Next Article in Journal
Neurofeedback Training Modulates Brain Functional Networks and Improves Cognition in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients Aged 60–70 Years
Previous Article in Journal
ERP Biomarkers of Auditory–Visual Distraction in Aging and Cognitive Impairment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sex-Dependent Phenotypic and Histomorphometric Biomarkers in the APPswe/PS1dE9/Blg Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 15
Issue 11
10.3390/brainsci15111241
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The cGAS–STING Pathway in Dementia: An Emerging Mechanism of Neuroinflammation

by
Young Min
1,
Yoon-Seob Lee
2,3,*,
Juwon Lee
4,
Da-Young Keum
4,
Joo-Young Gwag
5,
Sung-Min Jeon
4,
Heejin Jo
4,6,* and
Sung-Ung Kang
4,7,*
1
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
2
Department of Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
3
The Yonsei Dental Clinic, Suwon 16385, Republic of Korea
4
Neuroregeneration and Stem Cell Programs, Institute for Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
5
Department of Biomolecular Engineering and Bioinformatics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
6
Department of Korean Medicine, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul 06062, Republic of Korea
7
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(11), 1241; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15111241
Submission received: 13 October 2025 / Revised: 14 November 2025 / Accepted: 15 November 2025 / Published: 19 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

Dementia is a growing global health concern in aging societies, leading to a progressive decline in cognitive function that severely impairs daily life. Despite the growing burden, effective preventive and therapeutic strategies remain elusive, emphasizing the urgent need for novel interventions. Recent advances underscore the pivotal role of neuroinflammation in dementia pathogenesis, particularly in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Chronic activation of central nervous system immune cells, particularly microglia, exacerbates neurodegeneration and establishes a self-perpetuating cycle of inflammation and cognitive decline. This review focuses on emerging research exploring the cGAS-STING pathway’s role in dementia, examining its potential as a diagnostic and therapeutic target. The cGAS-STING pathway, integral to innate immune responses, may contribute to the chronic neuroinflammation seen in neurodegenerative diseases. By targeting this pathway, new strategies could mitigate the inflammatory processes that drive neuronal loss, offering a promising avenue for therapeutic development in dementia.

1. Introduction

Dementia is a clinical syndrome defined by gradual impairment of memory, executive function, language, and visuospatial skills, leading to loss of independence while typically sparing basic alertness or consciousness. At its core, dementia is driven by the loss of neurons and synaptic connections within the brain, which disrupts neural circuits necessary for cognitive integrity [1]. The incidence of dementia has risen significantly due to global aging trends, with an increase in cases from 20.2 million in 1990 to 43.8 million in 2016 [2]. Projections estimate that by 2050, the number of people living with dementia will escalate to over 152.8 million globally, reflecting both increased life expectancy and the persistent lack of effective preventive measures [3,4].
Recent advances in our understanding of dementia pathogenesis have highlighted the significant contribution of neuroinflammation to disease progression, particularly in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative conditions [5]. Neuroinflammation is characterized by the activation of immune cells within the central nervous system (CNS), notably microglia and astrocytes, which can release pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and reactive oxygen species (ROS). While acute inflammation is necessary for CNS defense and tissue repair, engaging resident immune cells to clear pathogens such as viruses and bacteria and to restore homeostasis [6], chronic neuroinflammation is implicated in the exacerbation of neuronal damage, ultimately leading to cognitive decline [7]. Microglia, the resident immune cells of the CNS coupled with the activation of inflammatory signaling pathways, exacerbates the progression of AD and other dementias. In response to pathogenic stimuli such as amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques or tau aggregates, microglia undergo a phenotypic transformation from a homeostatic to a pro-inflammatory state, releasing a cascade of inflammatory mediators [8].
Additionally, the cGAS-STING pathway is increasingly seen as a major player in mediating these inflammatory responses, linking cytosolic DNA sensing to neuroinflammatory cascades [9,10,11,12,13]. Although no cure exists for AD or other forms of dementia, targeting neuroinflammatory signaling such as modulating microglial activation, inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines, or suppressing the cGAS-STING pathway has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for their potential to slow disease progression and preserve cognitive function [9,14]. Accordingly, this review summarizes current understanding of neuroinflammation and highlights emerging evidence for the cGAS-STING pathway as a diagnostic and therapeutic target in dementia.

2. Neuroinflammation in Dementia: A Shared Mechanism

Dementia is an umbrella term encompassing a range of cognitive impairments that significantly affect memory, thinking, and behavior. AD, the most common form of dementia, accounts for 60–80% of all dementia cases [15]. While all individuals with Alzheimer’s have dementia, not all individuals with dementia have AD, as dementia can arise from various etiologies, including vascular causes, Lewy body formations, or frontotemporal degeneration [16], distinguished by the type of protein aggregation and its localization in the brain. AD, Vascular Dementia (VaD), Lewy Body Dementia (LBD), and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD)—are associated with distinct pathophysiological mechanisms, yet all are linked to chronic neuroinflammatory processes, which exacerbate neuronal damage and cognitive deficit [17,18].

2.1. Disease-Specific Mechanisms and Neuroinflammatory Pathways in Dementia

In AD, the most common form of dementia, the classical hallmark features include the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and tau tangles. These aggregates primarily affect the medial temporal lobe and neocortical regions, leading to synaptic dysfunction, neuronal death, and eventual brain atrophy [16,19]. Aβ and tau accumulation is believed to trigger a neuroinflammatory cascade of events, including the activation of microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system, and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as Interleukin-1α(IL-1α), Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), Interleukin-6(IL-6), Interleukin-12(IL-12) and interleukin-23(IL-23) and chemokines such as Chemokine CC motif Ligand 2(CCL2), Chemokine CXC motif Ligand 8(CXCL8 or IL-8), CCL3, CCL4, and Macrophage Inflammatory Peptide-1 (MIP-1α), which further exacerbate neuronal damage [5,20,21]. VaD, the second most common type of dementia, results primarily from cerebrovascular injury, such as cortical infarctions and white matter lesions. The subtypes of VaD include post-stroke dementia (PSD), multi-infarct dementia (MID), and subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD) [22]. Recent evidence suggests that not only ischemia-induced neuronal damage but also neuroinflammation plays a pivotal role in VaD progression. In particular, pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF- α, as well as activated microglia, are known to disrupt the blood–brain barrier (BBB) exacerbate cerebral ischemia and contribute to the progressive loss of white matter integrity [23,24], triggering inflammatory responses and neuronal injury that contribute to cognitive decline [25]. Chronic neuroinflammation in VaD has also been associated with systemic risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes, further implicating the immune system in the progress of vascular brain damage [26]. LBD, on the other hand, is characterized by the aggregation of α-synuclein into Lewy bodies, predominantly affecting the brainstem, cortex, and limbic regions. The pathogenesis of LBD is complex, driving by an interplay of genetic risk factors such as APOE e4 allele, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) and glucocerebrosidase (GBA) and acquired factors like aging, systemic inflammation and altered microbiota. Activated microglia surrounding Lewy bodies release pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and TNF-α, which may contribute to neuronal death and synaptic dysfunction [27,28]. Elevated neuroinflammatory markers correlate the severity of cognitive and motor impairments in LBD patients [28,29]. FTD involves progressive degeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes, with marked neuronal atrophy linked to proteinopathies such as tau or TDP-43 aggregates which also stimulate neuroinflammatory pathway [30]. Neuroimaging studies have revealed that increased microglial activation in patients with FTD and correlates with disease progression and severity of symptoms [30,31,32].
Despite differing etiologies, the convergence of microglial activation and neuroinflammation forms a unifying theme in dementia pathogenesis. In each case, microglial activation contributes to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress and chronic neurodegeneration [33]. Chronic systemic inflammation, stemming from infections, lifestyle factors, or aging itself, may influence microglial priming and exacerbate neurodegenerative processes [7,34]. Biomarkers and neuroimaging studies reinforce this shared mechanism. In AD, elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), have been detected in both the CSF and plasma [35]. Additionally, elevated soluble TREM2 (sTREM2), explored as a marker of microglial activation [36], correlate with neuroinflammatory activity and may predict the progression of AD [36,37]. In FTD, increased levels of progranulin and inflammatory cytokines such as IL-8 are being investigated as potential biomarkers of microglial dysfunction [30]. Similarly to traditional biomarkers, inflammatory biomarkers in the CSF remain difficult to utilize clinically due to the invasive nature of lumbar punctures, efforts are being made to identify reliable blood-based biomarkers. Plasma levels of sTREM2 and cytokines, as well as microRNA profiles, have shown potential in reflecting neuroinflammatory processes in both AD and FTD.
Neuroimaging studies have evolved beyond structural assessments and now allow the visualization of neuroinflammation in vivo. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) using ligands that target the translocator protein (TSPO), which is upregulated in activated microglia, has emerged as a powerful tool for mapping neuroinflammation in various forms of dementia [38]. In AD, TSPO-PET imaging has shown increased microglial activation in regions corresponding to amyloid-β deposition, particularly in the hippocampus and frontal cortex [38,39]. Similarly, in FTD, TSPO binding correlates with microglial activation in regions undergoing neurodegeneration, such as the frontal and temporal lobes [32]. This technique also holds promise in VaD, where chronic neuroinflammation in response to cerebrovascular damage has been observed using TSPO-PET. Furthermore, advanced MRI techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) are being used to assess white matter integrity and cerebral blood flow, respectively, in the context of neuroinflammatory damage. In LBD, neuroinflammation visualized through these techniques may help differentiate the disease from other neurodegenerative disorders [27].

2.2. Genetic Drivers of Neuroinflammation in Dementia

Recent advances in genetic research have yielded significant insights into the genetic basis of dementia,. highlighting the role of genetic variants in inflammatory pathways. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) continue to identify novel loci associated with dementia subtypes, highlighting the complex interplay between genetic predispositions, immune function and neuroinflammatory processes in dementia [40,41].
One of the most well-known genetic risk factors for AD is the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele (APOE-ε4), which not only influences amyloid-β deposition but also alters microglial reactivity. APOE-ε4 carriers exhibit increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the presence of amyloid plaques, exacerbating neurodegeneration [42,43]. Variants in the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) gene, which modulates microglial activation, have been identified in populations with high dementia risk and associated with an increased risk for late-onset AD. TREM2 mutations impair the microglial response to amyloid-β, resulting in inefficient clearance of toxic aggregates and heightened neuroinflammation [44]. This impaired microglial response to inflammatory stimuli and phagocytosis exacerbates neurodegeneration in FTD as well [44]. The sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (CD33) and the membrane-spanning 4-domain subfamily A (MS4A) gene families suggest additional connections to microglial signaling. CD33 variants particularly regulate the immune inhibitory receptor functions of microglia, linking them to increased neuroinflammation [45,46]. ATP-binding cassette transporter subfamily A member 7 (ABCA7) is also known to alter the response of inflammation, leading to amyloid accumulation [47]. Variants in the MS4A gene cluster, which regulate immune signaling, are associated with AD risk [40,48]. Furthermore, in FTD, mutations in the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT)gene have been shown to drive neuroinflammation by promoting tau pathology and inducing a reactive microglial state [49]. Mutations in progranulin gene (GRN), a known risk factor for familiar FTD, have been shown to modulate microglial activation and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, amplifying neuroinflammatory responses [30,50]. Similarly, C9orf72 gene disrupt autophagy and immune regulation, resulting in increased neuroinflammation and microglial activation in FTD [51]. In LBD, genes involved in α-synuclein processing, such as SNCA, also have indirect ties to neuroinflammation through their effects on microglial activation [41] (Table 1).

3. cGAS-STING Pathway and Neuroinflammation in Dementia: A Potential Therapeutic Target

3.1. Molecular Mechanisms of cGAS-STING Pathway

The cGAS-STING pathway represents a crucial component of the body’s innate immune system, functioning primarily as a sensor for cytosolic DNA. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) detects aberrant DNA within the cytoplasm—whether of exogenous origin, such as viral or bacterial DNA, or endogenous, such as mitochondrial or nuclear DNA released during cellular stress or damage. Upon binding to this DNA, cGAS catalyzes the synthesis of cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP), a second messenger that subsequently binds to and activates STING (Stimulator of Interferon Genes) [64]. This activation triggers downstream signaling through the TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), leading to the phosphorylation of the transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and the subsequent induction of Type I interferon (IFN) and other pro-inflammatory cytokines [33] (Table 2, Figure 1).

3.2. cGAS-STING Activation in Dementia

In the context of neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD and other types of dementia, the activation of the cGAS-STING pathway has gained increasing attention as a key mediator of neuroinflammation [9,14]. Mitochondrial dysfunction, which is well established in neurodegenerative conditions, can lead to the release of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) or double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) into the cytoplasm, where it serves as a potent activator of cGAS [33]. This activation may exacerbate chronic neuroinflammation, a hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases. Additionally, nuclear DNA instability, which may occur during cellular senescence or in the presence of oxidative stress, can also trigger the cGAS-STING pathway, further promoting neuroinflammatory responses (Figure 1).
Emerging evidence further suggests that cGAS-STING activation is involved in the progression of several neurodegenerative diseases. Both cGAS and STING protein levels are substantially elevated in the brains of 5xFAD mice, the most commonly used transgenic AD model. Genetic deletion of cGAS or STING in 5xFAD shows reduced Aβ plaque, altered microglial activation with reduced pro-inflammatory gene expression and protected cognitive function [65,66]. In Parkinson’s disease (PD), mouse models of α-synucleinopathies, which mimic the neuropathology of PD, show specific activation of cGAS-STING in the nigrostriatal regions, accompanied by elevated cytokine levels and enhanced neuroinflammation [67]. In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), TDP-43 protein aggregates have been found to disrupt mitochondrial integrity, leading to mtDNA release and subsequent cGAS-STING activation [68]. A similar phenomenon has been observed in Huntington’s disease (HD), where cGAS upregulation has been identified in both murine models and human tissues [14,69].
Beyond these specific diseases, the cGAS-STING pathway also appears to play a significant role in broader neuroinflammatory processes. Elevated type I interferon levels, a downstream consequence of STING activation, have been documented in models of prion disease, promoting microglial activation and perpetuating neuroinflammatory cascades [33]. Post-mortem analyses of human CNS tissues from patients with AD, PD, ALS, and multiple sclerosis (MS) reveal increased STING protein levels in neurons and brain endothelial cells [70,71,72]. In vitro studies further demonstrate that mitochondrial stress induced by factors like palmitic acid leads to cytosolic DNA leakage and robust activation of the cGAS-STING axis, suggesting that metabolic dysfunction may be a common trigger of neuroinflammation [73,74].

4. Translational Insights: Therapeutic Targeting of cGAS-STING in Neurodegeneration

Current therapeutic approaches for dementia remain largely symptomatic and do not adequately address the underlying neuroinflammatory pathophysiology. The predominant treatments, including cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists, provide modest symptomatic benefits but do little to alter the disease progression. This limitation stems from the complex etiology of dementia, wherein neuroinflammation plays a pivotal role in driving neuronal loss and disease progression [75].
Among the inflammatory pathways implicated, the cGAS-STING pathway has emerged as a critical mediator linking cytosolic DNA sensing to innate immune activation. Its overactivation has been associated with chronic neuro-inflammation and neurodegeneration, making it a promising therapeutic target. Current strategies to inhibit this pathway focus on both cGAS, the cytosolic DNA sensor, and STING, the adaptor proteins.

Therapeutic Modulation of cGAS-STING Pathway: Comparison Between Targeting cGAS vs. STING

cGAS inhibitors aim to block the synthesis of cGAMP, thereby reducing STING activation and downstream interferon production [76]. These inhibitors typically target the active site of cGAS or disrupt its interaction with dsDNA. Although several small-molecule inhibitors have shown promise in preclinical models, none have advanced to clinical trials [77].
Most STING inhibitors, by contrast, aim to block the ligand-binding domain or interfere with post-translational modifications that enhance STING activity [76]. Their potential in neurodegenerative diseases remains largely unexplored while it has been focused in the context of cancer immunotherapy [76]. Despite the lack of clinically approved inhibitors, research in this area continues to evolve, offering hope for future therapies targeting neuroinflammation in dementia and related disorders.
Targeting cGAS versus STING offers distinct points of intervention within the same signaling cascade, yet the optimal target remains uncertain. Whether inhibiting the upstream sensor, cGAS, or the downstream adaptor, STING, yields superior efficacy or safety has yet to be determined as well, as both act sequentially in DNA-initiated signaling. However, targeting cGAS or STING is generally preferred rather than targeting downstream components such as TBK1 or IFNAR as it allows other pattern recognition receptor systems remain functional.
Although no clinically approved inhibitors currently exist, continued research into selective and tunable modulators of the cGAS–STING pathway offers a promising avenue for developing disease-modifying therapies in dementia and related neurodegenerative disorders. The compounds which have demonstrated efficacy in preclinical neurodegenerative models by targeting the cGAS-STING axis are shown in Table 3.

5. Conclusions

The recognition of cGAS-STING pathway as an upstream axis related to chronic neuroinflammation indicates a deeper understanding in neurodegenerative disease. In summary, the cGAS-STING pathway plays a crucial role in mediating neuroinflammation across various dementia including AD, VaD, PD and FTD. Activation of this pathway, often triggered by mitochondrial or nuclear DNA leakage, initiates a pro-inflammatory cascade, involving IFN-I signaling predominantly in microglia but also in vulnerable neurons and brain endothelial cells. Consequently, it accelerates neuronal damage and disease progression. The connection between this pathway and major risk factors for dementia such as APOE, TREM2, c9orf72 highlights cGAS-STING pathway as a common convergence point in neuro-immune axis, affecting disease onset and progression.
While much remains to be understood about the precise mechanisms by which cGAS-STING contributes to neurodegeneration, the development of inhibitors targeting this pathway has already demonstrated preclinical success in alleviating neuroinflammation and pathology in dementia animal models. For clinical translation, the exploration of these inhibitors should consider blood–brain barrier penetration because species variability, for example, molecular differences between murine STING and human STING, could yield different permeability and efficacy. Also, potential systemic immune suppression should also be considered as cGAS-STING pathway is essential for host defense. Validating specific biomarkers of cGAS-STING activation such as measuring cGAMP or STING expression and developing new neuroimaging techniques such as new PET tracers visualizing the activation would be essential for identifying and monitoring the disease state and should be considered in the future research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, and Writing—original draft, all authors; Formal analysis, Y.M., D.-Y.K., J.-Y.G. and S.-M.J.; Supervision, Y.M., Y.-S.L., J.L., H.J. and S.-U.K.; Visualization, Y.M., D.-Y.K., J.-Y.G., S.-M.J., H.J. and S.-U.K.; Writing—review & editing, Y.M., Y.-S.L., J.L., H.J. and S.-U.K. All authors led the writing of the manuscript and contributed to the literature search, the design of the figure, and writing of the Review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

H.J. was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI22C2064). S.U.K was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R01 NS123456.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Spires-Jones, T.L.; Hyman, B.T. The Intersection of Amyloid Beta and Tau at Synapses in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuron 2014, 82, 756–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nichols, E.; Szoeke, C.; Vollset, S.E.; Abbasi, N.; Murray, C.J.L. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 88–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Longhe, Z. 2020 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020, 16, 391–460. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alzheimer’s Disease International. Dementia Statistics; Alzheimer’s Disease International: London, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  5. Heneka, M.T.; Carson, M.J.; El Khoury, J.; Landreth, G.E.; Brosseron, F.; Feinstein, D.L.; Jacobs, A.H.; Wyss-Coray, T.; Vitorica, J.; Ransohoff, R.M.; et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015, 14, 388–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tian, L.; Ma, L.; Kaarela, T.; Li, Z. Neuroimmune crosstalk in the central nervous system and its significance for neurological diseases. J. Neuroinflammation 2012, 9, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ransohoff, R.M. How neuroinflammation contributes to neurodegeneration. Science 2016, 353, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Salter, M.W.; Stevens, B. Microglia emerge as central players in brain disease. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 1018–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, Y.; Liu, B.; Sinha, S.C.; Amin, S.; Gan, L. Mechanism and therapeutic potential of targeting cGAS-STING signaling in neurological disorders. Mol. Neurodegener. 2023, 18, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Guo, X.; Yang, L.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, Y.; Du, L.; Li, L.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, X. The cytosolic DNA-sensing cGAS-STING pathway in neurodegenerative diseases. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2024, 30, e14671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Liu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Duan, R.; Liu, Y. Mitochondrial DNA Leakage and cGas/STING Pathway in Microglia: Crosstalk Between Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration. Neuroscience 2024, 548, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sharma, O.; Kaur Grewal, A.; Khan, H.; Gurjeet Singh, T. Exploring the nexus of cGAS STING pathway in neurodegenerative terrain: A therapeutic odyssey. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2024, 142 Pt B, 113205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Zou, M.; Wu, H.; Zhu, J.; Jin, T. The cGAS-STING pathway drives neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration via cellular and molecular mechanisms in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol. Dis. 2024, 202, 106710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Paul, B.D.; Snyder, S.H.; Bohr, V.A. Signaling by cGAS-STING in Neurodegeneration, Neuroinflammation, and Aging. Trends Neurosci. 2021, 44, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alzheimer’s Association. “What Is Dementia?”. Available online: https://www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/what-is-dementia (accessed on 10 September 2025).
  16. Jack, C.R., Jr.; Bennett, D.A.; Blennow, K.; Carrillo, M.C.; Dunn, B.; Haeberlein, S.B.; Holtzman, D.M.; Jagust, W.; Jessen, F.; Karlawish, J.; et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2018, 14, 535–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moyse, E.; Krantic, S.; Djellouli, N.; Roger, S.; Angoulvant, D.; Debacq, C.; Leroy, V.; Fougere, B.; Aidoud, A. Neuroinflammation: A Possible Link Between Chronic Vascular Disorders and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 14, 827263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, W.; Xiao, D.; Mao, Q.; Xia, H. Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hardy, J.; Selkoe, D.J. The Amyloid Hypothesis of Alzheimer’s Disease: Progress and Problems on the Road to Therapeutics. Science 2002, 297, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Heppner, F.L.; Ransohoff, R.M.; Becher, B. Immune attack: The role of inflammation in Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 16, 358–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. De Strooper, B.; Karran, E. The Cellular Phase of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell 2016, 164, 603–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Venkat, P.; Chopp, M.; Chen, J. Models and mechanisms of vascular dementia. Exp. Neurol. 2015, 272, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tian, Z.; Ji, X.; Liu, J. Neuroinflammation in Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Current Evidence, Advances, and Prospects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Love, S.; Miners, J.S. Cerebrovascular disease in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2016, 131, 645–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gorelick, P.B.; Scuteri, A.; Black, S.E.; Decarli, C.; Greenberg, S.M.; Iadecola, C.; Launer, L.J.; Laurent, S.; Lopez, O.L.; Nyenhuis, D.; et al. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: A statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke 2011, 42, 2672–2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kalaria, R.N. Neuropathological diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment and vascular dementia with implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2016, 131, 659–685. [Google Scholar]
  27. Loveland, P.M.; Yu, J.J.; Churilov, L.; Yassi, N.; Watson, R. Investigation of Inflammation in Lewy Body Dementia: A Systematic Scoping Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Surendranathan, A.; Su, L.; Mak, E.; Passamonti, L.; Hong, Y.T.; Arnold, R.; Vázquez Rodríguez, P.; Bevan-Jones, W.R.; Brain, S.A.E.; Fryer, T.D.; et al. Early microglial activation and peripheral inflammation in dementia with Lewy bodies. Brain 2018, 141, 3415–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vrillon, A.; Bousiges, O.; Götze, K.; Demuynck, C.; Muller, C.; Ravier, A.; Schorr, B.; Philippi, N.; Hourregue, C.; Cognat, E.; et al. Plasma biomarkers of amyloid, tau, axonal, and neuroinflammation pathologies in dementia with Lewy bodies. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2024, 16, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bright, F.; Werry, E.L.; Dobson-Stone, C.; Piguet, O.; Ittner, L.M.; Halliday, G.M.; Hodges, J.R.; Kiernan, M.C.; Loy, C.T.; Kassiou, M.; et al. Neuroinflammation in frontotemporal dementia. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 540–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bevan-Jones, W.R.; Cope, T.E.; Jones, P.S.; Kaalund, S.S.; Passamonti, L.; Allinson, K.; Green, O.; Hong, Y.T.; Fryer, T.D.; Arnold, R.; et al. Neuroinflammation and protein aggregation co-localize across the frontotemporal dementia spectrum. Brain 2020, 143, 1010–1026. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, J. Mapping neuroinflammation in frontotemporal dementia with molecular PET imaging. J. Neuroinflammation 2015, 12, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mathur, V.; Burai, R.; Vest, R.T.; Bonanno, L.N.; Lehallier, B.; Zardeneta, M.E.; Mistry, K.N.; Do, D.; Marsh, S.E.; Abud, E.M.; et al. Activation of the STING-Dependent Type I Interferon Response Reduces Microglial Reactivity and Neuroinflammation. Neuron 2017, 96, 1290–1302.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bachiller, S.; Jiménez-Ferrer, I.; Paulus, A.; Yang, Y.; Swanberg, M.; Deierborg, T.; Boza-Serrano, A. Microglia in Neurological Diseases: A Road Map to Brain-Disease Dependent-Inflammatory Response. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Daniilidou, M.; Holleman, J.; Hagman, G.; Kåreholt, I.; Aspö, M.; Brinkmalm, A.; Zetterberg, H.; Blennow, K.; Solomon, A.; Kivipelto, M.; et al. Neuroinflammation, cerebrovascular dysfunction and diurnal cortisol biomarkers in a memory clinic cohort: Findings from the Co-STAR study. Transl. Psychiatry 2024, 14, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ewers, M.; Biechele, G.; Suárez-Calvet, M.; Sacher, C.; Blume, T.; Morenas-Rodriguez, E.; Deming, Y.; Piccio, L.; Cruchaga, C.; Kleinberger, G.; et al. Higher CSF sTREM2 and microglia activation are associated with slower rates of beta-amyloid accumulation. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e12308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nabizadeh, F.; Seyedmirzaei, H.; Karami, S. Neuroimaging biomarkers and CSF sTREM2 levels in Alzheimer’s disease: A longitudinal study. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 15318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pan, J.; Hu, J.; Meng, D.; Chen, L.; Wei, X. Neuroinflammation in dementia: A meta-analysis of PET imaging studies. Medicine 2024, 103, e38086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gouilly, D.; Saint-Aubert, L.; Ribeiro, M.J.; Salabert, A.S.; Tauber, C.; Péran, P.; Arlicot, N.; Pariente, J.; Payoux, P. Neuroinflammation PET imaging of the translocator protein (TSPO) in Alzheimer’s disease: An update. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2022, 55, 1322–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kunkle, B.W.; Grenier-Boley, B.; Sims, R.; Bis, J.C.; Damotte, V.; Naj, A.C.; Boland, A.; Vronskaya, M.V.; van der Lee, S.J.; Amlie-Wolf, A.; et al. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 414–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chia, R.; Sabir, M.S.; Bandres-Ciga, S.; Saez-Atienzar, S.; Reynolds, R.H.; Gustavsson, E.; Walton, R.L.; Ahmed, S.; Viollet, C.; Ding, J.; et al. Genome sequencing analysis identifies new loci associated with Lewy body dementia and provides insights into its genetic architecture. Nat. Genet. 2021, 53, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yin, Z.; Rosenzweig, N.; Kleemann, K.L.; Zhang, X.; Brandão, W.; Margeta, M.A.; Schroeder, C.; Sivanathan, K.N.; Silveira, S.; Gauthier, C.; et al. APOE4 impairs the microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease by inducing TGFβ-mediated checkpoints. Nat. Immunol. 2023, 24, 1839–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lee, S.; Devanney, N.A.; Golden, L.R.; Smith, C.T.; Schwartz, J.L.; Walsh, A.E.; Clarke, H.A.; Goulding, D.S.; Allenger, E.J.; Morillo-Segovia, G.; et al. APOE modulates microglial immunometabolism in response to age, amyloid pathology, and inflammatory challenge. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ulland, T.K.; Colonna, M. TREM2—A key player in microglial biology and Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2018, 14, 667–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Siddiqui, S.S.; Matar, R.; Merheb, M.; Hodeify, R.; Vazhappilly, C.G.; Marton, J.; Shamsuddin, S.A.; Al Zouabi, H. Siglecs in Brain Function and Neurological Disorders. Cells 2019, 8, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Griciuc, A.; Serrano-Pozo, A.; Parrado, A.R.; Lesinski, A.N.; Asselin, C.N.; Mullin, K.; Hooli, B.; Choi, S.H.; Hyman, B.T.; Tanzi, R.E. Alzheimer’s disease risk gene CD33 inhibits microglial uptake of amyloid beta. Neuron 2013, 78, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dib, S.; Pahnke, J.; Gosselet, F. Role of ABCA7 in Human Health and in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Naj, A.C.; Jun, G.; Beecham, G.W.; Wang, L.S.; Vardarajan, B.N.; Buros, J.; Gallins, P.J.; Buxbaum, J.D.; Jarvik, G.P.; Crane, P.K.; et al. Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Leyns, C.E.G.; Ulrich, J.D.; Finn, M.B.; Stewart, F.R.; Koscal, L.J.; Remolina Serrano, J.; Robinson, G.O.; Anderson, E.; Colonna, M.; Holtzman, D.M. TREM2 deficiency attenuates neuroinflammation and protects against neurodegeneration in a mouse model of tauopathy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 11524–11529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Baker, M.; Mackenzie, I.R.; Pickering-Brown, S.M.; Gass, J.; Rademakers, R.; Lindholm, C.; Snowden, J.; Adamson, J.; Sadovnick, A.D.; Rollinson, S. Mutations in progranulin cause tau-negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17. Nature 2006, 442, 916–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. O’Rourke, J.G.; Bogdanik, L.; Yáñez, A.; Lall, D.; Wolf, A.J.; Muhammad, A.K.; Ho, R.; Carmona, S.; Vit, J.P.; Zarrow, J.; et al. C9orf72 is required for proper macrophage and microglial function in mice. Science 2016, 351, 1324–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jonsson, T.; Stefansson, H.; Steinberg, S.; Jonsdottir, I.; Jonsson, P.V.; Snaedal, J.; Bjornsson, S.; Huttenlocher, J.; Levey, A.I.; Lah, J.J.; et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Guerreiro, R.; Wojtas, A.; Bras, J.; Carrasquillo, M.; Rogaeva, E.; Majounie, E.; Cruchaga, C.; Sassi, C.; Kauwe, J.S.; Younkin, S.; et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shi, Y.; Yamada, K.; Liddelow, S.A.; Smith, S.T.; Zhao, L.; Luo, W.; Tsai, R.M.; Spina, S.; Grinberg, L.T.; Rojas, J.C.; et al. ApoE4 markedly exacerbates tau-mediated neurodegeneration in a mouse model of tauopathy. Nature 2017, 549, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sierksma, A.; Lu, A.; Mancuso, R.; Fattorelli, N.; Thrupp, N.; Salta, E.; Zoco, J.; Blum, D.; Buée, L.; De Strooper, B.; et al. Novel Alzheimer risk genes determine the microglia response to amyloid-β but not to TAU pathology. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e10606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mishra, S.; Knupp, A.; Young, J.E.; Jayadev, S. Depletion of the AD risk gene SORL1 causes endo-lysosomal dysfunction in human microglia. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2022, 18, e068943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Feng, T.; Mai, S.; Roscoe, J.M.; Sheng, R.R.; Ullah, M.; Zhang, J.; Katz, I.I.; Yu, H.; Xiong, W.; Hu, F. Loss of TMEM106B and PGRN leads to severe lysosomal abnormalities and neurodegeneration in mice. EMBO Rep. 2020, 21, e50219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ledo, J.H.; Liebmann, T.; Zhang, R.; Chang, J.C.; Azevedo, E.P.; Wong, E.; Silva, H.M.; Troyanskaya, O.G.; Bustos, V.; Greengard, P. Presenilin 1 phosphorylation regulates amyloid-β degradation by microglia. Mol. Psychiatry 2021, 26, 5620–5635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Karch, C.M.; Goate, A.M. Alzheimer’s disease risk genes and mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. Biol. Psychiatry 2015, 77, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chapuis, J.; Hansmannel, F.; Gistelinck, M.; Mounier, A.; Van Cauwenberghe, C.; Kolen, K.V.; Geller, F.; Sottejeau, Y.; Harold, D.; Dourlen, P.; et al. Increased expression of BIN1 mediates Alzheimer genetic risk by modulating tau pathology. Mol. Psychiatry 2013, 18, 1225–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhao, P.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, L.L.; Fan, X.; Ku, Z.; Li, L.; Liu, X.; Deng, M.; Arase, H.; Zhu, J.J.; et al. LILRB2-mediated TREM2 signaling inhibition suppresses microglia functions. Mol. Neurodegener. 2022, 17, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Y. Progress on the roles of MEF2C in neuropsychiatric diseases. Mol. Brain 2022, 15, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pasinelli, P.; Brown, R.H. Molecular biology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Insights from genetics. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7, 710–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ablasser, A.; Chen, Z.J. cGAS in action: Expanding roles in immunity and inflammation. Science 2019, 363, eaat8657. [Google Scholar]
  65. He, S.; Li, X.; Mittra, N.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Wang, H.; Song, S.; Zhao, S.; Liu, F.; Han, X. Microglial cGAS Deletion Preserves Intercellular Communication and Alleviates Amyloid-β-Induced Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e2410910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Thanos, J.M.; Campbell, O.C.; Cowan, M.N.; Bruch, K.R.; Moore, K.A.; Ennerfelt, H.E.; Natale, N.R.; Mangalmurti, A.; Kerur, N.; Lukens, J.R. STING deletion protects against amyloid β-induced Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2025, 21, e70305. [Google Scholar]
  67. Hinkle, J.T.; Patel, J.; Panicker, N.; Karuppagounder, S.S.; Biswas, D.; Belingon, B.; Chen, R.; Brahmachari, S.; Pletnikova, O.; Troncoso, J.C.; et al. STING mediates neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation in nigrostriatal α-synucleinopathy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2118819119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Bright, F.; Chan, G.; van Hummel, A.; Ittner, L.M.; Ke, Y.D. TDP-43 and Inflammation: Implications for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Jauhari, A.; Baranov, S.V.; Suofu, Y.; Kim, J.; Singh, T.; Yablonska, S.; Li, F.; Wang, X.; Oberly, P.; Minnigh, M.B.; et al. Melatonin inhibits cytosolic mitochondrial DNA-induced neuroinflammatory signaling in accelerated aging and neurodegeneration. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 3124–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ferecskó, A.S.; Smallwood, M.J.; Moore, A.; Liddle, C.; Newcombe, J.; Holley, J.; Whatmore, J.; Gutowski, N.J.; Eggleton, P. STING-Triggered CNS Inflammation in Human Neurodegenerative Diseases. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Marques, C.; Held, A.; Dorfman, K.; Sung, J.; Song, C.; Kavuturu, A.S.; Aguilar, C.; Russo, T.; Oakley, D.H.; Albers, M.W.; et al. Neuronal STING activation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 2024, 147, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Govindarajulu, M.; Ramesh, S.; Beasley, M.; Lynn, G.; Wallace, C.; Labeau, S.; Pathak, S.; Nadar, R.; Moore, T.; Dhanasekaran, M. Role of cGAS-Sting Signaling in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8151. [Google Scholar]
  73. Bryant, J.D.; Lei, Y.; VanPortfliet, J.J.; Winters, A.D.; West, A.P. Assessing Mitochondrial DNA Release into the Cytosol and Subsequent Activation of Innate Immune-related Pathways in Mammalian Cells. Curr. Protoc. 2022, 2, e372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Picca, A.; Calvani, R.; Coelho-Junior, H.J.; Landi, F.; Bernabei, R.; Marzetti, E. Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress, and Neuroinflammation: Intertwined Roads to Neurodegeneration. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Frozza, R.L.; Lourenco, M.V.; De Felice, F.G. Challenges for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy: Insights from Novel Mechanisms Beyond Memory Defects. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Decout, A.; Katz, J.D.; Venkatraman, S.; Ablasser, A. The cGAS–STING pathway as a therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2021, 21, 548–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Yu, X.; Cai, L.; Yao, J.; Li, C.; Wang, X. Agonists and Inhibitors of the cGAS-STING Pathway. Molecules 2024, 29, 3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, H.; He, Z.; Yin, C.; Yang, S.; Li, J.; Lin, H.; Hu, G.; Wu, A.; Qin, D.; Hu, G.; et al. STING-mediated neuroinflammation: A therapeutic target in neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2025, 17, 1659216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brainsci 15 01241 g001
Figure 1. The cGAS-STING pathway in dementia progression and microglial activation Cytosolic DNA activates cGAS to synthesize cGAMP, which binds STING and triggers TBK1-IRF3 and NF-κB signaling. Both pathways induce the transcriptional activation of pro-inflammatory genes and interferons, amplifying the inflammatory response and contributing to neuronal damage in dementia by the activation of disease-associated microglia (DAMs). This feedback loop between DAMs and neuroinflammation potentially exacerbates the progression of dementia. cyclic GMP–AMP (cGAMP), TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), Interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), Inhibitor of κB alpha (IKB1, NFKBIA, IκBα), IκB kinase complex (IKK).
Figure 1. The cGAS-STING pathway in dementia progression and microglial activation Cytosolic DNA activates cGAS to synthesize cGAMP, which binds STING and triggers TBK1-IRF3 and NF-κB signaling. Both pathways induce the transcriptional activation of pro-inflammatory genes and interferons, amplifying the inflammatory response and contributing to neuronal damage in dementia by the activation of disease-associated microglia (DAMs). This feedback loop between DAMs and neuroinflammation potentially exacerbates the progression of dementia. cyclic GMP–AMP (cGAMP), TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), Interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), Inhibitor of κB alpha (IKB1, NFKBIA, IκBα), IκB kinase complex (IKK).
Brainsci 15 01241 g001
Table 1. Genetic mutations associated with dementia that are also linked to microglial activation.
Table 1. Genetic mutations associated with dementia that are also linked to microglial activation.
Gene
Symbols		Full
Name		Chromosomal
Location		Role in Microglia ActivationAssociated
Dementia		References
Genes governing microglial activation and phagocytosis
TREM2Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells 26p21.1Impair microglial activation, reduce phagocytosis of Aβ and damaged cells.AD,
FTD		[52,53]
APOE ε4Apolipoprotein E (Allele ε4)19q13.32impairs microglial Aβ clearance; detrimental TREM2 signaling pathway driving microglia from a resting state to a protectiveAD[54]
CD33Cluster of Differentiation 3319q13.41Inhibitory signal that suppresses microglial phagocytosis of AβAD[45,46]
PLCG2Phospholipase C Gamma 216q23.3downstream effector of TREM2, promote microglial activation and phagocytosis, improving immune response in AD.AD[55]
MAPTMicrotubule-associated Protein Tau17q21.32Promotes tau pathology, induce reactive microglial stateFTD[49]
Genes involved in protein and debris clearance within the microglia
GRNGranulin (progranulin)17q21.31Lysosomal dysfunction, excessive microglial activation, impaired microglia debris clearanceFTD[50]
SORL1Sortilin Related Receptor 111q24.2lysosome dysfunction of microglia, malfunction in processing and trafficking of amyloid precursor protein and Aβ AD[56]
TMEM106BTransmembrane Protein 106B7p21.3lysosomal dysfunction in microglia, excessive microglial activation, impaired waste clearance.FTD[57]
ABCA7ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily A Member 719p13.3abnormal cholesterol efflux and lipid metabolism, impaired microglial phagocytosis and inflammatory response AD[47]
PS1 (PSEN1)Presenilin 114q24.2Cause massive Aβ burden leading secondary microglial toxicity, impaired lysosomal calcium signaling and autophagy leading abnormal brain homeostasisAD[58]
SNCASynuclein Alpha4q22.1Lipid peroxidation, loss of antioxidant defense, microglial phagocytic exhaustionLBD[41]
Genes affecting complement and inflammatory signaling that microglia use to label and clear damaged cells
CR1Complement Receptor type 11q32.2Variants in CR1 impair complement regulation and enhance microglial activation via the complement cascade. AD[59]
MS4AMembrane Spanning 4 domain, subfamily A11q12.2Altered membrane protein interaction, abnormal microglial inflammatory signaling AD[40,48]
BIN1Bridging Integrator 12q14.3The second most significant AD risk gene, highly expressed in microglia, Abnormal microglial phagocytosis and endocytosis of AβAD[60]
LILRB2Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor B219q13.42co-expressed with TREM2 in microglia, inhibitory receptor, suppresses microglial phagocytosis of AβAD[61]
Genes associated with a non-cell-autonomous role contributing to neurotoxicity
C9orf72Chromosome 9 open reading frame 729p21.2dysregulated microglial activation, lysosomal storage defects, toxic inflammatory activationFTD, ALS[51]
MEF2CMyocyte Enhancer Factor 2C5q14.3A transcriptional factor, modulating inflammatory environment in microglia AD[62]
SOD1Superoxide Dismutase 121q22.11increases oxidative stress, enhanced toxic microglial activation ALS[63]
Table 2. Key Molecular Components of cGAS-STING Pathway.
Table 2. Key Molecular Components of cGAS-STING Pathway.
ComponentCellular Location/TargetFunction in ActivationPrimary Downstream Effect
cGASCytosol
/Nucleus		Recognizes cytosolic dsDNA (DAMPs/PAMPs); dimerizes/catalyzes cGAMP synthesiscGAMP production
cGAMPCytosolSecond messenger; binds and activates STING proteinSTING conformational change and trafficking (from ER to Golgi)
STINGEndoplasmic
Reticulum		Activated by cGAMP; recruits and activates TBK1Recruitment and phosphorylation of TBK1
TBK1Cytosol
/Golgi		Kinase; Phosphorylates STING, IRF3, and IKKActivation of IRF3/NF-κB pathways
IRF3Cytosol
/Nucleus		Transcription Factor; drives transcription of inflammatory genesTranscription of Type I IFNs
Table 3. Pharmacological Inhibitors of the cGAS-STING pathway in dementia.
Table 3. Pharmacological Inhibitors of the cGAS-STING pathway in dementia.
Compound Name/ClassTargetMechanism of Action (MOA)Key Preclinical Use/Disease ModelReferences
RU.521, RU.365 (Tricyclic benzofluoropyrimidine compounds)cGASInhibit cGAS catalytic activity by competitive binding to DNA-binding domain; blocks dsDNA-cGAS interaction and cGAMP synthesissubarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH)/macrophages from autoimmune mice Trex1−/− mice, human iPSC-derived Huntington’s disease (HD) neurons, ed in iPSC-derived ALS neurons/cGAS inhibition, Neuroprotection, reduced cognitive dysfunction, microglial inflammation[69,76,78]
A151cGASInhibitor that competes with dsDNA for cGAS binding; Synthetic oligonucleotide antagonistAcute brain trauma/mouse model of ischemic stroke; reduced neuronal loss, immune cell infiltration and infarct volume[14,76]
TDI-6570cGASBrain-permeable cGAS inhibitorAD/P301S tauopathy mouse model/protect impaired cognitive and synaptic function[9]
H-151STINGCovalent binding to Cys91; blocks palmitoylation/clustering (irreversible)AD, ALS, FTD/5xFAD mice, TDP-43 mutant mice, iPSC-derived ALS neurons/reduced phospho-IRF3, improved cognitive function in aged mice[71,72,76]
,SN-011STINGPotent small molecule inhibitorAicardi–Goutières syndrome (AGS)/Trex1-deficient model/Mitigating neurological impairment)[78]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Min, Y.; Lee, Y.-S.; Lee, J.; Keum, D.-Y.; Gwag, J.-Y.; Jeon, S.-M.; Jo, H.; Kang, S.-U. The cGAS–STING Pathway in Dementia: An Emerging Mechanism of Neuroinflammation. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15111241

AMA Style

Min Y, Lee Y-S, Lee J, Keum D-Y, Gwag J-Y, Jeon S-M, Jo H, Kang S-U. The cGAS–STING Pathway in Dementia: An Emerging Mechanism of Neuroinflammation. Brain Sciences. 2025; 15(11):1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15111241

Chicago/Turabian Style

Min, Young, Yoon-Seob Lee, Juwon Lee, Da-Young Keum, Joo-Young Gwag, Sung-Min Jeon, Heejin Jo, and Sung-Ung Kang. 2025. "The cGAS–STING Pathway in Dementia: An Emerging Mechanism of Neuroinflammation" Brain Sciences 15, no. 11: 1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15111241

APA Style

Min, Y., Lee, Y.-S., Lee, J., Keum, D.-Y., Gwag, J.-Y., Jeon, S.-M., Jo, H., & Kang, S.-U. (2025). The cGAS–STING Pathway in Dementia: An Emerging Mechanism of Neuroinflammation. Brain Sciences, 15(11), 1241. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15111241

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop