Next Article in Journal
An Overview of Oxidative Stress in Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies in Pediatric Populations
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Oxidative Stress-Induced Senescence in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Regenerative Organic Agriculture and Human Health: The Interconnection Between Soil, Food Quality, and Nutrition

by
Giulia Feliziani
1,2,
Laura Bordoni
2 and
Rosita Gabbianelli
2,*
1
School of Advanced Studies, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy
2
Unit of Molecular Biology and Nutrigenomics, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2025, 14(5), 530; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14050530
Submission received: 5 April 2025 / Revised: 23 April 2025 / Accepted: 26 April 2025 / Published: 29 April 2025

Abstract

:
Regenerative organic agriculture (ROA) combines ecological and organic principles to promote soil health, biodiversity, and long-term sustainability. This narrative review explores the connection between soil quality, food nutritional value, and human health, highlighting how ROA can enhance phytochemical content and reduce harmful residues in plant-based foods. Empirical studies report increases in vitamin C, zinc, and polyphenols in crops such as leafy greens, grapes, and carrots grown under regenerative systems, along with reductions in nitrates and pesticide residues. We summarize recent literature (2000–2025) that links soil-driven improvements in food composition to antioxidant activity and potential health benefits. By addressing current research gaps, this review supports the role of ROA in building resilient food systems and preventing chronic disease.

1. Introduction

Nutrition plays an essential role in chronic disease prevention, immune system support, and general well-being [1,2]. A diet rich in nutrients, antioxidants, and bioactive compounds can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer [3]. Among these compounds, polyphenols and flavonoids help fight inflammation and oxidative stress. Since the nutritional quality of food depends on soil health and agricultural practices, improving soil with sustainable methods is critical to overall health [4]. Regenerative agriculture (RA), a holistic system that seeks to restore soil and ecosystem health, has gained increasing attention for its potential to improve food quality and sustainability [5].
Over past decades, intensive agricultural practices have drastically altered the global landscape, leading to widespread soil degradation and presenting significant challenges to agricultural productivity, biodiversity, and environmental sustainability [6,7]. The excessive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, along with monoculture farming, has not only reduced soil fertility but also disrupted the microbial communities essential for soil health [8]. While these practices initially boosted yields, they initiated a cycle of diminishing returns, greater dependency on inputs, and escalating environmental harm. Simultaneously, global population growth and shifting dietary demands have placed unprecedented pressure on agricultural systems, further amplifying the need for productivity [9].
The intricate relationship between agricultural practices, soil health, food quality, and human health has emerged as a key focus in scientific research. Soil quality, characterized by its chemical composition, structure, and microbial biodiversity, is fundamental to determining the nutritional, chemical, and sensory properties of crops [10]. Healthy soils support robust plant growth and foster the production of bioactive compounds, which are essential to the functional and nutritional attributes of food [11]. Conversely, degraded soils result in nutrient-poor crops, reduced yields, and increased susceptibility to pests and diseases, thereby exacerbating the challenges faced by conventional farming systems [10].
The global trajectory of agricultural expansion further heightens these challenges, posing serious long-term risks to ecosystems through deforestation, biodiversity loss, and greenhouse gas emissions. These interconnected issues cast doubt on the capacity of conventional agricultural systems to secure long-term food security and nutrition [12].
In the face of these pressing challenges, sustainable agricultural practices have gained prominence as both a necessity and an opportunity. Consumers increasingly demand foods that are not only nutritionally superior but also sustainably produced, reflecting evolving societal values centered on health and environmental responsibility [13,14,15]. This dual emphasis on sustainability and health underscores the need for a deeper understanding of the dynamic relationships between soil health, agricultural practices, and food quality.
Sustainable farming approaches, such as organic and regenerative agriculture, have emerged as promising solutions to these challenges. By prioritizing soil health through reduced chemical inputs, enhanced microbial biodiversity, and practices like crop rotation, cover cropping, and minimal tillage, these methods restore soil fertility while producing safer, nutrient-rich foods. Importantly, these approaches align with consumer preferences for high-quality, environmentally sustainable products, offering viable pathways to address the interconnected crises of nutrition, environmental degradation, and food security [14,15].
This narrative review examines the critical role of organic and regenerative agricultural practices in addressing these global challenges. By synthesizing current scientific evidence published between 2000 and 2025, it explores how these approaches contribute to improving soil health, protecting the environment, and enhancing the nutritional and functional qualities of food. Although previous reviews have addressed sustainable agriculture or the nutritional quality of organic foods, few have integrated the direct link between regenerative organic agriculture (ROA), soil-driven phytochemical enhancement, and health implications. This review aims to fill that gap by connecting ROA practices with antioxidant pathways and chronic disease prevention, providing novel insights into how soil-focused interventions may benefit human health and sustainability.

2. Regenerative Agriculture

2.1. What Is Regenerative Agriculture

The concept of regenerative agriculture (RA) was introduced in the 1980s by Robert Rodale [16]. In recent years, it has gained increasing attention and popularity [17,18]. However, defining it precisely is not straightforward, as its application varies according to geographical and environmental context [18,19,20,21].
RA is a multidisciplinary concept addressing the environmental, economic, and social dimensions of farming, reflecting its broad scope and adaptability. Despite extensive research efforts, defining RA in a universally accepted manner remains challenging due to its complexity and context-specific nature. A recent meta-analysis by Jayasinghe and colleagues provides a comprehensive definition, describing RA as a transdisciplinary approach that integrates local and indigenous knowledge with established scientific insights [22]. This framework combines adaptable principles with context-specific practices, prioritizing soil conservation as a foundational step to restore soil health, enhance ecosystem functions, and improve socioeconomic outcomes.
Unlike organic farming, which strictly prohibits synthetic inputs, RA adopts a more flexible approach, promoting their minimal and responsible use when necessary [20]. This strategy allows farmers to focus on restoring soil health and biodiversity while gradually reducing dependence on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides [23]. Its central aim is to restore and strengthen the health, vitality, and adaptive capacity of interconnected ecosystems within farms, ensuring their long-term sustainability [23]. Furthermore, it emphasizes the social and economic dimensions of food production systems, aiming to foster long-term resilience in social, economic, and environmental contexts [18,24]. Case studies in North America and Europe have shown that farms adopting RA practices report improved crop yields, enhanced soil fertility, and increased financial viability due to their reduced dependence on chemical inputs [25,26].
A significant focus of RA is on improving soil health, particularly by restoring organic carbon levels. As Sahu and Das explain, regenerative practices leverage carbon absorbed by plants from the atmosphere to rebuild soil organic carbon, thereby promoting resilience [27]. In addition to soil restoration, RA seeks to strengthen economic stability within farming communities, enhance water management, and conserve biodiversity, both above and below ground. This holistic approach underscores RA’s potential to address interconnected global challenges while adapting to the unique characteristics of diverse landscapes and farming systems.
Driven by the projected global population of 8.6 billion by 2030, intensified conventional industrial agriculture practices exacerbate resource exploitation and environmental degradation, posing significant sustainability challenges in meeting the surging food demand [22]. This concern has fueled interest in developing more sustainable farming systems that reduce synthetic input dependency. RA offers the synergistic potential of landscape restoration and biodiversity conservation [22]. RA practices provide a promising avenue to reverse the trend of degrading landscapes, holding substantial potential for the future of global sustainable agriculture [22].
This approach has gained growing attention in response to global challenges related to climate change and food security. One of its primary benefits is its capacity to sequester organic carbon in the soil, contributing to greenhouse gas emission mitigation [28]. Soil can function as both a source and a sink of carbon, depending on management, biomass input levels, micro-climatic conditions, and bioclimatic change. Global soils are estimated to store approximately 1500 gigatons of carbon, three times the amount present in the atmosphere, making improved soil management a crucial factor in combating global warming [28,29].
RA enhances the resilience of agricultural systems against extreme weather events, such as droughts and floods. Practices such as reduced tillage and cover cropping help preserve soil structure, improve moisture-holding capacity, and protect crops from the adverse effects of climatic fluctuations. Studies from drought-prone regions have demonstrated that farms implementing regenerative practices experience higher soil moisture retention and improved crop survival rates during extreme weather events [30,31]. By integrating these strategies, RA stands as a viable solution for modern agricultural and environmental challenges, offering a sustainable path forward for food production and ecosystem conservation.
RA is not only a response to environmental challenges but also an opportunity to transform agricultural systems into a more resilient and productive model. However, its implementation requires initial investment, technical training, and institutional support to incentivize farmers to adopt these practices. Only through an integrated approach, involving research, public policy, and local communities, will it be possible to maximize the benefits of regenerative agriculture on a global scale [32].

2.2. Key Principles and Practices

Figure 1 shows the fundamental principles of RA. RA focuses on creating sustainable and resilient agricultural systems by maintaining continuous soil cover, minimizing soil disturbance, preserving living roots in the soil throughout the year, increasing species diversity, integrating livestock, and reducing or eliminating synthetic inputs like herbicides and fertilizers [23,32]. These practices, some of which have been used by farmers for generations, are deeply rooted in ecological science, while others are more recent innovations requiring technological support and investments in specialized machinery.
A key aspect of RA is reducing soil disturbance. Practices such as reduced tillage or zero tillage are essential for preserving soil structure, which plays a critical role in nutrient cycling. By allowing fungal hyphae to proliferate and maintaining the integrity of soil aggregates, these techniques help reduce erosion and retain soil organic matter [18]. An intact soil structure also significantly improves water retention, enabling the soil to store more water for plant use [33]. This is especially important in mitigating the effects of drought, making agricultural systems more resilient to climate variability.
Maintaining vegetation cover is another crucial practice. Studies have demonstrated that during periods when the main crop is not growing, planting cover crops, such as legumes (e.g., clovers, lentils, beans) and grasses (e.g., ryegrass, barley, oats), plays a crucial role in soil conservation by enhancing soil structure, improving fertility, reducing soil erosion, water evaporation, and promoting better water retention [34,35,36]. For instance, a field trial in Canada showed that using winter rye as a cover crop reduced soil erosion by 40% and improved water retention by 25% [35]. Additionally, cover crops regulate soil temperature, creating a favorable environment for microbial life [23]. These microbial communities play a pivotal role in nutrient cycling and overall soil health [35].
Promoting biodiversity is fundamental to regenerative systems. Crop diversification, intercropping, and integrating natural habitats within farmland enhance ecological resilience and disrupt cycles of pests and diseases [34,37,38,39]. Rotating diverse crops not only minimizes soil degradation associated with monoculture but also improves nutrient cycling and supports the development of a healthy, balanced soil ecosystem [40,41,42]. Integrating livestock into crop systems through practices like rotational grazing further contributes to nutrient recycling and soil fertility, mimicking natural processes that sustain ecosystems [23]. A recent review by Lai and colleagues further highlights the benefits of intercropping as a strategy to optimize resource use and improve soil health [43]. By allowing crops to efficiently share sunlight, water, and nutrients, intercropping enhances yield stability and land productivity while reducing weed competition, pest outbreaks, and soil depletion [43]. Legume–cereal intercropping systems are particularly valuable, as legumes fix atmospheric nitrogen and transfer it to cereals, improving soil fertility. Additionally, intercropping fosters a more diverse soil microbial community, influencing nitrogen cycling and plant–microbe interactions [43].
Maximizing nutrient and water-use efficiency is another priority. Reducing the reliance on chemical fertilizers and pesticides in favor of organic inputs like compost and manure preserves water quality and enhances soil structure [44,45]. Techniques such as contour plowing and planting cover crops help reduce water runoff and soil erosion, while grasses planted along waterways stabilize the soil, preventing sedimentation and protecting aquatic ecosystems [46].
Livestock integration, particularly through rotational grazing, exemplifies the holistic management approach central to RA. By rotating animals through a series of paddocks, overgrazing is avoided, manure is evenly distributed as a natural fertilizer, and soil health is improved [47]. This approach not only increases soil organic carbon but also supports ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration [47]. While livestock farming is often associated with methane emissions, properly managed grazing systems provide significant environmental benefits, including enhanced soil fertility and resilience [5,23]. For example, in a study conducted in the Midwest USA, farms adopting RA practices, such as minimal tillage and cover cropping, demonstrated a 20% increase in soil organic matter and a 30% reduction in fertilizer use over five years [20]. Similarly, in France, vineyards implementing regenerative methods reported improved grape quality and higher resilience to drought conditions [21].
Ultimately, RA leverages a combination of traditional wisdom and modern innovations to restore soil health, improve water efficiency, and promote ecological balance. By focusing on these practices, farmers can build more sustainable and resilient systems that benefit both agricultural productivity and the environment.
Another emerging practice in regenerative systems is the application of biochar, a stable carbon-rich material obtained from the pyrolysis of plant biomass. When incorporated into soil, biochar can enhance soil structure, water retention, and nutrient availability, while also supporting microbial biodiversity [23]. Recent studies suggest that its use may positively affect crop nutritional quality by increasing the concentration of certain micronutrients and phytochemicals [48].
Figure 2 provides an overview of the fundamental principles and practices of RA, highlighting their benefits for soil health, biodiversity, and sustainability. It also illustrates the key microbial mechanisms that contribute to improved nutrient cycling, plant growth, and ecosystem resilience.

2.3. Regenerative Organic Agriculture

The integration of regenerative and organic agriculture (ROA) offers a synergistic approach that significantly enhances soil health, food quality, environmental sustainability, and socio-economic outcomes [49,50,51,52]. Organic farming prioritizes the avoidance of synthetic inputs, such as fertilizers and pesticides, thereby preserving soil microbial biodiversity, while RA focuses on soil restoration through practices like cover cropping, crop rotation, and reduced tillage [53]. Together, these methods build soil organic matter, improve nutrient cycling, enhance water retention, and promote long-term soil fertility [50,53]. Crops cultivated under organic systems are often richer in nutrients and bioactive compounds, as the absence of synthetic chemicals facilitates the uptake of nutrients from healthier soils [8,54]. Regenerative methods further contribute to improved nutritional profiles and sensory qualities of food by fostering soil vitality [50,55].
The combination of these approaches also bolsters biodiversity by eliminating harmful synthetic inputs and integrating agroecological practices that support diverse ecosystems both above and below ground [49]. This enhanced biodiversity creates a resilient agricultural system, benefiting pollinators, natural pest control, and soil microbiomes. Additionally, these systems play a vital role in climate change mitigation; organic farming reduces greenhouse gas emissions by avoiding energy-intensive synthetic fertilizers, while regenerative practices, such as agroforestry and cover cropping, sequester carbon in the soil [32,56]. This combined strategy reduces the carbon footprint of agriculture and enhances climate resilience [28,50,57].
Economically, the rising demand for organic and sustainably produced foods provides premium market opportunities, while the reduced reliance on costly external inputs in regenerative practices improves farm profitability [58,59]. Both systems emphasize the importance of local and traditional knowledge, empowering farmers and fostering community engagement. Furthermore, these practices significantly reduce environmental impacts by minimizing soil and water contamination from agrochemicals, restoring degraded lands, and preventing soil erosion, thereby protecting ecosystems and ensuring sustainable agricultural productivity [55].
Organic and regenerative methods also increase resilience to environmental stressors by promoting robust soil and plant health, enabling crops to better withstand pests, diseases, and climatic variability [49,60]. This ensures sustainable yields, even in challenging conditions. Finally, the principles of ROA align closely with growing consumer demand for sustainable, high-quality products and with policy initiatives that incentivize environmentally friendly practices, providing additional support for their adoption and contributing to a more sustainable agricultural future [50,59].
By integrating ROA principles, agricultural systems can achieve a balance between productivity, sustainability, and environmental stewardship, addressing both current and future challenges in global food production.

3. Links Between Soil Health and Food Quality

3.1. Links Between Soil Health and Plant Health

The intricate relationship between soil composition and plant development is a dynamic interplay of physical, chemical, and biological factors. Soil health refers to the condition of the soil in terms of its capacity to sustain biological productivity, enhance environmental quality, and support both plant and animal health [11]. Soil properties, including texture, acidity, nutrient composition, and microclimatic conditions, significantly influence plant growth, biomass distribution, and the composition of plant communities [61,62,63]. Variations in soil moisture, temperature, and local microclimates further shape plant community structures and microbial ecosystems, demonstrating the complex interdependence between soil and vegetation [62,63,64].
Plants, in turn, contribute to the shaping of soil properties. For instance, plant species can leave lasting “legacies” in the soil, influencing the development of subsequent plant communities. These plant–soil feedback interactions are vital for understanding ecosystem dynamics and nutrient cycling [61,62,65]. Additionally, invasive plant species can alter soil organic matter dynamics and microbial composition, further emphasizing the bidirectional relationship between plants and soils [61,62,66].
From a wide-ranging perspective, soil health profoundly impacts plant productivity and resilience through three interrelated dimensions: physical, chemical, and biological. Physically, soil structure affects water retention, aeration, and root penetration. Well-textured and porous soils ensure adequate water and oxygen availability, which is crucial for root health and overall plant vigor. Chemically, nutrient availability, soil pH, and the balance of essential minerals like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium determine the soil’s capacity to support crop growth. Nutrient deficiencies or imbalances can weaken plants, making them more susceptible to stress [67].
Biologically, soil health hinges on microbial activity, organic matter decomposition, and symbiotic relationships, such as those between nitrogen-fixing bacteria and legumes or mycorrhizal fungi and plant roots. These interactions enhance nutrient cycling, improve soil structure, and strengthen plant defenses against pathogens. Soils rich in microbial diversity create a favorable environment for plant growth by improving nutrient uptake and suppressing harmful microbes [68].
Given the interconnection of soil and plant systems, fostering soil health is fundamental for sustainable agriculture. Practices like crop rotation, organic amendments, and precision farming can restore and maintain soil quality, leading to enhanced crop performance and resilience to environmental stressors [53,69]. ROA, which treats soil as a dynamic living system, offers a holistic approach to improving soil and plant health. By integrating these practices, farmers can achieve long-term productivity while minimizing environmental impacts, paving the way for more resilient agricultural systems.

3.2. Soil Health and Food Quality

Food quality is shaped by a complex interplay of factors, including the chemical composition of food, such as the concentration of nutrients and phytochemicals, often referred to as secondary metabolites or bioactives, and the specific forms in which these compounds are present, such as their glycosylation status, which influences their bioavailability and health benefits. Equally important is food safety, defined by the absence of pathogens, mycotoxins, chemical contaminants, and toxic levels of minerals or phytochemicals [70]. Organoleptic qualities, including taste, flavor, aroma, visual appearance, texture, and storage stability, also play a significant role in determining food quality. Additionally, practical attributes, such as the food’s suitability for handling and distribution along the supply chain, contribute to its overall value [67,70].
Soil health plays a key role in determining the nutritional quality of food. A healthy soil ecosystem, characterized by high biodiversity and robust microbial activity, enhances nutrient cycling and improves the bioavailability of essential minerals and phytochemicals in crops [71,72,73]. Conversely, conventional agricultural practices, such as intensive tillage, synthetic nitrogen fertilization, and pesticide use, disrupt the symbiosis between plants and soil microbiota, leading to a decline in the nutritional density of crops [8,54,74]. In contrast, ROA’s methods promote soil biodiversity, resulting in higher levels of vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals in the food produced, although the underlying mechanisms remain an area for further exploration [8].
The influence of soil types on plant biochemical composition further highlights the importance of soil health in food quality. These are just a few examples that illustrate this relationship. Research on wild garlic (Allium ursinum) demonstrated that leaves grown in Chernozem soil exhibited the highest levels of phytochemicals and antioxidant potential [75]. Similarly, lemongrass cultivars showed significant variations in biochemical properties, yield, and quality based on soil texture, underlining the critical role of soil characteristics in plant development [76]. Moreover, studies on Lepidozia borneensis extract revealed that soil type influences antioxidant and anti-proliferative activities, while marine plants like red seaweed (Kappaphycus alvarezii) and seagrass (Cymodocea serrulata) displayed distinct phytochemical profiles and antioxidant properties depending on soil composition [77,78]. These findings emphasize that soil characteristics are not only critical for plant growth but also for determining the bioactive properties and nutritional quality of agricultural produce.
Cover crops and organic amendments are essential tools for improving soil fertility and, subsequently, food quality. By preventing soil erosion, enhancing moisture retention, and fostering microbial biodiversity, these practices improve nutrient availability in the soil, which directly translates to higher concentrations of bioactive compounds in crops [79,80].
Soil microorganisms, particularly arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), play a crucial role in nutrient cycling, nitrogen fixation, and phosphate solubilization, further improving the nutritional composition of food [81]. A promising approach to further enhance soil biodiversity and nutrient efficiency is the application of biofertilizers, which provide a sustainable alternative to chemical fertilizers. Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms mobilize bound phosphates, making them more accessible to plants, while nitrogen-fixing bacteria convert atmospheric nitrogen into plant-usable forms, significantly improving soil fertility [82,83]. Additionally, algal biofertilizers supply essential nutrients, enhance soil structure, and promote microbial activity and water retention [84]. Similarly, fungal biofertilizers, such as mycorrhizal fungi, establish symbiotic relationships with plant roots, improving nutrient absorption and overall plant health [85,86].
Integrating biofertilizers and microbial inoculants into agricultural systems has been shown to increase the concentration of bioactive compounds in crops, thereby enhancing their nutritional profile and health benefits [87]. For instance, studies have shown that plants grown in soils enriched with mycorrhizal fungi exhibit increased levels of essential minerals and antioxidants [88,89,90]. Likewise, PGPR-inoculated crops often show improved vitamin content and greater stress resilience, resulting in more nutrient-dense and health-promoting foods [91,92].
Adopting strategies such as biofertilizer application, promoting mycorrhizal associations, and enriching rhizosphere microbiome diversity is a key step toward sustainable agriculture. These approaches not only support soil regeneration and crop productivity but also enhance food quality, increase nutrient density, and reduce dependence on synthetic inputs, fostering more resilient and environmentally friendly farming systems [85,86]. Moreover, sustainable soil management practices, such as integrated nutrient management and conservation tillage, improve soil structure and nutrient retention while reducing reliance on chemical inputs. These methods enhance the concentration of essential nutrients and bioactive compounds in crops while mitigating environmental degradation and ensuring food safety [93].
In summary, the health of the soil is intricately linked to the quality of the food it produces. By prioritizing soil biodiversity and functionality, agricultural systems can improve both the nutritional value and safety of food, ultimately benefiting consumer health and ensuring long-term sustainability.

3.3. Effects on Food Quality

ROA aims to eliminate genetically modified organisms (GMOs), antibiotics, pesticides, and mineral fertilizers in order to enhance soil biological activity, balance nutrients, improve regenerative properties, and increase crop yields [24,94]. This approach leads to environmentally friendly products free of chemical elements not naturally present in food. RA focuses on restoring soil health, biodiversity, and ecosystem services, aiming to increase soil organic carbon levels and enhance water cycles, which can lead to improved soil health, increased resilience to climate change, cost savings, and sustainably produced food that meets consumer demand [24,53,94].
By restoring soil function through ROA practices, agricultural systems can overcome nutritional limitations, improve physical properties, increase soil organic matter, and foster beneficial microbial communities [53,95]. These practices also aim to achieve sustainable intensification, resilience, and long-term food security by transforming the foundation of agricultural systems [94,96]. By optimizing resource use, precision farming, and promoting sustainable practices, ROA approaches contribute to economic viability, environmental sustainability, and food security [24,53,94]. This transformative method not only supports farmers’ livelihoods but also aligns with the broader goals of environmental protection and sustainable development, creating more resilient and sustainable food systems globally [94,96,97].
In particular, agricultural management practices, such as organic farming and crop rotation, play a crucial role in determining the polyphenol content of crops, which directly influences their nutritional quality [98,99]. Adequate soil management techniques, including the use of organic amendments and micronutrient fertilization, can contribute to increased polyphenol synthesis in plants [100]. Furthermore, the selection of plant varieties with high inherent polyphenol content and the optimization of growing conditions through proper irrigation and pest control strategies can further enhance polyphenol levels in agricultural produce [101,102]. By focusing on agricultural management strategies that prioritize polyphenol accumulation in plants, farmers can potentially improve the nutritional quality of their crops and meet consumer demand for healthier food options.

3.3.1. Influence on Macronutrient Content

Unlike conventional systems, which often prioritize yield maximization through synthetic inputs, ROA focuses on soil health and nutrient cycling, leading to improved macronutrient density in edible plant tissues. The enrichment of soil organic matter, coupled with increased microbial activity and enhanced nutrient availability, plays a crucial role in optimizing plant metabolism and macronutrient synthesis [103].
One of the advantages of regenerative farming is its ability to improve nitrogen mineralization, a process through which organic matter decomposition releases nitrogen in plant-available forms [23]. This mechanism is particularly relevant for protein synthesis, as nitrogen is a fundamental component of amino acids, the building blocks of proteins essential for human nutrition [104]. The slow and sustained release of nitrogen from compost and organic amendments supports balanced protein accumulation in crops, contrasting with the rapid nutrient depletion often observed in conventionally fertilized soils [94,105,106].
Carbohydrate composition is also influenced by soil health and nutrient availability. Research suggests that ROA systems promote greater starch and soluble sugar accumulation in root and tuber crops, such as potatoes and sweet potatoes, likely due to improved soil structure and water retention capacity [4,94,107]. Similarly, enhanced microbial diversity and nutrient cycling in regenerative systems facilitate higher fiber content in whole grains, fruits, and vegetables, contributing to improved gut health and metabolic regulation in human diets [106,108]. The presence of beneficial soil microbiota stimulates the synthesis of bioactive polysaccharides, which strengthen plant defense mechanisms and improve crop quality by enhancing carbohydrate composition and fiber content. These compounds contribute to digestive health and metabolic balance in human diets [109]. For instance, exopolysaccharides (EPSs) secreted by various microorganisms contribute to soil structure stabilization, nutrient entrapment, and microbial community resilience, allowing plants to better tolerate abiotic stress. These EPSs not only promote plant growth but also have applications beyond agriculture, including potential biomedical uses such as immune modulation and antitumor activity [110]. The ability of EPS-producing microbes to compartmentalize the soil microbial community further enhances their role in plant stress tolerance, making them valuable in the context of sustainable agriculture [109,110,111,112].
Beyond individual macronutrients, ROA fosters a more balanced macronutrient profile in crops, which is critical for both food quality and human health. Comparative studies on conservation agriculture and organic farming indicate that these systems produce grains with higher protein content and better essential amino acid balance, as well as fruits and vegetables with greater dietary fiber and carbohydrate complexity [54,113]. These improvements are attributed to soil organic matter retention, microbial activity, and nutrient cycling efficiency, which collectively optimize macronutrient synthesis and storage in plant tissues.
Although more research is needed to further quantify how ROA systems influence macronutrient density, key gaps remain in understanding the variability across different crop species, climatic conditions, and soil types. Comparative studies evaluating long-term effects on staple crops versus specialty crops, as well as the interactions between regenerative practices and external environmental factors, will be essential to fully assess the scalability and consistency of these benefits.

3.3.2. Influence on Micronutrient Content

Micronutrient deficiencies (MNDs), resulting from inadequate intake of essential nutrients such as calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), iodine (I), selenium (Se), potassium (K), and zinc (Zn), affect over two billion people worldwide and pose a significant challenge to achieving the United Nations’ zero hunger goal by 2030 [114,115,116]. Since plants obtain micronutrients primarily from the soil, agricultural practices that enhance soil health play a crucial role in determining the nutrient density of crops [117]. ROA systems, which prioritize biodiversity, soil structure, and nutrient cycling, have been shown to improve the bioavailability of essential micronutrients in food crops. Unlike conventional agriculture, which often relies on synthetic fertilizers and intensive tillage, ROA promotes soil organic matter accumulation, microbial activity, and efficient nutrient cycling, all of which contribute to improved micronutrient uptake by plants, which can help mitigate MNDs. Notably, Zn, a vital cofactor for numerous enzymes involved in immune function and DNA synthesis, is frequently found in greater amounts in crops grown in soils enriched with compost and organic fertilizers [118,119]. Similarly, regenerative agricultural practices that enhance soil biodiversity improve the bioavailability of key micronutrients such as Mg, K, and Fe, which play fundamental roles in enzymatic activity, energy metabolism, and oxygen transport. The application of compost, cover cropping, and minimal soil disturbance increases the availability of micronutrients by enhancing soil structure and microbial interactions [94,105,106]. Microbial communities play a fundamental role in mineral solubilization and nutrient exchange, releasing essential elements from organic and mineral sources and making them more accessible to plants [107,120].
One of the key mechanisms through which ROA improves nutrient density is by increasing the cation exchange capacity (CEC), a measure of the soil’s ability to retain and supply essential cations such as Ca2⁺, Mg2⁺, K⁺, and Fe3⁺. Higher CEC values enhance soil fertility by preventing nutrient leaching and ensuring a steady supply of essential cations like Ca2⁺, Mg2⁺, and K⁺ to plant roots. This improved nutrient retention translates to higher micronutrient concentrations in edible crops [121]. Additionally, diverse plant-microbe interactions in biologically active soils facilitate the synthesis of natural chelators, such as organic acids and siderophores, which increase the solubility and absorption of essential minerals [94,107].
Empirical studies demonstrate that ROA management practices enhance the micronutrient content of staple crops such as rice, wheat, and tomatoes. Crops grown in organically managed soils have been found to contain higher concentrations of Zn, Fe, and Mg, largely due to the improved soil structure and microbial diversity that facilitate nutrient availability [106,108]. In rice, regenerative practices such as cover cropping and organic amendments have been associated with increased Zn accumulation in grains [115,122]. Similarly, tomatoes cultivated under organic fertilization and deficit irrigation conditions exhibit elevated vitamin C levels and improved mineral content [123,124].
Outside individual nutrient enhancements, regenerative systems also contribute to holistic improvements in food nutrient density. Studies comparing conservation agriculture with conventional methods indicate that regenerative farming leads to higher concentrations of phytochemicals, vitamins, and minerals in a variety of crops, though specific outcomes depend on environmental conditions and crop species [8,54,125]. Organic crops have been found to contain significantly higher levels of vitamin C, Fe, Mg, and phosphorus (P) while also showing reduced nitrate concentrations compared to conventionally grown counterparts [113]. Some studies also highlight the superior polyphenol content in organically grown fruits and vegetables, which further enhances their antioxidant potential [126,127,128,129].
Despite these promising findings, further research is needed to quantify how regenerative practices influence crop nutrient density under different soil compositions, climatic conditions, and cropping systems. Understanding the long-term effects of ROA on micronutrient bioavailability, particularly in nutrient-poor or degraded soils, is crucial for optimizing sustainable agricultural practices. The interplay between soil microbiome diversity, organic matter decomposition, and mineral bioavailability remains an area of active study, with important implications for sustainable food production and global nutrition security. Nonetheless, the growing body of evidence suggests that ROA systems offer a viable pathway to enhancing food nutrient density, reducing dependence on synthetic inputs, and improving long-term soil health. By prioritizing soil regeneration, these systems not only support higher micronutrient availability in crops but also contribute to broader environmental and public health benefits.

3.3.3. Influence on Bioactive Molecule Synthesis

Soil quality is a fundamental determinant in the accumulation of bioactive compounds in crops. The physical, chemical, and microbiological properties of soil directly influence nutrient availability, water retention, and microbial interactions, all of which play a key role in the biosynthesis of polyphenols, flavonoids, and carotenoids [105,107,130]. ROA systems, which prioritize soil health through increased organic matter content and biodiversity, create optimal conditions for the production of these secondary metabolites [105,107].
Several studies have demonstrated that organically managed soils promote the synthesis of phenolic compounds and antioxidant molecules across various crops, including fruits, vegetables, and grains [106,107,130]. The presence of diverse microbial communities enhances nutrient availability and activates the plant metabolic pathways responsible for bioactive compound synthesis. The overall result is a higher concentration of these beneficial compounds, which contribute not only to plant adaptation and resistance but also to improved nutritional quality for consumers [94,107]. Numerous studies have shown that higher levels of these compounds contribute to antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cardioprotective effects, which are essential for the prevention of chronic diseases [130,131,132].
Research has shown that organically cultivated crops contain higher levels of bioactive molecules compared to conventionally grown ones [94,108,133]. This trend has been observed across a wide range of plant species, including leafy greens, cruciferous vegetables, tomatoes, berries, cereals, and legumes [94,105,107]. For example, organically grown cruciferous vegetables tend to have increased glucosinolates and flavonoids, which contribute to their antioxidant properties and potential cancer-preventive effects [107,108]. Similarly, organic tomatoes and berries have been found to exhibit higher concentrations of lycopene, anthocyanins, and polyphenols, compounds known for their role in reducing oxidative stress and promoting cardiovascular health [94,106,107]. A study conducted in Guanajuato, Mexico, further supports these findings, demonstrating that organically managed soils contained higher levels of moisture, organic matter, phosphorus, and nitrogen [108]. These enriched conditions facilitated the accumulation of phenolic compounds such as catechin, gallic acid, and rutin in various crops, reinforcing the idea that organic farming enhances the synthesis of bioactive molecules through improved soil conditions [94,108].
Beyond organic farming, regenerative practices such as minimal tillage, cover cropping, composting, and biochar application have been shown to further enrich soil fertility and microbial ecosystems, leading to greater bioactive compound production in plants [94,107,120]. These methods stimulate root–microbe interactions, facilitating nutrient uptake and secondary metabolite synthesis [105,106]. Additionally, they help to reduce oxidative stress in plants, thereby promoting the accumulation of antioxidants like flavonoids and carotenoids [94,107].
The integration of regenerative techniques also contributes to a more resilient agricultural system [23]. The use of biochar-based ecological farming, for instance, has been found to improve soil carbon content, microbial richness, and nutrient availability, leading to increased polyphenol levels in a variety of crops [107,120]. Similarly, conservation agriculture methods that reduce chemical inputs while maintaining high organic matter levels have been associated with higher nutrient density in fruits, vegetables, and grains [23,94,106]. These approaches create a self-sustaining environment that not only enhances plant metabolism but also promotes ecological balance and long-term agricultural sustainability [94,105].
The evidence indicates that ROA significantly increases the bioactive molecule content in crops, resulting in food products with enhanced nutritional value and potential health benefits. By promoting soil biodiversity, improving nutrient availability, and minimizing dependence on synthetic inputs, these agricultural practices foster an environment that naturally stimulates the synthesis of polyphenols, flavonoids, and carotenoids.
To provide a clear and structured overview of the main effects of ROA on the nutritional quality of crops, Table 1 summarizes key findings from the literature. This synthesis highlights the differences between agricultural practices in terms of nutrient and bioactive compound content, offering valuable insights into their potential health benefits.

4. Food-Crop Quality and Human Health

As detailed in Section 3.3.3, ROA enhances the synthesis of antioxidant compounds such as polyphenols and carotenoids in crops due to improved soil conditions and microbial interactions. In this section, we focus on the functional implications of these compounds for human health, particularly their role in oxidative stress reduction and chronic disease prevention.

4.1. Impact on Human Health

The impact of ROA extends beyond environmental sustainability, offering significant benefits for human health through improved nutritional profiles of food. These agricultural practices prioritize soil health, biodiversity, and reduced chemical inputs, which directly influence the macronutrient and micronutrient content of crops, enhance bioactive compounds, and boost antioxidant properties [54,70].
Numerous studies show that organically grown fruit, vegetables, and cereals contain higher amounts of essential micronutrients, antioxidants, and polyphenols [10,67,99,113,115,137,138]. These compounds help reduce oxidative stress, inflammation, and the risk of chronic diseases [132,133,138]. Additionally, ROA practices enhance nutrient uptake in plants, making them more resistant to disease [139]. Reducing reliance on synthetic pesticides and herbicides further mitigates the obesogenic risk associated with early life endocrine disruption exposure, neurotoxicity in neonatal exposed organisms and their progenies, and carcinogenicity due to chronic chemical exposure, presenting significant public health benefits [140,141]. Moreover, pasture-based livestock systems, integral to RA, yield animal products with a more favorable lipid profile, including higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid, known for their cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory properties [142,143,144].
While substantial research supports the benefits of ROA for human health, gaps remain in fully understanding the long-term implications of these practices on food composition and disease prevention. More longitudinal studies and clinical trials are needed to establish definitive links between ROA diets and health outcomes. However, the growing body of evidence reinforcing the connection between soil health, nutrient density, and human well-being highlights the transition to organic and regenerative systems as an imperative strategy for promoting long-term health while safeguarding environmental integrity.

4.2. Antioxidant-Related Benefits

As we have already pointed out, foods grown using ROA methods often exhibit superior antioxidant properties. Antioxidants are crucial for neutralizing reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are associated with aging and numerous diseases, including cancer [145,146]. Emerging evidence suggests that ROS play a crucial role as signaling molecules throughout the entire cell death pathway [147]. Excessive ROS production can damage organelle structures and biomolecules, triggering an inflammatory response, a well-established underlying mechanism in the development of diabetes and cancer [147,148]. Crops from organically managed and regenerative systems consistently show higher levels of antioxidants such as vitamin C, tocopherols, and glutathione [54,120]. These outcomes are linked to enhanced soil microbiota activity and increased availability of nutrients like selenium, a key component of glutathione peroxidase (GPx), an enzyme that protects cells from oxidative damage [149,150]. Additionally, avoiding synthetic pesticides and fertilizers minimizes chemical stress on plants and humans, prompting them to enhance natural defense mechanisms [151]. This shift leads to greater investment in antioxidant biosynthesis, particularly in secondary metabolites such as flavonoids and phenolic compounds [74,151,152].
Building on these findings, specific bioactive compounds found in organically grown foods, such as lycopene in tomatoes, play a crucial role in modulating oxidative stress and inflammation, further highlighting the health benefits of antioxidant-rich diets [3]. Tomatoes are rich in lycopene, a red carotenoid pigment with potent antioxidant properties [99,153]. Lycopene scavenges singlet oxygen and peroxyl radicals, reducing oxidative stress. It also inhibits nuclear factor-kB (NF-κB) signaling, a pro-inflammatory pathway, thereby exerting anti-inflammatory effects. Furthermore, lycopene enhances the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor (Nrf2) pathway, promoting the expression of antioxidant response element (ARE)-regulated genes such as heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), which help detoxify ROS and maintain cellular redox balance [147,153]. Moreover, lycopene supports cardiovascular health, reduces cancer risk, combats oxidative stress, lowers blood pressure, prevents LDL oxidation, and inhibits tumor growth [153]. Its antioxidant properties also benefit the skeletal system and neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s [153,154].
Similarly, polyphenols found in organic fruits, such as quercetin in apples and flavonoids in berries, contribute to antioxidant defense by modulating key enzymes in ROS metabolism [155]. Quercetin inhibits xanthine oxidase, an enzyme involved in ROS production, and upregulates catalase (CAT) and GPx, two critical enzymes that neutralize hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [155]. In addition, quercetin interacts with SIRT1, a sirtuin involved in longevity and metabolic regulation, contributing to antiaging effects by enhancing mitochondrial function and cellular resilience against oxidative stress [144,156].
Although a wide range of crops—including cereals, legumes, cotton, and vegetables—may benefit from regenerative organic agriculture [69,157,158,159,160,161], we deliberately focused on well-documented examples, such as grapes and turmeric, where the literature clearly illustrates the connections between soil health, phytochemical composition, and specific antioxidant or anti-inflammatory pathways [108,137,162].
On the anti-inflammatory side, curcumin, a bioactive compound in turmeric, modulates inflammatory pathways by inhibiting cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) and nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), enzymes responsible for prostaglandin (PG) and nitric oxide (NO) synthesis, respectively [163,164]. This leads to reduced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1 [165]. Curcumin also suppresses the activation of NF-κB, a key regulator of inflammation that controls the expression of numerous pro-inflammatory genes [166]. By modulating NF-κB activity, curcumin reduces the transcription of inflammatory mediators, thereby alleviating chronic inflammation linked to various diseases, including arthritis, metabolic syndrome, and neurodegenerative disorders [166]. Additionally, curcumin enhances the activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ), a nuclear receptor involved in lipid metabolism and inflammation resolution, further contributing to its protective effects [167].
Beyond its role in inflammation suppression, curcumin activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), promoting mitochondrial biogenesis and cellular energy balance, which further supports its antiaging properties [164]. This activation improves insulin sensitivity, enhances fatty acid oxidation, and regulates glucose homeostasis, making curcumin a promising therapeutic agent for metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes and obesity [154]. Furthermore, curcumin modulates the gut microbiota composition, promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria while inhibiting pathogenic strains, thereby reducing intestinal inflammation and contributing to overall health [168].
Recent agronomic research supports the claim that agricultural practices, particularly organic and regenerative methods, significantly influence curcumin content in Curcuma longa. Organic systems—leveraging compost, vermicompost, and biofertilizers—create favorable soil conditions that enhance secondary metabolite synthesis. For example, [169] found that vermicompost application, either alone or with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and Azospirillum, significantly improved turmeric rhizome biomass and curcumin content. Similarly, [170] demonstrated that integrating biofertilizers with organic inputs like neem cake and compost enhanced both yield and curcumin concentration, achieving up to 6.32% curcumin content. In another study, [162] reported that combining 50% of the recommended doses of synthetic fertilizers with neem compost improved curcumin levels (5.13%) while maintaining soil fertility, underscoring the value of integrative approaches. While direct evidence on regenerative agriculture remains limited, sustainable strategies like reduced tillage and cover cropping are known to foster favorable soil conditions that could similarly promote curcumin synthesis through enhanced organic matter and microbial diversity [162]. Therefore, organic and regenerative farming approaches hold promise for improving not only the agronomic performance and environmental sustainability of turmeric cultivation but also its nutritional and therapeutic properties.
Emerging research also highlights curcumin’s role in epigenetic modulation, as it influences histone modifications and DNA methylation patterns, potentially impacting gene expression related to inflammation and aging [171]. These results suggest that curcumin not only provides immediate anti-inflammatory benefits but also induces long-term protective effects at the molecular level, underscoring its potential as a multi-faceted therapeutic compound for chronic diseases and longevity.
These findings suggest that even slight increases in specific bioactive compounds, influenced by soil quality and agricultural practices, can significantly enhance the biochemical profile of food. Consequently, consuming such nutrient-rich foods can not only modulate metabolic pathways but also strengthen immune defenses and promote cellular resilience against aging and chronic diseases. Moreover, since the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of these compounds are closely interconnected, they work together to mitigate oxidative stress and reduce chronic inflammation, both of which are key factors in disease prevention and longevity. These results underscore the potential health benefits of ROA products, which, through their enriched bioactive and nutrient composition, help regulate oxidative stress, inflammation, and aging-related pathways (Figure 3). By enhancing soil health and promoting natural plant defenses, ROA not only improves food quality but also contributes to disease prevention and longevity.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

ROA provides measurable health benefits by improving the macronutrient and micronutrient content of food, enhancing bioactive molecules, and boosting antioxidant properties. These advantages are deeply rooted in the improved soil health and biodiversity associated with these sustainable practices. By prioritizing these agricultural systems, we can not only protect the environment but also promote human health and reduce the burden of diet-related diseases.
There is growing scientific interest in the relationship between agricultural practices, soil health, food quality, and human well-being, with increasing evidence supporting the role of ROA in building more sustainable and nutrient-rich food systems. These approaches prioritize soil restoration, biodiversity conservation, and ecological balance, reducing reliance on synthetic inputs while enhancing the availability of essential nutrients and bioactive compounds in crops.
Soil health is at the core of this paradigm shift, as it directly influences plant metabolism, nutrient composition, and the synthesis of bioactive molecules such as polyphenols, flavonoids, and carotenoids. A well-structured soil ecosystem, enriched by microbial diversity and organic matter, enhances plant resilience, supports sustainable yields, and contributes to improved food quality with potential health benefits [74]. Scientific studies confirm that crops grown in regenerative and organic systems often exhibit higher concentrations of vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants, with implications for disease prevention and overall human health. This is of particular interest considering that consuming nutrient-dense foods has been associated with a modestly decreased risk of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and all-cause mortality [172]. Thus, by increasing nutrient density, ROA may offer a promising strategy to combat non-communicable diseases, which remain one of the leading global health challenges.
Beyond nutritional aspects, ROA has the potential to mitigate climate change through carbon sequestration and improved soil structure while reducing the environmental footprint of conventional farming. Sustainable practices, such as cover cropping, crop rotation, reduced tillage, and livestock integration, play a fundamental role in restoring degraded ecosystems and increasing farm resilience.
As global food systems face mounting pressures, transitioning to a more sustainable and health-focused model of agriculture is no longer an option but a necessity. By advancing scientific research, promoting innovative farming techniques, and fostering a deeper understanding of the connections between soil, food, and health, ROA can pave the way toward a more resilient, environmentally responsible, and nutritionally beneficial future.
This approach offers a promising pathway to align agricultural productivity with sustainability and public health goals. However, its widespread adoption will require supportive policy frameworks that incentivize sustainable soil management, promote biodiversity, and ensure equitable access to regenerative practices—particularly for smallholders and transitional systems. Integrating ROA principles into national and international agri-food policies could contribute to long-term food security and public health resilience.
From a research perspective, more interdisciplinary studies are needed to evaluate the specific health impacts of crops grown under ROA systems. Clinical trials, nutritional metabolomics, and long-term epidemiological studies would help clarify the mechanisms linking soil health to human physiology. Additionally, better standardization of RA/ROA definitions and metrics is crucial to foster comparability across studies and support evidence-based policymaking. Overall, ROA offers a unique opportunity to reconnect agricultural practices with the broader goals of planetary and human health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox14050530/s1, Table S1: Comprehensive summary of studies evaluating the effects of soil type and agricultural practices on the nutritional composition and bioactive compound content of crops.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G.; methodology, G.F.; investigation, G.F.; data curation, G.F.; writing—original draft preparation, G.F.; writing—review and editing, L.B. and R.G.; supervision, L.B. and R.G.; funding acquisition, R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been funded by NGEU–PNRR, DM 118/2023, M4 C1 I4.1 “Ricerca PNRR”, CUP J11J23001390006 (Giulia Feliziani’s scholarship), and by FPC102016 Arca srl Benefit to Rosita Gabbianelli.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT (OpenAI, GPT-4 model, version April 2025) for language refinement and text clarification purposes. The authors have reviewed, edited, and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank “Arca srl Benefit” for their financial support to the research activity, which has been conducted under “The Future of Eating” project (co-funded by the Marche Region, through ERDF 2021–2027, intervention 1.1.2.1, project ID 64753—UPC B47H24003250007).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that this study received funding from Arca srl Benefit. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AMFArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
AMPKAMP-activated protein kinase
AREAntioxidant response element
CaCalcium
CATCatalase
CECCation exchange capacity
COX-2Cyclo-oxygenase-2
EPSExopolysaccharide
FeIron
GPx Glutathione peroxidase
GMOGenetically modified organisms
H2O2Hydrogen peroxide
HO-1Heme oxygenase-1
IIodine
KPotassium
MgMagnesium
MNDMicronutrient deficiencies
NF-kBNuclear factor-Kb
NONitric oxide
Nrf2Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor
PPhosphorus
PGProstaglandin
PGPRPlant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
PPAR-γPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma
RARegenerative agriculture
ROARegenerative organic agriculture
ROSReactive oxygen species
SODSuperoxide dismutase
SeSelenium
ZnZinc

References

  1. World Health Organization. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases: Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; ISBN 978-92-4-120916-8. [Google Scholar]
  2. Afshin, A.; Sur, P.J.; Fay, K.A.; Cornaby, L.; Ferrara, G.; Salama, J.S.; Mullany, E.C.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abebe, Z.; et al. Health Effects of Dietary Risks in 195 Countries, 1990–2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2019, 393, 1958–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhou, D.-D.; Luo, M.; Shang, A.; Mao, Q.-Q.; Li, B.-Y.; Gan, R.-Y.; Li, H.-B. Antioxidant Food Components for the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases: Effects, Mechanisms, and Clinical Studies. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 6627355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Silver, W.L.; Perez, T.; Mayer, A.; Jones, A.R. The Role of Soil in the Contribution of Food and Feed. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2021, 376, 20200181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rhodes, C.J. The Imperative for Regenerative Agriculture. Sci. Prog. 2017, 100, 80–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Patra, S.; Julich, S.; Feger, K.-H.; Jat, M.L.; Sharma, P.C.; Schwärzel, K. Effect of Conservation Agriculture on Stratification of Soil Organic Matter under Cereal-Based Cropping Systems. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2019, 65, 2013–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lori, M.; Kundel, D.; Mäder, P.; Singh, A.; Patel, D.; Sisodia, B.S.; Riar, A.; Krause, H.-M. Organic Farming Systems Improve Soil Quality and Shape Microbial Communities across a Cotton-Based Crop Rotation in an Indian Vertisol. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2024, 100, fiae127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Montgomery, D.R.; Biklé, A. Soil Health and Nutrient Density: Beyond Organic vs. Conventional Farming. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 699147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tilman, D.; Balzer, C.; Hill, J.; Befort, B.L. Global Food Demand and the Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20260–20264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mditshwa, A.; Magwaza, L.S.; Tesfay, S.Z.; Mbili, N. Postharvest Quality and Composition of Organically and Conventionally Produced Fruits: A Review. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 216, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cárceles Rodríguez, B.; Durán-Zuazo, V.H.; Soriano Rodríguez, M.; García-Tejero, I.F.; Gálvez Ruiz, B.; Cuadros Tavira, S. Conservation Agriculture as a Sustainable System for Soil Health: A Review. Soil Syst. 2022, 6, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wijerathna-Yapa, A.; Pathirana, R. Sustainable Agro-Food Systems for Addressing Climate Change and Food Security. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kenny, T.A.; Woodside, J.V.; Perry, I.J.; Harrington, J.M. Consumer Attitudes and Behaviors toward More Sustainable Diets: A Scoping Review. Nutr. Rev. 2023, 81, 1665–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Horská, E.; Ürgeová, J.; Prokeinová, R. Consumers’ Food Choice and Quality Perception: Comparative Analysis of Selected Central European Countries. Agric. Econ. Zemědělská Ekon. 2011, 57, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wongprawmas, R.; Mora, C.; Pellegrini, N.; Guiné, R.P.F.; Carini, E.; Sogari, G.; Vittadini, E. Food Choice Determinants and Perceptions of a Healthy Diet among Italian Consumers. Foods 2021, 10, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rodale, R. Breaking New Ground: The Search for a Sustainable Agriculture. Futurist 1983, 17, 15–20. [Google Scholar]
  17. Francis, C.A.; Harwood, R.R.; Parr, J.F. The Potential for Regenerative Agriculture in the Developing World. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 1986, 1, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schreefel, L.; Schulte, R.P.O.; de Boer, I.J.M.; Schrijver, A.P.; van Zanten, H.H.E. Regenerative Agriculture—The Soil Is the Base. Glob. Food Secur. 2020, 26, 100404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Newton, P.; Civita, N.; Frankel-Goldwater, L.; Bartel, K.; Johns, C. What Is Regenerative Agriculture? A Review of Scholar and Practitioner Definitions Based on Processes and Outcomes. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 577723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giller, K.E.; Hijbeek, R.; Andersson, J.A.; Sumberg, J. Regenerative Agriculture: An Agronomic Perspective. Outlook Agric. 2021, 50, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Voisin, R.; Horwitz, P.; Godrich, S.; Sambell, R.; Cullerton, K.; Devine, A. What Goes in and What Comes out: A Scoping Review of Regenerative Agricultural Practices. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 2024, 48, 124–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jayasinghe, S.L.; Thomas, D.T.; Anderson, J.P.; Chen, C.; Macdonald, B.C.T. Global Application of Regenerative Agriculture: A Review of Definitions and Assessment Approaches. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khangura, R.; Ferris, D.; Wagg, C.; Bowyer, J. Regenerative Agriculture—A Literature Review on the Practices and Mechanisms Used to Improve Soil Health. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Elrick, W.; Luke, H.; Stimpson, K. Exploring Opportunities and Constraints of a Certification Scheme for Regenerative Agricultural Practice. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 2022, 46, 1527–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jordon, M.; Willis, K.; Bürkner, P.-C.; Haddaway, N.; Smith, P.; Petrokofsky, G. Temperate Regenerative Agriculture; a Win-Win for Soil Carbon and Crop Yield? Res. Sq. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vugt, D.V.; Franke, A.C.; Giller, K.E. Participatory Research to Close the Soybean Yield Gap on Smallholder Farms in Malawi. Exp. Agric. 2017, 53, 396–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sahu, G.; Das, S. Regenerative Agriculture: Future of Sustainable Food Production. Biot. Res. Today 2020, 2, 745–748. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ghosh, S.; Saha, A.; Kumar, S.; Pathania, S. Regenerative Agriculture for Climate Change Mitigation and Food Security. In Regenerative Agriculture for Sustainable Food Systems; Kumar, S., Meena, R.S., Sheoran, P., Jhariya, M.K., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 83–133. ISBN 978-981-9766-91-8. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zomer, R.J.; Bossio, D.A.; Sommer, R.; Verchot, L.V. Global Sequestration Potential of Increased Organic Carbon in Cropland Soils. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Maurya, S.K.; Kalhapure, A.; Verma, V.K.; Tiwari, A.; Chaubey, C.; Maurya, D.K.; Kumar, M. Irrigation Scheduling and Cultivar Management for Increasing Water Productivity under Dryland Condition: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change 2024, 14, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Soujanya, B.; Gurjar, D.S. Water-Efficient Crop Production: Agronomic Strategies for Drought-Prone Areas. Int. J. Res. Agron. 2024, 7, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dabalen, A.; Goyal, A.; Song, R. Regenerative Agriculture in Practice: A Review; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bharathi, M.; Sivakumar, K.; Gopalakrishnan, M.; Vennila, M.A.; Anandham, R.; Sritharan, N. Soil Physical Health Sustenance: Strategies and Perspectives—A Review. Plant Sci. Today 2024, 11, 5342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gill, H.K.; Grabau, Z.J.; McSorley, R. Cover Crops for Managing Root-Knot Nematodes: IN892 Rev./ENY063, 1/2023. EDIS 2022, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sharifi, M.; Salimi, K.; Rosa, D.; Hart, M. Screening Cover Crops for Utilization in Irrigated Vineyards: A Greenhouse Study on Species’ Nitrogen Uptake and Carbon Sequestration Potential. Plants 2024, 13, 1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kaspar, T.C.; Singer, J.W. The Use of Cover Crops to Manage Soil. In Soil Management: Building a Stable Base for Agriculture; American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 2011; pp. 321–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nasiro, K. Cropping Systems Diversification as an Approach to Enhancing Crop Productivity: A Review. Plant 2024, 12, 48–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tseng, T.M.; Shrestha, S.; Sudip, K.; Tseng, T.M. Crop Diversification for Improved Weed Management: A Review. Agriculture 2021, 11, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Beillouin, D.; Ben-Ari, T.; Malézieux, E.; Seufert, V.; Makowski, D. Positive but Variable Effects of Crop Diversification on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 4697–4710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tully, K.; Ryals, R. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems: Balancing Food and Environmental Objectives. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 2017, 41, 761–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qui, N.V.; Khoa, L.V.; Phuong, N.M.; Vien, D.M.; Dung, T.V.; Linh, T.B.; Khanh, T.H.; Thuong, B.T.; Tran, V.T.T.; Nghia, N.K.; et al. Effects of Rotating Rice with Upland Crops and Adding Organic Amendments, and of Related Soil Quality on Rice Yield in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nesper, M.; Kueffer, C.; Krishnan, S.; Kushalappa, C.G.; Ghazoul, J. Simplification of Shade Tree Diversity Reduces Nutrient Cycling Resilience in Coffee Agroforestry. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 56, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lai, H.; Gao, F.; Su, H.; Zheng, P.; Li, Y.; Yao, H. Nitrogen Distribution and Soil Microbial Community Characteristics in a Legume–Cereal Intercropping System: A Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chotangui, A.H.; Mandou, M.S.; Beyegue-Djonko, H.; Tamfuh, P.A.; Atabontsa, D.; Waa, S.C.S.; Tchapga, F.J.N.; Kouam, E.B. Effects of Poultry Manure, Urban Waste Compost and NPK-20-10-10 on the Growth, Yield and Shelf-Life of Two Varieties of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in the Western Highlands of Cameroon. Asian J. Agric. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hijbeek, R.; Pronk, A.A.; van Ittersum, M.K.; Verhagen, A.; Ruysschaert, G.; Bijttebier, J.; Zavattaro, L.; Bechini, L.; Schlatter, N.; ten Berge, H.F.M. Use of Organic Inputs by Arable Farmers in Six Agro-Ecological Zones across Europe: Drivers and Barriers. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2019, 275, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Elevitch, C.; Mazaroli, D.; Ragone, D. Agroforestry Standards for Regenerative Agriculture. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Waters, C.M.; Orgill, S.E.; Melville, G.J.; Toole, I.D.; Smith, W.J. Management of Grazing Intensity in the Semi-Arid Rangelands of Southern Australia: Effects on Soil and Biodiversity. Land Degrad. Dev. 2017, 28, 1363–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Thapa, R.B.; Coupal, R.H.; Dangi, M.B.; Stahl, P.D. An Assessment of Plant Growth and Soil Properties Using Coal Char and Biochar as a Soil Amendment. Agronomy 2024, 14, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rehberger, E.; West, P.; Spillane, C.; McKeown, P. What Climate and Environmental Benefits of Regenerative Agriculture Practices? An Evidence Review. Environ. Res. Commun. 2023, 5, 052001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Begam, A.; Paramanik, B.; Dutta, S.; Dutta, G.; Bhattacharjee, S. Combating the Effects of Climate Change through Regenerative Organic Agriculture. In Regenerative Agriculture; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; ISBN 978-1-00-330958-1. [Google Scholar]
  51. Banerjee, S.; Verma, S.; Regmi, R.; Kaushal, S. A Vision toward Regenerative Organic Agriculture to Sustain Climate Change and Combat Global Warming. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2023, 42, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dierenfeld, E.S. 94 Sustainable Feeding Solutions Across the Animal Kingdom: Identifying and Implementing. J. Anim. Sci. 2023, 101, 116–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Singh, N.K.; Sachan, K.; Manoj, B.P.; Panotra, N.; Katiyar, D. Building Soil Health and Fertility through Organic Amendments and Practices: A Review. Asian J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2024, 10, 175–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Montgomery, D.R.; Biklé, A.; Archuleta, R.; Brown, P.; Jordan, J. Soil Health and Nutrient Density: Preliminary Comparison of Regenerative and Conventional Farming. PeerJ 2022, 10, e12848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Varma, N.; Wadatkar, H.; Salve, R.; Kumar, T.V. Advancing Sustainable Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of Organic Farming Practices and Environmental Impact. J. Exp. Agric. Int. 2024, 46, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Scialabba, N.E.-H.; Müller-Lindenlauf, M. Organic Agriculture and Climate Change. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2010, 25, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Akpoti, K.; Kabo-bah, A.T.; Zwart, S.J. Review—Agricultural Land Suitability Analysis: State-of-the-Art and Outlooks for Integration of Climate Change Analysis. Agric. Syst. 2019, 173, 172–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sahota, A. The Global Market for Organic Food & Drink. In The World of Organic Agriculture; Routledge: London, UK, 2010; pp. 59–63. ISBN 978-1-84977-599-1. [Google Scholar]
  59. Willer, H.; Schlatter, B.; Trávníček, J. The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2023; Willer, H., Schlatter, B., Trávníček, J., Eds.; Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL: Frick, Switzerland; IFOAM—Organics International: Bonn, Germany, 2023; pp. 1–358. [Google Scholar]
  60. Fenster, T.L.D.; LaCanne, C.E.; Pecenka, J.R.; Schmid, R.B.; Bredeson, M.M.; Busenitz, K.M.; Michels, A.M.; Welch, K.D.; Lundgren, J.G. Defining and Validating Regenerative Farm Systems Using a Composite of Ranked Agricultural Practices. F1000Research 2021, 10, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Heinen, R.; Hannula, S.E.; De Long, J.R.; Huberty, M.; Jongen, R.; Kielak, A.; Steinauer, K.; Zhu, F.; Bezemer, T.M. Plant Community Composition Steers Grassland Vegetation via Soil Legacy Effects. Ecol. Lett. 2020, 23, 973–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bauer, J.T.; Blumenthal, N.; Miller, A.J.; Ferguson, J.K.; Reynolds, H.L. Effects of Between-Site Variation in Soil Microbial Communities and Plant-Soil Feedbacks on the Productivity and Composition of Plant Communities. J. Appl. Ecol. 2017, 54, 1028–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xue, R.; Yang, Q.; Miao, F.; Wang, X.; Shen, Y.; Xue, R.; Yang, Q.; Miao, F.; Wang, X.; Shen, Y. Slope Aspect Influences Plant Biomass, Soil Properties and Microbial Composition in Alpine Meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2018, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wei, Z.; Gu, Y.; Friman, V.-P.; Kowalchuk, G.A.; Xu, Y.; Shen, Q.; Jousset, A. Initial Soil Microbiome Composition and Functioning Predetermine Future Plant Health. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaaw0759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Heinen, R.; van der Sluijs, M.; Biere, A.; Harvey, J.A.; Bezemer, T.M. Plant Community Composition but Not Plant Traits Determine the Outcome of Soil Legacy Effects on Plants and Insects. J. Ecol. 2018, 106, 1217–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tamura, M.; Suseela, V.; Simpson, M.; Powell, B.; Tharayil, N. Plant Litter Chemistry Alters the Content and Composition of Organic Carbon Associated with Soil Mineral and Aggregate Fractions in Invaded Ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 2017, 23, 4002–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Reeve, J.R.; Hoagland, L.A.; Villalba, J.J.; Carr, P.M.; Atucha, A.; Cambardella, C.; Davis, D.R.; Delate, K. Organic Farming, Soil Health, and Food Quality: Considering Possible Links. In Advances in Agronomy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 137, pp. 319–367. ISBN 978-0-12-804692-0. [Google Scholar]
  68. Coban, O.; De Deyn, G.B.; van der Ploeg, M. Soil Microbiota as Game-Changers in Restoration of Degraded Lands. Science 2022, 375, abe0725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zani, C.F.; Manning, D.A.C.; Abbott, G.D.; Taylor, J.A.; Cooper, J.; Lopez-Capel, E. Diversified Crop Rotations and Organic Amendments as Strategies for Increasing Soil Carbon Storage and Stabilisation in UK Arable Systems. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 11, 1113026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lister, C. Nutrient Density and Food Quality in the Context of Regenerative Agriculture; AgResearch: Lincoln, New Zealand, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  71. Allam, M.; Radicetti, E.; Petroselli, V.; Mancinelli, R. Meta-Analysis Approach to Assess the Effects of Soil Tillage and Fertilization Source under Different Cropping Systems. Agriculture 2021, 11, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rusu, M.; Mihai, M.; Tritean, N.; Mihai, V.C.; Moldovan, L.; Ceclan, A.O.; Russu, F.; Toader, C. Protection and Modeling in the Use of S, Ca, and Mg Alternatives for Long-Term Sustainable Fertilization Systems. Agronomy 2024, 14, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. El-Waraky, E.A.; El-Beltagi, H.S.; El-Nady, M.F.; Al-daej, M.I.; Belal, E.B.; Shehata, W.F.; Hadid, M.L.; Metwaly, M.M.S. Responses of Gossypium Barbadense L. Cotton Plants to Biofertilizers under Different Levels of Nitrogen Fertilization. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2025, 34, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Barański, M.; Srednicka-Tober, D.; Volakakis, N.; Seal, C.; Sanderson, R.; Stewart, G.B.; Benbrook, C.; Biavati, B.; Markellou, E.; Giotis, C.; et al. Higher Antioxidant and Lower Cadmium Concentrations and Lower Incidence of Pesticide Residues in Organically Grown Crops: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analyses. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 112, 794–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Stefan, G.; Dragoja, R.; Sandra, V. Phytochemical Characterization and Antioxidant Potential of Allium Ursinum L. Cultivated on Different Soil Types- a Preliminary Study. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2023, 35, 904–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mehrotra, R.; Lothe, N.B.; Verma, R.K. Comparative Study on Changes in Biochemical Constituents, Yield and Quality of Lemongrass (Cymbopogon flexuosus) Grown under Different Soil Types. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2023, 69, 3167–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Abu Bakar, M.F.; Abdul Karim, F.; Suleiman, M.; Isha, A.; Rahmat, A. Phytochemical Constituents, Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Properties of a Liverwort, Lepidozia Borneensis Stephani from Mount Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. ECAM 2015, 2015, 936215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Das, D.; Arulkumar, A.; Paramasivam, S.; Lopez-Santamarina, A.; Del Carmen Mondragon, A.; Miranda Lopez, J.M. Phytochemical Constituents, Antimicrobial Properties and Bioactivity of Marine Red Seaweed (Kappaphycus alvarezii) and Seagrass (Cymodocea serrulata). Foods 2023, 12, 2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tahat, M.M.; Alananbeh, K.M.; Othman, Y.A.; Leskovar, D.I. Soil Health and Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sharma, P.; Singh, A.; Kahlon, C.S.; Brar, A.S.; Grover, K.K.; Dia, M.; Steiner, R.L. The Role of Cover Crops towards Sustainable Soil Health and Agriculture—A Review Paper. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1935–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, D.; Saeed, M.; Ali, M.N.H.A.; Raheel, M.; Ashraf, W.; Hassan, Z.; Hassan, M.Z.; Farooq, U.; Hakim, M.F.; Rao, M.J.; et al. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Combined Application Reveals Enhanced Soil Fertility and Rice Production. Agronomy 2023, 13, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rawat, P.; Das, S.; Shankhdhar, D.; Shankhdhar, S.C. Phosphate-Solubilizing Microorganisms: Mechanism and Their Role in Phosphate Solubilization and Uptake. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 21, 49–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Alomari, S.; Hasan, R.; Nazar Al-najim, A.; Saadi, A. Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria and Their Applications in the Environment: A Review. Int. J. Med. Body Health Res. 2024, 5, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chatterjee, A.; Singh, S.; Agrawal, C.; Yadav, S.; Rai, R.; Rai, L.C. Chapter 10—Role of Algae as a Biofertilizer. In Algal Green Chemistry; Rastogi, R.P., Madamwar, D., Pandey, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 189–200. ISBN 978-0-444-63784-0. [Google Scholar]
  85. Areej, A.; Usama, M.; Zulfiqar, U.; Sarwar, F.; Ashiq, A. Sustainable Agriculture Development: The Role of Biofertilizers in Soil Fertility and Crop Yield Improvement. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2024, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Reddy, G.S.V.; Bokka, S.K.R.; Chellem, S.R.; Kalpana, K.; Indrani, K.; Bindu, T.P.L.H.; Navya, D.S. Mutualistic Relationships between Plants and Mycorrhizal Fungi Impacts on Ecosystem Functioning: A Review. Uttar Pradesh J. Zool. 2024, 45, 242–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Reis, G.A.; Martínez-Burgos, W.J.; Pozzan, R.; Pastrana Puche, Y.; Ocán-Torres, D.; de Queiroz Fonseca Mota, P.; Rodrigues, C.; Lima Serra, J.; Scapini, T.; Karp, S.G.; et al. Comprehensive Review of Microbial Inoculants: Agricultural Applications, Technology Trends in Patents, and Regulatory Frameworks. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yang, Y.; Han, X.; Liang, Y.; Ghosh, A.; Chen, J.; Tang, M. The Combined Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Lead (Pb) Stress on Pb Accumulation, Plant Growth Parameters, Photosynthesis, and Antioxidant Enzymes in Robinia pseudoacacia L. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ben Hassena, A.; Zouari, M.; Labrousse, P.; Decou, R.; Soua, N.; Khabou, W.; Zouari, N. Effect of Arbuscular Myccorhizal Fungi on Soil Properties, Mineral Nutrition and Antioxidant Enzymes of Olive Plants under Treated Wastewater Irrigation. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 148, 710–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Alam, M.Z.; Choudhury, T.R.; Mridha, M.A.U. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Enhance Biomass Growth, Mineral Content, and Antioxidant Activity in Tomato Plants under Drought Stress. J. Food Qual. 2023, 2023, 2581608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jabborova, D.; Kannepalli, A.; Davranov, K.; Narimanov, A.; Enakiev, Y.; Syed, A.; Elgorban, A.M.; Bahkali, A.H.; Wirth, S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; et al. Co-Inoculation of Rhizobacteria Promotes Growth, Yield, and Nutrient Contents in Soybean and Improves Soil Enzymes and Nutrients under Drought Conditions. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tsegaye, Z.; Alemu, T.; Desta, F.A.; Assefa, F. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterial Inoculation to Improve Growth, Yield, and Grain Nutrient Uptake of Teff Varieties. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 896770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mamatha, B.; Mudigiri, C.; Ramesh, G.; Saidulu, P.; Meenakshi, N.; Prasanna, C.L. Enhancing Soil Health and Fertility Management for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Asian J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2024, 10, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Pejanović, V.; Radaković, M.; Radović, G. Smart and Regenerative Agriculture in the Function of Agricultural Entrepreneurship. In Proceedings of the 13th International Scientific Conference “Employment, Education and Entrepreneurship”, Belgrad, Serbia, 25 October 2024; pp. 593–603. [Google Scholar]
  95. Prairie, A.M.; King, A.E.; Cotrufo, M.F. Restoring Particulate and Mineral-Associated Organic Carbon through Regenerative Agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2217481120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Watson, D. Transforming Food Systems: The Quest for Sustainability; Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing: London, UK, 2024; ISBN 978-1-00-356288-7. [Google Scholar]
  97. Singh, Y.K.; Rakesh, S.; Singh, B. veer Organic Farming for Residue-Free Production. J. Exp. Agric. Int. 2024, 46, 548–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Khoshgoftarmanesh, A.H.; Schulin, R.; Chaney, R.L.; Daneshbakhsh, B.; Afyuni, M. Micronutrient-Efficient Genotypes for Crop Yield and Nutritional Quality in Sustainable Agriculture. A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 30, 83–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hallmann, E. The Influence of Organic and Conventional Cultivation Systems on the Nutritional Value and Content of Bioactive Compounds in Selected Tomato Types. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 2840–2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Heimler, D.; Romani, A.; Ieri, F. Plant Polyphenol Content, Soil Fertilization and Agricultural Management: A Review. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Swami, S.; Muzammil, R.; Saha, S.; Shabeer, A.; Oulkar, D.; Banerjee, K.; Singh, S.B. Evaluation of Ozonation Technique for Pesticide Residue Removal and Its Effect on Ascorbic Acid, Cyanidin-3-Glucoside, and Polyphenols in Apple (Malus domesticus) Fruits. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Munir, S.; Azeem, A.; Sikandar Zaman, M.; Haq, M.Z.U. From Field to Table: Ensuring Food Safety by Reducing Pesticide Residues in Food. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 922, 171382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Karim, A.; Kumar, M.; Singh, E.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, S.; Ray, A.; Dhal, N. Enrichment of Primary Macronutrients in Biochar for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 52, 1449–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ohyama, T. Nitrogen as a Major Essential Element of Plants. In Nitrogen Assimilation in Plants; Research Singpos: Kerala, India, 2010; pp. 1–17. ISBN 978-81-308-0406-4. [Google Scholar]
  105. Majhi, D.A. Impact of Organic Farming in Economic Development in Agriculture. Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Manag. 2024, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Capetz, M.; Sharma, S.; Padilha, R.; Olsen, P.; Wolk, J.; Kiciman, E.; Chandra, R. Enabling Adoption of Regenerative Agriculture through Soil Carbon Copilots. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2411.16872. [Google Scholar]
  107. da Silva, P.F.; dos Santos, M.S.N.; Araújo, B.d.A.; Kerber, B.D.; de Oliveira, H.A.P.; Guedes, J.V.C.; Mazutti, M.A.; Tres, M.V.; Zabot, G.L. Co-Cultivations of Beauveria Bassiana, Metarhizium Anisopliae, and Trichoderma Harzianum to Produce Bioactive Compounds for Application in Agriculture. Fermentation 2025, 11, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Macías-Gallardo, F.; Quiñones-Muñoz, T.A.; Miranda-Avilés, R.; Ramírez-Santoyo, L.F.; Zanor, G.A.; Ozuna, C. Impact of Organic Agriculture on the Quality of Grapes (Syrah and Tempranillo) Harvested in Guanajuato, Mexico: Relationship Between Soil Elemental Profile and Grape Bioactive Properties. Agriculture 2025, 15, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Xu, Y.; Zhu, M.; Feng, Y.; Xu, H. Panax Notoginseng-Microbiota Interactions: From Plant Cultivation to Medicinal Application. Phytomedicine 2023, 119, 154978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Paul, S.; Parvez, S.S.; Goswami, A.; Banik, A. Exopolysaccharides from Agriculturally Important Microorganisms: Conferring Soil Nutrient Status and Plant Health. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 262, 129954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. El Khoury, D.; Cuda, C.; Luhovyy, B.L.; Anderson, G.H. Beta Glucan: Health Benefits in Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. J. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 2012, 851362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chudan, S.; Ishibashi, R.; Nishikawa, M.; Tabuchi, Y.; Nagai, Y.; Ikushiro, S.; Furusawa, Y. Effect of Wheat-Derived Arabinoxylan on the Gut Microbiota Composition and Colonic Regulatory T Cells. Molecules 2023, 28, 3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Worthington, V. Nutritional Quality of Organic versus Conventional Fruits, Vegetables, and Grains. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2001, 7, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020: Transforming Food Systems for Affordable Healthy Diets; Food & Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2020; ISBN 978-92-5-132901-6. [Google Scholar]
  115. Manzeke-Kangara, M.G.; Joy, E.J.M.; Lark, R.M.; Redfern, S.; Eilander, A.; Broadley, M.R. Do Agronomic Approaches Aligned to Regenerative Agriculture Improve the Micronutrient Concentrations of Edible Portions of Crops? A Scoping Review of Evidence. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1078667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Tulchinsky, T.H. Micronutrient Deficiency Conditions: Global Health Issues. Public Health Rev. 2010, 32, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Shukla, A.; Behera, S.K.; Pakhre, A.; Chaudhary, S. Micronutrients in Soils, Plants, Animals and Humans. Indian J. Fertil. 2018, 14, 30–54. [Google Scholar]
  118. Hacisalihoglu, G. Zinc (Zn): The Last Nutrient in the Alphabet and Shedding Light on Zn Efficiency for the Future of Crop Production under Suboptimal Zn. Plants 2020, 9, 1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Recena, R.; García-López, A.M.; Delgado, A. Zinc Uptake by Plants as Affected by Fertilization with Zn Sulfate, Phosphorus Availability, and Soil Properties. Agronomy 2021, 11, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Mishra, A.K.; Tiwari, A.; Maurya, P.K.; Sharma, S. Enhancing Ecosystem Dynamics: Organic and Regenerative Practices in Rice–Wheat Systems and Their Impact on Soil Arthropod Biodiversity. Front. Environ. Sci. 2024, 12, 1407954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Aprile, F.; Lorandi, R. Evaluation of Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) in Tropical Soils Using Four Different Analytical Methods. J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 4, p278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Chandel, N.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, R. Towards Sustainable Agriculture: Integrating Agronomic Practices, Environmental Physiology and Plant Nutrition. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2024, 36, 492–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Sunusi, M.; Lurwanu, Y.; Zamfara, F. Zinc Biofortification of Rice (Oryza sativa. L.) Breeding and Agronomic Approaches: Status and Challenges for Its Adoption in Sub-Saharan African Countries. Fudma J. Sci. 2019, 3, 291–298. [Google Scholar]
  124. Melash, A.A.; Vad, A.; Bytyqi, B.; Ábrahám, É.B. Harnessing Diversity in Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) to Enhance Climate Resilience and Micronutrient Concentration through Genetic and Agronomic Biofortification. Acta Agrar. Debreceniensis 2022, 2, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Oldfield, E.; Bradford, M.; Wood, S. Global Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Soil Organic Matter and Crop Yields. Soil 2019, 5, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ropero, A.B.; Borrás, F.; Rodríguez, M.; Beltrá, M. Nutritional Description of Organic and Conventional Food Products in Spain: The BADALI Project. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Dall’Asta, M.; Angelino, D.; Pellegrini, N.; Martini, D. The Nutritional Quality of Organic and Conventional Food Products Sold in Italy: Results from the Food Labelling of Italian Products (FLIP) Study. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Frías-Moreno, M.N.; Parra-Quezada, R.A.; González-Aguilar, G.; Ruíz-Canizales, J.; Molina-Corral, F.J.; Sepulveda, D.R.; Salas-Salazar, N.; Olivas, G.I. Quality, Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Capacity, and Enzymes of Raspberries at Different Maturity Stages, Effects of Organic vs. Conventional Fertilization. Foods 2021, 10, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ciucu-Paraschiv, M.; Hoza, D. The Effect of Foliar Application with Organic and Inorganic Products on the Biochemical Quality Indicators of Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinum corymbosum L.). Sci. Pap. Ser. B Hortic. 2024, LXV, 48–57. [Google Scholar]
  130. van Breda, S.G.J.; de Kok, T.M.C.M. Smart Combinations of Bioactive Compounds in Fruits and Vegetables May Guide New Strategies for Personalized Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, 1700597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Sharifi-Rad, J.; Rodrigues, C.F.; Sharopov, F.; Docea, A.O.; Can Karaca, A.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; Kahveci Karıncaoglu, D.; Gülseren, G.; Şenol, E.; Demircan, E.; et al. Diet, Lifestyle and Cardiovascular Diseases: Linking Pathophysiology to Cardioprotective Effects of Natural Bioactive Compounds. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhang, H.; Tsao, R. Dietary Polyphenols, Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2016, 8, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Johansson, E.; Hussain, A.; Kuktaite, R.; Andersson, S.C.; Olsson, M.E. Contribution of Organically Grown Crops to Human Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 3870–3893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Bourn, D.; Prescott, J. A Comparison of the Nutritional Value, Sensory Qualities, and Food Safety of Organically and Conventionally Produced Foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2002, 42, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ceccanti, C.; Landi, M.; Antichi, D.; Guidi, L.; Manfrini, L.; Monti, M.; Tosti, G.; Frasconi, C. Bioactive Properties of Fruits and Leafy Vegetables Managed with Integrated, Organic, and Organic No-Tillage Practices in the Mediterranean Area: A Two-Year Rotation Experiment. Agronomy 2020, 10, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Miyamoto, H.; Shigeta, K.; Suda, W.; Ichihashi, Y.; Nihei, N.; Matsuura, M.; Tsuboi, A.; Tominaga, N.; Aono, M.; Sato, M.; et al. Agricultural Quality Matrix-Based Multi-Omics Structural Analysis of Carrot under Soils Fertilized with Thermophile-Fermented Compost. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2202.03132. [Google Scholar]
  137. Pérez-Álvarez, E.P.; Martínez-Vidaurre, J.M.; Garde-Cerdán, T. Anthocyanin Composition of Grapes from Three Different Soil Types in Cv. Tempranillo A.O.C. Rioja Vineyards. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 4833–4841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Głodowska, M.; Krawczyk, J. Difference in the Concentration of Macro Elements between Organically and Conventionally Grown Vegetables. Agric. Sci. 2019, 10, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Biswas, S.; Singh, S.; Bera, A. Regenerative Nutrient Management Practices for Enhancing Plant Nutrition and Soil Health. In Regenerative Agriculture for Sustainable Food Systems; Kumar, S., Meena, R.S., Sheoran, P., Jhariya, M.K., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 303–339. ISBN 978-981-9766-91-8. [Google Scholar]
  140. Ngegba, P.M.; Cui, G.; Khalid, M.Z.; Zhong, G. Use of Botanical Pesticides in Agriculture as an Alternative to Synthetic Pesticides. Agriculture 2022, 12, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Bordoni, L.; Nasuti, C.; Di Stefano, A.; Marinelli, L.; Gabbianelli, R. Epigenetic Memory of Early-Life Parental Perturbation: Dopamine Decrease and DNA Methylation Changes in Offspring. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 1472623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Forbes, A.; Ellis, K. Parasite Control in Regenerative Livestock Farming. Livestock 2023, 28, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Wróbel, B.; Zielewicz, W.; Staniak, M. Challenges of Pasture Feeding Systems—Opportunities and Constraints. Agriculture 2023, 13, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Liu, Y.-X.; Yu, J.-H.; Sun, J.-H.; Ma, W.-Q.; Wang, J.-J.; Sun, G.-J. Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids Supplementation on Serum Lipid Profile and Blood Pressure in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Foods 2023, 12, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Cutler, R. Antioxidants and Aging. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991, 53, 373S–379S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Martemucci, G.; Portincasa, P.; Di Ciaula, A.; Mariano, M.; Centonze, V.; D’Alessandro, A.G. Oxidative Stress, Aging, Antioxidant Supplementation and Their Impact on Human Health: An Overview. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2022, 206, 111707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Averill-Bates, D. Reactive Oxygen Species and Cell Signaling. Review. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2024, 1871, 119573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. He, L.; He, T.; Farrar, S.; Ji, L.; Liu, T.; Ma, X. Antioxidants Maintain Cellular Redox Homeostasis by Elimination of Reactive Oxygen Species. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 44, 532–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Rotruck, J.T.; Pope, A.L.; Ganther, H.E.; Swanson, A.B.; Hafeman, D.G.; Hoekstra, W.G. Selenium: Biochemical Role as a Component of Glutathione Peroxidase. Science 1973, 179, 588–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Spallholz, J.E. Selenium and Glutathione Peroxidase: Essential Nutrient and Antioxidant Component of the Immune System. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1990, 262, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Souto, A.L.; Sylvestre, M.; Tölke, E.D.; Tavares, J.F.; Barbosa-Filho, J.M.; Cebrián-Torrejón, G. Plant-Derived Pesticides as an Alternative to Pest Management and Sustainable Agricultural Production: Prospects, Applications and Challenges. Molecules 2021, 26, 4835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Benbrook, C.; Kegley, S.; Baker, B. Organic Farming Lessens Reliance on Pesticides and Promotes Public Health by Lowering Dietary Risks. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Przybylska, S. Lycopene—A Bioactive Carotenoid Offering Multiple Health Benefits: A Review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Chen, D.; Huang, C.; Chen, Z. A Review for the Pharmacological Effect of Lycopene in Central Nervous System Disorders. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 111, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Rudrapal, M.; Khairnar, S.J.; Khan, J.; Dukhyil, A.B.; Ansari, M.A.; Alomary, M.N.; Alshabrmi, F.M.; Palai, S.; Deb, P.K.; Devi, R. Dietary Polyphenols and Their Role in Oxidative Stress-Induced Human Diseases: Insights Into Protective Effects, Antioxidant Potentials and Mechanism(s) of Action. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 806470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Cui, Z.; Zhao, X.; Amevor, F.K.; Du, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, D.; Shu, G.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, X. Therapeutic Application of Quercetin in Aging-Related Diseases: SIRT1 as a Potential Mechanism. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 943321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Reganold, J.P.; Wachter, J.M. Organic Agriculture in the Twenty-First Century. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 15221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Tamburini, G.; Bommarco, R.; Wanger, T.C.; Kremen, C.; van der Heijden, M.G.A.; Liebman, M.; Hallin, S. Agricultural Diversification Promotes Multiple Ecosystem Services without Compromising Yield. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaba1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Bhardwaj, D.; Ansari, M.W.; Sahoo, R.K.; Tuteja, N. Biofertilizers Function as Key Player in Sustainable Agriculture by Improving Soil Fertility, Plant Tolerance and Crop Productivity. Microb. Cell Factories 2014, 13, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Tang, X.; Zhang, C.; Yu, Y.; Shen, J.; van der Werf, W.; Zhang, F. Intercropping Legumes and Cereals Increases Phosphorus Use Efficiency; a Meta-Analysis. Plant Soil 2021, 460, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Bedoussac, L.; Journet, E.-P.; Hauggaard-Nielsen, H.; Naudin, C.; Corre-Hellou, G.; Jensen, E.S.; Prieur, L.; Justes, E. Ecological Principles Underlying the Increase of Productivity Achieved by Cereal-Grain Legume Intercrops in Organic Farming. A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 911–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Lohar, R.R. Sustainable Agricultural Practices for Improving Growth, Yield and Quality of Turmeric (Curcumalonga L.). Ann. Plant Soil Res. 2021, 23, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ramírez-Carrasco, P.; Alemán, A.; González, E.; Gómez-Guillén, M.C.; Robert, P.; Giménez, B. Bioaccessibility, Intestinal Absorption and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Curcuminoids Incorporated in Avocado, Sunflower, and Linseed Beeswax Oleogels. Foods 2024, 13, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Camacho-Barquero, L.; Villegas, I.; Sánchez-Calvo, J.M.; Talero, E.; Sánchez-Fidalgo, S.; Motilva, V.; Alarcón de la Lastra, C. Curcumin, a Curcuma Longa Constituent, Acts on MAPK P38 Pathway Modulating COX-2 and iNOS Expression in Chronic Experimental Colitis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2007, 7, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Gorabi, A.M.; Razi, B.; Aslani, S.; Abbasifard, M.; Imani, D.; Sathyapalan, T.; Sahebkar, A. Effect of Curcumin on Proinflammatory Cytokines: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cytokine 2021, 143, 155541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Aggarwal, B.B.; Gupta, S.C.; Sung, B. Curcumin: An Orally Bioavailable Blocker of TNF and Other pro-Inflammatory Biomarkers. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 169, 1672–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Liu, Z.-J.; Li, Z.-H.; Liu, L.; Tang, W.-X.; Wang, Y.; Dong, M.-R.; Xiao, C. Curcumin Attenuates Beta-Amyloid-Induced Neuroinflammation via Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma Function in a Rat Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Feng, W.; Wang, H.; Zhang, P.; Gao, C.; Tao, J.; Ge, Z.; Zhu, D.; Bi, Y. Modulation of Gut Microbiota Contributes to Curcumin-Mediated Attenuation of Hepatic Steatosis in Rats. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Gen. Subj. 2017, 1861, 1801–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Kadam, J.H.; Kamble, B.M. Effect of Organic Manures on Growth, Yield and Quality of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L). J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2020, 12, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Kumar, S.; Chanchan, M.; Vipin; Gulzar, M.; Singh, S.R.; Stina, K.; Singh, R.P.; Kumar, S. Influence of Graded Levels of Inorganic with Organics and Biofertilizers on Yield, Quality and Economics of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Int. J. Adv. Biochem. Res. 2024, 8, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Ming, T.; Tao, Q.; Tang, S.; Zhao, H.; Yang, H.; Liu, M.; Ren, S.; Xu, H. Curcumin: An Epigenetic Regulator and Its Application in Cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 156, 113956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Chiuve, S.E.; Sampson, L.; Willett, W.C. The Association between a Nutritional Quality Index and Risk of Chronic Disease. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2011, 40, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The fundamental principles of RA: maintaining continuous soil cover, minimizing soil disturbance, preserving living roots in the soil throughout the year, increasing species diversity, integrating livestock, and reducing or eliminating synthetic inputs like herbicides and fertilizers. Original figure created by the authors.
Figure 1. The fundamental principles of RA: maintaining continuous soil cover, minimizing soil disturbance, preserving living roots in the soil throughout the year, increasing species diversity, integrating livestock, and reducing or eliminating synthetic inputs like herbicides and fertilizers. Original figure created by the authors.
Antioxidants 14 00530 g001
Figure 2. Fundamental practices of RA, benefits, and mechanisms that contribute to improved nutrient cycling, plant growth, and ecosystem resilience [23]. Original figure created by the authors.
Figure 2. Fundamental practices of RA, benefits, and mechanisms that contribute to improved nutrient cycling, plant growth, and ecosystem resilience [23]. Original figure created by the authors.
Antioxidants 14 00530 g002
Figure 3. Examples of molecules enriched from ROA and pathways of activation in reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. Original figure created by the authors.
Figure 3. Examples of molecules enriched from ROA and pathways of activation in reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. Original figure created by the authors.
Antioxidants 14 00530 g003
Table 1. Summary of selected studies reporting the effects of different agricultural practices on crop nutritional quality and bioactive compound content. Please check supplementary materials for extended data (Table S1).
Table 1. Summary of selected studies reporting the effects of different agricultural practices on crop nutritional quality and bioactive compound content. Please check supplementary materials for extended data (Table S1).
ReferenceCrop(s)Treatment/Soil ManagementKey Finding
[74]Various cropsOrganic vs. conventional↑ Antioxidants, ↓ cadmium, ↓ pesticide residues
[134]Cereals (e.g., wheat)Zn-enriched fertilizers↑ Zinc and iron contents in grains
[135]Fruits and vegetablesOrganic and no-tillage systems↑ Polyphenols and antioxidant activity
[136]CarrotsThermophile-fermented compost↑ Bioactive compounds and yield
[115]Various cropsRegenerative practices↑ Micronutrients and vitamin C
[100]Fruits and vegetablesLow-nitrogen fertilization↑ Polyphenols (especially in vegetables)
[108]GrapesOrganic vs. conventional↑ Phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity
[137]Tempranillo grapesDifferent soil types (A.O.C. Rioja)Different anthocyanin profiles based on soil composition
[113]Fruits, vegetables, grainsOrganic vs. conventional↑ Vitamin C, Fe, Mg, P, ↓ nitrate content
[127]Prepacked foodsOrganic vs. conventionalVariable results, ↓ energy and sugars in organic versions
Note: ↑ indicates an increase; ↓ indicates a decrease.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feliziani, G.; Bordoni, L.; Gabbianelli, R. Regenerative Organic Agriculture and Human Health: The Interconnection Between Soil, Food Quality, and Nutrition. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14050530

AMA Style

Feliziani G, Bordoni L, Gabbianelli R. Regenerative Organic Agriculture and Human Health: The Interconnection Between Soil, Food Quality, and Nutrition. Antioxidants. 2025; 14(5):530. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14050530

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feliziani, Giulia, Laura Bordoni, and Rosita Gabbianelli. 2025. "Regenerative Organic Agriculture and Human Health: The Interconnection Between Soil, Food Quality, and Nutrition" Antioxidants 14, no. 5: 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14050530

APA Style

Feliziani, G., Bordoni, L., & Gabbianelli, R. (2025). Regenerative Organic Agriculture and Human Health: The Interconnection Between Soil, Food Quality, and Nutrition. Antioxidants, 14(5), 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14050530

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop