L.; Chan, K.H.; Leung, W.S.; Tang, B.S.F.; Chan, V.L.; et al. Initial viral load and the outcomes of SARS. CMAJ 2004, 171, 1349–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Snijder, E.J.; van der Meer, Y.; Zevenhoven-Dobbe, J.; Onderwater, J.J.M.; van der Meulen, J.; Koerten, H.K.; Mommaas, A.M. Ultrastructure and Origin of Membrane Vesicles Associated with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Replication Complex. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 5927–5940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hemmat, N.; Asadzadeh, Z.; Ahangar, N.K.; Alemohammad, H.; Najafzadeh, B.; Derakhshani, A.; Baghbanzadeh, A.; Baghi, H.B.; Javadrashid, D.; Najafi, S.; et al. The roles of signaling pathways in SARS-CoV-2 infection; lessons learned from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Arch. Virol. 2021, 166, 675–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xiao, K.; Zhai, J.; Feng, Y.; Zhou, N.; Zhang, X.; Zou, J.J.; Li, N.; Guo, Y.; Li, X.; Shen, X. Isolation of SARS-CoV-2-related coronavirus from Malayan pangolins. Nature 2020, 583, 286–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Granados, A.; Peci, A.; McGeer, A.; Gubbay, J.B. Influenza and rhinovirus viral load and disease severity in upper respiratory tract infections. J. Clin. Virol. 2017, 86, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Raj, V.S.; Mou, H.; Smits, S.L.; Dekkers, D.H.; Müller, M.A.; Dijkman, R.; Muth, D.; Demmers, J.A.; Zaki, A.; Fouchier, R.A. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature 2013, 495, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lu, R.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Niu, P.; Yang, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, W.; Song, H.; Huang, B.; Zhu, N.; et al. Genomic characterization and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020, 395, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cui, W.; Fan, Y.; Wu, W.; Zhang, F.; Wang, J.Y.; Ni, A.P. Expression of lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 37, 857–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Li, T.; Qiu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Han, Y.; He, W.; Liu, Z.; Ma, X.; Fan, H.; Lu, W.; Xie, J.; et al. Significant changes of peripheral T lymphocyte subsets in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. J. Infect. Dis. 2004, 189, 648–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Li, L.; Wo, J.; Shao, J.; Zhu, H.; Wu, N.; Li, M.; Yao, H.; Hu, M.; Dennin, R.H. SARS-coronavirus replicates in mononuclear cells of peripheral blood (PBMCs) from SARS patients. J. Clin. Virol. 2003, 28, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chien, J.Y.; Hsueh, P.R.; Cheng, W.C.; Yu, C.J.; Yang, P.C. Temporal changes in cytokine/chemokine profiles and pulmonary involvement in severe acute respiratory syndrome. Respirology 2006, 11, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Huang, K.J.; Su, I.J.; Theron, M.; Wu, Y.C.; Lai, S.K.; Liu, C.C.; Lei, H.Y. An interferon-gamma-related cytokine storm in SARS patients. J. Med. Virol. 2005, 75, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Jiang, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhou, C.; Wu, Z.; Zhong, S.; Liu, J.; Luo, W.; Chen, T.; Qin, Q.; Deng, P. Characterization of cytokine/chemokine profiles of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005, 171, 850–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jones, B.M.; Ma, E.S.; Peiris, J.S.; Wong, P.C.; Ho, J.C.; Lam, B.; Lai, K.N.; Tsang, K.W. Prolonged disturbances of in vitro cytokine production in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) treated with ribavirin and steroids. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2004, 135, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tang, N.L.; Chan, P.K.; Wong, C.K.; To, K.F.; Wu, A.K.; Sung, Y.M.; Hui, D.S.; Sung, J.J.; Lam, C.W. Early enhanced expression of interferon-inducible protein-10 (CXCL-10) and other chemokines predicts adverse outcome in severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin. Chem. 2005, 51, 2333–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wong, C.K.; Lam, C.W.; Wu, A.K.; Ip, W.K.; Lee, N.L.; Chan, I.H.; Lit, L.C.; Hui, D.S.; Chan, M.H.; Chung, S.S.; et al. Plasma inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2004, 136, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cameron, M.J.; Ran, L.; Xu, L.; Danesh, A.; Bermejo-Martin, J.F.; Cameron, C.M.; Muller, M.P.; Gold, W.L.; Richardson, S.E.; Poutanen, S.M.; et al. Interferon-mediated immunopathological events are associated with atypical innate and adaptive immune responses in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 8692–8706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cheung, C.Y.; Poon, L.L.; Ng, I.H.; Luk, W.; Sia, S.F.; Wu, M.H.; Chan, K.H.; Yuen, K.Y.; Gordon, S.; Guan, Y.; et al. Cytokine responses in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-infected macrophages in vitro: Possible relevance to pathogenesis. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 7819–7826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Reghunathan, R.; Jayapal, M.; Hsu, L.Y.; Chng, H.H.; Tai, D.; Leung, B.P.; Melendez, A.J. Expression profile of immune response genes in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. BMC Immunol. 2005, 6, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tang, B.S.; Chan, K.H.; Cheng, V.C.; Woo, P.C.; Lau, S.K.; Lam, C.C.; Chan, T.L.; Wu, A.K.; Hung, I.F.; Leung, S.Y.; et al. Comparative host gene transcription by microarray analysis early after infection of the Huh7 cell line by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and human coronavirus 229E. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 6180–6193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cheng, V.C.C.; Lau, S.K.P.; Woo, P.C.Y.; Yuen, K.Y. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus as an Agent of Emerging and Reemerging Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 660–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, L.; Zhang, F.; Yu, W.; He, T.; Yu, J.; Yi, C.E.; Ba, L.; Li, W.; Farzan, M.; Chen, Z.; et al. Antibody responses against SARS coronavirus are correlated with disease outcome of infected individuals. J. Med. Virol. 2006, 78, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Peng, M.-Y.; Liu, W.-C.; Zheng, J.-Q.; Lu, C.-L.; Hou, Y.-C.; Zheng, C.-M.; Song, J.-Y.; Lu, K.-C.; Chao, Y.-C. Immunological Aspects of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the Putative Beneficial Role of Vitamin-D. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abassi, Z.; Knaney, Y.; Karram, T.; Heyman, S.N. The Lung Macrophage in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Friend or a Foe? Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sungnak, W.; Huang, N.; Becavin, C.; Berg, M.; Queen, R.; Litvinukova, M.; Talavera-Lopez, C.; Maatz, H.; Reichart, D.; Sampaziotis, F.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wan, Y.; Shang, J.; Graham, R.; Baric, R.S.; Li, F. Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: An Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e00127-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sims, A.C.; Baric, R.S.; Yount, B.; Burkett, S.E.; Collins, P.L.; Pickles, R.J. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection of human ciliated airway epithelia: Role of ciliated cells in viral spread in the conducting airways of the lungs. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 15511–15524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Reyfman, P.A.; Walter, J.M.; Joshi, N.; Anekalla, K.R.; McQuattie-Pimentel, A.C.; Chiu, S.; Fernandez, R.; Akbarpour, M.; Chen, C.I.; Ren, Z.; et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Human Lung Provides Insights into the Pathobiology of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 199, 1517–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Netland, J.; Meyerholz, D.K.; Moore, S.; Cassell, M.; Perlman, S. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection causes neuronal death in the absence of encephalitis in mice transgenic for human ACE2. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 7264–7275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Khan, T.; Khan, M.A.; Mashwani, Z.-R.; Ullah, N.; Nadhman, A. Therapeutic potential of medicinal plants against COVID-19: The role of antiviral medicinal metabolites. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 101890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- De Clercq, E. Potential antivirals and antiviral strategies against SARS coronavirus infections. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2006, 4, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Mahmood, N.; Nasir, S.B.; Hefferon, K. Plant-Based Drugs and Vaccines for COVID-19. Vaccines 2021, 9, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tohidi, B.; Rahimmalek, M.; Arzani, A. Essential oil composition, total phenolic, flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity of Thymus species collected from different regions of Iran. Food Chem. 2017, 220, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ma, L.; Yao, L. Antiviral Effects of Plant-Derived Essential Oils and Their Components: An Updated Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- B’aez-Santos, Y.M.; John, S.E.S.; Mesecar, A.D. The SARS-coronavirus papain-like protease: Structure, function and inhibition by designed antiviral compounds. Antivir. Res. 2015, 115, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cheng, P.W.; Ng, L.T.; Chiang, L.C.; Lin, C.C. Antiviral effects of saikosaponins on human coronavirus 229E in vitro. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2006, 33, 612–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kim, M.K.; Yu, M.-S.; Park, H.R.; Kim, K.B.; Lee, C.; Cho, S.Y.; Kang, J.; Yoon, H.; Kim, D.-E.; Choo, H.; et al. 2,6-Bis-arylmethyloxy-5-hydroxychromones with antiviral activity against both hepatitis C virus (HCV) and SARS-associated coronavirus (SCV). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 5698–5704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Müller, C.; Schulte, F.W.; Lange-Grunweller, K.; Obermann, W.; Madhugiri, R.; Pleschka, S.; Ziebuhr, J.; Hartmann, R.K.; Grunweller, A. Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of the eIF4A inhibitor silvestrol against corona- and picornaviruses. Antivir. Res. 2018, 150, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- O’Keefe, B.R.; Giomarelli, B.; Barnard, D.L.; Shenoy, S.R.; Chan, P.K.; McMahon, J.B.; Palmer, K.E.; Barnett, B.W.; Meyerholz, D.K.; Wohlford-Lenane, C.L.; et al. Broad-spectrum in vitro activity and in vivo efficacy of the antiviral protein griffithsin against emerging viruses of the family Coronaviridae. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 2511–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lin, S.-C.; Ho, C.-T.; Chuo, W.-H.; Li, S.; Wang, T.T.; Lin, C.-C. Effective inhibition of MERS-CoV infection by resveratrol. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ho, T.Y.; Wu, S.L.; Chen, J.C.; Li, C.C.; Hsiang, C.Y. Emodin blocks the SARS coronavirus spike protein and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 interaction. Antivir. Res. 2007, 74, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yi, L.; Li, Z.; Yuan, K.; Qu, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, G.; Zhang, H.; Luo, H.; Zhu, L.; Jiang, P.; et al. Small molecules blocking the entry of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus into host cells. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 11334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cinatl, J.; Morgenstern, B.; Bauer, G.; Chandra, P.; Rabenau, H.; Doerr, H. Glycyrrhizin, an active component of liquorice roots, and replication of SARS associated coronavirus. Lancet 2003, 361, 2045–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bailly, C.; Vergoten, G. Glycyrrhizin: An alternative drug for the treatment of COVID-19 infection and the associated respiratory syndrome? Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 214, 107618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fuzimoto, A.D.; Isidoro, C. The antiviral and coronavirus-host protein pathways inhibiting properties of herbs and natural compounds—Additional weapons in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic? J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2020, 10, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mani, J.S.; Johnson, J.B.; Steel, J.C.; Broszczak, D.A.; Neilsen, P.M.; Walsh, K.B.; Naiker, M. Natural product-derived phytochemicals as potential agents against Coronaviruses: A review. Virus Res. 2020, 284, 197989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hoever, G.; Baltina, L.; Michaelis, M.; Kondratenko, R.; Baltina, L.; Tolstikov, G.A.; Doerr, H.W.; Cinatl, J. Antiviral activity of glycyrrhizic acid derivatives against SARS Coronavirus. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 1256–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, S.-y.; Chen, C.; Zhang, H.-q.; Guo, H.-y.; Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Hua, S.-n.; Yu, J.; Xiao, P.-g. Identification of natural compounds with antiviral activities against SARS-associated coronavirus. Antivir. Res. 2005, 67, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Anand, K.; Ziebuhr, J.; Wadhwani, P.; Mesters, J.R.; Hilgenfeld, R. Coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro) structure: Basis for design of anti-SARS drugs. Science 2003, 300, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wu, C.-Y.; Jan, J.-T.; Ma, S.-H.; Kuo, C.-J.; Juan, H.-F.; Cheng, Y.-S.E.; Hsu, H.-H.; Huang, H.-C.; Wu, D.; Brik, A.; et al. Small molecules targeting severe acute respiratory syndrome human coronavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 10012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Keyaerts, E.; Vijgen, L.; Pannecouque, C.; Damme, E.V.; Peumans, W.; Egberink, H.; Balzarini, J.; Ranst, M.V. Plant lectins are potent inhibitors of Coronaviruses by interfering with two targets in the viral replication cycle. Antivir. Res. 2007, 753, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ryu, Y.B.; Jeong, H.J.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, Y.M.; Park, J.-Y.; Kim, D.; Naguyen, T.T.H.; Park, S.-J.; Chang, J.S.; Park, K.H.; et al. Biflavonoids from Torreya nucifera displaying SARS-CoV 3CLpro inhibition. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 7940–7947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wen, C.-C.; Kuo, Y.-H.; Jan, J.-T.; Liang, P.-H.; Wang, S.-Y.; Liu, H.-G.; Lee, C.-K.; Chang, S.-T.; Kuo, C.-J.; Lee, S.-S.; et al. Specific plant terpenoids and lignoids possess potent antiviral activities against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 4087–4095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yu, M.-S.; Lee, J.; Lee, J.M.; Kim, Y.; Chin, Y.-W.; Jee, J.-G.; Keum, Y.-S.; Jeong, Y.-J. Identification of myricetin and scutellarein as novel chemical inhibitors of the SARS coronavirus helicase, nsP13. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 4049–4054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Russo, M.; Moccia, S.; Spagnuolo, C.; Tedesco, I.; Russo, G.L. Roles of flavonoids against coronavirus infection. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2020, 328, 109211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Schwarz, S.; Wang, K.; Yu, W.; Sun, B.; Schwarz, W. Emodin inhibits current through SARS-associated coronavirus 3a protein. Antivir. Res. 2011, 90, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lau, K.-M.; Lee, K.-M.; Koon, C.-M.; Cheung, C.S.-F.; Lau, C.-P.; Ho, H.-M.; Lee, M.Y.-H.; Au, S.W.-N.; Cheng, C.H.-K.; Lau, C.B.-S.; et al. Immunomodulatory and anti-SARS activities of Houttuynia cordata. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 118, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gebrelibanos, M.; Periyasamy, G.; Sintayehu, B. Senna occidentalis seed: Is it health risk or potential medicine? Int. J. Pharmacogn. 2014, 1, 161–167. [Google Scholar]
- Monkheang, P. Species diversity, usages, molecular markers and barcode of medicinal Senna species (Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae) in Thailand. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 6173–6181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hennebelle, T.; Weniger, B.; Joseph, H.; Sahpaz, S.; Bailleul, F. Senna alata. Fitoterapia 2009, 80, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kayembe, J.S.; Taba, K.M.; Ntumba, K.; Kazadi, T.K. In vitro Antimalarial Activity of 11 Terpenes Isolated from Ocimum gratissimum and Cassia alata Leaves. Screening of Their Binding Affinity with Haemin. J. Plant Stud. 2012, 1, 168–172. [Google Scholar]
- Kayembe, J.S.; Taba, K.M.; Ntumba, K. In vitro anti-malarial activity of 20 quinones isolated from four plants used by traditional healers in the Democratic Republic of Congo. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 991–994. [Google Scholar]
- Oladeji, O.S.; Adelowo, F.E.; Oluyori, A.P.; Bankole, D.T. Ethnobotanical Description and Biological Activities of Senna alata. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 2020, 2580259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Panyod, S.; Ho, C.-T.; Sheen, L.-Y. Dietary therapy and herbal medicine for COVID-19 prevention: A review and perspective. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2020, 10, 420–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Runfeng, L.; Yunlong, H.; Jicheng, H.; Weiqi, P.; Qinhai, M.; Yongxia, S.; Chufang, L.; Jin, Z.; Zhenhua, J.; Haiming, J.; et al. Lianhuaqingwen exerts anti-viral and anti-inflammatory activity against novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 156, 104761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Boozari, M.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Natural products for COVID-19 prevention and treatment regarding to previous coronavirus infections and novel studies. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 864–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Luo, H.; Tang, Q.L.; Shang, Y.X.; Liang, S.B.; Yang, M.; Robinson, N.; Liu, J.P. Can Chinese Medicine Be Used for Prevention of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)? A Review of Historical Classics, Research Evidence and Current Prevention Programs. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2020, 26, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, C.-J.; Michaelis, M.; Hsu, H.-K.; Tsai, C.-C.; Yang, K.D.; Wu, Y.-C.; Cinatl, J.; Doerr, H.W. Toona sinensis Roem tender leaf extract inhibits SARS coronavirus replication. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 120, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wen, C.-C.; Shyur, L.-F.; Jan, J.-T.; Liang, P.-H.; Kuo, C.-J.; Arulselvan, P.; Wu, J.-B.; Kuo, S.-C.; Yang, N.-S. Traditional Chinese medicine herbal extracts of Cibotium barometz, Gentiana scabra, Dioscorea batatas, Cassia tora, and Taxillus chinensis inhibit SARS-CoV replication. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2011, 1, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Park, J.-Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kwon, J.M.; Kwon, H.-J.; Jeong, H.J.; Kim, Y.M.; Kim, D.; Lee, W.S.; Ryu, Y.B. Dieckol, a SARS-CoV 3CLpro inhibitor, isolated from the edible brown algae Ecklonia cava. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 3730–3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Qiu, M.; Shi, Y.; Guo, Z.; Chen, Z.; He, R.; Chen, R.; Zhou, D.; Dai, E.; Wang, X.; Si, B.; et al. Antibody responses to individual proteins of SARS coronavirus and their neutralization activities. Microbes Infect. 2005, 7, 882–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Tang, X.-C.; Agnihothram, S.S.; Jiao, Y.; Stanhope, J.; Graham, R.L.; Peterson, E.C.; Avnir, Y.; Tallarico, A.S.C.; Sheehan, J.; Zhu, Q.; et al. Identification of human neutralizing antibodies against MERS-CoV and their role in virus adaptive evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E2018–E2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Siriwattananon, K.; Manopwisedjaroen, S.; Shanmugaraj, B.; Rattanapisit, K.; Phumiamorn, S.; Sapsutthipas, S.; Trisiriwanich, S.; Prompetchara, E.; Ketloy, C.; Buranapraditkun, S.; et al. Plant-produced receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 elicits potent neutralizing responses in mice and non-human primates. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- He, Y.; Li, J.; Heck, S.; Lustigman, S.; Jiang, S. Antigenic and immunogenic characterization of recombinant baculovirus-expressed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein: Implication for vaccine design. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 5757–5767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Y.; Tai, W.; Yang, J.; Zhao, G.; Sun, S.; Tseng, C.-T.K.; Jiang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Du, L.; Gao, J. Receptor-binding domain of MERS-CoV with optimal immunogen dosage and immunization interval protects human transgenic mice from MERS-CoV infection. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2017, 13, 1615–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Z.; Xu, W.; Xia, S.; Gu, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, J.; Wu, Y.; Cai, X.; Qu, D.; et al. RBD-Fc-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate induces highly potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody response. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Modjarrad, K.; Roberts, C.C.; Mills, K.T.; Castellano, A.R.; Paolino, K.; Muthumani, K.; Reuschel, E.L.; Robb, M.L.; Racine, T.; Oh, M.-D.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an anti-Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus DNA vaccine: A phase 1, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 1013–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tai, W.; Wang, Y.; Fett, C.A.; Zhao, G.; Li, F.; Perlman, S.; Jiang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Du, L. Recombinant receptor-binding domains of multiple Middle East respiratory syndrome Coronaviruses (MERS-CoVs) induce cross-neutralizing antibodies against divergent human and camel MERS-CoVs and antibody escape mutants. J. Virol. 2016, 91, e01651-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wu, Z.; Hu, Y.; Xu, M.; Chen, Z.; Yang, W.; Jiang, Z.; Li, M.; Jin, H.; Cui, G.; Chen, P.; et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy adults aged 60 years and older: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 803–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Walsh, E.E.; Frenck, R.W., Jr.; Falsey, A.R.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Neuzil, K.; Mulligan, M.J.; Bailey, R.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based COVID-19 vaccine candidates. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2439–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Anderson, E.J.; Rouphael, N.G.; Widge, A.T.; Jackson, L.A.; Roberts, P.C.; Makhene, M.; Chappell, J.D.; Denison, M.R.; Stevens, L.J.; Pruijssers, A.J.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine in older adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2427–2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Novavax. Novavax COVID-19 Vaccine Demonstrates 89.3% Efficacy in UK Phase 3 Trial. Available online: https://ir.novavax.com/news-releases/news-release-details/novavax-covid-19-vaccine-demonstrates-893-efficacy-uk-phase-3 (accessed on 15 February 2021).
- Folegatti, P.M.; Ewer, K.J.; Aley, P.K.; Angus, B.; Becker, S.; Belij-Rammerstorfer, S.; Bellamy, D.; Bibi, S.; Bittaye, M.; Clutterbuck, E.A.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: A preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020, 396, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fischer, R.; Buyel, J.F. Molecular farming—The slope of enlightenment. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 40, 107519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Capell, T.; Twyman, R.M.; Armario-Najera, V.; Ma, J.K.; Schillberg, S.; Christou, P. Potential applications of plant biotechnology against SARS-CoV-2. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gómez, M.L.; Huang, X.; Alvarez, D.; He, W.; Baysal, C.; Zhu, C.; Armario-Najera, V.; Perera, A.B.; Bennasser, P.C.; Saba-Mayoral, A.; et al. Contributions of the international plant science community to the fight against human infectious diseases—Part 1: Epidemic and pandemic diseases. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 1901–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- He, W.; Baysal, C.; Gómez, M.L.; Huang, X.; Alvarez, D.; Zhu, C.; Armario-Najera, V.; Perera, A.B.; Bennaser, P.C.; Saba-Mayoral, A.; et al. Contributions of the international plant science community to the fight against infectious diseases in humans—Part 2: Affordable drugs in edible plants for endemic and re-emerging diseases. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 1921–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mohammadinejad, R.; Shavandi, A.; Raie, D.S.; Sangeetha, J.; Soleimani, M.; Hajibehzad, S.S.; Thangadurai, D.; Hospet, R.; Popoola, J.O.; Arzani, A.; et al. Plant molecular farming: Production of metallic nanoparticles and therapeutic proteins using green factories. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 1845–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rattanapisit, K.; Shanmugaraj, B.; Manopwisedjaroen, S.; Purwono, P.B.; Siriwattananon, K.; Khorattanakulchai, N.; Hanittinan, O.; Boonyayothin, W.; Thitithanyanont, A.; Smith, D.R.; et al. Rapid production of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) and spike specific monoclonal antibody CR3022 in Nicotiana benthamiana. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Shanmugaraj, B.; Phoolcharoen, W. Addressing demand for recombinant biopharmaceuticals in the COVID-19 era. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2021, 14, 49–51. [Google Scholar]
- Siriwattananon, K.; Manopwisedjaroen, S.; Kanjanasirirat, P.; Purwono, P.B.; Rattanapisit, K.; Shanmugaraj, B.; Smith, D.R.; Borwornpinyo, S.; Thitithanyanont, A.; Phoolcharoen, W. Development of plant-produced recombinant ACE2-Fc fusion protein as a potential therapeutic agent against SARS-CoV-2. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rattanapisit, K.; Srifa, S.; Kaewpungsup, P.; Pavasant, P.; Phoolcharoen, W. Plant-produced recombinant Osteopontin-Fc fusion protein enhanced osteogenesis. Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 21, e00312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rattanapisit, K.; Chao, Z.; Siriwattananon, K.; Huang, Z.; Phoolcharoen, W. Plant-produced anti-enterovirus 71 (EV71) monoclonal antibody efficiently protects mice against EV71 infection. Plants 2019, 8, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rattanapisit, K.; Phakham, T.; Buranapraditkun, S.; Siriwattananon, K.; Boonkrai, C.; Pisitkun, T.; Hirankarn, N.; Strasser, R.; Abe, Y.; Phoolcharoen, W. Structural and in vitro functional analyses of novel plant-produced anti-Human PD1 antibody. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 15205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gengenbach, B.B.; Keil, L.L.; Opdensteinen, P.; Müschen, C.R.; Melmer, G.; Lentzen, H.; Bührmann, J.; Buyel, J.F. Comparison of microbial and transient expression (tobacco plants and plant-cell packs) for the production and purification of the anticancer mistletoe lectin viscumin. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2019, 116, 2236–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fard, A.B.; Nayeri, F.D.; Anbuhi, M.H. Transient expression of etanercept therapeutic protein in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 130, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Seki, M.; Komeda, Y.; Iida, A.; Yamada, Y.; Morikawa, H. Transient expression of beta-glucuronidase in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves and roots and Brassica napus stems using a pneumatic particle gun. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 17, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bernat-Silvestre, C.; Vieira, V.D.S.; Sánchez-Simarro, J.; Aniento, F.; Marcote, M.J. Transient Transformation of A. thaliana Seedlings by Vacuum Infiltration. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2200, 147–155. [Google Scholar]
- Maharjan, P.M.; Choe, S. Transient expression of hemagglutinin antigen from canine influenza virus H3N2 in Nicotiana benthamiana and Lactuca sativa. Clin. Exp. Vaccine Res. 2019, 8, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chen, Q.; Dent, M.; Hurtado, J.; Stahnke, J.; McNulty, A.; Leuzinger, K.; Lai, H. Transient Protein Expression by Agroinfiltration in Lettuce. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016, 1385, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Krenek, P.; Samajova, O.; Luptovciak, I.; Doskocilova, A.; Komis, G.; Samaj, J. Transient plant transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens: Principles, methods and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1024–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Komarova, T.V.; Baschieri, S.; Donini, M.; Marusic, C.; Benvenuto, E.; Dorokhov, Y.L. Transient expression systems for plant derived biopharmaceuticals. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2010, 9, 859–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kim, M.J.; Baek, K.; Park, C.-M. Optimization of conditions for transient Agrobacterium-mediated gene expression assays in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28, 1159–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lee, M.W.; Yang, Y. Transient expression assay by agroinfiltration of leaves. Methods Mol. Biol. 2006, 323, 225–229. [Google Scholar]
- Aboul-Ata, A.A.E.; Vitti, A.; Nuzzaci, M.; El-Attar, A.K.; Piazzolla, G.; Tortorella, C.; Harandi, A.M.; Olson, O.; Wright, S.A.I.; Piazolla, P.; et al. Plant-based vaccines: Novel and low-cost possible route for mediterranean innovative vaccination strategies. Adv. Virus Res. 2014, 89, 1–37. [Google Scholar]
- Pogrebnyak, N.; Golovkin, M.; Andrianov, V.; Spitsin, S.; Smirnov, Y.; Egolf, R.; Koprowski, H. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) S protein production in plants: Development of recombinant vaccine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 9062–9067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zheng, N.; Xia, R.; Yang, C.; Yin, B.; Li, Y.; Duan, C.; Liang, L.; Guo, H.; Xie, Q. Boosted expression of the SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein in tobacco and its immunogenicity in mice. Vaccine 2009, 27, 5001–5007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Márquez-Escobar, V.A.; Rosales-Mendoza, S.; Beltrán-López, J.I.; González-Ortega, O. Plant-based vaccines against respiratory diseases: Current status and future prospects. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2017, 16, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, H.-Y.; Ramalingam, S.; Chye, M.-L. Accumulation of recombinant SARS-CoV spike protein in plant cytosol and chloroplasts indicate potential for development of plant-derived oral vaccines. Exp. Biol. Med. 2006, 231, 1346–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Demurtas, O.C.; Massa, S.; Illiano, E.; Martinis, D.D.; Chan, P.K.S.; Bonito, P.D.; Franconi, R. Antigen production in plant to tackle infectious diseases flare up: The case of SARS. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Diego-Martin, B.; González, B.; Vazquez-Vilar, M.; Selma, S.; Mateos-Fernández, R.; Gianoglio, S.; Fernández-del-Carmen, A.; Orzáez, D. Pilot production of SARS-CoV-2 related proteins in plants: A proof of concept for rapid repurposing of indoor farms into biomanufacturing facilities. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- iBio. IBIO-201 Demonstrates Ability to Elicit Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immune Response in Preclinical Studies. Available online: https://www.ibioinc.com/ibio-provides-update-on-ibio-201-covid-19-vaccine-program/ (accessed on 18 June 2021).
- iBio. iBio Reports Successful Preclinical Immunization Studies with Next-Gen Nucleocapsid COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate. Available online: https://ibioinc.com/ibio-reports-successful-preclinical-immunization-studies-with-next-gen-nucleocapsidcovid-19-vaccine-candidate/ (accessed on 12 August 2021).
- Siriwattananon, K.; Manopwisedjaroen, S.; Shanmugaraj, B.; Prompetchara, E.; Ketloy, C.; Buranapraditkun, S.; Tharakhet, K.; Kaewpang, P.; Ruxrungtham, K.; Thitithanyanont, A.; et al. Immunogenicity Studies of Plant-Produced SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain-Based Subunit Vaccine Candidate with Different Adjuvant Formulations. Vaccines 2021, 9, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- British American Tobacco. BAT Makes Progress on COVID-19 Vaccine & Provides Community Support. Available online: https://www.bat.com/group/sites/UK__9D9KCY.nsf/vwPagesWebLive/DOBPMBZC# (accessed on 31 May 2021).
- The Canadian Press. Medicago Reports Promising but Preliminary Results of Possible COVID-19 Vaccine. Available online: https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/medicago-covid-19-vaccine-phase-1-1.5796411 (accessed on 31 May 2021).
- Ward, B.J.; Gobeil, P.; Séguin, A.; Atkins, J.; Boulay, I.; Charbonneau, P.-Y.; Couture, M.; D’Aoust, M.-A.; Dhaliwall, J.; Finkle, C.; et al. Phase 1 randomized trial of a plant-derived virus-like particle vaccine for COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kumar, A.U.; Kadiresen, K.; Gan, W.C.; Ling, A.P.K. Current updates and research on plant-based vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019. Clin. Exp. Vaccine Res. 2021, 10, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pillet, S.; Arunachalam, P.S.; Andreani, G.; Golden, N.; Fontenot, J.; Aye, P.; Röltgen, K.; Lehmick, G.; Dubé, C.; Gobeil, P.; et al. Safety, immunogenicity and protection provided by unadjuvanted and adjuvanted formulations of recombinant plant-derived virus-like particle vaccine candidate for COVID-19 in non-human primates. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2022, 19, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rosales-Mendoza, S.; Márquez-Escobar, V.A.; González-Ortega, O.; Nieto-Gómez, R.; Arévalo-Villalobos, J.I. What Does PlantBased Vaccine Technology Offer to the Fight against COVID-19? Vaccines 2020, 8, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pillet, S.; Couillard, J.; Trépanier, S.; Poulin, J.-F.; Yassine-Diab, B.; Guy, B.; Ward, B.J.; Landry, N. Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent plant-derived virus like particle influenza vaccine candidate—Two randomized Phase II clinical trials in 18 to 49 and ≥50 years old adults. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rybicki, E. History and Promise of Plant-Made Vaccines for Animals. In Prospects of Plant-Based Vaccines in Veterinary Medicine; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Gretler, C. Tobacco-Based Coronavirus Vaccine Poised for Human Tests Bloomberg, May 15. Available online: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-05-15/cigarette-maker-s-coronavirus-vaccine-poised-for-human-tests (accessed on 24 December 2020).
- Mullan, K. Tobacco Giant BAT Says It Could Be Making 1 to 3 Million COVID-19 Vaccines a Week by June. 2020. Available online: https://www.derryjournal.com/news/people/tobacco-giant-bat-says-it-could-be-making-1-3-million-covid-19-vaccines-week-june-2526933 (accessed on 24 December 2020).
- Nogrady, B. How SARS-CoV-2 Tests Work and What’s Next in COVID-19 Diagnostics. The Scientist March 3. 2020. Available online: https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/how-sars-cov-2-tests-work-and-whats-next-in-covid-19-diagnostics67210 (accessed on 24 December 2020).
- Makay, C. Algae Tasked with Making COVID-19 Kits. 2020. Available online: https://phys.org/news/2020-04-algae-taskedcovid-kits.html (accessed on 24 December 2020).
- Dai, L.; Gao, G.F. Viral targets for vaccines against COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021, 21, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dutta, N.K.; Mazumdar, K.; Gordy, J.T. The Nucleocapsid Protein of SARS-CoV-2: A Target for Vaccine Development. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e00647-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Oliveira, S.C.; de Magalhães, M.T.Q.; Homan, E.J. Immunoinformatic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein and Identification of COVID-19 Vaccine Targets. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 587615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zhao, P.; Cao, J.; Zhao, L.J.; Qin, Z.L.; Ke, J.S.; Pan, W.; Ren, H.; Yu, J.G.; Qi, Z.T. Immune responses against SARS-coronavirus nucleocapsid protein induced by DNA vaccine. Virology 2005, 331, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hardy, A. IBIO-201 Demonstrates Ability to Elicit Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immune Response in Preclinical Studies. Available online: https://biotuesdays.com/2020/08/10/ibio-updates-ibio-201-covid-19-vaccine-candidate/ (accessed on 20 November 2021).
- Baiya Phytopharm. COVID-19 Vaccine Development. Available online: https://baiyaphytopharm.com/covid-19/ (accessed on 12 August 2021).
- Peyret, H.; Steele, J.F.C.; Jung, J.-W.; Thuenemann, E.C.; Meshcheriakova, Y.; Lomonossoff, G.P. Producing Vaccines against Enveloped Viruses in Plants: Making the Impossible, Difficult. Vaccines 2021, 9, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chung, Y.H.; Cai, H.; Steinmetz, N.F. Viral nanoparticles for drug delivery, imaging, immunotherapy, and theranostic applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020, 156, 214–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lopez-Ramirez, M.A.; Soto, F.; Wang, C.; Rueda, R.; Shukla, S.; Silva-Lopez, C.; Kupor, D.; McBride, D.A.; Pokorski, J.K.; Nourhani, A.; et al. Built-In Active Microneedle Patch with Enhanced Autonomous Drug Delivery. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e1905740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chan, S.K.; Du, P.; Ignacio, C.; Mehta, S.; Newton, I.G.; Steinmetz, N.F. Biomimetic Virus-Like Particles as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Diagnostic Tools. ACS Nano 2020, 15, 1259–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Clemente, V.; D’Arcy, P.; Bazzaro, M. Deubiquitinating Enzymes in Coronaviruses and Possible Therapeutic Opportunities for COVID-19. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hefferon, K.L. DNA Virus Vectors for Vaccine Production in Plants: Spotlight on Geminiviruses. Vaccines 2014, 2, 642–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ning, L.; Abagna, H.B.; Jiang, Q.; Liu, S.; Huang, J. Development and application of therapeutic antibodies against COVID-19. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 17, 1486–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bayry, J.; Lacroix-Desmazes, S.; Kazatchkine, M.D.; Kaveri, S.V. Monoclonal antibody and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for rheumatic diseases: Rationale and mechanisms of action. Nat. Clin. Pract. Rheumatol. 2007, 3, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tuccori, M.; Ferraro, S.; Convertino, I.; Cappello, E.; Valdiserra, G.; Blandizzi, C.; Maggi, F.; Focosi, D. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies: Clinical pipeline. MAbs 2020, 12, 1854149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sui, J.; Li, W.; Murakami, A.; Tamin, A.; Matthews, L.J.; Wong, S.K.; Moore, M.J.; Tallarico, A.S.C.; Olurinde, M.; Choe, H.; et al. Potent neutralization of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus by a human mAb to S1 protein that blocks receptor association. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2536–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jiang, L.; Wang, N.; Zuo, T.; Shi, X.; Poon, K.-M.V.; Wu, Y.; Gao, F.; Li, D.; Wang, R.; Guo, J.; et al. Potent neutralization of MERS-CoV by human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to the viral spike glycoprotein. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 234–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lip, K.-M.; Shen, S.; Yang, X.; Keng, C.-T.; Zhang, A.; Oh, H.-L.J.; Li, Z.-H.; Hwang, L.-A.; Chou, C.-F.; Fielding, B.C.; et al. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the HR2 domain and the region immediately upstream of the HR2 of the S protein neutralize in vitro infection of Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 941–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yu, X.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, L.; Cui, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, D.; Wang, N.; Fu, L.; Shi, X.; Li, Z.; et al. Structural basis for the neutralization of MERS-CoV by a human monoclonal antibody MERS-27. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Houser, K.V.; Gretebeck, L.; Ying, T.; Wang, Y.; Vogel, L.; Lamirande, E.W.; Bock, K.W.; Moore, I.N.; Dimitrov, D.S.; Subbarao, K. Prophylaxis with a Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)-specific human monoclonal antibody protects rabbits from MERS-CoV infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 213, 1557–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sui, J.; Li, W.; Roberts, A.; Matthews, L.J.; Murakami, A.; Vogel, L.; Wong, S.K.; Subbarao, K.; Farzan, M.; Marasco, W.A. Evaluation of human monoclonal antibody 80R for immunoprophylaxis of severe acute respiratory syndrome by an animal study, epitope mapping, and analysis of spike variants. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 5900–5906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Roberts, A.; Vogel, L.; Guarner, J.; Hayes, N.; Murphy, B.; Zaki, S.; Subbarao, K. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection of golden Syrian hamsters. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shanmugaraj, B.; Rattanapisit, K.; Manopwisedjaroen, S.; Thitithanyanont, A.; Phoolcharoen, W. Monoclonal antibodies B38 and H4 produced in Nicotiana benthamiana neutralize SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 589995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Baum, A.; Ajithdoss, D.; Copin, R.; Zhou, A.; Lanza, K.; Negron, N.; Ni, M.; Wei, Y.; Mohammadi, K.; Musser, B.; et al. REGNCOV2 antibodies prevent and treat SARS-CoV-2 infection in rhesus macaques and hamsters. Science 2020, 370, 1110–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Shi, R.; Shan, C.; Duan, X.; Chen, Z.; Liu, P.; Song, J.; Song, T.; Bi, X.; Han, C.; Wu, L.; et al. A human neutralizing antibody targets the receptor-binding site of SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2020, 584, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zost, S.J.; Gilchuk, P.; Chen, R.E.; Case, J.B.; Reidy, J.X.; Trivette, A.; Nargi, R.S.; Sutton, R.E.; Suryadevara, N.; Chen, E.C.; et al. Rapid isolation and profiling of a diverse panel of human monoclonal antibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1422–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Du, L.; He, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, S.; Zheng, B.-J.; Jiang, S. The spike protein of SARS-CoV–a target for vaccine and therapeutic development. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.; Shi, W.; Chappell, J.D.; Joyce, M.G.; Zhang, Y.; Kanekiyo, M.; Becker, M.M.; van Doremalen, N.; Fischer, R.; Wang, N.; et al. Importance of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies targeting multiple antigenic sites on the middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike glycoprotein to avoid neutralization escape. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e02002-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wu, Y.; Wang, F.; Shen, C.; Peng, W.; Li, D.; Zhao, C.; Li, Z.; Li, S.; Bi, Y.; Yang, Y.; et al. A noncompeting pair of human neutralizing antibodies block COVID-19 virus binding to its receptor ACE2. Science 2020, 368, 1274–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, C.; Li, W.; Drabek, D.; Okba, N.M.A.; van Haperen, R.; Osterhaus, A.D.M.E.; van Kuppeveld, F.J.M.; Haagmans, B.L.; Grosveld, F.; Bosch, B.-J. A human monoclonal antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pinto, D.; Park, Y.-J.; Beltramello, M.; Walls, A.C.; Tortorici, M.A.; Bianchi, S.; Jaconi, S.; Culap, K.; Zatta, F.; Marco, A.D.; et al. Cross-neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by a human monoclonal SARS-CoV antibody. Nature 2020, 583, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sainsbury, F. Innovation in plant-based transient protein expression for infectious disease prevention and preparedness. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020, 61, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Makatsa, M.S.; Tincho, M.B.; Wendoh, J.M.; Ismail, S.D.; Nesamari, R.; Pera, F.; de Beer, S.; David, A.; Jugwanth, S.; Gededzha, M.P.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Antigens Expressed in Plants Detect Antibody Responses in COVID-19 Patients. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rattanapisit, K.; Yusakul, G.; Shanmugaraj, B.; Kittirotruji, K.; Suwatsrisakul, P.; Prompetchara, E.; Taychakhoonavud, S.; Phoolcharoen, W. Plant-produced recombinant SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain; an economical, scalable biomaterial source for COVID-19 diagnosis. Biomater. Transl. 2021, 2, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
- iBio. Therapeutic & Vaccine Candidates. Available online: https://ibioinc.com/pipeline/ (accessed on 12 August 2021).
- Leaf Expression Systems. COVID-19: What We’re Doing. Available online: https://www.leafexpressionsystems.com/covid-19/ (accessed on 31 May 2021).
- Ortega-Berlanga, B.; Pniewski, T. Plant-Based Vaccines in Combat against Coronavirus Diseases. Vaccines 2022, 10, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rybicki, E.P. Plant molecular farming of virus-like nanoparticles as vaccines and reagents. WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2020, 12, e1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Blokhina, E.A.; Kuprianov, V.V.; Stepanova, L.A.; Tsybalova, L.M.; Kiselev, O.I.; Ravin, N.V.; Skryabin, K.G. A molecular assembly system for presentation of antigens on the surface of HBc virus-like particles. Virology 2013, 435, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pumpens, P.; Grens, E. The true story and advantages of the famous Hepatitis B virus core particles. Mol. Biol. 2016, 50, 489–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Qian, B.; Shen, H.; Liang, W.; Guo, X.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.; Wu, A.; Cao, K.; Zhang, D. Immunogenicity of recombinant hepatitis B virus surface antigen fused with preS1 epitopes expressed in rice seeds. Transgenic Res. 2008, 17, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mati´c, S.; Rinaldi, R.; Masenga, V.; Noris, E. Efficient production of chimeric Human papillomavirus 16 L1 protein bearing the M2e influenza epitope in Nicotiana benthamiana plants. BMC Biotechnol. 2011, 11, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mohammadzadeh, S.; Roohvand, F.; Memarnejadian, A.; Jafari, A.; Ajdary, S.; Salmanian, A.H.; Ehsani, P. Co-expression of hepatitis C virus polytope-HBsAg and p19-silencing suppressor protein in tobacco leaves. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Balke, I.; Zeltins, A. Use of plant viruses and virus-like particles for the creation of novel vaccines. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 145, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ibrahim, A.; Odon, V.; Kormelink, R. Plant viruses in plant molecular pharming: Toward the use of enveloped viruses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Naderi, S.; Baratali, F. Overview of Plant-based Vaccines. Res. J. Fish. Hydrobiol. 2015, 10, 275–289. [Google Scholar]
- Vela Ramirez, J.E.; Sharpe, L.A.; Peppas, N.A. Current state and challenges in developing oral vaccines. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017, 114, 116–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hager, K.J.; Pérez Marc, G.; Gobeil, P.; Diaz, R.S.; Heizer, G.; Llapur, C.; Makarkov, A.I.; Vasconcellos, E.; Pillet, S.; Riera, F.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of a Recombinant Plant-Based Adjuvanted Covid-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 2084–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- AboulFotouh, K.; Cui, Z.; Williams, R.O., III. Next-generation COVID-19 vaccines should take efficiency of distribution into consideration. AAPS PharmSciTech 2021, 22, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Morel, S.; Didierlaurent, A.; Bourguignon, P.; Delhaye, S.; Baras, B.; Jacob, V.; Planty, C.; Elouahabi, A.; Harvengt, P.; Carlsen, H.; et al. Adjuvant system AS03 containing α-tocopherol modulates innate immune response and leads to improved adaptive immunity. Vaccine 2011, 29, 2461–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Budroni, S.; Buricchi, F.; Cavallone, A.; Bourguignon, P.; Caubet, M.; Dewar, V.; D’Oro, U.; Finco, O.; Garçon, N.; El Idrissi, M.; et al. Antibody avidity, persistence, and response to antigen recall: Comparison of vaccine adjuvants. NPJ Vaccines 2021, 6, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gobeil, P.; Pillet, S.; Boulay, I.; Séguin, A.; Makarkov, A.; Heizer, G.; Bhutada, K.; Mahmood, A.; Charland, N.; Trépanier, S.; et al. Interim report of a phase 2 randomized trial of a plant-produced virus-like particle vaccine for Covid-19 in healthy adults aged 18–64 and older adults aged 65 and older. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bally, J.; Jung, H.; Mortimer, C.; Naim, F.; Philips, J.G.; Hellens, R.; Bombarely, A.; Goodin, M.M.; Waterhouse, P.M. The Rise and Rise of Nicotiana Benthamiana: A Plant for All Reasons. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018, 56, 405–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shahid, N.; Daniell, H. Plant-Based Oral Vaccines against Zoonotic and Non-Zoonotic Diseases. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 14, 2079–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Twyman, R.M.; Christou, P. Plant Transformation Technology: Particle Bombardment. In Handbook of Plant Biotechnology; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004; ISBN 978-0-470-86914-7. [Google Scholar]
- Zahmanova, G.; Takova, K.; Valkova, R.; Toneva, V.; Minkov, I.; Andonov, A.; Lukov, G.L. Plant-Derived Recombinant Vaccines against Zoonotic Viruses. Life 2022, 12, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Xu, J.; Zhang, N. On the Way to Commercializing Plant Cell Culture Platform for Biopharmaceuticals: Present Status and Prospect. Pharm. Bioprocess. 2014, 2, 499–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mamedov, T.; Yuksel, D.; Ilgın, M.; Gürbüzaslan, I.; Gulec, B.; Mammadova, G.; Ozdarendeli, A.; Yetiskin, H.; Kaplan, B.; Islam Pavel, S.T.; et al. Production and Characterization of Nucleocapsid and RBD Cocktail Antigens of SARS-CoV-2 in Nicotiana Benthamiana Plant as a Vaccine Candidate against COVID-19. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Maharjan, P.M.; Cheon, J.; Jung, J.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.; Song, M.; Jeong, G.U.; Kwon, Y.; Shim, B.; Choe, S. Plant-Expressed Receptor Binding Domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Elicits Humoral Immunity in Mice. Vaccines 2021, 9, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dubé, C.; Paris-Robidas, S.; Andreani, G.; Gutzeit, C.; D’Aoust, M.-A.; Ward, B.J.; Trépanier, S. Broad neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 variants induced by ancestral and B.1.351 AS03-Adjuvanted recombinant Plant-Derived Virus-Like particle vaccines. Vaccine 2022, 40, 4017–4025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kalarikkal, S.P.; Sundaram, G.M. Edible plant-derived exosomal microRNAs: Exploiting a cross-kingdom regulatory mechanism for targeting SARS-CoV-2. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2021, 414, 115425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kanjanasirirat, P.; Suksatu, A.; Manopwisedjaroen, S.; Munyoo, B.; Tuchinda, P.; Jearawuttanakul, K.; Seemakhan, S.; Charoensutthivarakul, S.; Wongtrakoongate, P.; Rangkasenee, N.; et al. High-content screening of Thai medicinal plants reveals Boesenbergia rotunda extract and its component Panduratin A as anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kim, E.-H.; Lee, B.W.; Ryu, B.; Cho, H.M.; Kim, S.-M.; Jang, S.-G.; Casel, M.A.B.; Rollon, R.; Yoo, J.-S.; Poo, H.; et al. Inhibition of a broad range of SARS-CoV-2 variants by antiviral phytochemicals in hACE2 mice. Antivir. Res. 2022, 204, 105371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Coperchini, F.; Chiovato, L.; Croce, L.; Magri, F.; Rotondi, M. The cytokine storm in COVID-19: An overview of the involvement of the chemokine/chemokine-receptor system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020, 53, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Csermely, P.; Agoston, V.; Pongor, S. The efficiency of multi-target drugs: The network approach might help drug design. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2005, 26, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kasuga, Y.; Zhu, B.; Jang, K.-J.; Yoo, J.-S. Innate immune sensing of coronavirus and viral evasion strategies. Exp. Mol. Med. 2021, 53, 723–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pedersen, S.F.; Ho, Y.-C. SARS-CoV-2: A storm is raging. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 2202–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, J.; Wu, H.; Yao, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, Y.; Fu, B.; Wang, W.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Hu, Z. Pyroptotic macrophages stimulate the SARS-CoV-2-associated cytokine storm. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2021, 18, 1305–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Rahman, B.; Sadraddin, E.; Porreca, A. The Basic Reproduction Number of SARS CoV2 in Wuhan is About to die out, How About the Rest of the World? Rev. Med. Virol. 2020, 30, e2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liu, Y.; Gayle, A.A.; Wilder-Smith, A.; Rocklöv, J. The Reproductive Number of COVID-19 Is Higher Compared to SARS Coronavirus. J. Trav. Med. 2020, 27, taaa021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sahoo, J.P.; Samal, K.C. World on alert: WHO designated South African new COVID strain (omicron/B. 1.1. 529) as a variant of concern. Biotica Res. Today 2021, 3, 1086–1088. [Google Scholar]
- Halfmann, P.J.; Hatta, M.; Chiba, S.; Maemura, T.; Fan, S.; Takeda, M.; Kinoshita, N.; Hattori, S.-i.; Sakai-Tagawa, Y.; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, K. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in domestic cats. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 592–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Schlottau, K.; Rissmann, M.; Graaf, A.; Schön, J.; Sehl, J.; Wylezich, C.; Höper, D.; Mettenleiter, T.C.; Balkema-Buschmann, A.; Harder, T.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 in fruit bats, ferrets, pigs, and chickens: An experimental transmission study. Lancet Microb. 2020, 1, e218–e225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tiwari, R.; Dhama, K.; Sharun, K.; Iqbal Yatoo, M.; Malik, Y.S.; Singh, R.; Michalak, I.; Sah, R.; Bonilla-Aldana, D.K.; Rodriguez-Morales, A.J. COVID-19: Animals, veterinary and zoonotic links. Vet. Q. 2020, 40, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rakib, A.; Nain, Z.; Islam, M.A.; Sami, S.A.; Mahmud, S.; Islam, A.; Ahmed, S.; Siddiqui, A.B.F.; Babu, S.M.O.F.; Hossain, P.; et al. A molecular modelling approach for identifying antiviral selenium-containing heterocyclic compounds that inhibit the main protease of SARS-CoV-2: An in silico investigation. Brief. Bioinform. 2021, 22, 1476–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mahmud, S.; Uddin, M.A.R.; Paul, G.K.; Shimu, M.S.S.; Islam, S.; Rahman, E.; Islam, A.; Islam, M.S.; Promi, M.M.; Emran, T.B.; et al. Virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulation study of plant derived compounds to identify potential inhibitor of main protease from SARS-CoV-2. Brief. Bioinform. 2021, 22, 1402–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, D.-h.; Wu, K.-l.; Zhang, X.; Deng, S.-q.; Peng, B. In silico screening of Chinese herbal medicines with the potential to directly inhibit 2019 novel coronavirus. J. Integr. Med. 2020, 18, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Poojary, S. Role of Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Computer Technologies in Combating COVID-19 Virus-a Review. Int. J. Biotech Trends Technol. 2020, 10, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Singh, T.U.; Parida, S.; Lingaraju, M.C.; Kesavan, M.; Kumar, D.; Singh, R.K. Drug Repurposing Approach to Fight COVID-19. Pharmacol. Rep. 2020, 72, 1479–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Drevinskas, T.; Mickienė, R.; Maruška, A.; Stankevičius, M.; Tiso, N.; Šalomskas, A.; Lelešius, R.; Karpovaitė, A.; Ragažinskienė, O. Confirmation of the Antiviral Properties of Medicinal Plants via Chemical Analysis, Machine Learning Methods and Antiviral Tests: A Methodological Approach. Anal. Methods 2018, 10, 1875–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Denaro, M.; Smeriglio, A.; Barreca, D.; De Francesco, C.; Occhiuto, C.; Milano, G.; Trombetta, D. Antiviral Activity of Plants and Their Isolated Bioactive Compounds: An Update. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 742–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Siddiqui, A.J.; Danciu, C.; Ashraf, S.A.; Moin, A.; Singh, R.; Alreshidi, M.; Patel, M.; Jahan, S.; Kumar, S.; Alkhinjar, M.I.; et al. PlantsDerived Biomolecules as Potent Antiviralphytomedicines: New Insights on Ethnobotanical Evidences against Coronaviruses. Plants 2020, 9, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shree, P.; Mishra, P.; Selvaraj, C.; Singh, S.K.; Chaube, R.; Garg, N.; Tripathi, Y.B. Targeting COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) main protease through active phytochemicals of ayurvedic medicinal plants—Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha), Tinospora cordifolia (Giloy) and Ocimum sanctum (Tulsi)—A molecular docking study. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 40, 190–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chikhale, R.V.; Gurav, S.S.; Patil, R.B.; Sinha, S.K.; Prasad, S.K.; Shakya, A.; Shrivastava, S.K.; Gurav, N.S.; Prasad, R.S. Sars-cov-2 host entry and replication inhibitors from Indian ginseng: An in-silico approach. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 39, 4510–4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Singh, R.; Bhardwaj, V.K.; Sharma, J.; Kumar, D.; Purohit, R. Identification of potential plant bioactive as SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein and human ACE2 fusion inhibitors. Comput. Biol. Med. 2021, 136, 104631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kulkarni, S.A.; Krishnan, S.B.B.; Chandrasekhar, B.; Banerjee, K.; Sohn, H.; Madhavan, T. Characterization of Phytochemicals in Ulva intestinalis L. and Their Action Against SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein Receptor Binding Domain. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 735768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Singhal, T.; Chansoria, A.; Kothari, S. Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Docosahexanoic Acid on Carrageenan Induced Paw Oedema in Rats. Int. J. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. 2020, 9, 718–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Stanly, C.; Alfieri, M.; Ambrosone, A.; Leone, A.; Fiume, I.; Pocsfalvi, G. Grapefruit-Derived Micro and Nanovesicles Show Distinct Metabolome Profiles and Anticancer Activities in the A375 Human Melanoma Cell Line. Cells 2020, 9, 2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Michele, C.A.; Angelo, B.; Valeria, L.; Teresa, M.; Pasquale, D.L.; Giuseppe, C.; Giovanni, M.; Michele, D.P.; Ernestina, P.; Mario, B. Vitamin Supplements in the Era of SARS-Cov2 Pandemic. GSC Biol. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 11, 007–019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Morais, A.H.; Passos, T.S.; Maciel, B.L.; da Silva-Maia, J.K. Can Probiotics and Diet Promote Beneficial Immune Modulation and Purine Control in Coronavirus Infection? Nutrients 2020, 12, 1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gröber, U.; Holick, M.F. The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)A Supportive Approach with Selected Micronutrients. Int. J. Vitamin Nutr. Res. 2021, 92, 13–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nallusamy, S.; Mannu, J.; Ravikumar, C.; Angamuthu, K.; Nathan, B.; Nachimuthu, K.; Ramasamy, G.; Muthurajan, R.; Subbarayalu, M.; Neelakandan, K. Exploring Phytochemicals of Traditional Medicinal Plants Exhibiting Inhibitory Activity Against Main Protease, Spike Glycoprotein, RNA-dependent RNA Polymerase and Non-Structural Proteins of SARS-CoV-2 Through Virtual Screening. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 667704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Balkrishna, A.; Pokhrel, S.; Singh, H.; Joshi, M.; Mulay, V.P.; Haldar, S.; Varshney, A. Withanone from Withania somnifera Attenuates SARS-CoV-2 RBD and Host ACE2 Interactions to Rescue Spike Protein Induced Pathologies in Humanized Zebrafish Model. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2021, 15, 1111–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kato, Y.; Higashiyamaa, A.; Takaokaa, E.; Miyu Nishikawac, M.; Ikushiro, S. Food phytochemicals, epigallocatechin gallate and myricetin, covalently bind to the active site of the coronavirus main protease in vitro. Adv. Redox Res. 2021, 3, 100021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Matsui, Y.; Sugiyama, K.; Kamei, M.; Takahashi, T.; Suzuki, T.; Katagata, Y.; Ito, T. Extract of passion fruit (Passiflora edulis) seed containing high amounts of piceatannol inhibits melanogenesis and promotes collagen synthesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 11112–11118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jo, S.; Kim, H.; Kim, S.; Shin, D.H.; Kim, M.S. Characteristics of flavonoids as potent MERS-CoV 3C-like protease inhibitors. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2019, 94, 2023–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jo, S.; Kim, S.; Shin, D.H.; Kim, M.S. Inhibition of SARS-CoV 3CL protease by flavonoids. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2020, 35, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jang, M.; Park, Y.I.; Cha, Y.E.; Park, R.; Namkoong, S.; Lee, J.I.; Park, J. Tea polyphenols EGCG and theaflavin inhibit the activity of SARS-CoV-2 3CLprotease in vitro. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 2020, 5630838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Abian, O.; Ortega-Alarcon, D.; Jimenez-Alesanco, A.; Ceballos-Laita, L.; Vega, S.; Reyburn, H.T.; Rizzuti, B.; Velazquez-Campoy, A. Structural stability of SARS-CoV2 3CLpro and identification of quercetin as an inhibitor by experimental screening. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 1693–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chiou, W.C.; Chen, J.C.; Chen, Y.T.; Yang, J.M.; Hwang, L.H.; Lyu, Y.S.; Yang, H.Y.; Huang, C. The inhibitory effects of PGG and EGCG against the SARS-CoV-2 3C-like protease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 591, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Su, H.; Yao, S.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Shao, Q.; Wang, Q.; Li, M.; Xie, H.; Shang, W.; et al. Identification of pyrogallol as a warhead in design of covalent inhibitors for the SARSCoV-2 3CL protease. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jo, S.; Kim, S.; Kim, D.Y.; Kim, M.S.; Shin, D.H. Flavonoids with inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2020, 35, 1539–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Deetanya, P.; Hengphasatporn, K.; Wilasluck, P.; Shigeta, Y.; Rungrotmongkol, T.; Wangkanont, K. Interaction of 8-anilinonaphthalene-1-sulfonate with SARSCoV-2 main protease and its application as a fluorescent probe for inhibitor identification. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 3364–3371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pitsillou, E.; Liang, J.; Karagiannis, C.; Ververis, K.; Darmawan, K.K.; Ng, K.; Hung, A.; Karagiannis, T.C. Interaction of small molecules with the SARS-CoV-2 main protease in silico and in vitro validation of potential lead compounds using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2020, 89, 107408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mahmud, S.; Paul, G.K.; Afroze, M.; Islam, S.; Gupt, S.B.R.; Razu, M.H.; Biswas, S.; Zaman, S.; Uddin, M.S.; Khan, M.; et al. Efficacy of Phytochemicals Derived from Avicennia officinalis for the Management of COVID-19: A Combined In Silico and Biochemical Study. Molecules 2021, 26, 2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Schwarz, S.; Sauter, D.; Wang, K.; Zhang, R.; Sun, B.; Karioti, A.; Bilia, A.R.; Efferth, T.; Schwarz, W. Kaempferol derivatives as antiviral drugs against the 3a channel protein of coronavirus. Planta Med. 2014, 80, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wahedi, H.M.; Ahmad, S.; Abbasi, S.W. Stilbene-based natural compounds as promising drug candidates against COVID-19. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 39, 3225–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chiow, K.; Phoon, M.; Putti, T.; Tan, B.K.; Chow, V.T. Evaluation of antiviral activities of Houttuynia cordata Thunb. extract, quercetin, quercetrin and cinanserin on murine coronavirus and dengue virus infection. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2016, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Cho, J.K.; Curtis-Long, M.J.; Lee, K.H.; Kim, D.W.; Ryu, H.W.; Yuk, H.J.; Park, K.H. Geranylated flavonoids displaying SARS-CoV papain-like protease inhibition from the fruits of Paulownia tomentosa. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 3051–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Park, J.-Y.; Yuk, H.J.; Ryu, H.W.; Lim, S.H.; Kim, K.S.; Park, K.H.; Ryu, Y.B.; Lee, W.S. Evaluation of polyphenols from Broussonetia papyrifera as coronavirus protease inhibitors. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2017, 32, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lung, J.; Lin, Y.S.; Yang, Y.H.; Chou, Y.L.; Shu, L.H.; Cheng, Y.C.; Liu, H.T.; Wu, C.Y. The potential chemical structure of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Haggag, Y.A.; El-Ashmawy, N.E.; Okasha, K.M. Is hesperidin essential for prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 Infection? Med. Hypotheses 2020, 144, 109957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gyebi, G.A.; Ogunro, O.B.; Adegunloye, A.P.; Ogunyemi, O.M.; Afolabi, S.O. Potential inhibitors of coronavirus 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro): An in silico screening of alkaloids and terpenoids from African medicinal plants. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 39, 3396–3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kim, D.E.; Min, J.S.; Jang, M.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Shin, Y.S.; Park, C.M.; Song, J.H.; Kim, H.R.; Kim, S.; Jin, Y.H.; et al. Natural bis-benzylisoquinoline alkaloids-tetrandrine, fangchinoline, and cepharanthine, inhibit human coronavirus OC43 infection of MRC-5 human lung cells. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bleasel, M.D.; Peterson, G.M. Emetine, ipecac, ipecac alkaloids and analogues as potential antiviral agents for Coronaviruses. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wink, M. Potential of DNA intercalating alkaloids and other plant secondary metabolites against SARS-CoV-2 causing COVID-19. Diversity 2020, 12, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chang, F.-R.; Yen, C.-T.; Ei-Shazly, M.; Lin, W.-H.; Yen, M.-H.; Lin, K.-H.; Wu, Y.C. Anti-human coronavirus (anti-HCoV) triterpenoids from the leaves of Euphorbia neriifolia. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 1415–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nadjib, B.M. Effective antiviral activity of essential oils and their characteristic terpenes against Coronaviruses: An update. J. Pharmacol. Clin. Toxicol. 2020, 8, 1138. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, A.D.; Kaur, I. Eucalyptol (1,8-cineole) from eucalyptus essential oil a potential inhibitor of COVID 19 corona virus infection by molecular docking studies. Preprints 2020, 2020, 2020030455. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, A.D.; Kaur, I. Jensenone from eucalyptus essential oil as a potential inhibitor of COVID 19 corona virus infection. Res. Rev. Biotechnol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, C.-W.; Tsai, F.-J.; Tsai, C.-H.; Lai, C.-C.; Wan, L.; Ho, T.-Y.; Hsieh, C.C.; Chao, P.D.L. AntiSARS coronavirus 3C-like protease effects of Isatis indigotica root and plantderived phenolic compounds. Antivir. Res. 2005, 68, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ryu, Y.B.; Park, S.-J.; Kim, Y.M.; Lee, J.-Y.; Seo, W.D.; Chang, J.S.; Park, K.H.; Rho, M.C.; Lee, W.S. SARS-CoV 3CLpro inhibitory effects of quinone-methide triterpenes from Tripterygium regelii. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 1873–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Majnooni, M.B.; Fakhri, S.; Shokoohinia, Y.; Kiyani, N.; Stage, K.; Mohammadi, P.; Gravandi, M.M.; Farzaei, M.H.; Echeverría, J. Phytochemicals: Potential Therapeutic Interventions Against Coronavirus-Associated Lung Injury. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 588467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, L.; Xia, Z.; Tang, W.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Y.; Kwok, H.F.; Sun, F.; Cao, Z. p38 activation and viral infection. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2022, 24, e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Grimes, J.M.; Grimes, K.V. p38 MAPK inhibition: A promising therapeutic approach for COVID-19. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2020, 144, 63–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhou, F.; Yu, T.; Du, R.; Fan, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, J.; Wang, Y.; Song, B.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pfizer. Pfizer’s Novel COVID-19 Oral Antiviral Treatment Candidate Reduced Risk of Hospitalization or Death by 89% in Interim Analysis of Phase 2/3 EPIC-HR Study. 2021 5/11/2021. Available online: https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizers-novel-covid-19-oral-antiviral-treatment-candidate (accessed on 31 December 2021).
- Kabinger, F.; Stiller, C.; Schmitzová, J.; Dienemann, C.; Kokic, G.; Hillen, H.S.; Höbartner, C.; Cramer, P. Mechanism of molnupiravir-induced SARS-CoV-2 mutagenesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2021, 28, 740–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gumbrecht, J.; Sealy, A.; Howard, J. Covid Pill: FDA Authorizes Two Antivirals to Treat Coronavirus Infection—CNN. 2021 24/12/2021. Available online: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/22/health/pfizer-antiviral-pill-authorized/index.html (accessed on 31 December 2021).
- Vandyck, K.; Deval, J. Considerations for the discovery and development of 3- chymotrypsin-like cysteine protease inhibitors targeting SARS-CoV-2 infection. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2021, 49, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Dias, I.R.D.S.R.; Cao, Z.; Kwok, H.F. Adamalysins in COVID-19—Potential mechanisms behind exacerbating the disease. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 150, 112970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Haga, S.; Nagata, N.; Okamura, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Sata, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Sasazuki, T.; Ishizaka, Y. TACE antagonists blocking ACE2 shedding caused by the spike protein of SARS-CoV are candidate antiviral compounds. Antivir. Res. 2010, 85, 551–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Haga, S.; Yamamoto, N.; Nakai-Murakami, C.; Osawa, Y.; Tokunaga, K.; Sata, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Sasazuki, T.; Ishizaka, Y. Modulation of TNF-alpha-converting enzyme by the spike protein of SARS-CoV and ACE2 induces TNF-alpha production and facilitates viral entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 7809–7814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Theret, N.; Bouezzeddine, F.; Azar, F.; Diab-Assaf, M.; Legagneux, V. ADAM and ADAMTS proteins, new players in the regulation of hepatocellular carcinoma microenvironment. Cancers 2021, 13, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Edwards, D.R.; Handsley, M.M.; Pennington, C.J. The ADAM metalloproteinases. Mol. Asp. Med. 2008, 29, 258–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Arganaraz, G.A.; Palmeira, J.D.F.; Arganaraz, E.R. Phosphatidylserine inside out: A possible underlying mechanism in the inflammation and coagulation abnormalities of COVID-19. Cell Commun. Signal. 2020, 18, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lambrecht, B.N.; Vanderkerken, M.; Hammad, H. The emerging role of ADAM metalloproteinases in immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 745–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- FDA. Complementary and Alternative Medicine Products and Their Regulation by the Food and Drug Administration Draft Guidance for Industry. 2006. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/complementary-andalternative-medicine-products-and-their-regulation-food-and-drugadministration#i (accessed on 14 April 2020).
- Calapai, G. European legislation on herbal medicines: A look into the future. Drug Saf. 2008, 31, 428–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- EMA. In: Human Regulatory; Herbal Medicinal Products. 2001. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/herbal-medicinal-products (accessed on 14 April 2020).
- Calixto, J.B. Efficacy, safety, quality control, marketing and regulatory guidelines for herbal medicines (phytotherapeutic agents). Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. Rev. Bras. De Pesqui. Med. E Biol. 2000, 33, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Montero-Morales, L.; Steinkellner, H. Advanced Plant-Based Glycan Engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

