Next Article in Journal
Targeting Lipophagy in Liver Diseases: Impact on Oxidative Stress and Steatohepatitis
Previous Article in Journal
Properties of Plant Extracts from Adriatic Maritime Zone for Innovative Food and Packaging Applications: Insights into Bioactive Profiles, Protective Effects, Antioxidant Potentials and Antimicrobial Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrated Proteomics and Metabolomics Reveal Spermine Enhances Sperm Freezability via Antioxidant Pathways
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

ROS Regulation and Antioxidant Responses in Plants Under Air Pollution: Molecular Signaling, Metabolic Adaptation, and Biotechnological Solutions

by
Muhammad Junaid Rao
1,*,†,
Mingzheng Duan
2,*,
Muhammad Ikram
3 and
Bingsong Zheng
1,†
1
National Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Forest Food Resources, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
2
College of Agronomy and Life Sciences, Zhaotong University, Zhaotong 657000, China
3
MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antioxidants 2025, 14(8), 907; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14080907
Submission received: 25 June 2025 / Revised: 23 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 July 2025 / Published: 24 July 2025

Abstract

Air pollution acts as a pervasive oxidative stressor, disrupting global crop production and ecosystem health through the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Hazardous pollutants impair critical physiological processes—photosynthesis, respiration, and nutrient uptake—triggering oxidative damage and yield losses. This review synthesizes current knowledge on plant defense mechanisms, emphasizing the integration of enzymatic (SOD, POD, CAT, APX, GPX, GR) and non-enzymatic (polyphenols, glutathione, ascorbate, phytochelatins) antioxidant systems to scavenge ROS and maintain redox homeostasis. We highlight the pivotal roles of transcription factors (MYB, WRKY, NAC) in orchestrating stress-responsive gene networks, alongside MAPK and phytohormone signaling (salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, ethylene), in mitigating oxidative stress. Secondary metabolites (flavonoids, lignin, terpenoids) are examined as biochemical shields against ROS and pollutant toxicity, with evidence from transcriptomic and metabolomic studies revealing their biosynthetic regulation. Furthermore, we explore biotechnological strategies to enhance antioxidant capacity, including overexpression of ROS-scavenging genes (e.g., TaCAT3) and engineering of phenolic pathways. By addressing gaps in understanding combined stress responses, this review provides a roadmap for developing resilient crops through antioxidant-focused interventions, ensuring sustainability in polluted environments.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, the global trends of industrialization and rapid urbanization have triggered environmental pollution, leaving harmful effects on living organisms [1]. Anthropogenic activities escalate the production of air pollutants and soil contamination, and their devastating impacts on plant life and the ecosystem have garnered significant attention from the scientific community [2]. Any physical, chemical, or biological factor that affects the natural characteristics of indoor or outdoor environments is defined as air pollution. Some common air pollutant examples are ozone, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and particulate matter that directly disrupt physiological processes (photosynthesis and respiration) in plants, leading to reduced growth and yield [3]. Similarly, industrial activities accumulate heavy metals in soil, such as cadmium, lead, arsenic, chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), and mercury, posing severe threats to plant development by inducing oxidative stress, reducing root development, disrupting nutrient uptake, stunted growth, and impairing cellular functions [4]. Heavy metal in soil is taken up by roots and accumulated in the vegetative tissues and seeds, and can enter directly into the animal and human body upon consumption, causing significant hazards for living organisms, thus disrupting the entire ecosystem [5]. Under natural environments, air pollution and heavy metal stress coexist near industrial and urban areas, creating a tough situation for plants, where they have to counter combined adverse conditions simultaneously [6]. Understanding how plants regulate transcription factor genes to combat individual or combined stress conditions is crucial to developing strategies to enhance plant hardiness against hazardous materials [7].
Transcription factor (TF) genes play crucial roles in plant responses to hazardous pollutants [7,8]. These TFs control the expression of downstream stress-responsive genes and modulate complex signaling networks at the cellular level that enable plants to adapt and survive under challenging conditions [9]. Several TF families, such as NAC, CCAAT-DR1, HB, ARID, AREB/ABF, CCAAT-HAP5, C2C2-Dof, C2C2-CO-like, E2F-DP, ABI3VP1, C2C2-Gata, WRKY, DREB1/CBF, C2C2-YABBY, ARF, AtSR, bHLH, MYB, CPP, E2F-DP, MYC, HSF, bZIP, EMF1, MADS, TUB, C2H2, C3H, CCAAT-HAP2, AP2/ERF, and CCAAT-HAP3SBP, etc., have been well-known in plant responses to stresses [7,8,9,10]. These TFs activate or repress the expression of target genes that help plants to adapt to environmental challenges. Among these TFs, the MYB, WRKY, NAC, bHLH, and bZIP have emerged as key players in regulating stress responses against hazardous air pollutants. These TFs regulate a wide range of biological processes, including antioxidant defense, metal ion homeostasis, polyphenols, regulation of stress-responsive genes, and signaling pathways under environmental stress [7,9,10]. MYB TFs are known to modulate the downstream genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis, which play a protective role against oxidative stress induced by air pollutants [11]. WRKY transcription factors regulate the expression of genes involved in reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, heavy metal chelation, and stress signaling pathways [8]. Similarly, NAC transcription factors modulate the expression of genes related to metal chelation, metal sequestration, metal transport, antioxidant defense, and are involved in cellular detoxification [7,11,12,13].
The bHLH and bZIP families of TFs also play significant roles in abiotic stress [14]. bHLH TFs, such as FIT and PYE, are essential for iron homeostasis and the regulation of metal uptake and distribution [14,15]. bZIP TFs, such as AREB/ABF and HY5, activate the antioxidant defense mechanisms under oxidative stress conditions. These TFs often function in interconnected networks, allowing for a coordinated response to individual or combined stresses. The bZIP and WRKY TFs enhance the expression of genes involved in detoxification pathways, providing a robust defense against both air pollutants and heavy metals [8,16]. Identification and understanding of the complex interplay between different TF families and their target genes is crucial for developing stress-tolerant crop varieties. The identification and characterization of novel TFs involved in stress responses have opened new avenues for genetic engineering approaches aimed at enhancing plant tolerance to environmental pollutants [10].
In this review, we synthesize current knowledge on the molecular and metabolic strategies plants employ to counteract hazardous air pollutant stress. We highlight the pivotal roles of transcription factors (e.g., MYB, WRKY, NAC) in orchestrating stress-responsive gene networks, alongside the interplay of MAPK and phytohormone signaling cascades (e.g., SA, JA, ethylene) in mitigating oxidative damage. Furthermore, we explore how secondary metabolites—flavonoids, lignin, and terpenoids—act as frontline antioxidants to neutralize ROS and detoxify pollutants. By integrating recent advances in transcriptomics and metabolomics, this review underscores the potential of genetic engineering to develop resilient crops, while identifying critical gaps in understanding plant adaptation to combined stressors. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive resource for advancing research and applications in sustainable agriculture under escalating environmental pollution.

2. Anthropogenic and Natural Sources of Air Pollutants: Impacts on Plant Systems

The sources of air pollutants include a mixture of hazardous compounds from natural and anthropic activity (Figure 1). Industrial production, fossil fuel combustion, traffic and mobility, pesticide usage, heating systems, and burning of agricultural wastes are the key sources of air pollution, which release hazardous substances into the atmosphere [17,18]. These hazardous substances include primary pollutants (direct discharge into the environment) and secondary pollutants (formed by reaction between primary pollutants and other molecules in the atmosphere) (Figure 1) [19]. The sources of hazardous substances and different kinds of pollutants are represented in Figure 1. These all-hazardous air pollutants have significant effects on plants’ physiological processes, juvenile phase, and reproductivity, restricting growth and development and reducing yields [4,5,7,10,19].

Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and Its Impact on Plants

Particulate matter (PM), especially PM10 (≤10 µm) and PM2.5 (≤2.5 µm), is a major air pollutant that adversely affects plant physiology and molecular processes. PM deposits on leaf surfaces, clogging stomata and reducing photosynthetic efficiency, while finer particles (PM2.5) can penetrate tissues, inducing oxidative stress via reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction [20,21]. PM exposure upregulates stress-responsive genes, including those encoding for ROS-scavenging enzymes (e.g., SOD, CAT, APX) and transcription factors (e.g., WRKY, MYB, NAC) [3,4]. For instance, Arabidopsis exposed to PM2.5 shows elevated expression of RBOHD (Respiratory Burst Oxidase Homolog D), amplifying ROS signaling [20]. PM increases the activity of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, POD) and phenylpropanoid pathway enzymes (PAL, CHS), which are critical for detoxification [6,7]. Plants accumulate secondary metabolites (e.g., flavonoids, lignin, phenolic acids) to counteract PM-induced oxidative damage. For example, PM2.5 exposure in Triticum aestivum elevates rosmarinic acid and quercetin levels, which act as ROS scavengers [22]. PM often co-occurs with heavy metals (e.g., Pb, Cd adsorbed on particles), exacerbating toxicity. Plants employ chelators (e.g., glutathione, phytochelatins) and upregulate metal transporters to mitigate damage [21].

3. Signal Transduction Pathways Activated by Air Pollutants in Plants

Plants activate their signaling transduction mechanisms when exposed to different air pollutants. The air pollutant enters the plant leaf tissues via stomata [7,10]. These air pollutants, such as O3, NO2, etc., react with proteins and lead to protein modification, lipid peroxidation, and DNA damage (Figure 2). These alterations induce ROS overproduction, especially of superoxide (O2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Under normal conditions, plants produce ROS during metabolic process; however, their excessive production causes dual functions: (1) oxidative damage to cellular components and (2) acting as a signaling molecule, which initiates a cascade of defense response that includes mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, calcium signaling, and hormonal networks such as abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene [4,9,10]. The Respiratory Burst Oxidase Homologs (RBOHs) are subsequently activated through these calcium signals and MAPK-mediated phosphorylation, amplifying ROS production to regulate stress responses (Figure 2). These signaling pathways activate the regulatory transcription factors that modulate the expression of downstream stress-responsive genes, enabling plants to adapt to stress conditions [9].

3.1. MAPK Cascades in Plant Responses to Oxidative Stress

The MAPK cascade plays a pivotal role in plant responses to diverse abiotic stresses [23]. This signaling mechanism comprises three hierarchical protein kinases that operate through sequential phosphorylation events: MAPK kinase kinase (MEKK) activates MAPK kinase (MKK), which subsequently phosphorylates MAPK (MPK). Specific stress responses are mediated by distinct MAPK signaling modules, organized as MKK-MPK or MEKK-MKK-MPK units [24]. Upon ozone exposure, Arabidopsis MPK3 and MPK6 undergo rapid and transient activation (within 0.5–2 h). Following activation, these MPKs translocate to the nucleus and regulate expression of specific genes, including tobacco orthologs SIPK and WIPK, which exhibit ozone-induced expression patterns [25]. Interestingly, MPK3 and MPK6 display reciprocal regulation mechanisms—inhibition of MPK3 enhances MPK6 activation, while MPK6 suppression results in sustained and intensified MPK3 activity [26,27]. During pathogen stress responses, MKK4/MKK5 activation occurs via MEKK1 [28], and MKK5 also participates in MPK3/MPK6 activation following ozone pollutant exposure [29]. Appropriate ozone response requires precise calibration of MPK3/MPK6 activity levels, as prolonged activation or aberrant signal intensity increases ozone vulnerability, as shown by the ozone-sensitive radical-induced cell death1 (rcd1) mutant, which exhibits extended MPK3/MPK6 activation than wild-type plants [30]. Research indicates that MPK3/MPK6 substrates participate in transcriptional regulation, nitric oxide (NO) signaling networks, signaling pathways, and ethylene biosynthesis [31]. Additionally, the MKK4/MKK5–MPK3/MPK6 module crucially regulates stomatal dynamics, indirectly influencing ozone penetration into leaf tissues [27]. A significant knowledge gap remains regarding the specific mechanisms that enable a limited number of kinases to orchestrate such diverse stress responses.

3.2. Phytohormonal Crosstalk in Air Pollution Stress Adaptation

Phytohormones serve as crucial regulators for alleviating the adverse effects of environmental stresses in plants. Salicylic acid (SA), a versatile phenolic compound, plays integral roles in plant developmental processes and stress responses, including ozone exposure [32]. SA operates within interconnected signaling networks alongside other phytohormones such as jasmonic acid and ethylene when responding to air pollutant stress [10]. Research has demonstrated SA’s ability to induce stomatal closure, a key protective mechanism. JA similarly modulates stomatal aperture but typically promotes closure under oxidative stress, synergizing with SA to limit pollutant entry [33]. While SA signaling in guard cells, together with its crosstalk with other pathways, significantly contributes to stomatal immunity, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain incompletely characterized in response to air pollution [3,10].
SA biosynthesis in plants occurs via two primary pathways: the phenylpropanoid pathway and the isochorismate synthase pathway in plant species [34]. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) represents a critical enzyme in one SA biosynthetic route [34,35]. Studies have revealed that ethylene can modulate ozone-induced SA accumulation by altering the expression patterns of PAL and chorismate mutase in tobacco plants [36]. Under ozone stress, Arabidopsis ecotype Wassilewskija exhibits reduced expression of AtSR/NFκB transcription factor family members, C2-domain proteins, and genes involved in cell wall formation and critical point drying processes [37]. The RCD1 protein (radical-induced cell death 1) has been identified as a potential regulatory candidate in this response [37,38]. Investigations using 14C-labeled benzoic acid as a precursor revealed distinct pathway preferences between species: while tobacco primarily utilizes the phenylalanine pathway with minimal isochorismate synthase induction upon ozone exposure, Arabidopsis shows enhanced ICS activity [36]. This pathway distinction is further supported by observations in the salicylic acid induction-deficient 2 (sid2) Arabidopsis mutant, which lacks ICS1 activity and consequently exhibits reduced SA levels following ozone treatment [36,37,38]. These findings collectively show species-specific SA biosynthetic routes: predominantly via benzoic acid from phenylalanine in tobacco, while Arabidopsis primarily utilizes the isochorismate pathway.
Previous research has exhibited that SA accumulation exhibits a dose-dependent relationship with ozone-induced leaf lesion formation [39]. Tobacco cultivar ‘Xanthi’ expressing the NahG gene showed reduced SA accumulation and subsequently decreased lesion development during ozone exposure. Notably, both SA-deficient and hyperaccumulating genotypes show increased ozone sensitivity, suggesting an optimal SA threshold for defense [36,40]. In Arabidopsis, the ozone-tolerant Col-0 ecotype transformed with NahG exhibited enhanced sensitivity to ozone compared to wild-type plants, while the ozone-sensitive Cvi-0 ecotype accumulated excess SA (3× higher than Col-0) [36,40]. This implies that balanced SA levels—not merely their presence—mediate ozone tolerance, potentially by modulating PR1 expression and redox homeostasis. Ozone exposure significantly upregulated PR1 (AT2G14610) expression in Cvi-0 plants, with expression levels surpassing those observed in Col-0 even under control conditions [37,38].
In the ethylene biosynthesis pathway, two enzymes play pivotal roles: ACC synthase (ACS) and ACC oxidase (ACO) [41]. The process begins with the conversion of S-adenosyl-L-methionine to 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) by ACS, followed by oxidative cleavage catalyzed by ACO to generate ethylene [42]. These enzymatic activities are encoded by conserved gene families across diverse organisms, all performing identical biochemical functions in the ethylene production cascade [41]. Among the nine characterized ACS genes in Arabidopsis, only one appears to function as the primary regulator triggering ethylene levels during ozone exposure. Notably, a consistent relationship exists between ozone-induced ethylene production rates and the severity of leaf damage across multiple plant species [37]. For instance, the ozone-tolerant ‘Bel-B’ tobacco cultivar generated significantly less ethylene compared to its ozone-sensitive counterpart ‘Bel-W3′ when subjected to ozone stress. Furthermore, the application of ethylene biosynthesis inhibitors during ozone exposure effectively mitigated leaf injury [43]. These observations suggest that increased ozone-induced foliar damage associated with ethylene might result from the generation of harmful free radicals and toxic aldehydes through direct chemical interactions between ozone and ethylene molecules [43,44]. Notably, certain plant-associated microbes expressing ACC deaminase can mitigate this damage by cleaving the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), thereby reducing stress ethylene levels and enhancing pollutant tolerance [45,46,47]. Mechanistically, ethylene functions as a signaling molecule through receptor binding, and the evidence presented indicates that ethylene signaling pathways become activated in response to ozone, ultimately contributing to leaf damage manifestation.
JA plays a critical role in mitigating ROS-mediated lesion formation in ozone-exposed leaf tissue. Research utilizing ozone-sensitive JA-deficient Arabidopsis mutants has revealed significant insights into this protective mechanism [48]. Several JA-related mutants demonstrate heightened ozone sensitivity, including the JA-insensitive 1 (oji1), coronatine insensitive1 (coi1), methyl jasmonate-resistant 1 (jar1), and 12-oxophytodienoate reductase 3 (opr3) mutants. Experimental evidence indicates that methyl jasmonate (MeJA) pretreatment significantly enhances ozone tolerance in both Arabidopsis and tobacco species, strongly suggesting JA’s functional involvement in ozone stress response pathways [48]. Mechanistically, MeJA enhances expression of genes encoding ethylene response sensors (ERS2), which effectively inhibit foliar damage [49]. JA appears to counteract ozone-induced ethylene-dependent lesion development [37,49]. Furthermore, JA likely facilitates antioxidant production, providing an additional protective mechanism against ozone damage. MeJA treatment has been demonstrated to enhance expression of genes associated with the ascorbic acid pathway and glutathione synthesis enzymes [50,51,52]. These findings collectively suggest that JA-mediated antioxidant accumulation represents a significant mechanism underlying increased ozone tolerance in plants.

3.3. Integrated Phytohormone Networks Under Stress Conditions

Classical phytohormones (ethylene, abscisic acid, auxins, and cytokinins) and signaling molecules (salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, proline, and brassinosteroids) exhibit different responses to chronic and acute air pollutant exposure [33]. The air pollutants trigger ROS accumulation within cellular compartments, ultimately leading to programmed cell death (PCD), which operates under a regulatory mechanism involving feedback inhibition [27]. Recent investigations have increasingly focused on elucidating phytohormone interactions under ozone stress conditions in plant systems [53]. Evidence suggests that ozone exposure initiates ROS generation, subsequently triggering the production of ethylene, salicylic acid, and jasmonic acid concurrent with PCD activation. Within this cascade, ethylene accumulation appears to be essential for sustaining continuous ROS production [27,53].
During oxidative cell death processes, phytohormones exhibit complex antagonistic interactions. JA, SA, and ethylene (ET) demonstrate regulatory crosstalk, while ABA plays a crucial role in stomatal regulation to restrict pollutant entry and appears to counteract ET-mediated acceleration of cell death [54]. ABA is essential for regulating developmental processes and gene expressions related to stomatal function [55]. Studies have established that ABA mediates drought stress responses by promoting stomatal closure [55,56]. Interestingly, ozone-induced ET accumulation appears to interfere with ABA-mediated stomatal signaling in ozone-sensitive species, potentially promoting stomatal opening [27,53]. This ET accumulation can effectively disrupt ABA-mediated stomatal regulation pathways [57]. Research has further shown that ROS signaling activates auxin responses through complex mechanisms [58]. Studies utilizing ozone as a model ROS inducer revealed that apoplastic ROS altered auxin homeostasis and signaling pathways, thereby modulating gene expression patterns in Arabidopsis [38]. Limited research exists regarding cytokinins’ (CKs) protective role against oxidative damage following ozone exposure [56]. However, in plants, kinetin has been shown to delay leaf senescence, maintain free sterol levels, and inhibit foliar necrosis during stress [45,46,47].

4. Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Antioxidant Systems Under Combined Pollution and Heavy Metal Stress

A critical outcome of the signaling transduction cascade is the activation of the plant’s antioxidant defense system, which includes both enzymatic components (e.g., superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidases) and non-enzymatic components (e.g., ascorbate, glutathione, and tocopherols) [59]. These antioxidants work synergistically to scavenge excess ROS, preventing oxidative damage to cellular components such as proteins, lipids, and DNA [11,59]. Concurrently, detoxification mechanisms are engaged to neutralize pollutants and their byproducts through three sequential phases: Phase I (Functionalization): Cytochrome P450 enzymes (e.g., CYP450s) oxidize pollutants to increase reactivity. Phase II (Conjugation): Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) or glycosyltransferases link activated pollutants to glutathione/sugars for solubilization. Phase III (Compartmentalization): ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters sequester conjugated metabolites into vacuoles or apoplast [60,61]. The efficiency of these defense systems varies considerably among species and cultivars, contributing to differential pollution sensitivity [62]. Despite significant advances in understanding plant responses to air pollution, substantial knowledge gaps remain regarding the precise molecular mechanisms through which ROS and RBOHs orchestrate signal transduction under pollutant stress [10,62]. The complexity of these interactions is further compounded by the influence of other environmental factors, such as temperature, light intensity, and water availability [11], which can substantially modify plant responses to air pollution [62].
Plant exposure to atmospheric heavy metals (HMs) also induces ROS overproduction, leading to oxidative damage, lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, and disruptions in calcium homeostasis [62]. In response to HM stress, plants enhance the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX). SOD, a key antioxidant enzyme, is present in most subcellular compartments and catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide radicals (O2•−) into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [63]. SOD, located in various subcellular compartments, represents a primary defense mechanism against oxidative damage; it catalyzes the conversion of superoxide radicals (O2) to oxygen and hydrogen peroxide [64]. In chloroplasts, the ascorbate-glutathione cycle plays a crucial role in detoxifying H2O2, with enzymes like dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), and glutathione reductase (GR) participating in this process [65]. CAT, localized in peroxisomes, dismutates H2O2 into water and oxygen, while APX modulates H2O2 for signaling purposes. Studies have shown that antioxidant enzyme activities increase under HM stress, with elevated SOD, CAT, and GPX activities observed in response to lead (Pb) and arsenic (As) exposure [66]. Non-enzymatic antioxidants, such as proline, ascorbate, and glutathione, also accumulate under stress conditions, further enhancing plant resilience [11,59,67]. Overexpression of antioxidant genes, such as TaCAT3 in wheat, has been shown to confer tolerance to As stress, highlighting the potential for biotechnological interventions to improve plant stress tolerance [68]. These findings collectively emphasize the critical role of antioxidant defenses in mitigating the adverse effects of air pollutants and HMs on plants.
Several studies have highlighted the potential role of antioxidants in mitigating HM stress in plants [59,63]. Research has shown that the activities of key antioxidant enzymes—such as SOD, GPX, CAT, and APX—increase significantly with rising lead (Pb) concentrations, particularly within the range of 50 to 100 μM [69]. Comparative analyses of Pb-stress tolerance across flax genotypes revealed that the ‘Milas’ variety exhibited superior SOD and peroxidase (POD) activity compared to other genotypes [70]. Similarly, exposure to As has been shown to enhance SOD and CAT activity in plants [71]. In cadmium (Cd)-stressed Brassica juncea cultivars, elevated levels of non-enzymatic antioxidants—including proline, ascorbate, and glutathione—were observed, along with increased activity of enzymatic antioxidants such as SOD, CAT, glutathione S-transferase (GST), GR, APX, and POX [72]. Furthermore, transgenic approaches have underscored the importance of catalase in HM stress tolerance. Overexpression of Triticum aestivum CAT (TaCAT3) conferred enhanced As stress tolerance, while transgenic lines expressing TaCAT3-B gene exhibited improved resistance to both arsenite (AsIII) and arsenate (AsV) toxicity [68]. These studies have shown the critical function of antioxidants in mitigating HM stress in plants.

5. Transcriptomic Reprogramming Under Air Pollution Stress

Transcriptomic analyses of Arabidopsis under ozone (O3) stress have unveiled ecotype-specific responses, underscoring the complexity of transcriptional regulation in plant defense mechanisms. For instance, the Cvi-0 ecotype exhibited upregulation of three ethylene-responsive genes (AT1G49830, AT1G55150, and AT2G22300) with undetermined functions, while both Cvi-0 and Col-0 ecotypes showed downregulation of At5g44440 and At2g26020 genes during O3 exposure [37]. Similar transcriptional patterns were observed in other crop species, such as potato and tomato, where O3 exposure induced the expression of ethylene biosynthesis genes (e.g., ST-ACS4, ST-ACS5, LE-ACS1A, LE-ACS2, and LE-ACS6) [73]. JA appears to counteract O3-induced ethylene-dependent lesion development, with JA-induced genes like AT2G24850 and AT5G24770 playing a protective role. Additionally, MeJA enhances the expression of genes involved in key antioxidant systems, including components of the ascorbic acid pathway (VTC1, VTC2, DHAR, and MDHAR) and glutathione synthesis enzymes (GSH1 and GSH2) [50,51,52]. These findings highlight the intricate interplay between hormonal signaling and transcriptional regulation in mitigating oxidative stress caused by air pollutants.
Urban areas face growing air quality concerns due to elevated nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions from human activities [10]. Despite this, research exploring NO2’s impact on plant development remains limited, with most studies focusing on injury symptoms, physiological responses, and photosynthetic efficiency. A comprehensive investigation of air pollution effects on plant gene expression examined approximately 372 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions exposed to NO2 (up to 30 ppm for 1 h) or O3 (up to 400 ppm for 2–6 h). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) revealed varying tolerance levels among accessions [74]. Transcriptomic and microarray analyses demonstrated that both pollutants elicited similar molecular responses, particularly involving hormone signaling pathways. Expression of JA and ethylene signaling marker genes, such as those cooperatively regulated by ethylene and jasmonate 1 (CEJ1), and SA signaling genes, including glutaredoxin 480 (GRX480) and flavin-dependent monooxygenase 1 (FMO1), showed significant upregulation in NO2- and O3-exposed plants compared to controls [74]. These findings emphasize the critical role of transcriptional regulation in mediating plant responses to air pollutants.
Further transcriptomic analysis of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. (common ragweed) pollen subjected to extended fumigation (61 days) with varying concentrations of NO2 (40 ppb control, 80 ppb treatment) and O3 (40 ppb control, 80 ppb, and 120 ppb treatments) revealed enrichment of gene ontology (GO) terms associated with abiotic and biotic stress responses, JA biosynthesis, and phosphate homeostasis [75]. Additionally, GO terms related to ethylene perception, ABA, and auxin signaling pathways were predominantly enriched in upregulated transcripts from treated pollen [75]. These results underscore the critical role of phytohormones in pollution response mechanisms, with JA signaling emerging as particularly important in mediating plant responses to both NO2 and O3 exposure. Differential responses to NO2 and O3 exposure were observed in genes regulating ROS production and metabolism. O3 treatment upregulated respiratory burst oxidase homolog F (RBOH), which encodes an NADPH oxidase essential for ROS synthesis, while NO2 exposure resulted in its downregulation [74]. Nevertheless, substantial evidence confirms NO2-induced oxidative stress. In a recent investigation, Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd. seedlings subjected to acute high-concentration NO2 fumigation (8 µL·L−1 for 8 h) developed characteristic yellow-brown leaf spotting indicative of oxidative damage [76]. Biochemical analysis revealed significantly elevated activities of POD, SOD, and CAT in NO2-treated seedlings compared to controls, demonstrating activation of antioxidative defense mechanisms [76]. Furthermore, comprehensive metabolomic profiling identified substantial alterations in pathways related to flavonoid and stilbene biosynthesis, amino acid metabolism, and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates between treated and control plants, providing additional evidence for NO2-induced oxidative stress in B. spectabilis [76].
Plants activate a complex network of molecular pathways and genes in response to different air pollutant stresses (Figure 3). Key genes associated with phytohormone signaling (e.g., SA, ET, JA, ABA), antioxidant defense mechanisms (e.g., SOD, CAT, APX, GSH), and transcription factors (e.g., WRKY, MYB, NAC) are upregulated to mitigate oxidative stress induced by air pollutants. This molecular reprogramming highlights the intricate interplay between hormonal signaling, antioxidant systems, and transcriptional regulation in plant stress responses (Figure 3). Additionally, plants exhibit enhanced production of secondary metabolites and activation of detoxification mechanisms to counteract the harmful effects of air pollutants. These findings collectively highlight the critical role of transcriptional regulation in plant responses to air pollutants, offering insights into potential strategies for enhancing stress tolerance.

6. Metabolic Adaptations and Secondary Metabolite Production in Polluted Environments

Secondary metabolites in plants are predominantly regulated by genetic factors in response to environmental stimuli, exhibiting high species specificity [11]. These bioactive compounds are synthesized via specialized metabolic pathways as defensive mechanisms when plants encounter stressful conditions [59]. The major secondary metabolites originate from three principal biosynthetic routes: phenylpropanoid, isoprenoid, and alkaloid pathways [79]. Beyond their well-recognized antimicrobial properties, these phytochemicals demonstrate remarkable antioxidant capacity, effectively neutralizing ROS generated by oxidative stress [11,59]. The significant ecological and economic importance of these compounds has driven extensive research into their biosynthetic pathways, including associated enzymes and regulatory genes [80,81,82]. Current evidence suggests that metabolite biosynthesis typically exhibits compartmentalization at both inter- and intracellular levels, necessitating sophisticated trafficking mechanisms for intermediate and end products within and between cells [83]. Additionally, numerous secondary metabolites are stored in inactive forms or specific compartments, requiring activation or release from these compartments to exert their biological functions [84,85].

Phenylpropanoid Metabolism and Its Role in Pollutant Detoxification

Plants exhibit complex metabolic adaptations in response to various air pollutants (Figure 4). These air pollutants trigger distinct metabolic pathways, leading to the production of specific compounds that help plants mitigate stress and maintain cellular homeostasis (Figure 4). These bioactive compounds may act as protective agents, helping plants detoxify harmful pollutants, neutralize the ROS produced during oxidative stress induced by air pollutants, and ultimately reduce oxidative damage [11,59].
Phenolic compounds in plants predominantly originate from phenylpropanoid metabolism, a pathway evolutionarily significant for enabling the plant transition from aquatic to terrestrial environments. The fundamental C6-C3 skeletal structure characterizes all phenylalanine-derived compounds (Figure 4). Contemporary research has consistently demonstrated that plants under ozone stress exhibit upregulation of secondary metabolites, particularly within the shikimate and flavonol biosynthetic pathways [86]. The biosynthesis of flavonoids, stilbenes, hydroxycinnamates, and phenolic acids involves a sophisticated network of interconnected metabolic pathways, primarily centered around shikimate, phenylpropanoid, and flavonoid biosynthesis [84,86]. Each distinct branch of shikimic acid metabolism contributes specialized phenolic compounds to the overall metabolite profile. The enzymes PAL and tyrosine ammonia-lyase (TAL) catalyze critical conversion reactions: phenylalanine to cinnamic acid and tyrosine to p-coumaric acid, respectively [35]. PAL activity is frequently utilized as a molecular biomarker indicating activation of plant defense mechanisms, encompassing the production of both protective and structural compounds.
The interrelationship between O3 stress and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis has been extensively characterized through contemporary and historical phytochemical investigations [87,88]. However, the specific cellular localization of these biosynthetic processes remains insufficiently documented. The vacuolar sequestration of phenylpropanoids is extensively documented; these compounds predominantly enter vacuoles as glycosides or alternative conjugated forms. The translocation mechanism appears potentially contingent upon terminal conjugation reactions. Several enzymes participating in the general phenylpropanoid pathway, particularly PAL and CHS, exhibit cytoplasmic distribution [11]. Furthermore, substantial evidence indicates that cytochrome P-450 enzymes (including cinnamate-4-hydroxylase, isoflavone synthase, and isoflavone-2′-hydroxylase) function as transmembrane proteins associated with the endoplasmic reticulum or affiliated cellular components [81,89].
Upon entry into plant tissues, ozone first encounters resistance in the apoplastic region, comprising the cell wall and extracellular fluid [90]. While ascorbic acid within the apoplastic fluid provides initial protection against ozone-generated ROS, numerous studies have documented elevated levels of phenolic compounds in response to ozone exposure [84], suggesting their potential involvement in ROS neutralization (Figure 4). Although Gupta and De (2017) have proposed theoretical mechanisms for cell wall-bound phenolics as ROS scavengers, their specific role in ozone detoxification remains uncertain [91]. Research has demonstrated concentration-dependent ozone-stimulated lignin synthesis in foliar and stem cell walls, indicating a possible function in ROS neutralization [60,61]. The biosynthesis of lignin is connected to primary metabolism through the phenylpropanoid pathway. In dicotyledonous plants, phenylalanine serves as the fundamental precursor for all monolignols present in lignin and is derived from the shikimate pathway. Although phenylalanine synthesis primarily occurs within plastids, its subsequent transport to the cytosol via specialized cationic-amino acid transporters highlights the compartmentalized nature of phenylpropanoid metabolism [92].
The specific metabolic pathways and compounds involved in plant responses to air pollution showed that glycolysis and phosphoenolpyruvate pathways are activated to produce a diverse group of bioactive compounds and highlighting their importance in energy production and stress adaptation. Additionally, amino acid derivatives, including arginine and specialized metabolites like N-acetyl-glutamate and L-glutamate S-nondeldehyde, serve as key players in nitrogen metabolism and detoxification processes [62]. These compounds increased in plants in response to NO2 stress, except arginine, which was reduced (Figure 4). Phenolic acids such as salicylic acid and rosmarinic acid increased, while syringic acid and vanillic acid decreased under ozone stress in plants, suggesting their role in antioxidant defense and signaling during stress [60,93]. Furthermore, some alkaloids, terpenoids, polyamines (e.g., putrescine, spermidine) [94], and other secondary metabolites were also increased in response to air pollutants, which accumulated in plants as an adaptive strategy to mitigate the oxidative stress caused by pollutants [84]. Polyamines in particular stabilize membranes and scavenge ROS through their cationic nature, while also modulating antioxidant enzyme activity under stress [95]. These metabolic responses also contribute to their ability to maintain growth and productivity under challenging environmental conditions (Figure 4). Overall, Figure 4 provides a comprehensive overview of the metabolic flexibility of plants in adapting to air pollution, highlighting the interplay between primary and secondary metabolism in stress tolerance.
Flavonoids exhibit diverse cellular distribution, including vacuoles of mesophyll cells, chloroplasts, glandular trichomes, and the vacuoles and cell walls of epidermal tissues [96,97]. Notably, chloroplasts function not only as sites for flavonoid biosynthesis but also as significant accumulation reservoirs [96]. This strategic positioning, proximal to or within ROS generation sites, enables flavonoids to effectively attenuate photooxidative damage [59]. While flavonoid synthesis occurs primarily in the cytosol, these compounds are subsequently sequestered in vacuoles and demonstrate capacity for systemic transport throughout the plant [96,98]. This subcellular localization pattern strongly supports their proposed function as ROS scavengers. Research indicates that vacuolar flavonols in both mesophyll and epidermal cells serve as electron donors to phenol peroxidases (POX), thereby facilitating hydrogen peroxide detoxification within the organelle. Additionally, chloroplast-localized flavanols demonstrate efficacy in quenching singlet oxygen species [11,59,96,99].
Mitochondria exhibit greater susceptibility to ozone damage compared to chloroplasts, despite possessing a comprehensive array of antioxidant defense mechanisms [100]. Interestingly, the synthesis and accumulation of phenolic compounds within mitochondria remain largely unexplored, although these metabolites are recognized for their inhibitory effects on respiratory processes. In addition to aerial plant tissues, subterranean structures also synthesize and release modest quantities of flavonoids. For example, flavonoid aglycons (non-glycosylated flavonoids) exuded from leguminous root systems potentially function as signaling molecules essential for establishing symbiotic relationships with rhizobial communities in soil [62,84,90]. This suggests the possible enhancement of flavonoid exudation into the rhizosphere under ozone stress conditions.

7. Secondary Metabolites as Antioxidants and Chelators to Mitigate Oxidative Stress

In plant defense mechanisms against oxidative stress, flavonoids (including anthocyanins) serve as critical non-enzymatic antioxidants within the phenolic class of secondary metabolites [11,59]. Research by Tonelli et al. (2015) showed that Melissa officinalis shoot cultures, when exposed to O3, activated enzymes involved in phenolic metabolism, resulting in enhanced polymerization of cinnamyl alcohols (CAD), which maintained plant vitality [60]. Furthermore, differential responses were observed between cultivars under O3 stress conditions. The tolerant cultivar Kharchiya 65 exhibited superior oxidative stress tolerance through significantly elevated activities of CAD, 4CL, PAL, and chalcone isomerase (CHI), along with increased alpha-tocopherol accumulation. Conversely, the sensitive cultivar HD 2987 predominantly induced flavonoid biosynthesis as a mechanism to neutralize excessive ROS production under O3 stress [101]. Consistent with these findings, Pellegrini et al. (2018) documented that Liriodendron tulipifera displayed markedly increased PAL activity following a 45-day exposure to 120 ppb O3 [102]. This metabolic adaptation represents a strategic response to O3-induced oxidative damage, characterized by enhanced production of defensive secondary metabolites (specifically rutin and caffeic acid) and upregulated transcriptional expression of CHS and PAL genes.
The impact of elevated O3 concentrations on woody plants has predominantly been investigated through the lens of phenylpropanoid metabolism. These compounds serve critical functions in plant stress tolerance through their protective barrier formation and antioxidant properties [103]. The phenylpropanoid pathway, including its genes, enzymes, and metabolites, represents one of the primary targets of O3 exposure. Multiple studies with woody species have documented increases in total phenolic content following O3 treatment [104]. Research by Cotrozzi et al. (2018) revealed enhanced accumulation of isofraxidin and transchalcone in Fraxinus excelsior (European ash) when subjected to 150 ppb O3 for 8 h daily (Table 1), suggesting these compounds function in ROS detoxification mechanisms [105]. In Brazil’s early secondary succession species, Astronium graveolens, which exhibits high light sensitivity, researchers examined the combined effects of elevated light intensity and O3. This investigation demonstrated that polyphenols accumulated within the vacuoles of palisade parenchyma cells throughout the leaf blade, representing a coordinated defense response against these environmental stressors [104].
Polyphenols and their glycosylated derivatives function as potent antioxidants by directly neutralizing ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) or by acting as peroxyl radical scavengers [11]. Notably, polyphenols containing two adjacent hydroxyl groups demonstrate metal chelation capabilities against transition metals [116]. Within the phenylpropanoid family, quercetin plays a particularly significant role in enhancing scavenging efficiency. The extensive cellular distribution of secondary metabolites, coupled with the quantity and positioning of hydroxyl groups on their ring structures, enables flavonoids to demonstrate superior ROS scavenging capacity compared to other phenylpropanoids [11,129]. Specifically, flavonoids with dihydroxy groups on the B-ring exhibit enhanced antioxidant activity. Through single electron oxidation reactions, flavonoids effectively reduce free radicals by transferring protons from their A and/or B rings, thereby generating less reactive flavonoid radicals [96]. Additionally, flavonoids inhibit oxygen radical formation by suppressing the enzymatic activities of cyclooxygenase, lipoxygenase, xanthine oxidase, and glutathione S-transferase [130]. In experimental conditions using Open-Top Chambers (OTCs), Tibouchina pulchra (Cham.) saplings exposed to ambient non-filtered air (NF) and NF supplemented with 40 ppb ozone (NF+O3) for 8-h daily periods demonstrated elevated flavonoid concentrations compared to those in carbon-filtered air (CF) environments [131].
Research demonstrates that exposure to elevated ozone concentrations induces increased lignin accumulation in the aboveground portions of multiple forage and cereal species [132]. While lignin deposition typically occurs in root endodermal and vascular cells under normal conditions, ozone preferentially triggers lignification in aerial tissues (e.g., leaves, stems) as a physical barrier against oxidative damage [94]. This response activates genes and enzymes involved in lignin biosynthesis, particularly PAL, as part of defensive mechanisms limiting cellular damage. PAL activation serves as a biochemical indicator of triggered defense responses, including the development of structural barriers and protective compounds. The enhanced PAL activity correlates with elevated lignin content in ozone-exposed foliar tissues, which differs compositionally from lignin in control plants [103]. Scientific literature consistently reports that ozone exposure not only increases lignin content but also alters its composition in affected plants [84]. For example, Betz et al. (2009) documented that following ozone exposure, Fagus sylvatica L. exhibited increased guaiacyl (G) and p-hydroxyphenyl (H) units, while syringyl (S) monomer content decreased [133]. Moreover, plants under ozone stress demonstrate lignin-adaptive mechanisms to maintain mechanical integrity under challenging conditions [133]. Investigations by Richet et al. (2012) revealed reduced cellulose-to-lignin ratios in ozone-treated hybrid poplar stems, suggesting prioritization of lignification over cellulose production under ozone stress, thereby promoting radial development [103]. This adaptive response potentially enables ozone-affected trees to sustain growth while optimizing carbon resource allocation. Numerous tree species exhibit alterations in their proanthocyanidin profiles in response to ozone exposure, as documented in various studies [133]. However, the scientific literature has predominantly investigated proanthocyanidins through the lens of their antioxidative capabilities, while largely neglecting their important structural and supportive functions within plant tissues.
Oxidative stress occurs when ROS accumulation exceeds the plant’s detoxification capacity, leading to cellular damage [134]. Research indicates that insufficient upregulation of phenylpropanoid metabolism and subsequent inadequate phenolic concentrations failed to mitigate ozone-induced H2O2 accumulation in poplar clone Eridano, resulting in oxidative damage [135]. Similarly, Ginkgo biloba exhibited reduced ozone stress tolerance when leaf phenolic concentrations decreased [136]. Interestingly, following ozone exposure, G. biloba leaves demonstrated enhanced antioxidant capacity through increased terpene synthesis. Terpenoids contribute to photorespiratory mechanisms that protect plants against oxidative stress and photodamage [137]. Carotenoids represent the most extensively studied terpenoids involved in photoprotection, with numerous studies documenting their modulation by ozone exposure [138]. Certain isoprenoids, including zeaxanthin and tocopherols, exhibit direct ROS scavenging capabilities through interactions with hydroxyl radicals [139]. Furthermore, investigations have revealed that isoprene contributes to cellular membrane stabilization, particularly the thylakoid membranes within chloroplasts [140,141].
Lignin biosynthesis exhibits notable alterations in response to O3 exposure. Experimental studies have demonstrated that both poplar leaves subjected to O3 stress display increased lignin concentrations due to enhanced activity within the lignin biosynthetic pathway [103]. The O3-induced lignins appear to serve a protective function by mitigating ROS propagation [142]. Evidence suggests these stress-induced lignins may function as antioxidant compounds, potentially contributing to enhanced tolerance against this atmospheric pollutant. The positive correlation between lignin accumulation and stress severity under O3 exposure further substantiates their defensive role [60,61]. Regional variation in lignin response has been documented; for instance, Fraxinus excelsior specimens from Tuscany province exhibited significantly elevated lignin content when exposed to O3 compared to specimens from Piedmont province [105]. In Croton floribundus, O3 exposure stimulated the emission of sesquiterpenes, particularly β-caryophyllene, which functions as an effective antioxidant, scavenging O3 molecules when plants were subjected to ozone-enriched filtered air versus filtered air alone [143]. Table 1 provides comprehensive information regarding various secondary metabolites and their respective roles as ROS scavengers under oxidative stress conditions.

8. Biotechnological Strategies for Enhancing Plant Tolerance to Pollution

Our review demonstrates how biotechnological interventions can systematically enhance plant tolerance to hazardous air pollutants through four synergistic strategies (Figure 5A,B). Overexpression of stress-responsive transcription factors (MYB, WRKY) robustly upregulates lignin biosynthesis pathways, as evidenced in Arabidopsis ozone tolerance studies. Precise modulation of phytohormonal networks (SA/JA/ET) proves equally critical; SA accumulates under ozone exposure by regulating ET and reduces ozone-induced cell death [36]. Metabolic engineering approaches yield particularly promising outcomes, with transgenic upregulation of phenylpropanoid pathway genes increasing protective flavonoid and lignin production, which involves chelating of pollutants [124,144]. When combined with antioxidant system reinforcement (e.g., TaCAT3 wheat lines showing higher heavy metal survival) [68]. Small RNA modifications (e.g., methylation) further expand the biotech toolkit by enabling precision regulation of stress-responsive genes [145]. Emerging single-cell transcriptomics and spatial metabolomics now enable tissue- and subcellular-resolution mapping of these adaptations—revealing compartment-specific mechanisms (e.g., ROS quenching in guard cells or lignin deposition in xylem) that bulk omics miss [146,147]. Complementary omics-driven approaches (Figure 5B) are revolutionizing trait discovery, with multi-omics identifying MYB/WRKY/NAC/bZIP as master regulators of multi-stress responses [148,149,150,151], metabolomics linking specialized compounds like rosmarinic acid to ROS quenching in plants, and proteomics pinpointing RBOHF/APX2 as oxidative stress sentinels. However, a striking translational gap persists—only 15% of omics-predicted biomarkers have been field-validated in polluted environments, underscoring the need for real-world testing of these laboratory-validated solutions. Together, these findings chart a roadmap for developing “green warrior” crops through integrated genetic engineering and precision breeding approaches.

Multi-Omics Approaches for Decoding Plant Stress Responses

Recent advances in high-throughput “-omics” technologies have revolutionized the study of plant responses to air pollution [152]. These tools provide systemic insights into molecular adaptations: (1) Transcriptomics—RNA sequencing and microarrays identify stress-responsive genes (e.g., WRKY, MYB, RBOHs) under ozone (O3) or PM2.5 exposure [1,2], such as Arabidopsis exposed to NO2 shows upregulation of ethylene/JA signaling genes (CEJ1, GRX480) [3]. (2) Proteomics—mass spectrometry reveals post-translational modifications (PTMs) and stress-related proteins (e.g., peroxidases, heat shock proteins) [4]. O3 stress increases APX2 and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) abundance in Populus [5]. (3) Metabolomics—LC-MS/GC-MS profiles highlight key metabolites (e.g., flavonoids [153,154,155], glutathione, lignin) in pollution-tolerant species [146,147]. PM2.5 induces rosmarinic acid and ascorbate accumulation in Triticum aestivum [60,106] (Table 1).
Auxiliary techniques such as 1-epigenomics: DNA methylation (e.g., MET1 gene silencing) modulates stress memory under recurrent O3 exposure [156]. 2-miRNAomics: miRNAs (e.g., miR398, miR393) regulate SOD and auxin signaling under heavy metal stress [157]. 3-Microbiome analysis: Rhizosphere microbes enhance pollutant detoxification via symbiotic interactions [158]. While multi-omics data are powerful, their integration remains complex due to technical variability and species-specific responses [152]. Future studies should leverage machine learning to predict cross-talk between omics layers.

9. Challenges and Opportunities in Plant-Pollution Interaction Research

  • Combined Stress Responses: Most studies focus on single pollutants, yet plants in urban/industrial areas face simultaneous exposure to multiple stressors (e.g., O3 + HMs). Research must elucidate synergistic or antagonistic interactions between pollutants and their integrated effects on plant physiology.
  • Field-to-Lab Translation: While transcriptomic and metabolomic studies reveal stress responses in controlled environments, field validation is scarce. Long-term studies are needed to assess the stability of engineered traits under real-world conditions.
  • Phytohormone Crosstalk: The dynamics of SA, JA, and ethylene signaling under chronic pollution exposure remain poorly understood. Deciphering their spatiotemporal regulation could optimize stress tolerance without compromising growth.
  • Secondary Metabolite Engineering: Despite their protective roles, the metabolic costs of producing flavonoids, lignin, and terpenoids are unclear. Balancing defense and productivity through targeted metabolic engineering is a promising yet underexplored avenue.

10. Conclusions

This review comprehensively synthesizes the current understanding of plant defense mechanisms against air pollution, focusing on the pivotal roles of ROS scavenging, antioxidant systems, and molecular signaling pathways. The integration of enzymatic (e.g., SOD, CAT, APX, GR) and non-enzymatic (e.g., flavonoids, glutathione, ascorbate) antioxidant systems is essential for maintaining redox homeostasis and mitigating oxidative damage. Transcription factors such as MYB, WRKY, and NAC, along with MAPK and phytohormone signaling cascades (e.g., salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, ethylene), orchestrate stress-responsive gene networks, enabling plants to adapt to hazardous pollutants. Secondary metabolites, including flavonoids, lignin, and terpenoids, serve as frontline antioxidants and chelators, neutralizing ROS and detoxifying pollutants.
The review also highlights the potential of biotechnological strategies to enhance plant tolerance to pollution, such as the overexpression of ROS-scavenging genes (e.g., TaCAT3) and the engineering of phenolic pathways. These approaches, combined with omics-driven insights, offer promising avenues for developing resilient crops capable of thriving in polluted environments. By integrating molecular, metabolic, and biotechnological perspectives, this review provides a roadmap for advancing research and applications in sustainable agriculture under escalating environmental pollution.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.J.R., M.D. and B.Z.; methodology, software, validation, M.J.R., M.I. and M.D.; formal analysis, investigation, resources, M.J.R. and M.I.; data curation, M.J.R., M.D., and B.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J.R.; writing—review and editing, M.J.R., M.D., and B.Z.; supervision, B.Z.; project administration, M.J.R.; funding acquisition, B.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Ningbo (2024Z268); National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071807); The Central Funded Forestry Science and Technology Promotion Demonstration Project ([2023]TS 03-1); Scientific Research Development Fund Project of Zhejiang A&F University (2022LFR001, 2023LFR066); Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University (SKLSS-KF2023-07); the Key Funded Project of Zhejiang 151 Talent Engineering (for Bingsong Zheng); The Project of “Higher Education Discipline Innovation and Talent Introduction base” Zhejiang A&F University (No. D18008).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

SymbolFull NameFamily/Class
MYBMYELOBLASTOSISMYB-domain TFs
WRKYWRKYGQK domainWRKY-domain TFs
NACNAM/ATAF/CUC (NO APICAL MERISTEM/ARABIDOPSIS TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATION FACTOR/CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON)NAC-domain TFs
bHLHBasic Helix-Loop-HelixbHLH-domain TFs
bZIPBasic Leucine ZipperbZIP-domain TFs
AP2/ERFAPETALA2/Ethylene-Responsive FactorAP2/ERF superfamily
ARFAuxin Response FactorARF family
HSFHeat Shock FactorHSF family
DREB1/CBFDehydration-Responsive Element-Binding Protein 1/C-repeat Binding FactorAP2/ERF superfamily
ABI3VP1ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 3/VIVIPAROUS 1B3-domain TFs
CCAAT-DR1CCAAT-box Binding ProteinCCAAT-box TFs
CCAAT-HAP2/3/5CCAAT-binding Histone-Associated ProteinsCCAAT-box TFs
C2C2-DofDNA-binding One Zinc FingerDof family
C2C2-CO-likeCONSTANS-likeCO-like family
E2F-DPE2F-Dimerization PartnerE2F/DP family
C2C2-GATAGATA-bindingGATA family
C2C2-YABBYYABBY domainYABBY family
AtSRArabidopsis Stress-ResponsiveNF-κB-like TFs
C3HCys3His zinc fingerZinc finger TFs
C2H2Cys2His2 zinc fingerZinc finger TFs
EMF1EMBRYONIC FLOWER 1Polycomb-group TFs
MADSMCM1/AGAMOUS/DEFICIENS/SRFMADS-box TFs
TUBTUBBY domainTUBBY family
FITFER-LIKE IRON DEFICIENCY-INDUCED TRANSCRIPTION FACTORbHLH family
PYEPOPEYE (Iron homeostasis regulator)bHLH family
HY5ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5bZIP family

References

  1. Edo, G.I.; Itoje-akpokiniovo, L.O.; Obasohan, P.; Ikpekoro, V.O.; Samuel, P.O.; Jikah, A.N.; Nosu, L.C.; Ekokotu, H.A.; Ugbune, U.; Oghroro, E.E.A. Impact of Environmental Pollution from Human Activities on Water, Air Quality and Climate Change. Ecol. Front. 2024, 44, 874–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rathod, S.V.; Saras, P.; Gondaliya, S.M. Environmental Pollution: Threats and Challenges for Management. In Eco-Restoration of Polluted Environment; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rafie-Rad, Z.; Raza, T.; Eash, N.S.; Moradi-Khajevand, M.; Moradkhani, M. Effects of Outdoor Air Pollutants on Plants and Agricultural Productivity. In Health and Environmental Effects of Ambient Air Pollution; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 71–90. [Google Scholar]
  4. Angon, P.B.; Islam, M.S.; Das, A.; Anjum, N.; Poudel, A.; Suchi, S.A. Sources, Effects and Present Perspectives of Heavy Metals Contamination: Soil, Plants and Human Food Chain. Heliyon 2024, 10, e28357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Musah, B.I. Effects of Heavy Metals and Metalloids on Plant-Animal Interaction and Biodiversity of Terrestrial Ecosystems—An Overview. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2025, 197, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hanif, S.; Ali, S.; Chaudhry, A.H.; Sial, N.; Marium, A.; Mehmood, T. A Review on Soil Metal Contamination and Its Environmental Implications. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 2025, 24, 1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carfora, A.; Lucibelli, F.; Di Lillo, P.; Mazzucchiello, S.M.; Saccone, G.; Salvemini, M.; Varone, M.; Volpe, G.; Aceto, S. Genetic Responses of Plants to Urban Environmental Challenges. Planta 2025, 261, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Huang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Zhou, X. WRKY Transcription Factors in Response to Metal Stress in Plants: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Niekerk, L.; Gokul, A.; Basson, G.; Badiwe, M.; Nkomo, M.; Klein, A.; Keyster, M. Heavy Metal Stress and Mitogen Activated Kinase Transcription Factors in Plants: Exploring Heavy Metal-ROS Influences on Plant Signalling Pathways. Plant Cell Environ. 2024, 47, 2793–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Antenozio, M.L.; Caissutti, C.; Caporusso, F.M.; Marzi, D.; Brunetti, P. Urban Air Pollution and Plant Tolerance: Omics Responses to Ozone, Nitrogen Oxides, and Particulate Matter. Plants 2024, 13, 2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rao, M.J.; Zheng, B. The Role of Polyphenols in Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Their Antioxidant Properties to Scavenge Reactive Oxygen Species and Free Radicals. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mendoza-Almanza, B.; de la Guerrero-González, M.L.; Loredo-Tovias, M.; García-Arreola, M.E.; Loredo-Osti, C.; Padilla-Ortega, E.; Delgado-Sánchez, P. AsNAC Genes: Response to High Mercury Concentrations in Allium Sativum Seed Clove. BioTech 2025, 14, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mansoor, S.; Ali, A.; Kour, N.; Bornhorst, J.; AlHarbi, K.; Rinklebe, J.; Abd El Moneim, D.; Ahmad, P.; Chung, Y.S. Heavy Metal Induced Oxidative Stress Mitigation and ROS Scavenging in Plants. Plants 2023, 16, 3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rabeh, K.; Hnini, M.; Oubohssaine, M. A Comprehensive Review of Transcription Factor-Mediated Regulation of Secondary Metabolites in Plants under Environmental Stress. Stress. Biol. 2025, 5, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Chen, X.; Li, X.; Li, W.; Li, L.; Li, Q.; Geng, Z.; Shi, S. Malus Xiaojinensis MxbHLH30 Confers Iron Homeostasis Under Iron Deficiency in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wu, X.; Chen, J.; Yue, X.; Wei, X.; Zou, J.; Chen, Y.; Su, N.; Cui, J. The Zinc-Regulated Protein (ZIP) Family Genes and Glutathione s-Transferase (GST) Family Genes Play Roles in Cd Resistance and Accumulation of Pak Choi (Brassica campestris Ssp. Chinensis). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 183, 109571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Isinkaralar, O.; Rajfur, M.; Isinkaralar, K.; Świsłowski, P. Contamination Degree and Health Implications of Indoor Air Pollution: Operating Field Measurements in Market Environments. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 969, 178946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tavella, R.A.; da Silva Júnior, F.M.R.; Santos, M.A.; Miraglia, S.G.E.K.; Pereira Filho, R.D. A Review of Air Pollution from Petroleum Refining and Petrochemical Industrial Complexes: Sources, Key Pollutants, Health Impacts, and Challenges. ChemEngineering 2025, 9, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Atafar, Z.; Sarkhoshkalat, M.M.; Manesh, M.B. Overview of Air Pollution: History, Sources and Effects. In Air Pollution, Air Quality, and Climate Change; Elsevier: Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands, 2025; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sharma, P.; Saxena, P. Impacts and Responses of Particulate Matter Pollution on Vegetation. In Airborne Particulate Matter: Source, Chemistry and Health; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 229–264. [Google Scholar]
  21. Roy, S.S.; Bahri, S.; Devi, L.S.; Moitra, S. Impact of Particulate Matter on the Ecophysiology of Plants. In Ecophysiology of Tropical Plants; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 66–72. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tripathi, D.P.; Nema, A.K. Air Pollution Mitigation and Suspended Particulate Matter Retention Potential of Selected Plant Species across Seasonal Variation in the Urban Area. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 45035–45054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ali, A.; Zhao, X.-T.; Lin, J.-S.; Zhao, T.-T.; Feng, C.-L.; Li, L.; Wu, R.-J.; Huang, Q.-X.; Liu, H.-B.; Wang, J.-G. Genome-Wide Identification and Unveiling the Role of MAP Kinase Cascade Genes Involved in Sugarcane Response to Abiotic Stressors. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Khan, A.; Shah, S.T.; Basit, A.; Mohamed, H.I.; Li, Y. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase: A Potent Signaling Protein That Combats Biotic and Abiotic Stress in Plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2024, 43, 1762–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Samuel, M.A.; Ellis, B.E. Double Jeopardy: Both Overexpression and Suppression of a Redox-Activated Plant Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Render Tobacco Plants Ozone Sensitive. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2059–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Miles, G.P.; Samuel, M.A.; Zhang, Y.; Ellis, B.E. RNA Interference-Based (RNAi) Suppression of AtMPK6, an Arabidopsis Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase, Results in Hypersensitivity to Ozone and Misregulation of AtMPK3. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 138, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hasan, M.M.; Rahman, M.A.; Skalicky, M.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Waseem, M.; Jahan, M.S.; Ahammed, G.J.; El-Mogy, M.M.; El-Yazied, A.A.; Ibrahim, M.F.M. Ozone Induced Stomatal Regulations, MAPK and Phytohormone Signaling in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rasmussen, M.W.; Roux, M.; Petersen, M.; Mundy, J. MAP Kinase Cascades in Arabidopsis Innate Immunity. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Vainonen, J.P.; Kangasjärvi, J. Plant Signalling in Acute Ozone Exposure. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 240–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Overmyer, K.; Brosché, M.; Pellinen, R.; Kuittinen, T.; Tuominen, H.; Ahlfors, R.; Keinänen, M.; Saarma, M.; Scheel, D.; Kangasjärvi, J. Ozone-Induced Programmed Cell Death in the Arabidopsis Radical-Induced Cell Death1 Mutant. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 1092–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Xu, J.; Zhang, S. Regulation of Ethylene Biosynthesis and Signaling by Protein Kinases and Phosphatases. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 939–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ali, A.; Kant, K.; Kaur, N.; Gupta, S.; Jindal, P.; Gill, S.S.; Naeem, M. Salicylic Acid: Homeostasis, Signalling and Phytohormone Crosstalk in Plants under Environmental Challenges. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2024, 169, 314–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gandin, A.; Dizengremel, P.; Jolivet, Y. Integrative Role of Plant Mitochondria Facing Oxidative Stress: The Case of Ozone. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 159, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, J.; Zhu, W.; Zhao, Q. Salicylic Acid Biosynthesis Is Not from Phenylalanine in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Barros, J.; Dixon, R.A. Plant Phenylalanine/Tyrosine Ammonia-Lyases. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 66–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ogawa, D.; Nakajima, N.; Sano, T.; Tamaoki, M.; Aono, M.; Kubo, A.; Kanna, M.; Ioki, M.; Kamada, H.; Saji, H. Salicylic Acid Accumulation under O3 Exposure Is Regulated by Ethylene in Tobacco Plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 1062–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, P.; Mane, S.P.; Sioson, A.A.; Robinet, C.V.; Heath, L.S.; Bohnert, H.J.; Grene, R. Effects of Chronic Ozone Exposure on Gene Expression in Arabidopsis Thaliana Ecotypes and in Thellungiella Halophila. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 854–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Morales, L.O.; Shapiguzov, A.; Safronov, O.; Leppälä, J.; Vaahtera, L.; Yarmolinsky, D.; Kollist, H.; Brosché, M. Ozone Responses in Arabidopsis: Beyond Stomatal Conductance. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Modesti, M.; Marchica, A.; Pisuttu, C.; Risoli, S.; Pellegrini, E.; Bellincontro, A.; Mencarelli, F.; Tonutti, P.; Nali, C. Ozone-Induced Biochemical and Molecular Changes in Vitis Vinifera Leaves and Responses to Botrytis Cinerea Infections. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Rao, M.V.; Davis, K.R. Ozone-induced Cell Death Occurs via Two Distinct Mechanisms in Arabidopsis: The Role of Salicylic Acid. Plant J. 1999, 17, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Khan, S.; Alvi, A.F.; Saify, S.; Iqbal, N.; Khan, N.A. The Ethylene Biosynthetic Enzymes, 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate (ACC) Synthase (ACS) and ACC Oxidase (ACO): The Less Explored Players in Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Houben, M.; Van de Poel, B. 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylic Acid Oxidase (ACO): The Enzyme That Makes the Plant Hormone Ethylene. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bandurska, H.; Borowiak, K.; Miara, M. Effect of Two Different Ambient Ozone Concentrations on Antioxidative Enzymes in Leaves of Two Tobacco Cultivars with Contrasting Ozone Sensitivity. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 2009, 51, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gupta, S.K.; Sharma, M.; Majumder, B.; Maurya, V.K.; Lohani, M.; Deeba, F.; Pandey, V. Impact of Ethylene Diurea (EDU) on Growth, Yield and Proteome of Two Winter Wheat Varieties under High Ambient Ozone Phytotoxicity. Chemosphere 2018, 196, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Altaf, F.; Parveen, S.; Lone, M.L.; Haq, A.U.; Farooq, S.; Tahir, I.; Mansoor, S.; ALYEMENI, M.N. Modulation of Leaf Senescence in Bergenia ciliata (Haw.) Sternb. through the Supplementation of Kinetin and Methyl Jasmonate. Pak. J. Bot. 2024, 56, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bozsó, Z.; Barna, B. Diverse Effect of Two Cytokinins, Kinetin and Benzyladenine, on Plant Development, Biotic Stress Tolerance, and Gene Expression. Life 2021, 11, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kantharaj, V.; Ramasamy, N.K.; Yoon, Y.-E.; Lee, K.-A.; Kumar, V.; Choe, H.; Chohra, H.; Kim, Y.-N.; Lee, Y.B. Regulatory Response of Rice Seedlings to Exogenously Applied Kinetin During Oxidative Stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2024, 43, 4680–4690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ruan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, M.; Yan, J.; Khurshid, M.; Weng, W.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, K. Jasmonic Acid Signaling Pathway in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, Y.; Yuan, J.; Yang, W.; Zhu, L.; Su, C.; Wang, X.; Wu, H.; Sun, Z.; Li, X. Genome Wide Identification and Expression Profiling of Ethylene Receptor Genes during Soybean Nodulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cai, Y.; Cao, S.; Yang, Z.; Zheng, Y. MeJA Regulates Enzymes Involved in Ascorbic Acid and Glutathione Metabolism and Improves Chilling Tolerance in Loquat Fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011, 59, 324–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sasaki-Sekimoto, Y.; Taki, N.; Obayashi, T.; Aono, M.; Matsumoto, F.; Sakurai, N.; Suzuki, H.; Hirai, M.Y.; Noji, M.; Saito, K. Coordinated Activation of Metabolic Pathways for Antioxidants and Defence Compounds by Jasmonates and Their Roles in Stress Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2005, 44, 653–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhu, L.; Yu, H.; Dai, X.; Yu, M.; Yu, Z. Effect of Methyl Jasmonate on the Quality and Antioxidant Capacity by Modulating Ascorbate-Glutathione Cycle in Peach Fruit. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 303, 111216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yadav, D.S.; Rai, K.; Gupta, A.; Agrawal, S.B.; Agrawal, M. Cross-Talk between ROS and Phytohormones Signaling Determines Crop Sensitivity against Ozone. In Advances in Botanical Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; Volume 108, pp. 47–81. ISBN 0065-2296. [Google Scholar]
  54. Samanta, S.; Roychoudhury, A. Molecular Crosstalk of Jasmonate with Major Phytohormones and Plant Growth Regulators during Diverse Stress Responses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2025, 44, 62–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Muhammad Aslam, M.; Waseem, M.; Jakada, B.H.; Okal, E.J.; Lei, Z.; Saqib, H.S.A.; Yuan, W.; Xu, W.; Zhang, Q. Mechanisms of Abscisic Acid-Mediated Drought Stress Responses in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hsu, P.; Dubeaux, G.; Takahashi, Y.; Schroeder, J.I. Signaling Mechanisms in Abscisic Acid-mediated Stomatal Closure. Plant J. 2021, 105, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Liu, H.; Song, S.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Niu, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, W. Signaling Transduction of ABA, ROS, and Ca2+ in Plant Stomatal Closure in Response to Drought. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Parveen, N.; Kandhol, N.; Sharma, S.; Singh, V.P.; Chauhan, D.K.; Ludwig-Müller, J.; Corpas, F.J.; Tripathi, D.K. Auxin Crosstalk with Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Plant Development and Abiotic Stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 2022, 63, 1814–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Rao, M.J.; Duan, M.; Zhou, C.; Jiao, J.; Cheng, P.; Yang, L.; Wei, W.; Shen, Q.; Ji, P.; Yang, Y.; et al. Antioxidant Defense System in Plants: Reactive Oxygen Species Production, Signaling, and Scavenging During Abiotic Stress-Induced Oxidative Damage. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tonelli, M.; Pellegrini, E.; D’Angiolillo, F.; Petersen, M.; Nali, C.; Pistelli, L.; Lorenzini, G. Ozone-Elicited Secondary Metabolites in Shoot Cultures of Melissa officinalis L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. PCTOC 2015, 120, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sadeghifar, H.; Ragauskas, A. Lignin as a Bioactive Polymer and Heavy Metal Absorber-an Overview. Chemosphere 2022, 309, 136564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Molina, L.; Segura, A. Biochemical and Metabolic Plant Responses toward Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Heavy Metals Present in Atmospheric Pollution. Plants 2021, 10, 2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ansari, M.K.A.; Iqbal, M.; Ahmad, M.; Munir, M.; Gaffar, S.A.; Chaachouay, N. Heavy Metal Stress and Cellular Antioxidant Systems of Plants: A Review. Agric. Rev. 2024, 45, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jiang, J.; Zhang, N.; Srivastava, A.K.; He, G.; Tai, Z.; Wang, Z.; Yang, S.; Xie, X.; Li, X. Superoxide Dismutase Positively Regulates Cu/Zn Toxicity Tolerance in Sorghum Bicolor by Interacting with Cu Chaperone for Superoxide Dismutase. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 480, 135828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chauhan, P.; Mir, R.A.; Khah, M.A. Ascorbate–Glutathione Cycle. In Nitric Oxide in Plants: A Molecule with Dual Roles; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  66. Balali-Mood, M.; Naseri, K.; Tahergorabi, Z.; Khazdair, M.R.; Sadeghi, M. Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 643972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Irato, P.; Santovito, G. Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Molecules with Antioxidant Function. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Tyagi, S.; Singh, K.; Upadhyay, S.K. Molecular Characterization Revealed the Role of Catalases under Abiotic and Arsenic Stress in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 123585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Farooq, M.A.; Ali, S.; Hameed, A.; Ishaque, W.; Mahmood, K.; Iqbal, Z. Alleviation of Cadmium Toxicity by Silicon Is Related to Elevated Photosynthesis, Antioxidant Enzymes; Suppressed Cadmium Uptake and Oxidative Stress in Cotton. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 96, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Pan, G.; Zhao, L.; Li, J.; Huang, S.; Tang, H.; Chang, L.; Dai, Z.; Chen, A.; Li, D.; Li, Z. Physiological Responses and Tolerance of Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) to Lead Stress. Acta Physiol. Plant 2020, 42, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Singh, V.P.; Srivastava, P.K.; Prasad, S.M. Nitric Oxide Alleviates Arsenic-Induced Toxic Effects in Ridged Luffa Seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 71, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chowardhara, B.; Borgohain, P.; Saha, B.; Awasthi, J.P.; Panda, S.K. Differential Oxidative Stress Responses in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss Cultivars Induced by Cadmium at Germination and Early Seedling Stage. Acta Physiol. Plant 2020, 42, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sinn, J.P.; Schlagnhaufer, C.D.; Arteca, R.N.; Pell, E.J. Ozone-induced Ethylene and Foliar Injury Responses Are Altered in 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate Synthase Antisense Potato Plants. New Phytol. 2004, 164, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Leppälä, J.; Gaupels, F.; Xu, E.; Morales, L.O.; Durner, J.; Brosché, M. Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide Regulate Similar Gene Expression Responses in Arabidopsis but Natural Variation in the Extent of Cell Death Is Likely Controlled by Different Genetic Loci. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 994779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhao, F.; Durner, J.; Winkler, J.B.; Traidl-Hoffmann, C.; Strom, T.-M.; Ernst, D.; Frank, U. Pollen of Common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.): Illumina-Based de Novo Sequencing and Differential Transcript Expression upon Elevated NO2/O3. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 224, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sheng, Q.; Zhou, C.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Song, M.; Zhu, Z. Elevated NO2 Induces Leaf Defensive Mechanisms in Bougainvillea Spectabilis Seedlings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 248, 114292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Wang, H.; Li, M.; Yang, Y.; Sun, P.; Zhou, S.; Kang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Yuan, X.; Feng, Z.; Jin, W. Physiological and Molecular Responses of Different Rose (Rosa hybrida L.) Cultivars to Elevated Ozone Levels. Plant Direct 2023, 7, e513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Iyer, N.J.; Tang, Y.; Mahalingam, R. Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Responses to a Combination of Drought and Ozone in Medicago Truncatula. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 706–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kabera, J.N.; Semana, E.; Mussa, A.R.; He, X. Plant Secondary Metabolites: Biosynthesis, Classification, Function and Pharmacological Properties. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2014, 2, 377–392. [Google Scholar]
  80. Rao, M.J.; Wang, H.; Lei, H.; Zhang, H.; Duan, X.; Bao, L.; Yang, C.; Han, D.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, S.; et al. LC-MS/MS-Based Metabolomic Study Provides Insights into Altitude-Dependent Variations in Flavonoid Profiles of Strawberries. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 15, 1527212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Rao, M.J.; Xu, Y.; Tang, X.; Huang, Y.; Liu, J.; Deng, X. CsCYT75B1, a Citrus CYTOCHROME P450 Gene, Is Involved in Accumulation of Antioxidant Flavonoids and Induces Drought Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Rao, M.J.; Xu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Tang, X.; Deng, X.; Xu, Q. Ectopic Expression of Citrus UDP-GLUCOSYL TRANSFERASE Gene Enhances Anthocyanin and Proanthocyanidins Contents and Confers High Light Tolerance in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Yu, F.; De Luca, V. Transport of Monoterpenoid Indole Alkaloids in Catharanthus Roseus. Plant ABC Transp. 2014, 63–75. [Google Scholar]
  84. Singh, A.A.; Ghosh, A.; Agrawal, M.; Agrawal, S.B. Secondary Metabolites Responses of Plants Exposed to Ozone: An Update. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 88281–88312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wink, M.; Schimmer, O. Molecular Modes of Action of Defensive Secondary Metabolites. Annu. Plant Rev. Funct. Biotechnol. Plant Second. Metab. 2010, 39, 21–161. [Google Scholar]
  86. Boublin, F.; Cabassa-Hourton, C.; Leymarie, J.; Leitao, L. Potential Involvement of Proline and Flavonols in Plant Responses to Ozone. Environ. Res. 2022, 207, 112214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Marchica, A.; Ascrizzi, R.; Flamini, G.; Cotrozzi, L.; Tonelli, M.; Lorenzini, G.; Nali, C.; Pellegrini, E. Ozone as Eustress for Enhancing Secondary Metabolites and Bioactive Properties in Salvia officinalis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chen, C.; Zhang, H.; Dong, C.; Ji, H.; Zhang, X.; Li, L.; Ban, Z.; Zhang, N.; Xue, W. Effect of Ozone Treatment on the Phenylpropanoid Biosynthesis of Postharvest Strawberries. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 25429–25438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Zhang, K.; Qin, Y.; Sun, W.; Shi, H.; Zhao, S.; He, L.; Li, C.; Zhao, J.; Pan, J.; Wang, G. Phylogenomic Analysis of Cytochrome P450 Gene Superfamily and Their Association with Flavonoids Biosynthesis in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Genes 2023, 14, 1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Cho, K.; Tiwari, S.; Agrawal, S.B.; Torres, N.L.; Agrawal, M.; Sarkar, A.; Shibato, J.; Agrawal, G.K.; Kubo, A.; Rakwal, R. Tropospheric Ozone and Plants: Absorption, Responses, and Consequences. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2011, 212, 61–111. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  91. Gupta, P.; De, B. Differential Responses of Cell Wall Bound Phenolic Compounds in Sensitive and Tolerant Varieties of Rice in Response to Salinity. Plant Signal Behav. 2017, 12, e1379643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Zhang, S.; Yang, J.; Li, H.; Chiang, V.L.; Fu, Y. Cooperative Regulation of Flavonoid and Lignin Biosynthesis in Plants. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2021, 40, 109–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Marchiosi, R.; dos Santos, W.D.; Constantin, R.P.; de Lima, R.B.; Soares, A.R.; Finger-Teixeira, A.; Mota, T.R.; de Oliveira, D.M.; de Foletto-Felipe, M.P.; Abrahão, J. Biosynthesis and Metabolic Actions of Simple Phenolic Acids in Plants. Phytochem. Rev. 2020, 19, 865–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Khan, P.; Tong, L.; Khan, S.U.; Zhang, C.; Wang, W. Lignin: A Defensive Shield Halting the Environmental Stresses—A Review. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2022, 20, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Shao, J.; Huang, K.; Batool, M.; Idrees, F.; Afzal, R.; Haroon, M.; Noushahi, H.A.; Wu, W.; Hu, Q.; Lu, X. Versatile Roles of Polyamines in Improving Abiotic Stress Tolerance of Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1003155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Shen, N.; Wang, T.; Gan, Q.; Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Jin, B. Plant Flavonoids: Classification, Distribution, Biosynthesis, and Antioxidant Activity. Food Chem. 2022, 383, 132531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Rao, M.J.; Wu, S.; Duan, M.; Wang, L. Antioxidant Metabolites in Primitive, Wild, and Cultivated Citrus and Their Role in Stress Tolerance. Molecules 2021, 26, 5801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Winkel-Shirley, B. Flavonoid Biosynthesis. A Colorful Model for Genetics, Biochemistry, Cell Biology, and Biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hajam, Y.A.; Lone, R.; Kumar, R. Role of Plant Phenolics against Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Induced Oxidative Stress and Biochemical Alterations. In Plant Phenolics in Abiotic Stress Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 125–147. [Google Scholar]
  100. Dusart, N.; Gandin, A.; Vaultier, M.-N.; Joffe, R.; Cabané, M.; Dizengremel, P.; Jolivet, Y. Importance of Detoxification Processes in Ozone Risk Assessment: Need to Integrate the Cellular Compartmentation of Antioxidants? Front. For. Glob. Change 2019, 2, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fatima, A.; Singh, A.A.; Mukherjee, A.; Agrawal, M.; Agrawal, S.B. Variability in Defence Mechanism Operating in Three Wheat Cultivars Having Different Levels of Sensitivity against Elevated Ozone. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 155, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pellegrini, E.; Campanella, A.; Cotrozzi, L.; Tonelli, M.; Nali, C.; Lorenzini, G. What about the Detoxification Mechanisms Underlying Ozone Sensitivity in Liriodendron Tulipifera? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 8148–8160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Richet, N.; Afif, D.; Tozo, K.; Pollet, B.; Maillard, P.; Huber, F.; Priault, P.; Banvoy, J.; Gross, P.; Dizengremel, P. Elevated CO2 and/or Ozone Modify Lignification in the Wood of Poplars (Populus tremula x Alba). J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 4291–4301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Fernandes, F.F.; Cardoso-Gustavson, P.; Alves, E.S. Synergism between Ozone and Light Stress: Structural Responses of Polyphenols in a Woody Brazilian Species. Chemosphere 2016, 155, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Cotrozzi, L.; Campanella, A.; Pellegrini, E.; Lorenzini, G.; Nali, C.; Paoletti, E. Phenylpropanoids Are Key Players in the Antioxidant Defense to Ozone of European Ash, Fraxinus Excelsior. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 8137–8147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Joardar, S.; Dewanjee, S.; Bhowmick, S.; Dua, T.K.; Das, S.; Saha, A.; De Feo, V. Rosmarinic Acid Attenuates Cadmium-Induced Nephrotoxicity via Inhibition of Oxidative Stress, Apoptosis, Inflammation and Fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Kittipornkul, P.; Treesubsuntorn, C.; Thiravetyan, P. Effect of Exogenous Catechin and Salicylic Acid on Rice Productivity under Ozone Stress: The Role of Chlorophyll Contents, Lipid Peroxidation, and Antioxidant Enzymes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 25774–25784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Bano, K.; Kumar, B.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ahmad, P. Exogenously-Sourced Salicylic Acid Imparts Resilience towards Arsenic Stress by Modulating Photosynthesis, Antioxidant Potential and Arsenic Sequestration in Brassica Napus Plants. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Ma, J.; Saleem, M.H.; Ali, B.; Rasheed, R.; Ashraf, M.A.; Aziz, H.; Ercisli, S.; Riaz, S.; Elsharkawy, M.M.; Hussain, I. Impact of Foliar Application of Syringic Acid on Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under Heavy Metal Stress-Insights into Nutrient Uptake, Redox Homeostasis, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidant Defense. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 950120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Balci, M.; Arikan-Abdulveli, B.; Yildiztugay, E.; Ozfidan-Konakci, C. Role of Syringic Acid in Enhancing Growth, Photosynthesis, and Antioxidant Defense in Lettuce Exposed to Arsenic Stress. Physiol. Plant 2025, 177, e70051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Badhani, B.; Sharma, N.; Kakkar, R. Gallic Acid: A Versatile Antioxidant with Promising Therapeutic and Industrial Applications. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 27540–27557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kerdsomboon, K.; Chumsawat, W.; Auesukaree, C. Effects of Moringa Oleifera Leaf Extracts and Its Bioactive Compound Gallic Acid on Reducing Toxicities of Heavy Metals and Metalloid in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Chemosphere 2021, 270, 128659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Afzaal, Z.; Hussain, I.; Ashraf, M.A.; Riaz, S. Ascorbic Acid and Vanillic Acid Application Alleviate the Lead Toxicity in Lycopersicon Esculentum by Modulating Key Biochemical Attributes and Antioxidant Defense Systems. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2023, 70, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Chen, S.; Lin, R.; Lu, H.; Wang, Q.; Yang, J.; Liu, J.; Yan, C. Effects of Phenolic Acids on Free Radical Scavenging and Heavy Metal Bioavailability in Kandelia obovata under Cadmium and Zinc Stress. Chemosphere 2020, 249, 126341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ghosh, A.; Pandey, B.; Agrawal, M.; Agrawal, S.B. Interactive Effects and Competitive Shift between Triticum aestivum L. (Wheat) and Chenopodium album L. (Fat-Hen) under Ambient and Elevated Ozone. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 114764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Goncharuk, E.A.; Zagoskina, N. V Heavy Metals, Their Phytotoxicity, and the Role of Phenolic Antioxidants in Plant Stress Responses with Focus on Cadmium. Molecules 2023, 28, 3921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Sharma, A.; Soares, C.; Sousa, B.; Martins, M.; Kumar, V.; Shahzad, B.; Sidhu, G.P.S.; Bali, A.S.; Asgher, M.; Bhardwaj, R. Nitric Oxide-mediated Regulation of Oxidative Stress in Plants under Metal Stress: A Review on Molecular and Biochemical Aspects. Physiol. Plant 2020, 168, 318–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Pellegrini, E.; Campanella, A.; Cotrozzi, L.; Tonelli, M.; Nali, C.; Lorenzini, G. Ozone Primes Changes in Phytochemical Parameters in the Medicinal Herb Hypericum Perforatum (St. John’s Wort). Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 126, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gaur, K.; Siddique, Y.H. The Role of Apigenin in Alleviating the Impact of Environmental Pollutants. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2025, 21, E050324227673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Mao, B.; Yin, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, T.-H.; Tian, R.-R.; Wang, W.; Ye, J.-S. Combined Effects of O3 and UV Radiation on Secondary Metabolites and Endogenous Hormones of Soybean Leaves. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Magray, J.A.; Sharma, D.P.; Deva, M.A.; Thoker, S.A. Phenolics: Accumulation and Role in Plants Grown under Heavy Metal Stress. Plant Phenolics Abiotic Stress. Manag. 2023, 321–351. [Google Scholar]
  122. Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Gu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, T.; Li, C. Metabolite Profiling for Model Cultivars of Wheat and Rice under Ozone Pollution. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 179, 104214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mi, Y.; Tong, K.; Zhu, G.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Si, Y. Surface Spraying of Anthocyanin through Antioxidant Defense and Subcellular Sequestration to Decrease Cd Accumulation in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Grains in a Lead–Zinc Mine Area. Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 43, 1855–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Dai, L.-P.; Dong, X.-J.; Ma, H.-H. Antioxidative and Chelating Properties of Anthocyanins in Azolla Imbricata Induced by Cadmium. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2012, 21, 837–844. [Google Scholar]
  125. Richau, K.H.; Kozhevnikova, A.D.; Seregin, I.V.; Vooijs, R.; Koevoets, P.L.M.; Smith, J.A.C.; Ivanov, V.B.; Schat, H. Chelation by Histidine Inhibits the Vacuolar Sequestration of Nickel in Roots of the Hyperaccumulator Thlaspi Caerulescens. New Phytol. 2009, 183, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Kanagendran, A.; Pazouki, L.; Niinemets, Ü. Differential Regulation of Volatile Emission from Eucalyptus Globulus Leaves upon Single and Combined Ozone and Wounding Treatments through Recovery and Relationships with Ozone Uptake. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 145, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Kanagendran, A.; Chatterjee, P.; Liu, B.; Sa, T.; Pazouki, L.; Niinemets, Ü. Foliage Inoculation by Burkholderia Vietnamiensis CBMB40 Antagonizes Methyl Jasmonate-Mediated Stress in Eucalyptus Grandis. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 242, 153032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Bortolin, R.C.; Caregnato, F.F.; Junior, A.M.D.; Zanotto-Filho, A.; Moresco, K.S.; de Oliveira Rios, A.; de Oliveira Salvi, A.; Ortmann, C.F.; de Carvalho, P.; Reginatto, F.H. Chronic Ozone Exposure Alters the Secondary Metabolite Profile, Antioxidant Potential, Anti-Inflammatory Property, and Quality of Red Pepper Fruit from Capsicum baccatum. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 129, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Machinery in Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Nile, S.H.; Keum, Y.S.; Nile, A.S.; Jalde, S.S.; Patel, R. V Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory, and Enzyme Inhibitory Activity of Natural Plant Flavonoids and Their Synthesized Derivatives. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2018, 32, e22002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. da Rosa Santos, A.C.; Furlan, C.M. Levels of Phenolic Compounds in Tibouchina Pulchra after Fumigation with Ozone. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2013, 4, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, T.; Li, C. Metabolic Response of Soybean Leaves Induced by Short-Term Exposure of Ozone. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 213, 112033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Betz, G.A.; Knappe, C.; Lapierre, C.; Olbrich, M.; Welzl, G.; Langebartels, C.; Heller, W.; Sandermann, H.; Ernst, D. Ozone Affects Shikimate Pathway Transcripts and Monomeric Lignin Composition in European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Eur. J. For. Res. 2009, 128, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Matyssek, R.; Sandermann, H. Impact of Ozone on Trees: An Ecophysiological Perspective. Prog. Progress. Bot. Genet. Physiol. Syst. Ecol. 2003, 349–404. [Google Scholar]
  135. Di Baccio, D.; Castagna, A.; Paoletti, E.; Sebastiani, L.; Ranieri, A. Could the Differences in O3 Sensitivity between Two Poplar Clones Be Related to a Difference in Antioxidant Defense and Secondary Metabolic Response to O3 Influx? Tree Physiol. 2008, 28, 1761–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. He, X.; Wei, H.; Wei, C.; Dong, T.; Liu, C.; Chen, Z.; Xu, S.; Ruan, Y. Changes of Main Secondary Metabolites in Leaves of Ginkgo Biloba in Response to Ozone Fumigation. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Bartwal, A.; Mall, R.; Lohani, P.; Guru, S.K.; Arora, S. Role of Secondary Metabolites and Brassinosteroids in Plant Defense against Environmental Stresses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 32, 216–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Chaudhary, I.J.; Nigam, B.; Rathore, D. Effect of Elevated Ozone on Soybean (Glycine max L.) Cultivar: Role of Orange Juice and Synthetic Ascorbic Acid. Nat. Environ. Pollut. Technol. 2023, 22, 1225–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Munné-Bosch, S.; Falk, J. New Insights into the Function of Tocopherols in Plants. Planta 2004, 218, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Pollastri, S.; Baccelli, I.; Loreto, F. Isoprene: An Antioxidant Itself or a Molecule with Multiple Regulatory Functions in Plants? Antioxidants 2021, 10, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Velikova, V.; Sharkey, T.D.; Loreto, F. Stabilization of Thylakoid Membranes in Isoprene-Emitting Plants Reduces Formation of Reactive Oxygen Species. Plant Signal Behav. 2012, 7, 139–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Ansari, N.; Yadav, D.S.; Agrawal, M.; Agrawal, S.B. The Impact of Elevated Ozone on Growth, Secondary Metabolites, Production of Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Response in an Anti-Diabetic Plant Costus pictus. Funct. Plant Biol. 2021, 48, 597–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Bison, J.V.; Cardoso-Gustavson, P.; de Moraes, R.M.; da Silva Pedrosa, G.; Cruz, L.S.; Freschi, L.; de Souza, S.R. Volatile Organic Compounds and Nitric Oxide as Responses of a Brazilian Tropical Species to Ozone: The Emission Profile of Young and Mature Leaves. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 3840–3848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Shi, J.; Yan, X.; Sun, T.; Shen, Y.; Shi, Q.; Wang, W.; Bao, M.; Luo, H.; Nian, F.; Ning, G. Homeostatic Regulation of Flavonoid and Lignin Biosynthesis in Phenylpropanoid Pathway of Transgenic Tobacco. Gene 2022, 809, 146017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Yousuf, P.Y.; Shabir, P.A.; Hakeem, K.R. MiRNAomics and Stress Management in Plants; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; ISBN 1040120032. [Google Scholar]
  146. Taylor, M.J.; Lukowski, J.K.; Anderton, C.R. Spatially Resolved Mass Spectrometry at the Single Cell: Recent Innovations in Proteomics and Metabolomics. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 2021, 32, 872–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Dezem, F.S.; Morosini, N.S.; Arjumand, W.; DuBose, H.; Plummer, J. Spatially Resolved Single-Cell Omics: Methods, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 2024, 7, 131–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Charagh, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Raza, A.; Hui, S.; Cao, R.; Zhou, L.; Tang, S.; Hu, P.; Hu, S. Leveraging Multi-Omics Tools to Comprehend Responses and Tolerance Mechanisms of Heavy Metals in Crop Plants. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2024, 24, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Rao, M.J.; Duan, M.; Yang, M.; Fan, H.; Shen, S.; Hu, L.; Wang, L. Novel Insights into Anthocyanin Metabolism and Molecular Characterization of Associated Genes in Sugarcane Rinds Using the Metabolome and Transcriptome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Rao, M.J.; Duan, M.; Wang, J.; Han, S.; Ma, L.; Mo, X.; Li, M.; Hu, L.; Wang, L. Transcriptomic and Widely Targeted Metabolomic Approach Identified Diverse Group of Bioactive Compounds, Antiradical Activities, and Their Associated Genes in Six Sugarcane Varieties. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Zia, K.; Rao, M.J.; Sadaqat, M.; Azeem, F.; Fatima, K.; Tahir Ul Qamar, M.; Alshammari, A.M.; Alharbi, M. Pangenome-Wide Analysis of Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channel (CNGC) Gene Family in Citrus Spp. Revealed Their Intraspecies Diversity and Potential Roles in Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 1034921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Mukherjee, A.; Abraham, S.; Singh, A.; Balaji, S.; Mukunthan, K.S. From Data to Cure: A Comprehensive Exploration of Multi-Omics Data Analysis for Targeted Therapies. Mol. Biotechnol. 2025, 67, 1269–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Rao, M.J.; Duan, M.; Eman, M.; Yuan, H.; Sharma, A.; Zheng, B. Comparative Analysis of Citrus Species’ Flavonoid Metabolism, Gene Expression Profiling, and Their Antioxidant Capacity under Drought Stress. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Rao, M.J.; Duan, M.; Shad, M.A.; Aslam, M.Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, L. Widely Targeted LC-MS/MS Approach Provides Insights into Variations in Bioactive Flavonoid Compounds and Their Antioxidant Activities in Green, Red, and Purple Sugarcane. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 209, 116792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Duan, M.; Bao, L.; Eman, M.; Han, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, B.; Yang, S.; Rao, M.J. The Ectopic Expression of the MpDIR1(t) Gene Enhances the Response of Plants from Arabidopsis Thaliana to Biotic Stress by Regulating the Defense Genes and Antioxidant Flavonoids. Plants 2024, 13, 2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Li, Y. Modern Epigenetics Methods in Biological Research. Methods 2021, 187, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Yan, W.; Fu, R.; Huang, X.; Zhan, A. Dynamic and Functional MiRNA-mediated Gene Regulations in Response to Recurrent Environmental Challenges during Biological Invasions. Mol. Ecol. 2025, e17749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Sandrini, M.; Nerva, L.; Sillo, F.; Balestrini, R.; Chitarra, W.; Zampieri, E. Abiotic Stress and Belowground Microbiome: The Potential of Omics Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Human and natural sources of air pollution. (A) Major sources of air pollution, categorized into human activities and natural processes. Human activities include agriculture (e.g., pesticide use), industrial activities, transportation emissions, waste disposal, and wood burning. Natural sources encompass wildfires, volcanic eruptions, and biogenic emissions. (B) Classification of air pollutants into primary and secondary types. Primary pollutants are directly emitted into the atmosphere and include sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM), heavy metals (HMs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Secondary pollutants are formed in the atmosphere through chemical reactions involving primary pollutants and include particulate matter (PM), ozone (O3), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), and nitric acid (HNO3).
Figure 1. Human and natural sources of air pollution. (A) Major sources of air pollution, categorized into human activities and natural processes. Human activities include agriculture (e.g., pesticide use), industrial activities, transportation emissions, waste disposal, and wood burning. Natural sources encompass wildfires, volcanic eruptions, and biogenic emissions. (B) Classification of air pollutants into primary and secondary types. Primary pollutants are directly emitted into the atmosphere and include sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM), heavy metals (HMs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Secondary pollutants are formed in the atmosphere through chemical reactions involving primary pollutants and include particulate matter (PM), ozone (O3), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), and nitric acid (HNO3).
Antioxidants 14 00907 g001aAntioxidants 14 00907 g001b
Figure 2. Air pollutant stress adaptation mechanism in plants. Abbreviations: RBOHs: Respiratory Burst Oxidase Homologs, CaM: Calmodulin, CDPKs: Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinases, TFs: Transcription Factors, SMs: Secondary Metabolites, SOD: Superoxide dismutase, CAT: Catalase, POD: Peroxidase, APX: Ascorbate peroxidase, GR: Glutathione reductase, GSH: Glutathione, ABC Transporters: ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters. The plant responses to air pollutant stress are categorized into (1) Stress perception: the air pollutants (SOx, NOx, O3, PM, etc.) passively enter leaf tissues through open stomata during normal gas exchange. These air pollutants react with the cellular components and generate ROS and activation of RBOHs, which amplify the stress signal. (2) The signal transduction pathways (MAPK cascade, calcium signaling, and hormonal signaling) are activated, leading to the induction of transcription factors (TFs) such as NAC, WRKY, MYB, AP2/ERF, etc. These TFs regulate the expression of downstream genes involved in the antioxidant defense system and detoxification mechanisms. (3) The plant responds through morphological changes, physiological changes, and biochemical changes (e.g., increased production of secondary metabolites like phenolics, flavonoids, lignification, terpenoids, alkaloids, etc.). These coordinated responses enable the plant to adapt to and mitigate the effects of air pollutant stress, whereas the plants that fail to activate such responses reveal lipid peroxidation, protein modification, and DNA damage, which causes severe stress damage or even cell/plant death.
Figure 2. Air pollutant stress adaptation mechanism in plants. Abbreviations: RBOHs: Respiratory Burst Oxidase Homologs, CaM: Calmodulin, CDPKs: Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinases, TFs: Transcription Factors, SMs: Secondary Metabolites, SOD: Superoxide dismutase, CAT: Catalase, POD: Peroxidase, APX: Ascorbate peroxidase, GR: Glutathione reductase, GSH: Glutathione, ABC Transporters: ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters. The plant responses to air pollutant stress are categorized into (1) Stress perception: the air pollutants (SOx, NOx, O3, PM, etc.) passively enter leaf tissues through open stomata during normal gas exchange. These air pollutants react with the cellular components and generate ROS and activation of RBOHs, which amplify the stress signal. (2) The signal transduction pathways (MAPK cascade, calcium signaling, and hormonal signaling) are activated, leading to the induction of transcription factors (TFs) such as NAC, WRKY, MYB, AP2/ERF, etc. These TFs regulate the expression of downstream genes involved in the antioxidant defense system and detoxification mechanisms. (3) The plant responds through morphological changes, physiological changes, and biochemical changes (e.g., increased production of secondary metabolites like phenolics, flavonoids, lignification, terpenoids, alkaloids, etc.). These coordinated responses enable the plant to adapt to and mitigate the effects of air pollutant stress, whereas the plants that fail to activate such responses reveal lipid peroxidation, protein modification, and DNA damage, which causes severe stress damage or even cell/plant death.
Antioxidants 14 00907 g002
Figure 3. Molecular response of plants under different air pollutant stress. Abbreviations: SA: Salicylic Acid, ET: Ethylene, JA: Jasmonic Acid, ABA: Abscisic Acid, SOD: Superoxide dismutase, GPX6: Glutathione Peroxidase 6, SOD2: Superoxide dismutase 2, POD72: Peroxidase 72, CAT: Catalase, GRXS13: Glutaredoxin 13, GRX480: Glutaredoxin 480, FMO1: Flavin-dependent monooxygenase 1, APX2: Ascorbate peroxidase 2, NTRC: NADPH Thioredoxin reductase C, GSH: Glutathione, AO: Ascorbate oxidase, Rh: Rosa hybrida (L.) [77], Mt: Medicago truncatula [78], At: Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants activate a complex network of molecular pathways in response to air pollutants such as ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and particulate matter (PM). The enrichment of various pathways, including ethylene, auxin, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, abscisic acid, brassinosteroids, and glutathione metabolism, which are critical for stress adaptation.
Figure 3. Molecular response of plants under different air pollutant stress. Abbreviations: SA: Salicylic Acid, ET: Ethylene, JA: Jasmonic Acid, ABA: Abscisic Acid, SOD: Superoxide dismutase, GPX6: Glutathione Peroxidase 6, SOD2: Superoxide dismutase 2, POD72: Peroxidase 72, CAT: Catalase, GRXS13: Glutaredoxin 13, GRX480: Glutaredoxin 480, FMO1: Flavin-dependent monooxygenase 1, APX2: Ascorbate peroxidase 2, NTRC: NADPH Thioredoxin reductase C, GSH: Glutathione, AO: Ascorbate oxidase, Rh: Rosa hybrida (L.) [77], Mt: Medicago truncatula [78], At: Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants activate a complex network of molecular pathways in response to air pollutants such as ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and particulate matter (PM). The enrichment of various pathways, including ethylene, auxin, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, abscisic acid, brassinosteroids, and glutathione metabolism, which are critical for stress adaptation.
Antioxidants 14 00907 g003
Figure 4. Plant metabolic responses to different air pollutants. The figure showed the metabolic adaptations of plants in response to various air pollutants, including particulate matter (PM), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), ozone (O3), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Plants exhibit differential metabolic responses depending on the type and concentration of pollutants.
Figure 4. Plant metabolic responses to different air pollutants. The figure showed the metabolic adaptations of plants in response to various air pollutants, including particulate matter (PM), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), ozone (O3), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Plants exhibit differential metabolic responses depending on the type and concentration of pollutants.
Antioxidants 14 00907 g004
Figure 5. Biotechnological strategies for engineering pollution-tolerant plants. (A) Key molecular targets for genetic improvement (Transcription factor (TF) engineering: Overexpression of stress-responsive TFs (MYB, WRKY) to enhance antioxidant pathways. Phytohormone modulation: Genetic manipulation of salicylic acid (SA), jasmonate (JA), and ethylene (ET) signaling. Secondary metabolite production: Upregulation of phenylpropanoid-derived compounds (flavonoids, lignin) via key enzymes (e.g., chalcone synthase). Antioxidant boost: Overexpression of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) genes. Synthetic biology tools: CRISPR-based genome editing to integrate multigene traits). (B) Omics-guided approaches for stress tolerance breeding: (High-throughput genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, miRNAomics, and epigenomics analyses to identify elite cultivars and molecular markers linked to pollution resilience).
Figure 5. Biotechnological strategies for engineering pollution-tolerant plants. (A) Key molecular targets for genetic improvement (Transcription factor (TF) engineering: Overexpression of stress-responsive TFs (MYB, WRKY) to enhance antioxidant pathways. Phytohormone modulation: Genetic manipulation of salicylic acid (SA), jasmonate (JA), and ethylene (ET) signaling. Secondary metabolite production: Upregulation of phenylpropanoid-derived compounds (flavonoids, lignin) via key enzymes (e.g., chalcone synthase). Antioxidant boost: Overexpression of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) genes. Synthetic biology tools: CRISPR-based genome editing to integrate multigene traits). (B) Omics-guided approaches for stress tolerance breeding: (High-throughput genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, miRNAomics, and epigenomics analyses to identify elite cultivars and molecular markers linked to pollution resilience).
Antioxidants 14 00907 g005
Table 1. Plant metabolites accumulated in response to air pollutants and their function in stress tolerance and antioxidant defense.
Table 1. Plant metabolites accumulated in response to air pollutants and their function in stress tolerance and antioxidant defense.
Serial No.Metabolic CompoundResponse to Air PollutionHeavy Metal PollutionROS
Quenching
Stress Tolerance MechanismAntioxidant
Defense
Reference
1Rosmarinic AcidReduces oxidative stress caused by PM and O3.Chelates HMs like cadmium and lead, reducing toxicity.Direct ROS scavenger enhances antioxidant enzyme.Strengthen stress tolerance by regulating antioxidant genes.Activates glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and SOD pathways.[60,106]
2Salicylic AcidMitigates ozone-induced oxidative stress.Reduces cadmium and arsenic toxicity by enhancing antioxidant capacity.Indirect ROS quenching via upregulation of antioxidant enzymes.Induces systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in plants.Activates peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) pathways.[107,108]
3Syringic AcidProtects against oxidative damage from air pollutants.Chelates heavy metals like arsenic stress.Direct ROS scavenger.Enhances membrane stability under stress.Boosts ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity.[109,110]
4Gallic AcidReduces oxidative stress from air pollutants.Chelates heavy metals like chromium and nickel.Direct ROS scavenger.Stabilizes cellular membranes and proteins.Activates SOD and CAT pathways.[84,111,112]
5Vanillic AcidProtect oxidative stress from sulfur dioxide.Reduces lead and cadmium toxicity.Indirect ROS quenching via antioxidant enzyme activation.Enhances lignin biosynthesis for structural defense.Upregulates POD and APX pathways.[84,113]
6LigninActs as a physical barrier against air pollutants.Binds heavy metals, reducing their bioavailability.Indirect ROS quenching by reinforcing cell walls.Provides structural integrity under stress.Enhances the phenylpropanoid pathway for stress tolerance.[60,61]
7p-Coumaric AcidReduces oxidative stress from O3 and PM.Chelates heavy metals like cadmium.Direct ROS scavenger.Enhances lignin biosynthesis.Activates PAL (phenylalanine ammonia-lyase) pathway.[114,115]
8Caffeic AcidProtects against oxidative damage from air pollutants.Chelates heavy metals like iron and copper.Direct ROS scavenger.Enhance phenolic compound biosynthesis.Boosts APX and SOD activity.[114,116]
9Ferulic AcidReduces oxidative stress from different air pollutants.Chelates heavy metals like aluminum.Direct ROS scavenger.Stabilizes cell walls and membranes.Activates POD and CAT pathways.[114,116,117]
10IsofraxidinMitigates oxidative stress from O3.Reduces cadmium toxicity.Direct ROS scavenger.Improves lignin biosynthesis.Activates POD and CAT pathways.[105]
11KaempferolReduces oxidative stress from particulate matter.Chelates heavy metals like lead and cadmium.Direct ROS scavenger.Enhances flavonoid biosynthesis.Activates GST and SOD pathways.[118]
12ApigeninProtects against oxidative damage from air pollutants.Reduces chromium toxicity.Direct ROS scavenger.Strengthens stress tolerance via flavonoid metabolism.Boosts CAT and APX activity.[119]
13QuercetinReduces oxidative stress from ozone and nitrogen oxides (NOx).Chelates heavy metals like cadmium and lead.Direct ROS scavenger.Increases flavonoid biosynthesis.Activates SOD, CAT, and APX pathways.[118]
14QuercitrinMitigates oxidative damage from air pollutants.Reduces arsenic toxicity.Direct ROS scavenger.Enhance stress tolerance via flavonoid metabolism.Activates GST and SOD pathways.[120,121]
15RutinProtects against oxidative stress from sulfur dioxide (SO2).Chelates heavy metals like cadmium.Direct ROS scavenger.Improves flavonoid biosynthesis.Boosts CAT and APX activity.[120]
16IsoquercetrinReduces oxidative stress from ozone.Reduces lead toxicity.Direct ROS scavenger.Enhance stress tolerance via flavonoid metabolism.Activates SOD and CAT pathways.[105,122]
17IsoquercetinMitigates oxidative damage from air pollutants.Reduces cadmium toxicity.Direct ROS scavenger.Increases flavonoid biosynthesis.Boosts APX and GST activity.[105,122]
18OleuropeinProtects against oxidative stress from ozoneChelates heavy metals like copper and zinc.Direct ROS scavenger.Enhance phenolic compound biosynthesis.Activates SOD and CAT pathways.[105,122]
19Condensed TanninActs as a physical barrier against air pollutants.Binds heavy metals, reducing their bioavailability.Indirect ROS quenching by reinforcing cell walls.Provides structural integrity under stress.Enhances the phenylpropanoid pathway for stress tolerance.[121]
20AnthocyaninsReduces oxidative stress from ozone and particulate matter.Chelates heavy metals like cadmium.Direct ROS scavenger.Enhances flavonoid biosynthesis.Activates SOD, CAT, and APX pathways.[123,124]
21SerineHelps in detoxifying air pollutants by supporting glutathione synthesis.Reduces heavy metal toxicity by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activity.Indirect ROS quenching via glutathione production.Supports cellular metabolism and stress signaling.Activates glutathione (GSH) biosynthesis pathway.[62]
22ThreonineSupports protein synthesis under oxidative stress caused by air pollution.Chelates heavy metals like cadmium and lead.Indirect ROS quenching by supporting antioxidant enzyme synthesis.Boosts protein stability and repair under stress.Boosts the synthesis of stress-responsive proteins.[62]
23ArginineReduces oxidative stress from nitrogen oxides (NOx) by producing nitric oxide (NO).Chelates heavy metals like copper and zinc.Indirect ROS quenching via nitric oxide (NO) signaling.Increases stress tolerance through polyamine biosynthesis.Activates nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and polyamine pathways.[62]
24OrnithineSupports detoxification of air pollutants by participating in the urea cycle.Reduces heavy metal toxicity by enhancing polyamine biosynthesis.Indirect ROS quenching via polyamine production.Enhance cellular repair and stress signaling.Activates polyamine biosynthesis pathway.[6]
25PhenylalaninePrecursor for phenolic compounds that mitigate oxidative stress from air pollution.Reduces heavy metal toxicity by enhancing lignin and flavonoid biosynthesis.Indirect ROS quenching via phenolic compound production.Improves structural defense through lignin biosynthesis.Activates the phenylpropanoid pathway for antioxidant production.[7,8]
26AnthranilateSupports the synthesis of secondary metabolites that combat oxidative stress.Reduces HM toxicity by enhancing tryptophan-derived metabolite production.Indirect ROS quenching via secondary metabolite production.Enhance stress tolerance through secondary metabolite biosynthesis.Activates tryptophan metabolism pathway.[62,105]
27HistidinolPrecursor for histidine, which plays a role in metal binding and ROS scavenging.Reduces heavy metal toxicity by chelating metals like nickel and cadmium.Indirect ROS quenching via histidine production.Increases metal binding and stress tolerance.Activates the histidine biosynthesis pathway.[125]
28HistidineChelates heavy metals and reduces oxidative stress from air pollutants.Strong metal chelator, reduces the toxicity of nickel, cadmium, and copper.Direct ROS scavenger and metal chelator.Enhances metal detoxification and stress tolerance.Activates metal chelation and antioxidant defense pathways.[125]
29GlutamateCentral metabolite in nitrogen metabolism, supports detoxification of air pollutants.Reduces heavy metal toxicity by enhancing glutathione synthesis.Indirect ROS quenching via glutathione production.Boosts nitrogen metabolism and stress signaling.Activates glutathione (GSH) biosynthesis pathway.[62,105]
30GlutamineSupports the synthesis of antioxidants and stress-responsive proteins.Reduces heavy metal toxicity by enhancing glutathione synthesis.Indirect ROS quenching via glutathione production.Enhances nitrogen metabolism and cellular repair.Activates glutathione (GSH) biosynthesis and stress-responsive protein pathways.[62,105]
31β-CaroteneProtects from oxidative stress caused by O3 and PM.Reduces HM toxicity by scavenging ROS generated by metals like cadmium and lead.Direct ROS scavenger, protects chlorophyll and membranes.Protects photosynthetic apparatus and stabilizes membranes.Activates non-enzymatic antioxidant defense by quenching singlet oxygen and peroxyl radicals.[13,126,127]
32α-PineneReduces oxidative stress from O3 and nitrogen oxides (NOx).Reduces HM toxicity by enhancing antioxidant capacity.Indirect ROS quenching via upregulation of antioxidant enzymes.Improves membrane stability and reduces lipid peroxidation.Boosts the activity of SOD and CAT enzymes.[126]
331,8-CineoleMitigates oxidative stress from O3 and sulfur dioxide (SO2).Decreases HM toxicity by chelating metals like cadmium and lead.Indirect ROS quenching via antioxidant enzyme activation.Enhance stress tolerance by stabilizing cellular membranes.Activates GST and APX pathways.[127]
34CampheneMitigates oxidative damage from O3 and PM.Reduces heavy metal toxicity by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activity.Indirect ROS quenching via antioxidant enzyme activation.Increases membrane stability and reduces oxidative damage.Boosts SOD and CAT activity.[126]
35QuinolizidineAccumulates in response to ozone (O3) to protect against oxidative stress.Chelating metals like cadmium and nickel.Indirect ROS quenching via secondary metabolite production.Improve stress tolerance through alkaloid biosynthesis.Activates secondary metabolite pathways for stress tolerance.[122]
36PiperidineMitigates oxidative stress from O3 and nitrogen oxides (NOx).Reduces heavy metal toxicity by chelating metals like lead and cadmium.Indirect ROS quenching via alkaloid production.Strengthen stress tolerance through alkaloid biosynthesis.Activates alkaloid biosynthesis pathways.[122]
37AromadendreneProtects against oxidative damage from O3 and PM.Lessens HM toxicity by enhancing antioxidant capacity.Indirect ROS quenching via terpenoid production.Enhances membrane stability and reduces oxidative damage.Boosts the activity of antioxidant enzymes like SOD and CAT.[126]
38CapsaicinReduces oxidative stress from O3 and PM.Scavenging ROS generated by metals like cadmium and Pb.Direct ROS scavenger.Boosts stress tolerance through phenolic compound biosynthesis.Activates the phenylpropanoid pathway for antioxidant production.[128]
39PyridineMitigates oxidative stress from O3 and nitrogen oxides (NOx).Chelating metals like nickel and cadmium.Indirect ROS quenching via alkaloid production.Improve stress tolerance through alkaloid biosynthesis.Activates alkaloid biosynthesis pathways.[122]
40PyrimidineProtects against oxidative damage from O3 and PM.Enhances antioxidant enzyme activity against HM.Indirect ROS quenching via nucleotide metabolism.Increase stress tolerance through nucleotide biosynthesis.Activates nucleotide metabolism pathways for stress tolerance.[122]
Plant species for each metabolite are documented in the cited references.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rao, M.J.; Duan, M.; Ikram, M.; Zheng, B. ROS Regulation and Antioxidant Responses in Plants Under Air Pollution: Molecular Signaling, Metabolic Adaptation, and Biotechnological Solutions. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14080907

AMA Style

Rao MJ, Duan M, Ikram M, Zheng B. ROS Regulation and Antioxidant Responses in Plants Under Air Pollution: Molecular Signaling, Metabolic Adaptation, and Biotechnological Solutions. Antioxidants. 2025; 14(8):907. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14080907

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rao, Muhammad Junaid, Mingzheng Duan, Muhammad Ikram, and Bingsong Zheng. 2025. "ROS Regulation and Antioxidant Responses in Plants Under Air Pollution: Molecular Signaling, Metabolic Adaptation, and Biotechnological Solutions" Antioxidants 14, no. 8: 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14080907

APA Style

Rao, M. J., Duan, M., Ikram, M., & Zheng, B. (2025). ROS Regulation and Antioxidant Responses in Plants Under Air Pollution: Molecular Signaling, Metabolic Adaptation, and Biotechnological Solutions. Antioxidants, 14(8), 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14080907

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop