Next Article in Journal
A Two-Stage Framework for Early Detection and Subtype Identification of Alzheimer’s Disease Through Multimodal Biomarker Extraction and Improved GCN
Previous Article in Journal
Semantic and Phonological Brain Networks in Older Adults: A Systematic Scoping Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Effect of Traumatic Brain Injury on the Gastrointestinal System: A Comprehensive Review

1
Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA
2
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, JFK Johnson Rehabilitation Institute at Hackensack Meridian Health, Edison, NJ 08820, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(3), 254; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16030254
Submission received: 26 January 2026 / Revised: 20 February 2026 / Accepted: 21 February 2026 / Published: 25 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Neurorehabilitation)

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • Traumatic brain injury can lead to widespread gastrointestinal dysfunction through disruptions of the brain–gut axis, dysmotility, dysbiosis, malnutrition, and metabolic disturbances.
  • Patients with TBI may experience GI disturbances, including dysphagia, gastroparesis, and sialorrhea, among many others.
What are the implications of the main findings?
  • Routine assessment and early management of gastrointestinal dysfunction should be integrated into standard TBI care to optimize recovery.
  • Targeted interventions, such as early enteral nutrition, represent promising strategies to improve neurorecovery.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health concern resulting in physical, cognitive, and behavioral impairments. Emerging evidence highlights a bidirectional relationship between brain injury and gut health, known as the brain–gut axis. This paper provides a comprehensive review of current literature exploring the relationship between TBI and various gastrointestinal (GI) pathologies, examining how brain injuries contribute to GI dysfunction and how gut health influences neurorecovery. Methods: A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed articles was conducted between March and June 2025 using databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane. Studies from 2010 onwards involving human subjects were screened. Search terms included combinations of “traumatic brain injury,” “TBI,” and “[gastrointestinal pathology].” Data regarding study design, population, GI outcomes, and proposed mechanisms were analyzed. Results: TBI triggers secondary injury cascades, including neuroinflammation, dysautonomia, and gut microbiome dysbiosis. The review identifies a wide spectrum of TBI-associated GI disorders, including dysphagia, esophageal disorders, gastric disorders, and intestinal disorders. Bowel dysfunction, manifesting as constipation or incontinence, is prevalent due to neurogenic factors and cognitive impairments. Additionally, metabolic dysregulation following TBI leads to malnutrition, hyperglycemia, and hypoglycemia, all of which impact morbidity. Conclusions: The GI system is integrally connected to TBI recovery through immune modulation and nutrient absorption. Dysfunction within the brain–gut axis, specifically altered motility, permeability, and inflammation, contributes to secondary brain injury and impedes neurological outcomes. Clinical assessment of GI dysfunction should be integrated into routine TBI care. Therapeutic strategies, including early enteral nutrition, are essential to optimize recovery and reduce systemic inflammation.

1. Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health concern that can result in a wide spectrum of physical, cognitive, and behavioral impairments [1]. TBIs occur when there is an external force to the brain caused by an impact to the head and/or body. The most common causes of TBI include falls, especially in older adults, as well as motor vehicle accidents and sports injuries, which tend to affect younger individuals [2].
The effects of TBI can range from mild and temporary to severe and permanent, depending on the nature and severity of the injury. Recovery from TBI is unique to each individual and may be impacted by TBI severity. Following TBI, many patients require long-term rehabilitation and support and are often at greater risk for a host of medical complications [3].
One often overlooked consequence of TBI is its impact on gastrointestinal (GI) function. Emerging evidence suggests a bidirectional relationship between brain injury and gut health [4]. The initial TBI triggers a secondary injury cascade characterized by glutamate excitotoxicity, intracellular calcium overload, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress, which can lead to neuronal cell loss, synaptic failure, and cognitive deficits. This secondary injury is propagated by chronic neuroinflammation, driven by the sustained activation of microglia and astrocytes.
Bacterial extracellular vesicle dysfunction has been implicated as an additional mediator of GI pathology in patients with traumatic brain injury. These vesicles influence neuroinflammation, neuronal survival, and immune responses and have the ability to cross the blood–brain barrier [5]. In response to gut dysbiosis following TBI, imbalanced bacterial endosome production can exacerbate inflammation and metabolic dysregulation, creating pathological feedback loops that aggravate both the central nervous system and the GI system [6,7].
Arousal is disrupted through direct damage to key regulatory centers in the brainstem and hypothalamus, leading to hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation and a “sympathetic storm” that overwhelms the parasympathetic system [8].
Distinct and sustained changes occur in the gut microbiome, with downstream effects on the gut–brain axis that may worsen neurological outcomes. Animal models demonstrate that TBI triggers gut microbial dysbiosis, impaired intestinal barrier function (leading to increased permeability and bacterial translocation), and altered microbial metabolite profiles that correspond with persistent microglial activation, neuroinflammation, and worse recovery [9]. Additionally, post-TBI, many patients are treated with medications that exacerbate the gut–brain dysfunction; these include antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which drastically alter gut microbiota composition [10,11]. Longitudinal studies find that the post-injury microbiome remains significantly altered in composition months after injury [12]. TBI-associated gut dysbiosis is thought to contribute to the increased susceptibility of TBI patients to neurodegenerative processes, such as Parkinson’s disease [13]. These findings have prompted consideration of microbiome-targeted interventions (probiotics, prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation) as potential adjuvants in patients recovering from brain injuries.
The disruption of the gut–brain axis and the autonomic nervous system can contribute to a wide range of GI issues, including dysphagia, dysmotility, and constipation [4,14]. In addition, altered arousal resulting from TBI, including hypersomnia, fatigue, and disorders of consciousness, can impact patients’ ability to feed themselves, in turn, causing poor oral intake and malnutrition [15]. This highlights the importance of understanding how gut health can influence neurorecovery, or conversely, how brain injuries contribute to GI dysfunction. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the current literature exploring the relationship between TBI and various GI pathologies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

A comprehensive search was conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles examining the relationship between TBI and GI dysfunction. Multiple databases were analyzed in order to conduct this review: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane. The search was performed between March and June 2025. Search terms included combinations of keywords and MeSH terms such as “traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “gastrointestinal” OR “gut”. Further search terms can be found in Appendix A. Boolean operators (AND, OR) and filters were used to refine the search results.
Relevant articles and reviews were manually screened to identify additional studies. All identified articles were screened for relevance by two independent reviewers based on titles and abstracts. Full-text reviews were conducted for articles that met the inclusion criteria or when eligibility was unclear. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer.
Key data extracted included study design, population characteristics, type and severity of TBI, GI outcomes assessed, underlying mechanisms proposed (e.g., microbiome alterations, vagus nerve signaling, intestinal permeability), and major findings.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Studies were included if they met the following criteria:
  • Published in English;
  • Involved human subjects;
  • Addressed GI outcomes, mechanisms, or dysfunctions associated with TBI;
  • Peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses;
  • Articles published from 2010 onwards, aside from key references found in the literature.
Exclusion criteria included:
  • Conference abstracts, editorials, and opinion pieces;
  • Studies not pertaining to TBI;
  • Articles not available in full text.

3. Results

3.1. Dietary Considerations (Table 1)

3.1.1. Cognition, Arousal, Olfaction, and Ageusia

Cognitive impairment and arousal disturbances following a TBI can impact nutritional intake. Damage to the frontal lobe can impact executive function and, therefore, impact the ability to feed oneself and maintain proper nutrition. Executive functioning, which includes planning, organization, task initiation, and working memory, renders multi-step activities like meal preparation overwhelmingly difficult, often leading to task avoidance, reliance on nutrient-poor processed foods, or skipped meals entirely [16,17,18]. Memory impairments further compound this issue, as anterograde amnesia can cause individuals to forget to eat, while disinhibition and poor impulse control linked to orbitofrontal cortex damage can manifest as hyperphagia and an uncontrollable craving for highly palatable foods [19,20,21,22]. Disturbances in smell due to olfactory nerve injury and frontal lobe damage can also impact appetite [23,24]. Concurrently, disturbances in arousal, including sleep–wake cycle disruption, can act as chronic stressors that promote gut microbiome dysbiosis and compromise the integrity of the intestinal barrier [25,26,27,28].
Table 1. Dysphagia, Hyper-, and hypoglycemia.
Table 1. Dysphagia, Hyper-, and hypoglycemia.
DisorderMechanisms Post-TBISymptomsTreatment
DysphagiaDisruption of neural pathways controlling the swallowing musclesDifficulty swallowing
Coughing or choking
Sensation of food being stuck
Recurrent pneumonia
Swallowing rehabilitation therapy
Dietary modifications (texture/consistency)
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Pharyngeal electrical stimulation
HyperglycemiaStress-induced physiological response to severe injuryPolyuria, polydipsia
Dehydration
Altered mental status
Insulin therapy
Conventional glycemic control is often preferred
Nutritional support
HypoglycemiaOften, a complication of intensive insulin therapy used to treat hyperglycemiaConfusion, altered mental status
Seizures, diaphoresis
Tachycardia, loss of consciousness
Prompt IV glucose administration
Continuous glucose monitoring
Adjustment of insulin therapy
Adequate nutritional support

3.1.2. Malnutrition

For patients with TBI, nutritional support is crucial, as managing glucose levels alongside providing necessary calories and proteins, preferably via enteral nutrition, is needed to support recovery and meet a patient’s metabolic needs [29,30].
Malnutrition is seen in roughly 60% of hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. Pulmonary infection, urinary tract infection, application of nasogastric tubes, low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, and low Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores may contribute to malnutrition [31].
It is estimated that 25–30 percent of patients with TBI also have dysphagia, which can cause coughing or choking with food intake as well as the sensation of food being “stuck in the throat,” termed globus sensation [32]. This can worsen malnutrition as well as result in dehydration and aspiration pneumonia [33,34]. Its prevalence is higher in individuals with TBI because the injury can disrupt the neural pathways that control the swallowing muscles. Treatment includes swallowing rehabilitation therapy, dietary modifications, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve muscle function [34,35,36].
Patients with TBI experience considerable energy and protein deficits, which persist throughout their hospitalization, including both ICU and ward-based care [37]. These deficits are associated with adverse outcomes, including increased morbidity and mortality [37,38]. Symptoms of malnutrition in patients with TBI include weight loss, muscle wasting, impaired wound healing, increased susceptibility to infections, and prolonged recovery times. These symptoms are due to the hypermetabolic and hypercatabolic states induced by TBI, which increase nutritional requirements [39,40].
Treatment options for malnutrition in TBI patients focus on early and adequate nutritional support. Enteral nutrition is preferred and should be initiated as soon as the patient is hemodynamically stable, ideally within 72 h of injury, to reduce infection rates and complications [41]. More specifically, studies have demonstrated that early enteral nutrition in patients with TBI has led to outcomes such as significantly improved GCS scores; significantly lower decreases in tools of nutritional assessment, including serum albumin and protein and mid-arm muscle circumference; and significantly improved hormonal profiles, including significantly lower declines in TSH, free T3 and T4, and testosterone (in males) and significantly lower rises in cortisol [42,43,44]. The goal of early enteral feeding is to provide 25–35 non-protein kcal/kg/day and 2.0–2.5 g protein/kg/day. If enteral feeding is not feasible, parenteral nutrition should be considered [40]. Immunonutrition, which includes nutrients like omega-3 fatty acids and curcumin, may also help reduce inflammation and improve outcomes [45,46].
Monitoring nutritional status using indirect calorimetry and nitrogen balance studies is recommended to tailor nutritional interventions and prevent complications such as hyperglycemia [29]. This comprehensive approach aims to optimize recovery and improve clinical outcomes in TBI patients.

3.1.3. Hyperglycemia and Hypoglycemia

Hyperglycemia is a common occurrence in patients suffering from TBI. The prevalence of hyperglycemia in this patient population varies across studies, but it is generally reported to be significant. A study by Matovu et al. (2021) found that nearly one in six patients with severe TBI were admitted with hyperglycemia, defined as blood glucose levels greater than 11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) [47]. Another study by El-Menyar et al. (2021) reported that 13% of trauma patients presented with hyperglycemia upon admission, with half of these cases being stress-induced hyperglycemia (SIH) [47,48]. This is significant because SIH is associated with poor neurological outcomes and higher morbidity and mortality rates in TBI patients [49,50,51,52]. Additionally, many TBI patients may be treated with steroids, which can also contribute to hyperglycemia [53]. Symptoms of hyperglycemia in patients with TBI include polyuria, polydipsia, dehydration, altered mental status, and, in severe cases, diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state.
The prevalence of hypoglycemia in patients suffering from TBI is notably influenced by the glycemic control strategy employed. According to a systematic review and meta-analysis by Hermanides et al., intensive glycemic control in TBI patients significantly increases the risk of hypoglycemia compared to conventional control [54]. The study found that severe hypoglycemia occurred more frequently with intensive glucose control compared to a relative risk of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.09–0.52) for conventional control, indicating a lower incidence of hypoglycemia in this group. The NICE-SUGAR study subgroup analysis by Finfer et al. also reported that moderate hypoglycemia (blood glucose 2.3–3.9 mmol/L) occurred in 79.2% of patients under intensive control, compared to 9.0% under conventional control [55]. Furthermore, severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose ≤ 2.2 mmol/L) was observed in 4.9% of patients with intensive control and none with conventional control. Thus, with intensive glycemic control strategies, the prevalence of hypoglycemia in TBI patients is significantly increased, underscoring the need for careful monitoring and management of blood glucose levels in this population. Symptoms of hypoglycemia include confusion, altered mental status, seizures, diaphoresis, tachycardia, and, in severe cases, loss of consciousness, which can exacerbate the neurological deficits already present and complicate the clinical management of these patients.

3.2. Disorders of the Oral Cavity (Table 2)

3.2.1. Oral Ulcers

Oral ulcers are small, painful lesions that form on the mucous membranes inside the mouth, causing discomfort while eating and/or speaking. Patients with TBI have higher rates of dental plaque, gingival inflammation, and oral infections [56,57]. Additionally, they face changes in nutrition, and the combination of these factors may contribute to the development of oral ulcers [58]. Treatments include maintaining good oral hygiene, using topical corticosteroids to reduce inflammation, and applying protective pastes to cover the lesions. In severe cases, systemic options like oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants may be considered [59].
Table 2. Disorders of the oral cavity.
Table 2. Disorders of the oral cavity.
DisorderMechanisms Post-TBISymptomsTreatment
Oral UlcersImmune dysregulation
Increased stress
Altered oral hygiene and nutritional intake
Small, painful lesions in the mouth
Burning sensation
Difficulty eating and speaking
Good oral hygiene
Topical Corticosteroids
Protective pastes
Systemic corticosteroids/immunosuppressants
Oral Candidiasis (Thrush)Immune dysregulation/suppression
Prolonged hospitalization and antibiotic use
Poor oral hygiene
White, creamy lesions on tongue/cheeks
Pain and redness
Difficulty swallowing
Cracking at mouth corners
Emphasis on good oral hygiene
Topical antifungals (e.g., nystatin)
Systemic antifungals (e.g., fluconazole) for severe cases
Emphasis on good oral hygiene
Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) ReactivationSystemic immunosuppression following injury allows the latent virus to reactivatePainful vesicular lesions (cold sores)
Fever, headache
Severe cases: encephalitis, seizures
Antiviral medications (e.g., acyclovir, valacyclovir)
SialorrheaImpaired neuromuscular control of orofacial muscles, affecting saliva management and swallowingExcessive, unintentional loss of saliva from the mouth
Can lead to skin irritation and aspiration
Anticholinergic medications (e.g., glycopyrrolate)
Botulinum toxin injections into salivary glands
Radiation therapy

3.2.2. Oral Candidiasis

Oral candidiasis, or thrush, is a fungal infection caused by Candida species that creates painful, white lesions in the mouth, often accompanied by a cottony feeling and loss of taste. The prevalence of oral candidiasis is increased in TBI patients, likely due to an immunosuppressive state following the injury, prolonged hospitalization with broad-spectrum antibiotic use that disrupts oral flora, salivary gland hypofunction, and poor oral hygiene resulting from physical or cognitive impairments [60,61,62]. Treatment guidelines recommend topical antifungals such as nystatin or clotrimazole as first-line therapy for mild cases, with systemic antifungals such as fluconazole reserved for moderate-to-severe cases, alongside an emphasis on good oral hygiene [63].

3.2.3. Herpes Simplex Virus

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection can cause conditions such as oral herpes, characterized by painful blisters or sores on the lips, mouth, and/or gums. The virus establishes latency in sensory neurons and may reactivate during periods of stress/immunosuppression, as seen following TBI [61,64,65,66,67]. One study noted the reactivation of HSV infection in 39% of TBI patients who required mechanical ventilation [65]. Treatment guidelines recommend intravenous acyclovir for severe disease or encephalitis, with oral antivirals like valacyclovir and famciclovir for less severe cases, and foscarnet or cidofovir for acyclovir-resistant infections [68,69].

3.2.4. Sialorrhea

Sialorrhea, or excessive drooling, is the unintentional loss of saliva from the mouth, which can lead to skin irritation and an increased risk of aspiration pneumonia [70,71]. The prevalence of sialorrhea is increased in individuals with TBI due to impaired neuromuscular control of the orofacial muscles, which affects the ability to manage saliva effectively [72]. First-line pharmacologic therapy includes anticholinergic medications such as glycopyrrolate or scopolamine patches to reduce saliva production [70,73]. If these are not effective, botulinum toxin injections into the salivary glands are recommended, and in refractory cases, radiation therapy may be considered [73,74].

3.3. Esophageal Disorders (See Table 3)

GERD, Esophagitis, and Barrett’s Esophagus

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic condition where stomach contents flow back into the esophagus, causing symptoms that include heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, and extraesophageal manifestations such as chronic cough and laryngitis. The prevalence of GERD is increased in TBI patients due to systemic inflammation and impaired autonomic nervous system function, which can decrease lower esophageal sphincter tone and delay gastric emptying [58,75,76,77,78]. Additionally, TBI patients with altered mobility may be on medications that exacerbate GERD symptoms. Guidelines for treatment include lifestyle modifications such as weight loss, avoiding meals close to bedtime, eliminating spicy/acidic foods, and elevating the head of the bed [79]. The primary pharmacologic treatment is proton pump inhibitors [79,80,81]. Complications include progression to Barrett’s esophagus, esophagitis, and esophageal carcinoma.
Table 3. Esophageal disorders.
Table 3. Esophageal disorders.
DisorderMechanisms Post-TBISymptomsTreatment
GERDImpaired autonomic nervous system function
Decreased lower esophageal sphincter tone
Delayed gastric emptying
Heartburn
Regurgitation
Chest pain
Chronic cough, laryngitis
Weight loss
Avoiding late meals, trigger foods, to-bacco
Elevating head of bed
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)

3.4. Gastric Disorders (Table 4)

3.4.1. Gastritis, Peptic Ulcer Disease, and Cushing Ulcer

Gastritis is an inflammation of the stomach lining that can cause symptoms such as epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, bloating, loss of appetite, and, in severe cases, hematemesis or melena. The prevalence of gastritis is higher in individuals with TBI due to factors such as dysautonomia, which impairs gastric protection, and the common use of medications such as NSAIDs and corticosteroids that can damage the stomach lining [75,76,82,83,84]. TBI-induced dysautonomia can lead to impaired gastric motility and reduced mucosal defense. This mechanism is also implicated in the increase in the prevalence of peptic ulcers in patients with TBI.
Table 4. Gastric disorders.
Table 4. Gastric disorders.
DisorderMechanisms Post-TBISymptomsTreatment
GastritisDysautonomia affecting gastric motility and mucosal protection
Use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids
Epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting
Bloating, loss of appetite
Hematemesis or melena
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)
H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs)
Avoidance of NSAIDs
Peptic Ulcer Disease and Cushing UlcersIncreased gastric acid secretion from stress (Cushing ulcers)
Use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids
Epigastric pain (burning/gnawing)
Nausea, vomiting, bloating
Hematemesis or melena
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)
H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs)
Avoidance of NSAIDs
Gastroparesis and Recurrent EmesisDysautonomia impairing gastric motility
Neuroinflammation and systemic inflammation
Nausea, vomiting
Early satiety, bloating
Postprandial fullness, abdominal pain
Dietary modifications (low-fat, low-fiber)
Prokinetic and antiemetic agents
Gastric electrical stimulation
Hydration and nutritional support
In patients with brain injury, peptic ulcers are specifically referred to as Cushing ulcers [85]. These ulcers occur in the lining of the stomach or the first part of the small intestine, causing burning or gnawing epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, bloating, and, in severe cases, hematemesis or melena [85,86]. In addition to dysautonomia and neuroinflammation, it is also thought that elevated intracranial pressure stimulates the vagus nerve, leading to hypersecretion of gastric acid and subsequent ulcer formation due to stress-related mucosal damage [76,83,87,88]. Treatment of these conditions focuses on reducing stomach acid with PPIs or H2-receptor antagonists, limiting NSAIDs and corticosteroids, eliminating H. pylori infection if present, and lifestyle changes such as avoiding alcohol and smoking [89]. For bleeding ulcers, endoscopic therapy is used to stop the bleeding, and sucralfate may be used as an adjunctive therapy to protect the stomach lining [89,90,91].

3.4.2. Gastroparesis

Gastroparesis is a disorder characterized by delayed emptying of the stomach in the absence of a blockage, causing symptoms like nausea, vomiting, early satiety, bloating, postprandial fullness, and abdominal pain. Its prevalence is estimated to be 45–50% in TBI patients due to dysautonomia, which impairs the autonomic nervous system’s control over gastric motility [76,92]. In addition to TBI-associated neuroinflammation, medications such as opioids can also contribute to this delay in stomach emptying [78,93]. Treatment includes dietary modifications, such as small, frequent, low-fat, and low-fiber meals. Prokinetic agents, such as metoclopramide, are used to improve stomach emptying, and antiemetic agents can help control nausea, and for severe cases, gastric electrical stimulation or a gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy may be considered [94,95].

3.5. Disorders of the Intestines (Table 5)

3.5.1. Duodenitis

Duodenitis is an inflammation of the duodenum, which can be caused by various factors, including infections (e.g., Helicobacter pylori), NSAIDs, and autoimmune diseases. It can be characterized by upper abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, bloating, and loss of appetite, as well as GI bleeding in severe cases. While its prevalence in TBI patients is not explicitly quantified, there is substantial evidence that TBI-induced neuroinflammation and dysautonomia can disrupt the brain–gut axis and alter gut microbiota and bile acid profiles, leading to increased intestinal permeability and inflammation, both of which are factors that can contribute to duodenitis [58,75,83]. Management of duodenitis typically involves addressing the underlying cause, such as eradicating H. pylori infection with antibiotics or discontinuing NSAIDs. PPIs are commonly used to reduce gastric acid secretion and promote mucosal healing [96].
Table 5. Disorders of the intestines.
Table 5. Disorders of the intestines.
DisorderMechanisms Post-TBISymptomsTreatment
DuodenitisNeuroinflammation and dysautonomia
Increased intestinal permeability
Alterations in gut microbiota
Upper abdominal pain
Nausea, vomiting
Bloating, loss of appetite
Address underlying cause (e.g., H. pylori)
Proton Pump Inhibitors
Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO)Gut microbiota dysbiosis
Increased intestinal permeability
Systemic inflammation and dysautonomia
Changes in gut motility
Abdominal pain, bloating, gas, distension
Diarrhea or constipation
Nausea, cramping
Antibiotics (e.g., Rifaximin)
Dietary modifications
Probiotics and prokinetic agents
Small Bowel ObstructionDysmotility from systemic and neuroinflammation
Increased intestinal permeability
Severe, crampy abdominal pain
Nausea and bilious vomiting
Abdominal distension
Inability to pass stool or gas
Nasogastric decompression
IV fluids
Prokinetic agents
Surgical intervention if needed
Superior Mesenteric Artery (SMA) SyndromePredisposing factors like significant weight loss and prolonged immobilization can occur post-TBISevere postprandial epigastric pain
Nausea and bilious vomiting
Early satiety, weight loss
Nutritional support
Positional therapy
Surgical intervention
Constipation/IncontinenceDisruption of the brain–gut axis
-Neuroinflammation
Dysautonomia
Fewer than three bowel movements per week
Hard stools, straining, bloating
Feeling of incomplete evacuation
Increased dietary fiber
Osmotic agents
Stimulant laxatives
Biofeedback therapy
Irritable Bowel SyndromeNeuroinflammation and systemic inflammation
Dysmotility and increased mucosal permeability
Gut microbiota dysbiosis
Recurrent abdominal pain
Bloating
Diarrhea, constipation, or alternating
Dietary modifications
Antispasmodics
Probiotics
Ischemic ColitisDysautonomia, systemic inflammation, and increased intestinal permeability can exacerbate the conditionSudden onset of abdominal pain
Rectal bleeding
Diarrhea
Supportive care including bowel rest, IV fluids
Antibiotics
Surgical intervention
ProctitisSystemic inflammation and dysautonomia may predispose patients to proctitisRectal pain, tenesmus
Rectal bleeding and discharge
Urinary urgency
Mesalamine
Oral 5-ASA agents
Systemic therapies (refractory cases)
Clostridium difficile and SequelaeGut dysbiosis and increased mucosal permeability can predispose to C. difficile overgrowthWatery diarrhea
Abdominal pain and cramping
Fever, nausea, dehydration
Discontinue inciting antibiotic
Oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin
Hydration and electrolyte management

3.5.2. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a clinical syndrome characterized by the presence of an excessive number of bacteria in the small intestine, defined by a bacterial colony count of ≥103 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) in a duodenal or jejunal aspirate [97]. Symptoms commonly include abdominal pain, bloating, gas, distension, flatulence, and diarrhea, which are prevalent in more than two-thirds of patients [97]. While the prevalence of SIBO in patients with TBI is not explicitly quantified, TBI has been shown to cause gut microbiota dysbiosis, increased intestinal permeability, systemic inflammation, dysautonomia, and changes in gut motility, all of which can contribute to the development of SIBO [58,75,83,98]. Treatment of SIBO primarily involves the use of antibiotics to reduce the bacterial load, such as rifaximin (first-line), metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, and amoxicillin–clavulanate [99]. Adjunctive therapies include dietary modifications, probiotics, and prokinetic agents to enhance intestinal motility and prevent recurrence [99].

3.5.3. Small Bowel Obstruction and Paralytic Ileus

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) occurs when there is a blockage within the intestinal tract that prevents food, liquid, gas, and stool from passing normally through the bowel, while paralytic ileus is a condition characterized by the absence of intestinal peristalsis without any mechanical obstruction. Both conditions share common symptoms, which typically involve severe, crampy abdominal pain, nausea and bilious vomiting, abdominal distension, absence of bowel sounds, and eventually, inability to pass gas or stool [75,76,100,101]. The prevalence of SBO and paralytic ileus in patients with TBI is limited. However, TBI is known to cause significant gastrointestinal dysfunction, including dysmotility and increased intestinal permeability, as well as neuroinflammation and dysautonomia, all of which can predispose to both SBO and paralytic ileus [75,76].
Treatment for both conditions begins with nasogastric decompression and nothing by mouth (NPO) status for patients to relieve bowel distension and vomiting, as well as IV fluids for hydration and electrolyte balance. Prokinetic agents, such as metoclopramide, which can be utilized to stimulate bowel motility, may also be given but must be considered carefully in the context of TBI-induced dysautonomia. Lastly, encouragement of early ambulation can be vital to care, as it has been shown to stimulate bowel function [75,76,101].

3.5.4. Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome

Superior mesenteric artery syndrome (SMAS) is a rare condition characterized by compression of the third portion of the duodenum between the aorta and the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), leading to duodenal obstruction and symptoms of severe postprandial epigastric pain, nausea and vomiting (frequently bilious), early satiety, weight loss, and abdominal distension and bleeding [102,103,104]. Although specific quantitative data on the prevalence of SMAS in TBI patients are lacking, systemic inflammation, dysautonomia, and prolonged immobilization can contribute to gastrointestinal complications and significant weight loss, predisposing TBI patients to SMAS via a reduction in the angle between the aorta and the SMA. To diagnose SMAS, physicians must identify its characteristic clinical symptoms along with CT or CT angiography showing the presence of a reduced aortomesenteric angle (≤22°) and aortomesenteric distance (≤8 mm), with proximal duodenal and gastric dilation and narrowing of the third portion of the duodenum [105]. Treatment guidelines recommend conservative management first, such as enteral feeding via a nasojejunal tube or total parenteral nutrition, to promote weight gain and relieve duodenal compression. Positional therapy to relieve compression and metoclopramide to enhance GI motility may also be utilized. In severe cases, a duodenojejunostomy can be pursued to bypass the compressed segment [104,106].

3.5.5. Constipation/Incontinence

Bowel incontinence is the involuntary loss of solid or liquid stool, typically presenting as unintentional soiling, unawareness of the need to defecate, or inability to defer defecation [107]. In patients with TBI, the prevalence of bowel incontinence was highest during the acute phase of TBI rehabilitation, with 68% of patients experiencing incontinence at admission to inpatient rehabilitation, according to a retrospective study conducted by Foxx-Orenstein et al. [108]. This prevalence decreased to 12.4% at discharge and 5.2% at one-year follow-up, highlighting the acute nature of bowel incontinence [108]. One reason for bowel incontinence in TBI stems from cognitive deficits, such as impaired awareness, attention, executive function, and memory, which can reduce patients’ ability to recognize the need to defecate, respond appropriately to rectal sensations, or perform timely toileting behaviors. Moreover, TBI-induced behavioral disturbances, such as apathy, disinhibition, and lack of motivation, can cause incontinence by interfering with adherence to bowel routines or the initiation of toileting. Lastly, TBI patients who simply have reduced mobility or loss of ability to control their external anal sphincter can also suffer from bowel incontinence, as well as incontinence-associated dermatitis, which can stem from inadequate cleansing, prolonged contact with moisture, and prolonged pressure on the skin for these TBI patients with limited mobility [108,109]. First-line management of bowel incontinence is typically a structured bowel program with scheduled toileting, dietary fiber optimization, environmental modifications (e.g., use of commodes), and use of stool-bulking agents alongside antidiarrheal medications to both improve stool consistency and reduce urgency [110,111]. For patients with partial neurological injury, a treatment plan that combines sensory retraining with pelvic floor muscle exercises can be utilized [112]. Finally, transanal irrigation, sacral neuromodulation, and surgical interventions can be indicated as options for symptoms refractory to conservative measures and less invasive therapies [110,112,113,114].
Constipation is defined as having fewer than three bowel movements per week, often accompanied by symptoms such as hard stools, a feeling of incomplete evacuation, abdominal discomfort, bloating, excessive straining, and a sense of anorectal blockage during defecation [115,116]. While the prevalence of constipation in patients with TBI is not precisely defined within the literature, it is a commonly observed complication that can stem from disruption of the brain–gut axis, neuroinflammation, and dysautonomia, as shown by studies indicating that bowel dysfunction, including constipation, affects nearly two out of three patients with acquired brain injury [75,111]. Increasing dietary fiber intake is recommended as a first-line treatment and can be achieved through fiber-rich foods or supplements [115]. Pharmacological treatments, including osmotic agents such as polyethylene glycol or milk of magnesia, are also commonly used, as well as stimulant laxatives like bisacodyl or glycerol suppositories [115]. Lastly, for refractory cases, newer agents such as lubiprostone and linaclotide may be considered, and in severe cases, colonic manometry and barostat testing may be required to evaluate colonic motility [115].

3.5.6. Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic disorder of gut–brain interaction characterized by recurrent abdominal pain associated with changes in stool frequency or form [117,118]. The prevalence of IBS in patients with TBI is not explicitly detailed, although studies have shown that TBI can induce gut microbiota dysbiosis and intestinal inflammation, both of which are factors implicated in the pathogenesis of IBS [75,83]. Additionally, TBI is known to cause significant neuroinflammation and systemic inflammation, which can lead to conditions such as dysmotility and increased mucosal permeability, which overlap with the symptoms present in IBS [75,76,83]. Treatment options for IBS first include dietary modifications, with the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) recommending a low-FODMAP diet [119]. Second-line treatments include antispasmodics for pain, antidiarrheals for diarrhea, and laxatives for constipation, as well as intestinal secretagogues, central neuromodulators, and drugs acting on opioid or 5-HT receptors in more severe cases of IBS [117,118]. Finally, cognitive–behavioral therapy and mindfulness treatments have also shown efficacy in improving symptoms and quality of life [119,120].

3.5.7. Mesenteric Ischemia, Ischemic Colitis, and Proctitis

Mesenteric ischemia is a condition characterized by reduced blood flow to the intestines, leading to ischemic injury, which can lead to symptoms of severe abdominal pain out of proportion to physical findings, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea or bloody stools, abdominal distension, and fever and leukocytosis, which can indicate possible bowel necrosis [75,76,121]. Ischemic colitis is a condition characterized by reduced blood flow to the colon, which can lead to symptoms of sudden onset of abdominal pain, often associated with tenderness, rectal bleeding, diarrhea, and fever [122]. Proctitis is inflammation of the rectum, typically the distal 10–12 cm, which can lead to symptoms of rectal pain, tenesmus, rectal bleeding, discharge, urgency, and lower abdominal pain [123]. There are no specific data on the prevalence of mesenteric ischemia, ischemic colitis, or proctitis in patients with TBI in the medical literature. However, TBI can lead to gastrointestinal dysfunction through mechanisms involving the brain–gut axis, systemic inflammation, and dysautonomia, all of which may predispose patients to various GI conditions, including mesenteric ischemia, ischemic colitis, or proctitis, via endothelial dysfunction, impaired vasoconstriction/vasodilation of arteries, and impaired blood flow [75,76,121,124].
Despite potentially similar pathophysiological mechanisms, the treatment of these three conditions differs significantly. For mesenteric ischemia, resuscitation with IV fluids, hemodynamic support, and broad-spectrum antibiotics constitute first-line procedures to prevent sepsis. After patient stabilization, angioplasty and stenting can be performed to revascularize occluded mesenteric arteries, with surgical interventions such as bypass performed in cases where endovascular treatment is not feasible [125]. For ischemic colitis, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis and appropriate supportive care with bowel rest, IV fluids, and antibiotics to prevent secondary infection. In severe cases, surgical intervention may be necessary to remove necrotic bowel segments or to address complications [122]. For proctitis, the AGA recommends mesalamine suppositories for mild-to-moderate ulcerative proctitis due to their efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission [126]. Topical corticosteroids are indicated for patients unresponsive to mesalamine, while oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) agents or biologic agents, such as anti-TNF therapies, are indicated for severe cases or for patients unresponsive to topical corticosteroids [126,127].

3.5.8. Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) and Sequelae

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most common healthcare-associated infection in the US, occurring after a disruption of the colonic microbiota, where C. difficile normally resides, typically due to recent antibiotic exposure [128,129,130,131]. Transmission occurs via the fecal–oral route, and major risk factors include recent or prolonged antibiotic use, immunodeficiency, hospitalization, advanced age, and underlying morbidities [128,131]. Clinical manifestations of CDI classically present as watery diarrhea, abdominal pain, fever, and leukocytosis, although severe cases may progress to pseudomembranous colitis, toxic megacolon, and/or death [128,132]. The prevalence of CDI in TBI patients in the ICU ranges between 0.6 and 2.6%, with a higher risk associated with prolonged antibiotic use and ICU stay, the presence of CNS devices, and the use of enteral nutrition [133,134,135]. To treat CDI, the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons recommends oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin as first-line therapy and fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent or refractory cases [128]. Prevention of CDI is dependent on antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures [132].

3.6. Pancreatic Disorders (Table 6)

Pancreatitis (Acute and Chronic) and Hyperamylasemia

Pancreatitis is an inflammatory condition of the pancreas that can cause local injury, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and organ failure. Symptoms typically include severe epigastric or left upper quadrant pain that may radiate to the back, nausea, vomiting, and fever [136,137]. The prevalence of pancreatitis in patients with TBI is limited. However, TBI can lead to systemic inflammation and dysautonomia, which may predispose patients to various gastrointestinal conditions, including pancreatitis. A study by de Toledo et al. found that increases in pancreatic enzymes, including amylase, were observed in 57% of children with severe TBI, suggesting a potential link between TBI and pancreatic dysfunction [138]. Treatment of acute pancreatitis first involves aggressive IV fluid resuscitation, typically with lactated Ringer’s solution, to maintain adequate hydration and organ perfusion [139,140]. Opioid analgesics are also indicated for pain relief, and early enteral nutrition is preferred over parenteral nutrition to maintain gut integrity and reduce the risk of infections [139,140].
Table 6. Pancreatic disorders.
Table 6. Pancreatic disorders.
DisorderMechanisms Post-TBISymptomsTreatment
Pancreatitis Systemic inflammation
Dysautonomia
Stress responses leading to pancreatic dysfunction
Severe epigastric or left upper quadrant pain
Nausea, vomiting
Fever
IV fluid resuscitation
Pain management
Early enteral nutrition
Antibiotics for infected necrosis
HyperamylasemiaSystemic inflammation and stress responses leading to pancreatic dysfunctionSymptoms are related to the underlying cause (example: pancreatitis)Treat the underlying condition
Supportive care (hydration, antibiotics, etc.)
Monitoring of amylase levels

3.7. Other Disorders (Table 7)

Acalculous Cholecystitis

Acalculous cholecystitis is an inflammation of the gallbladder without the presence of gallstones that is often seen in critically ill patients and is associated with factors such as fasting, parenteral nutrition, and mechanical ventilation, which can lead to ischemia of the gallbladder wall. Symptoms can include fever, right upper quadrant abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, and sepsis. The prevalence of acalculous cholecystitis in TBI patients is limited. However, TBI patients are often critically ill and may require mechanical ventilation and parenteral nutrition, which are risk factors for developing acalculous cholecystitis. A study by Mossaab et al. highlighted that acalculous cholecystitis is common in intensive care unit patients, which can include those with severe TBI [141]. For definitive treatment, early cholecystectomy, typically within 72 h, is recommended. However, for patients who are not suitable surgical candidates, percutaneous cholecystostomy can be a temporary measure used to drain the gallbladder and control infection [141,142].
Table 7. Other disorders.
Table 7. Other disorders.
DisorderMechanisms Post-TBISymptomsTreatment
Acalculous CholecystitisFactors such as fasting, parenteral nutrition, and mechanical ventilation can lead to gallbladder ischemiaFever, right upper quadrant pain
Nausea, vomiting
Signs of systemic inflammation/sepsis
Broad-spectrum antibiotics
Cholecystectomy
Percutaneous cholecystostomy

4. Conclusions

The GI system is integrally connected to the recovery of patients with TBI, given its central role in systemic inflammation, immune modulation, and nutrient absorption, all of which can significantly influence neurological outcomes. After TBI, neuroinflammatory processes and autonomic dysregulation frequently disrupt GI motility, increase intestinal permeability, and alter the gut microbiota, resulting in dysbiosis and impaired gut barrier function. These changes facilitate translocation of microbial products and proinflammatory mediators into the systemic circulation, amplifying systemic inflammation and contributing to secondary brain injury, thereby impeding neurological recovery.
GI dysfunction, however, can also occur post-TBI, given the elevated circulation of proinflammatory cytokines, impaired intestinal transit, and a shift towards pathogenic bacterial populations, which perpetuate neuroinflammation and worsen cognitive and functional outcomes. Alterations in bile acid metabolism and gut-derived metabolites further modulate both local and central immune responses, linking GI health to brain recovery and highlighting the importance of metabolic crosstalk between the gut and the CNS.
Lastly, the brain–gut axis—a bidirectional communication network involving neural, immune, and endocrine pathways—serves as the interface through which TBI-induced changes in the CNS affect GI physiology and vice versa. Disruption of this axis after TBI is now recognized as a key factor in the pathogenesis of secondary injury and represents a promising therapeutic target.
With the GI system’s significance in TBI, clinical assessment of GI dysfunction in TBI should be integrated into routine care. This includes vigilant monitoring for GI motility disorders (such as ileus or delayed gastric emptying), assessment of intestinal permeability (e.g., clinical signs of “leaky gut” or laboratory markers), and evaluation for dysbiosis (e.g., unexplained diarrhea, infection, or malabsorption). Potential biomarkers for monitoring gut health and injury progression include analysis of gut microbiota composition (via stool studies), measurement of circulating inflammatory mediators (such as TNF-α and IL-1β), and markers of intestinal barrier integrity (e.g., D-lactate and endotoxin). While these are not yet standard in all clinical settings, they are increasingly recognized as valuable adjuncts in research and specialized care [75,143,144,145]
Therapeutic strategies targeting the GI system in TBI patients should focus on both prevention and management of GI dysfunction to optimize neurological recovery and reduce secondary brain injury. Dietary interventions—including early enteral nutrition, macronutrient optimization, and specialized diets—can support gut health and modulate neuroinflammation. There is emerging evidence that specific macronutrients (such as omega-3 fatty acids and high-quality proteins) and dietary patterns may promote resilience against secondary insults and support neurological recovery [146,147].
Future directions include the need for well-designed clinical trials to establish standardized protocols for GI-targeted therapies in TBI, as current evidence is largely based on preclinical studies and small clinical trials. There is a lack of large-scale, guideline-based recommendations for the routine use of microbiome-targeted interventions in TBI, and further research is required to define optimal patient selection, timing, and specific therapeutic regimens [143,148].
In summary, incorporating systematic assessment and targeted management of the GI system can help optimize neurological recovery and reduce secondary brain injury in patients with TBI.

Author Contributions

The following lists the contributions made by each author: Conceptualization, R.K.S. and B.D.G.; methodology, R.K.S., J.J.L. and T.M.; validation, B.D.G.; investigation, R.K.S., J.J.L., and B.D.G.; writing—original draft preparation, R.K.S. and J.J.L.; writing—review and editing, R.K.S., J.J.L., T.M., B.D.G. and A.A.B.; supervision, B.D.G.; project administration, B.D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
5-ASA5-Aminosalicylic Acid
5-HT5-Hydroxytryptamine (Serotonin)
ADLActivities of Daily Living
AGAAmerican Gastroenterological Association
CDIClostridioides difficile Infection
CNSCentral Nervous System
DKADiabetic Ketoacidosis
GERDGastroesophageal Reflux Disease
GCSGlasgow Coma Scale
GIGastrointestinal
H2RAsH2-Receptor Antagonists
HHSHyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State
HPAHypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal (Axis)
IBSIrritable Bowel Syndrome
ICUIntensive Care Unit
IL-1βInterleukin-1 Beta
IVIntravenous
MeSHMedical Subject Headings
NPONil Per Os (Nothing by Mouth)
NSAIDsNonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
PPIsProton Pump Inhibitors
SBOSmall Bowel Obstruction
SIBOSmall Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth
SMASuperior Mesenteric Artery
TBITraumatic Brain Injury
TNF-αTumor Necrosis Factor Alpha

Appendix A

Table A1. List of search terms.
Table A1. List of search terms.
“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “gastrointestinal” OR “gut”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Gastrointestinal dysmotility”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Gut microbial dysbiosis”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Malnutrition”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Hyperphagia”
“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Hyperglycemia”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Diabetic ketoacidosis” OR “DKA”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state” OR “HHS”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Hypoglycemia”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Oral ulcers”
“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Oral candidiasis” OR “Oral thrush”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Herpes Simplex Virus infection” OR “Oral herpes” OR “HSV”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Glossitis”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Sialorrhea” OR “Hypersalivation”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Dysphagia”
“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease” OR “GERD”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Esophagitis”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Barrett’s esophagus”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Esophageal cancer”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Esophageal adenocarcinoma”
“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Gastritis”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Peptic Ulcer Disease” OR “PUD”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Cushing ulcer”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Gastric Cancer” OR “Stomach Cancer”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Gastroparesis” OR “Delayed gastric emptying”
“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Gastric Polyps”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Recurrent Emesis”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Duodenitis”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth” OR “SIBO”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Small bowel obstruction” OR “SBO”
“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Paralytic Ileus” OR “Ileus”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome” OR “SMAS”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Constipation”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Bowel incontinence” OR “Fecal incontinence”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Incontinence-associated dermatitis”
“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Incontinence” AND “Dermatitis”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Irritable Bowel syndrome” OR “IBS”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Mesenteric Ischemia”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Ischemic colitis”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Proctitis”
“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Clostridioides difficile infection” OR “C. diff“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Pseudomembranous colitis”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Toxic megacolon”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Pancreatitis” OR “Hyperamylasemia”“Traumatic brain injury” OR “TBI” AND “Cholecystitis” OR “Acalculous cholecystitis”

References

  1. Johnson, L.W.; Diaz, I. Exploring the Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Health Care Services; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Committee on Accelerating Progress in Traumatic Brain Injury Research and Care; Matney, C.; Bowman, K.; Berwick, D. (Eds.) The Scope and Burden of Traumatic Brain Injury. In Traumatic Brain Injury: A Roadmap for Accelerating Progress; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ginsburg, J.; Smith, T. Traumatic Brain Injury. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sundman, M.H.; Chen, N.-K.; Subbian, V.; Chou, Y.-H. The Bidirectional Gut-Brain-Microbiota Axis as a Potential Nexus between Traumatic Brain Injury, Inflammation, and Disease. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2017, 66, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Sun, D.; Chen, P.; Xi, Y.; Sheng, J. From Trash to Treasure: The Role of Bacterial Extracellular Vesicles in Gut Health and Disease. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1274295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Benameur, T.; Hasan, A.; Toufig, H.; Panaro, M.A.; Filannino, F.M.; Porro, C. Microbiota-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Potential Mediators of Gut–Brain Communication in Traumatic Brain Injury: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Implications. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Cao, Y.; Jia, H.; Li, X.; Li, F.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, J. Neuroinflammation of Traumatic Brain Injury: Roles of Extracellular Vesicles. Front. Immunol. 2023, 13, 1088827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Meyfroidt, G.; Baguley, I.J.; Menon, D.K. Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity: The Storm after Acute Brain Injury. Lancet Neurol. 2017, 16, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Zheng, Z.; Wang, S.; Wu, C.; Cao, Y.; Gu, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Hu, W. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis after Traumatic Brain Injury Contributes to Persistent Microglial Activation Associated with Upregulated Lyz2 and Shifted Tryptophan Metabolic Phenotype. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Celorrio, M.; Shumilov, K.; Rodgers, R.; Schriefer, L.; Li, Y.; Baldridge, M.T.; Friess, S.H. Innate and Peripheral Immune Alterations after Traumatic Brain Injury Are Regulated in a Gut Microbiota-Dependent Manner in Mice. J. Neurotrauma 2023, 40, 772–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  11. Garg, K.; Mohajeri, M.H. Potential Effects of the Most Prescribed Drugs on the Microbiota-Gut-Brain-Axis: A Review. Brain Res. Bull. 2024, 207, 110883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Pyles, R.B.; Miller, A.L.; Urban, R.J.; Sheffield-Moore, M.; Wright, T.J.; Maxwell, C.A.; Randolph, K.M.; Danesi, C.P.; McGovern, K.A.; Vargas, J.; et al. The Altered TBI Fecal Microbiome Is Stable and Functionally Distinct. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2024, 17, 1341808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Chiu, L.S.; Anderton, R.S. The Role of the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Long-Term Neurodegenerative Processes Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2023, 57, 400–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Mukhtar, K.; Nawaz, H.; Abid, S. Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders and Gut-Brain Axis: What Does the Future Hold? World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 552–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Rabinowitz, A.R.; Levin, H.S. Cognitive Sequelae of Traumatic Brain Injury. Psychiatr. Clin. 2014, 37, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Kwak, E.H.; Wi, S.; Kim, M.; Pyo, S.; Shin, Y.-K.; Oh, K.J.; Han, K.; Kim, Y.W.; Cho, S.-R. Factors Affecting Cognition and Emotion in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2020, 46, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Wood, R.L.; Worthington, A. Neurobehavioral Abnormalities Associated with Executive Dysfunction after Traumatic Brain Injury. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Fortin, S.; Godbout, L.; Braun, C.M.J. Cognitive Structure of Executive Deficits in Frontally Lesioned Head Trauma Patients Performing Activities of Daily Living. Cortex 2003, 39, 273–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. De Simoni, S.; Grover, P.J.; Jenkins, P.O.; Honeyfield, L.; Quest, R.A.; Ross, E.; Scott, G.; Wilson, M.H.; Majewska, P.; Waldman, A.D.; et al. Disconnection between the Default Mode Network and Medial Temporal Lobes in Post-Traumatic Amnesia. Brain J. Neurol. 2016, 139, 3137–3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  20. Paterno, R.; Folweiler, K.A.; Cohen, A.S. Pathophysiology and Treatment of Memory Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2017, 17, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Berlin, H.A.; Rolls, E.T.; Kischka, U. Impulsivity, Time Perception, Emotion and Reinforcement Sensitivity in Patients with Orbitofrontal Cortex Lesions. Brain J. Neurol. 2004, 127, 1108–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  22. Nolan, A.L.; Sohal, V.S.; Rosi, S. Selective Inhibitory Circuit Dysfunction after Chronic Frontal Lobe Contusion. J. Neurosci. 2022, 42, 5361–5372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Liu, X.; Lei, Z.; Gilhooly, D.; He, J.; Li, Y.; Ritzel, R.M.; Li, H.; Wu, L.-J.; Liu, S.; Wu, J. Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Inflammatory Changes in the Olfactory Bulb Disrupt Neuronal Networks Leading to Olfactory Dysfunction. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2023, 114, 22–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Savard, D.J.; Ursua, F.G.; Gaddey, H.L. Smell and Taste Disorders in Primary Care. Am. Fam. Physician 2023, 108, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Schneider, K.M.; Blank, N.; Alvarez, Y.; Thum, K.; Lundgren, P.; Litichevskiy, L.; Sleeman, M.; Bahnsen, K.; Kim, J.; Kardo, S.; et al. The Enteric Nervous System Relays Psychological Stress to Intestinal Inflammation. Cell 2023, 186, 2823–2838.e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. VA/DoD, T.L.G. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management and Rehabilitation of Post-Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Available online: https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/rehab/mtbi/ (accessed on 20 February 2026).
  27. Ouellet, M.-C.; Beaulieu-Bonneau, S.; Morin, C.M. Sleep-Wake Disturbances after Traumatic Brain Injury. Lancet Neurol. 2015, 14, 746–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Valko, P.O.; Gavrilov, Y.V.; Yamamoto, M.; Noaín, D.; Reddy, H.; Haybaeck, J.; Weis, S.; Baumann, C.R.; Scammell, T.E. Damage to Arousal-Promoting Brainstem Neurons with Traumatic Brain Injury. Sleep 2016, 39, 1249–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Kurtz, P.; Rocha, E.E.M. Nutrition Therapy, Glucose Control, and Brain Metabolism in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multimodal Monitoring Approach. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  30. Fenger, A.-S.W.; Olsen, M.H.; Fabritius, M.L.; Riberholt, C.G.; Møller, K. Glycaemic Control for Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: Protocol for a Systematic Review. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2023, 67, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Cai, A.; Li, Y.; Xi, X.; Wang, Q.; Yang, J.; Wang, L.; Li, H.; Luo, X.; Zeng, X. Analysis of Risk Factors and Development of Predictive Model for Malnutrition in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Nutr. Neurosci. 2024, 27, 1439–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Suárez-Escudero, J.C.; Lema-Porto, K.S.; Palacio-Patiño, D.; Izquierdo-Moreno, M.; Bedoya-Londoño, C.L.; Suárez-Escudero, J.C.; Lema-Porto, K.S.; Palacio-Patiño, D.; Izquierdo-Moreno, M.; Bedoya-Londoño, C.L. Neurogenic Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: Concept, Clinical Pathophysiology, and Therapeutics. Arch. Neurocienc. 2022, 27, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Nieto, K.; Ang, D.; Liu, H. Dysphagia among Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Population-Based Study. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Kalhori Boroujerdi, S.; Ghoreishi, Z.S.; Ghorbani, M.; Mohammadpour, A.; Kenarangi, T. Impact of Early Swallowing Rehabilitation on Oral Feeding in Patients with Dysphagia Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Inj. 2025, 39, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Eskildsen, S.J.; Poulsen, I.; Jakobsen, D.; Riberholt, C.G.; Curtis, D.J. Scoping Review to Identify and Map Non-Pharmacological, Non-Surgical Treatments for Dysphagia Following Moderate-to-Severe Acquired Brain Injury. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e053244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  36. Bai, A.V.; Agostini, F.; Bernetti, A.; Mangone, M.; Fidenzi, G.; D’Urzo, R.; Ruggiero, M.; Murgia, M.; Santilli, V.; Paoloni, M.; et al. State of the Evidence about Rehabilitation Interventions in Patients with Dysphagia. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2021, 57, 900–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  37. Chapple, L.-A.S.; Deane, A.M.; Heyland, D.K.; Lange, K.; Kranz, A.J.; Williams, L.T.; Chapman, M.J. Energy and Protein Deficits throughout Hospitalization in Patients Admitted with a Traumatic Brain Injury. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 35, 1315–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  38. Shestopalov, A.E.; Yakovleva, A.V.; Yadgarov, M.Y.; Sergeev, I.V.; Kuzovlev, A.N. Prevalence and Impact of Malnutrition Risk on Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Stroke: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Electronic Health Records. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Caliri, S.; Andaloro, A.; Corallo, F.; Donato, A.; Marino, S.; Mantarro, C.; Terranova, A.; Bramanti, P.; Caminiti, F.; Rifici, C. Recovery of Malnutrition in a Patient with Severe Brain Injury Outcomes: A Case Report. Medicine 2019, 98, e16755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Vizzini, A.; Aranda-Michel, J. Nutritional Support in Head Injury. Nutrition 2011, 27, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. American College of Surgeons. Best Practice Guidelines: The Management of Traumatic Brain Injury. 2024. Available online: https://www.facs.org/media/vgfgjpfk/best-practices-guidelines-traumatic-brain-injury.pdf (accessed on 20 February 2026).
  42. Chiang, Y.-H.; Chao, D.-P.; Chu, S.-F.; Lin, H.-W.; Huang, S.-Y.; Yeh, Y.-S.; Lui, T.-N.; Binns, C.W.; Chiu, W.-T. Early Enteral Nutrition and Clinical Outcomes of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients in Acute Stage: A Multi-Center Cohort Study. J. Neurotrauma 2012, 29, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Dhandapani, S.; Dhandapani, M.; Agarwal, M.; Chutani, A.M.; Subbiah, V.; Sharma, B.S.; Mahapatra, A.K. The Prognostic Significance of the Timing of Total Enteral Feeding in Traumatic Brain Injury. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2012, 3, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Chourdakis, M.; Kraus, M.M.; Tzellos, T.; Sardeli, C.; Peftoulidou, M.; Vassilakos, D.; Kouvelas, D. Effect of Early Compared with Delayed Enteral Nutrition on Endocrine Function in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: An Open-Labeled Randomized Trial. JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2012, 36, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Lai, J.-Q.; Chen, X.-R.; Lin, S.; Chen, C.-N.; Zheng, X.-X. Progress in Research on the Role of Clinical Nutrition in Treating Traumatic Brain Injury Affecting the Neurovascular Unit. Nutr. Rev. 2023, 81, 1051–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Quintard, H.; Ichai, C. Nutritional and Metabolic Supplementation for the Injured Brain: An Update. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2019, 25, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Matovu, P.; Kirya, M.; Galukande, M.; Kiryabwire, J.; Mukisa, J.; Ocen, W.; Lowery Wilson, M.; Abio, A.; Lule, H. Hyperglycemia in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients and Its Association with Thirty-Day Mortality: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study in Uganda. PeerJ 2021, 9, e10589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  48. El-Menyar, A.; Asim, M.; Mir, F.; Hakim, S.; Kanbar, A.; Siddiqui, T.; Younis, B.; Ahmed, K.; Mahmood, I.; Atique, S.; et al. Patterns and Effects of Admission Hyperglycemia and Inflammatory Response in Trauma Patients: A Prospective Clinical Study. World J. Surg. 2021, 45, 2670–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  49. Tsai, Y.-C.; Wu, S.-C.; Hsieh, T.-M.; Liu, H.-T.; Huang, C.-Y.; Chou, S.-E.; Su, W.-T.; Hsu, S.-Y.; Hsieh, C.-H. Association of Stress-Induced Hyperglycemia and Diabetic Hyperglycemia with Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Analysis of a Propensity Score-Matched Population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  50. Shi, J.; Dong, B.; Mao, Y.; Guan, W.; Cao, J.; Zhu, R.; Wang, S. Review: Traumatic Brain Injury and Hyperglycemia, a Potentially Modifiable Risk Factor. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 71052–71061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Garcia-Ballestas, E.; Villafañe, J.; Nuñez-Baez, K.; Florez Perdomo, W.A.; Duran, M.A.; Janjua, T.; Moscote-Salazar, L.R.; Agrawal, A. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Glycemic Control in Traumatic Brain Injury. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2024, 245, 108504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Stoudt, K.; Chawla, S. Don’t Sugar Coat It: Glycemic Control in the Intensive Care Unit. J. Intensive Care Med. 2019, 34, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Fathallah, N.; Slim, R.; Larif, S.; Hmouda, H.; Ben Salem, C. Drug-Induced Hyperglycaemia and Diabetes. Drug Saf. 2015, 38, 1153–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Hermanides, J.; Plummer, M.P.; Finnis, M.; Deane, A.M.; Coles, J.P.; Menon, D.K. Glycaemic Control Targets after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit. Care 2018, 22, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators; Finfer, S.; Chittock, D.R.; Su, S.Y.-S.; Blair, D.; Foster, D.; Dhingra, V.; Bellomo, R.; Cook, D.; Dodek, P.; et al. Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 1283–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Kothari, M.; Spin-Neto, R.; Nielsen, J.F. Comprehensive Oral-Health Assessment of Individuals with Acquired Brain-Injury in Neuro-Rehabilitation Setting. Brain Inj. 2016, 30, 1103–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  57. Kothari, S.F.; Nascimento, G.G.; Jakobsen, M.B.; Nielsen, J.F.; Kothari, M. Oral Health: Something to Worry about in Individuals with Acquired Brain Injury? Brain Inj. 2020, 34, 1264–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Lin, Y.; Hou, C.; Wang, C.; Chen, R.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Shao, B.; Huang, Y.; Li, S. Research Progress on Digestive Disorders Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1524495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Stoopler, E.T.; Villa, A.; Bindakhil, M.; Díaz, D.L.O.; Sollecito, T.P. Common Oral Conditions: A Review. JAMA 2024, 331, 1045–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  60. Odgaard, L.; Kothari, M. Prevalence and Association of Oral Candidiasis with Dysphagia in Individuals with Acquired Brain Injury. Brain Inj. 2018, 32, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Sharma, R.; Shultz, S.R.; Robinson, M.J.; Belli, A.; Hibbs, M.L.; O’Brien, T.J.; Semple, B.D. Infections after a Traumatic Brain Injury: The Complex Interplay between the Immune and Neurological Systems. Brain Behav. Immun. 2019, 79, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  62. Gandasasmita, N.; Li, J.; Loane, D.J.; Semple, B.D. Experimental Models of Hospital-Acquired Infections After Traumatic Brain Injury: Challenges and Opportunities. J. Neurotrauma 2024, 41, 752–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Pappas, P.G.; Kauffman, C.A.; Andes, D.R.; Clancy, C.J.; Marr, K.A.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Reboli, A.C.; Schuster, M.G.; Vazquez, J.A.; Walsh, T.J.; et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 62, e1–e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Zhu, S.; Viejo-Borbolla, A. Pathogenesis and Virulence of Herpes Simplex Virus. Virulence 2021, 12, 2670–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Chaumette, T.; Cinotti, R.; Mollé, A.; Solomon, P.; Castain, L.; Fourgeux, C.; McWilliam, H.E.G.; Misme-Aucouturier, B.; Broquet, A.; Jacqueline, C.; et al. Monocyte Signature Associated with Herpes Simplex Virus Reactivation and Neurological Recovery after Brain Injury. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 206, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Bautista, J.; Ávila-Coello, D.; Hidalgo-Tinoco, C.; Bueno-Miño, J.; López-Cortés, A. Unraveling the Gut-Brain-Immune Interplay in Herpes Simplex Virus-Associated Neurodegeneration. J. Med. Virol. 2025, 97, e70504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Faller, C.J.; Kursancew, A.C.S.; Lima, B.B.; Duarte, N.G.; Noetzold, J.T.; Studnicka, N.; Mathias, K.; Petronilho, F.; Streck, E.L.; Generoso, J.S. Association between Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk of Developing Infections in the Central Nervous System and Periphery. Metab. Brain Dis. 2025, 40, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Workowski, K.A.; Bachmann, L.H.; Chan, P.A.; Johnston, C.M.; Muzny, C.A.; Park, I.; Reno, H.; Zenilman, J.M.; Bolan, G.A. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2021, 70, 1–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  69. Tyler, K.L. Acute Viral Encephalitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Hockstein, N.G.; Samadi, D.S.; Gendron, K.; Handler, S.D. Sialorrhea: A Management Challenge. Am. Fam. Physician 2004, 69, 2628–2634. [Google Scholar]
  71. Morgante, F.; Bavikatte, G.; Anwar, F.; Mohamed, B. The Burden of Sialorrhoea in Chronic Neurological Conditions: Current Treatment Options and the Role of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®). Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2019, 12, 1756286419888601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Cherney, L.R.; Halper, A.S. Swallowing Problems in Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury. Semin. Neurol. 1996, 16, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  73. Khan, A.; Frazer-Green, L.; Amin, R.; Wolfe, L.; Faulkner, G.; Casey, K.; Sharma, G.; Selim, B.; Zielinski, D.; Aboussouan, L.S.; et al. Respiratory Management of Patients With Neuromuscular Weakness: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline and Expert Panel Report. CHEST 2023, 164, 394–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  74. Clark, T.; Arikan, E.; Bradley, L. The Effectiveness and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Treatment for Sialorrhea Due to Severe Brain Injury. Brain Inj. 2025, 39, 476–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Hanscom, M.; Loane, D.J.; Shea-Donohue, T. Brain-Gut Axis Dysfunction in the Pathogenesis of Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e143777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Cannon, A.R.; Anderson, L.J.; Galicia, K.; Murray, M.G.; Kamran, A.S.; Li, X.; Gonzalez, R.P.; Choudhry, M.A. Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Inflammation and Gastrointestinal Motility Dysfunction. Shock 2023, 59, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  77. Olsen, A.B.; Hetz, R.A.; Xue, H.; Aroom, K.R.; Bhattarai, D.; Johnson, E.; Bedi, S.; Cox, C.S.; Uray, K. Effects of Traumatic Brain Injury on Intestinal Contractility. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2013, 25, 593–e463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Kharrazian, D. Traumatic Brain Injury and the Effect on the Brain-Gut Axis. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2015, 21, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  79. Fass, R. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 1207–1216. Available online: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMcp2114026?utm_source=openevidence (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  80. Katz, P.O.; Dunbar, K.; Schnoll-Sussman, F.H.; Greer, K.B.; Yadlapati, R.; Spechler, S.J. ACG Clinical Guideline: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 117, 27–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  81. Yadlapati, R.; Gyawali, C.P.; Pandolfino, J.E.; Chang, K.; Kahrilas, P.J.; Katz, P.O.; Katzka, D.; Komanduri, S.; Lipham, J.; Menard-Katcher, P.; et al. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Personalized Approach to the Evaluation and Management of GERD: Expert Review. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 20, 984–994.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  82. Kamada, T.; Fusamoto, H.; Kawano, S.; Noguchi, M.; Hiramatsu, K.; Masuzawa, M.; Sato, N. Acute Gastroduodenal Lesions in Head Injury. An Endoscopic Study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1977, 68, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. You, W.; Zhu, Y.; Wei, A.; Du, J.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, P.; Tu, M.; Wang, H.; Wen, L.; Yang, X. Traumatic Brain Injury Induces Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota Accompanied by Alterations of Bile Acid Profile. J. Neurotrauma 2022, 39, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. El Baassiri, M.G.; Raouf, Z.; Jang, H.-S.; Scheese, D.; Duess, J.W.; Fulton, W.B.; Sodhi, C.P.; Hackam, D.J.; Nasr, I.W. Ccr2-Dependent Monocytes Exacerbate Intestinal Inflammation and Modulate Gut Serotonergic Signaling Following Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024, 97, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Siddiqui, A.H.; Farooq, U.; Siddiqui, F. Curling Ulcer. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  86. Almadi, M.A.; Lu, Y.; Alali, A.A.; Barkun, A.N. Peptic Ulcer Disease. Lancet 2024, 404, 68–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  87. Kumaria, A.; Kirkman, M.A.; Scott, R.A.; Dow, G.R.; Leggate, A.J.; Macarthur, D.C.; Ingale, H.A.; Smith, S.J.; Basu, S. A Reappraisal of the Pathophysiology of Cushing Ulcer: A Narrative Review. J. Neurosurg. Anesthesiol. 2024, 36, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  88. Kemp, W.J.; Bashir, A.; Dababneh, H.; Cohen-Gadol, A.A. Cushing’s Ulcer: Further Reflections. Asian J. Neurosurg. 2015, 10, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Vakil, N. Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Review. JAMA 2024, 332, 1832–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Kavitt, R.T.; Lipowska, A.M.; Anyane-Yeboa, A.; Gralnek, I.M. Diagnosis and Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Disease. Am. J. Med. 2019, 132, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  91. Laine, L.; Barkun, A.N.; Saltzman, J.R.; Martel, M.; Leontiadis, G.I. ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding. Off. J. Am. Coll. Gastroenterol. ACG 2021, 116, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Kunovac, F.; Cicvaric, A.; Robba, C.; Turk, T.; Muzevic, D.; Kralik, K.; Kvolik, S. Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders Correlate with Intracranial Bleeding, Opioid Use, and Brainstem Edema in Neurosurgical Patients. Neurocrit. Care 2023, 39, 368–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  93. Ott, L.; Young, B.; Phillips, R.; McClain, C.; Adams, L.; Dempsey, R.; Tibbs, P.; Ryo, U.Y. Altered Gastric Emptying in the Head-Injured Patient: Relationship to Feeding Intolerance. J. Neurosurg. 1991, 74, 738–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Camilleri, M.; Kuo, B.; Nguyen, L.; Vaughn, V.M.; Petrey, J.; Greer, K.; Yadlapati, R.; Abell, T.L. ACG Clinical Guideline: Gastroparesis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 117, 1197–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  95. Lacy, B.E.; Tack, J.; Gyawali, C.P. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Medically Refractory Gastroparesis: Expert Review. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 20, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  96. Hameed, H.; Hussain, J.; Cláudia Paiva-Santos, A.; Zaman, M.; Hamza, A.; Sajjad, I.; Asad, F. Comprehensive Insights on Treatment Modalities with Conventional and Herbal Drugs for the Treatment of Duodenal Ulcers. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2024, 397, 8211–8229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  97. Pimentel, M.; Saad, R.J.; Long, M.D.; Rao, S.S.C. ACG Clinical Guideline: Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 115, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Yang, W.; Yuan, Q.; Li, Z.; Du, Z.; Wu, G.; Yu, J.; Hu, J. Translocation and Dissemination of Gut Bacteria after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Zafar, H.; Jimenez, B.; Schneider, A. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: Current Update. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2023, 39, 522–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Iftikhar, P.M.; Anwar, A.; Saleem, S.; Nasir, S.; Inayat, A. Traumatic Brain Injury Causing Intestinal Dysfunction: A Review. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2020, 79, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  101. Daniels, A.H.; Ritterman, S.A.; Rubin, L.E. Paralytic Ileus in the Orthopaedic Patient. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2015, 23, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Le, D.; Stirparo, J.J.; Magdaleno, T.F.; Paulson, C.L.; Roth, K.R. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Findings in the Diagnosis and Management of Superior Mesenteric Artery (SMA) Syndrome. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2022, 55, 233.e1–233.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  103. Jin, S.; Zhou, H.; Li, W. Nursing of a Lactating Patient with Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome: A Case Report. J. Int. Med. Res. 2023, 51, 3000605231157198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  104. Jain, N.; Chopde, A.; Soni, B.; Sharma, B.; Saini, S.; Mishra, S.; Mishra, S.; Gupta, R.; Bhojwani, R. SMA Syndrome: Management Perspective with Laparoscopic Duodenojejunostomy and Long-Term Results. Surg. Endosc. 2021, 35, 2029–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  105. Warncke, E.S.; Gursahaney, D.L.; Mascolo, M.; Dee, E. Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome: A Radiographic Review. Abdom. Radiol. 2019, 44, 3188–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  106. Cienfuegos, J.A.; Hurtado-Pardo, L.; Valentí, V.; Landecho, M.F.; Vivas, I.; Estévez, M.G.; Diez-Caballero, A.; Hernández-Lizoáin, J.L.; Rotellar, F. Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for the Treatment of Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome: Long-Term Outcomes. World J. Surg. 2020, 44, 1798–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  107. Bharucha, A.E.; Knowles, C.H.; Mack, I.; Malcolm, A.; Oblizajek, N.; Rao, S.; Scott, S.M.; Shin, A.; Enck, P. Faecal Incontinence in Adults. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2022, 8, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Foxx-Orenstein, A.; Kolakowsky-Hayner, S.; Marwitz, J.H.; Cifu, D.X.; Dunbar, A.; Englander, J.; Francisco, G. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Fecal Incontinence after Acute Brain Injury: Findings from the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003, 84, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  109. Safaz, I.; Alaca, R.; Yasar, E.; Tok, F.; Yilmaz, B. Medical Complications, Physical Function and Communication Skills in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single Centre 5-Year Experience. Brain Inj. 2008, 22, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  110. ASCRS Management of Fecal Incontinence Guideline Summary—Guideline Central. Available online: https://www.guidelinecentral.com/guideline/9290 (accessed on 7 January 2026).
  111. Zandalasini, M.; Pelizzari, L.; Ciardi, G.; Giraudo, D.; Guasconi, M.; Paravati, S.; Lamberti, G.; Frizziero, A. Bowel Dysfunctions after Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1146054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  112. Whitehead, W.E.; Rao, S.S.C.; Lowry, A.; Nagle, D.; Varma, M.; Bitar, K.N.; Bharucha, A.E.; Hamilton, F.A. Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: State of the Science Summary for the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 110, 138–146; quiz 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  113. Paris, G.; Gourcerol, G.; Leroi, A.M. Management of Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2011, 47, 661–676. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  114. Van Koughnett, J.A.M.; Wexner, S.D. Current Management of Fecal Incontinence: Choosing amongst Treatment Options to Optimize Outcomes. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 9216–9230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  115. American Gastroenterological Association; Bharucha, A.E.; Dorn, S.D.; Lembo, A.; Pressman, A. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on Constipation. Gastroenterology 2013, 144, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  116. Jamshed, N.; Lee, Z.-E.; Olden, K.W. Diagnostic Approach to Chronic Constipation in Adults. Am. Fam. Physician 2011, 84, 299–306. [Google Scholar]
  117. Ford, A.C.; Sperber, A.D.; Corsetti, M.; Camilleri, M. Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Lancet 2020, 396, 1675–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  118. Lacy, B.E.; Pimentel, M.; Brenner, D.M.; Chey, W.D.; Keefer, L.A.; Long, M.D.; Moshiree, B. ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 116, 17–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  119. Chey, W.D.; Hashash, J.G.; Manning, L.; Chang, L. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Role of Diet in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2022, 162, 1737–1745.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  120. Jagielski, C.H.; Riehl, M.E. Behavioral Strategies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Brain-Gut or Gut-Brain? Gastroenterol. Clin. 2021, 50, 581–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  121. Pan, P.; Song, Y.; Du, X.; Bai, L.; Hua, X.; Xiao, Y.; Yu, X. Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurol. Sci. 2019, 40, 1105–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  122. Brandt, L.J.; Feuerstadt, P.; Longstreth, G.F.; Boley, S.J. ACG Clinical Guideline: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Patterns of Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Colon Ischemia (CI). Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 110, 18–44; quiz 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  123. Hall, R.; Patel, K.; Poullis, A.; Pollok, R.; Honap, S. Separating Infectious Proctitis from Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Common Clinical Conundrum. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  124. El Baassiri, M.G.; Raouf, Z.; Badin, S.; Escobosa, A.; Sodhi, C.P.; Nasr, I.W. Dysregulated Brain-Gut Axis in the Setting of Traumatic Brain Injury: Review of Mechanisms and Anti-Inflammatory Pharmacotherapies. J. Neuroinflamm. 2024, 21, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  125. Tolonen, M.; Vikatmaa, P. Diagnosis and Management of Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: What You Need to Know. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025, 99, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  126. Ko, C.W.; Singh, S.; Feuerstein, J.D.; Falck-Ytter, C.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; Cross, R.K. AGA Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 748–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  127. Aruljothy, A.; Singh, S.; Narula, N.; Moran, G.W.; Vuyyuru, S.K.; Hogan, M.; Zayadi, A.; MacDonald, J.K.; Caron, B.; Danese, S.; et al. Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Medical Therapies for Treatment of Ulcerative Proctitis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2023, 58, 740–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  128. Poylin, V.; Hawkins, A.T.; Bhama, A.R.; Boutros, M.; Lightner, A.L.; Khanna, S.; Paquette, I.M.; Feingold, D.L. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Clostridioides Difficile Infection. Dis. Colon Rectum 2021, 64, 650–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  129. Czepiel, J.; Dróżdż, M.; Pituch, H.; Kuijper, E.J.; Perucki, W.; Mielimonka, A.; Goldman, S.; Wultańska, D.; Garlicki, A.; Biesiada, G. Clostridium Difficile Infection: Review. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 38, 1211–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  130. Leffler, D.A.; Lamont, J.T. Clostridium Difficile Infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 1539–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  131. Sandhu, B.K.; McBride, S.M. Clostridioides Difficile. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 1049–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  132. Mounsey, A.; Lacy Smith, K.; Reddy, V.C.; Nickolich, S. Clostridioides Difficile Infection: Update on Management. Am. Fam. Physician 2020, 101, 168–175. [Google Scholar]
  133. Chauv, S.; Fontaine, G.V.; Hoang, Q.P.; McKinney, C.B.; Baldwin, M.; Buckel, W.R.; Collingridge, D.S.; Majercik, S.; Wohlt, P.D. Risk of Resistant Organisms and Clostridium Difficile with Prolonged Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Central Nervous System Devices. Neurocrit. Care 2016, 25, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  134. Musa, S.A.; Robertshaw, H.; Thomson, S.J.; Cowan, M.L.; Rahman, T.M. Clostridium Difficile-Associated Disease Acquired in the Neurocritical Care Unit. Neurocrit. Care 2010, 13, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  135. Vieira, L.V.; Pedrosa, L.A.C.; Souza, V.S.; Paula, C.A.; Rocha, R. Incidence of Diarrhea and Associated Risk Factors in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Enteral Nutrition. Metab. Brain Dis. 2018, 33, 1755–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  136. Tenner, S.; Vege, S.S.; Sheth, S.G.; Sauer, B.; Yang, A.; Conwell, D.L.; Yadlapati, R.H.; Gardner, T.B. American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2024, 119, 419–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  137. Crockett, S.D.; Wani, S.; Gardner, T.B.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; Barkun, A.N. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on Initial Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 1096–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  138. de Toledo, J.S.; Adelson, P.D.; Watson, R.S.; Gaines, B.; Brown, S.D.; Kochanek, P.M.; Wisniewski, S.R.; Fink, E.; Bayir, H.; Clark, R.S.B.; et al. Relationship between Increases in Pancreatic Enzymes and Cerebral Events in Children after Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurocrit. Care 2009, 11, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  139. Song, Y.; Lee, S.-H. Recent Treatment Strategies for Acute Pancreatitis. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  140. Szatmary, P.; Grammatikopoulos, T.; Cai, W.; Huang, W.; Mukherjee, R.; Halloran, C.; Beyer, G.; Sutton, R. Acute Pancreatitis: Diagnosis and Treatment. Drugs 2022, 82, 1251–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  141. Mossaab, G.; Ben Khlifa, M.; Karim, N.; Moez, B.; Oussama, J.; Hajer, N.; Ali Habiba, B.S.; Zoukar, O.; Jemaa, Y. Acute Acalculous Cholecystitis in Hospitalized Patients in Intensive Care Unit: Study of 5 Cases. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  142. Morgan, M.A.; DePietro, D.M.; Whorms, D.S.; Pantel, A.R.; Ganeshan, D.; Goldman, I.A.; Yang, J.; Khot, R. Acalculous Cholecystitis- an Imaging and Therapeutic Update. Abdom. Radiol. 2025, 50, 2881–2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  143. Lin, D.; Howard, A.; Raihane, A.S.; Di Napoli, M.; Cáceres, E.; Ortiz, M.; Davis, J.; Abdelrahman, A.N.; Divani, A.A. Traumatic Brain Injury and Gut Microbiome: The Role of the Gut-Brain Axis in Neurodegenerative Processes. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2025, 25, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  144. Yuan, B.; Lu, X.-J.; Wu, Q. Gut Microbiota and Acute Central Nervous System Injury: A New Target for Therapeutic Intervention. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 800796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  145. Rice, M.W.; Pandya, J.D.; Shear, D.A. Gut Microbiota as a Therapeutic Target to Ameliorate the Biochemical, Neuroanatomical, and Behavioral Effects of Traumatic Brain Injuries. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  146. Cotoia, A.; Charitos, I.A.; Corriero, A.; Tamburrano, S.; Cinnella, G. The Role of Macronutrients and Gut Microbiota in Neuroinflammation Post-Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2024, 16, 4359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  147. Krakovski, M.A.; Arora, N.; Jain, S.; Glover, J.; Dombrowski, K.; Hernandez, B.; Yadav, H.; Sarma, A.K. Diet-Microbiome-Gut-Brain Nexus in Acute and Chronic Brain Injury. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 1002266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  148. Weaver, J.L. The Brain-Gut Axis: A Prime Therapeutic Target in Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Res. 2021, 1753, 147225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shah, R.K.; Lin, J.J.; Makkapati, T.; Berkowitz, A.A.; Greenwald, B.D. The Effect of Traumatic Brain Injury on the Gastrointestinal System: A Comprehensive Review. Brain Sci. 2026, 16, 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16030254

AMA Style

Shah RK, Lin JJ, Makkapati T, Berkowitz AA, Greenwald BD. The Effect of Traumatic Brain Injury on the Gastrointestinal System: A Comprehensive Review. Brain Sciences. 2026; 16(3):254. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16030254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shah, Ruhi K., Justin J. Lin, Tejaswi Makkapati, Arielle A. Berkowitz, and Brian D. Greenwald. 2026. "The Effect of Traumatic Brain Injury on the Gastrointestinal System: A Comprehensive Review" Brain Sciences 16, no. 3: 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16030254

APA Style

Shah, R. K., Lin, J. J., Makkapati, T., Berkowitz, A. A., & Greenwald, B. D. (2026). The Effect of Traumatic Brain Injury on the Gastrointestinal System: A Comprehensive Review. Brain Sciences, 16(3), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16030254

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop